HomeMy WebLinkAbout7.b. Park Boundary Markers � ROS�MO EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting: May 22, 2017
AGENDA ITEM: Park Boundary Markers AGENDA SECTION:
New Business
PREPARED BY: Dan Schultz, Parks and Recreation AGENDA NO.
Director 7 b.
ATTACHMENTS: none APPROVED BY: dls
RECOMMENDED ACTION: None, discussion, only.
ISSUE
It was recently requested that we discuss the topic of park bounda.ry markers. Sta,ff had indicated to the
Commission that we currendy to not use any sort of markers to show where park boundaries are located
in relation to private property.The city currendy does not have too many issues with residents encroaching
into parks but is does happen.
Staff recendy asked severallocal communities if they use any sort of paxk boundary maYkexs and their
responses are identified in the chart below.
Park Boundary Survey
City Park Boundary Notes
Eagan No
Apple Valley No Might use a fence or plantings
Inver Grove Heights Yes Do not enforce
Burnsville No
Hastings No
Cottage Grove Yes Installed over a 7 year period
Farmington No
Lakeville In 2 parks
Woodbury Yes
SUMMARY
This item is on the agenda to be discussed by the Commission and no action is being Yecommended at this
time.