Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09.b. Request by Ron Clark Construction for a Planned Unit Development Master Development Plan with Rezoning and PUD Final Site and Building Plan and a Simple Plat to Construct a 49-Unit Apartment Building EXECUTIVE SUMMARY City Council Meeting: July 17, 2018 AGENDA ITEM: Request by Ron Clark Construction for a Planned Unit Development Master Development Plan with Rezoning and PUD Final Site and Building Plan and a Simple Plat to Construct a 49-Unit Apartment Building AGENDA SECTION: New Business PREPARED BY: Anthony Nemcek, Planner AGENDA NO. 9.b. ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance, Resolutions, PUD Agreement, Site Location; Existing Conditions; Plat; Site Plan; Utility Plan; Grading Plan; Landscape and Tree Preservation Plans; Lighting Plan; Color Renderings; Building Elevation; Building and Unit Plans; Engineer’s Memo dated July 10, 2018; Parks and Recreation Memo dated July 12, 2018, Draft June 26, 2018, PC Excerpt Minutes APPROVED BY: LJM RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff and the Planning Commission recommend the City Council make the following motions: 1. Motion to adopt an Ordinance Rezoning the subject property from AG-Agriculture to R4 PUD-High Density Residential Planned Unit Development for Wexford Place 2. Motion to Adopt a Resolution Approving the Planned Unit Development (PUD) Master Development Plan with Building and Site Plan Review for Wexford Place 3. Motion to Adopt a Resolution Approving the Wexford Place Simple Plat with conditions 4. Motion to approve the Planned Unit Development Agreement for Wexford Place and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into this agreement. SUMMARY Ron Clark Construction has submitted applications for a Planned Unit Development Master Development Plan with rezoning, site and building plan approval, and a simple plat to construct a 49-unit apartment building. The site is currently zoned AG-Agriculture. The applicant is requesting the site be rezoned to R4 PUD-High Density Residential Planned Unit Development to accommodate the project. The site is currently undergoing a reguiding to HDR-High Density Residential from NC-Neighborhood Commercial. The reguiding has been approved by the Planning Commission and City Council and is currently at the Metropolitan Council for final adoption. There is no reason to believe that the Metropolitan Council will not approve the request; there have been no negative comments received from any agencies that 2 commented. Deviations from the City Code with regard to building height, setbacks, and landscaping are being requested as part of the PUD. The proposed building will be 39 feet tall while the maximum building height in the R4 zoning district is 35 feet. Additionally, the proposal includes setback deviations from the City Code with regard to the side yard setback for the driveway as well as prescribed setback increases due to the site’s location at the intersection of designated collector and arterial streets. The proposed apartment building meets the standard 30-foot setbacks on all sides as required in the R4 zoning district, but the Code also requires an additional 10 feet of setback along Chippendale Ave and an additional 20- foot setback from 160th Street. A 10-foot side yard setback is required for surface parking and driveways while the proposed development shows a 5.7-foot setback from the side lot line, adjoining the eastern mini storage facility. Finally, the applicant is requesting a reduction in the total amount of trees required to be planted on the site from 57 trees to 43 trees. This is due to the small size and irregular shape of the lot. A simple plat of the site is being proposed to combine the three existing parcels and the former Chippendale Avenue right of way. An issue for Council discussion is waiver of some fees in recognition of the affordable housing aspect of the project. The project is competing for tax credits which will allow the apartments to be more affordable. In the case of this project, the rents are estimated at $850 for a one-bedroom and up to $1175 for a three- bedroom. As part of the tax credit program the building must meet affordability requirements for 30 years. The tax credit program is a competitive program and not all projects are chosen and obtain funding. One of the scoring criteria is City support; financial support. Staff had indicated to the applicant, so they could include the information in the tax credit application, that a $25,000 waiver of fees was supported. With Council approval, predicated on receiving the tax credits, staff would recommend waiving a combination of the required tree replacement payment and park dedication fees. At this time, the tree payment is estimated at $12,200 although a few more trees could be added to the site if the pond size is reduced, lowering the payment. Staff recommends waiving the tree replacement fee with the rest coming from the Park Dedication fees to equal $25,000. The rationale is support of affordable housing in the community and in recognition of the private recreational amenity proposed for the site. When this was discussed at the Parks Commission meeting, the Commission did not support the waiver. Staff believes this is a unique situation that does not set a precedence and therefore supports the waiver. Additionally, staff and the Planning Commission recommend approval of the Planned Unit Development Master Development Plan with Site and Building Plan approval, the Rezoning and the Simple Plat with conditions. Property Owner: Ed McMenomy Applicant: Ron Clark Construction Plat Area in Acres: 2.88 Acres Total Housing Units: 49 Gross Density: 17 Units/Acre Net Density: 17 Units/Acre Comprehensive Plan Guiding: Currently Guided as NC-Neighborhood Commercial, Reguiding to HDR-High Density Residential in process Current Zoning: AG-Agriculture Requested Zoning: R4 PUD-High Density Residential Planned Unit Development Surrounding Land Uses West and North: Twin-home Residential East: Self-storage Facility South: Agriculture (Empire Township) PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION 3 The Planning Commission reviewed the requests at a public hearing held on June 26, 2018. The Planning Commission asked about parking, particularly since there is no parking along Chippendale Avenue near the site. The site plan meets the minimum parking requirements of the ordinance, and the applicant has not seen parking in excess of that required by the City Code. However, in recognition of limited off-site parking options, nine additional stalls are included as a proof of parking should onsite parking prove insufficient. One resident spoke at the public hearing with a question about what percentage of the units would be subsidized. The applicant described how requested tax credits would support the project and how apartments would be limited to households with incomes below certain thresholds. The rents are fixed and not based on income. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the requests with conditions. BACKGROUND The subject property has been the site of a single family home since at least 1962. The current site boundaries were drawn with the realignment of Chippendale Avenue which moved the street’s connection with 160th Street from the southeast corner of the site to the southwest corner. The northern portion of the site was platted as an outlot of the Geronime Pond subdivision in 1997. Around that time, the owner of the property had asked for approval to construct a gas station on the site as part of a larger planned unit development that included the self-storage facility. Ultimately, Council decided to approve the self-storage facility separate from the proposed gas station. The site was reguided to NC-Neighborhood Commercial at the request of the current property owner during the 2008 update to the City’s Comprehensive Plan. Since then, the property owner has requested the site’s land use designation be changed to a high density residential use. That change was approved by the City Council in April of 2018, is currently being reviewed by the Metropolitan Council for final approval. ISSUE ANALYSIS Legal Authority Plats requests are considered quasi-judicial actions. In such cases, the City is acting as a judge to determine if the regulations within the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and Subdivision Ordinance are being followed. Generally, if the application meets these requirements it must be approved. The Planned Unit Development Master Development Plan is a rezoning activity and therefore is a legislative decision. Legislative decisions give the City Council more latitude, but consideration should be given to the ordinance criteria for granting of PUDs and the property Comprehensive Plan Land Use designation. Land Use and Zoning As previously stated, a reguiding of the site to HDR-High Density Residential has been approved by the Planning Commission and City Council and is under Met Council review. The HDR land use designation in the Comprehensive Plan identifies multi-story apartment buildings as a typical use with a density of 10- 24 units per acre. The proposed development will have a density of 17 units per acre. The development also meets the minimum requirements for such developments identified in the Comprehensive Plan, such as: common private recreational activities; the provision of full urban infrastructure including sidewalks, trails, and streets with good access; and buffering between high density residential and low density residential. The Rosemount Comprehensive Plan includes specific goals and policies concerning housing that apply to this development. In particular, three of these goals indicate that the City should 1) provide a mixture of rental and home ownership opportunities to provide life cycle housing, 2) locate different housing styles within the appropriate areas, which includes a policy of dispersing medium and high density housing throughout the community to avoid entire neighborhoods of medium or high density residential, and 3) provide workforce and affordable housing opportunities through cooperative efforts with other agencies. 4 The applicant is requesting a rezoning of the site from Ag-Agriculture to R4-High Density Residential PUD, which is consistent with the HDR future land use designation. Apartments are a permitted use in the district. With the PUD designation, the development also needs to adhere to the standards, requirements, and any flexibility allowed under the approved master development plan. The following section highlights proposed deviations from the City Code contained in the Planned Unit Development Master Development Plan. Planned Unit Development Master Development Plan The subject property is currently zoned AG-Agriculture. To facilitate the project, Ron Clark Construction is requesting rezoning the site to R4 PUD-High Density Residential Planned Unit Development. Planned Unit Developments are usually utilized by developers to accommodate a mix of uses or a development located on a lot with unusual dimension. Planned unit developments are typically larger in size than the proposed development area, but the City Code does permit use of a PUD for smaller sites when located along collector and arterial streets or within areas that transition between different designated land uses. The proposal is generally consistent with the R4 standards with the exceptions being the deviations from the maximum building height standard, the required side yard setback for the driveway, the additional setback requirement for lots adjacent to collector and arterial streets, and the minimum number of trees. The proposal shows a building height of 39 feet, four feet higher than the maximum building height in the R4 zoning district of 35 feet. The applicant’s narrative identifies several reasons for the increased building height. They include: taller underground parking to accommodate accessible vans, a 6/12 roof slope is more visually appealing which increases overall height, and providing a first floor that is 3-4 feet above grade for safety and improved sightlines above vehicle headlights. The deviation from the side yard setback requirement for driveways and surface parking will allow the driveway access onto Chippendale Avenue to be positioned to provide the greatest visibility and distance from 160th Street as well as maintaining the appropriate grade into the entrance of the garage. Finally, the deviation from the additional setback requirements for principle structures on sites adjacent to collector and arterial streets is necessitated by the irregular shape of the lot and the placement of the surface parking away from Chippendale and the neighboring residential areas. Staff finds the deviations agreeable because the City ends up with better overall project that has fewer impacts on the residential areas to the west and north. EASEMENT VACATION The applicant has requested the vacation of two easements on the property which is scheduled for a public hearing elsewhere on the July 17 Council agenda. The first easement is the right of way easement over the former alignment of Chippendale Avenue. The second easement is a former drainage and utility easement that covered the location of the water main connection along the original alignment of Chippendale Avenue. The Assistant City Engineer has reviewed the vacation requests and has included conditions in the Engineer’s Memo dated July 11, 2018. Standard perimeter drainage and utility easements are shown on the final plat and will be recorded with the County. SITE PLAN REVIEW Building Massing and Materials The 3-story apartment building contains 49 units. The unit’s mix is as follows: 1 Bed 9 18% 2 Bed 26 53% 3 Bed 14 29% Total 49 100% The building height is approximately thirty-nine feet as measured by the ordinance. The ordinance 5 measurement is calculated by adding the façade height and the average distance between the eaves and the ridge level of the roof. There is some variation in height due to the site grades but it is only a couple feet. The applicant has requested a deviation from the City Code to exceed the 35 foot building height maximum. Staff finds the building height acceptable as the major reason for the proposed height is a steeper pitch to the roof that offers a more attractive building that better matches the style of other residential structures. As the applicant notes there are also functional reasons for the slight increase, to permit taller accessible vans access in the underground parking, the desire to raise the ground level to avert headlights directly into the units, and the desire to raise decks off the ground. The building exterior is comprised of a combination of lap siding, face brick, rock face block, shakes, and cement board paneling. The building walls are articulated to break up the long wall faces. Vertical articulations are highlighted by brick, rockface block, or lap siding. The cement board paneling is located on the architectural parapets that are located at the corners of the building and extend above the roofline. Finally, the gables along the roof line will receive vinyl shakes as a finish. The architectural treatments are featured on all four sides of the building, even those not visible from the public right of way. Setbacks The apartment building is located at least thirty feet from all lot lines in accordance with the standard setbacks within the R4 zoning district. The City Code also requires additional setback from collector and arterial streets to allow for berming or buffer yards. The site plan does not contain the extraordinary setbacks required. This is partially due to the irregular shape of the site. More importantly, the applicant is locating the surface parking lot away from the residential neighborhood to the east, meaning that the building is shifted up toward the street. It does appear flipping the parking to be in the front, along Chippendale, and the building to the rear, along the mini-storage, would allow the plan to meet required setbacks. However, the applicant feels, and staff agrees, that switching the building and parking to meet ordinance standards is not as desirable a site plan. The City has attempted over the last several years to screen parking when possible and place buildings more to the front of the site, if applicable. Given the exterior materials on the building, showcasing that to the front of the site is more desirable and reduces potential noise or headlights that may affect the adjacent neighborhood. As trees will be planted to provide a buffer from Chippendale and 160th Street and the impacts on the neighboring residential lots will be reduced by the parking lot placement; staff finds the deviation from the supplemental setback requirements acceptable. The setback requirement for surface parking and driveways is thirty feet in the front yard and ten feet in the side and rear yards. Generally, the proposed development meets the surface parking and driveway setback requirements with the exception of a portion of driveway where it is located 5.7 feet from the eastern parcel boundary. This deviation achieves the goals of providing the most visibility at the access to Chippendale, maintaining the proper grade on the driveway into the underground parking garage, and ensuring that the existing utility poles are not disturbed. Staff finds this deviation from the side yard setback for the driveway acceptable due to the fact the eastern parcel is a self-storage facility and the impact on that site would be minimal do to the inward-facing nature of the storage buildings. Setback Standard Increased Setback Total Setback Required Proposed Front 30 feet 10 feet 40 feet 30.5 feet and 45 6 feet Side 30 feet n/a 30 feet 60 feet Rear 30 feet 20 feet 50 feet 30.5 feet Drives/Parking, Front 30 feet n/a 30 feet 30.5 feet Drives/Parking, Rear 10 feet n/a 10 feet 51 feet Drives/Parking, Side 10 feet n/a 10 feet 5.7 feet Parking and Access Site access is from Chippendale Avenue. The driveway is positioned to provide reasonable sight distances for motorists on Chippendale and for vehicles exiting the site. During the Commission discussion about reguiding the property the question of access was raised. The City Engineer has reviewed the site in the field and believes the driveway location provides acceptable sight distances, and also maintains a good separation from County Road 46. After entering the site, traffic can either turn into the underground parking or continue along the eastern side of the site to the surface parking lot. The entrance to the building is located on the eastern elevation closest to the parking lot. Traffic is able to circulate around the parking lot in a loop to be directed back to the main access on Chippendale. Plans provided by the applicant indicate a total of 98 parking stalls; sixty-one stalls are located in the underground garage and thirty-seven stalls are located in the surface parking lot. This results in a parking ratio of two stalls for every unit, in accordance with the City Code. The applicant has also provided a proof of parking plan for an additional nine stalls, which brings the ratio up to 2.18 stalls per unit. Staff supports provision of a proof of parking plan as there are few additional opportunities for parking near the site and parking in the adjoining neighborhoods is discouraged. The applicant has stated that the parking ratio they see at their other similar properties is a 1.7/unit ratio. Landscaping A landscaping plan and a tree preservation plan have been provided by the applicant. According to the tree inventory, a total of 324 caliper inches of significant trees will be removed from the site. Developers are permitted to remove up to 25% of the trees on site without replacement. Any trees removed beyond the 25% threshold must be replaced at a .5 to 1 ratio. In this case, the developer is proposing to remove 243 caliper inches beyond the 25% threshold. Therefore, 122 caliper inches of trees must be replaced. Because of the irregular shape of the site, there is not enough area to accommodate the replacement trees in addition to the trees required by the City’s landscaping ordinance. For this reason, staff is recommending the applicant provide cash in lieu of planting replacement trees on site currently estimated at $12,200. More recently there has been some discussion that the pond proposed on site may be reduced allowing additional tress to be added to the site and reducing the required payment. The condition of approval allows for the modification, should it occur. The landscaping plan provided by the applicant shows a total of 43 trees on the site. The City’s landscaping ordinance requires 8 trees plus one per unit for developments in the R4 zoning district, or a total of 57 trees. The applicant has worked with staff to amend the original landscape plans submitted with their application to provide a greater number of trees. Due to the irregular shape of the site, there is not space to accommodate the further addition of trees. The applicant is requesting a deviation from the landscape ordinance to reduce the minimum number of trees on the site from 57 to 43. Because the proposed onsite stormwater retention pond is larger than necessary, the applicant is looking into reducing the size of the pond. If this is the case, additional trees would be required in the space made available by the change. The majority of the trees are located along the perimeter of the site, while some are placed in the yard area near the stormwater retention pond. Two trees are also shown on the landscaping plan to be located in 7 the parking lot islands. The landscaping ordinance also requires one foundation planting per ten linear feet of building. The building features approximately 790 feet of perimeter meaning 79 foundation plants must be installed on the site. According to the landscape plan provided, there will be 109 shrubs planted on site. Most of these foundation plantings will be located near the entrance of the building and along the façade facing the parking lot. Additional shrubs will be located in the parking lot islands and on either side of the driveway leading into the underground parking garage. Lighting The applicant has submitted a lighting plan including a photometric study that indicates the proposed lighting on the site meets the requirements of the City Code. The majority of the lighting will be located along the eastern face of the building and within the parking lot. Additional lighting is being proposed at the entrance to the underground parking garage. The lighting fixtures are designed to direct light downward and feature LED bulbs to ensure the light does not spill over to adjacent properties. Park Dedication The site plan shows a “tot lot” playground area located near the south end of the building. This area will be surrounded by a 48” fence. Additionally, the City’s Comprehensive Parks Plan indicates that the development is served by Winds Park just north of the site at Chippendale Avenue and 158th Street West. Staff is recommending cash in lieu of land dedication for this development. Council will discuss waiving a portion of the park dedication fee as a show of support and city participation in the project regarding the developer’s application for funding assistance from the Dakota County CDA. The park dedication fee is $122,500 (49 unit’s x $2,500 per unit). The final amount may be reduced depending on the Council decision to waive a portion of the fee. The Parks and Recreation Commission indicates that it does not support the reduction of fees, but the decision is ultimately the Council’s to make. Engineering Water to the site will be supplied via an existing water main that runs down the former Chippendale Avenue right of way. Waste water will leave the site via an existing connection along the current Chippendale Avenue. Stormwater will be retained on site within an infiltration basin located between the building and Chippendale Avenue prior to flowing to the Geronime Pond regional stormwater basin. The plans provided by the applicant indicate a stormwater pond that is larger than necessary. The plans may be updated with a reduced retention pond. This will allow the developer to plant more trees on the site to bring the landscaping further into compliance with the City’s landscape ordinance. This 49-unit development is expected to generate 349 vehicle trips per day. Engineering staff is not anticipating any additional improvements will be warranted for the proposed development, but will continue to monitor traffic levels on Chippendale Avenue as part of the annual Minnesota State Aid data collection and review process. A memo dated, June 21, 2018, containing the rest of the engineer’s comments and conditions is included with the attachments. RECOMMENDATION Based on the information provided by the applicant and reviewed in this memo, the Planning Commission and staff are recommending approval of the Planned Unit Development Master Development Plan with Rezoning as well as a Simple Plat to allow Ron Clark Construction to build a forty-nine unit apartment building at the intersection of Chippendale Avenue and 160th Street West, subject to conditions. City of Rosemount Ordinance No. B-269 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE B CITY OF ROSEMOUNT ZONING ORDINANCE Wexford Place THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Ordinance B, adopted September 19, 1989, entitled “City of Rosemount Zoning Ordinance,” is hereby amended to rezone property from AG – Agricultural to R-4 PUD – High Density Residential Planned Unit Development that is located North of 160th Street and East of Chippendale Avenue within the City of Rosemount legally described as follows: The South 175.00 feet of the East 325.00 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 31, Township115, Range 19, according to the United States Government survey thereof and situate in Dakota County, Minnesota. And Outlot D, Geronime Pond, according to the recorded plat thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota. And All that part of vacated Chippendale Avenue bounded on the south by the easterly extension of the southerly line of Outlot D, GERONIME POND; bounded on the west by the east line of said Outlot D; bounded on the north by the easterly extension of the northerly line of said Outlot D; and bounded on the east by the east line of the Southeast Quarter of Section 31, Township 115, Range 19, Dakota County, Minnesota. Section 2. The Zoning Map of the City of Rosemount, referred to and described in said Ordinance No. B as that certain map entitled “Zoning Map of the City of Rosemount,” shall not be republished to show the aforesaid rezoning, but the Clerk shall appropriately mark the said zoning map on file in the Clerk’s office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this Ordinance and all of the notation references and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made part of this Ordinance. Section 3. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication according to law. ENACTED AND ORDAINED into an Ordinance this 17th day of July, 2018. CITY OF ROSEMOUNT William H. Droste, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff May, Deputy City Clerk CITY OF ROSEMOUNT DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2018-70 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN WITH SITE AND BUILDING PLAN APPROVAL FOR WEXFORD PLACE WHEREAS, the Community Development Department of the City of Rosemount received a request for a Planned Unit Development Master Development Plan with Rezoning from Ron Clark Construction concerning property legally described as: The South 175.00 feet of the East 325.00 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 31, Township115, Range 19, according to the United States Government survey thereof and situate in Dakota County, Minnesota. And Outlot D, Geronime Pond, according to the recorded plat thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota. And All that part of vacated Chippendale Avenue bounded on the south by the easterly extension of the southerly line of Outlot D, GERONIME POND; bounded on the west by the east line of said Outlot D; bounded on the north by the easterly extension of the northerly line of said Outlot D; and bounded on the east by the east line of the Southeast Quarter of Section 31, Township 115, Range 19, Dakota County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, on June 26, 2018 the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount held a public hearing and reviewed the PUD Master Development Plan with Site and Building Plan Review for Wexford Place; and WHEREAS, on June 26, 2018, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the PUD Master Development Plan with Site and Building Plan Review for Wexford Place, subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, on July 17, 2018, the City Council of the City of Rosemount reviewed the Planning Commission’s recommendations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Council of the City of Rosemount hereby approves the Planned Unit Development (PUD) Master Development Plan of Wexford Place and the Rezoning from AG – Agricultural to R4 PUD – High Density Residential Planned Unit Development, subject to: 1. Execution of a PUD Agreement. 2. Approval of a rezoning of the site from AG-Agriculture to R4 PUD-High Density Residential Planned Unit Development. 3. Approval of the Wexford Place Simple Plat. 4. The following deviations from the City Code: RESOLUTION 2018-70 2 a. A deviation from City Code Section 11-5-1 to reduce the side yard setback for driveways and surface parking from 10 feet to 5.7 feet. b. A deviation from City Code Section 11-5-2 C.6. to reduce the front yard setback for principle structures from 40 feet to 30.5 feet and the rear yard setback for principle structures from 50 feet to 30.5 feet. c. A deviation from City Code Section 11-4-9 F.8. to increase the maximum building height from 35 feet to 39 feet. d. A deviation from City Code Section 11-6-3 B. to reduce the minimum number of trees required from 57 to 43. 5. The applicant pay $122, 500 in lieu of park land dedication and $12,200 in lieu of tree replacement minus $25,000 to signify local support of the project (to be allocated first to tree replacement and then to park dedication fees) if the project is chosen as a tax credit affordable project. The amount required for the tree replacement may be modified if additional trees are added to the site. 6. Payment of $10, 012.22 for use of the regional stormwater pond. 7. Entry monuments shall be subject to sign permits and normal zoning standards. Appropriate sight distances must be maintained. 8. Installation of the proof of parking if the City determines a need for additional onsite parking. 9. Provision of additional trees as space permits should the infiltration basin be eliminated or reduced in size. 10. Conformance with all requirements of the City Engineer as detailed in the attached memorandum dated July 10, 2018. 11. Conformance with all requirements of the Parks and Recreation Director as detailed in the attached memorandum dated July 12, 2018. ADOPTED this 17th day of July, 2018, by the City Council of the City of Rosemount. __________________________________________ William H. Droste, Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________________ Jeff May, Deputy City Clerk CITY OF ROSEMOUNT DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2018-69 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SIMPLE PLAT FOR WEXFORD PLACE WHEREAS, the Planning Department received an application for approval of a Simple Plat for Wexford Place to construct a 49-unit apartment building legally described as follows: The South 175.00 feet of the East 325.00 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 31, Township115, Range 19, according to the United States Government survey thereof and situate in Dakota County, Minnesota. And Outlot D, Geronime Pond, according to the recorded plat thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota. And All that part of vacated Chippendale Avenue bounded on the south by the easterly extension of the southerly line of Outlot D, GERONIME POND; bounded on the west by the east line of said Outlot D; bounded on the north by the easterly extension of the northerly line of said Outlot D; and bounded on the east by the east line of the Southeast Quarter of Section 31, Township 115, Range 19, Dakota County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount conducted a public hearing as required by ordinance for the purpose of receiving public comment regarding the proposed Wexford Place Simple Plat on June 26, 2018; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the application on June 26, 2018, and found it consistent with the criteria for simple plat review outlined in the Subdivision Ordinance; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission adopted a motion to recommend approval of the application for a Simple Plat on June 26, 2018. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, The Council of the City of Rosemount does hereby approve the Wexford Place Simple Plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. Vacation of the right of way easement over the former alignment of Chippendale Avenue. 2. Vacation of existing drainage and utility easements within the site. 3. Drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated over all stormwater ponds, buffers and outlets. 4. Dedication of standard perimeter drainage and utility easements over the property. 5. Approval of a Planned Unit Development Master Plan with Rezoning. 6. Conformance with all requirements of the City Engineer as detailed in the attached memorandum dated July 10, 2018. 7. Conformance with all requirements of the Parks and Recreation Director as detailed in the attached memorandum dated July 20, 2018. ADOPTED this 17th day of July, 2018 by the City Council of the City of Rosemount. __________________________________________ William H. Droste, Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________________ Jeff May, Deputy City Clerk 1 DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS WEXFORD PLACE MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THIS DECLARATION made this ______ day of _________________, 2018, by Ed McMenomy (hereinafter referred to as the “Declarant”); WHEREAS, Declarant is the owner of the real property as described on Attachment One, attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof (hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Subject Property”); and WHEREAS, the Subject Property is subject to certain zoning and land use restrictions imposed by the City of Rosemount (hereinafter referred to as the “City”) in connection with the approval of an application for a master development plan planned unit development for a residential development on the Subject Property; and WHEREAS, the City has approved such development on the basis of the determination by the City Council of the City that such development is acceptable only by reason of the details of the development proposed and the unique land use characteristics of the proposed use of the Subject Property; and that but for the details of the development proposed and the unique land use characteristics of such proposed use, the master development plan planned unit development would not have been approved; and 2 WHEREAS, as a condition of approval of the master development plan planned unit development, the City has required the execution and filing of this Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (hereinafter the “Declaration”); and WHEREAS, to secure the benefits and advantages of approval of such planned unit development, Declarant desires to subject the Subject Property to the terms hereof. NOW, THEREFORE, the Declarant declares that the Subject Property is, and shall be, held, transferred, sold, conveyed and occupied subject to the covenants, conditions, and restrictions, hereinafter set forth. 1. The use and development of the Subject Property shall conform to the following documents, plans and drawings: a. City Resolution No. 2018-XX, Attachment Two b. Site Plan (Sheet C2.0), Attachment Three d. Preliminary Utility Plans (Sheets C4.0 through C5.4), Attachments Four through Nine e. Preliminary Grading Plans, (Sheets C3.0), Attachment Ten f. Preliminary Storm Sewer Plan (Sheets SW1.1 through SW1.5) Attachments Eleven through Fifteen g. Preliminary Landscape Plan (Sheet L2.0), Attachment Sixteen. h. Tree Preservation Plan (Sheet L5.0), Attachment Seventeen. i. Lighting Plan (Sheet L4.0), Attachment Eighteen j. Building Elevations (A3.0), Attachments Nineteen and Twenty. k. Building and Unit Plans (A0.0 through A4.3), Attachments Twenty-one through Twenty-seven. 3 All of which attachments are copies of original documents on file with the City and are made a part hereof. 2. Development and maintenance of structures and uses on the Subject Property shall conform to the following standards and requirements: a. Maintenance of the stormwater basin, infiltration basin and associated stormwater infrastructure necessary for the long term operation and function will be performed by the City. All other maintenance including but not limited to garbage collection, or landscape replacement or the like shall be the responsibility of the of the private property owners. All maintenance of the stormwater basin and infiltration basin shall be the responsibility of the City after the basins have been established. b. Maintenance and replacement of trees and landscaping other than that associated with the stormwater basin and infiltration basin described in standard a. shall be the responsibility of the adjoining homeowners’ association. c. The home design front elevation shall include a minimum of three and a half (3.5) feet of brick or stone wainscoting, excluding doors, windows or the wall behind the front porch; a front porch with railing that extends at least 30% of the width of the front elevation, including the garage; a side entry garage; or no more than 70% lap siding, excluding doors and windows. e. Fences are not allowed in wetland buffers. f. All areas within the wetland buffers that do not have natural vegetation shall be seeded and established with a wetland buffer seed mix. 4 3. The Subject Property may only be developed and used in accordance with Paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Declaration unless the owner first secures approval by the City Council of an amendment to the planned unit development plan or a rezoning to a zoning classification that permits such other development and use. 4. In connection with the approval of development of the Subject Property, the following deviations from City Zoning or Subdivision Code provisions were approved: a. Section 11-5-1: Reduce the side yard setback for driveways and surface parking from 10 feet to 5.7 feet. b. Section 11-5-2 C.6.: Reduce the front yard setback for principle structures from 40 feet to 30.5 feet and the rear yard setback for principle structures from 50 feet to 30.5 feet. c. Section 11-4-9 F.8.: Increase the maximum building height from 35 feet to 39 feet. d. Section 11-6-3 B.: Reduce the minimum number of trees required from 57 to 43. 5. This Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions provides only the Subject Property only master development plan planned unit development approval. Prior to the improvement or development of the Subject Property, beyond the rough grading, a final development plan planned unit development approval pursuant to Zoning Code Section 11-10-6 C. 5. of the Subject Property is required and an addendum filed with County Recorder to this Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions. 6. The obligations and restrictions of this Declaration run with the land of the Subject Property and shall be enforceable against the Declarant, its successors and assigns, by the City of 5 Rosemount acting through its City Council. This Declaration may be amended from time to time by a written amendment executed by the City and the owner or owners of the lot or lots to be affected by said amendment. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned as duly authorized agents, officers or representatives of Declarant have hereunto set their hands and seals as of the day and year first above written. DECLARANT RON CLARK CONSTRUCTION By Its STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF __________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of _________, 2018, by _____________________, the _________________, for and on behalf of _________________________, a ____________________, by and on behalf of said _______________________. _______________________________ Notary Public 6 THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: CITY OF ROSEMOUNT 2875 145TH STREET WEST ROSEMOUNT, MN 55068 651-423-4411 18" RCP18" RCP2 1R C PBituminous DrivewayBituminousTrail 18" RCP18" RCP18" RCPPipeline/Ingerssand EgressEasement per Doc. No.'s276846, 707438 and 1539136Bituminous TrailBituminous TrailOne Story Lap Sided BuildingAddress: 3567 160th StWFoundation Area=1,923 Sq. Ft.16. 13. 720. 53. 927. 446. 3 24. 023. 939. 522. 1StoneRetainingWall21" RCP8" PVCN56°54'42"E124. 97S00°12'56"W 316.16 33.00N89° 41'54" ES00°12' 56"W 175.01S89°41'54"W 325.01N00°12'56"E 175.01 100.1 6 2 Pipeline/Ingerss and EgressEasement per Doc. No.'s276846, 707438 and 1539136N56°54'42"E 124 .97 S00°12'56"W 536.89S89°41'54"W 325.01N00°12'56"E 175.01 15 6 .9 4 Δ= 2 5 ° 4 1 ' 3 2 " R = 3 5 0 . 0 0 LOT 1 BLOCK 1160TH STREET WEST (COUNTY ROAD 46)S89°41'54"W1.25C=215.10CB=N31°25'55"ER=250.00Δ=50°57'33"222.3532.38 14.89 N87°13'14"W 325.32522.00 142.63 KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That R.E.C., Inc., a Minnesota corporation, fee owner of the following described property situated in the County of Dakota,State of Minnesota to wit:The South 175.00 feet of the East 325.00 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 31, Township 115, Range 19, according to the United StatesGovernment survey thereof and situate in Dakota County, Minnesota.TOGETHER WITHOutlot D, Geronime Pond, according to the recorded plat thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota.TOGETHER WITHAll that part of vacated Chippendale Avenue bounded on the south by the easterly extension of the southerly line of Outlot D, GERONIME POND; bounded on the west by the east line of saidOutlot D; bounded on the north by the easterly extension of the northerly line of said Outlot D; and bounded on the east by the east line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter ofSection 31, Township 115, Range 19, Dakota County, Minnesota.Have caused the same to be surveyed and platted as WEXFORD PLACE and do hereby dedicate to the public for public use forever the public ways and the drainage and utilityeasements as shown on this plat.In witness whereof said R.E.C., Inc., a Minnesota corporation, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this day of , 2018.Signed: R.E.C., Inc., a Minnesota corporationBy: ___________________________ Its: ___________________________STATE OF MINNESOTA, COUNTY OF DAKOTAThe foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2018,By: ___________________________ Its: ___________________________of R.E.C., a Minnesota corporation on behalf of said corporation. My Commission Expires: Notary Public, ______________County, Minnesota Notary Printed NameSURVEYORS CERTIFICATEI Rory L. Synstelien, Licensed Land Surveyor, do hereby certify that I have surveyed or directly supervised the survey of the property described on this plat; prepared this plat ordirectly supervised the preparation of this plat; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated onthis plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been correctly set; that all monuments indicated on this plat will be correctly set within one year; that all waterboundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of the surveyor's certification are shown and labeled on this plat; and allpublic ways are shown and labeled on this plat.Dated this day of , 2018.Rory L. Synstelien, Land SurveyorMinnesota License No. 44565STATE OF MINNESOTA, COUNTY OF DAKOTAThe foregoing Surveyor's Certificate was acknowledged before me this day of , 2018, by Rory L. Synstelien, a Licensed Land Surveyor. My Commission Expires: Notary Public, ______________County, Minnesota Notary Printed NamePLANNING COMMISSION OF ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTAApproved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount Minnesota, at a regular meeting thereof, this ___________ day of _____________, 2018. Also, the conditionsof Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2, have been fulfilled.By:, Chair By:, SecretaryCITY COUNCIL OF ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTAI hereby certify that on the ___________ day of _____________, 2018, the City Council of the City of Rosemount, Minnesota, approved this plat. Also, the conditions ofMinnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2, have been fulfilled.By:, Mayor By:, City ClerkCOUNTY SURVEYORI hereby certify that this plat complies with the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, and is pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 383A.42,this day of , 2018.By: Todd B. Tollefson Dakota County SurveyorDEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION AND RECORDSPursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 9, taxes payable in the year 2018 on the land hereinbefore described have been paid. Also pursuant to MinnesotaStatutes, Section 272.12, there are no delinquent taxes and transfers entered this day of , 2018.By:, DirectorBy , DeputyDepartment of Property Taxation and RecordsCOUNTY RECORDER, COUNTY OF DAKOTA, STATE OF MINNESOTAI hereby certify that This plat of WEXFORD PLACE was filed in the office of the County Recorder for public record on this day of , 2018, ato'clock M.and was duly filed in Book of Plats, Page , as Document Number .By: County Recorder60153001530SCALE IN FEETNBeing 5 feet in width when adjoining side and rear lot lines,unless otherwise indicated, and 10 feet in width when adjoiningright of way lines unless otherwise indicated, as shown on theplat.DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS:NOT TO SCALE5510 Denotes 1/2 inch Open Iron Pipe Found, unless otherwise shown.Denotes Dakota County cast iron monument.Denotes 1/2 inch by 14 inch Rebar set marked with a plastic capLinetype & Symbol Legend inscribed "RLS 44565".FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS PLAT, THE EAST LINE OF THEWEXFORD PLACERestricted Access to Dakota County per the Dakota County VICINITY MAPNSEC. 31, TWP. 115, RNG. 19DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTAContiguous Plat OrdinanceSE 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 115, RANGE 19IS ASSUMED TO HAVE A BEARING OF SOUTH 00 DEGREES 12 MINUTES56 SECONDS WEST.10 18" RCP18" RCP2 1 R C P Bituminous Trail 18" RCP 18" RCPBituminous TrailBituminous Trail 21" RCP8" PVCN56°54'42"E 124.97 S00°12'56"W 316.16 33. 00N89° 41' 54" ES00° 12' 56" W 175. 01S89° 41'54" W 325.01N00°12'56"E 175.01100.1 6 2 4 4 3 R= 35000R=250. 50°57'33"222.351.25N89°41' 54" E15" RCP15" RCPCHIPPENDALEAVENUE W(APUBLICR/W)160THSTREET W( APUBLIC R/W)(A PublicR/W)(WIDTHVARIES)12" DIP8" DIPNOPARKING(2) A CC ASISL E@8.5'255 8 ST ALL S@ 85 68 0 11 STALLS @8. 5' = 9 3 516 ST AL LS @ 8 5680 9 S T A L L S @ 8 5 7 6 5 R4.0'R4. 0'R4.0'19. 0' 18" RCP18" RCP2 1 R C P Bituminous Trail 18" RCP 18" RCPBituminous TrailBituminous Trail 21" RCP8" PVCN56°54'42"E 124.97 S00°12'56"W 316.16 33. 00N89° 41' 54" ES00° 12' 56" W 175. 01S89° 41'54" W 325.01N00°12'56"E 175.01100.1 6 2 4 4 3 R 35000R=250. 50° 57'33"222.351.25N89°41'54" E15" RCP15" RCP CHIPPENDALE AVENUE W(A PUBLIC R/W)160TH STREET 18" RCP18" RCP21" RCPBituminous Trail 18" RCP 18" RCPBituminous TrailBituminous Trail 21" RCP8" PVCN56°54'42"E 124.97 S00°12'56"W 316.16 33. 00N89° 41' 54" ES00° 12' 56" W 175. 01S89°41' 54"W325.01N00°12'56" E175.01 100. 16 2 4 4 3 R= 3 5 0 0 0R=250.50°57'33" 222.351.25N89°41'54"E15" RCP15" RCP CHIPPENDALE AVENUE W( A T 12" SPR 18" SPR 24" COT 18" SPR 18" MAP 15" SPR 12" SPR 12" CHE 20" MAP 20" SPR 9" SPR 12" SPR 9" SPR 9" SPR 9 4 1 9419419429429429429 4 3 9439439439439439449449449449449449449449469469469 4 6 9 4 6 9 4 6 9469469 4 6 9469469469 46 9479479479479 4 7 9479479479479479 4 7 947947948948 948 9489489 4 8 9 48 948948 9489489489 4 8948 9499 49 949949949949 9 4 9 9 4 9 949949 9499499 4 9 940 940940945945945945945945945945950950 9 50 950 95094 5.8 94 6.0 9 5 1 .7 95 1.8 9 5 1 .5 95 1.4 95 1.3 95 1.8 951.6 GFE= 952.0 FFE= 953.2 GFE= 944.8 FFE= 953.3 36" MAP 24" ASH 36" COT 48" MAP GRD 36" MAP 48" MAP 36" MAP 15" COT 24" COT 18" COT 8" BOX /3 10" BOX 8" COT GRD 15" COT 12" COT 12" COT 12" SPR 12" SPR 9" SPR 9" SPR Stone Retaining Wall 948.4949.31 0 0 100 7533 33 33 33 8" PVC TNH=BM#1 949.95 Tree Preservation Required Replacement Calipers Significatn Tree Calipers Total Significant Tree Calipers 324 Allowed 25% Removal 81 Total Calipers in Excess of 25%243 0.5 Caliper Per Caliper Removed 122 " Calipers 122 " Required Calipers to be Replaced 160th STREET WESTCHIPPENDALE AVENUE WESTPROPOSED 3-STORY APARTMENT BUILDING TOT LOT 2,300 SQ. FT. EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED LEGEND T U S H I E M O N TG O M ER Y A R C H I T E C T S 7645 LYNDALE AVENUE SOUTH, #100 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55423 -4084 612 . 861 . 9636 FAX: 612 . 86 . 9632 W W W . T M I A R C H I T E C T S . C O M PREPARED FOR: PRINT NAME: SIGNATURE: DATE: 05/23/2018 LICENSE #: © 2016 Tushie Montgomery & Associates, Inc. ALL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING DRAWINGS ARE IN CONFIDENCE AND DISSEMINATION MAY NOT BE MADE WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE ARCHITECT. ALL COMMON LAW RIGHTS OF COPYRIGHT AND OTHERWISE, ARE HEREBY SPECIFICALLY RESERVED. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PRE- PARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 53757 -P R E L IM IN A R Y -N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T IO N Kevin Kroen CITY APPLICATION 05/23/2018 5/25/2018 7:28:55 AM WEXFORD PLACE3567 160TH STREET WESTROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTAL5.0 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN Project Number SCALE 1" = 30'-0" 1 TREE PRESERVATION Tree Preservation - Inventory Count Tree / Caliper Total Site Caliper 1 Ash 24" 24 3 Boxelder 8" 24 1 Boxelder 10" 10 1 Cottonwood 8" 8 2 Cottonwood 12" 24 2 Cottonwood 15" 30 1 Cottonwood 18" 18 1 Cottonwood 24" 24 1 Cottonwood 36" 36 3 Maple 36" 108 2 Maple 48" 96 18 402 Tree Preservation - Significant Trees Count Tree / Caliper Total Site Caliper 1 Ash 24" 24 2 Cottonwood 12" 24 2 Cottonwood 15" 30 1 Cottonwood 18" 18 1 Cottonwood 24" 24 1 Cottonwood 36" 36 2 Maple 36" 72 2 Maple 48" 96 12 324 Tree Preservation - Replacement Trees Count Common Name Botanical Name Caliper Site Caliper Replaced 6 Autumn Radiance Maple Acer rubrum 'Autmun Radiance'3 18 7 Northern Catalpa Catalpa speciosa 3 21 3 Redmond Linden Tilia americana 'Redmond' 3 9 13 Black Hills Spruce Picea glauca 'Densata' 3 39 9 Concolor Fir Abies concolor 4 36 38 123 0' SCALE = 15'30'60' 1" =30'-0" N V F T G E RR RR S 940 9409409 4 1 9419419429429429429 4 3 9439439439439439449449449449449449449449459459459459459459459459469469469 4 6 9 4 6 9 4 6 9469469 4 6 9469469469 46 9479479479479 4 7 9479479479479479 4 7 947947948948 948 9489489 4 8 9 48 948948 9489489489 4 8948 949949 949949949949 9 4 9 9 4 9 949949 9499499 4 9 950950 9 50 950 95012" SPR 18" SPR 24" COT 18" SPR 18" MAP 15" SPR 12" SPR 12" CHE 20" MAP 20" SPR 9" SPR 12" SPR 9" SPR 9" SPR 948.4949.38" PVC 200SMH Ri m=947.2 Inv=930.1(N) Inv=930.1( W) TNH=BM#1 949.95 160th STREET WESTCHIPPENDALE AVENUE WESTPROPOSED 3-STORY APARTMENT BUILDING TOT LOT 2,300 SQ. FT. 10' PARKING SETBACK 30' BUILDING SETBACK 30' PARKING & BUILDING SETBACK10' PARKING SETBACK30' BUILDING SETBACK11 10 9 8 8 (2) BHS (1) CF (1) NC (1) ARM (1) CF (1) ARM (3) NC (1) ARM (1) CF (1) ARM (2) BHS (1) CF (1) ARM (1) NC (1) BHS (1) CF (1) BHS (1) NC (1) BHS (1) CF (1) BHS (1) NC (1) BHS (1) CF (1) BHS (1) ARM (1) NC (3) BHS (1) RLN (1) RLN (3) AFD (3) AFD (3) AFD L2.0 1 (1) CF (2) RLN (1) CF (1) ARM (1) ARM (1) ARM (12) ZRD (7) SCD(18) LPS (1) DKLT (12) ZRD (7) SCD (18) LPS (1) DKLT LANDSCAPE NOTES: 1. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL GUARANTEE ALL PLANT MATERIAL FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR. FROM THE DATE OF CERTIFICATION OF SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION FOR THE PROJECT OR LATER IF INSTALLATION IS DELAYED BECAUSE OF PLANTING SEASON. 2. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL MEET MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS SHOWN IN THE "AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK" (ANSI Z60.1-2004). 3. NO PLANT OR MATERIAL, SHALL BE SUBSTITUTED WITHOUT AUTHORIZATION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 4. TREES SHALL ONLY BE STAKED AND GUYED WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, IN CASES OF EXTREMELY WINDY LOCATIONS AND/OR WET CLAY OR VERY SANDY SOIL. REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLAN AND DETAILS FOR SPECIFIC PLANTING INSTRUCTIONS. 5. IF THERE IS A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN PLANT QUANTITIES IN THE PLANT LIST AND THOSE GRAPHICALLY REPRESENTED, THE GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE. 6. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL UTILITY LOCATIONS AND PROTECT ALL UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES. DAMAGE TO UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES SHALL BE REPAIRED BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER. 7. IF PLANTS OR LANDSCAPE ELEMENTS CANNOT BE INSTALLED AS SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE LOCATIONS FOR THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S APPROVAL PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION OR INSTALLATION. 8. UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE, ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS WITHIN THE SITE BOUNDARY SHALL RECEIVE SOD. AREAS OUTSIDE THE SITE BOUNDARY WHICH HAVE BEEN DISTURBED SHALL RECEIVE SEED OR BE REPAIRED BACK TO THEIR ORIGINAL CONDITION, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 9. ALL SOD AND LANDSCAPE INSTALLATIONS SHALL BE IRRIGATED, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 10. WOOD FIBER BLANKET MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED OVER SEED ON ALL SLOPES, NATIVE GRASS HAY MULCH MAY BE USED ON RELATIVELY FLAT AREAS. 11. IN AREAS WHERE AN EXISTING PARKING LOT OR DRIVE AREAS HAVE BEEN REMOVED, ALL SUB-BASE SHALL BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH TOPSOIL AND ORGANIC MATTER. 12. UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE, ALL PLANTS TO RECIEVE MINIMUM 4" OF RIVER ROCK MULCH. T U S H I E M O N T G O M E R Y A R C H I T E C T S 7645 LYNDALE AVENUE SOUTH, #100 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55423 -4084 612 . 861 . 9636 FAX: 612 . 86 . 9632 W W W . T M I A R C H I T E C T S . C O M PREPARED FOR: PRINT NAME: SIGNATURE: DATE: 05/23/2018 LICENSE #: © 2016 Tushie Montgomery & Associates, Inc. ALL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING DRAWINGS ARE IN CONFIDENCE AND DISSEMINATION MAY NOT BE MADE WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE ARCHITECT. ALL COMMON LAW RIGHTS OF COPYRIGHT AND OTHERWISE, ARE HEREBY SPECIFICALLY RESERVED. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PRE- PARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 53757 -P R E L IM IN A R Y -N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T IO N Kevin Kroen CITY APPLICATION 05/23/2018 6/21/2018 11:32:51 AM WEXFORD PLACE15876 CHIPPENDALE AVENUE| ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTAL2.0 LANDSCAPE PLAN Project Number SCALE 1" = 30'-0"2 LANDSCAPE PLAN 0' SCALE = 15'30'60' 1" =30'-0" N Planting Schedule ID Count Common Name Botanical Name Size Description 1. Deciduous Tree ARM 9 Autumn Radiance Maple Acer rubrum 'Autmun Radiance' 3" Caliper Ball and Burlap DKLT 2 Dwarf Korean Lilac Syringa meyeri 'Palibin' #10 Container NC 8 Northern Catalpa Catalpa speciosa 3" Caliper Ball and Burlap RLN 4 Redmond Linden Tilia americana 'Redmond' 3" Caliper Ball and Burlap 2. Evergreen Tree BHS 13 Black Hills Spruce Picea glauca 'Densata' 6' Tal l Ball and Burlap CF 9 Concolor Fir Abies concolor 8' Tall Ball and Burlap 3. Shrub AFD 15 Arctic Fire Dogwood Cornus stolonifera ' Farrow' #5 Container AFD LPS 36 Little Princess Spirea Spiraea japonica 'Little Princess' #5 Container 4. Perennial FRG 20 Karl Foerster Feather Reed Grass Calamagrostis x acutiflora 'Karl Foerster' #5 Container FRG SCD 14 Strawberry Candy Daylily Hemerocallis 'Strawberry Candy' #1 Container ZRD 24 Zing Rose Dianthus Dianthus 'Zing Rose'#1 Container Grand total: 154 SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0"1 LANDSCAPE PLAN @ FRONT ENTRANCE 12" SPR 18" SPR 24" COT 18" SPR 18" MAP 15" SPR 12" SPR 12" CHE 20" MAP 20" SPR 9" SPR 12" SPR 9" SPR 9" SPR 9 4 1 9419419429429429429 4 3 9439439439439439449449449449449449449449469469469 4 6 9 4 6 9 4 6 9469469 4 6 9469469469 46 9479479479479 4 7 9479479479479479 4 7 947947948948 948 9489489 48 9 48 948948 9489489489 48948 949949 949949949949 9 4 9 9 4 9 949949 9499499 4 9 45.76 46.35 45.91 45.91 45.87 45.79 45.13 44.83 45.06 45.40 940 940940945945945945945945945945950950 950 950 950# Name Parameter Min Max Average Min/average Min/ max 1 Calculation surface 1 Perpendicular illuminance 0.00 fc 16.93 fc 0.34 fc 0.00 0. 00 Luminaire parts list Index Manufacturer Luminaire type Item number Fitting Luminous flux Light loss factor Connected load Quantity 1 PHILIPS GARDCO EcoForm Area LED ECF - Small, 32 LED's, 4000K CCT, TYPE 2-HIS OPTIC, House-side Internal Shielding ECF-S-32L-1.2A-NW-G2-2-HIS1x(2) LEDGINE SLD LIGHT ARRAY(S) DRIVEN AT 1200mA 10584 lm 0.80 121.6 W 5 2 PHILIPS STONCO LytePro 16 LED Small Wall Sconce LPW16-7 1x16 NW Lumiled Luxeon R LEDs 3373 lm 0.80 36.3 W 4 PROPOSED 3- STORY APARTMENT BUILDING 160thSTREET WESTCHIPPENDALE AVENUE WESTPG PG PG PG PG PS PS PS PS SITE LIGHTING NOTES:1. PHOTOMETRIC IS CONCEPT PLAN ONLY. IT SHALL NOT BE USED AS A CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT 2. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN LIGHTING PERMIT THROUGH ELECTRICAL SUBCONTRACTOR 3. ALL LIGHTING IN THE R-O-W MUST BE COORDINATED WITH CITY.T U S H I E M O N TG O M ER Y A R C H I T E C T S 7645 LYNDALE AVENUE SOUTH, #100 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55423 -4084 612 . 861 . 9636 FAX: 612 . 86 . 9632 W W W . T M I A R C H I T E C T S . C O M PREPARED FOR: PRINT NAME:SIGNATURE:DATE: 05/23/ 2018 LICENSE #: 2016 Tushie Montgomery & Associates, Inc.-P R E L IM IN A R Y -N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T IO N CITY APPLICATION 05/ 23/2018 5/23/2018 10:05: 59 AM WEXFORD PLACE3567 160TH STREET WESTROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTAL4.0 LIGHTINGPLAN Project Number SCALE 1" = 30'-0" 1 LIGHTING PLAN 1) PG ( 2) PS 0' SCALE = T U S H I E M O NT G O M E R Y A R C H I T E C T S 7645 LYNDALE AVENUE SOUTH, #100 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55423 -4084 612 . 861 . 9636 FAX: 612 . 86 . 9632 W W W . T M I A R C H I T E C T S . C O M PREPARED FOR: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PRE- PARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. PRINT NAME: SIGNATURE: DATE: 05/23/2018 LICENSE #: © 2018 Tushie Montgomery & Associates, Inc. ALL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING DRAWINGS ARE IN CONFIDENCE AND DISSEMINATION MAY NOT BE MADE WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE ARCHITECT. ALL COMMON LAW RIGHTS OF COPYRIGHT AND OTHERWISE, ARE HEREBY SPECIFICALLY RESERVED. CITY APPLICATION 05/23/2018 5/25/2018 2:44:58 PM WEXFORD PLACE3567 160TH STREET WESTROSEMOUNT, MN 55068A5.0 PERSPECTIVES 218038A 160TH STREET WEST & CHIPPENDALE AVENUE WEST ENTRY DRIVE T U S H I E M O NT G O M E R Y A R C H I T E C T S 7645 LYNDALE AVENUE SOUTH, #100 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55423 -4084 612 . 861 . 9636 FAX: 612 . 86 . 9632 W W W . T M I A R C H I T E C T S . C O M PREPARED FOR: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PRE- PARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. PRINT NAME: SIGNATURE: DATE: 05/23/2018 LICENSE #: © 2018 Tushie Montgomery & Associates, Inc. ALL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING DRAWINGS ARE IN CONFIDENCE AND DISSEMINATION MAY NOT BE MADE WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE ARCHITECT. ALL COMMON LAW RIGHTS OF COPYRIGHT AND OTHERWISE, ARE HEREBY SPECIFICALLY RESERVED. CITY APPLICATION 05/23/2018 5/25/2018 2:44:58 PM WEXFORD PLACE3567 160TH STREET WESTROSEMOUNT, MN 55068A5.1 PERSPECTIVES 218038A FRONT ELEVATION 1ST FLOOR 100' -0" 2ND FLOOR 110' -1 7/8" 3RD FLOOR 120' -3 3/4" ROOF LEVEL 128' -4 7/8" GARAGE 89' -4" SIDING #3 SIDING #2 BRICK #1 SIDING #1SIDING #1 BRICK #1 SIDING #3 SIDING #2 BRICK #1 SIDING #2SIDING #2SIDING #2 SIDING #3SIDING #3 SIDING #1 BRICK #1 SIDING #2 SIDING #1 SIDING #2 SIDING #1SIDING #1 STONE #1BRICK #1BRICK #1BRICK #1STONE #1 BRICK #2 BRICK #2 BRICK #2 BRICK #2 STONE #1 BRICK #2 BRICK #2 BRICK #2 BRICK #2 ROOF #1 ROOF #1 STONE #1ROCKFACE CMU #1 BUILDING HEIGHT39' - 3" AVERAGE GRADE PLANE 2' - 5"1ST FLOOR 100' -0"2ND FLOOR 110' - 1 7/8"3RD FLOOR 120' - 3 3/4"ROOF LEVEL 128' -4 7/8" GARAGE 89' - 4"STONE # 1 SIDING # 2 SIDING # 1 BRICK #1 SIDING # 1 BRICK #1BRICK #1SIDING # 2 BRICK # 2BRICK #2BRICK # 2 ROOF # 1 ROOF # 1 BUILDING HEIGHT39' - 3"UNIT BALCONY COMMUNITY DECK SIDING #3 ROCKFACE CMU # 1 AVERAGE GRADE PLANE 2' - 5" 1ST FLOOR 100' -0"2ND FLOOR 110' -1 7/8"3RD FLOOR 120' -3 3/4" ROOF LEVEL 128' - 4 7/ 8"SIDING # 2 STONE # 1 ALUM. UNIT BALCONY 1ST FLOOR 100' -0"2ND FLOOR 110' -1 7/8"3RD FLOOR 120' -3 3/4" ROOF LEVEL 128' -4 7/8"SIDING #1 1ST FLOOR 100' -0"2ND FLOOR 110' -1 7/8"3RD FLOOR 120' -3 3/4" ROOF LEVEL 128' -4 7/8" SIDING #2 SIDING #1 1ST FLOOR 100' -0"2ND FLOOR 110' -1 7/8"3RD FLOOR 120' -3 3/4"ROOF LEVEL 128' -4 7/8"STONE # 1 MAGIC PAC LOUVER ALUM. UNIT BALCONY EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE BRICK #1 MANUFACTURER HEBRON COLOR DAKOTA COMMON SIZE UTILITY BRICK MORTAR GRAY SIDING # 1 MANUFACTURER JAMES HARDIE TYPE HARDIE PLANK COLOR AUTUMN TAN SIZE 3" LAP BRICK #2 - SOLDIER COURSING MANUFACTURER HEBRON COLOR DAKOTA COMMON SIZE UTILITY BRICK MORTAR GRAY SIDING # 2 MANUFACTURER CFB COLOR AUTUMN TAN TYPE CEMENT BOARD PANEL STONE #1 MANUFACTURER BORAL STONE COLOR COMPASS CREEK LEDGESTONE SUPPLIER BROCK WHITE SIDING #3 MANUFACTURER ALSIDE TYPE VINYL SHAKE COLOR TUSCAN CLAY PROFILE BOARD AND BATTEN ROOF #1 MANUFACTURER CERTAIN TEED TYPE ARCHITECTURAL ASPHALT SHINGLES COLOR WEATHERED WOOD SOFFIT / FASCIA MANUFACTURER NAPCO TYPE PREFINISHED ALUMINUM COLOR IVORY GUTTERS MANUFACTURER NAPCO TYPE PREFINISHED ALUMINUM COLOR IVORY BALCONIES RAIL / STRUCTURE AND BRACKETS TYPE PREFINISHED ALUMINUM COLOR DARK BRONZE DECKING COLOR DARK BRONZE MANUFACTURER MAGIC- PAK TYPE METAL KYNAR FINISH COLORS SURREY BEIGE (SIDING # 1)MAGIC PAK GRILLS MANUFACTURER PRIMEX TYPE METAL KYNAR FINISH COLORS DARK GREY (BRICK, STONE) TAUPE (SIDING # 1)EXHAUST GRILLS MANUFACTURER DOORLINK TYPE PREFINISHED ALUMINUM COLOR ALMOND GARAGE DOOR SIDING TRIM MANUFACTURER HARDIE CFB TYPE VINYL SHAKE COLOR SAIL CLOTH SIZE PER ELEVATIONS ROCKFACE CMU #1 MANUFACTURER TBD COLOR TAN SIZE 8 X 16 MORTAR TAN T U S H I E M O NT G O M E R Y A R C H I T E C T S 7645 LYNDALE AVENUE SOUTH, #100 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55423 -4084 612 . 861 . 9636 FAX: 612 . 86 . 9632 W W W . T M I A R C H I T E C T S . C O M PREPARED FOR:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PRE-PARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.PRINT NAME:SIGNATURE: DATE: 05/23/2018 LICENSE #: 2018 Tushie Montgomery & Associates, Inc.ALL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING DRAWINGS ARE IN CONFIDENCE AND DISSEMINATION MAY NOT BE MADE WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE ARCHITECT. ALL COMMON LAW RIGHTS OF COPYRIGHT AND OTHERWISE, ARE HEREBY SPECIFICALLY RESERVED.CITY APPLICATION 05/23/ 2018 5/ 23/ 2018 12:22:10 PMWEXFORD PLACE3567 160TH STREET WESTROSEMOUNT, MN 55068A3.0EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 218038A SCALE 1/16" = 1'-0" 1 EAST ELEVATION SCALE 1/16" = 1'-0"2 NORTH ELEVATION EXTERIOR WALL SCHEDULE -OVERALL BUILDING EXTERIOR - 3" EXPOSURE LAP SIDING OVER 2x6 WOOD STUDS 9,389 SF 38%EXTERIOR - BRICK OVER 2x6 WOOD STUDS 6, 226 SF 25%EXTERIOR - CEMENT BOARD PANEL SIDING OVER 2x6 WOOD STUDS 4,301 SF 17%EXTERIOR - ROCKFACE CMU OVER CAST CONCRETE 2 2,281 SF 9%EXTERIOR - STONE OVER 2x6 WOOD STUDS 1,852 SF 7% EXTERIOR - VINYL SHAKE SIDING OVER2x6 WOOD STUDS 765 SF 3%Grand total24, 813 SF SCALE 1/16" = 1'-0"5 EAST ENTRY SCALE 1/16" = 1'-0"7EAST TYP.SCALE 1ST FLOOR 100' -0" 2ND FLOOR 110' -1 7/8" 3RD FLOOR 120' -3 3/4" ROOF LEVEL 128' -4 7/8" GARAGE 89' -4" SIDING #2 SIDING #3 SIDING #1 SIDING #2 SIDING #2 SIDING #3 BRICK #2 BRICK #2 BRICK #1 BRICK #1 SIDING #3SIDING #3 SIDING #3 SIDING #3 SIDING #1SIDING #1 SIDING #2 SIDING #1 SIDING #2 SIDING #1 SIDING #1 SIDING #2 ROOF #1 STONE #1 ROCKFACE CMU #1 ROCKFACE CMU #1 ROCKFACE CMU #1 BUILDING HEIGHT39' - 3" AVERAGE GRADE PLANE 2' - 5"1ST FLOOR 100' -0"2ND FLOOR 110' - 1 7/8"3RD FLOOR 120' - 3 3/4"ROOF LEVEL 128' -4 7/8" GARAGE 89' - 4"BRICK # 2 BRICK # 1 SIDING # 3 SIDING # 2 SIDING # 1 BRICK # 1 BRICK # 2 SIDING # 2 BRICK #1 ROOF # 1 STONE #1 STONE #1 ROCKFACE CMU #1 BUILDING HEIGHT39' - 3"2' - 5"AVERAGE GRADE PLANE 1ST FLOOR 100' -0"2ND FLOOR 110' -1 7/8"3RD FLOOR 120' - 3 3/ 4"ROOF LEVEL 128' -4 7/8" GARAGE 89' -4" SIDING #1 MAGIC PAK GRILL OUTDOOR DECK ROCKFACE CMU #1 1ST FLOOR 100' -0"2ND FLOOR 110' -1 7/8"3RD FLOOR 120' - 3 3/ 4"ROOF LEVEL 128' - 4 7/ 8"GARAGE 89' - 4"SIDING # 1 UNIT BALCONY SIDING # 2 ROCKFACE CMU #1 1ST FLOOR 100' -0"2ND FLOOR 110' -1 7/8"3RD FLOOR 120' - 3 3/ 4"ROOF LEVEL 128' - 4 7/8" GARAGE 89' - 4"SIDING # 2 SIDING # 1 ROCKFACE CMU #1 1ST FLOOR 100' -0"2ND FLOOR 110' -1 7/8"3RD FLOOR 120' - 3 3/ 4"ROOF LEVEL 128' -4 7/8"GARAGE 89' -4"SIDING # 1 ROCKFACE CMU #1 T U S H I E M O NT G O M E R Y A R C H I T E C T S 7645 LYNDALE AVENUE SOUTH, #100 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55423 -4084 612 . 861 . 9636 FAX: 612 . 86 . 9632 W W W . T M I A R C H I T E C T S . C O M PREPARED FOR:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PRE-PARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.PRINT NAME:SIGNATURE: DATE: 05/23/2018 LICENSE #: 2018 Tushie Montgomery & Associates, Inc.ALL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING DRAWINGS ARE IN CONFIDENCE AND DISSEMINATION MAY NOT BE MADE WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE ARCHITECT. ALL COMMON LAW RIGHTS OF COPYRIGHT AND OTHERWISE, ARE HEREBY SPECIFICALLY RESERVED.CITY APPLICATION 05/23/ 2018 5/ 23/ 2018 12:22:16 PMWEXFORD PLACE3567 160TH STREET WESTROSEMOUNT, MN 55068A3.1EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 218038A SCALE 1/16" = 1'-0"1 WEST ELEVATION SCALE 1/16" = 1'-0"2SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE 1/16" = 1'-0"4WEST GRILLS 1 SCALE 1/16" = 1'-0"3WEST DECK T U S H I E M O NT G O M E R Y A R C H I T E C T S 7645 LYNDALE AVENUE SOUTH, #100 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55423 - 4084 612 . 861 . 9636 FAX: 612 . 86 . 9632 W W W . T M I A R C H I T E C T S . C O M PREPARED FOR: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PRE- PARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. PRINT NAME: SIGNATURE: DATE: 05/23/2018 LICENSE #: 2018 Tushie Montgomery & Associates, Inc. ALL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING DRAWINGS ARE IN CONFIDENCE AND DISSEMINATION MAY NOT BE MADE WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE ARCHITECT. ALL COMMON LAW RIGHTS OF COPYRIGHT AND OTHERWISE, ARE HEREBY SPECIFICALLY RESERVED. CITY APPLICATION 05/23/2018 5/23/2018 12:21:58 PM WEXFORD PLACE3567 160TH STREET WESTROSEMOUNT, MN 55068A0. 0 COVER SHEET 218038A SITE LOCATION GENERAL NOTES PROJECT TEAM ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL MEET ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND MOST STRINGENT SHALL APPLY.DIMENSIONS GIVEN FOR MASONRY ON ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS, ARE NOMINAL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.SCALED MEASUREMENTS OF DRAWINGS SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED.ALL NECESSARY AND/OR REQUIRED TESTS, INSPECTIONS SHOP DRAWING REVIEWS AND DRAWING INTERPRETATIONS, REQUIRED BY THE GENERAL CONDITIONS, SHALL BE EXECUTED BY A REGISTERED ARCHITECT AND/OR BY A REGISTERED ENGINEER; IF NOT, THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD AND/ OR THE ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL BE HELD HARMLESS FOR THAT PORTION OF THE WORK IMPROPERLY EXECUTED. THE INSPECTION ARCHITECT AND/OR ENGINEER SHALL BECOME RESPONSIBLE FOR THOSE INSPECTIONS, DECISIONS AND/OR DOCUMENT INTERPRETATIONS MADE AS THEY RELATE TO THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND THEIR INTENT. DIMENSION FOR STUD WALLS ARE TO FACE OF STUD AND DIMENSIONS FOR MASONRY WALLS ARE TO FACE OF BLOCK UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.DRAWING INDEX TUSHIE MONTGOMERY ARCHITECTS 7645 LYNDALE AVENUE SOUTH, # 100 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55423 CIVIL ENGINEER:OWNER:ARCHITECT:612) 861-9636 FAX (612) 861- 9632 ANDY KRENIKMIKESTUEVEN ( DESIGNER)RON CLARK CONSTRUCTION & DESIGNWEXFORD PLACE 3567 160TH STREET WEST ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068 CIVIL CS COVER SHEET andyk@tmiarchitects. com mikes@tmiarchitects. com BUILDING AREA SUMMARY PROJECT INFO. PARKING COUNT SUMMARY UNIT MIX SUMMARY ARCHITECTURAL CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.DAVID KNAEBLE 4931 WEST 35TH STREET, SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 Dknaelbe@civilsitegroup.com 763- 234-7523 MIKE WALDO, COO/CFO 7500 WEST 78TH STREET EDINA, MN 55439 mike@ronclark.com 952-947- 3022 DIRECT 952-947-3030 FAX 1 BED ("A" UNITS) 9 18% 2 BED ("C" UNITS) 26 53% 3 BED ("D" UNITS) 14 29%Grand total 49 100%GARAGE 22,175 SF 1ST FLOOR 21,992 SF 2ND FLOOR 21,940 SF 3RD FLOOR 21,835 SF GRAND TOTAL 87,941 SF UNIT MIX BY UNIT TYPE UNIT A1 6 752 SF UNIT A2 3 750 SF UNIT C1 13 UNIT C2 11 966 SF UNIT C3 ADA 2 UNIT D1 2 1,234 SF UNIT D3 9 UNIT D5 3 1,289 SF Grand total 49 A1.0 GARAGE / 1ST FLOOR PLAN A1. 1 2ND - 3RD FLOOR / ROOF PLAN A3.0 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A3.1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A4.0 UNIT PLANS A4.1 UNIT PLANS A4.2 UNIT PLANS A4.3 ENLARGED COMMON SPACE L1.0 SITE PLAN L2.0 LANDSCAPE PLAN L3.0 LANDSCAPE DETAILS L4.0 LIGHTING PLAN L5.0 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN LANDSCAPE TUSHIE MONTGOMERY ARCHITECTS 7645 LYNDALE AVENUE SOUTH, # 100 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55423 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:612) 861-9636 FAX (612) 861-9632 KEVIN KROEN GARY TUSHIE kevink@tmiarchitects.com garyt@tmiarchitects. com TOTAL POTENTIAL PARKING SPACES - 107 mwaldo@ronclark.com 952-947- 3037 DIRECT 952-947-3035 FAX LANCE CALHOUN,SENIOR PROJECT MANAGER lance@ronclark.com 952-947- 3012 DIRECT C0.0 TITLE SHEET V1. 0 ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY C1.0 REMOVALS PLAN C2.0 SITE PLAN C2.1 TRUCK TURN MOVEMENT PLAN C3.0 GRADING PLAN C4.0 UTILITY PLAN C5.0 CIVIL DETAILS C5.1 CIVIL DETAILS C5.2 CIVIL DETAILS C5.3 CIVIL DETAILS C5.4 CIVIL DETAILS SW1.0 SWPPP -EXISTING CONDITIONS SW1.1 SWPPP - PROPOSED CONDITIONS SW1.2 SWPPP -DETAILS SW1.3 SWPPP -NARRATIVE SW1.4 SWPPP -ATTACHMENTS SW1. 5 SWPPP -ATTACHMENTS 1,299 SF MIKE ROEBUCK, PRESIDENT GENERAL CONTRACTOR: RON CLARK CONSRUCTION & DESIGN 984 SF GARAGE SPACES SURFACE PARKING PROOF OF PARKING 61 37 9 1,181 SF PARKING SUMMARY:2. 0 PARKING SPACES PER UNIT REQUIRED)GARAGE PARKING SPACES 61 SURFACE PARKING SPACES 37 TOTAL PARKING SPACES 98 98 PARKING SPACES / 49 UNITS = 2.0 SPACES PER UNIT)PROOF OF PARKING SPACES 9 107 PARKING SPACES ( WITH PROOF OF PARKING) / 49 34 9144STAIRGARAGETRASH ELEV. EQUIP. ELEV LOBBY 61INDOOR PARKING SPACES18' - 0" 24' - 0"18' - 0" STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGESTORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGESTORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE FD FD FD FD FD WATER SERVICE FD ELECTRICAL SANITARY WATER SUPPLY - SEE CIVIL INFLAMABLE WASTE TRAP MAU WALL MOUNTED BIKE RACKS BIKE STORAGE ELECTRICAL SERVICE GAS METER 27' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"FD FD 4' - 10"314' - 8 3/ 8"4' - 11"324' - 5 3/8"71' - 10"23' - 6 3/8"24' - 9 1/4"23' - 6 3/8"32' - 2 3/ 4"27' - 5 3/8"23' - 4 7/8" 83' - 1" 4' - 115/ 8"319' - 2 3/4" 4' - 10"329' - 03/8" UNIT D3 UNIT C2 UNIT C1UNITC1CLUBROOMFITNESSSTORAGEUNITC1UNITC2UNITD3UNITD5UNITA2UNIT A1UNIT C1 MEN'SOFFICELOBBYOFFICEMAINT./ELEC.ELEV.LOBBYTRASHPACK.VESTIBULE UNIT A1UNIT C1UNITC2UNITD3STAIRSTAIR41' - 41/4"34' - 0"34' - 0"62' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0" 41' - 4 1/4" 35' - 7 7/ 8"35' - 10 7/8"71' - 6 3/4"29' - 6 3/8"23' - 4 1/2"9' - 5"26' - 3 1/2"34' - 0"51' - 0"26' - 0" 34' - 0"34' - 3 1/2"9' - 5"41' - 7 3/4"4' - 10"46' - 11 7/8"35' - 10 7/8"82' - 10 3/4" 48' - 10"OUTDOOR DECK FIRE DEPT. CONNECTION WOMEN'S13' - 11 3/4"324' - 4 3/8"4' - 10"4' - 10"324' - 0 3/8"T U S H I E M O NT G O M E R Y A R C H I T E C T S 7645 LYNDALE AVENUE SOUTH, #100 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55423 -4084 612 . 861 . 9636 FAX: 612 . 86 . 9632 W W W . T M I A R C H I T E C T S . C O M PREPARED FOR:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PRE-PARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. PRINT NAME:SIGNATURE:DATE: 05/23/ 2018 LICENSE #: 2018 Tushie Montgomery & Associates, Inc. ALL ARCHITECTURAL AND UNIT C2 UNIT D3 UNITD5UNITC2UNITC1UNITA1 STAIR UNITC1UNITC2UNITD3 UNIT D3 UNIT A2 UNIT C1 STAIR UNIT C1 UNITD1UNITC2 UNIT C3ADAELEVLOBBYMAINT./ ELEC.STORAGESTORAGE4' - 5 3/4"41' - 4 1/4"34' - 0"34' - 0"34' - 0"10' - 0"34' - 0"8' - 0"44' - 0"34' - 0"41' - 4 1/4"4' - 5 3/ 4"323' - 7 7/ 8"35' - 7 7/8"35' - 10 7/8"71' - 6 3/4"4' - 5 3/4"41' - 7 3/4"9' - 5"34' - 3 1/2"34' - 0"26' - 0"51' - 0"34' - 0"26' - 3 1/2"9' - 5"23' - 4 1/ 2"29' - 9"46' - 11 7/ 8"35' - 10 7/ 8"82' - 10 3/ 4"UNIT A1 323' - 8 1/ 8"6" / 12" 6" / 12" RIDGE VENT6" / 12"6" / 12"6" / 12"6" / 12"6" / 12"6" / 12"6" / 12" 6" / 12"6" / 12"318' - 1 3/8"75' - 2 1/8"64' - 11 1/ 4"21' - 7 3/ 8"299' - 10 7/8"22' - 8" 16' - 10"16' - 8 1/4"TYP.TYP.TYP.CRICKET TYP.TYP.T U S H I E M O NT G O M E R Y A R C H I T E C T S 7645 LYNDALE AVENUE SOUTH, #100 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55423 -4084 612 . 861 . 9636 FAX: 612 . 86 . 9632 W W W . T M I A R C H I T E C T S . C O M PREPARED FOR:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PRE-PARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.PRINT NAME:SIGNATURE:DATE: 05/ 23/2018 LICENSE #: 2018 Tushie Montgomery & Associates, Inc. ALL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING DRAWINGSARE IN CONFIDENCE AND DISSEMINATION MAY NOT BE MADE WITHOUTPRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT 752 SF UNIT A1 BEDROOM 1 145 SF CLOSET BATHROOM WASHER / DRYERKITCHEN / LIVING ROOM 750 SF UNIT A2 BEDROOM 1 130 SF CLOSET BATHROOM WASHER / DRYER KITCHEN / LIVING ROOM 750 SF UNIT A2 BEDROOM 1 138 SF CLOSET BATHROOM WASHER / DRYER KITCHEN / LIVING ROOM T U S H I E M O NT G O M E R Y A R C H I T E C T S 7645 LYNDALE AVENUE SOUTH, # 100 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55423 - 4084 612 . 861 . 9636 FAX: 612 . 86 . 9632 W W W . T M I A R C H I T E C T S . C O M PREPARED FOR:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PRE-PARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.PRINT NAME: SIGNATURE:DATE: 05/23/2018 LICENSE #: 2018 Tushie Montgomery & Associates, Inc.ALL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING DRAWINGS ARE IN CONFIDENCE AND DISSEMINATION MAY NOT BE MADE WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE ARCHITECT. ALL COMMON LAW RIGHTS OF COPYRIGHT AND OTHERWISE, ARE HEREBY SPECIFICALLY RESERVED.CITY APPLICATION 05/23/ 2018 5/23/2018 12:22:17 PM WEXFORD PLACE3567 160TH STREET WESTROSEMOUNT, MN 55068A4.0 UNITPLANS 218038A SCALE 1/4" = 1'-0"1UNIT A1 SCALE 1/4" = 1'-0"3 UNIT A2 - TYPE B SCALE 1/4" = 966 SF UNIT C2 MASTER BEDROOM 140 SF CLOSET BATHROOM WASHER / DRYERKITCHEN / LIVING ROOM BATHROOMBEDROOM 1 126 SF CLOSET 1,181 SF UNIT C3 ADA CLOSET BATHROOM WASHER / DRYER KITCHEN / LIVING ROOM MASTER BEDROOM 172 SF CLOSET BATHROOM BEDROOM 1 122 SF 984 SF UNIT C1 BEDROOM 1 136 SF CLOSET BATHROOM WASHER / DRYERKITCHEN / LIVING ROOM MASTER BEDROOM 150 SF CLOSET BATHROOMT U S H I E M O NT G O M E R Y A R C H I T E C T S 7645 LYNDALE AVENUE SOUTH, #100 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55423 -4084 612 . 861 . 9636 FAX: 612 . 86 . 9632 W W W . T M I A R C H I T E C T S . C O M PREPARED FOR:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PRE-PARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. PRINT NAME:SIGNATURE:DATE: 05/23/ 2018 LICENSE #: 2018 Tushie Montgomery & Associates, Inc.ALL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING DRAWINGS ARE IN CONFIDENCE AND DISSEMINATION MAY NOT BE MADE WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE ARCHITECT. ALL COMMON LAW RIGHTS OF COPYRIGHT AND OTHERWISE, ARE HEREBY SPECIFICALLY RESERVED.CITY APPLICATION 05/ 23/2018 5/23/2018 12:22: 19 PM WEXFORD PLACE3567 160TH STREET WESTROSEMOUNT, MN 55068A4.1UNIT PLANS 218038A SCALE 1/4" = 1'-0"2 UNIT C2 SCALE 1/4" = 1'-0"3 UNIT C3 1,299 SF UNIT D3 BEDROOM 1 123 SF CLOSET BATHROOMWASHER/ DRYER KITCHEN / LIVING ROOM BEDROOM 2 121 SF CLOSET CLOSET MASTER BEDROOM 186 SF BATHROOM 1,289 SF UNIT D5 BEDROOM 1 122 SF CLOSETBATHROOM WASHER/ DRYER KITCHEN / LIVING ROOM BEDROOM 2 101 SF CLOSETMASTER BEDROOM 140 SF CLOSET BATHROOM 1,234 SF UNIT D1 BEDROOM 1 133 SF CLOSET BATHROOM WASHER / DRYER KITCHEN / LIVING ROOM BATHROOM BEDROOM 2 154 SF CLOSET MASTER BEDROOM 161 SF CLOSET T U S H I E M O NT G O M E R Y A R C H I T E C T S 7645 LYNDALE AVENUE SOUTH, #100 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55423 -4084 612 . 861 . 9636 FAX: 612 . 86 . 9632 W W W . T M I A R C H I T E C T S . C O M PREPARED FOR: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PRE- PARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. PRINT NAME: SIGNATURE: DATE: 05/23/2018 LICENSE #: 2018 Tushie Montgomery & Associates, Inc. ALL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING DRAWINGS ARE IN CONFIDENCE AND DISSEMINATION MAY NOT BE MADE WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE ARCHITECT. ALL COMMON LAW RIGHTS OF COPYRIGHT AND OTHERWISE, ARE HEREBY SPECIFICALLY RESERVED. CITY APPLICATION 05/23/2018 5/23/2018 12:22:20 PM WEXFORD PLACE3567 160TH STREET WESTROSEMOUNT, MN 55068A4.2 UNIT PLANS218038A SCALE 1/ 4" = 1'-0"2 UNITD3 SCALE 1/ 4" = 1'-0"3 UNITD5 SCALE 1/ 822 SF CLUB ROOM 453 SF FITNESS 138 SF STORAGE MEN'S 136 SF MAINT./ELEC.ELEV. LOBBY VESTIBULE 230 SF OFFICE 83 SF PACK. TRASH 176 SF OFFICE LOBBY 121 WOMEN'S OUTDOOR DECK T U S H I E M O NT G O M E R Y A R C H I T E C T S 7645 LYNDALE AVENUE SOUTH, #100 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55423 -4084 612 . 861 . 9636 FAX: 612 . 86 . 9632 W W W . T M I A R C H I T E C T S . C O M PREPARED FOR: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PRE- PARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. PRINT NAME: SIGNATURE: DATE: 05/23/2018 LICENSE #: 2018 Tushie Montgomery & Associates, Inc. ALL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING DRAWINGS ARE IN CONFIDENCE AND DISSEMINATION MAY NOT BE MADE WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE ARCHITECT. ALL COMMON LAW RIGHTS OF COPYRIGHT AND OTHERWISE, ARE HEREBY SPECIFICALLY RESERVED. CITY APPLICATION 05/23/2018 5/23/2018 12:22:22 PM WEXFORD PLACE3567 160TH STREET WESTROSEMOUNT, MN 55068A4.3 ENLARGED COMMON SPACE218038A SCALE 1/ MEMORANDUM DATE: July 10, 2018 TO: Anthony Nemcek, Planner CC: Kim Lindquist, Community Development Director Stacy Bodsberg, Planning & Personnel Secretary Brian Erickson, Director of Public Works/City Engineer FROM: Stephanie Smith, Assistant City Engineer RE: Wexford Place Engineering Review SUBMITTAL: The plans for Wexford Place have been prepared by Civil Site Group dated May 23, 2018. Engineering review comments were generated from the following documents included in the submittal:  PUD Submittal ▫ Existing Conditions ▫ Site Plan ▫ Plat Map ▫ Erosion Control Plan (SWPPP) ▫ Grading and Drainage Plan ▫ Utility Plan ▫ Landscape Plan ▫ Soils Report ▫ Stormwater Management Report An updated final plat map, prepared June 18, 2018, was submitted and was reviewed for comment in this memorandum. ENGINEERING FEES: 1. Development fees are required based on the current Schedule of Rates and Fees. For 2018, the estimated development fees are listed below:  Storm Sewer Trunk Charge: $ 6,865 / acre  Sanitary Sewer Trunk Charge: $ 1,075 / acre  Watermain Trunk Charge: $ 6,500 / acre 2. Stormwater ponding fee of $3,820/acres is due with the final plat. This fee is associated with the use of the regional stormwater pond. (2.621 acres x $3,820/acres = $10,012.22) RIGHT OF WAY AND EASEMENTS: 3. Vacation of 33-foot right-of-way from the old alignment of Chippendale is anticipated in the proposed plat map. The vacation shall be recorded concurrently but prior to recording the Wexford Place plat. 4. All work occurring within the Mid-America Pipeline Company easement shall be by agreement or permit with the easement owner. 5. Additional drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated on the plat near the City’s sanitary and storm manhole to allow for a 2:1 excavation for future maintenance. 6. Permits are required for work in the right-of-way. GRADING AND DRAINAGE 7. The developer is required to obtain a grading permit from the City prior to construction grading activity. 8. The site currently has a well and septic system. These shall be shown on the survey. 9. Include the horizontal and vertical datums used from the survey on the title sheet of the plan. 10. Include the benchmark elevation used from the survey on the title sheet of the plan. 11. The plan shall label the first floor elevation of the neighboring building. STREETS AND PARKING LOTS The site has a proposed driveway access off Chippendale Avenue. Chippendale Avenue is designated a collector roadway in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan and is a Municipal State Aid roadway. Our engineering consultant, WSB, collected traffic counts on Chippendale Avenue June 27th and 28th for the City as part of the Minnesota State Aid traffic data collection. The average daily traffic during the collection period was 2944 vehicles per day. Per the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 6th Ed., a 49- unit apartment is anticipated to generate 325 trips during a weekday. These additional trips are not anticipated to change warrants for traffic control on Chippendale Avenue, therefore, roadway improvements are recommended with this proposal. 12. The plans show nine stalls for proof of parking. This future impervious surface must be taken into account for the stormwater design of the site. 13. The applicant’s engineer shall show the sight distance triangle for the driveway on the landscaping plan. Landscaping features may not impede the sight triangle for turning onto Chippendale Avenue. 14. The fire truck may not enter the parking spaces to show proof of turning movements. UTILITIES This project is not anticipated to include public infrastructure improvements. The privately-owned watermain, sanitary sewer and storm sewer will tie into public systems. 15. Utility permits are required for connection to the public utilities. 16. Utility construction shall be installed in accordance with the 2015 City of Rosemount General Specifications and Standard Detail Plates and the Engineering Guidelines. 17. Hydrant number and location require approval of the Fire Marshal. 18. The applicant shall confirm existence of a second watermain stub on the southern end of the property and remove it. 19. The sanitary service shall not be located under the infiltration basin. 20. The inlet pipes to the infiltration basin shall have 1.0% minimum slopes to prevent ice damage, per the MN Stormwater Manual. 21. The applicant shall enter into a Stormwater Management Agreement with the City to be recorded against the property. The agreement shall detail the applicant’s inspection and maintenance responsibilities for their stormwater BMPs. 22. Upon completion of the infiltration basin, the applicant’s engineer shall submit infiltrometer testing to certify the functionality of the basin as modeled. 23. A NPDES Stormwater Permit and SWPPP are required and must be submitted to the City prior to the start of construction. 24. Upon completion of the sanitary sewer, watermain, and storm sewer construction, the City requires record drawings. See Engineering Guidelines for submittal and formatting requirements. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN COMMENTS: WSB Engineering (WSB) reviewed the Wexford Place stormwater management plan on behalf of the City. The full memorandum, dated June 12, 2018, is included as an attachment. The recommendations are summarized below: The City’s volume control requirement is being achieved in a regional basin. Pretreatment prior to discharge to the regional basin is provided with sumps, SAFL baffles, and an infiltration basin. 25. Include the horizontal and vertical datums used from the survey on the title sheet of the plan. 26. Include the benchmark elevation used from the survey on the title sheet of the plan. 27. Call out all emergency overland flow (EOF) elevations at all low points on the plan. All EOFs should be accompanied with a flow arrow. See WSB report for locations missing EOF labels. 28. Include inlet protection across from the construction exit and at all 4 catch basins at the low point of Chippendale Avenue W. This will prevent sediment from entering the storm sewer when vehicles use Chippendale Avenue W to access 160th Street W. 29. Install silt fence around the infiltration basin at the 941’ contour to prevent clogging of the infiltration basin during construction. 30. The City only allows RCP to be used for storm water applications. Switch all HDPE to RCP. 31. The City minimum lateral pipe size is 15‐inchs. Switch all 12‐inch storm sewer pipes to 15‐inch. 32. Add sumps and SAFL baffles to CB14, CB15, and CB24 for ease of maintenance and sediment clean out. 33. Do not allow for infiltration (Discarded Outlet Devices) when calculating 2, 10 and 100‐year discharge rates and 100‐year high water levels. Please rerun the HydroCAD model and adjust the outlet control structure/basin grading as necessary to achieve a reduction in discharge rates from existing to proposed conditions. Should you have any questions or comments regarding the items listed above, please contact me at 651-322-2015. ATTACHMENTS: 1. WSB Memorandum Re: Wexford Place Plan Review, dated 6-12-2018 MEMORANDUM To: Kim Lindquist, Community Development Director Kyle Klatt, Senior Planner Anthony Nemcek, Planner Brian Erickson, City Engineer/Public Works Director Stephanie Smith, Assistant City Engineer From: Dan Schultz, Parks and Recreation Director Date: July 10, 2018 Subject: Wexford Place Development The Parks and Recreation Department staff and the Parks and Recreation Commission recently reviewed the development plans for the Wexford Place Development project. The project is proposing to build 49 units. The parks dedication requirement for 49 high density residential units is .02 acres of land per unit or $2,500 per unit. If the City choses to collect the full cash dedication the amount would be paid by the developer would be $122,500. Listed below are the recommendations from staff and the commission. Parks and Recreation Staff Recommendation: Staff is recommending the City collect cash in-lieu of land to meet the parks dedication requirements for the 49 units. Should the developer be chosen to receive tax credits for an affordable housing project through Dakota County and if they install and maintain a tot lot that meets ADA requirements, parks and Recreation department staff supports waiving up to $25,000 of the parks dedication fees. Parks and Recreation Commission Recommendation: The Commission has recommended that the City collect the full dedication amount and that no credit is given for the for private recreation amenities installed with the project. Please let me know if you have any questions about this memo. 5.a. Request by Ron Clark Construction for a Planned Unit Development Master Development Plan with Rezoning and a Simple Plat to Construct a 49-Unit Apartment Building (18-31-PUD & 18-32-SMP) Planner Nemcek gave a brief summary of the staff report for the Planning Commission. The public hearing opened at 6:49 pm. Public Comments: Mike Waldo, Ron Clark Construction, stated that they held a neighborhood meeting and the main questions were for traffic. Commissioner Clements questioned if the property in Lakeville was the same height as the proposed property in Rosemount. Mr. Waldo confirmed that it is but that Lakeville has different grading then what the Rosemount property will have. Commissioner Reed questioned if there was parking along Chippendale. Nemcek confirmed that there is not. Reed questioned where parking would go if the lot were full. Mr. Waldo stated that they have not run into that problem. However, the applicant is meeting the requirements for parking. The Commission received on public comment during the hearing. A resident asked what percentage of the 49 units will be subsidized for any government agency. Planner Nemcek deferred to the applicant. MOTION by Clements to close the public hearing. Second by Freeman. Ayes: 4. Nays: 0. Motion Passes. The public hearing was closed at 7:00 pm. Additional Comments: Mike Waldo, Ron Clark Construction, stated that the project will be funded through tax credits through the CDA. Income limitations will be considered for the applicants. The rents would be fixed, and applicants must show that their income is below certain income thresholds based on family size. MOTION by Reed to recommend the City Council approve a Planned Unit Development Master Development Plan with Rezoning and Site and Building Plan Approval for Wexford Apartment project subject to the following conditions: 1. Execution of a PUD Agreement. 2. Approval of a rezoning of the site from AG-Agriculture to R4 PUD-High Density Residential Planned Unit Development. 3. Approval of the Wexford Place Simple Plat. 4. The following deviations from the City Code: a. A deviation from City Code Section 11-5-1 to reduce the side yard setback for driveways and surface parking from 10 feet to 5.7 feet. b. A deviation from City Code Section 11-5-2 C.6. to reduce the front yard setback for principle structures from 40 feet to 30.5 feet and the rear yard setback for principle structures from 50 feet to 30.5 feet. c. A deviation from City Code Section 11-4-9 F.8. to increase the maximum building height from 35 feet to 39 feet. d. A deviation from City Code Section 11-6-3 B. to reduce the minimum number of trees required from 57 to 43. 5. Payment in lieu of tree replacement in the amount of $12,000. 6. Compliance with all conditions detailed in the Engineer’s Memorandum dated June 21, 2018. 7. Payment of $122,500 in lieu of park land dedication. 8. Payment of $10,012.22 for use of the regional stormwater pond. 9. Entry monuments shall be subject to sign permits and normal zoning standards. Appropriate sight distances must be maintained. Second by Clements. Ayes: 4. Nays: 0. Motion Passes. MOTION by Reed to recommend the City Council adopt an Ordinance rezoning the Property at 15876 Chippendale Avenue from AG-Agriculture to R4 PUD-High Density Residential Planned Unit Development. Second by Clements. Ayes: 4. Nays: 0. Motion Passes. MOTION by Reed to recommend the City Council approve a Simple Plat subject to the following conditions: 1. Vacation of the right of way easement over the former alignment of Chippendale Avenue. 2. Vacation of existing drainage and utility easements within the site. 3. Drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated over all stormwater ponds, buffers and outlets. 4. Dedication of standard perimeter drainage and utility easements over the property. 5. Approval of a Planned Unit Development Master Plan with Rezoning. 6. Conformance with all requirements of the City Engineer as detailed in the attached memorandum dated June 21, 2018. 7. Conformance with all requirements of the Parks and Recreation Directors as detailed in the attached memorandum dated June 20, 2018. Second by Clements. Ayes: 4. Nays: 0. Motion Passes.