HomeMy WebLinkAbout6.q. Final PUD Site and Building Plan Approval and Final Plat for Rosewood Crossing
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
City Council Meeting Date: June 20, 2017
AGENDA ITEM: Case 17-20 FP, Final PUD Site and
Building Plan Approval and Final Plat for
Rosewood Crossing
AGENDA SECTION:
Consent
PREPARED BY: Kyle Klatt, Senior Planner
Anthony Nemcek, City Planner AGENDA NO. 6.q.
ATTACHMENTS: Site Location Map, Final Plat Resolution,
Final PUD Resolution, Amended PUD
Agreement, Subdivision Agreement;
Rosewood Crossing Final Plat; Final Site
Plan and Phasing (Phase 1 – 8 Sheets);
Final Grading Plan, Building Elevations;
Fence Design; Resolution Approving
PUD Master Plan; City Engineer Review
Memo Dated 5-23-17
APPROVED BY: LJM
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
1) Motion to adopt a resolution approving the Final Site and Building Plan for the
Rosewood Crossing PUD subject to conditions:
2) Motion to authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a Minor Amendment to the
Rosewood Crossing PUD Agreement to incorporate an updated building design and
phasing plan.
3) Motion to adopt a resolution approving the Final Plat for Rosewood Crossing subject to
conditions.
4) Motion to approve the Subdivision Development Agreement for Rosewood Crossing
and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the agreement.
SUMMARY
The City Council is being asked to consider a request by Warren Israelson (Copperhead Development,
Inc.) for a final plat and final PUD development plans relating to the Rosewood Crossing 225-unit rental
apartment complex located south of 145th Street and east of Downtown. The City approved the PUD
Master Development Plan and preliminary plat in December, 2016. At that time, it was recognized that
the item would come back through the process for final site and building plan approval and final plat
approval. After the applicant obtains these approvals, they would be allowed to obtain building permits for
the project. There would be no further public actions needed regarding the overall site design or even the
details associated with the project. They would be addressed through the administrative issuance of
grading and building permits.
2
As part of the Master Development Plan approval there were 14 conditions of approval, many of which
detailed items that were anticipated as part of the final site and building plan. The main issues raised during
the City’s review of the preliminary development plans were questions about phasing and what
improvements would be built as what part of the project build-out. The applicant has submitted a phasing
plan which itemizes their build-out intentions. Additionally, the final site and building plan functions like a
site plan review and therefore those specific items are called out in the following analysis.
The applicant is also requesting final plat approval to create the lots for the first two apartment buildings,
accessory garages, the caretaker’s premises, and necessary drainage and utility easements.
Applicant: Warren Israelson
Property Owner: Warren Israelson and Copperhead Development Inc.
Property Location: Lot 1 Block 1 Greif Addition and Lot 1 Block 2 Rosewood Village
3rd Addition
Size of Property: 12.25 Acres
Comprehensive Plan Designation: HDR High Density Residential (pending final Met Council action
on 5/24/17)
Zoning: R-4 High Density Residential/PUD
Number of Units: 225 units overall/65 units within Final Plat area
Site Density: 18.9 units/acre overall
Current Neighboring Land Uses: North – Self-storage Facility
South – Residential and Future Commercial
East – Detached Townhomes
West – Railroad and Rosemount Park and Ride
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING – MAY 23, 2017
The Planning Commission considered the final plat and final site and building plan for the Rosewood
Crossing Planned Unit Development (PUD) at its May 23, 2017 meeting. There were no public comments
during the meeting.
During its deliberations on the request, the Commission raised questions concerning the proposed fence
around the exterior of the property. Staff noted that the fence would be six feet in height and extend from
the 145th Street right-of-way to the southernmost portion of garage number seven. The Commission also
discussed the service doors along the back of each garage unit, and requested clarification concerning the
staff recommendation for the doors. Staff replied that it was recommending removal of the doors citing
concerns with safety, the visual appearance of the doors and the fact that the doors will not lead anywhere.
There was a general conversation about the need for service doors for each garage unit. The applicant
stated that he would not have any issues removing the doors from the development plans.
The Commission also discussed the landscape plan for the site, and asked why the developer is being
allowed to pay a fee instead of replacing trees. Staff noted that there is limited room on the property for
the planting of trees due to the storm water ponds in the southern portion of the site, and that the fee is
deposited into a separate City fund that is used for planting trees throughout the City. The Commission
reviewed the mixture of trees to be planted, with Staff noting that specific trees will need to be identified
by the developer as each project phase is brought forward.
The developer has provided a spec sheet for the proposed fence, and will be using the design labeled as
CP4 on the attached sheet.
The Planning Commission recommended approval of the Rosewood Crossing final plat and final PUD
3
site and building plan for the development with the conditions as recommended by staff on a 4-0 vote.
Commissioners Clements and Henrie were absent.
BACKGROUND
The Planning Commission reviewed the application for a Master PUD Development Plan at its October
25, 2016 meeting and continued the item to permit time to modify some of the plans relating to parking,
landscaping, building architecture and site circulation. At the meeting there were several members of the
public in attendance; some requested denial of the project and others asked for additional information.
The Commission again reviewed the item at their meeting on November 22, 2016 and recommended
approval of the PUD Master Development Plan. The Plan had been modified to increase drive, sidewalk
and the property access widths, additional landscaping was proposed, including additional screening along
the eastern boundary, and additional information was provided regarding site work and timing. However,
the applicant could not respond to all the phasing questions asked during the meeting and therefore a
recommended condition of approval required submittal of a project phasing plan.
At the City Council meeting in December 2016, the Council heard the presentation from staff, who noted
there are still concerns about on-site parking and therefore a specific condition relating to parking is
included as a recommended condition of approval. The council had questions about fencing, snow storage
and removal and clarifications to site access. The project was approved with conditions.
ISSUE ANALYSIS
Final Plat
The final plat combines the two properties that comprise the site and creates separate lots for five separate
buildings; the caretakers building, two apartment buildings, and two detached garage structures. The
remainder of the site will be designated as Outlot B and additional platting will be required prior to
construction of additional apartment buildings beyond the first two buildings. The plat includes easements
for drainage and utility purposes, but these easements will need to be expanded to account for utility
construction on Outlot B.
Final Site and Building Plan
Land use and Zoning
The final step in City review of a PUD is final site and building plan approval. The review is similar to site
plan approval with the caveat that conditions of the PUD Master Development Plan must also be met.
Along with rezoning to PUD, the project received a reguiding of the northern parcel from Business Park
to High Density Residential and southern parcel from Medium Density Residential to High Density
Residential. The Amendment has been submitted to the Metropolitan Council for final approval, and the
amendment was approved by the Met Council on May 24, 2017.
Lot and Building Standards
As noted above, each apartment building and detached garage will be placed on a separate lot of record.
There will also be a separate lot for the caretakers building and common space. Because it is a PUD, there
are no issues associated with internal lot lines, only setbacks from the adjoining properties. Building
setback requirements are 30’ for the principal structures from all sides of the PUD and 50’ front yard and
10’ side yard setbacks for accessory structures which would include the parking garages. The plan meets
these standards.
Building and Architecture
One area of interest is the exterior plans for the individual apartment buildings. The applicant has revised
4
the plans to include more enhancement than previously presented, including additional stone on the
building elevations. The previous review requested additional enhancements on all sides of the buildings
since they face other residential properties and other apartment buildings within the complex. The initial
plan had the enhancements on the front elevations of the apartment buildings.
The current plan has stone veneer wainscoting on the front with the façade under each gable also clad in
stone. The remainder of the front elevation is lap siding, with a small amount of shake siding denoting the
front entrance. The rear elevations have stone wainscoting, stone on the facades of each end, and on the
first floor of the central gabled feature. The second level is shake siding with the interior spaces with patios
and balconies being lap siding. Side elevations include more stone, shake siding with some lap siding. The
PUD Master Plan approval permitted up to 60% of all exterior elevations to be siding, excluding windows
and doors. The new plan meets this condition as 58.66% is lap or shake siding with the remaining 41.34%
stone. The applicant has provided updated drawings for the office/caretaker’s residence and garage units
as well, and these buildings also comply with the required material percentages. The garages are 55%
stone veneer and the leasing office is 46% stone veneer.
The composition of apartment unit types within the project are listed as follows:
Proposed Types of Apartment Units for Rosewood Commons
Type of Unit Size Number of Units Percentage of Units
One Bedroom 700 Square Feet 140 63%
Two Bedroom 829-894 Square Feet 84 37%
The above chart does not take into account the caretaker’s residence, which would bring the overall
number of units up to 225 for the entire project. The final plat area includes two of the apartment
buildings with the caretaker’s residence (65 units).
The arrangement and location of the garage follows the master plan very closely; however, the updated
plans show a service door on the back of each unit. Since the service doors are not a building code
requirement and cannot be accessed from the front of each building, Staff is recommending that they be
eliminated from the plans and the developer has agreed to remove the doors from any plans submitted for
a building permit.
Parks and Open Space
The developer is being asked to pay a fee-in-lieu of park land for the project. The fee was estimated at
$792,200 based on the City’s current fee schedule. However, staff is proposing a change in the park
dedication fee calculation which will stratify dedication and resulting fees, based upon the density of the
project. It is anticipated that this modification will be made prior to obtaining any building permits for the
project. Under the current proposal, the payment for the entire project would be $562,000. Actual
payment for each apartment building will occur at the time of building permit and will reflect the current
fee schedule at that time.
The master plan includes a small private playground area on the southern portion of the site in the back of
buildings four, six, and seven. As noted in the master plan review, the final details for the play area should
be submitted to the City for review prior to construction. The updated phasing plan provided by the
applicant identifies that the playground will be installed as part of phase four.
Access and Parking
The City’s approval of the master development plan included several conditions related to parking and
access across the site. The final development plans have been updated to address maneuvering concerns
5
at the 145th Street entrance, and now provide adequate stacking for vehicles waiting to exit the site onto
145th Street. The phasing plan also includes the construction of a specific number of parking stalls within
each project phase. Overall the applicant is proposing 450 parking stalls of which 113 will be located
within the detached accessory garage structures and 337 will be exterior surface parking stalls, around each
building. The number and location of parking stalls is consistent with the preliminary development plan
approval.
The conditions of preliminary plan approval specified that the project was approved for six buildings and
the office building, and that the parking situation had to be evaluated before a seventh building could be
constructed. The parking evaluation must be completed before the fourth phase is constructed, at which
point the City will have the ability to either find that the parking provided is adequate and the developer
can proceed with all seven buildings, or that the parking is not adequate to meet the actual demand on the
site. If parking is not adequate, one building will need to be eliminated from the plan. The parking analysis
is not needed until the fourth phase, and therefore, will not impact the applicant’s ability to move forward
with the final development plans for phases one and two.
Phasing Plan
The final development plans include a revised phasing plan that more accurately describes the timing of all
proposed improvements to the site. This plan has also been updated to better align the building
numbering with the project phases. The cover sheet for the phasing plan includes all project
improvements, while the latter drawings focus on the improvements that will be completed with each
specific phase. Please note that the Rosewood Crossing final plat covers the first two phases of the project
and will allow construction to commence on both these buildings without any additional approvals (other
than a building permit) from the City. Any subsequent phases will be subject to approval of a final plat.
The need for future final plats will help the City ensure that the timing requirements for various
improvements as spelled out in the preliminary approval and the required parking study are met by the
applicant.
Each phase of the project will essentially include one of the 32-unit apartment buildings, detached garage
structure with 16 parking stalls, surface parking around each building, access road extension, fencing to the
furthest extent of each phase, and landscaping. In addition to these elements, the first project phase will
include the caretaker’s residence/office, the sanitary sewer mains, and approximately half of the storm
sewer pipes required to serve the entire project area. Water service will be extended in each phase with the
other improvements. Staff does not have any specific comments concerning the phasing plan, but would
like to see more of the trees along the boundary with the Rosewood Village Second Addition installed in
phase four.
Landscaping and Tree Preservation
The original site plan approved with the PUD indicated a total of 151 trees planted throughout the
development. This was far short from the required trees. The landscaping plan provided with the final
plat, final site and building plan indicates a total of 240 trees. This exceeds the 233 trees required by code
(eight plus one tree per unit). The majority of the new trees are located along the eastern property line.
With regard to foundation plantings the landscaping plan is consistent with the original plan approved
with the PUD. The landscape plan indicates 105 foundation plantings spaced 30 inches off center will be
planted along the front and sides of each building. The number of foundation plantings is in compliance
with the City’s Landscape Ordinance requirement of one foundation planting per 10 linear feet of building
perimeter.
The tree preservation plan provided with the original PUD application indicated that the developer will be
removing 196 caliper inches of existing vegetation beyond the threshold for removal without replacement
being required. Because of the amount of landscaping required for the site before any replacement, staff is
6
recommending the applicant pay in lieu of planting for the trees. The cost per tree is $300 and therefore
the applicant would be required to pay $11,700.
Signage
The applicant is proposing a monument sign that will be located at the entrance along 145th Street. The
grading/site plan has been updated to include the proposed sign. A sign permit for the sign may be
approved administratively so long as it meets all the requirements of the Sign Ordinance.
Trash Enclosure
The plans supplied by the applicant indicate that dumpsters will be located adjacent or in-between the
garages at four different locations on the site. The site plan indicates that the enclosures will be
constructed of concrete block and the final construction plans will be reviewed by the Fire Marshall prior
to issuance of a building permit to ensure the proper separation between the enclosure and the adjacent
garage structures is maintained.
Fencing
The applicant is proposing an aluminum picket fence that will extend southward from 145th Street along
the western edge of the project area. The fence will be extended between each of the garages and
terminate with “Garage 7” in the southern portion of the site. The type of fence proposed and location of
the fence are consistent with the approved master plan.
Lighting
The lighting indicated on the final site plan is consistent with that which was provided with the original
PUD application. The plan demonstrates compliance with City’s lighting ordinance for lighting standards
and the maximum intensity of light at neighboring property lines. There are a series of private internal
street lights proposed that will be operated and maintained by the site owner.
Engineering
The City’s project engineer has reviewed the plan and provided comments in the Engineer’s Memo dated
May 23, 2017. Generally, the comments pertain to information that must be included for review prior to
building permit approval. The development fees that must be paid by the applicant are $84,096.25 for the
storm sewer trunk charge, $13,168.75 for the sanitary sewer trunk charge, and $79,625 for the water main
trunk charge.
CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATION
Staff and the Planning Commission recommend approval of the application for a Planned Unit
Development Final Site and Building Plan and Final Plat to allow the construction of the first two phases of
an apartment complex with two two-story buildings and a leasing office/maintenance building that contains
a community room and a three-bedroom caretaker’s unit subject to the conditions of approval outlined in
the recommended action section above.
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2017 -
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) FINAL
SITE AND BUILDING PLAN FOR ROSEWOOD CROSSING
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department of the City of Rosemount received an
application from KJ Walk Inc., 6001 Egan Drive, Suite 100, Savage, MN (Applicant) requesting a
Planned Unit Development (PUD) Final Site and Building Plan concerning property legally
described as:
Lot 1 Block 1 of the Greif Addition, Dakota County, Minnesota
Together with:
Lot 1 Block 2 of the Rosewood Village 3rd Addition, Dakota County, Minnesota.
WHEREAS, on May 23, 2017 the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount held a public
hearing and reviewed the PUD Final Site and Building Plan; and
WHEREAS, on May 23, 2017 the Planning Commission recommended approval of the PUD Final
Site and Building Plan, subject to conditions; and
WHEREAS, on June 20, 2017 the City Council of the City of Rosemount reviewed the Planning
Commission’s recommendations.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Council of the City of Rosemount hereby
approves the Planned Unit Development (PUD) Final Site and Building Plan of Rosewood Crossing
subject to the following conditions:
1. Execution of an amendment to the Rosewood Crossing PUD Agreement to incorporate
the updated site and building plans.
2. Payment in lieu of replacement trees of $11,700 prior to the issuance of a building
permit for any structure.
3. Incorporation of recommendations from the City Engineer in a review memorandum
dated May 23, 2017 relative to drainage, grading, street design, easements, utilities and
the adjacent sidewalks.
4. Payment of a fee in lieu of park land dedication for each unit consistent with the City’s
adopted fee schedule.
ADOPTED this 20th day of June, 2017 by the City Council of the City of Rosemount.
__________________________________________
William H. Droste, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________________
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2017-
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A FINAL PLAT
FOR ROSEWOOD CROSSING
WHEREAS, KJ Walk Inc., 6001 Egan Drive, Suite 100, Savage, MN (Applicant) has submitted an
application to the City of Rosemount (City) for a Final Plat concerning property legally described as
follows:
Lot 1 Block 1 of the Greif Addition, Dakota County, Minnesota
Together with:
Lot 1 Block 2 of the Rosewood Village 3rd Addition, Dakota County, Minnesota
WHEREAS, on May 23, 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount reviewed the
Final Plat for Rosewood Crossing; and
WHEREAS, on May 23, 2017, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Final Plat
for Rosewood Crossing subject to conditions; and
WHEREAS, on June 20, 2017, the City Council of the City of Rosemount reviewed the Planning
Commission’s recommendations and the Final Plat for Rosewood Crossing; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Rosemount hereby
approves the revised Final Plat for Rosewood Crossing, subject to the following conditions:
1. Execution of a subdivision agreement.
2. Provision of all easements as required by the City Engineer, and specifically, drainage
and utility easements over Lot 6, Block 1 and Outlot B of the final plat.
ADOPTED this 20th day of June 2017, by the City Council of the City of Rosemount.
__________________________________________
William H. Droste, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________________
Clarissa Hadler, City Clerk
1
A MINOR AMENDMENT TO THE ROSEWOOD CROSSING PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT (PUD) AGREEMENT UPDATING FINAL BUILDING DESIGNS AND
INCORPORATING A PHASING PLAN
THIS DECLARATION made this _____ day of __________________, 2017 by and
between KJ Walk, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as the “Declarant”), and the CITY OF
ROSEMOUNT, a Minnesota municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as the “City”);
WHEREAS, Declarant is the owner of the real property described as Lot 1 Block 1 of the
Greif Addition, Dakota County, Minnesota together with Lot 1 Block 2 of the Rosewood Village 3rd
Addition, Dakota County, Minnesota (hereinafter referred to as the “Subject Properties”); and
WHEREAS, the Subject Properties are subject to a Planned Unit Development
Agreement, “Rosewood Crossing Planned Unit Development Agreement” dated January 17,
2017, (hereinafter referred to as the “Planned Unit Development Agreement”); and
WHEREAS, Declarant wishes to amend the Planned Unit Development Agreement as
hereinafter provided, which amendment has been approved and consented to by the City of
Rosemount, acting through its City Council, as evidenced by the duly authorized signatures of its
officers affixed hereto.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Declarant declares that the Subject Property is, and shall be,
held, transferred, sold, conveyed and occupied subject to the covenants, conditions, and
restrictions, hereinafter set forth.
1. The use and development of the Subject Property shall conform to the Planned Unit
Development Agreement except as modified herein.
A. The documents, plans, and drawings listed in paragraph 1 of the Planned Unit
Development Agreement is amended as follows:
‐ Replace the exterior elevations in subparagraph “c” with Attachment One.
‐ Add subparagraph “k”: Phasing Plan, Attachment Two.
2
2. Except as modified by paragraph 1 of this Amendment, the Planned Unit Development
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
3. The obligations and restrictions of this Amendment shall run with the land of the Subject
Property and shall be enforceable against the Declarant, its successors and assigns, by the
City of Rosemount acting through its City Council. This Amendment may be amended
from time to time by a written amendment executed by the City and the owner or owners
of the lot or lots to be affected by said amendment.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned as duly authorized agents, officers or
representatives of Declarant have hereunto set their hands and seals as of the day and year first
above written.
DECLARANT
KJ WALK, INCORPORATED
By
Its
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF ___________ )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of _________, 2017
by ________________________, the _____________________, for and on behalf of KJ Walk,
Inc. a Minnesota Corporation, by and on behalf of said corporation.
_______________________________
Notary Public
This Amendment is approved and consented to by the City Council of the City of Rosemount.
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
3
By:
William H. Droste, Mayor
And by:
Clarissa Hadler, City Clerk
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF DAKOTA )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of ___________, 2016
by William H. Droste and Clarissa Hadler, the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, for and on
behalf of the City of Rosemount, a Minnesota corporation, by and on behalf of said corporation.
Notary Public
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY:
City of Rosemount
2875 145th Street West
Rosemount, MN 55068
651-423-4411
Rosewood Crossing
June / 2017
G:\ENGPROJ\476\Subdivisionagreement - 476.docx Page 1 of 11
SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT
Rosewood Crossing
AGREEMENT dated this ________ day of ________________________, 2017, by and between the
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT, a Minnesota municipal corporation, (the "City"), and KJ WALK, INC., a Florida
corporation, (the "Developer").
1. Request for Plat Approval. The Developer has asked the City to approve the subdivision of land
and a plat of land to be known as Rosewood Crossing, which land is legally described on
ATTACHMENT ONE, attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof (hereinafter referred to as the
“subject property”).
2. Conditions of Plat Approval. The City has approved the subdivision and the plat on the following
conditions:
a. Incorporation of recommendations of the City Engineer concerning design and installation of
public and private infrastructure, and including grading, erosion control, streets and utilities.
b. Execution of a Subdivision or Development Agreement to secure the public and private
improvements.
c. Payment of all applicable fees including GIS, Park Dedication and other fees identified in the
current fee schedule.
d. Incorporation of any easements necessary to accommodate drainage, ponding, trails,
underpasses, conservation areas, streets and utilities.
3. Phased Development. The City may refuse to approve final plats of subsequent additions of the
plat if the Developer has breached this Agreement and the breach has not been remedied.
Development of subsequent phases may not proceed until Subdivision Agreements for such phases
are approved by the City.
4. Effect of Subdivision Approval. For two (2) years from the date of this Agreement, no
amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, except an amendment placing the plat in the current
urban service area, or official controls shall apply to or affect the use, development density, lot size,
lot layout or dedications of the approved plat unless required by state or federal law or agreed to in
writing by the City and the Developer. Thereafter, notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the
contrary, to the full extent permitted by state law, the City may require compliance with any
amendments to the City's Comprehensive Guide Plan, official controls, platting or dedication
requirements enacted after the date of this Agreement.
Rosewood Crossing
June / 2017
G:\ENGPROJ\476\Subdivisionagreement - 476.docx Page 2 of 11
5. Development Plans. The subject property shall be developed in accordance with the following
plans, specifications and contract documents, original copies of which are on file with the City
Engineer. The plans and contract documents may be prepared, subject to City approval, after
entering this Agreement, but before commencement of any work on the Subject Property. If the
plans vary from the written terms of this Agreement, the written terms shall control. The plans are:
Plan A - Plat
Plan B - Soil Erosion Control Plan and Schedule
Plan C - Drainage and Storm Water Runoff Plan
Plan D - Plans and Specifications for Public and Private Improvements
Plan E - Grading Plan and House Pad Elevations
Plan F - Street Lights
Plan G - Landscape Improvements
All Improvements, including Developer Improvements and City-Installed Public Infrastructure
Improvements (if any) that lie within the public right-of-way or easements and are improvements
listed in Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.021 (hereinafter the Improvements) will be designed by the
Developer at the Developer’s expense, and approved by the City Engineer. The Developer will
prepare plans and specifications for the Improvements and will perform all construction
administration for the Improvements, all at Developer expense. Construction administration
includes but is not limited to documentation, as-builts, surveying, field staking, and testing. The City
Engineer will perform inspection services at Developer’s expense.
6. Installation by Developer. The Developer shall install or cause to be installed and pay for the
following, hereinafter referred to as the “Developer Improvements”:
A. Surveying and staking
B. Surface improvements (paved streets, sidewalks, trails, etc.)
C. Water main improvements
D. Sanitary sewer improvements
E. Storm sewer improvements
F. Setting of lot and block monuments
G. Gas, electric, telephone, and cable lines
H. Site grading
I. Landscaping
J. Streetlights
K. Other items as necessary to complete the development as stipulated herein or in other
agreements
7. Time of Performance. The Developer shall install all required improvements enumerated in
Paragraph 6 that will serve the subject property by December 31, 2017, subject to delays due to
inclement weather, casualty, labor strikes, material shortages, or other force majeure not within the
Rosewood Crossing
June / 2017
G:\ENGPROJ\476\Subdivisionagreement - 476.docx Page 3 of 11
Developer’s reasonable control. The Developer may, however, request an extension of time from the
City. If an extension is granted, it shall be conditioned upon updating the security posted by the
Developer to reflect cost increases and the extended completion date.
8. City-Installed Public Infrastructure. The following improvements, hereinafter referred to as “City-
Installed Public Infrastructure Improvements” (known as City Project 476), shall be designed,
inspected, surveyed and administered by the City, and installed in the Subject Property at Developer
expense by a Contractor selected by the City through the public bidding process:
A. None
9. [This Section Intentionally Left Blank]
10. Security for Developer Improvements. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Agreement,
payment of the costs of all Developer Improvements, and construction of all Developer
Improvements (as noted in Paragraph 6), the Developer shall furnish the City with a cash deposit or
irrevocable letter of credit from a local bank (“security”) in the amount of Two Hundred Seventeen
Thousand, Seventy Six Dollars ($217,076). The amount of the security was calculated as follows:
Cost 110%
Survey Monumentation $500 $550
Landscaping (64 trees) $19,200 $21,120
Street Lighting (5 lights) $20,000 $22,000
Cost 125%
Surface Improvements $50,000 $62,500
Water Main Improvements $38,005 $47,506
Sanitary Sewer Improvements $27,160 $33,950
Storm Sewer Improvements $23,560 $29,450
Total $178,425 $217,076
Refer to Exhibit A and Exhibit B for an explanation of each item.
The bank and form of the letter of credit or other security shall be subject to the approval of the City
Administrator. The letter of credit shall be automatically renewable until the City releases the
developer from responsibility. The letter of credit shall secure compliance with all terms of this
Agreement and all obligations of the Developer under it. The City may draw down on the letter of
credit without notice if the obligations of the Developer have not been completed as required by this
Agreement. In the event of a default under this Subdivision Agreement by the Developer, the City
shall furnish the Developer with written notice by certified mail of Developers default(s) under the
terms of this Subdivision Agreement. If the Developer does not remove said default(s) within two (2)
weeks of receiving notice, the City may draw on the letter of credit and take such steps as it deems
necessary to remedy the default. With City approval, the letter of credit may be reduced from time to
time as financial obligations are paid and Developer Improvements and other Developer obligations
are completed to the City’s requirements.
11. Grading Plan/Site Grading. Site grading shall be completed by the Developer at its cost and
approved by the City Engineer. The completion of grading activities will need to be coordinated by
the City in conjunction with the installation of utilities. Developer shall furnish the City Engineer
satisfactory proof of payment for the site grading work and shall submit a certificate of survey of the
development to the City as the site grading is completed by phase, with street and lot grades. If the
installation of utilities by the City is occurring simultaneously with the grading, the utility contractor
shall have preference over the grading activities. No substantial grading activities can be completed
Rosewood Crossing
June / 2017
G:\ENGPROJ\476\Subdivisionagreement - 476.docx Page 4 of 11
over installed utilities unless otherwise protected. All improvements to the lots and the final grading
shall comply with the grading plan as submitted and shall be the responsibility of the Developer.
12. License. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a
license to enter the Subject Property to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the
City. Such license shall terminate as to all residential lots within the subject property upon acceptance
by the City of the public infrastructure improvements.
13. Erosion Control. Prior to site grading, and before any utility construction is commenced or building
permits are issued, the erosion control plan, Plan B, shall be implemented, inspected and approved by
the City. All areas disturbed by the excavation and backfilling operations shall be reseeded within 72
hours after the completion of the work in that area. Except as otherwise provided in the erosion
control plan, seed shall be rye grass or other fast-growing seed suitable to the existing soil to provide a
temporary ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be mulched and disc-anchored as
necessary for seed retention.
All basement and/or foundation excavation spoil piles shall be kept completely off City right-of-way
and shall be completely surrounded with an approved erosion control silt fence. Approved erosion
control fencing shall be installed around the perimeter of each lot or at City-approved locations at the
time of building permit issuance and remain in place until the lot is seeded or sodded. A 20-foot
opening will be allowed on each lot for construction deliveries.
The parties recognize that time is critical in controlling erosion. If development does not comply with
the erosion control plan and schedule, or supplementary instructions received from the City, the City
may take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion. This right also applies to the required
erosion control for basement and/or foundation excavation spoil piles. The City will attempt to
notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect
the Developer’s or City’s rights or obligations hereunder. If the Developer does not reimburse the
City for any cost the City incurred for such work within thirty (30) days, the City may draw down the
letter of credit to pay any costs. No development will be allowed, and no building permits will be
issued unless the Subject Property is in full compliance with the erosion control requirements.
14. Planting and Seeding. Landscaping shall be in accordance with Landscape Plans approved by the
City Planner.
15. Clean up. The Developer shall clean streets of dirt and debris that has resulted from construction
work by the Developer, its agents or assignees. The City will inspect the site on a weekly basis and
determine whether it is necessary to take additional measures to clean dirt and debris from the streets.
After 24 hours verbal notice to the Developer, the City will complete or contract to complete the
clean-up at the Developer’s expense in accordance with the procedures specified in Paragraph 13. The
Developer shall inspect and, if necessary, clean all catch basins, sumps, and ponding areas of
erosion/siltation and restore to the original condition at the end of home construction within this
development. All silt fence and other erosion control should be removed following the establishment
of turf. These items are to be secured through the letter of credit as is noted in Exhibit A.
16. Ownership of Improvements. Upon completion and City acceptance of the work and construction
required by this Agreement, the Public Improvements lying within public rights-of-way and easements
shall become City property without further notice or action unless the improvements are specifically
identified herein as private infrastructure. Water main is a Public Improvement. All other
improvements are Private Improvements.
Rosewood Crossing
June / 2017
G:\ENGPROJ\476\Subdivisionagreement - 476.docx Page 5 of 11
17. Warranty. The Developer warrants all work required to be performed by it against poor material and
faulty workmanship for a period of two (2) years after its completion and acceptance by the City or
such longer period as is specified in plans and specifications prepared by the City Engineer for
Developer Improvements that are Public Improvements. All trees, grass and sod shall be warranted
to be alive, of good quality and disease free for twenty-four (24) months after planting. Vegetation
surrounding ponds and/or wetlands shall be warranted to be alive, of good quality and weed free for
three (3) years after planting. For each pond/wetland in the development, the developer shall provide
to the City Engineer an inspection report by July 31 each year which includes the following:
A. Date of inspection
B. Name of person responsible for inspection
C. Photos of the pond/wetland area confirming the vegetation is established as intended
D. Maintenance plan describing the required maintenance activities and tentative schedule.
18. Responsibility for Costs.
A. Except as otherwise specified herein, the Developer shall pay all costs incurred by it or the City
in conjunction with the development of the Subject Property including, but not limited to, Soil
and Water Conservation District charges, legal, planning, engineering and inspection expenses
incurred in connection with approval and acceptance of the subdivision and the plat, the
preparation of this Agreement and any amendments hereto, and all costs and expenses incurred
by the City in monitoring and inspecting the development of the Subject Property.
B. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers and employees harmless from claims made by
itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from plat or subdivision
approval and development of the Subject Property, except for any costs or expenses arising
from the negligence or other wrongful acts or omissions of the City, it’s agents, employees or
contractors. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers and employees for all costs,
damages or expenses that the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including
attorney’s fees.
C. The Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the preparation and enforcement of
this Agreement, including engineering and attorney’s fees. Upon request, the City shall provide
invoices, in reasonable detail, as to any such fees. The estimated City fees of $33,212 shall be
deposited with the City at the time this Agreement is signed, and represent the following
amounts:
$10,000 Engineering Review Fees (estimate)
$13,873 Construction Monitoring Fees (15% of construction estimate)
$2,000 Attorney Fees
$6,936 5% City Fees (based on construction estimate of $446,265)
$403 GIS Fees
$33,212 Total Amount Due
If the actual City fees exceed this estimate, the Developer shall pay the additional costs to the
City within ten (10) days of the request. If actual City fees are lower than this estimate, any
surplus funds will be returned to the developer when the project fund is reconciled and closed.
D. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under
this Agreement within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the City
may halt development work and construction including, but not limited to, the issuance of
Rosewood Crossing
June / 2017
G:\ENGPROJ\476\Subdivisionagreement - 476.docx Page 6 of 11
building permits for lots that the Developer may or may not have sold, until the bills are paid in
full. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of nine percent (9%)
per year.
E. The Developer shall pay all energy costs for street lights installed within the Subject Property.
19. The Developer agrees to pay fees, charges and assessments set forth in this Section prior to, or at the
time of execution of any plat by the City:
A. Storm Sewer Trunk Area Charges in the amount of $23,066
B. Sanitary Sewer Trunk Area Charges in the amount of $3,612
C. Watermain Trunk Area Charges in the amount of $21,840
Or other amounts for such fees as in effect at the time of plat approval.
20. The Developer understands that builders will be required to pay for the Subject Property fees, charges
and assessments in effect at the time of issuance of building permits. The rates for each of these items
will be set according to the current rate structure at the time the building permit is received. The fees,
charges, and assessments in effect as of the date of this agreement are:
A. Metropolitan Council Environmental Services Availability Charges per SAC unit (current rate is
$2,485).
B. Storm Sewer Connection Charges per single family unit and per multiple family unit (single
family currently at $770; multi-family currently at $290 per housing unit).
C. Sanitary Sewer Availability Charges per SAC unit (currently at $1,200/SAC unit).
D. Water Availability Charges per SAC unit (currently at $2,300/SAC unit for single family
residential and multi-family residential).
E. Park dedication fees in the amount of $2,500 per unit (total of $162,500 for Phase 1, which is 65
units x $2,500)
21. Building Permits. No occupancy permits shall be issued until:
A. The site grading is completed and approved by the City.
B. All utilities are tested, approved by the City Engineer, and in service.
C. All curbing is installed and backfilled.
D. The first lift of bituminous is in place and approved by the City.
E. All building permit fees are paid in full.
F. No early building permits will be issued.
The Developer, in executing this Agreement, assumes all liability and costs for damage or delays
incurred by the City in the construction of the Improvements caused by the Developer, its employees,
contractors, subcontractors, material men or agents. No occupancy permits shall be issued until the
streets and utilities referred to in paragraph 6 are installed and approved by the City (excluding the
final wear course of bituminous), unless otherwise authorized in writing by the City Engineer.
22. Record Drawings. At project completion, Developer shall submit record drawings of all public and
private infrastructure improvements in accordance with the City’s Engineering Guidelines. No
Rosewood Crossing
June / 2017
G:\ENGPROJ\476\Subdivisionagreement - 476.docx Page 7 of 11
securities will be fully released until all record drawings have been submitted and accepted by the City
Engineer.
23. Developer’s Default. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be
performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall
promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer is first
given notice of the work in default, not less than 48 hours in advance. This Agreement is a license for
the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a court order for permission to enter
the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, draw on
the letter of credit or other security described in section 10, or levy the cost in whole or in part as a
special assessment against the Subject Property. Developer waives its rights to notice of hearing and
hearing on such assessments and its right to appeal such assessments pursuant to Minnesota Statutes,
Section 429.081.
24. Miscellaneous.
A. The Developer represents to the City that the development of the Subject Property, the
subdivision and the plat comply with all city, county, metropolitan, state and federal laws and
regulations including, but not limited to: subdivision ordinances, zoning ordinances and
environmental regulations. If the City determines that the subdivision, or the plat, or the
development of the Subject Property does not comply, the City may, at its option, refuse to
allow construction or development work on the Subject Property until the Developer does
comply. Upon the City’s demand, the Developer shall cease work until there is compliance.
B. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Agreement.
C. Breach of the terms of this Agreement by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of building
permits, including lots sold to third parties.
D. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph or phase of this Agreement is for
any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of
this Agreement.
E. If building permits are issued prior to the completion and acceptance of the Improvements, the
Developer assumes all liability and costs resulting in delays in completion of the Improvements
and damage to the Improvements caused by the City, the Developer, its contractors,
subcontractors, material men, employees, agents or third parties.
F. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions
of this Agreement. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the
parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City’s failure to promptly
take legal action to enforce this Agreement shall not be a waiver or release.
G. This Agreement shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the subject
property. The Developer shall take such steps, including execution of amendments to this
Agreement, as are necessary to effect the recording hereof. After the Developer has completed
the work required of it under this Agreement, at the Developer’s request, the City will execute
and deliver to the Developer a release.
H. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to
every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to the
City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and
Rosewood Crossing
June / 2017
G:\ENGPROJ\476\Subdivisionagreement - 476.docx Page 8 of 11
remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and
in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to
exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy.
I. The Developer may not assign this Agreement without the written permission of the City
Council.
25. Notices. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to
the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by registered mail at the following
address:
Mr. Warren Israelson
KJ Walk, Inc.
6001 Egan Drive, Suite 100
Savage, MN 55378
952-226-3200
warren@kjwalk.com
Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Administrator, or
mailed to the City by registered mail in care of the City Administrator at the following address:
City Administrator
Rosemount City Hall
2875 145th Street West
Rosemount, Minnesota 55068
Rosewood Crossing
June / 2017
G:\ENGPROJ\476\Subdivisionagreement - 476.docx Page 9 of 11
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands the day and year first above
written.
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
BY:
William H. Droste, Mayor
BY:
Clarissa Hadler, City Clerk
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) SS
COUNTY OF DAKOTA )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of _____________________, 2017,
by William H. Droste, Mayor, and Clarissa Hadler, City Clerk, of the City of Rosemount, a Minnesota
municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City
Council.
Notary Public
KJ WALK, INC.
BY:
Its
BY:
Its
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) SS
COUNTY OF _____________)
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ______________________, 2017
by __ , its ______________________________________, and
_____________________________, its_________________________________ ________________ of
KJ Walk, Inc., a Florida corporation, on behalf of said corporation.
Notary Public
Drafted By:
City of Rosemount
2875 145th Street West
Rosemount, MN 55068
Rosewood Crossing
June / 2017
G:\ENGPROJ\476\Subdivisionagreement - 476.docx Page 10 of 11
EXHIBIT A
The following clarifies the various portions of the letter of credit for Developer Improvements that are
outlined in the Subdivision Agreement:
Survey Monumentation – An amount equal to 110% of the cost to monument all lots within the
development.
Landscaping – An amount equal to 110% of the cost to complete the minimum required landscaping. If
additional landscaping is planned, a surety for that cost is not required.
Street Lighting – An amount equal to 110% of the cost to complete the minimum required lighting. If
additional lighting is planned, a surety for that cost is not required ($4,000 per light has been used to
calculate this cost).
Buffer Monumentation – An amount equal to 110% of the cost to manufacture and install the necessary
buffer monumentation signs around all ponds and wetlands ($50 per sign has been used to calculate this
cost).
Rosewood Crossing
EXHIBIT B (Page 1 of 2)
No.Item Cost 110%Calculation
1 Grading and Erosion Control -$ -$ LOC received with Grading Permit
2 Pond Restoration and Erosion Control Removal -$ -$ N/A
3 Survey Monumentation 500$ 550$ $500/lot x 1 lot/parcel
4 Retaining Wall -$ N/A
5 Landscaping 19,200$ 21,120$ Per City Planner, 64 trees x $300
6 Street Lights 20,000$ 22,000$ 5 lights x $4000/light
7 Buffer Monumentation -$ N/A
8 Surface Improvements 50,000$ 62,500$ 125%
9 Water Main Improvements 38,005$ 47,506$ 125%
10 Sanitary Sewer Improvements 27,160$ 33,950$ 125%
11 Storm Sewer Improvements 23,560$ 29,450$ 125%
Total 178,425$ 217,076$
No.Item Cost
Estimated Construction Cost 138,725$
1 Engineering Review Fees 10,000$
2 Construction Monitoring Fees 13,873$
3 Attorney Fees 2,000$
4 5% City Administrative Fees 6,936$
5 Street Light Energy Cost -$
6 GIS Fees 403$
7 Trail Fog Seal -$
8 Seal Coating -$
Total 33,212$
No.Item Cost
1 Storm Sewer Trunk Charge 23,066$
2 Sanitary Sewer Trunk Charge 3,612$
3 Water Trunk Charge 21,840$
4 Stormwater Ponding Fee -$
Total 48,518$
No.Item Cost
1 Park Dedication 162,500$
Total 162,500$
Estimate
5% of Estimated Construction Cost
Developer responsible for ongoing electricity and maintenance
$120/acre x 3.36 acres
N/A
10% of Estimated Construction Cost
Letter of Credit for Developer Improvements (due with signed agreement)
City Fees (due with signed agreement)
Calculation
City Engineer Estimation
City Engineer Estimation
$6500/acre x 3.36 acres
N/A
Development Fees (due before signed plat is released)
65 units x $2,500 per unit
Development Fees (due with building permit application)
Calculation
Calculation
$6865/net developable acre 3.36 acres
$1075/acre x 3.36 acres
N/A
Phase Units Phase SQ FT Acres
1 65 1 146329.160 3.359
2 2 0.000
3 3 0.000
4 4 0.000
5 5 0.000
6 6 0.000
7 7 0.000
Total 65 0.000
0.000
Total Plat Area =3.36 acres 0.000
Total Park Area 0.00 acres 0.000
Future Plat Area =0.00 acres 0.000
Developable Area =3.36 acres *0.000
Ponding to HWL = 0.00 acres 0.000
Net Developable Area =3.36 acres 0.000
0.000
* Excludes future plat and park areas 0.000
0.000
Outlot A 0.000
Outlot B 0.000
Total Boundary 146329.160 3.359
Totals
Rosewood Crossing
June / 2017
G:\ENGPROJ\476\Subdivisionagreement - 476.docx Page 11 of 11
ATTACHMENT ONE
Rosewood Crossing
Final Plat
1011GARAGE 4B
8 STALLS- 963.50
GA
R
A
G
E
2
16 S
T
A
L
L
S
-
9
6
4
.
0
0
BLDG 1-32 UNITS
966.00
BLDG 3-32 UNIT
965.00
BLDG 4-32 UNIT
963.50
BLDG 5-32 UNIT
963.00
BLDG 2-32 UNIT
964.0
BLDG 7-32 UNIT
962.00
BLDG 6-32 UNIT
962.5016LEASING
OFFICE
969.25 18161119111118111311111311161109421011117110311168GARAGE 4A8 STALLS- 964.00GARAGE 3
16 STALLS- 964.68
GARAGE 616 STALLS- 962.50GARAGE 5
16 STALLS
-
9
6
3
.
0
0
GA
R
A
G
E
1
16 S
T
A
L
L
S 11A
DECORATIVE FENCE
A
M
A
M
M
A
A
L
L
L
A
DECORATIVE FENCE
M
DECORATIVE FENCE
15
"
R
C
P10
M 201020101020102020106A
L
M
11DECORATIVE FENCE
A
M
A
12020
20 15L
A
M
A
A
A
L
M
M
M
M
M
A
L
L
A
A
L1212M
L
A
A
M
L
M
AA
L
A
M
A
A
L
L
A14
A
A
A12
L
L
L L
L
A
LL
M
M
M
L L
A
M
2020
A
L
L
A
A
L
L
L
12 12
12202020
107201911DECORATIVE FENCE
DECORATIVE FENCE1 196123I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me,
or under my direct supervision, and that I am a
duly registered engineer under the laws of the
State of Minnesota.
Warren John Israelson
6001 Egan Drive, Ste 100, Savage, MN 55378
Phone: 952.226.3200 Web: www.kjwalk.com
Date:Revision:
Original
Registration #: 40175
Rosewood
Crossing
Rosemount, MN
SHEET 1 of 8
Date: 4/25/2017
0 50 100 150
FILE PATH: C:\Users\Skills\Documents\Projects\Rosemount\Rosewood Crossing\Engineering\CAD\DWGs\RWC-PhaseCover.dwg
Legend
Existing watermain
Proposed watermain
Existing sanitary
Proposed sanitary
Existing storm
Proposed storm
Existing hydrant
Proposed hydrant
Existing gate valve
Proposed gate valve
Existing manhole
Proposed manhole
Proposed catchbasin
Silt fence
Inlet protectors
Parking lot lights
Building Lights
Rip Rap
TYPICAL PARKING SPACE
(NOT TO SCALE)
BLDG
CONCRETE SIDEWALK6.5'4'17.5'8.5'
NOTES
LIGHTS ALSO INSTALLED ON EXTERIOR OF
BUILDINGS.
LAST SAVED: April 25, 2017
PARKING
REQUIRED
2 STALLS PER UNIT (225 UNITS)450
PROVIDED
GARAGE STALLS 113
PARKING STALLS 337
TOTAL 450
DUMPSTER LOCATION
WITH CONCRETE
BLOCK ENCLOSURE
PAVED ACCESS EASEMENT
DUMPSTER LOCATION
WITH CONCRETE
BLOCK ENCLOSURE
DUMPSTER LOCATION
WITH CONCRETE
BLOCK ENCLOSURE
DUMPSTER LOCATION
WITH CONCRETE
BLOCK ENCLOSURE
For Review
April 25,2017
04/25/13
Phasing Plan
Cover
PHASE 1
PHASE 3
PHASE 2
PHASE 5
PHASE 4
PHASE 6
PHASE 7
SHEET INDEX
1 Cover
2 Phase 1
3 Phase 2
4 Phase 3
5 Phase 4
6 Phase 5
7 Phase 6
8 Phase 7
BLDG 1-32 UNITS
966.00
LEASING
OFFICE
969.251
111811131113GA
R
A
G
E
1
16
S
T
A
L
L
S
A
DECORATIVE FENCE
A
M
A
L
DECORATIVE FENCE 1010101010106M
A
201212L
AA
L
A
M12 L
2020
12 12
12202020
20Temporary
Turn Around
R45
For Review
April 25,2017
I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me,
or under my direct supervision, and that I am a
duly registered engineer under the laws of the
State of Minnesota.
Warren John Israelson
6001 Egan Drive, Ste 100, Savage, MN 55378
Phone: 952.226.3200 Web: www.kjwalk.com
Date:
04/25/13
Revision:
Original
Phasing Plan
Phase 1
Registration #: 40175
Rosewood
Crossing
Rosemount, MN
SHEET 2 of 8
Date: 4/25/2017
0 50 100 150
FILE PATH: C:\Users\Skills\Documents\Projects\Rosemount\Rosewood Crossing\Engineering\CAD\DWGs\RWC-Phase1.dwg
TYPICAL PARKING SPACE
(NOT TO SCALE)
BLDG
CONCRETE SIDEWALK6.5'4'17.5'8.5'
DUMPSTER LOCATION
WITH CONCRETE
BLOCK ENCLOSURE
NOTES
LIGHTS ALSO INSTALLED ON EXTERIOR OF
BUILDINGS.
LAST SAVED: April 25, 2017
PARKING
REQUIRED
2 STALLS PER UNIT (33 UNITS)66
PROVIDED
GARAGE STALLS 17
PARKING STALLS 61
TOTAL 78
GA
R
A
G
E
2
16 S
T
A
L
L
S
-
9
6
4
.
0
0
BLDG 1-32 UNITS
966.00
BLDG 2-32 UNIT
964.0
LEASING
OFFICE
969.251
11118111311113116211GA
R
A
G
E
1
16
S
T
A
L
L
S
A
DECORATIVE FENCE
A
M
A
L
A
DECORATIVE FENCE
DECORATIVE FENCE 1010101010106M
1A
201212L
AA
L
A
M12 L
2020
12 12
12202020
10720Temporary
Turn Around
R45
I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me,
or under my direct supervision, and that I am a
duly registered engineer under the laws of the
State of Minnesota.
Warren John Israelson
6001 Egan Drive, Ste 100, Savage, MN 55378
Phone: 952.226.3200 Web: www.kjwalk.com
Date:Revision:
Original
Registration #: 40175
Rosewood
Crossing
Rosemount, MN
SHEET 3 of 8
Date: 4/25/2017
0 50 100 150
FILE PATH: C:\Users\Skills\Documents\Projects\Rosemount\Rosewood Crossing\Engineering\CAD\DWGs\RWC-Phase2.dwg
TYPICAL PARKING SPACE
(NOT TO SCALE)
BLDG
CONCRETE SIDEWALK6.5'4'17.5'8.5'
DUMPSTER LOCATION
WITH CONCRETE
BLOCK ENCLOSURE
NOTES
LIGHTS ALSO INSTALLED ON EXTERIOR OF
BUILDINGS.
LAST SAVED: April 25, 2017
PARKING
REQUIRED
2 STALLS PER UNIT (65 UNITS)130
PROVIDED
GARAGE STALLS 33
PARKING STALLS 97
TOTAL 130
For Review
April 25,2017
04/25/13
Phasing Plan
Phase 2
1GA
R
A
G
E
2
16
S
T
A
L
L
S
-
9
6
4
.
0
0
BLDG 1-32 UNITS
966.00
BLDG 3-32 UNIT
965.00
BLDG 2-32 UNIT
964.016LEASING
OFFICE
969.25 11111181113111131162111171011GARAGE 3
16 STALLS- 964.68
GA
R
A
G
E
1
16
S
T
A
L
L
S
A
DECORATIVE FENCE
A
M
A
M
A
L
L
A
DECORATIVE FENCE
DECORATIVE FENCE 10201020101020102020106L
M
1A
M
A
120201212 L
A
A
M
L
M
AA
L
A
M
1412L
2020
12 12
12202020
10720Phase 3 Gr
a
v
e
l
l
o
o
p Phase 3 Gravel loopPhase 3 Gravel loopI hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me,
or under my direct supervision, and that I am a
duly registered engineer under the laws of the
State of Minnesota.
Warren John Israelson
6001 Egan Drive, Ste 100, Savage, MN 55378
Phone: 952.226.3200 Web: www.kjwalk.com
Date:Revision:
Original
Registration #: 40175
Rosewood
Crossing
Rosemount, MN
SHEET 4 of 8
Date: 4/25/2017
0 50 100 150
FILE PATH: C:\Users\Skills\Documents\Projects\Rosemount\Rosewood Crossing\Engineering\CAD\DWGs\RWC-Phase3.dwg
TYPICAL PARKING SPACE
(NOT TO SCALE)
BLDG
CONCRETE SIDEWALK6.5'4'17.5'8.5'
DUMPSTER LOCATION
WITH CONCRETE
BLOCK ENCLOSURE
NOTES
LIGHTS ALSO INSTALLED ON EXTERIOR OF
BUILDINGS.
LAST SAVED: April 25, 2017
PARKING
REQUIRED
2 STALLS PER UNIT (97 UNITS)194
PROVIDED
GARAGE STALLS 49
PARKING STALLS 155
TOTAL 204
For Review
April 25,2017
04/25/13
Phasing Plan
Phase 3
11GARAGE 4B
8 STALLS- 963.50
GA
R
A
G
E
2
16
S
T
A
L
L
S
-
9
6
4
.
0
0
BLDG 1-32 UNITS
966.00
BLDG 3-32 UNIT
965.00
BLDG 4-32 UNIT
963.50
BLDG 2-32 UNIT
964.016LEASING
OFFICE
969.25 116191111811131111311621111711011GARAGE 4A8 STALLS- 964.00GARAGE 3
16 STALLS- 964.68
GA
R
A
G
E
1
16
S
T
A
L
L
S
A
DECORATIVE FENCE
A
M
A
M
A
A
L
L
L
A
DECORATIVE FENCE
DECORATIVE FENCE 10201020101020102020106A
L
M
1A
M
A
12020 15L
A
M
A
M
M
A
L
L
A
A1212
L
A
A
M
L
M
AA
L
A
M
1412L
2020
12 12
12202020
10720Phase 3 Gr
a
v
e
l
l
o
o
p 19Phase 3 Gravel loopI hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me,
or under my direct supervision, and that I am a
duly registered engineer under the laws of the
State of Minnesota.
Warren John Israelson
6001 Egan Drive, Ste 100, Savage, MN 55378
Phone: 952.226.3200 Web: www.kjwalk.com
Date:Revision:
Original
Registration #: 40175
Rosewood
Crossing
Rosemount, MN
SHEET 5 of 8
Date: 4/25/2017
0 50 100 150
FILE PATH: C:\Users\Skills\Documents\Projects\Rosemount\Rosewood Crossing\Engineering\CAD\DWGs\RWC-Phase4.dwg
TYPICAL PARKING SPACE
(NOT TO SCALE)
BLDG
CONCRETE SIDEWALK6.5'4'17.5'8.5'
DUMPSTER LOCATION
WITH CONCRETE
BLOCK ENCLOSURE
NOTES
LIGHTS ALSO INSTALLED ON EXTERIOR OF
BUILDINGS.
LAST SAVED: April 25, 2017
PARKING
REQUIRED
2 STALLS PER UNIT (129 UNITS)258
PROVIDED
GARAGE STALLS 65
PARKING STALLS 204
TOTAL 269
DUMPSTER LOCATION
WITH CONCRETE
BLOCK ENCLOSURE
PAVED ACCESS EASEMENT
For Review
April 25,2017
04/25/13
Phasing Plan
Phase 4
1011GARAGE 4B
8 STALLS- 963.50
GA
R
A
G
E
2
16
S
T
A
L
L
S
-
9
6
4
.
0
0
BLDG 1-32 UNITS
966.00
BLDG 3-32 UNIT
965.00
BLDG 4-32 UNIT
963.50
BLDG 5-32 UNIT
963.00
BLDG 2-32 UNIT
964.016LEASING
OFFICE
969.25 1161191111811131111131161109421111711011GARAGE 4A8 STALLS- 964.00GARAGE 3
16 STALLS- 964.68
GARAGE 5
16 STALLS
-
9
6
3
.
0
0
GA
R
A
G
E
1
16
S
T
A
L
L
S
A
DECORATIVE FENCE
A
M
A
M
M
A
A
L
L
L
A
DECORATIVE FENCE
DECORATIVE FENCE 10M 201020101020102020106A
L
M
1A
M
A
12020
20 15L
A
M
A
M
M
A
L
L
A
A
L1212M
L
A
A
M
L
M
AA
L
A
M
DECORATIVE FENCE1412L
L L
L
A2020
L
12 12
12202020
107201911DECORATIVE FENCE Phase 3 Gravel loopI hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me,
or under my direct supervision, and that I am a
duly registered engineer under the laws of the
State of Minnesota.
Warren John Israelson
6001 Egan Drive, Ste 100, Savage, MN 55378
Phone: 952.226.3200 Web: www.kjwalk.com
Date:Revision:
Original
Registration #: 40175
Rosewood
Crossing
Rosemount, MN
SHEET 6 of 8
Date: 4/25/2017
0 50 100 150
FILE PATH: C:\Users\Skills\Documents\Projects\Rosemount\Rosewood Crossing\Engineering\CAD\DWGs\RWC-Phase5.dwg
TYPICAL PARKING SPACE
(NOT TO SCALE)
BLDG
CONCRETE SIDEWALK6.5'4'17.5'8.5'
NOTES
LIGHTS ALSO INSTALLED ON EXTERIOR OF
BUILDINGS.
LAST SAVED: April 25, 2017
PARKING
REQUIRED
2 STALLS PER UNIT (161 UNITS)322
PROVIDED
GARAGE STALLS 81
PARKING STALLS 245
TOTAL 326
DUMPSTER LOCATION
WITH CONCRETE
BLOCK ENCLOSURE
DUMPSTER LOCATION
WITH CONCRETE
BLOCK ENCLOSURE
PAVED ACCESS EASEMENT
DUMPSTER LOCATION
WITH CONCRETE
BLOCK ENCLOSURE
For Review
April 25,2017
04/25/13
Phasing Plan
Phase 5
1011GARAGE 4B
8 STALLS- 963.50
GA
R
A
G
E
2
16
S
T
A
L
L
S
-
9
6
4
.
0
0
BLDG 1-32 UNITS
966.00
BLDG 3-32 UNIT
965.00
BLDG 4-32 UNIT
963.50
BLDG 5-32 UNIT
963.00
BLDG 2-32 UNIT
964.0
BLDG 6-32 UNIT
962.5016LEASING
OFFICE
969.25 181611191111181113111113116110942101111711011GARAGE 4A8 STALLS- 964.00GARAGE 3
16 STALLS- 964.68
GARAGE 616 STALLS- 962.50GARAGE 5
16 STALLS
-
9
6
3
.
0
0
GA
R
A
G
E
1
16
S
T
A
L
L
S
A
DECORATIVE FENCE
A
M
A
M
M
A
A
L
L
L
A
DECORATIVE FENCE
DECORATIVE FENCE 10M 201020101020102020106A
L
M
11A
M
A
12020
20 15L
A
M
A
M
M
M
A
L
L
A
A
L1212M
L
A
A
M
L
M
AA
L
A
M
14A
A12
L
L
L L
L
A2020
A
L
L
L
12 12
12202020
107201911DECORATIVE FENCE
DECORATIVE FENCE1 196Phase 3 Gravel loopI hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me,
or under my direct supervision, and that I am a
duly registered engineer under the laws of the
State of Minnesota.
Warren John Israelson
6001 Egan Drive, Ste 100, Savage, MN 55378
Phone: 952.226.3200 Web: www.kjwalk.com
Date:Revision:
Original
Registration #: 40175
Rosewood
Crossing
Rosemount, MN
SHEET 7 of 8
Date: 4/25/2017
0 50 100 150
FILE PATH: C:\Users\Skills\Documents\Projects\Rosemount\Rosewood Crossing\Engineering\CAD\DWGs\RWC-Phase6.dwg
TYPICAL PARKING SPACE
(NOT TO SCALE)
BLDG
CONCRETE SIDEWALK6.5'4'17.5'8.5'
NOTES
LIGHTS ALSO INSTALLED ON EXTERIOR OF
BUILDINGS.
LAST SAVED: April 25, 2017
PARKING
REQUIRED
2 STALLS PER UNIT (193 UNITS)386
PROVIDED
GARAGE STALLS 97
PARKING STALLS 289
TOTAL 386
DUMPSTER LOCATION
WITH CONCRETE
BLOCK ENCLOSURE
PAVED ACCESS EASEMENT
DUMPSTER LOCATION
WITH CONCRETE
BLOCK ENCLOSURE
DUMPSTER LOCATION
WITH CONCRETE
BLOCK ENCLOSURE
DUMPSTER LOCATION
WITH CONCRETE
BLOCK ENCLOSURE
For Review
April 25,2017
04/25/13
Phasing Plan
Phase 6
1011GARAGE 4B
8 STALLS- 963.50
GA
R
A
G
E
2
16
S
T
A
L
L
S
-
9
6
4
.
0
0
BLDG 1-32 UNITS
966.00
BLDG 3-32 UNIT
965.00
BLDG 4-32 UNIT
963.50
BLDG 5-32 UNIT
963.00
BLDG 2-32 UNIT
964.0
BLDG 7-32 UNIT
962.00
BLDG 6-32 UNIT
962.5016LEASING
OFFICE
969.25 181611191111181113111113111611094210111171103111GARAGE 4A8 STALLS- 964.00GARAGE 3
16 STALLS- 964.68
GARAGE 616 STALLS- 962.50GARAGE 5
16 STALLS
-
9
6
3
.
0
0
GA
R
A
G
E
1
16
S
T
A
L
L
S 11A
DECORATIVE FENCE
A
M
A
M
M
A
A
L
L
L
A
DECORATIVE FENCE
M
DECORATIVE FENCE 10M 201020101020102020106A
L
M
11DECORATIVE FENCE
A
M
A
12020
20 15L
A
M
A
A
A
L
M
M
M
M
M
A
L
L
A
A
L1212M
L
A
A
M
L
M
AA
L
A
M
A
A
L
L
A14
A
A
A12
L
L
L L
L
A
LL
M
M
M
L L
A
M
2020
A
L
L
A
A
L
L
L
12 12
12202020
107201911DECORATIVE FENCE
DECORATIVE FENCE1 196123I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me,
or under my direct supervision, and that I am a
duly registered engineer under the laws of the
State of Minnesota.
Warren John Israelson
6001 Egan Drive, Ste 100, Savage, MN 55378
Phone: 952.226.3200 Web: www.kjwalk.com
Date:Revision:
Original
Registration #: 40175
Rosewood
Crossing
Rosemount, MN
SHEET 8 of 8
Date: 4/25/2017
0 50 100 150
FILE PATH: C:\Users\Skills\Documents\Projects\Rosemount\Rosewood Crossing\Engineering\CAD\DWGs\RWC-Phase7.dwg
TYPICAL PARKING SPACE
(NOT TO SCALE)
BLDG
CONCRETE SIDEWALK6.5'4'17.5'8.5'
NOTES
LIGHTS ALSO INSTALLED ON EXTERIOR OF
BUILDINGS.
LAST SAVED: April 25, 2017
PARKING
REQUIRED
2 STALLS PER UNIT (225 UNITS)450
PROVIDED
GARAGE STALLS 113
PARKING STALLS 337
TOTAL 450
DUMPSTER LOCATION
WITH CONCRETE
BLOCK ENCLOSURE
PAVED ACCESS EASEMENT
DUMPSTER LOCATION
WITH CONCRETE
BLOCK ENCLOSURE
DUMPSTER LOCATION
WITH CONCRETE
BLOCK ENCLOSURE
DUMPSTER LOCATION
WITH CONCRETE
BLOCK ENCLOSURE
For Review
April 25,2017
04/25/13
Phasing Plan
Phase 7
5" CASING
LP LAP 6" REVEAL
COVERED VENT
LP LAP 4" REVEAL
SINGLE DOOR WITH SIDELITES
IN COVERED ENTRY
STONE VENEER
LP SHINGLES
ASPHALT SHINGLES
LP LAP 6" REVEAL
LP LAP 4" REVEAL
STONE VENEER
5" CASING
COVERED VENT
ASPHALT SHINGLES
LP LAP 6" REVEAL
5" CASING
LP SHINGLES
COVERED VENT
LP LAP 4" REVEAL
COVERED VENT
LP LAP 4" REVEAL
5" CASING
LP SHINGLES
STONE VENEERSTONE VENEER
LP LAP 6" REVEAL
ASPHALT SHINGLESASPHALT SHINGLES
24'.+/Á
(4106'.'8#6+10 Á
4'#4'.'8#6+10 Á'ICP&TKXG5VG5CXCIG/02JQPG 9GD YYYMLYCNMEQO4+)*6'.'8#6+10 Á.'(6'.'8#6+10 Á#22#46/'065)#4#)'524'.+/Á
5KFKPI
5VQPG
4GXKUGFÁ
ÁÁÁ
ÁÁ
ÁÁÁ
ÁÁ
Á
ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ
Á
Á
ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ
:18*&4:18*&4:18*&4:18*&4:18*&4:18*&4:18*&4:18*&4:18*&4:18*&4:18*&4:18*&4:18*&4:18*&4:18*&4:18*&4ÁÁ
ÁÁÁ
&7/256'4'0%.1574'
%10%4'6'/#5104;70+6
:%10%(6)5
:64'#6'&5+..2.#6 Á)4#07.#4(+..
&4#+06+.'
95+.641%-
#.7/(#5%+#
);2$1#4&
#52*#.65*+0).'5
('.6
5*'#6*+0)
411(64755'5
#.7/8'06'&51((+6 4Á+057.#6+10
'0'4);*''.
)4#&'
2174'&%10%9#..
94'$#42'4%1&'
*14+<.#25+&+0)
9'#6*'4$#44+'4
5647%65*'#6*+0)
:567&5"1%
);2$1#4&4Á25+
4+&)+&+057.
LP SHINGLES
CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT
STONE VENEER
ASPHALT SHINGLES
LP LAP 6" REVEAL
STONE VENEER
LP LAP 6" REVEAL
8'X7' GARAGE DOORSDUMPSTER ENCLOSURE
CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT
DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE
CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT
LP LAP 6" REVEALASPHALT SHINGLES
DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE
CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT
#22#46/'065)#4#)'54'#4'.'8#6+10 Á
(170+102.#0 Á'ICP&TKXG5VG5CXCIG/02JQPG 9GD YYYMLYCNMEQO4'#4'.'8#6+10 Á.'(6'.'8#6+10 Á4+)*6'.'8#6+10 Á
911&567&(4#/+0)
)4155#4'# 53(6
24'.+/Á
24'.+/Á
(.1142.#0 Á
411(2.#0 Á6;2+%#.)#4#)'9#..5'%6+10 Á
6QVCN5VQPG
5KFKPI
5VQPG
4GXKUGFÁ
STONE VENEER
LP LAP 6" REVEAL
LP SHINGLES
DOUBLE DOORS
IN COVERED ENTRY DOUBLE DOORS
IN COVERED ENTRY
ASPHALT SHINGLES
ASPHALT SHINGLES
5" CASING
LP LAP 6" REVEAL
STONE VENEER
LP LAP 4" REVEAL
LP SHINGLES
COVERED VENT
LP LAP 6" REVEAL
5" CASING
LP LAP 4" REVEAL
COVERED VENT
LP LAP 6" REVEAL
STONE VENEER
.'#5+0)1((+%'/#+06#0%'2#46;411/%#4'6#-'4#22#46/'06(4106'.'8#6+10 Á
4'#4'.'8#6+10 Á4+)*6'.'8#6+10 Á.'(6'.'8#6+10 Á'ICP&TKXG5VG5CXCIG/02JQPG 9GD YYYMLYCNMEQO24'.+/Á
24'.+/Á
5KFKPI
5VQPG
4GXKUGFÁ
ExposedPicketDesignsCoveredPicketDesignsSpecialtyDesignsWireFenceDesignsMatch the styles seen here with actual product installations on our website at www.jerith.comREV011414ORNAMENTAL Fencesof Distinction™American SeriesLibertyECONOMYHEAVY DUTYResidentialAeroRegencyIndustrialEP-1These designs have no top rail, and are classic “wrought iron” designs that have been used for over 100 years.A smooth top rail makes these styles perfect around pools. These are our most popular designs because of this. Their aluminum construction makes them ideal for pool enclosures since they can never rust.These fences have a narrower space between the pickets to keep pets inside your yard. The spacing also makes it very difficult for children to obtain a foothold on the fence.Jerith’s Patriot line of wire fence is a great alternative to aluminum fence that’s strong, but has a more subtle visual presence that blends in with the environment.To see our full line of wire fence alternatives, download the Patriot Wire Fence Style Guide ALUMINUM FENCEWIRE FENCEFINIALS, GATES, ARBORS AND LATCHESJerith has a wide variety of scrolls, finials and other items to accent your Jerith fence. Gates are also available to match any of our fence designs, and we have aluminum arbors to highlight a walkway or gate into your yard. ACCESSORIESAVAILABLE GRADESAligned pickets Staggered pickets Aligned pickets with finialsAligned pickets withflush bottom railAligned pickets with finialsand flush bottom railEP-2EP-3EP-5EP-6CP-1Aligned pickets Staggered pickets Staggered pickets with finialsAligned picketswith flush bottom railStaggered picketswith flush bottom railCP-2CP-3CP-4CP-5Two rail designCP-6SP-1Aligned pickets with top rail Staggered pickets with top rail Aligned pickets Pickets with top rail andcombination picket spacingLoops and open picketsSP-2SP-3SP-4EP-4Technical specifications are available on our website with available heights and accessories.Jerith Manufacturing Company, Inc.14400 McNulty Road, Philadelphia, PA 19154215-676-4068 • Fax 215-676-9756Call Toll Free 800-344-2242ALUMINUM FENCESTYLE GUIDE
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2016 - 85
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD)
MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN WITH REZONING FOR
ROSEWOOD COMMONS
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department of the City of Rosemount received an
application from Copperhead Development Inc. and Warren Israelson requesting a Planned Unit
Development (PUD) Master Development Plan with Rezoning concerning property legally
described as:
Lot 1 Block 1 of the Greif Addition
Together with:
Lot 1 Block 2 of the Rosewood Village 3`d Addirion;Dakota County,Minnesota.
WHEREAS, on November 22, 2016,the Planning Cotni ussion of the City of Rosemount held a
public hearing and reviewed the PUD Master Development Plan; and
WHEREAS, on November 22, 2016, the Planning Con unission recommended approval of the
PUD Master Development Plan, subject to conditions; and
WHEREAS, on December 20, 2016, the City Council of the City of Rosemount reviewed the
Planning Coinmissiods recommendations.
NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Council of the City of Rosemount hereby
approves the Planned Unit Development Master Plan with the rezoning of the property from BP-
Business Park and R1-Low Density Residential, subject to the following conditions:
a) Execution of a PUD Agreement.
b) Approval of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment reguiding the property to HDR
c) The preliminary development plans are approved for no more than seven apartment
buildings and 225 dwelling units. However, final approval for a seventh apartment building
32 additional units) is subject to completion of a parking study after construction of the
third apartment building in development phase three. If the City Council finds that adequate
parking has been provided for the all existing structures, the seventh unit may be
incorporated as shown in the preliminary development plans. If the City Council determines
that there is a parking shortage, the preliminary plans will be amended to eliminate a
building,anticipated as building number three (Phase 5) from the plans.
d) A deviation from City Code Section 11-6-1H to allow the office and public gathering space
to share parking otherwise required for the apartment use.
e) Payment in lieu of replacement trees up to $11,700 should there be no additional reasonable
locations for tree plantings.
The developer shall consider the use of sound insulating materials for portions of any
buildings that will be facing the railroad right-of-way.
RESOLUTION 2016-`
g) Incorporation of recommendations from the City Engineer in a review memorandum dated
November 22,2016 relative to drainage,grading, street design,easements,utilities and the
adjacent sidewalks.
h) Pay a fee in lieu of park land dedication for 225 units consistent with the most recent fee
schedule as adopted by the City Council. The payment of these fees shall be collected at the
time a building permit is issued for each building.
i) Construction of the emergency vehicle access connecting to Lower 147`' Court West must
be completed as part of the fourth phase. Maintenance of the emergency vehicle access
through the railroad spur and up to the Lower 147' Court West cul-de-sac shall be the
responsibiliry of the developer and/or the Rosewood Crossing HOA. These maintenance
responsibilities will include snow removal, signage,pavement markings, and other
requirements specified in Resolution No. 2010-44 approving the Rosewood Village Third
Addition.
j) Provision of contact information for the caretaker or other responsible party in the absence
of a caretaker must be submitted to the city.
k) The applicant is responsible for reconstruction of shared access drive with El Dorado
Packaging and all costs associated with this construction.
1) Repair and maintenance of all private trails and sidewalks are the responsibility of the
developer and/or homeowners association(s). Snow removal from all public and private
trails and sidewalks shall be the responsibility of the developer and/or homeowners
association(s.
m) Entry monuments shall be subject to sign permits and normal zoning standards.Appropriate
sight distances must be maintained.
n) The applicant shall obtain final site and building plan approval from the City prior to any
site work or issuance of building permit. The Plans should address the following items:
The construction and installation of the decorative fence shall coincide with the
timing of construction of apartment buildings within each phase. Submission of
details for the decorative fence prior to the approval of a final plan for the first
phase.
Submission of finallandscape plan that meets ordinance criteria for site and
foundation plantings,landscape screening and buffering. includes:
Realignment of the sidewalk at least four feet from parking and driving areas when
said sidewalk is not located in front of a building. Sidewalks adjacent to parking areas
shall be increased to 7 feet.
Revision of the main entrance road to include sufficient vehicle stacking areas as
required by the City Engineer.
All garbage storage areas and dumpsters must meet City ordinance standards for
construction and screening,including fire code separarion requirements.
Submission of detailed plans for the playground area.
2
RESOLUTION 2016-
A Final Phasing Plan that addresses installation of landscaping,paving,utilities, and
parking. A temporary turn-around shall be provided on the site prior to the
construction of the second or any subsequent apartment buildings. No more than
three of the apartment buildings may be constructed before the emergency vehicle
access,with curbing on both sides through the adjacent parking lot,providing a
connection to Lower 147`'' Court West is installed and connected to the built
porrions of the site.
Exterior building materials are limited to no more than 60%lap siding not including
doors and windows.All other primary materials will be limited to brick or natural
stone. Final architectural plans shall be submitted with any final PUD development
plans. The final development plans shall include exterior material samples and colors.
A lighting plan that includes details about parking lot lighting standards and a
photometric plan which conforms to the City's lighting ordinance.
ADOPTED this 20`'' day of December,2016, by the City Council of the City o osemount.
William H. Droste,Mayor
ATTEST:
larissa adler, City Clerk
3
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 23, 2017
TO: Kyle Klatt, Senior Planner
CC: Kim Lindquist, Community Development Director
John Morast, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Amy Roudebush, Planning and Personnel Secretary
FROM: Mitch Hatcher, Project Engineer
RE: Rosewood Crossing Engineering Review
SUBMITTAL:
Prepared by KJ Walk, Rosewood Crossing dated July 18, 2016, updated January 10, 2017. The
review comments were generated from the following documents included in the submittal:
Plan comprised of the following:
▫ Site Plan
▫ Grading & Erosion Control Plan (Updated 5/15/17)
▫ Utility Plan
▫ Landscape Plan
▫ Details
▫ Phasing Plan (Updated 4/25/17)
GENERAL COMMENTS:
1. Development fees are required based on the current Schedule of Rates and Fees. The
estimated development fees are listed below:
Storm Sewer Trunk Charge: $ 6,865 / acre
Sanitary Sewer Trunk Charge: $ 1,075 / acre
Watermain Trunk Charge: $ 6,500 / acre
2. A Subdivision Agreement will be required for the installation of public utilities. The city is
currently preparing the agreement. The agreement will go to council for approved at the
same time as the final plat.
3. Existing conditions and removal plan should be included for review.
4. Typical cross section and pavement sections should be provided for the drive and parking
areas.
5. The developer is required to obtain a NPDES construction Stormwater Permit and provide
a copy of the approved SWPPP to the City prior to the start of any construction activity.
6. Street and utility construction shall be installed in accordance with the 2015 City of
Rosemount General Specifications and Standard Detail Plates and the Engineering
Guidelines.
7. Final construction plans and specifications for street and utilities should be submitted to the
City for review.
8. City inspection of utility installation is required during construction.
9. Upon completion of the sanitary sewer, watermain, and storm sewer construction, the City
requires record drawings. See Engineering Guidelines for submittal and formatting
requirements.
UTILITY COMMENTS:
10. All required agreements with the railroad for the utility crossings should be secured by the
developer.
11. Developer is responsible for obtaining MPCA Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit and MDH
Watermain Permit.
12. Hydrant spacing should be approved by the Fire Marshal.
13. Watermain is required to be DIP CL 52.
14. Existing sanitary stub provided at Lower 147th Ct is 8” not 10”.
STORMWATER COMMENTS:
15. Two-foot sump catch basin is required prior to discharging to Pond A.
16. It is recommended that street grades are a minimum of 1.0%. Several locations show street
grades to be less than 1.0%.
17. It is recommended catch basins are placed in the curb line to collect drainage. Some are
shown in the parking stalls and drive lanes.
18. Additional catch basins may be required. Inlets are generally required every 300’. Inlets
should be located such that 3 cfs is the maximum flow at the inlet for the 10-yr design event
and does not exceed the applicable spread and run design.
Should you have any questions or comments regarding the items listed above, please contact me at
651-322-2015.