Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2.b. Transportation Discussion with Dakota County
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY City Council Work Session: June 12, 2017 AGENDA ITEM: Transportation Discussion with Dakota County AGENDA SECTION: Discussion PREPARED BY: Kim Lindquist, Community Development Director AGENDA NO. 2.b. ATTACHMENTS: Agenda Topics, Potential Sales Tax Projects, East-West Corridor Map APPROVED BY: LJM RECOMMENDED ACTION: Discussion Item SUMMARY Every year, the City meets with Dakota County transportation staff to discuss issues of mutual benefit. Attached is an agenda comprised of local and regional transportation items which affect the City of Rosemount. Mark Krebsbach, County Engineer and Brain Sorenson, Asst. County Engineer will be in attendance, along with Commissioner Joe Atkins, to discuss and receive feedback on the attached slate of proposed County transportation projects. RECOMMENDATION Discussion Item. City of Rosemount – City Council Workshop June 12, 2017 1. Arterial Connector Study 2. CSAH 33 (Diamond Path) & Connemara Intersection a. Traffic Control Assessment & CIP Project (2020 Construction) 3. CSAH 42 & Business Parkway/Biscayne Intersection Changes a. Letter to Document Parameters 4. Principal Arterial Study 5. Greater Minnesota Sales Tax Update a. TH 3 from North of Downtown to TH 149 b. CSAH 46 from TH 3 to TH 52 c. East-West Transit on CSAH 42 6. Hastings/Rosemount Transit a. Park and Ride Potential ") ") ") ") ")") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ")") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") §¨¦ §¨¦ §¨¦ §¨¦ §¨¦ §¨¦ §¨¦ £¤ £¤ £¤ £¤ £¤ !( !(!(!( !(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !(!( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( ' '' !(!(!( !( !(!( ' ' ' '' !('''!('' ' ' ' ' ' '' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '' ' '' ' !( !( ' ' !( £¤ £¤ ") ") !(' !( !(") !( !( !( !( ' !( !(") !( §¨¦ !(§¨¦ !(") !(") ") ")!( !( ' ") £¤ £¤!(!( !( !( !( ") ") £¤ £¤ !( !( ' ' !( LAKEVILLE FARMINGTON ROSEMOUNT INVER GROVE HEIGHTS EAGAN APPLE VALLEY BURNSVILLE EMPIRE TOWNSHIP VERMILLION TOWNSHIP MARSHAN TOWNSHIP NININGER TOWNSHIP HASTINGS RAVENNA TOWNSHIP DOUGLAS TOWNSHIP HAMPTON TOWNSHIP CASTLE ROCK TOWNSHIPEUREKA TOWNSHIP MENDOTA HEIGHTS SOUTH ST PAULWEST ST PAUL SUNFISH LAKE LILYDALE MENDOTA GREENVALE TOWNSHIP WATERFORD TOWNSHIP SCIOTA TOWNSHIP RANDOLPH TOWNSHIP HAMPTON VERMILLION MIESVILLENEW TRIER RANDOLPH Coates SPRING LAKE CRYSTAL LAKE ORCHARD LAKE LAKE MARION CHUB LAKE ST. CROIX RIVER MISSISSIPPI RIVER ALIMAGNET BYLLESBY RESERVOIR 14 3 1 6 10 7 12 13 4 15 2 11 8 16 3 3 3 3 3 3 77 35 13 35 13 13 77 13 55 13 13 55 55 56 5555 20 50 56 50 56 5050 56 1919 156 156 110 149 35W 291 494 494 35E 494 35E 35E 149 110 149 316 316 316 5 8 5 9 8 6 4 9 9 9 5 43 17 84 46 31 52 52 56 80 71 73 52 61 56 28 32 38 46 31 38 33 46 62 42 54 54 94 47 52 52 31 93 76 62 91 59 9696 79 59 94 83 83 90 90 53 79 89 76 51 31 78 89 89 85 81795064 64 62 62 8981 87 73 73 3811 43 28 43 28 91 68 54 50 70 50 60 88 23 23 86 88 86 23 23 91 86 86 85 47 80 80 8080 23 50 23 74 31 66 4766 85 91 47 47 4646 85 4242 42 31 42 23 42 71 3338 42 32 32 303030 31 73 2626 63 26 14 1473 63 61 61 61 61 52 80S 53N 74A ² Prepared by: Dakota County Office of GIS, 3/2017. 02461 Miles Greater Minnesota Transportation Sales and Use Tax - Eligible Projects MINNESOTA RIVER Legend Regional Transitways Regional Transitway Extension Regional County Highway Projects Trunk Highway Projects Dakota County Transportation Sales and Use Tax Transportation Improvement Program - Eligible Projects REGIONAL TRANSITWAY CAPITAL AND OPERATION COSTS 1. METRO Red Line, Cedar Avenue Bus Rapid Transit, capital and operating costs 2. METRO Orange Line, I-35 Bus Rapid Transit, capital and operating costs 3. METRO Orange Line Extension, I-35 Bus Rapid Transit, capital and operating costs 4. Robert Street Transitway Locally Preferred Alternative Study TRANSIT SERVICE EXPANSION CAPITAL AND OPERATING COSTS 5. Up to $1 million annually for non-transitway transit service expansion capital and operating costs REGIONAL COUNTY HIGHWAY PROJECTS 6. CSAH 70 2 to 4 lane expansion from I-35 to CSAH 23 in Lakeville 7. CSAH 46 2 to 4 lane expansion from TH 3 to TH 52 in Rosemount and Empire Township 8. CSAH 42 4 to 6 lane expansion from I-35E east to city border in Burnsville REGIONAL TRAIL PROJECTS TO MATCH FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION FUNDS 9. Up to $1 million annually to match federal aid transportation funds received for regional trails TRUNK HIGHWAY PROJECTS 10. TH 77 Managed lane/MnPASS expansion in Apple Valley and Eagan 11. TH 3 2 to 4 lane expansion from 55th Street to TH 55 in Inver Grove Heights 12. TH 3 2 to 4 lane expansion from TH 149 to downtown Rosemount in Eagan, Inver Grove Heights, and Rosemount 13. TH 55 2 to 4 lane expansion from CSAH 42 to Hastings in Rosemount and Nininger Township 14. TH 52 and CSAH 66 interchange in Vermillion Township 15. I-35 Managed lane/MnPASS extension to CSAH 50 in Burnsville and Lakeville 16. I-35 and CSAH 50 interchange reconstruction in Lakeville � � 6/9/2017 �. . �- _ __ _�a . _.-� r .�...,� �� �� -. , .__. p, �;:t ...:��.. � . _ ,. ..:: v_�: - _ ._ 3 _. _ - - — y-�- �,.-�:=8 �� :, ��:., �:" - � �. _.. � �.,,i"'` . .•,�.:. ... _ �.. .. :.,_ - ,_. -... ;:� . _ ,. ,�t_ ..... ..�. - ,.� _.,�-.-- . . _.-. _Q J+ _ �:= ' �> ° ` � � � • • � _ y.�. . 1 •`- . r 'i � • • � I � • , � � � � ROSEMOUNT .,;C�; � '��c�s�nic�uN�r f..�y� CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP- June 12,2017 � � x.,a; ���;����y�� ����,.��� �' °�' � 1 4: �u+ui '�;`� ` : �� z � � SCENAR IO — D� r;' . . � ; � �1 , ,� :_ . � � � �a^�� .��;� n ''.?C F T 1�1�(� 52� .� fr't,�e �E�:�a. � "' � ����.,�,�� �, �'�xxxxxxxx �� ,.� Y �,p� ;, , ��� CL IF� RD _. . l'�x '���� r•�lol � r r, �'.,tf�� "1�` �R � � < ��'.1� '�- � x ��� +�,�� lr i �'. ��♦ !'+5' ' �a % l� �.� " � i t• a 1 � � �F4� � � �'r U ... I � j,4• '7�_�'�.• �. _ ��, .. � �f � .� f1 r �@ A.. 4T�, �6� xf ��� . e r i 1 .� � { y�.._ . '#. ��� �'- r� 7 . 117TH ST. e�� '��:"�' �r,��@.it y, � '� ,�! �y :t. :—n:.•-t� ���•. �y,��� . ,�.�i � �ri4a"� � q.1�a kn� y � ��} p� 1 r`a1 ����.. � i i:�'�� Jy ���� +�� r`_; � f tl-.+7f,�1 , �� � �� Q�t>�i L }• C�n. y: }.��} �t� � Y ♦ � _-c^a•' "_ Y�� .G 1 . � � ��I.� . � � _ 6 � �. y r ' —, �4�,t.t��f� t .��-��, � ;? ��C�. �1]f�'1�f�', �I� �",��.Q �',t �<. ���Y���. '� . . � , t�x. � �i�� � � `G ` i � Q `- � .�1.1 � � �� � , �� �'���J , � ` � y �_ � ' ' t, . =��. �-. - ��� JLL 15. 2013 � ���� F� � . . � � w'�,•- � ��'a PiIELIMINARY f ��� ' � f � �(: _ . . ,- 30NAIRE PATH , ` �—'--- �, s'•- �:X" t• H.����. .g��a."�!� .���� � ..�.r �� Sx '�� s . �.-.� 1 6/g/2017 • ��. -�:� � ' • ' • . • 1. Complete 30% design now to improve County 73 to a 2-lane paved roadway from Bonaire Path to �+## Rea�4-City Border - Complete 30% design to identify impacts, right of way needs, and costs - County staff will recommend to County Board consideration for constructing future turnback portion at 100% County cost - Supports short/intermediate-term traffic needs and fits long-term vision of Akron as a city Collector - Typical 55/45 cost share would apply to future alignment �`� .�.� ' • ' • . • Assuming County Baard adoption of Scenario D- Refined, Staff will recommend 100% County cost for turnback segment. Design to meet City collector standards. � �� . �� - The City of Rosemount ""' p� �`-< �. �e�>>' would still pay 45% for the . _ .�,,�;- �� ��, - � - . - . � � %z mile segment that is not � , . �; � ��- ' l- future turnback, per County ' , � �" � .V � policy. �.;�, �r�..-'� �, '�_� ,, 1 mile n� `,; cm,m...�i...nd.q - This segment is similar to �� ,�. = "' "°"�"'""" x �q�,...,.,......�.. P.."�""' �.,.•µ,,, what's already been �:."�`�,�� . _ ,_ � � ~'� completed south of �-� t '�w �' Bonaire Path. ��� � 3�S mile �� .�� � � . �.,��� � �� .� ��� . �-= g,; 2 ' 6/9/2017 � � ' • ' • . • 2. Long-term Plan for County 73 consistent with Scenario D-Refined — If and when needed, 4-lane roadway from County 42 to future County 32 and transition to 2-lane roadway north of County 32 — 150 foot right-of-way along existing Akron and 180 foot through refinery buffer land — Exact alignment will be determined when needed — Agreement with Flint Hills is necessary to document support and process for future right-of-way `��� � • � • . • 2. Long-term Plan for County 73 consistent with Scenario D-Refined — If and when traffic conditions dictate, consider interim alignment (consistent with Scenario D-Refined) 2 or 4 lane connection to 117th/CR 71 intersection based on actual traffic conditions, subject to approval of both cities — Consider implications of truck traffic as part of any interim alignment — Transfer jurisdiction of Akron Avenue beyond CR 73 realignment to cities of Rosemount and Inver Grove Heights if/when long-term alignment or interim alignment is constructed 3 6/9•;2017 - __- - -_ �;� � � � • • . • _ �r � p Y = � � ;. ,_ _, �`t:�.� �� � , . • � t . . 1l� - � � >� . �.. i�f.; u .__..—... -- .. , • `. , W ��'��' "�,1':�,LONG TERM ALIGNMENT OF i L `Q_ v���f CO.RD.73(SCENARIO D-REFINED) « �'!. � �:Q 7�` ' � ��,�, � � '� d�$2 � � � ..t.". �rt_.'._ rrv- .s.r,.,.r �`• � ���� ����� �«�• � t '..—��� �� �. � � ��: � INVEIiGROYEHEIGNTS f �'.�;`� �„ � ^ ROSEMOUHT � � T;� O�� . ! • '.. .:�y�� . � � • �� � ���} .i� ,� � c!� ��� il � � ,Q"• �� ��� <:��' �„ 1 , , �• r� r� r �'-�;L�������- ,�'�� ��..rY � >r#Ry ' y — '�.t � ,� .-.,. '��� ` .�,����� �? , yy �,+', . � � �1�• .,;����� �-��—�--r— �t�-i ; �r� --, 73 : �I �i '�'"•�:J'1i1 ' _-.++�'+! r��3 ['�.� /��y � ����i�NAIRE!PATH�'" �• � ' �t'd "��� .., .� . r ��-r___ '�. � 1_..�rv.+����, ' - -- s b � � � � � 3. Long Term Plan for County 32 consistent with Scenario D-Refined — If and when needed, improve County 32 to a 4-lane roadway from Trunk Highway 3 to Trunk Highway 52, and realign from Akron to 117th Street — 150 foot right-of-way along existing Cliff Road and 180 foot through refinery buffer land. Right-of-way for 117tn to be determined through design. — Timing of realignment likely tied to full, long term realignment of County 73 due to Bituminous Roadway mining, and design considerations 4 � � 6/9/2017 ,. �r�rv -� ' • ' • . • Improvements to 117th Street (future County 32) — Improve 117th Street to a 4-lane facility with turn lanes and access management for safety. Include improvements at County 71. �t':^�.� � ' ��� �� c � �� ��' '•�+� :•�i►,r>„�" � � ., +�� / .r J '' A �x " 3 '1`� �- _ �,' i►tiS�y �:�..�^* ,i , � �.` �'� ' _,.x .1k'•i; ;.��i •y ..� , ' ' � � h I' �.,� ,I. rT ;Ir.�.: .... . \ r•:�.'� n��, �+�� r �,��� ��` �� ) �'� 1 �.5' ==i �Y w4' �x... ,��11°^.--�e. �. �, - ...nsi�Al►�ii1t, •-_ �o�� j Y# a�'�Y . n►w.. �r"'ti�� r s q '"'—'_ '�' ! fl �� 4��;C � �` � _•�' a `�w."';.�Aj�� � "� I !i•�r t �� •+�,�H..,ast +• :).. �,�, I1 �� � { i ! � � '-� '� �: . ,, /[ti • i� . � ��:. v .. � , / t ' �� . .' ,S�. �4 % k� � � ;p. '�I ,-, 'fQ°.ea`�..!—� \ , , ,, �;ti,. , � � z,�. , 1 '�'r,'� xy �` � "��+,,;;,,`=�t , �±1'c8�,� � ,. -. y ^ �" �._... : � , �- ,,-w � ..�.. _- - -- :� ! •- • �. r-- ••,t '�' r . � '��:�� '� �, �_ �r: `_' t `'�r '�^" �� .I i C r— � :_..�� __- .._;,;-_�.,.. — — _ �: ��� � � � � 4. Assess Long Term Alignment for County 71 when County 73 is realigned — Dependent upon traffic � ,���`' ��+.�,����,� ,�:'! � „- , �� � :�:r a� " F conditions and projections �, . .�� �.� � � ,q,;; at the time of design " `�'' �Y'%'`xY� "_�� '�� #� ....� � � p �4. t �.� � �4 � � = � ) � � y �{ ; "A . �,�' �l �� ;.� �ay' 'Y ♦ 11 M SI r �� �m� y �� ,���`� f! � +A+ ���� < ��' � '�u °�r . �,,��,,�� � , . ��k � ��'� � ��� ,+r '��:. :1 L 1 ,�� � ", ,.� g �:y2.. p ; . �7S + ' . I . n r � ��m�1 � `'�� ��"�� • �. �� �... e r ` 9�1A�^'lll � '�a - `. p Gr'� �,_ Y'' �^*�=1 ...� 1 ^Y � �:__ #� : , .�.,s 5 6/9J2017 � Dakota County Highway Sysbem ,.,,,., . _ 1 ..�' ��", +v i. ie � v. � � V.� 1 �PnnClpdAhmel / r �� ;\ ��t 7 �� MinorMmal � � ���!� ' ? Futve Cainy liqhways-Mina Mmals �..� / # lJ �+ t �. /, �"'_ r __ ( I , _� t � , . .a'e., ' . __}"'""_' . ,r__... . ___..- ��-- -- - � �.. - � ..._ � r._ ' � �..--. :... .. �.�. ' �� � �^� ; , ` � ' I '` i � - ' w.� I I 1O 4 w.t� : : � �wwG�� . . I- �� � MF4V I 9 1 .' : � ' ++. � �. _. .. _�. r- � ._ ._........._..,I.._....,.. .._-.-..y � � _ � : _ 1,=- � i � �� � j :. ..... L.., ...�.... . w� ii� aw I 1 iutt �t . : Kxriox -. ., ....� : ' ' �N�MF� � "' •. i r� • w�snu (�on�sn� .u�. ..'"'_ '.. . . 1" . inrw.w � ..;z�,. ........ � �. � �. � . t i i .. , �S. I - i _a,_- � j � � I i, �:� � i i '�. , i i i � . , . ._. . .._.. .____,". .... ___. _. ._.__._._.._ __ _ _. _.. . .. .. , . __ . I' i � ' �,r ' � � � � ' . c m..aw 'Y' .x.� 6