The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About5.h. Transit Opt-Out Update�d o osemount TO: Mayor Knutson Councilmembers Napper Tucker Walsh Willard FROM: Stephan Jilk, Administrator/Clerk DATE: December 11, 1987 f' O BOX 510 2875 1451 ti sT. w. ROSEMOUNT. MINNU'Z0 rA 55068 612 423.4411 RE: Mass Transit Opt Out Update On Friday, the 4th of December, I met with several other administrators of Dakota County cities. We met in what will be the first of regular meetings to discuss issues which we feel are relative to many or most cities in Dakota County. Issues such as transportation, solid waste management, light rain, airports and joint community facilities will be discussed. Specifically on the topic of transportation and opt out consideration, we discussed the idea of a joint study, which cities would be involved, the funding of the study and the coordination of the study. All cities in attendance, including Lakeville, advised the group of their city's desire to be involved and whether a city was now in the mass transit tax levy/service area or not, which is the case for Lakeville. Lakeville wished to be involved just from a "transportation study" standpoint. It was further decided that the City of Eagan would attempt to free up a staff member to coordinate the study project for the cities. Funding was discussed, noting that funds could be applied for through the RTB; and if necessary, Burnsville would provide "up front" funding through one of its Community Development Block Grants. This group will be meeting again early January along with the other cities including Prior Lake and Savage who indicated a willingness to be involved in this study. Dean Johnson has also attended a meeting sponsored by the MTC and attended by ail the cities who responded favorably to the letter sent out by Mayor Knutson regarding opt out,and the proposed joint study. The MTC had obviously been made aware of the number of cities involved in this "mutiny" in the ranks and wanted these cities to be aware of ramifications of opting out; not apparently through a threatening mode but trying to supply the most realistic scenario as to what negatives and positives result from cities choosing opt out. Dean may present more information on the meeting to you on December 15, 1987. At this juncture, it appears the next step is to organize the cities into the joint study group, get input from Dakota County, which has indicated a desire to be involved, obtain funding for the study and get formal authorization to proceed form the various city councils. I will update the Council as we proceed. smj CITY OF ROSEMOUNT RESOLUTION 1987- A RESOLUTION ADOPTING LAND VALUES AND FORMULAS FOR THE COLLECTION OF PARK DEDICATION FEES IN THE CITY OF ROSEMOUNT WHEREAS, the City of Rosemount has adopted a Subdivision Ordinance for the City (Ordinance No. XVII.4), and this ordinance sets out requirements for the dedication of land and/or monies for the establishment and development of _ parks, playgrounds or other public use exclusive of property dedicated for streets and other public ways in the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rosemount has amended this Ordinance by adopting Ordinance XVII.83 to establish new guidelines and requirements for the dedication of land and/or cash payments for parks, playgrounds and other public use exclusive of property dedicated for streets and other public ways; and WHEREAS, this amended ordinance allows for the setting of certain land values and cash amounts by Council resolution; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rosemount has received and reviewed information on land values, dedication formulas and cash contribution amounts. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the following land values be set for the dedication of land and/or cash contribution for: (1) New residential subdivision - $8,000.00/acre; (2) New commercial subdivision - $22,000.00/acre; (3) New industrial subdivision - $22,000.00/acre. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the following cash contribution method be followed when considering unplatted properties or any properties not having made prior dedications under Ordinance XVII.83: (1) Residential development - $320.00 per residential unit. The payment is to be made to the City at the time a building permit is issued; J (2) Commercial/industrial development - $1,100.00 per acre used in the development or .005 x the building permit value, whichever is greater. The payment is to be made to the City at the time a building permit is issued. ADOPTED this 15th day of December, 1987. Leland S. Knutson, Mayor ATTEST: Stephan Jilk, Administrator/Clerk City of Rosemount 2875 145th Street West Rosemount, MN 55068 Affidavit of Posted Hearing Notice STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF DAKOTA )ss CITY OF ROSEMOUNT ) Stephan Jilk, being first duly sworn, deposes and says I am a United States citizen and the duly qualified Clerk of the City of Rosemount, Minnesota. On December 1, 1987, acting on behalf of the said City, i posted at the City Hall, 2875 145th Street West, Rosemount, Minnesota, a copy of the attached notice of public hearing for the proposed amendments to Ordinance No. XVIIA, Subdivision 5.7. 'Steph# Jilk Administrator/ rk City of Rosemount Dakota County, Minnesota Subscribed and sworn to before me this 1st day of December, 1987. Notary Pub : A nnnnnnnnwAfvvtnMnJl,��nnq,�f��yy, U4� y�. NOIAii'( 1-1�E3UC—A4!?iiuE�UTA W"':10 1 tvvfi rY MY CUAXI t.?f'Jv 3 JL't.c 11. 1992 1tWbV'L�ViPVRMMryIW4bVbVWY1lVY�1iVi/t^• . City of Rosemount 2875 145th Street West Rosemount, MN 55068 PUBLIC NOTICE TO WHOM iT MAY CONCERN: Notice is Hereby Given, that the City Council of the City of Rosemount will conduct a Public Hearing on Tuesday, December 15, 1987, in the Council Chambers of the City Itall, 2875 145th Street West, at 8:00 p.m. The purpose of the hearing is to receive comments on proposed amendments to the Subdivision Ordinance of the City of Rosemount (Ordinance No. XVIIA). The ,:following subsections of Subdivision 5.7 of the Subdivision Ordinance shall be amended to read as follows: b. Dedication. In all new residential subdivisions, the City shall require that a sufficient portion of such land be set aside and dedicated to the public for parks, playgrounds or other public use exclusive of property dedicated for streets and other public ways. 11 shall be presumed that a sufficient amount of land has been dedicated for parks and playgrounds for the present and future residents of the subdivision if the subdivider dedicates at least four percent (401o) of the land in the subdivision for each dwelling unit- proposed nitproposed to be subdivided (0.04 x number of units). The City upon consideration of the particular type of development propos in in the subdivision may require larger or lesser amounts of land to be dedicated if. the;idetermines that the present and future residents of the subdivision would require greater or lesser amounts of land for such purposes. The City shall determine whether a cash in lieu of land dedication is appropriate. The value of the cash dedication is determined by multiplying the number of acres dedicated by a value of land set by resolution of the City Council_ In all new commercial and industrial subdivisions, it shall be,presumed that a sufficient amount of land has been dedicated to serve the needs of the resident and working population if the subdivider dedicates at least five percent (5%) of the land in the subdivision for parks, recreation and usable open space. The City upon consideration of the particular type of development proposed in the subdivision may require larger or lesser amounts of land to be dedicated if it determines that the present and future residents of the subdivision would require greater or lesser amounts of land for such purposes. The City shall determine whether a cash in lieu of land dedication is appropriate. The value of cash dedication is determined by multiplying the number of acres dedicated by a value of land set by resolution of the City Council In all developments, where a subdivision of land has not occurred, or where a dedication has not been made in the past, a contribution shall be made at the time of building permit issuance, according to a formula established by resolution of the City Council. d. Pedestrian Ways and Trails. The City shall define a meaningful pedestrian circulation system for each development, which connects to the major trail system, parks, schools and shopping areas. Subdividers shall be required to install such sidewalks and trails as determined by the City and according to City standards. Pedestrian improvements required by the City are in addition to the land dedication in subsection 6. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the above items will be heard at this meeting. Dated this 30th day of November, 1987. StephedJilk, Adm AstratorlClerk City of Roscmo1641 Dakota County, Minnesota