HomeMy WebLinkAbout5.a. Rosemount Woods Site PlanEXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Planning Commission Meeting Date: July 25, 2017
Tentative City Council Meeting Date: August 15, 2017
AGENDA ITEM: Case 17-31-SP Rosemount Woods
Site Plan Approval to Allow Construction of
a 6,188 Square Foot Addition to an Existing
Building at 14640 Diamond Path.
AGENDA SECTION:
Public Hearing
PREPARED BY: Kyle Klatt, Senior Planner
AGENDA NO. 5.a.
ATTACHMENTS: Location Map; Site Survey (Existing
Conditions); Site Development Plans: Site
Plan, Building Plans, Building Elevations,
3D Drawings, Location Map, Façade
Materials, Landscape Plan, Lighting Plan;
Broback Industrial Park Final Plat.
APPROVED BY: KJL
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to approve the site plan and building design
review for Rosemount Woods to allow the construction of a 6,188 square foot addition
to the existing building at 14640 Diamond Path, subject to the following conditions:
1. Submission of a landscape security equal to one hundred and ten percent
(110%) of the total cost of the plantings.
2. Provide an additional four coniferous trees along eastern property boundary
and four along the northern property boundary (a total of eight) to provide a
more effective screen from the residential properties adjacent to the project site.
3. Update the landscape plan to include the required 28 foundation plantings per
the landscape ordinance.
4. All storm water drainage shall be directed towards the storm water retention
area south of the building, and no storm water runoff will be directed on to any
adjacent residential lots.
5. Submission of an erosion control and restoration plan.
SUMMARY
The Planning Commission is being asked to conduct a site plan and building design review to allow
construction of a 6,188 square foot addition to the Rosemount Woods cabinet and cabinetry business
at 14640 Diamond Path. Rosemount Woods manufactures custom cabinets for home owners and
builders, and the existing building includes a small office area, manufacturing area, and warehouse.
The proposed addition would facilitate the expansion of all three of these areas; however, the bulk of
the new space would be devoted to additional warehouse/storage space. Staff is recommending
approval of the request subject to the conditions of approval listed in this report.
2
BACKGROUND
Applicant & Property Owner(s): Rosemount Woods, Inc./Joe Michalski
Location: Lot 5, Block 1 of Broback Industrial Park; 14640 Diamond
Path
Area in Acres: 1.2 Acres (52,306 square feet)
Comp. Guide Plan Designation: LDR – Low Density Residential
Current Zoning: IP – Industrial Park
The subject site was originally platted as part of the Broback Industrial Park in 1973 that created
industrial lots along Diamond Path from what is currently 145th Street West all the way to Upper 148th
Street West. Only one of these industrial lots was ever developed for a manufacturing use (the subject
site, with the original building built in 1976), while the lot immediately to the south of the subject
property was platted as an outlot and is currently used as a City-owned storm water retention pond.
All of the other property along Diamond Path was re-platted in the late 1990’s into single family lots
that have subsequently been developed as residences. The Rosemount Woods manufacturing facility
is now surrounded by single-family residential uses on all sides except the southern property boundary
next to the City pond site.
Although all of the properties in the immediate area around the applicant’s site are single-family
residential homes, there are two churches located further north and south along Diamond Path within
1,000 feet of the Rosemount Woods property. The Diamond Path Elementary school is also located
roughly 700 feet away at the intersection of 145th Street and Diamond Path. Due to its location along
Diamond Path, the property abuts the City boundary with the City of Apple Valley. All of the Apple
Valley properties west of Diamond Path, with the exception of the school site, have been developed
for single family residences.
The current Rosemount Woods building is 6,175 square feet in size and includes a combination of
space devoted to office, manufacturing, and warehousing/storage. As a custom cabinet manufacturer,
there is a lot of cutting, milling, and sanding of wood products that takes place on the premises, and
the building is equipped with a bag house to collect and store the sawdust and other byproducts from
the processing. The bag house is located essentially in the middle of the property, and is currently
buffered to the north by the building. The building includes three larger service doors, one of which
provides direct access to the manufacturing area, while the other two doors open up into the
warehouse for loading finished products onto delivery trucks. All overhead doors are presently facing
south toward the City outlot. The current parking lot provides space for 14 vehicles, although the
applicant has indicated that the parking demand rarely, if ever, approaches this number.
Due in large measure to the lack of space for storing finished products, the applicant is asking to
expand his current building in order to keep up with a strong demand for his cabinets. The proposed
addition would add 6,188 square feet of space to the building, doubling the size of the overall facility.
This additional space would allow for modest increases in the office and manufacturing portions of
the building, with the bulk of the additional space being used to increase warehouse space. The new
portion of the building would extend east from the present building and create a new leg that will
close off the parking area and bag house from adjacent residential properties to the east. The parking
area in front of the building is large enough to accommodate the parking requirements for the various
activities within the facility, so no major increase in the paved area in front of the building is proposed.
The bag house will also not be altered, either in terms of its size or location. No extensive grading is
required to construct the addition, and the site plan shows minimal grading to accommodate the
expansion.
3
A quick summary of the existing and proposed building usage is as follows:
Existing (sf) % Proposed (sf) %
Office 975 16% 1376 11%
Manufacturing 1984 32% 2995 24%
Warehouse 3212 52% 7960 65%
Total 6171 100% 12,331 100%
Site Plan and Design Review
The purpose of a site plan review is to evaluate each project as it relates to the performance and site
design standards of the zoning ordinance. Site plan approval is required for all commercial,
industrial, institutional and multi-family development projects. In this case, the applicant is
proposing to construct a 6,188 square foot industrial building expansion that is subject to the site
plan review process.
Site plan applications are approved by the Planning Commission and considered a Quasi-Judicial
action. As such, the City has a set of standards and requirements for review. Generally, if a site plan
application meets the ordinance requirements it must be approved. These standards are outlined in
Section 11-4-20 (Industrial Park District) and 11-10-3 (Site and Building Plan Review). The
Planning Commission is the final authority for approval of site plans.
Land Use & Zoning. The subject property is guided for Low Density Residential in accordance
with the 2030 Future Land Use Plan. This designation is consistent with the surrounding land uses
(and reflective of the late 1990’s re-platting of the area), but is not an exact match for the historic
and current use of the property. One of the unique aspects of this property is that it has retained a
zoning designation of IP – Industrial Park, and is the only property left in the City zoned in this
manner. The IP zoning was phased out when the City adopted the newer BP – Business Park
District, and the two share common features in terms of allowed uses and the prohibition against
outside processing or storage. There is no current future land designation for Industrial Park in the
Comprehensive Plan, and the subject site is much too small to be considered for designation under
the City’s Business Park category (which is intended to promote large job generators in business
parks larger than 150 acres).
Given the unique characteristics of the site, land use, and zoning, staff has found that the continued
use of the property under the IP zoning standards is acceptable and consistent with the overall
purpose and intent of the Comprehensive Plan. In particular, a manufacturing use on the property
has been in existence for over 40 continuous years, and pre-dates any other use in the immediate
area. The use conforms to all applicable zoning requirements, and is also consistent with the
purpose statement for the IP zoning district which reads as follows: “this district is intended to
accommodate new, modern, high performance, light industrial uses which are planned as a unit and
include an internal circulation system. This district is located within the MUSA and is intended to be
served by the public utility systems. Uses shall be conducted completely within structures except as
provided for herein”.
4
One of the key factors differentiating this situation, where the zoning and guiding are inconsistent,
with recent applications before the Commission is the historic use of the property for a
manufacturing business. Because the use has been in existence on the site for a considerable
amount of time, the Planning Commission is not being asked to make a determination of whether or
not introduction of a new use on the property is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Instead,
the Commission is only being asked to decide whether or not the expansion is consistent with the
Plan (which is a zoning standard, not a land use question). The use is considered a legal use of the
property and is allowed as a permitted activity under the City’s zoning regulations. The applicant is
not asking to establish a new use on the property; therefore, the site plan review for the expansion is
consistent with the past and current activity on the property. In other words, if there were no
established use on the property, any findings concerning consistency with the Comprehensive Plan
would be evaluated differently by staff.
Lot and Building Standards. The proposed manufacturing use is listed as a permitted use in the
City’s IP – Industrial Park zoning district. Unlike other similar zoning districts; however, the IP
District does not contain any specific development standards for uses within the district. Staff is
therefore recommending that the Planning Commission review the proposed request for consistency
with the next closest zoning designation of BP – Business Park, in which case the proposed
development meets or exceeds all of these requirements. The lot and building standards for the BP
district are detailed in the table below:
Building Performance Standards for the BP – Business Park District
(for review of an IP District proposal)
Standard Required Proposed
Minimum Lot Size One acre 1.2 acres
Front (West) 30 ft. 37 ft.
Side (North) – Buffer Setback 30 ft. or 2x building height =
40 ft.
42 ft.
Side (South) 10 ft.24 ft.
Rear (East) – Buffer Setback 30 ft. or 2x building height =
48 ft.
51 ft.
Maximum Lot Coverage 75% Approx. 35%
Exterior Building Materials. Consistent with the previous section, staff is recommending that the
Planning Commission review the proposed development for consistency with the BP District site
and building standards since none are specifically referenced in the IP District requirements. Using
these standards as a basis for the exterior building material requirements, please note the following
comments from staff:
Architectural Appearance – Entry Features. The City’s building standards require building
entrances facing a public right-of-way or required parking area to be accented by visually
pleasing entry features. The applicant is proposing to reconfigure the entrance of the
existing building to include additional window space and to move the main entrance from
the west side of the building to the south side. Along with the installation of a new awning
over the entrance, the proposed building modifications will help bring the existing portion of
the building closer to the ordinance requirements. Please note that the ordinance requires a
building entry feature of at least 300 feet in the BP District, which is not feasible with this
project since the overall building length is only 230 feet at its widest dimension. An entrance
5
into the new addition is also proposed with similar architectural treatment with an awning.
Corner Architecture. The Ordinance encourages architectural elements to define the edges of a
building. The proposed building plans incorporate metal and wood awnings that will wrap
around certain corners of the building, and include a metal cap at the roof line to define the
upper edge of the building. While there are no specific corner elements proposed, the overall
building design will extend a smooth concrete band around all sides of the building and help
define each of the corners for the new addition.
Building Massing. The City’s design standards require facades to be articulated to reduce their
mass and scale and provide visual interest consistent with Rosemount's identity, character,
and scale. The proposed structure includes some articulation (in the form of a four foot
extension of the wall) to break up the 84-foot length of the eastern wall. In addition, the
building has been off-set from where it will connect to the existing facility, providing
additional articulation along the northern side of the structure. The new addition will also
vary in height from 20 feet in the north to 24 feet in the south, providing further articulation
of the roof line.
Permitted Materials. The exterior wall surfaces, except for windows, of all buildings shall be
constructed of brick, natural stone, specialty integral colored concrete block (including
textured, burnished, and rock faced block), tile (masonry, stone or clay), architectural
textured concrete panels cast in place, precast concrete panels or better. Unadorned concrete
is prohibited. The exterior walls of the proposed addition will be comprised of a raked
concrete surface with two smooth concrete bands wrapping around the entire structure.
Accent materials will consist of a metal cap at the roof line and a metal and wood awning
above building entrances. All of the proposed materials are considered permitted under the
City’s building design standards for the BP District.
Access & Parking. The Zoning Ordinance requires that new (or expanded) uses provide a certain
number of parking stalls based on the parking schedule found in Section 11-6-1 of the City Code.
The applicant has provided a parking analysis using this schedule, with counts for each specific
activity listed on the site plan. In total, the Zoning Ordinance requires 21 parking stall for the office,
manufacturing, and warehouse activities taking place, and the applicant is proposing to provide 21
stalls in accordance with the proposed site plan. The proposed parking layout does not designate
accessible stalls which will need to be modified to comply with state requirements. The facility is
under the minimum size for which a dedicated loading facility would need to be provided.
Landscaping. The City’s landscape ordinance (Section 11-6-3) requires that new developments
include a minimum number of trees based on the size of the site and exterior dimensions of the
building. For the site under consideration, staff is estimating that the area surrounding the new
addition is approximately 20,000 square feet in area (or roughly 1/3 of the lot) and is only using the
perimeter of the new addition in the calculations. These requirements, and the amount provided on
the landscape plan, are as follows:
Trees Requirement: 1 tree per 3,000 square feet of land area
Trees Required/Provided 7/8
Foundation Plantings Requirement: 1 per 10 feet of building perimeter
Foundation Plants Required/Provided: 28/0
6
While the proposed landscape plan exceeds the general ordinance requirements, the plan does not
include any specific foundation plantings. The plan should be updated to include the required
minimum number of such plantings.
In addition to the general landscape requirements, when a buffer yard is required under the BP
District standards (which are being used in lieu of specific IP District standards), and zoning
ordinance specifies that: “this area shall contain landscaping and berming to provide a ninety percent
(90%) opacity screen to a height of at least six feet (6') and shall not contain any structures, parking,
off street loading or storage”. With that standard in mind, staff is recommending the planting of
additional coniferous trees above and beyond the landscaping provided in the attached plan.
Specifically, it is recommended that at least four more trees to the north and east of the proposed
addition be installed.
Staff is not recommending any additional parking lot landscaping since the proposed parking area is
already improved with a paved surface.
A landscape letter of credit for 110% of the site landscaping will also be required.
Signage. The site does not include any business signage, and the proposed plans do not depict any
building or free standing signage. If signage is added to the building, the applicant will need to
secure a separate sign permit.
Exterior Lighting. The applicant has submitted a photometric lighting plan for the entire site,
taking into account four lights on the existing structure and two new lights that will be added to the
addition. There are no freestanding pole lights proposed, and all lights will be located on walls
facing away from adjacent residential uses. The photometric plan demonstrated compliance with
the City’s lighting standards for off-site intensity of lighting.
Trash Enclosure. The development plans do not include any exterior garbage collection areas
outside of the bag house. There is a separate collection structure for sawdust and other debris
associated with this structure.
Engineering. The City Engineer has reviewed the proposed development plans and does not
identify any areas of specific concern. He has noted that all storm water runoff should be directed
away from neighboring properties and towards the City’s storm water retention area south of the
project site and that an erosion control and restoration plan must be submitted prior to the start f
construction. The ponding area can accommodate the additional hard surface and resulting run off.
Lot Development Fees. The City has adopted a fee schedule that includes various access charges
that apply any development of the subject property. The applicant will be required to pay any
applicable fees associated with the expansion at the time at the time a building permit is issued (for
any increase in the number of SAC units); these fees include the following:
Met Council Sewer Availability Charge: $2,485 per SAC unit as determined by MCES (Met
Council Environmental Services)
City Sanitary Sewer Availability Charge: $1,200 per SAC unit
City Water Availability Charge (if there are any changes to the meter on the site): Based on
size of meter, ranging from $9,800 to $44,150
Storm Water Connection Charge: $2,270 per acre ($1,975 for 0.87 acres)
7
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the site plan and building design review for Rosemount Woods to
allow the construction of a 6,188 square foot addition to the existing cabinet and cabinetry business
at 14640 Diamond Path. This recommendation is based on the plan submitted by the applicant, the
findings made in this report and the conditions outlined in the Recommended Actions section
above.
ROSEMOUNT WOODS
Property Information
Ju ly 1 4, 2017
0 450 900225 ft
0 130 26065 m
1:4,800
Disclaimer: Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not guaranteed. This is not a legal document and should not be substituted for a title search,appraisal, survey, or for zoning verification.
DATE:REVISIONS:JOB NO:SHEET NO:2723 Harriet Ave. Minneapolis, MN 55408612.685.0929craftdesignbuild.worksPID # 2206426048ProjectARCH D06/26/17 - SITE PLAN REVIEW6/27/2017 10:57:59 AMA000170606Issue DateRosemount Woods AdditionTITLE PAGE14640 Diamond Path, Rosemount, MNSheet ListSheetNumberSheet NameA000 TITLE PAGEA009 SITE PLANSA100 FOUNDATION PLANA102 MAIN LEVELA104 ROOF PLANA201 NORTH/SOUTHELEVATIONSA202 EAST/WEST ELEVATIONSA301 SECTIONSA901 3DA902 3DA903 AREA MAPSA905 FACADE TREATMENT -PRECASTL100 PROPOSED LANDSCAPEPLANL101 LIGHTING PLANX000 XXXXX001 XXXXX002 XXXXX003 XXXXALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO CENTER OF INTERIOR WALLS / FACE OF FRAMING ON EXTERIOR WALLS AND CONCRETE FOUNDATION WALLS-ALL CEILINGS TO BE 5/8" DRYWALL -TAPED, MUDDED, SANDED, PRIMED & PAINTED W/SMOOTH FINISH -ALL WALLS TO BE 1/2" DRYWALL -TAPED, MUDDED, SANDED, PRIMED & PAINTED W/SMOOTH FINISH-ALL WINDOWS SHOW AS TWO UNITS TO BE MULLED INTO ONE UNIT BY WINDOW MANUFACTURER.-OPTIONAL -ACOUSTIC WALL PARTITIONS (BATT INSUL) BETWEEN ALL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SPACES, AROUND ALL BATHROOMS, AND AROUND ALL BEDROOMS, ACOUSTICALLY INSULATE ALL DRAIN LINES-TYPICAL WINDOW HEADER TO BE 2-2x10 U.N.O. w/ (1)-2x8 TRIMMER STUD AND (1)-2X8 KING STUD, UNO.-ROUGH OPENING OF WINDOWS TO BE VERIFIED BY CONTRACTOR-HEAD HEIGHT OF ALL WINDOWS TO BE 6'11' HEADER HEIGHT UNLESS OTHERWISE NETED. GREAT ROOM WINDOWS DO NOT APPLY TO THIS NOTE.-ALL DOORS TO BE 6' 8" U.N.O.-STAIR RISE TO BE NO MORE THAN 7 3/4" AND RUN TO BE NO LESS THAN 10"-MIN. HEAD HEIGHT FOR STAIRS TO BE NO LESS THAN 6' 8"-STAIR RAILING TO BE DESIGNED SUCH THAT A 4" DIAMETER SPHERE WILL NOT PASS THROUGH-ALL RIM CONDITIONS TO BE SPRAY FOAMEDALL WINDOWS MEET MINIMUM CLEAR OPENING OF 24" HEIGHT, 20" WIDTH, AND 5.7 FT2ANY WINDOWS WITHIN A BATHROOM, 24" OF A DOORWAY, OR 36" OF A STAIRWAY SHALL BE TEMPERED GLASS.ALL WINDOWS W/SILLS 6' ABOVE GRADE TO NOT OPEN WIDER THAN 4".WINDOW NOTESEGRESS NOTEDIMENSION NOTEBUILDING NOTES-HVACSHEAR WALL NOTESSHEARWALLSPROJECT ADDRESS:14640 DIAMOND PATHCITY:ROSEMOUNT, MNCLIENTS NAME:ROSEMOUNT WOODSJOE MICHALSKI(612-720-0469DESIGNER:CRAFT DESIGN BUILDCONTACT: NATHANIEL TOLLEFSONNATE@CRAFTDESIGNBUILD.WORKS612.685.0929GENERAL CONTRACTOR:TBDPROJECT INFORMATIONGENERAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING ANY ADDITIONAL DETAILS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION.WARRANTIES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE MINIMUM STANDARDS. REGISTERED BUILDER PROGRAMS AND/OR PRODUCT WARRANTIES TO BE PROVIDED BY PRODUCT MANUFACTURERS. LIABILITY AND WORKERS COMPENSATION CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE REQUIRED FROM ALL SUBCONTRACTORS.GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBCONTRACTORS TO VERIFY AND COORDINATE ALL CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO WORK. G.C. TO CONTACT _______ TO VERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL, UTILITIES, SEWER, CABLE, GAS, ETC. PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK. IMMEDIATELY REPORT AND/OR REVIEW ALL QUESTIONS, DISCREPANCIES AND CONDITIONS WITH THE OWNER/ARCHITECT PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH WORK.ALL CONSTRUCTION AND/OR MATERIALS AS INDICATED SHALL BE AT OR ABOVE INDUSTRY STANDARDS FOR SIMILAR RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION.ALL CONSTRUCTION WORKS SHALL CONFORM TO ALL APPLICABLE CODES.ALL SURVEY DATA, SOIL DATA, MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL, AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING OF SYSTEMS, SIZES, AND LAYOUTS (INCLUDING TRUSS, FRAMING, AND GIRDER DESIGN) SHALL BE BY THE RESPECTIVE SUBCONTRACTOR AND/OR SUPPLIER OF THOSE SYSTEMS OR BY OTHER NECESSARY CONSULTANTS AND SHALL BE COORDINATED BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. INFORMATION SHOWN IN REGARD TO THESE CONCERNS IS ONLY DIAGRAMMATIC AND IS INTENDED TO PROVIDE AN INDICATION OF THE DESIGN INTENT ONLY. USE OF CONSULTANT DATA BY S.D.C DOES NOT INFER OR ENDORSE THE ACCURACY OF THE DATA. EACH CONSULTANT AND CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CORRECTNESS AND ACCURACY OF DATA SUPPLIED BY THE RESPECTIVE CONSULTANT AND/OR CONTRACTOR.GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE AND SITE THE BUILDING ON THE OWNERS LEGAL SURVEY. GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY OWNER/ARCHITECT/ENGINEER OF ANY DISCOVERED DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO ANY SITE WORK.GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SHORING AND BRACING AND FOR ALL TEMPORARY FACILITIES & SERVICES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO POWER, WATER, TELEPHONE, FAX, SANITATION FACILITIES AND FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT.GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL REQUIRED EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AND ANY SPECIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ISSUES ARISING FROM THE CONSTRUCTION ON THE SITE.GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN THE SITE IN FIRST-CLASS CONDITION DURING THE PROJECT. ALL WASTE AND DEBRIS SHALL PROMPTLY BE REMOVED. CONSIDERATION SHALL BE GIVEN TO MATERIAL STORAGE ON THE SITE AND ITS IMPACT ON ADJOINING NEIGHBORS.GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE FINAL CLEANING OF ALL INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR SURFACES. ALL TRANSPARENT MATERIALS ARE TO BE LEFT IN A POLISHED CONDITION. REMOVE ALL LABELS THAT ARE NOT INTENDED TO REMAIN AS PERMANENT INSTRUCTION INFORMATION.GENERAL CONTRACT SHALL PROVIDE INSTRUCTIONS TO THE OWNER PERTAINING TO OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT. COMPILE AND FORWARD TO THE OWNER ALL MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS DATA AND WARRANTIES IN THE FROM OF A WELL-ORGANIZED OWNER'S NOTEBOOK.ROOF TRUSS ENGINEERING AND DESIGN TO BE PROVIDED BY TRUSS SUPPLIER. TRUSS SUPPLIER TO COORDINATE FINAL TRUSS SOLUTION WITH PROJECT STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. TRUSS SUPPLIER TO COORDINATE TRUSS DESIGN WITH ENERGY HEEL REQUIREMENTS.GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.13.ALL WINDOW DESIGNATIONS ARE FROM PELLA WINDOWS, CONTRACTOR MAY PROVIDE BID ALTERNATE FOR OTHER WINDOW MANUFACTURERS -SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR ALTERNATES. SUPPLIER TO SUBMIT WINDOW SCHEDULE TO GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND OWNER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO PLACING WINDOW ORDER. GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO CONFIRM TEMPERED GLASS LOCATIONS, EAGRESS AND VENT WINDOW REQUIREMENTS, LITE PATTERNS, WINDOW SIZES, WINDOW OPERATION, JAMB SIZES, EXTENSION JAMBS, ETC. WITH OWNER. WINDOWS ARE TO BE VINYL WINDOWS WITH TRIPLE-PANE INSULATED GLASS AND SIMULATED DIVIDED LITES WITH SPACER BARS (SEE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS FOR 1 1/8" AND 2 1/4" MUTIN LOCATIONS), PREFINISHED COLOR AND HARDWARE FINISH AS SELECTED BY OWNER. WINDOWS TO BE SIMILAR IN SIZE AND SPECIFICATION TO THOSE INDICATED ON THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. WINDOW MANUFACTURER SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS OF ALL CUSTOM WINDOWS AND DOORS TO G.C. AND OWNER FOR REVIEW PRIOR TO FABRICATION.CABINET DRAWINGS SHOWN HERE ARE NOT CABINET SHOP DRAWINGS, BUT DEPICT DESIGN INTENT ONLY. CABINET MANUFACTURER TI COORDINATE WITH CABINET DESIGN WITH OWNER PREFERENCES, AS-BUILT DIMENSIONS (FIELD-VERIFY), WITH FIELD CHANGES MADE DURING CONSTRUCTION, WITH FINAL MILLWORK PROFILES, WITH FINAL COUNTERTOP THICKNESS AND DESIGNS, AND WITH FINAL APPLIANCE AND FIXTURE SELECTIONS. CABINET MAKER TO VERIFY END PANEL DESIGNS AND CABINET CLEARANCES WITH OWNER PRIOR TO CABINET FABRICATION. CABINET MAKER TO MEET WITH OWNERS TO DISCUSS AND VERIFY ALL DRAWER AND CABINET DIVISIONS AND USES, INCLUDING PULLOUT LOCATIONS, SPICEPARTITION LOCATIONS, LAZY SUSAN LOCATIONS, COST RAMIFICATIONS, HARDWARE TYPES AND QUALITY, AND ANY OTHER SUGGESTIONS THE CABINET MAKER OR OWNER MAY HAVE FOR MAXIMIZING CABINETRY EFFICIENCY AND EASE OF USE.SUBCONTRACTORS TO REFER TO OWNER-APPROVED CABINET SHOP DRAWINGS PRIOR TO ROUGH FRAMING FOR CABINETS/BUILT-INS. REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO G.C/CABINET MAKER PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH WORK.GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE OWNER'S REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SAMPLES OF ALL INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR FINISH MATERIALS, INCLUDING PROFILES, SIZES, SPECIES, MORTAR AND GROUT COLORS, JOINT SIZES, FINISHES AND COLORS PRIOR TO ORDERING OF SAME. SAMPLES TO BE PROVIDED ON-SITE WHEN OWNER DEEMS NECESSARY, AND IN SIZES LARGE ENOUGH TO SEE IN THE FINAL SPACES (E.G. 4'X4' WALL PAINT SAMPLES AND STAINED AND FINISHED 3-BOARD WOOD FLOOR SAMPLES). G.C. TO COORDINATE OWNER'S REVIEW AND APPROVE FULL-SIZED MOCKUPS OF ALL STONE ON SITE, INCLUDING STONE SIZE & SPECIES, MORTAR JOINT SIZE, MORTAR COLOR, STONE STACKING, CAP SPECIES AND SIZE, STONE SAMPLES TO BE DISPLAYED ALONGSIDE RELEVANT INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR FINISH MATERIALS, AS REQUIRED FOR FINAL COLOR PALLET COORDINATION. G.C. TO COORDINATE OWNER'S COUNTERTOP SELECTIONS, AND TO VERIFY THAT NATURAL STONE SLABS THAT OWNER SELECTS ARE PROPERLY STORED, AND USED IN THE FINAL PROJECT.DIMENSIONS LOCATING EXTERIOR WALLS ARE TO THE EXTERIOR FACE OF FRAMING AND/OR FACE OF FOUNDATION WALLS, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. DIMENSIONS LOCATING INTERIOR WALLS ARE TO CENTERLINE OF STUD, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. DIMENSIONS LOCATING DOORS AND WINDOWS ARE TO CENTERLINE OF OPENING, UNLESSNOTED OTHERWISE. SEE DIMENSION KEYS ON ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.ALL EXTERIOR WALLS SHALL BE 2X6 AS PER BUILDING SECTIONS, U.N.O. ALL BEARING WALLS, PLUMBING WALLS, AND WALLS WITH POCKET DOORS TO BE 2X6 CONSTRUCTION U.N.O. ALL OTHER WALLS TO BE 2X4 OR 2X6 CONSTRUCTION TO THICKNESS SHOWN ON ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS U.N.O. HEADERS SHALL BE SIZEDPER STRUCTURAL PLANS, OR COORDINATED WITH STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. BLOCKING AS REQUIRED FOR CABINETS, BATH AND KITCHEN HARDWARE AND ACCESSORIES, HANDRAILS, ETC. VERIFY W/ G.C. PRIOR TO FRAMING.PROVIDE ACOUSTIC INSULATION AND PARTITIONS PER ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ADDITIONAL ACOUSTIC INSULATION, CEILING ACOUSTIC INSULATION, AND ACOUSTIC PARTITION LOCATIONS W/ OWNER PRIOR TO VAPOR BARRIER & DRYWALL INSTALLATION. ACOUSTIC CONSIDERATION TO BE GIVEN TO HVAC DUCT LAYOUTS AND PLUMBING LOCATION, AND ACOUSTIC DAMPENING TO BE PROVIDED TO HVAC SYSTEM AND PLUMBING WASTE STACKS (VERIFY CAST IRON LOCATIONS WITH OWNERS) AS REQUIRED TO MINIMIZE SOUND TRANSMISSION.PLUMBING ROUGH-IN DIMENSIONS ARE PROVIDED FOR REFERENCE ONLY. ALL PLUMBING DIMENSIONS ARE TO BE COORDINATED BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR WITH SPECIFIC FIXTURE SELECTIONS AND FINAL CABINET DESIGN. ALL FLOOR DRAINS CONNECTED TO SANITARY SEWER TO HAVE BACK-FLOW PREVENTER INSTALLED.MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT & CONTROL LOCATIONS TO BE VERIFIED WITH OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION -SEE DRAWINGS FOR PROPOSED LOCATIONS. MAKEUP AIR TO TBE PROVIDED AS PER I.B.C AND ANY OTHER APPLICABLE CODES. SUPPLY AND RETURN REGISTER COVERS TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER -ASSUMED FLUSH WOOD VENTS TO MATCH WOOD FLOOR SPECIES & FINISH FOR BID. WHERE AFFECTED BY MECHANICAL DUCTS AND EQUIPMENT, CEILING HEIGHTS AND SOFFIT SIZES AND LOCATIONS ARE TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF HVAC DUCTS AND EQUIPMENT.14.15.16.17.18.19.20.21.22.13D Title PageROSEMOUNT WOODS ADDITIONBROBACK INDUSTRIAL PARKLOT 5 BLOCK 17 CURRENT EMPLOYEESTOTAL OF 12 POSSIBLE EMPLYEES4 IN THE OFFICE8 IN THE WAREHOUSE/SHOP
957' - 0" 958' - 0" 959' - 0" 960' - 0" 9 60 ' - 0 " 961' - 0 "
9 62 ' - 0" 9 6 3 ' - 0 "
9 5 8 ' - 0 " 9 5 9 ' - 0 " 957' - 0" 958' - 0" 959' - 0" 960' - 0" 9 6 0' - 0" 961' - 0 "
9 62 ' - 0" 9 6 3 ' - 0 " 9 5 8 ' - 0 " 9 5 9 ' - 0 " N30' - 0"40' - 0"59' - 0"21' - 0"150' - 0"350' - 0"63' - 9 9/32"80' - 0"PROPERTY LINESEXISTING OFFICE975 sq.ft.EXISTING WAREHOUSE3212 sq.ft.DUST COLLECTORPARKINGLOW SPOT IN THE LANDSCAPEPROPERTY AREA: 52,500 SQ.FT.EX. BUILDING AREA: 6175 SQ.FT.30' - 0"290' - 0"30' - 0"0' - 0"10' - 0"110' - 0"30' - 0"PROPERTY SETBACK AREA: 31,900 SQ. FT.EXISTING PARKING AREA: 13,070 SQ.FT.14 EXISTING PARKING 8' X 20' SPACESMATERIAL IS COMPOSED OF ASPHALTEXISTING MANUFACTURING1984 sq.ft.125' - 10 29/32"7/8" / 1'-0"3 /8 " / 1 '-0 "5 /8 " / 1 '-0 "7/8" / 1'-0"SLOPESLOPESLOPESLOPEEXISTING DRAINAGE GENERALLY TO THE SOUTH LOT LINEASPHALT PARKINGLANDSCAPING IS MOSTLY GRASSN30' - 0"12' - 0"28' - 0"80' - 0"150' - 0"350' - 0"63' - 9 9/32"160' - 0"DUST COLLECTORLOW SPOT IN THE LANDSCAPE150' - 0"PROPOSED ADDITION AREA: 6188 SQ.FT.PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY SETBACKNEW AWNING OVER ENTRANCEPROPOSED OFFICE1376 sq.ft.PROPOSED WAREHOUSE7960 sq.ft.PROPOSED MANUFACTURING2995 sq.ft.EXISTING PARKING AREA: 13,070 SQ.FT.14 EXISTING PARKING 8' X 20' SPACESPROPOSED PARKING7 COUNT FOR OFFICE4 COUNT FOR WAREHOUSE10 COUNT FOR MANUFATURING21 TOTAL COUNT 8' X 20' MATERIAL TO BE OF ASPHALT21 SPACES51' - 4"4' - 0"24' - 0"32' - 0"28' - 0"70' - 11 13/16"37' - 0"5' - 0"79' - 0"80' - 4"20' TALL PORTION OF BUILDINGEXISTING BUILDING 14' TALL24' TALL PORTION OF BUILDINGDATE:REVISIONS:JOB NO:SHEET NO:2723 Harriet Ave. Minneapolis, MN 55408612.685.0929craftdesignbuild.worksPID # 2206426048ProjectARCH D06/26/17 - SITE PLAN REVIEW6/27/2017 10:58:00 AMA009170606Issue DateRosemount Woods AdditionSITE PLANS14640 Diamond Path, Rosemount, MNALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO CENTER OF INTERIOR WALLS / FACE OF FRAMING ON EXTERIOR WALLS AND CONCRETE FOUNDATION WALLS-ALL CEILINGS TO BE 5/8" DRYWALL -TAPED, MUDDED, SANDED, PRIMED & PAINTED W/SMOOTH FINISH -ALL WALLS TO BE 1/2" DRYWALL -TAPED, MUDDED, SANDED, PRIMED & PAINTED W/SMOOTH FINISH-ALL WINDOWS SHOW AS TWO UNITS TO BE MULLED INTO ONE UNIT BY WINDOW MANUFACTURER.-OPTIONAL -ACOUSTIC WALL PARTITIONS (BATT INSUL) BETWEEN ALL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SPACES, AROUND ALL BATHROOMS, AND AROUND ALL BEDROOMS, ACOUSTICALLY INSULATE ALL DRAIN LINES-TYPICAL WINDOW HEADER TO BE 2-2x10 U.N.O. w/ (1)-2x8 TRIMMER STUD AND (1)-2X8 KING STUD, UNO.-ROUGH OPENING OF WINDOWS TO BE VERIFIED BY CONTRACTOR-HEAD HEIGHT OF ALL WINDOWS TO BE 6'11' HEADER HEIGHT UNLESS OTHERWISE NETED. GREAT ROOM WINDOWS DO NOT APPLY TO THIS NOTE.-ALL DOORS TO BE 6' 8" U.N.O.-STAIR RISE TO BE NO MORE THAN 7 3/4" AND RUN TO BE NO LESS THAN 10"-MIN. HEAD HEIGHT FOR STAIRS TO BE NO LESS THAN 6' 8"-STAIR RAILING TO BE DESIGNED SUCH THAT A 4" DIAMETER SPHERE WILL NOT PASS THROUGH-ALL RIM CONDITIONS TO BE SPRAY FOAMEDALL WINDOWS MEET MINIMUM CLEAR OPENING OF 24" HEIGHT, 20" WIDTH, AND 5.7 FT2ANY WINDOWS WITHIN A BATHROOM, 24" OF A DOORWAY, OR 36" OF A STAIRWAY SHALL BE TEMPERED GLASS.ALL WINDOWS W/SILLS 6' ABOVE GRADE TO NOT OPEN WIDER THAN 4".WINDOW NOTESEGRESS NOTEDIMENSION NOTEBUILDING NOTES-HVACSHEAR WALL NOTESSHEARWALLS 1" = 20'-0"1SITE EXISTING 1" = 20'-0"2SITE PROPOSEDPARKING CALCULATION NOTESMANUFACTURING 1 SPACE PER 300 SQ.FT.OFFICE 1 SPACE PER 200 SQ.FT.WAREHOUSING 1 SPACE PER 2000 SQ.FT.DIAMOND PATHDIAMOND PATHSLOPE OF NEW GRADE TO REAMIN SIMILAR TO EXISTINGDRAINAGE WILL BE GENERALLY TOWARDS THE SOUTHERN LOT LINEPUBLIC UTILITIES NOTESCURRENT PUBLIC UTILITIES INCLUDE GAS, WATER, ELECTRICITY. THE ONLY NECESSARY CHAGE DUE TO THE PROPOSED EXPANSION IS THE ADDITION OF 3 PHASE ELECTRICAL SERVICE.WASTE WATER TREATMENT IS TO REMAIN CONSITENT WITH CURRENT USES.
30' SET BACK LINEPROPOSED ADDITION AREA: 6188 SQ.FT.EX. BUILDING AREA: 6175 SQ.FT.36' - 0 3/8"80' - 0"80' - 4"71' - 0 3/16"4' - 0"8' - 0"56' - 0 3/16"84' - 0"72' - 0"4' - 0"DATE:REVISIONS:JOB NO:SHEET NO:2723 Harriet Ave. Minneapolis, MN 55408612.685.0929craftdesignbuild.worksPID # 2206426048ProjectARCH D06/26/17 - SITE PLAN REVIEW6/27/2017 10:58:00 AMA100170606Issue DateRosemount Woods AdditionFOUNDATION PLAN14640 Diamond Path, Rosemount, MN 1" = 10'-0"1NEW FOUNDATIONALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO CENTER OF INTERIOR WALLS / FACE OF FRAMING ON EXTERIOR WALLS AND CONCRETE FOUNDATION WALLS-ALL CEILINGS TO BE 5/8" DRYWALL -TAPED, MUDDED, SANDED, PRIMED & PAINTED W/SMOOTH FINISH -ALL WALLS TO BE 1/2" DRYWALL -TAPED, MUDDED, SANDED, PRIMED & PAINTED W/SMOOTH FINISH-ALL WINDOWS SHOW AS TWO UNITS TO BE MULLED INTO ONE UNIT BY WINDOW MANUFACTURER.-OPTIONAL -ACOUSTIC WALL PARTITIONS (BATT INSUL) BETWEEN ALL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SPACES, AROUND ALL BATHROOMS, AND AROUND ALL BEDROOMS, ACOUSTICALLY INSULATE ALL DRAIN LINES-TYPICAL WINDOW HEADER TO BE 2-2x10 U.N.O. w/ (1)-2x8 TRIMMER STUD AND (1)-2X8 KING STUD, UNO.-ROUGH OPENING OF WINDOWS TO BE VERIFIED BY CONTRACTOR-HEAD HEIGHT OF ALL WINDOWS TO BE 6'11' HEADER HEIGHT UNLESS OTHERWISE NETED. GREAT ROOM WINDOWS DO NOT APPLY TO THIS NOTE.-ALL DOORS TO BE 6' 8" U.N.O.-STAIR RISE TO BE NO MORE THAN 7 3/4" AND RUN TO BE NO LESS THAN 10"-MIN. HEAD HEIGHT FOR STAIRS TO BE NO LESS THAN 6' 8"-STAIR RAILING TO BE DESIGNED SUCH THAT A 4" DIAMETER SPHERE WILL NOT PASS THROUGH-ALL RIM CONDITIONS TO BE SPRAY FOAMEDALL WINDOWS MEET MINIMUM CLEAR OPENING OF 24" HEIGHT, 20" WIDTH, AND 5.7 FT2ANY WINDOWS WITHIN A BATHROOM, 24" OF A DOORWAY, OR 36" OF A STAIRWAY SHALL BE TEMPERED GLASS.ALL WINDOWS W/SILLS 6' ABOVE GRADE TO NOT OPEN WIDER THAN 4".WINDOW NOTESEGRESS NOTEDIMENSION NOTEBUILDING NOTES-HVACSHEAR WALL NOTESSHEARWALLS
PROPOSED ADDITIONEXISTING SPACE INDOOR PARKING/ LOADING & ADDITIONAL SHOP80' - 0"1A3012A30124' - 0"32' - 0"28' - 0"DATE:REVISIONS:JOB NO:SHEET NO:2723 Harriet Ave. Minneapolis, MN 55408612.685.0929craftdesignbuild.worksPID # 2206426048ProjectARCH D06/26/17 - SITE PLAN REVIEW6/27/2017 10:58:00 AMA102170606Issue DateRosemount Woods AdditionMAIN LEVEL14640 Diamond Path, Rosemount, MN 3/32" = 1'-0"1NEW MAIN LEVELALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO CENTER OF INTERIOR WALLS / FACE OF FRAMING ON EXTERIOR WALLS AND CONCRETE FOUNDATION WALLS-ALL CEILINGS TO BE 5/8" DRYWALL -TAPED, MUDDED, SANDED, PRIMED & PAINTED W/SMOOTH FINISH -ALL WALLS TO BE 1/2" DRYWALL -TAPED, MUDDED, SANDED, PRIMED & PAINTED W/SMOOTH FINISH-ALL WINDOWS SHOW AS TWO UNITS TO BE MULLED INTO ONE UNIT BY WINDOW MANUFACTURER.-OPTIONAL -ACOUSTIC WALL PARTITIONS (BATT INSUL) BETWEEN ALL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SPACES, AROUND ALL BATHROOMS, AND AROUND ALL BEDROOMS, ACOUSTICALLY INSULATE ALL DRAIN LINES-TYPICAL WINDOW HEADER TO BE 2-2x10 U.N.O. w/ (1)-2x8 TRIMMER STUD AND (1)-2X8 KING STUD, UNO.-ROUGH OPENING OF WINDOWS TO BE VERIFIED BY CONTRACTOR-HEAD HEIGHT OF ALL WINDOWS TO BE 6'11' HEADER HEIGHT UNLESS OTHERWISE NETED. GREAT ROOM WINDOWS DO NOT APPLY TO THIS NOTE.-ALL DOORS TO BE 6' 8" U.N.O.-STAIR RISE TO BE NO MORE THAN 7 3/4" AND RUN TO BE NO LESS THAN 10"-MIN. HEAD HEIGHT FOR STAIRS TO BE NO LESS THAN 6' 8"-STAIR RAILING TO BE DESIGNED SUCH THAT A 4" DIAMETER SPHERE WILL NOT PASS THROUGH-ALL RIM CONDITIONS TO BE SPRAY FOAMEDALL WINDOWS MEET MINIMUM CLEAR OPENING OF 24" HEIGHT, 20" WIDTH, AND 5.7 FT2ANY WINDOWS WITHIN A BATHROOM, 24" OF A DOORWAY, OR 36" OF A STAIRWAY SHALL BE TEMPERED GLASS.ALL WINDOWS W/SILLS 6' ABOVE GRADE TO NOT OPEN WIDER THAN 4".WINDOW NOTESEGRESS NOTEDIMENSION NOTEBUILDING NOTES-HVACSHEAR WALL NOTESSHEARWALLS
1A3012A301DATE:REVISIONS:JOB NO:SHEET NO:2723 Harriet Ave. Minneapolis, MN 55408612.685.0929craftdesignbuild.worksPID # 2206426048ProjectARCH D06/26/17 - SITE PLAN REVIEW6/27/2017 10:58:00 AMA104170606Issue DateRosemount Woods AdditionROOF PLAN14640 Diamond Path, Rosemount, MN 3/32" = 1'-0"1EXISTING ROOF1ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO CENTER OF INTERIOR WALLS / FACE OF FRAMING ON EXTERIOR WALLS AND CONCRETE FOUNDATION WALLS-ALL CEILINGS TO BE 5/8" DRYWALL -TAPED, MUDDED, SANDED, PRIMED & PAINTED W/SMOOTH FINISH -ALL WALLS TO BE 1/2" DRYWALL -TAPED, MUDDED, SANDED, PRIMED & PAINTED W/SMOOTH FINISH-ALL WINDOWS SHOW AS TWO UNITS TO BE MULLED INTO ONE UNIT BY WINDOW MANUFACTURER.-OPTIONAL -ACOUSTIC WALL PARTITIONS (BATT INSUL) BETWEEN ALL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SPACES, AROUND ALL BATHROOMS, AND AROUND ALL BEDROOMS, ACOUSTICALLY INSULATE ALL DRAIN LINES-TYPICAL WINDOW HEADER TO BE 2-2x10 U.N.O. w/ (1)-2x8 TRIMMER STUD AND (1)-2X8 KING STUD, UNO.-ROUGH OPENING OF WINDOWS TO BE VERIFIED BY CONTRACTOR-HEAD HEIGHT OF ALL WINDOWS TO BE 6'11' HEADER HEIGHT UNLESS OTHERWISE NETED. GREAT ROOM WINDOWS DO NOT APPLY TO THIS NOTE.-ALL DOORS TO BE 6' 8" U.N.O.-STAIR RISE TO BE NO MORE THAN 7 3/4" AND RUN TO BE NO LESS THAN 10"-MIN. HEAD HEIGHT FOR STAIRS TO BE NO LESS THAN 6' 8"-STAIR RAILING TO BE DESIGNED SUCH THAT A 4" DIAMETER SPHERE WILL NOT PASS THROUGH-ALL RIM CONDITIONS TO BE SPRAY FOAMEDALL WINDOWS MEET MINIMUM CLEAR OPENING OF 24" HEIGHT, 20" WIDTH, AND 5.7 FT2ANY WINDOWS WITHIN A BATHROOM, 24" OF A DOORWAY, OR 36" OF A STAIRWAY SHALL BE TEMPERED GLASS.ALL WINDOWS W/SILLS 6' ABOVE GRADE TO NOT OPEN WIDER THAN 4".WINDOW NOTESEGRESS NOTEDIMENSION NOTEBUILDING NOTES-HVACSHEAR WALL NOTESSHEARWALLS
NEW GROUNDLEVEL960' - 0"MAIN LEVEL960' - 6"EXISTING ROOF975' - 5"NEW FOUNDATION955' - 4"FOOTINGS955' - 0"23' - 10"19' - 10"14' - 9"RAKED CONCRETESMOOTH FINISH COCRETEMETAL CAPNEW GROUNDLEVEL960' - 0"MAIN LEVEL960' - 6"EXISTING ROOF975' - 5"NEW FOUNDATION955' - 4"FOOTINGS955' - 0"2A30114' - 9"23' - 10"RAKED CONCRETESMOOTH FINISH COCRETEWOOD FINISH BY ENTRYMETAL AND WOOD FINISHMETAL CAPDATE:REVISIONS:JOB NO:SHEET NO:2723 Harriet Ave. Minneapolis, MN 55408612.685.0929craftdesignbuild.worksPID # 2206426048ProjectARCH D06/26/17 - SITE PLAN REVIEW6/27/2017 10:58:02 AMA201170606Issue DateRosemount Woods AdditionNORTH/SOUTHELEVATIONS14640 Diamond Path, Rosemount, MN 1/8" = 1'-0"1North 1/8" = 1'-0"2South
MAIN LEVEL960' - 6"EXISTING ROOF975' - 5"NEW FOUNDATION955' - 4"FOOTINGS955' - 0"1A301RAKED CONCRETESMOOTH FINISH COCRETEMETAL CAPNEW GROUNDLEVEL960' - 0"MAIN LEVEL960' - 6"EXISTING ROOF975' - 5"NEW FOUNDATION955' - 4"FOOTINGS955' - 0"1A30114' - 11"EXISTING LIGHITING FIXTURE TO BE MOVED BELOW SHADING DEVICENEW DOWNWARD FACING LIGHTING FIXTURES4' - 11"4' - 0"RAKED CONCRETESMOOTH FINISH COCRETEWOOD FINISH BY ENTRYMETAL AND WOOD FINISHMETAL CAPDATE:REVISIONS:JOB NO:SHEET NO:2723 Harriet Ave. Minneapolis, MN 55408612.685.0929craftdesignbuild.worksPID # 2206426048ProjectARCH D06/26/17 - SITE PLAN REVIEW6/27/2017 10:58:03 AMA202170606Issue DateRosemount Woods AdditionEAST/WESTELEVATIONS14640 Diamond Path, Rosemount, MN 3/16" = 1'-0"1East 3/16" = 1'-0"2WestALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO CENTER OF INTERIOR WALLS / FACE OF FRAMING ON EXTERIOR WALLS AND CONCRETE FOUNDATION WALLS-ALL CEILINGS TO BE 5/8" DRYWALL -TAPED, MUDDED, SANDED, PRIMED & PAINTED W/SMOOTH FINISH -ALL WALLS TO BE 1/2" DRYWALL -TAPED, MUDDED, SANDED, PRIMED & PAINTED W/SMOOTH FINISH-ALL WINDOWS SHOW AS TWO UNITS TO BE MULLED INTO ONE UNIT BY WINDOW MANUFACTURER.-OPTIONAL -ACOUSTIC WALL PARTITIONS (BATT INSUL) BETWEEN ALL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SPACES, AROUND ALL BATHROOMS, AND AROUND ALL BEDROOMS, ACOUSTICALLY INSULATE ALL DRAIN LINES-TYPICAL WINDOW HEADER TO BE 2-2x10 U.N.O. w/ (1)-2x8 TRIMMER STUD AND (1)-2X8 KING STUD, UNO.-ROUGH OPENING OF WINDOWS TO BE VERIFIED BY CONTRACTOR-HEAD HEIGHT OF ALL WINDOWS TO BE 6'11' HEADER HEIGHT UNLESS OTHERWISE NETED. GREAT ROOM WINDOWS DO NOT APPLY TO THIS NOTE.-ALL DOORS TO BE 6' 8" U.N.O.-STAIR RISE TO BE NO MORE THAN 7 3/4" AND RUN TO BE NO LESS THAN 10"-MIN. HEAD HEIGHT FOR STAIRS TO BE NO LESS THAN 6' 8"-STAIR RAILING TO BE DESIGNED SUCH THAT A 4" DIAMETER SPHERE WILL NOT PASS THROUGH-ALL RIM CONDITIONS TO BE SPRAY FOAMEDALL WINDOWS MEET MINIMUM CLEAR OPENING OF 24" HEIGHT, 20" WIDTH, AND 5.7 FT2ANY WINDOWS WITHIN A BATHROOM, 24" OF A DOORWAY, OR 36" OF A STAIRWAY SHALL BE TEMPERED GLASS.ALL WINDOWS W/SILLS 6' ABOVE GRADE TO NOT OPEN WIDER THAN 4".WINDOW NOTESEGRESS NOTEDIMENSION NOTEBUILDING NOTES-HVACSHEAR WALL NOTESSHEARWALLS
NEW GROUNDLEVEL960' - 0"MAIN LEVEL960' - 6"EXISTING ROOF975' - 5"NEW FOUNDATION955' - 4"FOOTINGS955' - 0"2A301NEW GROUNDLEVEL960' - 0"MAIN LEVEL960' - 6"EXISTING ROOF975' - 5"NEW FOUNDATION955' - 4"FOOTINGS955' - 0"1A301DATE:REVISIONS:JOB NO:SHEET NO:2723 Harriet Ave. Minneapolis, MN 55408612.685.0929craftdesignbuild.worksPID # 2206426048ProjectARCH D06/26/17 - SITE PLAN REVIEW6/27/2017 10:58:03 AMA301170606Issue DateRosemount Woods AdditionSECTIONS14640 Diamond Path, Rosemount, MNALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO CENTER OF INTERIOR WALLS / FACE OF FRAMING ON EXTERIOR WALLS AND CONCRETE FOUNDATION WALLS-ALL CEILINGS TO BE 5/8" DRYWALL -TAPED, MUDDED, SANDED, PRIMED & PAINTED W/SMOOTH FINISH -ALL WALLS TO BE 1/2" DRYWALL -TAPED, MUDDED, SANDED, PRIMED & PAINTED W/SMOOTH FINISH-ALL WINDOWS SHOW AS TWO UNITS TO BE MULLED INTO ONE UNIT BY WINDOW MANUFACTURER.-OPTIONAL -ACOUSTIC WALL PARTITIONS (BATT INSUL) BETWEEN ALL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SPACES, AROUND ALL BATHROOMS, AND AROUND ALL BEDROOMS, ACOUSTICALLY INSULATE ALL DRAIN LINES-TYPICAL WINDOW HEADER TO BE 2-2x10 U.N.O. w/ (1)-2x8 TRIMMER STUD AND (1)-2X8 KING STUD, UNO.-ROUGH OPENING OF WINDOWS TO BE VERIFIED BY CONTRACTOR-HEAD HEIGHT OF ALL WINDOWS TO BE 6'11' HEADER HEIGHT UNLESS OTHERWISE NETED. GREAT ROOM WINDOWS DO NOT APPLY TO THIS NOTE.-ALL DOORS TO BE 6' 8" U.N.O.-STAIR RISE TO BE NO MORE THAN 7 3/4" AND RUN TO BE NO LESS THAN 10"-MIN. HEAD HEIGHT FOR STAIRS TO BE NO LESS THAN 6' 8"-STAIR RAILING TO BE DESIGNED SUCH THAT A 4" DIAMETER SPHERE WILL NOT PASS THROUGH-ALL RIM CONDITIONS TO BE SPRAY FOAMEDALL WINDOWS MEET MINIMUM CLEAR OPENING OF 24" HEIGHT, 20" WIDTH, AND 5.7 FT2ANY WINDOWS WITHIN A BATHROOM, 24" OF A DOORWAY, OR 36" OF A STAIRWAY SHALL BE TEMPERED GLASS.ALL WINDOWS W/SILLS 6' ABOVE GRADE TO NOT OPEN WIDER THAN 4".WINDOW NOTESEGRESS NOTEDIMENSION NOTEBUILDING NOTES-HVACSHEAR WALL NOTESSHEARWALLS 1/8" = 1'-0"1Section 2 3/16" = 1'-0"2Section 3
DATE:REVISIONS:JOB NO:SHEET NO:2723 Harriet Ave. Minneapolis, MN 55408612.685.0929craftdesignbuild.worksPID # 2206426048ProjectARCH D06/26/17 - SITE PLAN REVIEW6/27/2017 10:58:06 AMA901170606Issue DateRosemount Woods Addition3D14640 Diamond Path, Rosemount, MN13D A901
DATE:REVISIONS:JOB NO:SHEET NO:2723 Harriet Ave. Minneapolis, MN 55408612.685.0929craftdesignbuild.worksPID # 2206426048ProjectARCH D06/26/17 - SITE PLAN REVIEW6/27/2017 10:58:08 AMA902170606Issue DateRosemount Woods Addition3D14640 Diamond Path, Rosemount, MN13D A902
DATE:REVISIONS:JOB NO:SHEET NO:2723 Harriet Ave. Minneapolis, MN 55408612.685.0929craftdesignbuild.worksPID # 2206426048ProjectARCH D06/26/17 - SITE PLAN REVIEW6/27/2017 10:58:08 AMA903170606Issue DateRosemount Woods AdditionAREA MAPS14640 Diamond Path, Rosemount, MN14640 DIAMOND PATH123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404118.19.20.21.22.23.24.25.26.27.28.29.30.31.32.33.34.35.36.37.38.39.40.41.42.NEIGHBOR LOCATIONSKay Schmidt14675 Delft Ave. W.Rosemount, Minnesota 55068Frank & Frances Seasholtz14715 Delft Ave. W.Rosemount, Minnesota 55068Timothy Traeger14718 Delmar Ct.Rosemount, Minnesota 55068Desbele Berhe14704 Delmar Ct.Rosemount, Minnesota 55068Andrew & Jessica Perreir14690 Delmar Ct.Rosemount, Minnesota 55068Barbara Manson14697 Delmar Ct.Rosemount, Minnesota 55068AC Broback LTD Partnership14711 Delmar CourtRosemount, Minnesota 55068Kyle Bebler14725 Delmar Ct.Rosemount, Minnesota 55068Jeffrey & Deeanna Otis14710 Delft Ave. W.Rosemount, Minnesota 55068Frances Louis Sommers14674 Delft Ave. W.Rosemount, Minnesota 55068Kristine Mantour14660 Delft Ave. W,Rosemount, Minnesota 55068Lowell & Dianna Riddle14640 Delft Ave. W.Rosemount, Minnesota 55058Amanda/Stephanie/Deborah Erickson14620 Delft Ave. W.Rosemount, Minnesota 55068Dale Huseby14610 Delft Ave. W.Rosemount, Minnesota 55068Debra Hubbard14582 Delft Ave. Rosemount, Minnesota 55068Ethan & Melissa Merseth14572 Delft Ave. W.Rosemount, Minnesota 55068Jean Marie Tucker14564 Delft Ave. W.Rosemount, Minnesota 55068Nancy James14684 Denmark Ct.Apple Valley, Minnesota 55124Wayne & Stacy Waibel14688 Denmark Ct.Apple Valley, Minnesota 55124Jon Meister14692 Denmark Ct.Apple Valley, Minnesota 55124Nathan Austin14696 Denmark Ct.Apple Valley, Minnesota 55124Tyler Nelson14700 Denmark Ct.Apple Valley, Minnesota 55124Lloyd & Shirley Johnson14704 Denmark Ct. Apple Valley, MinnesotaMaria Hayden14708 Denmark Ct.Apple Valley, Minnesota 55124Matthew & Jessica Neudecker14712 Denmark Ct.Apple Valley, Minnesota 5512442NEIGHBOR LOCATIONS1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.13.14.15.16.17.Susie Bellamy14565 Denver Ct.Rosemount, Minnnesota 55068Derek Hughes/Krysten Edwards14577 Denver Ct.Rosemount, Minnesota 55068Christopher & Wendy Staub14589 Denver Ct.Rosemount, Minnesota 55068Mary Jane Schneider14601 Denver Ct.Rosemount, Minnesota 55068Thomas & Patricia Gold14590 Denver Ct.Rosemount, Minnesota 55068David Swenson14578 Denver Ct.Rosemount, Minnesota 55068Jerry & Christine Ferrell14566 Denver Ct.Rosemount, Minnesota 55068Korey & Heather Malberg14554 Denver Ct.Rosemount, Minnesota 55068Doran & Julie Thompson14542 Denver Ct.Rosemount, Minnesota 55068Kevin & Mary Best14555 Delft Ave. W.Rosemount, Minnesota 55068Mark & Maggie Simons14565 Delft Ave. W.Rosemount, Minnesota 55068Larry & Marcia Mcneal14575 Delft Ave.Rosemount, Minnesota 55068Charles & Loris Stauffer14587 Delft Ave. W.Rosemount, Minnesota 55068Doreen Schmidt 14615 Delft Ave. N.Rosemount, Minnesota 55068Garry & Marjeen Weber 14625 Delft Ave.Rosemount, Minnesota 55068Darla Hathaway14645 Delft Ave. W.Rosemount, Minnesota 55068Dexter & Barbara Eleazor14665 Delft Ave. W.Rosemount, Minnesota 55068
DATE:REVISIONS:JOB NO:SHEET NO:2723 Harriet Ave. Minneapolis, MN 55408612.685.0929craftdesignbuild.worksPID # 2206426048ProjectARCH D06/26/17 - SITE PLAN REVIEW6/27/2017 10:58:08 AMA905170606Issue DateRosemount Woods AdditionFACADETREATMENT -PRECAST14640 Diamond Path, Rosemount, MNEXAMPLE OF RAKED CONCRETE WALL PANEL WITH SMOOTH BANDINGAWNING EXAMPLEEXAMPLE OF RAKED CONCRETE WALL PANEL..COLOR AND TEXTURE EXAMPLEWOOD FACADE BY ENTRY DOOR
957' - 0" 958' - 0" 959' - 0" 960' - 0" 96 0 ' - 0" 961' - 0 " 9 62 ' - 0" 9 6 3 ' - 0 " 9 5 8 ' - 0 "
9 5 9 ' - 0 " 1A3012A30130' - 0"12' - 0"28' - 0"80' - 0"160' - 0"DUST COLLECTORLOW SPOT IN THE LANDSCAPE150' - 0"PROPOSED ADDITION AREA: 6188 SQ.FT.PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY SETBACKNEW AWNING OVER ENTRANCEPROPOSED OFFICE1376 sq.ft.PROPOSED WAREHOUSE7960 sq.ft.PROPOSED MANUFACTURING2995 sq.ft.EXISTING PARKING AREA: 13,070 SQ.FT.14 EXISTING PARKING 8' X 20' SPACESPROPOSED PARKING7 COUNT FOR OFFICE4 COUNT FOR WAREHOUSE10 COUNT FOR MANUFACTURING21 TOTAL COUNT 8' X 20' MATERIAL TO BE OF ASPHALT21 SPACES51' - 4"4' - 0"24' - 0"32' - 0"28' - 0"70' - 11 13/16"37' - 0"5' - 0"79' - 0"80' - 4"20' TALL PORTION OF BUILDINGEXISTING BUILDING 14' TALL24' TALL PORTION OF BUILDINGTOTAL OF 9 NEW 1.5" TREES. MIX OF DECIDUOUS AND CONIFEROUS SUITABLE FOR EXISTING SOILS.EXISTING TREE INVENTORY9 -6" DECIDUOUS TREES NEAR NORTH LOT LINE3 -6" DECIDUOUS TREES IN FRONT YARDEXISTING TREES SHOULD NOT BE IMPACTED BY NEW ADDITION.EROSION CONTROL FABRIC OR SIMILAR ACCEPTABLE METHODS. SECTION IN EXISTING DRIVE TO BE MOVABLE FOR DELIVERIES.DATE:REVISIONS:JOB NO:SHEET NO:2723 Harriet Ave. Minneapolis, MN 55408612.685.0929craftdesignbuild.worksPID # 2206426048ProjectARCH D06/26/17 - SITE PLAN REVIEW6/27/2017 10:58:09 AML100170606Issue DateRosemount Woods AdditionPROPOSEDLANDSCAPE PLAN14640 Diamond Path, Rosemount, MN 3/32" = 1'-0"1PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN
NPROPERTY LINESPROPERTY LINEEXISTING LIGHTSNEW LIGHTSDATE:REVISIONS:JOB NO:SHEET NO:2723 Harriet Ave. Minneapolis, MN 55408612.685.0929craftdesignbuild.worksPID # 2206426048ProjectARCH D06/26/17 - SITE PLAN REVIEW6/27/2017 10:58:09 AML101170606Issue DateRosemount Woods AdditionLIGHTING PLAN14640 Diamond Path, Rosemount, MN 1" = 20'-0"1SITE LIGHTING