HomeMy WebLinkAboutPCExSumm WS Comp Plan Discussion 3-19-18
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Planning Commission Work Session: March 19, 2018
AGENDA ITEM: Comprehensive Plan Update AGENDA SECTION:
Work Session
PREPARED BY: Kyle Klatt, Senior Planner
Anthony Nemcek, Planner AGENDA NO. 1
ATTACHMENTS: Resiliency Goals, MRCCA Draft Section,
MRCCA Fact Sheet, Rulemaking/Plan
Tables, MRCCA Maps: Districts, Bluff
Impact Zones, Vegetation Restoration
Policies, Native Plant Communities,
Wetlands and Floodplains
APPROVED BY: K.L.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: No action required
FUTURE LAND USE MAP COMP PLAN DISCUSSION
The Planning Commission is being asked to review and discuss the Comprehensive Plan update at a
workshop session following its next regular meeting on March 19, 2018. Staff is planning to present an
update covering four areas:
1) An overall verbal update concerning the Comprehensive Plan and a progress report concerning the
various plan elements.
2) An initial list of goals and objectives for the Resiliency section of the plan.
3) The Mississippi River Critical Area Plan (MRCCA). Staff has attached a very early (an incomplete)
draft of this section of the Plan, which must be completed and submitted along with the other plan
elements. Also attached is some information concerning the MRCCA planning process along with
maps prepared by the Met Council for this area.
4) A discussion concerning short-term updates to the 2030 based on recent developed inquiries and
potential future projects.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff is looking for input from the Commissioners concerning the updates listed above. Because the
meeting is a work session, no action is required.
This chapter of the Comprehensive Plan addresses the ability of Rosemount to withstand disruptions
created not only by our changing climate but also due to shifting demographics, economic volatility, and
impacts to the reliability of the community’s energy grid. A resilient community has strategies in place
to respond, adapt, and thrive under changing conditions.
Since the 2008 Comprehensive Plan update, the City has moved forward with a number of
recommended implementation strategies. The City has promoted the development of clean industry by
approving a community solar garden and also helped support site selectors in identifying locations that
would be ideal for light industrial or data center developments. The City updated the Zoning Ordinance
to allow for alternative energy development such as solar power and combined heat and power plants.
Finally, the City Council convened an environmental and sustainability task force that, while not a formal
advisory commission, works with City staff to develop policies and ordinances to enhance the City’s
environment and natural resources.
Several programs exist to help communities benchmark the efforts they have made toward for local
sustainability, and Rosemount has been a part of three such programs. One initiative is the STAR
Community Rating System (STAR). This framework and certification program encompasses economic,
environmental, and social performance measures. Rosemount joined the STAR network as a leadership
community in January 2014. On March 9, 2015, the City became a 3-STAR Community.
The STAR Framework is divided into eight areas with goals, objectives, and evaluation measures
included in each area. Rosemount scored the highest in Health and Safety in large part due to the
development of the Active Living Plan included in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. The City also scored
strongly in the area of the Built Environment. Rosemount earned points due to the water and
wastewater systems in the City as well as efforts to provide a mix of densities in residential
development.
In addition to the STAR Communities Program, the City of Rosemount also participates in the GreenStep
Cities, a program of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Minnesota GreenStep Cities is a voluntary
challenge, assistance and recognition program to help cities achieve their sustainability and quality-of-
life goals. GreenStep is a free continuous improvement programs based upon 29 best practices that are
divided into 5 different areas. In 2011, the Rosemount City Council passed a resolution to authorize the
City to participate in this program, and Rosemount gained STEP 2 status in June, 2012. The City scored
strongly on the benchmarks related to Land Use and Environmental Management. A total of 9 best
practices have been adopted. To reach STEP 3, the City must adopt a total of 16 best practices.
Finally, the City received a grant from the University of Minnesota to participate in the U’s Resilient
Communities Program. This program allows communities to benefit from a partnership with graduate,
professional, and advanced undergrad students. City staff and relevant stakeholders from the
community worked closely with University of Minnesota faculty and students to provide local
knowledge and deeper insight into the issues to ensure projects were not only innovative but also
relevant to the community.
Building on the previous plan, the concept of a resilient community addresses environmental concerns
as well as the ability for a community address and plan for shifts in social and economic patterns. This
resiliency plan is comprised of 4 components: infrastructure and environment, energy infrastructure and
resources, healthy communities, and economy and society.
Infrastructure and Environment
Stormwater/Wastewater
1. Continue developing stormwater capacity requirements that accommodate more frequent and
intense storms.
2. Incorporate planning for municipal services to all lots in areas currently served by private well
and septic system.
3. Explore effluent reuse opportunities in partnership with the Metropolitan Council for future
Business Park development.
Road Infrastructure
1. Follow a complete streets approach and critically evaluate anticipated traffic volumes to avoid
overbuilding roadways.
2. Investigate opportunities to reduce the use of salt and sand on city roads during winter months.
Natural Resources
1. Preserve, protect and restore the natural environment with emphasis on the conservation of
needed and useful natural resources for the present and future benefit of the community.
2. Utilize natural resource areas to provide an overall open space system that satisfies the needs of
the community and its residents.
3. Create a livable community where future development respects and integrates the natural,
cultural, and historic resources of the community while maintaining or enhancing the economic
opportunities and community well-being.
4. Moderate City-wide water consumption to promote aquifer recharge.
Energy Infrastructure
Renewable Energy
1. Look for opportunities to remove barriers and increase renewable energy use in order to
strengthen and diversify the energy grid and mitigate climate related impacts.
2. Continue monitoring solar garden subscriptions and City power use to identify ways to support
emerging technology.
Energy Efficiency and Conservation
1. Share and promote opportunities and resources with residents to increase City-wide energy
efficiency and renewable energy use.
2. Identify ways to modify City ordinances to encourage developments that are consistent with
LEED standards, including LEED Neighborhood Development standards.
3. Investigate potential ways to incorporate green building standards into the project review and
approval process.
4. Continue partnering with other public entities, utility companies, and the private sector to
maximize energy efficiencies.
Healthy Communities
1. Continue partnering with Dakota County and other organizations to support Pedestrian-
Oriented Transportation Facilities and Services such as: Active Living Land Use Planning, Safe
Routes to School, and Farmers’ Markets.
2. Evaluate existing ordinances to assess alignment with City development goals.
3. Promote city cohesion through community-wide events and celebrations and welcome new
residents into the community.
Economy and Society
1. Support a diverse tax base that is less vulnerable to fluctuations in property values and
development cycles.
2. Work with large landholders to entice Business Park development that will increase the City’s
tax base and provide residents jobs.
3. Diversify tax base so there is not over-reliance on any one property owner.
Commercial Resilience
1. Encourage building materials that feature durability and meet City standards for maintenance.
2. Allow for commercial developments that reflect changing retail trends that are site sensitive and
serve local neighborhoods.
Housing and Jobs
1. Encourage life cycle housing to enable residents to age in place.
2. Plan for medium and high density housing types throughout the community to provide
opportunities for market-driven housing.
3. Partner with Metropolitan organizations to provide affordable housing opportunities for
community residents.
4. Support the creation of jobs that support the heads of households with living wages.
Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Appendix A – MRCCA
DRAFT 3/19/18 A-1
APPENDIX A: MRCCA
INTRODUCTION
This Mississippi River Critical Area Plan has been prepared to preserve and manage the
environmental, scenic and economic values afforded the City of Rosemount by the
Mississippi River. The city’s policy is to incorporate these values into the Comprehensive
Plan. The Critical Area within the City of Rosemount is located east of Highway 52 and
north of Highway 55.
HISTORY AND OVERVIEW
Designated by Governor’s Executive Order in the 1970s, the Mississippi River Corridor Critical
Area (MRCCA) is a land corridor along the Mississippi River in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area
governed by special land planning requirements and land development regulations. These
regulations, which are implemented through local MRCCA plans and ordinances, protect and
preserve the natural, scenic, recreational, and transportation resources of this section of the
Mississippi River. The MRCCA comprises 72 miles of river and 54,000 acres of surrounding land in
30 local jurisdictions.
Critical Area Act – Tier I
The Critical Areas Act passed by the 1973 Minnesota Legislature provided a process for planning
and managing an area of recreational and statewide public interest. A 72-mile stretch of the
Mississippi River and adjoining lands, which includes part of Rosemount, was designated a Critical
Area by the Governor of Minnesota in 1976. This Critical Area was established to preserve and
enhance the natural environment by providing guidelines for development along the River. Under
provisions of this Act, the designation was made permanent by the Metropolitan Council in 1979.
Local governments and state and regional agencies are required to implement their plans and
regulations consistent with standards for the river corridor in Executive Order 79-19. The Critical
Area requirements are referred to as Tier I standards. Rosemount adopted a Critical Area Plan and
Ordinances to meet the Tier I requirements of the Mississippi River Critical Area in 1980.
Mississippi National River and Recreation Area (MNRRA) – Tier II
In 1988, the Mississippi National River and Recreation Area (MNRRA) was created and became part
of the National Park System (Public Law 100-696). MNRRA was established with a number of goals
that were adopted as part of the City’s 2030 Comprehensive Plan update. In the mid 1990’s the
Governor transferred administrative responsibility for the MRCCA from the Environmental Quality
Board to the DNR, which was later tasked with preparing a report concerning the status of the
MRCCA to respond to concerns around the adequacy of the program. The report was completed in
2008 and identified several approaches to accomplish the preservation and protection goals
developed by the State Legislature.
Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Appendix A – MRCCA
DRAFT 3/19/18 A-2
Rules Update 2009 - Present
In 2009, the State Legislature amended MN Statutes 116G.15 and directed the DNR to establish
rules for the MRCCA, and revised the legislation again in 2013 and directed the DNR to resume
rulemaking at that time. The new rulemaking effort commenced in 2013, and after a public review
process prepared a final draft of the MRCCA rules in later 2014. Minnesota Rules, Chapter 6106,
became effective on January 4, 2017 and describe the land planning and regulatory framework that
protects the MRCCA’s resources. The rules replace Executive Order 79-19, which previously
governed land use in the MRCCA. The rules require local governments to update their MRCCA
plans (a chapter of the local comprehensive plan) and MRCCA ordinances for consistency with the
rules.
The MRCCA contains many significant natural and cultural resources, including: scenic views, water,
navigational capabilities, geology and soils, vegetation, minerals, flora and fauna, cultural and historic
resources and land and waterbased recreational resources. The MRCCA is home to a full range of
residential neighborhoods and parks, as well as river-related commerce, industry, and transportation.
Though the river corridor has been extensively developed, many intact and remnant natural areas
remain, including bluffs, islands, floodplains, wetlands, riparian zones, and native aquatic and
terrestrial flora and fauna. The MRCCA also shares the same border as the Mississippi National
River & Recreation Area (MNRRA), a unit of the National Park Service.
This Mississippi River Corridor Plan has been prepared to ensure that responsible development
occurs in the MNRRA area and to recognize the Mississippi River as an integral part of the City.
Working with adjacent communities and other organizations, Rosemount hopes to protect the
scenic and natural resources and enhance the recreational opportunities within the Mississippi River
Corridor. The City also supports the continued use of the River Corridor for industrial uses.
Map of MRCCA in Rosemount
Public Input Process
Accomplishment of goals since last MRCCA Plan
DISTRICTS
MRCCA DISTRICTS
Rural and Open Space District (CA-ROS)
• Description: The rural and open space district (CA-ROS) is characterized by rural and low-
density development patterns and land uses, and includes land that is riparian or visible from
the river, as well as large, undeveloped tracts of high ecological and scenic value, floodplain,
and undeveloped islands. Many primary conservation areas exist in the district.
• Management Purpose: The CA-ROS district must be managed to sustain and restore the
rural and natural character of the corridor and to protect and enhance habitat, parks and
open space, public river corridor views, and scenic, natural, and historic areas.
Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Appendix A – MRCCA
DRAFT 3/19/18 A-3
Separated From River District (CA-SR)
• Description: The separated from river district (CA-SR) is characterized by its physical and
visual distance from the Mississippi River. The district includes land separated from the river
by distance, topography, development, or a transportation corridor. The land in this district
is not readily visible from the Mississippi River.
• Management Purpose: The CA-SR district provides flexibility in managing development
without negatively affecting the key resources and features of the river corridor. Minimizing
negative impacts to primary conservation areas and minimizing erosion and flow of
untreated storm water into the Mississippi River are priorities in the district.
Urban Mixed District (CA-UM)
• Description: The urban mixed district (CA-UM) includes large areas of highly urbanized
mixed use that are a part of the urban fabric of the river corridor, including institutional,
commercial, industrial, and residential areas and parks and open space.
• Management Purpose: The CA-UM district must be managed in a manner that allows for
future growth and potential transition of intensely developed areas that does not negatively
affect public river corridor views and that protects bluffs and floodplains. Restoring and
enhancing bluff and shoreline habitat, minimizing erosion and flow of untreated storm water
into the river, and providing public access to and public views of the river are priorities in
the district.
DISTRICT MAP
PRIMARY CONSERVATION AREAS
GENERAL OVERVIEW
Shore Impact Zone
Floodplains and Wetlands
Natural Drainage Ways
Bluff and Bluff Impact Zones
Native Plant Communities and Significant Existing Vegetative Stands
Cultural and Historic Properties
Unstable Soils and Bedrock
PUBLIC RIVER CORRIDOR VIEWS
GENERAL OVERVIEW
Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Appendix A – MRCCA
DRAFT 3/19/18 A-4
Views Toward River from Public Places
Views Toward Bluffs from River
Other Important Views
RESTORATION PRIORITIES
Description of Priority Areas
Map(s)
Restoration Policies
• Protect native and existing vegetation during the development process, and require
restoration if any is removed by development. Priorities for restoration shall include
stabilization of erodible soils, riparian buffers and bluffs or steep slopes visible from the
river.
• Seek opportunities to restore vegetation to protect and enhance PRCVs identified in this
plan.
• Seek opportunities to restore vegetation in restoration priority areas identified in this plan
through the CUP, variance, vegetation permit and subdivision/PUD processes.
• Sustain and enhance ecological functions (habitat value) during vegetation restorations.
• Evaluate proposed development sites for erosion prevention and bank and slope
stabilization issues and require restoration as part of the development process.
MRCCA USES
SURFACE WATER USES
WATER-ORIENTED USES
OPEN SPACE AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES
TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC UTILITIES
MISSISSIPPI RIVER CRITICAL AREA CORRIDOR
KEY ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES
Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Appendix A – MRCCA
DRAFT 3/19/18 A-5
POLICIES
IMPLEMENTATION ACTIONS
Ordinance Updates
MRCCA Ordinance Administration
Education and Outreach
Capital Improvements
Land Acquisition
Specific Planning Efforts, Projects, and Other Initiatives
MRCCA LOCAL PLANNING HANDBOOK
PLANNING TO PROTECT THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER CORRIDOR CRITICAL AREA
What is the Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area?
Designated by Governor’s Executive Order in the 1970s,
the Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area (MRCCA) is a
land corridor along the Mississippi River in the Twin Cities
Metropolitan Area governed by special land planning
requirements and land development regulations. These
regulations, which are implemented through local MRCCA
plans and ordinances, protect and preserve the natural,
scenic, recreational, and transportation resources of this
section of the Mississippi River. The MRCCA comprises
72 miles of river and 54,000 acres of surrounding land in
30 local jurisdictions.
New Rules
Minnesota Rules, chapter 6106, lay out the land planning
and regulatory framework that protects the MRCCA’s
resources. These rules became effective on January 4,
2017, and replace Executive Order 79-19, which previously
governed land use in the MRCCA. The rules require local
governments to update their MRCCA plans (a chapter of
the local comprehensive plan) and MRCCA ordinances for
consistency with the rules. The DNR’s MRCCA Program
webpage has additional information about the new
MRCCA rules, district maps, and FAQs about the program.
Local Government Plan and Ordinance Updates
The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
(DNR) is the state agency with overall responsibility for
administering the MRCCA rules. However, the Metropolitan
Council plays a key role in ensuring that MRCCA plans
are updated on the same schedule as, and incorporated
into, the local comprehensive plans as a separate MRCCA
chapter. The DNR and the Metropolitan Council coordinate
review and approval of local government MRCCA plans for
consistency with the planning requirements in Minn. Rules
6106. Please see the Critical Area section of the Local
Planning Handbook for guidance, tools, and resources for
developing plans that meet the minimum requirements.
Under the notification schedule developed by the DNR
and Metropolitan Council, local governments must submit
their updated MRCCA plans to the Metropolitan Council
and the DNR by December 30, 2018 - the same time
that the 2040 Comprehensive Plan update is due to the
Metropolitan Council. Once a local MRCCA plan has been
updated, the DNR will notify each local government to
update their MRCCA zoning ordinance. Once notified,
each local government will have 12 months to update
their zoning ordinances. The DNR anticipates that it
will notify all affected local governments to update their
zoning ordinances between 2019 and 2021.
Continue to next page
The MRCCA contains many sensitive features that are not always suitable
for intensive development. Bluff setbacks and vegetation requirements help
prevent erosion and protect the integrity of natural systems.
Metropolitan Council
390 Robert Street North
Saint Paul, MN 55101
metrocouncil.org
Main: 651.602.1000
TTY: 651.291.0904
Public Information: 651.602.1500
public.info@metc.state.mn.us
LOCAL PLANNING HANDBOOK
July 2017
Why is the MRCCA Important?
The MRCCA contains many significant natural and cultural resources, including: scenic views, water, navigational
capabilities, geology and soils, vegetation, minerals, flora and fauna, cultural and historic resources and land and water-
based recreational resources. The MRCCA is home to a full range of residential neighborhoods and parks, as well as
river-related commerce, industry, and transportation. Though the river corridor has been extensively developed, many
intact and remnant natural areas remain, including bluffs, islands, floodplains, wetlands, riparian zones, and native
aquatic and terrestrial flora and fauna. The MRCCA also shares the same border as the Mississippi National River &
Recreation Area (MNRRA), a unit of the National Park Service.
MRCCA History
The MRCCA was designated in 1976 by Executive Order following passage of the Minnesota Critical Areas Act of 1973.
The Critical Areas Act (Minn. Stat., §116G) provides a general regulatory framework for protecting specific areas of the
state that possess important historic, cultural, or aesthetic values or natural systems through a defined local-regional
planning and regulation process. The MRCCA was the first and remains the only critical area in the state. The MRCCA
protects these resources through local governments’ land use plans and zoning ordinances that regulate structure
placement, height, vegetation clearing, land alteration, and subdivision of land. Following is a timeline of key milestones
in the MRCCA.
1973 Minnesota passes Critical Areas Act of 1973 (MN Statutes, Chapter 116G)
EQB adopts rules to implement Act (MN Rules, parts 4410.8100 – 4410.9910)
1976 Mississippi River and adjacent corridor designated a state critical area by Governor Wendell Anderson
(Executive Order No. 130)
1979 Designation continued by Governor Albert Quie (Executive Order 79-19)
Metropolitan Council acts to make designation permanent (Resolution 79-48)
1988 Mississippi National River and Recreational Area (MNRRA) established by Congress as unit of NPS
(MNRRA shares same boundary as Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area)
1991 MNRRA designated a state critical area per Critical Areas Act (MN Statutes, section 116G.15)
1995 Responsibility shifts from EQB to DNR by Governor Arne Carlson (Reorganization Order 170)
2007 Legislature directs DNR to prepare report on the Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area
(Completed January 2008)
2009 Legislature amends MN Statutes, section 116G.15 and directs DNR to conduct rulemaking for the Mississippi
River Corridor Critical Area (MN Laws 2009, Chapter 172, Article 2, Section 5.e.)
2011 DNR develops draft rule after participatory stakeholder process, but rulemaking authority lapses
2013 Legislature directs DNR to resume rulemaking process in consultation with local governments
2017 Rules become effective January 4.
Content prepared by:
Plan Element Executive Orders RulesDistrictsFour districts Six districtsConservation AreasFloodplains, wetlands, slopes, bluffs, unsuitable soils, significantvegetation stands, natural drainage routesSame, plus: shore impact zones, gorges, areas of confluence, unstable bedrock, native plant communities, cultural & historic properties, tree canopiesScenic ViewsAesthetic quality Public River Corridor Views & other scenic viewsRestoration PrioritiesNone Identify priorities for Veg restoration, erosion prevention, bank/slope stabilizationProvision of Sewer ServiceCoordinate development NoneSurface Water UseMinimize conflicts with land usesProvide for barge fleetingSameCom’l & Ind Water‐orientedConsider/provide for such uses SameOpen SpaceMaximize creation of open and recreational spaceID public access & trailsEncourage creation of open and recreational spaceSameTransportation & PublicUtilityLimit impacts Same
Plan Element Ordinance ImplicationsDistricts•Structure setbacks (OWHL, Bluff)•Structure height•Open space set aside percentagePrimary Conservation Areas (PCAs)•Included in definitions section •Variance and CUP (impacts, mitigation)•Permit submittals must show/describe PCAs•Incentives for alternative design methods that protect PCAs•Open space set asides (percentages)Public River Corridor Views (PRCVs)•Included in definitions section•Variance and CUP (impacts, mitigation)•Permit submittals must show/describe PRCVs•Wireless towers minimize impacts•Structure design/placement in RTC, UM, UC districts minimize impacts•CUP for taller buildings must consider PRCV enhancement•Trails, viewing areas, signs & kiosks minimize impacts•Vegetation permits for clearing minimize impactsRestoration Priorities•Vegetation clearing permits – conditions for restoration
4242
52
52
52
55
55
Coates
CottageGrove
Eagan
Farmington
InverGroveHeights
Rosemount
VermillionTwp.
EmpireTwp.
Grey CloudIsland Twp.
County Boundaries
City and Township Boundaries
NCompass Street Centerlines
Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area Districts
0 1 2 3 4 5 60.5
Miles
MRCCA Boundary
MRCCA Districts
CA -RN (River Neighborhoods)
CA -ROS (Rural and Open Space)
CA -RTC (River Towns and Crossings)
CA -SR (Separated from River)
CA -UC (Urban Core)
CA -UM (Urban Mixed)
Water
City of Rosemount, Dakota County
4242
52
52
52
55
55
Coates
CottageGrove
Eagan
Farmington
InverGroveHeights
Rosemount
VermillionTwp.
EmpireTwp.
Grey CloudIsland Twp.
Miss is sip p iR ive r
County Boundaries
City and Township Boundaries
NCompass Street Centerlines
Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area - Bluff Impact Zones
0 1 2 3 4 5 60.5
Miles
City of Rosemount, Dakota County
MRCCA Boundary
MRCCA Bluff Impact Zones(Bluffs and land within 20 feet of bluffs)
4242
52
52
52
55
55
Coates
CottageGrove
Eagan
Farmington
InverGroveHeights
Rosemount
VermillionTwp.
EmpireTwp.
Grey CloudIsland Twp.
County Boundaries
City and Township Boundaries
NCompass Street Centerlines
Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area - Vegetation Restoration Priorities
0 1 2 3 40.5
Miles
City of Rosemount, Dakota County
MRCCA Boundary
DNR Native Plant Communities &Significant Existing Vegetative Stands
Vegetation Restoration Priorities(Bulff and shore impact zones, floodplainsand wetlands not already covered bynative plant communities and significantexisting vegetative stands)
4242
52
52
52
55
55
Coates
CottageGrove
Eagan
Farmington
InverGroveHeights
Rosemount
VermillionTwp.
EmpireTwp.
Grey CloudIsland Twp.
Miss is sip p iR ive r
County Boundaries
City and Township Boundaries
NCompass Street Centerlines
Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area - Native Plant Communities andSignificant Existing Vegetative Stands
0 1 2 3 4 5 60.5
Miles
City of Rosemount, Dakota County
MRCCA Boundary
DNR Native Plant Communities
MRCCA Significant Existing Vegetative Stands
4242
52
52
52
55
55
Coates
CottageGrove
Eagan
Farmington
InverGroveHeights
Rosemount
VermillionTwp.
EmpireTwp.
Grey CloudIsland Twp.
Miss is sip p iR ive r
County Boundaries
City and Township Boundaries
NCompass Street Centerlines
Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area - Wetlands & Floodplains
0 1 2 3 4 50.5
Miles
City of Rosemount, Dakota County
MRCCA Boundary
NWI Wetlands
100 Year Floodplain