Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout9.a. Rosemount-Apple Valley-Eagan Public Schools ISD 196 Site Plan and CUP Approval EXECUTIVE SUMMARY City Council Regular Meeting: October 17, 2017 AGENDA ITEM: Case 17-35-SP and 17-36-CUP - Rosemount-Apple Valley-Eagan Public Schools ISD 196: Site Plan and CUP Approval to Allow Parking, Access, and Entrance improvements to the Rosemount High School, Middle School, and Elementary School campus. AGENDA SECTION: New Business PREPARED BY: Kyle Klatt, Senior Planner AGENDA NO. 9.a. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution of Approval; Excerpt from Planning Commission Minutes; Location Map; Application Letter; Partial Boundary, Topographic and Utility Survey (6); Overall Site Plan; Drainage Area Maps (2); Removals Plan (2); Site Plan (2); Grading and Drainage Plan (2); Utility, Sediment, and Erosion Control Plan (2); Landscaping Plan (2); Site Details (3); High School Architectural Plans (6); Middle School Architectural Plans (3); Electrical and Lighting Plans (5); Traffic Study; Neighborhood Meeting Notes; Zoning Map; City Engineer Report; Fire Marshall Comments APPROVED BY: LJM RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt a Resolution Approving the Conditional Use Permit with Site Plan for Independent School District 196 SUMMARY The City Council is being asked to consider a site plan and building design review request from Independent School District 196 (Rosemount, Apple Valley, Eagan Public Schools) to construct several building, parking, and access improvements to its Rosemount campus near downtown Rosemount. In conjunction with this application, the School District has also applied for a Conditional Use Permit for the improvements planned in and around the Middle and Elementary school sites since the buildings are located within the R1A – Low Density Residential zoning district. The School District is proposing improvements to the Rosemount campus following approval of a referendum in 2015 by voters to address security, safety, and building modifications needed to improve learning throughout the district’s facilities. Staff and the Planning Commission are recommending approval of the requests subject to the conditions of approval listed in this report and in the attached resolution. 2 The school district conducted a neighborhood meeting concerning the project on September 12th; the notes provided by the school district from the meeting are attached to this report. Applicant & Property Owner(s): Independent School District 196 (Rosemount, Apple Valley, Eagan Public Schools) Location: Two larger parcels that comprise the majority of the Rosemount School campus, all part of Lot 6, Auditor’s Subdivision No. 1. Area in Acres: 86.74 Acres Comp. Guide Plan Designation: PI – Public/Institutional and LDR – Low Density Residential Current Zoning: PI – Public/Institutional and R1A – Low Density Residential PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION The Planning Commission reviewed the applicant’s request for site plan including building design review and conditional use permit at its September 26, 2017 meeting. Scott McQueen of WOLD Architects (representing ISD 196) addressed the Commission and explained that the school district is proposing a series of improvements to the site in order to increase safety and security throughout the campus, and to provide additional spaces for learning and technology within the Rosemount school facilities. He noted that the proposed changes will provide dedicated areas for parents and buses to safely drop off and pick up students. He also pointed out that the district completed a traffic study for the area focusing on traffic at many intersections surrounding the school campus. The Commission raised questions about the location of the reserved parking spaces at the high school; Scott McQueen responded that these stalls would be moved to one of the three proposed separate parking areas in front of the high school. The Commission generally discussed how housing and population projections would impact the district’s facilities in Rosemount. McQueen noted that the school district is continually monitoring enrollment projections, and that most of the impacts are expected to occur within the elementary schools. The construction of the new East Lake School will help the district accommodate growth in the southern portions of their service area. Commissioners questioned other elements of the proposed project, including the amount of impervious coverage and the potential loss of parking spaces in front of the middle school due to the reconfigured drop-off areas. McQueen indicated that overall, the pre-construction and post- construction impervious coverage would be very similar. In addition, any loss of parking spaces near the middle school would be offset by increases in on-street parking. The Commission also discussed the proposed security updates to the facilities, and McQueen explained that new entrances into the middle and high school would include security enhancements. One member of the public spoke at the hearing. Dave Lakey, representing Lighthouse Christian Church, stated that the church is in support of the new bus drop off loop and explained that the Church has approached the school district about sharing parking spaces between the two entities. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the site and building design review and conditional use permit with the recommended conditions. BACKGROUND The school campus area includes the Rosemount High School, Rosemount Middle School, and Rosemount Elementary School, all of which have been located at the present site since the mid 1960’s 3 when the high school was built in this location. Portions of the middle and elementary schools were on or near their present locations prior to construction of the high school. Over time, each of the buildings on the campus have been modified and expanded to accommodate the needs of a growing district and to add space for a growing student population. The site now accommodates over 4,000 students and 477 staff in the three school facilities. Since the construction of the high school, there have been limited changes to the parking and access around the site, even as Rosemount and surrounding communities within the district have experienced substantial growth and change. In recognition of existing safety and security issues in and around its numerous sites, ISD 196 brought forward a $180,000,000 referendum in 2015 that was ultimately approved by district voters. The district has since proceeded to examine each of its facilities and to develop a series of recommended improvements based on their own internal analysis. Based on this analysis, the Rosemount campus is one of the sites in need of improvements in three primary areas: 1) safety, security, and ease of access at building entrances, 2) bus and parental drop-off areas, and 3) pedestrian safety in and around parking and loading areas. The school district is proposing changes to the High School, Middle School, and Elementary School sites to address these issues with the applications in front of the Planning Commission. Please note that the City’s Zoning Ordinance regulates secondary (high) schools differently from elementary and middle schools. High schools are a permitted use in PI – Public and Institutional zoning districts, and elementary and middle schools require a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) in residential zoning districts. At the Rosemount site, the high school and surrounding grounds are in a PI zone, while the middle and elementary school buildings and parking areas are within a R1A district. There are some open space areas/ball fields west of the elementary school that are bisected by a property line separating the two districts. Regardless of the zoning boundaries, the three schools are very much interconnected with walking trails and make use of shared recreation fields and open space between each facility. At the recommendation of City staff, the school district has combined its improvement plans for each of the facilities into one larger application. All of the work will require a site and building design review, while the elementary and middle school sites are subject to approval of a CUP for the work within the R1A zoning district. The proposed improvements include the following general elements: • Reconstruction of the high school parking lot and parking/drop-off area in front of the school. This portion of the project includes the realignment of the access road that currently crosses the site in front of the high and connects Chili Avenue to South Robert Trail (TH3). The proposed improvements will create separate bus loading and unloading and parental drop- off/parking areas in front of the high school, with a pedestrian walkway that divides three larger parking areas for general parking south of the building. In addition to the separated walkway, the proposed work will also include the introduction of trees and landscaping along the perimeter and within the interior of the parking areas (as opposed to the current situation with very large, unbroken expanses of parking). The improvements are intended to improve pedestrian safety by eliminating numerous points of conflict between cars, buses, and pedestrians, while also discouraging drive-through traffic between Chili Avenue and South Robert Trail. Overall, the plans will include the addition of 32 parking stall above the existing conditions not counting the separate bus parking area. • The creation of a new bus loading and unloading area immediately west of the elementary school. Under present conditions, all traffic coming to and from the elementary and middle 4 schools must use 143rd Street West, which results in significant congestion in front of both schools during the peak hours right before and after school hours. As part of its safety improvements, the applicant is planning to move all bus traffic that is currently part of this congestion by constructing a separate bus loading area west of the elementary school. The loading area would be accessed via an existing private road between the Lighthouse Christian Church and elementary school along 144th Street West. This area is presently used for ball fields and general green space, and the change to a new loading area will eliminate two of these ball fields while pushing an existing football/soccer practice field further to the north. • Reconfiguration of the drop-off areas in front of the middle and elementary schools. The removal of the buses from 143rd Street West as described in the preceding paragraph will allow the reconfiguration of the drop-off areas along this street and in front of the elementary school. The plans call for the elimination of one of the current driveway openings in front of the middle school to provide more stacking for vehicles along 143rd Street West and to eliminate several pedestrian conflict points in this area. While the access to the car parking area will remain on 143rd Street West, the flow of buses will move from the 143rd Street West/Cameo Avenue intersection to the 144th Street West/Canada Avenue intersection. This means that residents along Canada will now experience approximately 60 bus trips per day (30 buses per day) when there are currently none. • The construction of new entrances into the high school and middle school facilities, along with the construction of a new student commons area and band rehearsal area at the high school. The high school project will add 12,000 square feet of space, while the middle school improvements will be limited to 940 square feet at the main entrance. In both cases, the new additions will extend out beyond the existing building entrances. • The plans include two potential future building additions to the elementary and middle schools that will not be constructed with the current project (and the school district has provided no time frame for their construction). The additions represent a small enough portion of the overall structures that they may be approved with just a building permit and would not be subject to a formal site plan and building design approval process. All of the planned modifications are described in much greater detail in the submission materials provided by the applicant. These include very detailed site surveys documenting existing conditions, site plans divided between the northern and southern portions of the school campus site, architectural plans for the high school and middle school entrance projects, and a detailed traffic study documenting projected traffic impacts in and around the school property. The applicant has also conducted a neighborhood meeting for property owners around the school site, and the presentation from that meeting is also available for review by request. The next section of this report includes staff’s analysis of the City’s relevant zoning requirements for the project. Additionally, staff has received a written report from the City’s Project Engineer with most of his comments focused on storm water plan details that will need to be addressed by the applicant along with a separate review memorandum concerning the traffic study. All of the proposed improvements, in total, will require site plan and building design review approval by the City, while only those aspects of the project associated with the elementary and middle schools will require a CUP. In order to provide a more straight-forward review, all of staff’s zoning review 5 comments (for both site plan and CUP review) are found under the Site Plan and Design Review heading, while only the findings specific to the CUP review are listed under the CUP Review heading. Site Plan and Design Review The purpose of a site plan review is to evaluate each project as it relates to the performance and site design standards of the zoning ordinance. Site plan approval is required for all commercial, industrial, institutional and multi-family development projects. In this case, the applicant is proposing to construct a series of improvements across the Rosemount High School, Middle School, and Elementary School campus that in total is subject to the site plan review process even though individual smaller projects may be exempt from such review. Staff has determined that all together, these improvements clearly meet the requirements for site plan review. Site plan applications are approved by the Planning Commission and considered a Quasi-Judicial action. As such, the City has a set of standards and requirements for review. Generally, if a site plan application meets the ordinance requirements it must be approved. These standards are outlined in Section 11-4-18 (Public and Institutional District) and 11-10-3 (Site and Building Plan Review). While the Planning Commission is the final authority for approval of site plans, due to the size and scope of the planned improvements, the Council will also be asked to review the plan for concurrence of the Commission’s recommendation. One of the unique aspects concerning the school district’s request is that the site pre-dates many of the City’s current zoning regulations, including storm water management, parking, and landscaping requirements. In addition, the proposed improvements do not substantially increase the amount of impervious coverage on the site, decrease the available parking, or alter the site in a manner that represents a major expansion from the existing conditions. In circumstances such as these, staff generally advises applicants to bring the site into conformance with current zoning requirements as much as practical, even though they may otherwise be allowed to continue an existing legal non- conformity. For any new construction or clear additions beyond current conditions (like the high school front entrance additions) the applicant will need to comply with all applicable code requirements. Traffic and Access Issues. The most significant alterations to the Rosemount school campus area concern the relocation of bus drop off areas from their present locations in front of the middle school and high school. To a lesser extent, the general loading unloading areas around the schools will also be modified according the plans. These changes are expected to alter some of the traffic patterns around the campus, and in particular, the streets being used by buses to drop off and pick up students every day. In order to address the potential impacts from these changes, the City asked that the school district complete a traffic study for the project, and recommended that the study examine the existing and forecast conditions for several intersections around the school site. SRF Consulting has completed a traffic study for the applicant, which examined the existing and future traffic conditions for intersections in the area bounded by 142nd Street West, Chili Avenue, 145th Street West, and South Robert Trail. In terms of expected traffic changes, the study demonstrates that the proposed site improvements will not change the overall levels of traffic coming to and from the school site on an area-wide basis since none of the changes will add additional students, teachers, or staff to the schools. The proposed changes will alter the types of traffic at intersections in the area since the primary intent of the improvements is to separate bus, parent/student drivers, and pedestrian traffic from each other. The most significant of the changes are as follows: 6 • The school notes in its traffic report that all High School buses will be directed to the Chili Avenue entrance since this street provides the most direct connection to the bus loading and unloading area in front of the school. Overall, this means that additional buses will be accessing the site from 145th Street West/Chili Avenue, with a corresponding reduction in bus traffic at the South Robert Trail entrance to the high school. • All bus traffic that previously stacked in front of the middle and elementary schools along 143rd Street West will now be directed to a dedicated bus loading and unloading area off of Canada Avenue and 144th Street West. This change will result in all of these buses ultimately accessing the new parking area from the 145th Street West and Canada Avenue intersection. This is a new traffic corridor for the neighborhood. • The direct connection between Chili Avenue and South Robert Trail through the high school site will be eliminated, which will likely eliminate some of the previous cut-through traffic between these two streets. Since the access to the parental drop-off area will be most readily accessible from 142nd Street West (the private eastern entrance to the school site from South Robert Trail), more parents and student drivers are expected to choose this entrance over the Chili Avenue access in the future. The traffic study notes that under present conditions, certain intersections in the area are experiencing large loads and delays during the morning and afternoon peak time periods. Traffic levels and delays at these intersections are not projected to substantially change after completion of the planned improvements. Essentially, if an intersection is experiencing issues at present, the proposed improvements will neither improve nor make these intersections any worse than they are today. Instead, some of these intersections may see additional bus traffic during peak periods, while others will see a reduction in bus traffic. Outside of the internal access roads in front of the high school, the intersections experiencing lower levels of service (more congestion) during peak times include the ones at South Robert Trail and 142nd and 143rd Streets and Chili Avenue/145th Street. These intersections are all identified for further review in the City’s Comprehensive Plan, and the City will need to continue working with the school district to monitor traffic conditions at these particular intersections in the future. Staff is recommending that the school district complete a follow-up traffic study once all improvements have been in place, and also encourages the district to continue conversations with both the City and MnDOT in the future about proper management of traffic along South Robert Trail at the school entrances. The traffic study gives a more complete view of the various traffic counts and level of service at various intersections for both the existing and future conditions around the school site. The City’s consulting transportation engineer has completed a review of the study and included his comments in a review letter attached to this report. Taking this review into account, staff offers the following comments or recommendations concerning traffic and access issues around the school campus: • The district should discourage the use of Chili Avenue by vehicles other than buses during the peak morning and afternoon periods. The traffic study indicated that all buses will enter and exit the site from Chili Avenue, but does not state that access will be limited for other users. The district may want to consider signage that restricts traffic to buses only during specific time periods to help avoid unnecessary conflicts with bus traffic. A final decision will be made after receiving the information from the follow up traffic study. The School District should be 7 on notice that additional modifications may be required by the City due to the findings of the future traffic analysis. • The City and school district will need to reevaluate certain intersections once the improvement projects are complete to verify new traffic patterns and deficiencies and to evaluate any needed traffic control improvements. The specific intersections that should be further evaluated include South Robert Trail and 142nd Street West, South Robert Trail and 143rd Street West, and Canada Avenue and 145th Street West. Depending on the timing of all improvements, the school district should perform a follow-up traffic and intersection analysis in late 2018 or early 2019. This study should also include a safety analysis examining the crash rate and severity rate of accidents at these intersections to determine if additional improvements are necessary. • The school district should continue to work with the City and MnDOT to evaluate and develop improvements at the South Robert Trail intersections to improve traffic flow and safety. These intersections are especially important given the increasing traffic levels within the state highway. • The school district should clarify whether or not parking will continue to be allowed along 142nd Street. The City’s transportation engineer is concerned that parking along the street could have an impact of the operations within the street (especially concerning turning movements into and out of the parental drop-off area). • The proposed intersection along 142nd Street West and the parent drop-off area should be reconfigured to eliminate the numerous conflict points in this area. The applicant should work with the City to develop an intersection that minimizes potential turning movements, avoids multiple pedestrian crossing points, provides safe access to the side and rear of the high school building and avoids unnecessary backups along 142nd Street. • The Chili Avenue and 145th Street West intersection has been improved with bump outs that could restrict the ability of larger vehicles to maneuver through this intersection. The school district should confirm that this intersection will function properly for buses that will be traveling through it. The City and the school district will need to continue working together to address transportation issues as they arise in the future. The district does not expect to see any significant increases in enrollments at any of the three schools near downtown Rosemount; however, there are certain intersections that have historically experienced a large amount of traffic and that may need further improvements to address safety and capacity issues in the future. Overall, the proposed project will bring needed safety and access improvements to the school while making relatively minor changes to the movement of traffic around the site as a whole. Storm Water M anagement and Grading . Because most of the planned improvements are replacing existing infrastructure and hard-surface areas, there is not an extensive amount of grading associated with the project. The high school parking lot will see a minor amount of grading around its perimeter in order to provide room for the access road and to provide some internal pathways and landscaping islands that do not presently exist on the site. Nearly all of this grading work will occur at the southern and eastern edges of the lot adjacent to the loop road. The City Engineer notes that the maximum slope permitted is 4:1 which should be verified by the applicant. Some of the slopes may 8 need to be adjusted in order to comply with this requirement. There is one retaining wall proposed at the south west corner of the high school parking lot within 20 feet of an adjacent residential lot. Any wall over 4 feet in height will need a building permit and must be designed by a licensed engineer. The elementary and middle school bus loading area will be constructed over an existing ball field area that is relatively level. A minimal amount of grading will be needed to accommodate the paving for the bus area. No new infiltration or storage of storm water is proposed around the high school, and the applicant will not be required to provide any new storage areas under the City’s ordinances because there is no net increase in impervious surface coverage in this part of the site. The applicant is encouraged to being the site into conformance with City’s requirements whenever possible; moreover, the system will continue to drain via new storm water pipes to an existing outlet near the southeast corner of the high school building (which then drains into the pond areas north of the school). Because the elementary and middle school bus parking area is new, the applicant will need to meet current storm water requirements for this additional impervious area. The applicant is proposing an underground chamber system to manage the storm water runoff in order to preserve as much of the ball field and play area space as possible around the new parking area. The City Engineer notes that additional information will be needed from the applicant in order to complete his review. Review and approval of this information is recommended as a condition of approval. Land Use & Zoning . The subject property is guided for either PI – Public Institutional (high school property) or LDR – Low Density Residential (elementary and middle schools) in accordance with the 2030 Future Land Use Plan. The present zoning of the property follows this designation and is consistent with the expected zoning for schools. The continued use and improvement of the three schools is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and allowed under the City’s zoning for the property. Lot and Building Standards. The school district campus in Rosemount covers over 85 acres with a significant amount of open space dedicated for ball fields, play areas, and the wooded hill side adjacent to Carroll’s Woods Park. None of the proposed improvements are located within any required setback areas for either the PI or R1A zoning district, so staff is not providing a detailed breakdown of all proposed setbacks for the project. The lot dimensional standard that should be discussed is the City’s impervious coverage requirement of 70% for PI zoning districts and 30% for R1A districts. Staff estimates that the entire site is under 30% coverage at present, and should remain under this amount with the additional bus loading area west of the elementary school. Because the bus loading area will be split between the two zoning districts, staff is recommending that the entire site be taken into consideration for determining compliance with this provision. The entire site will remain under 30% cover even after the improvements; therefore, the proposed plans demonstrate compliance with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. Without specific performance standards for school buildings, staff would also recommend following the PI district requirements for such buildings. Exterior Building Materials. The PI – Public Institutional building materials standards require all surfaces of buildings to be at least 50% brick or natural stone, with an allowance for other building materials over the remaining portions of the structure (such as concrete block, tile, concrete panels) and other decorative materials covering less than 10% of the non-glass or brick portion of the 9 building). Buildings are required to have“360 degree” architecture so that all sides of the building meet the architectural standards. Finally, the Zoning Ordinance requires larger buildings to include articulation to break up larger expanses of unadorned walls. Although the City does not specify design standards for the R1A zoning district, staff recommends using the PI requirements for the elementary school improvements to be consistent with the high school standards. The high school addition will extend roughly two-thirds of the length of the front of the building and create two new entry points into the facility directly in front of the existing entrances. The primary material for the addition will be brick matching the color and pattern of the current building. Glass will be featured predominately along the front of the building in order to create a much more open and spacious gathering area near the entrances. Aluminum and metal will be used for trim around the windows and doors and as metal coping for the roof of the building. The district’s architects have proposed a design that matches the existing high school buildings while adding a fair amount of glass to the building to improve views inside and outside the structure. All of the materials and portion of materials used comply with the City standards for new structures. The new band rehearsal area presents some challenges from a design perspective because of its size and the fact that windows cannot be used to help break up its mass. The proposed plans for the band space does match the rest of the building, and staff is not recommending any specific alterations to the plans for this reason. Overall, the architectural plans for the high school addition comply with the City’s design standards. The middle school project includes a much small addition that adds more office space to the front part of the building. This addition will consist of glass and brick also designed to match the existing style and colors of the materials used on the existing facility. With this improvement, the building will extend no further to the to the south than the classrooms on either side. The middle school addition is also in compliance with the City’s building design requirements. Access & Parking. The City’s parking requirements are the same for the various types of public schools: one parking stall for each classroom and one per 20 students. Although the plans submitted by the applicant do not include a complete count of classroom space, this information is not necessary to determine compliance with the Zoning Ordinance because none of the additional space will require additional parking. In general, the middle school would need around 150-200 spaces to comply with the City’s parking standards; the proposed plans show 190 stalls. At the high school, there are far more spaces than would be required by the Zoning Ordinance. The City’s parking standards require somewhere between 200-300 stalls, while the plans indicate there will be 740 total stalls around the site. Some of these additional stalls are needed for the stadium and auditorium associated with the high school, however, the proposed project will neither decrease the existing parking supply nor trigger the need for additional spaces. The issues associated with access to the schools and parking areas are addressed under the above traffic review. None of the existing access points into the school campus are will be altered with the improvement plans, and no modifications to City streets are proposed. Since the Planning Commission meeting, both the school district and Lighthouse Christian Church have raised questions concerning the ownership of the road between the elementary school and the church property. The church has provided the City with a copy of a warranty deed from the 1950’s that seems to indicate that the City does indeed own this stretch of property between the two entities. The City Attorney’s office is reviewing this information and will be proving an opinion on 10 the ownership situation. In terms of the present review, regardless of ownership, the road is not considered a City street and therefore must be maintained by the adjacent owners. If the City does indeed control the right-of-way through this area, the school district will need to secure a permit to make improvements within this property. As an alternative, the road could be vacated and revert back to private ownership since these does not appear to be any public purpose for maintaining a public road in this location. Staff has added a condition of approval to the draft resolution to address this issue. Parks and Trails. The school campus has a fairly extensive network of sidewalks and trails providing internal connections between the three schools, access to the play area and ball field on the site, links to the surrounding neighborhoods, and connections to the Caroll’s Woods trail system. The project maintains this sidewalk and trail system while improving direct pedestrian access to the front of each building and providing separated and safer access through the high school parking lot. The parks department is requesting that the school district consider adding a trail from the northeast portion of the high school building to the existing trails providing access to the northern ball fields east of Schwarz Pond. This trail would serve two purposes: 1) to provide a pedestrian link to the northern fields that connect directly to the school sidewalk and trail system, and 2) to provide a paved access for emergency vehicles that would otherwise need to cross a grass field or make a longer trip through Schwarz Pond Park to access the fields. Since such a trail would be outside the immediate project area, it is being offered as a recommendation and not a specific condition of approval. Landscaping . The high school and adjacent parking lot was constructed under an earlier ordinance with lessor requirements for landscaping associated with new construction. Although the site is therefore considered a legal non-conforming use (since it lacks the amount of interior parking lot landscaping or overall number of trees that are currently required), the applicant is proposing a landscape plan that brings the site closer into conformance with the City’s current standards. Most notably, the high school parking lot will include both interior planting islands and plantings around the perimeter of the lot. A distinguishing feature of the parking lot will be a pedestrian walkway through its middle with trees on either side of the sidewalk. In total, the applicant is proposing 46 deciduous and 45 coniferous trees (91 total) within the interior portions of the parking area where only 21 trees exist today. The ordinance does not otherwise specify a number of tress to be planted within PI zoning districts. The City’s tree removal and replacement requirements will apply to the site, and the applicant will be eliminating 27 existing trees from the area in front of the high school. This number will be nowhere near the 25% removal on the entire site that is allowed before replacement is required, so there are is no specific number of replacement trees required under the landscaping ordinance. Because the bus loading and unloading area west of the elementary school is new construction, this portion of the site will be subject to the City’s screening requirements for buffer yards and screening next to residential areas. These provisions include the following requirements: 1) A buffer yard equal to thirty feet (30') or two (2) times the height of the building, whichever is greater, shall be required along any side or rear property line abutting any residential use. This area shall contain landscaping and berming to provide a ninety percent (90%) opacity screen to a height of at least six feet (6') and shall not contain any structures, parking, off street loading or storage, and 2) A minimum of ten percent (10%) of the parking area shall be landscaped; a minimum of one tree shall 11 be required for each two hundred fifty (250) square feet or fraction thereof, of required landscape area. Based on these standards, the applicant should provide approximately 2,000 square feet of landscaping around the bus loading area with a minimum of eight trees. Staff is also recommending a more robust level of screening between the bus parking are and adjacent homes to the west in order to comply with the above requirements. There are some existing deciduous trees on along this border that will remain with the project; however, the school district should plant additional coniferous trees in this area to achieve a 90% opacity screen to the required height of six feet. Staff is recommending a condition of approval that will require an updated landscape plan for this area. Signage. The applicant is not proposing any changes to existing signage for any of the schools. Exterior Lighting . The applicant has submitted an overall lighting and photometric plan as part of the request, and the plans demonstrate compliance with the City’s light intensity standards. Specifically, the light fixtures to be used are shielded and will direct light towards the ground (and not towards residential property) and the parking lot lighting will not exceed a reading of 0.5 lumens along any residential property line (the maximum level near any residential property according the plans will be 0.2 lumens). The lighting ordinance also specifies a maximum height of 20 feet for light poles within 100 feet of a residential property, while the applicant is proposing 30 feet for all of the light fixtures around parking areas. The light fixtures to the west of the elementary and middle school bus loading area and at least one of the fixtures in the southernmost portion of the high school lot do not conform to 20 foot limitation and will need to be lowered to bring the lighting into conformance with this section. Trash E nclosure . No changes are proposed for the existing trash pick-up areas for each of the school buildings. Engineering . Detailed grading, erosion control, and storm water management plans have been submitted with the application, and these plans, along with the proposed connections to existing City utilities within and adjacent to the project site have been reviewed by the City’s Project Engineer. The Engineer’s comments and recommendations are included in a September 26, 2017 memorandum (attached), and include specific recommendations concerning the planned utility connections and storm water management plan. The bulk of these comments address the need for minor modifications to the plans, which must be addressed by the applicant prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit for the site. In general, the City Engineer has found that the plans are in conformance with the City’s storm water management regulations pending review of final submission documents. Development Fees. The proposed improvement projects must be reviewed under Met Council requirements to determine if additional sewer and water connection charges will be generated by the project. This analysis will need to be completed prior to the issuance of a building permit for the project, and any additional fees will be collected with the building permit. Conditional Use Permit Review A conditional use permit is required for the middle school addition because it is located within a R1A zoning district. The City may approve a CUP upon finding that the use at the proposed location: 1) Will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, or general welfare of the 12 neighborhood or the city. 2) Will be harmonious with the objectives of the comprehensive plan and city code provisions. 3) Will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained so as to be compatible or similar in an architectural and landscape appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and will not change the essential character of that area, nor substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. 4) Will be served adequately by existing (or those proposed in the project) essential public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage, structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems and schools. 5) Will not involve uses, activities, processes, material equipment and conditions of operation that will be hazardous or detrimental to any persons, property, or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors. 6) Will have vehicular ingress and egress to the property which does not create traffic congestion or interfere with traffic on surrounding public streets. 7) Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic, or historic feature of major importance and will comply with all local, state, and federal environmental quality standards. 8) These standards apply in addition to specific conditions as may be applied throughout this code. Based on the staff review and analysis for the above site and building design analysis, staff has determined that middle school addition meets each of these required findings. RECOMMENDATION Staff and the Planning Commission recommend approval of the site plan and building design review for Independent School District 196 to allow the reconfiguration and reconstruction of the parking and drop-off areas around the Rosemount High School, Middle School, and Elementary School campus and additions to the High School and Middle School buildings, subject to conditions, and further recommends approval of the conditional use permit to allow a small addition to the Rosemount Middle School facility, a reconfiguration of the parking area in front of the Middle School, and the construction of a new bus drop-off area west of the Rosemount Elementary School. These recommendations are based on the plan submitted by the applicant, the findings made in this report and the conditions outlined in the resolution of approval. CITY OF ROSEMOUNT DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2017- A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) WITH SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 196 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department of the City of Rosemount received an application from Independent School District #196, 3455 153rd Street West (Applicant), requesting a Site and Building Design Review and Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to reconfigure and reconstruct the parking and drop-off areas around the Rosemount High School, Middle School, and Elementary School campus and to construct additions to the High School and Middle School buildings; and WHEREAS, on September 26, 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount held a public hearing to review the Site and Building Design Review and CUP for the Applicant’s proposed site and building improvements; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission adopted a motion to recommend that the City Council approve the Site and Building Design Review and CUP for the Applicant’s proposed site and building improvements; and WHEREAS, on October 17, 2017, the City Council of the City of Rosemount reviewed the Planning Commission recommendation concerning the Applicant’s request. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Rosemount hereby approves the Site and Building Design Review and CUP to reconfigure and reconstruct the parking and drop-off areas around the Rosemount High School, Middle School, and Elementary School campus and to construct additions to the High School and Middle School buildings, subject to the following conditions: 1) Submission of a landscape security equal to one hundred and ten percent (110%) of the total cost of the plantings. 2) Installation of additional landscaping of sufficient quantity to provide a ninety percent (90%) opacity screen to a height of at least six feet (6') from the residential properties west of the elementary and middle school bus loading area. 3) Inclusion of at least eight trees adjacent to or within the elementary and middle school bus loading area. 4) Reconfiguration of the intersection adjacent to the high school parent drop off area to reduce turning and pedestrian conflict points subject to review and approval by the City. Consider relocation of the driveway providing access to the east side of the high school away from 142nd Street. 5) Submission of an agreement between the school district and the Lighthouse Christian Church concerning ownership and maintenance responsibility for the private road providing access to the elementary and middle school bus loading area prior to installation of the loading area. 6) If the City Attorney determines that the road providing access to the elementary and middle school bus loading area is owned by the City, the applicant shall either secure proper permits from the City to construct private improvements on public property, or as an alternative may request to vacate said right-of-way subject to review and approval of by the City. RESOLUTION 2017- 2 7) Conformance with all conditions as outlined in the review memorandum from the City Engineer dated September 26, 2017. 8) Conformance with all conditions as outlined in the review memorandum from the Fire Marshall dated September 7, 2017. 9) Light fixtures within 100 feet of a residential property line shall be no higher than 20 feet. 10) Payment of any required sewer and connection charges due the building additions as determined by the Metropolitan Council. 11) Upon completion of all improvements, the school district shall perform a follow-up traffic and intersection analysis in late 2018 or early 2019. The study should also include a safety analysis examining the crash rate and severity rate of accidents at intersections to determine if additional improvements are necessary. The School District will share in financial participation for modifications needed to address neighborhood and roadway impacts associated with the proposed 2017 site plan changes. 12) The School District will work with the City regarding future upgrades to Hwy 3 relating to school entrance geometrics and safety. ADOPTED this 17th day of October, 2017 by the City Council of the City of Rosemount. __________________________________________ William H. Droste, Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________________ Clarissa Hadler, City Clerk PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES SEPTEMBER 26, 2017 PAGE 1 I. Regular Meeting Call to Order: Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission was held on Tuesday, September 26, 2017. Chair Kenninger called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. with Commissioners VanderWiel, Clements, and Freeman. Commissioner Mele was absent. Also in attendance were Community Development Director Lindquist, Senior Planner Klatt, Planner Nemcek, Engineer Hatcher and Recording Secretary Bodsberg. The Pledge of Allegiance was said. Additions to Agenda: None. Audience Input: None. Consent Agenda: a.Approval of the July 25, 2017 Regular Meeting Minutes. MOTION by Clements. Second by VanderWeil. Ayes: 4. Nays: 0. b.Approval of the September 12, 2017 Work Session Meeting Minutes. MOTION by Freeman. Second by Clements. Ayes: 4. Nays: 0. Public Hearing: 5.a. Request by Rosemount-Apple Valley-Eagan Public Schools Independent School District #196 for a Site Plan and Conditional Use Permit approval to allow parking, access and entrance improvements to the Rosemount High School, Middle School, and Elementary School campus. (17-35-SP & 17-36-CUP) Senior Planner Klatt gave a brief summary of the staff report for the Planning Commission. The public hearing opened at 7:01 pm. Public Comments: Scott McQueen, representing Independent School District #196, St. Paul, MN, stated that there are three key factors that went into their plan; safety and security, additional spaces for learning, and technology for learning. Mr. McQueen stated that the current site situations can get chaotic. The proposed changes can create dedicated locations for parents and busses to safely drop-off and pick-up students. All of the intersection traffic has been intensely studied. Commissioner Clements questioned where all of the reserved parking will be moved to. Mr. McQueen stated that they will be moved to the large parking lot out of the three parking lots created. They will be the closest parking to the buildings. Clements stated that the parking will be essentially pulled away from the front of the building. Mr. McQueen confirmed that is correct. Commissioner Clements questioned how the future housing will impact the schools. Mr. McQueen stated that most of the impacts are at the elementary level. The school district will be evaluating and they are seeing that less high school students are driving. Commissioner Clements questioned if the project will increase the amount of impervious surfaces within the project area. Mr. McQueen stated that the existing impervious coverage for the overall site is very close to the proposed coverage. PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES SEPTEMBER 26, 2017 PAGE 2 Chair Kenninger questioned if the loss of parking spots at the middle school. Mr. McQueen stated that he doesn’t believe there will be a loss of parking. What parking spaces are lost in the lot they will be picked up on the street. Commissioner Freeman inquired if the updates at the high school will increase the security. Mr. McQueen stated that both entrances will be secured and all visitors will be routed to the office to get screened before they can move forward into the building. Freeman noted that Colorado Spruce trees are no longer recommended for the Minnesota climate. Commissioner Clements questioned if a roundabout is recommended Dave Lakey, 14701 Denmark Ct, Lakeville, stated that he is a representative from the Lighthouse Christian Church. Mr. Lakey stated that the church is in support of the new bus loop and MOTION by Clements to close the public hearing. Second by Freeman. Ayes: 4. Nays: 0. Motion Passes. The public hearing was closed at 7:29 pm. Additional Comments: Chair Kenninger stated that this is a great update to the schools and MOTION by VanderWeil to approve the site plan and building design review for Independent School District #196 to allow the reconfiguration and reconstruction of the parking and drop-off areas around the Rosemount High School, Middle School, and Elementary School campus and additions to the High School and Middle School buildings, subject to the following conditions: 1. Submission of a landscape security equal to one hundred and ten percent (110%) of the total cost of the plantings. 2. Installation of additional landscaping of sufficient quantity to provide a ninety percent (90%) opacity screen to a height of at least six feet (6’) from the residential properties west of the elementary and middle school bus loading area. 3. Inclusion of at least eight trees adjacent to or within the elementary and middle school bus loading area. 4. Reconfiguration of the intersection adjacent to the high school parent drop off area to reduce turning and pedestrian conflict points subject to review and approval of the City. Consider relocation of the driveway providing access to the east side of the high school away from 142nd Street. 5. Submission of an agreement between the school district and the Lighthouse Christian Church concerning ownership and maintenance responsibility for the private road providing access to the elementary and middle school bus loading area prior to installation of the loading area. 6. Conformance with all conditions as outlined in the review memorandum from the City Engineer dated September 26, 2017. 7. Conformance with all conditions as outlined in the review memorandum from the Fire Marshall dated September 7, 2017. 8. Light fixtures within 100 feet of a residential property line shall be no higher than 20 feet. 9. Payment of any required sewer and connection charges due at the building additions as determined by the Metropolitan Council. 10. Upon completion of all improvements, the school district shall perform a follow-up traffic and intersection analysis in late 2018 or early 2019. The study should also include a safety analysis examining the crash rate and severity rate of accidents at intersections to determine if additional improvements are necessary. The School District will share in financial participation for modifications needed to address neighborhood and roadway impacts associated with the proposed 2017 site plan changes. 11. The School District will work with the City regarding future upgrades to Highway 3 relating to school entrance geometrics and safety. Second by Clements. PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES SEPTEMBER 26, 2017 PAGE 3 Ayes: 4. Nays: 0. Motion Passes. MOTION by Clements to approve a Conditional Use Permit to allow a small addition to the Rosemount Middle School facility, a reconfiguration of the parking area in front of the Middle School, and the construction of a new bus drop-off area west of the Rosemount Elementary School on property that is zoned R1A – Low Density Residential, subject to all conditions approved as part of the City’s site plan and building design review for the project. Second by Freeman. Ayes: 4. Nays: 0. Motion Passes. 5.b. Request by John Green Partnership, LLC. for a Site Plan Review and Conditional Use Permit for the Drive-Through to redevelop the existing Hong Kong Bistro site. (17-33-SP & 17-34-CUP) Planner Nemcek gave a brief summary of the staff report for the Planning Commission. Commissioner Clements inquired as to the amount of traffic to the parking lot. Clements questioned if the traffic has been looked into. Planner Nemcek stated that the use is not much different since the site has previously been a restaurant. Engineer Hatcher stated that they can look into it but that he doesn’t see it being an issue. Chair Kenninger questioned if Canada Ave will be changed to just turning right only onto County Road 42. Community Development Director stated that isn’t accurate. It’s something that can be looked into closer. Clements stated that it might not be an issue with parking but that the volume of vehicles moving through the parking lot. Commissioner Freeman questioned if there is outdoor space for the restaurant. Nemcek stated that is not currently the case. Chair Kenninger inquired if the brick can be changed and adding architectural stone to the building. Nemcek stated that is something The public hearing opened at 7:49 pm. Public Comments: Dennis Blau, 604 Wilson Ave, Menomonee, WI, stated that Mr. Nemcek covered all of the main points and that they have nothing further to add. Roxanne Erhardt, 3270 Lower 150th St. W., stated that the additional restaurant building will add a lot of light to the area. Ms. Erhardy indicated that she can here the ordering system at McDonald’s. Additional a light from the Arby’s/Chipotle shines in her backyard. MOTION by Clements to close the public hearing. Second by Freeman. Ayes: 4. Nays: 0. Motion Passes. The public hearing was closed at 7:52 pm. Additional Comments: Chair Kenninger questioned if the drive-through could be redesigned so that the noise would not have an impact on the neighborhood. Planner Nemcek stated that there will be three tenants in the building and that redesigning the layout would be difficult for getting the other tenants in and out of the site. Independent School District 196 Property Information Se pte mber 14, 2017 0 875 1,750437.5 ft 0 270 540135 m 1:9,600 Disclaimer: Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not guaranteed. This is not a legal document and should not be substituted for a title search,appraisal, survey, or for zoning verification. August 29, 2017 City of Rosemount 2875 145th Street West Rosemount, Minnesota 55068 Re: Independent School District #196 Rosemount Schools 2018 Addition and Site Improvements Commission No. 152317, 152318 To Whom It May Concern: In November 2015, the taxpayers within School District #196 approved an $180,000,000 referendum. The approved, community-developed plan addresses security, safety and improving learning spaces to meet district standards among other needs. In Rosemount, The District is proposing a variety of improvements to meet its commitment to its voters. The proposed project was developed by staff at Rosemount Elementary, Middle and High Schools to best match their vision for the use of the site and supporting academic needs. Rosemount High School is proposing a 12,000 SF addition at the front of the building for improved circulation and secure/welcoming entry. Also as part of this addition is space for music rehearsal, practice and instrument storage. The Band addition is being designed to match the existing brick building while the Student Commons introduces a new feature to the school to promote collaborative learning and to enhance the process for arrival and connectivity with students and staff. This project combines with a significant parking lot/bus and parent drop-off, pavement reconstruction, which proposes a change to the through “street” that bisects the campus to improve vehicular and pedestrian safety Rosemount Middle School is proposing a 940 SF addition to bring the current office up to district standards and to enhance their front door security and supervision. The office addition is designed to match the existing brick building. There is also a proposal to improve overall safety at the Elementary and Middle School campus by separating bus drop-off from parent pick-up by providing a new dedicated bus area off Canada Avenue, which will free up the main lot for parents and visitors. The proposed project does not increase daily capacity students or staff. These enhancements allow the current population to enjoy an improved standard of quality. Upon approval, these projects will begin fall of 2017 and plan to be completed in the fall of 2018. The person coordinating the project on behalf of District #196 is Sara Kelzenberg, Wold Architects and Engineers, 332 Minnesota Street, Suite W2000, Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55101, ph. 651-227-7773 Sincerely, Wold Architects and Engineers Sara Kelzenberg JB/ISD_196/152317/crsp/aug17 ROSEMOUNT HIGH SCHOOL366,654 SFPROPERTY LINE10 PARKINGSPACES143RD ST WUPPER 143RD ST W144TH ST W143RD ST WCAMEO AVE WS R O B E R T T R L 166EXISTINGPARKINGSPACES14 EXISTINGPARKING SPACES25 BUSSTALLS160 SPACESHIGH SCHOOL PARKING CALCULATION:EXISTING STALLS 708 (1 STALL PER 518 SF)PROPOSED STALLS 740 (1 STALL PER 512 SF)196 SPACES322SPACESROTATED FIELD142ND ST WMARCHING BANDPRACTICE FIELDENTRYENTRY52 SPACES29 BUS STALLS10SPACESRETAININGWALLCONTROLLEDINTERSECTIONGATECONTROLLEDINTERSECTIONCHILI AVE12,000 SF ADDITION:STUDENT COMMONS &BAND REHEARSALEXISTINGPLAYGROUNDROSEMOUNTELEMENTARYSCHOOL71,393 SFENTRYPARENT DROP OFFENTRYPARENT DROP OFFMIDDLE / ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PARKING:EXISTING STALLS 194PROPOSED STALLS 190ROSEMOUNTMIDDLE SCHOOL149, 357 SFOFFICEADDITION:940 SFPOTENTIAL FUTURECLASSROOM ADDITION6,500 SFPOTENTIAL FUTURECLASSROOM ADDITION3,000 SFC:\Users\sdanielson\Documents\ROSEMOUNT HIGH SCHOOL 2018 BASE_sdanielson@woldae.com.rvt9/6/2017 3:56:13 PMISD #196: ROSEMOUNT - APPLE VALLEY - EAGAN PUBLIC SCHOOLSSEPTEMBER 7, 2017Comm No: 152317Central: \\Wae-srv-mn.woldae.com\StPaul\ISD196\HS_Rosemount\ROSEMOUNT HIGH SCHOOL 2018 BASE.rvtOVERALL SITE PLAN0 1" = 80'-0"OVERALL SITE PLAN160' 120' LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SITE PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERINGANDERSON - JOHNSONASSOCIATES,INC.7575 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD SUITE 200 MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55427FAX (763) 544-0531 PH (763) 544-712DateRegistration NumberCheckDrawnDate:CommI hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared byme or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensedunder the laws of the State ofRevisionsDescription Date NumScale:NorthEXISTINGDRAINAGEAREA MAPDAVID A. REYXX/XX/XX40180152317A08/29/2017METDAR1" = 100'C0.11MINNESOTAPROFESSIONAL ENGINEERISD #196: ROSEMOUNT -APPLE VALLEY - EAGANPUBLIC SCHOOLS3455 153RD STREET WESTROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 550683335 142ND STREET WESTROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068ROSEMOUNT HIGHSCHOOL 2018PARKINGPond P1E1E4E2Tank E2Tank MSE3E5E61L 936937937937937937937938938938938938938938938938939939939939939939939939939 939939940940940940940940940940940940940940940941941941941941941941941941941941942942 942942942942942943943943943943944944944944944944944945 945945945945945945946946946946946946 947947947947947947947948948948948948948949949949949949949950950950950950951951951 951951952952952 952952953953953953953954954 954954955955955955956956956956976976976977977977978978978978978979979 979979979979 979980980980980980980 981981981 957957957957981 98277.778.078.278.478.777.876.475.576.575.578.779.779.779.479.879.779.179.979.280.080.379.279.279.580.380.080.080.379.979.680.080.481.881.581.280.880.979.980.779.880.679.580.380.579.480.279.575.576.477.778.595795843.043.043.043.043.043.043.043.043.043.043.036.537.238.878.978.077.579.779.579.579.579.579.079.579.178.678.778.980.142.542.542.542.442.242.342.542.542.537.538.040.640.540.440.240.040.143.043.344.338.939.038.239.339.940.239.439.640.941.841.640.740.340.140.040.239.239.137.746.546.346.747.446.745.945.645.846.546.145.245.045.346.146.947.747.147.556.054.856.957.567.566.738.439.039.639.939.338.738.043.143.442.137.138.138.838.938.638.837.538.139.639.839.840.039.639.939.539.237.838.137.237.538.137.838.939.046.346.248.155.156.156.138.738.638.938.256.157.056.756.556.056.240.240.540.741.139.740.340.440.240.640.740.640.540.440.940.840.240.039.738.839.540.540.639.839.939.139.840.340.741.040.941.639.940.639.440.140.341.041.142.242.241.840.740.539.837.936.438.437.338.538.939.239.138.938.647.548.347.843.243.543.245.645.945.646.344.644.944.645.344.543.844.143.844.944.244.544.246.046.446.445.545.647.147.047.456.156.357.056.8LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SITE PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERINGANDERSON - JOHNSONASSOCIATES,INC.7575 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD SUITE 200 MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55427FAX (763) 544-0531 PH (763) 544-712DateRegistration NumberCheckDrawnDate:CommI hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared byme or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensedunder the laws of the State ofRevisionsDescription Date NumScale:NorthPROPOSEDDRAINAGEAREA MAPDAVID A. REYXX/XX/XX40180152317A08/29/2017METDAR1" = 100'C0.12MINNESOTAPROFESSIONAL ENGINEERISD #196: ROSEMOUNT -APPLE VALLEY - EAGANPUBLIC SCHOOLS3455 153RD STREET WESTROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 550683335 142ND STREET WESTROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068ROSEMOUNT HIGHSCHOOL 2018PARKINGPond P1P1AP4P2Tank E2Tank MSP3P5P61LP1B1P REMOVE EXISTING LIFT STATIONAND RELATED COMPONENTSREMOVE EXISTINGFORCEMAINLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SITE PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERINGANDERSON - JOHNSONASSOCIATES,INC.7575 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD SUITE 200 MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55427FAX (763) 544-0531 PH (763) 544-712DateRegistration NumberCheckDrawnDate:CommI hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared byme or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensedunder the laws of the State ofRevisionsDescription Date NumScale:NorthREMOVALSPLANNORTHDAVID A. REYXX/XX/XX40180152317A08/29/2017METDAR1" = 40'C1.11MINNESOTAPROFESSIONAL ENGINEERISD #196: ROSEMOUNT -APPLE VALLEY - EAGANPUBLIC SCHOOLS3455 153RD STREET WESTROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 550683335 142ND STREET WESTROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068ROSEMOUNT HIGHSCHOOL 2018PARKINGNOTES:LEGEND1. REFER TO SHEET C1.31, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN NORTH, FOR GENERAL NOTES.2. MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE TO SITE AND PROTECT EXISTING VEGETATION AND SITE FEATURES(CURBS, WALKS, PAVEMENTS, OVERHEAD AND UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, SIGNAGE, FENCING,ROADWAYS, ETC.) WHICH ARE TO REMAIN.3. REPAIR OR REPLACE EXISTING PROPERTY AND SITE FEATURES, INCLUDING GRASS ANDVEGETATION, WHICH IS TO REMAIN THAT IS DAMAGED BY THE WORK, TO OWNER'SSATISFACTION AND AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER.4. VISIT THE SITE PRIOR TO BIDDING; BE FAMILIAR WITH ACTUAL CONDITIONS IN THE FIELD.EXTRA COMPENSATION WILL NOT BE ALLOWED FOR CONDITIONS WHICH COULD HAVE BEENDETERMINED OR ANTICIPATED BY EXAMINATION OF THE SITE, THE CONTRACT DRAWINGS ANDTHE INFORMATION AVAILABLE PERTAINING TO EXISTING SOILS, UTILITIES AND OTHER SITECHARACTERISTICS.5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HIRE THE SERVICES OF A UTILITY LOCATOR COMPANY TO LOCATEALL PRIVATELY OWNED UTILITIES THAT MAY BE DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS.CONCRETE PAVEMENT REMOVALSCONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER REMOVALSBITUMINOUS PAVEMENT REMOVALSAGLIME REMOVALSFENCING REMOVALSUTILITY REMOVALSTREE REMOVALSMASS TREE / SHRUB REMOVALSSAWCUTAPPROXIMATE GRADING LIMITSPROPERTY LINE REMOVE EXISTINGFORCEMAINLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SITE PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERINGANDERSON - JOHNSONASSOCIATES,INC.7575 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD SUITE 200 MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55427FAX (763) 544-0531 PH (763) 544-712DateRegistration NumberCheckDrawnDate:CommI hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared byme or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensedunder the laws of the State ofRevisionsDescription Date NumScale:NorthREMOVALSPLANSOUTHDAVID A. REYXX/XX/XX40180152317A08/29/2017METDAR1" = 40'C1.12MINNESOTAPROFESSIONAL ENGINEERISD #196: ROSEMOUNT -APPLE VALLEY - EAGANPUBLIC SCHOOLS3455 153RD STREET WESTROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 550683335 142ND STREET WESTROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068ROSEMOUNT HIGHSCHOOL 2018PARKINGNOTES:LEGENDCONCRETE PAVEMENT REMOVALSCONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER REMOVALSBITUMINOUS PAVEMENT REMOVALSAGLIME REMOVALSFENCING REMOVALSUTILITY REMOVALSTREE REMOVALSMASS TREE / SHRUB REMOVALSSAWCUTAPPROXIMATE GRADING LIMITSPROPERTY LINE1. REFER TO SHEET C1.31, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN NORTH, FOR GENERAL NOTES.2. MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE TO SITE AND PROTECT EXISTING VEGETATION AND SITE FEATURES(CURBS, WALKS, PAVEMENTS, OVERHEAD AND UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, SIGNAGE, FENCING,ROADWAYS, ETC.) WHICH ARE TO REMAIN.3. REPAIR OR REPLACE EXISTING PROPERTY AND SITE FEATURES, INCLUDING GRASS ANDVEGETATION, WHICH IS TO REMAIN THAT IS DAMAGED BY THE WORK, TO OWNER'SSATISFACTION AND AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER.4. VISIT THE SITE PRIOR TO BIDDING; BE FAMILIAR WITH ACTUAL CONDITIONS IN THE FIELD.EXTRA COMPENSATION WILL NOT BE ALLOWED FOR CONDITIONS WHICH COULD HAVE BEENDETERMINED OR ANTICIPATED BY EXAMINATION OF THE SITE, THE CONTRACT DRAWINGS ANDTHE INFORMATION AVAILABLE PERTAINING TO EXISTING SOILS, UTILITIES AND OTHER SITECHARACTERISTICS.5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HIRE THE SERVICES OF A UTILITY LOCATOR COMPANY TO LOCATEALL PRIVATELY OWNED UTILITIES THAT MAY BE DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. PROPOSED BUS PARKING(29 BUS STALLS, 10 COOK STALLS)PROPOSED WESTPARKING A(160 STALLS)PROPOSED EAST PARKING(330 STALLS)48PROPOSED NORTH PARKING(50 STALLS)1415PROPOSED BUILDING ADDITIONREFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANSFOR DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT32165656PROPOSED WESTPARKING B(196 STALLS)323252526616PROPOSED WESTPARKING C(10 STALLS)2270787847102515.00'15.00'15.00'15.00'R35.00'R50.00' R35.00'R115.00'R110.00'R60.00'R20.00'R60.00'R80.00'R138.00'R35.00'R35.00'R50.00'R35.00'R15.00'R40.00'R55.00'R20.00'R25.00'R6.00' (TYPICAL)24.00'24.00'9' x 20' STALLS (TYPICAL)9' x 20' STALLS (TYPICAL)9' x 20' STALLS (TYPICAL)4" WIDE PAINT STRIPE (TYPICAL)4" WIDE PAINT STRIPE @ 3' O.C. (TYPICAL)PAINTED ACCESSIBLESYMBOL (TYPICAL)4" WIDE PAINT STRIPE (TYPICAL)4" WIDE PAINT STRIPE @ 3' O.C. (TYPICAL)4" WIDE PAINT STRIPE (TYPICAL)4" WIDE PAINT STRIPE @ 3' O.C. (TYPICAL)PAINTED ACCESSIBLESYMBOL (TYPICAL)R39.00'R350.00'RETAINING WALLRETAINING WALL6' WALK8' WALK10' WALK10' WALK12' WALK15' WALK10' WALK15' WALK15' WALK10' WALK12' WALK12' WALK24.00'40.00'24.00'24.00'30.00'24.00'24.00'24.00'12.00'12.00'12.00'LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SITE PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERINGANDERSON - JOHNSONASSOCIATES,INC.7575 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD SUITE 200 MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55427FAX (763) 544-0531 PH (763) 544-7129DateRegistration NumberCheckDrawnDate:CommI hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared byme or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensedunder the laws of the State ofRevisionsDescription Date NumScale:NorthSITEPLANNORTHDAVID A. REYXX/XX/XX40180152317A08/29/2017METDAR1" = 40'C1.21MINNESOTAPROFESSIONAL ENGINEERISD #196: ROSEMOUNT -APPLE VALLEY - EAGANPUBLIC SCHOOLS3455 153RD STREET WESTROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 550683335 142ND STREET WESTROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068ROSEMOUNT HIGHSCHOOL 2018PARKINGNOTES:LEGENDPROPOSED CONCRETE WALKPROPOSED CONCRETE SLABPROPOSED MEDIUM DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTPROPOSED HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTPROPOSED RETAINING WALLPROPOSED CHAIN LINK FENCINGPROPOSED TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNPAINTED ACCESSIBLE SYMBOLPROPOSED MANHOLE (MH)PROPOSED CATCH BASIN (CB)PROPOSED FLAGPOLEPROPERTY LINE1. REFER TO SHEET C1.31, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN NORTH, FOR GENERAL NOTES.2. CHECK ALL PLAN AND DETAIL DIMENSIONS AND VERIFY SAME BEFORE FIELD LAYOUT.3. SIGNAGE SHALL GENERALLY BE INSTALLED 18" BEHIND THE BACK OF CURB.4. ALL DISTURBED AREAS OUTSIDE THE BUILDING PAD WHICH ARE NOT DESIGNATED TO BEPAVED SHALL RECEIVE AT LEAST 6" OF TOPSOIL AND SHALL BE SODDED OR SEEDED.5. WHERE NEW SOD MEETS EXISTING TURF, EXISTING TURF EDGE SHALL BE CUT TO ALLOW FORA CONSISTENT, UNIFORM STRAIGHT EDGE. JAGGED OR UNEVEN EDGES WILL NOT BEACCEPTABLE. REMOVE TOPSOIL AT JOINT BETWEEN EXISTING AND NEW AS REQUIRED TOALLOW NEW SOD SURFACE TO BE FLUSH WITH EXISTING.6. FAILURE OF TURF DEVELOPMENT: IN THE EVENT THE CONTRACTOR FAILS TO PROVIDE ANACCEPTABLE TURF, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RE-SOD OR RE-SEED ALL APPLICABLE AREAS,AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER, TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER. PROPOSED BUS PARKING(25 BUS STALLS)PROPOSED BUILDING ADDITIONREFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANSFOR DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT10R60.00'R80.00'15' WALK24.00'24.00'24.00'LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SITE PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERINGANDERSON - JOHNSONASSOCIATES,INC.7575 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD SUITE 200 MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55427FAX (763) 544-0531 PH (763) 544-7129DateRegistration NumberCheckDrawnDate:CommI hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared byme or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensedunder the laws of the State ofRevisionsDescription Date NumScale:NorthSITEPLANSOUTHDAVID A. REYXX/XX/XX40180152317A08/29/2017METDAR1" = 40'C1.22MINNESOTAPROFESSIONAL ENGINEERISD #196: ROSEMOUNT -APPLE VALLEY - EAGANPUBLIC SCHOOLS3455 153RD STREET WESTROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 550683335 142ND STREET WESTROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068ROSEMOUNT HIGHSCHOOL 2018PARKINGNOTES:LEGENDPROPOSED CONCRETE WALKPROPOSED CONCRETE SLABPROPOSED MEDIUM DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTPROPOSED HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTPROPOSED RETAINING WALLPROPOSED CHAIN LINK FENCINGPROPOSED TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNPAINTED ACCESSIBLE SYMBOLPROPOSED MANHOLE (MH)PROPOSED CATCH BASIN (CB)PROPERTY LINE1. REFER TO SHEET C1.31, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN NORTH, FOR GENERAL NOTES.2. CHECK ALL PLAN AND DETAIL DIMENSIONS AND VERIFY SAME BEFORE FIELD LAYOUT.3. SIGNAGE SHALL GENERALLY BE INSTALLED 18" BEHIND THE BACK OF CURB.4. ALL DISTURBED AREAS OUTSIDE THE BUILDING PAD WHICH ARE NOT DESIGNATED TO BEPAVED SHALL RECEIVE AT LEAST 6" OF TOPSOIL AND SHALL BE SODDED OR SEEDED.5. WHERE NEW SOD MEETS EXISTING TURF, EXISTING TURF EDGE SHALL BE CUT TO ALLOW FORA CONSISTENT, UNIFORM STRAIGHT EDGE. JAGGED OR UNEVEN EDGES WILL NOT BEACCEPTABLE. REMOVE TOPSOIL AT JOINT BETWEEN EXISTING AND NEW AS REQUIRED TOALLOW NEW SOD SURFACE TO BE FLUSH WITH EXISTING.6. FAILURE OF TURF DEVELOPMENT: IN THE EVENT THE CONTRACTOR FAILS TO PROVIDE ANACCEPTABLE TURF, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RE-SOD OR RE-SEED ALL APPLICABLE AREAS,AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER, TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER. PROPOSED BUS PARKING(29 BUS STALLS, 10 COOK STALLS)PROPOSED WESTPARKING A(160 STALLS)PROPOSED EAST PARKING(330 STALLS)PROPOSED NORTH PARKING(50 STALLS)936937937937937937937938938938938938938938938938939939939939939939939939939 939939940940940940940940940940940940940940940941941941941941941941941941941941942942 942942942942942943943943943943944944944944944944944945 945945945945945945946946946946946946 947947947947947947947948948948948948948949949949949949949950950950950950951951951 951951952952952 952952953953953953953954954 954954955955955955956956956956976976976977977977978978978979979 97998098098195795795795777.876.475.576.575.578.779.779.779.479.875.576.477.778.595795843.043.043.043.043.043.043.043.043.043.043.036.537.238.878.942.542.542.542.442.242.342.542.542.537.538.040.640.540.440.240.040.143.043.344.338.939.038.239.339.940.239.439.640.941.841.640.740.340.140.040.239.239.137.746.546.346.747.446.745.945.645.846.546.145.245.045.346.146.947.747.147.556.054.856.957.567.566.738.439.039.639.939.338.738.043.143.442.137.138.138.838.938.638.837.538.139.639.839.840.039.639.939.539.237.838.137.237.538.137.838.939.046.346.248.155.156.156.138.738.638.938.256.157.056.756.556.056.240.240.540.741.139.740.340.440.240.640.740.640.540.440.940.840.240.039.738.839.540.540.639.839.939.139.840.340.741.040.941.639.940.639.440.140.341.041.142.242.241.840.740.539.837.936.438.437.338.538.939.239.138.938.647.548.347.843.243.543.245.645.945.646.344.644.944.645.344.543.844.143.844.944.244.544.246.046.446.445.545.647.147.047.456.156.357.056.8PROPOSED BUILDING ADDITIONF.F.E. = 943.0 = ARCH. 100'-0"PROPOSED WESTPARKING B(196 STALLS)PROPOSED WESTPARKING C(10 STALLS)LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SITE PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERINGANDERSON - JOHNSONASSOCIATES,INC.7575 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD SUITE 200 MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55427FAX (763) 544-0531 PH (763) 544-7129DateRegistration NumberCheckDrawnDate:CommI hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared byme or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensedunder the laws of the State ofRevisionsDescription Date NumScale:NorthGRADING ANDDRAINAGE PLANNORTHDAVID A. REYXX/XX/XX40180152317A08/29/2017METDAR1" = 40'C1.31MINNESOTAPROFESSIONAL ENGINEERISD #196: ROSEMOUNT -APPLE VALLEY - EAGANPUBLIC SCHOOLS3455 153RD STREET WESTROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 550683335 142ND STREET WESTROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068ROSEMOUNT HIGHSCHOOL 2018PARKING1. ALL CONSTRUCTION MUST COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE STATE AND LOCAL ORDINANCES.2. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR AND SHALL PAY FOR ALL CONSTRUCTIONSTAKING / LAYOUT.3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN AND PAY FOR ALL RELATED CONSTRUCTION PERMITS,INCLUDING THE NPDES PERMIT FROM THE MPCA. SUBMIT A COPY OF ALL PERMITS TO THECITY.4. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAGE (CONSTRUCTIONZONES) NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. ALL SIGNAGE LAYOUTSMUST BE DESIGNED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND APPROVED BY LOCAL AUTHORITIES.5. INSTALL CONTROL FENCING AND BARRICADING AS NECESSARY TO PROTECT THE PUBLIC.6. INSPECT SITE AND REVIEW SOIL BORINGS TO DETERMINE EXTENT OF WORK AND NATURE OFMATERIALS TO BE HANDLED.7. REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR DEWATERING REQUIREMENTS.8. CHECK ALL PLAN AND DETAIL DIMENSIONS AND VERIFY SAME BEFORE FIELD LAYOUT.9. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR BUILDING AND STOOP DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT.10. REFER TO THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) NARRATIVE, PART OFSECTION 01 89 13, FOR EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS. SECTION 31 00 00 SHALL BERESPONSIBLE FOR FULL IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPP.11. MAINTAIN ADJACENT PROPERTY AND PUBLIC STREETS CLEAN FROM CONSTRUCTION CAUSEDDIRT AND DEBRIS ON A DAILY BASIS. PROTECT DRAINAGE SYSTEMS FROM SEDIMENTATIONAS A RESULT OF CONSTRUCTION RELATED DIRT AND DEBRIS.12. MAINTAIN DUST CONTROL DURING GRADING OPERATIONS.13. ALL EROSION CONTROL METHODS SHALL COMPLY WITH MPCA AND LOCAL REGULATIONS.14. CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE TO SITE AND PROTECT EXISTING SITE FEATURES(INCLUDING TURF AND VEGETATION) WHICH ARE TO REMAIN.15. PROPOSED CONTOURS AND SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN TO FINISH GRADE UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED.16. PROPOSED ELEVATIONS SHOWN TYPICALLY AS 50.1 OR 50 SHALL BE UNDERSTOOD TO MEAN950.1 OR 950.17. SPOT ELEVATIONS SHOWN IN PARKING LOTS, DRIVES AND ROADS INDICATE GUTTER GRADES,UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. SPOT ELEVATIONS WITH LABELS OUTSIDE THE BUILDINGPERIMETER INDICATE PROPOSED GRADES OUTSIDE THE BUILDING. SPOT ELEVATIONS WITHLABELS INSIDE THE BUILDING PERIMETER INDICATE PROPOSED FINISH FLOOR ELEVATIONS.18. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING QUANTITIES OF CUT,FILL AND WASTE MATERIALS TO BE HANDLED, AND FOR AMOUNT OF GRADING TO BE DONE INORDER TO COMPLETELY PERFORM ALL WORK INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS. IMPORTSUITABLE MATERIAL AND EXPORT UNSUITABLE / EXCESS / WASTE MATERIAL AS REQUIRED. ALL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH IMPORTING AND EXPORTING MATERIALS SHALL BE INCIDENTALTO THE CONTRACT.19. NO FINISHED SLOPES SHALL EXCEED 4' HORIZONTAL TO 1' VERTICAL (4:1), UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED.20. ALL DISTURBED AREAS OUTSIDE THE BUILDING PAD WHICH ARE NOT DESIGNATED TO BEPAVED SHALL RECEIVE AT LEAST 6" OF TOPSOIL AND SHALL BE SEEDED OR SODDED.21. WHERE NEW SOD MEETS EXISTING SOD, EXISTING SOD EDGE SHALL BE CUT TO ALLOW FOR ACONSISTENT, UNIFORM STRAIGHT EDGE. JAGGED OR UNEVEN EDGES WILL NOT BEACCEPTABLE. REMOVE TOPSOIL AT JOINT BETWEEN EXISTING AND NEW AS REQUIRED TOALLOW NEW SOD SURFACE TO BE FLUSH WITH EXISTING.22. FAILURE OF TURF DEVELOPMENT: IN THE EVENT THE CONTRACTOR FAILS TO PROVIDE ANACCEPTABLE TURF, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RE-SEED OR RE-SOD ALL APPLICABLE AREAS,AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER, TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER.23. ANY MANHOLE, CATCH BASIN, STORM SEWER, SANITARY SEWER, DRAINTILE OR OTHERPOTENTIAL SOURCE FOR CONTAMINATION SHALL BE INSTALLED AT LEAST 10 FEETHORIZONTALLY FROM ANY WATERMAIN PER MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE. THIS ISOLATIONDISTANCE SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THE OUTER EDGE OF THE PIPE TO THE OUTER EDGE OFTHE CONTAMINATION SOURCE (OUTER EDGE OF STRUCTURES OR PIPING OR SIMILAR).24. LOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES, VERIFY LOCATION, SIZE AND INVERT ELEVATION OF ALLEXISTING UTILITIES. VERIFY LOCATIONS, SIZES AND ELEVATIONS OF SAME BEFOREBEGINNING CONSTRUCTION.25. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN DRAINAGE FROM EXISTING BUILDING AT ALL TIMES. PROVIDETEMPORARY STORM SEWER (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, CATCH BASINS, MANHOLES,PIPING, ETC.) AS REQUIRED. EXISTING STORM SEWER SHALL NOT BE REMOVED UNTILTEMPORARY OR PERMANENT STORM SEWER IS INSTALLED AND FUNCTIONAL. COORDINATEALL REMOVALS WITH APPROPRIATE TRADES (SITE UTILITY CONTRACTOR, MECHANICALCONTRACTOR, ETC.) AS REQUIRED.GENERAL NOTESLEGENDEXISTING CONTOUREXISTING SPOT ELEVATIONPROPOSED CONTOURPROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONPROPOSED GRADING LIMITSAPPROXIMATE SOIL BORING / TEST PIT LOCATIONPROPOSED MANHOLE (MH)PROPOSED CATCH BASIN (CB)PROPOSED HYDRANT (HYD)PROPERTY LINE95554.6 PROPOSED BUS PARKING(25 BUS STALLS)953954955956956976976976977977977978978978978978979979 979979979979 979980980980980980980 981981981 957957957981 98277.778.078.278.478.777.876.475.576.575.578.779.779.779.479.879.779.179.979.280.080.379.279.279.580.380.080.080.379.979.680.080.481.881.581.280.880.979.980.779.880.679.580.380.579.480.279.575.576.477.778.595795878.978.077.579.779.579.579.579.579.079.579.178.678.778.980.156.055.156.156.156.157.056.756.556.056.257.056.8PROPOSED BUILDING ADDITIONF.F.E. = 978.5 = ARCH. 100'-0"LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SITE PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERINGANDERSON - JOHNSONASSOCIATES,INC.7575 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD SUITE 200 MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55427FAX (763) 544-0531 PH (763) 544-7129DateRegistration NumberCheckDrawnDate:CommI hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared byme or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensedunder the laws of the State ofRevisionsDescription Date NumScale:NorthGRADING ANDDRAINAGE PLANSOUTHDAVID A. REYXX/XX/XX40180152317A08/29/2017METDAR1" = 40'C1.32MINNESOTAPROFESSIONAL ENGINEERISD #196: ROSEMOUNT -APPLE VALLEY - EAGANPUBLIC SCHOOLS3455 153RD STREET WESTROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 550683335 142ND STREET WESTROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068ROSEMOUNT HIGHSCHOOL 2018PARKINGLEGENDEXISTING CONTOUREXISTING SPOT ELEVATIONPROPOSED CONTOURPROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONPROPOSED GRADING LIMITSAPPROXIMATE SOIL BORING / TEST PIT LOCATIONPROPOSED MANHOLE (MH)PROPOSED CATCH BASIN (CB)PROPOSED HYDRANT (HYD)PROPERTY LINE95554.61. REFER TO SHEET C1.31, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN NORTH, FOR GENERAL NOTES.NOTES PROPOSED BUS PARKING(29 BUS STALLS, 10 COOK STALLS)PROPOSED WESTPARKING A(160 STALLS)PROPOSED EAST PARKING(330 STALLS)PROPOSED NORTH PARKING(50 STALLS)936937937937937937937938938938938938938938938938939939939939939939939939939 939939940940940940940940940940940940940940940941941941941941941941941941941941942942 942942942942942943943943943943944944944944944944944945 945945945945945945946946946946946946 947947947947947947947948948948948948948949949949949949949950950950950950951951951 951951952952952 952952953953953953953954954 954954955955955955956956956956976976976977977977978978978979979 97998098098195795795795777.876.475.576.575.578.779.779.779.479.875.576.477.778.595795843.043.043.043.043.043.043.043.043.043.043.036.537.238.878.942.542.542.542.442.242.342.542.542.537.538.040.640.540.440.240.040.143.043.344.338.939.038.239.339.940.239.439.640.941.841.640.740.340.140.040.239.239.137.746.546.346.747.446.745.945.645.846.546.145.245.045.346.146.947.747.147.556.054.856.957.567.566.738.439.039.639.939.338.738.043.143.442.137.138.138.838.938.638.837.538.139.639.839.840.039.639.939.539.237.838.137.237.538.137.838.939.046.346.248.155.156.156.138.738.638.938.256.157.056.756.556.056.240.240.540.741.139.740.340.440.240.640.740.640.540.440.940.840.240.039.738.839.540.540.639.839.939.139.840.340.741.040.941.639.940.639.440.140.341.041.142.242.241.840.740.539.837.936.438.437.338.538.939.239.138.938.647.548.347.843.243.543.245.645.945.646.344.644.944.645.344.543.844.143.844.944.244.544.246.046.446.445.545.647.147.047.456.156.357.056.8PROPOSED BUILDING ADDITIONF.F.E. = 943.0 = ARCH. 100'-0"NEW LIFT STATIONAND FORCEMAINCONNECT TOEXISTING FORCEMAINCONNECT TOEXISTING FORCEMAINCONNECT TOEXISTING FORCEMAINCONSTRUCT NEWFORCEMAIN1AAAAAAAMH 101CONNECT EXISTING STORM PIPESTO NEW STRUCTURE. PROVIDEFLEXIBLE JOINTS AT CONNECTIONS.PROPOSED WESTPARKING B(196 STALLS)PROPOSED WESTPARKING C(10 STALLS)AAAAAACB 1CB 2xx" IDCB 3A, 3B, 3C, 3D, & 3ECB 9A, 9B, & 9CCB 4CB 8CB 10CB 11CB 12CB 13CB 14A & 14BCB 15CB 16A, 16B, & 16CCB 17CB 17CB 18 (EXISTING)ADJUST TO FINISH GRADE ANDREPLACE CASTING. CONNECT TOEXISTING STRUCTURE -RECONSTRUCT AS REQUIRED.CB 19CB 20MH 102MH 103MH 104STAKE AND LATH SODSTAKE AND LATH SODSTAKE AND LATH SODSTAKE AND LATH SODSTAKE AND LATH SODSTAKE AND LATH SODSTAKE AND LATH SODALANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SITE PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERINGANDERSON - JOHNSONASSOCIATES,INC.7575 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD SUITE 200 MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55427FAX (763) 544-0531 PH (763) 544-7129DateRegistration NumberCheckDrawnDate:CommI hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared byme or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensedunder the laws of the State ofRevisionsDescription Date NumScale:NorthUTILITY,SEDIMENT, ANDEROSIONCONTROL PLANNORTHDAVID A. REYXX/XX/XX40180152317A08/29/2017METDAR1" = 40'C1.41MINNESOTAPROFESSIONAL ENGINEERISD #196: ROSEMOUNT -APPLE VALLEY - EAGANPUBLIC SCHOOLS3455 153RD STREET WESTROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 550683335 142ND STREET WESTROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068ROSEMOUNT HIGHSCHOOL 2018PARKING1. REFER TO SHEET C1.31, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN NORTH, FOR GENERAL NOTES.2. ALL WATERMAIN PIPE SHALL BE DIP, CLASS 52. ALL WATERMAIN SHALL HAVE MINIMUM 8'-0"BURY (TOP OF PIPE TO FINISH GRADE). DIP SHALL BE ENCASED WITH POLYETHYLENE FILMCONFORMING TO ASTM D 1248-889.3. ALL SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE PVC PIPE (ASTM D 3034, SDR 26), UNLESS OTHERWISENOTED. SANITARY SEWER INSTALLATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D2321.4. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE RCP, CLASS III (MIN.), WITH FLEXIBLE WATERTIGHT JOINTSIN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM C-361 OR PVC PIPE (ASTM D3034, SDR 35) INSTALLED INACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D2321, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.5. FLEXIBLE JOINTS AT STORM SEWER PIPE CONNECTIONS TO STRUCTURES:a. IN ACCORDANCE WITH MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE, PROVIDE FLEXIBLE JOINTS AT ALLPIPE CONNECTIONS TO ALL STORM SEWER STRUCTURES.b. ACCEPTABLE MANUFACTURERS / PRODUCTS:i.FERNCO, “CONCRETE MANHOLE ADAPTORS” OR “LARGE-DIAMETER WATERSTOPS”ii. PRESS-SEAL, WATERSTOP GROUTING RINGS”iii. OR APPROVED EQUAL.6. WATERMAIN SHALL BE INSTALLED AT LEAST 10 FEET HORIZONTALLY FROM ANY MANHOLE,CATCH BASIN, STORM SEWER, SANITARY SEWER, DRAINTILE OR OTHER POTENTIAL SOURCEFOR CONTAMINATION PER MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE. THIS ISOLATION DISTANCE SHALL BEMEASURED FROM THE OUTER EDGE OF THE PIPE TO THE OUTER EDGE OF THECONTAMINATION SOURCE (OUTER EDGE OF STRUCTURES OR PIPING OR SIMILAR).7. ANY MANHOLE, CATCH BASIN, STORM SEWER, SANITARY SEWER, DRAINTILE OR OTHERPOTENTIAL SOURCE FOR CONTAMINATION SHALL BE INSTALLED AT LEAST 10 FEETHORIZONTALLY FROM ANY WATERMAIN PER MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE. THIS ISOLATIONDISTANCE SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THE OUTER EDGE OF THE PIPE TO THE OUTER EDGE OFTHE CONTAMINATION SOURCE (OUTER EDGE OF STRUCTURES OR PIPING OR SIMILAR).8. LOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES, VERIFY LOCATION, SIZE AND INVERT ELEVATION OF ALLEXISTING UTILITIES. VERIFY LOCATIONS, SIZES AND ELEVATIONS OF SAME BEFOREBEGINNING CONSTRUCTION.9. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF PROPOSED BUILDING UTILITY SERVICES (STORM, SANITARYSEWER), VERIFY ALL PROPOSED BUILDING UTILITY SERVICE PIPE SIZES, LOCATIONS ANDELEVATIONS WITH MECHANICAL PLANS. COORDINATE CONSTRUCTION AND CONNECTIONSWITH MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR.10. CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE LIMITS OF WALKS AND CURBING PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OFGATE VALVES, CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES. GATE VALVE AND MANHOLE LOCATIONSSHALL BE ADJUSTED TO AVOID PLACEMENT OF THESE STRUCTURES IN WALKS AND CURBAND GUTTER. CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE STAKED TO ALLOW CURB INLET TYPE CATCHBASINS TO BE PROPERLY LOCATED IN LINE WITH CURBING.11. REFER TO SWPPP NARRATIVE (SECTION 01 89 13) FOR CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING ANDEROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS.12. MAINTAIN ADJACENT PROPERTY AND PUBLIC STREETS CLEAN FROM CONSTRUCTION CAUSEDDIRT AND DEBRIS ON A DAILY BASIS. PROTECT DRAINAGE SYSTEMS FROM SEDIMENTATIONAS A RESULT OF CONSTRUCTION RELATED DIRT AND DEBRIS.13. MAINTAIN DUST CONTROL DURING GRADING OPERATIONS.14. ALL EROSION CONTROL METHODS SHALL COMPLY WITH MPCA AND OTHER LOCALREGULATIONS.15. IF EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES TAKEN ARE NOT ADEQUATE AND RESULT INDOWNSTREAM SEDIMENT, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CLEANING OUTDOWNSTREAM STORM SEWERS AS NECESSARY, INCLUDING ASSOCIATED RESTORATION.16. SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICE AT STORM SEWER INLETS. AT THE INLETS TO ALL STORM SEWERSTRUCTURES, PROVIDE A PRODUCT FROM THE FOLLOWING LIST. ACCEPTABLE PRODUCTS:A. WIMCO TOP SLAB™ MODEL RD 27.B. INFRASAFE® SEDIMENT CONTROL BARRIER, DISTRIBUTED BY ROYAL ENVIRONMENTALSYSTEMS, INC. SCB'S SHALL BE SIZED SPECIFICALLY FOR THE STRUCTURE ANDCASTING SPECIFIED. SCB'S SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH FRAME AND PERFORATEDSHROUD AND SHALL BE WRAPPED ON THE OUTSIDE, COVERING THE PERFORATED WALLONLY, WITH A GEOTEXTILE SOCK.C. DANDY BAG® OR DANDY BAG II® DISTRIBUTED BY BROCK WHITE COMPANY, ST. PAUL,MN (615) 647-0950. DANDY BAG SHALL BE USED ONLY FOR CURB INLETS AFTERPAVEMENT (BINDER COURSE OR WEAR COURSE) IS INSTALLED OR AT EXISTING PAVEDAREAS.D. INFRASAFE® DEBRIS COLLECTION DEVICE BY ROYAL ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, INC.,DISTRIBUTED BY ESS BROTHERS, 9350 COUNTY ROAD 19, CORCORAN, MN 55357 DCD'SSHALL BE SIZED SPECIFICALLY FOR THE STRUCTURE AND CASTING SPECIFIED. PROVIDEFILTER BAGS AND TIES FOR COMPLETE INSTALLATION.E. OR APPROVED EQUAL.NOTESLEGENDEXISTING CONTOUREXISTING SPOT ELEVATIONPROPOSED CONTOURPROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONPROPOSED GRADING LIMITSPROPOSED SANITARY SEWERPROPOSED STORM SEWERPROPOSED WATERMAINPROPOSED DRAINTILE / FINGER DRAINPROPOSED MANHOLE (MH)PROPOSED CATCH BASIN (CB)PROPOSED UNDERGROUND STORAGE UNITSPROPOSED HYDRANT (HYD)PROVIDE MINIMUM 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION AT CROSSING - PROVIDEVERTICAL BENDS IN WATERMAIN AS REQUIRED TO ACCOMPLISHSEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICE AT STORM SEWER INLETPROPOSED ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEPROPOSED TEMPORARY DIVERSION BERMPROPERTY LINE95554.61A PROPOSED BUS PARKING(25 BUS STALLS)953954955956956976976976977977977978978978978978979979 979979979979 979980980980980980980 981981981 957957957981 98277.778.078.278.478.777.876.475.576.575.578.779.779.779.479.879.779.179.979.280.080.379.279.279.580.380.080.080.379.979.680.080.481.881.581.280.880.979.980.779.880.679.580.380.579.480.279.575.576.477.778.595795878.978.077.579.779.579.579.579.579.079.579.178.678.778.980.156.055.156.156.156.157.056.756.556.056.257.056.8PROPOSED BUILDING ADDITIONF.F.E. = 978.5 = ARCH. 100'-0"CONNECT TOEXISTING FORCEMAINCONNECT TOEXISTING FORCEMAINCONSTRUCT NEWFORCEMAINAAAACB 5CB 7CB 6167' - 18" RCPUNDERGROUND STORAGE #1AACB 4CB 8MH 102MH 103MH 104MH 105STAKE AND LATH SODSTAKE AND LATH SODSTAKE AND LATH SODLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SITE PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERINGANDERSON - JOHNSONASSOCIATES,INC.7575 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD SUITE 200 MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55427FAX (763) 544-0531 PH (763) 544-7129DateRegistration NumberCheckDrawnDate:CommI hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared byme or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensedunder the laws of the State ofRevisionsDescription Date NumScale:NorthUTILITY,SEDIMENT, ANDEROSIONCONTROL PLANSOUTHDAVID A. REYXX/XX/XX40180152317A08/29/2017METDAR1" = 40'C1.42MINNESOTAPROFESSIONAL ENGINEERISD #196: ROSEMOUNT -APPLE VALLEY - EAGANPUBLIC SCHOOLS3455 153RD STREET WESTROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 550683335 142ND STREET WESTROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068ROSEMOUNT HIGHSCHOOL 2018PARKING1. REFER TO SHEET C1.31, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN NORTH, FOR GENERAL NOTES.2. ALL WATERMAIN PIPE SHALL BE DIP, CLASS 52. ALL WATERMAIN SHALL HAVE MINIMUM 8'-0"BURY (TOP OF PIPE TO FINISH GRADE). DIP SHALL BE ENCASED WITH POLYETHYLENE FILMCONFORMING TO ASTM D 1248-889.3. ALL SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE PVC PIPE (ASTM D 3034, SDR 26), UNLESS OTHERWISENOTED. SANITARY SEWER INSTALLATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D2321.4. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE RCP, CLASS III (MIN.), WITH FLEXIBLE WATERTIGHT JOINTSIN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM C-361 OR PVC PIPE (ASTM D3034, SDR 35) INSTALLED INACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D2321, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.5. FLEXIBLE JOINTS AT STORM SEWER PIPE CONNECTIONS TO STRUCTURES:a. IN ACCORDANCE WITH MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE, PROVIDE FLEXIBLE JOINTS AT ALLPIPE CONNECTIONS TO ALL STORM SEWER STRUCTURES.b. ACCEPTABLE MANUFACTURERS / PRODUCTS:i.FERNCO, “CONCRETE MANHOLE ADAPTORS” OR “LARGE-DIAMETER WATERSTOPS”ii. PRESS-SEAL, WATERSTOP GROUTING RINGS”iii. OR APPROVED EQUAL.6. WATERMAIN SHALL BE INSTALLED AT LEAST 10 FEET HORIZONTALLY FROM ANY MANHOLE,CATCH BASIN, STORM SEWER, SANITARY SEWER, DRAINTILE OR OTHER POTENTIAL SOURCEFOR CONTAMINATION PER MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE. THIS ISOLATION DISTANCE SHALL BEMEASURED FROM THE OUTER EDGE OF THE PIPE TO THE OUTER EDGE OF THECONTAMINATION SOURCE (OUTER EDGE OF STRUCTURES OR PIPING OR SIMILAR).7. ANY MANHOLE, CATCH BASIN, STORM SEWER, SANITARY SEWER, DRAINTILE OR OTHERPOTENTIAL SOURCE FOR CONTAMINATION SHALL BE INSTALLED AT LEAST 10 FEETHORIZONTALLY FROM ANY WATERMAIN PER MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE. THIS ISOLATIONDISTANCE SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THE OUTER EDGE OF THE PIPE TO THE OUTER EDGE OFTHE CONTAMINATION SOURCE (OUTER EDGE OF STRUCTURES OR PIPING OR SIMILAR).8. LOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES, VERIFY LOCATION, SIZE AND INVERT ELEVATION OF ALLEXISTING UTILITIES. VERIFY LOCATIONS, SIZES AND ELEVATIONS OF SAME BEFOREBEGINNING CONSTRUCTION.9. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF PROPOSED BUILDING UTILITY SERVICES (STORM, SANITARYSEWER), VERIFY ALL PROPOSED BUILDING UTILITY SERVICE PIPE SIZES, LOCATIONS ANDELEVATIONS WITH MECHANICAL PLANS. COORDINATE CONSTRUCTION AND CONNECTIONSWITH MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR.10. CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE LIMITS OF WALKS AND CURBING PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OFGATE VALVES, CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES. GATE VALVE AND MANHOLE LOCATIONSSHALL BE ADJUSTED TO AVOID PLACEMENT OF THESE STRUCTURES IN WALKS AND CURBAND GUTTER. CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE STAKED TO ALLOW CURB INLET TYPE CATCHBASINS TO BE PROPERLY LOCATED IN LINE WITH CURBING.11. REFER TO SWPPP NARRATIVE (SECTION 01 89 13) FOR CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING ANDEROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS.12. MAINTAIN ADJACENT PROPERTY AND PUBLIC STREETS CLEAN FROM CONSTRUCTION CAUSEDDIRT AND DEBRIS ON A DAILY BASIS. PROTECT DRAINAGE SYSTEMS FROM SEDIMENTATIONAS A RESULT OF CONSTRUCTION RELATED DIRT AND DEBRIS.13. MAINTAIN DUST CONTROL DURING GRADING OPERATIONS.14. ALL EROSION CONTROL METHODS SHALL COMPLY WITH MPCA AND OTHER LOCALREGULATIONS.15. IF EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES TAKEN ARE NOT ADEQUATE AND RESULT INDOWNSTREAM SEDIMENT, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CLEANING OUTDOWNSTREAM STORM SEWERS AS NECESSARY, INCLUDING ASSOCIATED RESTORATION.16. SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICE AT STORM SEWER INLETS. AT THE INLETS TO ALL STORM SEWERSTRUCTURES, PROVIDE A PRODUCT FROM THE FOLLOWING LIST. ACCEPTABLE PRODUCTS:A. WIMCO TOP SLAB™ MODEL RD 27.B. INFRASAFE® SEDIMENT CONTROL BARRIER, DISTRIBUTED BY ROYAL ENVIRONMENTALSYSTEMS, INC. SCB'S SHALL BE SIZED SPECIFICALLY FOR THE STRUCTURE ANDCASTING SPECIFIED. SCB'S SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH FRAME AND PERFORATEDSHROUD AND SHALL BE WRAPPED ON THE OUTSIDE, COVERING THE PERFORATED WALLONLY, WITH A GEOTEXTILE SOCK.C. DANDY BAG® OR DANDY BAG II® DISTRIBUTED BY BROCK WHITE COMPANY, ST. PAUL,MN (615) 647-0950. DANDY BAG SHALL BE USED ONLY FOR CURB INLETS AFTERPAVEMENT (BINDER COURSE OR WEAR COURSE) IS INSTALLED OR AT EXISTING PAVEDAREAS.D. INFRASAFE® DEBRIS COLLECTION DEVICE BY ROYAL ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, INC.,DISTRIBUTED BY ESS BROTHERS, 9350 COUNTY ROAD 19, CORCORAN, MN 55357 DCD'SSHALL BE SIZED SPECIFICALLY FOR THE STRUCTURE AND CASTING SPECIFIED. PROVIDEFILTER BAGS AND TIES FOR COMPLETE INSTALLATION.E. OR APPROVED EQUAL.NOTESLEGENDEXISTING CONTOUREXISTING SPOT ELEVATIONPROPOSED CONTOURPROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONPROPOSED GRADING LIMITSPROPOSED SANITARY SEWERPROPOSED STORM SEWERPROPOSED WATERMAINPROPOSED DRAINTILE / FINGER DRAINPROPOSED MANHOLE (MH)PROPOSED CATCH BASIN (CB)PROPOSED UNDERGROUND STORAGE UNITSPROPOSED HYDRANT (HYD)PROVIDE MINIMUM 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION AT CROSSING - PROVIDEVERTICAL BENDS IN WATERMAIN AS REQUIRED TO ACCOMPLISHSEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICE AT STORM SEWER INLETPROPOSED ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEPROPOSED TEMPORARY DIVERSION BERMPROPERTY LINE95554.61A PROPOSED BUS PARKING(29 BUS STALLS, 10 COOK STALLS)PROPOSED WESTPARKING A(160 STALLS)PROPOSED EAST PARKING(330 STALLS)PROPOSED NORTH PARKING(50 STALLS)936937937937937937937938938938938938938938938938939939939939939939939939939 939939940940940940940940940940940940940940940941941941941941941941941941941941942942 942942942942942943943943943943944944944944944944944945 945945945945945945946946946946946946 947947947947947947947948948948948948948949949949949949949950950950950950951951951 951951952952952 952952953953953953953954954 954954955955955955956956956956976976976977977977978978978979979 979980980981957957957957957958PROPOSED BUILDING ADDITIONPROPOSED WESTPARKING B(196 STALLS)PROPOSED WESTPARKING C(10 STALLS)LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SITE PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERINGANDERSON - JOHNSONASSOCIATES,INC.7575 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD SUITE 200 MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55427FAX (763) 544-0531 PH (763) 544-7129DateRegistration NumberCheckDrawnDate:CommI hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared byme or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensedunder the laws of the State ofRevisionsDescription Date NumScale:NorthLANDSCAPINGPLANNORTHJAY R. POMEROYXX/XX/XX23543152317A08/29/2017METJRP1" = 40'L1.11MINNESOTALANDSCAPE ARCHITECTISD #196: ROSEMOUNT -APPLE VALLEY - EAGANPUBLIC SCHOOLS3455 153RD STREET WESTROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 550683335 142ND STREET WESTROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068ROSEMOUNT HIGHSCHOOL 2018PARKINGNOTES:LEGENDPROPOSED DECIDUOUS TREEPROPOSED CONIFEROUS TREEPROPOSED SHRUBSAPPROXIMATE SOD LIMITSPROPOSED SHRUB / MULCH BEDPROPERTY LINE1. REFER TO SHEET C1.31, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN NORTH, FOR GENERAL NOTES.2. REFER TO SWPPP NARRATIVE FOR CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING AND EROSION CONTROLREQUIREMENTS.3. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST INSPECT AND APPROVE FINISH GRADING BEFORECONTRACTOR PROCEEDS WITH SODDING AND SEEDING.4. ALL DISTURBED AREAS OUTSIDE THE BUILDING PAD WHICH ARE NOT DESIGNATED TO BEPAVED RECEIVE AT LEAST 6" OF TOPSOIL AND SHALL BE SODDED OR SEEDED.5. WHERE NEW SOD MEETS EXISTING TURF, EXISTING TURF EDGE SHALL BE CUT TO ALLOW FORA CONSISTENT, UNIFORM STRAIGHT EDGE. JAGGED OR UNEVEN EDGES WILL NOT BEACCEPTABLE. REMOVE TOPSOIL AT JOINT BETWEEN EXISTING AND NEW AS REQUIRED TOALLOW NEW SOD SURFACE TO BE FLUSH WITH EXISTING.6. FAILURE OF TURF DEVELOPMENT: IN THE EVENT THE CONTRACTOR FAILS TO PROVIDE ANACCEPTABLE TURF, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RE-SOD OR RE-SEED ALL APPLICABLE AREAS,AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER, TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER.7. BEGIN TURF ESTABLISHMENT IMMEDIATELY AFTER SODDING OR SEEDING, REFER TOSPECIFICATION FOR PROCEDURE.8. ALL TREES TO BE BALLED AND BURLAPPED.9. ALL TREES AND SHRUBS SHALL RECEIVE 4" DEPTH OF CLEAN SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH,UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED.10. ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE NO. 1 QUALITY, NURSERY GROWN AND SPECIMENS MUST BEMATCHED. ALL OVERSTORY TREES ADJACENT TO DRIVE AND IN PARKING LOT SHALL BEGINBRANCHING NO LOWER THAN 6'. PROPOSED BUS PARKING(25 BUS STALLS)953954955956956976976976977977977978978978978978979979 979979979979 979980980980980980980 981981981 957957957981 982957958PROPOSED BUILDING ADDITIONLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SITE PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERINGANDERSON - JOHNSONASSOCIATES,INC.7575 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD SUITE 200 MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55427FAX (763) 544-0531 PH (763) 544-7129DateRegistration NumberCheckDrawnDate:CommI hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared byme or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensedunder the laws of the State ofRevisionsDescription Date NumScale:NorthLANDSCAPINGPLANNORTHJAY R. POMEROYXX/XX/XX23543152317A08/29/2017METJRP1" = 40'L1.11MINNESOTALANDSCAPE ARCHITECTISD #196: ROSEMOUNT -APPLE VALLEY - EAGANPUBLIC SCHOOLS3455 153RD STREET WESTROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 550683335 142ND STREET WESTROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068ROSEMOUNT HIGHSCHOOL 2018PARKINGNOTES:LEGENDPROPOSED DECIDUOUS TREEPROPOSED CONIFEROUS TREEPROPOSED SHRUBSAPPROXIMATE SOD LIMITSPROPOSED SHRUB / MULCH BEDPROPERTY LINE1. REFER TO SHEET C1.31, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN NORTH, FOR GENERAL NOTES.2. REFER TO SWPPP NARRATIVE FOR CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING AND EROSION CONTROLREQUIREMENTS.3. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST INSPECT AND APPROVE FINISH GRADING BEFORECONTRACTOR PROCEEDS WITH SODDING AND SEEDING.4. ALL DISTURBED AREAS OUTSIDE THE BUILDING PAD WHICH ARE NOT DESIGNATED TO BEPAVED RECEIVE AT LEAST 6" OF TOPSOIL AND SHALL BE SODDED OR SEEDED.5. WHERE NEW SOD MEETS EXISTING TURF, EXISTING TURF EDGE SHALL BE CUT TO ALLOW FORA CONSISTENT, UNIFORM STRAIGHT EDGE. JAGGED OR UNEVEN EDGES WILL NOT BEACCEPTABLE. REMOVE TOPSOIL AT JOINT BETWEEN EXISTING AND NEW AS REQUIRED TOALLOW NEW SOD SURFACE TO BE FLUSH WITH EXISTING.6. FAILURE OF TURF DEVELOPMENT: IN THE EVENT THE CONTRACTOR FAILS TO PROVIDE ANACCEPTABLE TURF, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RE-SOD OR RE-SEED ALL APPLICABLE AREAS,AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER, TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER.7. BEGIN TURF ESTABLISHMENT IMMEDIATELY AFTER SODDING OR SEEDING, REFER TOSPECIFICATION FOR PROCEDURE.8. ALL TREES TO BE BALLED AND BURLAPPED.9. ALL TREES AND SHRUBS SHALL RECEIVE 4" DEPTH OF CLEAN SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH,UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED.10. ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE NO. 1 QUALITY, NURSERY GROWN AND SPECIMENS MUST BEMATCHED. ALL OVERSTORY TREES ADJACENT TO DRIVE AND IN PARKING LOT SHALL BEGINBRANCHING NO LOWER THAN 6'. ENGINEERED FILL10"6"UNSUITABLE SOILTOPSOIL1'-0" (TYP)3'-0"11VARIESNOTE:BOTTOM OF EXCAVATION MUST BE APPROVED BY THE SOILSENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF ANY FILL.4" SLAB AND 6" SAND SUBBASE - VERIFYWITH ARCHITECTURAL PLANSFINISH FLOORFINISH SUBGRADEFINISH GRADE (TURF)MINIMUM EXCAVATIONLIMITSFOOTINGSUITABLE SOILENGINEERED FILLROCK CONSTRUCTIONENTRANCENOTE: PROVIDE WHERE CONSTRUCTION TRAFFICENTERS OR EXITS THE CONSTRUCTION SITE6" MINIMUM THICKNESS50' MINIMUMAS REQUIREDEXISTING PAVEMENT TO REMAINPROPERTY/R.O.W. LINE2" TO 3" WASHED ROCKGEOTEXTILE FABRICSILT FENCEHEAVY DUTYNORMAL USEPOSTS:(IF USED WITHSUPPORT FENCE)POSTS:(IF USED WITHOUTSUPPORT FENCE) WOOD4" DIA. (MIN)@ 8' (MAX)SPACING2" SQ. (MIN)@ 4' (MAX)SPACING METAL1.3 lbs/lf (MIN.)@ 8' (MAX)SPACING1.0 lbs/lf (MIN.) "T" OR"U" SECTION @ 4'(MAX) SPACINGDIRECTION OFRUNOFF FLOWNOTE: DEPENDING UPON CONFIGURATION, ATTACH TO WIRE MESH WITHHOG RINGS, STEEL POSTS WITH TIE WIRES, OR WOOD POSTS WITH STAPLES5' MIN. LENGTH POSTSILT FENCE FABRICOVERLAP FABRIC 6" ANDFASTEN @ 2' INTERVALSEXTEND WIRE MESH INTO TRENCHFABRIC ANCHORAGETRENCH BACKFILL WITHTAMPED NATURAL SOIL6" MIN.6" MIN.NATURAL SOIL24" MIN. BURY DEPTH30" MIN.METAL STAKE ORWOOD POSTOPTIONAL SUPPORTFENCE (WIRE MESH)SEDIMENT CONTROL LOGFLOW24" MIN.2' O.C.MAX.FLOWFLOWSTAKE DETAILINSTALLATION DETAILSEDIMENT CONTROL LOGSTAKE TO BE PLACED AT TOEOF SLOPE, BOTH SIDESWOOD STAKEBOTTOM OF SWALEWOOD STAKE TOPENETRATE NETTINGMATERIAL ONLYSEDIMENT CONTROL LOGSAND SUBBASE/ DRAIN TILE ATDOORS & FROST FOOTED STOOPS5'-0"20'-0"5'-0"6'-0"4"NOTE: REFER TO GRADING AND DRAINAGEPLAN FOR LIMITS OF SAND SUB-BASEFINISH GRADEAT EDGE OF STOOPFINISH GRADEOF PAVEMENT ADJACENTTO FOOTED STOOPSTOOP FOOTINGREFER TO STRUCTURALDRAWINGS6" DRAIN TILE (WHERE INDICATEDON DRAWINGS) - EXTEND TOSTORM SEWER STRUCTUREWHERE INDICATED ONDRAWINGSSUBGRADE SOILSSAND SUBBASEDET_PAVE_CONCWALK#DET_SHT_NUM1LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SITE PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERINGANDERSON - JOHNSONASSOCIATES,INC.7575 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD SUITE 200 MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55427FAX (763) 544-0531 PH (763) 544-7129DateRegistration NumberCheckDrawnDate:CommI hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared byme or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensedunder the laws of the State ofRevisionsDescription Date NumScale:NorthSITEDETAILSDAVID A. REYXX/XX/XX40180152317A08/29/2017METDARN.T.S.C2.11MINNESOTAPROFESSIONAL ENGINEERISD #196: ROSEMOUNT -APPLE VALLEY - EAGANPUBLIC SCHOOLS3455 153RD STREET WESTROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 550683335 142ND STREET WESTROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068ROSEMOUNT HIGHSCHOOL 2018PARKINGPIPE BEDDING - PVCNOTES:TRENCH SIDEWALLS TO MEET O.S.H.A REQUIREMENTS.UPPER 3 FT. OF BACKFILL SHALL BE COMPACTED TO AT LEAST 100%STANDARD PROCTOR DRY DENSITY. BELOW THIS ELEVATION, BACKFILLSHALL BE COMPACTED TO AT LEAST 95% STANDARD PROCTOR DRY DENSITY.SEWER INSTALLATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D2321.DEPTH (VARIES)6" MIN.1/8 O.D.(6" MIN.)O.D. + 2' (MAX)PIPE DIA.FINAL SUBGRADEHAND TAMPEDSANDPIPE BEDDING - RCP & DIPNOTES:TRENCH SIDEWALLS TO MEET O.S.H.A REQUIREMENTS.UPPER 3 FT. OF BACKFILL SHALL BE COMPACTED TO AT LEAST 100%STANDARD PROCTOR DRY DENSITY. BELOW THIS ELEVATION, BACKFILLSHALL BE COMPACTED TO AT LEAST 95% STANDARD PROCTOR DRY DENSITY.DEPTH (VARIES)1/8 DEPTH (12" MIN.)1/6 O.D.1/8 O.D. (4" MIN.)O.D. + 2' (MAX)FINAL SUBGRADELIGHTLYCOMPACTEDFILLCOMPACTED CRUSHED ROCKOR PEA GRAVEL - 100% PASSINGTHE 34" SIEVE AND A MAXIMUMOF 5% PASSING THE #10 SIEVE.FINGER DRAIN3"3"3"CURB AND GUTTERBITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTIONREFER TO DETAIL6"3" MINIMUMUNDER TILEWRAP TRENCH AND PEAROCKWITH GEOTEXTILE FABRICPEA ROCK AROUND TILE6" DRAIN TILE - LENGTH OF INDIVIDUALFINGER DRAIN SHALL BE 30' MINIMUMUNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.BACKWATER VALVEFLOWBACKWATER VALVESOLVENT WELD BACKWATERVALVE TO DRAINTILEPROVIDE FLEXIBLE JOINT -REFER TO SPECS6" DRAINTILECONNECT DRAINTILE TOSTRUCTURE AT ELEVATIONSHOWN ON THE DRAWING.GROUT SECURE TO STRUCTUREWALLMINIMIZE STUB THROUGH WALL.STUB ONLY AS REQUIREDTO ALLOW BACKWATER VALVETO BE CONNECTED TO DRAINTILEPROVIDE FLEXIBLEJOINT ATCONNECTION -REFER TO SPECSREFER TO PLAN FORSTRUCTURE TYPENOTE:ATTACH A GREEN #12 SOLIDCOPPER TRACER WIRE TOPIPE AT 3' 0.C. WITH PLASTICZIP-TIES (OR APPROVEDEQUAL). FOR STORM SEWERCLEANOUTS WIRE SHALLALSO HAVE BROWN STRIPE.DRAINTILE CLEANOUTMCDONALD 74M "A"SERIES CAST IRONMETER PIT FRAMEAND COVERFITTING HUB WITH 4"THREADED PLUG. APPLYTEFLON THREAD TAPE,OR APPROVED EQUAL,OVER THREADS.FINISH GRADELEAVE 24" OF EXCESSWIRE AT SURFACETRACER WIRETO MAIN6" TOPSOILVARIES15"11 12"4"RETAINING WALLVARIES(TWOCOURSEMINIMUM)VARIESGEOSYNTHETIC REINFORCEMENTWALL BASE5'-0" MINIMUMEXCAVATION4'-0"6"5'-0"18" MAX.FENCE WITH POSTSCENTERED ON SONOTUBEREFER TO GRADING ANDPAVING PLANS FORTREATMENT BEHIND WALLDRAINTILE - CONNECT TODRAINTILE IN SWALE(REFER TO GRADING ANDDRAINAGE PLAN)PROVIDE 12" DIA. SONOTUBEBEHIND BACK OF WALL. PLACESONOTUBE PLUMB VERTICALLY ANDAGAINST TOP RETAINING WALL BLOCK6" MINIMUMCOMPACTEDGRANULARBASEFINISHGRADEFREE DRAININGAGGREGATESLOPE VARIESCAP BLOCK - MAX. ELEVATIONCHANGE AT TOP OF WALL IS4" - DOUBLE STACK CAPBLOCKS AS NECESSARYSANITARY FORCE MAINCLEAN OUTCRUSHED ROCK4" SANITARYFORCE MAIN4 x 4 WYEGATE VALVEWITH BOXFINISH GRADEVALVE EXTENSION4" CAPPED FLANGESANITARY SEWERMANHOLE CONE (24"RISER) WITHOUT STEPS.MAX. 1 ADJUSTMENT RING.NOTE:VALVES, VALVE BOXES AND VALVE EXTENSIONS SHALL MEET THE SAMEREQUIREMENTS AS FOR WATERMAIN. VALVE BOX COVERS SHALL BEMARKED FOR SEWER.9'-0" MIN. BURYNEENAH R-1642 CASTING4" SANITARYFORCE MAIN4" CAPPED FLANGESANITARY SEWERMANHOLE CONE (24"RISER) WITHOUT STEPS.MAX. 1 ADJUSTMENT RING.4" SANITARYFORCE MAINTWO 45°BENDSCLEANOUT STRUCTUREPLAN VIEWSECTION VIEW4" SANITARYFORCE MAINTWO 45°BENDSSANITARY SEWER LIFTSTATIONSANITARY SEWER LIFTSTATIONTEMPORARY DIVERSIONBERMPLAN VIEWSECTION A-AAADISTURBED EARTH2'MIN.24" MIN.2' MIN.UNDISTURBEDEARTHDISTURBED EARTH2:1 SLOPE ORFLATTER2:1 SLOPE OR FLATTERSILT FENCESILT FENCE21WHERE POSSIBLE, 10'UNDISTURBED EARTHUPHILL OF SILT FENCE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SITE PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERINGANDERSON - JOHNSONASSOCIATES,INC.7575 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD SUITE 200 MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55427FAX (763) 544-0531 PH (763) 544-7129DateRegistration NumberCheckDrawnDate:CommI hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared byme or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensedunder the laws of the State ofRevisionsDescription Date NumScale:NorthSITEDETAILSDAVID A. REYXX/XX/XX40180152317A08/29/2017METDARN.T.S.C2.12MINNESOTAPROFESSIONAL ENGINEERISD #196: ROSEMOUNT -APPLE VALLEY - EAGANPUBLIC SCHOOLS3455 153RD STREET WESTROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 550683335 142ND STREET WESTROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068ROSEMOUNT HIGHSCHOOL 2018PARKINGTYPICAL MANWAY DETAILØ PIPE2'-6"Ø PIPE2'-6"Ø PIPEPLANFRONTPERFORATION DETAILEXFILTRATION AREASTANDARD PERFORATION PATTERNSAASTHO M-36 AND ASTM A760, B745APPROXIMATE AREA PER LINEAR FOOT OF PIPECORRUGATION PATTERNPIPE Ø(INCHES)2-2/3"X1/2"(SQ. INCHES)3"X1"(SQ. INCHES)7270.9 78.4ULTRA-FLO(SQ. INCHES)5"x1"(SQ. INCHES)62.8 77.5NOTES:1. PERFORATIONS MEET AASHTO AND ASTM SPECIFICATIONS.2. PERFORATION OPEN AREA PER SQUARE FOOT OF PIPE IS BASED ON THENOMINAL DIAMETER AND LENGTH OF PIPE.3. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE SUBJECT TO MANUFACTURING TOLERANCES.4. ALL HOLES 3/8"Ø.NOTES:1.ALL HOLES ARE 3/8" DIAMETER,AND ARE NOTED AS 'CLASS 2PERFORATIONS' PER AASHTO AND ASTM.2.GAGE AND COATING LIMITATIONS APPLY. 5" X 1" IS NOT AVAILABLEIN ALUMINUM.3.ALL DIMENSIONS ARE SUBJECT TO MANUFACTURING TOLERANCES.9@2.711" = 24.399"2.711"COIL WIDTHOPEN AREA = 3.33 SQ. IN/ SQ FT.1.75" CC(TYP)BACKFILL DETAILFOUNDATION/BEDDING PREPARATIONPRIOR TO PLACING THE GRANULAR BEDDING, THE FOUNDATION MUST BE CONSTRUCTED TO AUNIFORM AND STABLE SUBGRADE. IN THE EVENT THAT UNSUITABLE FOUNDATION MATERIALSARE ENCOUNTERED DURING EXCAVATION, THEY SHALL BE REMOVED AND BROUGHT BACK TOSUBGRADE WITH GRANULAR BEDDING. ONCE THE FOUNDATION PREPARATION IS COMPLETE, 6"OF SAND IMPORT (GRANULAR BEDDING) SHALL BE PLACED.BACKFILLTHE BACKFILL SHALL BE SELECT GRANULAR FILL. THE MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED IN 8" LOOSELIFTS AND COMPACTED. WHEN PLACING THE FIRST LIFTS OF BACKFILL IT IS IMPORTANT TO MAKESURE THAT THE BACKFILL IS PROPERLY COMPACTED UNDER AND AROUND THE PIPE HAUNCHES.BACKFILL SHALL BE PLACED SUCH THAT THERE IS NO MORE THAN A TWO LIFT (16") DIFFERENTIALBETWEEN ANY OF THE PIPES AT ANY TIME DURING THE BACKFILL PROCESS. THE BACKFILLSHALL BE ADVANCED ALONG THE LENGTH OF THE DETENTION SYSTEM AT THE SAME RATE TOAVOID DIFFERENTIAL LOADING ON THE PIPE.SELECTGRANULARFILL PLACEDIN 8" LIFTS6" SAND IMPORT(GRANULAR BEDDING)ROUGHLY SHAPED TO FITTHE BOTTOM OF PIPEUGS tUGGEOTEXTILE FABRIC (REFER TO SPEC SECTION 33 40 00)BURRITO WRAP (ENTIRE ASSEMBLY)MIN. 24" SEAM OVERLAPOPEN GRADED STONEGEOTEXTILE FABRIC(REFER TO SPECSECTION 31 00 00)10-C BANDNOTES1.BANDS SHALL BE NORMALLY FURNISHED AS FOLLOWS: 2-PIECE2.BAND FASTENERS SHALL BE ATTACHED WITH SPOT WELDS, RIVETS OR HAND WELDS.3.REROLLED ANNULAR END CORRUGATIONS SHALL BE 2-2/3" X 1/2". DIMENSIONS ARESUBJECT TO MANUFACTURING TOLERANCES.SECTIONCONNECTION DETAIL2512"10-C CORRUGATE BAND2-2/2"X1/2"RE-ROLLED PIPE2512"24"458"12"Ø BOLT(2) 24" TECHCO BAND ANGLESPER DRAWINGS 1008413UGS TURFCONSTRUCTION LOADINGDIAGRAMCONSTRUCTION LOADSFOR TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION VEHICLE LOADS, AN EXTRA AMOUNT OF COMPACTED COVERMAY BE REQUIRED OVER THE TOP OF THE PIPE. THE HEIGHT-OF-COVER SHALL MEET THE MINIMUMREQUIREMENTS SHOWN IN THE TABLE BELOW. THE USE OF HEAVY CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENTNECESSITATES GREATER PROTECTION FOR THE PIPE THAN FINISHED GRADE COVER MINIMUMSFOR NORMAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC.PIPE SPAN,INCHES18-50MINIMUM COVER (FT)AXLE LOADS (kips)50-75 75-110 110-15012-422.02.5 3.0 3.04.03.53.048-72 3.03.078-1203.54.04.04.54.54.0126-1443.5*MINIMUM COVER MAY VARY, DEPENDING ON LOCAL CONDITIONS. THE CONTRACTOR MUST PROVIDETHE ADDITIONAL COVER REQUIRED TO AVOID DAMAGE TO THE PIPE. MINIMUM COVER IS MEASUREDFROM THE TOP OF THE PIPE TO THE TOP OF THE MAINTAINED CONSTRUCTION ROADWAY SURFACE.HEIGHTOF COVERTEMPORARY COVER FORCONSTRUCTION LOADSFINISHGRADEMANHOLE CAPNOTES1.DESIGN IN ACCORDANCE WITH AASHTO, 17th EDITION AND ACI 350.2.DESIGN LOAD HS25.3.EARTH COVER = 1' MAX.4.CONCRETE STRENGTH = 4,000 psi5.REINFORCING STEEL = ASTM A615, GRADE 60.6.PROVIDE ADDITIONAL REINFORCING AROUND OPENINGS EQUAL TO THE BARSINTERRUPTED, HALF EACH SIDE. ADDITIONAL BARS TO BE IN THE SAME PLANE.7.TRIM OPENING WITH DIAGONAL #4 BARS, EXTEND BARS A MINIMUM OF 12" BEYONDOPENING, BEND BARS AS REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN BAR COVER.8.PROTECTION SLAB AND ALL MATERIALS TO BE PROVIDED AND INSTALLED BYCONTRACTOR.9.DETAIL DESIGN BY DELTA ENGINEERS, ARCHITECTS AND LAND SURVEYORS, ENDWELL,NY.SECTION VIEWPLAN VIEW54"Ø30" CMP RISER32"1" GAP(TYP. ALL SIDES)2" COVER TYP.8"12"CMP PROTECTION SLABØ36" MAX., HS-25 ACCESSCASTING TO BE PROVIDED ANDINSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR11" TYP.2" COVER (TYP.)Ø54"Ø32"2" COVER (TYP.)#4 DIAGONAL TRIMBAR (TYP. 4 PLACES),SEE NOTE 7.OPENING INPROTECTION SLABFOR CASTINGINTERRUPTED BARREPLACEMENT, SEE NOTE 6.REINFORCING -#5 @ 10" OCEWUGS #1RISER LADDERELEVATIONPLAN(4) 116" FILLET WELDS FROMEACH ANGLE CORRUGATIONCREST (2 WELDS EACH SIDE)RISER(4) ∠3x3x3/16512" LONG(2) 14" FILLET WELDS 1" LONG FROMEACH ANGLE TO LADDER RAIL16"LADDER RAILS AND RUNGSAARISER - NORMALLY223" x 12" CMP(4) 116" FILLET WELDSFROM EACH ANGLETO CORRUGATIONCREST (2 WELDSEACH SIDE)∠3x3x3/16512" LONG±3"6"LADDER RAILS AND RUNGSSECTION A-ALADDER RAILS AND RUNGSRISER NORMALLY CMP WITH223" x 12" CORRUGATIONS(4) 116" FILLET WELDS FROMEACH ANGLE TOCORRUGATION CREST (2WELDS EACH SIDE)∠3x3x3/16512" LONG(2) 14" FILLET WELDS 1" LONGATTACHMENT ANGLEMINIMUM OF 4 ANGLES PER LADDERSECTION, (2 EACH SIDE OF LADDER) 6'MAX. SPACING VERTICALLYLADDER DETAIL16"6"212"6"12" TYP. CENTER TOCENTER RUNG SPACING34" (#6) REBAR. CAN E CUTFLUSH TO OUTSIDE OFRAIL (BAR LENGTH = 1634")OR BAR CAN EXTENDBEYOND RAIL 12"±FABRICATION TOLERANCE: ±14"FLAT BAR AND REBAR: MILLTOLERANCE APPLIES78" HOLE WITH 34" REBAR RUNG,WELD REBAR TO RUNG ONOUTSIDE OF STEEL RAIL212" x 38" FLAT BAR SIDE RAILLADDERS CAN BE MADE IN 20'-0"STANDARD LENGTHS AND CUT TO FITRISER WITH LADDER AND STEPSMAINLINE CMP2 23 x 12, 5x1, 3x1, ETC.℄ PIPE1'-6" MAX.1'-0"∠5x3x14 x 16" LONG AT 1'-0"SPACING. LONG LEG TO PROJECTOUT. WELD TOP AND BOTTOM OF3" LEG TO EACH CORRUGATIONCREST (THESE ANGLES SHOULDBE USED FOR LARGER DIAMETERMAINLINES WHERE ADDITIONALSTEPS ARE NEEDED)SECTION THROUGH UNDERGROUND STORAGE #1CORRUGATEDMETALPERFORATEDPIPE (TANK)72" (TYPICAL)GEOTEXTILE FABRIC (REFER TOSPEC SECTION 33 40 00)BURRITO WRAP (ENTIRE ASSEMBLY)MIN 24" SEAM OVERLAPPREPARED SUBGRADE21INV. =BOTTOM OFSTONE =SELECTGRANULARFILLTOP OF STONE/GEOTEXTILEFABRIC = ELEV. 858.5036"(TYPICAL)DEPTH VARIESOPEN GRADED STONE12" MIN(TYPICALFOR SIDES6" SAND IMPORT (GRANULAR BEDDING)CATCH BASINVARIESFLOWFLOW61"RIM ELEVATION"PRECAST COVER -8" THICKSTEPS - INSTALL ONDOWNSTREAM SIDE@ 16" O.C.RUBBER GASKET -TYP AT ALL JOINTSPRECAST CONCRETESECTIONGROUT SHELF ANDCHANNELSBASES SHALL BE 8"STANDARD PRECASTWITH 2" LEAN GROUT,OR POURED 8" SLABREINFORCED WITH6" x 6" 10/10 MESHPROVIDE FLEXIBLE JOINTAT CONNECTION -REFER TO SPECSSTORM SEWER PIPE - REFERTO PLAN FOR LOCATION,INVERT, AND SIZESMIN. 2 AND MAX. 5 ADJUSTINGRINGS. GROUT BETWEENRINGS, CASTING, AND ALONGOUTSIDE.METAL SEWER CASTING - REFERTO PLAN FOR TYPESTORM SEWER MANHOLEBASES SHALL BE 8" STANDARD PRECAST WITH 2" LEAN GROUT,OR POURED 8" SLAB REINFORCED WITH 6" x 6" 10/10 MESH16" O.C.VARIABLE27"4'-0"VARIABLE5"MIN.COVER SHALL BE STAMPED"STORM SEWER"METAL SEWER CASTING - REFERTO PLAN FOR TYPEMIN. 2 AND MAX. 5 ADJUSTING RINGS.GROUT BETWEEN RINGS, CASTING, ANDALONG OUTSIDE.PRECAST CONCRETE CONE SECTIONSTEPS ON DOWNSTREAM SIDERUBBER GASKET, TYP ALL JOINTSGROUT SHELF AND CHANNELSPROVIDE FLEXIBLE JOINTAT CONNECTION - REFER TO SPECS B-612 CURB AND GUTTERNOTE:1. DIRECTION OF TRANSVERSE GUTTER SLOPE TO MATCH DIRECTION OF ADJACENTPAVEMENT SLOPE. CONSTRUCT WITH CURBING MACHINE.2. AT CURB INLET CATCH BASINS, ADJUST CASTING TO BE 1" BELOW GUTTER GRADE. SLOPEGUTTER 5' EACH SIDE OF CATCH BASIN. PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE TO CATCH BASINS.12"6"7 1/2"13 1/2"6"12"12AGGREGATE BASE TO BEPLACED BY PAVINGCONTRACTOR (4" MIN.)7"FACE OF CURB12" RADIUS3" RADIUSSLOPE 34" PER FOOT TOWARDSPAVEMENT ON HIGH SIDE OFLOT/DRIVE (TIP OUT) - SLOPE 34" PERFOOT TOWARDS BACK OF CURB FACEON LOW SIDE OF LOT/DRIVE (TIP BACK)12" RADIUS1:3 BATTERB-618 CURB AND GUTTERNOTE: DIRECTION OF TRANSVERSE GUTTER SLOPE TO MATCHDIRECTION OF ADJACENT PAVEMENT SLOPE.12"6"7 12"1'-1 12"6"18"12AGGREGATE BASE TOBE PLACED BY PAVINGCONTRACTOR (4" MIN.)FACE OF CURB1:3 BATTER3" RADIUS12" RADIUSSLOPE 34" PER FOOT TOWARDSPAVEMENT ON HIGH SIDE OFLOT/DRIVE (TIP OUT) - SLOPE 34"PER FOOT TOWARDS BACK OFCURB FACE ON LOW SIDE OFLOT/DRIVE (TIP BACK)12" RADIUSCONCRETE RIBBON CURB7"2'-0"CONCRETE RIBBONCURBMIN. 7" AGGREGATE BASECOURSE TO BE PLACEDBY PAVING CONTRACTOR6" MIN.3"TYPICAL AT ALLGRASS AREASMEDIUM DUTY BITUMINOUSPAVEMENT13"1.5" BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSETACK COAT1.5" BITUMINOUS BINDER COURSE10" AGGREGATE BASE COURSE12" SUBGRADE PREPARATIONLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SITE PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERINGANDERSON - JOHNSONASSOCIATES,INC.7575 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD SUITE 200 MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55427FAX (763) 544-0531 PH (763) 544-7129DateRegistration NumberCheckDrawnDate:CommI hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared byme or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensedunder the laws of the State ofRevisionsDescription Date NumScale:NorthSITEDETAILSDAVID A. REYXX/XX/XX40180152317A08/29/2017METDARN.T.S.C2.13MINNESOTAPROFESSIONAL ENGINEERISD #196: ROSEMOUNT -APPLE VALLEY - EAGANPUBLIC SCHOOLS3455 153RD STREET WESTROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 550683335 142ND STREET WESTROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068ROSEMOUNT HIGHSCHOOL 2018PARKINGCONIFEROUS TREE6"1'-0"MIN1'-0"MIN2.5 X BALL DIA. MIN.SET TREE AT FINISH GRADESHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH(4" MIN. DEPTH)PLANTING SOIL (MIN. DIMENSIONSHOWN)SOIL SAUCER: USED PREPAREDSOIL (4" MIN.)ROPES AT TOP OF BALL SHALL BECUT. REMOVE TOP 1/3 OF BURLAP.NON-BIODEGRADABLE MATERIALSHALL BE TOTALLY REMOVED.PREPARED SUBSOIL TO FORMPEDESTAL TO PREVENT SETTLING.7C2.131'-0"MIN1'-0"MIN2.5 X BALL DIA. MIN.DECIDUOUS TREESET TREE WITH ROOT COLLAR ATFINISH GRADE - ADJUST TREE ASREQUIRED SO THAT ROOT COLLARSTANDS LEVEL TO OR SLIGHTLYABOVE FINISHED GRADESHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH(4" MIN DEPTH)PLANTING SOIL (MIN. DIMENSIONSHOWN)SOIL SAUCER: USED PREPAREDSOIL (4" MIN.)ROPES AT TOP OF BALL SHALL BECUT. REMOVE TOP 1/3 OF BURLAP.NON-BIODEGRADABLE MATERIALSHALL BE TOTALLY REMOVED.PREPARED SUBSOIL TO FORMPEDESTAL TO PREVENT SETTLING.C2.138SHRUB2 X BALL DIA. MIN.9"(MIN.)9"(MIN.)4" SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCHEDGING (5 STAKES PER 20'LENGTH MINIMUM) ANDWEED BARRIERROOT BALL OR POTPLANTING SOIL (MIN.DIMENSION SHOWN)UNDISTURBED SOIL ORCOMPACTED SUBGRADEC2.139SHRUB BED EDGING6" MIN.4" MIN.FINISH GRADETOPSOILEDGINGFINISH GRADEMULCH BEDCOMPACTED SUBGRADEGEOTEXTILE WEED BARRIER -WRAP SIDES, TYPICAL10C2.13GROUNDCOVER ANDPERENNIALS6"EQUALEQUALPLANSECTION12"PLANTER EDGEALL GROUND COVER AND ANNUALSSHALL BE PLANTED AT EQUALTRIANGULAR SPACING AS INDICATEDON LANDSCAPE PLAN.4" MULCHCULTIVATE TO A 12" DEPTHAND AMEND PER SPECIFICATIONSTO FORM PREPARED PLANTING MIXC2.1311HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUSPAVEMENT14"2" BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSETACK COAT2" BITUMINOUS BINDER COURSE10" AGGREGATE BASE COURSE12" SUBGRADE PREPARATIOND-412 CURB & GUTTER12"6"6"R12"4"7"AGGREGATE BASE TO BEPLACED BY PAVINGCONTRACTOR (4" MIN.)12"NOTE:1. DIRECTION OF TRANSVERSE GUTTER SLOPE TO MATCH DIRECTION OFADJACENT PAVEMENT SLOPE. CONSTRUCT WITH CURBING MACHINE.12SLOPE 34" PER FOOT TOWARDSPAVEMENT ON HIGH SIDE OFLOT/DRIVE (TIP OUT) - SLOPE 34"PER FOOT TOWARDS BACK OFCURB FACE ON LOW SIDE OFLOT/DRIVE (TIP BACK)FACE OF CURBCURB TRANSITION D-412 TOB-61210' TRANSITIONPROVIDE EXPANSIONJOINT AT ENDSOF TRANSITION (TYP.)6"6"12"12"5'-0" TAPERB-612 CURB TERMINATORSLOPE TOP OF CURB DOWN TO GUTTER4PLAN VIEW OF PERPENDICULAR RAMPDOME SPACINGDOME SECTION3221NOTES:SECTION A-AELEVATION OF RAMPPEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP3'-8"2CONCRETEWALK3'-8"A4'-0"MIN.4'-0"MIN4'-0" MIN4'-0" UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTEDON PLAN5'-8"5'-8"2'-0"436'-0"(6" CURB4'-0"(4" CURB)CONCRETE WALKA6'-3" (6" CURB)4'-2" (4" CURB)4'-0" UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTEDON PLAN6'-3" (6" CURB)4'-2" (4" CURB)16'-0" (6" CURB)4'-0" (4" CURB)4'-0"7/8" - 1-7/16"1/5"50%-60% OF BASEDIAMETER5/8" MIN.2'-0"5/8" MIN.15/16" (TYP.)1 5/8" - 2 3/8"1 5/8" - 2 3/8"15/16" (TYP.)6'-3"(6" CURB & 0.08 FT./FT. SLOPE)4'-2"(4" CURB & 0.08 FT./FT. SLOPE)4'-0"6'-3"(6" CURB & 0.08 FT./FT. SLOPE)4'-2"(4" CURB & 0.08 FT./FT. SLOPE)1/2 INCH PREFORMED JOINT FILLER MATERIAL, AASHTO M 213.PROVIDE A PATH OF TRAVEL 4' 0" WIDE BEHIND THE PEDESTRIAN RAMP. A RELATIVELYFLAT 4' X 4' LANDING WILL ALLOW WHEELCHAIRS TO NAVIGATE AROUND THE PEDESTRIANRAMP.6" TO 8" IS THE REQUIRED OFFSET OF THE DETECTABLE WARNINGS/ TRUNCATED DOMEAREA FROM THE FRONT FACE OF CURB, OR PLACE THE DETECTABLE WARNINGS AT THEBACK OF CURB.ADA REQUIRED TRUNCATED DOME AREA SHALL BE 2' 0" MIN. IN DIRECTION OF TRAVEL ANDSHALL EXTEND THE FULL WIDTH (4' 0" TYP.) OF THE CURB RAMP. THIS 2' 0" BY 4' 0" WIDTH(TYP.) TRUNCATED DOME AREA SHALL CONTRAST VISUALLY WITH THE ADJACENT WALKINGSURFACE. THE ENTIRE TRUNCATED DOME AREA SHALL BE A LIGHT COLOR (LIGHT GRAY,WHITE, OR YELLOW) WHEN THE ADJACENT SIDEWALK IS A DARK COLOR. THE ENTIRETRUNCATED DOME AREA SHALL BE A DARK COLOR (RED, BLACK, DARK GRAY, OR BRIGHTYELLOW) WHEN THE ADJACENT SIDEWALK IS A "WHITE" OR LIGHT GRAY CEMENT COLOR.DISTURBED MINIMUMOUTER LIMITS OFCONCRETE WALKBACK OF CURBFRONT FACEOF CURBROUND ALL SLOPEDINTERSECTIONS0.08 FT./FT. SLOPE OF FLARED SIDECURB OR, CURBAND GUTTER0.083 FT./FT. OR FLATTER0.02 FT./FT. MAXDOME (TYP)6"CONCRETE SLAB3'-0"10"10"1"TYPICAL2 5/8"2 1/2"1 5/8"8" CONCRETE SLAB6" SAND BASE (MIN.)KEY JOINT - TYP. ALLCOLD JOINTSCURBTHICKENEDSLABCOMPACTEDSUBGRADE3'-0"2 5/8"2 1/2"1 5/8"8" CONCRETE SLAB6" SAND BASE (MIN.)KEY JOINT - TYP. ALLCOLD JOINTSTHICKENEDSLABCOMPACTEDSUBGRADEEXPANSIONJOINTCONCRETE RAISEDCROSSWALKTOP OF GUTTERUNIFORM SLOPE(TYPICAL)PAINTED CROSSWALK (TYPICAL)WHERE WHITE MARKINGS ARE PLACED ON CONCRETEPAVEMENTS, BLACK PAINT SHALL BE PLACED PRIORTO THE WHITE PAINT BEING APPLIED AND SHALLEXTEND ONE INCH BEYOND THE WHITE PAINT STRIPE.(FOR EXAMPLE, A 4" WHITE PAINT STRIPE SHALL HAVEA 6" BLACK PAINT STRIPE UNDERNEATH TO PROVIDESUFFICIENT CONTRAST).SLOPE GUTTER UP TO BE FLUSH WITHTOP OF CURB OVER 10' (TYPICAL)10'SIMILAR TO10'TRUNCATEDDOME (TYPICAL)SIMILAR TOCONCRETE WALK1"NOTE: PROVIDE WIRE MESH REINFORCEMENT IN PANELS WITHDIMENSIONS TO JOINTS GREATER THAN 6' - REINFORCEMENT SHALL BEUNIFORMLY SUSPENDED 2" BELOW CONCRETE FINISH GRADE.WALK WIDTH ASLABELED ON PLANBITUMINOUS PAVEMENTCONCRETE CURB AND GUTTERWALK FLUSH WITH TOP OF CURB AND PROVIDETOOLED EDGE (WITH EXPANSION JOINT)5" CONCRETE WALKMIN. 4" SAND BASE THICKENED TOBOTTOM OF CURB WHERE APPLICABLETYPICAL AT ALLGRASS AREASPREPARED SUBGRADEPROVIDE 2% CROSS SLOPE (MAX.)REFER TO GRADING PLAN FORDIRECTION12"MIN. 4"DEPTHACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGNAND POST2"3'-6"3'-0"12"18"SIGN: WHITE LEGEND AND BORDER ON BLUE BACKGROUND FULLY REFLECTORIZEDCL1'-6"1'-0"POST TOPMETAL SIGN ACCORDINGTO MN STATE STATUTE169.346PROVIDE "VAN-ACCESSIBLE"LABELING (MNMUTCD R7-8b)PROVIDE AT ONE STALL3 1/2" FLANGED CHANNELSIGN POST PER Mn/DOT 34015" O.D. GALVANIZEDSTEEL PIPE WITH TWO COATSSIGN ENAMEL (COLOR TO BEAPPROVED BY OWNER). FILLANNULAR SPACE WITH CONCRETE10° SLOPEFILL ANNULAR SPACEWITH CONCRETE1/4" METAL PLATEWELDED TO BOTTOMOF 5" PIPECONCRETE(MN/DOT 3A32OR EQUAL)60" - 66"SLOPE CONCRETE AT PIPETOP TO SHED WATERNOTE:SIGN SHALL BE PLACED NOT MORE THAN 96" FROM FACEOR EDGE OF PAVEMENT AT THE ACCESSIBLE STALL.TRAFFIC SIGNPARKINGNOFIRELANEVEHICLESONLYEMERGENCYABCD2"7'-0" - VERIFYWITH LOCAL CODE2'-6"BUSSESONLYDURINGSCHOOLHOURS2"7'-0" - VERIFYWITH LOCAL CODE2'-6"INSTALLATION INPAVEMENTINSTALLATION INTURF1'-6"POST TOPREFER TO PLANFOR MESSAGEMETAL SIGN5" O.D. GALVANIZEDSTEEL PIPE WITH TWOCOATS SIGN ENAMEL(COLOR TO BEAPPROVED BY OWNER).FILL ANNULAR SPACEWITH GROUT3 1/2" FLANGEDCHANNEL SIGN POST10° SLOPE1" SILICONE RUBBEROR ASPHALTICCAULKINGCOMPOUNDFILL ANNULARSPACE TO 1 INCHFROM TOP WITHSILICA SAND1/4" METAL PLATEWELDED TO BOTTOMOF 5" PIPECONCRETE(MN/DOT 3A32OR EQUAL)POST TOPREFER TO PLANFOR MESSAGEMETAL SIGN3 1/2" FLANGEDCHANNELSIGN POST42"BOLLARD4'-0"3'-0"1'-0"1'-6"4" PIPE CAP2" WIDE BANDS OFREFLECTORIZED TAPE4" O.D. GALVANIZED STEEL PIPEPAINTED WITH TWO COATSSIGN ENAMEL (COLOR TO BEAPPROVED BY OWNER)10° SLOPEEXPANSION JOINT (TYP.)1 INCH SILICONE RUBBER ORASPHALTIC CAULKING COMPOUNDFILL ANNULAR SPACE TO 1 INCHFROM TOP WITH SILICA SAND5" GALVANIZED METAL PIPESLEEVE WITH 1/4" METALPLATE WELDED TO BOTTOMCONCRETE MIX(MN/DOT) 3A32 OR EQUALCHAIN LINK FENCEHEIGHT VARIES REFER TO PLANNOTES:1. END, CORNER, GATE, AND PULL POSTSSHALL BE 3" O.D. LINE POSTS SHALL BE2 1/2" O.D.2. ALL FENCING SHALL RECEIVE 2" x 2" #9GAUGE FABRIC UNLESS NOTEDOTHERWISE.3. LINE POSTS MAY BE AIR DRIVEN.4. POST SPACING SHALL NOT EXCEED 10'O.C.5. BOTTOM RAIL SHALL BE PLACED NOMORE THAN 2" ABOVE FINISH GRADE.6"1 5/8" O.D. TOP RAILCHAIN LINK FENCE1 5/8" O.D. BOTTOM RAILFINISH GRADECONCRETE PADCONCRETE FOOTING 12" x 48"FOR END, CORNER, GATE ANDPULL POSTS RENOVATIONENTRYENTRYCANOPYCANOPYADDITIONEXISTINGADDITIONEXISTING447'-0"20'-8"EXISTING WALLSNEW WALLSLEGENDLOBBYSTUDENT COMMONSGYM BELOWMEDIA CENTERCLASS LECTURE CLASS CLASSSTAFFAVCOMPUTERCLASSWMCOURTYARDAUDITORIUMAUX GYMBELOWWRESTLINGCHOIRWMBANDMECHPRACWMFLEXCOURTYARDGUIDANCE OFFICECLASSCLASSCLASSCLASSCOURTYARDTV STUDIOVIDEOMAINOFFICEKITCHENMAINTENANCECAFTERIACONFSPEDFACSFACSCLASSWWMMCLASSCLASSCLASSCLASSMECHCLASSDRAFTINGPHOTOCLASSCLASSMECHSHOPSHOP SHOP62'-6"WWMMC:\Users\ejensen\Documents\ROSEMOUNT HIGH SCHOOL 2018 BASE_ejensen@woldae.com.rvt8/29/2017 10:48:08 AMISD #196: ROSEMOUNT - APPLE VALLEY - EAGAN PUBLIC SCHOOLSAUGUST 29, 2017Central: \\Wae-srv-mn.woldae.com\StPaul\ISD196\HS_Rosemount\ROSEMOUNT HIGH SCHOOL 2018 BASE.rvtHIGH SCHOOL OVERALL PLAN0 1" = 30'-0"HIGH SCHOOL OVERALL PLAN122'-6" 45'EXISTING BUILDING: 366,674 SF THREE STORIESPROPOSED ADDITION: 12,000 SF ONE STORYPROPOSED RENOVATION: 15,800 SF ENTRYENTRYCANOPYCANOPYADDITIONEXISTING20'-8"STUDENT COMMONSGYM BELOWAUX GYMBELOWWRESTLINGCHOIRWMBANDMECHPRACWMFLEXTV STUDIOVIDEOMAINOFFICE62'-6"WMCONCESSIONS447'-1"A D D IT IO NEXISTING C:\Users\ejensen\Documents\ROSEMOUNT HIGH SCHOOL 2018 BASE_ejensen@woldae.com.rvt8/29/2017 10:48:16 AMISD #196: ROSEMOUNT - APPLE VALLEY - EAGAN PUBLIC SCHOOLSAUGUST 29, 2017Central: \\Wae-srv-mn.woldae.com\StPaul\ISD196\HS_Rosemount\ROSEMOUNT HIGH SCHOOL 2018 BASE.rvtHIGH SCHOOL- AREA OF WORK0 1/16" = 1'-0"HIGH SCHOOL - AREA OF WORK112' 24' EXISTINGADDITIONALUM STOREFRONTDOORS/WINDOWSCANOPYALUM STOREFRONTSYSTEM, TYPBRICK, COLOR AND BONDPATTERN TO MATCH EXISTING, TYPALUMINUMLOUVERS, TYPALUMINUMWINDOWS, TYPPREFINISHEDMETAL COPINGCANOPYDECORATIVE METAL PANEL SYSTEMABOVE STOREFRONT SYSTEM, TYP16'-3"34'-8"EXISTINGADDITIONEXISTING BUILDING BEYONDPREFINISHEDMETAL COPINGBRICK, COLOR ANDBOND PATTERN TOMATCH EXISTING, TYPALUMINUM WINDOW24'-10"ADDITIONEXISTING16'-8"----SPR_42SPR_41ADDITIONEXISTING BUILDINGC:\Users\ejensen\Documents\ROSEMOUNT HIGH SCHOOL 2018 BASE_ejensen@woldae.com.rvt8/29/2017 10:48:32 AMISD #196: ROSEMOUNT - APPLE VALLEY - EAGAN PUBLIC SCHOOLSAUGUST 29, 2017Central: \\Wae-srv-mn.woldae.com\StPaul\ISD196\HS_Rosemount\ROSEMOUNT HIGH SCHOOL 2018 BASE.rvtHIGH SCHOOL ELEVATIONS0 1/16" = 1'-0"EXTERIOR ELEVATION - SOUTH112' 24'0 1/8" = 1'-0"EXTERIOR ELEVATION - EAST26' 12'0 1" = 100'-0"KEY PLAN475' 150' C:\Users\ejensen\Documents\ROSEMOUNT HIGH SCHOOL 2018 BASE_ejensen@woldae.com.rvt8/29/2017 10:48:32 AMISD #196: ROSEMOUNT - APPLE VALLEY - EAGAN PUBLIC SCHOOLSAUGUST 29, 2017Central: \\Wae-srv-mn.woldae.com\StPaul\ISD196\HS_Rosemount\ROSEMOUNT HIGH SCHOOL 2018 BASE.rvtROSEMOUNT HIGH SCHOOLADDITIONEXISTINGADDITIONEXISTINGEXISTINGADDITION 12MAINENTRANCECLASS CLASS CLASS CLASS CLASS CLASS CLASS CLASSCLASSCLASSCLASSCLASSCLASSCLASSCLASSCLASSCOMP COMPAUX GYMLECTURELECTURECLASSCLASSMEDIA CENTERIMC OFFICECLASSCLASSCLASSCLASSCLASSSTAFFLOUNGEMULTI-PURPOSESERVINGGYMARTCLASSKILNCLAYTECHTECHCOPYGALLERYLOCKER BAYADHOME EC.HOME EC.TECHSTORAGE STORAGECLASSCLASSCLASS MECHCLASSCLASSHOME EC.CLASSCLASSCLASSCLASSCLASSCLASSCLASSCLASSCLASSCLASSSCISCICLASSCLASSMECHBANDCHOIRGIRLS LOCKERSBOYS LOCKERSPOOLSTORAGELAUNDRYCONC.CLASS CLASSOFFICEADDITIONEXISTINGADDITIONEXISTINGRENOVATIONCIRCULATION79'-6"12'-8"POTENTIAL FUTURECLASSROOM ADDITION6,500 SFEXISTING BUILDING: 149,357 SF TWO STORIESPROPOSED ADDITION: 940 SF ONE STORYPROPOSED RENOVATION: 1,500 SFC:\Users\ejensen\Documents\ROSEMOUNT MIDDLE SCHOOL 2018 BASE_ejensen@woldae.com.rvt8/29/2017 12:40:10 PMDISTRICT #196: ROSEMOUNT - APPLE VALLEY - EAGAN PUBLIC SCHOOLSAUGUST 29, 2017Central: \\Wae-srv-mn.woldae.com\StPaul\ISD196\MS_Rosemount\ROSEMOUNT MIDDLE SCHOOL 2018BASE.rvtMIDDLE SCHOOL - OVERALL PLAN0 1" = 20'-0"MIDDLE SCHOOL - OVERALL PLAN115' 30' GYMWORKROOMCONFPRINCIPALCLASSRMNURSESTORAGESECUREVESTIBULE10 MONTHSECRETARYWAITINGASSTPRINCIPALADMINISTRATOROFFICETOILET12 MONTHSECRETARYDATARENOVATIONCIRCULATION79'-6"12'-8"TOILETC:\Users\ejensen\Documents\ROSEMOUNT MIDDLE SCHOOL 2018 BASE_ejensen@woldae.com.rvt8/29/2017 12:40:13 PMDISTRICT #196: ROSEMOUNT - APPLE VALLEY - EAGAN PUBLIC SCHOOLSAUGUST 29, 2017Central: \\Wae-srv-mn.woldae.com\StPaul\ISD196\MS_Rosemount\ROSEMOUNT MIDDLE SCHOOL 2018BASE.rvtMIDDLE SCHOOL - AREA OF WORK0 1/4" = 1'-0"MIDDLE SCHOOL - AREA OF WORK13' 6' ADDITIONEXISTINGADDITIONEXISTING12'-8"ALUMINUM ENTRANCEEXISTING BUILDING BEYONDPREFINISHED METAL COPINGBRICK TO MATCH EXISTINGALUMINUM WINDOWSROSEMOUNT MIDDLE SCHOOLA NATIONAL SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCEEXISTING SIGNAGEC:\Users\ejensen\Documents\ROSEMOUNT MIDDLE SCHOOL 2018 BASE_ejensen@woldae.com.rvt8/29/2017 12:40:12 PMDISTRICT #196: ROSEMOUNT - APPLE VALLEY - EAGAN PUBLIC SCHOOLSAUGUST 29, 2017Central: \\Wae-srv-mn.woldae.com\StPaul\ISD196\MS_Rosemount\ROSEMOUNT MIDDLE SCHOOL 2018BASE.rvtMIDDLE SCHOOL SOUTH ELEVATION0 1/4" = 1'-0"MIDDLE SCHOOL SOUTH ELEVATION13' 6' GENERAL SHEET NOTES KEYED SHEET NOTES A. ALL LIGHTING AND POWER CONDUCTORS SHALL BE INSTALLED BETWEEN 24" (MINIMUM) AND 36" (MAXIMUM) BELOW FINISHED GRADE. B. ALL COMMUNICATIONS CONDUIT AND CABLES SHALL BE INSTALLED 36" (MINIMUM) BELOW FINISHED GRADE. C. ALL CONDUCTORS FOR EXTERIOR LIGHTING AND POWER CIRCUITS SHALL BE #10 AWG MINIMUM UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. 1 EXTERIOR POLE LUMINAIRE UNDERGROUND POWER CONDUITS SHALL BE 1"C, 2#8+1#10G. ALL OTHER POLE LUMINAIRE UNDERGROUND POWER CONDUITS SHALL BE 3/4", 2#10+1#12G. TYPICAL. 2 PROVIDE 120V CONNECTION FOR FLAG POLE. FLAG POLE LIGHT INTEGRAL TO UNIT. AA4 AA5 AA5 AA5 AA5 AA4 AA5 AA5 AA5 AA4 AA4 BB5 BB5 BB5 BB5 BB5 BB4 BB4 BB4 BB4 BB4 BB4 BB4 BB4 BB5 BB5 U G E UGEUGEUGE UGE U G E UGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGE UGEUGE UGE UGE 1"C, 2#8+1#10G 1"C, 2#8+1#10G 1"C, 2#8+1#10G 1"C, 2#8+1#10G FLAG POLE 1 TYP. 2 UGEUGEUGEUGEAA4 AA4 AA4 AA4 AA4 AA4 AA4 AA4 AA4 AA4 AA4 FL FL FL FL UGEUGE UGE UGEUGEUGE UGEUGE UGE UGE UGEUGE UGEUGEEXISTING FLOOD CONTROL BOX F E D C B A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 E MN NorthCheck: Drawn: Date: Comm: License Number: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed under the laws of the State of Scale: Date 8/29/2017 11:30:05 AMC:\_Revit Local Files\152317 - Elec (2016 Rosemount HS).rvtAs indicatedCentral: \\Wae-srv-mn.woldae.com\StPaul\ISD196\HS_Rosemount\152317 - 2018 Addition &Parking\06_ELEC\REVIT\ROSEMOUNT HIGH SCHOOL 2018.rvtISD #196: ROSEMOUNT - APPLE VALLEY - EAGAN PUBLIC SCHOOLS ROSEMOUNT HS ADDITION & PARKING E0.02 ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN - NEW CONSTRUCTION 3455 153RD STREET WEST ROSEMOUNT, MN 55068 3335 142nd St. W. Rosemount, MN 55068 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DD ESTIMATE SET S. SKARVAN A. NILSON 7/14/11 152317A MINNESOTA 7/14/11 BRADLEY R. JOHANNSEN 43936 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER Revisions Description Date Num 1" = 40'-0" ELECTRICAL SITE PLANF2 0.10.20.40.50.50.50.40.40.30.30.30.30.40.40.50.50.50.40.30.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.40.60.70.70.60.60.50.40.40.40.40.50.60.60.70.70.60.40.10.10.10.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.20.50.80.90.80.80.70.60.50.50.50.50.60.70.80.90.90.80.60.20.10.10.30.30.30.30.30.30.30.30.30.30.30.30.20.20.20.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.20.20.20.40.81.11.11.11.00.80.70.60.50.50.60.70.81.01.11.21.10.90.50.20.30.50.50.50.50.40.40.40.40.40.40.40.40.40.40.30.20.10.10.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.10.10.10.10.20.30.40.51.41.71.51.31.21.00.80.60.50.50.60.81.01.21.31.51.71.40.60.50.40.60.60.60.60.60.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.60.50.50.30.10.10.30.30.40.40.30.30.30.20.20.20.20.10.20.40.60.51.72.62.01.51.31.00.70.60.50.50.60.71.01.31.52.02.71.90.60.60.50.80.80.80.80.70.70.60.60.60.60.60.70.70.70.60.50.10.20.50.50.60.50.50.40.40.30.30.30.30.30.20.30.50.72.23.42.31.61.31.00.80.60.50.50.60.81.01.31.62.33.42.60.90.70.61.01.01.01.00.90.80.70.70.70.70.80.80.90.90.80.60.30.30.60.70.70.70.60.50.50.40.50.70.90.70.20.40.60.61.93.12.21.61.31.00.80.60.50.50.60.81.01.31.62.23.22.30.90.81.21.31.41.31.21.10.90.80.80.80.80.91.01.11.21.21.00.60.50.91.01.00.90.70.70.60.60.81.73.12.20.20.40.50.51.62.11.81.51.41.10.90.70.60.60.70.91.11.41.51.82.21.90.91.01.21.92.11.61.41.21.00.80.70.80.91.01.21.41.61.91.60.81.01.41.31.21.10.90.80.70.60.92.66.04.80.20.30.30.51.11.51.51.41.31.21.00.80.70.70.81.01.21.31.51.61.61.41.10.91.02.53.02.01.51.21.00.80.70.70.81.01.31.62.13.02.21.01.71.91.81.41.31.10.90.70.60.92.14.33.10.20.20.20.30.81.21.41.41.31.11.00.80.70.70.81.01.11.31.41.41.41.10.70.71.02.93.12.11.51.31.00.90.80.80.91.11.31.62.43.72.91.21.52.42.51.71.41.10.90.70.60.61.01.51.10.10.10.10.20.71.11.31.31.21.11.00.80.80.80.81.01.11.21.41.41.31.10.60.70.82.22.82.01.61.31.10.90.80.80.91.11.41.62.33.42.51.21.63.22.91.91.41.10.90.70.50.50.60.60.50.10.10.10.20.71.11.31.31.21.11.00.90.80.80.91.01.11.21.41.41.31.10.60.61.01.72.01.71.51.41.21.00.90.91.01.21.41.61.92.42.11.11.52.92.81.91.41.10.90.70.60.50.60.70.50.20.20.20.30.81.31.41.41.31.11.00.80.80.70.81.01.11.31.41.51.41.10.60.40.81.41.51.51.51.31.21.11.01.01.11.21.41.51.71.81.61.11.52.12.11.61.41.20.90.70.60.71.21.71.30.20.30.40.61.21.51.51.51.41.21.00.80.70.70.81.01.21.41.51.61.71.40.80.50.61.21.41.51.41.31.21.11.11.11.11.21.31.51.51.51.20.61.11.41.51.31.21.10.90.80.71.02.34.83.60.20.40.50.51.72.21.81.61.41.20.90.70.60.60.70.91.21.41.61.92.31.80.70.70.61.21.31.41.41.31.21.11.11.11.11.21.31.41.51.30.90.40.51.01.11.11.00.90.80.70.71.12.75.94.70.20.40.60.62.03.22.21.61.41.10.90.70.60.60.70.91.11.41.62.33.32.30.80.70.71.21.31.41.41.31.21.11.11.11.11.21.31.41.41.20.90.30.40.80.91.00.90.80.80.70.71.01.93.02.20.20.40.50.72.23.42.31.61.41.10.90.70.60.60.70.91.11.41.72.33.52.61.00.70.91.41.51.51.51.31.21.11.11.11.11.21.31.51.51.31.00.40.30.80.90.90.90.80.70.70.70.91.62.11.50.20.40.60.51.72.62.01.61.41.10.90.70.60.60.70.91.11.41.62.12.82.10.91.01.41.71.91.61.51.41.21.11.01.01.11.31.41.51.61.61.30.70.50.90.90.90.80.80.70.60.71.02.34.33.10.20.30.50.51.41.71.61.51.41.21.00.80.60.60.81.01.21.41.51.71.91.71.11.01.12.22.61.91.61.41.11.00.90.91.01.21.51.61.92.31.70.60.71.00.90.90.80.80.70.60.71.12.95.10.20.20.20.40.91.31.41.41.31.11.00.80.70.70.81.01.21.31.41.51.51.30.80.81.12.93.22.11.61.31.11.00.90.91.01.21.41.72.33.32.30.80.71.00.90.90.90.80.70.70.71.02.13.62.60.20.10.10.20.71.21.31.31.21.11.00.90.80.80.91.01.11.31.41.41.31.10.60.70.92.73.12.11.61.41.11.00.90.91.01.21.51.72.43.52.50.90.81.11.11.00.90.90.80.70.70.91.52.01.50.10.10.10.20.71.11.31.31.21.11.00.90.80.80.91.01.11.21.41.41.31.10.60.70.91.92.41.81.61.41.21.00.90.91.01.21.51.72.22.92.00.81.11.41.41.21.11.00.90.80.81.02.03.52.50.20.10.20.20.71.21.31.31.21.11.00.80.80.80.81.01.11.31.41.41.31.10.60.51.01.51.71.61.51.41.21.11.01.11.21.31.61.71.92.21.81.01.61.81.81.41.31.10.90.80.81.12.86.25.00.20.30.20.41.01.41.41.41.31.11.00.80.70.70.81.01.21.31.51.51.51.20.70.40.71.31.51.51.41.31.21.11.11.11.21.31.51.61.71.81.60.91.32.22.41.71.41.20.90.80.71.02.34.43.20.20.40.50.51.41.81.61.51.41.20.90.70.60.60.70.91.21.41.51.72.01.60.70.60.61.21.31.41.41.31.21.11.11.21.21.31.41.51.61.61.40.81.22.92.81.91.51.20.90.70.70.91.52.01.50.20.40.60.61.72.72.11.61.41.10.80.70.50.50.70.81.11.41.62.12.92.00.70.70.61.21.31.41.41.31.21.11.11.21.21.31.41.51.61.61.40.81.12.82.81.91.41.10.90.70.70.91.72.72.00.20.30.50.72.23.42.31.61.31.00.80.60.50.50.60.81.01.31.62.33.52.60.90.70.71.31.41.51.41.31.21.11.11.11.21.31.51.61.71.81.50.91.32.12.21.71.41.20.90.70.71.02.65.74.50.20.40.60.61.93.02.21.51.31.00.80.60.50.50.60.81.01.31.62.23.22.41.00.91.21.51.61.61.51.41.21.11.01.11.21.31.51.71.82.11.81.01.51.71.71.41.31.10.90.70.70.92.45.13.80.20.40.50.51.62.01.71.41.31.00.80.60.50.50.60.81.01.31.51.82.21.91.01.01.22.02.21.81.61.41.21.00.90.91.01.31.51.72.12.72.00.81.01.31.31.21.00.90.80.70.60.71.31.91.40.20.30.30.51.01.31.31.21.11.00.80.70.50.50.70.81.01.21.31.41.51.41.10.91.12.63.12.11.61.41.10.90.90.91.01.21.41.72.43.52.50.90.81.11.01.00.90.80.70.60.50.50.60.60.50.20.20.20.30.70.91.01.00.90.80.80.70.60.60.70.80.91.01.11.21.11.00.70.81.13.03.22.21.71.41.11.00.90.91.01.11.41.72.33.42.40.90.81.00.90.80.80.70.60.50.40.40.30.30.20.10.10.10.20.50.70.80.90.80.80.80.70.70.60.70.91.01.01.11.11.01.00.90.91.02.43.02.21.81.51.21.11.01.01.11.21.41.62.02.52.00.90.91.00.80.80.80.70.60.50.40.30.20.20.10.10.10.10.10.40.60.70.80.91.11.31.20.90.80.91.21.51.41.21.11.21.41.31.21.42.02.52.42.21.81.51.41.51.71.51.41.41.51.72.02.01.61.21.00.80.81.01.21.00.70.40.30.20.20.10.10.10.10.10.30.50.60.81.11.92.82.81.81.21.42.53.12.81.71.41.92.82.92.11.62.03.13.83.62.51.82.03.03.42.81.81.41.41.62.02.83.02.51.51.01.22.22.82.41.20.60.40.30.20.10.10.10.10.30.40.60.81.42.83.83.62.81.62.13.24.73.52.51.72.73.44.03.01.82.33.74.94.23.42.22.83.64.93.62.31.51.41.62.43.44.53.32.21.21.82.94.33.12.00.80.40.30.20.10.10.10.20.30.40.50.81.52.83.93.72.91.72.23.34.83.52.51.82.83.54.23.11.82.33.64.94.23.32.22.83.75.03.72.31.51.41.52.33.34.63.32.31.31.93.04.53.22.10.90.50.30.20.20.10.10.20.30.40.50.71.22.13.03.02.01.41.72.73.22.81.81.52.02.93.12.31.51.92.83.63.52.41.82.13.13.42.91.81.41.31.31.82.73.12.71.71.21.42.43.02.71.40.80.50.40.30.20.10.10.20.30.40.50.70.91.31.61.61.31.21.31.51.71.51.31.21.41.61.61.41.21.41.71.91.91.61.51.51.81.91.61.41.31.21.21.31.51.51.41.21.11.11.41.61.41.00.70.60.50.40.30.10.10.20.30.40.60.70.81.01.21.21.11.11.11.11.21.21.11.11.11.21.21.11.11.21.31.41.41.31.31.31.41.31.31.31.21.11.11.11.11.11.01.01.11.01.11.11.00.90.80.70.80.70.50.10.10.20.30.40.60.80.91.01.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.21.21.21.21.21.21.21.21.21.11.11.01.00.91.01.01.01.01.11.11.11.00.90.90.91.31.81.40.10.10.20.30.40.50.70.91.01.11.31.21.11.11.01.01.01.01.11.11.11.21.21.11.11.11.01.01.01.11.21.21.31.31.11.11.00.90.80.80.91.01.01.01.11.11.01.01.00.91.12.24.84.00.10.10.20.30.40.60.70.91.01.21.41.31.11.11.01.01.01.01.11.11.21.41.31.11.11.01.01.01.01.11.11.21.31.41.21.11.00.90.80.80.91.01.01.11.31.31.11.00.90.91.12.45.75.20.10.10.20.30.40.60.80.91.01.11.31.21.11.11.11.01.01.01.11.11.11.31.21.11.11.11.01.01.01.11.11.11.21.21.11.01.00.90.80.80.80.91.01.01.21.21.01.00.90.91.11.82.92.30.10.10.20.30.50.70.81.01.01.11.11.11.11.11.21.21.11.21.21.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.01.00.90.90.80.80.90.91.01.01.01.01.01.00.90.91.01.41.81.40.10.10.20.40.50.70.80.91.01.11.11.11.21.21.21.21.31.21.21.21.21.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.01.01.01.00.91.00.90.80.90.90.90.90.90.90.90.90.91.00.90.90.91.11.93.42.70.10.20.30.40.60.70.80.91.01.01.11.11.21.21.21.21.21.21.21.21.21.11.11.11.11.11.11.01.00.90.90.90.80.80.80.80.80.80.80.80.80.80.80.90.80.80.90.80.80.81.22.66.05.60.10.10.20.30.40.50.70.81.01.01.01.01.01.21.31.21.21.21.21.31.21.11.11.01.11.21.11.01.00.90.90.80.70.70.60.70.70.70.70.70.70.70.70.80.70.70.70.70.70.70.81.12.24.53.70.10.20.30.40.50.70.81.01.01.01.01.01.21.31.21.21.21.21.31.21.11.11.11.11.21.11.00.90.90.80.70.60.50.50.50.60.60.70.70.70.70.70.70.60.60.60.60.60.70.71.01.52.11.60.10.20.30.40.60.70.80.91.01.11.11.11.21.21.21.21.21.21.21.21.21.11.11.11.11.11.00.90.90.70.60.50.40.40.40.50.60.60.60.70.70.70.60.50.50.50.50.60.70.71.01.52.21.80.10.10.20.40.50.70.80.91.01.11.11.11.11.11.21.21.21.21.21.11.21.11.11.11.11.11.00.90.80.70.60.50.40.40.40.50.60.60.70.70.70.70.60.50.50.50.50.60.70.71.12.34.94.20.10.10.20.30.50.60.80.91.01.01.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.21.11.11.11.11.00.90.80.70.60.50.50.50.50.60.70.70.70.70.70.70.70.60.60.60.60.60.70.71.12.55.85.30.10.10.20.30.40.60.70.91.01.11.31.21.11.11.01.01.01.01.11.11.11.31.21.11.11.11.00.90.80.80.80.70.60.60.70.70.80.80.80.80.80.80.80.70.70.70.70.70.70.71.01.83.02.40.10.10.20.30.40.50.70.91.01.11.31.21.01.01.00.90.91.01.01.11.11.31.31.11.11.01.00.90.90.90.90.90.80.80.90.90.90.90.90.90.80.90.90.90.80.80.80.80.70.81.01.41.81.40.10.10.20.40.50.70.91.01.01.21.01.01.01.00.90.90.91.01.01.01.21.11.11.11.11.01.01.01.01.11.11.11.11.11.11.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.00.90.90.80.80.81.01.93.32.60.10.20.30.40.60.70.80.91.01.01.01.00.90.90.90.90.90.91.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.11.11.01.11.21.41.41.41.41.31.11.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.11.01.00.90.90.81.12.45.95.40.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.90.90.90.90.80.80.90.90.90.80.90.90.90.90.90.90.91.01.11.11.21.31.61.81.81.61.41.21.11.01.01.01.01.01.11.31.11.00.90.80.81.02.04.23.50.10.20.30.30.40.50.60.70.70.70.70.80.80.70.70.80.70.70.80.80.70.70.80.80.80.80.91.01.21.52.02.62.62.21.61.21.01.00.91.01.01.01.11.31.21.00.90.80.70.81.11.51.20.10.10.10.20.30.30.40.50.50.50.50.50.60.60.60.60.60.60.60.60.60.50.50.60.60.70.70.80.91.11.41.92.62.82.01.51.10.90.90.90.91.01.01.01.11.01.00.90.80.70.60.60.60.40.10.10.20.20.30.30.40.40.40.40.40.40.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.40.40.40.40.40.40.40.40.40.61.11.21.01.01.11.20.70.50.50.60.70.80.91.01.01.00.90.80.80.60.50.40.30.20.10.10.10.20.20.30.30.20.20.20.30.30.30.40.40.40.40.40.30.30.30.20.20.30.30.30.30.30.30.40.50.60.60.50.50.40.40.50.50.60.70.80.90.80.80.80.70.60.60.50.40.20.20.10.10.10.20.20.20.10.10.10.20.20.20.30.30.30.30.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.40.50.50.50.50.50.30.30.40.40.50.60.70.70.70.70.70.60.50.40.40.30.20.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.20.20.20.20.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.20.20.30.40.30.30.40.40.30.30.30.40.40.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.40.40.30.20.20.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.30.30.30.40.40.40.30.40.30.40.40.40.30.20.20.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.20.20.20.20.30.30.20.20.20.20.20.30.30.20.20.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.20.20.20.20.10.10.10.10.10.20.20.20.10.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.06.3AA4 @ 30'AA4 @ 30'AA4 @ 30'AA4 @ 30'AA4 @ 30'AA4 @ 30'AA4 @ 30'AA4 @ 30'AA4 @ 30'AA4 @ 30'AA4 @ 30'AA4 @ 30'AA5 @ 30'AA5 @ 30'AA5 @ 30'AA5 @ 30'AA5 @ 30'AA5 @ 30'AA5 @ 30'AA4 @ 30'AA4 @ 30'AA4 @ 30'BB4 @ 16' BB4 @ 16' BB4 @ 16' BB4 @ 16'BB4 @ 16' BB4 @ 16' BB4 @ 16' BB4 @ 16'BB4 @ 16'BB5 @ 16'BB5 @ 16'BB5 @ 16'BB5 @ 16'BB5 @ 16'BB5 @ 16'BB5 @ 16'ROSEMOUNT HIGH SCHOOL PARKING LOT LIGHTING CALCULATIONSDesignerDate8/28/2017ScaleNot to ScaleDrawing No.Summary1 of 1ScheduleSymbol Label Quantity Manufacturer Catalog Number Description LampLumens PerLampLight Loss Factor WattageAA415 Lithonia Lighting DSX2 LED 80C 700 40K T4MMVOLTDSX2 LED WITH 80 LEDs @700mA,4000K, TYPE 4 MEDIUM OPTICSLED21670 0.9 188AA57 Lithonia Lighting DSX2 LED 80C 700 40K T5WMVOLTDSX2 LED WITH 80 LEDs @700mA,4000K, TYPE 5 WIDE OPTICSLED22422 0.9 188BB49 Sternberg Lighting SL730-FFA-84L45T4-MDL03 SOLANA Series Fixture, BoltOnArm,Hang Straight,Type 4, Flat FrostedAcrylic84 LEDS 8211 0.9 94.8BB57 Sternberg Lighting SL730-FLD-84L45T5-MDL03 Solana Series, Hang Straight, Type 5Optic, Flat Lens Diffuse84 LEDS 8831 0.9 93.7 0.60.81.01.01.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.00.80.60.40.81.11.31.31.41.41.41.41.31.41.41.41.41.41.31.31.10.80.40.40.71.21.51.61.71.81.91.81.71.61.61.71.81.91.81.71.71.51.20.70.40.60.61.72.32.22.22.42.32.22.01.91.92.02.22.42.42.22.22.31.80.60.70.70.82.33.52.92.93.12.92.72.42.22.22.42.73.03.12.93.03.52.10.80.80.60.92.74.03.84.24.44.13.42.82.52.52.93.54.14.44.23.84.12.61.00.80.70.82.24.05.36.57.05.54.23.12.72.73.24.35.77.16.45.13.92.31.11.10.60.82.04.48.812.09.27.34.73.22.72.73.34.97.59.511.98.54.22.21.21.10.40.71.86.416.817.112.67.64.43.02.42.43.14.78.113.018.016.25.81.91.10.90.30.51.68.221.410.95.93.52.52.12.12.53.76.311.822.424.27.21.70.90.80.30.52.06.312.110.95.93.62.62.11.91.92.12.73.76.311.511.55.52.10.90.80.62.33.75.85.94.23.12.52.22.02.02.22.53.24.46.15.83.72.30.90.60.40.82.07.421.616.99.05.03.42.72.42.52.83.65.39.717.921.06.92.00.90.60.60.92.28.723.222.714.07.85.13.63.03.13.75.38.214.923.622.57.72.20.90.70.70.82.66.914.116.812.89.76.24.53.83.84.76.510.213.217.413.86.42.50.90.90.71.03.06.09.112.211.89.67.05.14.34.45.37.39.812.112.08.95.82.91.10.90.70.92.85.68.411.111.99.57.15.24.44.45.47.49.812.110.98.15.42.71.21.00.70.82.45.711.515.412.39.86.64.84.04.14.96.910.112.515.511.25.42.61.21.10.51.02.07.620.119.614.78.65.64.03.33.44.25.89.115.320.419.36.82.21.31.10.30.61.87.924.519.610.76.14.03.12.72.73.14.16.511.420.724.17.01.91.00.90.30.52.14.78.37.75.13.52.72.32.12.12.32.83.65.48.18.14.32.20.90.80.62.24.27.46.94.63.22.42.11.91.92.12.53.34.97.27.34.02.30.80.70.30.61.87.623.918.59.75.13.12.32.02.02.43.35.510.519.523.46.71.80.80.60.50.91.97.720.519.513.57.14.22.82.22.22.94.47.514.220.319.76.81.91.00.60.70.82.25.411.114.110.37.74.63.12.52.63.24.88.110.514.410.85.12.30.80.80.70.82.54.76.58.07.96.04.43.22.72.73.34.66.18.27.96.34.62.40.90.90.60.92.74.24.24.85.14.63.72.92.62.63.03.84.75.14.84.24.32.71.10.90.70.72.03.23.03.23.53.32.92.52.32.32.63.03.33.53.33.13.22.21.11.10.60.71.52.02.12.32.62.52.42.22.02.02.22.42.62.62.32.22.21.91.11.10.30.61.11.41.61.71.92.02.01.91.81.81.92.02.02.01.81.71.61.31.00.90.30.81.01.21.41.51.61.61.61.61.61.61.71.71.61.51.41.21.10.90.90.60.91.01.21.31.41.51.51.41.41.51.61.61.51.41.31.21.21.11.00.50.70.91.11.31.82.32.21.71.51.72.22.52.11.61.41.62.01.91.40.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.2 0.20.20.20.224.6AA4 @ 30'AA4 @ 30'AA4 @ 30'AA4 @ 30'AA4 @ 30'AA4 @ 30'FL @ 30'FL @ 30'FL @ 30'FL @ 30'FL @ 30'FL @ 30'FL @ 30'FL @ 30'ROSEMOUNT HIGH SCHOOL PARKING LOT LIGHTING CALCULATIONSDesignerDate8/28/2017ScaleNot to ScaleDrawing No.Summary1 of 1ScheduleSymbol Label Quantity Manufacturer Catalog Number Description LampLumens PerLampLight Loss Factor WattageAA415 Lithonia Lighting DSX2 LED 80C 700 40K T4MMVOLTDSX2 LED WITH 80 LEDs @700mA,4000K, TYPE 4 MEDIUM OPTICSLED21670 0.9 188AA57 Lithonia Lighting DSX2 LED 80C 700 40K T5WMVOLTDSX2 LED WITH 80 LEDs @700mA,4000K, TYPE 5 WIDE OPTICSLED22422 0.9 188BB49 Sternberg Lighting SL730-FFA-84L45T4-MDL03 SOLANA Series Fixture, BoltOnArm,Hang Straight,Type 4, Flat FrostedAcrylic84 LEDS 8211 0.9 94.8BB57 Sternberg Lighting SL730-FLD-84L45T5-MDL03 Solana Series, Hang Straight, Type 5Optic, Flat Lens Diffuse84 LEDS 8831 0.9 93.7FL8 Lithonia Lighting HLF2 LED P3 40K NFL MVOLTWGHIGH LUMEN FLOOD SIZE 2, 4000 K,NARROW FLOOD, 120-277V, WIREGUARDLEDAbsolute 0.9 598 BALL FIELD BB2 CC4H CC4H CC4H CC4H PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE 3/4"C, 2#10+1#10G UG EUG E3/4"C, 2#10+1#10G ROSEMOUNT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ROSEMOUNT MIDDLE SCHOOL UGE 3/4"C, 2#10+1#10G UGE UGE F E D C B A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 E MN NorthCheck: Drawn: Date: Comm: License Number: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed under the laws of the State of Scale: Date 9/14/2017 2:43:07 PMC:\_Revit Local Files\152317 - Elec (2016 Rosemount HS).rvt 1" = 40'-0"Central: \\Wae-srv-mn.woldae.com\StPaul\ISD196\HS_Rosemount\152317 - 2018 Addition &Parking\06_ELEC\REVIT\ROSEMOUNT HIGH SCHOOL 2018.rvtISD #196: ROSEMOUNT - APPLE VALLEY - EAGAN PUBLIC SCHOOLS ROSEMOUNT HS ADDITION & PARKING E0.05 ELECTRICAL BUS LOOP LIGHTING PLAN 3455 153RD STREET WEST ROSEMOUNT, MN 55068 3335 142nd St. W. Rosemount, MN 55068 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CD ESTIMATE SET S. SKARVAN A. NILSON 7/14/11 152317A MINNESOTA 7/14/11 BRADLEY R. JOHANNSEN 43936 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER 1" = 40'-0" ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN Copy 1E3 Revisions Description Date Num ROSEMOUNT ES/MS BUS LOOPDesignerDate9/13/2017ScaleNot to ScaleDrawing No.Summary1 of 10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.30.40.30.20.10.10.10.10.10.20.30.30.30.10.10.10.10.20.40.81.10.90.60.20.20.10.20.20.60.91.10.80.40.20.10.10.10.20.40.60.81.21.92.92.41.41.10.90.90.91.11.52.42.91.91.10.80.60.40.20.10.20.40.61.01.31.72.01.91.51.21.00.91.01.31.51.92.01.71.31.00.60.40.20.10.20.40.60.91.31.61.71.71.51.21.01.01.01.31.51.71.71.61.30.90.60.40.20.10.20.30.50.71.01.21.21.21.21.00.80.80.81.01.21.21.21.21.00.70.50.30.20.10.10.20.30.40.60.60.60.60.60.60.50.50.50.60.60.60.60.60.60.40.30.20.10.10.10.10.20.30.40.30.40.40.40.40.30.30.30.40.40.30.30.30.30.30.20.10.10.10.10.20.30.40.60.80.80.80.80.90.80.60.60.60.80.80.70.70.70.70.50.30.20.10.10.20.40.50.91.21.41.41.41.31.10.90.80.91.11.31.31.31.31.10.70.50.30.20.10.20.40.71.01.31.71.91.81.41.21.01.01.01.31.51.71.71.61.30.90.60.40.20.10.20.40.60.91.41.92.52.11.51.20.90.91.01.31.62.12.21.71.20.80.50.30.20.10.20.30.50.91.32.02.72.21.41.10.80.80.91.21.62.52.71.81.20.80.50.30.20.10.10.30.50.80.60.40.10.10.10.10.20.50.70.80.60.30.10.10.10.10.20.20.20.10.10.10.10.10.20.30.30.20.30.20.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.20.50.60.10.10.10.10.21.12.10.20.20.10.10.21.94.70.80.40.10.22.81.10.30.10.22.15.21.00.40.10.21.42.80.30.20.10.10.60.80.10.10.10.20.20.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.06.2CC4H @ 30'CC4H @ 30'CC4H @ 30'CC4H @ 30'BB2 @ 15'Plan ViewScale - 1" = 40ftDescriptionSymbol Label Manufacturer Catalog Number Description LampLumens PerLampLight Loss Factor WattageCC4HLithonia Lighting DSX2 LED 80C 700 40K T4MMVOLT HSDSX2 LED WITH 80 LEDs @700mA,4000K, TYPE 4 MEDIUM OPTICS, WITHHOUSE SIDE SHIELDLED16564 0.9 188BB2Lithonia Lighting DSX0 LED 40C 700 40K T2MMVOLTDSX0 LED with 40 LEDs @700 mA,4000K, Type 2 Medium OpticsLED10889 0.9 91 Memorandum ONE CARLSON PARKWAY, SUITE 150 | MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55447 | 763.475.0010 | WWW.SRFCONSULTING.COM To: Jeffrey M. Solomon, Director of Finance and Operations Rosemount-Apple Valley-Eagan Public Schools From: Emily Gross, PE, Senior Engineer Matthew Pacyna, PE, Senior Associate Date: September 7, 2017 Subject: Independent School District #196, Rosemount Schools Traffic Study Introduction As requested, SRF has completed a traffic study for the proposed site modifications at the Rosemount School Complex, which encompasses the high school, middle school, and elementary school. The high school is currently located north of 142nd Street and west of S Robert Trail (Highway 3); the middle school is located north of 143rd Street and west of S Robert Trail; and the elementary school is located south of 143rd Street and west of Cameo Avenue (see Figure 1: Project Location). The high school has parking lots both north and south of 142nd Street, while the middle school and elementary school share a parking lot located south of 143rd Street and west of Cameo Avenue. The main objectives of the study are to review existing operations within the study area, evaluate transportation impacts (vehicular and pedestrian) within the study area based on the proposed access/circulation modifications, and recommend any necessary improvements to provide safe and efficient operations. The following information provides the assumptions, analysis, and recommendations offered for consideration. Existing Conditions SRF conducted various data collection efforts and field observations on Wednesday, May 17, 2017 and Thursday May 18, 2017 to identify current traffic conditions at the high school, middle school, and elementary school. Data Collection SRF collected vehicular turning movement and pedestrian/bicyclist counts (in five (5)-minute intervals) during the school arrival (6:45 to 9:45 a.m.) and departure (2:00 to 4:30 p.m.) peak periods at the following locations: · S Robert Trail/142nd Street · S Robert Trail/143rd Street · S Robert Trail/144th Street · S Robert Trail/145th Street · 142nd Street /High School East Access · 142nd Street/High School West Access · 143rd Street/Cameo Avenue · 145th Street/Cameo Avenue · 145th Street/Canada Avenue · 145th Street/Chill Avenue NORTHNorth145th St W Chili Ave W142nd St W 42Canada Ave WCameo Ave W143rd St W 3 S Robert Trail Elementary School Middle School High School 01710646 Sept 2017 Project Location Figure 1H:\Projects\10000\10646\TS\Figures\Fig01_Project Location.cdr144th St W 143rd St W Upper 143rd St W Independent School District #196, Rosemount Schools Traffic Study Rosemount, MN Jeffrey M. Solomon, Rosemount-Apple Valley-Eagan Public Schools September 7, 2017 Independent School District #196, Rosemount Schools Traffic Study Page 3 Short-duration (i.e. 15-minute) pulse counts were also collected during the school arrival and departure peak periods on Chili Avenue at 143rd Street, Upper 143rd Street, and 144th Street, as well as along 144th Street at Canada Avenue and Cameo Avenue to understand general area travel patterns and magnitude. These counts were modified based on the data collected at adjacent intersections to reflect peak hour conditions. Existing geometrics, traffic controls, and peak hour traffic volumes are shown in Figure 2. The peak hours were identified as 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m. and 2:15 p.m. to 3:15 p.m., which captures the peak hours during both the arrival and departure periods for the high school and middle school. However, the elementary school peak activity occurs outside of these peak hours. Driveway Counts Driveway counts were collected at the school access locations from 6:45 a.m. to 9:45 a.m. and from 2:00 p.m. 4:30 p.m. to capture the peak entering/exiting traffic for the three schools. Driveway counts for trips entering/exiting the school area were combined and summarized into five (5)-minute intervals, shown in Figure 3. School start/end times are currently separated at least 30 minutes, which helps spread out traffic. Current hours of operation for the three schools include: · High School: 7:30 a.m. to 2:20 p.m. · Middle School: 8:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. · Elementary School: 9:25 a.m. to 3:45 p.m. School Information Student enrollment and staff numbers for the 2016-2017 calendar year at the three schools are summarized as follows: · High School: 2,124 students/231 staff · Middle School: 1,275 students/132 staff · Elementary School: 745 students/114 staff Information collected for the Safe Routes to School Comprehensive Plan, dated June 2010 found that the mode split for the three schools are as follows: · High School students o 35 percent school bus o 25 percent driven by parent o 20 percent drive themselves o 20 percent walk or bike · Middle School students o 65 percent school bus o 26 percent driven by parent/carpool o 9 percent walk or bike NORTHNorthChili Ave W143rd St W 3 01710646 Sept 2017 XX (XX) - A.M. Peak Hour Volume - Afternoon Peak Hour Volume - Side-Street Stop Control - Signalized Control - All Way Stop Control - Uncontrolled - Three-Way Stop LEGEND Existing Conditions Independent School District #196, Rosemount Schools Traffic Study Rosemount, MN Figure 2H:\Projects\10000\10646\TS\Figures\Fig02_Existing Conditions 11x17.cdr142nd St W 145th St W 144th St W Canada Ave WCameo Ave W Elementary School Middle School High School (117) 41 (134) 78268 (90)469 (503) (31) 80(467) 803S Robert Trail142nd St W55 (21) 4 (1)85 (46) (34) 16 (65) 31 (1) 3 162 (74) 23 (26) 163 (21) (25) 0 (1) 1(140) 3 HS East Acces 142nd St W 165 (106) 8 (3)15 (15) (47) 149 (58) 35 (11) 223 3 (1) 69 (69) 6 (2) (124) 5 (3) 2(27) 0 HS West Access 142nd St W 9 (11) 4 (5)12 (7) (4) 20 (238) 330 (13) 5 34 (9) 195 (222) 16 (8) (13) 9 (1) 10(11) 33 Canada Ave W 145th St W (55) 50(340) 619(50) 3822 (57)289 (450)74 (75) (76)149 (66) 68 (99) 47 95 (63) 103 (80) 42 (73)S Robert Trail145th St W 9 (13) 0 (0) 0 (2) (38) 91 (0) 3 (36) 88210 (68)317 (574)0 (0) (18) 67(437) 788(3) 0S Robert Trail143rd St W 4 (3) 0 (0) 1 (8) (10) 12 (1) 0 (20) 7 (29) 4(445) 839(5) 104 (27)392 (579)9 (6) S Robert Trail144th St W 145th St W 147(81) 13 (9)36 (39) (63) 167 (165) 197 (23) 11 48 (32) 94 (126) 8 (29) (7) 4 (3) 9(12) 16 Cameo Ave W143rd St W (1) 1 (53) 180 (39) 202 165 (11) 97 (30) 15 (45) (22) 79 (14) 139(21) 2 Cameo Ave W 18 (16) 148 (148) 72 (87) (40) 25(87) 202(83) 129136 (122)114 (187)43 (28) (65) 155 (139) 173 (29) 12 Chili Ave W 145th St W Chili Ave W 4 (2) 0 (0) 12 (2)4 (4)233 (291)2 (4) (2) 4 (0) 0 (2) 12 (12) 5(112) 399(10) 2143rd St W Chili Ave W 144th St W 37 (4) 0 (0) 15 (24)4 (2)270 (289)5 (2) (2) 4 (3) 0 (24) 8 (16) 5(136) 366(16) 4Chili Ave W Upper 143rd St W4 (4)251 (289)2 (2) (2) 4 (0) 0 (2) 16 (4) 5(130) 396(8) 66 (2) 0 (0) 12 (2) 144th St W Canada Ave W 5 (0) 17 (16) 17 (8) (7) 35 (1) 4(6) 25 (0) 0 (7) 15 (14) 40 (0) 4 (1)0 (0) Cameo Ave W 1(3) 7 (8) 0 (30) (12) 5 (82) 214(4) 5 (2)20 (1) 5 (10)1527 (4) 181 (89)9 (1) 144th St W Jeffrey Solomon, Rosemount-Apple Valley-Eagan Public Schools September 7, 2017 Independent School District #196, Rosemount Schools Traffic Study Page 5 Figure 3 – School Driveway Counts (Five-Minute Intervals) 05010015020025006:4506:5006:5507:0007:0507:1007:1507:2007:2507:3007:3507:4007:4507:5007:5508:0008:0508:1008:1508:2008:2508:3008:3508:4008:4508:5008:5509:0009:0509:1009:1509:2009:2509:3009:3509:4014:0014:0514:1014:1514:2014:2514:3014:3514:4014:4514:5014:5515:0015:0515:1015:1515:2015:2515:3015:3515:4015:4515:5015:5516:0016:0516:1016:1516:2016:25Traffic VolumeTotal EnterTotal ExitHS Arrival Peak MS Arrival Peak ES Arrival Peak HS Departure Peak MS Departure Peak ES Departure Peak HS Start MS Start ES Start HS End MS End ES End Jeffrey M. Solomon, Rosemount-Apple Valley-Eagan Public Schools September 7, 2017 Independent School District #196, Rosemount Schools Traffic Study Page 6 · Elementary School students o 69 percent school bus o 23 percent driven by parent/carpool o 8 percent walk or bike Site Observations Site visits were conducted during the school arrival and departure peak periods for the high school, middle school, and elementary school to observe traffic operations and identify operational issues during a typical school day. These site visits were also used to identify roadway characteristics (i.e. roadway geometry, traffic controls, and posted speed limits) within the study area. Site observations including drop-off/pick-up operations, queuing, and operational issues, which are summarized for each school respectively as follows: High School: 1) During the a.m. peak hour, approximately 320 vehicles dropped students off in the north parking lot. During the afternoon peak hour, approximately 150 vehicles picked students up in the north parking lot. During the afternoon, vehicles parked on-street along the north side of 142nd Street to pick-up students. 2) The east and west driveways are uncontrolled, although these intersections operate similar to an all-way stop controlled intersections, with vehicles alternating who has the right-of-way. Vehicles dropping-off or picking-up students utilize the north parking lot area. Vehicles enter/exit at both the east and west high school driveways and circulated through the parking lot. 3) After school, students walk through the baseball fields/grass area northeast of the school building. 4) The bus loading/unloading area is the same area used for parent drop-off/pick-up (north parking lot adjacent to the building). This causes conflicts with pedestrians/buses/vehicles within the parking lot as students walk to/from the school. 5) The high school is served by 25 full buses and six (6) short buses. 6) During the a.m. and afternoon peak hours, buses generally enter at the east access, unload/load students, and exit at the west access. 7) Buses arrive to drop-off students between 6:55 a.m. and 7:10 a.m. and depart between 7:05 a.m. and 7:15 a.m. when school starts. At the end of school, buses arrive to pick-up students between 1:55 p.m. and 2:20 p.m. and depart either at 2:25 p.m. or 2:28 p.m. 8) During the a.m. peak, there are queues along 142nd Street due to the high volume of vehicles entering the school driveways in a short period of time. This is also due to vehicles yielding to pedestrians crossing from the parking area to the school. 9) Eastbound queues at the west access extend approximately 500 feet. Westbound queues at the east access extend approximately 750 feet. Jeffrey M. Solomon, Rosemount-Apple Valley-Eagan Public Schools September 7, 2017 Independent School District #196, Rosemount Schools Traffic Study Page 7 10) Pedestrians parking in the lot south of 142nd Street cross 142nd Street at three locations – the east approach of the West Access, midblock, and the east approach of the East Access 11) Vehicles using 142nd Street are generally destined to the high school, with very few non-high school related trips (i.e. through trips). Based on the driveway counts collected at the high school, 100 through trips were observed over a six-hour period, which is less than 20 vehicles per hour. Left: Queues on 142nd Street (Vehicles Yielding to Buses Exiting in Afternoon) Center: Pedestrians crossing 142nd Street midblock Right: Vehicle waiting on 142nd Street to pick-up student Middle School: 1) During the a.m. peak hour, approximately 300 vehicles dropped students off in the drop-off area on the south side of the middle school building and approximately 80 vehicles dropped students off in the parking lot (shared by the middle and elementary school). During the afternoon peak hour, vehicles used a combination of the drop-off/pick-up area south of the middle school building (after buses exit), the parking lot, and on-street pick-ups along Cameo Avenue and 143rd Street. Approximately 50 vehicles picked students up at the middle school parking lots. 2) The drop-off/pick-up area located south of the middle school building has one-way operations, with vehicles entering on the east and exiting on the west. Vehicles utilize two westbound lanes for drop-offs and pick-ups (double park). 3) The middle school is served by 24 full buses and three (3) short buses. 4) Buses unload/load in the parking lot (enter/exit at Cameo Avenue/143rd Street). Buses park along the curb on the north, west, and south sides of the parking lot to unload/load students. During the afternoon peak period, buses park in the drop-off/pick-up area to the south of the middle school building. 5) Buses arrive between 7:40 a.m. and 7:50 a.m. to drop-off students and depart between 7:45 a.m. and 7:55 a.m. when school starts. At the end of school, buses arrive to pick-up students between 2:40 p.m. and 3:00 p.m. and depart at 3:10 p.m. or 3:11 p.m. Jeffrey M. Solomon, Rosemount-Apple Valley-Eagan Public Schools September 7, 2017 Independent School District #196, Rosemount Schools Traffic Study Page 8 6) During the afternoon peak, vehicles park and wait to pick-up students along 143rd Street and Cameo Avenue. Queues from vehicles waiting to pick-up extend to S Robert Trail, blocking southbound right-turn movements onto 143rd Street. Left: Vehicles waiting on 143rd Street to pick-up students Center: Buses parked in the main parking lot. Right: Vehicle waiting on Cameo Avenue to pick-up student Elementary School: 1) The elementary school peak traffic near the start and end times of school are outside of the study peak hour selected for this project. As shown in Figure 3, the elementary school generates fewer trips than the middle school and high school. The elementary school also has fewer students enrolled than the middle school and high school. 2) Vehicles dropping-off or picking-up students utilize two areas: the parking lot or the drop-off area along the south side of building on 144th Street. Vehicles dropping-off/picking-up students on the south side of the building travel westbound and unload/load in the area south of the playground. Staff is available on-site to assist students and direct vehicles. Vehicles are instructed to exit traveling westbound (U-turns on 144th Street are not allowed). During the afternoon, vehicles picking-up students were observed to park along both sides of 144th Street. 3) Approximately five to 10 students walk to school in the morning. Students walking must arrive by 9:00 a.m. The school has identified locations where students should wait (e.g. along 144th Street and 145th Street at Chili Avenue, Canada Avenue) and a staff member walks to those locations to escort them to the school. 4) The elementary school is served by eight (8) full buses and three (3) short buses. 5) Buses unload/load in the parking lot (enter/exit at Cameo Avenue/143rd Street). Buses park along the curb on the north, west, and south sides of the parking lot to unload/load students. 6) Buses arrive between 9:10 a.m. and 9:15 a.m. to drop-off students and depart between 9:15 a.m. and 9:20 a.m. when school starts. At the end of school, buses arrive to pick-up students between 3:30 p.m. and 3:45 p.m. and depart either at 3:45 p.m. or 3:50 p.m. Jeffrey M. Solomon, Rosemount-Apple Valley-Eagan Public Schools September 7, 2017 Independent School District #196, Rosemount Schools Traffic Study Page 9 Left: Student drop-off/pick-up area on south side of building along 144th Street Center: Students crossing 144th Street midblock. Right: Vehicles waiting on 144th Street to pick-up student Intersection Capacity Analysis An existing intersection capacity analysis was completed to establish a baseline condition to which future traffic operations could be compared. The existing study intersections were analyzed using Synchro/SimTraffic software. Capacity analysis results identify a Level of Service (LOS) which indicates how well an intersection is operating. Intersections are ranked from LOS A through F. The LOS results are based on average delay per vehicle, which correspond to the delay threshold values shown in Table 1. LOS A indicates the best traffic operation and LOS F indicates an intersection where demand exceeds capacity. Overall intersection LOS A through D is considered acceptable based on MnDOT guidelines. Table 1. Level of Service Criteria for Signalized and Unsignalized Intersections LOS Designation Signalized Intersection Average Delay/Vehicle (seconds) Unsignalized Intersection Average Delay/Vehicle (seconds) A ≤ 10 ≤ 10 B > 10 - 20 > 10 – 15 C > 20 - 35 > 15 – 25 D > 35 - 55 > 25 – 35 E > 55 - 80 > 35 – 50 F > 80 > 50 For side-street stop controlled intersections, special emphasis is given to providing an estimate for the level of service of the side-street approach. Traffic operations at an unsignalized intersection with side- street stop control can be described in two ways. First, consideration is given to the overall intersection level of service. This takes into account the total number of vehicles entering the intersection and the capability of the intersection to support these volumes. Jeffrey M. Solomon, Rosemount-Apple Valley-Eagan Public Schools September 7, 2017 Independent School District #196, Rosemount Schools Traffic Study Page 10 Second, it is important to consider the delay on the minor approach. Since the mainline does not have to stop, the majority of delay is attributed to the side-street approaches. It is typical of intersections with higher mainline traffic volumes to experience high levels of delay (poor levels of service) on the side-street approaches, but an acceptable overall intersection level of service during peak hour conditions. Results of the existing capacity analysis shown in Table 2 indicate that all study intersections currently operate at an acceptable overall LOS D or better during the a.m. and afternoon peak 15-minute periods, with the existing traffic control, geometric layout, and signal timing, except the Chili Avenue/ 145th intersection and the West/East High School Accesses on 142nd Street. These intersections operate at LOS E or worse during the peak 15-minutes during the a.m. peak hour. It should be noted that due to the peaking characteristics of the schools, LOS results for the worst 15-minute period were reported rather than the average delay for the peak hour. Evaluating the worst 15-minute period helps to identify where traffic operational issues occur since the traffic operational issues observed were focused on the 15 to 20 minutes near the school start and end times. Table 2. Existing Peak Hour Capacity Analysis (Worst 15-Minute Period) Intersection A.M. Peak Afternoon Peak LOS Delay LOS Delay Chili Avenue/145th Street (2) F* 54 sec. C 24 sec. Chili Avenue/144th Street (1) A/B 10 sec. A/A 9 sec. Chili Avenue/Upper 143rd Street (1) A/B 11 sec. A/A 7 sec. Chili Avenue/143rd Street (3) A/A 8 sec. A/A 7 sec. West High School Access/142nd Street (4) E 45 sec. B 11 sec. East High School Access/142nd Street (4) F 65 sec. B 10 sec. S Robert Street/142nd Street (1) A/E 37 sec. C/F 68 sec. Cameo Avenue/143rd Street (2) A/B 12 sec. B/D 33 sec. S Robert Street/143rd Street (1) A/E 49 sec. A/F 50 sec. Canada Avenue/144th Street (2) A 4 sec. A 4 sec. Cameo Avenue/144th Street (1) A/B 10 sec. A/A 8 sec. S Robert Street/144th Street (1) A/D 29 sec. A/D 33 sec. Canada Avenue/145th Street (1) A/A 9 sec. A/A 7 sec. Cameo Avenue/145th Street (1) A/A 8 sec. A/A 9 sec. S Robert Street/145th Street D 35 sec. C 21 sec. (1) Indicates an unsignalized intersection with side-street stop control, where the overall LOS is shown followed by the worst approach LOS. (2) Indicates an unsignalized intersection with all-way stop control. (3) Indicates an unsignalized intersection with three-way stop control (northbound approach uncontrolled), where the overall LOS is shown followed by the worst approach LOS. (4) Indicates an unsignalized intersection uncontrolled intersection. * Operates at LOS E (38 seconds) for the overall peak hour. Jeffrey M. Solomon, Rosemount-Apple Valley-Eagan Public Schools September 7, 2017 Independent School District #196, Rosemount Schools Traffic Study Page 11 The following traffic operational issues were identified at the study intersections: 1) Chile Avenue/142nd Street a. During the a.m. peak hour, the northbound approach queues extend approximately 700 feet. Vehicles commonly make “rolling stops” rather than coming to a complete stop. 2) West High School Access/142nd Street a. During the a.m. peak hour, eastbound queues extend approximately 500 feet. b. During the afternoon peak hour, queuing was observed for vehicles exiting the parking lot and along 142nd Street. 3) East High School Access/142nd Street a. During the a.m. peak hour, westbound queues extend approximately 750 feet. b. During the afternoon peak hour, queuing was observed for vehicles exiting the parking lot and along 142nd Street. 4) S Robert Trail/142nd Street: a. During the a.m. peak hour, the eastbound approach operates at LOS E. The amount of volume on S Robert Street make it difficult for vehicles to make a left- or right-turn. i. Vehicles making a southbound right-turn onto 142nd Street obscure the view of southbound through vehicles, causing sight distance issues for the eastbound approach. ii. Based on a review of travel patterns entering/exiting the high school driveways, vehicles avoid exiting towards the S Robert Street/142nd Street intersection. b. During the afternoon peak hour, the eastbound approach operates at LOS F and eastbound queues extend approximately 500 feet. 5) S Robert Trail/143rd Street: a. During the afternoon peak hour, when the middle school gets out, queues on 143rd Street extend to S Robert Street causing vehicles to queue in the southbound right-turn lane. These queues cause sight distance issues for the eastbound approach vehicles. 6) S Robert Trail/145th Street: a. During the a.m. peak hour, northbound queues extend approximately 550 feet. b. During the afternoon peak hour, southbound queues extend beyond 144th Street approximately five (5) times during the peak hour (2:15 p.m. to 3:15 p.m.). Jeffrey M. Solomon, Rosemount-Apple Valley-Eagan Public Schools September 7, 2017 Independent School District #196, Rosemount Schools Traffic Study Page 12 Proposed Site Plan Modifications As shown in Figure 4, modifications are proposed to improve traffic flow, parking, and bus drop- off/pick-up at the high school, middle school, and elementary school. Phase 1 includes proposed modifications to the high school. Phase 2 includes proposed modifications to the middle school and elementary school. While both Phase 1 and Phase 2 are expected to be completed for the start of the 2018 school year, depending on the approval process Phase 2 may be constructed later. SRF worked with project staff to develop the proposed site plan modifications and provided input on turn lane and traffic control needs. The proposed modifications are summarized as follows: High School (Phase 1) 1) The proposed 142nd Street alignment reroutes the roadway around the 322-space and 160-space parking lots, but not the 196-space parking lot. a. With the realignment of 142nd Street, non-school related trips will continue to be permitted to use 142nd Street. There are currently less than 20 non-school trips per hour using 142nd Street. b. The 196-space parking lot will be used for marching band practice in addition to everyday parking for students. 2) Bus parking and parent drop-off/pick-up are separated in two different locations. a. Bus loading/unloading is proposed to be located on the southwest side of the building, all buses would enter and exit to/from the south on Chili Avenue. All bus loading/unloading is proposed to occur adjacent to a pedestrian walkway/sidewalk so that students do not need to walk through the parking lot, reducing bus/pedestrian conflicts. b. Parent drop-off/pick-up is proposed to be located on the southeast side of the building. All vehicles making drop-offs/pick-ups would enter and exit to/from the east access on 142nd Street. Vehicles that currently arrive to/from the south on Chili Avenue are expected to continue to access the school in that direction and would route around the parking lot. Vehicles that currently arrive to/from the east on 142nd Street are expected to continue to access the school in that direction. i. The parent drop-off/pick-up is proposed to operate with one-way circulation around the parking area. With one lane dedicated to loading/unloading and the second lane dedicated as a drive-lane to maintain circulation. 3) The existing pedestrian walkway through the middle of the main parking lot is proposed to remain. However, with 142nd Street realigned, students parking in the 322-space and 160-space parking lots will no longer need to cross 142nd Street or walk through the north parking lot when traveling between the parking lot and the school. A fence is proposed to be constructed on the north side of the 196-space to encourage students to walk at the designated crossing. 4) Currently the parking lot aisles are parallel to 142nd Street. The site plan proposes to modify the orientation of the parking aisles so that they are parallel to the pedestrian walkway. NORTHNorth01710646 Sept 2017 Proposed Site Plan Modifications Figure 4H:\Projects\10000\10646\TS\Figures\Fig01_Project Location.cdrIndependent School District #196, Rosemount Schools Traffic Study Rosemount, MN Jeffrey M. Solomon, Rosemount-Apple Valley-Eagan Public Schools September 7, 2017 Independent School District #196, Rosemount Schools Traffic Study Page 14 5) The east access (parent drop-off/pick-up access) is proposed to be all-way-stop controlled with turn lanes. The west access (bus loop access) is proposed to be side-street stop controlled with the bus loop access stop controlled. A third controlled access on 142nd Street is noted on the site plan. All other access to the parking lot along 142nd Street was assumed to be side-street stop controlled with 142nd Street having free flow conditions. Middle School/Elementary School (Phase 2) 1) A new bus parking and drop-off/pick-up area is proposed on the west side of the elementary school. Access to the bus loop area is proposed via the north approach of the Canada Avenue/ 144th Street intersection. This bus loop area will serve both the middle school and elementary school. 2) The parking lot located south of the middle school is being modified to no longer serve as a drop- off/pick-up area. The western exit-only access is proposed to be removed and the eastern access will be modified to serve two-way traffic. A small number parking spaces will continue to be provided in the lot. 3) With the buses no longer loading/unloading in the parking lot, parent drop-off/pick-ups are expected to occur within the parking area. This is expected to divert vehicles currently dropping- off/picking-up along 143rd Street or Cameo Avenue to the parking lot. It should be noted that in addition to constructing new bus loop areas at the high school and the middle/elementary school, how buses route to/from the schools is proposed to change from current conditions. Currently about half of the buses to/from the schools utilize S Robert Street (either turning at 142nd Street for the high school or 143rd Street for the middle/elementary school) and the remaining buses utilize 144th Street or 145th Street (either turning at Chili Avenue for the high school or turning at Cameo Avenue for the middle/elementary school). Under the proposed conditions, buses to/from the schools will generally arrive/depart to the south either via the Chili Avenue/145th Street intersection for the high school or via the Canada Avenue/145th Street intersection for the middle/elementary school. Traffic Forecasts Based on future student enrollment projections provided by the School District, the number of students are not expected to significantly change in the near future. Further, the historical traffic volumes provided by MnDOT near the schools along S Robert Trail and 145th Street, indicate that traffic volumes have not significantly changed between year 2010 and year 2014/2015 and that traffic volumes along S Robert Trail have decreased or remained the same since 2010. Therefore, to understand impacts of the proposed modifications, the existing school related trips (parent drop- off/pick-up, students driving, and buses) were rerouted based on the Phase 1 and Phase 2 proposed modifications to the three schools. No background traffic growth was added. Jeffrey M. Solomon, Rosemount-Apple Valley-Eagan Public Schools September 7, 2017 Independent School District #196, Rosemount Schools Traffic Study Page 15 Since the construction timeline of Phase 2 (modifications to the middle school and elementary school) is currently unknown. Year 2018 build traffic volumes were developed for the Phase 1 modifications as a standalone project as well as for a condition where both the Phase 1 and 2 modifications were constructed. The year 2018 build traffic volumes for Phase 1 and for Phase 1 and 2 are shown in Figure 5 and Figure 6, respectively. Year 2018 Build Conditions Intersection Operations Analysis – Phase 1 To determine if the proposed Phase 1 access and traffic flow modifications will operate with acceptable levels of service, a detailed traffic capacity analysis was completed. Results of the traffic operations analysis shown in Table 3 indicate that the study intersections are expected to operate at an overall acceptable level of service, except at the Chili Avenue/145th Street intersection which operates at LOS F for the worst 15-minute and operates at the LOS D/E border for the peak hour (minimal change from existing conditions). Table 3. Year 2018 Phase 1 Build Peak Hour Capacity Analysis (Worst 15-Minute Period) Intersection A.M. Peak Afternoon Peak LOS Delay LOS Delay Chili Avenue/145th Street (2) F* 52 sec. C 24 sec. Chili Avenue/144th Street (1) A/B 10 sec. A/A 9 sec. Chili Avenue/Upper 143rd Street (1) A/B 11 sec. A/A 7 sec. Chili Avenue/143rd Street (3) A/A 8 sec. A/A 7 sec. West High School Access/142nd Street (1) A/A 4 sec. A/B 10 sec. East High School Access/142nd Street (2) C * 23 sec. A 4 sec. S Robert Street/142nd Street (1) A/E 37 sec. C/F 68 sec. Cameo Avenue/143rd Street (2) A/B 12 sec. B/D 33 sec. S Robert Street/143rd Street (1) A/E 49 sec. A/F 50 sec. Canada Avenue/144th Street (2) A 4 sec. A 4 sec. Cameo Avenue/144th Street (1) A/B 10 sec. A/A 8 sec. S Robert Street/144th Street (1) A/D 29 sec. A/D 33 sec. Canada Avenue/145th Street (1) A/A 9 sec. A/A 7 sec. Cameo Avenue/145th Street (1) A/A 8 sec. A/A 9 sec. S Robert Street/145th Street D 35 sec. C 21 sec. (1) Indicates an unsignalized intersection with side-street stop control, where the overall LOS is shown followed by the worst approach LOS. (2) Indicates an unsignalized intersection with all-way stop control. (3) Indicates an unsignalized intersection with three-way stop control (northbound approach uncontrolled), where the overall LOS is shown followed by the worst approach LOS. * Chili Avenue/145th Street operates at LOS E (36 seconds) for the overall peak hour; East High School Access/142nd Street operates at LOS C (16 seconds) for the overall peak hour. NORTHNorthChili Ave W3 01710646 Sept 2017 XX (XX) - A.M. Peak Hour Volume - Afternoon Peak Hour Volume - Side-Street Stop Control - Signalized Control - All Way Stop Control - Uncontrolled LEGEND Year 2018 Build Conditions - Phase 1 Independent School District #196, Rosemount Schools Traffic Study Rosemount, MN Figure 5H:\Projects\10000\10646\TS\Figures\Fig05_Year 2018 Build Conditions - Phase 1 - 11x17.cdr142nd St W 145th St W 144th St W Canada Ave WCameo Ave W Elementary School High School (115) 40 (135) 80260 (90)485 (510) (30) 80(475) 805S Robert Trail142nd St W 35 (35)0 (0) (10) 30 (115) 395 0 (0) 210 (270) 142nd St W142nd St W 10 (15) 5 (5)15 (10) (5) 20 (245) 330 (15) 5 35 (10) 210 (230) 20 (10) (15) 10 (5) 10(15) 35 Canada Ave W 145th St W (60) 55(340) 620(50) 4035 (60)290 (450)75 (75) (80)150 (70) 70 (105) 50 95 (65) 105 (80) 45 (75)S Robert Trail145th St W 10 (15) 0 (0) 0 (5) (40) 95 (0) 5 (40) 90210 (70)330 (575)0 (0) (20) 70(440) 790(5) 0S Robert Trail143rd St W 5 (5) 0 (0) 5 (10) (10) 15 (5) 0 (20) 10 (30) 5(450) 840(5) 105 (30)405 (580)10 (10) S Robert Trail144th St W 145th St W 150 (85) 15 (10)40 (40) (65) 170 (170) 200 (25) 15 50 (35) 110(135) 10 (30) (10) 5 (5) 10(15) 20 Cameo Ave W143rd St W (5) 5 (55) 180 (40) 205 165 (15) 100 (30) 15 (45) (25) 80 (15) 140(25) 5 Cameo Ave W 35 (25) 150 (150) 75 (90) (40) 25(90) 205(85) 130140 (125)115 (190)45 (35) (65) 155 (140) 175 (30) 15 Chili Ave W 145th St W Chili Ave W 5 (5) 0 (0) 15 (5)5 (5)235 (300)5 (5) (5) 5 (0) 0 (5) 15 (15) 5(120) 415(10) 5143rd St W Chili Ave W 144th St W 40 (5) 0 (0) 15 (25)5 (5)275 (295)5 (5) (5) 5 (5) 0 (25) 10 (20) 5(145) 385(20) 5Chili Ave W Upper 143rd St W5 (5)255 (295)5 (5) (5) 5 (0) 0 (5) 20 (5) 5(135) 415(10) 1010 (5) 0 (0) 15 (5) 144th St W Canada Ave W 5 (0) 20 (20) 20 (10) (10) 35 (5) 5(10) 25 (0) 0 (10) 15 (15) 50 (0) 5 (5)0 (0) 200 (105)100 (55) 155 (75) 185 (45) (85) 155(190) 15 142nd St W 0 (0) 0 (0)0 (0) Parent Drop-off142nd St WBus Loop XX (XX) - A.M. Peak Hour Volume - Afternoon Peak Hour Volume - Side-Street Stop Control - Signalized Control - All Way Stop Control - Uncontrolled - Three-Way Stop LEGEND Cameo Ave W 5 (5) 10 (10) 0 (30) (15) 5 (85) 215(5) 5 (5) 20 (5) 5 (10) 1530 (5) 185 (90)10 (5) 144th St W Bus Loop Middle School 143rd St W NORTHNorthChili Ave W3 01710646 Sept 2017 XX (XX) - A.M. Peak Hour Volume - Afternoon Peak Hour Volume - Side-Street Stop Control - Signalized Control - All Way Stop Control - Uncontrolled LEGEND Year 2018 Build Conditions - Phases 1 and 2 Independent School District #196, Rosemount Schools Traffic Study Rosemount, MN Figure 6H:\Projects\10000\10646\TS\Figures\Fig05_Year 2018 Build Conditions - Phases 1 & 2 - 11x17.cdr142nd St W 145th St W 144th St W Canada Ave WCameo Ave W Elementary School High School (115) 40 (135) 80260 (90)485 (510) (30) 80(475) 805S Robert Trail142nd St W 35 (35)0 (0) (10) 30 (115) 395 0 (0) 210 (270) 142nd St W142nd St W 20 (20) 5 (5)30 (25) (20) 30 (230) 325 (15) 5 55 (25) 205 (225) 20 (10) (15) 10 (5) 10(15) 35 Canada Ave W 145th St W (60) 55(340) 615(50) 4050 (70)285 (445)75 (75) (90)155 (70) 70 (110) 55 95 (65) 105 (80) 45 (75)S Robert Trail145th St W 10 (15) 0 (0) 0 (5) (30) 90 (0) 5 (30) 85195 (60)345 (585)0 (0) (15) 70(450) 790(5) 0S Robert Trail143rd St W 5 (5) 0 (0) 5 (10) (10) 15 (5) 0 (20) 10 (30) 5(455) 840(5) 105 (30)415 (585)10 (10) S Robert Trail144th St W 145th St W 140 (75) 15 (10)35 (40) (50) 160 (190) 210 (25) 15 50 (35) 130(145) 10 (30) (10) 5 (5) 10(15) 20 Cameo Ave W143rd St W (5) 5 (40) 170 (35) 190 0 (0) 250 (30) 15 (45) (25) 210 (0) 0(20) 5 Cameo Ave W 35 (25) 150 (150) 75 (90) (40) 25(90) 205(85) 130140 (125)115 (190)45 (35) (65) 155 (140) 175 (30) 15 Chili Ave W 145th St W Chili Ave W 5 (5) 0 (0) 15 (5)5 (5)235 (300)5 (5) (5) 5 (0) 0 (5) 15 (15) 5(120) 415(10) 5143rd St W Chili Ave W 144th St W 40 (5) 0 (0) 15 (25)5 (5)275 (295)5 (5) (5) 5 (5) 0 (25) 10 (20) 5(145) 385(20) 5Chili Ave W Upper 143rd St W5 (5)255 (295)5 (5) (5) 5 (0) 0 (5) 20 (5) 5(135) 415(10) 1010 (5) 0 (0) 15 (5) 144th St W Canada Ave W 5 (0) 20 (20) 20 (10) (10) 35 (30) 35(10) 25 (0) 0 (10) 15 (15) 50 (0) 30 (25)0 (0) 200 (105)100 (55) 155 (75) 185 (45) (85) 155(190) 15 142nd St W 0 (0) 0 (0)0 (0) Parent Drop-off142nd St WBus Loop XX (XX) - A.M. Peak Hour Volume - Afternoon Peak Hour Volume - Side-Street Stop Control - Signalized Control - All Way Stop Control - Uncontrolled - Three-Way Stop LEGEND Cameo Ave W 5 (5) 10 (10) 0 (30) (15) 5 (70) 205(5) 5 (5) 20 (5) 5 (10) 1530 (5) 170 (80)10 (5) 144th St W Bus Loop Middle School 143rd St W Jeffrey M. Solomon, Rosemount-Apple Valley-Eagan Public Schools September 7, 2017 Independent School District #196, Rosemount Schools Traffic Study Page 18 The operational and queuing issues observed at the middle school and elementary school are expected to continue under the year 2018 Phase 1 build conditions. Until a separate bus loop area is constructed, parent drop-off/pick and bus unloading/unloading will continue to be located in the same area and will continue to cause congestion near the Cameo Avenue/143rd Street intersection. The following traffic operational issues were identified at the study intersections: 1) Chile Avenue/142nd Street a. During the a.m. peak hour, northbound queues extend approximately 700 feet. Similar to existing conditions, vehicles are expected to continue to make “rolling stops” rather than coming to a complete stop at the intersection. b. Operates at an overall LOS D/E threshold during the a.m. peak hour. c. This intersection was identified for future capacity improvements (i.e. signalization) in the City of Rosemount Transportation Plan, dated July 2009. 2) West High School Access/142nd Street a. No traffic operational issues are expected during the a.m. and afternoon peak hours. It was assumed that when the buses depart, traffic on 142nd Street/Chili Avenue will yield to the buses exiting, which is consistent with current bus operations. 3) East High School Access/142nd Street a. During the a.m. peak hour, this intersection and the parent drop-off area is expected to be congested for the peak 15-minutes prior to school start time. Southbound queues from vehicles exiting the parent drop-off area are expected to extend approximately 200 feet and westbound queues on 142nd Street are expected to extend approximately 350 feet. Since these queues are expected to occur for a short-period of time, these operations are considered acceptable. 4) S Robert Trail/142nd Street: a. This intersection was identified for future capacity improvements (i.e. signalization) in the City of Rosemount Transportation Plan, dated July 2009. b. During the a.m. peak hour, vehicles avoid exiting towards the S Robert Street/ 142nd Street intersection. If this intersection were signalized, vehicles are expected to change their travel patterns and divert away from the Chili Avenue/145th Street intersection towards the S Robert Trail/142nd Street intersection. 5) S Robert Trail/145th Street: a. During the a.m. peak hour, northbound queues are expected to continue to extend approximately 550 feet. b. During the afternoon peak hour, southbound queues are expected to continue to extend beyond 144th Street during the peak hour (2:15 p.m. to 3:15 p.m.). Jeffrey M. Solomon, Rosemount-Apple Valley-Eagan Public Schools September 7, 2017 Independent School District #196, Rosemount Schools Traffic Study Page 19 Intersection Operations Analysis – Phase 1 and 2 To determine if the proposed Phase 2 access and traffic flow modifications will operate with acceptable levels of service, a detailed traffic capacity analysis was completed assuming the proposed modifications for both Phase 1 and Phase 2. Results of the traffic operations analysis shown in Table 4 indicate that the study intersections are expected to operate at an overall acceptable level of service, except at the Chili Avenue/145th Street intersection which operates at LOS F for the worst 15-minute and operates at the LOS D/E border for the peak hour (minimal change from existing and year 2018 Phase 1 build conditions). Intersection queuing and operational issues at the intersections along S Robert Trail identified under existing conditions are expected to continue under build conditions. Table 4. Year 2018 Phase 1&2 Build Peak Hour Capacity Analysis (Worst 15-Minute Period) Intersection A.M. Peak Afternoon Peak LOS Delay LOS Delay Chili Avenue/145th Street (2) F* 52 sec. C 24 sec. Chili Avenue/144th Street (1) A/B 10 sec. A/A 9 sec. Chili Avenue/Upper 143rd Street (1) A/B 11 sec. A/A 8 sec. Chili Avenue/143rd Street (3) A/A 8 sec. A/A 7 sec. West High School Access/142nd Street (1) A/A 4 sec. A/B 10 sec. East High School Access/142nd Street (2) C * 23 sec. A 4 sec. S Robert Street/142nd Street (1) A/E 37 sec. C/F 68 sec. Cameo Avenue/143rd Street (2) A/A 6 sec. A/A 3 sec. S Robert Street/143rd Street (1) A/E 49 sec. A/C 15 sec. Canada Avenue/144th Street (2) A 6 sec. A 5 sec. Cameo Avenue/144th Street (1) A/B 11 sec. A/A 4 sec. S Robert Street/144th Street (1) A/D 29 sec. A/D 33 sec. Canada Avenue/145th Street (1) A/B 13 sec. A/B 12 sec. Cameo Avenue/145th Street (1) A/A 8 sec. A/A 9 sec. S Robert Street/145th Street D 36 sec. C 26 sec. (1) Indicates an unsignalized intersection with side-street stop control, where the overall LOS is shown followed by the worst approach LOS. (2) Indicates an unsignalized intersection with all-way stop control. (3) Indicates an unsignalized intersection with three-way stop control (northbound approach uncontrolled), where the overall LOS is shown followed by the worst approach LOS. * Chili Avenue/145th Street operates at LOS E (36 seconds) for the overall peak hour; East High School Access/142nd Street operates at LOS C (16 seconds) for the overall peak hour. Relocating the bus loading/unloading from the middle school/elementary school parking lot is expected to significantly improve operations along 143rd Street and Cameo Avenue where vehicles make drop-offs and pick-ups. The proposed modifications reduce pedestrian/vehicle conflicts and create a designated area for parent drop-off/pick-ups. Minimal impact to traffic operations at study intersections on Chili Avenue, Robert Street, 145th Street, and near the high school is expected when comparing Phase 1 as a standalone project to constructing both Phase 1 and 2. Jeffrey M. Solomon, Rosemount-Apple Valley-Eagan Public Schools September 7, 2017 Independent School District #196, Rosemount Schools Traffic Study Page 20 It should be noted that from a traffic perspective, since buses arrive/depart in a short period of time, the modifications to the bus routes are not anticipated to significantly impact traffic operations on the adjacent roadway network under both Phase 1 and Phase 2. However, as previously mentioned, the changes to the bus routes will improve traffic operations at the school accesses by separating the bus traffic from the parent drop-off/pick-up traffic. From a safety perspective, the proposed bus loops at the high school and middle/elementary school will provide pedestrian safety benefits. All bus loading/unloading is proposed to occur adjacent to a pedestrian walkway/sidewalk so that students do not need to walk through the parking lot, reducing vehicle/pedestrian conflicts. Considerations The proposed modifications are expected to improve safety and traffic operations for pedestrians and vehicles entering/exiting the Rosemount Schools. While not necessarily needed from a traffic capacity perspective, the following additional suggestions are offered for consideration. 1. At the high school, utilize the entire length of the parent/visitor parking lot for drop-offs/pick- ups to maximize the number of drop-offs/pick-ups during peak periods. a. The parking lot is proposed to operate as a one-way with vehicles entering routed to the north side of the parking lot to circulate around the parking area and to the south before exiting. Provide sufficient drive aisle width to accommodate two lanes; one lane for loading/unloading students and a drive lane to maintain traffic flow. b. The entire length of the curb in the parent drop-off area (adjacent to the building) should be utilized for drop-offs so that 10 or more vehicles can drop-off simultaneously. Staff may be needed near the start and end times of the school to encourage vehicles to pull forward. 2. At the high school, consider designating the staff parking to be located in the northeast corner of the 322-space parking lot. This is to reduce the likelihood of students parking in this area and crossing the parent drop-off/pick-up area during the peak school arrival and departure periods (staff typically arrive during non-peak time periods). Findings and Recommendations 1. Existing operations indicate that all study intersections currently operate at an acceptable overall LOS D or better during the a.m. and afternoon peak 15-minute periods, except the Chili Avenue/145th intersection and the West/East High School Accesses on 142nd Street, which operate at LOS E or worse during the peak 15-minutes during the a.m. peak hour. 2. The following exiting issues traffic operational issues were identified at the study intersections: a. Chile Avenue/142nd Street: During the a.m. peak hour, the northbound approach queues extend approximately 700 feet. Vehicles commonly make “rolling stops” rather than coming to a complete stop. Jeffrey M. Solomon, Rosemount-Apple Valley-Eagan Public Schools September 7, 2017 Independent School District #196, Rosemount Schools Traffic Study Page 21 b. West High School Access/142nd Street: During the a.m. peak hour, eastbound queues extend approximately 500 feet; during the afternoon peak hour, queuing was observed for vehicles exiting the parking lot and along 142nd Street. c. East High School Access/142nd Street: During the a.m. peak hour, westbound queues extend approximately 750 feet; during the afternoon peak hour, queuing was observed for vehicles exiting the parking lot and along 142nd Street. d. S Robert Trail/142nd Street: During the a.m. peak hour, the eastbound approach operates at LOS E. The amount of volume on S Robert Street make it difficult for vehicles to make a left- or right-turn. Vehicles making a southbound right-turn onto 142nd Street obscure the view of southbound through vehicles, causing sight distance issues for the eastbound approach. Based on a review of travel patterns entering/exiting the high school driveways, vehicles avoid exiting towards the S Robert Street/142nd Street intersection. During the afternoon peak hour, the eastbound approach operates at LOS F and eastbound queues extend approximately 500 feet. e. S Robert Trail/143rd Street: During the afternoon peak hour, when the middle school gets out, queues on 143rd Street extend to S Robert Street causing vehicles to queue in the southbound right-turn lane. These queues cause sight distance issues for the eastbound approach vehicles. f. S Robert Trail/145th Street: During the a.m. peak hour, northbound queues extend approximately 550 feet; during the afternoon peak hour, southbound queues extend beyond 144th Street approximately five (5) times during the peak hour (2:15 p.m. to 3:15 p.m.). 3. The School District is proposing modifications to improve traffic flow, parking, and bus drop- off/pick-up at the high school, middle school, and elementary school. Phase 1 includes proposed modifications to the high school. Phase 2 includes proposed modifications to the middle school and elementary school. While both Phase 1 and Phase 2 are expected to be completed for the start of the 2018 school year, depending on the approval process Phase 2 may be constructed later. The proposed modifications include: a. High School (Phase 1): i. 142nd Street is proposed to be realigned around the 322-space and 160-space parking lots, but not the 196-space parking lot. ii. Bus parking and parent drop-off/pick-up are proposed in separated locations. iii. Modifications to the main parking lot are proposed including modifying the orientation of the parking aisles so that they are parallel to the pedestrian walkway. iv. The east access (parent drop-off/pick-up access) is proposed to be all-way-stop controlled with turn lanes. The west access (bus loop access) is proposed to be side-street stop controlled with the bus loop access stop controlled. A third controlled access on 142nd Street is noted on the site plan. All other access to the parking lot along 142nd Street was assumed to be side-street stop controlled with 142nd Street having free flow conditions. Jeffrey M. Solomon, Rosemount-Apple Valley-Eagan Public Schools September 7, 2017 Independent School District #196, Rosemount Schools Traffic Study Page 22 b. Middle School/Elementary School (Phase 2): i. A new bus parking and drop-off/pick-up area is proposed on the west side of the elementary school. ii. The parking lot located south of the middle school is being modified to no longer serve as a drop-off/pick-up area. The western exit-only access is proposed to be removed and the eastern access will be modified to serve two-way traffic. A small number parking spaces will continue to be provided in the lot. iii. With the buses no longer loading/unloading in the parking lot, parent drop-off/pick-ups are expected to occur within the parking area. 4. Results of the build traffic operations analysis indicate that the study intersections are expected to operate at an overall acceptable level of service, except at the Chili Avenue/145th Street intersection which similar to existing conditions is expected to continue to operate at LOS F for the worst 15-minute and operates at the LOS D/E border for the peak hour. a. The proposed modifications are expected to improve safety and traffic operations for pedestrians and vehicles entering/exiting the Rosemount Schools. b. Relocating the bus loading/unloading from the middle school/elementary school parking lot is expected to significantly improve operations along 143rd Street and Cameo Avenue where vehicles make drop-offs and pick-ups. 5. While not necessarily needed from a traffic capacity perspective, the following additional suggestions are offered for consideration: a. At the high school, utilize the entire length of the parent/visitor parking lot for drop- offs/pick-ups to maximize the number of drop-offs/pick-ups during peak periods. b. At the high school, consider designating the staff parking to be located in the northeast corner of the 322-space parking lot. This is to reduce the likelihood of students parking in this area and crossing the parent drop-off/pick-up area during the peak school arrival and departure periods (staff typically arrive during non-peak time periods). MEMORANDUM To: Kyle Klatt, City of Rosemount Jeff Solomon, Independent School District #196 From: Sara Kelzenberg | SK Date: September 22, 2017 Comm. No: 152317 Subject: Independent School District #196 Neighborhood Meeting for Proposed Rosemount Schools Projects September 12, 2017 Revised Memo The following is a summary of the neighborhood meeting held on September 12, 2017: Discussion Topics: A. Approximately twelve (12) community members attended the meeting. B. Scott McQueen with Wold Architects gave a power point presentation: 1. Summary of 2015 referendum. 2. Description of the School Districts’ participatory design process. 3. Description of proposed Rosemount projects: a) Site work including renovation of High School parking lot, Middle School visitor parking lot and a new dedicated Middle School/Elementary School bus loop. b) High School rehearsal space and Student Commons addition. c) Middle School office addition. d) Elementary School office renovation. 4. Brief description of traffic study by independent third party. C. Community comments regarding the Elementary/Middle School proposed bus loop: 1. Elementary School neighbors request a buffer between their homes and the proposed bus loop. They are also concerned about the City’s plans to remove the existing trees in this area. 2. Neighbors to the west of the proposed bus loop are concerned about snow plows being a disruption in the early A.M. 3. Neighbors are concerned about site lighting at the proposed bus loop. Wold ex plained that the city regulates lighting levels and that the District has automatic timing controls to turn lights off. 4. Neighbors to the west of the proposed bus loop are concerned about losing green space for kids. 5. A comment was made to possibly consider locating the Elementary/Middle School bus loop between the Middle School and Hwy 3. This would likely be too far for elementary students to walk. 6. A comment was made in support of the proposed bus loop and the enhanced pedestrian safety it will provide. MEMORANDUM Page 2 of 2 7. Can parking be restricted in the proposed bus loop? Parking cannot be easily restricted because the lot is paid for by taxpayers who utilize the school and community fields after school hours. 8. A request was made to provide porta-potties to prevent people from urinating in their back yards. 9. Where will snow from the main parking be piled when the new sidewalk for the proposed bus loop is built? The snow will likely continue to be piled in the same area, but beyond the proposed walkway. D. Community comments regarding the proposed High School parking lot renovation: 1. A comment was made that the marching band is disruptive; the flood lights sometimes stay on all night and practices sometimes go later than 9:00 p.m. John Wollersheim , High School Principal, said he will discuss with band leadership the possibility of the band practices ending and lights off at 9:00 p.m. 2. A comment was made in support of the band. 3. A neighbor commented that they have witnessed criminal activity in the parking lot. John Wollersheim encouraged neighbors to contact the school if they see anything suspicious; the school has a police officer on duty and can respond immediately. 4. A comment was made that stop signs at the High School parking lot will cause back-ups after large events. 5. Was a roundabout considered at the east access to the parking lot? The design team studied several options for this intersection including roundabouts; however the roundabout was not workable due to existing site constraints and did not function well in traffic studies. 6. Where will snow be piled when the proposed parking extends farther into the hill along the south side? The snow will likely continue to be piled on the south hill. E. Next Steps 1. Planning Commission meeting September 26, 2017 at 6:30 p.m. cc: Jane Berenz, ISD #196 Superintendent Heather Nosan, ISD #196 John Wollersheim, ISD #196 Tom Idstrom, ISD #196 Eric Hansen, ISD #196 Shane Butler, Wenck Scott McQueen , Wold Nick Marcucci, Wold CM/MN/Projects/ISD_196/152317/crsp/sept17 Dakota County GISDakota County GIS City of Rosemount - Zoning MXD: T:\GIS\Project\CommDev\Zoning\SchoolZoning8x11.mxd PDF: I:\GIS\Map_Library\CommDev\Zoning\SchoolZoning8x11.pdf 0 500250 Feet Residential: RR - Rural Residential R1 - Low Density Residential R1A - Low Density Residential R2 - Moderate Density Residential R3 - Medium Den sity Residential R4 - High Density Residential Commercial: C1 - Convenie nce Commercial DT - Downtown District C3 - Highwa y Service Commercial C4 - Gen era l Commercial Industrial: BP - Business Park IP - Industrial Park GI - General Industrial HI - He avy Ind ustrial Other: AGP - Agricultural Preserve AG - Agricultural PI - Public/Institutional FP - Flood Plain WM - Wa ste Management W - Water ROW - Right-of-Way PUD MEMORANDUM DATE: September 26, 2017 TO: Kyle Klatt, Senior Planner CC: Kim Lindquist, Community Development Director Brian Erickson, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Stacy Bodsberg, Planning & Personnel Secretary FROM: Mitch Hatcher, Project Engineer RE: School Improvements Engineering Review SUBMITTAL: The plans for Rosemount High School, Middle School, and Elementary School have been prepared by Wold Architects dated August 28, 2017. Engineering review comments were generated from the following documents included in the submittal: Survey, Removal, Site, Grading, Utility, Landscaping, Detail, Building Plans Stormwater Management Report Traffic Study GENERAL COMMENTS: 1.Maximum allowable slope is 4:1 (Horizontal:Vertical) and minimum slopes of 2% are allowed. Slopes surrounding the parking lots should be labeled. 2.The developer is required to obtain a grading permit from the City prior to construction grading activity. The developer is required to obtain a NPDES construction Stormwater Permit and provide a copy of the approved SWPPP to the City prior to the start of any construction activity. 3.Final construction plans for grading, street, and utilities should be submitted to the City for review. 4.Upon completion of the street, sanitary sewer, watermain, and storm sewer construction, the City requires record drawings. See Engineering Guidelines for submittal and formatting requirements. 5.Retaining wall should have top of wall and bottom of wall spot elevations. Retaining walls exceeding 4 feet in height shall require a plan prepared by a licensed engineer submitted for review and approval by the Building Official prior to permit issuance. UTILITY COMMENTS: 6. Hydrant spacing and locations should be approved by the Fire Marshal. Typical maximum spacing for public areas is 300’. 7. Information on the private lift station and forcemain should be provided for further review. 8. Stormwater Management requirements have not been reviewed at this time. Further information is required, and has been requested, to complete the review.  A Stormwater Management Plan summary report and tables outlining the permanent stormwater requirements for the City and NPDES. Report should outline which requirements are able to be met and which requirements they are requesting a variance for. Note: The City has agreed to allow for variances in their requirements; however, it does not have the authority to provide variances to the NPDES requirements.  Storm sewer pipe design calculations indicating the pipe size and slope needed to pass the flow of a ten-year, 24-hour event maintaining velocities between three and ten feet per second.  As-builts for existing underground storage systems  Water quality treatment BMPs should be evaluated downstream of areas where additional impervious surface is proposed. Entire High school parking lot is not receiving any treatment. TRAFFIC COMMENTS: 1. The attached Traffic Review Memo completed by WSB & Associates provides comments regarding the site improvements and traffic study. 2. Bus turning radii should be evaluated for the turning movements at Canada Ave & 145th Street with the existing bumpouts on 145th Street. Should you have any questions or comments regarding the items listed above, please contact me at 651-322-2015. Infrastructure  Engineering  Planning  Construction 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite #300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763 541-4800 Fax: 763 541-1700 Memorandum To: Mitch Hatcher, P.E., Project Engineer City of Rosemount From: Chuck Rickart, P.E., P.T.O.E., Traffic Engineer WSB & Associates, Inc. Date: September 19, 2017 Re: Traffic Review School District #196, Rosemount Schools Traffic Study City of Rosemount, MN WSB Project No.: 2235-46 Independent School District #196 has completed a Traffic Study, dated September 7, 2017, for proposed improvements in Rosemount at the High School, Middle School and Elementary School. The improvements include both building and parking lot changes as shown on the overall site plan dated September 7, 2017. The Traffic Study evaluated the existing conditions and anticipated conditions with proposed the improvements. In 2015 the City of Rosemount worked with the School District to review the intersection of TH 3 ant 142nd Street (High School Entrance). The traffic analysis completed at that time identified that a safety and operational issue existed at the intersection. Both a traffic signal system and roundabout was considered. The roundabout was recommended as the improvement that would provide the best safety and operational improvement. It was further recommended after discussions with the School District and MnDOT that any improvements be delayed until after the School District made its internal improvements to see if they would benefit the TH 3 intersection. The purpose of this memo is to provide the City with a review of the Traffic Study. Discussed below are my comments: 1.In general, the Traffic Study was well done and follows standard traffic engineering analysis methodologies. 2.One of the identified issues previously was the on-street parking on 142nd Street, will parking still be allowed? Will it have any impact on the operations of 142nd Street. 3.A safety analysis should be completed that looks at the crash rate and severity rate for the adjacent intersections to determine if additional improvements should be considered. Rosemount School Traffic Study Review September 19, 2017 Page 2 4.The 142nd Street at East Site Access is proposed to be an all-way stop t-intersection. Would making this a curve with a side street stop from the parent drop off lot operate better, without potential of backups on 142nd Street (like 142nd Street at the West Site Access)? 5.The center intersection on the 142nd Street (ring road) is identified as being controlled. What is the proposed control? Could the control be eliminated by removing the access to the 160-space parking lot and curving the roadway like the curves south and west of this intersection? If you have any question concerning these comments, please feel free to contact me by email crickart@wsbeng.com or phone (612)360-1283. MEMORANDUM To: Kyle Klatt, Senior City Planner Kim Lindquist, Community Development Director From: Rick Chase, Fire Marshal Date: September 7, 2017 Subject: Rosemount High School Addition The following comments are provided based on preliminary site plan review. • Fire lane signage and striping is required. • Post indicator valve appears to be in the construction area. This valve is required to be replaced and relocated. • Fire department connection appears to be located in the construction area. This connection is required to be relocated. • Horn strobe appears to be located in construction area and is required to be relocated. • Sprinkler riser drain appears to be located in construction area and is required to be relocated. • Hydrant front elevation between main exits is required to be located outside of the building collapse zone. • Life safety systems and emergency access is required to be maintained during construction. Sincerely, Rick Chase Fire Marshal