The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About5.b. Rosewood CrossingE X E C U T I V E S U M M A R Y Planning Commission Meeting Date: May 23, 2017 Tentative Council Meeting Date: June 20, 2017 AGENDA ITEM: Case 17-20-FP, Final Site and Building Plan Approval for PUD, and Final Plat for Rosewood Crossing AGENDA SECTION: Public Hearing PREPARED BY: Kyle Klatt, Senior Planner Anthony Nemcek, City Planner AGENDA NO. 5.b. ATTACHMENTS: Site Location Map; Rosewood Crossing Final Plat; Final Site Plan and Phasing (Phase 1 – 8 Sheets); Final Grading Plan, Building Elevations; Resolution Approving PUD Master Plan; City Engineer Review Memo Dated 5-23-17 APPROVED BY: KL RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1)Motion to Recommend Approval the Final Site and Building Plan for the Rosewood Crossing PUD subject to the following conditions: a.Execution of an amendment to the Rosewood Crossing PUD Agreement to incorporate the updated site and building plans. b.Payment in lieu of replacement trees of $11,700 prior to the issuance of a building permit for any structure. c.Incorporation of recommendations from the City Engineer in a review memorandum dated May 23, 2017 relative to drainage, grading, street design, easements, utilities and the adjacent sidewalks. d.Payment of a fee in lieu of park land dedication for each unit consistent with the City’s adopted fee schedule. 2)Motion to Recommend Approval of the Final Plat subject to the following conditions: a.Execution of a subdivision agreement. b.Provision of all easements as required by the City Engineer, and specifically, drainage and utility easements over Lot 6, Block 1 and Outlot B of the final plat. SUMMARY The City Council is being asked to consider a request by Warren Israelson (Copperhead Development, Inc.) relating to the Rosewood Crossing 225-unit rental apartment complex located south of 145th Street and east of Downtown. The City approved the PUD Master Development Plan and preliminary plat in December, 2016. At that time, it was recognized that the item would come back through the process for final site and building plan approval and final plat approval. After the applicant obtains these approvals, they would be allowed to obtain building permits for the project. There would be no further public actions needed regarding the overall site design or even the details associated with the project. They would be addressed through the administrative issuance of grading and building permits. 2 As part of the Master Development Plan approval there were 14 conditions of approval, many of which detailed items that were anticipated as part of the final site and building plan. The main issues raised during the public hearing at the Commission meeting were questions about phasing and what improvements would be built as what part of the project build-out. The applicant has submitted a phasing plan which itemizes their build-out intentions. Additionally, the final site and building plan functions like a site plan review and therefore those specific items are called out in the following analysis. The applicant is also requesting final plat approval to create the lots for the first two apartment buildings, accessory garages, the caretaker’s premises, and necessary drainage and utility easements. Applicant: Warren Israelson Property Owner: Warren Israelson and Copperhead Development Inc. Property Location: Lot 1 Block 1 Greif Addition and Lot 1 Block 2 Rosewood Village 3rd Addition Size of Property: 12.25 Acres Comprehensive Plan Designation: HDR High Density Residential (pending final Met Council action on 5/24/17) Zoning: R-4 High Density Residential/PUD Number of Units: 225 units overall/65 units within Final Plat area Site Density: 18.9 units/acre overall Current Neighboring Land Uses: North – Self-storage Facility South – Residential and Future Commercial East – Detached Townhomes West – Railroad and Rosemount Park and Ride BACKGROUND The Planning Commission reviewed the application and conducted a public hearing on this matter at its October 25, 2016 meeting and continued the item to permit time to modify some of the plans relating to parking, landscaping, building architecture and site circulation. At the meeting there were several members of the public in attendance some requested denial of the project and others asked for additional information. The Commission again reviewed the item at their meeting on November 22, 2017 and recommended approval of the PUD Master Development Plan. The Plan had been modified to increase drive, sidewalk and the property access widths, additional landscaping was proposed, including additional screening along the eastern boundary, and additional information was provided regarding site work and timing. However, the applicant could not respond to all the phasing questions asked during the meeting and therefore a recommended condition of approval required submittal of a project phasing plan. At the City Council meeting in December, the Council heard the presentation from staff, who noted there are still concerns about on-site parking and therefore a specific condition relating to parking is included as a recommended condition of approval. The council had questions about fencing, snow storage and removal and clarifications to site access. The project was approved with conditions. ISSUE ANALYSIS Final Plat The final plat combines the two properties that comprise the site and creates separate lots for five separate buildings; the caretakers building, two apartment buildings, and two detached garage structures. The remainder of the site will be designated as Outlot B and additional platting will be required prior to construction of additional apartment buildings beyond the first two. The plat includes easements for drainage and utility purposes, but these easements will need to be expanded to account for utility construction on Outlot B. 3 Final Site and Building Plan Land use and Zoning The final step in City review of a PUD is final site and building plan approval. The review is similar to site plan approval with the caveat that conditions of the PUD Master Development Plan must also be met. Along with rezoning to PUD, the project received a reguiding of the northern parcel from Business Park to High Density Residential and southern parcel from Medium Density Residential to High Density Residential. The Amendment has been submitted to the Metropolitan Council for final approval, which is tentatively scheduled for May 24, 2017. Lot and Building Standards As noted above, each apartment building and detached garage will be placed on a separate lot of record. There will also be a separate lot for the caretakers building and common space. Because it is a PUD, there are no issues associated with internal lot lines, only setbacks from the adjoining properties. Building setback requirements are 30’ for the principal structures from all sides of the PUD and 50’ front yard and 10’ side yard setbacks for accessory structures which would include the parking garages. The plan meets these standards. Building and Architecture One area of interest is the exterior plans for the individual apartment buildings. The applicant has revised the plans to include more enhancement than previously presented, including additional stone on the building elevations. The previous review requested additional enhancements on all sides of the buildings since they face other residential properties and other apartment buildings within the complex. The initial plan had the enhancements on the front elevations of the apartment buildings. The current plan has stone veneer wainscoting on the front with the façade under each gable also clad in stone. The remainder of the front elevation is lap siding, with a small amount of shake siding denoting the front entrance. The rear elevations have stone wainscoting, stone on the facades of each end, and on the first floor of the central gabled feature. The second level is shake siding with the interior spaces with patios and balconies being lap siding. Side elevations include more stone, shake siding with some lap siding. The PUD Master Plan approval permitted up to 60% of all exterior elevations to be siding, excluding windows and doors. The new plan meets this condition as 58.66% is lap or shake siding with the remaining 41.34% stone. The applicant has provided updated drawings for the office/caretaker’s residence and garage units as well, and these buildings also comply with the required material percentages. The garages are 55% stone veneer and the leasing office is 46% stone veneer. The composition of apartment unit types within the project are listed as follows: Proposed Types of Apartment Units for Rosewood Commons Type of Unit Size Number of Units Percentage of Units One Bedroom 700 Square Feet 140 63% Two Bedroom 829-894 Square Feet 84 37% The above chart does not take into account the caretaker’s residence, which would bring the overall number of units up to 225 for the entire project. The final plat area includes two of the apartment buildings with the caretaker’s residence (65 units). 4 The arrangement and location of the garaged follows the master plan very closely; however, the updated plans show a service door on the back of each unit. Since the service doors are not a building code requirement and cannot be accessed from the front of each building, Staff is recommending that they be eliminated from the plans. Parks and Open Space The developer is being asked to pay a fee in lieu of park land for the project. The fee was estimated at $792,200 based on the City’s current fee schedule. However, the staff is proposing a change in the park dedication fee calculation which will stratify dedication and resulting fees, based upon the density of the project. It is anticipated that this modification will be made prior to obtaining any building permits for the project. Under the current proposal, the payment for the entire project would be $562,000. Actual payment for each apartment building will occur at the time of building permit and will reflect the current fee schedule at that time. The master plan includes a small private playground area on the southern portion of the site in the back of buildings four, six, and seven. As noted in the master plan review, the final details for the play area should be submitted to the City for review prior to construction. The updated phasing plan provided by the applicant identifies that the playground will be installed as part of phase four. Access and Parking The City’s approval of the master development plan included several conditions related to parking and access across the site. The final development plans have been updated to address maneuvering concerns at the 145th Street entrance, and now provide adequate stacking for vehicles waiting to exit the site onto 145th Street. The phasing plan also includes the construction of a specific number of parking stalls within each project phase. Overall the applicant is proposing 450 parking stalls of which 113 will be located within the detached accessory garage structures and 337 will be exterior surface parking stalls, around each building. The number and location of parking stalls is consistent with the preliminary development plan approval. The conditions of preliminary plan approval specified that the project was approved for six buildings and the office building, and that the parking situation had to be evaluated before a seventh building could be constructed. The parking evaluation must be completed before the fourth phase is constructed, at which point the City will have the ability to either find that the parking provided is adequate and the developer can proceed with all seven buildings, or that the parking is not adequate to meet the actual demand on the site. If parking is not adequate, one building will need to be eliminated from the plan. The parking analysis is not needed until the fourth phase, and therefore, will not impact the applicant’s ability to move forward with the final development plans for phases one and two. Phasing Plan The final development plans include a revised phasing plan that more accurately describes the timing of all proposed improvements to the site. This plan has also been updated to better align the building numbering with the project phases. The cover sheet for the phasing plan includes all project improvements, while the latter drawings focus on the improvements that will be completed with each specific phase. Please note that the Rosewood Crossing final plat covers the first two phases of the project and will allow construction to commence on both these buildings without any additional approvals (other than a building permit) from the City. Any subsequent phases will be subject to approval of a final plat. The need for future final plats will help the City ensure that the timing requirements for various improvements as spelled out in the preliminary approval and the required parking study are met by the applicant. 5 Each phase of the project will essentially include one of the 32-unit apartment buildings, detached garage structure with 16 parking stalls, surface parking around each building, access road extension, fencing to the furthest extent of each phase, and landscaping. In addition to these elements, the first project phase will include the caretaker’s residence/office, the sanitary sewer mains, and approximately half of the storm sewer pipes required to serve the entire project area. Water service will be extended in each phase with the other improvements. Staff does not have any specific comments concerning the phasing plan, but would like to see more of the trees along the boundary with the Rosewood Village Second Addition installed in phase four. Landscaping and Tree Preservation The original site plan approved with the PUD indicated a total of 151 trees planted throughout the development. This was far short from the required trees. The landscaping plan provided with the final plat, final site and building plan indicates a total of 240 trees. This exceeds the 233 trees required by code (eight plus one tree per unit). The majority of the new trees are located along the eastern property line. With regard to foundation plantings the landscaping plan is consistent with the original plan approved with the PUD. The landscape plan indicates 105 foundation plantings spaced 30 inches off center will be planted along the front and sides of each building. The number of foundation plantings is in compliance with the City’s Landscape Ordinance requirement of one foundation planting per 10 linear feet of building perimeter. The tree preservation plan provided with the original PUD application indicated that the developer will be removing 196 caliper inches of existing vegetation beyond the threshold for removal without replacement being required. Because of the amount of landscaping required for the site before any replacement, staff is recommending the applicant pay in lieu of planting for the trees. The cost per tree is $300 and therefore the applicant would be required to pay $11,700. Signage The applicant is proposing a monument sign that will be located at the entrance along 145th Street. The grading/site plan has been updated to include the proposed sign. A sign permit for the sign may be approved administratively so long as it meets all the requirements of the Sign Ordinance. Trash Enclosure The plans supplied by the applicant indicate that dumpsters will be located adjacent or in-between the garages at four different locations on the site. The site plan indicates that the enclosures will be constructed of concrete block and the final construction plans will be reviewed by the Fire Marshall prior to issuance of a building permit to ensure the proper separation between the enclosure and the adjacent garage structures is maintained. Fencing The applicant is proposing an aluminum picket fence that will extend southward from 145th Street along the western edge of the project area. The fence will be extended between each of the garages and terminate with “Garage 7” in the southern portion of the site. The type of fence proposed and location of the fence are consistent with the approved master plan. Lighting The lighting indicated on the final site plan is consistent with that which was provided with the original PUD application. The plan demonstrates compliance with City’s lighting ordinance for lighting standards and the maximum intensity of light at neighboring property lines. 6 Engineering The City’s project engineer has reviewed the plan and provided comments in the Engineer’s Memo dated May 23, 2017. Generally, the comments pertain to information that must be included for review prior to building permit approval. The development fees that must be paid by the applicant are $84,096.25 for the storm sewer trunk charge, $13,168.75 for the sanitary sewer trunk charge, and $79,625 for the water main trunk charge. CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the application for a Planned Unit Development Final Site and Building Plan and Final Plat to allow the construction of the first two phases of an apartment complex with two two-story buildings and a leasing office/maintenance building that contains a community room and a three-bedroom caretaker’s unit subject to the conditions of approval outlined in the recommended action section above. 1011GARAGE 4B 8 STALLS- 963.50 GA R A G E 2 16 S T A L L S - 9 6 4 . 0 0 BLDG 1-32 UNITS 966.00 BLDG 3-32 UNIT 965.00 BLDG 4-32 UNIT 963.50 BLDG 5-32 UNIT 963.00 BLDG 2-32 UNIT 964.0 BLDG 7-32 UNIT 962.00 BLDG 6-32 UNIT 962.5016LEASING OFFICE 969.25 18161119111118111311111311161109421011117110311168GARAGE 4A8 STALLS- 964.00GARAGE 3 16 STALLS- 964.68 GARAGE 616 STALLS- 962.50GARAGE 5 16 STALLS - 9 6 3 . 0 0 GA R A G E 1 16 S T A L L S 11A DECORATIVE FENCE A M A M M A A L L L A DECORATIVE FENCE M DECORATIVE FENCE 15 " R C P10 M 201020101020102020106A L M 11DECORATIVE FENCE A M A 12020 20 15L A M A A A L M M M M M A L L A A L1212M L A A M L M AA L A M A A L L A14 A A A12 L L L L L A LL M M M L L A M 2020 A L L A A L L L 12 12 12202020 107201911DECORATIVE FENCE DECORATIVE FENCE1 196123I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly registered engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Warren John Israelson 6001 Egan Drive, Ste 100, Savage, MN 55378 Phone: 952.226.3200 Web: www.kjwalk.com Date: Revision: Original Registration #: 40175 Rosewood Crossing Rosemount, MN SHEET 1 of 8 Date: 4/25/2017 0 50 100 150 FILE PATH: C:\Users\Skills\Documents\Projects\Rosemount\Rosewood Crossing\Engineering\CAD\DWGs\RWC-PhaseCover.dwg Legend Existing watermain Proposed watermain Existing sanitary Proposed sanitary Existing storm Proposed storm Existing hydrant Proposed hydrant Existing gate valve Proposed gate valve Existing manhole Proposed manhole Proposed catchbasin Silt fence Inlet protectors Parking lot lights Building Lights Rip Rap TYPICAL PARKING SPACE (NOT TO SCALE) BLDG CONCRETE SIDEWALK6.5'4'17.5'8.5' NOTES LIGHTS ALSO INSTALLED ON EXTERIOR OF BUILDINGS. LAST SAVED: April 25, 2017 PARKING REQUIRED 2 STALLS PER UNIT (225 UNITS)450 PROVIDED GARAGE STALLS 113 PARKING STALLS 337 TOTAL 450 DUMPSTER LOCATION WITH CONCRETE BLOCK ENCLOSURE PAVED ACCESS EASEMENT DUMPSTER LOCATION WITH CONCRETE BLOCK ENCLOSURE DUMPSTER LOCATION WITH CONCRETE BLOCK ENCLOSURE DUMPSTER LOCATION WITH CONCRETE BLOCK ENCLOSURE For Review April 25,2017 04/25/13 Phasing Plan Cover PHASE 1 PHASE 3 PHASE 2 PHASE 5 PHASE 4 PHASE 6 PHASE 7 SHEET INDEX 1 Cover 2 Phase 1 3 Phase 2 4 Phase 3 5 Phase 4 6 Phase 5 7 Phase 6 8 Phase 7 BLDG 1-32 UNITS 966.00 LEASING OFFICE 969.251 111811131113GA R A G E 1 16 S T A L L S A DECORATIVE FENCE A M A L DECORATIVE FENCE 1010101010106M A 201212L AA L A M12 L 2020 12 12 12202020 20Temporary Turn Around R45 For Review April 25,2017 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly registered engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Warren John Israelson 6001 Egan Drive, Ste 100, Savage, MN 55378 Phone: 952.226.3200 Web: www.kjwalk.com Date: 04/25/13 Revision: Original Phasing Plan Phase 1 Registration #: 40175 Rosewood Crossing Rosemount, MN SHEET 2 of 8 Date: 4/25/2017 0 50 100 150 FILE PATH: C:\Users\Skills\Documents\Projects\Rosemount\Rosewood Crossing\Engineering\CAD\DWGs\RWC-Phase1.dwg TYPICAL PARKING SPACE (NOT TO SCALE) BLDG CONCRETE SIDEWALK6.5'4'17.5'8.5' DUMPSTER LOCATION WITH CONCRETE BLOCK ENCLOSURE NOTES LIGHTS ALSO INSTALLED ON EXTERIOR OF BUILDINGS. LAST SAVED: April 25, 2017 PARKING REQUIRED 2 STALLS PER UNIT (33 UNITS)66 PROVIDED GARAGE STALLS 17 PARKING STALLS 61 TOTAL 78 GA R A G E 2 16 S T A L L S - 9 6 4 . 0 0 BLDG 1-32 UNITS 966.00 BLDG 2-32 UNIT 964.0 LEASING OFFICE 969.251 11118111311113116211GA R A G E 1 16 S T A L L S A DECORATIVE FENCE A M A L A DECORATIVE FENCE DECORATIVE FENCE 1010101010106M 1A 201212L AA L A M12 L 2020 12 12 12202020 10720Temporary Turn Around R45 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly registered engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Warren John Israelson 6001 Egan Drive, Ste 100, Savage, MN 55378 Phone: 952.226.3200 Web: www.kjwalk.com Date:Revision: Original Registration #: 40175 Rosewood Crossing Rosemount, MN SHEET 3 of 8 Date: 4/25/2017 0 50 100 150 FILE PATH: C:\Users\Skills\Documents\Projects\Rosemount\Rosewood Crossing\Engineering\CAD\DWGs\RWC-Phase2.dwg TYPICAL PARKING SPACE (NOT TO SCALE) BLDG CONCRETE SIDEWALK6.5'4'17.5'8.5' DUMPSTER LOCATION WITH CONCRETE BLOCK ENCLOSURE NOTES LIGHTS ALSO INSTALLED ON EXTERIOR OF BUILDINGS. LAST SAVED: April 25, 2017 PARKING REQUIRED 2 STALLS PER UNIT (65 UNITS)130 PROVIDED GARAGE STALLS 33 PARKING STALLS 97 TOTAL 130 For Review April 25,2017 04/25/13 Phasing Plan Phase 2 1GA R A G E 2 16 S T A L L S - 9 6 4 . 0 0 BLDG 1-32 UNITS 966.00 BLDG 3-32 UNIT 965.00 BLDG 2-32 UNIT 964.016LEASING OFFICE 969.25 11111181113111131162111171011GARAGE 3 16 STALLS- 964.68 GA R A G E 1 16 S T A L L S A DECORATIVE FENCE A M A M A L L A DECORATIVE FENCE DECORATIVE FENCE 10201020101020102020106L M 1A M A 120201212 L A A M L M AA L A M 1412L 2020 12 12 12202020 10720Phase 3 Gr a v e l l o o p Phase 3 Gravel loopPhase 3 Gravel loopI hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly registered engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Warren John Israelson 6001 Egan Drive, Ste 100, Savage, MN 55378 Phone: 952.226.3200 Web: www.kjwalk.com Date:Revision: Original Registration #: 40175 Rosewood Crossing Rosemount, MN SHEET 4 of 8 Date: 4/25/2017 0 50 100 150 FILE PATH: C:\Users\Skills\Documents\Projects\Rosemount\Rosewood Crossing\Engineering\CAD\DWGs\RWC-Phase3.dwg TYPICAL PARKING SPACE (NOT TO SCALE) BLDG CONCRETE SIDEWALK6.5'4'17.5'8.5' DUMPSTER LOCATION WITH CONCRETE BLOCK ENCLOSURE NOTES LIGHTS ALSO INSTALLED ON EXTERIOR OF BUILDINGS. LAST SAVED: April 25, 2017 PARKING REQUIRED 2 STALLS PER UNIT (97 UNITS)194 PROVIDED GARAGE STALLS 49 PARKING STALLS 155 TOTAL 204 For Review April 25,2017 04/25/13 Phasing Plan Phase 3 11GARAGE 4B 8 STALLS- 963.50 GA R A G E 2 16 S T A L L S - 9 6 4 . 0 0 BLDG 1-32 UNITS 966.00 BLDG 3-32 UNIT 965.00 BLDG 4-32 UNIT 963.50 BLDG 2-32 UNIT 964.016LEASING OFFICE 969.25 116191111811131111311621111711011GARAGE 4A8 STALLS- 964.00GARAGE 3 16 STALLS- 964.68 GA R A G E 1 16 S T A L L S A DECORATIVE FENCE A M A M A A L L L A DECORATIVE FENCE DECORATIVE FENCE 10201020101020102020106A L M 1A M A 12020 15L A M A M M A L L A A1212 L A A M L M AA L A M 1412L 2020 12 12 12202020 10720Phase 3 Gr a v e l l o o p 19Phase 3 Gravel loopI hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly registered engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Warren John Israelson 6001 Egan Drive, Ste 100, Savage, MN 55378 Phone: 952.226.3200 Web: www.kjwalk.com Date:Revision: Original Registration #: 40175 Rosewood Crossing Rosemount, MN SHEET 5 of 8 Date: 4/25/2017 0 50 100 150 FILE PATH: C:\Users\Skills\Documents\Projects\Rosemount\Rosewood Crossing\Engineering\CAD\DWGs\RWC-Phase4.dwg TYPICAL PARKING SPACE (NOT TO SCALE) BLDG CONCRETE SIDEWALK6.5'4'17.5'8.5' DUMPSTER LOCATION WITH CONCRETE BLOCK ENCLOSURE NOTES LIGHTS ALSO INSTALLED ON EXTERIOR OF BUILDINGS. LAST SAVED: April 25, 2017 PARKING REQUIRED 2 STALLS PER UNIT (129 UNITS)258 PROVIDED GARAGE STALLS 65 PARKING STALLS 204 TOTAL 269 DUMPSTER LOCATION WITH CONCRETE BLOCK ENCLOSURE PAVED ACCESS EASEMENT For Review April 25,2017 04/25/13 Phasing Plan Phase 4 1011GARAGE 4B 8 STALLS- 963.50 GA R A G E 2 16 S T A L L S - 9 6 4 . 0 0 BLDG 1-32 UNITS 966.00 BLDG 3-32 UNIT 965.00 BLDG 4-32 UNIT 963.50 BLDG 5-32 UNIT 963.00 BLDG 2-32 UNIT 964.016LEASING OFFICE 969.25 1161191111811131111131161109421111711011GARAGE 4A8 STALLS- 964.00GARAGE 3 16 STALLS- 964.68 GARAGE 5 16 STALLS - 9 6 3 . 0 0 GA R A G E 1 16 S T A L L S A DECORATIVE FENCE A M A M M A A L L L A DECORATIVE FENCE DECORATIVE FENCE 10M 201020101020102020106A L M 1A M A 12020 20 15L A M A M M A L L A A L1212M L A A M L M AA L A M DECORATIVE FENCE1412L L L L A2020 L 12 12 12202020 107201911DECORATIVE FENCE Phase 3 Gravel loopI hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly registered engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Warren John Israelson 6001 Egan Drive, Ste 100, Savage, MN 55378 Phone: 952.226.3200 Web: www.kjwalk.com Date:Revision: Original Registration #: 40175 Rosewood Crossing Rosemount, MN SHEET 6 of 8 Date: 4/25/2017 0 50 100 150 FILE PATH: C:\Users\Skills\Documents\Projects\Rosemount\Rosewood Crossing\Engineering\CAD\DWGs\RWC-Phase5.dwg TYPICAL PARKING SPACE (NOT TO SCALE) BLDG CONCRETE SIDEWALK6.5'4'17.5'8.5' NOTES LIGHTS ALSO INSTALLED ON EXTERIOR OF BUILDINGS. LAST SAVED: April 25, 2017 PARKING REQUIRED 2 STALLS PER UNIT (161 UNITS)322 PROVIDED GARAGE STALLS 81 PARKING STALLS 245 TOTAL 326 DUMPSTER LOCATION WITH CONCRETE BLOCK ENCLOSURE DUMPSTER LOCATION WITH CONCRETE BLOCK ENCLOSURE PAVED ACCESS EASEMENT DUMPSTER LOCATION WITH CONCRETE BLOCK ENCLOSURE For Review April 25,2017 04/25/13 Phasing Plan Phase 5 1011GARAGE 4B 8 STALLS- 963.50 GA R A G E 2 16 S T A L L S - 9 6 4 . 0 0 BLDG 1-32 UNITS 966.00 BLDG 3-32 UNIT 965.00 BLDG 4-32 UNIT 963.50 BLDG 5-32 UNIT 963.00 BLDG 2-32 UNIT 964.0 BLDG 6-32 UNIT 962.5016LEASING OFFICE 969.25 181611191111181113111113116110942101111711011GARAGE 4A8 STALLS- 964.00GARAGE 3 16 STALLS- 964.68 GARAGE 616 STALLS- 962.50GARAGE 5 16 STALLS - 9 6 3 . 0 0 GA R A G E 1 16 S T A L L S A DECORATIVE FENCE A M A M M A A L L L A DECORATIVE FENCE DECORATIVE FENCE 10M 201020101020102020106A L M 11A M A 12020 20 15L A M A M M M A L L A A L1212M L A A M L M AA L A M 14A A12 L L L L L A2020 A L L L 12 12 12202020 107201911DECORATIVE FENCE DECORATIVE FENCE1 196Phase 3 Gravel loopI hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly registered engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Warren John Israelson 6001 Egan Drive, Ste 100, Savage, MN 55378 Phone: 952.226.3200 Web: www.kjwalk.com Date:Revision: Original Registration #: 40175 Rosewood Crossing Rosemount, MN SHEET 7 of 8 Date: 4/25/2017 0 50 100 150 FILE PATH: C:\Users\Skills\Documents\Projects\Rosemount\Rosewood Crossing\Engineering\CAD\DWGs\RWC-Phase6.dwg TYPICAL PARKING SPACE (NOT TO SCALE) BLDG CONCRETE SIDEWALK6.5'4'17.5'8.5' NOTES LIGHTS ALSO INSTALLED ON EXTERIOR OF BUILDINGS. LAST SAVED: April 25, 2017 PARKING REQUIRED 2 STALLS PER UNIT (193 UNITS)386 PROVIDED GARAGE STALLS 97 PARKING STALLS 289 TOTAL 386 DUMPSTER LOCATION WITH CONCRETE BLOCK ENCLOSURE PAVED ACCESS EASEMENT DUMPSTER LOCATION WITH CONCRETE BLOCK ENCLOSURE DUMPSTER LOCATION WITH CONCRETE BLOCK ENCLOSURE DUMPSTER LOCATION WITH CONCRETE BLOCK ENCLOSURE For Review April 25,2017 04/25/13 Phasing Plan Phase 6 1011GARAGE 4B 8 STALLS- 963.50 GA R A G E 2 16 S T A L L S - 9 6 4 . 0 0 BLDG 1-32 UNITS 966.00 BLDG 3-32 UNIT 965.00 BLDG 4-32 UNIT 963.50 BLDG 5-32 UNIT 963.00 BLDG 2-32 UNIT 964.0 BLDG 7-32 UNIT 962.00 BLDG 6-32 UNIT 962.5016LEASING OFFICE 969.25 181611191111181113111113111611094210111171103111GARAGE 4A8 STALLS- 964.00GARAGE 3 16 STALLS- 964.68 GARAGE 616 STALLS- 962.50GARAGE 5 16 STALLS - 9 6 3 . 0 0 GA R A G E 1 16 S T A L L S 11A DECORATIVE FENCE A M A M M A A L L L A DECORATIVE FENCE M DECORATIVE FENCE 10M 201020101020102020106A L M 11DECORATIVE FENCE A M A 12020 20 15L A M A A A L M M M M M A L L A A L1212M L A A M L M AA L A M A A L L A14 A A A12 L L L L L A LL M M M L L A M 2020 A L L A A L L L 12 12 12202020 107201911DECORATIVE FENCE DECORATIVE FENCE1 196123I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly registered engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Warren John Israelson 6001 Egan Drive, Ste 100, Savage, MN 55378 Phone: 952.226.3200 Web: www.kjwalk.com Date:Revision: Original Registration #: 40175 Rosewood Crossing Rosemount, MN SHEET 8 of 8 Date: 4/25/2017 0 50 100 150 FILE PATH: C:\Users\Skills\Documents\Projects\Rosemount\Rosewood Crossing\Engineering\CAD\DWGs\RWC-Phase7.dwg TYPICAL PARKING SPACE (NOT TO SCALE) BLDG CONCRETE SIDEWALK6.5'4'17.5'8.5' NOTES LIGHTS ALSO INSTALLED ON EXTERIOR OF BUILDINGS. LAST SAVED: April 25, 2017 PARKING REQUIRED 2 STALLS PER UNIT (225 UNITS)450 PROVIDED GARAGE STALLS 113 PARKING STALLS 337 TOTAL 450 DUMPSTER LOCATION WITH CONCRETE BLOCK ENCLOSURE PAVED ACCESS EASEMENT DUMPSTER LOCATION WITH CONCRETE BLOCK ENCLOSURE DUMPSTER LOCATION WITH CONCRETE BLOCK ENCLOSURE DUMPSTER LOCATION WITH CONCRETE BLOCK ENCLOSURE For Review April 25,2017 04/25/13 Phasing Plan Phase 7 1011REMOVE EXISTING ENTRACE ANDCONSTRUCT NEW ENTRANCEGARAGE 6A 8 STALLS- 963.50 GA R A G E 2 16 S T A L L S69.2BLDG 1-32 UNITS 966.27 BLDG 7-32 UNIT 965.31 BLDG 6-32 UNIT 963.50 BLDG 3-32 UNIT 963.00 BLDG 2-32 UNIT 964.27 BLDG 5-32 UNIT 962.00 BLDG 4-32 UNIT 962.5016LEASING OFFICE 970.00 18161119111118511113111113111961101911210111171103111GARAGE 6B8 STALLS- 964.00GARAGE 7 16 STALLS- 964.68 GARAGE 416 STALLS- 962.50GARAGE 3 16 STALLS - 9 6 3 . 0 0 GA R A G E 1 16 S T A L L S 171020'X 75' ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE20102010227.87 10201017.47 2036.44 20106191.221 5 6 . 0 2 11202020201511412121220201212 12 962.50959.00961.30HP 70.0965.10964.58963.10962.60961.50962.00961.50959.90960.00963.50969.53968.00967.19962.00961.50961.00961.00967.56962.50960.50962.00961.00959.60965.33966.18965.89965.89965.56965.56965.23965.23964.89965.61964.61963.33963.61963.89963.56963.56963.23963.23962.89963.89966.00968.91968.24967.85967.76967.24966.28965.72966.39968.60968.60968.24969.62967.77966.58969.13962.61965.30965.20965.78966.63966.72967.48964.67964.58965.15964.94964.68962.33963.43963.90964.18965.43965.90965 . 2 3 965 . 5 6 965 . 8 9 963 . 8 9 963 . 5 6 963 . 2 3964.33964.67967.66963.38964.94964.46964.68964.68964.40963.62963.90SIGN MONUMENT 30'30'I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly registered engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Warren John Israelson 6001 Egan Drive, Ste 100, Savage, MN 55378 Phone: 952.226.3200 Web: www.kjwalk.com Date: 04/18/13 Revision: Original Grading and Erosion Control Plan Registration #: 40175 Rosewood Crossing Rosemount, MN SHEET 4 of 9 Date: 5/17/2017 0 50 100 150 FILE PATH: C:\Users\Skills\Documents\Projects\Rosemount\Rosewood Crossing\Engineering\CAD\DWGs\RWCOM-APT.dwg 04/18/16 Revised 06/17/16 Revised 07/18/16 Revised Silt Fence to be installed along perimeter of construction area prior to the start of work. NOTES: MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SLOPE 3:1 PONDS MAY BE USED AS TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS DURING CONSTRUCTION, IF A POND IS USED AS A TEMP. SED. BASIN IT MUST BE CLEANED OUT PRIOR TO BEING PUT INTO SERVICE. DRAINAGE TO THE TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS MUST BE MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS. SEED MIXES AS SHOWN IN LEGEND , WHERE NOT SPECIFIED USE MN DOT MIX 250 AS GENERAL SITE STABILIZATION. STOCKPILES TO BE STABILIZED IF NOT UTILIZED FOR MORE THAN 7 DAYS. LAST SAVED: May 17, 2017 09/08/16 Revised 11/17/16 Revised For Review MAY 15,2017 01/10/17 Revised CB & DROP IN INLET PROTECTORS LEGEND SILT FENCE DRAINAGE ARROW 05/15/17 Revised 5" CASING LP LAP 6" REVEAL COVERED VENT LP LAP 4" REVEAL SINGLE DOOR WITH SIDELITES IN COVERED ENTRY STONE VENEER LP SHINGLES ASPHALT SHINGLES LP LAP 6" REVEAL LP LAP 4" REVEAL STONE VENEER 5" CASING COVERED VENT ASPHALT SHINGLES LP LAP 6" REVEAL 5" CASING LP SHINGLES COVERED VENT LP LAP 4" REVEAL COVERED VENT LP LAP 4" REVEAL 5" CASING LP SHINGLES STONE VENEERSTONE VENEER LP LAP 6" REVEAL ASPHALT SHINGLESASPHALT SHINGLES 24'.+/Á (4106'.'8#6+10Á 4'#4'.'8#6+10Á'ICP&TKXG5VG5CXCIG/02JQPG9GDYYYMLYCNMEQO4+)*6'.'8#6+10Á.'(6'.'8#6+10Á#22#46/'065)#4#)'524'.+/Á 5KFKPI 5VQPG 4GXKUGFÁ ÁÁÁ ÁÁ ÁÁÁ ÁÁ Á ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ Á Á ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ :18*&4:18*&4:18*&4:18*&4:18*&4:18*&4:18*&4:18*&4:18*&4:18*&4:18*&4:18*&4:18*&4:18*&4:18*&4:18*&4ÁÁ ÁÁÁ &7/256'4'0%.1574' %10%4'6'/#5104;70+6 :%10%(6)5 :64'#6'&5+..2.#6 Á)4#07.#4(+.. &4#+06+.' 95+.641%- #.7/(#5%+# );2$1#4& #52*#.65*+0).'5 ('.6 5*'#6*+0) 411(64755'5 #.7/8'06'&51((+6 4Á+057.#6+10 '0'4);*''. )4#&' 2174'&%10%9#.. 94'$#42'4%1&' *14+<.#25+&+0) 9'#6*'4$#44+'4 5647%65*'#6*+0) :567&5"1% );2$1#4&4Á25+ 4+&)+&+057. LP SHINGLES CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT STONE VENEER ASPHALT SHINGLES LP LAP 6" REVEAL STONE VENEER LP LAP 6" REVEAL 8'X7' GARAGE DOORSDUMPSTER ENCLOSURE CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT LP LAP 6" REVEALASPHALT SHINGLES DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT #22#46/'065)#4#)'54'#4'.'8#6+10Á (170&#6+102.#0Á'ICP&TKXG5VG5CXCIG/02JQPG9GDYYYMLYCNMEQO4'#4'.'8#6+10Á.'(6'.'8#6+10Á4+)*6'.'8#6+10Á 911&567&(4#/+0) )4155#4'#53(6 24'.+/Á 24'.+/Á (.1142.#0Á 411(2.#0Á6;2+%#.)#4#)'9#..5'%6+10Á 6QVCN5VQPG 5KFKPI 5VQPG 4GXKUGFÁ STONE VENEER LP LAP 6" REVEAL LP SHINGLES DOUBLE DOORS IN COVERED ENTRY DOUBLE DOORS IN COVERED ENTRY ASPHALT SHINGLES ASPHALT SHINGLES 5" CASING LP LAP 6" REVEAL STONE VENEER LP LAP 4" REVEAL LP SHINGLES COVERED VENT LP LAP 6" REVEAL 5" CASING LP LAP 4" REVEAL COVERED VENT LP LAP 6" REVEAL STONE VENEER .'#5+0)1((+%'/#+06#0%'2#46;411/%#4'6#-'4#22#46/'06(4106'.'8#6+10Á 4'#4'.'8#6+10Á4+)*6'.'8#6+10Á.'(6'.'8#6+10Á'ICP&TKXG5VG5CXCIG/02JQPG9GDYYYMLYCNMEQO24'.+/Á 24'.+/Á 5KFKPI 5VQPG 4GXKUGFÁ ExposedPicketDesignsCoveredPicketDesignsSpecialtyDesignsWireFenceDesignsMatch the styles seen here with actual product installations on our website at www.jerith.comREV011414ORNAMENTAL Fencesof Distinction™American SeriesLibertyECONOMYHEAVY DUTYResidentialAeroRegencyIndustrialEP-1These designs have no top rail, and are classic “wrought iron” designs that have been used for over 100 years.A smooth top rail makes these styles perfect around pools. These are our most popular designs because of this. Their aluminum construction makes them ideal for pool enclosures since they can never rust.These fences have a narrower space between the pickets to keep pets inside your yard. The spacing also makes it very difficult for children to obtain a foothold on the fence.Jerith’s Patriot line of wire fence is a great alternative to aluminum fence that’s strong, but has a more subtle visual presence that blends in with the environment.To see our full line of wire fence alternatives, download the Patriot Wire Fence Style Guide ALUMINUM FENCEWIRE FENCEFINIALS, GATES, ARBORS AND LATCHESJerith has a wide variety of scrolls, finials and other items to accent your Jerith fence. Gates are also available to match any of our fence designs, and we have aluminum arbors to highlight a walkway or gate into your yard. ACCESSORIESAVAILABLE GRADESAligned picketsStaggered pickets Aligned pickets with finialsAligned pickets withflush bottom railAligned pickets with finialsand flush bottom railEP-2EP-3EP-5EP-6CP-1Aligned picketsStaggered pickets Staggered pickets with finialsAligned picketswith flush bottom railStaggered picketswith flush bottom railCP-2CP-3CP-4CP-5Two rail designCP-6SP-1Aligned pickets with top rail Staggered pickets with top rail Aligned pickets Pickets with top rail andcombination picket spacingLoops and open picketsSP-2SP-3SP-4EP-4Technical specifications are available on our website with available heights and accessories.Jerith Manufacturing Company, Inc.14400 McNulty Road, Philadelphia, PA 19154215-676-4068 • Fax 215-676-9756Call Toll Free 800-344-2242ALUMINUM FENCESTYLE GUIDE CITY OF ROSEMOUNT DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2016 - 85 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN WITH REZONING FOR ROSEWOOD COMMONS WHEREAS, the Community Development Department of the City of Rosemount received an application from Copperhead Development Inc. and Warren Israelson requesting a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Master Development Plan with Rezoning concerning property legally described as: Lot 1 Block 1 of the Greif Addition Together with: Lot 1 Block 2 of the Rosewood Village 3`d Addirion;Dakota County,Minnesota. WHEREAS, on November 22, 2016,the Planning Cotni ussion of the City of Rosemount held a public hearing and reviewed the PUD Master Development Plan; and WHEREAS, on November 22, 2016, the Planning Con unission recommended approval of the PUD Master Development Plan, subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, on December 20, 2016, the City Council of the City of Rosemount reviewed the Planning Coinmissiods recommendations. NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Council of the City of Rosemount hereby approves the Planned Unit Development Master Plan with the rezoning of the property from BP- Business Park and R1-Low Density Residential, subject to the following conditions: a) Execution of a PUD Agreement. b) Approval of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment reguiding the property to HDR c) The preliminary development plans are approved for no more than seven apartment buildings and 225 dwelling units. However, final approval for a seventh apartment building 32 additional units) is subject to completion of a parking study after construction of the third apartment building in development phase three. If the City Council finds that adequate parking has been provided for the all existing structures, the seventh unit may be incorporated as shown in the preliminary development plans. If the City Council determines that there is a parking shortage, the preliminary plans will be amended to eliminate a building,anticipated as building number three (Phase 5) from the plans. d) A deviation from City Code Section 11-6-1H to allow the office and public gathering space to share parking otherwise required for the apartment use. e) Payment in lieu of replacement trees up to $11,700 should there be no additional reasonable locations for tree plantings. The developer shall consider the use of sound insulating materials for portions of any buildings that will be facing the railroad right-of-way. RESOLUTION 2016-` g) Incorporation of recommendations from the City Engineer in a review memorandum dated November 22,2016 relative to drainage,grading, street design,easements,utilities and the adjacent sidewalks. h) Pay a fee in lieu of park land dedication for 225 units consistent with the most recent fee schedule as adopted by the City Council. The payment of these fees shall be collected at the time a building permit is issued for each building. i) Construction of the emergency vehicle access connecting to Lower 147`' Court West must be completed as part of the fourth phase. Maintenance of the emergency vehicle access through the railroad spur and up to the Lower 147' Court West cul-de-sac shall be the responsibiliry of the developer and/or the Rosewood Crossing HOA. These maintenance responsibilities will include snow removal, signage,pavement markings, and other requirements specified in Resolution No. 2010-44 approving the Rosewood Village Third Addition. j) Provision of contact information for the caretaker or other responsible party in the absence of a caretaker must be submitted to the city. k) The applicant is responsible for reconstruction of shared access drive with El Dorado Packaging and all costs associated with this construction. 1) Repair and maintenance of all private trails and sidewalks are the responsibility of the developer and/or homeowners association(s). Snow removal from all public and private trails and sidewalks shall be the responsibility of the developer and/or homeowners association(s. m) Entry monuments shall be subject to sign permits and normal zoning standards.Appropriate sight distances must be maintained. n) The applicant shall obtain final site and building plan approval from the City prior to any site work or issuance of building permit. The Plans should address the following items: The construction and installation of the decorative fence shall coincide with the timing of construction of apartment buildings within each phase. Submission of details for the decorative fence prior to the approval of a final plan for the first phase. Submission of finallandscape plan that meets ordinance criteria for site and foundation plantings,landscape screening and buffering. includes: Realignment of the sidewalk at least four feet from parking and driving areas when said sidewalk is not located in front of a building. Sidewalks adjacent to parking areas shall be increased to 7 feet. Revision of the main entrance road to include sufficient vehicle stacking areas as required by the City Engineer. All garbage storage areas and dumpsters must meet City ordinance standards for construction and screening,including fire code separarion requirements. Submission of detailed plans for the playground area. 2 RESOLUTION 2016- A Final Phasing Plan that addresses installation of landscaping,paving,utilities, and parking. A temporary turn-around shall be provided on the site prior to the construction of the second or any subsequent apartment buildings. No more than three of the apartment buildings may be constructed before the emergency vehicle access,with curbing on both sides through the adjacent parking lot,providing a connection to Lower 147`'' Court West is installed and connected to the built porrions of the site. Exterior building materials are limited to no more than 60%lap siding not including doors and windows.All other primary materials will be limited to brick or natural stone. Final architectural plans shall be submitted with any final PUD development plans. The final development plans shall include exterior material samples and colors. A lighting plan that includes details about parking lot lighting standards and a photometric plan which conforms to the City's lighting ordinance. ADOPTED this 20`'' day of December,2016, by the City Council of the City o osemount. William H. Droste,Mayor ATTEST: larissa adler, City Clerk 3 MEMORANDUM DATE: May 23, 2017 TO: Kyle Klatt, Senior Planner CC: Kim Lindquist, Community Development Director John Morast, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Amy Roudebush, Planning and Personnel Secretary FROM: Mitch Hatcher, Project Engineer RE: Rosewood Crossing Engineering Review SUBMITTAL: Prepared by KJ Walk, Rosewood Crossing dated July 18, 2016, updated January 10, 2017. The review comments were generated from the following documents included in the submittal:  Plan comprised of the following: ▫ Site Plan ▫ Grading & Erosion Control Plan (Updated 5/15/17) ▫ Utility Plan ▫ Landscape Plan ▫ Details ▫ Phasing Plan (Updated 4/25/17) GENERAL COMMENTS: 1. Development fees are required based on the current Schedule of Rates and Fees. The estimated development fees are listed below:  Storm Sewer Trunk Charge: $ 6,865 / acre  Sanitary Sewer Trunk Charge: $ 1,075 / acre  Watermain Trunk Charge: $ 6,500 / acre 2. A Subdivision Agreement will be required for the installation of public utilities. The city is currently preparing the agreement. The agreement will go to council for approved at the same time as the final plat. 3. Existing conditions and removal plan should be included for review. 4. Typical cross section and pavement sections should be provided for the drive and parking areas. 5. The developer is required to obtain a NPDES construction Stormwater Permit and provide a copy of the approved SWPPP to the City prior to the start of any construction activity. 6. Street and utility construction shall be installed in accordance with the 2015 City of Rosemount General Specifications and Standard Detail Plates and the Engineering Guidelines. 7. Final construction plans and specifications for street and utilities should be submitted to the City for review. 8. City inspection of utility installation is required during construction. 9. Upon completion of the sanitary sewer, watermain, and storm sewer construction, the City requires record drawings. See Engineering Guidelines for submittal and formatting requirements. UTILITY COMMENTS: 10. All required agreements with the railroad for the utility crossings should be secured by the developer. 11. Developer is responsible for obtaining MPCA Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit and MDH Watermain Permit. 12. Hydrant spacing should be approved by the Fire Marshal. 13. Watermain is required to be DIP CL 52. 14. Existing sanitary stub provided at Lower 147th Ct is 8” not 10”. STORMWATER COMMENTS: 15. Two-foot sump catch basin is required prior to discharging to Pond A. 16. It is recommended that street grades are a minimum of 1.0%. Several locations show street grades to be less than 1.0%. 17. It is recommended catch basins are placed in the curb line to collect drainage. Some are shown in the parking stalls and drive lanes. 18. Additional catch basins may be required. Inlets are generally required every 300’. Inlets should be located such that 3 cfs is the maximum flow at the inlet for the 10-yr design event and does not exceed the applicable spread and run design. Should you have any questions or comments regarding the items listed above, please contact me at 651-322-2015.