Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPacket 4 ROSEMOU NT AGENDA City Council Regular Meetin my 17, 2007 /j\. CITY COUNCIL :30 p.m. City Council Chambers, City Hall 1. Call to Order/Pledge of Allegiance 2. Additions or Corrections to Agenda 3. Public Comment 4. Response to Public Comment 5. DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS/BUSINESS a. Special Event Update- Leprechaun Days 6. CONSENT AGENDA a. Minutes of the June 13, 2007 City Council Work Session Proceedings b. Minutes of the June 19, 2007 City Council Proceedings c. Bills Listing, Packet 1 d. Bills Listing, Packet 2 e. Budget Amendments f. Approval of Final Payment on Fire Station No. 2 Contractor g. Temporary On-Sale Liquor License for the Rosemount American Legion h. Temporary On-Sale Liquor Licenses for the Rosemount VFW i. Resolution and Consent Order for Rosemount Liquor j. Declaration of Surplus Equipment k. Authorization for Temporary Street Closings I. Appointment to St. Joseph's Church Facilities Task Force m. Receive Donation — Parks and Recreation Dept. n. Expenditure Approval from the Donation Account—Parks and Recreation Dept. o. Receive Plans & Spec's/Authorize Ad for Bid-CSAH 42/Shannon Parkway Intersection Improvements, City Project#412 p. Acquisition of Easement—CSAH 42/Shannon Pkwy Intersection Improvements, City Project#412 q. Receive Bids/Award Contract-Connemara Trail/Azalea Avenue Reconstruction, City Project 415 r. Change Order#3-Old Cty Rd 38/132nd Ct.W. Street& Utility Improvements, City Project#387 s. Request Speed Study—Old Cty Rd 38/132nd Ct W Street& Utility Improvements, City Project #387 t. Change Order#1 -Flint Hills Resources Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Extension, City Project #406 u. Ryan Companies Preliminary Plat v. Abrahamsen Lot Split w. Rosewood Village 2nd Addition (Ryan Real Estate) Minor PUD Amendment x. UMore Advisory Panel Appointments y. Award Abatement Bid 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS a. Rosemount Saw&Tool Sewer Easement Vacation 8. OLD BUSINESS 9. NEW BUSINESS a. Tree Preservation Ordinance b. 42/52 Official Map c. ISD#917 Conditional Use Permit d. Joint Powers Agreement— Lebanon Hills Regional Park 10. ANNOUNCEMENTS 11. ADJOURNMENT 4 ROSEMOUNT ADMINISTRATION MEMORANDUM To: Mayor and Council Members From: Jamie Verbrugge, City Administrator Date: July 17, 2007 Subject: Council Agenda Updates 1. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: CONSENT AGENDA Item 6.w. Rosewood Village 2nd Addition (Ryan Real Estate) Minor PUD Amendment. The recommended action has been revised to include an additional housing type. Motion to execute a Minor Amendment to the Rosewood Village Townhomes Planned Unit Development (also known as Rosewood Village 2"d Addition) allowing eight (8) housing types, subject to conditions. 2. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: CONSENT AGENDA Item 6.x. UMore Advisory Panel Appointments. Staff recommends that Sandra Knight be appointed as the representative for the Parks Commission. 3. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: NEW BUSINESS Item 8.a. Tree Preservation Ordinance. The recommended action has been revised to include a motion to approve the draft Resolution Authorizing Publication of Ordinance No. 2007-190. 1. Motion to approve an Ordinance amending the City of Rosemount Zoning Ordinance B relating to Landscape Requirement and Tree Preservation. 2. Motion to adopt a Resolution authorizing publication of Ordinance No. B-190 amending Ordinance B, the Zoning Ordinance relating to Landscape Requirement and Tree Preservation. 4. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: NEW BUSINESS Item 8.b. 42/52 Official Map. The recommended action has been revised to include a motion to approve the draft Resolution Authorizing Publication of Ordinance No. 2007- 189. 1. Motion to approve an Ordinance adopting the City of Rosemount TH 52/CSAH 42 Official Map of Proposed Right-of-Way. 2. Motion to approve a Resolution authorizing publication of Ordinance No. B-189 adopting the City of Rosemount TH 52/CSAH 42 Official Map of Proposed Right-of- Way. 4 4 ROSEMOUNTT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CITY COUNCIL City Council Meeting Date: July 17, 2007 AGENDA ITEM: Case 06-30-AMD — Rosewood Village 2nd— AGENDA SECTION: Addition (Ryan Real Estate) Minor PUD Amendment PREPARED BY: Jason Lindahl, AICP AGENDA NO. Planner L iU ATTACHMENTS: Location Map, Rosewood Village 2"d APPROVED BY: Addition Minor PUD Amendment, The Allyson dated 04-12-07, The Amber 3 dated 06-25-07, The Ashton dated 03-07- 07, The Elliana dated 04-03-07, The Kylie dated Received on 06-27-07, The Lanigan dated 06-04-07, The Temperance dated Received on 06-27-07, The Kyla dated Received on 06-16-07 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to execute a Minor Amendment to the Rosewood Village Townhomes Planned Unit Development (also known as Rosewood Village 2nd Addition) allowing eight (8) new housing types, subject to conditions. SUMMARY Applicant&Property Owner(s): Ryan Real Estate Company Location: South of 145th Street,North of the Railroad Spur and West of Biscayne Avenue Area in Acres: 14.5 Acres Comp. Guide Plan Desig: UR—Urban Residential Current Zoning: R-1,Low Density Residential PUD The applicant,Ryan Real Estate Company,requests a Minor Amendment to the Rosewood Village Townhome Planned Unit Development Agreement (also know as Rosewood Village Second Addition).The proposed amendment would allow eight(8) new housing types to the list of permitted homes for this neighborhood. The subject property is located south of 145th Street,north of Blueberry Court, east of the railroad spur and Greif Brother Packaging, and west of Biscayne Avenue. BACKGROUND Rosewood Village Second Addition represents the detached townhome portion of the Rosewood neighborhood and contains 56 detached townhome sites. The applicant last amended the PUD 4 ROSEN43I.JN11T EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CITY COUNCIL City Council Regular Meeting: June 17, 2007 AGENDA ITEM: Case 07-05-TA Tree Preservation AGENDA SECTION: Ordinance REVISED New Business PREPA RED BY: Eric Zweber, AICP; Senior Planner AGENDA NO. I , ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance, Resolution, Comparison of Other Cities' Tree Preservation Ordinances, Excerpt from the June 13 City Council Work Session Minutes, Excerpt APPROVED BY: from the March 13 Planning Commission Workshop Minutes, Excerpt from the April 24 Planning Commission Meeting. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Motion to approve an Ordinance amending the City of Rosemount Zoning Ordinance B relating to Landscape Requirement and Tree Preservation. 2. Motion to adopt a Resolution authorizing publication of Ordinance No. B-190 amending Ordinance B, the Zoning Ordinance relating to Landscape Requirement and Tree Preservation. ISSUE In the past year, a number of Planning Commissioners and City Councilmembers have expressed frustration with our Tree Preservation Ordinance. One specific comment has been that the ordinance encourages tree replacement over the preservation of existing trees. Staff has evaluated a number of other cities' tree preservation ordinances and has proposed an ordinance that focuses on preserving truly exceptional trees while allowing other trees to be removed provided replacement trees are planted. CHANGES MADE AS A RESULT OF THE JUNE 13 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION A number of issues were discussed by the City Council regarding tree preservation at their June 13, 2007 City Council meeting. As a result of these discussions,the following changes have been made to the ordinance: • Clarification of the tree replacement requirement for developers versus home and business owners. • Maximum tree removal before replacement is set at a flat rate of 25%. • Added a list of acceptable tree replacement species and clarified that it is the City's prerogative to approve additional replacement species. • Woodlots are not identified specifically within the ordinance. Developers will be responsible to identify all significant and heritage trees within wooded lots and replacement will be based on any tree removed beyond the threshold. Large stands of existing trees will be identified and addressed by other City plans and regulations, such as wetland buffers, the interpretative corridor,parkland dedication, or private open space within planned unit developments. The old ordinance mentioned ROSEN4OUNTEXECUTIVE SUMMARY CITY COUNCIL City Council Regular Meeting: July 17, 2007 AGENDA ITEM: Case 07-24-OM City of Rosemount TH AGENDA SECTION: 52/CSAH 42 Official Map of Proposed New Business Right-of-Way REVISED PREPARED BY: Tom Morton, Planning Intern AGENDA NO. 61t0i ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance, Resolution, US Highway 52/County Road 42 Official Map, Excerpt from the June 26 Planning Commission Minutes, Alternative 5b, US Highway APPROVED BY: 52/County Road 42 Memorandum of Understanding, US Highway 52/County Road 42 Ownership Table RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Motion to approve an Ordinance adopting the City of Rosemount TH 52/CSAH 42 Official Map of Proposed Right-of-Way. 2. Motion to approve a Resolution authorizing publication of Ordinance No. B-189 adopting the City of Rosemount TH 52/CSAH 42 Official Map of Proposed Right-of-Way. ISSUE The current intersection of County Road 42/US Highway 52 is scheduled to be reconstructed as an interchange to address future growth in the area. In 2003,Dakota County, the Minnesota Department of Transportation,and the City of Rosemount developed a joint solution to construct a more efficient intersection that can carry higher volumes of traffic. The 2003 MnDot approved layout is the basis for the official map currently before the Council. Currently there is an engineering study which will provide more detailed plans associated with the interchange project. Adopting the Official Map will prevent development from occurring in the right-of-way needed for the new interchange,between the time of approval of the Official Map and actual construction of the 52/42/55 interchange. SUMMARY In May 2002, a traffic analysis study was conducted by the Minnesota Department of Transportation,in collaboration with Dakota County and the City of Rosemount, to look at seven alternatives aimed at meeting future travel demand for the 52/42/55 interchange. The alternatives ranged from single point urban interchange to a full cloverleaf. While conducting the study, a balance was reached between right-of-way needed and function of the intersection. This balance was best illustrated in alternative 5b, a hybrid cloverleaf and folded diamond II. Following the recommendation of the study, the City of Rosemount entered into a memorandum of understanding with the state recognizing that alternative 5b was the best CITY OF ROSEMOUNT DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2007- A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF ORDINANCE NO. 2007-189 ADOPTING THE CITY OF ROSEMOUNT TH 52/CSAH 42 OFFICIAL MAP OF PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount recommended City Council approval of these amendments after holding a public hearing on June 26,2007; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rosemount adopted Ordinance No. B-189 adopting the City of Rosemount TH 52/CSAH 42 Official Map of Proposed Right-of-Way; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.191, Subd. 4 allows publication by title and summary in the case of lengthy ordinances; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the following summary would clearly inform the public of the intent and effect of the Ordinance. NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the City of Rosemount that the City Clerk shall cause the following summary of Ordinance No. B-189 to be published in the official newspaper in lieu of the entire ordinance: Public Notice During their July 17, 2007,meeting, the City Council of the City of Rosemount adopted Ordinance No. B-189. The ordinance adopts the City of Rosemount TH 52/CSAH 42 Official Map of Proposed Right-of-Way. In summary, the new ordinance adopts the Official Map allows Dakota County to purchase property prior to development on lands that have been identified as future right-of-way for construction of the 52/42/55 interchange. The Official Map is based upon the 2003 MnDot approved layout for the interchange and adjoining highways. The official map covers the area approximately ''A mile surrounding the intersection of County Road 42 and Highway 52. NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of Ordinance No. B-189 shall be kept in the City Clerk's office at City Hall for public inspection and a full copy of the ordinance be posted in the lobby of City Hall for 30 days after adoption. Resolution 2007- ADOPTED this 17th day of July, 2007,by the City Council of the City of Rosemount. William H. Droste, Mayor ATTEST: Amy Domeier, City Clerk Motion by: Second by: Voted in favor: Voted against: Member absent: ROSEN4EIUNTEXECUTIVE SUMMARY CITY COUNCIL City Council Meeting: July 17, 2007 AGENDA SECTION: AGENDA ITEM: Declaration of Surplus Property Consent PREPARED BY: Gary Kalstabakken, Chief of Polic r • NDA NO. 651. J ATTACHMENTS: None APPROVED BY: RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to declare the listed items and authorize c. staff to sell as authorized by City Code and state statute or to dispose of those items that are not able to be sold. The Council is asked to declare the listed items as surplus property. This declaration will authorize staff to sell those items that have value and those items that are found to not be saleable to be disposed. These items are the result of two actions. The listed air compressor was left in the Genz- Ryan property and became part of the purchase of the property by the Port Authority. There is not a need for this equipment within any city department. The other items are various pieces of emergency equipment from squad cars. All light bars, sirens, etc. were replaced on the squads over the last two years. The age and condition of the replaced equipment was such that no trade in value was offered by the vendor who did the installation of the new equipment. Radio items are no longer needed because of the transition to 800 MHz later this year. Attempts will be made to sell the items through the League of MN Cities website and the police chiefs association electronic newsletter. If no purchases come forward, the items will be scrapped. ► t 1. (5) Code 3 — "Mastercom" Model - 3892L6 - Light and Siren Control 2. (1) Code 3 — "V-con" Model — 367214 — Light and Siren Control 3. (5) Code 3 —ArrowStik Control Head 4. (6) Radio / Emergency Equipment Center Consoles ➢ Serial Numbers 23040595 28610995 26140995 52850898 5450598 26200995 5. (6) Def Tek— Shotgun / Rifle gun locks—vehicle mounted 6. (7) 3 position 12 volt DC socket multiplier (3 position cigarette lighter for accessories) 7. (5) Uniden Bearcat Model BC560XLT Scanner ➢ Serial Numbers 85002723 8. (1) Lip mounted scanner antenna 9. (3) Siren Speaker 10.(4) Sets - 1 red & 1 blue — Halogen grill lights 11.(1) Set— red & white — Halogen alley light 12.(5) 3M Opticom Stobes — not the emitters 13.(2) Ignition override switches (unknown if complete) 14.(3) Radio / computer speakers 15.(5) Power / noise filters 16.(4) Sets — 1 red & 1 blue - Code 3 AS1 Deck Lights 17.(1) Code 3 Slick Stik — Halogen rear deck Arrowstik with red & blue rotators ➢ Serial Number— L88201 18.(1) Code 3 — Model MX7000 — Halogen Light bar 19.(1) Speedaire Compressor 2 RESEN1OUNTEXECUTIVE SUMMARY CITY COUNCIL City Council Regular Meeting: July 17, 2007 AGENDA SECTION: AGENDA ITEM: Award Abatement Bid Consent PREPARED BY: Kim Lindquist, Community Development AGENDA NO. L .J • Director ATTACHMENTS: Draft Resolution, Bid Sheets APPROVED BY: RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve the Resolution awarding the abatement ntract to Robinson Environmental for not more than $27,057.00. BACKGROUND The City acquired the St.Joseph's church property in 2004 to provide land for a new Dakota County Library. One of the western lots of the library site contains a convent at 14400 Cameo Avenue. The building is now empty and will need to be demolished in preparation for construction of the library. DISCUSSION In order to prepare the building at 14400 Cameo Avenue for demolition, the first step is to assess the property for hazardous materials and then solicit bids for the clean-up. The assessment has been completed and based upon that, the City received two bids for the required abatement. One was from Red Pine Industries in the amount of$29,770.00. The other was from Robinson Environmental in the amount of$27,057.00. Staff was informed the high quotes are due to asbestos floor tile and black adhesive used to hold the floor down. Both are highly labor intensive to remove. Based on the staffs review, the services needed for abatement of the hazardous materials at 14400 Cameo Avenue should not exceed$27,057.00 using the estimates provided by Robinson Environmental. Staff is recommending approval of the low bid by Robinson Environmental for not more than $27,057.00. RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending approval of the attached resolution. CITY OF ROSEMOUNT DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2007- RESOLUTION AWARDING THE HAZARDOUS MATERIAL ABATEMENT CONTRACT TO ROBINSON ENVIRONMENTAL FOR $27,057.00 WHEREAS, the City Council for the City of Rosemount acquired the St.Joseph's church property in 2004 to provide land for a new Dakota County Library; WHEREAS, one building on the site has been slated for demolition located at 14400 Cameo Avenue; WHEREAS, the City of Rosemount's Building Official received two bids relating to the abatement of hazardous material at the demolition site;and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the proposals submitted by two vendors and Robinson Environmental was the lowest bidder for the project. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED the City Council has chosen Robinson Environmental and awarded the contract not to exceed$27,057.00. ADOPTED this 17th day of July, 2007. William H. Droste,Mayor ATTEST: Amy Domeier, City Clerk Motion by: Second by: Voted in favor: Voted against: Member absent: Red Pine Industries, Inc. 1946 West County Road C Roseville, MN 55113 Phone (651) 645-8600 July 3, 2007 Fax (651) 645-8617 City of Rosemount Attn: Mr. Alan Strand 2875 145th Street Rosemount, MN. 55068 Re: Asbestos and hazardous material removal at 14400 Cameo We propose to remove and dispose of the asbestos and hazardous waste materials as noted on the inspection report dated 05/30/2007 by Red Pine Industries, Inc. for the following address in Rosemount, MN. 14400 Cameo Avenue$29,770.00 Our price includes labor, materials, equipment, disposal, air monitoring, permits, and insurance as required by state, federal and local agencies. If you have any questions please contact us at(651) 645-8600. Our price is valid for 30 days past bid date You will be invoiced upon completion of the project and payment is due in 10 days from receiving the invoice. You will receive copies of the permit, air tests and waste manifest with your invoice. Sincerely Steven K. Coles Project manager/ Estimator Acceptance: Date: City of Rosemount Equal Opportunity Employer July 06, 2007 Proposal to: City of Rosemount Port Authority From: Robinson Environmental. For: Asbestos Abatement at 14400 Cameo street furnish all labor, materials, equipment, supplies, disposal The work will include removal of asbestos containing materials @ 14400 Cameo Avenue under C. 1. Price 27,057.00 • Tim Robinson Robinson Environmental 4714 67th Ave North,Brooklyn Center Fax: (763)566-4681 ROSE \4OUNT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CITY COUNCIL City Council Regular Meeting Date: July 17, 2007 AGENDA SECTION: AGENDA ITEM: UMore Advisory Panel Appointments Consent PREPARED BY: Kim Lindquist, Community Development AGENDA NO. Director ATTACHMENTS: None. APPROVED BY: RECOMMENDED ACTION: Appoint City Council Member Kim Shoe-Corrigan, V rt Authority Member William Droste, Planning Commission Jason Messner, and Ut ity Commissioner Shawn Mulhern to serve on the UMore Advisory Panel. BACKGROUND As the Council is aware, planning staff has initiated the 2030 Comprehensive Plan process and has indicated that the UMore property will be a separate amendment to the adopted 2030 Plan. At the City Council work session on July 11, 2007, representatives from UMore gave a presentation on the process involved in the development of a comprehensive plan amendment for the UMore property. As part of the public involvement in the process, an advisory panel will be created consisting of representatives from the City of Rosemount, Empire Township, Dakota County, Metropolitan Council and other interested parties as approved by the City of Rosemount and Empire Township. DISCUSSION Staff is recommending that one member from each City of Rosemount advisory committee serve on the UMore Advisory Panel. Staff's recommendation of the appointees is as follows: City Council Member Kim Shoe-Corrigan,Port Authority Member William Droste,Planning Commissioner Jason Messner, and Utility Commissioner Shawn Mulhern. A Parks Commissioner will also be added to the list. Due to Commissioner vacation schedules, staff is working to firm up the Parks representative. The first meeting is anticipated sometime in August with approximately 10-12 meetings over the next 18-24 months. CONCLUSION Staff requests the Council formally approve the appointment of City Council Member Kum Shoe-Corrigan, Port Authority Member William Droste,Planning Commissioner Jason Messner, and Utility Commissioner Shawn Mulhern to serve on the UMore Advisory Panel. ROSEV1OUNT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CITY COUNCIL City Council Regular Meeting: July 17, 2007 AGENDA ITEM: Sanitary Sewer Easement Vacation at AGENDA SECTION: 14650 Robert Trail South (Lot 4 Block 3, Public Hearing Rosemount Addition) PREPARED BY: Eric Zweber; Senior Planner AGENDA NO. 7.a. ATTACHMENTS: Vacation Resolution, Sanitary Sewer As APPROVED BY: Built, 1955 Sanitary Sewer Easement RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to adopt a resolution approving the Vacatio f the Sanitary Sewer Easement at 14650 Robert Trail South. ISSUE On June 5, 2007, the Port Authority approved the purchase of the Rosemount Saw and Tool property at 14650 Robert Trail South,which is legally described as Lot 4 Block 3, Rosemount Addition. Upon conducting the title search,it was discovered that there is a sanitary sewer easement over the entire property for a sanitary sewer line and manhole located in the back half of the property. This sewer line runs north from the trunk sewer line in Lower 147th Street West through the backs of the three properties to the south of 19650 Robert Trail South (the antique shop, Quilter's Haven, and Music Magic) to a manhole located roughly in the middle of the former Rosemount Saw and Tool property. With the purchase of this property with the intention to redevelop Core Block East, the need for this sewer connection is no longer needed and can be eliminated. With the need for the sewer connection gone, the City should vacate the sanitary sewer easement on this property to allow for redevelopment free from this encumbrance. Following the easement vacation, the sanitary sewer manhole will need to be moved to the south, either to the property line or onto the Music Magic property. The relocation could occur either before the sale of this property to Stonebridge or could be relocated as a part of the Core Block East redevelopment. CONCLUSION Staff recommends the approval of the easement vacation. 16. CITY OF ROSEMOUNT DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2007- A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE VACATION OF THE SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT AT 14650 ROBERT TRAIL SOUTH WHEREAS,in 1954, the Village of Rosemount recorded a sanitary sewer easement over 14650 Robert Trail South, the property legally described as: Lot 4 Block 3, Rosemount Addition, Dakota County,Minnesota WHEREAS,the City of Rosemount purchased the property at 14650 Robert Trail South for the purposes of redeveloping Core Block East;and WHEREAS, the redevelopment of Core Block East has the ability to receive sanitary sewer service from the sanitary sewer lines within Lower 147th Street West, 146th Street West, or Burma Avenue; and WHEREAS, the 1954 sanitary sewer easement on Lot 4 Block 3, Rosemount Addition is no longer needed. NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Council of the City of Rosemount hereby approves the Vacation of the Sanitary Sewer Easement at 14650 Robert Street South legally described as: A sanitary sewer easement vacation over, under, and across all the property described as: Lot 4 Block 3, Rosemount Addition,Dakota County,Minnesota ADOPTED this 17th day of July, 2007 by the City Council of the City of Rosemount. William H. Droste,Mayor ATTEST: Amy Domeier, City Clerk RESOLUTION 2007- Motion by: Second by: Voted in favor: Voted against: Member absent: 2 Y 0 *:A, 0 y /oe, • //61;;.t.?:,: ,-,/, 14- 7 '''-` 10 , w.wA�_C Sfi G'-EL 5%o . ,�__ _---_.-0-------' t *•� 04 r � N w v W '4 d w 064 tb r ,50 i'0 -cc MP ui 1 n u u\ S ev .., u a tah q Ni A • o 1 6i � = . 0 44 r ) n,s1 a - b rn • /#96.7W.• • 0 li i ztaosW t�. GrE%•94.% ...... Vh4 WEB I A - G., ,,,, „ Ki Z______ , o /� d o a o 1 1• 4 r \\\\\\.., /so' i DSO• ° N #� isFiV ' . Off `, � G.E/.9Rso 0 .. h1 0 - so I �So 0 1 0 N. Q o 0 ,2 �_ �J �°.. 0 98W .,, u 1, * /trey" 1 \1 f` 16 _ — Haw 6-p E:/Ce U') /t55 nf/i• O © p . t t i. : N \ N '4 _ L , I 1 Li in 4 4 I ,� , 763) 1 /t30 NW y�of s : L. .• ® u� 1 $ ro '��- o b+ (h y adn s,r N 0 t W J q i / - .r5o 4 A I 4\.\1 _«� -_, 0 . A r----1- �l G,.r`i 5 -� _0 I -.v, lbs o \ i • f .\\\\\\N - • - ! • tR.r ftt1 ' ' '' -* }' v'..1 �nr1 j • • { ° • ° r F L v �9 si , *d.s !. r. i a `.„. }it, tar dN b ` . .., y z�.l ¢ - -1;A' • +i r. '.t, t. f Rry, Ft&sr r•v' '< -i�`` ''! '- •` '4 1. ,y 4X : :iT T 1. ' � . � ♦tY .4 ...� l p' f i.. , I •7 f 11 4.,i'•.!--.4 ..*:,•1. !,,k,',......,i,,.. .;,-,4".%,..•.i.._',..4i..-..e:';'''..- ....w•.:0 '-i:'..•' .•• ''''='!''''':ii.;• :43:;74,02.',..:.. ;.-.8'.14)..k •I' xt...-,.... ; fe, 7, �. I I' -•�\ • y, i ^S l v �P' L T �1 83• c.Jt:M:y'• U'�' !- �;{p''-t 'I-.i-1 7 { Kar -• x�s ....et ;,� °� - .• •+! 4"r ••s aC I1L1 { c. • O • i'• , ai � s i r d .°y- Sa .S.' @ _ az•e�'... as fl 0�' 00 4.3 0 @ 0 . .0 A t 1 j i •� p p m •rI • QC,p . rl • .!i .�7..t .. ',':fie r . °It . -4.1 QL. •., (.�y fA to IP v� '+3 w •r•1 '0 0 . ( • / - • •, "" 1 " '"•Q< i • '_" • �.• ./�j'�.,1 _ @ C ffi @ to Y a ta .• • •,. -ri.p 4-i 0 a3.ea % • et ta • 4-4 r�a '� wl,, "' O -V4. iam r C• A •a - rN.c '�t . ' -3" M•1' • .' a ti .) ' 0 GY 4tk " y cd if, } r - .1 ', O '- -1i��� @ m ':04) -Y tip .•.4t, a`' ,va: P • .0` c.r7) +3 F7. Tom+} t • .t 4 --Q- w t 4." , Tti ' w•0 S., +3 of.0 F4 .0 O a co r n xr.'0) O E 04 ;. •I 1,, '' •., .' ,LLrr' z{4` .N: • ., ,- 41 �+ O 'ri iy N td • ."�'. „yl'•• 1 JiL(3\' '�. '`in ..:i •.,. rti•O '@ 'Lf @ +1 i. ' _- �'*.'" ,n 4.1• � - Jam• • ` ., 0` jy i..� 4Z U ♦♦-1 0 0 4? :'.' •.,•- 0 ! 0+ Gi �0 - ' .g:C ' , cm U 17. U is to . t i ,ria 0. • � o PI �' Q.o F- ,i2 p X Yy L +•s •11..0- • +) _n N la Fr O @7 7 y • 44 J t a �s i 1 k t.''�'r - , - q! w '.icy :... s[1 x�l.` Ey Fa g� d N i > i 't, Si-! ?'.�: • ,':`�,„ „• Y 1 • '::z g!O.P.,• H SO • ..,-I FL N .,1, i `P i ,v r.m. a'. '.,; • R. N • 4,.0 3` .O. f.1 W H O 'CI '0 T! .X a ;`t • a 'r.':. td .U' - A C7 cm W R7 @ C Cr un 1 a �i O w ri Cam.':fti', . H.t06 Cn•-.T:1 O 0 0 c{S_ d7 7 @ @ @ ' Y' !p;4'`:' *:.* .e.414 " @u 43. '4 W w N Cs. S r-I N N N O t it t I, i 4-1 n i F •f. o}tYv • r .0..i F.A ' ' it«4.g-,', .,Ti Ill -.'O 'ri*ci, y V A ba �a.V. { 1 ''. 3 i v•�• PI! a'{a V,: a: . .U 3 • O C rl '@ .�4 r• W y �1 ch • { gis • 'a t•. L ♦.,L':r•i, 1r aft>s ,• ' t 1 • I ` el Cyr. -iz I S a; 8'. 4 f• '72F yea yJ ,+4 .r f- ,d Ya� -rid . { .s3' � } � '� rt yl 6 y �-' t -. -'� r S,- 1 is y d i .J Qn + �".z4u' Yr4 � � � II T a . 1�� "1 �j .+- 1: g • . 5 Pam QN cd N"x'o `4-) m Li S-, .r'r o r4-1-1 ca. Cai $ O H O O �J w Ism.. ' s_ .0 ' i.•r-• �Ot O ~ W cd IID i ' CD -0 +) C N OA v � � 7 y JN P, m N N G7 C.---4A cd1O N •r-I O a) •ri S. W A 0 Q I U ❑ 4. F. is cd O N shill ' : z 0 , - to .9 Al U N › N g U es 4 csO +N y M C r. 3 G ' a1 F. O U +3 w 0 N ' cd mtj O •.. .0 O P. x ?mm 0 aN N U f) U {7. N w r-1 CC -) ?a rf 'd +) c�-} r O.•EO r1 cd • CS •ri d .4 0 0 o Cd w 4 ai 1 €, a) O O - O •0 cC + 3 N U 'd d aC3cdO •r� Q 4-1 OO O S. d S. F+ F N � 3 .0 04+3 I. PQ. x O :1i a 0 .) a a Cl) m Cl) to 4 1 a) d d N) 3 0 UO .co ) 4-1 I N.0 C '� 0) w: aI HN F)- +) 0 O ;. r-I oo a) 0 +) 0 •rI +> cd 0 0-1 O +) 0 ,C P �� •tf 3 O 4� t 0 0 -0 O N S. O 0 a) R. x O •.a al V . P. ° R 0 r!) d) a)• 1 0 C v.w Ti -N N Cl) Cl) a) C) c0 o cd ' . o •� O .,�' O +) 0 0 += a) -0 O s~ rn w Sc.� 4-4 w cd 0 to .O 'd F. y� N Ja7� 4 R. G �. F1, N oo}DN . an 0 0 (13 U i 3 0 , cd • a a a O 0 00N A) CS � R+ a) S. Q)O 0 Cry F. O 4- N N +) 0.-I-)) w•. - 3 a r-I F s N C CV H a) v) 0 F, K 0 +) 4-1 -v 0 C H +) -C -N 0 o Oa) • ° n r-4 y `n d :H c 1 R. daH ...0C0 3 ' 0 � U ° y a)0 .52 o- cd a) = U) 0 3 S. S.Cr) O 4) O cd • 4 +) N a +) 6 0 Cil .C) n CC) ) . 0 a FU. +v 0 O O G .c�33 , Ocd N -� 4. 0 O P. 4-1 y O a) a) • cd 4 0 S1.-0 +3 O s~ a H O N N N S. 0 a) Q .0 'CY 'O cii C a) •ri () cd o4) tic a) 'L) +) cd a N° a n ° to In G a .0 r w t cd • d O F. L. + • 0 NC +a) O + y N U4a) O Fi •r w N. U € 0. 054.. Ena4-I M 0s +) 4- .p r-I• 0 'd 0 N •O•rH a) cd a) R. 0 . F. a) w rr) a` 0) a'd r' ' ) -) S.. cd S. . U...1 a) a) 0 S. 1 � a 0)C 4 S. •d 0 +) 0 ..) v 0 S. 0 d 'C +) a) U a) a) r-1 � + Q , m0 ( Q)S' Nc .5 .0 F. + a) 40a)U > y r I m N3 ) O O' .Oa .0 0 C .•-. .P U O 'd H O +) +) a +) . 4-4 4.) z v o '3 6 +) £ o o +, w'a ca 3 0 U O a0i 'd a-, a) p, • U cd w O N N cd 0 '0 U 0 C •-) • d N 0 o -) >n � C C F. t7 � EN dC C . "N '� O 0 cd +) � FQc . , N t U crs F O ^ a) cd r G O cd cd cd Z � 4 r1 qn .O t) N O N w U H SA o ri d W r •r1 cd d .0 2 a) L+ rn^ to O G s. a) 0 a) F. O cu ) =+ is .-) rn H .0 F. (r�n O 'O U U Ili 4. 5 f c� O O r" cd D m 4+ N C 4.) O E O� r-I N N N O O O r-f ! Z �: c''•1 +Ile q o) O o r-, `� C.> O cd H �$ O a) N .N ct o O �0 N .0 N O •ri a) 0 a) cd +) F+ 6 ✓�./ 2 z .2 O �-. Fa 0 Qi CH +) 4.1 rn O CS O N N • cd cf) O r*. +) U N i) x O - O C O 0 azi O a) .0 cd 4� 4-1 4 •rl Sa 0 •$. 0 O .0 rtia O .0 '1 LA a:-1 L 0 N S. O MEL • ROSEMOL1NTEXECUTIVE SUMMARY CITY COUNCIL City Council Meeting Date: July 17, 2007 AGENDA ITEM: Case 06-30-AMD — Rosewood Village 2nd— AGENDA SECTION: Addition (Ryan Real Estate) Cots . Minor PUD Amendment PREPARED BY: Jason Lindahl, AICP AGENDA NO.(P Planner •Vi• ATTACHMENTS: Location Map, Rosewood Village 2nd APPROVED BY: Addition Minor PUD Amendment,The - Allyson dated 04-12-07, The Amber 3 dated 06-25-07, The Ashton dated 03-07- 07, The Elliana dated 04-03-07, The Kylie dated Received on 06-27-07, The Lanigan dated 06-04-07, The Temperance dated Received on 06-27-07 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to execute a Minor Amendment to the Rosewood Village Townhomes Planned Unit Development (also known as Rosewood Village 2nd Addition) allowing seven (7) new housing types, subject to conditions. SUMMARY Applicant&Property Owner(s): Ryan Real Estate Company Location: South of 145th Street,North of the Railroad Spur and West of Biscayne Avenue Area in Acres: 14.5 Acres Comp. Guide Plan Desig: UR—Urban Residential Current Zoning: R-1,Low Density Residential PUD The applicant, Ryan Real Estate Company,requests a Minor Amendment to the Rosewood Village Townhome Planned Unit Development Agreement (also know as Rosewood Village Second Addition). The proposed amendment would allow seven (7) new housing types to the list of permitted homes for this neighborhood. The subject property is located south of 145th Street,north of Blueberry Court, east of the railroad spur and Greif Brother Packaging, and west of Biscayne Avenue. BACKGROUND Rosewood Village Second Addition represents the detached townhome portion of the Rosewood neighborhood and contains 56 detached townhome sites. The applicant last amended the PUD agreement in May of 2006 to add five additional housing styles. In response to the changing needs of n . their customers as well as to further diversify the housing stock of this neighborhood, the applicant wishes to amend the PUD agreement again to add seven (7) additional housing units. Elevations and plan for these new products are included in the attached Minor PUD Amendment. ISSUE By ordinance,Minor PUD Amendments are administratively approved by staff. However,given this is an amendment to a contract, the City Council must formally approve the change. Minor amendments may be administratively approved where staff determines that review and approval by the planning commission and city council of a detailed site and building plan is unnecessary to meet the objectives of the PUD ordinance. When making this determination staff must find that the proposed amendment does not: 1. Substantially alter the location of buildings,parking areas or roads. 2. Increase or decrease the number of residential dwelling units by more than five percent (5%). 3. Increase the gross floor area of nonresidential buildings by more than five percent (5%) or increase the gross floor area of any individual building by more than ten percent (10%). 4. Increase the number of stories of any building. 5. Decrease the amount of open space by more than five percent (5%) or alter it in such a way as to change its original design or intended use. 6. Create noncompliance with any special condition attached to the approval of the master development plan. In this case, staff finds the proposed amendment to add seven (7) new housing products to the list of permitted housing plans in the Rosewood Village Townhome PUD does not violate any of the criteria listed above and therefore does not require review of a detailed site and building plan by the Commission or Council. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Council execute a Minor Amendment to the Rosewood Village Townhomes Planned Unit Development allowing seven (7) new housing types, subject to conditions. This recommendation is based on the finding that the proposed seven (7) new housing products are consistent with the terms and conditions of the original PUD and will serve to further diversify the housing stock of this neighborhood. 2 Rosewood Village 2nd Addition BEECH ST W i �,ommN,r1i�i °� 1-6ve C NA/x.1,N I I I I l f I l i 145TH ST i A $IM'x gr6.c BroS• I► 11 1 f1TH ST ,YT ►I II ' ' ' 1 i 0 . v i i 41ky!' " 11...,N.0.7. /4 / al Ea ;.,,o, ICT1 Ili I AP _ Ilk* , BQYRFNRRBRY C'�' / \ i`44 I ,,_. .4,,,, - Viw-bn-D-H"' .0. .,,, . ,. . i 1 GThisize-auw ,,, , a0 . . ., .• // MINOR AMENDMENT TO THE ROSEWOOD VILLAGE TOWNHOMES PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ALSO KNOWN AS ROSEWOOD VILLAGE 2ND ADDITION THIS DECLARATION made this 17th day of July, 2007, by and between the TOPAZ, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (hereinafter referred to as the "Declarant"), and the CITY OF ROSEMOUNT, a Minnesota municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "City"); WHEREAS, Declarant is the owner of the real property described on Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof(hereinafter referred to as the "Subject Properties"); and WHEREAS, the Subject Property is subject to a Planned Unit Development Agreement, Rosewood Village Townhomes, also known as Rosewood Village Second Addition, Progress Land Company, dated December 6, 2004, and recorded with the Dakota County Recorder as document number 228591 on January 18, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as the "Planned Unit Development Agreement"); and WHEREAS, Declarant wishes to amend the Planned Unit Development Agreement as hereinafter provided, which amendment has been approved and consented to by the City of Rosemount, acting through its City Council, as evidenced by the duly authorized signatures of its officers affixed hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, the Declarant declares that the Subject Property is, and shall be, held, transferred, sold, conveyed and occupied subject to the covenants, conditions, and restrictions, hereinafter set forth. 1. The use and development of the Subject Property shall conform to the Planned Unit Development Agreement except as modified herein. a. The list of permitted housing plans in paragraph 1 of the Planned Unit Development Agreement is amended by adding the following: 1) The Allyson dated 04-12-07—Exhibit B 2) The Amber dated 06-25-07 - Exhibit C 3) The Ashton dated 03-07-07—Exhibit D 4) The Elliana dated 04-03-07—Exhibit E 5) The Kylie dated Received on 06-27-07 -Exhibit F 6) The Lanigan dated 06-04-07—Exhibit G 7) The Temperance dated Received on 06-27-07 - Exhibit H 2. Except as modified by paragraph 1 of this Amendment, the Planned Unit Development Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 1 3. The obligations and restrictions of this Amendment run with the land of the Subject Property and shall be enforceable against the Declarant, its successors and assigns, by the City of Rosemount acting through its City Council. This Amendment may be amended from time to time by a written amendment executed by the City and the owner or owners of the lot or lots to be affected by said amendment. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned as duly authorized agents, officers or representatives of Declarant have hereunto set their hands and seals as of the day and year first above written. DECLARANT TOPAZ,LLC By Its By Its (SEAL) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2007, by and , the and , for and on behalf of TOPAZ, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company,by and on behalf of the company. Notary Public 2 This Amendment is approved and consented to by the City Council of the City of Rosemount. CITY OF ROSEMOUNT By: William H. Droste, Mayor And by: James Verbrugge,Administrator STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2007, by William H. Droste and James Verbrugge, the Mayor and City Administrator, respectively, for and on behalf of the City of Rosemount, a Minnesota corporation, by and on behalf of said corporation. Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: City of Rosemount 2875 145th Street West Rosemount, MN 55068 651-423-4411 3 EXHIBIT A Subject Properties Lots 3 through Lot 16; Lot 18;and Lots 20 through 24; All in Block 2, Rosewood Village 2nd Addition, and interest attributable to common area known as Lot 25,Block 2, subject to CIC #486,Rosewood Village East, Dakota County,Minnesota. Pxlitbcr 13- Me A(Iyson c _; t. c p @c ¢,13 c �11 p 11 1R 7 4PibPIPIIi!1I € mwwirum tp(,Ea•i5$g9 r ai�f SSE >,$y`g ii 1g1vi3 R�5 RtRc !II N* ll. ij I I ihnIrr ______41 , r n ,,_- III fiill 11 �-yxyIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIollll1 ,B1 ��G U Ws _V �4 I�Ilillll ■ �IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ,�i� .,I IIIII� III ..I ly �, . ;._ _ I Ip w IIIIII O Z nuuulnnl111111 0 I 1 1I Ill mlJJ]lll pa o0o Si • � . IIIIIIIII��III i d a II 1 c 1- 1 NI ' "� �� Iri- 1;I,lo;l; 'I an, rF°a°°°°°°C LRIP 11 3110E 1111[1111 a§ LE-1111 Fil 1 �_ hag I f �� 1111111h1111 :I;alalill- } 9 6MAB!MT!WT. y it_ / s N ortr g i i Y RYAN REAL ESTATE i `�` -_"1 _ 9gt8;1 `an THEALLYSON s�gl ' `"ap pia'-' s3 'i ROSEWOODVR.T..ACWTi 11111 "I r @g „ I,c:' 1 11 il t I; li RC / 13'•2. / 4'-I0• / ,'-0• / 1O-Y w1C / i —1 \ . I n Iioc ttiILL : lilI MI Hi I $gg II r 1; .i 1H, ! ,12 a •: ..1,,,-t-t 1 z N l R 4 ( iF:: i 1::1)1.1 t II:: �_, - TJ :_a ''C I?L J gagr I •g'Ia %... $ n4 I pys.0 %%e 1. . pow lill $F - S _ ale' g 4 II 1 ri - a �"€' ,3 �. 3 pd gglilt • \ V5 LO,TI / s.-4. m•-w• / sr_a• [THE s 10% 3 . , 1 11/ s w 1 RYAN REAL ESTATE a�ig, :. __o 9 Z I� ALLYSON gtg€g ii'�e� �,�It11 � ` o n• H 6•. f 1 i$ V ROSEWOOD VILLAGE II „ °_ ? :•.� a 4t �id ®. R1ill Paji.g2 24 C q Iiiiiiiih i 1 Pi a IT !3'b• TC / 334 /Ys of o-+• I ,i L 4Ile ;F1Oli I l Z. x' b £d I ailln,.i....A Q4 6z b a [] d ;63 0 I' 4pH yt• I aa 1 xy,9! A T IGni! i� iK rG N 2U I 1 4 s ) iiNg e� t , IdHi ass! ou P<1 AR.!„ ti 1--- ill MP*SOOT TRIT.,S 0 A b� 3+•OL. • 11.1.1 ® ®1 O 4 4 2'*• 0- vtEcc VOP..m N-. JCS P�OFWATICN W tgiq � � t w , RYAN REAL ESTATE �;�� '': A� yR' K 3 THE ALLYSON �aaa'< �h `E F i g ROSEWOOD VILLAGE II M ?:_ pp# as OF =L / - - M. - --------------------------- --- II 1 1,70 tt A ~ ti ara• 11 __ 56 y'— 5'-1 1/5• D'-1 IID• i 4 li �juP Z j °p psi flu a" m r- >6,3 ,,i 44 i. k+ P i II I$ rti Al 1 ii4 e gya/ J'7 \ a'tail i `l jiid $$ If 1 r s p� 'ago y S E t Os 4!` F qy g S O n,.m noon rvre nee urea nnoa nn,e nelsnr 5 1,.> g.K u a li 77g zz hi T2 p @q S a• A3 Q 1 r� 1 # fy P b li 1 1-1—gg ° F. �aF §m g E 6 m 3 @ LLLL — --- {{ 4 112 D �+ Fq 44 Dp S4 z� i'R�1l 9 F 1.: !; Mill 'ea.:n, E .fr w tf, RYAN REAL ESTATE sa siy S 1` °�ga 8THE ALLYSON G °� F r o N ' 1`-`s`s i fl i ROSEI'\OOD VILLAGE II 2 _i =Z;: el e3 1-= 'm ixthe rr C - 114E P 602, I' L_. 7 �Z 1 hil IF r, i i ei IR!g i, 114J11 `13.A Al-hil ii 3 xou 111111111 il Oli a 14 1 4 '' _s i 1Ri Alga E R9111111 �R .X gXg- 1131 ,I : %� 14416 b: ag e i01. 6ARABE PLATE HEI6NT II11111 I irr (°��I�1 null z ,� nRft e = " II 1:nnnn = =__1u m — II �N o 'ILI -. ye II i I -_T1 111_ ,- I I „ u u � � i Er s � x.‹,,,,, 7_77 IP H II H II — J0 II XVl: II I` C7 94 1/D• U p MAIN PLATE NEI6NT 6-1 Vb. D'-I V6• LOWER PLATE NEI6HT k UPPER PLATE NEIOHT -- i Ju II F if 14 u-- u d dl OT- CTm V m to A LtNOB INFORMATIONo m , , g aj1IRYANREAL ESTATE _ F. g g Iry 9 s A 8 THE AMBER,3 BEDROOM,GARAGE LEFT PIP ;� >£ g l c mgto I 4 "m z a° ROSEWOOD VILLAGE _ p IM ROSEMOUNT,MINNESOTA illil f 8 R, ,g El 1' ia R ' h ° ids 0 10 Eg 9 iI 6 b• R � 4 ,D'-, L'O' r4' / 5,�....... , r-- --- . - ----Ih -•fir--- '— — --1 I xF}+' p vY II l/D'I-YJ�DTD I I I - ,o .16 1 x,uln ra Q 1 . fellI g 4 o�3Zo 1y ; 1 I i�, r 1 Pip Ny { a �I a L- �'rt�.' � �.I I it -_its' '\ AR I !Vn I ,, • al 1' - t T___ I T c .,� r I_, 1DT-D• i i ij li .I , . .lit, ";t7.7.77 4 . ,1 r 1 1 i � 4 l' .i. roE a h. a� � 1 I 1JI 1 ? i L � t -I' I i i v '''''''",-1 e a a u p JOB PFOflMAT10N i .. o i 1 A RYAN REAL ESTATE } �� .a� =';'t N <a' 9 o THE AMBER,3 BEDROOM,GARAGE LEFT l>go;i` g ,r1 �; z> ROSEWOOD VILLAGE li "$ a Y' °a N T �1 poi 4? s .� 61oi Ica, go di ,c_,D-, IMMIT:14•1e. z gx zi #014 ii� xp�tpi{� P 6 i � �A/ t - r 4 0 ] F gOI°1 A R,IH 0 Ai Dom• l ..! '`es k _r i 4 $ $ q 4 R Fg3 P. D •°er .` 1 tr�cc S. g q f j• i li t { § I 4. "IF ng' :' ' 3 im fp ,.. . VA -,,. 1,1: - Tr PI . ii ri 60j - ----- " i - :, l4 - <' .F: FY 9A Al i LJ'J II 42-42. IOb' Y s-,O NJ.N N •o 1po 4ATION e 1.1 § RYAN REAL ESTATE CNrn e g THE AMBER,3 BEDROOM,GARAGE LEFT ii$;� P.S ' �$#I -- 7 € ' 8 ` �z g ROSEWOOD VILLAGE S„3 1 i 13? _ 5i ° III \ . oi ii II iIi, . .. Ir ,� uE i Pi r; k bb k 34 p?�h 4 ® _ li ;- A 1E a i; to gi FQ iA :-' 7)5 i 6 F.i Nif 1 y f�711I xg 0A1 la Y 11111 Hint- , c F 8g pA y.' .0 a. b 1. MNN ROON MIL 1@Ibllf I F u P • • pii pi; 1 - 1 : f F 3. 1 � 31 it la 3g ifil" 6 I/ 'o W.'N, 1 RYAN RNEAL ESTATE ._ r � 12V: 1 7Fg I =j_ qi (� �� A ❑5 THE AMBER,3 BEDROOM,GARAGE LEFT �� � 7 � RlICATA/hf1Tl\ITT T G rF EXi4161- D - 1 AS D J =: N cCs7:2"z•-.1 7"--..L-------•-';1 r ' . { Dmrm ' t r m { ;,0,Gt 1 0 --I r T 3 I I, i -n -n -n f7T a 1 - �= _ 3__ o Mil=_ _ . vol _I�oll_ I 1 0 a 0 I ' II I � o I'; ®®® Cim j n a mx n N 3r7c 0 ® I4° .; I III o I Z D x Z �i rrrl _ I N ,I,' ,�, NR [ 111IIIIflll�•�• I II 11 'i I=I 0 0 1 I rl .. g I—I-0 / II I I I - 7ln, ,-, I II Ii ,. . II LU IIIIIIIIIUIIII1i�IINIM Ii N i aDIII I I II or a m L !•ju .... mama =' I m v Z�' Z ■■■ I I II o li !i I� � I —4 i Z D r$ � I,I ) Ill i lIig < � mr-D -Ir0 bN vg Z Z 3 N _, IIIICI, T Q THESE DRAIWING5 ARE THE ' D 11 -{-H E PROPRIETARY UIORG PRODUCT AND PROPERTY OF ROBERT MCNEARNEY McNEARNEY R1 CUSTOM HOMES,DEVELOPED FOR THE Y W EXCLUSIVE USE OF ROBERT MCNEARJEY Gusto—--LI es 0 4SNTON CUSTOM HOMES,USE OF THESE DRAWINGS Third Ge„eraao„Quality Homes ,"{+ "� WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION IS PROHIBITED AND MAY BE SUBJECT TO A (952)985-0965 MN LIC.#8844 CLAIM FOR DAMAGES tr-. T•i-f a•-we !4. u.e . 1w ���_ �r Ir 441 i ID ❑ I •II \ 1 EI { Pi`:$ `s eR R \ m 3{99`1 1 j°:1 N ie1 PLl. y 9[1I'iL i i \ yR . .!\ _.—-_-i--_----—,,--_-t,__---.- 'i i ;,47 i lr1•1I t IIL ,.:: Eii _01 FO�� J1 J11 - r-I-1 1 I\ J ;L 11 1 g il I 1 1 aK ; ® i1 4 a i S' Of if , 41-1-', i 7 a9 -4ZOr mmCO cn,�m m �rn O ' Nrn m X A) 0 _N THESE DRAIWING5 Al THE y I IC PROPRIETARY WORK PRODUCT AND D TP'tl- PROPERTY OF ROBERT MCNEARNEY 'alert ji:`'fi1 RT I 1- CUSTOM HOMES,DEVELOPED FOR THEEXCLUSIVE ARNEY I1^\ \\y McNEA2NEY tik CUSTOM HOMES.OF OFBEHESE DRT ERAWINGS 11 �J r� W Custom:Homes IFk a ASNTON WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION 15 Third Generation Quality Homes .44n4`'' PROHIBITED AND MAY BE SUBJECT TO A 0 CLAIM FOR DAMAGES e 1(952)985-0965 ' MN LIC.#8844, " 31,11. II l'' F. m h I• i fi s 1 �I } F. A( + III a f I r �' A Imo_._.—]`•' _-...0 a£ yy m i ?0 , ° - ; . i _®. � I _—= I � • m.14 .s ri J III 4 � �_ ypi, ' _ ''' ''' =... if D1IJrn Ill gFy Oi a ,,,, 'e 4 It .. S gg ny I�I1 S E „ gi ++ I r 9 • I 1 jr • .1 Or rr r muuu� em m 0` � —INm 0XN 0 0 THESE DRAWINGS ARE THE PROPRIETARY wow.PRODUCT AND y -, THE —, PROPERTY OF ROBERT MCNEARNEY �- m CUSTOM HOMES,DEVELOPED FOR THE \\ MCNEARNEY . w EXCLUSIVE U5E OF ROBERT MCNEARNEY Custom S I fImo(TO` ' CUSTOM HOMES,USE OF THESE DRAWINGS Homes: s.+,`'Y B rr WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMI55ION I5 Third Gener d Quarry Humes ,r;;„, 6 PROHIBITED AND MAY BE SUBJECT TO A (952)985-0965 MN LIC.4 884-e CLAIM FOR DAMAGES le A&� i A Ili:::: $°nA'@m a 6'ili t� 5 i rF U !al 12- •": 'CI zD 4 I— Irli 1'i-1 I I d x �iC i !L1 n6 R O VOF 1c 1 � n 61 ~ 4,-1 -LI MI.......................... NEM A T 1 A x, iA .. D x P 6 t < x x o yr' D P 41114 a Q :Ti m % i h N 1. U1 3 >_ r�rrr� '!lol 1 m e �i a•b m gi. D- 1:111ii r x o is o„ ' x ; Tc y I P ' y AU A THESE DRAIWING5 ARE THE KD PROPRIETARY WORK PRODUCT AND �tj` m t'' II CUSTOM Y OF,OBERT MCNE FO T g --1 i �"'1� CUSTOM HOMES,DEVELOPED FOR THE McNEARNEY u 7_I W EXCLUSIVE USE OF ROBERT MCNEARNEY CUSTOM HOMES•USE OF THESE DRAWINGS /�L'I ITON WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION IS Custom Homes -, d,,� H�JT1 PROHIBITED AND MAY BE SUBJECT TO A Thir (95 Generation)985-0 65 Homes ,_... B CLAIM FOR DAMAGES (9 521 9 8 5-0 9 65 MN LIP.#0044 � Y Hi 6 ri e.- -r4E amni\ch ._ ,..-,,..-., .......? ...„,,, .. ,•••_•• . • • . . _... . . • .......,:,„.„.„..„ ,...- -10 cl ,..„,..,11:inp3Inig Itga .. „ 4.= 'illgli it IP IP W 01#41111)N1 6 if t-*,‘q,t cz . -A.,... , ,.. > ,._,_ p2/,,,F4_.,.0 161 i. i',1 pi 11 iii tail Or ifil/ , ? , .---4 ME 1---c,i,,,. 4 -.:.1 - %11 P--- ---If ...t,- 1 ,- - . 49 : iMi"1 1011111i .,-.1'.,t:;„fr4:.. " III 1g:fin.",,,, i! irp.<, !1,1111 ..,110,1„. — Dr"4 .i F'4! 111111 .1.ia foil --,..;4.0 iiri ,_:Hum bill ilik.-, Prill 11"1 1 1 ,11 1 I 1 11 ill 43In g II Il Li si ill 11 •-y cr. E I, !1 14 P 11 0 11 i .44 14 '--' - iii -4rtrr 1 2171 g ..:03: - 1.4 ''''.k..:1• 1 - il I 11 41 f ewar.e RATE mew ji . - ,t1.4:.-' ! f r i [IF 7 hilinighhilln ,7 !liF1 II.1 1 Vi.il ICI 11 1111111 W111111111 1111111 l'I'L'' "ti .1 - ,i- 11 ll II Bil MD s 3q 1 • 4 ft: . 6 a liC: R• II 11111 igl`Fg- ' fill ,itil ,, i_ 111 II / q i i ia _ e:la 51 C7 Irni kl,r7:,7111111111111 Ill A': -=_=- MINI 1 lo '' alP „ ,i in" I!,,,, if i 1 1 ,, ,, ilipliiiiiiiiiiiillz.w. .i i 1 11111 /11 ' 3 1 1 3 ------- P11111111111111111 -, .1 :111 111 cr._ -,i- .1 ,..4=..:1-=) 1111 . 44 n--. 7 46-qi: , 1 1 , , R:',116,10i 6 . I 1 , ;. 1 1 et 1 T1011111 I :1 1_______IIIIMMINI" '\:' 11 4 10 iiiall 6 =MIME 1 k • .1 1: ___ __ 1.fi 2..:i, g II so.If: EMI: I Vz•;',-,..!1.-• i',,,L;- , • , IIrti_iTh : Irmo 4.1,,..--,.. g 111 0 i ok i 1 -,,, 'ql-r.' i, , -,,,. •g - 1 1 moormi miminua I .1 1.1.r:'';! A; ,1 i 1 i i ode' A\ ,. .,..:.,-. 6 ) I. f...... ii , ,-,... I • -.,k, 4g •?ri----;,,,...,„ , LOOM PLATE Mae WIN 1.1-MG MONT il :,:t4 V': . --'.....P., • I it III *44 . .. ff:IMIllff ';:0 '• -i-,•:. ;# .,,, .-.......0, de RYAN'REAL ESTATE THE ELLIANA X 9 §1 N. §i•}3 . -'I E° iiNg-4.ak- olq ...--.,;-Li, . , ,: ?,.., - 1 .2i •-,,,f; a -- 't ,..,--:.„/ i.3 efille 4-.u ` 'i. 0 os it .1 i ill __ giRiig il ig ' S R I. 4 1 r 4 al'j a ti i ]Pd , . r, pill �• p i I SOSa I ,IiiY///I--- ISd 1. iq!P i l'i : ]1' I,-2' I t gg �F a .o axws 1, b gg IR x$ l 'I I 1 I ua --I.l — rT ] 1 _ v �timo ' j� . x —1 I _Ax '..,V I ; Pti iti III I� � n b sQ \3 pL J 1 4,4,,:___,_,,J, , „As , \ ♦ 1 —11s � .I` I �� x�ls oI I ' I ' II " 2'Lll Q • s, � I- ++ I I 2 ni�a�:os ;@i Y-.I 1 f2' I F I I S� x® ga c =Q iI I a MI6 J1 = a d i .. 1 g 4'- m . . II, a•o I 1 'II Ie o _ S-. W. 4 [RYAN çAL ESTATE '"Il la, - — ii I..' o $I1 THEELLIANA iliIJ $-s� — ---, f --= ..... le.e.el t iiiIP IR iP IP 11 W ft/7 !LA el RI NI it i .' 31 ••:, i 0 hi f i i g21 ,z- i,a4 A - R 1 a , P 4 a ,,_.• 6020.....J \ •.. ..-- *, t&i•,N 2 g V.2 Lvt:' 4 .........,,62020 i i:1 4,,ilt •2,OS ,, r6 , i,.. 4 4 h i . •51; , 4 `LW 4, € .•41 7; 4 "F a r, 14;1e i 444 i • ., Nit . .1 ,..1 .__,•• Z Z !;i":1 ''l .11;i1..‘,..1,,t, ;' 1_, .1 , ,-b• , 1.'§g gi \s\I. .' r I 0 i PO : I 7-4 4 1.i tr i rli J 1PP F 2 !4 1481 We Fi'':' di:s1 ' •:0€ 40 II t 4 3\ ' r•• . ow R \ , t 1 ,'NOM , MEM 4 .. , 1 6: Z A ; 80. 4., 1_,/ , 4 f_.--,,JU.. 41 , 4 . I I i ; . ° I tioo 9- 1 1;-=----1 4 a 4. 1...rn—.1 t -—— 14 x i . ,_ 1 6 4, g, . f , 2. ., 64 1 K 19.4 A : 1•,,: -. • r 1A., K I gel "'''''" i ‘._ 0 t ---' or Taussas ''''''mo•2,a.C. ' N N , 44 '''''''''''''... ..."."-..,,,—,:---__, — .....a........................_„. IS-CY t \ i I $ RYAN REAL ESTA l'E Li ! .1 _ „. THE ELLIANA ts5 ,=-0 c' s• 8 ti' '3 1 X .7> — - • - --'0 li ;i li till . ., 11 41ril ill f.P-1 1 11 1 V'1 Ir 10.2121 6.4 I-- 9 n 1 11, "t 1 1 11 II ii 11 II ill 1II 1 1 ;=2 ill 14 P z1 ? I iitomomoonn.A.-exenew I; ig :,t 1Z ;‘a. i 111 !i ii 11 gi q H i gi 1----0* 1 0 1 ____/ \ L---- - • ilmemor-I.v=,.---.s.=•=7:72.i., ..." L. • iif tiall 1 Pi t.i I§ ARO AN ,1 k.4 gn11l1P.lI.-FA.i"t r ii 1 Ism"— —.1 ii i =rim 11 qp 1 4 • tlimit. -,.. i g,,, l Ftl r Oa t I 1 t . d ir 1 1 :51, 1'1 ? "'t•I t 1.= ETIiiiM91 / / le . , a . @ 1 ijcaRY717NREAL ESTATE .-, -.., ti 21 ia THE ELLIANA ' I [11 , 1 4 i .410 A 1 4 ,-,‘• 4 - 1' '2-4 - •. - . .. . .. , . . .. . • . ..i.:, : .. •• . .Y1-k I es CC F-- i- -kE. KyLi . . .. .. . ...„.;;i:.. . .... ... 6 . . x (.., o . to \ m r- i t4 c A .-_-p,....\ .. ., ctrl illril 1 /,\I 4, , ' \ • \, \ „ , „ , , ‘, -. . • 1 ‘, „ , „ .,„ ...e s e k e •• • : . e. • \ I\ \ \ , • s ..--.•I, ., . . N • \ u.-,-4 -......N• ,......,•• ,.:, . S.... ,, P ‘..---1 s P" • ..' .,. )L:. . • . . \ \• 'fi' 41't:.'•. '•• .'.'. • 1 \ \ . . •••,r i• ,. i., •-----•• • • .•\ f ;`7.' i .*.- •. . .. • . . ..... . • . ' ' • • II 1111 , N \ \ IS/d fr'.. ,,, : \\\\N\'- e ' "N --,' 'i .,.. •..„ . . • • \ \ . • • ' ' !, :...': •',!:"-4. ••: .. : : . • • • ,:.e.. • • ''' ' '-c•:: ''.,.:.14:-•;,•, ci.: . • ..•CD1 ' • 1 • • i • • \ A .'s---'.'..'• ..;?•i:,.''li.:•,: ' .4: I • • .'„. • C.% . •:,- . '!:, 'P'0.-''•'•:.4.• '`..,!• '•*•,, :,l• ,,, y• ;•. \ • ---,,- , .a .•e^.77-•r ' s. :'j..4- ,. 1- :-'. .. • 1 -,- s, ' • ..:.Tl s. . 1. ! i:•..•...-: •-1: ,• .. . . ... `-------1 .......... . .. • ,1 CO Xi 0) C'th -T1 Il \ \ D"....., C"•••••, 0— Z— .• •., \ Z S•0 73 ••.1,;› / ..e s./7--... i•e..,,,7. ,;...... .,. : A ,ri ... i .,_ _ , ,.,..i.:,,.!•.;'..••'••••:. L.,,y",- \ 0 x 2 ao • • o • o 0 0 0• . ___---- • ° .::tit. Z • - • >-n m-n .::(4t ---.4 7 I 1 T 1111 1'1+1 i i•-:•.•,''1:, \ L \ \ Fi:i=D. 2 2 ,. 0 -4 0 . • rn •''' 1 ) 0 .. I CI • • • \ \ \ \ M -I 1 \ E., () N ) • (a l t ': . . . ,.. . , 4, > N • --1 2 x •.“ • -1... ''''..'• . • • •*;.. —I - . --'...`..„, • • • I I I I I 11.14-.., ,... II ,.. \ x 0 I---"''' • • o 0 z m . ii. Z •'• ,.-.. .'4: , • ,,,, \ , • j > • M 4 I III :...i.- * - - - I I , ' `N N m r-— ,..li - ,, t E NI ' I.-\- \ 1 11 . P7 0 -.I, _li 111111141 ,' ,S, -— \ ,s, \ / -<x) _.. _ I . ; , \II , ,.. , ,., ,.. ../ t n _ . . II . , \ I ... ,s, /..' • - . , N • N c. .... \ i \ 1,11111.1•11 41 •- 4 A „s. _ - \ • r % . 1 , . 1‘. • o > z 2 r 0 C F rl CD C^) in 1 13 0 co Ti• 0 M ii) Pl x '7 z n -0 T Z 0 Z 0 . 0 lii ul • ri il •-• • (/I •d0.1 Cil Fri i...." • .......... . . . ''..."Y.''''' .. • mi. • . .. • : 5 •, J . 1 1 40-0" ......... . 1 ' 19' 0" ' 6" r I ,...:______11 '.:21044/0 SIBS A,0 I',In 1 1 _.._ ...-,-;.- -..--r.-,,--. J I1 c .on 1 IF AI,I It W.I. CLO / ii • 1.x--. _:--x-7,=-r•-•=-1- ;10 en u.;n • , tn R&S• BEDROOM 2 ,.. ;R Zi GREAT ROOM ,--,4-1 W.I. . -,•.P.' '.g- CLO. . r- sol fr 4, .010 I tr1.0 1) . — .. 9'-2" ..I_3*--LOL.,.........,_____ 9'•0" 2/6 .._ 4'.'„0.• .e1 _. " .., :, a- i cs,z 1 • - f.stTi " .--c• 5'-4" '127....3'-6" _ 3'...•4" _ ____..1.0'..: Ili .71 . PARING-•• ' _ e... 4„ 2/4) ..ri in A..... , je' LINENN1/4 .0 0, 1... b • . . OWNER'S SUITE thi S' Li -1 BATH , ,-4 d • 3.-0' 1 3022" _'- "• 0• .1 1 ,• ---. i .y 0 .0 • 3 4 ..,.L. , ....._— —.—., b Ln • .I, DINING -7) 0 • .. • 0 " ic. . r• re d .ri :- '3/4 CIG 0 "'-------2 x6 F RUG , t.... .x. 9 ;t. t..) c... >12 w' •. 1 0 •ei ., _ A A •,4. ' ' • 3) 1.•3/4 x 16 M.L. BEAM--, I4'-4" 5'-4"S.,` 1 0 FLOS14 A I 8'-1 I.6"RGH ...,--- —!--- ,';.• i d 2/4 I .... 2 \\ CEILING Hr..,:ai r E- 5/8- r'VC 'x' FC SIIEE.PrOCK • 'W. < l'-'7-'-.7-3---'--.7 OFF COMm011 WALLS &CEILING 0 ^ •,t. .--8- -- i. ,• ,r, li ill 4. 2/8 YER'1. i L/.. , . -A tn i i .., S.C. o --.....r.,.. Di . 0 .SL I. Y --- i'T O \ iv 3/0 a ,6 z ____ 1 w 0 '-TOP OF GARAGE WALLS TO BE i ., A i2 V. 0 , FRAMED EVEN W/TOP OF 6,1 1/Fr. ' 1..,.3-,0',.... I i 0 RGH 1st FLR KITC1-1111 de FOYER KITCHEN WALLS PORCH I GARAGE zr, _ 1 1 4.•CONC SLAB ',..-7..0.-w---E---1------,__ ,, , , _ , Y___ I.... ;,„___Ii 1 ,• . b 14'-U" \ I ROOF IRVSSES I 2;643/6 CSMT:- I • 4. 1 1 1 , :i4-• 0 C. _______ROOF IRIISSFS BEAR 1114 I,I. F On It WALL i AND CAN I 6'-U"OU1 OAR PORCH, PLUS ' 1'-4" 0A.RHANGS i I . . . ! . . 40'-0" - ; . .. TES 1 I 1 b POP PA C: Pc i 1111 BO DI LI,2411.5 1'Cr.r,1 ' 5 1,0 PG11 CIII I it.:t Al 1)1,111W APE" FIRST FLOOR PLAN ..‘ ID0I15 -SITE VII1Y1 (r1.1r)11•1 4.l'A SEMEN I II i IS ILI')9. 0141 T Sr/t SCALE: ,'4",1'•n" • . • . . . . • . • • • - .. .i... •. • • ..• „.. .. . :•••!. . . ,... . • . - . . . .- • . i... . . . • . • . • . . . ..,... . . \ 1,z; • ...: . . .. . . • • . . • .; , . • . • i. • . . . . . • , • - . • .• •• . • . . • • • • • • ' , • ,••• . ,. • • - • . •,.. -: :••:•- ... i! ••• ... . • . I—. (!) , . › m • . . . • . , • 0, —I • ......: . “ . . , • • • . 1 / : .• :. . .• a; V) t : .I- '' .1. ‘;' " ' • * .• . - — .I . . . ..• I . • • " . .., ,.. ....... .:. . .., • . .• I M :. •1 0 . . .. •• • M • . . . - - • • • . ..: . : :. • . . .•:.:: • t < :1.•••: . , ..... •• .., > .. . . . . t:•,.... . l' . 0 '.- , 4..:';' !:.,: ?,. :••••:10.,• ;:•,:',.,-..- P.'.. . . , ....:," z t.... . . fits,: . . . . ,;.%,..::: •..., ,:-. :/:;:-.-.•-• -...,.... - ...,i .. . . . r: .: ' • f:1 '' '. ', Ir.' t ',.f...:: ... : ! . ":,-. : ' ' .....:.; !: : r., .,....,fii .... .,.. • ,, . . :. 7....,..,,..,..;. ; /,.4;..:.::..,,.40.,,,..," ,...... • . l.......:.• . i,....: • . ..• . . . . . . ..... . t.: . . ... • ... ., 1:16;t•'-,4-.01.•-.t.'"' • • .': " - .t : • • • :- ... • .:: I .t`f.,4;';'....•::ii.i.:,,t':: .•. •, ',. I .• • . 1 . • ' ' 4 i '.., :?•••. ::"Iir ,•1...('''311* 'i.,--.....!''' ""•'....'''' .: '. • .. . • • • :. ill " ' --- . .''''.. '1 / • , .„,.....„,..,....• ."..... ...,,-, ' ..,•?:.f.1.:''''!'*:',.::,::: :;1,:::.:••••;:•E.; ''' 'I• • • 1 • -0;.-..,,•::';',• ..'N,1'.'•'...4;•.•,...,"4:•:-• ';'- ••••.: :',...-.•• :.:' • I• ••.....,,,,,,,,,,r,a-T,,;044..4f•tr.,.s.p.,..,4 • ., •.,•-•,,FM5•M•17.5,... '''''''''''''''''''`" • . ••• •....:•„ •,•;,.• ' .'.'..,....'.:::::.f:A...:f••i?.:.:1:;:.:•,••. . • ' .. • ••.i.:'''..-.• .. . , . : . i;•:;•:::..f...:.:.....;;;•':•-.!:.:..•: , :::1•:•••:...• • . • . . ...?::.'• . ..... :.,....„,,.... . fit••:.••. ' • . .. '-':::,••••••:'.:.;•••:‘;;I:I:'• • ••.;'.i.":•. -.....',:. f.•:'•'•••••'..ii:ii?..ik''' •''..':', • • •.§• . :,•:::::::..-:'a... • . . • 4. . • . • . . :,:i.:.• • • .. •. :.•••:::..:.. ...'.., • .. '•.!:', . • ••••: i'• •,'::::::.; . . . •'::;:'.• . % ..„, ••• '.••••i.::••.'.:•• . .„., . -•'.,.:::: •,:•„„ . . ..„ .••.:..: • ', •'.....,... . , . .. ••..i? ' • •'.•:::ii.' ' .... •-••.- . ....::: •.:•••:::;: ' ...:; .,.: . • • • • • • • • p+ • • • §.- t .m "'�' i mn S S* Y . • fit. ` �tl. :.p. • • rnII ,^ o ' �.. <rri D O • .. • • / ja: - / 0-_ 1 � �7iYiK:(j'Jh'sh•V.�YY1u<i1rn....+Mnr...•.,..y.•n.4RQfu;ri+r!.:.`V:vwiu..........u.. 0 :. 4+w/nw.r' .-IliWns"µaw?uTM?:S!4+w.6w.vww..�n�.os�..:wpy�XN�w]�..•uiaYwTaavn � Al UN14A1J WT-5, v c- N ' O 0 1 i i il i I Al ti H illill$i Y 1 1 ii_ <' ,iiiilliiiiI1411 9 111 14:.1 ii_I!Iliu�ll_IIIII WIWWIull�6'i\ i " £ $ .: xi it z $I as 1i pllmm = 7ppII��I' 8 g 4'11alBj l 1 °a I N-I�IIWIIIIIII: �mW1u1L D\ 1 jij J1111111_11,, il 0 al 1b 711111111111T' 4- �. e-i ve• 7 II \ I I I 11 ��� �Iluu���CI1II��I��I��LJlIH $ , I • h: l p� 4 �llll�lll K il II x! RI iiiiii II iamb!iimr,-u wi° I ���� :IIITV ,, Ill I ''WILL ti 1111111� , is:: .1....--W.:-... .,.ill Hit I I i I�Iliylli, .�..I a I i. ali -,ve• i{ 1 II' 6...CME RAiC I�6ert LL L.IIE C_ I-' ; °WI V 0 A a,Ca ra+ IRYANREALESTATE o a�.1P .''' t "q 0 9 s g g _� T L.AOOD VI,2 BEDROOM,GARAGE RIGHT yak y ,,, R1 g. .. - 1 pifighl ' z —s sQ s°s ROSEWOOD V[T.T.�C F i1 1- :ssw -. Hid -- it ii 1a!1 ii :! 51 ill qa 18 i a 1°•-4. r a'-o• r 11'-0• JVx:a31 ♦ Fq i a u ii u ' Pzi 3' LAS" Ili F F 4 k' gall! ff 2 Rao j L——1 f !I i itiz DI'1 "� , �J` a"I 1 r • T: ':.4 4 ,a•-o In.x 'e..o. I# 1 iiiIL rt � vn--nian I111 S s lid r L !f zP` L el t. S 15. 3r�T xclroxrre. � krar� ig.ki M �+OI m�1�' glii ' c II..T�•---- I 4 I I vFI F -II ® !I II . J 4 ara r-f• b._a. se I 213 RYAN REAL ESTA'1'h °#� 11 �ag ` ry 9� THE LANIGAN,2 BEDROOM,GARAGE RIGHT 1,g$ppM' a 11115- S . d 0. ' Z Z $9 3P DncL',ninnn t/TT T ni—t 364 =. i`: €>1 a "4W-.. y R 01 11 ;51poipoiq glp 1 b I i ii � �$ is g 1 / l4-0• eb• -0 / / e-9 ,I to! / 'ab0'-;i 24 ? 4 ` • PI 71 U �; 11 . �I W I LI -.Asuis 1. 1..I i t I 14 • ICI __ a 4 : � _ i 1IJJL 4 ... iiiii ---..-----it t' ,g i 6. . mrd ROOP MSS.I Aa S a-u•I , y IP �'-e' _ u a . 1,3 I i. I�' � FFua° . Y n ,,�yy e 4 €G6g ibl 7� 4jT" I o pA 8 6\A. I""� y 1 N'-0• l P _ [RYAN € : 1 REAL ESTATE II! s ' T H g,4,6 $1 THE L NIG.N,2 BEDROOM,G NL4GE RIGHT 7: ti I MR • 1 1 1 lR ' IF „ob• T 3d cos e'-i VD' e-i ve• -1 . I e Vio.0 �. cG Q io iz ngo ul I I ____ u M. 1 '-- I o.a 1 tV ,;o.� a a.,= la -.. t __ `�� I — a f I; Nr.ii pill 14 A 1 140 ha e':. 51 a b 1 i4 F% II " os iii.,,! � � ,HP sc 4 g g yV p 2. a s Vu - g& 9zz G P i i AA5g€ ii i s i igig as a� a li gi A :*{ 4 A8i L Aid '- y. S to PA � h ri`. • i g AZI1 YA o n g 8 n is i a - s V o a J•u w— .KJB g.WgA/p11cN 3 :-•:; 4 P rill $; a RYAN REAL ESTATE '�ii; D: iii o s 9 4 a THE LANIGAN,2 BEDROOM,GARAGE RIGHT ce,"6' t" M s 9W • 'q• $ 4 4 5<< f� RnST'WnOD VTT.T.AGE q Ed" SZ;: - ::�'-..y 11 1 Sri 14 -n4e -iniiiPE.R.wc 7---.7 . , . ,, ,...... .._ .,- , c=3 ....... ....., .... . . ....., :.:_.....,... . ,,,,,,„„.,..•,.. •. ,.,..i.,!.e ::;.-‘,44 ,..1:1'.•; 1.144.17;M1 :i-',;,*:,..,?..1.'4! ,-.-.;41),i,,.:r....,•'' • .?' -- ---tobt:',-,,. 44..,-, 16. - ,i,Vi'l ';i-s' "I'sj...7.•-s7 :,!..1, ..1,,,,,........:r„,---%,,d1,•-•-.! ,, . ._ .f.-",....,.;471r.-..-ztf,.;ktfix; Zik:tec4,1:, _.-1.., ;-.-4•4-;7;_ikili",.zis,,.:,--' , . 4i,444FT .vi '--; 4.. it..:"..: , •. ig•;:e•••:›04;4.4-1=" 41C- "'-.."iit'W, i'Z'i• 441'.--'- f'-- (.' • g,;,,,,, „v.:FAA,' s.,--- 5,- - •..,. ,- ..ler,4%,,. .!. ."' • -' 4 14-' ,.s.-'0,-.,.. •-,.- ' --i'',0!1 ,,-'4 ; •:- 7 '-. • e.:-,,,...7,,,,Z':,,,,.' . :', ..:e., -... '1.1 ...: 04,-.. - ',x,%., Q'. :".--1.::';',. c r ' • , : ... -• • i;•-7''•--f•+c..‘ '".';A,.....:ci2i.:',.v.:,:•-•-,•`: .!..--',-i- -"--,,,... •'-it 7tAA.,••••-„i••;.1, . ',''.r. • • H.,{e '..]:•....4-;....4,-1-)e.•';'Y •l'''...' f.,...' *tf, fec..*.fi:,..,i4S. V.!-.., F-S4 ,0"' . '•••••••e.-,,i,••..;,...:,;T-• If'_ :-4:7.;,.•[...:-=''-trc•-•-_,v;kS4,•= ...•:- ...0,,,,,,,t, .:--I.,, 4,: ...... •-4•,.1:,Q.•11a,;•,.'0,3,;'. ..L.Alt., ,.:Je,..41-4,r1,-;•tic4i0e--41r ---i4N7.-:ii :-...-, •,fiN,IA-L.4140.',A•4,:... •-•f.'.:..,-.4...xeR,;.•::•.-,4 -;_;[. 4: .;:ilrre;t,',;r:,i'1140P.',e1-4".VA-1.;---- `;"f,'...i-4. :,;•,,(4,1: • :*P*•..• ,:- •-:- .,.:1-,-'---•..t...•`.•-'-..t :7"C44117''''.'.'7"..dr,r,4.AllY,t:,-„..., ' . , . ..1....-..i...:,,g,$-,4•::',.1.44,F".'4'1,,,;...::.„".1.41..:140,144,,, .4.,4,-*%• •,.-", .,:,.% tl:,:e.i.,, .4_, ,fr,,..;:,.,q.. . ," 14,!V.,x,....44,.:,. .,..._,: 171.,,,,„:.V '.r,, i,e.•)=..:11,,V4.,'.?. • :.•• ,..,..T.- *•••1'7, I-4,•- -,- . - ,, 3,..51:, MR:11W-:+77,7..*.' ...4!. ...i...1'...2 ''• =.::Ve •..i'. :6r:" :"'liN. 4 ,';4e-•,. ' '7;1111;f;,:'..' . . — ' -N---1.,!`1.C'• ',..•.7,1^ .•I'-,..;.A.•••::,•.,.•l'irs•‘..^,Ri 1.t.; . <tt'.X.' ;:l: ,,,,41",::t;..,,,;,,,Li,.....Zi.:...,').,,.. '"; - i., , „., .,111 I.i','ir?vi•?.•••••••••?-••=a,,,,i'.4-3,:-1.1=,...;:s;:j[fr• ,:.'v:7.,,,,-?.p,w.--404%: "4-•..._ •,- -*I'"-41ka,.,`,4,9.Z.,;:k.:".iit- -I AL, Eilf 1,11411i./.TI:11 1E;' II,.;4.,:..3i4c.x.,„...,..::i;-;74,f.....:;-i-;•••1*.,„-to.[. -.i.,04.-.:,... .....[e.,,,;‘,..:,._.,..-44.4 ....V: 4'.1.1Z.'"`?''',...t...44'4%- re— - -,--, ' .-! il 1-..,1--LI:;i-t,- v--*.,-1_4_;::,'414.0'.1"04..s.'•-h,i'''-•;[;1'[-..6.,71-eilitl-r-ilt;;:ikt.:-T'''';;..'-t**..."....''''71.:4•::;;:;:-.--0[1:',;,•1.., : .....' .•:r... -.' is51 oil'"""-''''''''''''' If' i 3 i ill•,"!...41..;1;:.„,:i•-;,-,1--a3;•*...1:1,5',A•N•4•44t`,..',;.•••I'c',..,:':;!'',••••'-'.4---14.:[•,..;'•.:t.e.t.1,...,;‘...'"--3,,:l.;,,,'2".."-; .-..""-,:-•-'4,-,-..r §-,,- [41.V : g';'-.'..!-Ir •-•:.•., ' 4 '. '.:I- -, ',i,s,4-1 I ,1 ,,,I,,*,ttr,,,,•Fr74.0.::4-t.12,e31-13F-i,i:: 4.,.a../p.,,TZ0f.P.;,..g4.1iki^ ,3 '.----- 14-,-,Pti-e'-'. .•,.:$:‘,...rn.,,S'.,.f2`• -,...1 ,;:ijn 1"...,:fe:;,11., .11 , ;4*,'7: -;'?eil'.?;:..ii,..n.4'.1•1'..!'t,l' .1 PIIII'7' 41 ill:-'"11.--y 1 1, '1 5 I i.T.'4:iitiv......•-,-aziW;14 :1';•••;;'4 =;...,!):.,4±.;:411.:; •••.,tiz•:::'':I,I'l'' '.. r.ihr.1 1-t0 '1 1 1--2' . ..17“:;',S:-.4;i:47.--.-:-;-'14-'.,f-•,-,.. ...,..,Y.'74:;:;-,ea.,1..•-•,t.litN:,-,Itgfp.ft0 t k.,,,.t.~,-r ,,,:•,:. ,,E.:1•1:•,,.. , . . ..:, .,. .•i,• [jai ri 3 if.i.tt•fit-,,, I....;-=.s;.•,' -1--n-'..:..,.;;t...-47 A.:::,!!•;-tk.c.,f."f.tf4':".4f7.-4,t7.'••••,:";.::: -•,:.; [..lipicktt,...!..!J;i:,•:.:.,!;4•,i.. hp,iii..tptioutiRr oil ..,.:2:00.-d-V!..:- '''':-.. • ' - '1.1' ' •'••,", a..I Jiiii . : .1 1,-.----f-,-..-..-;:s-::. .;,•,.....v.y.,.._.,.. , •. • • '4 !t.i.:,:i;.:;;.f.e..t :.... ."'k.' r r,,,,, •. . ,. • .. r.. r 1 1,.. •.1 1 : gi 1 id!' 11, .."-:.:'...?•,./.. .7. ..:!, . Icui,L- , III '.11!i.,' .!'. ... .4..-i, 0..=". ''7;1...7•„ ..,' 5:e:r T,.,•.;;'.7!.:.it.:'..$..;.•• • •. ' i=Ez=t a. ,1111 'f , 11 •- All 1 1 1 oriminimei .. .. „ xi • I,1 • - I Ili I MI ll :II i 1 AO : • • . — . 11 1 1Fil . .• R .,. 11441 11111 1 , ! -1 • 4- 0 0 0 011,i ''I'l '''.ii illi.11 ti! .; - . s" / / '"" •' i ,I ,.1.IMP!,1., ; in) Lai- Li 0 n olii ;.yul,.4.. !, iHilh ;Ito 1 • .1- ;III, , 1 , ,... . .. i, n ,1 gr 1....,..•::,;., g., ,.,. :.; ,.: 0 Cl_._ ill .,. k, ., 'i ..-•m .4 1 1 . - '''• 7- flUUU ',' . .: :,-..;:- -•..... 0E1E1 la,::.1.:.1 :li ' 1 II :.!•,:,:::,":•t-,..:,,,,t,-,'.cil ..,_:,'!-:.e,,,,--0.:ii...,...-.::•:,-•,4„ •.:f ..13 go Els i!i 1 F.,. 1 :...-,....tit... ,,f,:jr,:-,,,;:..!- , ..,,,,IQ•,.i,....,,,,I!.)1h.1.i.!“.151re,,,41,,V• ./.. .).44Z;'r --',.:i ;•-?'•-;!--f.';'lilac,:-. 'i .: \\ - 2,,;.1., ,....,....T.,ii.,-,.:,-.41(....,-.-1.i.,,,,, -'-,,•.•.i,:,7,...„,„,,I,•=,..1].im.,pfleil.i;',7.,,p, ..;7„,,. •,,' _ • . ..T.• 0777.4,--11,1. -14.V.3 • A'.14.:',::i,.'rl-.'14::j-,•,:,,,i,•:-, , i -::•44.gt-,Nre.i,-,?1'&2. 7 r" r''44''' , : Alc,i4Vs:q. "2"1/40-1/4,--f;.-4-1.''--:. 1....' .issr;:i;:- ' ':, .,„ . . '',..."‘t".4.04.,:iV -..7'-'-', -?..,71 •e.7.;._-'..'A', .: ",:,•-•...7.:nt.;-;.., --.,4 -.1-13.,,,i.., irt ,...' A . .e..st,',T77,a,:..,:-.-,4# -1.7.- --...;,,-,-,il',,Z.:7' _ ,•,-....V.- 40,-,>_,:„...,-..i.1.1T,.,,-..,,t,...,,,3,.r. .44!i ---, ..- -, -'_,-z7...P.,-*- --.0 `.! ;.4,1-`:::,4dt,', ,',4%,,:itr., :, •'''4.2.:*1`.'.1.. .,'W..$. .,- ..V.4','ligr*.. : .'t.'...-r-n`';1--'4 0,V T.rtf.r.„--:• ...,4 • -..,,.----4r4c,,,,,, • E g- ''V--, g-„-.-0..,,,,,:1:„..„,„.._ '. %:[•-.'.41.9.- -- -.•:•=4.A-- '.7'.j...00.r- .4=-4-_-_ •7,:,_,.. ,,t''',--7•1-e.t:--_, ti 1;74 v; ifj.,: __ la . - !f;-:.:-•-#.'7. =,..U,.-•- - ''''' ..*M ''A.;:l.: •,...;:,:r.,,- :,:;,,...L.,1 -• , . ,-:::•P:ASPI,,L -,-,"1.4.- '- — • • -,-,,-.-i. i.....,-;.----- :.....4,:v,*..-r,..:,,,ix,-rA.„ - ,- ..-z.v._,:..- ,......,..--_:_ ;6":',,-,..,-r------:••.::, p 4:-— 1611..,t..1,,x4,-:,,,,,:z,4,4 4,-•A-4•,--_-:---;.. .---;:--,;',4r-s-,%:-'47.4-',,:z..-- :14?,, •;....- ...--:;---•!--:,--•, , - -,;-t- .-..:-.- i.-• T. - s-s .... , -,r ';'.7---;4 ' , l''.4e.,_44--,----'--t.. .,•--:-. 14,*i'a•,,....,. • --.gz-•_._-; 7...,:-...,••••-------,,,,t--,.. ... •..-:;-17-;.,'1.---;•:;;v.2 -1:- :• , -...- --,-1..- , .......-.....-, ...r.G.e,,,,,,' Zfr,,g;,--f,r-Th'Sr,..-- •..- ,....,..,:.- it,, _.e'"W',2-..":1':',A. ._ I.'‘,-.1.'!'-'4,,,,:t.4-N-e'r,'%.,,,,ti-Ae."4"7.7:4-"f:-: ^ ig,,.t*'''ttinZ.'e?,,,-- '-46..,j.,,iF,-.1.,_- _4'4,4k7-•-•:---,A., ----"t.4-'7W-4-'4:--" _"`-w•---1-.--;,'-4. 4;:_I ft,f ,T-<••-•-_,. :-----,• •• . : 04,1;45•-•.•,.7-,;• ,';,v i, ..7::-.•.[ii-,4•,--v1''''• •---‘..:,,r,;:f-.1.t14-A7.1",-':,,,,;,- ',-.-7-.: .---•_.r 1 ,,_••••ort71.51- __, .. .fr.zi-;.; -- ,,,--,4_,,•••-••'74-_r-1--_,-:.---1.1.4...:.--,- c---'-',Z.;:lE4":4 .•tm .•-4-7_-4-4-;:-.;.__ :, __,--*,:,[4.-.--4-4,"; ,• .,-'7.•••.. I kritYr•••.:14••!.-.`1,'4-_••0- -- 70.514,-....;V: 4...7e. :-.4 :-:-;-...-;-,---;..---,,,r_..-4---,.44,-,„ -,.. .... .,..' . .„.,.-.iif..7.:1,..?1-„:-;:---:w -",,,V47...x+,74,..; 1.: -kW-1-':- .1%. :7 -;f1--`'."1".:r.q::-.-41•1'117 =n1. 4;P:-.' CIF•;,'it._. :-:;•sc----:7::::::-.:p '-''':7 -,'-- , ':-.;_i'.1.1._,.17,,,,';*9...,_.'4iAr-V-V:V..,71,0''--- - -Y--ti;.--'-'37::,VIVW.___. r 4'..,`L:4,--,,„. -.,,,_,:„-P,,,,,L174,..,_ __-,73.-'.: •.-- -?:-- I r. ..-,- --' i t-7'd ;7-...1$.4!x.‘zits..-.4..,&vt.e."14.-ci-4.;_;-al'?' 14-r.,-,,„-__.--,-:--;'-...,e,',- ..----- 13-....- ',....,,=.-- ''','-'-'47.-. --, e•-•''''''!' "-A.:t.vi 1 3V. - ,,2. e.':,..7.-1 r:A.-.0-:,-,2--1''77F1W.31.4..-.4rt,V.:57". .r•i-:-;.-„:,7-,,,----4-z...,4r.„44.-,.-44---4.:.- --4-4,-,:,..-,-.47,- --SX%-i-_,;,-.A4_,Are.' ... ...W.4-4,.';'::;V, •Vpi-i.f.1?:iP.:,9„...13,,,w4a--.-,,,,-,•• ,-.:•---..,..,,,,,--,-,-.--, ,.. _,-,4- ,.„---*-..-r-4:-.*-__• ,4-;2 z•'' 4-4'4,=•- -'"';'"*,,,_,-.r& ,' ''-ef,,-,•%•,;.2,-..- 4,,,v4,.2,,,,:ial"---. ..-•-- 2-,,'..--n*. •-e,-----------!-,, 7-7!--.1.104-k.,_•----, ••,-.•?4,_-,A,,,;-.-i- iStt, -4.:...',-7'*-...t:',i*,,..11i-Itg.+7,%''T.41,.:.....f.'llft.-f'-.1.'7• 1::.1':;?..X44.. _ SP-.'"t" ..,,,,,-_,--::7-`,1 .fla,...;,..„4....r,,,t5rr.,::.,, ,,-,.., ..,i,-, ......trtvir.„, • •• ., ..„41.4:.. ••..:i‘.'...-•:...-.F1.,-.- -;,..,. -:r4,-..,4"..-;.1 .,-.4-‘...';:qil:r."- :?''''.:::.A;i2,*-1-fir:.. ...,,,,,,, 'r- '''',-''4' --• 7-.''''-`• ,' ' '"-':-..:•,-,,-.--,:,,4 tri,,,i'L.V-V-t •..,,,,,r1.-fR.e......irt.-,-„,..?;_,_, ....,,i,.... ...t t xr r ' di. . ., .,t/r+'f T-... ,p • S � • 'wq'A 1 r 1' .f . •Z_...i-•4 k`+�..F-' Irk, .' 'F y g,: .%• .�+ ,gip. ..• + ; 41' y7'3 .kn �}' .,,,Ato�.5 i�' �4rg2 r ,: ,' ' K. . -*,, a1,s. 'x r: _:6 "f • X f 2 i- "4 r as -' s. F a • '' ie.r -ry Ep ..nrY .. .. i h. 7t e � %Y' y� p 4 Se• ''V' 1e p I f °' -.*4" 4 1 •` itc:f<��-4 2• /•:.t. .J 1 6 i•` j i F• . i" p'c. '"1 E, n., A` . iA2,I y ",� waNV.y, , 14. '}^': k•r .f 7 J..i .. ar • ..7`` -v.41..7. I.Y - 'k. 4 'Aihtt,.. f y "Ty p ytv��a ',. %• •-, ib+i ,',,� s..• .M .(i. 1 w n e .< ��.K- ,a..' ..n �i••••,—' `�r,-r Y�T�d . ; �`�' '� t Jam. . � l�Y....' ��� .g•?�d"�ia� �,�� T ,a' ;;I a•>: ?,. '�:to,.� p i•GIs`s:I�I-. .- $;: ,�.T r . yr .: '• v.°tr,+3F ,,y �r ' - 77 34 le i y,Y, I`' e a P`. "�' a '` u S� .+- • • °'" n;IL:-rtarnc 1 :y� xF L,. „ s f - 4„4, ;' ..j.""a -: 1z 2 -z I� ., +!�- , :•,,,i7 i ey e T• ? NE A' 1 c.- gr �r +• •• + •y, ` ,. .,� IkF zt a 111... I I' t I Icy. +t • t _ .;;;. ' ' : ,i . L''' ,°t ,,,v," • S t t S 1l r f1;: JF,SY v4k I,46_IA Oai 1NOWII�ICi.,- .i`?�. y- , . V t. • 0' •+ t' { LTA • �6e.- �" "�4r �. :., 4 . f, ps ,$- ` 'Ty ' rr .• ,+:r ' tb .•fi y , ,-C • w' 3 r r..s. ,,� -'d' ,a 'r"-i � s b 3'4 ..a� ,�y I-- .gyp"" ' U. xy'.:; s' -dy ,+Ft `S .Y. M��S � f .' •Vic��x� "'sS` t.G-k t!T. 'f fs•!, .,i. ;.,- r• t z ''- n '' •. ram 7 ri 1on,'4.a. /"4 44 r f� `3 °` _ t, ^r� ``'';Y..A_ 1- tt'- ,yam -. 49.tr`' '"faw iW nYi'h�..*:S'4µ"a°'t•"S.z�`^} + 'i4 '"�i'.: 't .R+ ?cs� e, { Y: ,,,. r a a ✓ {`C` :< j .f.�- +E !.34n `•r• . _ s""T. , -� 5, -", r4 : --a+4- F' ra'e` * t- �,:eC P , ..,1i 77 ' "`R: �'.i sl `--` is'^ 'Al...'. rrt ,e ti� °ice�' r '�sr, r ^i !- r "'(sue Mr' �. aL 'r '.:, - ,,". 'V 0� *' `lei, a,13� E :"' ss J ., d 1.A 2 t .�iG „' 2 t tz.. +tyr e ` 'fir`sA .gy p. [r L �`�ygiv^R-�{•'`�y t .a' ,fir,A�. `_m s- .ua '' -�•ca %�T PF" t,'Ly t Cr,l . �. .t, L ,. ri .�G ,,. " .i—v y 2-! All.- v... ....1i' ,fit: --Arr..se ' ROSE\40UN114 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CITY COUNCIL City Council Meeting Date:July 17, 2007 AGENDA ITEM: Case 07-25-LS Abrahamsen Lot Split AGENDA SECTION: Consent PREPARED BY: Jason Lindahl, A.I.C.P. AGENDA NO. (p.V� Planner ATTACHMENTS: Resolution, Location Map, Certificate of Survey, Minor Subdivision Agreement and APPROVED BY: Declaration, Excerpt from 6-26-07 Planning Commission Meeting RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends the City Council make the following motions: 1. Motion to approve a Lot Split allowing the creation of a 5.22 acre parcel to be known as Parcel B from the existing 75.14 acre parcel with a Parcel Identification Number of 34-03100-010-01 to be known as Parcel C, subject to conditions. 2. Motion to execute a Minor Subdivision and Declaration outlining the terms and conditions of the proposed lot split. SUMMARY Applicant&Property Owner(s): Hans J. and Phyllis M. Abrahamsen Location: Approximately One Mile Southeast of the Intersection of County Road 42 and Highway 52 and1 Mile North of County Road 46 Area in Acres: 75.14 Acres Comp. Guide Plan Desig: AG -Agriculture Current Zoning: AG -Agriculture The applicant, Hans J. and Phyllis M. Abrahamsen, requests Lot Split approval to allow the creation of a 5.22 acre parcel from their existing 75.14 acre parcel. The site is currently used as farm land and contains several agricultural and storage buildings. Should the City approve the split and associated Minor Subdivision and Declaration, the applicants intend to sell the new 5.22 acre property, including the agricultural and storage buildings, to another party for use as their homestead. The Abrahamsens will retain the 69.92 acre Parcel C with the understanding that it may not be used for another residential dwelling unit. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION The Planning Commission held a public hearing to review this item on June 26, 2007. Minutes from that meeting are attached for your reference. After hearing a presentation from staff, the Commission opened the public hearing on this item. The only person to speak during the public hearing was the neighbor to the west,Mr. Ken Schindeldecker of 4485 160th Street East,who stated he supported the application. The Commission then asked some general questions of staff regarding the Minor Subdivision and Declaration agreement before voting unanimously to recommend the City Council approve the request. SUBDIVISION REQUEST Standards for reviewing subdivision requests are contained in Title 12 of the Rosemount City Code - the Subdivision Regulations. Overall, this application meets the minimum requirements of the Subdivision Regulations as well as the lot and dimensional standards of the AG—Agriculture District. The applicable standards, along with staff findings related to each, are provided below. Land Use and Zoning. The subject property is guided and zoned AG—Agriculture. These designations set a minimum lot size of 2.5 acres and a maximum density of one (1) unit per forty (40) acres. Originally, the applicants owned this entire eighty (80) acre property (Parcels A, B, and C as shown on the Certificate of Survey). Previously, the applicants subdivided the 5.11 acre Parcel A leaving the existing 75.14 acre parcel. Under the current one (1) unit per forty (40) acre density standard, the applicants are allowed one other residential dwelling unit from the remaining 75.14 acre property. In this case, they wish to subdivide the 75.14 acre property into the 5.22 acre Parcel B and the 69.94 acre Parcel C. Staff is agreeable to this request with the following restrictions. First, once a residential building permit is issued for Parcel B, said Parcel B will be sold to another party. Second, that no other residential building permit will be issued for all or any part of Parcel C,absent changes to the zoning ordinance. These conditions are set forth in the attached Minor Subdivision Agreement and Declaration which must be approved by the City and recorded against the properties. Lot Analysis Lot Lot Size (sq. ft.) Lot Width (feet) Lot Depth (feet) Status Required Proposed Required Proposed Required Proposed Parcel B 2.5 Acres 5.22 300. 625 Conformin 1 Unit/40 Acres 300 N/A g Parcel C Acre 69.94 604 2,019 Conforming Density Acres Setbacks. The setback standards for the AG—Agriculture District are outlined in Section 11-4-1. These standards are illustrated in the table below. Setback Standards for the AG—Agriculture District Category Principal Structure Accessory Structure Surface Parking Front Yard Setback 50 Feet 30 Feet 30 Feet Side Yard Setback 50 Feet 30 Feet 30 Feet Rear Yard Setback 50 Feet 5 Feet 5 Feet Maximum Building Height 50 Feet 75 Feet N/A 2 It should be noted that existing buildings on Parcel B fail to meet these standards and are considered legal nonconforming. This is acceptable to staff since the proposed subdivision will not affect this nonconformity in that it will not change the applicable property line. According to Section 11-11-2, Continuance of Nonconforming Uses and Structures, these structures may be continued through repair, replacement, restoration,maintenance or improvement but not through expansion. Any expansion shall be subject to the conditions outlined in this section. Streets &Access. Currently,Parcel A and the existing 75.14 acre parcel have access to 160th Street (County Road 46) via a 0.7 mile long gravel driveway. This driveway appears to cross both the property owned by the applicants and the adjacent property to the south (David and Phyllis Larson—4357 160`h Street East). It is unclear whether an easement for this driveway exists. Therefore, staff recommends a condition of approval require the applicant to dedicate an access easement of sufficient width to accommodate the necessary driveway from parcels A, B, and C to the right-of-way for 160`h Street. Sidewalks, Trails and Pathway. According to Section 11-4-1, the AG—Agriculture District is primarily established to encourage the long term continuation of agricultural and related uses in the city in areas which are both suitable for agriculture and are not planned for urban development. Give this information and the relatively isolated location of these properties, staff fords that no pedestrian access is necessary to this site at this time. Utilities and Easements. The Engineering Department has review the proposal and requires only the access easement mentioned above. In addition,Parcel B will be required to conform with all septic and well standards including,but not limited to, designation of both a primary and secondary drain field on site. Parks and Open Space. The Park and Recreation Department recommends the applicant pay a park dedication fee equal to one (1) unit of parks dedication at a rate of$3,400/unit or $3,400. This dedication shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of a building permit for Parcel B. CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the Lot Split request from Hans J. and Phyllis M. Abrahamsen and the associated Minor Subdivision and Declaration to allow the creation of a 5.22 acre parcel from their existing 75.14 acre parcel. After holding a public hearing on this item, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend the City Council approve staffs recommendation. The site is currently used as farm land and contains several agricultural and storage buildings. Should the City approve the split and associated Minor Subdivision and Declaration, the applicants intend to sell the new 5.22 acre property, including the agricultural and storage buildings, to another party for use as their homestead. The Abrahamsens will retain the 69.92 acre Parcel C with the understanding that it may not be used for another residential dwelling unit. This recommendation is based on the plans and documents submitted by the applicants as well as the finding made in this report and is subject to the conditions outlined in the attached resolution. 3 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2007- A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE LOT SPLIT REQUEST FROM HANS J. ABRAHAMSEN AND PHYLLIS M. ABRAHAMSENAND EXECUTION OF A MINOR SUBDIVISION AND DECLARATION AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the Community Development Department of the City of Rosemount received an application from Hans J. Abrahamsen and Phyllis M. Abrahamsen (herein after the "Applicants") requesting a Lot Split to divide their existing 75.14 Acres acre property (herein after the "Existing Tax Parcel") legally described as follows: The East Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 31,Township 115,Range 18, except the West 420 feet of the South 375 feet and the North 250 feet of the South 625 feet of the West 260 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter,Dakota County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the Applicants' lot split request proposes to subdivide the Existing Tax Parcel into a 5.22 acre parcel for sale to a separate party for a proposed residential use and a 69.22 acre parcel for the Applicants to retain for continued agricultural use; and WHEREAS, the Applicants agree to the terms and conditions of this subdivision as detailed in the Minor Subdivision and Declaration;and WHEREAS, on June 26, 2007, the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount held a public hearing to review the proposed Lot Split and Minor Subdivision Agreement and found the proposed Lot Split consistent with the Existing Tax Parcel's AG—Agriculture land use and zoning performance standards, subject to the terms and conditions of the Minor Subdivision and Declaration; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission adopted a motion to recommend that the City Council approve the proposed Lot Split and execute the associated Minor Subdivision and Declaration, subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, on July 17, 2007, the City Council of the City of Rosemount reviewed the Planning Commission's recommendation and the Lot Split requested by the City of Rosemount and agreed with the Commission's recommendations. NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED,the City Council of the City of Rosemount hereby approves the Applicants'Lot Split request to subdivide the Existing Tax Parcel into two (2) tax parcels as illustrated on the attached survey (Exhibit A) to be identified below. This approval is also subject to the conditions listed below. Parcel B: The South 625.00 feet of the West 720.00 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, of Section 31, Township 115 North, Range 18 West, Dakota County, Minnesota. EXCEPT the following described lands: RESOLUTION 2007- The West 420.0 feet of the South 375.0 feet thereof and the North 250.0 feet of the South 625.0 feet of the West 260.0 feet of the NE 1/4 of Section 31, Township 115 North, Range 18. Containing 5.22 acres,more or less. AND Parcel C: The Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter and the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 31,Township 115 North,Range 18 West,Dakota County,Minnesota. EXCEPT the following described lands: The West 720.00 feet of the South 625.00 feet of said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter. Containing 69.92 acres,more or less. Conditions of approval: A. Execution and recording of the Minor Subdivision Agreement and Declaration prior to issuance of a building permit for Parcel B. B. Dedication of an access easement of sufficient width to accommodate the necessary driveway from parcels A, B, and C to the right-of-way for 160th Street, prior to issuance of a building permit for Parcel B. C. Conformance with all septic and well standards including,but not limited to, designation of both a primary and secondary drain field on site,prior to issuance of a building permit for Parcel B. D. Payment of all applicable development fees including a $300 Geographic Information (GIS) fee and 1 unit of Park Dedication equal to $3,400,prior to issuance of a building permit for Parcel B. NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Rosemount hereby approves the execution of a Minor Subdivision and Declaration detailing the terms and conditions of the Lot Split. ADOPTED this 17th day of July, 2007, by the City Council of the City of Rosemount. William H. Droste,Mayor 2 RESOLUTION 2007- ATTEST: Amy Domeier, City Clerk Motion by: Second by: Voted in favor: Voted against: Member absent: 3 Abrahamsen Lot Split J \ 1 Couo 1 I P.I( L{x r r - , >1 SITE 3 1 \ , .._...._............: il......... 1 , \ 1 - I1 • • \.\ _ 1 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR: MR. HANS ABRAHAMSEN Proposal Parcel B Ropeny Desaiptiw The Sou.635.00 fen of the West 720.00 feu of the Southeast Quarter of the Nor.®st Quarto,of Semen 31,Township 115 Out II3� Range 18 Wet.Dakota Cowry,Mrs...I I VS EXCEPT the following deaibed lends: Y The West 420.0 het of Me South 325.0 tem and the Nor.250.0 fen erne South 625.0 feet of the Pint 260.0 feet chile SEI/4 NEIVA of Sestiw 31,Township I15 Nor.,Range 16 Wen �-k �- ) Containing 522 Acres more or lea �`\ S \ Subject to all easements and ra0istions of«cord X a Parcel C 69.92 ACRES m w x �� k tile` 1\N (51\\).' N •• ti IA =an 5 89 'Sa-E T20.20' o ��s �/ IX i .or w aeo.12' <vN` 8 S.) Ie_a_uyy¢k.O Parcel e ii 'V 1r1 5.23 AcflES Parcel A :,- d R o 6 IC//ems' eo (Existing Potent 8- m �� k Lr e341V__ _g� —_---_—_—_—_—{—.L_—_—M y 5 a9']0'SB-IE 5 69'30'SB'E I604.06' X --_--- --_—_— MT? 300.013''n ProposedPafcelCPrOPGI}r De9C=i----- —`— — e`w���' i ( a,--1-- The Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter and the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 31,Township 115 North,Range 18 West,Dakota County.Minnesota. EXCEPT the following described lends: I 1 I The West 720.00 feet of the South 625.00 feet of said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter. 2m 1 Containing 69.92 Acres more or less. ° ! Subject to all easements and restrictions of record. I V 7 I A. / ABA I `' AAA i I ii Panel A losing Parcel of Record 15 i The Wen 420.0 Na of ge South 373.0fen and the Not.2500 ha of the Somh 625.0 feel of the West zoo feet ofNe SE1N 1C 1 NEIl4 of Seeim 31,Township 115 North,Range 8West,Containing5.11 ores more or Ins.together wig and easemet for road _ wr•pumosss°verge following deiesibed prope62 6! n ne $ n I � (a)) That pen of Mc Southl3 fat ofna SEIl4 NEIIO of said Seaton 31,lying let of Mc Near 020.0 het tthereof: � (b)The South 33 fen of Mc Won 33 font of the SWI)NW IN of Section 32,Township 115 North,Range IS Won i v`� (c)The West fen of Pe W l/2 SWIM efsaid Section 33. i 5�/ 1 H_en I • I 1 1 I _ e Deks¢tan err,,o.nmp 6 Nenn. .nee a I% wet. r�-- ,• IJUN 1 5 2007 •b., rl N JBy_— --— ® Surveying, Engineering Ill >�e,ew Fr � & Planning erne n npea u w. p b., ,, .r w.am,..t �,,y a;m rw� JOHNSON & SCOFIELD INC. ®°a;:..:'w. $00 600' J` 'e& F507 Vermillion Slreel Hestia 30 5503} ®pots,recta am pro e a w.er Na. xs G G G,INC. 95. ,STIVERIS .e_g;°;;eB,.naE,e.ngp•m °,r.�;,= . e, vh Bst.a3e.0000 ro=ssl.a}a.9oos D LT?:ew w-,>Ike.,: a==„_ • MINOR SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT AND DECLARATION This Agreement is made and entered into this day of July 2007, by and between THE CITY of ROSEMOUNT ("City") and HANS J. ABRAHAMSEN and PHYLLIS M. ABRAHAMSEN, husband and wife ("Owner"). WHEREAS, Owner owns, free and clear of encumbrances, the following parcel of land located in Dakota County, Minnesota, identified as Parcel Identification Number ("PID") 34-03100-010-01, herein referred to as "Existing Tax Parcel", to-wit: The East One-Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 31, Township 115, Range 18, Dakota County, Minnesota, according to the Government Survey thereof, EXCEPT the West 420 feet of the South 375 feet thereof and EXCEPT the North 250 feet of the South 625 feet of the West 260 feet (said Exceptions being herein referred to as Parcel A); and WHEREAS, Owner desires to divide the Existing Tax Parcel into two (2) tax parcels to be identified as follows, to-wit: Parcel B: The South 625.00 feet of the West 720.00 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, of Section 31, Township 115 North, Range 18 West, Dakota County, Minnesota. EXCEPT the following described lands: The West 420.0 feet of the South 375.0 feet thereof and the North 250.0 feet of the South 625.0 feet of the West 260.0 feet of the NE 1/4 of Section 31, Township 115 North, Range 18. Containing 5.22 acres,more or less. AND 1 Parcel C: The Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter and the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 31, Township 115 North, Range 18 West, Dakota County, Minnesota. EXCEPT the following described lands: The West 720.00 feet of the South 625.00 feet of said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter. Containing 69.92 acres,more or less. AND WHEREAS, Owner desires to obtain approval for a residential building permit on Parcel B and is willing to agree and acknowledge that, absent further zoning change, upon approval of a residential building permit for Parcel B, no additional building permits will issue for all or any portion of Parcel C; and WHEREAS, Owner contemplates that upon approval from City for a residential building permit on Parcel B, said Parcel B will be conveyed to a person not a party hereto;and WHEREAS, Owner is willing to document of record the restriction, and prohibition against any additional residential building permits being available for Parcel C; and WHEREAS, Owner and City set forth their Agreement regarding the ability to receive a residential building permit for the herein identified Parcel B and the prohibition against additional residential building permits being issued for Parcel C and wish to set forth that agreement in writing; and WHEREAS, Section 11-4-1, Paragraph F.6 of the Rosemount Zoning Code allows only one dwelling unit per 40 acres in the AG agricultural district; and WHEREAS, the Existing Tax Parcel is within the Ag agricultural district of the City of Rosemount; and WHEREAS, the 80-acre parcel of which the Existing Tax Parcel was a part was previously subdivided and a parcel containing approximately 5.11 acres was divided from the remainder of the 80-acre parcel and a residential structure has been constructed on said 5.11 acre parcel;and WHEREAS, as a result of said subdivision, only one residential dwelling unit may be constructed on the Existing Tax Parcel; and WHEREAS, the City has approved the subdivision of the Existing Tax Parcel on the condition that this declaration be executed and recorded against the title to Parcels B and C; and WHEREAS, Owner desires to subject Parcels B and C to the terms of this declaration to secure the benefit to Owner and to Parcels B and C of the subdivision of the Existing Tax Parcel. 2 NOW THEREFORE, the Owner declares that Parcels B and C are, and shall be, held, transferred, sold, conveyed and occupied subject to the covenants, conditions, and restrictions hereinafter set forth. 1. Parcel B shall be entitled to one residential building permit. 2. Parcel C shall not be entitled to any residential building permits, absent change in the zoning and other regulations of the City applicable to said Parcel C. 3. The parties agree that this Agreement shall be filed of record, on the descriptions of the above-identified Parcel B and above-identified Parcel C, said recording to be at the expense of Owner. 4. This Agreement has been approved by the City Council of the City of Rosemount. 5. This Agreement shall run with the land of Parcels B and C and bind the heirs, successors and assigns of the Owner. 6. The obligations and restrictions of this Minor Subdivision Agreement and Declaration may be enforced by the City of Rosemount, acting through its City Council. This Agreement and Declaration may be amended from time to time by a written amendment executed by the City and the Owner or Owners of the lot or lots to be affected by said Agreement. CITY OF ROSEMOUNT By: By: Its: Its: OWNER: By: By: Hans J.Abrahamsen Phyllis M. Abrahamsen 3 1 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss: COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) This Agreement was executed before me this day of July 2007,by and , respectively the and , on behalf of the City of Rosemount. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss: COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) This Agreement was executed before me this day of July 2007,by Hans J. Abrahamsen and Phyllis M.Abrahamsen,husband and wife. Notary Public This Instrument Drafted By: FLUEGEL LAW FIRM P.A. 1303 South Frontage Road, Suite 5 Hastings, MN 55033 Phone: 651-438-9777 (DJF:skr) 4 EXCERPT FROM MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING JUNE 26, 2007 5.c. Case 07-25-LS Abrahamsen Lot Split. Planner Lindahl presented this item. The applicants, Hans J. and Phyllis M. Abrahamsen, request lot split approval to allow the creation of a 5.22 acre parcel from their existing 75.14 acre parcel. The site is currently used as farm land and contains several agricultural and storage buildings. Should the City approve the split and associated minor subdivision and declaration, the applicants intend to sell the new 5.22 acre property,including the agricultural and storage buildings, to another party for use as their homestead. The Abrahamsens will retain the 69.92 acre Parcel C with the understanding that it may not be used for another residential dwelling unit. Mr. Lindahl further reviewed the subdivision request including the land use and zoning issues, setbacks, streets and access, sidewalks, trails and pathway, utilities and easements, and parks and open spaces. The applicant was present but had no comments. Chairperson Messner opened the public hearing at 8:OOp.m. Ken Schindeldecker, 4485 160`h Street East, stated he has no problem with the proposed split. He lives on parcel A and has no problem with the setbacks of the buildings. There were no further public comments. MOTION by Howell to close the Public Hearing. Second by Palda. Ayes: 5. Nays: None. Motion approved. Public hearing was closed at 8:01 p.m. Chairperson Messner asked the purpose of the Minor Subdivision Agreement and Declaration referred to in the second motion. Mr. Lindahl replied that the Agreement sets forth the conditions of approval of the lot split is in a form that is recordable against the property for future reference. MOTION by Schwartz to recommend that the City Council approve a Lot Split to allow for the creation of a 5.22 acre parcel to be known as Parcel B from the existing 75.14 acre with a Parcel Identification Number of 34-03100-010-01 to be known as Parcel C, subject to the following conditions: 1. Execution and recording of the Minor Subdivision Agreement and Declaration prior to issuance of a building permit for Parcel B. 2. Dedication of an access easement of sufficient width to accommodate the necessary driveway from parcels A, B, and C to the right-of-way for 160`h Street, prior to issuance of a building permit for Parcel B. 3. Conformance with all septic and well standards including, but not limited to, designation of both a primary and secondary drain field on site,prior to issuance of a building permit for Parcel B. 4. Payment of all applicable development fees including a $300 Geographic Information (GIS) fee and 1 unit of Park Dedication equal to $3,400, prior to issuance of a building permit for Parcel B. Second by Schultz. Ayes: 5. Nays: None. Motion approved. MOTION by Schultz to recommend that the City Council execute a Minor Subdivision and Declaration. Second by Schwartz. Ayes: 5. Nays: None. Motion approved. As follow-up, Mr. Lindahl stated the item will go before the City Council for approval on July 17`h. j : ROSEMOUNT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CITY COUNCIL City Council Regular Meeting: July 17, 2007 AGENDA ITEM: Case No. 07-02-PP Ryan Companies AGENDA SECTION: (Pahl Property) Preliminary Plat— Consent Rosemount Business Park Third Addition PREPARED BY: Eric Zweber; Senior Planner AGENDA NO. (P, U. ATTACHMENTS: Site Map, Resolution, Comprehensive Plan Map, Preliminary Plat, Site Plan, Grading Plan, Storm Sewer Plan, Utility Plan, Park and Recreation Director's APPROVED BY: Memorandum, City Engineer's Memorandum, Excerpt of the June 26, 2007 Planning Commission Minutes RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to adopt a Resolution approving the Preliminary Plat for Rosemount Business Park Third Addition. ISSUE Ryan Companies has submitted a 55 acre preliminary plat for a business park. The majority of the property (42 acres) is owned by the Pahl family and the remaining portion is owned by the City of Rosemount (13 acres) for a future water treatment plant. The preliminary plat approval would allow Ryan to market the business park and final plat in phase as business users present themselves. PLANNING COMMISSION DISCUSSION The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on June 26, 2007. No resident spoke regarding the preliminary plat. The only discussion held regarding the plat was the width of the right-of-way on Boulder Avenue and the applicant's willingness to work with the City to evaluate regional stormwater solutions including a portion of the JJT property and the property to the south. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the preliminary plat with the conditions contained within the resolution. SUMMARY Applicant: Ryan Companies US, Inc. Property Owner: Pahl Family Limited Partnership Property Location: Approximately 1/4 mile west of Biscayne Avenue, south of Boulder Trail and east of Boulder Avenue Size of Property: Approximately 55 Acres; 42 Acres owned by the Pahl family and 13 Acres owned by the City of Rosemount Comprehensive Plan Designation: BP—Business Park Zoning: BP—Business Park Current Neighboring Land Uses: North—Business Park South—Agriculture East—Pipeline Easement and Agriculture West—Undeveloped Business Park Planned Neighboring Land Uses: North, South, East and West—Business Park Southwest—Commercial Southeast—Water Treatment Plant Ryan Companies has submitted a preliminary plat to develop a business park with approximately 560,000 square feet of office/warehouse buildings. The site is approximately 55 acres in size, 42 acres of which would be developed as the business park and 13 acres is owned by the city for a current well house and future water treatment plant. Ryan Companies currently does not have any companies that are interested in locating within the business park, but the preliminary plat approval will allow Ryan to market the business park and request future final plats and site plan reviews when they locate interested companies. The preliminary plat site is relatively flat with the Northern Natural Gas pipeline on the eastern edge of the property. The site does drop off at the southeast edge of the property. The property is currently owned by the Pahl Family Limited Partnership and has been in agriculture production through its recent history. There are no wetlands or significant trees on this property. The Pahls own additional property to the east and south that they will keep in agricultural production and hold for future development. This spring,WSB completed an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the Ryan proposal. The EAW evaluated the proposal for impacts to the City's water, sewer, and transportation system, as well as other environmental concerns. The two issues identified to be addressed were the construction of stormwater controls on-site and the construction of the Boulder Avenue to South Robert Trail before the entire area planned for commercial and business park is developed. The Ryan preliminary plat can develop completely before the connection to South Robert Trail is needed. On May 15,2007, the City Council approved the EAW. Proposed Land Uses Ryan Companies has provided a preliminary site plan that illustrates a total of 558,900 enclosed square feet in five buildings. One of the buildings (lot 3) is shown as 347,600 square foot with 75,000 square feet of office and 272,600 square feet of warehousing design for a single large user. Lots 1 and 2 are designed for approximately 70,000 square feet office/warehousing buildings on each lot that can either be single or multiple tenants. The parking provided for Lots 1 and 2 can accommodate about 45% office and 55% warehouse uses. Lot 4 and 5 are designed for 30,000 to 40,000 square feet building that are aimed at single tenant and the parking provided can also accommodate a 45%/55% office to warehouse ratio. The final design of the buildings will be created with the actual companies and may modify the lot sizes and layouts. The Ryan preliminary plan allows them flexibility to market the lots to a wide variety of potential business park users. Site Access The lots within the proposed preliminary plat will be accessed via the existing Boulder Trail, the future extension of Boulder Avenue, or the future public street (Outlot E). In the future, as development continues to the south and west,Boulder Avenue will eventually be connected to South Robert Trail at the location of the current intersection with Canada Circle. The proposed preliminary plat can be completely developed without the connection of Boulder Avenue with South Robert Trail. Boulder Avenue will need to be constructed to the south boundary of the development,with the appropriate utility stubs. 2 The existing businesses on the north side of Boulder Trail and the future development within the JJT Business Park will have an effect on the locations of access drives within the Ryan preliminary plat. Accesses to Boulder Trail and Boulder Avenue, as well as the location of the future public road,will need to be designed to either connect directly across from existing business accesses or at an appropriate offset from the existing accesses. While this is an issue when marketing for businesses, there is a wide variety of possible access configurations that can be designed. Parking and Traffic Flow The BP—Business Park zoning requires a 5% landscaping area within parking lots. It appears that the preliminary site plan is close to meeting that requirement. Additional information will need to be provided with the site plan review for the eventual development to ensure that this requirement is fulfilled. The applicant has proposed a preliminary site plan that provides 1,135 parking stalls for the 558,900 square feet of buildings. These parking stalls would provide for a mix of approximately 33% office (190,000 square feet) and 67%warehousing (368,900 square feet). This mix of uses is comparable to the other companies within the business park. The traffic flow within the preliminary plat seems to be well thought out. All of the proposed lots will have access directly to the public streets, many with multiple accesses. The individual lots are designed to have vehicle access to at least three sides of the buildings and three of the lots are designed to access completely to all four sides of the building. Final site plan will likely be different from the preliminary proposal, but Ryan has provided a well designed concept that should be flexible to accommodate most business park uses. Landscaping A landscaping plan has not been submitted with the preliminary plat. A landscaping plan is always required for a residential preliminary plat, but not for commercial and industrial properties. The difference is because commercial and industrial developments will still need to gain site plan approval,while residential projects normally do not. Landscaping requirement will be reviewed for the buildings within this preliminary plat at the time of site plan approval. The approval of this preliminary plat does not waive any of the landscape requirements of the future development. Sanitary Sewer and Water Service Sanitary sewer and municipal water service have already been installed within the existing Boulder Trail and Boulder Avenue right-of-way. These services will need to be extended with the future extension of Boulder Avenue to the southern property line. A water main loop is provided adjacent to the western edge of Outlot C,running north to the existing water line in Boulder Trail. Sanitary sewer and water connection are provided to all the proposed lots directly from the utility within the public street right-of- ways. The water line connected to the future water treatment plant may need to be upsized above the proposed 8 inch line and 6 inch stub to provide a connection to the existing 12 inch water line in Boulder Trail. 3 a , Stormwater Management The preliminary plat is designed with one stormwater pond and infiltration area to serve the entire 42 acres under Ryan Companies ownership. The City owned site (Outlot C) will need to provide its own stormwater management, either on-site or through an off-site regional basin. The City Engineer is having discussions with Ryan Companies to expand the pond to include Outlot C and the area around the future Boulder Avenue in exchange for some form of compensation. The one stormwater pond and infiltration area will be located on Oudot B, located in the south central area of the plat. The stormwater for the plat will be conveyed to Outlot B either through a pipe within the public road constructed on Outlot E or through a pipe running north from Outlot B parallel to the western boundary of Outlot C. Depending on where and how large the first phases of development are, temporary ponding may need to be constructed. If the property along Boulder Trail nearest Biscayne Avenue develops first, then temporary ponding may be constructed adjacent to the development until the pond on Outlot B is constructed. City Owned Property/Future Water Treatment Plant Ryan Companies has requested a land swap of the land that the City owns south of Boulder Trail and east of Boulder Avenue (Outlot B) for a parcel of land interior to the development that would be of equal size (Outlot C). The City owns land in this area for a future water treatment plant. Water treatment plants do not need to be located on major thoroughfares,but only need a street access for city vehicles and access to the city well(s) located near the water treatment plant. Outlot A has an operating city well. The well on Outlot A will be connected with Outlot C through a 20 foot drainage utility easement. The City plans for an additional three to five wells located east and south of this plat to feed the water treatment plat. Additional utility easements will need to be acquired when the property to the east and the south develops to connect these future wells to the water treatment plant. The water treatment plant (Outlot C) will be served by a cul-de-sac at the end of a future public street (Outlot E). Ryan Companies states that the future public road will be constructed when future development occurs. In addition, the future public road may need to be constructed when the construction of the water treatment plant needs it, even if that is before the development needs it. The exact detail of when the public road will be constructed will be worked out within the Subdivision Agreement for the first final plat of the Rosemount Business Park Third Addition. Park and Recreation Memorandum The Parks and Recreation Director has requested that the sidewalk on the west side of Boulder Avenue be continued with future extension of Boulder Avenue and that a sidewalk be constructed on the south side of the future public street(Outlot E) to serve the needs of the business park employees. Additionally, a prospective fee-in-lieu of parkland dedication has been calculated to be approximately$357,000. The parkland dedication is not required at the preliminary plat and is provided only to give Ryan Companies an idea of what will be required. Parkland dedication will be officially calculated and collected with the future final plats. Engineering Memorandum The City Engineer has provided a memorandum describing a number of changes needed to the plan sheets or stormwater model. All major comments within the memorandum that are pertinent to the Planning Commission recommendation have been added in the specific area of discussion within this staff report. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the resolution approving the preliminary plat. 4 . ., ,...„,t, ..c, ,... E . A �t LL E3 `' i sr FOR ROSE.tou/TI 3c St^J€SS PAPI< Tf4tRS AQbf/rvj • =L____Lp 7/ UM ----7-----2 Ilild ii.s.. I F 1 1 ilhik. / .-- G'fY t b 4 z- '�A or U • '31 "-'''''\\ .F. • .. I gos 1vta0N3 t �3UsINIESs till ' L. 41 NOTE: Dimensions rounded to nearest foot. Copyright 2007,Dakota County- This drawing is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This drawing is a compilation of records,information and data located in various city,county,and state offices and other sources,affecting the area shown,and is to be used for reference purposes only. Dakota County is not responsible for any inaccuracies herein contained. If discrepancies are found,please contact Dakota County Survey and Land Information Department. Map Date:June 22,2007 Parcels Updated:6/14/2007 Aerial Photography: CITY OF ROSEMOUNT DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2007- A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELMINARY PLAT FOR ROSEMOUNT BUSINESS PARK THIRD ADDITION ADDITION WHEREAS, the City of Rosemount received a request for Preliminary Plat approval from Ryan Companies concerning property legally described as: The South '/z of the Northeast '/4, Section 32, Township 115,Range 19, except that part described as follows: Beginning in the Northwest corner of Southwest'/4 of Northeast 1/4 East on North line 1284.80 feet, South 120 feet, South 89°26'13"West 544.83 feet, South 44°53'08"West 862.95 feet, South 00°20'04"West 124.53 feet, South 89°26'14" West 134.50 feet to West line of Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4,North on West line 850 feet to beginning. (PID#34-03210-020-15) And Outlot B,JJT Business Park 1st Addition (PID# 34-40700-020-00). And Outlot B, Rosemount Business Park 2nd Addition (PID# 34-64552-020-00). WHEREAS, on June 26, 2007, the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount held a public hearing and reviewed the Preliminary Plat for Rosemount Business Park Third Addition Addition; and WHEREAS, on June 26, 2007, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Preliminary Plat; and WHEREAS, on July 17, 2007, the City Council of the City of Rosemount reviewed the Planning Commission's recommendations; and NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Council of the City of Rosemount hereby approves the Preliminary Plat for Rosemount Business Park Third Addition, subject to the following conditions: 1. Compliance with the conditions within the Park and Recreation Director's Memorandum dated June 18, 2007 and the Engineering Department's Memorandum dated June 20, 2007. 2. Utilities, sidewalk, and street lights will need to be constructed with the future extension of Boulder Avenue. 3. The water main will need to be upsized from Outlot C (future water treatment plant) to the existing 12 inch main in Boulder Trail. ADOPTED this 17th day of July, 2007, by the City Council of the City of Rosemount. William H. Droste, Mayor RESOLUTION 2007- ATTEST: Amy Domeier, City Clerk Motion by: Second by: Voted in favor: Voted against: Member absent: 2 • •\ Tr7-1 sk•c0 DOCEMOt 1.1 i t N, .ntd.V$ V;i'914a t: 1 h , [i u ,. 1 u,n, , li • itrY&'t‘.1s" 0 e,,,,,ti , trit. • ' SPIF:17" OF PRIDELLO PROGR::,SJ, -,-' -- • ,,-.,.:1, 4,7-7:777,17-7,:.7---,,5---1,..____-2;717.1 6''-,.::.r.'4.4/,•('. 4-',p.i.. •'.. ). .1'•-....;-,.4 k- :. -._6,.,)--•-- ,r.:), ----.. --: ""'-,--t.li-7,-- ,,,..„,k,.,-..,w,..„,-;.,.!.,,,i .0 ___-•,-, ,,,,,,,,,, c.,),,,,,, , . ,0 .,,i,,.....:..),,,,ry,,4 t,,r,.,S.,:, . . ---w- GO—7,, 1 ,/ .1 ypr 0.•,4 .14 #itt ; ' 'Hg --.-, '- , ---.- I- --- 148TH ST W _n•___,_6—,F ,'.4 i'''• Arrq ''.f,.•bypol: — „ifo ..- j ' r 1 .4.,1?, 1,1 A .44 tot 0 -..., , • :,,„1,,,,,!..,... -__-. .-- . ---- . (..--, •i.*11,,,,f,-/Atr',11),:trel,7 Vcri.v,41,4461.i --- ,,• -\,_ -___ —i* ''' i* ,, •'.*1 g ,, '."1,1iLiz..;CA 13PENHER CT -'". ".;tr 4,,11'v','),'"4./,...10;,,,,1,t.",:'.'" :::'-'. ,'• f"-------,--,-, ,,,. .. _. — i ' e' ! * c .11: z •! . 4.1 44 P$,..,Q,,,,4,,,j,ior,..,41';•s Ih...N4 ...-•-:: -. —.; L____. ----\of)-00-Firr.,?r, ,„. ,,,i, , .: , 'fir4,'F'. "! : • •,, a ,Itif.,,,,.., ,...* v. ----.:: r -,- rrir,,,,, ,14.,ir i,..,i,,,,„ , „ ,,, t .-,,. or,,...rk , - • . A:ill, '' s. it, ti - „../ IV — --P--:. ''--- L-Lcei 9 5 - - '5--k‘fikl,,:c.,•t:•..,4...0"/ s',.,•,:. q'',... , ,..Y . ,..4*, .;,,, '!.t...--.,-4,-.1-,cv,T.‘,.,41 t i• yl '',ql ri,; 1;1 z_.„,..00.. (_____J . _. )Lu .,'Itriptio.fit,k,7•it; ,'.1. ';',1177, ,Nplitrit,.,,,:': ),riY.v•t`,.0,.H ?'i',4,0 11 • '' 041.141i ,•4',',.P,,,, ,\J.';,..'-i -'. .,o,-.-, - w-i .444 ,,,,, .14, i, .!V ,t'k• 1 ,I 014W I,,.y.,,,,,MW.R1:12 , ' ,.., . . I --II------ ''''''''IL-M,` in'''''' " ',El 1't :O. i t9. P..;k101...ttr.1,4 114, IL,4,, , . ,. lir Ai, z,.,...,19,fii4, .4_1•;)..iticA;•'-'- • , T _}-• .-k.-- ; . ____t, ____. ...•;,0:-F,,,,,,,zi,;0:1 i 41,21,.„,..,.. 4v,,,,,,,,60044...,4411,1.1•,i10. 1,.,,,,„4,4,1 i74/1_,A . i....7„/„.1„1-.0._ ,...,i,•15,11,i-,,, Ir'll . --\._I. „41.i.,(4%' — q•qi,.. ' iit.;:iiktkiV. .4 i'i..1,,11,L2,L„..t.,.=:•1-. ...,,l'A 1 ,1) '--------- , i ,J., ,7, i • ;•11Pik .. . , . . . ''''A,41 * ,r., • 11.0., i. . •",79-',,,.,07.6,776),,i4, '',7 ./. • . ,. . • ' c i'• „ 1 r ,, 7i 4:, , p•,,,' ''' '4 7/ -17 ittrilltitff • ,k 1 , 4 .ceol., 1.T, ...,„.. 4 t/ .. : : . .\ . .... :,.. . - 171,,,i.,,, ,•11 0,, d1.twi, :4, ;" .1.•'• im,• 1 .44 • 1,1 , , 4t... '1 i' A.,)- :.e. ii . 12,, ;I•,•., „Raze . ,,i •. .-i„ ..; "AkIs ,„;*., ‘li '''gt144.1 / / '0 ,F4p0:4,. 16,,..ik,! 94 '1 ): !maw c,.1, i, ,.1„,•,,,INI rt,„,.... i• \ 1 p a ,.•.1 ,i .. „ . lit .;noltkht4,1 .frit . • ci.-_- ,.. .'-(j51ST CT W 0-V41`1'" * 1 4' 11 ' Ith 1! • .(7 ill" f 0,1•S!';'45/ -. ;1/ . i ,I,.; ..t• •,' isr . .' ' 1 i 1 i••-• •Ik4 - • ii:i k.) ''' ../, • , de" . 5. 57'. ' . , *, • 'A1N.:.,.0 „:?: tr,I • , . • .:;;:i.,k62_ 7,1: , , .,''„ . h fr i , ,, v.itt,4 ,, /-- •i; ; 6- '. th '-Ipt .ke, .....) ti---. nql,R mi. Vvor„.„,1 1.. ,, •,/ :•'-'-':. g:17? 74 ' 9 ''. o tF.. 1,,"V'It'' I 'P.' '..! 4" •T 0,, ,4, , . '4,' • V"A: •,..,- ,-;.-= "."-4,1, Ct. kg • '• i : iiii L t'FO' ..2-A' (7 , cl...i.....,.. 7,,,.,- -- *:i ' r q,.‘,. . 1,9'.'-''''.' :,'),t 0,6 i'' 440 • ------ ; ., .,.:, fl , .,, •.timi, . .. ,..,1( , I . i,,. .;,.. •rmy tV; • . ;1,,, / ' , . L k, , ',, ' qs-,.tik ',i.m :itivek..,1, „41,,,, , / • 04.,‘11 1 .1 Gc-Tii, li tt i'),( •NO ,4.*.) / . )iff.ii*'!'.' t'•''''; '' ''*,' I * . • • 't. L t (. '''C COP')PA—(t....> ! •;fr,. .,i, „ii Aill ';. ' ,,, / , A .. i 1 + r . • ,1 P • ' . f,'''' ox•fn - . — . 1 aRD.ST,- ' ..'0' )"44 * l''`)' ''' ' 'i [ ' t• ',.'? f,,, ' 1 i, I 19E.,1.—t l'A 1,•-CNKY p 1,..A-i _ . : i i ,,I.. i __.-7,..-- :... , ..:• ._, r . ,:,..1.1,._ ii, . . . , . o. . •r ' .li',' -1— Jr I ,TiVSIL! !-. •.. i.V. '. :' ''......'• ." .'‘4--.ii,,,,.,• •,folrolaiummozza. . J ' ,,Imo . . W \ 1 4.1.t) ilk t'.. 4P',./01 • ''IF IP i. i 1-..1 '14,t — .., • , , ,,;‘,.,, ., . yi,,i,. , ..,„ ,, ; , li ri., • , • . 1: t' t glr: • ; 1' . '0•1•1 • ... ... . ......, .... ,4: , ?,, ,,,1,.1,'' ,,,i:',, •,‘.,n ', :. r. H-11-I.L't ., .-'1.-.;"....---.. -'''''''•Z,:::'..4-, ile ''1' '„ ill '.t'i ' ) i is ' - . . ti• ' iq... r ) ,1( , ,:. . :____• ......___._11,,,,,,:1,1 1.1,,: - [-____.-12:7)_-_-±.: „:„..-...::„.•• =...,••_...,...:.-..4!: /.• , ,,, •1 . ,•,..t. . ,• „..!,i 4ii '4 t' ,•• • 1, i,;?' t. 1: • —-'•Nii..',"'"...- ----'6. 1 . ' ' ,0 4, to:, '(.. • ,..k .,, i,t. -'. 2 i • • . . •• Li ' ,'' 44 ' * ;- ',;*!• ' 11 * *.'!1.,', :! • . /7.•,.. ---- ' :c e!-. ''''. . . ... t , '' ,1i4?, , I.°'',)',•.',' ,:: ','6',4',I• .. . . i • i,, • ---:1-d:..1:.:•• ,...:--2 i . ,,; si 'tf'1 4 ., v ..111,1,.I:f,,-, t : ,, .--4Pa,,...,:'f. '',, "At), ), . ' ' ':I'.,t,,:',,,',.1:1','•:.; • 4 A 1,VI :1, ':li k :, 1 'i . U.I —:i.''-',..4:. i lki +41'kli f 1, ' 'S,,•'k''.' /'A, :',011' : ' _.._.......-.- -----,•rrr*-7:-**:'','r"-r-**'-'------ ----- • )'1'.!4, ------41*-24:::''': / 04.'fi4i 4 1.6'il 1 -3 ' •I •.„',i, .;,'' ' • --I--ILI- , „.',.,1."‘*.,.t.*,:, , .,., '*!•!,*,,,.. )';',f,,- 4.•': : i • _j , . ...,4,,,,,,,,...''.,,,, , !,,"!.,"'1 ,..I•',,Ii•:;:'*'1*".*/*,1 . • ..,- --L `.... " 10. ',C1,.;%',--.Yfl,'4'S,', ',,“1"`:"'' ":).".''"1.'''','"W,'"74..".1'Y,t'tk'':,' • / fk P'ej' " 4 ' R tr' .",1 ' A p, ;,,.,,..p.•,.,.!,;,,,:,,: r.'. .,,',.,'‘.:•?.,...:,' ...:. 'z......!,,;..,:.;-1 ',.','t''{.'4.1..-.Pii'•c z(iI,.,t- i.)p,'i:' '/'/,!/,/,!,'•,':$'1c0,i,,r 4 1 l'2`.,4,i4•• 1, i , '5.tt,1,1,I.",lid?.'';,)i,',,1i,',).t'.',-,:'i,,.:N!'''4:,,,,,-•1'.',''.,,,,',e.,.,,,',i,'[,'.,.,.`1.',.N,1.'',;,,'.,'.,S-',\)'i1.•4,,'4,''.,,;.:4„,4:,',,:','•9i1,-'',,,1'','1:,,1',)1.;0,::.,':.''`,'(;04.1.,,,.;,,'",.,,4,.!.;10,4,..,4,,..;.,•,'?"7..,..i'...,.'41,,•.,.:,‘-,•',..,-•.,v,t2,,6,4, T•,14,,,;'iA,-:1;',,41i7..;Ax,,,,,t,41,,,.,;:i,,,'p,.,•,'';f,e=i.,,,•.;:4.,:A',)1.,,,:!,,.'.',.:.,),or,,,',,4,,;q1',4,,.,.,,'-'..'.,'.';„i;.-.i.;'".‘'.,''4,,41".S1':9,;,,-:,„..,.:.4P1..,s,"'',.,;.,O,!k.1'.;'.,.,„:''vP,s',.'44fiNi,,,;,,,•,'.;V1(.,,,,,:,'0,•'1,,,,,;.,!o,,,,)''.,!•,,..,4,i,.4t-„/•,,,0;,r:.1..,-.vn,..2.0:.i,-h,..k.L.•R.-.„.,•„...•.,!„.!'1•!A,,fl.',.'l,•,:i,'.':.tl,,I•,i,;' *.;,1.,.,i:.•.,".:.-i'',.;,v,,'.:;;l.,1.,.,.,,;'.„V4':,,,'1Fo1,1,44; . ,.•I,1,,,.,`,Ai,e,,.,,ri,v'.i,::.k,,l,.Ii!L,,v4it.i','.w,!,r kfivi.1..1%41,-i:r4.:',4,°,t:r•,.,.4.l..a,L/:,,,i,,,x,:,;y1o.rt,,,4.,V,:.cii.ii,.,.'•.+1,•,ti•.i,f,i9•4ti.1,4..y,,,.„•K..,,,:t,.,,.0..,6t.e%i,,i,)t;4:‘f1,,„i)rN,.r.1:ri"l,i;,,,4 J,,„,:ti:::,,,i,,P;::,,f,,44t:`,1'.t':.':.:,i,11.„,i.%_?,.,,!k•y`;,.,,i,:.,.,*,.,:' .,I1..1i1i,1I1 - „ / i I a - - ---- -A- AGR Agricultural ResearchA PI Public/Institutional VC Commercial =l-,,E-t.lr!-p i-t.,,.,:,.'iIi'I‘:',,',r!k,,6,,,:,,,,•A,.'Ji,.'t.••o,.'.9'I.,..:,',.,-g••,,,,,•,g!,,t4:. -..O'..,r,",,,•ro%.,W.,.1Atf '.: --- , - ., IM Industrial/Mixed Use 1 .r.771 PO Existing Parks/Open Space •,;:, : RR Rural Residential LL: 1,.'....::, UR Urban Residential ..::,':'.'''' 1 GI General Industrial '•••: • ' BP Business Park , ... ,,,,,±•.............. -,-”•••••••••;71;i1 . TR Transitional Residential r.,:''.••.-, ' .1 CC Corporate Campus I ��-J , D-_11 . ssI II II6.800.Daa*slog ° �4St"" !•-I. _ li-� p 9 3 p 1 I1 1 • pap �i ' A �2 P Q� Y Z p £ k g Rn` a ® ,.. L E 4 i ,� $ A i B �"1 r_r .. 1, a oin smw'a1b^.,•.`1.: BO,I/LD£R y, Md iAt .•••• -_—_ - _-:,t 'S_•`'BQUtio_,,•.,,4VLNt/£ • . . Wit' pg i.�i%aa• `.° aryto,,,,,,,.°:. dl„ „i!1",...•i ,..° . a 4 / -T . \ tt ; ..4! !at., • ..? ' '....b. .,:\ ..;•S:P ;'.'8 eta 'tvl. . ' 'h. o i 1 �, \` �. 4' c. t 1: I' FI I f I 1 I ii ',p. SfiF,i:, p - /sa ta I t t. © - ..t.. H � . rrP 'SI s r o, 1, N I Y p •L Y l R jrla �, Al ; 1 5 hi.' 4, 41in bl..i ^ .,. 1".....son wyk..°.r ., L1_;<S,j, , 1 ` ', ,wY 1 ' 1 I 1, / �. i t \ ! 'Im ' ih.A--; ; : .. % . Ili ( \ \\ tl•.� I`'�ti\ ` r, 'L 5"y 1 L.ill a `\\ RV .i p Nn _n ��F`\'i •ate-'. 4 V/',C.._�_-.- ; , 1 1 ..a„ g6 i n; c ,,.{.1 x •w 4"... a\a�C•p- �If "b.` }``1 : ; 1 •f. i E n 9 a, ,Am '�'�, n,,, •'rs".+ acy`,,C`Z ,? .:w6;`e ,/'r ' J 1` _1 < / 1 00 ksF. 6�y]t ��° ` I j I `i Al t3 i g a. _ \; i4.� �t r '} `# . �'s[ t gyp¢. •1 //i • � m t�; ;eeEEEE ;"HI .gr,�p n �€La's 1E 11e[PeP-(jP s sggs s� t1/4 �,=rs ���'gc+.. �',, P vi ,..T. RIOIPA $ 1. "I!zr'i t;pai€11traw@- Iks-e 11' , '. ;'� 4 �' p r' s ; X ' x , P g -— . '- + M �vni �& N s a 5 1 1'4 1u 1t@'i i'R1g:FEz 4t11. •; 1g ' ,�:m, , ',1.. 1al • . .,� e # ad a Es cc t,1 1i•'ttafte ..p 3 v •:..._ ...> _ �� ° p fl `?C„ . 'Y a el 2xa ii 211 iasf`f:1111p11g11gq$$f[ I p r` '. e Rtkid 1 S 1G R Iv k yi,`:4aa t i 1Cd11-41.1' =t. pgx § Ec 5� .1 4d l',:ui1 St@sz=,e s 1 Al-.' �\ 3$ ,li A L€Y yg r C kitP.MVI.iP€ I ,Id ,r' �\ m I ,o) °A 1 1 ice -aai i 1 I % r b } is ; 1A t 0!8tiff ih;fq,;1y ,1� I.M 1}g �_ �� x : 4 4 1 1g�•'`1r` �b Iig ' s IFia gt= yIjg 4R''.1 ft r�' a Mg: a�3 '1 i}±t s' a II ky o 5 0 • m 3�#36 �e`1 °y tg$ i°= P it °1•C i:`1j"Jr €f ricg tg�8 8 icx psi r g i g II o L g; v� 1 11 .9 11 l_ I I1 fklgt 11 II :g$y ic$ ii I; .t-`? t lil j i'ity`i 1 'I _I a 13 r 1 h I :�{ � $� s }t ° i I� f,'p } 8' : i ��t 3 t $ °' I ill k9 1Pa_ 3 F} t tg . 1 ci R h:tn9 "' it! 1`! $1lI�$_ iiM k� �; J-1---- 3 II, FEELB G6 Ws jlt E 4 ii j?i IyFg ^( ti k .1 ya $P I i�; 4 _�l __-__-_ B °gt g gg IT I /41 jf 3):s! I3 'g €: 31 Ai 't'I''1,"81 #I°gP c e a }i N l'it.rp. I 2 ijgaq ft :s h;;i 1wiid7 9 I •1 1kta c �L 1q kt .4 PetFv, s vie A , t �• 's gi 'i 1t Pa e �� a �s 13, 3ilii s 111 P°� 9B. r :II € ' s 't -Ps 1- egi lit i, ,i z 1 F trii 1 j ? z -r `'... ,� S [p1 P �� Yg�P : s si i! " 1 �: ,th ! A �: r P¢Ss 5 < ,.. >,-. a.* III I,- s,P _} s T t. >9 - 13tiI °` 1p� .1, ,dh ; 1' -\� _T r:,: $! I ' 1e1; # itA. 1 3/ 9iq :11 1g ��:• 1 1!g1i I lly`. ! 1141 i A b ,,r \7\r1{ap, .b c 1 e 1 C r8 8 1 i! sl it I_ °i r ssiv; 4 _ �\�l{iaaeftli"�`'1 g ' iv I si 1 i g 7 j-t OVA g �` -as., I • I 1 Y \+x*.R Pr, ..nro, 4 BOULDER ,... ".' '.-\ AVENUE '� G_-- es,m`wcrola 1 r �vewwu iu'am---j^------ I ,,.ti !1; !I 'fir it 1' .h::!! . •'I.I,,,:i!l• •L Ill •!i. ;I7; : I. :I',ii;h'4 /n1o/ i z° O'•' 1p•I.,:iiIO. i1 I I1 !Ii 0 i T T c` LI iil 11111 I'�� ' li i1 41;111•:I:� ' ;I: IfI V , �� m 'j Ti� II 0•�'. :Ilij; !i!I.!:Ijo:!1.',.::I•I.11:�!I .I!il1 :�C/ :II I!I:li \\\ 1� i 1II -An ` %S•.\� ar,---I I II I t -q.1..-q 0 -- ,. I ,-\\ \ 0, 3$,� • 1Ai _ i \\ I o �„o Ism" 9 y111'— Trn 5 Ai AV ' •• "'\II a--"n J7::: 1t:•• 1-I�'„„ rm _, O i, ')I e w — I �: . I,:i. ,. :.I ju ` 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 / ,,. 11 ! O. A\\st l:1 .111 1 I / e I I R S '10 I 1 0l 1 1 e I P� F I AI \ I n :) 8 i!!:1111!':! /i 1 1 — — — o TIIIi yf ., T �n1.. 11� `z c •Y x 7 m ..— .// ; S I y I o r yyA - w n 1a \ � 1OS 1 I" -----,•."- fc-', .,p._ \: P PIN 115111 G 5I HA Q ill a $ YAP `004 m 110;i.p166#11;1 mow••: zP.,- '•..: ---- t ; 11 ..-- I i 111 a 11 " ei °a 4,1 m a'W. ,\. .`r 1. pi 4 t I I I I I a$gra I ? ,F2 g : .5,.Af } ••.,�`,Iw 111 Y1 Pi! S q Qgggu 9� a ga 4i?�4 IF II 1 v 1:g11°6 n p 'g >:4N�€ I I w\ gill; II i g" 0 ^ . g> I I II A M e4 I \ y ISSUED pF�OR SPRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL-NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ^ 47; ROSE 11 gTHNOBo„D�IN,,SN PARK V 1�t1; > tl,.��', ,"..� R["AORS 7:,, ...nre.. rli µr / '. —Iy 1A osluaux{' cgR*a 1A 7,..,,x PR LIMINARY 1 �•^ `"" ....-.... S 4 E PLAN .x.x...,,,..."...„w....n ....u....•.......,,. .,.... e.n_ .a xu ......x.�.x.......xx.... • a V•--I��-- Z� ASzENL3F7:°L-T«�. - - -e� It' s r0 A T+ Xya,... b. s F e t 5, i s ,, % .y �c�l. / �`tir/ ("6„,.,, . ,. gym G. • o i ► v 1 p b •. a w e ., 4 t. e y , a� -„ i0y � .k $Y\ \ • +y \-. ?` ' a b ''" T mm$ 7•tit.e n y y • i 9 ' m \ry/ b m •1n bs A .1i o . 4i. *\ h1 • 4L ,, I a: * llTll I ;tie I II I'* i s 3 f a'('/� '4 a a_ ( 4l fir?' • s i_e '� ya [1 . ii '% * S r. • I •-.. ;; , s- j.. 14? y i � . .T 1- 1. I.f e 1 t o 1 ,11}.___ \ \, ' ,, � m a 1 . I y1 �I g ,\ I eI t ,I \ Iz IiJo „ g 'i $A ;it " $ E a9a ? _ m " eRoR as? ! aa $' e7 N \ •\--,: a - , an 1. 1\ e1 If 4 V. ;.- iI9 F"AgS :!j diil axmgi ;. 4 R5. o - I .." 1 aag' a - C) a .4 llR?• 1 w 1'=0 ! ?' \ gn L 0 g 8 v :l I n ER: z #a !s:,iao�m> qqql Ili aan$! ° \`'•.`. � � •�\'�\``g5" '0 g3g gg 01 LP 4g%gal il, ill Q 6 „;ggai9 .pi dla Rg"gt to -"• •\ ,• 1r-1W q4=g a xeF SI"�" 3> B r : :2 g LgAll fly F.o 4 `''•...r\ 111"1 ,z1 At 4 Ci n": :"m hiTa 3a a O R wa ig„ a,a l a� ,,,H '-, `\••; .,- \ ; -s a gl sR s aag �E`s of '� m €ge 4nzk 4, g a £Y a s la's i 1 4 Fy a r! !WI a.'! jai is laa"gPP sy,gl v$ 4i^' "--- .,� a• a4 eg g$ a S oR .1v 4 8 g is g.4aji A ga u24 ...71 z" ag ISSUED FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL-NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 5/7 ROSEnB"sa+�uxPQSo BUSINESS S.PARK ++4S�y$.I'{�iii 4,..i,H ,.w..n.::�. 4Kwvn.s .,w.w...r...«.r..... ••••• K .. moinii" PRELIMINARY Af.+ W .•.w .w �•C'jtd ,A.,,,, GRADING PLAN a.e...,..:.�...wno,:.we ....:. .:.N..,. °"«.. v.rt .m.:m ....,.n.......,......x. • I st I "" 1 Y 1 —T-�q� ( `P-O-r41Dp •R a„0 * I I 8 :c affix omx-•,� R@i'� 11 I,ip e£ .G i1• . .el .(n i xi [/ t=�°i,!'Tue%� m °.,leG',. it�°I d• --Ai IAA ll 4 ik- " ... ,'..:•• . -k.:: ,\. 1. g. -a ''xr. K-'-4i� gy eG 4 rm eG s !g S la O 1° :. ° IX F /- I.§P. ^Ai m • x 4 x lq R • x" ffl. s gli c 't } O 8° "a P. \\1!w i !I U ! 111 Tr ag y • C m • :xe gg afi £�a „. _. r— — ,. — r."si+ • i xr}Imo, io "g J�'/� I I e 11 I • ,,l' 0 ai l A i6 a¢ a111 1 8 1 >: a U°a • •• :! I Pi a Xf V•- ,:j • Ki i W, 1 I I�i p✓, i A X• aMy�A1 .4. l ill 1 1 R- _ ,.�<.=:r fn.1..4., ,,,,,_„-fn a s n.v-f.'f... .,. ..�. '+a t I 1 ;i °- /„roF ° I eG X4 1s i d- o ° o_ O \ Al r IIli' / A a Al 4V //I . a _ -- I 3g"m 0 . /// .; :$ f Ifi tigk. iw• • iY • aF / N . .9. .1.-k.a. y N w { '--Z if 3- I G 9C S •� �� z s£tgqxb�ii$iFCF"g •�`'\ ��. "= qem P. llh EF E88 (!�"j863 w\ sG O N7 .• q 8 s a .—(h)fs_ w\•�� • XY ii. m "e it - Q e 11 ., sac 4 Win "� 4"' svpi w •\•\ ( ~-•„ ' " e••• I i 121 nii $� " pB§ to R� tea? . • `' - '� Ii 0. 8 g' 0. `t7 §294 1 A 0.2 $ \•...�•�•..- • `y Ift lt+eoe°I°. k� •b ",z: "gz a � zp'bp� n2 L9 € m `�y�` ~..-.. i I I I I Ki !- ' 9'§0. 'LRL 6 Pilo q a Ales \ �. •\•\ , `1"t § $ 4 'gI 1 n ':Z!Y ; 1 M 0. i Z •\ '`'"""\ .I it vo x \ `\ 0. TIMq ISSUED FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL-NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ROSEU NT BUSIFIESS PARK " ��' ,ulltti6/7 " I2,c4,24;Q2f. RNA t .. _..-.x IREMPM4 `en le-i,ozegsz-Pt-1 RT K xxiuiiu' PR�LIMII.IARY R •,<A.. ~ ^^"• s/i'o"ro> STORM SEWER PLAN .�°=>a.sAv" .........r.mu•ry n u°,e .,,........_,•......,... • .,.==t il I •`na � ` I Ij r \jis I Ff—=Z.T 4-V£N•F4E'd- M ., / f{�, I i'.IL; _-a BA y £ Ali. , 1 -;s91 (�;.�... .. _-:.�'I :r�i--f�I. .1:. -� Nn. .. t" `,` \+ ��^`� "ate 'a34 • ` . \ °'Y s \ •5 �1— -- � \ 1 of 1 � 3, \\ y`iaI } . Ala 1 :A y b I I �3 4 A; . 7y ppro bi3 _• GI - , r • @' 1 +I moon °r+NI— ni '%m iom .:- 9, a 1 J. I 1 1 iq g� 'e� - � hp,V1, • ____ _..._ i V sa +a-_ n P .1 r s.. rm . ... ''' 4 , 1 _ 1t1g d `tP. 6 Y )fii,1 1 i n wA iL±TIiIITI;; ttglf'I i s / •a c m 11---� "a 1 — — — son �_ f 1 s . O q E why Y/ U: '0 •'I fur Ed: a N, N. . s xr ° d\Alp `na " ~ a : t !I1H rig! 11 m B$.P 2? lAg; aRi 4p $c c ,zaR 2s": ! g " . ., \ ,,, ~' II a pi Pi jr% 59P 3i „. L9 i �w gNZSfla. :-. hi S1 C. • II I 4 gE g ?a _." r $ go -3:i §POI Wg, 4fi.g �. it - IrSI t.• I ii RR, .- bc, - FR at Al -M 8-A' R,';4' 19 iei8 Z \'^2 � ..,' Ill s a gg ! V, F i§a s a e a €33a±aa- - '6'"- 0 �. �1A� I I I I I � � v8 5 p^ 'f{ 'Ra' m Y. SR as `� =F g � ;- �Sc M g^>Rf g a m ``.,��•\� �1• a� Asgtg !My R R ' ;". TMMyB•, 1n0 N,g ' v. �S a �„'p XI' I .3.,E a03MT R oir; d' @gF ? at w2QMQ' ,A4 "�•` '�� r� g-g SP o� €y�a ?a a 8 A- gea3 g9R?A `K� 9ai'B \ �.`t• N"a? 1 g as r33 z a ; 1 24 �a s$y °I? hi;' TT�1 4 .. , .,, ISSUED FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL-NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION `�� 7� ROSE nn'sCuwU51NE36�.PARK Y y.,,.. .o--. uv w.4 M�. w<aswxs M l o.rt..v... uc I � ""w+`,Altrks I DOwE t 'Rpj4� 1.._ �S PRELIMINARY 41I i' ��' v .l{: V.A,• UTILITY PUN .wc....unria a.uuvrv. .vv w,.vvr,xwnu ...... v......+.u.o sj cmo 4 ROSEMOLINT PARKS AND RECREATION MEMORANDUM To: Kim Lindquist, Community Development Director Eric Zweber, Senior Planner Jason Lindahl, Planner Jamie Verbrugge, City Administrator Andy Brotzler, City Engineer Morgan Dawley, Project Engineer Tom Schuster, Parks Supervisor From: Dan Schultz, Parks and Recreation Director Date: June 18, 2007 Subject: Preliminary Plat - Ryan Companies After reviewing the preliminary plat provided by the Ryan Companies, the Parks and Recreation Department staff recommends the following conditions be added to any approval provided for the preliminary plat: • Any extension of Boulder Avenue should include the continuation of the sidewalk on the west side of the road. • A sidewalk should be added to the south side of the road titled"public road" providing for a connection from the future businesses to the sidewalk along Boulder Avenue. • The parks dedication requirements for the property will be collected as cash in lieu of land. The parks dedication fees will be collected at the rate in place at the time of final plat approval. • Based on the preliminary plat being 42 acres, the parks dedication fees (using the current 2007 Fees and Fee Policy) would be$357,000.00 (42 acres—10% = 4.2 acres x $85,000 = $357,000.00). The Parks and Recreation Commission will be provided an update on this preliminary plat at their regular meeting on Monday,June 25, 2007. Please call me at 651-322-6012 if you have any questions about this memo. G:\2007\Planning Cases\07-02-PP Ryan Companies(Pahl Property)Preliminary Plat\ParksandRecMemo Ryan_06262007.doc 4 ROSEMOUNT PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: June 20, 2007 TO: Eric Zweber, Senior City Planner CC: Kim Lindquist, Community Development Director Andrew Brotzler, City Engineer Kathie Hanson, Planning Department Secretary FROM: Morgan Dawley, Project Engineer RE: Ryan Companies (Pahl Property) Preliminary Plat Upon review of the Ryan Companies (Pahl Property) Preliminary Plat,Preliminary Plans, and Preliminary Stormwater Management Plan dated May 29, 2007 and received on May 29, 2007, the Engineering Department offers the following comments: General Comments: 1. Drainage and utility easements shall be incorporated into the final plat as deemed necessary upon review of the final grading plan at the discretion of the City Engineer. 2. A storm water pollution prevention plan (SWPPP)will need to be submitted with the final grading plan. 3. Hydrants shall be located and installed to meet minimum fire protection per the City's Fire Marshall. 4. The developer, shall submit for review a lighting plan for installation of decorative street lighting along the future extension of Boulder Avenue. Approval of the lighting plan and a Letter of Credit in an amount adequate to cover the cost of installation of said lighting shall be required prior to final plat approval. 5. It is recommended that the public street be located across at an appropriate offset from any possible future public street extending west into JJT Business Park. 6. At such time that Boulder Avenue is extended to the south, a cul de sac will be required at the roadway terminus. Sewer and water utilities should be shown to be stubbed out within the extension of Boulder Avenue to the south tract line. 7. The Comprehensive Water System Plan identifies a network of 12"watermain throughout the business park area to be installed with future development. Connection of the future water treatment plant (Outlot C)with the water system, as well as water system looping would indicate the need to oversize the 8"watermain currently proposed in the preliminary utility plan within the Public Road right of way and north from the Public Road cul de sac to Business Parkway. 8. The preliminary plat would indicate that future drainage and utility easements are required over the watermain and storm sewer systems crossing property boundaries.The storm sewer systems from Lot 1, 2, and 3 that convey flow from adjacent parcels should be located in a drainage and utility easement. The water main from the Business Parkway/Boulder Avenue intersection to the south should also be in an easement. 9. It is recommended that the storm sewer system in Boulder Avenue serving the JJT Business Park temporary pond to the west be incorporated into the Public Road storm sewer system. (Oudot E) This is requested if Boulder Avenue is not extended to the southwest property corner as part of the development and a temporary outlet is constructed for the basin and street right of way. 10. The water quality pond should have a skimmer structure included in the utility plan. The current design does not incorporate a skimmer in the calculations as required in the CSMP. 11. The Infiltration basin should have a permanent outlet with a control gate to allow for discharge in the future to pond 2274 to the south. The discharge from this structure would allow for discharge at 0.5cfs/acre and allow for the management of the water surface elevation/storage volume in the ponds. 12. It is recommended that the storm sewer system from Lots 4 and 5 be connected to the public road storm sewer to save costs by eliminating the parallel pipes. I would also recommend that the outfalls on the west side of the pond be combined to a single outfall to reduce maintenance of separate aprons. 13. The grading plan should illustrate the emergency overflow elevations and direction from the parking lot and site low points.The overflow from the public road low point appears to enter Lot 5. It is recommended that the low point overflow to the pond. 14. The pond access road for maintenance should be added to the plan as indicated in the City Engineering guidelines. The emergency overflow locations from the pond and infiltration basin should be defined and protected with erosion control practices to the bottom of the slopes. 15. The storm sewer system design calculations and drainage area mapping should be forwarded for review prior to final plat approval. The design should be consistent with the City Engineering guidelines and storm water plan for capacity. The Boulder Avenue and JJT Business Park runoff should be included in the design in the event that the storm sewer system in the public road will be extended to the Boulder Avenue system. 16. The existing storm sewer structures at the Boulder Avenue/Business Parkway entrance on the north should be modified to accommodate the proposed entrance. 17. The estimated development fees (based on 2007 Fee Resolution) due with the final plat and subdivision agreement are as follows: • GIS Fee = $120/acre • Trunk Sewer Area Charge = $1,075/acre • Trunk Water Area Charge = $4,860/acre • Trunk Stormwater Area Charge = $6,665/acre Storm Water Modeling Comments: 1. The water quantity volume provided in the pond appears to meet the City requirements. 2. The NURP water quality volume in the pond appears to meet the City requirements. 3. The infiltration basin appears to meet the City requirements. The infiltration rate of 0.75"/hr is being used in the analysis which exceeds the 0.5"/hr rate for"A" soils in the storm water plan. However, this rate appears to be acceptable based on the JJT Business Park analysis to the west. Should you have any questions or comments regarding the item listed above,please contact me at 651-322-2022. EXCERPT FROM MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING JUNE 26, 2007 5.d. Case 07-22-PP Ryan Companies Preliminary Plat. Planner Zweber presented this item. Ryan Companies has submitted a preliminary plat to develop a business park with approximately 560,000 square feet of office/warehouse buildings. The site is approximately 55 acres in size, 42 acres of which would be developed as the business park and 13 acres would be maintained by the city for an existing well house and future water treatment plant. Ryan Companies currently does not have any companies that are interested in locating within the business park, but the preliminary plat approval will allow Ryan to market the business park and request future final plats and site plan reviews when they locate interested companies. Mr. Zweber further reviewed the proposed land uses, site access,parking and traffic flow issues, landscaping, sanitary sewer and water service, and stormwater management. Chairperson Messner asked about part of the plat in the northeast corner along Boulder Trail and whether or not it is Pahl property or a City right-of-way. Mr. Zweber pointed out the actual edge of the right-of-way on the map and described rights associated with that. Applicant,Joe Samuels, RLK Engineers working with Ryan Companies, approached the Commission. He stated they are in concurrence with the conditions set forth by the City. With respect to Item 15 in the engineering memorandum on stormwater issues with the JJT Property, he stated that they need to do more research on how the stormwater runoff from the JJT property will affect the stormwater pond on the Ryan parcel. Project Engineer Dawley provided further detail on the stormwater issue and what was intended by the memorandum. Chairperson Messner opened the public hearing at 8:13p.m. There were no public comments. MOTION by Howell to close the Public Hearing. Second by Palda. Ayes: 5. Nays: None. Motion approved. Public hearing was closed at 8:14p.m. There was further discussion among the Commissioners. MOTION by Messner to recommend approval of the Preliminary Plat of the Rosemount Business Park Third Addition for Ryan Companies, subject to the following conditions: 1. Compliance with the conditions within the Park and Recreation Director's Memorandum dated June 18, 2007 and the Engineering Department's Memorandum dated June 20, 2007. 2. Utilities, sidewalk, and street lights will need to be constructed with the future extension of Boulder Avenue. 3. The water main will need to be upsized from Outlot C (future water treatment plant) to the existing 12 inch main in Boulder Trail. Second by Schultz. Ayes: 5. Nays: None. Motion approved. Mr. Zweber stated this item will go before the City Council for approval on July 17t. " s RQSEV _ouN 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CITY COUNCIL City Council Regular Meeting: June 17, 2007 AGENDA ITEM: Case 07-05-TA Tree Preservation AGENDA SECTION: Ordinance New Business PREPARED BY: Eric Zweber, AICP; Senior Planner AGENDA NO. q. ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance, Resolution, Comparison of Other Cities' Tree Preservation Ordinances, Excerpt from the June 13 City Council Work Session Minutes, Excerpt APPROVED BY: from the March 13 Planning Commission Workshop Minutes, Excerpt from the April 24 Planning Commission Meeting. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to approve an Ordinance amending the City of Rosemount Zoning Ordinance B relating to Landscape Requirement and Tree Preservation ISSUE In the past year, a number of Planning Commissioners and City Councilmembers have expressed frustration with our Tree Preservation Ordinance. One specific comment has been that the ordinance encourages tree replacement over the preservation of existing trees. Staff has evaluated a number of other cities' tree preservation ordinances and has proposed an ordinance that focuses on preserving truly exceptional trees while allowing other trees to be removed provided replacement trees are planted. CHANGES MADE AS A RESULT OF THE JUNE 13 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION A number of issues were discussed by the City Council regarding tree preservation at their June 13, 2007 City Council meeting. As a result of these discussions, the following changes have been made to the ordinance: • Clarification of the tree replacement requirement for developers versus home and business owners. • Maximum tree removal before replacement is set at a flat rate of 25%. • Added a list of acceptable tree replacement species and clarified that it is the City's prerogative to approve additional replacement species. • Woodlots are not identified specifically within the ordinance. Developers will be responsible to identify all significant and heritage trees within wooded lots and replacement will be based on any tree removed beyond the threshold. Large stands of existing trees will be identified and addressed by other City plans and regulations, such as wetland buffers, the interpretative corridor, parkland dedication, or private open space within planned unit developments. The old ordinance mentioned woodlots but did not set up a replacement schedule for impacts to woodlots. Rather than add a separate category for woodlots, staff is using the traditional tree replacement criteria for all properties. Therefore references to woodlots have been removed. t PLANNING COMMISSION DISCUSSION The Planning Commission has reviewed the proposed tree preservation ordinance at their March13, 2007 Work Session and April 23, 2007 Regular Meeting. The proposed changes to the ordinance that are described below are a result of the Planning Commission discussions and recommendations. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on April 23. No residents testified at the public hearing. SUMMARY Most cities' tree preservation ordinances contain five elements: • the definition of what is an important tree to the city (significant trees); • how many trees can be removed for construction before replacement is required; • how many trees need to be planted for each tree that is removed; • what is the minimum size of replacement trees;and • what species of trees will be accepted as replacement trees. Rosemount's current ordinance addresses all of these issues, although there have been some varying interpretations about how many trees can be removed for construction before replacement is required. Past interpretations of the ordinance have required replacement of every tree removed and also has required replacement only after 25% of the trees have been removed. Some Cities have begun adding additional elements to their ordinance,including: • definitions of trees that the city views are exceptionally important to preserve • credit or incentives for developers who save more trees; • the acceptance of a payment of a fee-in-lieu of tree replacement; • security bonds to ensure tree replacement; and • different tree protection requirements for existing lots and the redevelopment of existing buildings. Adding some of these standards,particularly the idea of exceptional trees,may help to achieve the goal of the City Council to implement an ordinance that focuses on preservation over replacement. PROPOSED ORDINANCE CHANGES What is a significant tree? Existing Ordinance: Any tree (other than box elder, cottonwood, or poplar) eight (8) caliper inches or larger. Proposed Ordinance: Hardwood trees six (6) caliper inches or larger; softwood trees twelve (12) caliper inches or larger; conifers twelve (12) feet in height or taller. Improvement: All tree species are considered significant. Hardwoods and conifers are increased to six (6) caliper inches or greater. The developer has received some relief that softwoods from 8 to 12 caliper inches in size are no longer counted. Are there exceptional trees? Existing Ordinance: No. Proposed Ordinance: Heritage trees: hardwoods 27 caliper inches or larger; conifers 50 feet in height or taller. Improvement: Allows developers and staff to design the subdivision around the truly unique trees. No tree removal allowance for heritage trees and a greater replacement ratio. 2 r When is replacement required? Existing Ordinance: Different interpretations from replacing every tree removed to replacement only after 25% removal. Proposed Ordinance: Any heritage tree removed. Significant tree removal beyond 25% of the total caliper inches. Improvement: Replacement of any heritage tree removed. Clarification of the tree removal allowed before replacement. How much replacement is required? Existing Ordinance: Two (2) trees per tree removed under 20 caliper inches in size; four (4) trees per tree removed over 20 caliper inches in size. Proposed Ordinance: 0.5 caliper inches per 1 caliper inch removed beyond the threshold. 1 caliper inch per 1 caliper inch of heritage tree removed. Improvement: The larger the tree, the more replacement required. Increased replacement over the existing ordinance for trees 10 caliper inches or larger. Larger replacement requirement for heritage trees (a minimum of 11 replacement trees for each heritage tree removed). Size of replacement trees. Existing Ordinance: 2.0 caliper inches for deciduous trees and 6 feet tall for conifers. Proposed Ordinance: 2.5 caliper inches for deciduous trees and 6 feet tall for conifers. Improvement: Somewhat neutral. Deciduous trees are larger when initially planted,but the number of deciduous trees planted is reduced by 20%. Species of replacement trees. Existing Ordinance: Similar species to those removed. A specific list of acceptable species. Proposed Ordinance: Similar species to those removed. A specific list of acceptable species. Heritage trees must be replaced with the same species. Minimum of 25%hardwood species and 25% conifers. Improvement: More variety by requiring a minimum of 25%hardwoods and 25% conifers. Heritage trees will need to be replaced with the same species as is removed. Are there any credits or incentives? Existing Ordinance: None. Proposed Ordinance: None. Improvement: Staff does not support using credits or incentives. Typically, the City negotiates subdivision requirements during the PUD approval process and would gain little by allowing a credit or incentive by right through the tree preservation ordinance. If a developer uses extraordinary measures to preserve trees within a PUD, then the City can determine if beneficial waivers to the other code requirements would be considered in exchange. Is there a fee-in-lieu of trees? Existing Ordinance: No. Proposed Ordinance: Yes. The fee for 2007 is proposed to be $375 per 2.5 caliper inch tree ($150 per caliper inch) and can be revised yearly within the City fee schedule. Improvement: If all replacement trees cannot be placed on the property, then a fee-in-lieu of trees would be accepted for the City's tree account. All possible on-site tree replacement will be exhausted before a fee is accepted. 3 r Is a security bond required? Existing Ordinance: Yes,but the amount is not specified. In practice, the City requires 110% of the value of the trees when the development has a subdivision agreement,while the City requires 125% of the value when it is a project requiring only site plan approval. Proposed Ordinance: 110% of the cost of the replacement trees. This is the current policy for the City's subdivision agreements. 75% of the security bond will release upon the installation of the replacement trees. The final 25% of the security bond will be released after the one year warranty period expires and any dead trees are replaced. Improvement: Consistency. Different requirements for existing lots, home builders and home owners on platted lots, and redevelopment or expansions of existing commercial or industrial buildings. Existing Ordinance: The City applies the existing tree preservation ordinance to all construction projects. The ordinance states it is applicable to all new development,but exempts preliminary plats approved before 1989. This exemption makes it difficult to apply the ordinance to new homes or buildings that are constructed on lots approved before 1989. Proposed Ordinance: Allowing removal of 10% of the existing caliper inches. Replacement remains the same at 0.5 caliper inches per 1 caliper inch removed. Heritage trees will not be allowed to be removed unless there is no other option. Heritage tree replacement will be 1 caliper inch per 1 caliper inch removed. Improvement: Lower removal threshold before replacement is required. Clarifies the authority to require tree preservation on existing lots. LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS Staff has included an updated to the Landscape Requirement table of the Zoning Ordinance. In the last couple of years, the City has added the LI—Light Industrial and HI—Heavy Industrial zoning districts and this ordinance change will add them to the landscape requirement table. CONCLUSION Staff recommends that the City Council approve and Ordinance amending the City of Rosemount Zoning Ordinance B relating to Landscape Requirement and Tree Preservation. 4 City of Rosemount Ordinance No. B-190 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY OF ROSEMOUNT ZONING ORDINANCE B RELATING TO LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS AND TREE PRESERVATION THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS that Ordinance B, adopted September 19, 1989, entitled"City of Rosemount Zoning Ordinance,"is hereby amended as follows: Section 1. Rosemount Zoning Ordinance B, Section 11-6-13 B. is amended as follows: B. Minimum Number Of Plantings Zoning Foundation Overstory Trees Plantings District g AG None 1 None AG-P None 1 None RR 1 tree per unit/frontage' 1 None RL 1 tree per unit/frontage' 1 None R-1 1 tree per unit/frontage' 1 None R-1A 1 tree per unit/frontage' 1 None R-2 1 tree per unit/frontage2 1 None R-3 1 tree per open space unit exposure' See note4 R-4 8 trees minimum plus 1 tree per units See note4 R-4 8 trees minimum plus 1 tree per 2 units' See note4 All Cs 8 trees or 1 per 3,000 square feet land area' See note4 BP 8 trees or 1 per 3,000 square feet land area' See note4 IP 8 trees or 1 per 3,000 square feet land area' See note4 PB 8 trees or 1 per 3,000 square feet land area' See note4 LI 8 trees or 1 per 3,000 square feet land area' See note4 GI 8 trees or 1 per 3,000 square feet land area' See note4 HI 8 trees or 1 per 3,000 square feet land area' See note4 Notes: 1. Trees shall be deciduous, planted at the boulevard of each tree exposure. 2. Two-family dwellings: Trees shall be deciduous,planted at the boulevard of each street exposure. 3. Other attached dwellings: Trees shall be deciduous; spacing must include trees at the boulevard at 50 foot intervals. 4. One 4- foundation planting per 10 linear feet of building (principal or accessory) perimeter. 5. One I to three 3 story building: Spacing must include trees at the boulevard at 50 foot intervals. 6. Over three 3 story building: Spacing must include trees at the boulevard at 50 foot intervals. 7. Whichever is greater: Spacing must include trees at the boulevard at 50 foot minimum intervals. Section 2. Rosemount Zoning Ordinance B, Section 11-6-13 C. is amended as follows: E. Tree Preservation: 1. Findings and purpose statement. The city council finds it is in the best interest of the city to protect, preserve, and enhance the natural environment of the community and to encourage a resourceful and prudent approach to the development and alteration of wooded areas. In the interest of achieving these objectives, the city has established the comprehensive tree preservation regulations herein to promote the furtherance of the following: a. Protection and preservation of the environment and natural beauty of the city; b. Assurance of orderly development within wooded areas to minimize tree and habitat loss: c. Evaluation of the impacts to trees and wooded areas resulting from development; d. Establishment of minimal standards for tree preservation and the mitigation of environmental impacts resulting from tree removal; e. Provision of incentives for creative land use and environmentally compatible site design which preserves trees and minimizes tree removal and clearcutting during development; and f. Enforcement of tree preservation standards to promote and protect the public health, safety and welfare of the community. 4-2. Definitions: For purposes of this subsection E, the following definitions shall apply: CANOPY OF TREE: The horizontal extension of a tree's branches and foliage in all directions from its trunk and upper layer of green crown. CONIFEROUS/EVERGREEN TREES: A woody plant bearing seeds and cones oftentimes,but not always,retaining foliage throughout the year. CONSTRUCTION AREA: Any area in which movement of earth, alteration in topography, soil compaction, disruption of vegetation, change in soil chemistry, or any other change in the natural character of the land occurs as a result of site preparation,grading,building construction or any other construction activity. DECIDUOUS/IIARDWOOD TREES: A woody plant which has a defined crown, and which loses leaves annually. DEVELOPER:Any person or entity who undertakes to improve a parcel of land, by platting for the purposes of establishing two (2) or more dwelling units, or grading which requires a grading permit. DIAMETER OF DECIDUOUS TREE: The length of a straight line measured in caliper inches through the trunk of a tree at four and one-half feet (4.5') above the ground, for trees greater than four inches (1") in diameter, or six inches (6") above the ground for trees four inchca (1") or less in diameter (also referred to as caliper in this case). DIAMETER OF A CONIFEROUS TREE: Every two feet in height of a coniferous tree is equivalent to one caliper inch of diameter. DRIP LINE OR ROOT ZONE OF A TREE:An imaginary vertical line which extends from the outermost branches of a canopy to the ground. FORESTER:A person holding at least a Bachelor's Degree in Forestay from an accredited four (4) year college of forestry or any official appointed by the city. HARDWOOD DECIDUOUS TREE: includes ironwood, catalpa, oak,maple (hard), walnut, ash, hickory,birch,black cherry, hackberry,locust and basswood. HEALTHY TREE: Average or better condition and vigor for area as may be determined by the forester. HERITAGE TREE: is a healthy hardwood deciduous tree measuring equal to or greater than twenty-seven (27) inches in diameter or a healthy coniferous evergreen tree greater than fifty (50) feet in height. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: A person licensed by the state of Minnesota as a landscape architect. NEW DEVELOPMENT: A piece of property that is being platted for the purpose of establishing urban residential use with two (2) or more dwelling units or is being improved by grading which requires a grading permit. This definition does not apply to agricultural lot splits or to public street/utility projects. NURSERYMAN: A person licensed by the state of Minnesota as a nurseryman. PROPERTY OWNER:The owner of a buildable property who is constructing or expanding a dwelling or a business on that property. SIGNIFICANT TREE:A healthy deciduous hardwood tree measuring a minimum of six caliper inches (6") in diameter, a healthy softwood deciduous tree measuring a minimum of eight twelve caliper inches (812") • half feet ('1.5') above the ground, and or a healthy coniferous tree measuring a minimum of twelve feet (12') in height for coniferous/evergreen trees. SIGNIFICANT WOODLAND: A grouping or cluster of six (6) or more significant tree) • • • corridor. SOFTWOOD DECIDUOUS TREE: includes cottonwood,poplars/aspen,box elder, willow, silver maple and elm. 2 3. Application:The provisions of this subsection E shall apply to all new development subdivision,grading permits or construction, except for preliminary plats approved by the city prior to the adoption hereof. 3,4. Process: a. For Developers: Unless otherwise determined by the city council, the following process for preserving trees shall be required from the developer: ft,i. Prepare a tree preservation plan which shall be incorporated on the grading plan. 1}u.Implement the tree preservation plan prior to and during site development. �iii.Submit a performance of financial guarantee for compliance with the approved tree preservation plan. d iv.Comply with the city's tree replacement procedure. The tree preservation plan shall be submitted with preliminary plat plans or as part of the application for a grading permit. The tree preservation plan must be certified by a forester, landscape architect, or nurseryman retained by the developer. The plat and grading plans will not be approved by the city without an approved tree preservation plan. In the case of grading permit applications, the tree preservation plan will be approved by city staff. This decision may be appealed directly to the city council. b. For Home and Business Owners: The following process for preserving trees shall be required from the home and business owner if trees are being removed during grading or construction: i. Identify the significant trees and heritage trees on the property. ii Identify the significant trees and/or heritage trees removed due to grading or construction. iii. Identify the protection measures used to protect the preserved trees during grading or constructio n. iv. Comply with the city's tree replacement procedure. The tree preservation plan shall be sub tee with the grading permit or building permit application. The tree preservation p . ; prepared by the applicant of the grading permit or the building permit. The tre - ervation plan will be approved by city staff. This decision may be appealed directly to the Board of Appeal and Adjustments. 4 5. Tree Preservation Plan: The developer shall be responsible for implementing the tree preservation plan prior to and during site grading and plan development. The tree preservation plan will be reviewed by city staff to assess the best overall design for the project taking into account significant trees and significant woodlands and ways to enhance the efforts of the developer to mitigate corresponding damage. The developer is encouraged to meet with staff prior to submission of the preliminary plat application or prior to application for the grading permit,whichever is sooner, to determine the placement of buildings, parking, driveways, streets, storage and other physical features which result in the fewest significant trees and significant woodlands being destroyed or damaged. The tree preservation plan shall include the following items: a. The name(s) and address(es) of property owners and developers. b. Delineation of the buildings, structures, or impervious surfaces situated thereon or contemplated to be built thereon. c. Delineation of all areas to be graded and limits of land disturbance. d. Size, species, and location of all significant trees and significant woodlands located within the area to be platted or the parcel of record. e. Identification of all significant trees and significant woodlands on all individual lots. (The developer shall be required to submit a list of all lot and block numbers identifying those lots.) f. Measures to protect significant trees and significant woodlands. g. Identification of all significant trees and significant woodlands proposed to be removed within the construction area,including the contouring of all areas to be clear cut. h. Size, species, and location of all replacement trees to be planted on the property in accordance with the tree replacement schedule. i. Signature of the person preparing the plan and statement which includes acknowledgment of the fact the trees to be used as replacements are appropriate species with respect to survival of the replacement trees. 5,6. Mandatory Protection: Measures to protect significant trees and significant woodlands shall include: a. Installation of snow fencing, silt fence, or polyethylene laminate safety netting placed at the drip line of significant trees and significant woodlands to be preserved. b. Identification of any oak trees requiring pruning between April 15 and July 1; any oak trees so pruned shall be required to have any cut areas sealed with an appropriate tree wound sealant. 6r.7. Discretionary Protection: Measures to preserve or protect significant trees and woodlands, which may be required by the city, include,but are not limited to: a. Installation of retaining walls or tree wells to preserve trees by eliminating the filling or cutting of soil within drip zones. b. Placement of utilities in common trenches outside of the drip line of significant trees, or use of tunneled installation. c. Prevention of change in soil chemistry due to concrete washout and leakage or spillage of toxic materials, such as fuels or paints. d. Use of tree root aeration, fertilization, and/or irrigation systems. e. Transplanting of significant trees into a protected area for later moving into permanent sites within the construction area. f. Safety pruning. 7,8. Significant Tree/Woodland Removal:Significant tree and significant woodlands removal itert-apply-to unhealthy trees or to trees that the city may consider to be inferior in quality, > > 0 a. Site grading. electrical service, and cable TV. c. Construction/grading of drainageways. d. Filling of any area. c. Any other construction activity within the construction area. 0 a. Heritage Trees: Heritage trees are unique trees to Rosemount due to their size and age. All possible measures will be taken to preserve these trees. Heritage trees removal may occur only when there is not a practical alternative, such as the alignment of a collector or arterial streets or the installation of a trunk utility corridor. There is a zero percent (0%) removal threshold on heritage trees, meaning every caliper inch of heritage tree removed will require replacement in accordance with the standards of this subsection E10 of this section. b. Significant Tree Removal for Developments: Although the applicant must retain the maximum amount of woodland possible, the City recognizes that a certain amount of significant trees and tree cover removal is an inevitable consequence of the urban development process. Therefore, twenty-five percent (25%) of the existing caliper inches of trees can be removed during development without obligation of replacement. Any removal beyond twenty-five percent (25%) will require replacement as described in subsection E10 of this section. c. Significant Tree Removal for Home and Business Owners: The majority of tree removal occurs during the grading and installation of infrastructure during subdivision. The City recognizes that additional tree removal may occur after subdivision to construct new houses or business, or the expansion of existing homes or business,but to a lesser degree than the original subdivision. Therefore, ten percent (10%) of the existing caliper inches of trees can be removed during home or business construction without obligation of replacement. Any removal beyond ten percent (10%) will require replacement as described in subsection E10 of this section. d. Trees Exempt from Replacement: The following types of trees do not need to be included as part of the tally of tree removals: a,i. Dead, diseased, or dying trees; or bdi.Trees that are transplanted from the site to another appropriate area within the city; or eiii.Trees that were planted as part of a commercial business such as a tree farm or nursery. 8,9. Financial Guarantee: Refer to subsection G of this section. significant wo indicated on the tree presery • woodlands that su greater than twenty inch " r r r r r•F ,i T �l en iiaged y dest ed A Jl O V , , , stock and be no less tha • a. Deciduous trees: Two inches (2" • • b. Coniferous trees: Six feet (6') in height. Replacement trccJ ' on public property at the direction of city staff. The following list of materials is acceptable. Other selections may be approved by city staff. DECIDUOUS TREES Small Trees Medium Trees Large Trees Crabapple Green ash Bur oak Hawthorn Hackberry Kentucky coffee tree Honey locust Maples (no Silver maple) Plum Linden (bass wood) Serviceberry River birch CONIFEROUS TREES Canadian hemlock Cedar European larch Fir Pine Tree Replacement Formula: Replacement of removed or disturbed trees in excess of the percentage allowed by this subsection shall be according to the following guidelines: a. For development which exceeds the percentage of allowable removal of significant trees, all significant trees shall be replaced at the ratio of one half(0.5) caliper inch per one (1) caliper inch removed. b. For each heritage tree removed by the developer, all heritage trees shall be replaced at the ratio of one (1) caliper inch per one (1) caliper inch removed. 11. Size,Types and Diversification of Replacement Trees: Replacement trees shall be of a similar species to those that are removed, but also shall be a minimum of 25% conifers and 25% deciduous hardwoods. Required heritage tree replacement must be of the same species as the heritage tree removed. Replacement trees must be no less than the following sizes: a. Deciduous trees shall be no less than two and one half caliper inches (2.5"); and b. Coniferous trees shall be no less than six feet (6') high. 12. Acceptable Tree Replacement Species: The following list of trees are acceptable for tree replacement species. The City may, at its discretion, approve additional species if circumstances such as soil conditions, hydrology, topography, or recent tree diseases warrant. Oaks,Maples (except Silver Maples),Walnut,Ash, Hickory,Black Cherry,Linden,Pine, Spruce, Fir and Cedar. 10.13. Other Replacement Tree Requirements: Choice of replacement trees species and location of the trees should also be contingent on the following information: a. Soil Composition: Comparisons should be made between soil conditions and the ecology of the proposed species to make sure they are compatible. b. Spatial Requirements:The potential height and crown spread of the proposed replacement trees should be known. Usually,half of the adult tree crown diameter is the amount of distance a tree should be planted from any aboveground objects. c. Diseases And Insect Problems: Appropriate replacement choices shall also consider insect and disease problems that may be common with particular species in the part of the state in which the city of Rosemount is located. 14. Fee-in-Lieu of Tree Replacement or Replacement Trees Planted in Public Areas: The City recognizes that there may be instances where the total amount of tree replacement required cannot occur on site or that there are some land uses (such as refining) that are not compatible with trees. In those instances, the City may, at its option, accept a fee-in-lieu of tree placement or allow the planting of replacement trees in public areas. Tree replacement is encouraged to happen on site as much as possible and fee-in-lieu of tree replacement should be used only when replacement cannot occur on site. The fee-in-lieu of tree replacement will be determined annually by the City Council through the City Fee Schedule. F. Parking Lot Landscaping: The need for internal parking lot landscaping will be subject to planning commission site review. When such landscaping is required,it will be to lessen the monotony, heat and wind associated with large parking lots.When the internal planting islands are required, the island boundaries must be constructed with concrete or of nondegradable material. The interior depth and total area of the island must allow the root zone of all planted materials to develop to their natural growth potential. G. Landscaping Performance Security: The city may, at its option,withhold occupancy certification or require cash, a letter of credit or a bond satisfactory to the city in the amount of one hundred and ten percent (110%) of the value of the landscaping, securing the full performance of landscaping requirements. The amount of the security shall be determined by the contract value of the required improvements and may be held by the city for one full year from the date improvements were completed. (Ord. B, 9 19 1989) Section 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication according to law. ENACTED AND ORDAINED into an Ordinance this 17th day of July, 2007. CITY OF ROSEMOUNT William H. Droste,Mayor ATTEST: Amy Domeier, City Clerk Published in the Rosemount Town Pages this day of , 2007. CITY OF ROSEMOUNT DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2007- A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF ORDINANCE NO. 2007-190 AMENDING THE CITY OF ROSEMOUNT ZONING ORDINANCE B RELATING TO LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS AND TREE PRESERVATION WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount recommended City Council approval of these amendments after holding a public hearing on April 23, 2007; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rosemount adopted Ordinance No. B-190 amending the City of Rosemount Zoning Ordinance B relating to Landscape Requirements and Tree Preservation; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.191, Subd. 4 allows publication by title and summary in the case of lengthy ordinances; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the following summary would clearly inform the public of the intent and effect of the Ordinances. NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the City of Rosemount that the City Clerk shall cause the following summary of Ordinance No. B-190 to be published in the official newspaper in lieu of the entire ordinance: Public Notice During their July 17, 2007,meeting, the City Council of the City of Rosemount adopted Ordinance No. B-190. The ordinance amends Section 11-3-13 of Ordinance B, the Zoning Ordinance relating to landscape requirements and tree preservation. In summary, the new ordinance updates the standards for landscaping and tree preservation within the City of Rosemount. The revised Zoning Ordinance provides guidelines for tree replacement standards including size and type of replacement trees, landscaping in parking lots, and financial security requirements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of Ordinance No. B-190 shall be kept in the City Clerk's office at City Hall for public inspection and a full copy of the ordinance be posted in the lobby of City Hall for 30 days after adoption. Resolution 2007- ADOPTED this 17th day of July, 2007,by the City Council of the City of Rosemount. William H. Droste,Mayor ATTEST: Amy Domeier, City Clerk Motion by: Second by: Voted in favor: Voted against: Member absent: EXCERPT FROM MINUTES CITY COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION JUNE 13, 2007 2.C. Tree Preservation Ordinance, Case 07-05-TA Senior Planner Zweber summarized the staff report and provided background on the Planning Commission recommendations. He reviewed the comparison chart that was provided with the staff report showing the analysis of other cities' tree preservation ordinances. Discussion was held regarding the acceptance of a payment of a fee-in-lieu of tree replacement. Council Member Shoe-Corrigan expressed concern about the changes in the ordinance compared to how the issues are currently handled. Mr. Zweber said that developers currently use letters of credit to ensure tree replacement. Community Development Director Lindquist stated that developers want to be able to dispose of their liability. Council Member Baxter noted that in Apple Valley there was no fee in lieu of replacement and questioned as part of PUD if the fee could be built in. Ms. Lindquist stated the City Council would ultimately decide. Council Member Shoe-Corrigan was concerned that requirements for which trees should be planted was not included. She wanted an example list of acceptable and desirable trees to be included. Ms. Lindquist stated the list could be written and included in conditions of a project. Council Member DeBettignies referred to Minnetonka's requirements. Mayor Droste spoke of concerns with the ash beetle disease. Mr. Zweber stated that condition 11 stated that trees be replaced with similar species. He said that a list could be added that included acceptable species. Council Member Baxter questioned the tree replacement requirement which was proposed different for different land uses. Ms. Lindquist explained the difference for tree replacement noting the City wanted to remain reasonable. Mr. Zweber indicated that most cities have a graduated scale for replacement. Council Member Baxter questioned allowing a multi-family or industrial use to take out more trees for replacement than a single family project. He stated those types of users are in a situation to pay more. Ms. Lindquist stated that it could potentially become an economic development issue. She stated the PUD could be strengthened to include more about tree preservation. Mr. Zweber stated that the landscaping requirements still need to be met that are above and beyond the tree preservation ordinance. Council Member DeBettignies questioned if the ordnance was specific for new developments only. Mr. Zweber stated that Section F was added to the ordinance to cover the existing properties. Council Member Shoe-Corrigan shared her concerns with eliminating significant woodlands and doing clustering. She suggested that woodlands be included in the tree inventory. Discussion continued regarding the woodlands and the greenway corridor. Mayor Droste shared his concerns about the buck thorn located at Carrols Woods. Mr. Schultz shared the process for removing the buck thorn that was located on the Wiklund property. Council Member Sterner stated the tree replacement policy was not strong enough. Mr. Zweber responded that if an area was to develop some tree removal would need to occur to put in roads, etc. The logic was to identify the trees considered truly unique which is the basis for change in the proposed ordinance. . Mr. Zweber stated the ordinance would be on the July 17 City Council agenda as a new business item as an educational piece to the public. Excerpt from the Planning Commission Work Session on March 13, 2007 c. 07-05-TA Tree Preservation Text Amendment. Senior Planner Zweber presented this item. Mr. Zweber stated that their has been interested from both the Planning Commission and the City Council in updating the Tree Preservation Ordinance to focus on preservation over replacement. Mr. Zweber reviewed the existing ordinance and summarized eight other ordinances from the metropolitan area. Mr. Zweber recommended that Rosemount revise the ordinance to include hardwood trees 6 inches and larger, softwood trees 12 inches and larger, and conifer 12 feet and taller;include a heritage tree category for hardwoods 27 inches or larger and conifers 50 feet and taller; allow 20% tree removal for single family developments, 30% for multi-family, and 40% for commercial and industrial;replacement of 0.5 inches for each inch removed;replacement tree of 2.5 inches; and provisions for a payment of a fee-in-lieu of tree replacement. Commissioner Schultz asked how the removal of dead trees would be addressed in the ordinance. Mr. Zweber stated that commonly significant trees are defined as trees that are in good or better condition meaning that dead trees or trees in poor condition can be removed without replacement. Commissioner Howell stated that a one year warranty period on replacement trees does not guarantee that trees will survive the transplanting. Mr. Zweber stated that the Planning Commission can recommend extending the warranty period, but that if the period is extended beyond two years that it would be difficult to determine if a tree died due to transplanting or some other cause that occurred after transplantation. Commissioner Palda inquired how a security for tree replacement is refunded. Mr. Zweber stated that it has been staff's policy to refund 75% of the security after the replacement trees have been planted and the remaining 25%is refunded after the warranty period has expired and any died trees have been replaced. Excerpt from the Planning Commission Meeting on April 24, 2007 5.b Case 07-05-TA Tree Preservation Ordinance. Senior Planner, Eric Zweber, presented this item. In the past year, a number of Planning Commissioners and City Councilmembers have expressed frustration with our Tree Preservation Ordinance. One specific comment has been that the ordinance encourages tree replacement over the preservation of existing trees. Staff has evaluated a number of other cities' tree preservation ordinances and has proposed an ordinance that focuses on preserving truly exceptional trees while allowing trees to be removed during development provided replacement trees are planted. Mr. Zweber summarized the proposed ordinance changes which included the definition of significant trees,whether or not there are exceptional trees,when and how much replacement is required, the size and species of replacement trees, credits and incentives, fees-in-lieu of trees, security bonds, and requirements of different construction circumstances. Mr. Zweber then provided an example of how the new ordinance would work using Rosemount Hills 5th Addition scenario. Chairperson Messner stated that after Rosemount Hills 5th Addition, he felt the 300 tree replacement requirement was excessive. He likes the idea of heritage tree replacement. Chairperson Messner opened the public hearing at 6:56p.m. There were no public comments. MOTION by Howell to close the Public Hearing. Second by Palda. Ayes: 3. Nays: None. Motion approved. Public hearing was closed at 6:57p.m. There was no discussion or questions among the Commission. MOTION by Commissioner Howell to recommend to the City Council the approval of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. Second by Palda. Ayes: 3. Nays: 0. As followup, Mr. Zweber stated the item will first go to a City Council work session in June before going before the Council at a regular meeting later in June. ROSEv1OUNT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CITY COUNCIL City Council Regular Meeting: July 17, 2007 AGENDA ITEM: Case 07-24-OM City of Rosemount TH AGENDA SECTION: 52/CSAH 42 Official Map of Proposed New Business Rig ht-of-Way PREPARED BY: Tom Morton, Planning Intern AGENDA NO. CI ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance, US Highway 52/County Road 42 Official Map, Excerpt from the June 26 Planning Commission Minutes, Alternative 5b, US Highway 52/County APPROVED BY: Road 42 Memorandum of Understanding, US Highway 52/County Road 42 Ownership Table RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to approve an Ordinance adopting the City of Rosemount TH 52/CSAH 42 Official Map of Proposed Right-of-Way. ISSUE The current intersection of County Road 42/US Highway 52 is scheduled to be reconstructed as an interchange to address future growth in the area. In 2003, Dakota County, the Minnesota Department of Transportation, and the City of Rosemount developed a joint solution to construct a more efficient intersection that can carry higher volumes of traffic. The 2003 MnDot approved layout is the basis for the official map currently before the Council. Currently there is an engineering study which will provide more detailed plans associated with the interchange project. Adopting the Official Map will prevent development from occurring in the right-of-way needed for the new interchange, between the time of approval of the Official Map and actual construction of the 52/42/55 interchange. SUMMARY In May 2002, a traffic analysis study was conducted by the Minnesota Department of Transportation,in collaboration with Dakota County and the City of Rosemount, to look at seven alternatives aimed at meeting future travel demand for the 52/42/55 interchange. The alternatives ranged from single point urban interchange to a full cloverleaf. While conducting the study, a balance was reached between right-of-way needed and function of the intersection. This balance was best illustrated in alternative 5b, a hybrid cloverleaf and folded diamond II. Following the recommendation of the study, the City of Rosemount entered into a memorandum of understanding with the state recognizing that alternative 5b was the best suited alternative for the 52/42/55 interchange. Upon the adoption of the Official Map, the City will be able to ensure that land within the right-of-way of the proposed interchange does not develop prior to construction of the interchange. Right-of-way property is needed from thirty-one (31) parcels. Twenty-five (25) of these parcels will be smaller but remain and six (6) parcels will need to be purchased completely. Property will be acquired for right-of-way from nine (9) parcels in the NW quadrant, eight (8) parcels in the NE quadrant, three (3) parcels in the SW quadrant, and eleven (11) parcels in the SE quadrant. Four (4) of the nine (9) affected parcels in the NW quadrant will need to be completely purchased, as will two (2) of the eight (8) affected parcels in the NE quadrant. Land owners of affected parcels will be able to build or expand current structures as long as they comply with the zoning ordinance and the structures are not located inside the boundaries of the right-of-way for the 52/42/55 interchange. The official map will provide the City with a legal basis to deny building permits for structures proposed to be built in the required right-or-way areas. When a permit is denied, the owner has the option to appeal to the Board of Appeals and Adjustment. If the Board approves the appeal of the property owner, the City has six (6) months to acquire the portion of the property owner's land dedicated to right-of-way for the 52/42/55 interchange as is depicted on the Official Map. If the land has not been acquired by the City within six (6) months, either after the appeal or the denial of the permit, the building permit must be issued to the property owner. Upon adoption of the Official Map for a principal arterial (US Hwy 52 &Cty Rd 42), the City can use Metropolitan Council Right-of-Way Acquisition Loan Funds (RALF) to acquire property. Through the RALF program, needed property can be purchased prior to financing of the project. When funding and programming of a project has commenced, the RALF is paid back through the project allocation. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission on June 26, 2007 conducted a public hearing for the County Road 42/US Highway 52 Official Map. John Sass from the Dakota County Engineers Office approached the Commission and stated that an EAW had been completed on the project and that Dakota County has been working on a layout plan that requires the least amount of right-of-way. Part of the discussion is also figuring out future access for properties affected by the interchange project. Those solutions have not been finalized and there is more time and input that will take place before decisions are made. Residents expressed concern about the timeframe for land acquisition as well as access points for construction of the interchange. Mrs. Lindquist stated that the access issues for the new interchange are being reviewed and that the City and County will be working in greater detail with individual property owner and additional public meetings will be held. John Sass confirmed that adoption of an Official Map allows for early acquisition of lands in the right-of-way are for the interchange. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the County Road 42/US Highway 52 Official Map. CONCLUSION Official mapping of the property needed for the future road project will allow the County to purchase property prior to development occurring. This tool is a mechanism to reduce the future cost of right-of-way acquisition. However,if funding is not available to purchase properties when development will occur, and permits are applied for, the permit must be issued pending full compliance with ordinances and building code standards. The County has some federal funds that also can be allocated to right-of-way acquisition which would be done on a willing seller basis. There is no intention to use eminent domain as part of the early acquisition for the project. RECOMMENDATION Motion to approve the Ordinance adopting the US Highway 52/County Road 42 Official Map. 2 City of Rosemount Ordinance No. B- 189 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE CITY OF ROSEMOUNT TH 52/CSAH 42 OFFICIAL MAP OF PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMOUNT,MINNESOTA, ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Ordinance B, adopted September 19, 1989, entitled"City of Rosemount Zoning Ordinance," Section 11-13, Official Maps,is hereby amended to adopt the map entitled "City of Rosemount TH 52/CSAH 42 Official Map of Proposed Right-of-Way", a copy of which is attached to Ordinance No. B-189 and is incorporated herein by reference. The official map covers the area approximately '/a mile surrounding the intersection of County Road 42 and Highway 52, attached hereto and incorporated herewith as Exhibit A. Section 2. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication according to law. ENACTED AND ORDAINED into an Ordinance this 17th day of July, 2007. CITY OF ROSEMOUNT William H. Droste, Mayor ATTEST: Amy Domeier, City Clerk Published in the Rosemount Town Pages this day of , 2007. °•n aafg.Qnn.4g nl61ir5inEg 1 5 ? `#se.5§§555f§€ 5565E65 5 � k� IN - w>- `W.iil`s`iibi yiiki y`•`hkiyb S. l!' y6 El v Z Lail d11e11ooa1� 9 d dId , 2I5o Jr J' m�� Jr Jr O w = ao niglIf f if i JHHJ!Ihi a §i'S.; - J' ' Na L+' J' ;o W 0 v J0 I!!!LLEPIEEfi EEELEEEb '•' 1a a �Al N a� OOOOO eea y i WIti ��l�l�:Il� o uNi um ky44y4ayiiyiyiy4i4y4¢ ikyiakkiykgb « 51! -g`-i >4 x oa 813d8d11111)d 1dd1§8d; a _ i 31 .a 12 �1Midll U 0 €111111=1116 •11gEESgg a L. ' €P A hffLL!lfffElEt $EIILEfLt Y g d.�• 'P �' 5 fE ka4gi ill It Ili ii 81 �" (S133H V JO H3 133HS 33S) I a of A. F`rGd /, sr•cu...o..i.00c mu. �b 1 a lir sr: \v t vik `40) <i 3 = U Z.W JO Ei wain e-•c.ecm 2S 'ARH$ii• F �' w nu.-tg.rr<o s--- M -/ JO = �I ' =Q Qw y a I- it ! T : a• w to --uxu s-a.n.m. p } E .?...T. r 9 p w in j z �j`_ N P • 1 A.. 1 ri t s& r z: ri ao¢ - ' z�nz Ho a - 1,., g-. Si: W �A v3j sz Sb'�O 0 2 lii! I ¢u win oFwF" ` tlY � a���¢xao�o ^E I J 6<w ffill I[ - I §>,"- .4 1ICa-C_ 5 / t / �I w § - § 2 §3 " §§ K• _ / » / / § ) j '0 ' } � � / " § § /\ /i / 77 k u „ 0( J /' / /I / | ; § | , \ ( ! \ \ | Lu .| n \ \ \!4. [: k1 > ( / '� 1 �� i . I .:,‘• 'i \\ w \ p,v * - ki '|% • - \\® I $ »$ t. . }/ s i , | ( 1 ` I \ y------ .. —��--- - - - U j . � � �.. 1 i ! . . II § j � ' $ B\ ` 1 St { � �\ ; ' f, | $ 1 e,$ !�2| 5 I % lilli q. e \ �mE. §|=[® �!/� 1 § \M. r e1 . . _ � 1E ,` J �\. a..: g | 2} , �[ � ( lIGG2 --__. aleV �fNlHD.LV 33S) 1/1 — UJ } k-.O.- III I— 3 I' Z U.1 �1 Q N OLL 0NM in N Q �2OA as 111117 : Eli1i: :y W LL N �3cZ a� 5�� 1 0 = O In op �I Mai f"'����--- V) Y 2 LLN 7SI-k NNW'MINE ce i Esc fie rc X ,u WHI p 6 Ill 6 i ,I• a -Tao o 33a r c)/ d i I u.3rm 2 b rs ,.a. y 9 '1 n Y -— L. y K-oKl i_K.K.ii i-m La - W m ax mils L».olm o-- -''- _....---........._ -. Yt_ Y V .—...__._.�._..�__...-____ AVM -- K•al[1 LK.K.II Z 2404.0. 1 ZS 'AMFI VI E.JO C -•.iF�[.1[pl-- ac•Ki c.[i.u.io• ---~L" -* --- wool Si4 cao� —_ L'W N VI LsI S VI i • oIIII . I i 1 o. I , I 'II _ WM WON Z ▪ Z J ghWEoiaW s EgEl i w<" W ONEg5wUrOl- o.<WVWi_w<0-- 1 In 1-- W f W r ra. 4 = Q ° GG• @ c S ♦ O o v Cu. f.i it • o I O ! VIcc U J_�N 45-• S ♦ 4 I t 4 .~-. H WO c oa U 0 a' ..I. a, a' Cr ♦ 4 ♦ 4 CL 6§ i in isCL.i % --aG. W •-cc�.u.a a \ K erns r w_ atir.u•e s 1 :• CN �_S- �- w._`� MGil G..a.Km f vmEo4caar ' . 1 i u w (— 1 ..Y n•cKl G-I I.r..m,-- I o 1 JO LS •'A�'M1ti S11 7 6 a . 'y d J Qw •.,-... .G.l•• [ N 1 `' M W - I LA Gn - I sz \ly L 6 y IIII I ,o Z U <020 EXCERPT FROM MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING JUNE 26, 2007 5.b. Case 07-24-OM Official Map of the 42/52 Area. Planning Intern Morton presented this item. The current intersection of County Highway 42/US Highway 52 is deficient to handle current traffic levels, and will become more dangerous as future traffic grows. Dakota County, the Minnesota Department of Transportation, and the City of Rosemount have come up with a joint solution to construct a more efficient intersection that can carry higher volumes of traffic. The purpose of this public hearing is to discuss the proposed Official Map to allow for improvements to the 52/42/55 interchange. Adopting the Official Map will prevent development from occurring in the area designated for future right-of-way needed for the new interchange during the time of Official Map approval and actual construction of the 52/42/55 interchange. Mr. Morton presented a map showing areas that will be needed for the right-of-way construction. Mr. Morton stated that John Sass from Dakota County is also present to answer any questions. Chairperson Messner asked for a timeline of events leading up to this point. Ms. Lindquist provided an overview of work on the plan since 2003. She stated that it is important to get the official map adopted to define right-of-way areas and create the ability to access funds. Mr.John Sass, Dakota County, approached the Commission. He stated there has been an EAW completed on the site and there are no significant impacts on the site. The County has been working on the layout in more detail to create the least right-of-way impact possible. The official map was prepared by MnDOT by a hired consultant. The County has federal money to use for friendly acquisitions, beginning with appraisals and meetings with residents. Adoption of the official map will give the opportunity to use RALF money,which is provided on a first come first some basis. Chairperson Messner opened the public hearing at 7:12p.m. Mr. Rahn, owner of the Rich Valley Golf Course, at 3855 145th St E., stated that he will go out of business if the easements go where they are proposing. He would have to move approximately 7 greens, 5 tees, the driving range, and will lose 40-60 spots in the parking lot. He is requesting that the frontage road access move approximately '/z mile farther east rather than circle it right into his #1 fairway and driving range. If the frontage road access is placed to the east of the golf course and a road is place over to 145th which comes into Connelly, then the golf course customers would have to come up Connelly and then come back again. All that would be needed for the golf course would be a driveway coming from the west side. Mr. Rahn stated if the plan stays as it is,it would cost between 1.3 and 1.5 million to change the golf course. He is requesting that this new plan be considered, however,if they want to keep the right to put a frontage road across his property in the future, he would agree to that. Marlin Rechtzigel, 3330 145th Street East, stated that in the original intersection plans, service roads were not included. The residents were just informed of the service roads and the increased area of the right-of-way in the last week or 10 days. He stated he has talked to the city planner about what would be the increased acreage and the planner said it wouldn't change. He stated the right-of-way on his parcel had clearly increased so the acreage would change as well. He has talked to the DOT engineer who said this intersection would be sufficient for the next 10 years barring any development. 4 Frank Knoll, 4322 145th Street East, asked if whether or not they are taking more land on his side of the road than the other and whether or not it is the end of the construction at that point. Ms. Lindquist replied that it is not the end of construction,just the end of the map. Mr. Knoll then asked when it is planned to put in the other streets running up to 138th running behind his property. Ms. Lindquist stated that there are two processes going on at the current moment: 1 - official mapping based on the MnDOT approved layout; and 2 -The County is working on a new layout with the intention to decide what the appropriate frontage roads and accesses to the parcels will be once the interchange is put in. The roads on the proposed map are options they will explore for access to other parcels. Randy Napper, 3381 145th, speaking for Myron Napper asked about the reference in the staff report about land not acquired by the City within six months. Mr. Zweber clarified the six month timeline with respect to submitted permits and the appeal process. Ms. Lindquist further clarified that if the City cannot come up with the money to purchase the property within the six month time period, then the permit will be approved,if all other ordinance and building code regulations are met. Chairperson Messner clarified that at this point no one is talking about actively condemning property for the right-of-way purposes. Wes Knodt, 15102 Clayton Avenue East, asked about the driveways that appear on the map over his property and expressed his concern with the access from his property to Highway 52. Ms. Lindquist stated there have been discussions on the issue of the access being blocked. There will be public meetings in the future associated with accesses during this planning process. Mr. Knodt asked when the actual surveying will be completed. Ms. Lindquist replied that the surveying was actually done several years ago. Mr. Myron Napper, 3381 145th Street East, approached the Commission and expressed his disappointment on how long this process has gone on. He asked what he can do when his property is deteriorating but the County won't buy it because they have no money. He stated he wants to be treated fairly in this process and not end up in Dr. Kurt Hansen's current position. Marlin Rechtzigel, 14727 Clayton Avenue, stated he owns three parcels involved in this process. He saw an article in the paper stating that one of the commissioners requested making this a 4 leaf clover instead of 3 leaves. He wondered if that proposal was still alive. Ms. Lindquist replied that this official map is based on the 2003 drawing and that the commission hasn't taken any action at this point; they are still working on the layout. Mr. Rechtzigel wanted to know where the accesses would be placed since he has 60 acres of property that may be affected. Ms. Lindquist stated that access issues are being reviewed right now and the City and County will be working in more detail with individual properties. Mr. Rechtzigel stated that this meeting was a waste of time and the public should be invited when there are more answers. MOTION by Schwartz to close the Public Hearing. Second by Palda. Ayes: 5. Nays: None. Motion approved. Public hearing was closed at 7:34p.m. Mr. Sass stated there are two separate issues. The official mapping is a state statute rule that provides a tool the City and County can use and it does not take any rights from the property owners. The second issue is background issues based on the map. When the County did the environmental work, they set out one frontage road through the golf course connecting to Connelly Road. They didn't do any other frontage accesses because there was zoning issues and land use issues. The designers did not want to spend to much time and dollars on land that would change before building commenced. Mr. Sass stated his job is to work out access issues looking at the ultimate vision and come to a balance. The frontage roads included on the map are just a concept. Chairperson Messner stated individual property particulars are not before the Commission tonight, but just the official map. By approving the official map, Chairperson Messner asked Mr. Sass if that then allow the process to facilitate early acquisitions. Mr. Sass replied that,yes, the money cannot be used unless you have an adopted official map. Mr. Sass also stated that once the map is adopted,he can then call the Met Council to have money available and then he can approach property owners. Commissioner Schultz stated she needed a good understanding on what she would be agreeing to at tonight's meeting. She stated she enjoys the golf course and wanted to make sure that what she agreed tonight would not jeopardize the golf course in the future. Mr. Sass responded that the right-of-way shown on the official map does go through the golf course parking lot and the driving range, but has no affect on the golf course access. Whether or not the Commission approves the official map does not mean the right-of-ways will stay that way. Mr. Sass stated alternatives will be evaluated and that the official map is just a footprint of the right-of-way and is more of a permitting issue. Commisioner Schwartz questioned the process and whether or not the Commission loses all control over the access issues once the official map is approved. Mr. Sass replied that the City has most control of the process on the official layout through the municipal consent process. There will be several open houses coming in the future. Commissioner Palda asked about development of properties in the right-of-way. Ms. Lindquist confirmed that in adopting the official map,it is insuring there is not additional capital investment within the right-of-way area. Mr. Napper, 3381 145th Street East, approached the Commission again. He stated he had been at a meeting about a month ago pertaining to light rail and the speaker said it would be between 7-14 years and there will be light rail in the 42/52 area. He stated he belongs to the Sierra Club and has heard that they would like to make his property a park-n-ride location. There was no further discussion. MOTION by Messner to recommend that the City Council approve the County Road 42/US Highway 52 Official Map. Second by Schwartz. Ayes: 5. Nays: None. Motion approved. As follow-up,Mr. Morton stated this item will go before the City Council for approval on July 17`h. .,..------ ... ......„„..„ „..„,. I-,•-• .";4,4-0,..r.$,,r:,,7,7-:,3-4.w!,,,,,,,,,z,,,.,,,,,,,M,:- :,-.;-,:,Z:::,: ,:::: r tr.!'s'e,, F,h,Z.',..:,). 'gVi,30-M,-:',VT,''':, :!g;:•':,.,,:',:'•::, :' ','': „ .,,,,,:KI&Inn-,,,,r ,r',.,..,-:',J.,,,,..,:,:,,..,::::::, ,,,.,,,„:•,:::- t ,, ,,,,,,,,, ,1,__,,,,,,,-„5._,. .,,_,,..4,,,, _;,„ 11...-Ir_ a 4,......*-.:.,Ar.,.,..;:„5,..,...,,,,.,,--,:,..,„?,,,,....J.11.4%;....4.•,,i , .....,.-... .---,,,,,., ,,i-, 1-F,44-1,17Vc*"'. ..,,V...11-*.°'____':17..0:'1,'''.7-•r.'.7z*4-.. .5.W.;:::!;AArtpid7 :::„ :,,,,„-,:„.,...„,„,,„-„,„,„,,,„,:,,,-.„:„,:,,,:,,,„„,„, ..-:.:...-:; -",4":7 'Oe i-...r.:01,!:,71,,i,'fti,R,_,..n*,:-,17,..46',,,kant,..,•.,. .... I i ,,,,•..,... -10,1,-J.n,z,.-,a7,.-,..-,....-,,.,,, ...,._&-.......F.,.tg.--0,: •- . ,-,„,.. - ?r,„.-_, ..2:::704--,.,..—••wo.--.7 .-, c7'.'"i•' .LR:'.i.g,'N'ii-;:•::;•,' '...c.'•,0,:PW-ti..4-5tit-N.,„:111,, '.:.7 .:•;, -7. -g,.,:' -'kirT,'-t''..: ., .,.,.i.i ilif.T.0,:k1k.-z,Ei4,:•;:,';14,.::,,t:'•,.,,z?§-?.: ..',.,.:,,.-,:,---.,-,.,'.r:-..,...4.:v.:,,,, „..;:•.,a,,,-3..-7•!,:is.--t-or, -.: „„,;":7"..-,'':.._ ...,..,.:t,...*,-..,.44, ..4-,..4tr,`,424:4'. ..-_..:5 ---.•:t..,Va,_-41t-ri-45.1t, .,.-..'... 7:. 7 :;`,',;,...;;it:.-..•-:--;•.*:t-41...:'-,, ,.., .,...i.. . i.,:,..i..,:ii,:i,- -2 :4', ,,if.;.:.4-24,41 . ,.1..='•.'-°"''' .7••1--2'. . •••....--"Vs"-4.---',,,,_ ,.:-4..=.._,-1-7-'''':In71,t64 ,:g•-,'''Ivi.--?t'-'.'':i',.,.,e• :'..a ..---7i'''''`'''.• .:,.;i,..t;a•-• '. "...,-,..,,....: „...,-4,,,,it . „:arie:,._,„,:;,„7,. .,;.T.,,..-%.,..-.:,,,,,;:,.., ,,,, ..,,.,..,...-ti „. ..,; 1 ,..-,,,,,-,,,,,_-,-. IIILIr.„"U:,.f, -`;',,I,-q- . :.;-1,].::,•: , *.-a'"z.,;V:.›.' -VA'r "- .. ..V,:4--11 ' ' •.- --,• - •' 4-2:74-41'0•'-,,,..;:i4*.T! :;.'.. . .1.1 . _ . -1-..,.._e1...' , • .,'..;;ri• -.1.*4-44.11-V:i c,.:- i„..,..„..,..,,,„-,,,„,„„..,.,. „_,,.,;4111C''WN,:?,. .i,:i'0,tri±4T-:'iM:r.ii : : '4,,,.., ',- •:::V 77:sr,,,4tkat'irli.-i I trtiftgL-.?. ,._„..,:-,...-. '1,- - o,,,-•7.:••%^4)1 ,k4--,.,.,:-,. .. ,-..t.`..-•,. ;:. .,, ,,..::=: ;,::2',;.-i.4:::;;,- --.,.' :'.,.',4-1'.;,,..,1".,.:4];7."'5.X.',. ,-.:-.^.71:,,r.i ' ' ' '-',.*11i ''' 4,-.,,, ".iii.,4,.. •..., Taitg, ,,Z,,,I,V - ..: t., c. :,:,:;','•,-'!:l.s E:::;,.'..'7A:i''''':57:'.'.."'f'atftt.5.:-,,,,,,,xv,,,,,,.„.:,-,„,,,„,,,....;.., ,.,,,,,,,,, ....,v,.„„z..± 7,,...4.,,,,,„..7.k.,_,4/., ely...---. ..:. ,. . ....,0,,,,. 7.4,-, ,,,-,-. .4.,, ,-• -i-Par.r.,.41.," - .- •,..,',:-.-.','lit•:' -'11. -1..VAQVI',- tr--'1,t-V3.'-i"4, ..----:!,ItIF" :•:, :•`-`07Zt.:;,'-it ,l',:•;:::,P.a'! , ,,, •! •:-.--:-4,17.-r ,....4.:?1* -.' •••'•,•!i--'..-•-'--7--:'•:,-4,-,: '''' ''';41°44 -%414; :4' ":;',fig'IdiitrAt.Highway 1 , ..44.7.7. ;•,,,,g;,•gizif ..trie ,._ ,:. ,:•,,:it,,,,54 .,, vt_B.,-,-- - .0-4,,,,-. ,/,4'4-‘'".."...- ;EXI,V,i:,-.1V- ,,.• ....- .'-',.. -.,--;..::.. ,,,.. ;i.'1 : tA,4,:-,Z,4.,,,-i,5.A.k.,,M 4 ,,,, , x-f.v.. -W , . ,,.;, :,'.-i;.:.; rl•L';',.-rti'i.',':' ,'•,i,a:':'!is'''.1...,.1.,- -,.'1'24-`24"'"'-.7,-'4,4,:',0 :*.;TAW ,--..1 7'-'1:' ,2:-.fOVetpOSS!';'i'..Pli:;•r. /73,Avt!'f'W.,;_,Iega-MO --s 11,,A,S,.'-',i-7."7,1"5-'4..-t7', '''' ''''' .1,,, -,,...,-,„.-1,-...„---1.0., ,„.„......„---..., ,,,i''',''',-Stiareth140 ;--,,••, - =-.-:t..-,•,,--.' i ii .•,:.. ::', -,-,•,!. .:: ..1,,,k-•,,,,,,,..,,,,,,tzi:.:4-3...-.04•415-,-,,,, ,Att,-4..1„,„,;.•*•;,,,,....- ;..,,,,,...,,--,,,,,,,..ic . 1 . - -------," •::„,•:=1 ,•.,,:•... 4:,r.:..,i,..3•• ,•,-,:,•!".,.• , ,,,.,„.:„. ..,,. ...,,,..ito..41.,• .,,,..fir aii,„ r , .„....A'. ,-- , , ,,, „ve..1* . ..„. . •. ,-r,,,;.-rm,..-.4.,44;,. .1,,--...11,.....,.....r'''"'..: p.-7-......1'.;;..:-.:14:•.1,,,. •::,,I,;,;,.:r;,,i-i,t. .,,,,43.,,,t.„:,,,Z,..4.:•,;,1.1",47.0"."--,zr. :_cttiTirAlr.t,•=z;%14-N.,,,..,40,;.s..11.L._,,,,).i ,,,,,t-.•,a„-r.,,,,,,,......1H,...0,4;1 , ,,,,...,.,,,,,.. .„,..,,,,,_4,tittt,., -_,,,:,‘...v4.. :,,k4.7i,.,..,..,.-. ....,vel,,-4._.ti;,,,;..ii... .,,,tot,:-,,,,,,-71;;;,..7;,i.:. .4..,11 ,4 ....0...,..74x1„. --, vr., - t• • '''t -•-laki -,''4',-*-1.:••-c7' ,.....'-v-r.f,E.,7:'::.::U.'.:-.,.„.'..,-7...47_-,7 47-' ..--:j..r„:" .;.'.1.,",--t:- :•. :.1iA if"vrri,r: . ,?• 74:-.4•-• ' •-• ,.',:•,7-,'"'.%r..,-,7-„,,,,,,;.1-..,,,4z*._-.- -",,-:•*4-1.;,,,,,! .,,, ,,•itit.;.'-•- • .,,,, , , 0,17k.„ t.',!Jrii 4: 1,.'::. ,.-,.-17-16,, t41-::::::;:te-_-e---.;,.':::..:;• 4• ,::..,.-.:.. -,-,...,,,4,,,,....,-,-,..,, ,r-,„:„,--tti-n ,,,,,, .v."7'...,..,-;-:--,..--, . ..,.. A ..:,,,,,.,..i,,,. :: : . ,,.:..,,,,,., ,. . •---N; A • ,,,, ..—., ,,,.....„: ':,,,'-1 to," -::',..-:,=---L-'-'-... ...'-jat•°i:s-e-,,,-. -. -.A..„•••;`-'4i...',,r,-•• ..,. 141';•h. 14. i amt,..,,:;:.4•. ,,: .• ,ws .• -:.4 ...*,,,,--*• • .4,..,7,•,..,-,. .,•-•,!.4t.f .• .;,...,:,, ,,,,-..7,..:4.--, 37"s-- .-1:r- ,2:',4 t :'''•••,,,c;,. ..,„„:.,.,,,-'• --'-'•!:.,.`"•--',',„.tit, ,,..'-',:r• -;•':,,,,9.1420..-. ::-..,a1,4.-r-..,.. ,...t., Ye , I tkiii/ip.-.- k riip -ti.; ,-_414,,,-ij-.. :;irr.w,,,;P.2-..74--tr.' ''''.•-,1*.r. ...:-:- -",:,..7,-- ;,..... i 7r77',...,'„gotr,,!.: ''':,..'..t.:',.$,nl.r.nicn '',..1.:f.,-%,4,`,'4.-1,.,21:.p.,4'.. t.,.., - 2,,,,,, ..-.„,•: .Tr. _ . -,..- , ^ ',, ,i',.. k .4 7/.. , •.;•4- ,,,_ ... 4.,,*„:•...,%'4,-:I'-.,`,L41'.-•'-`1,,i,'7:,. ,...,:l'"'....:.''.'•,'-..4.,.;', "MN''''.:..,:.';`.:tt:f;7:4%-Viik ''''Zika**:.:$?..,..,'.4:7'''.•''--,1,:iV.'''''-'Alfl'...&-i."'P',,.%-',.- . :_if i: 1-'s.4.1-Zi•'V*7.-tt l' ' '..''24:-.ft !i". '•'A;W: i ,14;Zr: ,:k.,;.-. ••• ..:',A.4q,'•',. ,i'Yt '-n•V-Z-,-1;0-it"•;-.4,,,'": ''''4j,-‘5".:, 'al--04 ';''''':.4" -;',..•••''0V•-...•41".'" Z '-' '44 1-7-,e-4".;Fi'r.;" I1 r•O:, -2.j-:'k .7• li-..--,_,..',,,r9.4 ,.':. :•,r,:'.tfi'l•'' --.7., -!1-%ti..*2-9' "---- ,41-''-',:,•,,, 7.i.N:s4-•xv,k•A'''''',"',- ''•''--I--•z':.,>/:::,2W:'/.:1--.,-..: - - ,, irip. 14,1,1,..s,r4i .r, -7x.,;•.,,pA4••,, 4: ,d, , ,••..• ,,, ,s..,t,,,,t,„,,, -•F•''!",0,47T-V r,3-...-fi, r,,,,,*.7r- v.I.7:•S. '.;j4 .?,W..,•,i,:::':J:: :' ..„;!L7'',7/: ...:" ",,..'.-,,..:..0,7.7...., , ...:,.4." r ri,,3 .,,4*,, ...'1.- ' . "ra,a-r,--,L,.......I.;, Iv. !,',, . .,7,:.;.'. /4,t),.„5-:%'... -'',3. -.7':, -.,..„.J *-;'''?.•:,„' '''''' .•,..i -: ::•''' W V;:',::'..,'.--, .'''.':'i',:: '..*'.i,','',:'':....',`:':;"'s,• ' 'T.,i,l'gb' ';II-,;. . e.',H-.,. . 1 ,..ir.ang.*_,-. 1 ., ..,..',,-,,. •:,,,,,,,,tp,.1.4;::.--L„-:,••,z..,:- .:--:4-4't.;,;..,•-,.., . nrii.,..',..k•:.kA ge, 1 ,'-'.7':;.-.., •-mi:!- :..:r.=•••• - : fl:'T.S.''';'!..N1.7L! si '.'. 4.`1". .,4,,i itW•it •'. . ! .' ,:rU---..-,,r.,,,,i=".; I '7 pL.0, !4,:,,,c' 'lit ....'.';'i::ZVI.'' '1"..:.-i'l:' -'N7:41':',;''...' . 31,4';'.' .:.., -0,r4,r,Itv,'., '':-:,,,i,,r--'‘J.4::,.,e-.-','•.'..V.3,:i.,,, (p.:itt, -...7 ; .,,,.,,, ..„,i,,,i .,-_ '..4„::: -, ! ; ,...4:,31V,ZrkVs", p....,. ••,..,-,,,,ri.,'.V1r...k., 'Ir k4,','.1'i1.-4‘,4".1'.,' jirif'-' 1:1',--'Ar,-a:lktr','.'',4,,,:r‘,'A ...,,"'dv,',IgV''..• .-.--...i-;.-,4'-1. 7-.,;.•.- .,-;•-',,,Y.. 1:•..,io..79 Vi..)„. .....v..-- .'77,-. • ..,., , , i ,..1,-- •, , -.: v.0,4.4 ..KI.-}k ',,,,,,t...,i,' ' • ...Li-Arit, ...A.-',_,..,;....,_,07-,..•.,f^ .,',A,iv,. .1;1 .„,.:.. y,,,••;7A.A3 . __ ,.".,,T-,:,:;.-,i...,,, •..-!,i;:77",14f.,..-:-...4.,..f.,'..,. ki7) , . -igi,.77.,...ir- ,. „,...--,,,,,rtt k J 4.Np:14,c .74,..114, 44e•jiik.,,-;•,...„.74.n t-77,-,t.:,4.-.--.,, ,0,,-, ,- : :.,•:.• ,.:.,,...i,..5.,,,,,,...,,r. .35.-. .?„. ,..,..,g.,,, i, ..i.,-,,r.-1 lti--,,, tkij67ttri, ,L.4;..,...-.:14,,,,,;,,:i. L.4"Ait • • t7Fr.-2,-; r.3,.:. . ..- ...;e: --.,.41=11.vi„Nri".•,.,- .:7..':,.,- . gA !.'.-,,,-• „..,.•:„•,,-; , -, -- ,,,•;,.....„,,,,,..-, ,•„,,,,-,,,. ,.,•.,:,,,,z,-_,,:..._•....,„.z.3.:.: •.„.",,,• ,..... 0..,-..g„,„-„,„.,., ,i,.,••:• . .....„ ro, 4,-•: ..,. 4. .: ,:',1',1 'iv ,i" .•f.".:'•••-",,:::,,...,,,.''•`,:. ,T.' ';''''''.- '' ' . ' '• 1:;''''''''N'ki"CAN't -.',- N3,1 a..0-:'4;,•,'.!.;',;114_1'4,''''el-VONV. A ( ?'..' ,:- . -.-' ,.."17 ,-tA, ',.i-,.„ ••••,.!:,,ii•,,, .l.,;.,,,, ,...,-•,,.)-t-.71."',-,:,-.,4,-,.-_-_,.,:,: 7 .' T''',?' ' ' ' • ".**e±,14,7C...ii:.-''', '.',-V.,..,.; P.'"'r.,47....#-'.ag,•VIP' ,,,,, 4. .v.,... ., ....k •k•. - It',4: -:','ef4'44,,-,K.•::,,c,---7-:tr-,4.:-t-'.- c-r'-',,.,: .,t.,,,: ,4,:::',,.-- . - •-•.:-, ,,-4.-r ..,..,,,,,,.t.ti\--,..,,,,n:r.-,-,=,,,y,t.,,,-.....--.1-:, .. -:.: ..,:,::.:, 2.1. ,.,. -., •i -.• 4.,.',k;4'fie.' :""1,-.5';''''' '''',.-$•'''''/ *4.0, .4.4.-:',,,..,:'!,,,14-_•:4 •,‘.•...;,j,5,7:.4.7,-k-7-# ...'•1:47;,..i.r.a''"st 4i , ..-..,.:,'•'4'01.!•iT' . ''':!`‘:1:•;',` "kiPtc '-- •-tr''. .......: r.,o4-_,Mti&!,-"t!.iit51'... ''' ,11.,'...• --..;:si; ". •'' t77., '.,',41.471.7"erur.7.,. 17..r,.1 ---- .4:.,-', .,':::, ' : ' - 77-'r,14 -'11-'i,,;:•:': ''.2.-1'§-:;.412,4.. Wt.'''4f,A.74(.:'7 P. P':',-• 1:'-$*, /-r- '-•-• .1::,0 :'.,,-_,02.,..06L.,.:•--.'.'...?!:'.;likip-rt,.'531FNI ..1.;,'Y:-.1,,:'.7-1; n,i,',•:;7..: ,:so, • . • ::.-...,,,,,,.- • -...,* ., :,.,;,:,4...Atk.lt:y. , .F. :. t .A.,:•• ,,Jr-a4..;;-.....,,%.4,,,•„7,4,,t-,.:.t41.1,t,„•e-zioi 4,•.,„,.-..,-. :-;, ...,1,,i,,,,,..4,..,!“41.•,,,,cr4 t.--,„_, ,c4,,:.j ,C.:•:.:'S ../..':; ..412r* "..14 Vi,.., ..},.,..,.... : i M.,.. 7....-..541D,..,., ' 4:1W.4.1''' '.,:r"1.,..':,‘...;,V.::.•,.f',-..r4f47,-:.i.....':,,,..''...44:-i:-e....1,.•,,.1-,. . „-i,:„, r'.' i:',•V,' ! .;- .•' :-•'-'4v.,-4.4.Zr,P,-"Y$',T7-rqiil — ',..'fa'.'17 '',-- ri L Ai,;p.,;r.n.:1,-. 2`•t.-'qi 42,74,,,,,.,:... li.::' I•S=4;.'?..f.k.J44.,4:?'.k4;'-''7"figg.i .: :1' ti.. ',,,:" , ...' :....::',,,,,,z .. ;-'...4.- .,....0,4411‘.-6940,4•-; , ,,.,, %,:....".""' :It., ' '`:11.::.,-4::.,''':!::,::,Fr.:%:, ')*•.‘;.ill,,:,4,i,1,'..,,,r,_4.;11:-.A.,t 4:,-..:,-..f.y.%,.4t ii„ts. •: •;:‘,". -,;-oig:f.,00:. • ,"-rr., , .- ,..'.-,,.,:••• :-.v...-1.:., :-...--‘,z,.-. r-Akt'l,t,.4"rb, „!-L,..ki, ' . I ,I,-;.... • ii„. . '0,24; 1 N''';..4.; :F.'..--V..-:4.,..:-....1 ,....,,,,.'1,- ..,1‘.,, ,.t•-,,A L--. ''''L'':'.'"'-'' `4, • - ;....ii.,,,./' ','"'''''''''';'.:f-•::;;;;.-44.-1:''-4;_ii'lL eg :K/:, ejt;,:,..,...* ] --..i_w••,,,,,.,!.. :1,trottiv .;,,--.•,.. 4,„:4.L.-,;.,_..',, .-1.m.,,,7.•. ,.:.p7'•'.,f';',-, '::'''''- '''':'-'-"•••:.•-•-: c.:7:;.," .":i4i6(4'i.''...*'',.• '.- •'147PAP" •'',t ' i ! , 4 '.i'.• • 013 • :'.-X, ,,.,: 7-':!..;.,''..,..„'aiEl....4.•9'9..-.7.,._.;:,,..Z.47.,11a.4,<1.1...Ilit'i2 'i.:..:...4„,....,'4.;........,;,'•11.,',. ,..f,...4.tr:,7;4,11' '.. ,., i , ,:rt, .., ,......,:....,...... .. ii..„,,, ,, ,...,. -,,......„.„....,1.,...„,.,,I, .r..v....1...-4 .. ..'4'',- '.•, :4-.:',.,W '0,".'.'q, $,V.•,•"1.,.. al -.7 --,• i , -104 :: 7,--,,,strl . .-.. * .it.fia'',25-.,....k.,..: •-.1,;,..,z• ....,. _.,: ,., .''''. :i;Z:l..,,,:14::.'').% . ,.,,,,...„_. 1"...•' ,,..r: ,'rPOL ,1.4.-:7-1. ,•,iRed.0. . r••• : 7 •- • ,• ;,:, ,A.•••,':...- I ...-... , -:.,,: '-'i_, yr,7- -,,,.,;.4 . ''•P.. .2t-'4 ''''''!;;:i. er`g..---M- '':-.- •/ ' •''..'.‘1. .,it.1,1•.' •.''. 47,f ..- — rt;:.,• t.,.-•.;,-• -• •ARI,:T,,:- ,-:.-- , ...,„.: -.,411,0,^4b. •.• '31A , :: r .''',. .":"-,3,.---:•., -3•,-,,.7.:.--.7„.:-,---4., ..,.....--....,- ,t : ! ...,• . •- ,....:..,..,,. .. . .-•..,., , ..,,,-....f.t.......,,,, tb.. • ..... +.y.,k1t.,,,, .ft,:;,.• ...:. ,,•Z.V...M!:, :- 'A;1._:i...,,,-.4.407-45..-44„...,..-v,....,44,,,-,......-ft,,,t ,,. ,. ' ,-iii'K--; --, r-;-:,•,,:-... ,-5,.--i.t., : • ::: - 7,44 7., ,."- ...,:"7."•,' ', 1 L.i.,,..;i;.f.',,L....4.4..:41. ? I X,,n''.'i r- ,....t. •, •••• ...,..„ -„,..,,,,,_.,., . , : .•.-.., ,,-..„t•,,,,.E.-‘,....--,4, „.,-,... i.,,i."•. ir:1 ' "C"'... 4. •. f''...,Ifi'M.....„ ..40.; ^7.4•41•' - --..0-,,,•••• •rajfket.,.,F,,,..i,..*,-L,A.,..„,.. „. .....,14-e,..--- ,•...-,., - -.4.-?.-• • ... .-,,,,,,,,tv.,,,e,.., .t-i„.....,1, • o •sr- •-:.-- '..-,..„.,-.-..w., .. ....„,74.::tr vv-%9 -'4'.'.."'•)4• Fa,,,,.1 A.:... .'et.'41,..,,,,,,, .7'• .•',:11..•,,;i.,.:4'.,•!:,.;:,":'''.::::, ''-'-s'.- •!"'-:' ......,. .7.- -- .„:,r,„Eft,,,,,,.. _-..:, -.,-. ••••".1---,„`-.1;,".4,;,,,71 T.::,;.. ..,..1 ,„ •,-i.;•• .„1,4k .4,r: ,.-47-,,,,g-Arfv," - ' „,,,,;;:,140, ic: .S..„1.,i.,' '.Th-4...--4,-za.;.•f.,..,i...,%, , .....".'.Vt;,.' :,i,.,,r.,....,.,,ekijp... . ...,:t-4-2- ...‘k,:•„?,,,-..:. 1 fili*Ari,.• '.-'7 -''t•-71- -7---•'1:t'Mg j.:.:t: (;'.:::';:.!,::',.' . -',' • rs,',..:•4;,,.'....;j,-,,,:...4,.. ''' -"N•10, 4,r,,,-..c.-.?•i'''''`i!z,..,,„ ,,,14.5..';'... ,.' --7 ' - . , _., '':-.<„,,e,.. 1.3.14-Set4gq,p,'Ate,,J..I..- ,•,.. ,, , a, 7.- -.r;-.:,.1,,,„.,,,....,..,,,„1.„.„7.4e0-, .14•1; k''s.:.,..' .1 : ; ;T'ele. , ' ...*Vq.414;/;,-SFIVer-4... • '' ..ti, ,,,,,..4 ' .1,4x4A-17-4-,-,1 r, ,r,'',.7 ,7'.:,,-' '.::: - , -• ,r,-.,: its#H,4„-lip',,*'!V.'",-4'''Arg-,,,';A:Witia'',10:..:.' r,','..r.', ..• ,,.,,',, r p..,..w.".i ,. - .,,,,,,,,eNyvk,„.; . ...2,.-.,-,-,-„,..,' .hf.t,..f.tv•-,..:, ., ,., • •••: .'j,,,,J.,,hg. :::•') : • . ,-.4'11 17444,4•:‘,..;;,:.---Ii.-:•••..-'5,.....j,..,;.,..t.itij.„,,, ,•,,,,.:•.-.1,,.. ,. ‘,-,,, i ';'(4,•.-,,,,. 7-1,,,,-...;,••• '-'''=., --ii',T,z,40.i.1,.T'''f.PAt2w- ''§-' ''''''. .'"%.`-c-,;,,k,r•.,..,,,t,•-,.--±..,,s A .,f .,-,otita4'.07. •-•',..,;,,- ,..0„,:;.tk,4. i.',.: ',r•, '„ , ,..,, A..*:.,. ...-,4,- 1.0:.,44 ,.-.•.;,.4%.,,,,- , . 1,,ya4.7.1,-,,,,,,,,. .,,'5 4•,- ,,,,ai.l.'...-::::.;;;:,,,,_k :ii,..4A+15,11.,%,,.;:,.',,,,,,:4;AX,;;;:;i....ti:V., .t ' P. ",,: • .„ ,.' %,,, lgivii.,,%‘• .,,s-• ..4.51. -:--, -,,t,r rEct",•':'-r,,,.-.7 ''' ' ':.''' '. '; -r;-'111-;.. :g;;;.•'4 I'.7:3174:4,4 .0.,Lit.la_tinig.:"..=,',f.10k fAii.,i.•-'... 11 1 i, ,L,•,..,. "t4'....ZE,.0.24-.1,PAi,'43;7,',k44,i..s':„:',' . LI ,,sv, : II:.k.,77 t'''. 1.'1 1.f;:- L ,:;'',• - .. •,':.!..,:'0 , I'.;""'.....''''''"7'7,1:'17-.,- '‘E#7,,,f... .kii',.:44,.. ,'''' .4:',,, ...49,-.,..- :it: i !,-;-3.W.,,,r44,-,...,u0.71,..1,. .,--4.4,-- j------ -,-, ,, ......„ ,..„„ ,_,,. ,,,.,.--„.i.,,,,...-..4.7i,.:4;„,-,:•-rq r77.7',-;,,,i„„::.7::::::::: ..r:• "IL;•::::.,::ti':"-,,::(:-4.':;--.7.;- ;.;,:;.4...I.A.Ziti.K.,:'•44.7c''...:•L'..''.7--,i-,i;i4 ‘J, ,./ 0,1et7-74.44%,__Nirg:N4;;I:,. ...e-'4t;••'- ! t is.:•. _.,...Ak.,::i,':: ••::_•.__.;:i-L,:..L, ,,.1--.,,,,:-;-4;:!._,N.-t•._,'::,:.-4t-r-AA.. ,,„.filirec_ •'-,,,ET '61';' '• 1 i : fAtri,kAWARA.0.0144...:-'4,40'. • -4&404*-e4e),4-.'',.'.`.!-,.,PV;:-..-'; e .1'':'',C7'''•.,',,', .. '' -'`i41-..: :,,- ti:'t Ni:k,' •2-'n4;:,::V.',•?-.7 .:4-;.4-•:,'-o;f:•4'.';4".,[ 'I: 1.1-4.::,:r.Miatglittl:%,'.:1611b,,i.14 44'). ',,,xvitl$4,4wf,,-M-t. ...L,,!,''Vf3A2i 7 . „,....„/Aft„ ,,,,,. , ,.4410,0. 'OVV4;'•:Vi'i•-:411..#t p '..•N'':-•.; '':-;*..;;:1-'•' ' , ;:•:'?•••••••,• ',..„0-fr,.2.-A,:::-.'..4..ie...;4•" ,,,:.' :JO ,1,..,,,'..,.,'4 !!-:, ,, ,, . 1: '•:4:-.,,, ----,5,N,,:,,,ptiltz4n1:4,V,V74*.rfi.. ,..;:p-,,,,,,,,,,,,,:,',:....,':,',, : .:::--c1"-„,,. ,.., ,4,.1:';.,?,:r: ,,,-.-1-4'17. 7. •::**I.:Wilt:r..;':,, ,•''.i,,--i•,-- : : g.,.. .. • •,,,...,04044.4vriAtio. ,,.. „. P---4-----z•,-,•41 :.74 ...1"...' ' ',-,:.- 7i '*0-ii,-,s, --_,:.?-•.,: ,;.$,.,T--,...1, -,':‘:',:fr-5'..-,4tf. ' t4,t,Z,--:•-s,.:. -, •'14,41404e.iite:*f4 --•!Attit ---...-. ..",t-,..1--, ...., ,.- .-; -:,-1 '''''''. ; 'r''Y'',;:i'::L.:.'7:4'-''.rs, ,•,.;i3,,s..1:•:-,,,,,,- ;._gf.,..,,,,r,,,,,%2,,41-, :4-.1‘;,..,-„ -,w 7.0-..;:•,: ': ,W45;Piel: 9'7 ' .''''''0,144rtfiTO--r. IF44::44:!04tF444.1'°l""4'''''kti't4 . !"" '..:f ::V., ;;-',;'-k.-k,',.,,..;oefr'14 ,;....1.4-,e,,,.-w.,,•,-;;;- •-;;,• ire..,; ,--t.t41,7; .4,1.,_ ,:,•4-i-. ; oh .z;z: ,...i, „,-Aftio,,ivii -:•,,,o,Jr. .:- ;=Ai,,,.•7:44A.* 1,.-f4-4-;• ,r,:,:tiV * / ....,„- .:,7,,, ;,;.:., ,,',..i'•.-,;,,T ,- * r....V.: -;•-•- '--":11!---,•-,-*,,,,-rt.---4.71:-Ft',.`4,,t4.10-'''• ,,,',1i l'.'t.0.'": el''''..Tr''''''' '. 11::::::::lit: ',..,..:L014::::::.01:::1,47.5::;:-1 ',..:', 4';i':••'•'..1'.:1; .'1,1•.;',.,,#%:. •If ,'...'.•3?. •'71,:f ::7,-;'-4.4.4434:- ;itkyq<41W',- ' '.11.(agli : a, . : 'Al 1P -111V.4.13A'WO* 4 't'' rea4V,a_e'''' 45,4:* r ',Ott ,'''.7i :::':.i.P.',::::'• ‘='g7.:.1:',..'.,F...' ..' -e,„ ,..,f .:,4-*.t11-.; ....,.• 4f.,,,..t1 r #.. 41.-,‘'.X.,i.: ,ti-A,4 ' -1.,,,.,.%.,,,!.+W-kilg..4.-';::44:;.P7*-41,, A'''''''''" •',,,485taa.4--''...i'T-,. .,„40',1:4i,, •!.'4 :':!",'.%,.'.,.'•'-'.:.1,,,'''..qg,'''';.a, ' .. z.? .." .' n T.:4:!.•.:-.•, -, ,--44, -;?:r. -',',I '.".•. :1.,..rii.1,7- .1,,1, . 17.,*:0„t#I'Vgn.i•:itat'lli' 'd'if' .. ,,,,i.INV - ,e-ik' iNik,;,q ii..14.:'.,i; ,:.... _.,:?..; .--..,, ,...„' :. ?I'' '.1i §';',Vi. ir,;:7 itrikW.,...4''...,.: i.11're4b...1 ''' Wi,47,1;:. liir4f..N.,*„.,-,4,:r.: -14,;,,•--...- „NE:.4 . . • ..--,..., li t.7 ,,,' .' , :--•.:',..4.,74!4,-7 .,'I, . • •.r.,1-.':kti .'''.4-...''.Villf4, :ir:‘ -i,n:'i1/41-4,d.•-- j --' ,If•t 1,"A'Vilh,4-4,4',r.'..1L'',,,irl'1;,',:4-tinerintrFl.g.0.77.,".45-4:‘'., ' • A.. fia,,''A'•"::,::::•':•:.: i'.'''':-7r'•,•20A''''':•'' -'r...' • .L';'1-t11_1%,„:1','t•-",'5.7,3i,„.2..1,1414,,...'4.•. ri 7C-'-1 its": F..,.....r. ! .",264‘,..1h,,Ar,4%.,,,i,:t141''4,1:1'44 iihyl.11,.....ik.14if...4 e.,,,,,.,,,)4)".01L,'CliL,,,,_.1,744,4..:7•7t,,,o,,..10.0.. .0*r, ,,,,,,,, ,410)43. ,.„..p::.,:r..,43w.,tt.,, ., :).:.i.i'; ;...,'.:''::16';.-:, ''';'?,. :4 .Z44?,:,''''''':•'''1.... '.• *-MA-7''''''''..--;• ,' 1;jr.k4A..-•-, VI:' —-;' ' i,.'4.••-r+i,11,444*..-014 ,...,.‘q.,,3,1.115,v,:two,.,A,*„.,,,,I.,,,„•:,?,,_:-•.,:,„ . ..„..• : ,,•„,..„.,,•,:•:.:;, 0,-,,,,•:,,,t,„:„*.,,,,,•;.„... ..4. , . k.go'''''*Z.,7,4%.141 ,.,,,..•4., j,;,,z1-1.1,1 , :•:-- •: - '' '' •• 1 ''f'''n'':1'l'1,:z•*) •..1.1.:::'.;::1..''!.-... ,1P;'44.,N4.47-Ac7.-,1,:,-:,4;'!„:44.'er'.•'7'-kCA'-:'"1',''--^',,:A-'.7•'k 1-...6‘'"-"•-• -••'•-`::'•f .,l'•.t Hai,-wv''iv--Vr-t4...::::;'''-'•',:-:1 14- --:7.----4---4:4, ..-,'','' ' IA.4A.t?,1'*.1, ' :,'%4f015440.'.VA1AV0P41,vF4ci#4,;4;,i4r:-$7:4..rP...'..:.i;;.:;,::,:..':,,'::•:.±;',4,,A,e,.,;:.V mF,,1:7a4,gl.,4.I ' ' 4 *''' t j.:4 i,,jo,:?,Lk,4:vg,r-M:..lk,'.:I!:-:,4.,.•.2./-..''V.ittk.ia;.f,e.,,,,'r,"r..,:.1ri-7-114-V,,,;-r,4e,.4-r--',.,t-"t,' ,M7fititU4.r Et,ti!f..,.-...4i;t oE,„r.„..-,r./-,%,„•E ltf, f.,i17',,.,,4t.-.4".,,[ I ,,. Figure C6 ...:., :7-11. 4.7r.1k14:tr,:',1 ,:-• ''' Highway;;;. ''.2/55142. Interchange gmolwil,;. .,,.r,. _14.:-.1:77 2.:-' '. 4 74,74a,"'lk*Ith.,,,-i' 01 :,.,1 i: I t, Partnership Project 1 x.„.i.,..•.,,,,.,,v,i4,-.17%..,,„--441,- 4...,...:7--- -•-.;,- %"..ir .0":4K4';',iLKI^1,YArr- k :. p 00 ' ITPUOOnl.Ktal,1,1,' -.. -Vt/X4R-r "..q45F4A Ifi i.-4 NU '•.'1::" '7,_. -,,,,,,e,i,c,,,,, ... .'"t, ..•,''' It4i:P1,4.74:W:::fWili 't.i...1_,:f.. alii,:t.i.p.: • ..*.l,s4k.A.7g45111,11:1"-IST . 9:,` ge Alter n:ritt salve 5b: :•:•.:', 14,t1;,.,...,. ,,,,1_441,0,witytt _ ...241,,:t47:ftr4r:_e:,:r4. ..,mpsi,74.., I.1. . ......,..._____.. IFI:triitcvla Cil o4 v2 e rfenife it; , . .-1.$144,,,,,,,:, ,,, IIenhdan -iiiiti.`,•Ii.4.-.f i':1;%.....:L4R -Mi4 -z..1%:441 ,..,.._.._. . ... ;;:....... A .-- ,'.-..i,..• ..........,. :- :' i FEB 08-2002 16:4'7 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT 651 423 5203 P.02/05 R STATE OF MINNESOTA METRO DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING Memorandum of Understanding between: k ' The State of Minnesota Department of Transportation, and The City of Rosemount v ',i, RE: Construction of Trunk Highway 52 , This Memorandum of Understanding is made and entered into by and ki,,,t,:i:,,i.„:„.„,:'.:,.::.:‘,2 between the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation, hereinafter referred to as the "State" and the City of Rosemount, Dakota County, Minnesota, Oik'll!':-,''''':'''.,,'?::: .!:..:.E:: in byand through its CityCouncil, hereinafter referred to as the "City". ,, acting g WITNESSETH: ; ' WHEREAS, the City, Dakota County, and State are completing an Inter- Regional Corridor(IRC) Study to plan for the future operation of TH 52 and the ^ connecting local road system; and ' WHEREAS, the study is recommending that a collector street be provided a that is grade separated with TH 52 between 117��' Street and CSAH 42; and s,,--2. , WHEREAS, the study is recommending that at grade intersections be L removed from TH 52 and the City and State work in partnership to provide a frontage road system; and L:‘,,,,,:.:',':: WHEREAS, the State is currently designing the bridges on TH 52 that will grade separate the relocated railroad crossing at 138' Street; and Y " WHEREAS, the City and the State concur that it is in their best interest to Li 'Al reserve TH 52 as a High Priority IRC; and r„„ :,,., WHEREAS, the City and the State concur that it is important to plan for and + 't3'1FEB ea 2e02 16.47 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT 651 423 5203 P.03i05 1 p•a 1" rt provide local street system continuity while removing at grade intersections on TH r':� * 52. ,r r ' a',r THEREFORE, it is the intent of the State, and the City to work .r,' F ryr ' YF I E& cooperatively toward the following objectives: Ilvth . :4, - ,,,.:,0,46.k:.i,,.,. ,... s if F. Article I - Non-binding Memorandum of Understanding .a R 1,'' 1. Both parties acknowledge that this Memorandum of Understanding ,,,;`,.Ai:;,,..':.: (MOU) is a non-binding statement of intent. Any binding agreements executed by the ' parties subsequent to this MOU will be made pursuant to written and properly executed and approved agreements. 4` . Article II -Trunk Highway 52 Construction—Mn/DOT Commitments y 1. As part of the TH 52/117t Street interchange and railroad grade separation project, scheduled for construction in 2002-2004, Mn/DOT will extend the span ..f on the TH 52 bridges over the railroad to provide local street system continuity by providing a corridor for 138t/140tI street under the TH 52 bridges. Mn/DOT will design, fund and maintain a bridge that accommodates the typical section as shown in exhibit 1 (revised on 12/20/01). 2, This will be the only local street grade separation with TH 52 that Mn/DOT will l'il. l. financially participate in between CSAH 42 and 117`" Street. 3. Mn/DOT will continue to work within the State's project development and cooperative agreement processes to develop a frontage road system as l identified in the TH 52/TH55/CSAH 42 IRC Partnership Study with the City. ` }" - 651 423 5203 P.04/05 FEB 08 2002 16'47 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT Article ill -Trunk Highway 52 Construction—City Commitments 1. The City will design, construct and fund all costs for the 138th/140th Street jr as i connection including acquiring the necessary right of way. r , ,l 2. The City will work to develop a frontage road system in accordance with the TH 52/TH 55/CSAH 42 IRC Partnership Study that will permit future closure of at- ' Sfi�4i511'i .. ? astl err, grade access points north of 138'" Street and will not request additional at-grade • �Yuk r access intersections on TH 52. 3. The City agrees to close the existing at grade access on TH 52 at 140th Street when the new 138th/140`" Street connection is completed. L, t 4. In conformance with the Mn/DOT access guidelines for High Priority Regional Corridors and the CSAH 42 Corridor Study,the City will include within their transportation plan the recommendations from the TH 52/TH 55/CSAH 42 Partnership Study. This includes providing right of way where possible through A ; platting, constructing a supporting local street system and working with Mn/DOT through the State's project development and cooperative agreement program in the development of the TH 52/CSAH 42 interchange to: il • move Connolly Road approximately '/2 mile east of the east TH 52/CSAH42 (TH {{`'"tY 55) interchange ramp with right-in/right-out access SF 5 ,1� • • plan for a full access intersection approximately 1 mile east of the east TH 52/CSAH 42 (TH 55) interchange ramp — 1 R FEH 08-2002 16:48 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT 651 423 5203 P.05/05 • ,, IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF the parties have executed this memorandum of 'All ' ' ' :: ' ' . understanding by their authorized officers, l'''' ''' ' ' . DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CITY OF ROSEMOUNT • B )r(z Y / By l�- r ,, Robert Winter Thomas Burt Acting Metropolitan Division Engineer City Administrator D� 3O/O _... , _,-6a te Date 4,.,., , . ,., , ..,:. , 'i I. i 6 of 6 TOTAL: P 05 m. 0 w 0 w w Z co W 0 0 Q W W Z Z v v V v Z LU Q puJ 1 <0 ~ N N N N N N N N Nt NI'V a 0 0�,-N '- '- -Z W 2 2 = J U u) J u1 O r CC W N z U m m m m m o,, O U 1.0 O r N 0) CO O Or O 0 a m a H O N 01 Lo V O N (_n CO Z '. O O O 0)N O O O a s O m 0 m O(0 o m°ti m a no (OD m m(NO 0)Of)O m N(0 woo ¢O U N m a W m o R m co ,_ 0 U z,W m O - - - N a(t)7 N rNm O (0(f)to(0000)O(0(0(o mO 0)N(0(0 N N O V vv O O N O O 0 0 0 0 0 (o(0 1�r m O O m r r r (0 m N N N O(0 O O O O 7 O N O O N 0 0 0 O O N 0 0 0 0 V N C)O O O 1�m O O O .- O O F- 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0(00 0 0 0 (00 0 0 W 0)(o(0 0 0 0 0 0 0)0) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0)0)0) (0 0) 0)0 C. (o N N N N N N N O O O O N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O CO (0 N CO (0 N m O O O O 09000 0 0 0 999 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m o m O CO (0 O a sr 4 a v 4 v 4 a 4 sr 4 v a sr a<a v 4 4 4 4 a a a v v v 4 4 4 4 4 in n. r)r)r)r)r) r)r)r)CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO co r)co co r)r)r)C')r) co CO r)CO 11 0 w CD EL rJ J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J 0_ Z <_,J Q Q Q Q J J J J J Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q U) O F-a2222HHHF-HF-Hf-1-HF- H Hf-HHF-F- H H'f F-'f-F-F-f- - f- p o 0 0 0 0 Q Q Q-Q Q ¢ <<<<<< < <<<<<<<< < Z Z ( QH¢a0-0. 0 ~Haaaaaa a aaaaaa a aaaaaaaa a - ] a 11, O oi U co 0 Q CO Q a 2 (/) w a o yw Z Ww 0 N N N C') a 7 00))m(N0,N gO M O ur)_W m N N NN,,(00 CO co W(m•)a N V f.N r Op m o.. Q Q C } 0a 0-00000.-ornv �o(nao of .7oHov�000cvoov�o o Zz E a Q nE 0 Y W 2 O W IL W W • W tll W LLj'N in < 0o o uiui w W wW ui W> >ulw o >wui > > Sx a 0 In u~)V) up u~)(~i)u)u~i W z Z(~i)co co Zco co < W o WO W ZH a V)uj 22 S 2522 >0 OS2 2 �2S 0 J H W 0L.Li }O CO �)i (Hn (Hn(n(Hn(Hn }} Y(Hn(Hn (Hn >_I-(Hn > z (nap W I mo a v,- a v Via W ��� _1,-� -J 00 '-u)v) _JO OM Q (n r(0(no ZU 0 o o U 0 CO oo ca N N vcnu) > m 0 (n(0 N CO CO v m 0 N N(O�)N m N(`)O O O W Q I td r)r) (o Mr)Or) ON a00 O avv "zw U Z a a 2 5 o a U 0 U J Z a Z J J Q 2a x § u) p (n V) p J J J (n J J W W V W W Z 2 W W W W J CC W J W LL -Ha,W0 F- 0 OU` W Z 0 Z z W 1-7- co LL w 1-1-1 ZwHZ - H Hi_RI Fr Z H Q a a < CV 4 Z O 2 O w< aJ. U U V d 0 0 W w i 0 0 co N z 0 2N232 = W W w W QF- 2Z 0 a a U Z J a p a x Q H S H 2 2 W 2 H w a 0 Z Z Q oa0000< Y z o<0<-o 2 <H0 dd O Q o HOHwOOF}-FQ w CO U z=,,Z000 2a0wNWN_,( J. o0< WQ Z Zpp-?p>j2p F- ax N > O OZZ JQQ)CU)p p J 0-i2 W p2 Y Yz W ZJOOJ W --)0 K JaJ< << 0JUOz0z2Z Z W OQ) ro 0]Y°-(UUUUC a In u"2 IXaX0x L6 (.92< < < QZ<f: Z< } }H22 WQQW 2 ZJ O W W W u)W Q w�W W W 00 Z 0 Z W 0 Z J'S Z Z m V) J J W a x 2 0 0 a <Z ~ 13 Q WNUZUUZdZmOJ}2}22F' < 2}QS W Z fn (0o000YYU 0 -J V) a 000 W O2 W<<00<t<<0 I <<0O?< W W 0200<<0 0 (� 02Y OY UY Z O u)u)U 2 U 2 U> 2 2CC_a-)OS 32UYYO0Y U 2� C z E- o a f" [OU0 W W C7 2 - Z QO]U0 W W 0S--2YJ2 ZO1O 2 (oFO>3X } N�0UO W W CD 2 _' v 0_ O Ui 0) W 0 N . . ROSEvtOUI\JT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CITY COUNCIL City Council Regular Meeting: July 17, 2007 AGENDA ITEM: Case No. 07-22-CUP ISD #917 AGENDA SECTION: Conditional Use Permit New Business PREPARED BY: Eric Zweber; Senior Planner AGENDA NO. vl ATTACHMENTS: Site Map, Resolution, Site Plan, Floor Plan, Exterior Elevations, Paving Plan, Grading Plan, Utility Plan, Photometric Plan, Planting Plan, Significant Tree Inventory, Rendering, Fire Marshall's APPROVED BY: Memorandum, Park and Recreation Director's Memorandum, City Engineer's Memorandum, Excerpt of the June 26, 2007 Planning Commission Minutes RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to adopt a Resolution approving the Conditional Use Permit for Intermediate School District 917 to construct a new school. ISSUE Intermediate School District (ISD) #917 is requesting a conditional use permit to construct a 40,000 square foot school designed for approximately 100 students and offices for about 20 teachers with special skills such as Braille and sign language. The proposed location is at the former Dakota County public works facility on Biscayne Avenue between Beech St. W. and the railroad tracks. PLANNING COMMISSION DISCUSSION The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on June 26, 2007. Two residents spoke, one from the townhome complex south of Beech St and one from the single family neighborhood north of the railroad tracks. The resident from the townhouse questioned if this site was economical because the existing building and asphalt would need to be demolished before the site can be used. He also requested that the fence on the north side of Beech St be constructed. John Christiansen, school superintendent, explained that this site is economical compared to an undeveloped site because the cost of demolition is less than the cost to construct new roads and infrastructure to an undeveloped area. The resident north of the railroad tracks asked that fencing and security between the railroad tracks and the school be maximized to ensure the safety of the students. The Planning Commission discussion focused on the fencing and berming of the northern property line with the railroad tracks and the extent of the fencing provided on the property. After an explanation of landscaping and fencing proposed on the north property line, the Planning Commission did not request any additional measures. The Planning Commission had significant discussion about the amount of fencing on site. Staff contended that the other schools within Rosemount do not have perimeter fencing and that it is unnecessary on the south and east sides. The school district expressed safety concerns with • the railroad tracks and the storm water pond. A compromise solution was determined by the Planning Commission where fencing will be installed on the north side to separate the railroad tracks and around the play areas and ball field to prevent students from wandering over to the stormwater pond, but there will not be fencing on the south and east perimeters of the site. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the Conditional Use Permit with this condition within the resolution. The Planning Commission approved the Site Plan of the 40,000 square foot school with the following conditions: 1. Compliance with the conditions within the Fire Marshall's Memorandum dated June 4, 2007, the Park and Recreation Director's Memorandum dated June 18, 2007 and the Engineering Department's Memorandum dated June 19, 2007. 2. Payment of the appropriate City Fees at the time of the issuance of building permit. The City Engineer has estimated the following fees based on the site plan submittal: Sewer Connection Fees —SAC units are calculated by MCES Trunk Area Assessment= 8.0 acres @ $1,075/acre = $8,600 MCES SAC Fee = $1,675/SAC unit City SAC Fee = $1,200/SAC unit Water Connection Fees Trunk Area Assessment = 8.0 acres @ $4,860/acre = $38,880 City WAC Fee, 8" Meter = $33,175 Storm Connection Fees Trunk Area Assessment = 7.4 acres @ $6,665/acre = $49,321 City STAC Fee = 7.4 acres @ $2,200/acre = $16,280 3. Confirm the existence of 50 feet of half right-of-way on Biscayne Avenue as indicated on the Survey Plan Sheet. 4. Any signage will require a separate administrative approval. 5. All roof top mechanical structures will require screening in accordance with the City Code. 6. The trash enclosure will need to be constructed with material similar to the building in accordance with City Code. 7. Removal of the chain link fence on the south and east side of the property except for the play areas. The chain link fence may remain on the north property line to provide separation from the rail line but shall be constructed of black vinyl coated chain links,posts and hardware. 8. Submission of a landscape security equal to one hundred and twenty five percent (125%) of the cost of the plantings illustrated on the approved landscape plan prior to issuance of the building permit. SUMMARY Applicant: ISD #917 Property Owner: Dakota County CDA Property Location: Former Dakota County Public Works Garage, Biscayne Avenue between Beech St. W. and the railroad line. Size of Property: Approximately 8 Acres Comprehensive Plan Designation: R—Residential Zoning: R1 —Low Density Residential Current Neighboring Land Uses: North—Railroad Tracks and Single Family Residents South and East—Townhomes West—Contractor's Yard and National Guard Maintenance Facility Planned Neighboring Land Uses: North, South and East—Residential West—Business Park and Institutional 2 ISD #917 is an educational partnership to provide vocation and special education to students of need from the Burnsville, Farmington, Hastings, Inver Grove Heights,Lakeville, Randolph, Rosemount, South St. Paul, and West St. Paul school districts. While some of the students will be from Rosemount, students attending this school can be from any of the Dakota County communities within the partnership. All students will be bused to the school site and the school does not have any after school activities and only a three week summer school program. The 40,000 square foot school is designed for 70 to 100 students and 16 to 20 itinerate teachers. Itinerate teachers are teachers with special skills, such as Braille or sign language, that travel each day to different schools within the partnership school district,but their offices will be permanently housed within this school. The 70 to 100 students are distributed throughout the 14 classrooms, creating a low student to teacher ratio. Site Plan The parcel on which the school will be sited is roughly trapezoidal in natural,is approximately 8 acres in size, and has about 375 feet of frontage on Biscayne Avenue and about 650 feet in width on the rear property line. The southern boundary is parallel with,but not connected to, Beech St. and is about 650 feet long. The northern boundary is parallel to the Union Pacific rail line running southwest to northeast is about 750 feet long. The school is relatively square in nature located near the center of the parcel. The school is aligned parallel to the rail line,which is about 25 degrees a skewed from Biscayne Avenue. Between the school and Biscayne Avenue is a semi-circular drive that accesses Biscayne Avenue using the two existing accesses from the former county public works facility. 60 stalls of visitor parking are provided between the drive and Biscayne Avenue and 23 stalls for employee parking are provided northwest of the school. To the rear of the school is a ball field and play surface. The site is relatively flat but gently slopes to the southeast to the location of the stormwater pond. There are no significant changes proposed to the existing grade other than to expand the stormwater pond and improve the berm along the rail line. Building Massing and Materials The school is relatively square in nature with the main entrance located approximately a third of the distance from the northwest corner of the building. The classrooms are generally south and east of the main entrance and the school offices,kitchen and gymnasium are located north and east of the main entrance. The majority of the school is approximately 15 feet tall,with the wall leading to the main entrance about 18 feet tall, and the walls surrounding the gymnasium being approximately 30 feet tall. The school has a secondary entrance on the east facade directly opposite the main entrance. The secondary entrance is used to access the ball field and play areas. The building material is generally made up of modular concrete brick and blocks. The concrete bricks are the same size and texture as baked clay bricks, but made of cast concrete. The top half of the school will be constructed with cream colored concrete bricks 4 inches by 12 inches in size. Most of the bottom half of the school will be made of red colored concrete blocks 8 inch by 16 inch in size. The bottom course of concrete block will also be red in color, but have a rock face texture and be 16 inches by 24 inches in size. 3 � n The building mass will be accented and broken in number of ways. The windows will be trimmed with cast stone grey in color. The individual classrooms will be defined by a band of 8 inch square concrete block grey in color with exposed aggregate. The main entrance will be defined by a wall on the north side of the approach sidewalk that will be made of 8 inch square concrete block red in color with exposed aggregate. Mounted to the entrance wall will be a cantilevered metal awning blue in color. The building massing and materials does not completely meet the standards of the C4—General Commercial zone,which is not required since the property is zoned R1 —Low Density Residential. Staff guided the school district to use the C4 standards for what the City would find as acceptable architecture for an institutional building within a residential area. Staff believes the school district has met the intention of this guidance. Conditional Use Permit Elementary and secondary schools, such as the one proposed, are conditional uses within the R1 —Low Density Residential zone. Conditional uses are uses that can be permitted provided that the impacts of the use (such as health, safety, and public welfare concerns) are addressed, mitigated, or conditioned. For the Planning Commission to recommend approval of a conditional use, eight (8) findings must be made: 1. Will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safe*, or general welfare of the neighborhood or the city. Finding: The school is not detrimental to the neighborhood and is a benefit to the public health and general welfare of the city and Dakota County. 2. Will be harmonious with the objectives of the comprehensive plan and city code provisions. Finding: The school is not requesting any deviation from the city code and achieves objectives within the comprehensive plan by providing facilities to children with special needs. 3. Will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained so as to be compatible or similar in an architectural and landscape appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicini y and will not change the essential character of that area, nor substantially diminish or impair propery values within the neighborhood. Finding: ISD #917 was instructed to design their school using the building material and massing standards for the C4— General Commercial zoning district,which exceed the architectural standards of the surrounding neighborhoods. The school design is as good as or better than the other schools within Rosemount. The school should add value to the essential character of the neighborhood. 4. Will be served adequately by existing(or those proposed in the project) essential public facilities and services, including streets,police and fire protection, drainage, structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer ystems and schools. Finding: All essential public services are available to the property and designed into the site plan for the school. 5. Will not involve uses, activities,processes, material equipment and conditions of operation that will be hazardous or detrimental to any persons,propery, or general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke,fumes, glare or odors. Finding: The school will operate similar to other public schools,but does not have any after school activities and operates only a three week summer school program. All traffic to and from the school will come from Biscayne Avenue and circulate interior to the site. No operations of the school should cause any detrimental impacts to surrounding neighborhood. 4 6. Will have vehicular ingress and egress to the property which does not create traffic congestion or interfere with traffic on surrounding public streets. Finding: All traffic to and from the school will come from Biscayne Avenue and circulate interior to the site. The accesses to Biscayne Avenue are in the same location as the accesses to the county public works facility. There are no accesses to Beech St. Biscayne Avenue is designated as a collector road and is designed to handle the traffic level that the school will generate. 7. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic, or historic feature of major importance and will comply with all local, state, and federal environmental quality standards. Finding: The former county public works facility is not historically significant and the school site is designed to meet all applicable environmental quality standards. 8. These standards apply in addition to specific conditions as may be applied throughout this code. Finding: The school design,with the staff recommended changes, meets all the standards of the city code. The school is not requesting any deviations from the city code. Site Access The site is accessed using the two existing drives onto Biscayne Avenue. The locations of these two accesses are acceptable to staff, but the actual entrance drives will need to be removed and reconstructed. The southern drive is too narrow to accommodate two way traffic, particularly school buses. The northern entrance is too wide and will need to be narrowed to create distinct drive lanes for traffic. Pedestrian access is provided by concrete sidewalks alongside both drive entrances connecting the main entrance to Biscayne Avenue. The City of Rosemount's Trail and Sidewalk Plan indicates a trail will be constructed on the east side of Biscayne Avenue. A trail, designed to the City specifications, should be added to the plan and installed within the Biscayne Avenue right-of-way and the proposed sidewalk interior to the site should be modified to connect into the trail. Parking and Traffic Flow 83 parking stalls are provided through two parking lots, a 60 stall parking lot west of school and a 23 stall parking lot northwest of the school. The school buses will park along the access drive. Passenger cars can access the 60 stall parking lot from either drive entrance. Staff vehicles and service or delivery vehicles will use the 23 stall parking lot on the northwest side of the school. The school building itself will shield the 23 stall parking lots and service garages from view of the residents to the south and east. Sanitary Sewer and Water Service Sanitary sewer and water services will be provided through connections in Biscayne Avenue. The utilities appear to be sized adequately to handle the demands of the school. Two fire hydrants will be installed, one to the northwest and one to the southwest of the school. In addition, a fire sprinkler system will be installed within the school. Stormwater Management Stormwater management will be conducted through an expansion of the existing stormwater pond in the southeast corner of the property. The stormwater pond seems to be sized properly,but corrections to the grading and outlet structure will need to be made per the City Engineer's memorandum. 5 Tree Replacement and Landscaping There are 47 trees existing at the former public works site. The school is proposing to remove five (5) trees and two (2) of the trees are dying,leaving 40 trees remaining on the site. The five (5) trees removed will require ten (10) trees to be planted as replacement. R1 landscaping requirements are based on landscaping per housing unit,which is not applicable to the school. Staff suggests applying the C4 landscaping requirements as an applicable standard for the school. The landscape requirement is for one tree to be planted for every 3,000 square feet of land area. The site is approximately 330,000 square feet requiring 110 trees. Required Landscaping Provided Landscaping 1 Tree per 3,000 Sq. Ft. 110 Existing Trees Saved 40 Tree Replacement 10 Additional Trees Added 103 Total 120 Total 143 The landscape plan meets the requirement for the total number of trees,but revision should be made to the location of the trees that are installed. The proposed landscape plan focuses the installed landscaping to the front of the school and the berm adjacent to the rail line, but the eastern and southern boundaries of the property rely predominately on the existing landscaping. The landscape plan should be revised to fill gaps in the existing landscaping to the east and south, particularly with additional conifers. In addition to the trees, the school has proposed a four (4) foot tall fence along the north, east, and south side of the property. Staff believes the fence,particularly on the east and south side, appears institutional. The school should remove the chain link fence on the south and east sides of the property. The chain link fence may remain on the north property line to provide separation from the rail line but should be constructed of black vinyl coated chain links,posts and hardware. Lighting The proposed lighting plan shows five lighting fixtures on 30 feet high poles. R1 zoning does not have specific lighting standards, but staff suggests that the standards of C4 zoning district should be observed for the purposes of this conditional use permit. The C4 zoning district states that lighting poles within 100 feet of a residential district have a maximum height of 20 feet and that lighting intensity shall not exceed 0.5 foot-candles at a residential property line. The lighting plan should be revised to meet these standards. Biscayne Avenue Right-of-Way The survey plan sheet indicates that there is 50 feet of half right-of-way for Biscayne Avenue in front of the school property. Other information indicates that there is only 33 feet of half right-of-way on Biscayne Avenue. The applicant will need to provide information to confirm the actual amount of right- of-way on Biscayne Avenue. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the Resolution approving the Conditional Use Permit for Intermediate School District 917 for a new school. 6 4 A,, p , . ,,, , S IT i , , ; 1 F82. ISM 4 91 ., 5 C E-(O O L. .../ BE,LFASy,� // 1 / ``33 rr \\ ��Y ,53:5 1** / *1k ' 1011 14.1 k I 1• cr I 1.0<i• vl ( 4,7,/• SC woo� s TE MO 111111 / 9. ilkiii/ BEEC.H_-T_7 ___% B B B B B m . B BB BB m m mm l '14STH S —__ IIIIIIMIMMIM tri 71I-1 El 1 11 / / NOTE: Dimensions rounded to nearest foot. N V Copyright 2007,Dakota County- This drawing is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This drawing is a compilation of records,information and data located in various city,county,and state offices and other sources,affecting the area shown,and is to be used for reference purposes only. Dakota County is not responsible for any inaccuracies herein contained. If discrepancies are found,please contact Dakota County Survey and Land Information Department. Map Date:June 22,2007 Parcels Updated:6/14/2007 Aerial Photography: CITY OF ROSEMOUNT DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2007-- A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) FOR INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL DISTRICT (ISD) NO. 917 TO CONSTRUCT A NEW SCHOOL WHEREAS, the Community Development Department of the City of Rosemount received an application from Intermediate School District (ISD) No. 917 requesting a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to construct a new 40,000 square foot school to serve students with special needs on property in the City of Rosemount,legally described as: That part of the Northwest Quarter, Section 28,Township 115, Range 19,beginning 560 feet north of the southwest corner of said Northwest Quarter; thence East 715.13 feet; thence north 653.63 feet to the southerly right of way of the railroad; thence southwesterly on said right of way 843.71 feet; thence South 234.92 feet; thence West 33.00 feet; thence 122.2 feet to the point of beginning. WHEREAS, on June 26, 2007, the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount reviewed the conditional use permit application for ISD #917; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission adopted a motion to recommend that the City Council approve the conditional use permit application for ISD #917 to construct a 40,000 square foot school to serve students with special needs, subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, on July 17,2007, the City Council of the City of Rosemount reviewed the Planning Commission recommendations for the conditional use permit. NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Rosemount hereby approves the conditional use permit for ISD #917 to construct a 40,000 square foot school to serve students with special needs, subject to the following conditions: 1. Construction of trail with a minimum of 8 foot width within the Biscayne Avenue Right-of- Way in accordance with the City of Rosemount Trail and Sidewalk Plan. 2. Removal of the two existing driveway entrances and replacing them with new driveways that meet City standards. 3. Revision of the landscape plan to supplement the existing landscaping to the south and the east. 4. Revision of the lighting plan to meet the lighting requirements of the C4—General Commercial zoning district. RESOLUTION 2007- ADOPTED this 17th day of July, 2007 by the City Council of the City of Rosemount. William H. Droste, Mayor ATTEST: Amy Domeier, City Clerk Motion by: Second by: Voted in favor: • Voted against: • Member absent: • 2 __-- ,.... ..-- -....... -, \..._ , \ \ aeoaaeoee,4 Biscayne Ave.W. \ n11111111 ' r-- . Property Line \ WI " 771 \ I ; Ci IP; Il \ \ 1 I \ 'eJOGO@9 I) 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 i .---55---' ‘ \ f $ si g , ' 1 I ... .... , ... p ,.... \ p ; \ 4L .° °'1' lailliti I V\\ il 1;i k gl.W .0,00•11. P 011 ! 0 ! eIl. % 1 ti i T CI 111 _ __. _._. 114 1 L__ __ J iliq \ \ \ 3 el A T LI . . \ \ i .;1 \ ..' ' • k ... V \ \A • C. a .. \ ........... \ \ MI \ 0 \ \ ._1 \ _ - (i \ \ ‘ )----. Property Line I 1 71.1107. i 1111.1 ------ ! I rillAt 1111 , , A I ,,i •• § I,tm,—— 4,4 - --- — VOA ll ' ' f 1 illg 7 , 9 !, dpil -j i .;:412. MAI MIMI I i i .1 ' . . PrNc-- rn., Ennui I P: l'il iii i ri i !i, 11 4 PE 33 ' Sh.-7 1 'p 411 53 i. i 13 it i 11 1 IMAM'3 m !:1 41% 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 li 1 b , I CD:. .1 M R' t) g 0 - P a 4t • • 2 ›.c) %.0 o — s.Z ri) 8-c) o &&g[ Pi f 01 1 i OH e 1 Ete: i ill ill I I R, 1 k' ii Nem ii L'II$: mow :° in ig g IA w= ,__, El 1 +ri an: x o P. 8 6 a ' 3 y o try a. E a: a . r g , F ,a;3 WQ 4 '4 m o O T n• ry N o a. 5). ) y " .. 7d 4 1 I .. ... I •. a (0 C r � " — O p r- - -r - - - - - - 1 ;,� . . - - °° `` I R`., R " i 1 ilE i I s I� � I ' ' D xa L. , —y ' © . ----- j.i 4-,g P a .. !. Pt; PIP a : —VQ PI; 4 � S• yam. � ' CfRA�q ���� � F is I'lLrm "1 al 21 1 mt a.. ,... "" dE E I t 1 1 ..-: tzi`° : E ------ ' _...-- ,,, FT. 0 Y milli I- ,, I 1J-L1J (� Oup,' .1 I IrT--r-r .1 9 _ mfil IL1L1 1g Et 1g Et &I g ti P:.t A3 11 I 2 to...M.. ul, A --- 1. `ifilri2. I11I 4_ ' I 11„...._; ,,,.. ___ . 1 e 0 P'. P7. P.. P:. 'e' "' gg e i is m0 44.17 r--To t IT : 1 - W W d O - -----I ------------,=- ---- -. 9 b b b b b b WI I I I I I I I I° o d ZCD t o Ni ' li IIIIIIII= d i Vii I. hi �n o o ! Pak `� C/1 r girls �3€a r. Ili �• a � , i 1n �€ a5is •( `:L 1:IE,llj = 1 pe , ;mil Q€ 5: : 2In gli i..:..ilil ,::iii ilea:l:.lu = I::E.`::: :::Fill r Ea ` / Cill Iiil:li�In '7 .I :133: •11 1`:•!ii::: 1 Pm:: k 0111,iii e•i l n1�iil.1 1 /::: Is 1 Hill iiii: 3 Iiii! ii: I . i•• I ii iiii :iiiiiiii iiii ii.l �� sogil � :pie ..::.I I mu1i�;i gala. �RI li rr i ,::::::: visa ii; , u. , ,I'1 i !'..■ 1 5 /1:: ;�_., JIII�. 1 II III. i i Fill:. ,.::._:::. i Aiiiii iiii !lim I' neimmirn NM- ./i iiii IiiiiI.: L Iu: kill., 1 .uii.� mii Iluinl►.' iii , p II/i::iiiiii ii I: III 11'1:::1;'11'1.,Ili.:_ 'ri°iIii., "?Ir► - ate: i ; /:: ,- Pik l?:, Via /, iii n Lill 1.1 ' imill 114 ; mill- DI Ills! Inl:n: 1��R1 €�1�• i:.l 1 Y q• t Fiji' : C �::�, >gg 11i s 1 iiii' I ,.I•I HE. Mil ° iii 1 111'1.l iii ��" Luau•1 �„ rill I ,• °� Il,iiii._ I"�' `lil: c , -I * g g11 1 1111 00 r III I 1 I . S Ali 1 IAN iii 111 J�-lo 58 I. 1I` 9 �� 14 l ill 1.13:1 I ° t . 1q 1 I5 •.qa Hp 11111111° F-i I �p (� n ti1 is ,®1,B a Sl O 1 Ritil 5 . ,,, . u 1 —;- u g ..L� 11u BISCAYNE AVEtIOE„ a A "''va"'-"§ .th r rna�W--" . . -a.. of —"—+ E3 II : g— I q!I 0.1 Rlc +Ra I' 6 a \ §"I 9' \ e \" 14 • 1 ' n Wi t\ \Q \, 1 ,33 1 1, . r) ; , -3-„,-5'.1,-,, 4:2/ \\ rrat gli ul .� 2 .----'10740 " . SEE �D y\l' r /1 \\\p S se M' \\ \ 3 `n "\ °y \D ,J. "v., aaa ‘ i \ pi wig Ghe Jr#° _ \ \ .\ T\\ 1 . ',. ' \ 1 ../ \ 1 \\\\\ \ ‘. 1-7:-.- \., i i : . . ... . ___,--__\ a 41 �'---...„� fl ,. Sit _ \�i ( - ---- ' 6 - \' :P11 / IdIII qa V" as /{f &s- at . 5iEIg5i ;iIIIIIiI! Ili 'g1gp gA iI11EiiIs 8 o"p 4 a i a7r! l e . q ill PI Aye II ° i li ill lAM /a i'll 1 II II M4 OP S: t 1 5i 1 5 2 5Q El: 1 1 I Ii t7 D I fli'l Gil I 101 II 1 k.!'I-I!: 11114 11 I'a li a 3 3 mm. ° 3 1 C o , 111111 p{{1) llJ1/11 1° !Bono cn " _ �' q 00 iii � J BISCAYNE AVE WEST ` et < < ra rrerrreeeeereretreereeeer eerti eeet et • eeereeereeeeeeeeeeeertereeeete • rrer ` r▪ cr ier reer teeeeeeeeeeee eeteeveree eeee ` ee ceeeeeeeeeeereereeeerreceeee re er e +• ree ' ereeetereeeerteeeetesereee A A ` Ceeeeteeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeteeeer • '[ ever •eet e e r e e e e e e r e r e e e e e e e e e e e e r e r e ' •' e r r r e r t e ereer eereeesrsereereeer " eeeereteeete GZ tee ; eteteeeeeteeeeecee ' eecc ceeee tee ' ee • teeeeeeeeeeteeeeeeee eAteerr trcree ere ` e e :fit e e e e e e r e s t e e e • • twee e e t e r e r r . a teee ee e e e e • . - eeeeetee eee ": ere = tree `y ereeeteeeeet . ereer • eeee e:eeee ., / teereee a eeeetsee ee e ` eereeere . • eeLsteteeter rereceeeeeee e r e e r e e . e e e e e e e e e r ` eceN , reer [ [ err e : et eceeleee ` IC; r eeeeeeeeeeer e eeeeec�� r crccrreerr I6 treeleeerr lre retiree • e, •+ + eetr're ` A e t A ree 't e . r e. . . e e t . e t t e t t r e ` m tic CV e " eetree • tie ll . ee . eeeeceret �m g es ` tlec - reer A ,69' et % - \eeeeereee rteeeerr ` x 9 e . e e e r e e e t e e e• e t t r t e e t gee A A t e e e e e t e t ` '! n tic e.ereer reer tie . eeeeeeeeeee OS At ,,� A e = r e e r e r e e r r e e e t r u e r [ tieetie . [ CCONAA fedefe , Aereree ' tccA . r err e ' eeeeeeeeeeteeeeee • eereceeeeeee ' . teecetc - ecteetrteeeeeeeeee . Atrerettettr ! teeter et Ae AeAAcre e . • • AAttAAeeeeee . erg Aeerr At Fill p A { A A A e e e e A e e A A t e e' A e A e A A A e A e A - C r e AL e e e A A Add eryte ratite [ wee • tit • err et et eerre r ➢qq rarer [ eer r re eet et etAreeteete • eree eeererr S1 fig 14 I Ili III IIIIIa xFLD o d t t ,,�t ; 1 i III I III IN o �, d e� y rg�e II ;Ill� d co 5 �[ —3 ] �d ��€ aq1 66 tilfl: ]E y , - -- - :I1 E° ° E°i]° 3 El \ $w- .5.6..T z'=u= 41 is F �, t;, �1 fi 5 g oc . ;� ill 1 E°El , ° -.,,� i ` AI, d$ a te' 8 Q r, liI .• m 3 i Soy fy�� 2, , I. w:53; • ff# /1 g � i S =�i i � � \ g., Rs , E t.'a 3' at--12.4 re a ,�,. p o 1 cn r1` --" fig:, a ` \ O 1,, , "` \ i 0 ., \ 8 a sr. ::::::::\:: .4",1,_,. 1 \ Z .10 1 .... 0 ©� lit _ &A6 i �i i<` �° g 0 ;1 ;§1 1 \ � . y 93 MANi-2 1 El , y 9° ea = V.. f � Rid?a I 8° r;. E° a V }:a' _ PON ce d, ' NI g & —�/'r ---- — --- ---- — -- -- — — -- -- - - - �;i1!;: .R,L. \I. d — - ego = " I i yopa i N € P ff 6Pii€1 9 I I: IP i Pr' A ilii -' 11 € ra R Hi irm 11; !; 1 mp Ii impt vy 6 ill i iiv e tUlIP 8p et6 iIti){ i ii 3101"i .1Ar R� a €Pjjff{ Fiigr, �i � �m'"� A � �° E�� {i ig fltf 9 a ■ I f+ .i l� ' Ali di i € 4 ipi A -I IR q; i 6 W W i lii i LII1LI1 fl II (ti3gp 1 a p N 4. I I !,� 94pp qq �'a H ;g; ■ 1; '�7�Jj ' li A (BSvv 'f F 111 b �4FiYP E F1 E1 1$ 1 i 0iRl -; R G g3 A� 1 €5 i Till k ; ^ _s^ a ee :eeeet A..,.• A PP P a °` d gl Old :- i ! i A€ cq p poi A fle IR eg g g c 3 44 c.... i a S 22 e I Pi� � �3'� e3�g � n � !S�55 S S� a ee� ee y A v IeiS v`� RS A@e i Ftiiii iw^,--^ fi', N� Al Ai P 1 " s U a it p R AM i P $ i Aa R is s t:{ 1 {{i i {E 6 P i { 1 1 I li m cZn T r E 7 0 1--1 n , C 5 tw • v1 R q — P11110110 { - iiw3tL i � Iaa 3- , ft s� T ; 33 — {AVAi 4) III m °» ��1\� . —_ ' e a --a 4c¢ 1 • fe + ratio t i ,, _ _� , o '� m 4e �c.. _ ti'\. � ..yy1' Apy m # ` —i #. 'I•.; . 0 1s'0tcr ltph re a ir r ' id n —.mo $ cyyan� ; Ss ays.,��:. g i \ $ • L r xc M1.<. �L sue. fok,:„..:S.;:: b 7.;▪ ' ' , :1 t , 4 v t H-,31 ,,'.,_S S1 j{, I . • ----7,t,- 1 r,i1 1,„H-,5111 h.33 ,,,,,.:.; Ii1";1%.11'4‘ , '' 44 IP 11\t-. ,, , co --—--4,s.3,,.,,..47, '[ ,( cam'\_. ; 1t 11I111113 �• n rri �,�� �°y duo_ F ;'� f. v e a _ • o yQ 11 c— VI CI Z t r.. py o�1 A o �O �I+� aYSA 22 cc' Ze it N S� Ili 9 Au) • ' • Ci0Y1D[D \ �»° � _ \ \ —,fie— y -� —--gin--\ \\ / BISCAYNE AVENI ,.� ‘--" „,_..,::, I-N ti. "r/-" } \ \ r� o \ \ . \ m 4.....> \ A\ , 1 .I' 3 o O qv,"• .- ia.c ..M . ce 1 Y...I.�e ._/ / ;O \`\ e N \ t mo per1� 1 r �m e / \/J-� \\ \ I oil \..3 `\ iz I % \ -..t. \ 41----..\\ \ I \V ~ E2m A , T y �' S pYb � t ill g a'Ez '" 2- a t <$ !m 11.c „--sit.... -----} —;:i, -� �. ems �11 I —BLOO FIELD— ;\ I i rA Q og > HI WO TT Ey mi 1 L' c"i$ � 2 Y O cg .vi z 90 0 goy § �s1 gg a " " E � a u' $o �S� �i' g > cp DC Mot A T 3 Mz yo Ell g gl O! 6 AB E p By* HI IIIIIIII" y � oom � � �t �� G' 9 '',�c'`, n � ° IIIIIIII z�� m cA OLtiiIL ]E y �T n • En n ��� s �m o 1 -Cxi73 c + '� �akSWc tAp yi VI (I I 4 ,w D 13 1 I 14,1 t B S : I X !!t'i . I . iv�4 !' rh �, L ',Jk ,,�ti ,e i - y1, I g ,, v3�n , t, ' VI0 , ' i w ' g i P0 i 0I j' iy thr, r, O y wI ° a �if.l . CyJ Ig • ,,, , . , , LA . s , n�" F s I "" f I I ,. 1, � Z. I � °,4 hk :i ` f -l i I rr 10 , v +i d icn'iil l: ,=, j p s»s:.r,rx IID �{Iui t9�I I r , iI 1, 1 k 0. F a iy� G I 7 t' d tJ 5 l q 4 .I I I •,t.•,l I ,.x i it i I I� 11# . • ,,ram qi{ ■ 'LAB. I: r i I:: li •. ,, ., „.....,.. .Ili of A: �..,„....,_. {' • .. qi ��>F II xi F j i ir- 1 w {Ii! I * y�dqy • l y ai A* ` L:pr t ft " '. ? = N O O }I WI Wl l rft V • IIIIF ran' i �v . l rs �` • r0Rl.a.s-..enl. % `„_ ) BISCAYNE P.V�i I : 7 aa,,,,.,.,..,n V;Z-1 \ � x vs Ira.�-x. r.i'V6N�7 m;I' <I.� �� 1 `t p,;,°;:;� '' a ,:- ___ 7".'"' ____..___ ______!__ _._.:_rto,,,\li \, \.\,, (Di , 1 4,, ,T, \ \ , • 7 1 I /' :iiI C i [v1.! 1 \ • I G9 ` GD \'\ s '\ I ` gib \ \1. `\ 1 */ 3'‘,._„--- ' 1 '\ l \\, /per \\ -- • ; i0 \ ``.� Ai ` ` 1 ` �O ,\' \ • IV 3 i .�,4 q= x IA ' '- ,-. , pt n' --- I ' 00 e 999 O VZ> A 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I° troy t7 Z I t MI A g a �����$ CD co tcn:10 ■ 1,, ,51, ! !I !!i !!I 9 3mm N ! ems 1 ill1 „...,_x„l.,i t.: BSCAYNE AVE^'UE,,.-,; ,„_, r� `, y a `. __ 5'•' "a.,7i `x7T4 rs•roa.A=3�f k ,---�<-- 74-,r;„—r s +., �'° ...}: gilt , —%' try..� � � 'i�h l•4o c,n.s .,... .. :a ' .f YYf 0i \� . `L\` C\ ,-: , ,,,,,,,,„ ,, „ / ,,„-„, \ \ , >. I1-if.`e3..`11L 4, ' C\ __-_\•„4`\ , \\ \ ��' ```, ,\u i-,. , ':.3,1''.11 - i\A-- ,....„-;•:).-..-..r, \,„ i k ,s.„.. . ..),;.: ., t41,,,, ., , ,r,„.„-- 11,,,'i,,.,,,n, s.....r \\--..„ c,„.....<„, ! Ali a.9 i; �� - I -nb a •di '\ ..- I -- VN _ O. :f,t 1 1 .i.:%Ir,..? 11 t.... -”' 1 1,. \, 4 1 t gz s r'= �C\ VA • I1I x�6 \'A `` IN 111 '-t` ``` ><',ou,-:-. - ' ` �dd\ \ 1:: q _ _ _ram-•,r- \+a`, n 1 a 11 + Y --- — ,nil. I t^-------------_—�`----" -------"--- -�= �`""•...-_-- til ill GY . __z„--- ill ii i ri!li gg[ tl Ii [IIHIIIL 1 ! 1llllllli I - d �,° uo O tiliI GI _:i �g _1 Memorandum To: Eric Zweber, City Planer From: George A Lundy, Fire Marshal Date: June 4, 2007 Subject: Purposed ISD 917 / CDA school review Eric, The above mentioned plans have been reviewed by the Rosemount Fire Prevention Bureau. Please note the following comments: 1. No Parking Fire Lane signs shall be place on the main road to this complex' 2. The utility contractor shall provide an Post Indicator Valve (PIV) between the main water line and the Fire Department Connection(FDC) 3. A Knox ®key box shall be provided to this facility. Please be advised that this list is only a preliminary review, once they submit a complete set of plans I will be able to conduct a more complete review. 4 ROSEMOUNT PARKS AND RECREATION MEMORANDUM To: Kim Lindquist, Community Development Director Eric Zweber, Senior Planner Jason Lindahl, Planner Jamie Verbrugge, City Administrator Andy Brotzler, City Engineer Morgan Dawley, Project Engineer Tom Schuster, Parks Supervisor From: Dan Schultz, Parks and Recreation Director Date: June 18, 2007 Subject: ISD 917 — Dakota County Site Plan Review and CUP After reviewing the ISD 917 site plan,Parks and Recreation Department staff recommends the following conditions be added to any approval provided for the site plan: • As identified in the City of Rosemount's Trail Sidewalk Plan,a trail should be added to the plan and installed along the western portion of the property. The Parks and Recreation Commission will be provided an update regarding this site plan at their regular meeting on Monday,June 25, 2007. Please call me at 651-322-6012 if you have any questions about this memo. G:\2007'Planning Cases\07-21-SP ISD#917-Dakota County CDA Site Plan Review\ParksandRecMemo ISD917 06262007.doc 4ROSEMOUNT PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: June 19, 2007 TO: Eric Zweber, Senior City Planner CC: Kim Lindquist, Community Development Director Andrew Brotzler, City Engineer Kathie Hanson, Planning Department Secretary FROM: Morgan Dawley, Project Engineer RE: ISD #917 — Dakota County CDA Site Plan Review and Conditional Use Permit Upon review of the ISD #917—Dakota County CDA Site Plans and stormwater calculations dated May 29,2007 and received on May 29, 2007, the Engineering Department offers the following comments: General Comments: 1. NPDES permit is the responsibility of the developer/contractor. Documentation of permit acquisition shall be forwarded to the City prior to issuance of a grading/building permit. 2. Hydrants shall be located and installed to meet minimum fire protection per the City's Fire Marshall. 3. A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be provided for review prior to the release of a grading permit. 4. The two driveway entrances appear to be outside of City standards and should be replaced to meet the 24' minimum width—36' maximum width requirement. Turning radii for vehicles appropriate to the site (i.e. school bus, delivery truck, etc.) should be examined to ensure safe vehicle paths in and out both entrances. Of particular concern is the path of vehicles entering the south access appears to potentially be in conflict with a stopped exiting vehicle. Driveway width should be examined and adjusted accordingly. 5. Estimated fees to be collected with Building Permit for the site are as follows (payment of an off-site ponding fee for storage of the stormwater runoff downstream to Bloomfield Ponds in lieu of storing stormwater runoff on-site has been discussed with the applicant's engineer, Larson Engineering—the fees outlined below assume plan approval as currently submitted and therefore no ponding fees are included) : • Sewer Connection Fees—SAC units are calculated by MCES o Trunk Area Assessment • 8.0 acres @ $1,075/acre = $8,600 o MCES SAC Fee = $1,675/SAC unit o City SAC Fee = $1,200/SAC unit • Water Connection Fees o Trunk Area Assessment • ■ 8.0 acres @ $4,860/acre =— $38,880 o City WAC Fee, 8" Meter = $33,175 • Storm Connection Fees o Trunk Area Assessment • 7.4 acres @ $6,665/acre = $49,321 o City STAG Fee • 7.4 acres @ $2,200/acre = $16,280 Storm Water Modeling Comments: 1. The Hydrocad stormwater model calculations appear to have errors associated with the pond outlet structure input and can not be approved at this time. A 6" orifice in the outlet structure weir wall with a slide gate is recommended to hold stormwater on site prior to discharge downstream which would allow for the management of the normal water elevation/storage volume in the pond. The high water level would extend outside of the fencing around the pond,however, the design submitted appears to have assumed this level of inundation. The storm water calculations require modification and re-submittal of the lyr-l0yr-100yr and 2.5"rainfall event results for review. It is requested that the digital copy of the storm water model be provided with the hard copy results. 2. The water quality volume provided in the pond is 0.16 Acre-Feet which does not meet the NURP criteria. The water quality volume below the outlet should be 0.67 Acre-Feet based on the storm water model data. 3. The documents provided did not include infiltration calculations or indicate an infiltration area in the site plan. The use of a subsurface system may be applicable under the green area adjacent to the pond meet the City criterion. Infiltration capabilities meeting the City criterion should be incorporated into the site design. Plan Review Comments: Survey Plan Sheet CO.0 1. Show existing drainage and utility easements. Demolition Plan Sheet Cl 1. Existing sewer and water service locations and removals should be identified on the plan. 2. Driveway removal shall be shown on the plans (see General Comments). Paving Plan Sheet C2 1. Driveway construction shall be shown on the plans (see General Comments). Erosion Control Plan Sheet C3 1. City of Rosemount Standard Detail Plates for applicable erosion control and sediment control items shall supersede Larson details and shall be included on the plan sheet. Grading Plan Sheet C4 1. Proposed storm sewer shall be shown on the grading plan. 2. The 975 and 974 contour elevations at the north driveway entrance should be verified. It appears that the existing 975 contour is in close proximity to the proposed 974 contour. 3. The 972 elevation contour on the north side of the south driveway entrance should be extended to the existing 972 contour. 4. The emergency overflow routes and elevations from the parking lot low points should be shown on the plans. 5. The grading plan should indicate the side slopes for the pond.( 1:3, 1:4, 1:10) Utility Plan Sheet C5 1. The type of casting used for the catch basins in open space and in locations of the parking lot lowpoint should be reviewed with respect to the plan detail casting. 2. The pond outlet structure detail in the plans should be updated to correspond with the stoniiwater model input. Details Sheet C6 1. City of Rosemount Standard Detail Plates,where applicable, shall supersede Larson details and shall be included on the plan sheet. Lanscape Concept Plan Sheet L1 1. Verify plantings do not conflict with emergency overflow routes, drainage and utility easements, or property boundaries. Should you have any questions or comments regarding the item listed above,please contact me at 651-322-2022. EXCERPT FROM MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING JUNE 26, 2007 5.a. Case 07-21-SP and 07-22-CUP Intermediate School District#917 Site Plan and Conditional Use Permit. Senior Planner, Eric Zweber, presented this item. Intermediate School District (ISD) #917 is requesting site plan review and a conditional use permit to construct a 40,000 square foot school designed for approximately 100 students and offices for about 20 teachers with special skills such as Braille and sign language. The proposed location is at the former Dakota County public works facility on Biscayne Avenue between Beech St.W. and the railroad tracks. Mr. Zweber reviewed the site plan, and further discussed building massing and materials showing the Commission samples of the building materials, requirements of approving a conditional use permit, site access,parking and traffic flow, sanitary sewer and water service, stormwater management tree replacement and landscaping,lighting, and the Biscayne Avenue right-of-way. Chairperson Messner asked why it was suggested that the fencing on the east and south sides of the property be removed. Mr. Zweber responded that staff felt if there was a fence around the ponding area,people could get in the area, but may not be able to get out. If the fence was removed, then it wouldn't be an issue. The City generally discourages fencing around ponds and most projects do not contain fencing around them. Commissioner Schultz asked if some of the trees could be salvaged. Mr. Zweber responded that some could be but the landscape architect had identified some of the trees as ill or dying. The Applicant,John Christiansen, Superintendent of District 917, approached the Commission and gave a brief synopsis of school operations including the number of students, transportation details and school hours. He stated there are between 60-100 students who will get to the school around 8:30 and leave around 2:30-3:00,by bus transportation. There would not be any after school or evening activities. There is a short summer school program. Faculty will arrive around 7:00-7:15a.m. and leave around 4:00-5:00p.m. Chairperson Messner opened the public hearing at 6:43p.m. Maynard Ohm, 2412 Beech Street, asked who will own the property. Mr. Zweber responded that Dakota County CDA will purchase the property on behalf of District 917. Mr. Ohm then stated he wondered the feasibility of completely clearing the site and stated he thought it would pretty expensive to get the property ready for construction of the school. He wondered if it would be more economical to begin with an empty field. He also asked if there could be a fence along Beech Street. He also voiced his concern with the railroad tracks north of the property being very noisy for a school environment. Mr. Zweber said it would be up to the Commission to approve a fence along Beech Street. Cindi Potaracke, 2354 Belfast Street, lives on other side of the railroad tracks. She stated her concern with the safety for children attending school with the railroad being so busy. She stated residents in the neighborhood put up fences to keep their children safe from the railroad track and suggested there should be a fence or more of a buffer blocking the school children from the tracks. MOTION by Schwartz to close the Public Hearing. Second by Howell. Ayes: 5. Nays: None. Motion approved. Public hearing was closed at 6:49p.m. Chairperson Messner asked Mr. Christiansen to come forward again and asked him why a fence along the east and south sides of the property was in the original design. Mr. Christiansen stated they had felt it was in the interest of the neighbors to have a fence and District#917 had no problem with it. Mr. Christiansen stated however that the City had stated a fence around the area was not consistent with the other schools in the community. It was the school's intention to use fencing more for a benefit to the neighborhood, but also to define where the children need to stay. Chairperson Messner asked what was envisioned for the north side of property with respect to the railroad tracks. Mr. Christiansen stated there will be a berm completely along the north side of property,with a great amount of trees and shrubs and a fence along the inside of the berm. He also stated it was designed to have the playground area between the tracks and the building to help reduce the noise. It is also planned that noise resistant materials will be used in the building. With respect to the demolition concerns, Mr. Christiansen stated that the school district was able to work with the County to complete the demolition at a very reasonable price. The blacktop is in poor condition and the buildings are basically block and concrete slab. The County has been through the pollution control agency for any issues. The demo process will try to salvage some of the items. Mr. Christiansen stated that cost-effective wise,going to a greenfield site with the cost of roads and utilities would easily outweigh the cost of demolishing the proposed site. Mark Lenz , Lenz Architecture, approached the Commission to add a few details on the landscaping and berm. Commissioner Howell expressed her concern with the safety of the children and asked how much supervision they would have during play times. Mr. Christiansen responded that the children will be supervised in small groups when outside so the opportunity to wander away is very limited. However, having fencing around the play area will help define the area so the students know the limitations. Commissioner Palda stated that since this school is so close to railroad tracks,it should be looked at differently than other schools in the city. He expressed his desire to have fencing on the north side to define the boundaries,but would exclude fencing on the south side. It was agreed upon by the Commission that there should be fencing to define the playground areas, but not around the entire site. Mr. Zweber stated Condition #7 should be modified. MOTION by Howell to approve the Site Plan for a 40,000 square foot school for ISD #917, subject to the following conditions: 1. Compliance with the conditions within the Fire Marshall's Memorandum dated June 4, 2007, the Park and Recreation Director's Memorandum dated June 18, 2007 and the Engineering Department's Memorandum dated June 19, 2007. 2. Payment of the appropriate City Fees at the time of the issuance of building permit. The City Engineer has estimated the following fees based on the site plan submittal: Sewer Connection Fees —SAC units are calculated by MCES Trunk Area Assessment = 8.0 acres @ $1,075/acre = $8,600 MCES SAC Fee = $1,675/SAC unit City SAC Fee = $1,200/SAC unit Water Connection Fees Trunk Area Assessment = 8.0 acres @ $4,860/acre = $38,880 City WAC Fee, 8" Meter = $33,175 Storm Connection Fees Trunk Area Assessment = 7.4 acres @ $6,665/acre = $49,321 City STAC Fee = 7.4 acres @$2,200/acre = $16,280 3. Confirm the existence of 50 feet of half right-of-way on Biscayne Avenue as indicated on the Survey Plan Sheet. 4. Any signage will require a separate administrative approval. 5. All roof top mechanical structures will require screening in accordance with the City Code. 6. The trash enclosure will need to be constructed with material similar to the building in accordance with City Code. 7. Removal of the chain link fence on the south and east side of the property except for the play areas. The chain link fence may remain on the north property line to provide separation from the rail line but shall be constructed of black vinyl coated chain links, posts and hardware. 8. Submission of a landscape security equal to one hundred and twenty five percent (125%) of the cost of the plantings illustrated on the approved landscape plan prior to issuance of the building permit. Second by Schultz. Ayes: 5. Nays: None. Motion approved. MOTION by Palda to recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit of a 40,000 square foot school for ISD #917, subject to the following conditions: 1. Construction of trail with a minimum of 8 foot width within the Biscayne Avenue Right- of-Way in accordance with the City of Rosemount Trail and Sidewalk Plan. 2. Removal of the two existing driveway entrances and replacing them with new driveways that meet City standards. 3. Revision of the landscape plan to supplement the existing landscaping to the south and the east. 4. Revision of the lighting plan to meet the lighting requirements of the C4—General Commercial zoning district. w f Second by Schwartz. Ayes: 5. Nays: None. Motion approved. As follow-up, Mr. Zweber stated the conditional use permit will go before the City Council for approval on July 17`h. What is a significant tree? Aires? Is there a fee-in-lieu of tree? Is a security bond required? 8"+deciduous and 12'+tall No 110%of the cost of replacement Rosemount(Currently) conifer trees. Apple Valley 8"+deciduous or 6'+tall conifer No No Eagan 6+" hardwood, 12"+softwood,or dig 100%of the cost of the 12'+tall conifer Yes replacement trees. ation :low Inver Grove Heights 8"+deciduous or 10'+tall conifer mum Yes $10,000 rk Minnetonka 8"+deciduous or 15'+tall conifer No No Plymouth 8"+deciduous or 4"+tallconifer $125 per tree No for tat is Prior Lake 6"+deciduous or 12'+tall Heritshow No 125%of the cost of the conifers -es replacement trees. tage Victoria 4"+Ironwood or bur oak,8"+for all other trees $100 per inch. No >of Woodbury6"+hardwoods, 12"+softwoods, sity and 12'+tall conifers 3peca set Yes No ent trees.