Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPacket NIAtA 4 ROSEMOUNT A City CouGENDAncil Regular Meeting Tuesday, March 6, 2007 CITY COUNCIL 7:30 p.m. City Council Chambers, City Hall 1. Call to Order/Pledge of Allegiance 2. Additions or Corrections to Agenda 3. Public Comment 4. Response to Public Comment 5. DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS/BUSINESS a. Spirit of Rosemount Award b. Acknowledgement of Award of Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting c. Proclamation of National Volunteer Week 6. CONSENT AGENDA a. Minutes of the February 14, 2007 Work Session City Council Proceedings b. Bills Listing c. Budget Encumbrance d. Professional Services Contract e. Receive Donation—Parks & Recreation Dept. f. Receive Donation—Fire Department g. Receive Plans and Specifications/Authorize Advertisement for Bids—Flint Hills Resources Sanitary Sewer&Watermain Extension, City Project#406 h. Receive Bids/Award Contract—Connemara Tower Painting, City Project#408 i. Great River Energy Lot Split, 05-23-LS 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS 8. OLD BUSINESS a. Rosemount Business Center Lot Combination, Rezoning, and Planned Unit Development Master Development Plan and Final Development Plan, 06-67-SP, 06-68-LC, 06-69-CON 9. NEW BUSINESS 10. ANNOUNCEMENTS 11. ADJOURNMENT I . . ROSR\I1OUNT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CITY COUNCIL City Council Regular Meeting: March 6, 2007 AGENDA ITEM: Professional Services Contract AGENDA SECTION: Consent PREPARED BY: Dan Schultz, Parks and Recreation AGENDA NO. (Q • Director ATTACHMENTS: Proposed Agreement APPROVED BY: RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to recommend the City Council approve c tracting with HKgi to assist staff with updating the City's Parks, Trails and Open Space aster Plan for a fee of $10,700. ISSUE By 2008, the City of Rosemount (along with all other local government units within the seven county metropolitan area) needs to submit a comprehensive plan to the Met Council to address our future growth through the year 2030. Part of updating our comprehensive plan includes updating the City's 2002 Parks, Trails and Open Space plan. The 2007 CIP Budget includes $15,000 for updating the City's Parks Trails and Open Space Master Plan. Staff is planning for much of the updating to be done in-house. BACKGROUND On January 22, 2007, the Parks and Recreation Commission asked staff to request Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. (HKgi) to submit a proposal to assist staff with updating the City's 2002 Parks,Trails and Open Space Master Plan. The reason for asking only HKgi for a proposal was because of the familiarity that HKgi has with Rosemount and a number of our existing plans such the Rosemount Interpretive Corridor Plan,Mississippi River Greenway Plan, Northern Dakota County Greenway Plan and the Natural Resource Mapping and Natural Areas Plan. The City's 2002 Parks,Trails, and Open Space Plan was written by Ingraham and Associates. Ingraham and Associates has recently merged with HKgi making their firm even more familiar with Rosemount. Greg Ingraham has been identified as the proposed project lead, as he was in 2002 when Ingraham and Associates wrote the plan. SUMMARY HKgi has submitted a proposal to assist staff with updating our 2002 Parks,Trails and Open Space Plan. Their submittal outlines that they will review and assist with the update of Chapter 3 -Park and Trail System Framework, Chapter 4- Needs Assessment and Recommendations, and Chapter 5 -Park,Trail and Open Space Plan for a fee of$10,700. The Parks and Recreation Commission and staff are recommending that the City Of Rosemount contract with HKgi to assist staff with updating the City's 2002 Parks,Trails and Open Space Master Plan for a fee of$10,700. Creative Solutions for Land Planning and Design ©© Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. ©® February 15, 2007 Dan Schultz, Parks and Recreation Director City of Rosemount 13885 South Robert Trail Rosemount, MN 55068 Re: Rosemount Park and Trail Plan Update Consulting Services Proposal Dear Dan: Thankyou for takingthe time to talk with me about Rosemount's need for assistance in updating the City P g Park and Trail Plan. On behalf of Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. (HKGi), I am pleased to submit this proposal to assist with the plan update. As we discussed the consulting assistance is to supplement city staff work on the plan and be done in partnership with city staff and the Parks and Recreation Commission. The plan update is to focus primarily on new park and trail needs based on growth and land development projections. HKGi is uniquely suited to efficiently update the Rosemount Park and Trail Plan. Greg Ingraham and Stephen Wensman (formerly with Ingraham&Associates)prepared the 2002 Rosemount Park, Trail and Open Space Plan and Lil Leatham recently prepared interpretive trail plans in the City. HKGi's knowledge of the City and significant park and recreation planning experience combined with City staff expertise and Commission guidance will result in a first class guide to the future. Services HKGi's role will be to supplement staff work on the plan and to update the park and trail system plan maps. City staff will prepare the bulk of the plan text updates. HKGi is to review and assist with the update of Chapter 3 Park and Trail System Framework, Chapter 4 Needs Assessment and Recommendations Ch. 5 Park, Trail and Open Space Plan. Greg Ingraham will be the project manger and principal in charge. Stephen Wensman and Lil Leatham will prepare the park and trail system plan maps,based on city growth forecasts. HKGi staff will participate in three planning work sessions with city staff to determine plan elements and one meeting with the Parks and Recreation Commission to review and set plan priorities. City staff will gather additional Commission and public input, and will assemble the final document(with HKGi assistance). City staff will also seek final approval by the City Council. 123 North Third Street,Suite 100,Minneapolis,MN 55401-1659 Ph(612)338-0800 Fx(612)338-6838 C:I Documents and SettingslajdlLocal SettingslTemporary Internet FilesIOLKDBIHKgi Park Plan Update prop 216 OZDOC Schedule and Fees The plan update work will begin immediately upon authorization to proceed by the city. The plan update is to be completed by June 2007. HKGi will work on an hourly basis on tasks as directed by City staff with a not-too-exceed consulting services fee, including direct expenses of$10,700.00 (this is based on an estimated 90-110 hours of work). Expenses such as mileage and printing will be charged at cost. The City will be invoiced monthly for services rendered. Payment to HKGi is to occur within 30 days of receipt of an invoice. Contact me at 612.252.7132 if you have any questions or to authorize us to begin work. Sincerely, Greg Ingraham Principal ROSEMOUNTEXECUTIVE SUMMARY CITY COUNCIL City Council Regular Meeting: March 6, 2007 AGENDA ITEM: Case 05-23-LS Great River Energy Lot AGENDA SECTION: Split Consent PREPARED BY: Eric Zweber, AICP; Senior Planner AGENDA NO. V.( , ATTACHMENTS: Lot Split Amendment Resolution, Location Map, Easement Diagram, APPROVED BY: Original Lot Split Resolution RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to adopt a resolution amending condition 3 Resolution 2006-109: a resolution approving the Lot Spilt as requested by Great River Energy, subject to conditions. ISSUE On October 17, 2006, the City Council approved a lot split for Great River Energy. The original parcel was located both north and south of Ehlers Path and the lot split divided the parcel into a parcel that is completely north of Ehlers Path and a parcel that is completely south of Ehlers Path. As a condition of the lot split, the applicant was required to dedicate a 50 foot half right-of-way (ROW) for Ehlers Path on both new parcels. Tonight, the applicant is requesting a revision to this condition. SUMMARY Great River Energy has purchased six parcels of land from Pine Bend Development Company. Ehlers Path crosses two of the parcels,isolating smaller fragments east of the bend in 140`h Street East, south of the SKB landfill. The lot split application will separate the parcel north of Ehlers Path from the rest of the East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 29, to be retained by Pine Bend Development Company. The West '/z of the Northeast '/4 of Section 29 will be similarly split, but that lot split is not subject to the City of Rosemount Subdivision Ordinance. State statute allows division of the eastern property without approval by the local government due to the size of the parcel and the parcels created. On October 17, 2006, the City Council adopted a resolution approving the lot split, subject to conditions. Condition 3 of the lot split resolution requires that a 50 foot wide half ROW is dedicated to the City for Ehlers Path on both parcels. Pine Bend Development is unwilling to dedicate the north half of the Ehlers Road ROW,which is approximately 1200 feet in length. As an alternative, Great River Energy is proposing to dedicate the a 50 foot wide half ROW for the south half of Ehlers Path on the parcel directly east of the lot split. This half ROW is approximately 1440 feet in length, resulting in a net gain of approximately 240 feet in Ehlers Path ROW. RECOMMENDATION Adopt the resolution amending the Great River Energy lot split. CITY OF ROSEMOUNT DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2007- A RESOLUTION AMENDING CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2006-109 WHEREAS, on October 17, 2006, by Resolution No. 2006-109, the Council approved the application of Great River Energy for the subdivision of certain real property as more fully described in Resolution No. 2006-109 (the"Subdivided Parcel");and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 2006-109 conditioned subdivision approval on, among other things, dedication of right-of-way of 100 feet for Ehlers Path, such right-of-way to be 50 feet on each side of the centerline of Ehlers Path over the Subdivided Parcel;and WHEREAS, Great River Energy has proposed the substitution of a 50-foot right-of-way easement on the south side of the centerline of Ehlers Path within the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 29, Township 115, Range 18 (the "Substitute Right-of-Way Easement") for the easement on the north side of Ehlers Path within the Subdivided Parcel;and WHEREAS, the Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the public to accept such substitution. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Rosemount that: "Paragraph 3 of Resolution No. 2006-109 is amended to read as follows: 3. Dedicate the 50-foot right-of-way for Ehlers Path lying 50 feet on the south side of the centerline of Ehlers Path within the parcel being subdivided and a 50-foot right-of-way easement on the south side of the centerline of Ehlers Path lying within the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 29,Township 115, Range 18, and standard drainage and utility easements per the Subdivision Ordinance." ADOPTED this 6th day of March, 2007, by the City Council of the City of Rosemount. William H. Droste, Mayor ATTEST: Amy Domeier, City Clerk RESOLUTION 2007- Motion by: Seconded by: Voted in favor: Voted against: Member absent: 2 • SITE MAP , PROPERTY ID NUMBER:34-02900-011-25 2006 ESTIMATED MARKET VALUES(PAYABLE 2007) 2006 BUILDING INFORMATION(PAYABLE 2007): FEE OWNER: PINE BEND DEVELOPCO LAND: 445,300 LOT SIZE NO DATA AVAILABLE M G ASTLEFORD CO BUILDING: BOX 110 705 CENTRAL AVE E TOTAL 445,300 3,278,201 TOTAL SQ FT SAINT MICHAEL MN 55376-8422 75.26 TOTAL ACRES SCHOOL DISTRICT: 196 110,675 ROAD RAN SQ FT PAYABLE 2006 TAXES LOCATION: NE1/4 NW1/4 SECTION 29-115-18 NET TAX: 1,560.74 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS: 0.00 PAYABLE 2007 HOMESTEAD STATUS: NON HOMESTEAD TOTAL TAX&SA: 1,560.74 WATERSHED DISTRICT: VERMILLION RIVER PAYABLE 2007 ASMNT USAGE:AG-GREEN ACRES LAST QUALIFIED SALE: DATE: AMOUNT: s C. PA10E__ �o 8E c5Pi.t r .4�' J I 1 ,�` ND 6 C. I�1 E, .1 A 1., ' / P' E iS. �E`/_�'LO L/Vr a a - 4d_ of _ m - \ ( , --\..) ON .„, l_li RC) , 6 f2- ) N._ A _C . Sv3tCt" 70 ' �. `//2_N"'S7� nSo f 5v� ��r �.. 61RE0 c)zY 5Uc3�, 4. 7© c(Ty seb. cybilsoce- rcz R c_..) Coo- r� 2vA Q q i NOTE: Dimensions rounded to nearest foot. PLAT NAME: SECTION 29 TWN 115 RANGE 18 'V TAX DESCRIPTION: E 1/2 OF NW 1/4 SUBJ TO HWY Copyright 2006,Dakota County- ESMNT PARCEL 11 ON CTY RAN MAP 21 C EX PT LYING N'LY OF This drawing is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. CR 38 This drawing is a compilation of records,information and data located in various city,county,and 29 115 18 state offices and other sources,affecting the area shown,and is to be used for reference purposes only. Dakota County is not responsible for any inaccuracies herein contained. If discrepancies are found,please contact Dakota County Survey and Land Information Department. Map Date:July 6,2006 Parcels Updated:6/29/2006 Aerial Photography:1990 • L.)Es--\c4- ovi (Niel- ouo t-- •f (D . OA= 22105'05' R - 1432.39' s690617.2 L= 552.14' 193.u' 262.1933'e r\• .*- 263541' -\ • v\ `\ Qi 4111.111�. k 1 I I \1!� p PID NO.34-02900-011-25 § pl NO.34-02900-010-20 8 . I£p 11 ls. / iv • ) -.. ---P f opoSEci.--2.6w io bg. ^ kc A Drv{In by Dale GREAT RIVER El 300 u 300 /lc Houston Engineering, Inc. KDO 05-06-05 PARCEL INFORM Seale i !""�L.� 1090073RDAVENUENORTH,SUITE106 TEL:(763)493-0522 Svv1i GREAT RIVER El 16�=300' MAPLE GROVE,MINNESOTA 55369 FAX:(763)493.5572 ACS AS SHOWN ELK RIVER,MINI CITY OF ROSEMOUNT DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2006- 10 9 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE LOT SPLIT REQUEST FROM GREAT RIVER ENERGY TO SPLIT THE PARCEL LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS THE EAST'/Z OF THE NORTHWEST '/4 OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 115, RANGE 18 WHEREAS,the Community Development Department of the City of Rosemount received an application from Great River Energy requesting the Lot Split of the property legally described as: The East'/z of the Northwest'/a of Section 29,Township 115,Range 18 WHEREAS, on May 24,2005,the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount held a public hearing to review the Lot Split;and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission adopted a motion to recommend that the City Council approve the Lot Split requested by Great River Energy,legally described as follows: Great River Energy Description: That part of the East'/z of the Northwest'/a of Section 29,Township 115,Range 18,lying southerly of the centerline of Right-of-Way of County Road No. 38 (Ehlet's Path) as shown on Dakota County Road Right-of-Way Map No. 81 filed December 27, 1988 Doc. #871736. Pine Bend Development Description: That part of the East'/z of the Northwest'/a of Section 29,Township 115,Range 18,lying northerly of the centerline of Right-of-Way of County Road No. 38 (Ehler's Path) as shown on Dakota County Road Right-of-Way Map No. 81 filed December 27, 1988 Doc. #871736. WHEREAS,on October 17,2006,the City Council of the City of Rosemount reviewed the Planning Commission's recommendation and the Lot Split requested by Great River Energy;and NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED,the City Council of the City of Rosemount hereby approves the Lot Split requested by Great River Energy,legally described as follows: Great River Energy Description: That part of the East'/z of the Northwest'/a of Section 29,Township 115,Range 18,lying southerly of the centerline of Right-of-Way of County Road No.38 (Ehler's Path) as shown on Dakota County Road Right-of-Way Map No. 81 filed December 27, 1988 Doc. #871736. Pine Bend Development Description: That part of the East'/z of the Northwest'/4 of Section 29,Township 115,Range 18,lying northerly of the centerline of Right-of-Way of County Road No. 38 (Ehler's Path) as shown on Dakota County Road Right-of-Way Map No. 81 filed December 27, 1988 Doc. #871736. RESOLUTION 2006-1 0 9 NOW,THEREFORE,FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED,the Council of the City of Rosemount hereby approves the Lot Split requested by Great River Energy,subject to: 1. Payment of G.T.S. established by the current fee schedule. 2. Recording of restrictive covenants for the parcel south of Ehlers Path to limit the potential for dwelling units to a maximum of 1,ensuring 1 per 40 density. 3. Dedicate the 100 feet right-of-way for Ehlers Path (50 feet on each side of the centerline)if not previously recorded and standard drainage and utility easements per the Subdivision Ordinance. 4. Dedicate the 75 feet of the north half of right-of-way for County Road 42 (75 feet on the north side of the centerline). 5. Payment of a Park Dedication Fee in the amount of$180,000.00. This amount is calculated based on$22,784.00 per acre times 7.9 acres of park dedication to arrive at the$180,000.00 ADOPTED this 17th day of October,2006 by the City Council of the City of Rosemount. ./.;..,, g,"frile.---g<f‘ ../.."71-0 William H. Droste,Mayor ATTEST: fi'LVri Lf\Cti(f Lie-I Amy Domeier, ity Clerk Motion by: DeBettignies Second by: Shoe—Corrigan Voted in favor: DeBettignies, Shoe—Corrigan, Droste, Baxter Voted against: Sterner Member absent: None L 2 ROSR\4OUNT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CITY COUNCIL City Council Regular Meeting: February 20, 2007 AGENDA ITEM: Case 06-67-SP, 06-68-LC, 06-69-CON Rosemount Business Center Lot AGENDA SECTION: Combination, Rezoning, and Planned New Business Unit Development Master Development Plan and Final Development Plan PREPARED BY: Eric Zweber, AICP; Senior Planner AGENDA NO. (6A. ATTACHMENTS: None. APPROVED BY: RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to continue the Rosemount Business Cent Lot Combination, Rezoning, and Planned Unit Development Master Development Ian and Final Development Plan to the March 20, 2007 City Council Meeting. ISSUE Rosemount Business Center,LLC has requested a continuance of their proposal to the March 20, 2007 City Council meeting. Their stated reason is to allow them to evaluate the financial implications of their proposed design changes. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends a motion to continue the Rosemount Business Center Lot Combination,Rezoning, and Planned Unit Development Master Development Plan and Final Development Plan to the March 20, 2007 City Council Meeting. From: Daniel Huntington [mailto:matdan©frontiernet.net] Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 2:52 PM To: Zweber,Eric Subject: RE: Rosemount Business Center Continuance Eric, Please continue the Rosemount Business Center Council meeting until March 20. I will be in touch with you before then to verify that we are ready to proceed. Thanks Dan