HomeMy WebLinkAbout6.h. Request by Appro Development for Final Plat Approval for Biscayne Business Park
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
City Council Regular Meeting: July 16, 2019
AGENDA ITEM: 19-37-FP: Request by Appro
Development for Final Plat Approval for
Biscayne Business Park
AGENDA SECTION:
Consent
PREPARED BY: Kyle Klatt, Senior Planner AGENDA NO. 6.h.
ATTACHMENTS: Final Plat Resolution; Subdivision
Agreement; Site Location Map; Final Plat;
Updated Project Development Plans: Site
Data, Overall SWPP, Existing Site and
Removals, Utility Plan, Road and Utility
Plans, Site Plan, Hydrant Coverage,
Overall Grading, Detailed Grading, Site
Restoration, Landscaping, Lighting and
Photometric Plan; City Engineer Review
Memo; Parks and Recreation Review
Memo
APPROVED BY: LJM
RECOMMENDED ACTION: The Planning Commission and Staff recommend the City
Council adopt the following motions:
1) Motion to adopt a Resolution Approving the final plat for Biscayne Business Park
subject to conditions.
2) Motion to approve the Subdivision Agreement for Biscayne Business Park and
Authorizing the Mayor and Clerk to enter into this Agreement.
SUMMARY
Applicant: Jim Connelly, Appro Development, 21476 Grenada Avenue,
Lakeville, MN
Property Owner: Tom Stordahl, 1001 Main Street East, Wabasha, MN
Comp. Guide Plan Designation: BP – Business Park
Current Zoning: BP/PUD – Business Park/Planned Unit Development
Gross Area: 15.32 Acres
Net Area: 14.55 Acres
Lots/Units: 8 Lots
The City Council is being asked to consider a Final Plat request from Jim Connelly of Appro Development
for Biscayne Business Park to create eight lots associated with the City’s recent approval of a planned unit
development (PUD) on the site. The applicant intends to build an 18,000 square foot building on Lot 1,
Block 1 shortly after final plat approval, and then will market the remaining lots to individuals or
companies looking for office, manufacturing, and warehousing space. The final plat is necessary to
facilitate subdivision of the property into individual lots along with the required street dedication over
Biscayne Avenue. Staff finds the application consistent with the Biscayne Business Park Preliminary Plat
and recommends approval of this application subject to the conditions listed above.
PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT
The Planning Commission reviewed the final plat for Biscayne Business Park at its June 25, 2019 meeting
and voted unanimously to approve the request as part of the consent agenda.
BACKGROUND
The Planning Commission reviewed a preliminary plat and planned unit development (PUD) master
development plan for Biscayne Business Park at its April 23, 2019 meeting. The City Council approved
the preliminary plat and PUD plans at its May 21, 2019 meeting based on the recommendation of the
Planning Commission. The applicant has subsequently submitted a final plat for the entire project area,
which will create eight individual lots as described within the overall master PUD development plan. The
final plat will cover the entire PUD area, which will allow the applicant to complete mass grading for the
entire site and install the private road to serve each of the individual lots. Future lot buyers will then be
able to construct buildings consistent with the master PUD development plan without needing to further
subdivide the property or perform additional mass grading on their lot.
Because the property is zoned BP – Business Park/PUD, permit review for building construction will be
conducted administratively consistent with the BP ordinance. The applicant has previously provided
preliminary building details for Lot 1, Block 1, and these plans will serve as the template for future lot
development within the business park. The approved PUD agreement allows for variation in the materials
and colors of individual buildings as long as they remain consistent with the general design proposed for
Lot 1. Additionally, all future buildings will need to conform to the City’s architectural review
requirements listed in the BP district development standards. The first building is being constructed as a
spec building, and the applicant has not identified a specific user for the site in advance of the Planning
Commission meeting. Since the proposed final plat incorporates all of the Biscayne Business Park PUD
area, the applicant will not need to come forward with another final plat before building any future
structures within the PUD development area.
ISSUE ANALYSIS
Legal Authority. The final plat application is Quasi-Judicial because the City has a set of standards and
requirements for reviewing this type of application that is described in detail below. Generally, if the final
plat meets the ordinance requirements it must be approved.
Land Use and Zoning . The proposed eight lot business park development is consistent with the land use
and zoning classifications for the project area. The subject property is guided BP – Business Park and zoned
BP/PUD Business Park with the Biscayne Business Park Planned Unit Development (PUD). As a result,
the property is subject to all the standards of the BP – Business Park zoning district as well as the specific
development standards for the project area described in the PUD. The Biscayne Business Park PUD
included deviations from the base BP zoning; the including the following:
1. Section 11-5-2.C.6.d. Driveways in Commercial, Business Park, and Industrial, and
Residential Developments: Shared driveways will be allowed with zero (0) setback to the
adjoining property.
2. Section 11-2-7 Street Access Required: Lots will be allowed to be platted without access to
a public street; all access to individual lots will occur from a private street.
Overall, the final plat conforms to the BP district standards and Biscayne Business Park PUD requirements,
with the smallest lot within the final plat at 1.41 acres (one acre required) and the width of the narrowest lot
at 214 feet (120 feet required). Many of the other standards will be addressed at the building permit stage
when an individual site survey is reviewed by the City.
2
Final Plat. Standards for reviewing subdivision requests are detailed in Title 12 of the Rosemount City
Code. This section of the Code outlines the two-step Preliminary and Final Plat process for land
subdivision. In this case, the preliminary plat was approved on May 21st consisting of eight lots. The
current application proposes to plat all eight of these lots for Biscayne Business Park and to dedicate the
easements necessary to construct the storm water retention areas within the overall project area. The
developer has been working to address the City’s preliminary plat review comments and the updated site
and development plans reflect some of this work.
The majority of the staff review comments concerning the project were incorporated into the
PUD/preliminary plat review memorandum and supporting documentation. Some of the updates to the
previous review are noted as follows:
Parks and Open Space. The City’s Parks and Recreation Department had previously recommended
that the City accept a fee in lieu of land dedication for the entire subdivision because there are no
planned municipal parks in the area. Based on the amount of land within the subdivision and City’s
current fee schedule, the applicant will need to pay a fee of $112,880 for the entire plat area. The City
is willing to either accept this payment with the final plat, or to allocate the fee throughout the
subdivision with each individual building permit. If the applicant elects to pay the fee at the time of
each building permit, the fee per lot will be calculated on a pro-rated basis consistent with the
adopted fee schedule in time at the time of each permit.
Storm Water Management. The City’s previous review identified two major areas of concern with
the overall storm water management plan for the subdivision. First, the City wanted to see some
consolidation of the storm water retention basins planned on each individual lot. After further
reviewing these comments, the developer has made minor modifications to the overall system, but
still is planning for a series of small interconnected ponds within each lot. Staff believes the system
will function properly overall, but is concerned about the long-term ownership and maintenance of
each pond, especially since the City is ultimately responsible for the basins under its city-wide MS4
(Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System) permit. To address the long-term maintenance issue, staff
is recommending that an overall master association for the business park assume responsibility for
maintenance of the entire storm water ponding system. This will help ensure that eight individual lot
owners will not be directly responsible for eight smaller pond systems on their lots.
Landscaping . The developer has updated the landscape plan to include nine additional plantings
along Biscayne Avenue that will be installed in conjunction with the overall site grading and
construction of the proposed building on Lot 1, Block 1. A site-specific landscape plan must be
submitted with each individual building permit and final site development plan associated with all of
the other lots within the subdivision.
Engineering . All public improvements depicted on the preliminary development plans are included
on the attached submission materials. The City Engineer has provided a review memorandum for the
proposed final plat, and all issues identified by the City Engineer must be addressed prior to the
release of the final plat for recording.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff and the Planning Commission are recommending approval of the final plat, subject to conditions,
based on the information provided by the applicant and reviewed within this report.
3
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2019-
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT FOR BISCAYNE BUSINESS PARK
WHEREAS, Appro Development, 21476 Grenada Avenue, Lakeville, MN, (Applicant) has submitted an
application to the City of Rosemount for a Plat concerning property legally described as follows:
The South Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 32, Township 115, Range 19, except the West
1645.05 feet and except the South 656.14 feet, Dakota County, Minnesota.
WHEREAS, on June 25, 2019, the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount reviewed the Final Plat
for Biscayne Business Park; and
WHEREAS, on June 25, 2019, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Final Plat for
Biscayne Business Park, subject to conditions; and
WHEREAS, on July 16, 2019, the City Council of the City of Rosemount reviewed the Planning
Commission’s recommendations and the Final Plat for Biscayne Business Park.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Rosemount hereby
approves the Final Plat for Biscayne Business Park, subject to the following conditions:
1. Execution of a Subdivision Agreement.
2. Provision of $112,880 for Fee-in-Lieu of Park Dedication for the entire subdivision. This fee
may also be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit for each lot in the amount
consistent with the City’s most recent fee schedule or any updates.
3. The applicant shall create a master association that will assume maintenance responsibility for
all shared roads, driveways, and stormwater infiltration and retention basins in accordance
with approved Stormwater management Mainenance Plan for Biscayne Business Park.
4. Compliance with the conditions and standards within the City Engineer’s Memorandum dated
June 19, 2019.
ADOPTED this 16th day of July 2019, by the City Council of the City of Rosemount.
__________________________________________
William H. Droste, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________________
Erin Fasbender, City Clerk
Biscayne Business Park
July / 2019
G:\ENGPROJ\2019-11 Biscayne Business Park\Subdivisionagreement 2019-11.docx
SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT
Biscayne Business Park
AGREEMENT dated this ________ day of ________________________, 2019, by and between the
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT, a Minnesota municipal corporation, (the "City"), and STORDAHL PARTNERSHIP,
L.L.L.P., a Minnesota limited liability limited partnership (the "Developer").
1. Request for Plat Approval. The Developer has asked the City to approve the subdivision of land
and a plat of land to be known as Biscayne Business Park, which land is legally described on
ATTACHMENT ONE, attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof (hereinafter referred to as the
“Subject Property”).
2. Conditions of Plat Approval. The City has approved the subdivision and the plat on the following
conditions:
a. Incorporation of recommendations of the City Engineer concerning design and installation of
public infrastructure and including grading, erosion control, streets and utilities.
b. Execution of a Subdivision or Development Agreement to secure the public and private
improvements.
c. Payment of all applicable fees including GIS, Park Dedication and other fees identified in the
current fee schedule.
d. Incorporation of any easements necessary to accommodate drainage, ponding, trails,
underpasses, conservation areas, streets and utilities.
e. Payment of $73,937 for the Developer’s share of Biscayne Avenue improvements, as indicated
on Exhibit B (Development Fees Paragraph, number 5).
f. Payment of $3,630 for the future removal of the sanitary sewer connection, as indicated on
Exhibit B (Development Fees Paragraph, number 6).
3. Phased Development. The City may refuse to approve final plats of subsequent additions of the
plat if the Developer has breached this Agreement and the breach has not been remedied.
Development of subsequent phases may not proceed until Subdivision Agreements for such phases
are approved by the City.
4. Effect of Subdivision Approval. For two (2) years from the date of this Agreement, no
amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, except an amendment placing the plat in the current
Biscayne Business Park
July / 2019
G:\ENGPROJ\2019-11 Biscayne Business Park\Subdivisionagreement 2019-11.docx
urban service area, or official controls shall apply to or affect the use, development density, lot size,
lot layout or dedications of the approved plat unless required by state or federal law or agreed to in
writing by the City and the Developer. Thereafter, notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the
contrary, to the full extent permitted by state law, the City may require compliance with any
amendments to the City's Comprehensive Guide Plan, official controls, platting or dedication
requirements enacted after the date of this Agreement.
5. Development Plans. The Subject Property shall be developed in accordance with the following
plans, specifications and contract documents, original copies of which are on file with the City
Engineer. The plans and contract documents may be prepared, subject to City approval, after
entering this Agreement, but before commencement of any work on the Subject Property. If the
plans vary from the written terms of this Agreement, the written terms shall control. The plans are:
Plan A - Plat
Plan B - Soil Erosion Control Plan and Schedule
Plan C - Drainage and Storm Water Runoff Plan
Plan D - Plans and Specifications for Public and Private Improvements
Plan E - Grading Plan and House Pad Elevations
Plan F - Street Lights
Plan G - Landscape Improvements
All Improvements, including Developer Improvements and City-Installed Public Infrastructure
Improvements (if any) that lie within the public right-of-way or easements and are improvements
listed in Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.021 (hereinafter Public Improvements) will be designed by
the Developer and must be approved by the City Engineer. The Developer will prepare plans and
specifications for Public Improvements which shall be approved by the City Engineer. Such
approvals shall not be unreasonably withheld and the City shall approve or provide Developer with
necessary revision comments within 30 calendar days of Developer submittal of Public Improvement
plans and specifications. The City will perform all construction inspection for the Public
Improvements, at the Developer’s expense. Construction inspection includes but is not limited to
inspection, documentation, and monitoring.
6. Installation by Developer. The Developer shall install or cause to be installed and pay for the
following, hereinafter referred to as the “Developer Improvements”:
A. Surveying and staking
B. Surface improvements (paved streets, sidewalks, trails, etc.)
C. Water main improvements
D. Sanitary sewer improvements
E. Storm sewer improvements
F. Setting of lot and block monuments
G. Gas, electric, telephone, and cable lines
H. Site grading
I. Landscaping
Biscayne Business Park
July / 2019
G:\ENGPROJ\2019-11 Biscayne Business Park\Subdivisionagreement 2019-11.docx
J. Streetlights
K. Other items as necessary to complete the development as stipulated herein or in other
agreements
7. Time of Performance. The Developer shall install all required improvements, excepting the wear
course of pavement, enumerated in Paragraph 6 that will serve the Subject Property by December 31,
2019, subject to delays due to inclement weather, casualty, labor strikes, material shortages, or other
force majeure not within the Developer’s reasonable control. The pavement wear course shall be
completed by December 31, 2020. The Developer may, however, request an extension of time from
the City. If an extension is granted, it shall be conditioned upon updating the security posted by the
Developer to reflect cost increases and the extended completion date.
8. City-Installed Public Infrastructure. The following improvements, hereinafter referred to as “City-
Installed Public Infrastructure Improvements” (known as City Project 2019-11), shall be designed,
inspected, surveyed and administered by the City, and installed in the Subject Property at Developer
expense by a Contractor selected by the City through the public bidding process:
A. None
9. [This Section Intentionally Left Blank]
10. Security for Developer Improvements. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Agreement,
payment of the costs of all Developer Improvements, and construction of all Developer
Improvements (as noted in Paragraph 6), the Developer shall furnish the City with a cash deposit or
irrevocable letter of credit from a local bank (“security”) in the amount of Nine Hundred Sixty-One
Thousand, Five Hundred Eighty-Two Dollars ($961,582). The amount of the security was calculated
as follows:
Private Improvements Cost 110%
Grading & Erosion Control $53,620 $58,982
Pond Restoration and Erosion Control Removal $25,000 $27,500
Survey Monumentation $4,000 $4,400
Landscaping (35 trees) $10,500 $11,550
Street Lighting (2 lights) $8,000 $8,800
Surface Improvements $523,374 $575,712
Storm Sewer Improvements $38,107 $41,918
Public Improvements Cost 125%
Water Main Improvements $104,736 $130,919
Sanitary Sewer Improvements $81,441 $101,801
Total $848,778 $961,582
Refer to Exhibit A and Exhibit B for an explanation of each item.
The bank and form of the letter of credit or other security shall be subject to the approval of the City
Administrator. The letter of credit shall be automatically renewable until the City releases the
Developer from responsibility. The letter of credit shall secure compliance with all terms of this
Agreement and all obligations of the Developer under it. The City may draw down on the letter of
credit without notice if the obligations of the Developer have not been completed as required by this
Agreement. In the event of a default under this Subdivision Agreement by the Developer, the City
shall furnish the Developer with written notice by certified mail of Developer’s default(s) under the
terms of this Subdivision Agreement. If the Developer does not remove said default(s) within two (2)
Biscayne Business Park
July / 2019
G:\ENGPROJ\2019-11 Biscayne Business Park\Subdivisionagreement 2019-11.docx
weeks of receiving notice, the City may draw on the letter of credit and take such steps as it deems
necessary to remedy the default. With City approval, the letter of credit may be reduced from time to
time as financial obligations are paid and Developer Improvements and other Developer obligations
are completed to the City’s requirements.
11. Grading Plan/Site Grading. Site grading shall be completed by the Developer at its cost and
approved by the City Engineer. The completion of grading activities will need to be coordinated by
the City in conjunction with the installation of utilities. Developer shall furnish the City Engineer
satisfactory proof of payment for the site grading work and shall submit a certificate of survey of the
development to the City as the site grading is completed by phase, with street and lot grades. If the
installation of utilities by the City is occurring simultaneously with the grading, the utility contractor
shall have preference over the grading activities. No substantial grading activities can be completed
over installed utilities unless otherwise protected. All improvements to the lots and the final grading
shall comply with the grading plan as submitted and shall be the responsibility of the Developer.
12. License. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a
license to enter the Subject Property to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the
City. Such license shall terminate as to all lots within the Subject Property upon acceptance by the
City of the public infrastructure improvements.
13. Erosion Control. Prior to site grading, and before any utility construction is commenced or building
permits are issued, the erosion control plan, Plan B, shall be implemented, inspected and approved by
the City. All areas disturbed by the excavation and backfilling operations shall be reseeded within 72
hours after the completion of the work in that area. Except as otherwise provided in the erosion
control plan, seed shall be rye grass or other fast-growing seed suitable to the existing soil to provide a
temporary ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be mulched and disc-anchored as
necessary for seed retention.
All basement and/or foundation excavation spoil piles shall be kept completely off City right-of-way
and shall be completely surrounded with an approved erosion control silt fence. Approved erosion
control shall be installed around the perimeter of each lot or at City-approved locations at the time of
building permit issuance and remain in place until the lot is seeded or sodded. A 20-foot opening will
be allowed on each lot for construction deliveries.
The parties recognize that time is critical in controlling erosion. If development does not comply with
the erosion control plan and schedule, or supplementary instructions received from the City, the City
may take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion. This right also applies to the required
erosion control for basement and/or foundation excavation spoil piles. The City will attempt to
notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect
the Developer’s or City’s rights or obligations hereunder. If the Developer does not reimburse the
City for any cost the City incurred for such work within thirty (30) days, the City may draw down the
letter of credit to pay any costs. No development will be allowed, and no building permits will be
issued unless the Subject Property is in full compliance with the erosion control requirements.
14. Planting and Seeding. Landscaping shall be in accordance with Landscape Plans approved by the
City Planner.
15. Clean up. The Developer shall clean streets of dirt and debris that has resulted from construction
work by the Developer, its agents or assignees. The City will inspect the site on a weekly basis and
determine whether it is necessary to take additional measures to clean dirt and debris from the streets.
After a 24-hour verbal notice to the Developer, the City will complete or contract to complete the
clean-up at the Developer’s expense in accordance with the procedures specified in Paragraph 13. The
Biscayne Business Park
July / 2019
G:\ENGPROJ\2019-11 Biscayne Business Park\Subdivisionagreement 2019-11.docx
Developer shall inspect and, if necessary, clean all catch basins, sumps, and ponding areas of
erosion/siltation and restore to the original condition at the end of construction within this
development. All silt fence and other erosion control should be removed following the establishment
of turf. These items are to be secured through the letter of credit as is noted in Exhibit A.
16. Ownership of Improvements. Upon completion and City acceptance of the work and construction
required by this Agreement, the Public Improvements lying within public rights-of-way and easements
shall become City property without further notice or action unless the improvements are specifically
identified herein as private infrastructure. Sanitary sewer and water main are Public Improvements.
All other improvements are Private Improvements.
17. Warranty. The Developer warrants all work required to be performed by it against poor material and
faulty workmanship for a period of two (2) years after its completion and acceptance by the City or
such longer period as is specified in plans and specifications for Public Improvements.
All trees, grass and sod shall be warranted to be alive, of good quality and disease free for twenty-four
(24) months after planting.
Vegetation surrounding ponds and/or wetlands shall be warranted to be alive, of good quality and
weed free for three (3) years after planting.
For each pond/wetland in the development, the Developer [or, after the formation of the association
of owners of the various lots comprising the Subject Property (the “Association”), the Association]
shall provide to the City Engineer an inspection report by July 31 each year which includes the
following:
A. Date of inspection
B. Name of person responsible for inspection
C. Photos of the pond/wetland area confirming the vegetation is established as intended
D. Maintenance plan describing the required maintenance activities and tentative schedule.
18. Responsibility for Costs.
A. Except as otherwise specified herein, the Developer shall pay all costs incurred by it or the City
in conjunction with the development of the Subject Property including, but not limited to, Soil
and Water Conservation District charges, legal, planning, engineering and inspection expenses
incurred in connection with approval and acceptance of the subdivision and the plat, the
preparation of this Agreement and any amendments hereto, and all costs and expenses incurred
by the City in monitoring and inspecting the development of the Subject Property.
B. The Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the preparation and enforcement of
this Agreement, including engineering and attorney’s fees. Upon request, the City shall provide
invoices, in reasonable detail, as to any such fees. The estimated City fees of $153,752 shall be
deposited with the City at the time this Agreement is signed, and represent the following
amounts:
$112,149 Engineering Fees (15% of construction estimate)
$2,000 Attorney Fees
$37,383 5% City Fees (based on construction estimate of $747,658)
$1,440 Streetlight Energy Cost
$300 6 wetland buffer signs purchased from the City
$480 GIS Fees
$153,752 Total Amount Due
Biscayne Business Park
July / 2019
G:\ENGPROJ\2019-11 Biscayne Business Park\Subdivisionagreement 2019-11.docx
If the actual City fees exceed this estimate, the Developer shall pay the additional costs to the
City within ten (10) days of the request. If actual City fees are lower than this estimate, any
surplus funds will be returned to the Developer when the project fund is reconciled and closed.
C. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under
this Agreement within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the City
may halt development work and construction including, but not limited to, the issuance of
building permits for lots that the Developer may or may not have sold, until the bills are paid in
full. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of nine percent (9%)
per year.
E. The Developer shall pay all energy costs for street lights installed within the Subject Property
incurred prior to the recording of a declaration against the Subject Property in the Office of the
Dakota County Recorder or Registrar of Titles, whereby the Association shall agree to pay such
energy costs.
19. Indemnification. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers, agents and employees harmless
from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from
plat or subdivision approval and development of the Subject Property, except for any costs or
expenses arising from the intentional acts or gross negligence of the City, it’s agents, employees or
contractors. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers, agents and employees for all
costs, damages or expenses that the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including
attorney’s fees.
20. Insurance. The Developer agrees to take out and maintain or cause to be taken out and maintained
until six months after the City has accepted the Subdivision Improvements, public liability and
property damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage
which may arise out of Developer’s work or the work of its contractors or subcontractors. Liability
limits shall not be less than $500,000 when the claim is one for death by wrongful act or omission or
for any other claim and $2,000,000 for any number of claims arising out of a single occurrence, and
twice said limits when the claim arises out of the release or threatened release of a hazardous
substance. The City shall be named as an additional insured on the policy. The certificate of insurance
shall provide that the City must be given the same advance written notice of the cancellation of the
insurance as is afforded to the Developer.
21. Utility Fees. The Developer agrees to pay fees, charges and assessments set forth in this Paragraph
prior to, or at the time of execution of any plat by the City:
A. Storm Sewer Trunk Area Charges in the amount of $83,684
B. Sanitary Sewer Trunk Area Charges in the amount of $16,469
C. Watermain Trunk Area Charges in the amount of $99,580
D. Developer share of Biscayne Avenue improvements in the amount of $73,937
E. Deposit for removal of sewer connection in the amount of $3,630
Or other amounts for such fees as in effect at the time of plat approval.
22. Park Dedication and Service Charges. The Developer understands that builders will be required to
pay for the Subject Property fees, charges and assessments in effect at the time of issuance of building
permits. The rates for each of these items will be set according to the current rate structure at the time
Biscayne Business Park
July / 2019
G:\ENGPROJ\2019-11 Biscayne Business Park\Subdivisionagreement 2019-11.docx
the building permit is received. The fees, charges, and assessments in effect as of the date of this
agreement are:
A. Park dedication fees in the amount of $112,880 ($14,110 to be collected with each building
permit application)
B. Metropolitan Council Environmental Services Availability Charges per SAC unit; SAC rate
determined by Metropolitan Council (current rate is $2,485)
C. Storm Sewer Connection Charges (STAAC) (currently $2,270 per acre for business park, public,
institutional, commercial, and industrial)
D. Sanitary Sewer Availability Charges per SAC unit (currently at $1,200/SAC unit)
E. Water Availability Charge is dependent upon water meter size. Current fee schedule is as
follows:
Meter Size Charge
1” $9,850
1.5” $14,700
2” $19,600
3” $29,450
4” $34,350
6” $39,250
8” $44,150
23. Building Permits. No occupancy permits shall be issued until:
A. The site grading is completed and approved by the City.
B. All utilities are tested, approved by the City Engineer, and in service.
C. All curbing is installed and backfilled.
D. The first lift of bituminous is in place and approved by the City.
E. All building permit fees are paid in full.
F. No early building permits will be issued without prior authorization from the City Building
Official.
The Developer, in executing this Agreement, assumes all liability and costs for damage or delays
incurred by the City in the construction of the Improvements caused by the Developer, its employees,
contractors, subcontractors, material men or agents. No occupancy permits shall be issued until the
streets and utilities referred to in Paragraph 6 are installed and approved by the City (excluding the
final wear course of bituminous), unless otherwise authorized in writing by the City Engineer.
24. Record Drawings. At project completion, Developer shall submit record drawings of all public and
private infrastructure improvements in accordance with the City’s Engineering Guidelines. No
securities will be fully released until all record drawings have been submitted and accepted by the City
Engineer.
25. Developer’s Default. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be
performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall
promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer is first
given notice of the work in default, not less than 48 hours in advance. This Agreement is a license for
the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a court order for permission to enter
the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, draw on
Biscayne Business Park
July / 2019
G:\ENGPROJ\2019-11 Biscayne Business Park\Subdivisionagreement 2019-11.docx
the letter of credit or other security described in Paragraph 10, or levy the cost in whole or in part as a
special assessment against the Subject Property. Developer waives its rights to notice of hearing and
hearing on such assessments and its right to appeal such assessments pursuant to Minnesota Statutes,
Section 429.081.
26. Miscellaneous.
A. The Developer represents to the City that the development of the Subject Property, the
subdivision and the plat comply with all city, county, metropolitan, state and federal laws and
regulations including, but not limited to: subdivision ordinances, zoning ordinances and
environmental regulations. If the City determines that the subdivision, or the plat, or the
development of the Subject Property does not comply, the City may, at its option, refuse to
allow construction or development work on the Subject Property until the Developer does
comply. Upon the City’s demand, the Developer shall cease work until there is compliance.
B. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Agreement.
C. Breach of the terms of this Agreement by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of building
permits, including lots sold to third parties.
D. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph or phase of this Agreement is for
any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of
this Agreement.
E. If building permits are issued prior to the completion and acceptance of the Public
Improvements, the Developer assumes all liability and costs resulting from delays in
completion of the Public Improvements and damage to the Public Improvements caused by
the City, the Developer, its contractors, subcontractors, material men, employees, agents or
third parties.
F. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions
of this Agreement. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the
parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City’s failure to promptly
take legal action to enforce this Agreement shall not be a waiver or release.
G. This Agreement shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the Subject
Property. The Developer shall take such steps, including execution of amendments to this
Agreement, as are necessary to effect the recording hereof. After the Developer has completed
the work required of it under this Agreement, at the Developer’s request, the City will execute
and deliver to the Developer a recordable release of the Subject Property from this Agreement.
H. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to
every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to the
City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and
remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and
in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to
exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy.
I The Developer may not assign this Agreement without the written permission of the City
Council.
Biscayne Business Park
July / 2019
G:\ENGPROJ\2019-11 Biscayne Business Park\Subdivisionagreement 2019-11.docx
J. The Developer acknowledges that the City may issue additional requirements outside of the
2015 General Specifications and Standard Detail Plates for Street and Utility Construction or the
2008 Engineering Guidelines as the City is in the process of updating these documents. The
review process may require additional time and expense due to this process, which shall be the
Developer’s responsibility. The Developer shall not be billed for the time required for the City
to update and approve their revisions to the 2015 General Specifications and Standard Details
Plates for Street and Utility Construction or the 2008 Engineering Guidelines.
27. Notices. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to
the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by registered mail at the following
address:
Stordahl Partnership, L.L.L.P.
Attn: Thomas J. Stordahl
1001 E. Main Street
Wabasha, MN 55024
With a copy to: Jim Connelly
Appro Development
21476 Grenada Avenue
Lakeville, MN 55044
952-469-2171
jimc@approdevelopment.com
Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Administrator, or
mailed to the City by registered mail in care of the City Administrator at the following address:
City Administrator
Rosemount City Hall
2875 145th Street West
Rosemount, Minnesota 55068
Biscayne Business Park
July / 2019
G:\ENGPROJ\2019-11 Biscayne Business Park\Subdivisionagreement 2019-11.docx
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands the day and year first above
written.
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
BY:
William H. Droste, Mayor
BY:
Erin Fasbender, City Clerk
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) SS
COUNTY OF DAKOTA )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of _____________________, 2019,
by William H. Droste, Mayor, and Erin Fasbender, City Clerk, of the City of Rosemount, a Minnesota
municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City
Council.
Notary Public
STORDAHL PARTNERSHIP, L.L.L.P.
BY:
Its
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) SS
COUNTY OF _____________)
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _______ day of _______________________,
2019 by , the _______________________________ of Stordahl
Partnership, L.L.L.P., a Minnesota limited liability limited partnership, on behalf of said limited liability
limited partnership.
Notary Public
Drafted By:
City of Rosemount
2875 145th Street West
Rosemount, MN 55068
Biscayne Business Park
July / 2019
G:\ENGPROJ\2019-11 Biscayne Business Park\Subdivisionagreement 2019-11.docx
EXHIBIT A
The following clarifies the various portions of the letter of credit for Developer Improvements that are
outlined in the Subdivision Agreement:
Grading & Erosion Control – A restoration and erosion control bond to ensure re-vegetation and erosion
control ($3,500/acre). Note: The minimum surety amount is set at $25,000.
Pond Restoration/Erosion Control Removal – A security to allow for cleaning of sedimentation ponds
prior to City acceptance, and removal of any installed erosion control measures such as silt fence and wood
fiber blanket following development of 75 percent of adjoining lots (estimated lump sum).
Survey Monumentation – An amount equal to 110% of the cost to monument all lots within the
development.
Landscaping – An amount equal to 110% of the cost to complete the minimum required landscaping. If
additional landscaping is planned, a surety for that cost is not required.
Street Lighting – An amount equal to 110% of the cost to complete the minimum required lighting. If
additional lighting is planned, a surety for that cost is not required ($4,000 per light has been used to
calculate this cost).
Buffer Monumentation – An amount equal to 110% of the cost to manufacture and install the necessary
buffer monumentation signs around all ponds and wetlands ($50 per sign has been used to calculate this
cost).
Wetland Monitoring – An amount equal to 110% of the cost to hire a wetland specialist to monitor the
mitigation areas for 5 years to ensure their proper creation. This wetland specialist will be hired by the City.
Wetland Restoration/Mitigation – An amount equal to 110% of the cost to develop new wetlands should
the mitigation not be effective ($20,000 per acre of mitigation).
Biscayne Business Park
EXHIBIT B (Page 1 of 2)
No.Item Cost 110%Calculation
1 Grading and Erosion Control 53,620$ 58,982$ $3500/ac x 15.32ac Minimum $25,000
2 Pond Restoration and Erosion Control Removal 25,000$ 27,500$ Minimum $25,000
3 Survey Monumentation 4,000$ 4,400$ $500/lot x 8 lots
4 Landscaping 10,500$ 11,550$ Per City Planner, 35 trees x $300
5 Street Lights 8,000$ 8,800$ 2 lights x $4000/light
6 Surface Improvements 523,374$ 575,712$ 110%
7 Storm Sewer Improvements 38,107$ 41,918$ 110%
8 Water Main Improvements 104,736$ 130,919$ 125%
9 Sanitary Sewer Improvements 81,441$ 101,801$ 125%
Total 848,778$ 961,582$
No.Item Cost
Estimated Construction Cost 747,658$
1 Engineering Fees 112,149$
2 Deposit -$
3 Attorney Fees 2,000$
4 5% City Administrative Fees 37,383$
5 Street Light Energy Cost 1,440$
6 Buffer Monumentation 300$
7 GIS Fees 480$
8 Trail Fog Seal -$
9 Seal Coating -$
Total 153,752$
No.Item Cost
1 Storm Sewer Trunk Charge 83,684$
2 Sanitary Sewer Trunk Charge 16,469$
3 Water Trunk Charge 99,580$
5 Biscayne Avenue Improvements 73,937$
6 Deposit for Removal of Sewer Connection 3,630$
Total 277,300$
No.Item Cost
1 Park Dedication 112,880$
Total 112,880$
$8,500 per acre x 13.28 acres (not including ROW). $14,110
due with each building permit application).
Calculation
$6500/acre x 15.32 acres
N/A - Private Streets
Development Fees (due with signed agreement)
Calculation
$6865/net developable acre 12.19 acres
$1075/acre x 15.32 acres
$110/front foot x 672.15 feet
Development Fees (due with building permits)
See Attachment Two
N/A
Letter of Credit for Developer Improvements (due with signed agreement)
City Fees (due with signed agreement)
Calculation
Engineer Estimation
15% of Estimated Construction Cost
Estimate
5% of Estimated Construction Cost
2 lights x 24 months x $30/month
$60/unit x 8 units
N/A
6 signs x $50/sign
Block Lots Units Block Lot Units SQ FT Acres
1 8 8 1 1 1 79,082.000 1.815
1 2 1 65,194.000 1.497
1 3 1 63,248.000 1.452
1 4 1 84,759.000 1.946
1 5 1 81,344.000 1.867
1 6 1 61,594.000 1.414
1 7 1 64,130.000 1.472
Total 8 8 1 8 1 78,944.000 1.812
Right-of-Way 88,941.000 2.042
Total Plat Area =15.32 acres Total Boundary 667,236.000 15.318
Total Park Area 0.00 acres
Future Plat Area =0.00 acres
Developable Area =15.32 acres *
Ponding to HWL = 3.13 acres
Net Developable Area =12.19 acres
* Excludes future plat and park areas
Biscayne Business Park
EXHIBIT B (Page 2 of 2)
Totals
Biscayne Business Park
July / 2019
G:\ENGPROJ\2019-11 Biscayne Business Park\Subdivisionagreement 2019-11.docx
ATTACHMENT ONE
Biscayne Business Park
Final Plat
BISCAYNE BUSINESS PARK
SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Stordahl Partnership, L.L.L.P., a Minnesota limited liability partnership, owner of
the following described property:
The South Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 32, Township 115, Range 19, except the West 1645.05 feet and except the
South 656.14 feet, Dakota County, Minnesota..
Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as BISCAYNE BUSINESS PARK and does hereby dedicate to the public for public use
the public way and drainage and utility easements as created by this plat.
In witness whereof said Stordahl Partnership, L.L.L.P., a Minnesota limited liability partnership, has caused these presents to be signed
by its proper partner this _______ day of ___________________, 20_____.
Signed: Stordahl Partnership, L.L.L.P.
By _____________________________________________
Tom Stordahl, Gerneral Partner
State of ____________________________
County of ____________________________
This instrument was acknowledged before me on _______________________, 20_____ by Tom Stordahl, General Partner of Stordahl
Partnership, L.L.L.P., a Minnesota limited liability partnership, on behalf of the partnership.
_______________________________________________________
Signature
_______________________________________________________
Printed
Notary Public ____________________________________________
My Commission Expires ___________________________________
SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE
I, Mark A. Schwanz, do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land
Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels
are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been, or will be correctly set within one year; that all
water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown
and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat.
Dated this _______ day of _______________________, 20_____.
_____________________________________________
Mark A. Schwanz, Licensed Land Surveyor
Minnesota License No. 45817
State of Minnesota
County of Rice
This instrument was acknowledged before me on _______________________, 20_____ by Mark A. Schwanz.
_____________________________________________
Jennifer R. Canedo
Notary Public, Minnesota
My Commission Expires January 31, 2020
CITY PLANNING COMMISSION, CITY OF ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA
Approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount, Minnesota this _______ day of _______________________, 20_____.
By: _____________________________________________, Chair
CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA
This plat was approved by the City Council of the City of Apple Valley, Minnesota at a regular meeting thereof held this _______ day of
_______________________, 20_____, and said plat is in compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2.
By: _____________________________________________, Mayor By: _____________________________________________, Chair
COUNTY SURVEYOR, COUNTY OF DAKOTA, STATE OF MINNESOTA
I hereby certify that in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 11, this plat has been reviewed and approved this _______ day of
_______________________, 20_____.
By: _____________________________________________
Todd B. Tollefson
Dakota County Surveyor
DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION AND RECORDS, COUNTY OF DAKOTA, STATE OF MINNESOTA
Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 9, taxes payable in the year 20_____ on the land hereinbefore described have been paid. Also,
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 272.12, there are no delinquent taxes and transfer entered this _______ day of ___________________,
20_____.
By: _____________________________________________
Amy A. Koethe
Director, Department of Property Taxation and Records
COUNTY RECORDER, COUNTY OF DAKOTA, STATE OF MINNESOTA
I hereby certify that this plat of BISCAYNE BUSINESS PARK was filed in the office of the County Recorder for public record on this _______ day of
___________________, 20_____, at _______ o'clock _______.M. and was duly filed in Book _________ of Plats, Page _________, as Document
Number. ______________________.
By: _____________________________________________
Amy A. Koethe
Dakota County Recorder
N89°41'05"E 995.03N00°20'03"E 670.24N89°34'26"E 993.29
N00°11'04"E 672.15259.79 50.00303.1366.00107.3950.00
NORTH 304.56EAST 672.40
N61°
5
2'
2
3"
E
70.00
70.
0
0
S6
1
°
5
2
'
2
3
"
E
L=371.10R=70.00Δ=303°44'44"260.77
70.58128.02BLOCK
1
1 N00°11'04"E 672.05OUTLOT A
BISCAYNE AVENUEEAST LINE OF S 1/2 SE 1/4
SEC. 32 - T115 - R19
N89°34'26"E 254.78
NORTH
21.41
N89°34'26"E
82.15 NORTH63.26N45°59'01"E17.87N89°34'26"E 233.85 S5
0
°
2
1
'
4
0
"E
1
9
.
1
4
SOUTH66.50N89°34'26"E 172.78 NORTH43.57N53°2
3'
5
4
"
E
15.55 N89°34'26"E 86.81S56°37'35"E16.50SOUTH41.11N89°34'26"E
59.46
N89°41'05"E 260.86NORTH45.58NORTH34.4382.10
N89°41'05"E
SOUTH70.3368.82NORTHN89°41'05"E
84.33 181.1174.35
N89°41'05"E
S00°11'04"W73.2921
.
4
0
S4
5
°
3
9
'
3
4
"
E
170.48
N89°41'05"E
35.12DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTNORTH 305.74NORTH 271.69341.34EAST 201.60328.91254.04 213.65 213.65 261.95
302.92213.65213.65257.94
136.26 213.64
EAST 610.67
EAST 610.88NORTH 299.38NORTH 300.97136.26 213.64 260.98
234
8765
L =91.38 Δ=74°4
7'2
9
"L=94.17Δ=77°04'5 3 "L=94.17Δ=77
°0
4'53"
L =9 1.3 8 Δ =7 4 °4 7'29"NORTH 262.56N18°44'25
"W
108
.58
S
4
9
°
4
0
'
1
6
"
E
1
0
3
.
2
1
2
9
.
4
3
7
3
.
7
8
N89°41'05"E 150.30
N89°41'05"E
107.23
1010 S00°11'04"W 1328.31NE CORNER S1/2 SE 1/4
SEC. 32 - T115- R19
FOUND CAST IRON MONUMENT
EAST LINE OF
S 1/2 OF SE 1/4
DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT
BISCAYNE BUSINESS PARK
Denotes Found Iron Monument
Indicates 1/2" Dia. x 18"
Long Solid Iron Pipe Set
With Plastic Cap Marked By
ISG, License No. 45817
LEGEND
BEARING NOTE:
The east line of the South Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 32,
Township 115, Range 19 is assumed to bear N00°11'04"E.
SEC. 32, TWP. 115, RGE. 19
VICINITY MAP
(NOT TO SCALE)
Dakota County, MNNW 1/4NE 1/4SE 1/4SW 1/4Biscayne AvenueC.S.A.H. No. 46 (160th Street West)
SITE
0
SCALE IN FEET
50 100
SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS
Drainage And Utility
Easements Are Shown Thus:10101010
10
Drainage And
Utility Easement
Lines
Lot Lines
Right-of-Way Line
Being 10 feet in width and adjoining lot lines,
right - of - way lines and rear lot lines, unless
otherwise indicated on the plat.
Location: Rosemount, MN
ISG Project #: 18-22185
Date: 06/24/2019
ITEM
NO.CONSTRUCTION ITEM UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL AMOUNT
1 MOBILIZATION (5%)LS 1 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$
2 ABANDON SANITARY SEWER PIPE LF 123 10.00$ 1,230.00$
3 PLUG SP-1 OUTLET IN S-2 EA 1 250.00$ 250.00$
4 REMOVE AND PATCH INSIDE DROP CONNECTION AT EX S-1 EA 1 800.00$ 800.00$
5 TURF ESTABLISHMENT LS 1 350.00$ 350.00$
3,630.00$
BISCAYNE BUSINESS PARK
APPRO DEVELOPMENT
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST
ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST
ISG
www.is-grp.com Project No. 18-22185 Page 1
NOPARKINGG
R=956.43
SAN MH
I=919.18
FO
BISCAYNE AVEEX 12" WATERMAINREGE
N
T
S
O
F
U
O
F
M
PID: 3
4
0
3
3
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
9101111S-2
EX S-1
SP-2 (8")
SP
-
1
(
8
"
)
SP-1A (8")
06/07/19 CITY COMMENTS TTK
22185 SANITARY REMOVAL
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
PROJECT
TITLE
SHEET
REVISION SCHEDULE
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
DESIGNED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE
DRAWN BY
CLIENT PROJECT NO.
REVIEWED BY
WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED
THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,
-
TTK
TTK
RAS
18-22185
06/10/2019
1
SANITARY SEWER
REMOVAL
C3-10 OVERALL SITE & UTILITY PLAN
300 22185 C3-10
APPRO
DEVELOPMENT
BISCAYNE
BUSINESS PARK
MINNESOTAROSEMOUNT
LIC. NO.DATE
LIC. NO.DATE
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONREESE SUDTELGTE
XX/XX/XXXX 54243
NOTE:
THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND
UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOES
NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN
ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT IN
MISINTERPRETATION.
0
SCALE IN FEET
40 80 120
FILL ABANDONED SANITARY SEWER
SP-1 WITH FLOWABLE FILL
CAP AND ABANDON SP-1
REMOVE AND PLUG 8" INSIDE DROP STRUCTURE AT EX S-1
REMOVE PLUG FROM SP-1A AND PLUG SP-1
CONNECT TO CITY SANITARY SEWER
Location Map—Biscayne Business Park
BISCAYNE BUSINESS PARK
SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Stordahl Partnership, L.L.L.P., a Minnesota limited liability partnership, owner of
the following described property:
The South Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 32, Township 115, Range 19, except the West 1645.05 feet and except the
South 656.14 feet, Dakota County, Minnesota..
Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as BISCAYNE BUSINESS PARK and does hereby dedicate to the public for public use
the public way and drainage and utility easements as created by this plat.
In witness whereof said Stordahl Partnership, L.L.L.P., a Minnesota limited liability partnership, has caused these presents to be signed
by its proper partner this _______ day of ___________________, 20_____.
Signed: Stordahl Partnership, L.L.L.P.
By _____________________________________________
Tom Stordahl, Gerneral Partner
State of ____________________________
County of ____________________________
This instrument was acknowledged before me on _______________________, 20_____ by Tom Stordahl, General Partner of Stordahl
Partnership, L.L.L.P., a Minnesota limited liability partnership, on behalf of the partnership.
_______________________________________________________
Signature
_______________________________________________________
Printed
Notary Public ____________________________________________
My Commission Expires ___________________________________
SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE
I, Mark A. Schwanz, do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land
Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels
are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been, or will be correctly set within one year; that all
water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown
and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat.
Dated this _______ day of _______________________, 20_____.
_____________________________________________
Mark A. Schwanz, Licensed Land Surveyor
Minnesota License No. 45817
State of Minnesota
County of Rice
This instrument was acknowledged before me on _______________________, 20_____ by Mark A. Schwanz.
_____________________________________________
Jennifer R. Canedo
Notary Public, Minnesota
My Commission Expires January 31, 2020
CITY PLANNING COMMISSION, CITY OF ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA
Approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount, Minnesota this _______ day of _______________________, 20_____.
By: _____________________________________________, Chair
CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA
This plat was approved by the City Council of the City of Apple Valley, Minnesota at a regular meeting thereof held this _______ day of
_______________________, 20_____, and said plat is in compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2.
By: _____________________________________________, Mayor By: _____________________________________________, Chair
COUNTY SURVEYOR, COUNTY OF DAKOTA, STATE OF MINNESOTA
I hereby certify that in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 11, this plat has been reviewed and approved this _______ day of
_______________________, 20_____.
By: _____________________________________________
Todd B. Tollefson
Dakota County Surveyor
DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION AND RECORDS, COUNTY OF DAKOTA, STATE OF MINNESOTA
Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 9, taxes payable in the year 20_____ on the land hereinbefore described have been paid. Also,
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 272.12, there are no delinquent taxes and transfer entered this _______ day of ___________________,
20_____.
By: _____________________________________________
Amy A. Koethe
Director, Department of Property Taxation and Records
COUNTY RECORDER, COUNTY OF DAKOTA, STATE OF MINNESOTA
I hereby certify that this plat of BISCAYNE BUSINESS PARK was filed in the office of the County Recorder for public record on this _______ day of
___________________, 20_____, at _______ o'clock _______.M. and was duly filed in Book _________ of Plats, Page _________, as Document
Number. ______________________.
By: _____________________________________________
Amy A. Koethe
Dakota County Recorder
N89°41'05"E 995.03N00°20'03"E 670.24N89°34'26"E 993.29
N00°11'04"E 672.15259.79 50.00303.1366.00107.3950.00
NORTH 304.56EAST 672.40
N61°
5
2'
2
3"
E
70.00
70.
0
0
S6
1
°
5
2
'
2
3
"
E
L=371.10R=70.00Δ=303°44'44"260.77
70.58128.02BLOCK
1
1 N00°11'04"E 672.05OUTLOT A
BISCAYNE AVENUEEAST LINE OF S 1/2 SE 1/4
SEC. 32 - T115 - R19
N89°34'26"E 254.78
NORTH
21.41
N89°34'26"E
82.15 NORTH63.26N45°59'01"E17.87N89°34'26"E 233.85 S5
0
°
2
1
'
4
0
"E
1
9
.
1
4
SOUTH66.50N89°34'26"E 172.78 NORTH43.57N53°2
3'
5
4
"
E
15.55 N89°34'26"E 86.81S56°37'35"E16.50SOUTH41.11N89°34'26"E
59.46
N89°41'05"E 260.86NORTH45.58NORTH34.4382.10
N89°41'05"E
SOUTH70.3368.82NORTHN89°41'05"E
84.33 181.1174.35
N89°41'05"E
S00°11'04"W73.2921
.
4
0
S4
5
°
3
9
'
3
4
"
E
170.48
N89°41'05"E
35.12DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTNORTH 305.74NORTH 271.69341.34EAST 201.60328.91254.04 213.65 213.65 261.95
302.92213.65213.65257.94
136.26 213.64
EAST 610.67
EAST 610.88NORTH 299.38NORTH 300.97136.26 213.64 260.98
234
8765
L =91.38 Δ=74°4
7'2
9
"L=94.17Δ=77°04'5 3 "L=94.17Δ=77
°0
4'53"
L =9 1.3 8 Δ =7 4 °4 7'29"NORTH 262.56N18°44'25
"W
108
.58
S
4
9
°
4
0
'
1
6
"
E
1
0
3
.
2
1
2
9
.
4
3
7
3
.
7
8
N89°41'05"E 150.30
N89°41'05"E
107.23
1010 S00°11'04"W 1328.31NE CORNER S1/2 SE 1/4
SEC. 32 - T115- R19
FOUND CAST IRON MONUMENT
EAST LINE OF
S 1/2 OF SE 1/4
DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT
79,082 SQ. FEET - 1.82 ACRES65,194 SQ. FEET - 1.50 ACRES63,248 SQ. FEET - 1.45 ACRES84,759 SQ. FEET - 1.95 ACRES
81,344 SQ. FEET - 1.87 ACRES 61,594 SQ. FEET - 1.41 ACRES 64,130 SQ. FEET - 1.47 ACRES 78,944 SQ. FEET - 1.81 ACRES
BISCAYNE BUSINESS PARK
Denotes Found Iron Monument
Indicates 1/2" Dia. x 18"
Long Solid Iron Pipe Set
With Plastic Cap Marked By
ISG, License No. 45817
LEGEND
BEARING NOTE:
The east line of the South Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 32,
Township 115, Range 19 is assumed to bear N00°11'04"E.
SEC. 32, TWP. 115, RGE. 19
VICINITY MAP
(NOT TO SCALE)
Dakota County, MNNW 1/4NE 1/4SE 1/4SW 1/4Biscayne AvenueC.S.A.H. No. 46 (160th Street West)
SITE
0
SCALE IN FEET
50 100
SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS
Drainage And Utility
Easements Are Shown Thus:10101010
10
Drainage And
Utility Easement
Lines
Lot Lines
Right-of-Way Line
Being 10 feet in width and adjoining lot lines,
right - of - way lines and rear lot lines, unless
otherwise indicated on the plat.
AREA TABLE:
Existing:
Total Area = 667,236 sq. ft. = 15.32 acres
Proposed:
Biscayne R/W = 33,605 sq. ft. = .77 acres
Street R/W = 55,336 sq. ft. = 1.27 acres
Lot 1, Block 1 = 79,082 sq. ft. = 1.82 acres
Lot 2, Block 1 = 65,194 sq. ft. = 1.50 acres
Lot 3, Block 1 = 63,248 sq. ft. = 1.45 acres
Lot 4, Block 1 =84,759 sq. ft. = 1.95 acres
Lot 5, Block 1 =81,344 sq. ft. = 1.87 acres
Lot 6, Block 1 = 61,594 sq. ft. = 1.41 acres
Lot 7, Block 1 = 64,130 sq. ft. = 1.47 acres
Lot 8, Block 1 = 78,944 sq. ft. = 1.81 acres
Total Area = 667,236 sq. ft. = 15.32 acres
06/07/19 CITY COMMENTS TTK
22185 C0-DATA
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
PROJECT
TITLE
SHEET
REVISION SCHEDULE
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
DESIGNED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE
DRAWN BY
CLIENT PROJECT NO.
REVIEWED BY
WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED
THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,
-
TTK
TTK
RAS
18-22185
06/10/2019
C0-10
SITE DATA SHEET
PROJECT LOCATION
N
S
W E
LOCATION MAP
0
SCALE IN FEET
2000 4000
SITE SUMMARY
ZONING:BP - BUSINESS PARK
SITE/LOT AREA:SITE = 667,236 SF / 15.32 AC LOT 1 = 79,082 SF / 1.82 AC
IMPERVIOUS AREA:SITE = 80,720 SF / 1.85 AC LOT 1 = 45,558 SF / 1.05 AC
GREENSPACE
PROVIDED:SITE = 586,516 SF / 13.46 AC LOT 1 = 33,524 SF / 0.77 AC
PARKING REQUIREMENTS (PER CITY CODE)
TYPE UNIT / AREA STALLS REQUIRED STALLS PROVIDED
OFFICE - 1 PER 200 SF GFA 3,456 SF 17 17
MANUFACTURING - 1 PER
300 SF GFA 3,456 SF 12 14
WAREHOUSE - 1 PER
2,000 SF GFA 10,368 SF 5 5
TOTAL:34 36
SETBACKS
PARKING BUILDING
FRONT YARD 20'-0"30'-0"
SIDE YARD 10'-0"10'-0"
REAR YARD 10'-0"10'-0"
PROJECT LOCATION:
MN05 T115M R19W SEC 32
THE NORTHERN HALF OF THE SW
QUARTER OF THE SW QUARTER OF
SEC 32
ROSEMOUNT TWP
ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA
B.M. ELEVATION=957.80
TIE IN NW SIDE OF PP LOCATED AT
THE SOUTHEAST PROPERTY CORNER
APPROX. 650' NORTH OF CR 46
1.ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, WHICH INCLUDE, BUT
ARE NOT LIMITED TO, THE OWNER - CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT, THE PROJECT MANUAL
(WHICH INCLUDES GENERAL SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS),
DRAWINGS OF ALL DISCIPLINES AND ALL ADDENDA, MODIFICATIONS AND CLARIFICATIONS
ISSUED BY THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER.
2.CONTRACT DOCUMENTS SHALL BE ISSUED TO ALL SUBCONTRACTORS BY THE
GENERAL CONTRACTOR IN COMPLETE SETS IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE THE FULL EXTENT AND
COMPLETE COORDINATION OF ALL WORK.
3.WRITTEN DIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS. NOTIFY
ARCHITECT/ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR CONDITIONS REQUIRING INFORMATION
OR CLARIFICATION BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.
4.FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS. NOTIFY
ARCHITECT/ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR CONDITIONS REQUIRING INFORMATION
OR CLARIFICATION BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.
5.DETAILS SHOWN ARE INTENDED TO BE INDICATIVE OF THE PROFILES AND TYPE OF
DETAILING REQUIRED THROUGHOUT THE WORK. DETAILS NOT SHOWN ARE SIMILAR IN
CHARACTER TO DETAILS SHOWN. WHERE SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS, DETAILS OR DESIGN
INTENT CANNOT BE DETERMINED, NOTIFY ARCHITECT/ENGINEER BEFORE PROCEEDING
WITH THE WORK.
6.ALL MANUFACTURED ARTICLES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE APPLIED,
INSTALLED, CONNECTED, ERECTED, CLEANED AND CONDITIONED ACCORDING TO
MANUFACTURERS' INSTRUCTIONS. IN CASE OF DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN
MANUFACTURERS' INSTRUCTIONS AND THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, NOTIFY
ARCHITECT/ENGINEER BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.
7.ALL DISSIMILAR METALS SHALL BE EFFECTIVELY ISOLATED FROM EACH OTHER TO
AVOID GALVANIC CORROSION.
8.THE LOCATION AND TYPE OF ALL INPLACE UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE FOR
GENERAL INFORMATION ONLY AND ARE ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF THE
KNOWLEDGE OF I & S GROUP, INC. (ISG). NO WARRANTY OR GUARANTEE IS IMPLIED. THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE SIZES, LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF ALL INPLACE
UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY
ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM PLAN.
9.THE CONTRACTOR IS TO CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" FOR UTILITY
LOCATIONS, MINIMUM 2 BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION / CONSTRUCTION
(1-800-252-1166).
PROJECT GENERAL NOTES
ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CITY OF ROSEMOUNT REQUIREMENTS AND
MnDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION, 2018 EDITION, THE STANDARD
SPECIFICATIONS FOR SANITARY SEWER, STORM DRAIN AND WATERMAIN AS PROPOSED BY
THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA 2013, AND CURRENT VERSION OF THE
MINNESOTA STATE PLUMBING CODE UNLESS DIRECTED OTHERWISE.
HORIZONTAL COORDINATES HAVE BEEN REFERENCED TO THE NORTH AMERICAN DATUM
OF 1983 (NAD83), 1996 ADJUSTMENT (NAD83(1996)) ON THE DAKOTA COUNTY COORDINATE
SYSTEM, IN U.S. SURVEY FEET.
ELEVATIONS HAVE BEEN REFERENCED TO THE NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF
1988 (NAVD 88).
RTK GPS METHODS WERE USED TO ESTABLISH HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL COORDINATES
FOR THIS PROJECT.
THIS PROJECT'S TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY CONSISTS OF DATA COLLECTED IN SEPTEMBER
2018 BY I&S GROUP.
SPECIFICATIONS REFERENCE
PROJECT DATUM
TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY
LEGEND
EXISTING
CITY LIMITS
ACCESS CONTROL
SECTION LINE
QUARTER SECTION LINE
RIGHT OF WAY LINE
PROPERTY / LOTLINE
EASEMENT LINE
CULVERT
WATER EDGE
WETLAND BOUNDARY
WETLAND / MARSH
WATER
FENCE LINE
STORM SEWER
SANITARY SEWER
SANITARY SEWER FORCEMAIN
CONTOUR (MAJOR)
UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE
OVERHEAD ELECTRIC
UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC
UNDERGROUND TV
GAS
UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC
CONTOUR (MINOR)
DECIDUOUS TREE
CONIFEROUS TREE
TREE LINE
MANHOLE/STRUCTURE
CATCH BASIN
HYDRANT
CURB STOP
VALVE
UTILITY PEDESTAL / CABINET
POWER POLE
990
989
PROPOSED
CULVERT
STORM SEWER
SANITARY SEWER SERVICE
WATER SERVICE
OVERHEAD ELECTRIC
UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC
UNDERGROUND TV
GAS
CONTOUR
STORM SEWER MANHOLE
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
HYDRANT
VALVE
EASEMENT
RIGHT OF WAY
1015
LOT LINE
OVERHEAD UTILITY
UNDERGROUND UTILITY
CITY OF
ROSEMOUNT
C0-10 SITE DATA SHEET
300 22185 C0-10
APPRO
DEVELOPMENT
BISCAYNE
BUSINESS PARK
MINNESOTAROSEMOUNT
LIC. NO.DATE
LIC. NO.DATE
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONREESE SUDTELGTE
XX/XX/XXXX 54243
NOTE:
THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND
UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOES
NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN
ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT IN
MISINTERPRETATION.
CIVIL SHEET INDEX
Sheet Number Sheet Title
C0-10 SITE DATA SHEET
C0-20 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT STANDARD DETAILS
C0-21 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT STANDARD DETAILS
C0-22 SITE DETAILS
C0-23 SITE DETAILS
C0-24 SITE DETAILS
C0-25 SITE DETAILS
C0-26 SITE DETAILS
C1-10 OVERALL SWPPP
C1-20 SWPPP NOTES
C1-21 SWPPP NOTES
C1-22 SWPPP NOTES
C1-23 SWPPP NOTES
C1-24 SWPPP DETAILS
C2-10 EXISTING SITE & REMOVALS PLAN
C3-10 OVERALL SITE & UTILITY PLAN
C3-20 PLANNED ROAD & UTILITY CONSTRUCTION
C3-21 PLANNED ROAD & UTILITY CONSTRUCTION
C3-22 DETAILED SITE PLAN
C3-30 UTILITY SCHEDULES
C3-40 HYDRANT COVERAGE PLAN
C4-10 OVERALL GRADING PLAN
C4-20 DETAILED GRADING PLAN
C5-10 SITE RESTORATION PLAN
C5-20 LANDSCAPING PLAN
C5-30 LANDSCAPING DETAILS AND NOTES
C6-10 SITE LIGHTING PLAN
C6-11 PHOTOMETRICS PLAN
CR RD 46CR RD 3BISCAYNE AVE145TH ST W
BONNIE PATH W
AKRON AVEPILOT KNOB RD170TH ST W
160TH ST WDIAMOND PATHCHIPPENDALE AVE W150TH ST W
145TH ST W
SANITARY SEWER
WATER
DEVELOPER:
JIM CONNELLY
APPRO DEVELOPMENT
21476 GRENADA AVE
LAKEVILLE, MN 55044
PROJECT MANAGER: REESE SUDTELGTE
EMAIL: REESE.SUDTELGTE@IS-GRP.COM
MANAGING OFFICE:
7900 INTERNATIONAL DRIVE
INTERNATIONAL PLAZA
SUITE 550
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55425
PHONE: 952.426.0699
MINNEAPOLIS /
ST. PAUL OFFICE
R=954.59
SAN MH
I=
G
R=956.43
SAN MH
I=919.18FO
I=948.22 BISCAYNE AVEI=954.77
I=955.36EX 12" WATERMAINDAKO
T
A
U
N
L
I
M
I
T
E
D
PID: 3
4
0
3
2
1
0
8
5
0
5
1
SPOW
D
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
L
L
C
PID: 3
4
0
3
2
1
0
8
5
0
4
0
METR
O
M
O
S
Q
U
I
T
O
C
O
N
T
R
O
L
PID: 3
4
0
3
2
1
0
8
5
0
1
9
PAHL
F
A
M
I
L
Y
L
I
M
I
T
E
D
P
A
R
T
N
E
R
S
H
I
P
PID: 3
4
0
3
2
1
0
7
5
0
1
5
DONA
L
D
R
.
W
A
C
H
T
E
R
&
S
A
N
D
R
A
M
.
R
A
H
N
PID: 3
4
0
3
2
1
0
7
5
0
1
2
REGE
N
T
S
O
F
U
O
F
M
PID: 3
4
0
3
3
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
LOT 5
81,344 SF
LOT 6
61,594 SF
LOT 7
64,130 SF LOT 8
78,944 SF
LOT 4
84,759 SF
LOT 3
63,248 SF
LOT 2
65,194 SF
PROPOSED BUILDING18,000 SQ. FT.FFE = 955.75SOUTHEAST POND
100-YR EVENT HWL = 952.88'
100-YR SNOWMELT HWL = 953.04'
SOUTHWEST POND
100-YR EVENT HWL = 952.88'
100-YR SNOWMELT HWL = 953.04'
NWL = 951.00
NORTHWEST POND
100-YR EVENT HWL = 953.21'
100-YR SNOWMELT HWL = 953.40'
NWL = 945.75
NORTH POND
100-YR EVENT HWL = 953.21'
100-YR SNOWMELT HWL = 953.40'
NWL = 951.00
NORTHEAST POND
100-YR EVENT HWL = 953.21'
100-YR SNOWMELT HWL = 953.40'
SOUTH POND
100-YR EVENT HWL = 952.88'
100-YR SNOWMELT HWL = 953.04'
NWL = 949.75 NOPARKING95
5954
955
953
954
950950
951
951
952
952
953
953
954
954
950
950
949949
951
951
951
952
952
952
953
953
953
953
954
940
945
939
941 942 943 944
950
948 949
951 952 953953
951951
952
952
953
953
954
954
950
950
948 948
949
949
951
951
952
952
952
953
953
953
954
953
954
950 955955955947948949951
952
953
953
953954954954
9
5
0
955955
946
9
4
7
948
949 9519519
5
1 95295295
2
9
5
3
953
953954
95
4
9
5
4 955955
955952953954954
954956 95606/07/19 CITY COMMENTS TTK
22185 C1-SWPPP
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
PROJECT
TITLE
SHEET
REVISION SCHEDULE
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
DESIGNED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE
DRAWN BY
CLIENT PROJECT NO.
REVIEWED BY
WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED
THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,
-
TTK
TTK
RAS
18-22185
06/10/2019
C1-10
OVERALL SWPPP
C1-10 OVERALL SWPPP
300 22185 C1-10
APPRO
DEVELOPMENT
BISCAYNE
BUSINESS PARK
MINNESOTAROSEMOUNT
LIC. NO.DATE
LIC. NO.DATE
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONREESE SUDTELGTE
XX/XX/XXXX 54243
NOTE:
THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND
UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOES
NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN
ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT IN
MISINTERPRETATION.
0
SCALE IN FEET
50 100 150
PROPERTY LINE, TYP.
EROSION CONTROL LEGEND
SYMBOL ITEM
NO.DESCRIPTION UNITS QUANTITY
2511.507 RANDOM RIPRAP, CLASS III CY 162
2511.504 GEOTEXTILE FILTER, TYPE IV SY 100
PERIMETER CONTROL LF 9,341
2573.502 EXISTING STORM DRAIN INLET
PROTECTION EACH 2
2573.502 PROPOSED STORM DRAIN
INLET PROTECTION EACH 14
2573.501 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION
EXIT EACH 1
2575.504 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET,
CATEGORY 3N SY 17,534
CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA EA 1
EXISTING DRAINAGE ARROW
PROPOSED DRAINAGE ARROW
PERIMETER CONTROL CAN BE SILT FENCE OR SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG.
QUANTITIES ARE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE
CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER PERMIT. NO GUARANTEE IS MADE TO THE ACTUAL QUANTITIES
REQUIRED.
THE QUANTITIES SHOWN ARE TOTAL FOR THE ENTIRE PROJECT NOT SPECIFIC TO THIS SHEET.
SEE SITE RESTORATION PLAN FOR FINAL TURF ESTABLISHMENT
NOTE: SWPPP COVERAGE INCLUDES ELECTRIC, GAS, TELEPHONE, AND CABLE INSTALLATION. EACH
COMPANY OR THEIR SUBCONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO FOLLOW THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS
SWPPP INCLUDING PROVIDING THEIR OWN RESTORATION IF INSTALLATION OCCURS AFTER PRIMARY
INSTALLATION OF SEEDING/SODDING/MULCHING DURING CONSTRUCTION OF EACH UTILITY.
LOT LINE, TYP.
UTILITY EASEMENT, TYP.
PERIMETER CONTROL, TYP.EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, TYP.INLET PROTECTION, TYP.
PROPOSED SURFACE DRAINAGE ARROW, TYP.
EXISTING SURFACE DRAINAGE ARROW, TYP.
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
CONCRETE WASHOUT AREARIGHT-OF-WAY, TYP.157TH STREET
R=954.59
SAN MH
I=
G
R=956.43
SAN MH
I=919.18FO
I=948.22
BENCHMARK TIE IN PP
ELEV = 957.80 BISCAYNE AVEI=954.77
I=955.36EX 12" WATERMAINDAKO
T
A
U
N
L
I
M
I
T
E
D
PID: 3
4
0
3
2
1
0
8
5
0
5
1
SPOW
D
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
L
L
C
PID: 3
4
0
3
2
1
0
8
5
0
4
0
METR
O
M
O
S
Q
U
I
T
O
C
O
N
T
R
O
L
PID: 3
4
0
3
2
1
0
8
5
0
1
9
PAHL
F
A
M
I
L
Y
L
I
M
I
T
E
D
P
A
R
T
N
E
R
S
H
I
P
PID: 3
4
0
3
2
1
0
7
5
0
1
5
DONA
L
D
R
.
W
A
C
H
T
E
R
&
S
A
N
D
R
A
M
.
R
A
H
N
PID: 3
4
0
3
2
1
0
7
5
0
1
2
REGE
N
T
S
O
F
U
O
F
M
PID: 3
4
0
3
3
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
9459
5
0
955 9559559449469479489499519519
5
1 95295295
2
95
3 95395395495495
4
946947947948948 955952953954956 955951952953954956 950955951952953954956955
956
06/07/19 CITY COMMENTS TTK
22185 C2-EXIST
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
PROJECT
TITLE
SHEET
REVISION SCHEDULE
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
DESIGNED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE
DRAWN BY
CLIENT PROJECT NO.
REVIEWED BY
WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED
THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,
-
TTK
TTK
RAS
18-22185
06/10/2019
C2-10
EXISTING SITE &
REMOVALS PLAN
C2-10 EXISTING SITE & REMOVALS PLAN
300 22185 C2-10
APPRO
DEVELOPMENT
BISCAYNE
BUSINESS PARK
MINNESOTAROSEMOUNT
LIC. NO.DATE
LIC. NO.DATE
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONREESE SUDTELGTE
XX/XX/XXXX 54243
NOTE:
THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND
UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOES
NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN
ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT IN
MISINTERPRETATION.
0
SCALE IN FEET
50 100 150
PROPERTY LINE, TYP.
PROTECT POWER POLE
PROTECT POWER POLE
EXISTING SURFACE CONTOUR, TYP.
EXITING FIELD EDGE, TYP.
EXISTING OVERHEAD LINE
EXISTING UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC LINE
EXISTING GRAVEL, TYP.670.24'960.3'
REMOVAL LEGEND
SYMBOL DESCRIPTION
REMOVE GRAVEL SURFACE
CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXISTING PAVEMENT SECTION
AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES.
PAVEMENT REMOVALS SHALL INCLUDE FULL DEPTH
SAWCUT & SECTION REMOVAL.
REMOVE GRAVEL SURFACING
NOTE:
CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE TRAFFIC CONTROL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
MNDOT TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL MANUAL AND THE CITY OF
OWATONNA REQUIREMENTS.
SALVAGE SIGN FOR REINSTALLMENT
REMOVE 7 LF OF WATERMAIN
CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY SIZE, DEPTH
AND LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES
962.03'
LOT 5
81,344 SF
LOT 6
61,594 SF LOT 7
64,130 SF LOT 8
78,944 SF
LOT 4
84,759 SF
LOT 3
63,248 SF
LOT 2
65,194 SF
PROPOSED BUILDING18,000 SQ. FT.FFE = 955.75SOUTHEAST POND
100-YR EVENT HWL = 952.88'
100-YR SNOWMELT HWL = 953.04'
SOUTHWEST POND
100-YR EVENT HWL = 952.88'
100-YR SNOWMELT HWL = 953.04'
NWL = 951.00
NORTHWEST POND
100-YR EVENT HWL = 953.21'
100-YR SNOWMELT HWL = 953.40'
NWL = 945.75
NORTH POND
100-YR EVENT HWL = 953.21'
100-YR SNOWMELT HWL = 953.40'
NWL = 951.00
NORTHEAST POND
100-YR EVENT HWL = 953.21'
100-YR SNOWMELT HWL = 953.40'
SOUTH POND
100-YR EVENT HWL = 952.88'
100-YR SNOWMELT HWL = 953.04'
NWL = 949.75 NOPARKINGR=954.59
SAN MH
I=
G
R=956.43
SAN MH
I=919.18FO
I=948.22
BENCHMARK TIE IN PP
ELEV = 957.80 BISCAYNE AVEI=954.77
I=955.36EX 12" WATERMAINDAKO
T
A
U
N
L
I
M
I
T
E
D
PID: 3
4
0
3
2
1
0
8
5
0
5
1
SPOW
D
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
L
L
C
PID: 3
4
0
3
2
1
0
8
5
0
4
0
METR
O
M
O
S
Q
U
I
T
O
C
O
N
T
R
O
L
PID: 3
4
0
3
2
1
0
8
5
0
1
9
PAHL
F
A
M
I
L
Y
L
I
M
I
T
E
D
P
A
R
T
N
E
R
S
H
I
P
PID: 3
4
0
3
2
1
0
7
5
0
1
5
DONA
L
D
R
.
W
A
C
H
T
E
R
&
S
A
N
D
R
A
M
.
R
A
H
N
PID: 3
4
0
3
2
1
0
7
5
0
1
2
REGE
N
T
S
O
F
U
O
F
M
PID: 3
4
0
3
3
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
012345678910A-7
FES-1A
FES-2
FES-1
A-10
FES-3AFES-4 FES-3
FES-7
FES-4A
FES-8A
FES-8 FES-9A
FES-9
FES-5A
FES-5
FES-6
A-2
P-1 (15")
P-3 (24")P-4 (24")
P-8 (24")P-9 (24")
P-10 (15")P-5 (24")P-6 (24")P-
7
(
2
4
"
)P-2 (12")S-2
S-3
EX S-1
S-5
S-4
8" PLUG
SP-4 (8")SP-3 (8")SP-2 (8")
SP
-
1
(
8
"
)
SP-1A (8")
12''x6'' TEE
12''x6'' TEE
12''x12'' TEE
12''x6'' REDUCER
6'' GV & BOX
6'' GV & BOX
6'' GV & BOX
12" WATERMAIN (C900)
6" WATERMAIN (C900)
8'' GV & BOX
8''x45° BEND
12''x8'' TEE
12''x8'' TEE
8''x45° BEND
8'' GV & BOX
8" WATERMAIN (C900)
8" WATERMAIN (C900)
8" WATERMAIN (C900)
8" WATERMAIN (C900)
8'' GV & BOX
12''x8'' TEE
12''x8'' TEE
8'' GV & BOX
8" WATERMAIN (C900)
8'' GV & BOX
12''x8'' TEE
12''x8'' TEE
8'' GV & BOX
8" WATERMAIN (C900)
12''x8'' TEE
6" WATERMAIN (C900)
8'' GV & BOX
12''x8'' TEE
8'' GV & BOX 8" WATERMAIN (C900)
8" WATERMAIN (C900)
5''x 7'-6'' HYDRANT
5''x 7'-6'' HYDRANT
5''x 7'-6'' HYDRANT
12'' GV & BOX
12'' GV & BOX
8'' CAP8'' CAP
8'' CAP
8'' CAP
8'' CAP
8'' CAP
8'' CAP
06/07/19 CITY COMMENTS TTK
22185 C3-SITE
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
PROJECT
TITLE
SHEET
REVISION SCHEDULE
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
DESIGNED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE
DRAWN BY
CLIENT PROJECT NO.
REVIEWED BY
WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED
THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,
-
TTK
TTK
RAS
18-22185
06/10/2019
C3-10
OVERALL SITE &
UTILITY PLAN
C3-10 OVERALL SITE & UTILITY PLAN
300 22185 C3-10
APPRO
DEVELOPMENT
BISCAYNE
BUSINESS PARK
MINNESOTAROSEMOUNT
LIC. NO.DATE
LIC. NO.DATE
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONREESE SUDTELGTE
XX/XX/XXXX 54243
NOTE:
THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND
UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOES
NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN
ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT IN
MISINTERPRETATION.
PROPERTY LINE, TYP.LOT LINE, TYP.OUTLOT A
0
SCALE IN FEET
40 80 120
FUTURE BUILDING PADS, TYP.
STUB 6" SANITARY SERVICE
TO ROAD EASEMENT, TYP.
STUB WATER SERVICE TO ROAD EASEMENT, TYP.
CONNECT TO MET COUNCIL
SANITARY SEWER (SEE NOTES)RIGHT-OF-WAY, TYP.DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT, TYP.
157TH STREET
STUB P-10 TO PROPERTY LINE
FOR CONNECTION TO BISCAYNE
AVE FUTURE STORM
CONSERVATION EASEMENT SIGN (SEE DETAIL)
CONSERVATION EASEMENT SIGN (SEE DETAIL)
CONSERVATION EASEMENT SIGN (SEE DETAIL)
CONSERVATION EASEMENT SIGN (SEE DETAIL)
MCES CONNECTION NOTES:
THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO CONTACT MIKE OLERICH AT 651-602-8908 BETWEEN 7:30 AM AND 3:30 PM AT
LEAST 48 HOUTS IN ADVANCE TO ARRANGE TO HAVE AN INSPECTOR ON SITE AT THE TIME THE CONNECTION IS
BEING MADE. INSPECTIONS PERFORMED OUTSIDE NORMAL HOURS, MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY 7:00 AM - 3:30 PM,
MAY REQUIRE REIMBURSEMENT TO MCES FOR OVERTIME. SHOULD THE CONTRACTOR ELECT TO PERFORM THE
CONNECTION OUTSIDE OF NORMAL BUSINESS HOURS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY FOR ANY ADDITIONAL FEES.
BACKUP CONTACTS ARE AS FOLLOWS: MATT AMUNDSON AT 651-262-8053 AND DAVE ELZINGA AT 651-602-8924.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE MEASUREMENTS BEFORE BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION TO ENSURE THAT SERVICE
CONNECTIONS SHALL NOT BE CUT INTO MAINTENANCE ACCESS STRUCTURE JOINTS OR PIPE BARREL JOINTS.
CUTTING INTO JOINTS WILL NOT BE ALLOWED.
LOT 5
81,344 SF
LOT 6
61,594 SF
LOT 7
64,130 SF
LOT 4
84,759 SF LOT 3
63,248 SF
LOT 2
65,194 SF
METR
O
M
O
S
Q
U
I
T
O
C
O
N
T
R
O
L
PID: 3
4
0
3
2
1
0
8
5
0
1
9
012345FES-5A
FES-5
FES-6
P-5 (24")P-6 (24")S-5
S-4
SP-4 (8")SP-3 (8")12''x6'' TEE
12''x6'' REDUCER
6'' GV & BOX
6'' GV & BOX
12" WATERMAIN
6" WATERMAIN 6" WATERMAIN6" WATERMAIN
8'' GV & BOX
8" WATERMAIN (C900)
8''x45° BEND
12''x8'' TEE
12''x8'' TEE 8''x45° BEND
8'' GV & BOX
8" WATERMAIN (C900)
8'' GV & BOX
12''x8'' TEE
12''x8'' TEE
8" WATERMAIN (C900)
8'' GV & BOX
8" WATERMAIN (C900)
8'' GV & BOX
12''x8'' TEE
8" WATERMAIN (C900)
12''x8'' TEE
8'' GV & BOX
8" WATERMAIN (C900)
5''x 7'-6'' HYDRANT
BREAK=953.98
5''x 7'-6'' HYDRANT
BREAK=953.47
8'' CAP
8'' CAP
8'' CAP
8'' CAP
8'' CAP
8'' CAP
MATCH LINE: 4+90STA. 5+52
S = 946.38
STA. 5+57
S = 946.36
STA. 3+99
S = 947.25
STA. 2+39
S = 948.22
STA. 2+32
S = 948.13
STA. 4+04
S = 947.22
0+00952.90+25953.2953.780+50953.6953.920+75954.0954.171+00954.4954.321+25954.6954.181+50954.9954.041+75955.1953.882+00955.3951.772+25955.5954.812+50955.6954.692+75955.7954.563+00955.8954.313+25955.8954.073+50955.8953.953+75955.6953.944+00955.3953.944+25954.4953.944+50953.6953.944+75952.8953.945+00952.1953.945+25951.4953.9440.3' @ -1.00%363.1' @ 0.00%3+11.90954.19953.943+61.90L = 50.0'
K = 50.00
A.D. = 1.00%
S-5
R=954.80
I=947.11 (8") SP-4
SP-4 300'x8" @0.50%
S-4
R=953.94
I=945.61 (8") SP-4
I=945.51 (8") SP-3
6" WATERMAIN (C900)
6" WATERMAIN (C900)
6'' GV & BOX
12''x6'' REDUCER
12" WATERMAIN (C900)
12''x6'' TEE
P-5
C
C
NOTE:
XXX.X - EXISTING GROUND L
XXX.XX - PROPOSED GRADE L
12''x8'' TEE
12''x8'' TEE
12" WATERMAIN (C900)
12''x8'' TEE12''x8'' TEE
12" WATERMAIN (C900)
12''x8'' TEE
12''x8'' TEE
930
935
940
945
950
955
960
965
970
975
930
935
940
945
950
955
960
965
970
975
06/07/19 CITY COMMENTS TTK
22185 C3-PROFILES
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
PROJECT
TITLE
SHEET
REVISION SCHEDULE
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
DESIGNED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE
DRAWN BY
CLIENT PROJECT NO.
REVIEWED BY
WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED
THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,
-
TTK
TTK
RAS
18-22185
06/10/2019
C3-20
PLANNED ROAD &
UTILITY
CONSTRUCTION
C3-20 PLANNED ROAD & UTILITY CONSTRUCTION
300 22185 C3-20
APPRO
DEVELOPMENT
BISCAYNE
BUSINESS PARK
MINNESOTAROSEMOUNT
LIC. NO.DATE
LIC. NO.DATE
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONREESE SUDTELGTE
XX/XX/XXXX 54243
NOTE:
THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND
UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOES
NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN
ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT IN
MISINTERPRETATION.
0
SCALE IN FEET
20 40 60
PROPOSED DITCH GRADE, 31' RIGHT OF CENTERLINE
PROPOSED CENTERLINE GRADE, TYP.EXISTING GRADE, TYP.
STUB WATER SERVICE TO ROAD EASEMENT, TYP.
STUB 6" SANITARY SERVICE TO ROAD EASEMENT, TYP.
UTILITY EASEMENT, TYP.LOT LINE, TYP.PROPERTY LINE, TYP.STA. 0+00 TO 5+50PROPOSED 66' ROAD EASEMENT30'R30'
R30'
R55'
R70'7.5' MIN BURY DEPTH18" MIN. SEPARATION5"x7'-6" HYDRANT
PROPOSED DITCH GRADE, 31' LEFT OF CENTERLINE
10' MIN. SEPARATION
10' MIN. SEPARATION
157TH STREET
0
V
E
R
T.
5
10
NOTE:
STA: 00+00 SANITARY WYE STATION
S = 0.0 SANITARY STUB INVERT ELEVATION
INSULATE SANITARY SERVICE
UNDER DITCH CROSSING
INSULATE SANITARY SERVICE
UNDER DITCH CROSSING
LOT 7
64,130 SF
LOT 8
78,944 SF
LOT 2
65,194 SF
17
19
PARKINGR=956.43
SAN MH
I=919.18
FO
BISCAYNE AVEEX 12" WATERMAINREGE
N
T
S
O
F
U
O
F
M
PID: 3
4
0
3
3
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
5678910FES-1AFES-1
A-2
P-1 (15")
S-2
S-3
EX S-1
S-4
8" PLUG
SP-2 (8")
SP
-
1
(
8
"
)
SP-1A (8")SP-3 (8")12''x6'' TEE
12''x12'' TEE
6'' GV & BOX 6" WATERMAIN12" WATERMAIN
8'' GV & BOX
12''x8'' TEE
8" WATERMAIN (C900)
12''x8'' TEE
8'' GV & BOX
8" WATERMAIN (C900)
8'' GV & BOX
12''x8'' TEE
12''x8'' TEE
8'' GV & BOX
8" WATERMAIN (C900)8" WATERMAIN (C900)5''x 7'-6'' HYDRANT
BREAK=954.04
12'' GV & BOX
8'' CAP
8'' CAP 8'' CAP
MATCH LINE: 4+90STA. 8+60
S = 944.74STA. 5+52
S = 946.38
STA. 5+57
S = 946.36
12'' GV & BOX
5+25951.4953.945+50951.0953.945+75950.8953.946+00950.8953.946+25951.1953.946+50951.3953.946+75951.7953.947+00952.2953.947+25952.9953.947+50953.5954.027+75954.0954.278+00954.5954.608+25954.6954.938+50954.7955.268+75954.8955.609+00954.7955.939+25954.5956.149+50954.7956.089+75955.7955.8310+00956.310+25955.410+50955.125.0' @ -1.00%
363.1' @ 0.00%
128.1' @ 1.33%7+25.00953.94954.277+75.00L = 50.0'
K = 21.48
A.D. = 2.33%
L = 50.0'
K = 37.66
A.D. = 1.33%956.169+31.649+03.12955.97956.059+53.12SP-3 300'x8" @0.50%
S-4
R=953.94
I=945.61 (8") SP-4
I=945.51 (8") SP-3
S-3
R=954.95
I=944.01 (8") SP-3
I=943.91 (8") SP-2
SP-2 114'x8" @0.50%
S-2
R=956.14
I=943.34 (8") SP-2
I=943.24 (8") SP-1
I=943.24 (8") SP-1A
SP-1 123'x8" @0.50%
EX S-1
R=955.13
I=942.63 (8") SP-1
951.769
5
2
.
1
2
P-1 90'x15" @0.40%
12''x12'' TEE12''x6'' TEE
12" WATERMAIN (C900)
930
935
940
945
950
955
960
965
970
975
930
935
940
945
950
955
960
965
970
975
C
C
NOTE:
XXX.X - EXISTING GROUND L
XXX.XX - PROPOSED GRADE L
12''x8'' TEE
12''x8'' TEE
12''x8'' TEE
12''x8'' TEE
12" WATERMAIN (C900)
12'' GV & BOXBISCAYNE AVE06/07/19 CITY COMMENTS TTK
22185 C3-PROFILES
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
PROJECT
TITLE
SHEET
REVISION SCHEDULE
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
DESIGNED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE
DRAWN BY
CLIENT PROJECT NO.
REVIEWED BY
WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED
THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,
-
TTK
TTK
RAS
18-22185
06/10/2019
C3-21
PLANNED ROAD &
UTILITY
CONSTRUCTION
C3-21 PLANNED ROAD & UTILITY CONSTRUCTION
300 22185 C3-21
APPRO
DEVELOPMENT
BISCAYNE
BUSINESS PARK
MINNESOTAROSEMOUNT
LIC. NO.DATE
LIC. NO.DATE
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONREESE SUDTELGTE
XX/XX/XXXX 54243
NOTE:
THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND
UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOES
NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN
ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT IN
MISINTERPRETATION.
0
SCALE IN FEET
20 40 60
PROPOSED DITCH GRADE, 31' LEFT OF CENTERLINE
PROPOSED CENTERLINE GRADE, TYP.EXISTING GRADE, TYP.
STUB WATER SERVICE TO ROAD EASEMENT, TYP.STUB 6" SANITARY SERVICE TO ROAD EASEMENT, TYP.UTILITY EASEMENT, TYP.LOT LINE, TYP.PROPERTY LINE, TYP.STA. 5+00 TO 10+75
CONSTRUCT WATER SERVICE AND 6" SANITARY SERVICE
TO WITHIN 5' FROM THE BUILDING. CONNECTION INTO
BUILDING BY MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR. (VERIFY
LOCATIONS WITH MECHANICAL PLANS)RIGHT-OF-WAY, TYP.CONTRACTOR TO DAM SP-1A
UNTIL CONNECTION TO FUTURE
CITY SANITARY IS ESTABLISHED
NOTE:
CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE TRAFFIC CONTROL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
MNDOT TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL MANUAL AND THE CITY OF
ROSEMOUNT REQUIREMENTS.7.5' MIN. BURY DEPTHPROPOSED DITCH GRADE, 31' RIGHT OF CENTERLINE
10' MIN. SEPARATION
10' MIN. SEPARATION
10' MIN. SEPARATION
10' MIN. SEPARATION
PROVIDE TEMPORARY INSIDE DROP
CONNECTION TO SANITARY MANHOLE
ASSUMED DEPTH OF 947.2
CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY
SIZE, DEPTH AND LOCATION.
CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY SIZE, DEPTH
AND LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES
157TH STREET
0
V
E
R
T.
5
10
FUTURE TRAIL (BY OTHERS)
SANITARY WYE = 8+55
NOTE:
STA: 00+00 SANITARY WYE STATION
S = 0.0 SANITARY STUB INVERT ELEVATION
PROPOSED 66' ROAD EASEMENT30'R35'
R35'
LOT 7
64,130 SF
LOT 8
78,944 SF
LOT 2
65,194 SF
17
19
PROPOSED BUILDING
18,000 SQ. FT.
FFE = 955.75
SOUTHEAST POND
100-YR EVENT HWL = 952.88'
100-YR SNOWMELT HWL = 953.04'
SOUTH POND
100-YR EVENT HWL = 952.88'
100-YR SNOWMELT HWL = 953.04'
NWL = 949.75 NOPARKINGG
R=956.43
SAN MH
I=919.18
FO
BENCHMARK TIE IN PP
ELEV = 957.80 BISCAYNE AVEI=955.36 EX 12" WATERMAINDAKO
T
A
U
N
L
I
M
I
T
E
D
PID: 3
4
0
3
2
1
0
8
5
0
5
1
REGE
N
T
S
O
F
U
O
F
M
PID: 3
4
0
3
3
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
06/07/19 CITY COMMENTS TTK
22185 C3-SITE
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
PROJECT
TITLE
SHEET
REVISION SCHEDULE
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
DESIGNED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE
DRAWN BY
CLIENT PROJECT NO.
REVIEWED BY
WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED
THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,
-
TTK
TTK
RAS
18-22185
06/10/2019
C3-22
DETAILED SITE
PLAN
C3-22 DETAILED SITE PLAN
300 22185 C3-22
APPRO
DEVELOPMENT
BISCAYNE
BUSINESS PARK
MINNESOTAROSEMOUNT
LIC. NO.DATE
LIC. NO.DATE
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONREESE SUDTELGTE
XX/XX/XXXX 54243
NOTE:
THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND
UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOES
NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN
ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT IN
MISINTERPRETATION.
0
SCALE IN FEET
20 40 60
PAVEMENT LEGEND
SYMBOL DESCRIPTION
BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT
HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS
PAVEMENT
CONCRETE PAVEMENT
HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE
PAVEMENT
CONCRETE SIDEWALK
ROAD EASEMENT, TYP.
PROPERTY LINE, TYP.LOT LINE, TYP.32'19'24'19'24'9'9'
CONSTRUCT TURN DOWN WALK
(SEE DETAIL)6'6'
CONSTRUCT CONCRETE WALK
(SEE DETAIL)
CONSTRUCT TURN DOWN WALK
(SEE DETAIL)5'20'20'5'
FUTURE BUILDING PAD
CONSTRUCT B618 CURB & GUTTER
(SEE DETAIL)
3' CURB TAPER
3' CURB TAPER
R50'
R15'
R15'
R30'R30'
R15'
R39'
CONSTRUCT WATER SERVICE AND 6" SANITARY SERVICE
TO WITHIN 5' FROM THE BUILDING. CONNECTION INTO
BUILDING BY MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR. (VERIFY
LOCATIONS WITH MECHANICAL PLANS)
SANITARY CLEANOUT
R = 955.65
I =944.01 10'F&I: ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGNS
SOUTHEAST BASIN
SOUTH BASIN
17'
R50'
R3', TYP.RIGHT-OF-WAYF&I: 4" WHITE STRIPING, TYP.
CONSTRUCT ACCESSIBLE
PARKING AREA (SEE DETAIL)
CONNECT TO MET COUNCIL
SANITARY SEWER
PATCH GRAVEL SURFACING
TO MATCH EXISTING
(SEE DETAIL)
SALVAGE & REINSTALL
SIGNAGE AS NEEDED
NOTE:
CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE TRAFFIC CONTROL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
MNDOT TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL MANUAL AND THE CITY OF
ROSEMOUNT REQUIREMENTS.
CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT AND FIELD VERIFY
SIZE, DEPTH AND LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES
DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT, TYP.
157TH STREET
CONSTRUCT 2' GRAVEL SHOULDER
18'18'FUTURE TRAIL (BY OTHERS)
R1-1 (30x30)
CONSTRUCT 12" RIBBON CURB (SEE DETAIL)
CONSERVATION
EASEMENT SIGN
(SEE DETAIL)
LOT 5
81,344 SF
LOT 6
61,594 SF
LOT 7
64,130 SF LOT 8
78,944 SF
LOT 4
84,759 SF
LOT 3
63,248 SF
LOT 2
65,194 SF
PROPOSED BUILDING18,000 SQ. FT.FFE = 955.75SOUTHEAST POND
100-YR EVENT HWL = 952.88'
100-YR SNOWMELT HWL = 953.04'
SOUTHWEST POND
100-YR EVENT HWL = 952.88'
100-YR SNOWMELT HWL = 953.04'
NWL = 951.00
NORTHWEST POND
100-YR EVENT HWL = 953.21'
100-YR SNOWMELT HWL = 953.40'
NWL = 945.75
NORTH POND
100-YR EVENT HWL = 953.21'
100-YR SNOWMELT HWL = 953.40'
NWL = 951.00
NORTHEAST POND
100-YR EVENT HWL = 953.21'
100-YR SNOWMELT HWL = 953.40'
SOUTH POND
100-YR EVENT HWL = 952.88'
100-YR SNOWMELT HWL = 953.04'
NWL = 949.75 NOPARKINGR=954.59
SAN MH
I=
G
R=956.43
SAN MH
I=919.18FO
I=948.22
BENCHMARK TIE IN PP
ELEV = 957.80 BISCAYNE AVEI=954.77
I=955.36EX 12" WATERMAINDAKO
T
A
U
N
L
I
M
I
T
E
D
PID: 3
4
0
3
2
1
0
8
5
0
5
1
SPOW
D
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
L
L
C
PID: 3
4
0
3
2
1
0
8
5
0
4
0
METR
O
M
O
S
Q
U
I
T
O
C
O
N
T
R
O
L
PID: 3
4
0
3
2
1
0
8
5
0
1
9
PAHL
F
A
M
I
L
Y
L
I
M
I
T
E
D
P
A
R
T
N
E
R
S
H
I
P
PID: 3
4
0
3
2
1
0
7
5
0
1
5
DONA
L
D
R
.
W
A
C
H
T
E
R
&
S
A
N
D
R
A
M
.
R
A
H
N
PID: 3
4
0
3
2
1
0
7
5
0
1
2
REGE
N
T
S
O
F
U
O
F
M
PID: 3
4
0
3
3
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
22185 C3-SITE
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
PROJECT
TITLE
SHEET
REVISION SCHEDULE
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
DESIGNED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE
DRAWN BY
CLIENT PROJECT NO.
REVIEWED BY
WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED
THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,
-
TTK
TTK
RAS
18-22185
06/10/2019
C3-40
HYDRANT
COVERAGE PLAN
C3-40 HYDRANT COVERAGE PLAN
300 22185 C3-40
APPRO
DEVELOPMENT
BISCAYNE
BUSINESS PARK
MINNESOTAROSEMOUNT
LIC. NO.DATE
LIC. NO.DATE
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONREESE SUDTELGTE
XX/XX/XXXX 54243
NOTE:
THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND
UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOES
NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN
ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT IN
MISINTERPRETATION.
PROPERTY LINE, TYP.
LOT LINE, TYP.
ROAD EASEMENT, TYP.
0
SCALE IN FEET
50 100 150
HYDRANT COVERAGE LEGEND
EXISTING HYDRANT
PROPOSED HYDRANT
R250'
R250'RIGHT-OF-WAY, TYP.
LOT 5
81,344 SF
LOT 6
61,594 SF
LOT 7
64,130 SF LOT 8
78,944 SF
LOT 4
84,759 SF
LOT 3
63,248 SF
LOT 2
65,194 SF
PROPOSED BUILDING18,000 SQ. FT.FFE = 955.75SOUTHEAST POND
100-YR EVENT HWL = 952.88'
100-YR SNOWMELT HWL = 953.04'
SOUTHWEST POND
100-YR EVENT HWL = 952.88'
100-YR SNOWMELT HWL = 953.04'
NWL = 951.00
NORTHWEST POND
100-YR EVENT HWL = 953.21'
100-YR SNOWMELT HWL = 953.40'
NWL = 945.75
NORTH POND
100-YR EVENT HWL = 953.21'
100-YR SNOWMELT HWL = 953.40'
NWL = 951.00
NORTHEAST POND
100-YR EVENT HWL = 953.21'
100-YR SNOWMELT HWL = 953.40'
SOUTH POND
100-YR EVENT HWL = 952.88'
100-YR SNOWMELT HWL = 953.04'
NWL = 949.75 NOPARKINGR=954.59
SAN MH
I=
G
R=956.43
SAN MH
I=919.18FO
I=948.22 BISCAYNE AVEI=954.77
I=955.36EX 12" WATERMAINDAKO
T
A
U
N
L
I
M
I
T
E
D
PID: 3
4
0
3
2
1
0
8
5
0
5
1
SPOW
D
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
L
L
C
PID: 3
4
0
3
2
1
0
8
5
0
4
0
METR
O
M
O
S
Q
U
I
T
O
C
O
N
T
R
O
L
PID: 3
4
0
3
2
1
0
8
5
0
1
9
PAHL
F
A
M
I
L
Y
L
I
M
I
T
E
D
P
A
R
T
N
E
R
S
H
I
P
PID: 3
4
0
3
2
1
0
7
5
0
1
5
DONA
L
D
R
.
W
A
C
H
T
E
R
&
S
A
N
D
R
A
M
.
R
A
H
N
PID: 3
4
0
3
2
1
0
7
5
0
1
2
REGE
N
T
S
O
F
U
O
F
M
PID: 3
4
0
3
3
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
95
5954
956
955
950 951 952 953 954
953
955953
954
956957951 950 951 952 953
954
951 952 953
954
950
947 948 949
951 952 953953
955
952
953
954
955
951952953
954
950
9
4
9
951
952
95
3
9539539
5
4
95
4 955951
951952952953954
950 951 952 953
953
940
945
939
941 942 943 944
952
953
954
952
953
954
-1.9%-2.3%-1.2%-
2
.
1%-2.0%-1.7%-0.6%-
3
.
3%-2.8%-3.1%-2.9%-2.9%-
3
.
6%
-3.1%-2.0%954.47954.47954.47954.47954.47954.47954.47954.47954.47954.47954.47954.47954.87954.87954.87954.87954.47954.47954.47954.47954.47954.47954.47954.47954.47954.47954.47954.47956-0.7%-0.7%-0.6%
-0.6%
-1.7%-0.7%-1.2%-1
.5%-2.4%-
2
.
4%-2.0%-2.0%950 948949948949947948949950947948949950NORTHEAST POND
100-YR EVENT HWL = 953.21'
100-YR SNOWMELT HWL = 953.40'
NORTH POND
100-YR EVENT HWL = 953.21'
100-YR SNOWMELT HWL = 953.40'
NWL = 951.00
NORTHWEST POND
100-YR EVENT HWL = 953.21'
100-YR SNOWMELT HWL = 953.40'
NWL = 945.75
SOUTHWEST POND
100-YR EVENT HWL = 952.88'
100-YR SNOWMELT HWL = 953.04'
NWL = 951.00
SOUTH POND
100-YR EVENT HWL = 952.88'
100-YR SNOWMELT HWL = 953.04'
NWL = 949.75
SOUTHEAST POND
100-YR EVENT HWL = 952.88'
100-YR SNOWMELT HWL = 953.04'
06/07/19 CITY COMMENTS TTK
22185 C4-GRADE
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
PROJECT
TITLE
SHEET
REVISION SCHEDULE
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
DESIGNED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE
DRAWN BY
CLIENT PROJECT NO.
REVIEWED BY
WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED
THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,
-
TTK
TTK
RAS
18-22185
06/10/2019
C4-10
OVERALL GRADING
PLAN
C4-10 OVERALL GRADING PLAN
300 22185 C4-10
APPRO
DEVELOPMENT
BISCAYNE
BUSINESS PARK
MINNESOTAROSEMOUNT
LIC. NO.DATE
LIC. NO.DATE
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONREESE SUDTELGTE
XX/XX/XXXX 54243
NOTE:
THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND
UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOES
NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN
ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT IN
MISINTERPRETATION.
PROPERTY LINE, TYP.
LOT LINE, TYP.
UTILITY EASEMENT, TYP.
0
SCALE IN FEET
50 100 150
GRADING LEGEND
EXISTING CONTOUR (MINOR INTERVAL)
EXISTING CONTOUR (MAJOR INTERVAL)
PROPOSED CONTOUR (MINOR INTERVAL)
PROPOSED CONTOUR (MAJOR INTERVAL)
PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION
PROPOSED TOP BACK OF CURB SPOT ELEVATION
SURFACE GRADE / DIRECTION
GENERAL GRADING NOTES
PROPOSED CONTOURS SHOW FINISHED GRADE ELEVATIONS. BUILDING PAD AND PAVEMENT HOLD
DOWNS ARE NOT INCLUDED.
REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR SOIL INFORMATION.
101
100
101
100
XXX.XXXXX.XX-X.X%RIGHT-OF-WAY, TYP.APPROXIMATE FFE = 955.3APPROXIMATE FFE = 955.3
APPROXIMATE FFE = 955.3
APPROXIMATE FFE = 955.3
APPROXIMATE FFE = 955.3
APPROXIMATE FFE = 955.3
APPROXIMATE FFE = 955.7
FUTURE PAVEMENT, TYP.
GRADING NOTES:
A SHRINKAGE FACTOR OF 1.15 (EMBANKMENT) & 1.20 (TOPSOIL) WERE
APPLIED TO ALL EXCAVATION MATERIAL WHEN DETERMINING SITE BALANCE.
NO WARRANTY IS MADE OR IMPLIED AS TO THE ACCURACY, SUFFICIENCY,
OR RELIABILITY OF SHRINKAGE FACTORS.
18" OF TOPSOIL WAS CALCULATED IN ALL TOPSOIL STRIP AREAS. GREEN
SPACE AREAS SHALL BE DRESSED WITH A MINIMUM OF 6" OF TOPSOIL AND A
MAXIMUM OF 18" OF TOPSOIL. SEE TOPSOIL NOTES FOR FUTURE AREAS.
THE SITE BALANCE PROVIDED ABOVE IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES. IT
IS THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY ALL QUANTITIES PRIOR
TO SUBMITTING A BID FOR THE PROJECT.
157TH STREET
EMERGENCY OVERFLOW @ 953.00
(SEE DETAIL)
EMERGENCY OVERFLOW STRUCTURE
(SEE DETAIL) TO BE CONNECTED TO
FUTURE BISCAYNE STORM SEWER
MAINTENANCE ACCESS ROUTEMAINTENANCE ACCESS ROUTE
MAINTENANCE ACCESS NOTE:
UNTIL LOTS 3-8 HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED TO A POINT WHERE THE
MAINTENANCE ACCESS ROUTE SHOWN ON THE PLAN IS VIABLE,
MAINTENANCE VEHICLES SHALL USE THE SHARED ACCESS DRIVE FOR LOTS
1 & 2 TO ACCESS THE STORMWATER BASINS.
EMERGENCY OVERFLOW @ 953.50
(SEE DETAIL)
TOPSOIL NOTES:
CONTRACTOR TO ENSURE NO MORE THAN 6" OF TOPSOIL IS PLACED IN THE
INFILTRATION BASIN AREAS.
CONTRACTOR TO ENSURE NO MORE THAN 6" OF TOPSOIL IS PLACED IN THE
FUTURE BUILDING PADS.
CONTRACTOR TO ENSURE NO MORE THAN 12" OF TOPSOIL IS PLACED IN THE
FUTURE PAVEMENT AREAS.
CONTRACTOR SHALL STOCKPILE EXCESS TOPSOIL IN A LOCATION
DETERMINED BY THE OWNER. THE STOCKPILE SHALL BE NO MORE THAN 8'
HIGH AND SHALL BE TEMPORARILY SEEDED TO ENSURE STABILITY. EROSION
CONTROL DEVICES (SILT FENCE, BIOROLL, ETC.) SHALL BE PLACED AROUND
THE PERIMETER OF THE STOCKPILE TO ENSURE NO SOIL LOSS. THIS
STOCKPILING SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE PROJECT.
LOT 8
78,944 SF
PROPOSED BUILDING
18,000 SQ. FT.
FFE = 955.75
SOUTHEAST POND
100-YR EVENT HWL = 952.88'
100-YR SNOWMELT HWL = 953.04'NOPARKINGG
R=956.43
SAN MH
I=919.18
FO
BISCAYNE AVEI=955.36 EX 12" WATERMAINDAKO
T
A
U
N
L
I
M
I
T
E
D
PID: 3
4
0
3
2
1
0
8
5
0
5
1
REGE
N
T
S
O
F
U
O
F
M
PID: 3
4
0
3
3
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
95
5954
956
955
950 951
952
953
954
953
955953
954
956957953-2.8%-3.1%-2.0%-4.1%955.25955.25955.75955.75955.75955.65955.65955.75955.75955.65955.65955.75955.65955.75955.65955.75955.65955.65955.75955.75955.75955.25955.75955.75952.25955.25953.12952.06953.109
5
4
.
0
0
LP954.32LP9
5
4
.
0
1
LP954.37954.69954.37954.01HP954.63HP954.30HP955.35954.99954.68955.65955.65955.65955.569
5
5
.
5
6
955.56953.71954.23955.20HP955.20HP955.09954.91954.40954.90954.86954.83954.76954.68954.74954.43954.47954.58954.20954.74954.69954.669
5
4
.
6
5954.58954.20954.35954.52
954.43954.56954.44953.64954.04953.649
5
4
.
0
0
954.36954.47954.47-1
.5%-2.4%-
2
.
4%-2.0%-2.0%-2.1%
-1.7%
-4.0%-0.7%-2.1%
-25.0%
-10.3%
-8.
3
%953.93954.74955.35952.15952.25948949947SOUTHEAST POND
100-YR EVENT HWL = 952.88'
100-YR SNOWMELT HWL = 953.04'NOPARKING955.56955.562" CURB955.562" CURB955.56BIT955.37955.37954.90954.86955.19955.19955.56FULL CURB9
5
5
.
5
6
F
U
L
L
C
U
R
B955.560" CURB955.560" CURB955.38BIT955.06BIT955.56BIT955.38BIT955.06BIT06/07/19 CITY COMMENTS TTK
22185 C4-GRADE
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
PROJECT
TITLE
SHEET
REVISION SCHEDULE
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
DESIGNED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE
DRAWN BY
CLIENT PROJECT NO.
REVIEWED BY
WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED
THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,
-
TTK
TTK
RAS
18-22185
06/10/2019
C4-20
DETAILED
GRADING PLAN
C4-20 DETAILED GRADING PLAN
300 22185 C4-20
APPRO
DEVELOPMENT
BISCAYNE
BUSINESS PARK
MINNESOTAROSEMOUNT
LIC. NO.DATE
LIC. NO.DATE
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONREESE SUDTELGTE
XX/XX/XXXX 54243
NOTE:
THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND
UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOES
NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN
ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT IN
MISINTERPRETATION.
0
SCALE IN FEET
20 40 60
UTILITY EASEMENT, TYP.
PROPERTY LINE, TYP.LOT LINE, TYP.GRADING LEGEND
EXISTING CONTOUR (MINOR INTERVAL)
EXISTING CONTOUR (MAJOR INTERVAL)
PROPOSED CONTOUR (MINOR INTERVAL)
PROPOSED CONTOUR (MAJOR INTERVAL)
PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION
PROPOSED TOP BACK OF CURB SPOT ELEVATION
SURFACE GRADE / DIRECTION
GENERAL GRADING NOTES
PROPOSED CONTOURS SHOW FINISHED GRADE ELEVATIONS. BUILDING PAD AND PAVEMENT HOLD
DOWNS ARE NOT INCLUDED.
REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR SOIL INFORMATION.
101
100
101
100
XXX.XXXXX.XX-X.X%
TOPSOIL NOTE:
CONTRACTOR TO ENSURE NO MORE THAN 6" OF TOPSOIL IS PLACED IN THE
FUTURE BUILDING PADS.
CONTRACTOR TO ENSURE NO MORE THAN 12" OF TOPSOIL IS PLACED IN THE
FUTURE PAVEMENT AREAS.
FUTURE PAVEMENT, TYP.
0
SCALE IN FEET
5 10 15
INSET A
SEE INSET A
157TH STREET
LOT 5
81,344 SF
LOT 6
61,594 SF
LOT 7
64,130 SF LOT 8
78,944 SF
LOT 4
84,759 SF
LOT 3
63,248 SF
LOT 2
65,194 SF
PROPOSED BUILDING18,000 SQ. FT.FFE = 955.75SOUTHEAST POND
100-YR EVENT HWL = 952.88'
100-YR SNOWMELT HWL = 953.04'
SOUTHWEST POND
100-YR EVENT HWL = 952.88'
100-YR SNOWMELT HWL = 953.04'
NWL = 951.00
NORTHWEST POND
100-YR EVENT HWL = 953.21'
100-YR SNOWMELT HWL = 953.40'
NWL = 945.75
NORTH POND
100-YR EVENT HWL = 953.21'
100-YR SNOWMELT HWL = 953.40'
NWL = 951.00
NORTHEAST POND
100-YR EVENT HWL = 953.21'
100-YR SNOWMELT HWL = 953.40'
SOUTH POND
100-YR EVENT HWL = 952.88'
100-YR SNOWMELT HWL = 953.04'
NWL = 949.75 NOPARKINGR=954.59
SAN MH
I=
G
R=956.43
SAN MH
I=919.18FO
I=948.22 BISCAYNE AVEI=954.77
I=955.36EX 12" WATERMAINDAKO
T
A
U
N
L
I
M
I
T
E
D
PID: 3
4
0
3
2
1
0
8
5
0
5
1
SPOW
D
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
L
L
C
PID: 3
4
0
3
2
1
0
8
5
0
4
0
METR
O
M
O
S
Q
U
I
T
O
C
O
N
T
R
O
L
PID: 3
4
0
3
2
1
0
8
5
0
1
9
PAHL
F
A
M
I
L
Y
L
I
M
I
T
E
D
P
A
R
T
N
E
R
S
H
I
P
PID: 3
4
0
3
2
1
0
7
5
0
1
5
DONA
L
D
R
.
W
A
C
H
T
E
R
&
S
A
N
D
R
A
M
.
R
A
H
N
PID: 3
4
0
3
2
1
0
7
5
0
1
2
REGE
N
T
S
O
F
U
O
F
M
PID: 3
4
0
3
3
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
06/07/19 CITY COMMENTS TTK
22185 C5-LAND
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
PROJECT
TITLE
SHEET
REVISION SCHEDULE
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
DESIGNED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE
DRAWN BY
CLIENT PROJECT NO.
REVIEWED BY
WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED
THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,
-
PRO
PRO
RAS
18-22185
06/10/2019
C5-10
SITE RESTORATION
PLAN
C5-10 SITE RESTORATION PLAN
300 22185 C5-10
APPRO
DEVELOPMENT
BISCAYNE
BUSINESS PARK
MINNESOTAROSEMOUNT
LIC. NO.DATE
LIC. NO.DATE
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONREESE SUDTELGTE
XX/XX/XXXX 54243
NOTE:
THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND
UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOES
NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN
ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT IN
MISINTERPRETATION.
PROPERTY LINE, TYP.
LOT LINE, TYP.
ROAD EASEMENT, TYP.
0
SCALE IN FEET
50 100 150 RIGHT-OF-WAY, TYP.TURF RESTORATION LEGEND
SYMBOL ITEM
NO.DESCRIPTION UNITS QUANTITY
2575.505 SEED, MIXTURE 25-151 AC 10.64
2575.505 SEED, MIXTURE 33-261 AC 2.29
2575.509 MULCH MATERIAL, TYPE 6 CY 47
THE QUANTITIES SHOWN ARE TOTAL FOR THE ENTIRE PROJECT NOT SPECIFIC TO THIS SHEET.
*SHALL MEET MNDOT SPECIFICATION 3876. SEED SHALL BE PLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT
2575.
TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES, INCLUDING PERIMETER CONTROL AND INLET
PROTECTION MUST BE MAINTAINED UNTIL FINAL STABILIZATION MEASURES ARE IN PLACE AND
APPROVED BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE. REFER TO THE STORM WATER POLLUTION
PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.
157TH STREET
PROPOSED BUILDING
18,000 SQ. FT.
FFE = 955.75
SOUTHEAST POND
100-YR EVENT HWL = 952.88'
100-YR SNOWMELT HWL = 953.04'BISCAYNE AVEI=955.36 EX 12" WATERMAINCK - (3)
TO - (1)
GT - (1)
HL - (5)
SM - (2)
BF - (5)
GT - (2)
(1) - GT
(1) - AA
(3) - TR
(3) - PG
(1) - AA
(1) - GT
(3) - AM
(3) - PG
SG - (9)
(6) - CK
(2) - TO
(3) - TB
(2) - TO
(6) - CK
(2) - TB
(5) - HL
(1) - TO
(3) - CK
(1) - SM
(2) - BN
(1) - TO
(3) - CK
AA - (1)
DL - (4)
SG - (5)
SM - (6)
DL - (8)
EVERGREEN TREE QTY COMMON / BOTANICAL NAME SIZE ROOT
PG 9 Black Hills Spruce
Picea glauca `Densata`
2" CAL B & B
OVERSTORY TREE QTY COMMON / BOTANICAL NAME SIZE ROOT
AA 5 Autumn Blaze Maple
Acer x freemanii `Jeffsred`
2" CAL B & B
AM 3 Green Mountain Sugar Maple
Acer saccharum `Green Mountain` TM
2" CAL B & B
BF 5 Dakota Pinnacle Asian White Birch
Betula platyphylla `Fargo` TM
2" CAL B & B
BN 2 River Birch Multi-Trunk
Betula nigra
2" CAL B & B
GT 6 Skyline Honeylocust
Gleditsia triacanthos `Skycole`
2" CAL B & B
TR 6 Redmond American Linden
Tilia americana `Redmond`
2" CAL B & B
SHRUBS QTY COMMON / BOTANICAL NAME SIZE ROOT
CK 21 Feather Reed Grass
Calamagrostis x acutiflora `Karl Foerster`
3 GAL CONT
DL 12 Dwarf Bush Honeysuckle
Diervilla lonicera
5 GAL CONT
HL 10 Little Lime Hydrangea
Hydrangea paniculata `Little Lime`
5 GAL CONT
SG 14 Goldflame Spirea
Spiraea x bumalda `Goldflame`
5 GAL CONT
SM 9 Dwarf Korean Lilac
Syringa meyeri `Palibin`
5 GAL CONT
TB 5 Mr. Bowling Ball Arborvitae
Thuja occidentalis `Bobazam`
5 GAL CONT
TO 7 Technito Arborvitae
Thuja occidentalis `Bailjohn`
5 GAL CONT
PLANT SCHEDULE
(1) - GT
(1) - AA
(1) - AA
(3) - TR
(3) - PG
06/07/19 CITY COMMENTS MW
22185 C5-LAND
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
PROJECT
TITLE
SHEET
REVISION SCHEDULE
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
DESIGNED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE
DRAWN BY
CLIENT PROJECT NO.
REVIEWED BY
WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED
THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,
-
PRO
PRO
RAS
18-22185
06/10/2019
C5-20
LANDSCAPING
PLAN
C5-20 LANDSCAPING PLAN
300 22185 C5-20
APPRO
DEVELOPMENT
BISCAYNE
BUSINESS PARK
MINNESOTAROSEMOUNT
LIC. NO.DATE
LIC. NO.DATE
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONREESE SUDTELGTE
XX/XX/XXXX 54243
NOTE:
THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND
UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOES
NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN
ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT IN
MISINTERPRETATION.
0
SCALE IN FEET
20 40 60LOT LINE, TYP.CITY PLANTING REQUIREMENTS
1.A MINIMUM OF 5% OF THE PARKING AREA SHALL BE LANDSCAPED. THE LANDSCAPING SHALL BE
LOCATED ON ISLANDS, PENINSULAS OR THE LIKE WITHIN THE PERIMETER OF THE PARKING AREA.
1.1.15,666 SQ FT x .05% = 783 SQ FT LANDSCAPED AREA REQUIRED. 1036 SQ FT LANDSCAPED
AREA SHOWN.
TREE REQUIREMENTS:
1.8 TREES OR 1 PER 3,000 SQUARE FEET LAND AREA
1.1.79,527 SQ FT/3,000 = 27 TREES REQUIRED
2.75% OF OVERSTORY TREES MUST BE DECIDUOUS
2.1.27 x .75 = 20 DECIDUOUS OVERSTORY TREES REQUIRED
FOUNDATION PLANTING REQUIREMENTS:
1.1 FOUNDATION PLANTING PER 10 LINEAR FEET OF BUILDING PERIMETER
1.1.552 LINEAR FEET/10 = 55 FOUNDATION PLANTINGS REQUIRED
MATCHLINE- SEE THIS SHEET
MATCHLINE- SEE THIS SHEET
22185 C5-LAND
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
PROJECT
TITLE
SHEET
REVISION SCHEDULE
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
DESIGNED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE
DRAWN BY
CLIENT PROJECT NO.
REVIEWED BY
WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED
THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,
-
PRO
PRO
RAS
18-22185
06/10/2019
C5-30
LANDSCAPING
DETAILS AND
NOTES
C5-30 LANDSCAPING DETAILS AND NOTES
300 22185 C5-30
APPRO
DEVELOPMENT
BISCAYNE
BUSINESS PARK
MINNESOTAROSEMOUNT
LIC. NO.DATE
LIC. NO.DATE
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONREESE SUDTELGTE
XX/XX/XXXX 54243
NOTE:
THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND
UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOES
NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN
ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT IN
MISINTERPRETATION.
1.COORDINATE LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES (LINES, DUCTS,
CONDUITS, SLEEVES, FOOTINGS, ETC.) WITH LOCATIONS OF
PROPOSED LANDSCAPE ELEMENTS (FENCE, FOOTINGS, TREE
ROOTBALLS, ETC.). CONTRACTOR SHALL REPORT ANY
DISCREPANCIES TO OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO
CONTINUING WORK.
2.REMOVE ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AND MATERIALS
INJURIOUS TO PLANT GROWTH FROM PLANTING PITS AND
BEDS PRIOR TO BACKFILLING WITH PLANTING MIX.
3.LAWN AREAS SHALL HAVE 6" MINIMUM DEPTH OF TOPSOIL.
TOPSOIL SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 85% MAXIMUM DENSITY AT
OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT.
4.REFER TO PLANTING DETAILS PLAN FOR AMENDED SOIL DEPTH
IN PLANTING BEDS AND SURROUNDING TREES. REFER TO
SPECIFICATIONS FOR MIX TYPE.
5.OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE SHALL APPROVE ALL PLANT
LOCATIONS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. OWNER RESERVES THE
RIGHT TO REVISE PLANTING LAYOUT AT TIME OF
INSTALLATION.
6.ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE TRUE TO THEIR SCIENTIFIC
NAME AND SIZE AS INDICATED IN THE PLANT SCHEDULE.
7.IF DISCREPANCIES EXIST BETWEEN THE NUMBER OF PLANTS
DRAWN ON THE PLANTING PLAN AND THE NUMBER OF PLANTS
IN THE SCHEDULE, THE PLANTING PLAN SHALL GOVERN.
8.OWNER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REVISE QUANTITIES TO SUIT
BUDGET LIMITATIONS. CONTRACTOR'S UNIT BID PRICES SHALL
PREVAIL FOR ANY CHANGES IN QUANTITIES.
9.ANY PROPOSED SUBSTITUTIONS OF PLANT SPECIES SHALL BE
MADE WITH PLANTS OF EQUIVALENT OVERALL FORM, HEIGHT,
BRANCHING HABIT, FLOWER, LEAF, COLOR, FRUIT AND
CULTURE, AND ONLY AFTER WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE
OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE AND OWNER.
10.ALL PLANT MATERIALS MUST CONFORM TO AMERICAN
STANDARDS FOR NURSERY STOCK (A.N.S.I.), LATEST EDITION
PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN,
WASHINGTON D.C. LARGER SIZED PLANT MATERIALS OF THE
SPECIES LISTED MAY BE USED IF THE STOCK CONFORMS TO
A.N.S.I.
11.ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE GUARANTEED TO BE IN A LIVE
AND HEALTHY GROWING CONDITION FOR ONE FULL GROWING
SEASON (ONE YEAR) AFTER FINAL PROJECT ACCEPTANCE OR
SHALL BE REPLACED FREE OF CHARGE WITH THE SAME GRADE
AND SPECIES. ALL TREES SHALL HAVE A STRONG CENTRAL
LEADER.
12.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DAMAGE DUE TO
OPERATIONS. ANY AREAS THAT ARE DISTURBED SHALL BE
RESTORED TO ITS ORIGINAL CONDITION AT NO ADDITIONAL
COST TO THE OWNER.
14.PLANTING BED EDGING - USE 3/4" x 6" PROFESSIONAL GRADE
POLY EDGING IN ALL AREAS WHERE PLANTING BED MEETS
LAWN AREAS OR WHERE INDICATED. USE 12" METAL SPIKES AS
INSTRUCTED BY MANUFACTURER.
14.PROVIDE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH, NATURAL COLOR,
SURROUNDING ALL PROPOSED TREES(5' Ø) AND WITHIN
PLANTING BEDS TO A 3-INCH MINIMUM DEPTH AS SHOWN IN
TREE PLANTING DETAIL. DO NOT USE AN UNDERLAYMENT
SUCH AS PLASTIC SHEET OR LANDSCAPE FABRIC. APPLY
PRE-EMERGENT TO ALL PLANTING BEDS PRIOR TO MULCHING.
REFER TO PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS. REFER TO
STORMWATER DETAILS FOR BASIN CONSTRUCTION AND
MULCH APPLICATION.
15.ALL GROUND AREAS NOT WITHIN PLANT BEDS OR HAVE A
DIFFERENT GROUNDCOVER INDICATED SHALL BE SODDED.
TURF AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE
SODDED. SOD SECTIONS SHALL BE NO SMALLER THAN 24" X
36" STAKED IN PLACE WITH BIODEGRADABLE SOD STAKES
WHEN SLOPE IS STEEPER THAN 5:1 OR WHEN CONDITIONS
REQUIRE.
16.FOR SHRUB LOCATIONS: CONTRACTOR IS PERMITTED TO USE
DISCRETION AS NECESSARY TO AVOID DRIVEWAYS, UTILITIES,
OR OTHER CONFLICTS. THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PLANTS,
INCLUDING SHRUBS AND TREES SHALL MEET CITY CODE.
21.INDICATED QUANTITIES ARE ESTIMATES AND SHOULD BE
CONFIRMED BY THE CONTRACTOR/BIDDER.
GENERAL PLANTING NOTES
CONIFER / EVERGREEN TREE PLANTING DETAIL
SCALE: 1" = 1'-0"
TIE NYLON STRAP AROUND TRUNK AS SHOWN
CUT AND REMOVE AT MINIMUM THE TOP HALF OF WIRE BASKETS,
BURLAP AND/OR TWINE AND REMOVE FROM THE PLANTING PIT.
AVOID CUTTING OR SCARING ROOTS. ANY ROOTS THAT ARE
SCARED OR BROKEN DURING PLANTING SHOULD BE CUT CLEAN
AT 90 DEGREES
BACKFILL PLANTING PIT PER TREE PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS
WHEN PROVIDED, OR WITH NATIVE SOIL-EXCEPT WHEN IN HEAVY
CLAY, MIX AMENDED TOPSOIL FROM A LOCAL SOURCE WITH
NATIVE SOIL
EXCAVATE PLANTING PIT TO A DEPTH EQUAL TO THE DEPTH OF
THE ROOTBALL MINUS 3" AND A MINIMUM TWICE THE DIAMETER OF
THE ROOTBALL
3" LAYER OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH MOUNDED AT EDGE
TO FORM A SHALLOW SAUCER - DO NOT PLACE MULCH DIRECTLY
ON TREE TRUNK, LEAVE A MIN. 3" RING AROUND CROWN
ROOTBALL DIA
1.5 X ROOTBALL DIA
DEPTH OF
ROOTBALL
NEVER CUT PRIMARY LEADER
PRUNE ALL BROKEN, DAMAGED, OR RUBBING LIMBS AND
BRANCHES IMMEDIATELY AFTER PLANTING - ALL PRUNING CUTS
CLEAN AT 90 DEGREES
TREES 8'+TREES 6'-8'
TOP OF ROOTBALL TO BE SET ABOVE GRADE 3"
1/2" WIDE NYLON STRAPPING - COLOR TO BE APPROVED BY
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
*NOTE: DO NOT STAKE
TREES UNLESS
INDICATED.
STAKING DIAGRAM,
NO STAKING TREES UNDER
6'
REMOVE AT MINIMUM THE TOP HALF OF WIRE
BASKETS, BURLAP, TWINE - REMOVE THESE AND ALL
NON-BIODEGRADIBLE MATURIALS FROM THE
PLANTING PIT. AVOID CUTTING OR SCARING ROOTS.
ANY ROOTS THAT ARE SCARED OR BROKEN DURING
PLANTING SHOULD BE CUT CLEAN AT 90 DEGREES
BACKFILL PLANTING PIT PER TREE PLANTING
SPECIFICATIONS WHEN PROVIDED, OR WITH NATIVE
SOIL-EXCEPT WHEN IN HEAVY CLAY, MIX AMENDED
TOPSOIL FROM A LOCAL SOURCE WITH NATIVE SOIL.
DO NOT TAMP SOIL, BUT SATURATE WITH WATER
THROUGHOUT BACKFILL PROCESS.
EXCAVATE PLANTING PIT TO A DEPTH EQUAL TO
THE DEPTH OF THE ROOTBALL MINUS 3" AND A
MINIMUM TWICE THE DIAMETER OF THE ROOTBALL
3" LAYER OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH
MOUNDED AT EDGE TO FORM A SHALLOW SAUCER -
DO NOT PLACE MULCH WITHIN 3" OF TRUCK. WHEN IN
PLANT BED, SUBSTITUTE WITH PLANT BED MULCH.
ROOTBALL DIA
2X ROOTBALL DIA
DEPTH OF
ROOTBALL
NEVER CUT PRIMARY LEADER
PRUNE ALL BROKEN, DAMAGED, OR RUBBING LIMBS
AND BRANCHES IMMEDIATELY AFTER PLANTING -
ALL PRUNING CUTS CLEAN AT 90 DEGREES
TREES 8'+TREES 6'-8'
SET ROOT FLAIR ABOVE GRADE 3"
WHEN STAKED, ATTACH 1/2" WIDE NYLON
STRAPPING SNUGLY AROUND TRUCK AND, WITH
SOME LOOSENESS, TO STAKES AS SHOWN
NOTE:
* AVOID STAKING
UNLESS NECESSARY.
* NO STAKING TREES
UNDER 6'.
STAKING DIAGRAM
MUST MAINTAIN TRUNK IN VERTICAL ORIENTATION
TREE PLANTING DETAIL
NO SCALE
UNDISTURBED SOIL
MULCH, PER PLANS AND NOTES
BACKFILL PLANTING PIT PER SHRUB PLANTING
SPECIFICATIONS WHEN PROVIDED, OR WITH NATIVE
SOIL-EXCEPT WHEN IN HEAVY CLAY, MIX AMENDED
TOPSOIL FROM A LOCAL SOURCE WITH NATIVE SOIL
EXCAVATE PLANTING PIT TO A DEPTH EQUAL TO THE
DEPTH OF THE ROOTBALL / CONTAINER MINUS 3" AND
A MINIMUM TWICE THE DIAMETER OF THE ROOTBALL
/ CONTAINER - TILL ALL PLANTING BEDS TO A
MINIMUM DEPTH OF 6" THROUGHT
PLACE ROOTBALL ON UNDISTURBED SOIL AND
ENSURE PLANT IS PLUMB
ALL PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED SO THAT THE TOP OF
THE CROWN OF THE PLANT IS SLIGHTLY ABOVE
FINISH GRADE 3"
ROOTBALL DIA
2 TIMES ROOTBALL DIA
DEPTH OF
ROOTBALL
CUT AND REMOVE AT MINIMUM THE TOP HALF OF
WIRE BASKETS, BURLAP AND/OR TWINE, OR ENTIRE
CONTAINER, AND REMOVE FROM THE PLANTING PIT,
SCARIFY ROOTS FOR ALL CONTAINERIZED PLANTS 5
GALLONS OR SMALLER
CONTAINER DIA
2 TIMES CONTAINER DIA
SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL
NO SCALE
LOT 8
78,944 SF
NOPARKINGG
R=956.43
SAN MH
I=919.18
FO
BISCAYNE AVEEX 12" WATERMAINREGE
N
T
S
O
F
U
O
F
M
PID: 3
4
0
3
3
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
Z1
LOT 5
81,344 SF
LOT 6
61,594 SF
LOT 7
64,130 SF
LOT 4
84,759 SF LOT 3
63,248 SF
LOT 2
65,194 SFZ1 06/07/19 CITY COMMENTS TTK
22185 C6-LIGHT
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
PROJECT
TITLE
SHEET
REVISION SCHEDULE
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
DESIGNED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE
DRAWN BY
CLIENT PROJECT NO.
REVIEWED BY
WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED
THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,
-
TTK
TTK
RAS
18-22185
06/10/2019
C6-10
SITE LIGHTING
PLAN
C6-10 SITE LIGHTING PLAN
300 22185 C6-10
APPRO
DEVELOPMENT
BISCAYNE
BUSINESS PARK
MINNESOTAROSEMOUNT
LIC. NO.DATE
LIC. NO.DATE
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONREESE SUDTELGTE
XX/XX/XXXX 54243
NOTE:
THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND
UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOES
NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN
ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT IN
MISINTERPRETATION.
UTILITY EASEMENT, TYP.
0
SCALE IN FEET
20 40 60
MANUFACTURER/MODEL NUMBER
LIGHT FIXTURE SCHEDULE
STYLETYPE LAMPS REMARKS
Provide light fixtures as shown on Fixture Schedule. Substitutions shall have prior approval by the Project Engineer before bid date. Being listed as an
acceptable Manufacturer in no way relieves the Contractors obligation to provide all equipment and features in accordance with these specifications.
LIGHT POLE BASE DETAIL
N.T.S.
157TH STREET
UTILITY EASEMENT, TYP.
157TH STREET
LOT 8
78,944 SF
NOPARKINGG
R=956.43
SAN MH
I=919.18
FO
BISCAYNE AVEEX 12" WATERMAINREGE
N
T
S
O
F
U
O
F
M
PID: 3
4
0
3
3
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0
0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.7 1.0 1.4 1.8 2.0 2.1 1.9 1.5 1.2 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1
0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.7 1.1 1.5 2.2 3.0 3.8 4.1 3.5 2.6 1.8 1.3 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1
0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.7 3.7 5.8 6.7 4.5 3.0 2.3 1.7 1.2 0.8 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1
0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.9 1.4 2.0 2.6 4.0 4.8 5.8 4.2 3.3 2.3 1.6 1.1 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.1 1.3 1.5 2.8 4.1 1.9 1.4 1.2 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 1.1 1.2 0.8 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Z1
LOT 5
81,344 SF
LOT 6
61,594 SF
LOT 7
64,130 SF
LOT 4
84,759 SF LOT 3
63,248 SF
LOT 2
65,194 SFZ1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.7
0.8
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.7
0.6
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.5
0.7
1.0
1.4
1.8
2.0
2.1
1.9
1.5
1.2
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.5
0.7
1.1
1.5
2.2
3.0
3.8
4.1
3.5
2.6
1.8
1.3
0.9
0.6
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.4
0.6
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.7
3.7
5.8
6.7
4.5
3.0
2.3
1.7
1.2
0.8
0.5
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.9
1.4
2.0
2.6
4.0
4.8
5.8
4.2
3.3
2.3
1.6
1.1
0.7
0.5
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.1
1.3
1.5
2.8
4.1
1.9
1.4
1.2
0.9
0.7
0.5
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
1.1
1.2
0.8
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
06/07/19 CITY COMMENTS TTK
22185 C6-LIGHT
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
PROJECT
TITLE
SHEET
REVISION SCHEDULE
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
DESIGNED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE
DRAWN BY
CLIENT PROJECT NO.
REVIEWED BY
WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED
THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,
-
TTK
TTK
RAS
18-22185
06/10/2019
C6-11
PHOTOMETRICS
PLAN
C6-11 PHOTOMETRICS PLAN
300 22185 C6-11
APPRO
DEVELOPMENT
BISCAYNE
BUSINESS PARK
MINNESOTAROSEMOUNT
LIC. NO.DATE
LIC. NO.DATE
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONREESE SUDTELGTE
XX/XX/XXXX 54243
NOTE:
THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND
UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOES
NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN
ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT IN
MISINTERPRETATION.
0
SCALE IN FEET
20 40 60
157TH STREET
157TH STREET
MEMORANDUM
To: Kyle Klatt, Planner
CC: Kim Lindquist, Community Development Director
Brian Erickson, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
From: Stephanie Smith, Assistant City Engineer
Date: June 25, 2019
Subject: Biscayne Business Park Final Plat - Engineering Review
SUBMITTAL:
The plans for Biscayne Business Park have been prepared by I & S Group (ISG), dated June 7th,
2019. Engineering review comments were generated from the following documents included in
the submittal:
▫ Final Plat
▫ Existing Survey and Removal Plan
▫ Site Plan
▫ Road and Utility Plan
▫ Grading Plan
▫ SWPPP
▫ Restoration and Landscaping Plans
▫ Lighting Plan
▫ Stormwater Management Report
GENERAL COMMENTS:
The applicant has applied for both a final plat of the entire site and a site plan for Lot 1, Block 1.
Additional site plans will be submitted for the remaining lots as the applicant is ready to
development them. Note: all site plans must meet the requirements for the overall development
plat.
1. Development fees are required based on the current Schedule of Rates and Fees. For
2018, the estimated development fees are listed below:
GIS Fee: $10 / parcel
Storm Sewer Trunk Charge: $ 6,865 / acre
Sanitary Sewer Trunk Charge: $ 1,075 / acre
Watermain Trunk Charge: $ 6,500 / acre
2. The developer shall be responsible for a pro-rated share of the future cost associated
with the improvement of Biscayne Avenue. The front-foot rate is $110/FF.
3. Plans must be signed by an engineer registered in the state of Minnesota prior to grading
on site.
RIGHT OF WAY AND EASEMENTS:
4. Permits are required for work in Right-of-Way (ROW).
5. The width of Drainage and Utility (D&U) easements over all public utilities shall be
verified during final design.
6. Easements are required over all ponding and infiltration areas, and shall encompass at
minimum the HWL and all naturally vegetated areas. Signage for easements shall be
provided by the developer and an extended maintenance warranty shall be required to
ensure establishment of the naturally vegetated areas.
STREETS & PARKING LOTS
1. To maintain the integrity of the pavement, 157th Street shall have 24” ribbon curb.
2. Truck turning movements shall be shown on the plans for the driveway entrances.
3. The plans shall show the proposed radius for the cul-de-sac bubble.
4. The plan shall include an intersection detail for 157th Street and Biscayne Avenue.
5. The applicant shall submit a signage plan for review.
6. The street lighting plan shall be revised to comply with City standards.
WATERMAIN AND SANITARY SEWER
Biscayne Avenue does not have City sanitary main at this time. The applicant has proposed
temporarily connecting to a Metropolitan Council sanitary manhole on Biscayne Avenue.
7. When City-owned sanitary main is installed on Biscayne Avenue (anticipated in 2020),
the applicant shall permanently connect to City-sanitary. At the time of final plat, the
applicant shall deposit a security with the City to cover the cost of the removal of the
MCES connection, new connection to City sewer and restoration of the street. Plans and
a cost estimate for this connection shall be submitted to the City prior to construction.
8. The water and sanitary main lines shall be owned and maintained by the City.
9. The proposed water service lines are 8” diameter. The applicant shall verify with City
staff whether this is an appropriate service size for these properties.
10. The water and sanitary sewer construction plans shall be designed consistent with City of
Rosemount Engineering Guidelines and Standard Specifications and Detail Plates.
11. Watermain and Sanitary Sewer will be revised during final design. Typical revisions will
include number and placement of hydrants, gate valves and manholes.
STORMWATER
The stormwater management plan for this development proposes six infiltration basins with a
total of 8 cells, three on the northern property line and three on the southern property line.
12. City Engineering Guideline’s direct the construction of regional basins to promote
efficiencies in treatment and maintenance. As this development will continue to come to
the City with additional site plans, staff recommends developing a temporary stormwater
condition. As the applicant comes to staff with site plans, working towards consolidation
of the number of basins to produce efficiencies in the treatment and maintenance of the
stormwater system.
13. Stormwater facilities shall be owned and maintained by the business park’s HOA. The
applicant shall enter into a Stormwater Management Agreement with the City to be
recorded against the property. The agreement shall detail the applicant’s inspection and
maintenance responsibilities for their stormwater BMPs.
14. Upon completion of the infiltration basins, the applicant’s engineer shall submit
infiltrometer testing to certify the functionality of the basins as modeled.
WSB Engineering reviewed the Biscayne Business Park plans on behalf of the City. The full
memorandum, dated June 20, 2019, is included as an attachment. The recommendations are
summarized below:
15. Preference to provide stormwater management through the use of a regional system
versus site-by-site systems remains. Applicant will need to provide evidence for why a
regional basin is not feasible if current stormwater management system is to be
approved. Additionally, if a regional system is not feasible it is preferred that the
stormwater system only be constructed to handle Lot 1 development at this time and
that interim conditions stormwater modeling and plans be submitted. As the plans for
the reconstruction of Biscayne Avenue are being developed, additional conversations
between the City and the developer over possible collaboration for stormwater treatment
for the Biscayne Business Park and the road reconstruction are recommended.
16. Based on the equalizer pipe elevation, it appears the maintained water level for the
southwest basin will be set at 949.75. Similarly, it appears the maintained water level for
the northwest basin will be set at 951.0. Applicant should update the pipe elevations or
update the HydroCAD modeling as applicable.
17. Emergency overflow elevations and locations should be called out for all basins (SW,
south, SE, NW, north and NE) to ensure water will not flood proposed and future
buildings if pipes are not functioning as designed.
18. Grading between the 949 and 951 contours shown in the southeast pond have a slope of
2:1. Applicant should update grading to meet requirements listed above. Additionally,
maintenance benches should be graded extending upwards from the NWL rather than
below the water level surface as currently shown.
19. It is recommended that additional consideration be given to the design of the storm
sewer northeast of the cul-de-sac. Applicant should consider providing additional
separation between FES 5 and FES 6 by changing the ditch grading in the area.
20. It appears there is still HDPE proposed under driving surfaces. Pipes P2 and P3 are both
called out as HDPE and are shown under a proposed driving surface. Applicant should
update the plans so RCP pipes are being used under proposed driving surfaces, including
future proposed driving surfaces.
21. Pipe P-2 should be upsized to a 15” pipe per the City Engineering Guidelines.
22. Applicant should add proposed roof drain locations to the plans.
23. It is unclear what area is being counted towards the ‘provided infiltration area’ in Table
3.1 of the stormwater management report. Applicant should include calculations for the
provided infiltration area.
24. Dead pool calculations were not found in Appendix E. The contours below the surface
water for the stormwater ponds should be included in the HydroCAD model to confirm
required dead pool storage is being provided.
25. The area below the NWL of the ponds will need to be lined to ensure they hold water on
a permanent basis as designed.
SITE PLAN
The following conditions of approval are for the site plan proposed at Lot 1, Block 1 of the
Biscayne Business Park.
26. The site plan must meet the applicable conditions of approval for the overall
development plat as listed above.
27. A 10-foot turnaround at the end of the parking lot shall be added to the plan.
28. Additional flow arrows shall be labeled on the grading plan.
29. Label the contour line northwest of the building corner to determine if that area is a rise
or a depression.
Should you have any questions or comments regarding the items listed above, please contact me
at 651-322-2015.
Attachment:
WSB Memorandum Re: Biscayne Business Park Plan Review, dated 4/16/2019
MEMORANDUM
To: Kim Lindquist, Community Development Director
Kyle Klatt, Senior Planner
Anthony Nemcek, Planner
Brian Erickson, City Engineer/Public Works Director
Stephanie Smith, Assistant City Engineer
From: Dan Schultz, Parks and Recreation Director
Date: June 18, 2019
Subject: Biscayne Business Park Final Plat
The Parks and Recreation Department recently reviewed the plans for the Biscayne Business Park
Final Plat. After reviewing the plans, the Parks and Recreation Department staff has the following
comments:
PARKS DEDICATION
The parks dedication requirement for business park development is 10% of the land area or the cash
in lieu of land at $8,500 per acre. The total cash in lieu of land dedication for the entire development
is $112,880 ($8,500 per acre x 13.28 acres, which does not include road ROW).
Staff is recommending that the City collect cash in lieu of land for the Biscayne Business Park and
that the cash payment should be paid for each lot being created at the time of issuance of the
building permit for each lot in the plat. The price per lot is $14,110.
Please let me know if you have any questions about this memo.