Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutChapter 8 - Transportation_Final MC doneRosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 8 – Transportation 8-1 C HAPTER 8: TRANSPORTATION VISION FOR THE TRANS PORTATION SYSTEM The purpose of the Transportation Plan is to provide a means to better connect and achieve the goals of the community. This plan will outline the policy and program guidance needed to make appropriate transportation related decisions when development occurs, state when elements of the transportation system need to be upgraded and help forecast when transportation problems may occur. The Transportation Plan demonstrates how the City of Rosemount will provide for a transportation system integrated into the fabric of the community that will serve the future needs of its residents and businesses. It will also support the City’s development plans and complement the portion of the metropolitan transportation system that lies within the City’s boundaries. Rosemount is located in Dakota County, Minnesota, 23 miles southeast of downtown Minneapolis and 20 miles southwest of downtown Saint Paul. The City is adjacent to the Mississippi River to the east and US 52 (TH 52) is the only U.S. Highway that is in the City. Population and the economy is expected to grow making it important for the City to maintain and improve the transportation system in the future. The City encompasses 35 square miles and is bordered by Eagan, Apple Valley, Lakeville, Empire Township, Coates, Vermillion Township, Nininger Township, Cottage Grove, and Inver Grove Heights. The City of Rosemount maintains public roadways used by public transit, as well as some of the trails and sidewalks within the City. Maintaining and improving this multimodal transportation system is important to the health, safety and well-being of the community and local business. REPORT ORGANIZATION The Transportation Plan is organized into the following sections:  Goals and Policies  Roadway System Plan  Transit System Plan  Bicycling and Walking Plan  Freight System Plan  Aviation System Plan  Implementation Plan Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 8 – Transportation 8-2 GOALS AND POLICIES SUMMARY OF REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION GOALS Guidance for the development of the Transportation Plan is provided by the Metropolitan Council’s 2040 Transportation Policy Plan (TPP), which identifies six broad goals for the regional transportation system. The six goals are paraphrased below: 1. Transportation System Stewardship: Providing sustainable investments in the transportation system which are protected by strategically preserving, maintaining and operating system assets. 2. Safety and Security: Ensuring the regional transportation system is safe and secure for all users. 3. Access to Destinations: Allowing people and businesses to prosper by using a reliable, affordable and efficient multimodal transportation system that connects them to destinations throughout the region and beyond. 4. Competitive Economy: Ensuring the regional transportation system supports the economic competitiveness, vitality and prosperity of the region and State. 5. Healthy Environment: Confirming the regional transportation system advances equity and contributes to communities’ livability and sustainability while protecting the natural, cultural, and developed environments. 6. Leveraging Transportation Investment to Guide Land Use: Leveraging the region’s transportation investments to guide land use and development patterns that advance the regional vision of stewardship, prosperity, livability, equity and sustainability. ROSEMOUNT GOALS The role of the Metropolitan Council, reflected above, is to coordinate large-scale transportation planning efforts to benefit the metropolitan region. As a metropolitan community, Rosemount’s role is to respond to Metropolitan Council’s initiatives and coordinate with adjacent communities, while addressing its local responsibility to improve the quality of life for its citizens. To respond to the above themes, as well as to serve economic activities and improve the quality of life in Rosemount, the City has adopted the following transportation policies. Transportation System Stewardship  Protect investments in the transportation system through strategic preservation, maintenance and operation of system assets.  New roadway facilities should be constructed in conjunction with new developments and designed according to the intended function.  Existing roadways should be upgraded when warranted by demonstrated volume, safety, or functional needs.  Consider traffic control improvements where appropriate to accommodate roadway capacity and reduce delay.  Prioritize maintenance for roadways based on surface conditions and other indicators of deterioration. Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 8 – Transportation 8-3  Maintenance assessments shall be considered when a facility requires reconstruction, and whether the removal or closure of the facility is a fiscally responsible alternative in certain instances.  Employ a variety of outreach tools to foster community engagement and eliminate barriers to public participation in transportation and land use planning, and ensure final plans reflect the values of Rosemount citizens. Safety and Security  Maximize the safety of the roadways for all users.  Use the appropriate access management guidelines to provide safe conditions on all road types.  Plan roadway projects with central consideration given to the roadway functional classification system. Access to Destinations  Improve access to destinations through improvement in transit and other modes of transportation.  Optimize capacity, operational and safety characteristics of the overall network.  Selectively expand the roadway system in order to relieve pressure from roads near or over capacity.  Review network needs assessment on an on-going basis regarding potential deficiencies.  Use the analysis and prioritization principals from this Plan as the basis for this review. Assess these needs against available funding. Competitive Economy  Invest in transportation improvements that will attract and retain businesses and workers within Rosemount and pursue design alternatives that reflect the values of its citizens.  Strengthen connections between work and activity centers.  Provide and protect efficient connections from major freight facilities to the regional highway system.  Coordinate with regional governments, transit agencies, and rideshare programs to capture the environmental and social costs of commuting and incentivize alternatives to single- occupancy vehicle trips. Healthy Environment  Encourage multimodal use by improving the safety and accessibility of all facilities.  Work with Minnesota Valley Transit Authority and the Metropolitan Council to maximize transit use and to coordinate potential transit facilities.  Provide off-road and on-road bike and pedestrian facilities improving the safety for all users of the road.  Integrate trail system with regional trail system and make connections to neighboring communities. Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 8 – Transportation 8-4 Leveraging Transportation Investment to Guide Land Use  Utilize sound land use planning to promote multimodal travel alternatives compared to single- occupant vehicles, with a focus on strategic job activity, and industrial and manufacturing concentrations located on congested highway corridors served by regional transit service.  Improvements shall be staged to reflect projected growth needs and land use changes.  Strengthen first-mile and last-mile connections between transit stations and transit-oriented development.  Develop community partnerships to address the opportunities and challenges related to creating walkable, bikeable and transit-friendly places. MAJOR TRENDS AND INF LUENCING FACTORS Several social, economic, environmental and technological trends will affect Rosemount, as well as the entire Twin Cities metropolitan area, over the next 20 years. These include population growth, changes in household size, increases in the cost of conventional fuels coupled with transition to alternative fuel sources, the emergence of the ride hailing and similar alternative modes and various environmental efforts and concerns. With increased population growth and limited new or expanded transportation facilities, congestion on the regional highway system is expected to increase. Specific transportation issues Rosemount faces include:  Growing congestion on regional and county routes such as Robert Trail South, TH 52 and 160th Street West (County State Aid Highway 46) causing diversion of traffic to City roadways.  Increasing development requiring funding for road maintenance and expansion.  Changing transportation needs due to an aging population.  Increasing competition for space among modes such as vehicles and bicycle and pedestrian interests.  Declining financial resources needed to maintain and improve the transportation systems as costs are expected to increase.  Suburban development densities increase costs per user for alternative modes of transportation. Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 8 – Transportation 8-5 EMERGING AND DEVELOP ING TECHNOLOGIES In addition to the issues cited above, several emerging technologies are anticipated to impact Rosemount and the rest of the Twin Cities metropolitan area within the 20-year planning horizon of this Transportation Plan update. Emerging technologies include electric vehicles, connected vehicles, automated vehicles, and continued development of ride hailing systems such as Uber and Lyft. As a growing community and an expanding economy, Rosemount should experience some degree of impacts from these technologies in the next 20 years. The following discussion examines some of the potential implications of these technologies. Ride Hailing The emergence of mobile application-based ride hailing systems, beginning with Uber in 2009, has added another layer to transportation planning. While this technology has produced many positive effects such as bridging the last-mile connection to transit, currently it is difficult to integrate ride hailing systems into transportation system plans as private companies tend to tightly guard ridership data. One working study by researchers at the University of California Davis shows that most ride hailing users are more affluent, more urban, and younger than non-users. Further, the study concludes that ride hailing does not appear to have significantly decreased rates of vehicle ownership or vehicle miles traveled, and that it has correlated with reductions in bus ridership and light rail usage. Ride hailing tends to concentrate in urban areas. The degree to which this service continues to expand to rural areas like Rosemount will dictate future planning efforts. Connected Vehicles and Autonomous Vehicles Connected Vehicles (CVs) refers to vehicles that communicate with one another and with other elements of intelligent transportation infrastructure. Autonomous, automated, or self-driving vehicles (AVs) describes a spectrum of vehicles that require varying degrees of human control. Connected Automated Vehicles (CAVs) refers to both technologies, which are automated vehicles connected to other vehicles and the transportation system. There is a wide range of forecasted adoption scenarios for CV and AV technology. Analysts from the automotive industry tend to provide more conservative forecasts, while analysts from the technology world tend to be less conservative, with some forecasting heavy adoption by as early as 2030. Before widespread adoption occurs, there will be an extended period during which the developing CV and AV platform must coexist with human-operated personal vehicles, as well as with public transit, pedestrian users and other modes. In Metropolitan Council’s 2040 TPP, it is noted that the implications of connected and automated vehicles need to be thoroughly examined. As with many new transportation technologies, automated and connected vehicles are likely to penetrate urban markets prior to expanding to rural areas, especially if they are initially developed through a ride-hailing platform. Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 8 – Transportation 8-6 Highway Capacity Implications Many analysts predict that widespread adoption of connected and automated vehicles will increase road capacity initially. Connected and automated vehicles are anticipated to require narrower lane widths than are needed for non-connected and automated vehicles. Reduced vehicle headways are also anticipated. Each of these factors would decrease congestion, however deployment of CVs and AVs will also lead to an increase in the number of zero-occupancy trips. Furthermore, travelers will likely adjust their behavior in response to the new technology, which could increase congestion and vehicle miles traveled (VMT). Parking Implications An increased share of autonomous vehicles could impact parking, both the amount needed and its location. With more AVs and fewer drivers, the location of parking could shift to the periphery of activity centers. Correspondingly, Rosemount could see the need to expand parking in some areas and retrofit underutilized surface parking in others. Plans to significantly expand parking should be thoroughly reviewed, as communities which have issued large bonds to meet current and projected parking demand could be challenged to recoup investment costs if demand decreases. Impacts to Other Modes In response to increased prominence of CV and AV technology, the role of regional and local transit providers could be reduced or become more specialized. As CV and AV technology is deployed in the Twin Cities, Rosemount and other communities will be faced with policy considerations as they look to promote equity for all transportation users and continue to provide a balanced transportation system. Electric Vehicles In October 2017, General Motors announced plans to release 20 electric vehicle models by 2023. This reflects a fundamental shift in the automobile industry vision of the future. While the first generation of electric vehicles remained expensive compared to their conventional vehicle counterparts, automakers aim to bring down the purchase price and increase profits by expanding electrical vehicle output. A growing fleet of electric vehicles would have implications for planning at all levels of government. For example, electric vehicles will require charging stations, which should be considered at public and private facilities in Rosemount’s land use planning and zoning ordinance. The placement of these charging stations should complement existing infrastructure, encourage equitable resource development and enhance intermodal connections. Widespread adoption of electric vehicles would require significant changes to highway funding programs. Most highway revenue is generated through fuel taxes. Widespread adoption of electric vehicles would necessitate changes to State and local revenue sources. Unlike other technologies discussed in this section, the proliferation of electric vehicles is not expected to be geographically dependent. Demand for electric vehicles in Rosemount is expected to be similar as in other areas. Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 8 – Transportation 8-7 ROADWAY SYSTEM An efficient and well-planned roadway system will help the City of Rosemount meet future population growth and a growing economy. Rosemount currently has sufficient access to the regional transportation roadway system with TH 52, TH 55, County Road 42 and Robert Trail South passing through the City. This section of the Transportation Plan identifies issues with the existing roadway system and recommends a plan for future roadway system improvements. The roadway system plan addresses jurisdictional issues, the functional classification system, future traffic volumes, congestion, safety, future roadway system issues and improvements and key transportation policies. The existing roadway system in the City of Rosemount is shown in Figure 1. Jurisdictional Classification Jurisdiction over Rosemount’s roadway system is shared among three levels of government: Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT), Dakota County, and Rosemount. MnDOT maintains the Interstate and Trunk Highway (TH) systems. Dakota County maintains the County State Aid Highway (CSAH) and County Road (CR) systems, and the remaining streets and roadways are the responsibility of Rosemount, including Municipal State Aid (MSA) streets. Often the municipal boundaries separating Rosemount from adjacent cities fall within a roadway right-of-way; partnership with those adjacent cities is required to coordinate maintaining and improving these roadways. Figure 1 displays the jurisdictional classification of each roadway within Rosemount. Table 1 displays the number of roadway miles associated with each jurisdictional class. The jurisdictional classification system is intended to maintain a balance of responsibility among the agencies and is organized around the principle that the highest volume limited access roadway, which carry regional trips, are primarily maintained by MnDOT. The intermediate volume roadways that carry medium length trips are maintained by Dakota County. Lastly, the local street system that provides access to individual properties is maintained by the City. Table 1. Existing (2018) Roadway Miles by Jurisdictional Classification Jurisdictional Classification Miles Percent of Total Miles State Roadways 17.5 10% County Roadways 27.9 15% Municipal Roadways 123.9 69% Township Roadways 2.2 1% Private Roadways 8.3 5% Total 180 100% Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 8 – Transportation 8-8 Figure 1. Jurisdictional Classification Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 8 – Transportation 8-9 Functional Classification The functional classification system defines both the function and role of a roadway within the hierarchy of an overall roadway system. This system is used to create a roadway network that collects and distributes traffic from neighborhoods and ultimately to the State or Interstate highway system. Functional classification planning works to manage mobility, access, and alignment of routes as shown in Figure 2. Functional classification also seeks to align designations that match current and future land uses with the roadway’s purpose. A roadway’s functional classification is based on several factors, including:  Trip characteristics: length of route, type and size of activity centers, and route continuity  Access to regional population centers, activity centers, and major traffic generators  Proportional balance of access, ease of approaching or entering a location  Proportional balance of mobility and ability to move without restrictions  Continuity between travel destinations  Relationship with neighboring land uses  Eligibility for State and Federal funding Within the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area, the Metropolitan Council has established detailed criteria for roadway functional classifications, which are summarized in Table 2. The existing functional classification of roadways in Rosemount is shown in Figure 3 and a breakdown by mileage is provided in Table 3. Figure 2. Access and Mobility Relationship Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 8 – Transportation 8-10 Table 2. Metropolitan Council Roadway Functional Classifications Criteria Principal Arterial Minor Arterial Collector Local Street Place Connections Interconnects metro centers and regional business concentrations Interconnects major trip generators Interconnects neighborhoods and minor business concentrations Interconnects blocks within neighborhoods and land parcels within commercial areas Spacing Developed areas: 2-3 miles Developing areas: 3-6 miles Developed areas: ½-1 mile Developing areas: 1-2 miles Developed areas: ¼- ¾ mile Developing areas: ½- 1 mile As needed to access land uses Roadway Connections To interstates, principal arterials and selected minor arterials To interstates, principal arterials, other minor arterials, collectors and some local streets To minor arterials, other collectors and local streets To collectors, other local streets and a few minor arterials Mobility Highest High Moderate Low Access No direct property access Limited property access Property access is common Unrestricted property access Percent of Mileage 5-10% 15-25% 5-10% 65-80% Percent of Vehicle Miles Traveled 40-65% 15-40% 5-10% 10-30% Intersections Grade-separated or high-capacity intersection controls Traffic signals and cross street stops All-way stops and some traffic signals As required for safe operation Parking None Restricted as necessary Restricted as necessary Permitted as necessary Large Trucks No restrictions No restrictions Restricted as necessary Permitted as necessary Typical Average Daily Traffic 15,000-200,000 5,000-30,000 3,000-15,000 Less than 3,000 Posted Speed Limits 45-65 mph 40-50 mph 30-45 mph Maximum 30 mph Right-of-Way Width 100-300 feet 60-150 feet 60-100 feet 50-80 feet Transit Accommodations Priority access for transit in peak periods Preferential treatment where needed Designed for use by regular route buses Normally used as bus routes only in non-residential areas S ource : Metropolitan Council , 2040 Transportation Policy Plan , 2015. T his table summarizes characteristics for existing roadways to be used in evaluating functional classification and should not be used as design guidelines . Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 8 – Transportation 8-11 Table 3. Existing (2018) Roadway Miles by Functional Classifications Functional Classification Miles Percent of Total Miles Principal Arterial 27.9 16% A Minor Expander 9.6 5% A Minor Connector 2.4 1% Other Arterial 2.0 1% Collector Roadways 29.1 16% Local Roadways 108.8 61% Total 180 100% Principal Arterials Principal arterials are part of the Metropolitan Highway System and provide high-speed mobility between the Twin Cities and important locations outside the metropolitan area. They are also intended to connect the central business districts of the two central cities with each other and with other regional business concentrations in the metropolitan area. These roadways, which are typically spaced from three to six miles apart, are generally constructed as limited access freeways in the urban area but may also be constructed as multiple-lane divided highways. In Rosemount, there are three principal arterials: TH 52, TH 55 and County Road 42. These facilities are envisioned to continue functioning as principal arterials for the planned future of Rosemount. Minor Arterials Minor arterials also emphasize mobility over land access, serving to connect cities with adjacent communities and the metropolitan highway system. Major business concentrations and other important traffic generators are usually located on minor arterial roadways. In urbanized areas, one- half to two-mile spacing of minor arterials is considered appropriate, depending upon development density. “A” Minor arterials are defined by the Metropolitan Council as roadways of regional importance as they serve to relieve, expand or complement the principal arterial system. Consistent with Metropolitan Council guidelines, “A” Minor arterials are categorized into four types and are described in further detail below:  Relievers – Roadways that provide direct relief for metropolitan highway traffic;  Expanders – Roadways that provide a way to make connections between urban areas outside the I-494/I-694 beltway.  Connectors – Roadways that provide safe connections to communities at the edge of the urbanized area and in rural areas.  Augmenters – Roadways that enhance principal arterials within the I-494/I-694 beltway. Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 8 – Transportation 8-12 Figure 3. Existing Functional Classification Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 8 – Transportation 8-13 A well-planned and adequately designed system of principal and A-minor arterials will allow the City’s overall street system to function the way it is intended and will discourage through traffic from using residential streets. Volumes on principal and minor arterial roadways are expected to be higher than on collector or local roadways. Providing the capacity for these higher volumes will keep volumes on other City streets lower. Collectors Collectors, as the term implies, collect and distribute traffic from neighborhoods and commercial areas. These roadways provide a critical link between local streets, which are designed for property access, and minor arterials, which are designed for mobility. Collector streets have an equal emphasis on land access and mobility. It is this category of roadways that the City of Rosemount has the greatest responsibility for since principal and minor arterials tend to be under the jurisdiction of either MnDOT or Dakota County. Table 4 provides a differentiation between minor and major collectors. Table 4. Characteristics of Minor and Major Collectors Criteria Minor Collector Major Collector Length Short, less than 1.5 miles Longer, 1.5 miles to three miles Travel Shed Limited to immediate neighborhood Larger area links more than one neighborhood Speeds Low Speed (30-35 mph) Medium Speed (35-45 mph) Access Private access permissible Private access discouraged, access is generally provided to higher trip generators (i.e., shopping centers, office buildings) Parking Usually allowed Some restrictions depending on traffic volumes Land Use Typically serves residential areas Residential, commercial or high employment concentrations Mobility Less emphasis on mobility and greater value on access More balance between mobility and access Transit May accommodate fixed route transit but less likely to be used as a route Should be designed to accommodate fixed route transit Spacing Closer spacing, contained within homogeneous neighborhoods to distribute trips Greater spacing, traverse’s distinct neighborhoods and land use types Example Roadways Pine Bend Trail, Autumn Path, 140th Street East Bonaire Path West, Connemara Trail, Biscayne Avenue Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 8 – Transportation 8-14 Local Streets Local streets provide access to adjacent properties and neighborhoods. Local streets are generally low speed and designed to discourage through traffic. All roadways in the City that are not included under the previous functional classifications above fall under the local road designation. PROGRAMMED & PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS Figure 4 identifies programmed roadway improvements from the City of Rosemount 2018-2027 Transportation Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), the Dakota County 2018-2022 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), and MnDOT’s 10 Year Capital Highway Improvement Plan (CHIP). Programmed improvements have advanced through the project funding programming process and have funds committed to the improvement in a designated year; while planned projects have been formally studied and/or included in a transportation plan but typically no financial commitments to fund the improvement have been made. Regional System The Regional roadway system improvements identified are consistent with the adopted MnDOT Metro District 10-Year Capital Highway Investment Plan (CHIP) 2018-2027 and the 2040 Metropolitan Council Transportation Policy Plan (TPP). Table 5. Regional Roadway System Improvements Roadway Project Extents Timeframe TH 55 Construct Turn Lanes 145th Street East (CSAH 42) Fahey Avenue 2018 Dakota County The following roadway capacity and safety improvements are identified in the Dakota County 2018- 2022 Transportation Capital Improvement Plan. In addition, the City has allocated CIP funds as matching funds for the Dakota County project(s). Table 6. Dakota County Roadway System Improvements Roadway Project Extents Timeframe 145th Street East Expansion At TH 52 2018 145th Street East Preservation At TH 55 Intersection 2018 McAndrews Road (CSAH 38) Expansion from 2 lanes to 3 lanes CSAH 31 Robert Trail South 2018 160th Street West (CSAH 46) Preservation CR 48 TH 61 2018 145th Street East Intersection Improvements TH 55 2018 Akron Avenue (CR 73) Pavement Construction Bonaire Path Northern City Limit 2020 Diamond Path (CSAH 33) Roundabout 140th Street Connemara Trail 2022 Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 8 – Transportation 8-15 Rosemount The following roadway capacity and safety improvements are identified in the Rosemount 2018- 2027 Transportation Capital Improvement Plan. Proposed minor and major collectors outlined in Figure 4 have not been planned or programmed yet but are important connections for future development. Table 7. City of Rosemount’s Roadway System Improvements Roadway Project Extents Timeframe Bonaire Path E Pavement Construction Akron Avenue Anderson Drive 2019 Biscayne Ave Expansion Boulder Trail 160th Street West 2020 2040 Travel Demand Forecasts The pattern and intensity of travel within any City is directly related to the distribution and magnitude of households, population and employment within that community, in neighboring communities and in the region. Land use, travel patterns, population and employment change over time and affect the efficiency and adequacy of the transportation network. Expected changes in the City’s land use pattern, households, population and employment will be the basis for estimating future travel demand within the City of Rosemount. Land Use The City of Rosemount has a community designation of emerging suburban edge located within the Metropolitan Council’s urban service area. As the metropolitan area moves forward with a greater focus on multimodal transportation, new development and redevelopment in Rosemount will be constrained by the existing and future transportation system. The Transportation Plan is designed to assist the City in developing a transportation system that supports land use and provides safe and efficient movement of people and goods throughout the City and greater region. Forecasted Socio-Economic Data Using the Land Use Guide Plan and development objectives as guidance, and with the assistance of the Metropolitan Council, the City has estimated existing and future population, employment and households for sub-areas of the City called Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs). This information was required to complete the traffic forecasting procedures used to estimate future traffic volumes. TAZ information can be found at the end of this chapter. Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 8 – Transportation 8-16 Table 8. Socioeconomic Data Year Population Households Employment 2010 21,874 7,587 6,721 2020 25,900 9,300 9,900 2030 31,700 11,600 11,500 2040 38,000 14,000 13,100 Source : Metropolitan Council, 2018 Forecast 2040 Traffic Volumes Estimated 2040 traffic forecasts for the City of Rosemount were prepared using the future population, households and employment data outlined above. These forecasts are an essential analytical tool to determine the adequacy of the roadway system to handle future development, as anticipated by the City of Rosemount and the Metropolitan Council. In addition to the planned and programmed roadway projects identified in Figure 4, the traffic forecast model accounts for future planned improvements that are in the Metropolitan Council’s 2040 TPP for regional highways outside Rosemount. The existing traffic volumes are shown in Figure 5 and results of the 2040 traffic forecasts are shown in Figure 6. ROADWAY CHARACTERIST ICS Roadways in Rosemount are made up of a variety of road types from two-lane undivided urban roads to four-lane rural expressways as identified in Figure 7. The western portion of the City, where a greater proportion of the population resides, is made up of many urban, undivided roadways which are designed for slower speeds and multiple modes of travel including transit, walking and bicycling. Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 8 – Transportation 8-17 Figure 4. Planned and Programmed Improvement Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 8 – Transportation 8-18 Figure 5. Existing Traffic Volumes Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 8 – Transportation 8-19 Figure 6. Forecast 2040 Traffic Volumes Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 8 – Transportation 8-20 EXISTING & ANTICIPAT ED ROADWAY CAPACITY Congestion on the roadway system is judged to exist when the ratio of traffic volume to roadway capacity (v/c ratio) approaches or exceeds 1.0. The ratio of volume to capacity provides a measure of congestion along a stretch of roadway and can help determine where roadway improvements, access management, transit services, or demand management strategies need to be implemented. It does not, however, provide a basis for determining specific intersection improvement needs. Table 9 provides a method to evaluate roadway capacity. For each facility type, the typical planning- level annual average daily traffic (AADT) capacity ranges and maximum AADT volume ranges are listed. These volume ranges are based upon guidance from the Highway Capacity Manual, discussions with the Metropolitan Council and professional engineering judgment. A range is used since the maximum capacity of any roadway design (v/c = 1) is a theoretical measure that can be affected by its functional classification, traffic peaking characteristics, access spacing, speed, and other roadway characteristics. “Daily capacity” of a facility is defined by the top of each facility type’s volume range. This allows for capacity improvements that can be achieved by roadway performance enhancements. Table 9. Planning Level Roadway Capacities by Facility Type Facility Type Planning Level Daily Capacity Ranges (AADT) Under Capacity Approaching Capacity Over Capacity LOS A B C D E F 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.85 1.0 >1.0 Two-lane undivided urban 8,000 – 10,000 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,500 10,000 > 10,000 Two-lane undivided rural 14,000 – 15,000 3,000 6,000 9,000 12,750 15,000 > 15,000 Two-lane divided urban (Three-lane) 14,000 – 17,000 3,400 6,800 10,200 14,450 17,000 > 17,000 Four-lane undivided urban 18,000 – 22,000 4,400 8,800 13,200 18,700 22,000 > 22,000 Four-lane undivided rural 24,000 – 28,000 5,600 11,200 16,800 23,800 28,000 > 28,000 Four-lane divided urban (Five-lane) 28,000 – 32,000 6,400 12,800 19,200 27,200 32,000 > 32,000 Four-lane divided rural 35,000 – 38,000 7,600 15,200 22,800 32,300 38,000 > 38,000 Four-lane expressway rural 45,000 9,000 18,000 27,000 38,250 45,000 > 45,000 Four-lane freeway 60,000 – 80,000 16,000 32,000 48,000 68,000 80,000 > 80,000 Six-lane freeway 90,000 – 120,000 24,000 48,000 72,000 102,000 120,000 > 120,000 Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 8 – Transportation 8-21 Figure 7. Existing (2018) Roadway Characteristics Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 8 – Transportation 8-22 Level of Service (LOS) Level of Service (LOS), as related to highways and local roadways, categorizes the different operating conditions that occur on a lane or roadway when accommodating various traffic volumes. It is a qualitative measure of the effect of traffic flow factors, such as speed and travel time, interruption, freedom to maneuver, driver comfort and convenience, and indirectly, safety and operating costs. It is expressed as levels of service “A” through “F.” Level “A” is a condition of free traffic flow where there is little or no restriction in speed or maneuverability caused by presence of other vehicles. Level “F” is a facility operating at a no or a low speed with many stoppages, with the highway acting as a storage area as indicated in Table 10. The following section describes LOS and further relates the correlation between LOS and planning- level roadway capacities, helping better understand the operations and capacity level on existing roadways. Table 10. Level of Service Definitions Level of Service (LOS) Traffic Flow Vehicle/Capacity Ratio Description A Free Flow Below Capacity 0.20 Low volumes and no delays B Stable Flow Below Capacity 0.40 Low volumes and speed dictated by travel conditions C Stable Flow Below Capacity 0.60 Speeds and maneuverability closely controlled due to higher volumes D Restricted Flow Near Capacity 0.85 Higher density traffic restricts maneuverability and volumes approaching capacity E Unstable Flow Approaching Capacity 1.0 Low speeds, considerable delays, and volumes at or slightly over capacity F Forced Flow Over Capacity >1.0 Very low speeds, volumes exceed capacity, and long delays with stop-and-go traffic Existing Capacity Deficiencies Using the methodology described above, existing capacity deficiencies were identified by comparing existing AADT volumes and roadway characteristics in Figure 7 to the thresholds noted in Table 9. Results of this analysis were mapped to identify roadways that currently exhibit capacity deficiencies. Roadway segments are defined as overcapacity if the volume-to-capacity ratio is at or above 1.0, which signifies that a segment of road has observed volumes which exceed its design capacity. Based on this analysis, the road segments that currently approach or exceed their design capacity are identified in Figure 8. Roadway segments are defined as near capacity if the volume-to-capacity ratio is at or above 0.85. Roadways approaching capacity are identified in Table 11. There are no existing roadways over a capacity of 1.0. Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 8 – Transportation 8-23 Table 11. Roadways Approaching Capacity (2018) Roadway V/C Extents TH 55 0.91 Fahey Avenue City Limits (East) TH 55 0.85 Pine Bend Trail Doyle Path 160th Street West 0.85 Akron Avenue Angus Avenue Congestion on the Regional Highway System The Metropolitan Freeway System Congestion Report is prepared annually by the Regional Transportation Management Center (RTMC) to document segments of the freeway system that experience recurring congestion. While the area included in this report is outside of the Rosemount City boundary, residents of the City are still impacted by congestion in the metro area during their commute to work or other destinations. According to the 2016 Metropolitan Freeway System Congestion Report there is congestion on I-35 and TH 77 during the AM and PM peak periods. During the AM peak period, I-35 has significant congestion northbound past the I-35E and I-35W split. Congestion continues north. TH 77 also has congestion in the AM peak, most significantly near I-35E. During the PM peak period, the report shows no recurring congestion near Rosemount with most of the congestion happening closer to Minneapolis and Saint Paul. I-494 westbound from I-35E to TH 52 has some congestion. There is no congestion reported on TH 52 during either the PM or AM periods. FUTURE CAPACITY DEFI CIENCIES Future capacity deficiencies were identified by comparing future (2040) AADT volumes and roadway characteristics in Figure 7 to the thresholds noted in Table 9. Results of this analysis were mapped to identify roadways that are forecasted to exhibit capacity deficiencies. Based on this analysis, the road segments that currently approach or exceed their design capacity are identified in Figure 9. Roadway segments are defined as near capacity if the volume-to-capacity ratio is at or above 0.85 are identified in Table 13. Roadway segments over a volume to capacity ratio of 1.0 are summarized in Table 12. Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 8 – Transportation 8-24 Table 12. Roadways Over Capacity (2040) Roadway V/C Extents TH 55 1.42 Fahey Avenue City Limits (East) Robert Trail South 1.35 Canada Avenue West 150th Street West Diamond Path 1.32 150th Street West Upper 148th Street West TH 55 1.25 145th Street West Fahey Avenue TH 55 1.19 ½ Mile South of MN 55 Split Doyle Path Robert Trail South 1.00 124th Street West Biscayne Avenue Table 13. Roadways Approaching Capacity (2040) Roadway V/C Extents Akron Avenue 0.93 Bonaire Path East 124th Court West TH 52 0.91 TH 52 Split 140th Street East 145th Street West 0.89 Cobalt Avenue Cimarron Avenue West 160th Street West 0.87 Station Trail Angus Avenue Robert Trail South 0.86 Connemara Trail Bonaire Path West The methodology described above is a planning-level analysis that uses average daily traffic volumes and is not appropriate for all traffic conditions. For example, traffic conditions that do not fit the average daily traffic criteria (e.g., weekend travel, holiday travel, special events, etc.) are likely to produce different levels of congestion. Additionally, factors such as the amount of access and roadway geometrics may influence capacity. Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 8 – Transportation 8-25 Figure 8. Existing (2018) V/C Ratio Deficiencies Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 8 – Transportation 8-26 Figure 9. Forecasted (2040) V/C Ratio Deficiencies Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 8 – Transportation 8-27 SAFETY ISSUES Roadway safety is a top priority of the future investment and design of roadways in Rosemount. MnDOT maintains a statewide database of crash records. These records identify the location, severity and circumstances associated with each crash. This dataset was reviewed to identify the number, location and severity of crashes on roadways, excluding Interstate highways, in the City of Rosemount for the years 2011-2015 (see Table 14). A majority of the crashes were located in the western portion of the City where much of the population resides. The intersections with the highest frequency of crashes are located in urban locations at busy intersections. Intersections with the four highest crash frequencies are on County Road 42 and are signalized. County Road 42 has a total of 7 of the top 10 highest crash locations. From 2011 – 2015, there were 3 fatalities and 15 incapacitating injuries on roadways in Rosemount. These fatalities were on high speed highways while the incapacitating injuries occurred on both highways and local roads as identified in Figure 10. These intersections were also evaluated using MnDOT’s crash rate methodology, shown in Table 15. Per MnDOT, a critical index of 1.00 or less indicates performance within statewide trends. Critical index above 1.00 indicates that the intersection operates outside of an expected range. Table 14. Crash Data Summary: 2011-2015 Year Fatal Personal Injury Crashes Property Damage Total Crashes Type A Incapacitating Injury Type B Non- Incapacitating Injury Type C Possible Injury 2011 0 4 13 50 155 222 2012 0 7 22 29 157 215 2013 0 1 14 35 148 198 2014 0 2 18 46 159 225 2015 3 1 12 49 153 218 Totals 3 15 79 209 772 1,078 As shown below, the majority of the crash hotspots are at signalized intersections. MnDOT’s Traffic Safety Fundamentals Handbook (2015) recommends the following strategies to reduce frequency and severity of intersection crashes:  Use of multiphase signal operation combined with left turn lanes  Provide a coordinated signal system along urban arterials  Use overhead indications – one per through lane mounted at the center of each lane  Provide dilemma zone protection and optimize clearance intervals Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 8 – Transportation 8-28  Use advance warning flashers to supplement static signs where a signal may be unexpected  Pedestrian indications including the use of countdown timers Additionally, an intersection traffic control change such as a roundabout or grade separation can also be considered. Roundabouts usually have less crashes than a traditional intersection. However, more importantly, the types of crashes associated with roundabouts tend to be less severe. Grade separation at an intersection would provide the greatest reduction in intersection conflict points which would most likely reduce the frequency and severity of crashes. A more detailed intersection traffic study will need to be completed to determine the appropriate traffic control type. Table 15: Top 10 Intersection Crash Locations 2011-2015 (By Frequency of Crashes) Intersection Severity Traffic Control Critical Index All Crashes Critical Index Fatal & Type A Fatal Type A Type B Type C Property Damage 1. County Road 42- Robert Trail S 0 0 5 8 49 Signal 1.89 0.00 2. County Road 42 - Chippendale Ave W 0 1 2 16 35 Signal 1.92 0.90 3. County Road 42 - Diamond Path 0 0 4 11 35 Signal 1.64 0.00 4. County Road 42 - Shannon Pkwy 0 0 1 11 34 Signal 1.48 0.00 5. Connemara Trail - Robert Trail S 0 1 4 13 27 Signal 2.01 0.99 6. County Road 42 -TH 55 0 1 2 10 24 Thru/Stop 2.45 0.65 7. 145th Street - Robert Trail S 0 0 3 11 19 Signal 1.13 0.00 8. TH 52 - TH 55 0 1 0 11 17 None 2.03 1.09 9. County Road 42 - Biscayne Ave 1 2 4 4 17 Thru/Stop 2.10 2.88 10. County Road 42 - 145th Street W 0 1 3 5 18 Thru/Stop 2.25 1.00 Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 8 – Transportation 8-29 Figure 10. Most Recent (2011-2015) Crash Data Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 8 – Transportation 8-30 RECOMMENDED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS Future roadway improvements designed to address system connectivity, continuity, congestion and safety issues are planned and recommended for the roadway system in the City of Rosemount. Recommended roadway improvements are shown in Figure 11 and are derived from the combination of system needs and the intended function of each roadway as it relates to the adjacent supporting land use. It should be noted that improvements discussed in this section do not include spot intersection improvements or trails. The determination of which projects will be built, and their proper sequencing, will be determined through each jurisdictions programming process that considers the estimated cost of each project, available financing and coordination with other projects. Robert Trail South is forecasted to be over capacity by the year 2040. Although the road may be expanded beyond the city border, it isn’t currently planned for expansion within the City of Rosemount because of a lack of right-of-way space and because of the negative impact on the existing historic downtown. To help mitigate traffic impacts, the City will be expanding Akron Avenue, giving drivers another option to drive from north to south. This is one part of a corridor study conducted with Dakota County, the University of MN, the DNR and Empire Township. The City continues to support installation of a full interchange at the intersection of County Road 42 and TH 52. Recent improvements increased the safety of the interchange by adding turn lanes and increasing sight distances. However, due to expected growth in the area, the City anticipates a full clover leaf to be constructed in the future. The City has approved an official map to maintain appropriate right-of-way for its future construction. Along with these interchange improvements, the County would also modify the 42/55 intersection and “T” up Hwy 55, so the free flow of traffic was from County Road 42. This improvement will draw more traffic unto TH 52 and remove some pass through traffic on TH55. City of Rosemount Roadways The City will be a partner in all recommended roadway improvements on County and State highways. Dakota County Roadways These improvements are on the regional highway system and are primarily Dakota County’s responsibility. The timing of these projects is uncertain.  Akron Avenue (County Road 73): Realigned and improved to a 3-lane divided highway.  Diamond Path (CSAH 33) from County Road 42 to 145th Street West: Improve to a 3-lane divided roadway MnDOT This improvement is on the regional highway system and is primarily MnDOT's responsibility. The timing of this project is uncertain.  TH 55 from the TH 55 / TH 52 split to the eastern City limits: Improve to a 4-lane divided roadway Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 8 – Transportation 8-31 Figure 11. Recommended Roadway Capacity Improvements Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 8 – Transportation 8-32 RIGHT -OF-WAY PRESERV ATION Right-of-way (ROW) is a valuable public asset. Therefore, it needs to be protected and managed to respect the roadway’s intended function, while serving the greatest public good. Rosemount will need to reconstruct, widen and construct new roadway segments to meet future capacity and connectivity demands due to its current and anticipated growth. Such improvements will require that adequate ROW be maintained or secured. The City will coordinate with MnDOT and Dakota County for ROW acquisition along county or state routes. ACCESS MANAGEMENT Access management is an important aspect of providing a safe and efficient roadway network. Access management measures include:  Providing adequate spacing between access points and intersecting streets to separate and reduce conflicts  Limiting the number of driveway access points to reduce conflicts  Aligning access with other existing access points  Sharing access points, through internal connectivity between property owners  Encouraging indirect access rather than direct access to high volume arterial roads  Constructing parallel roads and frontage roads  Consider all modes of transportation, including nearby transit routes, when making access management decisions for all roads  Implementing sight distance guidelines to improve safety  Using channelization to manage and control turning movements  Meeting these requirements while also maintaining appropriate access to local businesses Access review is a major aspect of the City’s project review process. The goal is to maintain the safety and capacity of the City’s roadways while providing adequate land access. Mobility is the ability to get from one place to another. Most roadways serve accessibility and mobility functions to some degree based on their functional classification. The four levels of functional classification and their corresponding mobility and access traits are as follows:  Principal arterials have the highest mobility with no direct land access  Minor arterials have high mobility with limited land access  Collector streets have moderate mobility with some land access  Local streets have low mobility with minimal restrictions on land access Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 8 – Transportation 8-33 The City will continue to support MnDOT’s and Dakota County’s Access Management guidelines on the roadway network in the City through the measures list above. MnDOT’s Highway Access Category System and Spacing Guidelines can be found at: https://www.dot.state.mn.us/accessmanagement/resources.html TRANSIT SYSTEM Transit is an important piece of the transportation system in a community. It provides another option for people to get to their destination without the use of a vehicle. Transit helps build a comprehensive, equitable, and environmentally friendly transportation system. Transit is a vital element in the transportation network as it:  Provides vulnerable populations access to services in the area, including those who cannot afford a personal vehicle, people who cannot drive, and senior citizens.  Provides opportunities for people who prefer an alternative to automobile travel.  Removes a portion of existing and future automobile traffic from the roadway, reducing travel time and congestion for everyone on the roadway.  Reduces air pollution for those living near the roadway and reduces greenhouse gas emissions helping mitigate climate change The City of Rosemount is committed to supporting and preserving existing transit services and facilities in the City and seeking ways to improve the transit system. Rosemount is a growing City and current and future residents will need a variety of transportation services available to meet their needs. As the population in the metro area continues to grow, demand will increase for new ways to get to destinations in Rosemount and in the surrounding areas including Minneapolis and St. Paul. Although the City does not have direct responsibility for the operation of services or the provision of facilities, the City can advocate for better service while promoting more transit supportive land use patterns as sections of the City redevelop. This chapter identifies the existing services, facilities, and programs within the City of Rosemount, suggests improvements, and discusses the City’s role in supporting the transit system. TRANSIT MARKET AREAS Rosemount is a growing suburb south of the Twin Cities with its population expected to grow almost 50% by 2040. Transit service and facilities will need to be put in place to meet this increase in demand. As indicated in Figure 12 much of the growth is occurring along the western side of the City where the Metropolitan Council has identified it as Market Area III. Land use plans should be integrated with these market areas to shape development near transit that supports a walkable and transit friendly environment. The majority of the City east of Market Area III is considered Market Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 8 – Transportation 8-34 Area V and is planned to have less reliance on transit. Table 16 provides further descriptions and characteristics of the Market Areas established by the Metropolitan Council. Table 16. Metropolitan Council Transit Market Service Areas Market Area Propensity to Use Transit Service Characteristics Typical Transit Service Presence in Rosemount I Highest potential for transit ridership Frequency: 15-30 min most modes Dense network of local routes with highest levels of service accommodating a wide variety of trip purposes. Limited stop service supplements local routes where appropriate. None Span: early to late, seven days a week Access: ½ mi between routes II Approximately 1/2 ridership potential of Market Area I Frequency: 15-60 min most modes Similar network structure to Market Area I with reduced level of service as demand warrants. Limited stop services are appropriate to connect major destinations. None Span: morning to night, seven days a week Access: one mile between routes III Approximately 1/2 ridership potential of Market Area II Frequency: 15-60 min most modes Primary emphasis is on commuter express bus service. Suburban local routes providing basic coverage. General public dial-a-ride complements fixed route in some cases. Primarily located west of Akron Avenue and south of McAndrews Road Span: peak times, occasional weekends Access: varies on development patterns IV Approximately 1/2 ridership potential of Market Area III Frequency: three trips per peak express bus Peak period express service is appropriate as local demand warrants. General public dial-a-ride services are appropriate. None Span: peak times Access: usually at large nodes, if at all V Lowest potential for transit ridership Frequency: 30 minutes, Commuter Rail Not well-suited for fixed- route service. Primary emphasis is on general public dial-a-ride services. The primary designation in Rosemount. Located east of Akron Avenue Span: n/a Access: n/a Emerging Market Overlay Varies, typically matches surrounding Market Area Varies Varies. Typically matches surrounding Market Area. None Source: Metropolitan Council, 2040 Transportation Policy Plan, 2015 Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 8 – Transportation 8-35 EXISTING TRANSIT SER VICES AND FACILITIES The City of Rosemount is currently served by three transit services: Minnesota Valley Transit Authority (MVTA), Metro Transit, and Dakota Area Resources and Transportation for Seniors (DARTS). MVTA is the only transit provider in the City that offers fixed-route transit services. DARTS, the Metropolitan Council, and Transit Link offer demand responsive services where regular route transit service is infrequent or unavailable and service for seniors and people with a disability or health condition. MTVA serves as the public transportation agency for Rosemount and surrounding municipalities in Dakota and Scott County, and operates the Metro Transit Red Line under contract to the Metropolitan Council. Fixed-Route Transit Service Fixed-route transit service includes both local and express bus services that operate on a regular schedule and follow consistent routes. Fixed-route transit service in Rosemount is provided primarily by MVTA, which serves as the public transportation agency for seven suburbs in Dakota and Scott Counties. Table 17 describes the characteristics of the routes serving the City of Rosemount. Table 17. Fixed Route Service in Rosemount Route Provider Type Cities Served Service Times Frequency 420 MVTA Local Rosemount, Apple Valley Weekdays, bi-directional 30-60 min 476 MVTA Express Bus Rosemount, Apple Valley, Minneapolis Peak only, weekdays, bi-directional 15-30 min 478 MVTA Express Bus Rosemount, Minneapolis Peak only, weekdays, bi-directional 15-30 min 484 MVTA Express Bus Rosemount, Saint Paul Peak only, weekdays, bi-directional 2 trips The western portion of Rosemount is served by four transit routes that move customers between Rosemount, Apple Valley, Downtown Minneapolis, and Downtown Saint Paul. Trips are concentrated throughout the peak times, Monday through Friday and weekend service is available on Route 420. Connection to the Red Line in Apple Valley and to Dakota County Technical College is via Route 420 and can be accessed throughout the day, Monday through Friday. Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 8 – Transportation 8-36 Express Routes Express service operates during peak periods and is designed to connect commuters to job centers. In Rosemount, these routes pickup at the Rosemount Transit Station and at roadside bus stops and operate closed door to the downtown area. The route from Minneapolis/St. Paul to Rosemount picks up at designated bus stops in Downtown Minneapolis and St. Paul. Express Routes that service neighborhoods before going to job centers expect passengers to flag down the bus at stops or any safe corner along the route. These are known as “flag stops.” MVTA ROUTE 476 The express route 476 serves portions of Apple Valley and Rosemount and connects to downtown Minneapolis. The route has fixed stops at set times and minimal stops throughout Rosemount and Apple Valley. This route has both southbound and northbound service during the morning and evening rush hours. MVTA ROUTE 478 The express route 478 is direct service between Rosemount and downtown Minneapolis. The route has fixed stops at set times and minimal stops on to its connection with downtown Minneapolis. This route has both southbound and northbound service during the morning and evening rush hours. MVTA ROUTE 484 The express route 484 is direct service between Rosemount and downtown Saint Paul. The route has fixed stops at set times and minimal stops on to its connection with downtown Saint Paul. This route has both southbound and northbound service during the morning and evening rush hours. Local Routes MVTA ROUTE 420 The Flex route 420 is a flexible route serving portions of Apple Valley and Rosemount. The route is designed to allow passengers to board at fixed stops at set times, and to deviate off-route to serve individuals within the designated service area who are unable to get to the fixed stops. The Flex service area extends approximately 0.75 mile on each side of the designated route. This service connects to the Red Line in Apple Valley and runs every hour throughout the day. Starting on August 20th, 2018 service expanded to Dakota County Technical College to allow students and employees to take transit to the school. Route 420 includes 5 trips to the school throughout the morning and afternoon and 6 trips departing the school throughout the day with the last trip departing at 9:21 PM. Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 8 – Transportation 8-37 Figure 12. Transit Service and Facilities in the City of Rosemount Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 8 – Transportation 8-38 Demand Responsive Transit Service In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the Metropolitan Council provides specialized, demand-responsive service for persons with disabilities that prevent them from using the regular-route system. This service is provided in the same areas that regular-route service is provided. In Dakota County, the Metropolitan Council contracts for these services with DARTS. DARTS is a demand-responsive transit service serving Rosemount and other communities in Dakota County. DARTS is funded by Performance Based Funding (PBF) grants from the Metropolitan Council, revenue from contract services including the Metro Mobility ADA contract, County contributions, and donations. Transit Station and Park and Rides There is one formal transit station in Rosemount. The the park and ride facility is located at 145th Street and Burnley Avenue. The 102-stall facility, across the street from City Hall, is the first permanent park and ride facility for the City. The facility is located in a walkable part of the City, close to a park and has sidewalks around it. The transit station is fully-enclosed and serves routes 420, 476, 478, and 484. The facility anchors service to the Cedar Avenue transit corridor and express routes to downtown Minneapolis and St. Paul. In 2017, the facility had a 77% utilization rate with 79 of the 102 spaces being used. This has increased from 65% in 2016. Bus Stops or “Flag Stops” Bus stops provide passengers with a predictable place to wait for bus service. There are two bus stops in Rosemount located at the Rosemount Transit Station and at the Dakota County Technical College. The bus stop at Dakota County Technical College is relatively new and the City is interested in formalizing that location, or one in close proximity, with a transit facility. Route 420 includes 5 trips to the school throughout the morning and afternoon and 6 trips departing the school throughout the day. Throughout the rest of the City, there are a series of “Flag Stops” for passengers to use to board the bus. If your trip origin and destination are near a flag stop or time point shown on the map, passengers must go to that stop and wait for the bus. The schedule lists the departure times for several key stops. If a flag stop is between two time points, passengers use the time point for the stop as a guide. ROSEMOUNT TRANSIT STATION. PHOTO BY THE CITY OF ROSEMOUNT Figure 13. Rosemount Transit Station Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 8 – Transportation 8-39 TRANSIT ADVANTAGES Transit Advantages is a term that describes physical features that provide a travel time advantage over automobiles using the same facility. Transit advantages improve the attractiveness of transit by allowing buses to move faster than automobiles making the same trip, effectively reducing the travel time for transit patrons relative to automobile users. There are no specific transit advantages improvement located within the City of Rosemount, but riders do get to take advantage of them on their bus routes. Downtown bus routes have improved service because of transit advantages. Routes to downtown Minneapolis get to take advantage of bus only shoulders and high occupancy vehicles lanes on TH 77 and I-35 while all downtown Rosemount bus routes take advantage of bus lanes in downtown Minneapolis and downtown St. Paul. There are also several ramp-meter bypasses that assist MVTA buses on TH 77 and I-35. TRAVEL DEMAND MANAGE MENT Travel Demand Management (TDM) services include programs that promote and support any alternative to commuting via single-occupant vehicle (SOV). TDM may include subsidized bus passes, flexible work hours and telecommuting. TDM could also include services to help employees with ride-matching, carpool, and vanpool. Metro Transit provides a regional TDM service through its Metro Commuter Services group, and four local Transportation Management Organizations provide further support and services, including two downtown organizations. The City and employers in Rosemount may use these services and programs free of charge to benefit employee travel arrangements and budgets. FUTURE TRANSIT DEMAN D Fixed route service in Rosemount helps residents get to destinations in a reliable and efficient manner. Park-and-Ride utilization is high in the south metro for routes using I-35, TH 77 and TH 52. According to the 2017 Metropolitan Council’s Park-and-Ride Plan, congestion on highways in the Twin Cities have risen from 20% in 2009 to nearly 25% in 2017. During this time, Park-and- Ride utilization has also increased from around 17,000 passengers to almost 20,000 passengers. These trends in the metro area indicate that capacity at the Rosemount Transit Station may not be enough to meet the demand for this reliable option to commute to work. Additional opportunities for park-and-ride facilities can help provide this service in the future. The City believes a logical location for the next park and ride facility is in the central portion of the City, near Dakota County Technical College and TH52. The Robert Street Transit study indicated that commuter bus service was a viable option along TH52 and a facility in this area would benefit a new route. As population growth continues in Rosemount, moving west to east, facilities should be located that benefit new residents and desired transit patterns. Future Transit Opportunities Rosemount, as with other suburban opt-out cities, has the advantage of direct input into local transit services and decisions via elected officials, and has the second advantage of the State’s second largest and professionally-managed suburban transit authority, MVTA. Other advantages are the presence of a high-quality county-based provider, DARTS, and Dakota County’s active planning and Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 8 – Transportation 8-40 management of future transit facilities and programs. The City should continue to be supportive and fully engaged in these programs and organizations to ensure a high level of transit service in the City. Transit Improvements and Strategies Future Route Improvements MVTA maintains a list of service improvement projects (SIP), which represent transit service expansion priorities within the MVTA service area, including Rosemount. MVTA uses its SIP as one input into its Future Growth Concept Map (2018), a larger strategic planning document that provides a more comprehensive vision for service expansion in the near (0-5 years), mid (5-10 years), and long-term (10+ years). The Future Growth Concept Map categorizes service improvements into three categories: those for which grant funding has been sought; study recommendations and those identified in the MVTA SIP; and those originating from MVTA’s customer service database. Future transit growth concepts listed below are in the 2018 Future Growth Concept Map and impact future transit in Rosemount and are also identified in Figure 14.  145th Street East between Dakota County Technical College and Hastings via Nininger Township (Long-term)  Expand local service on Route 420 (service between Apple Valley and Rosemount) and evaluate demand for weekend service (Near-term)  Expand express service to Minneapolis on Route 478 (from Rosemount) [Near-term]  Expand express service to St. Paul on Route 484 (from Rosemount) and evaluate additional St. Paul express service (Near-term) Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 8 – Transportation 8-41 Figure 14. MVTA Future Growth Concept Map Future Transit Strategies As population increases, Rosemount can help to inform residents and employers of transit opportunities available to them and their employees. Accessible and convenient transit in Rosemount is something that all residents should be aware of and given the opportunity to use. Integrate land use planning  The City can look for opportunities to integrate service near future housing and employment developments along the eastern portion of the City.  Future land use planning can look to increase ridership through walkable neighborhoods near Park-and-Ride facilities  Additional Park-and-Ride facilities should be built to accommodate future demand and walkable neighborhoods can be planned around these locations to support transit use. Improved facilities  Rosemount Transit Station utilization is reaching capacity and additional Park-and-Ride facilities can be planned to support increased demand. Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 8 – Transportation 8-42  Safe and comfortable waiting conditions can help to increase ridership. Current flag stops can be transitioned to permanent bus stops with shelters and benches. Transit Studies Dakota County Eastern Transit Study Rosemount is working with Dakota County on the Dakota County Eastern Transit Study. The purpose of the study is to evaluate present and future needs for a variety of transit service and facilities in eastern Dakota County. Rosemount is a key member of the study because of the future development of the University of Minnesota Outreach, Research and Education (UMore) property and transit needs of the community. Recommendations resulting from the study will concentrate on linking the residential, employment, and educational centers within eastern Dakota County to those in adjacent communities and the broader region. Dakota County East-West Study The Dakota County East-West Transit Study was needed to meet needs for transit travel east to west across Dakota County. The purpose of this study was to develop connections to employment, improve mobility, and expand range of travel options for transit-dependent populations in and across the county. There were five corridors the study identified as warranting further consideration:  Wentworth Avenue (Dodd Road to Southview Boulevard)  MN-110 (Fort Snelling Station to Concord St)  Yankee Doodle Road (MN 13 to Lone Oak Road and Inver Hills Community College)  Cliff Road (Not in study area)  County Road 42 (MN 13 and Mystic Lake Drive to Vermillion Street and Dakota County Technical College) Robert Street Corridor Study The Robert Street Corridor is recognized as a regional transitway by the Metropolitan Council. In 2012, the Dakota and Ramsey County Regional Railroad Authorities began an alternatives study to understand transportation needs in the area and identify transit projects that could address them. The study initially considered transit improvements, and explored transit modes, in areas between downtown St. Paul and Rosemount, including West St. Paul, South St. Paul, Eagan, Mendota Heights and Inver Grove Heights. The study led to two alternative transit modes for further study, although the corridor was truncated and did not extend far enough south to include Rosemount. An offshoot of the study was the recognition that commuter express bus service from Rosemount to St. Paul on TH 52 appeared to be a viable option. The City continues to support further investigation and ultimately funding for that commuter service. Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 8 – Transportation 8-43 BICYCLING AND WALKIN G OVERVIEW AND PURPOSE The City of Rosemount seeks to build a community where choosing to bicycle or walk is a safe, convenient, and enjoyable transportation option for everyone. In 2010 the City launched a Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan to help complete the bike and pedestrian network and achieve community goals around active living, accessible destinations, economic development, quality of life and environmental benefits. Implementation of the plan and its projects will occur as new development occurs in the community and when opportunities arise to complete planned improvements. The plan is a direct result of the comprehensive planning process and continues to guide pedestrian and bicycle improvements in the City. The City has also been collaborating with the Dakota County Active Living Group to promote active living and policy changes that would encourage physical activity. Pedestrian and system needs in Rosemount are organized around the following themes as identified by the Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan:  Safety – safer crossings, routes to schools and safe routes for seniors  Convenience – additional regional and City-wide connections  Enjoyment – enhance the experience, add wayfinding and increase awareness and education Walking and biking will help to support resident’s quality of life and promote Rosemount’s “Small Town Feel.” There are many intangible benefits with walking and biking. Youth, elderly, disabled and those that cannot afford a car gain a sense of independence. Local business can improve by making a community more walkable and accessible by biking. A City that is committed to bicyclists and pedestrians, is often safer with a more vibrant and active community. These all come together to create a ‘Small Town Feel’ that is a source of community pride in Rosemount. LOCAL EXISTING CONDI TIONS There are more than 50 miles of sidewalks, 34 miles of off-street trails, nearly 20 miles of on-road local, county, and state designated bike routes and approximately 600 designated bike parking stalls throughout the City of Rosemount as identified in Figure 15. The City builds pedestrian and bicycle facilities when it is cost effective and meets the Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan. Land use in the City and the surrounding area often forces people to use a car and limits the use of pedestrian and bicycle facilities. Rosemount features a dense urban core that fits an environment that can take advantage of bicycling and walking. This urban core area is very different than the majority of the City which is mostly rural in nature. Another inhibiting factor is that many residents have to drive more than 10 miles to work, which is outside of easy access by walking or biking. The urban downtown area of Rosemount has potential to be a signature pedestrian and bicycling destination for the entire City. Infrastructure improvements can be made to support the community’s vision as a gathering place where walking and biking is encouraged. This can be a model for other areas in the City to follow that are growing and have an opportunity to implement bicycle and pedestrian facilities in the near future. Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 8 – Transportation 8-44 Much of the City’s downtown area is connected by pedestrian and trails, however gaps within the area and across the remainder of the City are present. Some arterial and collector roadways within the City lack facilities for pedestrians or bikes, including appropriate lighting, places to rest, and landscaping that would encourage all transportation modes to use the facility. Regional Bicycle Transportation Network The City of Rosemount partners with Dakota County and the Metropolitan Council on improving and expanding regional bicycle trails in and around the City. The Metropolitan Council, in partnership with Dakota County created the Regional Bicycle Transportation Network (RBTN). The RBTN was developed as part of the to the Metropolitan Council 2014 Regional Bicycle System Study, which highlights important regional transportation connections for bicyclists. The RBTN serves as framework for designated regional corridors and alignments and defines critical bicycle transportation links to help municipalities guide their bikeway planning and development. The RBTN is subdivided into two tiers for regional planning and investment prioritization:  Tier 1 – Priority Regional Bicycle Transportation Corridors and Alignments These corridors and alignments have been determined to provide the best transportation connectivity to regional facilities and developed areas. They are given the highest priority for transportation funding. There are currently no RBTN Tier 1 corridors or alignments in the City of Rosemount.  Tier 2 – Regional Bicycle Transportation Network Corridors and Alignments These corridors and alignments are the second highest priority for funding. They provide connections to regional facilities in neighboring cities and serve to connect priority regional bicycle transportation corridors and alignments. There are five RBTN Tier 2 alignments within the City of Rosemount. 1. Robert Trail South Alignment: Located on the west side of the City going north and south. There currently isn’t an existing or planned bicycle or pedestrian facility on this roadway. 2. McAndrews Road Alignment: Connecting to the Robert Trail South alignment is the McAndrews Road alignment from Apple Valley going east and west. There currently isn’t an existing or planned bicycle or pedestrian facility on this roadway. 3. County Road 42 Alignment: This alignment crosses the entire City of Rosemount going east to west along County Road 42. There is an existing trail on the west part of this section and a bikeable shoulder on the eastern portion of this alignment. The City will be assessing whether the eastern portion of the City should have the trail located on County Road 42 or somewhat off the Principal Arterial but on a parallel corridor. 4. Mississippi Regional Trail Alignment: This alignment is located on the planned Mississippi Regional Trail near the Mississippi River on the eastern side of the City. 5. Rosemount Greenway Alignment: This alignment is located on the planned Rosemount Greenway from South Robert Trail to the Mississippi River Trail. There is one Tier 2 corridor located along the western portion going from north to south where City trails cover much of the area. Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 8 – Transportation 8-45 Figure 15. Existing Trail System in Rosemount Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 8 – Transportation 8-46 Regional Trails Dakota County has planned for three regional trails and greenways to connect gaps throughout Rosemount. Once these trails are constructed, bicyclists will be able to cross the City from multiple directions and access communities surrounding Rosemount. Mississippi River Trail The proposed Mississippi River Trail (MRT) is located directly on a RBTN Tier 2 alignment on the eastern side of the City. Part of this trail is paved and already exists in Spring Lake Park Reserve but will be extended and connect to the existing MRT from Saint Paul to Hastings. The entire trail will be paved and is intended for non-motorized uses such as walking, bicycling and in-line skating. The regional trail construction will be completed in phased segments with an anticipated completion date of 2020. Rosemount Greenway The Rosemount Greenway will align from downtown Rosemount to the Mississippi River Greenway with connections to Spring Lake Regional Park Reserve, the Mississippi River, the Vermillion Highlands Greenway, Lebanon Hills Regional Park and Whitetail Woods Regional Park. The 13-mile route is entirely within the City of Rosemount. This greenway is on a Tier 2 alignment and connects with the proposed Vermillion Highlands Greenway which crosses the City from north to south. Vermillion Highlands Greenway The Vermillion Highlands Greenway will connect Lebanon Hills Regional Park to Whitetail Woods Regional Park. The 11-mile greenway will travel through downtown Rosemount, the Dakota County Technical College campus and the University of Minnesota Outreach, Research and Education (UMore) Park property. The greenway will connect with the Rosemount Greenway and the greenway hub at Lebanon Hills Regional Park. This greenway fulfills the RBTN Tier 2 alignment that goes from north to south through Rosemount east of Robert Trail South. Dakota County adopted The Greenway Guidebook in 2010 which helps local jurisdictions within Dakota County work independently towards the shared goal of a complete greenway system throughout the County. Cities in Dakota County have recognized demand for trails and have implemented greenway systems through their local Parks Agencies. Connections to Regional Employment Clusters The City of Rosemount has identified four regional employment clusters that are characterized by significant retail, professional services, commercial, and industrial development. The four regional employment clusters include:  145th Street East between Chippendale Avenue and Shannon Parkway  Robert Trail South between 145th Street East and 145th Street West  Dakota County Technical College  Flint Hills Resources Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 8 – Transportation 8-47 Providing connections to these regional employment clusters with trails and sidewalks will strengthen the trail network within Rosemount and provide residents and visitors an alternative to driving. Each employment cluster is located near major roads, blocking easy access to the trail network due to large intersections or impassable highways. Planning for trail connections to regional employment cluster locations is an important first step in ensuring that future development includes multimodal facility enhancements, such as off-road trails, independent pedestrian bridges, and ADA compliant roadway crossings. Currently, there are trail connections to the Rosemount Transit Station. As additional transit facilities are developed within Rosemount, the City will need to ensure adequate pedestrian and bicycle trail connections are available. Connections to Destinations & Regional Trails Local trails near downtown Rosemount connect residents to parks and activity centers. Previous work to develop a complete sidewalk and trail system within and near the downtown area has provided residents the opportunity to walk or bike to most locations in the downtown vicinity. Plans for regional trails should include connection to the current trail system near the downtown area to expand upon a community-wide network that would provide residents access from to the broader region. The Rosemount Greenway will be a key connecting trail corridor for the City. It is planned to link downtown with the Vermillion Highlands Regional Trail and the Mississippi River Trail as identified in Figure 16. This will connect downtown residents to regional parks and destinations as well as connecting bicyclists from outside of the City and residents from nearby communities to downtown Rosemount. Other destinations that should be connected to the regional trail system include the Rosemount High School near the planned Rosemount Greenway and the Civic Campus Connector off-street bike trail along Robert Street which connects the school to the local bicycle trails in Rosemount. Gaps in the Existing Trail System Rosemount has built a well-connected pedestrian and bicycle system in its downtown area; however, this system is not currently connected to the greater region. Improving the local trail system involves identifying gaps and planning to fill those gaps to enhance connections to key destinations within and outside City limits. Connections to key destinations for the local trail system include the following:  Connections to local parks and schools  Connections to regional parks and trails  Connections to regional employment clusters  Connections to the Regional Bicycle Transportation Network (RBTN) There are several gaps within the City of Rosemount that need to be connected for the pedestrian and bicycle facilities to be fully utilized. Some of these gaps have been addressed since approval of the following plans. Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 8 – Transportation 8-48 Gaps identified in the Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan (2010)  Partner with Dakota County to build a grade separated crossing on County Road 42  Bike Lanes on Connemara Trail  On-Road bikeway on Dodd Blvd from 145th Street to Diamond Path  Trail on east side of Chili Ave from 145th Street to Rosemount High School  Bike lanes on 145th Street from Chippendale Avenue to County Road 42  Bike lanes on Cameo Avenue from 143rd Street to 147th Street  Bike lanes on 147th Street, Cambrian Avenue and Burma Avenue Gaps identified in the Dakota County Pedestrian and Bicycle Study (2018)  145th Street East (and County Road 42) from Robert Trail South to Akron Avenue  McAndrews Road from the western City boundary to Robert Trail South  Diamond Path on the western boundary of the City  Several grade separated crossings Gaps identified in the RBTN  Robert Trail South Tier 2 Alignment from 145th Street East to the northern City boundary  McAndrews Road Tier 2 Alignment from the western City boundary to Robert Trail South  145th Street East Alignment from Robert Trail South to Blaine Avenue  Rosemount Greenway  Mississippi River Greenway Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 8 – Transportation 8-49 Figure 16. Proposed Trail System in Rosemount Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 8 – Transportation 8-50 PEDESTRIAN AND BICYC LE SYSTEM NEEDS The City of Rosemount will need to invest in its pedestrian and bicycle network in order to provide new connections as well as increase levels of safety, convenience and overall enjoyment. Investments in bicycle and pedestrian network can be guided by the following objectives: 1. Make Walking and Biking Safer  The City of Rosemount can make walking and biking safer by making crossings safer. Crossings can be improved at: o Diamond Path at Connemara Trail o Robert Trail South (TH 3) at County Road 42 o Railroad and Biscayne Avenue o Connemara Trail and Meadows Park 2. Make Safe Routes to Schools and Safe Routes for Senior Citizens a Priority  Build a pedestrian-bike plaza in front of Rosemount High School  Connect existing trails in Schwarz Pond Park and Rosemount High School  Improve pedestrian-bike access to the City’s Community Center 3. Make Biking and Walking more Convenient by Completing System Gaps 4. Make Biking and Walking more enjoyable  Enhance the Experience o Quarterly walk-bike events  Improve Wayfinding o Create online and printed maps o Create trail heads o Build pedestrian scale lighting on Biscayne Avenue and Connemara Trail  Create Awareness and Build Education PROPOSED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES Infrastructure maintenance is an important aspect of a well-functioning pedestrian and bicycle facility network. Without dedicated funding, the pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure within the City of Rosemount will be difficult to maintain, as well as potentially unreliable and inaccessible during winter months. The City of Rosemount is committed to maintaining their trails and sidewalks at all times to reasonably address the safety and accessibility needs of all people. Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 8 – Transportation 8-51 FREIGHT SYSTEM The freight network in Rosemount is important for the local and regional economy. Businesses in Rosemount rely on an efficient transportation network to get product from their distributers and to their customers. Across the region, the freight network is built to transport commodities such as cereal grains, animal feed, aggregates and metallic ores. Within the City industries such as oil refineries, recyclers and manufactures all depend on the freight network for business. The freight network in the City consists of highways for heavy commercial vehicles, railroads for trains, and waterways for barges. Through proper land use, zoning, and freight-specific network enhancements, these needs are met. All industrial areas in Rosemount are located with adequate access to the metropolitan highway system as shown in Figure 17. The Federal interstate and State trunk highway systems in Rosemount are all built to 10-ton axle loading standards and are part of either the National Truck Network or the Minnesota Twin Trailer Network, allowing extra capacity and flexibility for commercial trucking. This major highway coverage reduces the impact of truck traffic on local roadways and minimizes the potential for disruption of neighborhoods. There are only a few major freight routes through the City which currently accommodate for heavy commercial vehicle activity. Future truck traffic from industrial, warehousing and commercial land uses should be adequately accommodated through the following measures:  Locating truck-intensive land uses with proximity to the metropolitan highway system and with reliable access to the minor arterial system.  Using acceptable design standard on arterials, which will ensure adequate turning radius and pavement depth for trucks.  Signing and marking to minimize truck traffic through neighborhoods. HEAVY COMMERCIAL & V EHICLE ACTIVITY By weight, 63% of goods are moved by truck across the Minnesota’s highways. Trucks transport goods over both long and short distances and are critical for first- and last-mile connections for freight. There are only a few major truck routes through Rosemount, but they are critical to the local economy and the greater region. Within the City, the average heavy commercial average annual daily traffic (HCAADT) is between 450 and 4,700 with a greater concentration of volume on TH 52 as indicated in Figure 17. The industrial zones where highways TH 52 and TH 55 connect are where most of the freight traffic is located. HCAADT on TH 52 is between 3,500 and 5,000, and near 1,500 on TH 55. Robert Trail South has minimal freight traffic with HCAADT between 450 and 740. Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 8 – Transportation 8-52 These volumes are generally less than the HCAADT in the urban centers of Minneapolis, St. Paul and adjacent communities where HCAADT is generally between 7,500 and 15,000. The heavy commercial traffic through Rosemount is comparable to other outer rings suburbs across the metro area. I-94 and I-35 are the main freight thoroughfares out of the Twin Cities and neither pass through Rosemount. FREIGHT RAIL ACTIVIT Y Rail transportation is an important piece of the freight network for both local business and as a critical connection for the rest of the region. Union Pacific Rail is integrated into the industrial areas on the eastern side of the City connecting local businesses within the City and to the greater region. There is also a railroad from the north, traveling west, connecting to the Canadian Pacific railroad near Robert Trail South. Canadian Pacific has a railroad running from north to south on the western side of the City along Robert Trail South with several at grade crossings at cross streets. Railroad crossings are mostly at grade and can cause conflict with vehicles, pedestrians, and bicyclists that are trying to cross. There are 17 crossings located throughout the City, three of which are grade separated. Rosemount has implemented quiet zones near at-grade intersections to limit or eliminate the amount of time train engineers use the train horn. The quiet zones took effect in 2012 and are in effect 24 hours a day at 15 quiet zones throughout the City. FUTURE CONSIDERATION S In recent years, e-commerce and same day deliveries have become more popular causing additional freight traffic. As the demands of customers to receive product quickly and on demand increases, stress on the freight network will also increase. This trend will need to be planned for in order to maintain safety for all modes of transportation, to provide an efficient freight network, and to mitigate congestion along roadways in Rosemount. To plan for these considerations in the future, the City should consider implementing the following policies and strategies:  Support the use of designated drop-off areas and times to minimize the impact of large freight vehicles onto other modes of transportation including pedestrians, bicyclists and vehicles.  Locate shipping centers at strategic locations to consolidate all delivery trips. Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 8 – Transportation 8-53 Figure 17. Freight System in Rosemount Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 8 – Transportation 8-54 AVIATION There are no airports within the Rosemount City limits although there are airports in nearby cities including the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport (MSP) only 20 miles away. Although the City is near MSP as well as the St. Paul Municipal Airport and Airlake Airport in Lakeville, the City’s land use is not impacted by these airports. The airspace over Rosemount is used by aircraft operating from the other metropolitan area airports as well as airports outside of the metropolitan area. As noted in the Metropolitan Council’s 2040 Transportation Policy Plan, no new general aviation airports are proposed in the future. There is adequate capacity at the airports surrounding the metropolitan area to support future growth. HEIGHT AND SAFETY ZO NING Structures which are 200 feet or higher above ground level may pose hazards to air navigation. The City of Rosemount has no existing structures of this height and does not permit such structures under its zoning ordinance and has no plans to permit such structures in the future. Any applicant who proposes to construct such a structure shall notify the City and the Federal Aviation Agency (FAA) as defined under the provisions of Federal Regulation Title 14 Part 77, using the FAA Form 7460-1 “Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration.” These forms must be submitted 30 days before alteration or construction begins, or the date of which the construction permit is filed, whichever is earlier. MnDOT must also be notified as required by MnDOT Rules Chapter 8800. The Minneapolis-St. Paul Airport Community Zoning Board’s land use safety zoning ordinance shall also be considered when reviewing construction within the City that raises potential aviation conflicts. HELIPORTS There are no heliports within the City of Rosemount. METROPOLITAN COUNCIL The Metropolitan Council is the regional planning agency that has the legislative authority over approving the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) Capital Improvements Plan budget. The Metropolitan Council’s role in the evaluation of noise is to promulgate guidelines for the compatible use and development of land in communities surrounding the airport and approve individual airport long-term comprehensive plans. OTHER AGENCIES A number of other State agencies work with the MAC in either a cooperative or regulatory capacity. MnDOT is involved in all construction projects that will impact the traveling public, including runway construction and roadway improvements. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) works with MAC Environment Department on issues such as noise and groundwater runoff. The Minnesota Environmental Quality Board (EQB) has the final authority in approving Environmental Impact Statements and other environmental documents related to the MSP. Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 8 – Transportation 8-55 FUNDING STRATEGIES Roadways under City jurisdiction are maintained, preserved, constructed and reconstructed by the City’s Department of Public Works. Funding for these activities, including the administrative costs of operating the Department, are obtained from a variety of sources, including ad valorem taxes, special assessments, development fees and tax increment financing. A major concern of the City is the availability of sufficient funds for maintenance and construction activities. If funds are unavailable, needed projects may be delayed or terminated and maintenance of existing facilities may fall short of acceptable standards. The following explains the existing sources of funding and potential new sources of revenue. STATE AID An important source of revenue to the City is State Aid. A network of City streets called Municipal State-Aid Streets (MSAS) are eligible for funding assistance with revenue from the State Highway User Tax Distribution Fund. This constitutionally-protected funding allocation is comprised of gasoline taxes and vehicle registration fees and is allocated based on a formula that considers the population of a City and the financial construction needs of its MSAS system. AD VALOREM TAXES For situations in which 20 percent of the cost of a City project can be assessed to the adjacent property owners, the remaining cost of the project can be added to the ad valorem or property taxes of the remaining property owners in the City. Ad valorem taxes for street improvements are excluded from the State-mandated levy limits. TAX INCREMENT FINANC ING Establishing a tax increment financing (TIF) district is a method of funding infrastructure improvements that are needed immediately using the additional tax revenue to be generated in future years by a specific development. Municipal bonds are issued against this future revenue, which is dedicated for a period of years to the repayment of the bonds or to other improvements within the TIF project area. TIF districts can accelerate economic development in an area by ensuring that the needed infrastructure is in place without requiring support from the usual funding. GRANT FUNDING There are many opportunities for metropolitan cities to take advantage of various grant funding initiatives. Regional Solicitation and Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) are among grant solicitations for the Twin Cities metropolitan area. The City should monitor the grant funding opportunities available for applicable projects and submit applications when possible. Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 8 – Transportation 8-56 PLANNING FOR THE FUT URE Throughout the City of Rosemount’s comprehensive planning effort, the City will consider how to address existing transportation needs, while setting the stage for future growth. Items are summarized below:  System Preservation o Performance Standards and Measures o Project Prioritization o New Revenue Sources o New Maintenance Techniques o Asset Management  Travel Demand Management o Bicycle Amenities o Car Sharing Programs o Shared Mobility  Autonomous Vehicles  Complete Streets and Safe Routes to School SYSTEM PRESERVATION Infrastructure systems such as roadways, bridges, culverts, and sidewalks have become expensive and challenging to maintain in today’s environment with aging infrastructure, rising costs of materials, and stagnant or declining revenue. In fact, many local agencies are being forced to pause, and ask questions about the costs and benefits of continuing to maintain assets throughout their entire system, or if other approaches should be explored to better balance needs with available resources. Generally, approaches to be considered include: Performance Standards and Measures A performance-based approach improves the accountability of local infrastructure investments, assesses risks related to different performance levels, and monitors progress and increases transparency. Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 8 – Transportation 8-57 Project Prioritization Project prioritization can help the City rank infrastructure needs in a manner that is consistent with preservation goals and objectives. This technique can help avoid the typical “worst first” approach to programming preservation projects that tends to invest limited resources in the most expensive improvements instead of directing maintenance funds to infrastructure that merely need rehabilitation, which will provide more cost-effective solutions in a timely manner. New Revenue Sources There are methods to capture new revenue streams to close the financial gap in maintaining assets in a state of good repair. Exploring new revenue sources will allow the City to expand and accelerate preservation initiatives. New Maintenance Techniques There are new maintenance techniques that can extend the lifecycle of an asset. For example, new maintenance techniques for roadway surfaces can provide longer service life and higher traffic volume thresholds, resulting in more stable road maintenance costs. Cost reduction of life cycle extension strategies which save money, or extend surface life, can directly benefit preservation needs, and minimize any identified financial gap. Asset Management Tracking assets and their condition will provide a stronger outlook on lifecycle costs and replacement schedules. This will help establish funding plans and identified future funding gaps or shortfalls. TRAVEL DEMAND MANAGE MENT Research has shown that Travel Demand Management strategies are a useful technique in helping alleviate parking demands in a geographical area. TDM strategies are applied to help reduce the number of single occupancy vehicles traveling and parking in a certain area. Opportunities to encourage TDM strategies are highlighted throughout this section. Bicycle Amenities Actively promoting bicycling as an alternative means of travel to and from a destination can be achieved through information dissemination and the provision of bicycle storage facilities and adding on-street bicycle lanes and additional connections to trails. These actions can help decrease the demand for vehicle parking. Car Sharing Provisions Car sharing programs provide mobility options to a cross section of residents who would not otherwise have access to a vehicle. These programs encourage the efficient use of a single vehicle among multiple users, while reducing the amount of parking needed to accommodate each resident within a neighborhood. Zoning language can encourage or require new developments of a certain size to include off-street parking provisions for car sharing programs. Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 8 – Transportation 8-58 Shared Mobility Shared mobility includes bike sharing, car sharing, and ride sourcing services provided by companies such as Uber and Lyft. Predictions indicate that by creating a robust network of mobility options, these new modes will help reduces car ownership and increase use of public transit, which will continue to function as the backbone of an integrated, multimodal transportation system. CONNECTED VEHICLES A ND AUTONOMOUS VEHICL ES There is a wide range of forecasted adoption scenarios for connected vehicle and autonomous vehicle technology. This new technology has the potential to improve safety, impact parking needs and change travel behavior. In Metropolitan Council’s 2040 TPP, it is noted that the implications of connected and automated vehicles need to be thoroughly examined. As with many new transportation technologies, automated and connected vehicles are likely to penetrate urban markets prior to expanding to rural areas, especially if they are initially developed through a ride-hailing platform. COMPLETE STREETS AND SAFE ROUTES TO SCHO OL Complete Streets are commonly defined as roadways that accommodate all users such as pedestrians, bicyclist, vehicles and transit, regardless of age and ability. This is important to consider when recognizing the diversity of people traveling throughout the community. The Transportation Plan’s goals and policies embrace several elements of complete streets, such as safety for pedestrians and bicyclists. MnDOT has adopted a Complete Streets Policy, last updated in May 2016, and has committed to assessing opportunities for incorporating complete street design principles in all MnDOT projects. MnDOT’s Complete Streets Policy can serve as a resource to the City for incorporating complete street design standards into City projects. Safe Routes to School is a national initiative to increase safety and promote walking and bicycling for America’s youth. The Safe Routes to school program will assist in providing infrastructure and non- infrastructure grants to build trails, paths, and safe connections to local schools. Planning for safe routes to schools will require specific attention to certain elements such as bike routes, complete street treatments, sidewalk networks, pedestrian/bicycle amenities and wayfinding signage. Combined, these elements can create Safe Routes to Schools or Complete Streets.