HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994 Carrolls Woods Mtg MinutesAGENDA
CARROLLS WOODS SUB -COMMITTEE MEETING
DATE: SEPTEMBER 19, 1994
PLACE: ROSEMOUNT CITY HALL
TIME: 6:00 P.M.
I. Call Meeting to Order
II. Approval of Minutes
III. Audience Input
IV. Parking Issue at Southwest Access
V . Trail Construction Update
VI. Policy on Bicycles and Horses
VII. Application for Carrolls Woods Sub -Committee
VIII. Cross Country Skiing
IX. Buckthorn Cutting
X. Budget Presentation
XI. Adjournment
o
MEMORANDUM
DATE: September 19, 1994
TO: Parks and Recreation Staff
FROM: Jim Topitzhofer
SUBJECT: FLYER FROM RON JACOBSON
Ron Jacobson has distributed the attached flyer to residents who live by Carrolls Woods.
Please review this letter and forward any calls regarding Carrolls Woods to myself.
I am in the process of preparing a response to Ron's comments. He has been included in the
agenda fro the City Council Meeting scheduled on September 20. The "State", namely the
DNR, has given their informal approval of the proposed trail construction and I am now
checking with the Extension Office regarding the effect of limerock to the Carrolls Woods'
ecosystem. I have also prepared what I think are appropriate responses to the other points
listed in Ron's flyer.
r
Changes In
CARROLLS WOODS NATURE AREA
BACKGROUND - The City of Rosemount Manages the Woods and makes
changes to it as approved by the State of Minnesota. A
Master Plan developed by the City Council in 1991 and the
terms of the State of Minnesota's Outdoor Recreation Grant
Program used by the City in 1975 to get funds to buy the 40
acres west of Rosemount High School are the two basic
guidance documents for the Woods. The City Council is
responsible for compliance to these documents.
ISSUES - A few of the issues follow:
1. Recent and proposed changes to the Woods appear to be at
variance with the Master Plan, they appear to have
V' proceeded without State approval, and they are not even
recorded on planning maps (new west path, limestone).
2. The use of crushed limestone on the nature trails means
S that the soil pH will change and the ecological system
will be affected.
3. Apparent lack of commitment to the passive recreation and
nature use of the Woods is a gray area and needs to be
addressed. Organized active recreation events in the
Woods violate the purpose of the Woods.
4. There is concern that logging in the Woods is changing
the Woods more to a New York Central park than a Woods
Nature Area.
5. Trail width is too wide and exceeds Master Plan of six
feet. No roads are permitted in the Woods as per
original Grant.
ACTION REQUESTED - The City Council has been asked to review the
way the Woods is managed and to suspend development
activities in the Woods pending the outcome of the review.
Professional management practices are needed as well as
policies which cover all activities in the Woods.
MEETING DATE - The action requested has been placed on the City
Council's agenda for Tuesday evening, September 20, 1994.
Please call City Hall at 423-4411 for the Carrolls Woods
agenda item time. Citizen input is most important at this
meeting. Also, a call to the Mayor and/or the Council
persons before the meeting is a good idea.
OTHER MEETINGS - Citizen advisory committees are meeting on
Monday night, 9/19 at the City Hall and include the Carrolls
Woods Committee at 6:00 PM and the Park and Rec Committee at
7:30 PM. It is possible that these committees will make
recommendation to the City Council. Citizen input is
welcomed at these meetings.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION - Please call Ron Jacobson at 423-2117.
THE WOODS NEED YOU ON TUESDAY
GOAL SETTING SESSION FOR CARROLLS WOODS
SUMMARY
JUNE 28, 1994
Possible Short Term Goals:
1. Identify & mark boundaries (west and south side only) in with west side and
proceed to south side.
2. Research prospec ��S �`� � A—h
3. Identify existing f lmo— .c o.x� st process to Committee
members.
4. Continue buckthorn` �°� -,ntified areas in Master
Plan. V
5. Clarify trails & deve
6. Develop vegetation n
7. Complete trail contra loween Trail.
Include culvert.
8. Develop and maintain foot path on west side of Schwarz Pond.
Possible Long Term Goals:
1. Plan and construct an interpretive center.
2. Develop an outdoor education program. Network with schools.
3. Develop and implement a marketing plan.
4. Initiate a trust fund for Carrolls Woods.
5. Continue buckthorn eradication.
6. Continue trail construction as outlined in Master Plan. Include signage, kiosks, and
landscaping on east access.
7. Acquire and develop Kelly Trust Prairie Area.
.............
X.
.............
..........
Prepared For:
City of Rosemount
. P.O. Box 510
2815 145th Street North
Rosemount, 1v4N 55068
Pr.-:)are,-� Ev:
Brauer & Associates, Ltd.
7901 Flying Cloud Drive -
Eden Prairie, IvLN 55344
October, 1991
Table of Contents
L Planning Overview
H. Development Program
III. Alternative Concepts
IV. Site Inventory
V. Site Analysis
VI. Master Plan
VH. Vegetation Management Program
VIII. Wildlife Habitat Program
IX. Cost Estimate and General Phasing Program
X. interpretive/Education Programs
ha. misting Community Programs
�I. Ad\ iso-ti, CoL=�ttee
Conclusions
"1S! 0! � l2u_:S:
Figure 1: Concept Plant
Figure 2: Concept Plan r2
Figure 3: Concept Plan #3
Figure 44: Drainage Patterns
Figure Slopes and Soils
Figure 6: Soil Characteristics
Figure 7: Vegetation
Ca,ro11S I� oo�s .�alltre �!C4
1
1
3
3
5
6
11
15
15
16
16
17
17
Figure 8: Site Analysis
Figure 9: Master Plan
Figure 10: Typical Trail Section
Figure 11: Vegetation Management
Figure 12: Vegetation Management Phasing
Program
Figure 13: Cost Estimate and General Phasing
Program
Ciry of Rosemount
Master Plan for Carrolls Woods Nature Area
Planning Overview
In early 1991 the City of Rosemount undertook this master
planning study for Carrolls Woods Nature Area to define
its long-term purpose and objectives for development.
To accomplish this task, the City:
• appointed an ad hoc advisory committee of local
citizens to oversee the development of a master plan
for the park.
• hired the firm of Brauer d Associates, Ltd. to facilitate
discussion and develop a part; master plan document.
The master plan document consists of the folloAmi r major
components:
• Development Program: defnes the park: s c=--r n:'
purpose and identifies the major issues affecting its
:pure development.
• Alternative Concepts: iliustr ate a nurnbtr of schtmat...
designs and physical relationships in response to the
development program.
Site Inventory. identifies the site's existing physical
characteristics such as soils, slopes, drainage patterns,
etc.
• Site Analysis: makes judgements about the site and
identifies the site's opportunities and constraints for
development.
• Site Master Plan: is an outgroN Lh of the accepted
concept plan and represents the design solution that
best responds to the development program and site
inventory/analysis information.
• Vegetation Management Program: identifies the key
management objectives to assure long term ecological
diversity and integrity.
• V Ii dlife Habitat Program: identifies the key
management objectives to assure that the needs of
,Azldlife are met.
• Cost F—sdmatr and General Phasing Program: projects
the anticipated costs to develop the park and establishes
a general phasing program.
• Education and Interpretive Program: identifies key
objectives of education and interpretive programs.
• Advisory Committee: defines the critical role the
advisory committee will play in overseeing the
development of the park.
The fm 'aims related to each of these components art
summarized in the forthcoming teat.
Development Program
The Advisory Committee defined during focus meetings
the histon, and eeneral purpose of the park and identified
the major issues affecting its future development. These
items make up the development program.
The development program is important because it provides
the direction and establishes the basis for the entire master
planning process.
LAWCON Grant
Carrolls «'oods Park ",as acquired by the City of
Rosemount in 1975 throuch the State of Minnesota's
Outdoor Recreation Grant Program (L5WCOIN).
According to the original grant application, the intent of
Ca; ,, o.11s i;'oods ?\`Clare Arcc 1 Ci � of Rosemour.:
the project was to 'protect (from development) a natural,
wooded area within a growing part of the metropolitan
area" and to "provide some outdoor recreational and
outdoor educational opportunities for the citizens of
Rosemount."
In subsequent years the City applied for a number of
revisions and amendments to the original grant.
LAWCON, in most cases, granted these requests.
Since, the original grant was obtained in 1975, the City has
created some trails and removed many dead American
Elms from the property. Thcre has been no other
substantial development.
Wayne Samos, Director of the Outdoor Recreation Grant
Program (Community Development Division of the
Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic
Development) represented the State in interpreting the
provisions of the various grant application. Under his
interpretation, the current level of development was
considered to be within the guidelines and general
parameters established as part of the original grant
application and subsequent amendments.
With respect to future development, Mr. Sames indicated
that, under the State's interpretation, the park should: a)
continue to focus on the preservation of the resource and
b) provide passive recreational opportunities, such as
nature observation, educational programs, walking trails,
benches, etc. for the citizens to enjoy.
General Purpose(s) Of The Park
G',v-_z their unc.,rstanding of ti pall:'s hlstor• and what is
Means to the communin" the .4dN�Sory Committee was
asked to identify what they corSiCered to be the Central
purpose(s) of the Dark:
j Consr-n-anon and Pros: nation: to protect the site are-
na:ural en%ir onmen: from encroaching dtn-tlopmtn:.
G j Passive R=cation: to pro,.ide opportunities for passive
recreational activities such as:
• walking/hiking (accessible for the handic.apptd)
• nature/wildlife study
• family and individual "quiet space"
• informal cross-country skiing/snow-shoeing (groomed
for one track of skiing only)
3� Interpretation and Education: to proNidt opportunities for -
education and interpretation without Jeopardizing the
-Dark's natural character. Tn-. City and School District
should develop programs for a variety of potential users
groups, including:
• school children of all age groups.
• " individuals and families.
• seniors and special populations.
The park should also allow for 'passive educational
opportunities so that an individual can gain knowledge in
an informal manner. This passive education would include
such things as interpretive signs, printed site maps as well
as informational brochures, etc.
Geaeral Lssues Related To The
Paris's Future Development
Along with identifying the purpose(s) of the park, the
Advisory Committee also identified a number of issues to
address during the planning process. These included:
• a general inventory/identification of existing plant
communities and vegetation.
• a need for a vegetation m—an agent program-
• a need to provide wildlife habitat.
• a need for an interpretation program to identify and
describe the various plant communities and wildlife.
• a need to encourage the local school district and local
civic groups to participate in the development of a
comprehensive; educational program to educate D=Vlt
(of all aces) about plant communities and wildlife.
• tht need to maintain some form of site ac.. ss and
control. Potential uses of the Dark which could damact
is included: general overuse, free -roaming domestic
animals attacking vildli.fe, motorized vehicles entering
the park, and other 'nuisance" problems, such as people
starting campfires, smoking, drinking, littering, etc.
uncontrolled access also allows a convenient
"thoroughfare" from the west side of the park to the
high school area.
the need to define more clearly the purpose of the
internal trails. The Committee expressed concerns
about the need to reduce the width of the trails, the
desire for woodchip trails, and limiting the grooming of
cross-country skiing trails.
• the need for additional parking. The Committee
considered the parking lots for Schwarz Pond Park and
Rosemount High School to be too far away and often
unavailable to potential users of the park.
S 14'DOrc :VG »rr - _ Ci:v of Rosemoun.
• the need for additional site amenities such as benches,
signs, observation blinds, bridges, etc.
• the need to identify and capitalize on the opportunities
inherent in park's proximity to Schwarz Pond Park and
Rosemount High School.
• the need for neighborhood recreational facilities to
service the recreational needs of existing and future
neighborhoods to the west and north of the park. Note:
this %a.s identified within the overall park system plan
for the City.
• the possibility of including a prairie preserve area within
the park -
the need to address safety issues (personal and
physical).
Addressing these needs provides the direction and basis for
the entire master planning process.
Alternative Concepts
Three alternative concepts explored different boundaries
for the park and illustrated different management
techniaues and relationships betw-_tn physical uses of the
site. These concepts respond to the issues listed above in
the Development Program.
Fzo ura I, 2, a 3 illustrate thr= 2'!ternative concepts for
the D2
=.fte. coaside:2bi ce — . r% : �.::e..
selected Concept = 3 (Fgsr-c ee _ i:.
.est)ondtd to the crlteal�: a; JZi for"L. _ t—
0tV'.10Dment D"oz am.
ro ided a %isiona-rapproac:. to the park's future
development.
• allowed for more diversity is plant communities and
wildlife species than the other concepts.
Based on these findings, Concept T3, along with the
development program, was used to define the study area
and provide the basis for the continuation of the master
planning process.
Site Inventory
Site inventory identifies the existing characteristics of the
proposed park area (including geology, topography,
drainage, soils, and vegetation).
Based on Concept Plan #3, the study area was broken
down into four adjacent parcels of land, of which
Rosemount currently owns two. The other two parcels
would have to be acquired through parkland dedication,
direct purchase, and/or State grant programs.
Figure 8 - Site Analysis identifies four parcels within the
study area:
• Parcel A includes Carrolls Woods as defined by its
current (1991) boundary (45 acres). Acquired by the
City through a LAWCON grant in 1976 for passive use,
nature preservation and environmental education.
• Par=1 B: includes the part of Schwarz Pond Park
which lies west of the north -south asphalt trail (e.g.,
west of the existing ballfield). This would include the
pond itself (31 acres). The parcel is already owned by
the City.
• Parcel C: is an area which lies between Carrolis Woods
and an existing gasline easement north of the park. This
parcel is currently used for pasta:-- land and is not
owned by the City (15 acres).
• "Parcel D: is an area west of Schwarz Pond, north of
Parcel C, east of a dominant ridge line, and south of a
future collector street. This parcel is also currently used
for pasture land and is not owned by the City (7 acres).
Geology, Topog: aphy, and Drainage
Thousands of years ago the climate of Minnesota warmed
and the glacial ice which covered Rosemount began to
melt. As the glaciers receded northwards, they deposited
huge amounts of debris which had been carried in the ice.
Tne deposits of sand and gravel and boulders, often over
one hundred feet thick, are known as terminal moraine.
The topography of the terminal moraine is rolling with
steep hills, ridges, and landlocked depressions. Some level
areas do exist at the base of slopes, in saddles and
depressions, and on hilltops.
Tne slopes of Carrolls Woods are mostly hot, south-
southwest facing slopes. The Schwarz Pond parcel is a hot
west -facing hillside. Parcel D has mostly north -facing
slopes and the most moderate topography. Parcel C is a
CGriOICS �4'OOGS :'�c,^lrC rCS _ Glv Of P,0SC1110:.•..
series of ridges running north to south with steepest slopes
facing east and west.
Glaciers determined the landscape of Carrolls Woods and
set up the drainage patterns which still exist today. Figure-
4 - Drainage Fanrnu illustrates the site's current drainage
patterns. These patterns are critical to the formation of
soils and the subsequent development of plant
communities. In Figures 4 - Drain ^ge Fauz=, the thick
dashed lines mark the high points of the property and the
boundaries of the watersheds. Water flows in opposite
directions on either side of these lines. It is interesting to
note the north -south pattern of ridges within the study area
which mark the direction of receding glaciers. Because of
the steep slopes of these ridges, the watersheds would tend
to drain rapidly after a heavy rain. Since the watersheds
are small, their lowpoints would not collect much runoff.
Even so, one would expect to find wetlands in the several
landlocked depressions on the property unless the soils are
porous.
After the glaciers melted, weathering forces began to act
upon the rock and debris left behind and started to form
soils. Soils and slopes are intrinsically related. Slopes
affect the decree of wind and water erosion, the rate at
which moisture is absorbed and retained, and finally in the
amount of sunlight reaching the ground. These factors in
turn affect the growth of vegetation and the subsequent
ceveiopment of soil strata czlied a rot.._.
z::, management pro�.am should begin wt an
examination of the area's soil profiles. Soils offer an
_ :�iznatio fcr e>cstia^ pi ..,
_,...._ess of a^y Dlantin^ estorati.... _ffo:._.
ijr S - Sion- cud SO."Is Shc s: d,
7ra-
zcntrally a d site. No clay soils ar o:ese.... M,OS', of th
o s are sandy or silt loamy with ,:,ode:ate to steep slopes.
This means water either runs off rapidly or percolates
ouch rapidiv. The subsoi's are usualiy composed of
sever zl feet of sand and/or grayer. Depressions on the site
are silty foams and poorly drained; these soil n•pes make
UT) a very small percentage of the total acres of the study
Fc,,= 6 - Soil Oumaciraisd= explains the possible uses of
each soil type found within the studv area. The Dakota
County Soil Survey states that the hillsides of the study
area are generally most suited to woodland or prairie/
pasture/hay. Tilling is often difficult. The Soil
Coaservation Senice recommends using drought resistant
species on the most of the hi lside soils.
Vegetation
150 years or so ago the Rosemount area was
predominantly oak savannah and prairie. Prairies are
communities dominated by grasses and forbes. Oak
savannahs consist of isolated oaks or small stands of oaks
surrounded by a sea of grasses and wildflowers. Both plant
communities are dependent on fire for continued existence.
The savannahs, with their open vistas and groves of
beautifully -formed craggy oaks, were particularly attractive
to European settlers who were reminded of the parklands
of their home countries. As the settlers turned the
savannahs into home sites and farms, they also suppressed
the fires which are so critical to the continued existence of
the prairie and oak savannah communities. In the absence
of fire, woodland species invaded uncultivated savannahs
and prairies. In the full sunlight betweenn tic established
Bur Oaks of the savannahs, Black Cherry, White Oak and
Red Oak sprouted and grew. Sun -loving shrubs such as
Hazelnut, Sumac, Gooseberry and Raspberry also invaded.
VAlhen wildfire was suppressed, American Elm, Boxelder,
Hackberry, Green Ash began to take hold. Under their
canopy, the more shade -tolerant shrub species such as
Elderberry, Dogwoods and perhaps Arrowwood and
N=vberry %,ibu,-nums crew. Within 50 years of the
arrival of settlers, the savannahs and prairies of Rosemount
had chanced dramatically.
In addition to suppressing fire, the European seuiers also
brought with them plant diseases and non-native shrubs
and t.rees which sometimes out -competed native species.
25 years ago. American Elm probably dominated the tree
no^y of Carro'tis Vvoods. Since then zimcst LI, the
....erica n Elm. nas died of Dutch Elm cisease and has ie..
the central portion of the 45 acre parcel with a very sparse
canopy of trees. Common Buckthorn (Rha.-_nus
cathartica), a particularly aggressive non-native shru'o, has
Lnvaded the propern, and has �:rtually taken over the
uncle.*story. I artarian Honeysuckle and woody vines have
also been aggressive invaders. Fortunately in the last
decade the Tartarian Honeysuckle has died out because of
aphid attacks and concerned citizens of Rosemount cut and
reduced considerably the vines strangling many canopy
trees.
Today the canopy of trees in Carrolls Woods is composed
of the following species:
Boxelder (Acer negundo)
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)
Black Cherry (Prunus serotina)
Hackberry (Celtis occidentals)
Red Oaf: (Quercus rubra)
,'northern Pin Oak (Quercus el'ipsoidaiis)
Bur Oal: (Quercus macrocarpa)
White Oak (Quercus alba)
Silver Maple (Ater saccharinum)
Cottonwood (Populus deltoides)
Aspen (Populus sp.)
Boxelder and Green Ash arc the most common trees of
the uplands. Black Cherry and oaks are also quite
prevalent with some beautiful stands of mature individuals
scattered throughout the site. Several Silver Maple
dominate the moist lowlands of the site. One enormous
Cottonwood grows along the trail which runs across the
southern edge of the property. Small mature stands of
aspen are scattered throughout the uplands. Aspen are
short-lived in a forest because they are intolerant of shade.
They may seed in or root sucker into opc=gs, but as the
canopy doses in, they will begin to die ouL
Ecologists and foresters examine the understory of a forest
to determine the future of its canopy. The understory of
Carrolls Woods and the forest west of Schwarz Pond has
a rather depressing story to tell. Barring human
intervention or natural catastrophe (fire), Carrolls Woods
will succeed to an almost pure stand of impenetrable
Buckthorn with some Boxelder as the existing canopv trees
die out. There are almost no seedlings of oak or cherry
present in the 45 acres except in small openings with full
sun and no Buckthorn. Occasional saplings of Green Ash
and Hack -berry are present but even they are rare. Shrub
species other than Buckthorn are also uncommon.
Occasional Elderberry and Prickly Ash are scattered
throughout the site.
The ground laver of Parcel (Carrolis 'Woods) shows
quite a diversity. Although not closely inventoried, Jacl:-
in-the-Pulpit, Trillium, ferns and mosses are present in
various areas of the site. These species indicate moist or
mesic microclimate conditions and need shade to s Hive.
Nettles, gooseberry, raspberry and seedlings of the ever-
present Buckthorn are common along paths and in
openings when, there is full sunlight. -
Parcel B (part of Schwarz Pond Park ) consists of a ho:
w--st-facing slope which lzacs down to the pond. The slope
is covered by a well -established canopy of Northern Pin
Oak, Red Oak, «%Hite Oak and Black Cherry with a dense
understory of Buckthorn. The eastern and northern shores
of the pond are primarily open with young successional
woodlands of pioneering species (aspen, Boxelder, and
willow) and stands of sumac.
Parcel C is a open, rolling site with one ven' small remnant
of prairie. The topography is spectacular and interesting.
1; is currently used as sheep pasture.
Parcel D is a open, rolling site with some fairly level
topography. It too is used for sheep pasture.
General Perceptions of Vegetation
It is clear that Rosemount citizens are very fond and
protective of Carrolls Woods and the Schwarz Pond
property. Most people enjoy strolling under a lush, cool
canopy of trees in the summer. They appreciate the beauty
of the woods as they are now and are more interested in
sensory experiences rather than how 'pure" the ecological
communities are.
Ecologists, on the other hand, see Carrolls Woods through
different eyes: as a forest of mixed hardwoods considerably
dcgradcd by Buckthorn and with a limited future.
The short-term management objectives for the two views
of the woods are opposite; the first demands little
disturbance of existing conditions, the second demands
heavy intervention and manipulation to maintain ecological
diversity.
Left on its current course, the canopy of mixed hardwoods
will continue to die out and be replaced by Buck -thorn
which effectively shades out any tree seedling or sapling.
In the not -to -distant future, Carrolls Woods will evolve into
a dramatically different place: a sea of Buck -thorn. The
trails will become corridors through a dense mass of 20-
25 foot Buckthorn with no cool shade and no sensory
diversity. At this point in time the two opposite
approaches for forest management will become similar,
demanding intense intervention to recreate the canopy.
The perceptions of the public, rather than the ecologies,
are critical to the acceptance of the Master Plan for
Car -,oils Woods Nature Area. Brauer & Associates Ltd.
recognized this and inventoried the vegetation of the four
parcels in a manner which would address these
perceptions. The wooded areas of the study site were
cnided into six forest types (see Figure 7. Vegetation). Each
n'ae has a different type of canopy and undtrston' and very
different Visual and season, qualities.
Site Analysis
Site analysis uses inventory information to make
judgements about the site. Site analysis identifies potential
opportunities and constraints for development.
Access and Control• Users of Carrolls Woods currently
enter the 45 acre parcel from several points. The asphalt
trail running along the eastern border is the most
sanctioned entry point. Several trails of varying widths
enter the woods off this trail. Another main entry point is
CX70!1S Y OO::S ,N'c :tre r'.rec City of Rosenioun:
at the bottom of a steep hill in the southeast corner of the
property. There are three points of entry along the west
border. The Advisory Committee felt strongly that the
number of access points into the park be limited.
The Committee also felt that entry points will be needed
on the north, west, and cast side of the property.
Internal Trail System: Many trails crisscross Carrolls
Woods. They vary in width, degree of steepness, and
quality of the surface. The Committee did not want to
create new trails unless necessary and felt some trails
should be eliminated or realigned_
Currently, individuals often use the trail along the southern
edge of the woods as a way to get from the areas west of
the park to the areas cast of the park, particularly
Rosemount High SchooL As residential development on
the west side of the park continues, use of this trail will
likely increase. The Committee felt that this type of
"thoroughfare" was not in line with the park's natural
character and therefore they did not want any trails
developed through the park for this specific purpose.
Figure 8 Site Analysis highlights those trails which should
be eliminated because, they are redundant, too steep, too
wet, or because they serve undesirable access points.
Site Amenities There are no benches, signs, or other site
amenities in Carrolls Woods. There are manv
opportunities for these built facilities which should bt
added once restoration tffcrts for the plant communitieS
art undtrw'ay.
Parking Visitors coming to Ca. -rolls %Voods by car must
e the parking lots fo: Rosemount high Scbooi o-
Schwa_z Pond Par!:. ThtSt art So fW' a' a�' .:OW t.^.
woods tbat it tai:ts a good wall: its: to ge, to tllt pari:.
15tit 101S art oft= t_11
�opog aphy _^C txisting tveio�^t rot ^c :^t
c=Cttr of tht sift prtst1..: a ...alien^ to the ctsi=
of a parking 10: w•;.ich rt ui.. is itvel ractS. Pared D has
t most levti graces for parking. Tht tw,o lots ownt;6 b•.
tht Ciry in tht southwest COrntr are inadtcuate in sl--- to
stn'e the future parking needs of the park.
Ne'Ishborhood Recreational Facilhies: Parcel D is an
open, rolling area with some fairly level topography. It will
be immediately adjacent to a proposed collector street. in
the near future the areas north and west of this parcel will
likely be developed for residential housing. Thtse
communities will need neighbor hood recreational facilties
yithin walking and biking distanct. Parcel D has tht
ac7ea2t and enough level topog achy for thtst recreational
fa.:ili[ies.
Schw-arz Pond The pond w:-,H n Sch•. arz Pond Par;::: ,
S,=_Zicant natural area anc has yalut as wi ^ ift 'nabi:at
It has limited value as a recreational lake. The woodland
east of the pond has many lovely oaks and cherry trees.
This area should be included in the park
Parcel a With its dramatic topography and open vistas
and its existing use as a pasture, this area is perfect for
prairie and oak savannah restoration. Near the northern
border of Carrolls Woods is a mature, beautifully -formed
Bur Oak and a nice stand of smaller Bur Oaks. The form
of these trees indicates the area could have once been a
savannah.
Woodland Vegetation: the inventory of vegetation in the
study area indicated six types of forest Each type will have
a different management approach (defined in the
Vegetation Management Program). Control of Buck -thorn
will be critical in all areas.
Figurc 8 SiteAnaba� simplifies the areas of forest for the
purpose of management.
• Degraded Woods: sparse canopy, isolated mature trees
@ 150-?.00T feet apart. Undcrstory is a impenetrable
wall of Buck -thorn.
• Open Canopy: mature trees are much more common
and closer together. The understory is still fairly dense
Buckthorn.
• Pleasant )-Voods: mature trees form a good canopy with
some Buckthorn in the understory.
• Lowland forest: crest small areas are CStL'rOtC
frtouently by croundwatcr or wet soil condition.
Gigantic Silver Mapies and Cottonwoods art common
with an cround layer of nettles.
• Successional. young frets, dtast unctrsto- v.=
'rarleR' Of SptC:eS.
:Master Plan
Tht Master Plan is a direct outgrowth of tht accepted
Concept Plan and represents the design solution that btst
responds to the development program and tht site
inventory and analysis.
riglm 9: MasierPlan illustrates the results of tht planning
process for Carrolls WOOL Nature Area. This graphic:
• citarly dtfints tht park's property boundary (consistent
,,h Concept Plan r3) to ensure diversity of plan;
ccrnmunitits and wildlift habitat.
iocztts and sizts all facilities and site zve^ ins.
• establishes appropriate pant communities which are the
basis for wildlife habitat.
The folloA*, text describes each physical element of the
Master Plan and explains the reasoning behind the design.
It is clear that Rosemount citizens feel the need for an
undeveloped area where they can stroll and appreciate the
beauty of nature. A number of recent studies have
documented this need, which is likely to bccomc more
acute as the community continues to grow. Likewise,
Rosemount schools will continue to need a place for
environmental education and interpretation. It is important
to recognize that the park is different from other
community -type parks: its environment is more fragile and
complex. Human activity and intervention can easily
change the character and overall quality of this natural
area.
To insure the long-term preservation of the parl'it will be
critical to protect the park from the pressures associated
with urban development. These pressures raise the issue -
of control and access.
Currently Cazols Woods has ar, unfenced perimeter.
Aithouch it is not easy for the average citizen to reach the
park Lpark.ing is fa away), it is easy to enter the woods at
2-My number of locations. There is no perceived
stewardship of the park. Th lack of control works fair!,,-
well with the eaistinz level of use of the pail: and with the
land uses which currently si,_;ound the property, i.t.
Ia.-mland to the west and north the hich school to the east,
and homes to the south. ;N'itho'L, a de-:..._. 12-11: cas al
approach to contl-oi is ideal and `.tn. app-ooriat_ v trs
near rsturt while the comm=,,-,,bems, rnanacinc the plan:
_.,mmt_.ities of the park and ceveic� Tress �_
,_round ' oar i:. cma= L-_it ,4.
'_:ou'_'Vt. ,...its art ..aancinc iz Rose^_.oi_^t. Flit^ tc:.•
dtcadc . tsidtntial deveic-,mc *' w v i r:Pig ozcu to tar
and west of tht park. —s undeveloped '=Z:
disappears from the community, citize:s will have a greater
desire to spend time in a natty e preserve. The City w iL
want to make access to the Dar!: as a community, resource,
easier for the averaec citizen by providing parking and
trails. undesirable actiNities within the park will increase
as the population of Rosemount grows. Free -roaming cats
and dogs will disturb wildlife. Sma11 footpaths begin to
increase in width as peopit make �htir owv shortcuts.
Students will cut throuch the Dark to ett to the hick
school. UnauthorrzedV uses (parties, campfires) and
nuisance and vandalism problems tend to Meer ease in areas
that the public does not perceive as con.ro'.itd. . ,.. est
pressures vU degrade the woods as a natural .i A:
som_ point in the future pa l; w41; l 't _ hz, to
protected by some means other than the goodwill of
Rosemount citizens, namely a fence around the perimeter.
This circumstance is certainly not unique to this parL•
Virtually all nature centers with limited acreage in the
Twin Cities metropolitan area fence their property. The
fence becomes not only a physical barrier but a
psychological one as well. It makes a statement to the
community that the area is special and needs protection.
By limiting the number of gates, the City can control the
hours and season of use (if desired) and most undesirable
activities. Gates are also opportune places to present rules
and interpretive information. Fences discourage -
unauthorized uses, encroachment, and trespassing on
private property.
Specifically, the fence is intended to:
• clearly define the parks perimeter and make a
statement as to its intended purpose.
• protect the park from developmental encroachment
• restrict site access to pedestrians and maintenance
vehicles and thereby limit trails.
• control free -roaming domestic animals.
• prevent motoHzed vehicles and bicvcles from entering
the park.
• conuol 'nuisance" problems, such as peopie start^c
amp?; es, smokia� d.-i.nking. litter.. g. ,,-a
prevent the pa--!, from becoming a convenient
"thoroughfare" between the developing part of the Ci:y
to west and ncr1-1 of t—" Dark: and tat school an d
_.al.o- commua,n• center.
coasiderablt discussion and debate, the
Committee recoraized that the need for a feu"t ma%'
t Oft 2 reaiitV a, son'. point iW the parl;'S P�tt'e aril
,cat a fence should bt included in the Master Pi=.
Ho•,vtve-, the CerramMet also felt that there is no
compcliing reason at this point to have the fence high oc
the prioritz, list for development. Instead, the AdNisory
Committee should review on a periodic basis the need for
z fens: along with other development considerations. The
Committee should use as criteria the items listed above to
determine whether or not the fence is needed. If the site
begins to degrade from unauthorized uses and these uses
cannot be effectively controlled by other means, the Cit}'
will have to strongly consider installing the fence to protect
tat site.
1-^...tiai . eactions to the idea of a fence arot:.nd the aarl: mz••
hat it is stimidatmg, ===ssar}•, and ugly. rioweve
dots not have to be the case. If installed properly,
enzt c2n bt . elatively u nnonczable. Vecetation will sc e.,..
it. Psychologically, the fence becomes a barrier to the
human world that, in the not so distant future, will encircle
the park. Those who arc involved in the park's future
development should go out to any one of a number of
fenced nature areas within the metropolitan area and see
for themselves how little a fence affects the park's
atmosphere.
Should a fence become necessary in the future, it should be
six foot in height. Galvanized chainlink fence of a suitable
commercial grade is the most commonly used material
because it is relatively economical to construct and
reasonably durable.
As the Master Plan illustrates, the fence is intended to
essentially follow the park's property boundary. To limit
its visual impact and make it as unobtrusive as possible,
the fence should be set back from 0 to 35 feet from the
property line and be screened by surrounding vegetation.
This is particularly true in the more heavily wooded areas
of the site, where the fence's alignment will be dictated as
much by the existing vegetation as by the property
boundary. Care should be taken during the fence's
installation to limit disturbance to the existing vegetation.
Installing the fence in the late fall when plant life is largely
dormant and avoiding existing trees will minimize damage
to the park_ In open areas, planting vines and shrubbery
will help screen the fence from view.
In areas where the fence will be adjacent to existing
residential properties, the City should make homeowners
aware of the fence's proposed alic^..ment prior to its
installation. Some homeowners may prefer the fence aionc
the property line rather than se, back and screened from
"itw.
.'I Maste7 gates to ro%ice
.._cess into the :)a ;:.
T:. turn s vie pecest- N ca._ in t south --as:
corner of the site w i se- t,e . eadv developed
esidential "core of t:^.e Ci as w•eli s the school. :•his
:nuance should sim, .t Lnc unobtrusi•, , wi,L a:
asphalt trail ac,._.._ .. ... r oadwa�
down to the cat--.
The access shown on the northwest corner of the site will
serve future residential areas to the west and northwest of
the site. This Cate should also be a turn-styl--, pedestrian -
only gate. To access the gate from the future residential
street west of the park, the City needs to acquire a 24'
wide easement to allow for grading, scr--eni.ng and building
a pedestrian trail.
The Advisory Committee debated at length the issue of
whether or not to provid-- a pedestrian access in the
southwest corner of the site. eft--r ienethy discussions and
considerable public input, the Committe-c felt that a gate
in the southwest is appropriate and n--cessan7 to serve both
the current and future residential areas to the west and
southwest of the park. As with the other secondary gates,
this gate should also be a turn-stylc, pedestrian -only gate.
To access this gate from the residential street west of the
park, the City needs to retain a portion of the park
dedication land directly adjacent to this corner of the park
Retaining a 24' wide strip (e.g., easement) to allow for
grading, screening and building a pedestrian trail should be.
adequate. The remainder of the park dedication land is of
limited future value (for the purpose of this master plan
and providing access to the park) and could be, at the
discretion of the Parks Committee and City Council, sold -
off for develcpment, with the proceeds ideally being used
for future development within the park.
With respect to the access in the southwest corner of the
site, adjacent property owners and the Committee were
very concerned about preventing a 'thoroughfare" from
being developed through the park along the southern
property line. In this instance, "thoroughfare" means either
a high volume asphalt -type trail and/or a developed
roadway. It is not the intention of the southwest corner
access to serve this type of development in the future. The
only intention (within the context of this master plan) is to
allow residents to the west and southwest the opportunity
to enter the park itself, and not to serve as a direct link to
other areas of the community.
The main entrance gate on the north side of the site will
serve not only those walkins; to the site but school buses
and those driving to the site from other areas of the
community. This entrance should be simple and natural in
d--sign and make a statement that the visitor is entering the
nature area and a protected environment. This gate should
be limited to pedestrians. A gathering area outside the gate
should accommodate a croup of 25 people (a class of
students). This area will include benches and perhaps a
kiosk. Inside the gate, a kiosk provides visitors with a map
of the area and a brief description of what might be seen.
ne aispla%s should include photos, graphics, and written
-x' to describe and illustrate the park's features. The kiosk
should have a leaflet box: to dispense park maps/guides.
The Master Plan also includes a number of rates for
maintenance vehicle access. The primary access is near the
main entrance gate on the north side of the park. This
access should serve most maintenance needs once the park
is fully developed. A second access is shown near the
existing hockey rink on the southeast side of the site. This
access will probably serve as the primary maintenance
access until the park becomes more fully developed. This
gate can also be opened in October for participants in the
Haunted Woods program. Third and fourth accesses are
shown near the pedestrian entrance on the northwest and
the southwest. These are intended to be used on a minimal
basis and only to senice areas of the park that cannot be
effectively serviced through other gates.
The Advisory Committee also discussed the twenty foot
easement near the southeast corner of the site. Given its
,, Y✓DOQs l�Ahlr_ *r !:!l' DrROSC/):O:P..
relatively steep grades and the current lack of use as an
access to the park, the Advisory Commintc felt no action
was necessary at this time. However, the members of the
Committee did agree that the issue should be reviewed
again prior to installing the fence, should the fence become
a reality in the future.
Internal Trail System
An internal trail system which meanders through the park
is intended to move people through the nature area with a
minimum impact to the environment and yet insure that
they receive a quality outdoor experience. Although the
primary objective of the trails is to link together the various
plant communities, the system should also be developed to
take advantage of the varying topography, views, and vistas.
The trails should provide visitors with a variety of
perspectives and experiences.
Figure IQ: Typical Trail Coss-Sn=on for Car oRs Woods
Nauor Area shows the suggested design for internal trails.
In order to keep the experience of the woods as intimate
as possible, the width of the trail should ideally be six feet
with a one foot maintenance strip on each side. Although
this would be ideal, it should be recognized that the trail
widths will have to be somewhat wider in at least the near
future since the Cit)'s current maintenance equipment
cannot economicaliv maintain an eight foot wide trail
corridor. Instead, a ten foot wide trail corridor is a more
realistic expectation at this time, with the width potentially
being narrowed over time as new equipment becomes
available.
The surfacing naterial should be:
co=acted crushed ag tc=... for n ci r
ac_essibiliry) on the prima.^ ioc^ w,thi^: t'cc wooded
and prairie/savanna areas.
wpodCa pS on the a.>liia a 1C fe OL ,ra:!, F1i.
wooded areas.
mowed grass on the and secondary tray.
within the prairie/savanna areas.
Because one of the prima: f development objectives is to
limit disruption to the existing mature vegetation, the
Master Plan uses existing trails within the park as much as
possible. However, some changes will be needed where
txisting trails do not serve a future pur post and/or where
their grades are excessive. In some cases, trails will be
eliminated because they serve undesirable access points.
Since the ex sting trials vary from four to twelve feet in
width, thev will require some rev" ian" much of which
can begin immediately. Also, even though the trails show„
on the Master Plan may follow existing alignments, they
may need redesigning to make sure that they are safe and
maintainable.
The new trails shown on the master plan supplement the
existing trails. All of the trail alignments, both old and
new, should give the user a quality experience of the park
with many options for routes to wall:. The exact location
of each trail must be established in the field during design
development (i.e. the "next step" in the planning process)
to take advantage of the opportunities afforded by the site.
In other words, the trail alignments as illustrated on the
Master Plan should be considered approximate and not
absolute.
As with the existing trails, new trials should be designed to
make sure that they are safe and maintainable.
Carrolls Woods Nature Arta should be a community
resource in the winter as well as in the spring, summer and
fall. Snow and ice can be barriers to using the trails. The
Advisory Committee felt that a single groomed tract: for
cross-country skiing would allow people to experience the
woods in winter and would not detract from the quality of
the environment. A single pass through the woods by a
snowmobile trailing a pair of weighted skis would create a
narrow trail for skiers which would not damaet
surrounding vegetation.
Site Amenities
�ahanci.ng the Dtreeptions and experiences of part: %^sllors
through the careful use and placement of site amenities is
important and will greatly affect the overall success of the
park as a public resource. Site amenities are the built
features w aich increase the comfort/access of the part:
users. .ems with the trial alimmcnts, the exact locations of
the various site amenities must be established in the field
design development to take advantage of the
opportunities afforded by the site.
111 of the site amenities should be natural and sunpie in
design and as much as possible blend into the en%zronment
that surrounds them.
Interpretive Nodes and Signs: interpretive nodes are
places along the trail with low profile kiosks. These kiosks
have interpretive panels and exhibits which are fun and
easy to read with good graphics and minimal tex,.
Interpretive nodes are typically located near benches and
other site amenities (i.c. decks, docks, etc.). Located
along the trails, unobtrusive interpretive signs will identify
the various plant communities and wildlife species and
augment the interpretive nodes.
Benches^ should bt providtd to take advantage of different
%.s and site features, ranging from quiet, intimate mate spots
to wade open vistas. Again, benches can be installed at
rro??s h'oo Tr -c �r o Croy of Rosemour.
interpretive nodes if appropriate.
A Floating Boardwalln located in the wet prairie area gives
park users an close -hand experience of the tall grasses and
forbes of the wet prairie.
Environmental Education Docc provides an educational
opportunity for school children so that they can study pond
life and take water samples, etc. In addition, the shop
students from the local schools could help construct the
dock as part of their classes.
Pond Overlook Dock provides park users with a pleasant
place to sit and view the pond. Two benches allow seating.
Pond Observation Blind: provides park users with an
opportunity to view waterfowl activities. If properly
designed, the blind hides people whose presence and
movements normally scare the waterfowl away. The blind
is on the edge of the pond and surrounded by vegetation
to help screen it from An elevated catwalk from high
ground provides an interesting access to the blind.
Wooden Bridge Across Woodland Pothole: is a simple
structure with a railing that crosses the woodland pothole
at a narrow point.
'Lookout' Tower. gives park users a birds eve «ew of the
area and is another opportunity for a visitor to observe
nature in relative anonvmin,. A height of thirty feet should
elevate the tower platform above most of the understory
trees.
R'oodland Dr--L is anohhe: simple structure with benches
designed for restinz and obsenvina nature.
Cottage House for Intc-prctive Displays, Storazz,
Meeting, R.strooms, Etc: is a simple building to sern_ the
i sued uses. The bui.ldinc should be sited near the main
entrant _ate a, the edge of the savannah. It should have
c low profile and L'se natural materials to blend LTito the
s�rroundinzs. A. nat:o outside the building allows Nisitors
s oiace to si'L and observe the Arai ie.
Entrance Drive and Par' '
Since the entrance drive is the first contact that %zsitors
have with the park, it should be located in a manner which
compliments the existing topogr apby. The entrance drive
will tie into a future collector street which is likely to be
developed north of Schwarz Pond Park.
The parking lot at the end of the entrance road should be
sized to prevent overuse of the park but large enough to
allow a bus to turn around. Ideally, the lot should be
paved with asphalt to minimize long-term maintenance and
dust.
Since the entrance drive and lot are outside the nature
area itself, they will technically be part of Schwarz Pond
Park. Users of the picnic areas on the west end of the
park will probably park in the lot. A lot for 35 to 50
spaces plus several bus parking stalls will probably be
sufficient to satisfy the parking needs of the users of both
the nature area and Schwarz Pond Park. However, as
actual design and construction of the lot and entrance road
become reality, the City should closely examine potential
demand for parking and size the lot accordingly.
Neighborhood Recreational Faa'Iides
The city-wide park system study identified the need for
neighborhood recreational facilities for this area of the
community. Parml D is an open, rolling area with some
fairly level topography and is adjacent to the proposed
collector street. Parcel D is the best site within the study
area for neighborhood recreational facilities.
Since it is the policy of the City to include input from area
residents when determining what recreational features will
be in the park, the facilities shown on the plan are for
reference only and need to be confirmed (or changed)
when development actually occurs.
These recreational facilities should be connected by trails
to the community -wide trail system.
Schwarz Pond Park
The pond within Schwarz Pond Park is a siLnificant naturl
area which could add greatly to the diversity of plant and
wildlife habitat within the park. The area east of the pond
can provide excellent waterfowl nesting habitat if current
mowing practices are discontinued and the Ciny restored
the area to prairie. Fencing (should it become necessary)
and wildlife plantings alone the asphalt trail would keep
domestic animals from disturbing nesting areas.
The woodlot west of the pond is a beautiful natural area
which justifiably should be included and managed as part
of the park- Its location next to the pond enhances the
wildlife value of both areas.
The pond is a ecological community which has important
education and interpretive possibilities. The City and
Rosemount School District should monitor the pond's
water quality and protect its integrity as a resource by
establishing water quality guidelines.
The Master Plan shows a number of amenities within
Schwarz Pond Park and outside the nature area. These
amenities include two scenic overlooks and a number of
C1nV' O' ROSC17101i :i
picnic areas near :-he parking lot. The overlooks should be
mowed areas or decks with benches overlooking the pond.
The picnic areas should also be simple in design, with a
number of picnic table and grills and perhaps a small -
group picnic shelter.
Eztcrnal Trails
External trails provide access to park entrances and play
an important role in how well the park ultimately serves
the residents of Rosemount. The four entrance gates
should tic into the community -wide trail system which is
defined within the Cin/s Comprehensive Part: Plan and
Development Guide.
The existing asphalt trails on the cast side of Carrolls
Woods and Schwarz Pond will ultimately be outside the
(fenced) nature area.
The trail link to the southwest entrance can easily tie into
the already established community trail along the 142nd
Street West. Since the trail does run across school
property, the district would have to be involved in
determining its exact location.
The trail links to the northwest, southwest, and main
enL--ante gates are also vet\- important and should be
developed in conjunction with future roadway and
suDdi\isioa deyeiOpnlent.
_t AdP1sC7-COmmiatt and i\' ShOILd .0\iew access
concerns ptriozicaliy and in COn7unCtiOa wi:.. pi'..n.-tz
_e\'e:Opment the area to i s' that -,rail a:=ss
opportunities are no. lost along the way.
`tcetation Ma--aacrntn, - "O=a= id: at es ...-
Wanaeement approaches anc proc dares to cuaranitt th_
..cological diversity, of the park so that it well be a treasure
end resource for future =negations.
in order to maintain long-term ecological diversity and
.nteerin, the wooded portions of the park must De
managed and improved and the open areas need to be
restored to prairie or savan:.ah.
Vegetation management programs can De geared to c. tare
five different t\-aes of sensor\' exper.ences of the part: and
adiacent _parcels. These sensor er: es also . esen:
rcn' ecoloaica
Dense canopy. 750"o-95% overstory coverage with sparse
understory (relatively open). Sensory experience: lush,
shady, cool. Open feeling under a ceiling of trees. bong
views through woods. This type of feeling is most common
in a lowland forest or in a mature Sugar Maple -Basswood
forest. The latter requires moist (not wet), protected and
semi -shaded conditions. Neither Sugar Maple or Basswood
grows naturally on the site; introducing these species would
create an anomaly or artificial condition. It might be
beneficial to attempt to create this woodland community
for an environmental education program.
Moderate canopy. 400"o-600%o overstory coverage with
moderately dense undcrstory. Cool shade dappled by
sunlight, limited views. Common in a mixed hardwood
forest. This sensory experience is probably most popular
among Rosemount citizens and already exists along most
of the trails and along the northern edge of Car -rolls
Woods.
Sparse canopy. less than 15010 overstory coverage and dense
understory. Without fire, this community is dominated by
aggressive pioneering plants. The sensory experience in
summer is hot, walled -in, transitional, young, not as
appealing as types listed above. This condition is frequent
in the center portion of the site with dense Buckthorn.
Savannah: mostly open with occasional spreading individual
trees or small stands of stunted trees. Intense sunlight with
pockets of shade. Bright, hot, open, windy in summer. In
�:nter, savannahs feel exposed and cold; snow melts awn\'
quickly especially on south -facing slopes. Attention focuses
on landiorm and trees. 021: savannahs are rare plant
communities today.
Prairie: open, hot, often uncomfortable in the summer
_ ess the. L a good bretzt. Pleasant i-a spring and
,N inq\' and ll^pr CteCted in winter; snow disappears quicla'
On south -facing slopes. Attention focuses on iandform, the
L're and color Oi c asses, the washes of color from
w-: lowcrs. Prairies can crow m a varlet}' of situations:
:r OW wet. p00:1\' drained areas t0 dry, balTeII hilltops.
.':aiiaole wait- and the depth of topsoils determine whic'n
es of -asses and wildflowers will best grow'.
:sitting Site Opportunities. The two wooded parcels
within the study area (Parcels A L: B) currently provide
opportunities for nature lovers to enjoy two types of
Minnesota forests: the dry upland forests of mixed
hardwoods (oak, cherry, ash, Hackberry) and lowland
forest of boxelder, cottonwood and silver maple. Parcel A
(Carrolls Woods) has one north -facing slope which could
provide the cooler microclimate conditions needed for a
moist upland forest (Sugar Maple -Basswood).
Parcel C is an open, rolling site with one very- small
. _mna nt of prairie. The topography of teas parcel 1S
spectacular and interesting and has great potential for
prairie and calk savannah restoration. If possioie,
Rosemount should acquire enough land to control the
viewshed (i.e. to the tops of ridge lines) and should also
consider scenic casements.
Aesthetics suggest softening the straight Trot boundaries
between woods and pasture (prairie) that exist along the
northern boundary of Parcel A (Car -rolls Woods) and along
the eastern border of Parcel B (Schwarz Pond Park ). For
this reason, some of the oak woods along the western edge
of Parcel B be restored to savannah
Since savannah is more easily restored than recreated,
Rosemount should treasure the savannah type oaks (Le.
100-150 year old Bur Oaks with rounded canopies) which
exist within the study area.
Management Objectives. The management objective of
woodland management within the nature area is to
maintain diversity within the existing woodland
communities. This will insure that the future generations
will be able to enjoy a forest of trees rather than a
monoculture of Buckthorn.
Woodland management will be a tricky issue for the City.
The Buckthorn infestation is so severe that removing it will
devastate the forest for a few years until other species take
hold. Unfortunately, there is no alternative if Rosemount
citizens want to achieve the long -tern goal for the park
with ecological diversity. Phasing and public
awareness/education will be critical to public's
understanding of what is happening Ai:hin the earl: and to
their support of management efforts.
he restoration of prai-ie an'- oal: savannah shoalz no:
create the s=-- concerns as woodland manaztme..,
program. The proposed sites for these communities are
en -,Iv in p sty. an:. es: _ ort w71 not aape.:
Crance the area so Gram.,. aL', y yn^ m2 prose...
Some D-0D s but acam 7)--n- ._ aC Sensible sC.^e in.
Fig% 11 - Veg..tation Marage-mcrr� c. idcs the Dar!: into
several zones. ach zone is describe,. b;-
a letter/number code.
• 2 phase number.
• an aDDro>amate ac.eace fimire.
I ht first Dart of the code CesC: lots the colopcal
cbmmun1R' (e.g. �h'O = `� OO a d - NHxtd :lardwoDd D
Pr aLrie, S = Savarnal:, Tne SeConQ Dart of the
code is an alphabetic,.. lotto. vlaich desCr ibe5 the method
of restoring or managing the ecological zone. These
methods are described in detail below. The third part of
the code is a number which describes the priority of the
zone for management/restoration. Zone 1 is the highest
priority within a particular ecological community and Zone
9 is the lowest. Ftg= 12 - Vegetation Managemt t Phasing
Progr= describes phasing in more detail.
Prairie Areas (Method A or P A-#)
The City should hire a firm specializing in prairie
restorations such as Prairie Restorations of Zimmerman,
Minnesota or Prairie Nursery of Winona, Minnesota.
These firms offer advice and a range of services including
burning and planting. Make sure the chosen firm uses
prairie seed collected within a 200 mile radius of
Rosemount. Non-native seeds can be aggressive, resulting
in one or two species dominating the site.
Mow fire breaks around the perimeter of the future prairie
areas.
The experts from the prairie restoration firms will
recommend the best techniouc for restoring the prairie
gasses and forbes appropriate to each particular microsite.
The nursery may recommend burning the entire prairie-
desivated area to see what surprises the seed bank in the
soil holds. Prairie seed can lie dormant for years in the
soil. Next, the experts may recommend one or m,o goner ai
or local applications of Round -tip. This herbicide wiLl IE
aL vegetation. The nex, step is to use a Truax DriL to
plant seeds of prairie grasses. The following year the
restoration frm may mow and plant by hand forbes or
wildflowers (1D30/ace).
i e nn n� iri` ' b� ' red >i-
tn., [?eL1�,.-IL._ 2 pr2 1.. S.lO::.1Q C1 ..:.' �'.. .y
o -. a cr to climate weeds and the woody Dian: materia.Ls
which natur aliv invade an oxen site. Burning also creates
spectacular wildflower dispi2vs. Onct es:abiished. a prairie
should be burned eve ti : 5 years. Although o,ht
techniques, such as mowing, can be used in the restoration
Drozess, burr::ng is typicaliv the most effective (and
natural) and should be used when at all possibie and
permitted by the City. Communicating with nearby
residents about the burning process and burning under
ideal conditions will go a long way toward minimizing or
mitigating the negative aspects of this procedure.
Recreated Oak Savannah (Method A or S-A-r)
In these designated savannah areas, mow 10-'_5 foot fire
breaks a; ounc the edges to prevent the fire from jumping
Wio ta_ 2C;2Cent woofs.
0' r05^l7n 0N71,
Hire a prairie restoration firm. Restore prairie. Once the
prairie community is established, tree spade in small Bur
Oaks ( 2" -3" diameter at breast height). Plant the Bur
Oaks in dusters or as isolated species 150-200 feet apart.
The City can reduce costs by transplanting Bur Oaks from
other City property or by donation from private property.
This transplanting can occur over a period of years. All
plant stock: should be obtained from a local source to
insure its hardiness.
Examine the transplanted trees after one season. If they
are doing well, leave them be. If they appear sides, cut the
trunks off around 6-12 inches above ground. The Bur
Oaks should sprout from the base. After 2-3 years, select
a main leader and prune off the rest.
The Bur Oaks seedlings will need Tubex Tree Shelters
(@S5.00 apiece installed) to protect them from deer
browsing.
Initially, a savannah should be burned annually. The voung
Bur Oaks need protection from the heat of the fire. Mow
a 16 foot diameter circle around each oak to protect it
from damage.
Once sufficient shade is established, plant the forbes and
grasses unique to a savannah community.
Restored Oak Savannahs (Method B or S-B-#)
Oal: Savannahs are more easily restored than created from
scratch. A few savannah riot trees exist alone the
northern edge of the Carrots «'ood. These :.re Bur Oaks
with well -formed rounded canopies; they look. like they
cart always =ov m in the open ...the. tha_. in cramped
forest conditions. Mature Bur Oak: have thigh corl"V bare:
which makes them resistant to gnicl: =round fags common
t0 pr?:lies.
z -ht des1L'.'lateQ4 savanna'- _-rzas rz- o%v it :oC.
�r eaks around the edges to rev
The City should also hire a prairie restoration firm to assist
in restoration of prairie grasses and forbes within the
savannah areas.
In the fall cut and remove undergrowth (usually
Buckthorn). Paint the herbicide Garlon on cut surfaces of
stems. The neat spring, burn. Because of lack of fuel it
may take a few years to get a complete burn. Savannah-
r pe grasses and forbes should start to reappear.
=after an area is burned, seed in handfuls of gasses and
forbes (seeds and berries) appropriate to an cal: savannas.
The prairie restoration firm can pro%ide some of these
speaes. Others may have to be collected by volunteers
from local areas.
Initially a restored savannah should be burned every years.
Once the understory of desired species is established, the
burning can be done every three to five years and
eventually once every ten to fifteen years.
Oak Woodland (Method A or WO -A-#. )
This restoration method is for degraded woods (see Fig=
8 Site Analysis) with a sparse canopy or isolated mature
trees @ 150-200+ feet apart. The understory is a
impenetrable wall of Buckthorn. These woodland areas
will be the most costly and exasperating to restore. This
method of management is geared towards eliminating the
dense understory of Buck. -thorn and replacing it with more
desirable species. This is a multiyear process because
Buckthorn is a prolific seeder.
Year One: In the fall or winter, cut and remove adult
Buckthorn (any stem over , inch in diameter if possible).
Treat the cut stems with Garlon. This phase will eliminate
90-95 io of the Buckthorn biomass. It is extremely labor
intensive (Rosemount may want to organize volunteer help.
A person licensed to apply herbicides must be in charge of
training and overseeing the volunteer help.)
Year Two: Plant 75 saplings per acre. Plant Red Oak,
v; Hite Oak Black Cherry, and Green Ash. Use the Tubex
5' tree shelters for these saplings. These tubes will serve
functions: -
protect the saplings from rodents and deer
create condensation which will help the saplings S::r-iye
the grournt-or one soils.
protect the saDlinas from herbicide sprays.
After planting, use a foliar spray (such as Krenite or
Round -up) to kill off all the Buckthorn seedlings. These
sprays will kill any green growing plant that they contact.
Buckthorn remains green and growing in the forest 2-14
days after most native vegetation goes dormant in the
autumn. This time may be the best time to spray in order
to preserve as much non -Buckthorn understory vegetation
as possible. Rosemount will need expert advice from the
herbicide distributor as to timing of application (the
window of opportunity varies from year to year and can be
quite small).
Year Three: Apply a foliar spray again to eliminate anv
remaining Buckthorn seedlings. Seed each ac" with
�.r-.*oils I,'ooes ?`c.�re.�re� _� Ci^' orRosernour.
acorns or plant oak;/cherry seedlings (2000/acre). The
DNR sells 1000 tree seedlings for S150. Acorns are not
available commercially, collecting them could be a
volunteer effort in early to mid August. One drawback: for
acorns is that not every year is a productive year for oaks
to product them.
Subsequent years: Monitor the restored areas for
buckthorn regeneration. Continue to eliminate either by
cutting and applying Garlon to the cut stems or by using
foliar sprays for pockets of infestation.
Oak: Woodland (Method B or WO-B-#)
This management method is for pleasant woods (sec Fgun
& Site Anaiysia) with a well -developed canopy of mature
trees and a moderate Buck. -thorn understory. Management
efforts should be directed at eliminating Buckthorn,
especially the mature individuals and ones in the occasional
openings in the canopy, and supplementing the planting
especially in openings.
Year One: Cut and remove adult Buckthorn (over , inch
in diameter). Apply Garlon to cut stems. Replace the
Buckthorn with tree saplings or shade -tolerant shrubs.
Possible species:
Common or Scarlet Eldtrbtrry (Sambucus canadensis
or pubens)
American Hazelnut (Con.' americans)
Nannyberry (Viburnum lentago)
Gray Dogwood (Corpus racemosa )
Pagoda Dogwood (Cornus alternifolia)
Round -Leafed Dogwood (Comus rugosa)
Senictbem, (.Amtlanc'aier canadtns"s)
Gooseberry (Ribts nmosbati)
R aspbtm, (Rubus strigosus)
Frick:ly Ash (Zanthoxylum a eri s
Green Ash (Fra)anus pennsyi� a
Rtd Oak: (Quercus nbra)
'northern Pin Oak (Quercus
F trite Oak (Quercus alba i
Black: Cherry (Prunus strotina)
Hackberry (Ctlds occidtntalis)
All plant stock: should be obtained from a local source to
insure its hardiness.
If there are any large openings in these zones with solid
stands of Buckthorn, eliminate using Method A.
Year Two: Monitor these zones, cut and apply Garion to
anv remaining Buckthorn. Continue to add shrubs and
saplings if needed. Begin to enrich the herbaceous layer
in shady areas with appropriate wildflowers.
Oak: Woodland (Method C)
This restoration method is for north -facing slopes with an
open canopy and a fairly dense understory of Buckthorn.
For areas without canopy trees and heavy Buckthorn, use
Method A- When planting, use the species listed below.
For areas with canopy trees and some Buckthorn, use
Method B.
Species to plant:
Susan Maple (Ater saccharum)
Basswood (Tilia americana)
Ironwood (Ostrva virginiana)
Black Cherry (Prunus scrotina)
Hackberry (Celtic occidentalis)
Red Oak (Quercus rubra)
Butternut (Juglans cinera)
Blacks Walnut (Juglans nigra)
All plant stock should be obtained from a local source to
insure its hardiness.
As the Buck. -thorn is eliminated and the canopy begins to
fill in, enrich the forest floor with wildflowers called spring
ephtmerals.
Lo,%iand Woods (WL)
T nest small areas of the site are disturbed frequently by
groundwater or wet soil conditions. This community will
not require much management except to prevent
disturbance of the drainage systems and to eliminate
i nfestations of Buckthorn.
Successional Woods (WS)
Successional forest: these areas are dominated by
pioneering plants and have few mature trees and a dense
understory of a variety of sptcits. The only management
needed for these areas is to control Buckthorn invasions.
Woodland Pothole
The area in the southwest corner of Carrolls Woods was
once quite productive waterfowl habitat. In the last twenty
vtars it has silted in and become dry enough for Silver
Maplts to grow. To make the area a pothole again, it
must be d. edged, regraded, and perhaps sealed to prevent
titer from seeping away. If possible the Ciri' should
Carols i�'nos Tdcr»re �rcc Ciry of r:oscmoun!
construct a small siltation pond to filter all stormwater
runoff before it enters the pothole. Once open water is
provided, the bird (and animal) life will return.
Schwarz Pond
The fluctuations in water levels for this pond actually
increase its productivity as a food source for waterfowl.
Discontinuing mowing and planting prairie would improve
this area as habitat for birds and animals. Some wildlife
plantings along the fence will help screen it. The City or
school should monitor water quality in future years.
Wildlife Habitat Program
One of the primary objectives for this park is to establish
diverse wildlife habitat which provides food, water, and
shelter for a variety of wildlife species.
Although the pallet of plants included in the Vegetation
Management Program for the park will provide habitat for
several wildiife species, a wildlife management program
will add extra components to improve the diversiy of
species using the nature area.
number of state and regional resources are available to
heip develop a wildlife habitat and management program.
i ne Minnesota Deaartment of Natural Resources (D.N.R.)
have individuals with expertise necessan to:
• e,aivate �.i�tir.� hab`.tat arc its aoteu..c: to s�000-.
• ccW .. aa�..at ceveioomen' r.r o==s to improve
...., habit.., is aireacv prestn".
• _nt the bcea lag czpacity of the pail: and %vat's to
z.aintain a heaithy A -id ift population.
The Cit\, should contact the D.N.R. Section of 'Tildlife
Prior to future development to insure that no opportunities
are missed along the way.
Based on the D.N.R.'s guidelines, fifteen components of
wild'ufe habitat are necessary to fulfill the major needs of
most species. fight of these components are plants and
eight are structural or non -living components.
Plant Components:
• grasses/le_gumes
• butterfly, bets, moth plants
• hummingbird plants
• summer plants
• fall plants
• winter plants
• nut/acorn trees
Structural Componnntr
• feeders
• water
• dust beds/grit
• salt
• cut banks/cliffs/banks
• brush/rock piles
• snags
• nest boxes
By providing these components, the community will
improve the chances of wildlife flourishing within the
confines of this nature area.
Cost Estimate and General
Phasing Program
Although certainly not an exact science, estimating or .
projecting the costs to develop this part: is important
because it provides the citizens of the communin,
governing bodies, and City staff with a basic understanding
Of the economic commitment necessary to put the park's
Master Plan into effect. The estimated costs to develop
the park will affect priorities for adding the various
components and amenities and in deciding which ones are
best accomplished through volunteer efforts versus paid
contracts.
The City and Advisory Committee should use the figures
below only as 'benchmarks" to compare the relative costs
of items and for budgeting purposes. Actual cost to
acquire land and develop the Master Plan will depend a
great deal on:
• the actual land values at the time of acquisition.
the actual construction costs at the time of
development.
• how much of the costs for development can be offset
through alternative funding programs, such as
volunteerism, grants, donations, etc.
The cost estimates below are based on estimated land
values in 1991 dollars (determined by the City) and apical
development costs in 1991 dollars (as determined by
industry cost -to -construct averages, i.e. what it would
typically cost, on average, for a contractor to come in and
do the work).
�er-olis -+ "oo^s N=rC �rec 2 Ciry of ROSCn7ou"I"'
Park Land Acquisition Costs
The Master Plan includes two parcels of land which the
City does not currently own.
The first parcel (Parcel C) has the highest priority for
acquisition because it plays an critical role in the long term
objectives of the Master Plan. Based on current land prices
in the City of $8,000 to S11,000 per acre, the cost for the
15 acres identified in the master plan would range from
a120,000 to S165,000.
The second parcel (Parcel D) plays an important secondary
role in the long term objectives of the Master Plan_ It
provides an area for support facilities (e.g., parking lot)
and neighborhood recreational facilities. Again based on
current land prices in the City of S8,000 to S11,000 per
acre, the cost for the 7 acres identified in the master plan
would range from S56,000 to S77,000.
Although these two parcels play an important role in the
park's Master Plan, they may not be either available for
purchase or the City may not be able to fund thew
acquisition. If this becomes the case, the overall integrity
of the Master Plan is not lost. Even v ithout these parcels,
the park xill be a priceless natural resource and will make
a significant contribution to the parl: system withi.n the
comm=n—. However, if the vision Of this master piaarirc
rOCCss IS to De realized, eve t eIIOr, should be made to
in—,udc these parcels Aiz
Park Deveiopment Costs
cos; es=atz az,:
_eveiep na tn_ pa ;: is
Estimate and Genera_' Ph—;i.
�L`eS eC 7uaS'n= Cct C 0 aSOIIa�:
--:3pr oaC tot e pa k;`S : t Ce'.'ei�•pTtent. 4 tali'+
management programs are the top priorit es. The a1D an,
site amenities can be added in the future. The phasing
program is based on the best judgements given cur, enl
:.onditions. Since conditions and opportunities often
hang- Oyer time, the Ciry and Ad:ison- COmmlttee SnOLld
-view the phasing pros: am on a per iodic e basis to chanc
pr loritics li necesSafl'.
Interpretive/Education Prograrn-s
One of the important program elements for this park is the
an interpretive and environmental education program to
emphasize the importance of preservation and conservation
of limited natural resources.
The programs should focus on native plant communities,
how they evolve and maintain themselves, and on the
wildlife which depend on them for survival. These
programs should also emphasize the use of native plants
around homes and the benefits they provide, both in an
aesthetic and practical sense (such as wind screening,
shade, attraction to wildlife, etc.).
Environmental education programs for elementary and
secondary schools should be a high priority, considering the
park's proximity to the nearby schools.
The Minnesota Department of Education often assists
communities in developing environmental educational
programs. State personnel, along with local school district
staff, should be contacted and asked to help create these
programs.
Interpretive programs should be created to reach a wide
variety of people and age groups. Interpretive programs
typically focus on provi g park visitors with information
about the plant communities and wildlife within the park.
These programs often include:
• interpretive nodes (low profile kiosks with late retive
paneis).
• interpretive signs taroushout the pail: v . ch describes
d:.`:e. =: features.
'.Taps and man OOuts vith te? CCSC lolnp- the pa:"
ecological systems, vildiife, geolog<, etc.
e�elOpment Of irate pretive programs should also incl:..
..=tsota Department cf Education, lo-ll school
2Ls a natu-aHst a:-z o:=.
On D'oI�SS;o:a'c.
Existing Communit-' Programs
i nis Master Plan does not intend to exclude existing and
successful community programs from taking place within -
park boundaries. However these programs should occur
oniv if thev do not cause significant negative impacts to the
park; s natural character. Organized events bring visitors to
the nark and create experiences which give people a vested
interest in the future of the park. ti pleasant memo of
a mace can motivate people to protect it as a resource.
�s an example, the.., is no compelling reason why the
i,'oods prow--= should not continue as i; has i
the past as long as its organizers take reasonable care to
protect fragile plant life from damage. To accomplish this,
organizers of community programs should work closely
with the Advisory Committee in selecting a route and
location for props. In the future, when the nature area is
fully restored and developed, the Haunted Woods program
may be better suited to another location. The organizers
should work with the Parks and Recreation Committee and
city staff in the nma few years to see if another more
suitable site exists. In the interim, the Haunted Woods
program should continue.
Advisor' Committee
The Citv should establish an advisory committee, to oversee
and guide the future development and protection of
Carrolls Woods Nature Area. The Committee should be.
made up of individuals with different backgrounds who can
help give direction and motivation to the community in
support of the park's Master Plan. The Advisory
Committee should work directly with the Parks &
Recreation Committee and City staff to guarantee that the
park's best interests are served.
The Parks and Recreation Committee and Cite Council
should formally accept the Advisor-,. Committee in an
advison, role and as the guiding force behind the park's
future development in order to add strength to ..%d:�so-�
COmmlttee's position.
Tile Committee's make-up should include:
• ioeal ci...._ S wino art cone,........ about Lh p_. k s ncture
aac rant t0 COnulbite the :Liles 10"wLrc'. surmc
.�•-at its mission is carries: ou;.
• .embers o: iocu. coas=,ation ore-�; �tio^s
est an perils-. ha .2bi.c C e
obsen•atioa and w7ldfiowc carctm,a
...embers of local garden club(s) ,;'ho havt a special
later est in native plants and gardening.
• teachers in the local educational communin, who have
an interest in en-,2ronmental education and
interpretation.
• community leaders who can proNide political guidance
and potential sources of private funding.
• a City staff members) to assist m L*uiding the project
through a�_—_laistratIve a.^.0 pO1 iC21 CnannelS.
1 he AQvlsory Committee's Llvolvement In the development
c' the park should occur prior tc the desl= developrn=*
stage of the project. The Advisory Committee should use
the Master Plan as a guide to any development within the
park. Other key responsibilities for the Committee
include:
• interpreting the master plan document, including
periodic review of the plan itself and the priorities for
phasing.
• implementing the plan, including scheduling of
improvements, securing professional assistance as
necessary, and making recommendations to the Parks
& Recreation Committee, City staff, and City Council.
• initiating education and interpretive programs.
• initiating public awareness programs and public meeting
to keep the citizens of Rosemount aware of the park's
development.
• initiating volunteer programs to assist in the
development of the park and reduce development costs.
• providing on -going guidance and support to volunteer
and educational programs to insure the long-term
success of the park.
• monitoring maintenance practices so that they stay
within the intent of the Master Plan.
• monitoring existing community programs (such as the
Haunted Woods) and work with program organizers to
eua_ ante-. that the best interests of Ine part: are served.
Conclusion
he citizens of Rosemount should commend its City
Council, Park and Recreation Committee, and the Advisor
Committee for their concern in planning for such a
valuable community resource as the. Car-, olls Woods
Nature Area. The Advisory Committee in particular put
in many hours debating the issues facing this park and
came to some tough and critical decisions about its future.
Carrolls Woods Mature Area is a treasure for future
cenerations. Rosemount is lucky to have citizens who feel
passionate about its existence and the quality of its
environment. Their energy can go a long way toward
motivating the community and creating the support
necessary to implement the Master Plan.
C;7 07 ROSeI)IOL,,.
MEMORANDUM
DATE: August 12, 1994
TO: Carrolls Woods Sub -Committee
FROM: Jim Topitzhofer, Parks & Recreation and Community Center Director
SUBJECT: Carrolls Woods Sub -Committee Meeting, August 15, 1994
I have enclosed an agenda for the upcoming Carrolls Woods Sub -Committee meeting on
August 15, 1994. The majority of the meeting will be spent on recommendations regarding
the proposed construction of trail between the southwest access and Halloween Trail. Mr.
Ron Jacobson has expressed concern over the location of this trail, and has given other
objections with activity connected with Carrolls Woods. I have attached a summary of these
objections which have in turn been sent to the Parks and Recreation Committee. I have also
attached a recent letter from Mr. Jacobson describing his opinion that the proposed alignment
of the trail in the southwest corner is at variance with the Master Plan for Carrolls Woods.
Mr. Jacobson also requests a topographical map showing the proposed trail be drawn and
made available to the public before work proceeds on the new trail. This letter was delivered
to our office just this morning.
If you desire clarification of these issues or have questions about the agenda, please contact
me at 322-6003, or my digital pager at 530-3456. 1 will be out of town on Saturday, August
13, and will be available to take calls at my home on Sunday, August 14. Please call my
pager if you need to contact me on the weekend.
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
CARROLLS WOODS SUB -COMMITTEE
REGULAR MEETING
AGENDA
August 15, 1994
6:30 PM
City Hall Council Chambers
1 . CALL TO ORDER
2. ADDITIONS/CORRECTIONS TO THE AGENDA
3. OLD BUSINESS
A. Status of boundary markings and removal of mailboxes at southwest access
B. Status of trail construction
4. NEW BUSINESS
A. Letter from Ron Jacobson
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR ACTION
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMITTEE MEETING DATE: August 15, 1994
AGENDA ITEM: Carrolls Woods Update AGENDA SECTION:
Old Business
PREPARED BY: Jim Topitzhofer, Parks & Recreation and AGENDA NO.:
Community Center Director II.
ATTACHMENTS: None APPROVED BY:
The Carrolls Woods Committee was postponed in July due to the goal setting session.
Since then, I have been approached by Ron Jacobson regarding his concerns with the development of
Carrolls Woods. I have listed these concerns below.
• Dead Logs and other bushes should not be removed from Carrolls Woods because they provide food for
mushrooms and other species.
• Funds should be requested from USPCI for the purchase of trail maintenance equipment which would
enable the City to maintain 6 foot trails, instead of 8 foot trails or wider. Mr. Jacobson would like the
width of the trails revised.
• The proposed trail construction from the Southwest access to Halloween Trail encourages the access to
"unruly" people which pose a threat to neighboring households.
• The material of this proposed trail should accommodate soft soled shoes (moccasins), instead of using
aggregate material.
• The Haunted Woods special event should be moved to another location because Carrolls Woods poses
a fire threat to participants. "This event has become too commercial."
• The name 'Carrolls Woods' should be changed to "Carrolls Woods Nature Center."
Mr. Jacobson has requested that his wife or son be invited to the Carrolls Woods Sub -Committee Meetings.
I have invited Mr. Jacobson to speak about his concerns with the Carrolls Woods Sub -Committee prior to
our meeting. A member of the sub -committee will report recommended action to Ro:-) Jacobson's concerns.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: None. Respond to Mr. Jacobson's concerns.
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMITTEE ACTION:
August 12, 1994
Jim Topitzhofer
City of Rosemount Administration
Rosemount, Minnesota 55068
Dear Jim:
Thank you for walking in Carrolls Woods with me to show me
where the new trail will go. I appreciate it being your
second walk in the woods and not being exactly sure of every
detail. However, your walk was sufficiently informative to
convince me that the proposed alignment of the trail in the
southwest corner is at variance with the Master Plan for
Carrolls Woods Nature Area (see Figure 9 of the Master Plan).
I hope you appreciate now why I requested of you in early
July for a map of the proposed new trail. I would assume
that a topographical map has been prepared for this
development which would show the grade of the trail. If you
look at the Master Plan the trails are located in a way
analogous to contour farming. This helps reduce erosion. It
also makes the paths easier to walk, consistent with the
passive recreation intent of the woods. Senior citizens will
navigate the planned paths in the Master Plan much more
easily than paths of steeper grade.
Conformance to the Master Plan is your stated commitment.
Any discussion about the trails without a contour map showing
the trails is speculative at best and just the recipe for
more disputes. In March of this year David Bechtol informed
me that the survey of the perimeter of the woods was done in
part to enable the City to locate the interior trails. This
I would assume to mean that an accurate map of the future
trail could be drawn.
I respectfully request that a topographical map showing
the proposed trail be drawn and made available to the public
before work proceeds on the new trail. It would also be
appropriate for public comment to be invited, particularly if
the proposed trail is at variance with the Master Plan.
Thank you very much for your hospitality and concern for
the Carrolls Woods Nature Area.
Sincerely,
Ron Jacobson
3647 143rd Street West
Rosemount, MN 55068
423-2117 (h), 772-7391 (w)
MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 24, 1994
TO: Carrolls Woods Committee
FROM: Jim Topitzhofer, Community Center and Parks & Recreation Director
SUBJECT: Time change for goal setting session
At the last Carrolls Woods Sub -Committee meeting on June 20, 1994, we scheduled a goal
setting meeting on June 28, 1994, at 6:00 p.m. There is a conflict with this time because the
Erickson Community Square Sub -Committee will be presenting a concept plan to the
Planning Commission that same evening at 5:15 p.m. For this reason, the Carrolls Woods
goal setting session is rescheduled to 7:00 p.m., Tuesday, June 28, Room 205.
To prepare for the goal setting session, please take some time to write down your ideas
regarding the five most important goals for the development of Carrolls Woods. In the goal
setting session, we will collect your ideas, prioritize them, and assemble a timeline.
GOAL SETTING EXERCISE
List your goals in priority order for the development of Carrolls Woods:
#1 Goal
#2 Goal
#3 Goal
#4 Goal
#5 Goal
CARROLLS WOODS COMMITTEE
MAY 16, 1994
DRAFT
MEMBERS PRESENT: Loretta Loesch, Mike Busho, Ed Howard, Deanna
Simpson, Tom Reller.
STAFF PRESENT: Mark Joosten, Dave Bechtold
MINUTES OF LAST MEETING - Date needs to be changed to state that
it was held in April.
I. Responses to inquiries: Committee felt that they should set
up a section of the agenda for audience input just as the
Parks & Recreation Committee does.
Each member of the audience would have five minutes to
present an item or opinion. A response to the item would be
considered for either during the meeting or at some other
time.
Citizen comments and inquiries will be copied to the
committee members. Copies of the responses by staff or the
committee will also be copied to the committee members.
MOTION: by Ed Howard to have a section of the agenda for audience
input. The time per person would be no longer than five
minutes. Responses will be given according to each item
presented. Second by Simpson / all voted in favor.
II. Consideration of taking the term park out of the title of
this area: Following discussion the committee felt that the
title of Carrolls Woods Park should remain. Reference to this
area as a park and as a nature area should continue.
MOTION: by Ed Howard to be consistent with the master plan and
to continue to refer to this area as both a park and as a
nature area. Second by Simpson / all voted in favor
III. Check into the access area on the southwest corner: The
committee has asked staff to check into the length of the
area from the roadway to the park boarder.
IV. Carrolls Woods has been listed by the staff as one of the
highest priority items for this summer. As a part of
parks, upgrades it is the highest priority.
V. Culvert and Walkway: This project was looked into by Bud
Osmundson and Rick Cook. Bud has been asked to give an
engineering report of his findings. Rick is not at the
meeting and no report is available tonight.
VI. News article: Staff will write an article for the Town Pages
and ask that it be published. That would take place the first
week of next month.
CARROLLS WOODS COMMITTEE
MAY 16, 1994
Page 2
DRAFT
VII. Flowers: Deanna commented that the flowers are growing very
well in several places. Loretta stated that she has seen many
orchids and flowers coming in where the buckthorn had taken
over. There were also a lot of Jack in the Pulpits. Pictures
should be taken of the area as time allows.
VIII. Goal Setting: Committee would like to work on setting goals
for the coming work season of the park. Ed Howard handed out
a task sheet that he follows on his job.
Items in setting goals would be listing estimated time
tables, staffing, volunteers, costs, objectives, etc.
Committee members could possibly set special goals for each
month.
Our next meeting will deal with goal setting discussions. We
could look into putting plants in the trail area that is
being closed off and other projects that could be worked on
after mid -July.
IX. Meeting was adjourned at 7:30 P.M.
CARROLLS WOODS SUBCOMMITTEE
MINUTES FOR APRIL 18, 1994
APPROVED
MEMBERS PRESENT: Dan Belting, Mike Busho, Loretta Loesch, Ed Howard, Scott Rynerson,
Deanna Simpson
STAFF PRESENT: Dave Bechtold, Rick Cook, Mark Joosten
GUEST: Bob Larson
Meeting was called to order by Chairperson Mike Busho at 6:30 p.m.
Southwest access should be constructed of granular material from the street to the woods.
This would allow for a good surface for the finished trail. It would also serve as a route for
construction and maintenance of the trails in the woods in that location.
Landscaping should be done after the trail is completed and when the next house on the
north of the trail is constructed. Signage would be installed when trail is completed and
landscaped.
Trail work would be considered after mid -July when the main period of concern for causing
oak wilt is over. Staff will plan to complete this project this fall.
Tree Trust people would be asked to assist with the installation of the culvert and bridge
work near the pond. This would be a top priority for this summer.
III. The certificate of appreciation to USPCI for funds donated was discussed. A final wording
was agreed upon with recommendation for this to go to the Parks and Recreation
Committee for action.
IV. There was a good turn out at the last buckthorn chipping day in Carrolls Woods. The date
of the chipping and clearing was April 9, 1994. With this effort the southwest corner is
basically cleared. Until after mid -July work, cutting and chipping will not be done.
V. There was a walk-through on the west boarder of Schwarz Pond Park. The trail along that
boarder will be worked on with wood chips being the base material. Trail preparation will be
completed with the trail groomer. This is on a secondary level of priority with the entrance
and other trails to that entrance as the top priority.
VI. Donations and sponsorships for this and other park projects was mentioned. People should
learn that donations are a positive personal approach to involvement. For businesses it is a
good way to become involved in the community programming.
Dan Belting commented that one thing we might like to consider is a program such as
"Friends of Carrolls Woods". This could be individual or corporate sponsors. Many times
corporations consider matching funds. If a group was formed to handle this type of funding
it could consider a non-profit status and would then be able to solicit funding. Other efforts
they could do is volunteer work in the park.
VII. Dan Belting gave his observations of the work that the staff and the committee have done.
He felt that a great deal of consideration has been given to observe the timing of the growth
of wild flowers and the oak wilt issues. He also commended staff for their hard work of
hand cutting nearly all of the buckthorn which helps to keep the base soil of the woods from
being too compacted (allows for better and more continuous growth of wild flowers and
plants). As long as we are ending this week with our work we are in great shape for timing
aspects.
Mr. Belting commented that we should see a great deal of flowers this year. Then we
should expect a period where the numbers of flowers will be down, but in a few years they
will then come back and have a steady return to growth each year.
CARROLLS WOODS SUBCOMMITTEE APPROVED
MINUTES FOR APRIL 18, 1994
Page 2
Mr. Belting indicated that we could consider planting some trees in the areas where the
buckthorn has been removed. He recommends some plantings of 2' to 3'. It might be good
to wait one more season (but then to plant several varieties such as sugar maple and
possibly some oaks, burr, red, and white), along with other varieties listed in the master
plan. We should keep in mind that red oak is the most susceptible to the oak wilt.
Many of the trees that were growing in with the buckthorn were rather tall, but were very
weak. The buckthorn was holding them up as they were growing. When the buckthorn
was removed the plants were too weak to stand alone. The trees we plant would add to
the number of trees that would replace the buckthorn growth.
Trees planted in this area would help shade out the buckthorn plants. Along with
continuous buckthorn cutting the shade would become a real asset in helping with the
buckthorn control. We need to work towards a solid canopy of leaves.
Vill. Discussions about the buckthorn control and the impact on the plant life indicated that we
must continue to work at its removal if we want to have a good woods later. The removal
of the buckthorn does not negatively affect the flowers, but it does allow for tree growth.
The buckthorn secretes a chemical into the ground that does not allow for trees to grow.
Flowers could grow, but the trees will eventually die out with only buckthorn growth
remaining. Once again this means a lot of hard work and dedication to remove the
buckthorn, but it must be done.
At the present time the common buckthorn plant cannot be legally sold in Minnesota. This
is the result of very negative impact it has on the wooded areas of the state. With the birds
eating the seeds, they then spread those seeds over large areas. Thus we will have a
control problem for a long time to come, even with the plant not being sold at the nurseries.
IX. Dan Belting summarized his comments about the projects. Again indicating the quality of
work because of hand cutting and careful use of herbicides. New trees will be coming up
and in about three years we should see many positive results. Many of the orchids, etc.,
are coming up now and will do so through a good part of May. With the care that we have
taken, there should be no negative impact, but rather the flowers should be greatly aided by
sunlight and have more room to grow.
Mr. Belting works for Wood Lake Park Preserve and they have been working at buckthorn
control for over 20 years. They have a continuous effort to that project each year. They
have enough control where they can do most of the control by annual clipping of the plants.
X. Dave Bechtold asked the committee to consider a change in the name of Carrolls Woods
Park to the name used in the master plan process. Committee members will discuss this at
the next meeting.
XI. Dave Bechtold reported receiving a letter from a citizen regarding projects and work being
completed in Carrolls Woods. The committee felt that items in the letter have been
addressed during the work that we are doing.
4-18min.cw
CARROLLS WOODS SUBCOMMITTEE
MINUTES FOR MARCH 21, 1994
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mike Busho, Loretta Loesch, Tom Reller, Deanna Simpson
STAFF PRESENT: Dave Bechtold, Rick Cook
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMITTEE MINUTES/PACKETS
A. Request was made for the Parks and Recreation Committee minutes. These
minutes will be a part of each subcommittee's packet in the future.
B. A copy of the grant will be given to each of the members for their files.
II. SUMMARY OF USPCI GRANT
A. Put a copy of the grant application with minutes for this meeting.
B. Send thank you note to USPCI for the donation — should consider certificate and
list each item and dollar amount related to the item on the certificate.
C. A special thank you to Kathy and those who helped get the list and amount put
together for the request.
D. When projects are completed there should be a thank you included at the entrance.
This could possibly be in the kiosk area.
E. The Subcommittee thanked Mike Busho for all of his efforts in funding.
III. LANDSCAPING, ETC., AT THE SOUTHWEST ENTRANCE
A. Members should look at the site again and come up with ideas to share for concept
design at the next meeting of this subcommittee.
B. Consider asking the Technical College to give input.
C. Give though to the signage and area outside of the kiosk site.
D. Have the mail boxes moved from the easement area next to the road.
E. Consider small sign like the ones Burnsville and Apple Valley use to identify the park
site at the roadway.
F. Trees for entrance at the school area were not included in the grant as approved by
the USPCI. Trees from the nursery could be considered for use in the landscaping
in that area.
G. The Subcommittee asked for input from staff on schedule for projects. Rick
commented land subcommittee members agreed) that we should consider the trail
work first and complete the entrance after that time. Trails would be considered for
alterations in early fall when ground is dried out and it is easier to complete the
work.
H. Bud Osmundson should be asked to go to the site to look at where the
culvert/walkway would be located.
Maintenance of the amenities at the entrance area is a big factor when deciding the
types of materials that we will use.
IV. BUCKTHORN CUTTING
A. Set for the weekend after Easter — Saturday, April 9th, from 9 a.m. to 1 1:30 a.m.
B. Meet at the southwest entrance at the top of the hill.
V. LOCATING BOUNDARY STAKES ON WEST AND SOUTH BOARDER
A. Boyd Bailey and Rich Lonnquist will locate property stakes that should be in place
from the Shannon Hills Development.
CARROLLS WOODS SUBCOMMITTEE
MINUTES FOR MARCH 21, 1994
Page 2
B. Temporarily mark stakes with flag or post.
C. Later, we will mark the corners with some type of landscape. This could be a rock,
a tree, etc., that are typical in type to the wooded property. The marker would be
natural in look, but serve the purpose to easily identify the park boarder.
VI. OTHER DONATIONS
A. Bowling alley would like to be involved.
B. Dave Bechtold recommended that with funding available for the short term projects,
that we might give some consideration to long term projects. The subcommittee
agreed that it is time to look at obtaining funding for items such as the interpretive
center, etc.
MOTION: Tom Reller moved to continue fine tuning request to the Lions, Bowling Alley,
USPCI, etc., for the development of Carrolls Woods. SECOND by Deanna Simpson. All
voted in favor.
VII. INTERN
A. Dave Bechtold has submitted a grant requesting funding to be used for the
employment of an intern who could complete work in Carrolls Woods.
B. If the grant is not approved, a part-time seasonal person will be hired to help with
our projects. (Plant identification, results of herbicide uses and various cutting
methods used, etc.)
C. Matching funds for the grant and/or the funding for the seasonal part-time person
would come from the encumbered account 202-4415. Remaining dollars were
identified as a potential for funding this type of part-time work.
VIII. SCHWARZ PARK TRAIL
A. Keep it rustic with wood chips.
B. This trail was cut in a long time ago and will not take a great deal of cutting to
complete.
C. Trail will be kept narrow.
D. Rick will get back to the subcommittee at the next meeting as to how much cutting
or work he feels is involved.
Those coming to the woods for the buckthorn project on April 9th should check out
this site and give comment at the next meeting.
NOTE: Lacelle should get names of volunteers who would be interested in
volunteering for the brush work on April 9th. Contact with these volunteers
should be made to invite them to join us again for the chipping project,
IX. Check on survey markers on the west boarder. We should identify how the northwest
access point is working out and where the developer has the last lines set.
X. Meeting was adjourned at 7:30 p.m.
SPECIAL NOTE: Mike Busho asked for volunteers to help out at the World Ringette
Tournament that was being held at the Community Center.
3-21 min.cw
CARROLLS WOODS COMMITTEE
FEBRUARY 28, 1994
Members present: Mike Busho, Loretta Loesch, Ed Howard, Deanna Simpson
Staff: Rick Cook, LaCelle Cordes, Mark Joosten, Dave Bechtold
Discussion was held with everyone giving their opinion of the trail paths
selected in the southwest access corner. The walk-through on February 26th
generated favorable comments and suggestions by the committee, resulting
in agreement of the trails by all present committee members.
Mike Busho made the motion to authorize the city staff to proceed with the
southwest entrance into the park and make the trail as presented in the
walk-through Saturday February 26th with the park board; deviating from
the master plan approximately 150 ft to the south, over the south ridge,
down through the drainage ditch, across existing trail and proceeding on
to the northeast to connect with the existing Halloween trail. We will be
fabricating a new map with the new location of the trail to be presented
to the park board.
Deanna Simpson seconded the motion.
Motion passed.
August will be a target date for limerooking the new trail, or as soon as
drier weather permits.
We will discuss the next buckthorn cutting schedule at our March meeting.
When the snow melts, OSM will survey and plot property lines. They feel
this will be an easy project, and not very expensive. Dave will bring
back cost estimates.
Dave Bechtold has applied for a grant to hire an intern to assist in
Carrolls Woods. Applications must be in by March 4.
Ed Howard made a motion for city staff to recruit personnel to help with
documentation of Carrolls Woods, i.e., species of wildlife, herbicide
results, maps and documentation.
Mike Busho seconded the motion.
All in favor - motion passed.
Park department has written a grant to purchase 19 acres for prairie land.
This is just north of Carrolls Woods and south of the pipeline.
Approximate cost is $228,000 or $12,000 per acre. This proposed purchase
is in the park master plan. Money would come out of park dedication and
grant money. Right now there is approximately $120,000 in park dedication,
but this is for many projects not just Carrolls Woods. However, Dave has
applied to use that money only because it identifies a natural source. It
would be preferable to obtain a grant. Grant applications have to be in by
March 15. Grant office will work with the city until August 1, trying to
correct any mistakes, or improve any language. This is for a 1995 grant. A
grant assures title to the property.
Dave passed out an updated financial statement to members and explained
line totals. Donations are used Dolor* encumbered tunas tberetore tntrut
funds are expired.
Mike Busho is going to ask USPCI for further funding for landscaping at
entrance, laminated trailhead maps with locations, limerock for 1500 ft of
trail, small gate at east access, culvert, bridge. Recognition to USPCI
would be made on plaque at entrance.
Loretta Loesch resigned as secretary of committee. City staff will take
care of minutes to the meetings.
Mike Busho made a motion to ask Scott Rynerson to join CArrolls Woods
committee.
Ed Howard seconded the motion.
Motion passed and Scott Rynerson accepted.
Next meeting of the committee will be March 21st at 6:30 p.m. in council
chambers before the Park Board meeting.
Meeting adjourned.
CARROLLS WOODS COM14ITTEE
JAWWi 24, 1994
Mer±be_s pre--ent: M_ke Butho, Ed H=wa}di Lcrstta Desch; Tom Rallati
Deanna Simpson
Staff: Dave Bechtold, Rick Cook, :.aCelle Cordes, Mark Joosten
City staff will tape record Carrolls Woods Committee meetings at a khmd ug
to notes taken.
Committee membership was discussed. In response to the letter sent out by
D. Bechtold, two committee members responded. Marie Jensen would like to
remain on the mailing list but not as an active member of the committee.
Dan Bolting cannot make it to the meetings, but would still like to keep
appral=ed of developments and s$$vr as An information resource for the
committee.
City has marked three color -coded trails - the south trail, north trail,
and the interconnecting trail where the two would merge. These trails are
at the southwest access. Dave has formally requested maps from the city
engineering department of the area.
Ed made a motion to request city engineering to survey the south and west
borders of the woods to identify property lines. Mike seconded the motion.
Date is an open issue.
Ed also made the motion to look at the opportunity to use trees or other
natural vegetation to identify boundaries on the south and west side and
to do so no later than May 31. Mike seconded the motion.
A walk through date to look at the trail markings has been set
for February 12th. Neat at the southwest corner at 1:00 p.m.
Park on Cobbler Avenue and enter there. February 26th will be the
alternate date.
Certificates have been made to present to students acknowledging their
work in Carrolls Woods.
Mike asked for input with regards to what type of entrance we want at
southwest corner. Some suggestions were 1) trail head sign labeled
"Carrolls Woods", 2) small kiosk, 3) sheltered trail marker with back
showing the trail system. Some type of recognition to the USPCI should be
included in honor of the funds they have made available to the Carrolls
Woods projects. A sign at the front of the trail would be appropriate.
Discussion turned to bridge(s) at the southwest corner. How long of a
bridge needed would depend upon which trail is chosen as the southwest
access and how much is dredged. Dredging does need to be done in that area
and is not contingent upon any one trail being selected. If the farthest
south trail is chosen, a bridge would be needed there and could become
costly. A culvert and dredging could be done at the same time.
A culvert with limerock trail may be a viable option in place of a bridge.
'•-Wood railing can be put along the culvert giving the appearance of a
bridge. This option would enable a bobcat to get through for maintenance
and such. A bridge would have to be built strong enough to hold the
bobcat. Thus, a foot bridge wouldn't be feasible.
Deanna suggested planting trees and shrubs along the 24 ft. easement at
the trail entrance. This would provide a buffer for property owners.
If the committee is to approach USPCI for further funding, we can give
them specific items for consideration - reforestation, limerock, culvert,
etc.
Dave will provide a balance of funds for Carrolls Woods.
Next projected buckthorn cutting is sometime in March.
At the next meeting committee should decide if we should add members and
discuss membership.
Tom Reller suggested members should keep track if any plant or wild life
has changed since buckthorn cutting. This reeds to be an ongoing
observation. It can't be done in a week or a month or the validity and
credibility of the project may be questioned.
Ed made the suggestion that as Mark is applying the herbicide he can do a
30 - 60 - 90 day ongoing review of the area to determine the ramifications
of the herbicides. He also suggested parameters could be drawn up to
perhaps offer an internship; see if fund balance can handle internship
position.
Dave said he would contact Faribault and Dan Belting to see what they are
doing to track their progress in eliminating buckthorn.
Next regular meeting of the Carrolls Woods committee is Monday,
February 28th, at 6:30 p.m. at city hall.
Meeting adjourned.
GOAL SETTING SESSION FOR CARROLLS WOODS
SUMMARY
JUNE 28, 1994
Possible Short Term Goals:
1. Identify & mark boundaries (west and south side only). Begin with west side and
proceed to south side.
2. Research prospective winter usage and activities.
3. Identify existing funding sources and communicate City budget process to Committee
members.
4. Continue buckthorn eradication. Solicit volunteers. Follow identified areas in Master
Plan.
5. Clarify trails & develop trail map.
6. Develop vegetation management plan.
7. Complete trail construction between the southwest access and Halloween Trail.
Include culvert.
8. Develop and maintain foot path on west side of Schwarz Pond.
Possible Long Term Goals:
1. Plan and construct an interpretive center.
2. Develop an outdoor education program. Network with schools.
3. Develop and implement a marketing plan.
4. Initiate a trust fund for Carrolls Woods.
5. Continue buckthorn eradication.
6. Continue trail construction as outlined in Master Plan. Include signage, kiosks, and
landscaping on east access.
7. Acquire and develop Kelly Trust Prairie Area.
Cc��\�s v��,c�
`�����o�
�-�����