HomeMy WebLinkAboutPacket IS ROSE A 1�/j AO AGENDA
City Council Regular Meeting
August 6, 2007
CITY COUNCIL 7:30 p.m.
City Council Chambers, City Hall
1. Call to Order/Pledge of Allegiance
2. Additions or Corrections to Agenda
3. Public Comment
4. Response to Public Comment
5. DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS/BUSINESS
6. CONSENT AGENDA
a. Minutes of the July 11,2007 City Council Special Proceedings
b. Minutes of the July 11,2007 City Council Work Session Proceedings
c. Minutes of the July 17,2007 City Council Proceedings
d. Authorization of Technology Study
e. Bills Listing
f. Resolution Authorizing Execution of Grant Agreement with the MN Department of Public
Safety—Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management for the Buffer Zone
Protection Program
g. Receive Donations—Parks&Recreation Dept.
h. Expenditure Approval from the Donation Account—Parks&Recreation Dept.
i. Receive Bids/Award Contract-2007 Utility Maintenance Improvements, ENG 133
j. County Highway 42 Corridor Study Update
k. Livable Communities Demonstration Account Resolution
I. Award Demolition Bid
7. PUBLIC HEARINGS
8. OLD BUSINESS
9. NEW BUSINESS
a. Rosemount High School Security Fence Conditional Use,07-31-CUP
10. ANNOUNCEMENTS
11. ADJOURNMENT
4 ROSEMOUNT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
CITY COUNCIL
City Council Meeting: August 6, 2007
AGENDA ITEM: County Highway 42 Corridor Study AGENDA SECTION:
Update Consent
PREPARED BY: Andrew J. Brotzler, PE, City Engineer Vyr AGENDA NO. (/• I,
v
ATTACHMENTS: Resolution, Maps, Dakota County APPROVED BY:
Memorandum
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt a Resolution Requesting Dakota Co my
Update the County Highway 42 Corridor Study
BACKGROUND:
In 1999,Dakota County,in cooperation with the City of Rosemount and other Dakota County cities
completed a corridor study for County Highway 42. The impetus for this study was the designation of
County Highway 42 as a principal arterial and the highways role as a contiguous east-west route across
Dakota County into Scott County. The primary goal of the Study related to the City was the planning of
future access locations east of 145d' Street in conjunction with the City's land use plan at the time.
Since the completion of this Study, the City has prepared and adopted an updated land use plan for land
along County Highway 42 east of Auburn Avenue to Trunk Highway 52. As part of this land use plan
update, staff has worked with Dakota County staff to develop an updated plan for access to County
Highway 42 as development occurs. The attached maps show the proposed access modifications on
County Highway 42 between 145th Street and Trunk Highway 52 along with the proposed City street
system as identified in the draft Transportation Plan.
Specific modifications to the study include:
1. The addition of three 3/4 intersections along the corridor to connect with future City minor
collector streets. These intersections will help reduce turning movements at busier, signalized
intersections, and are not expected to result in any reductions in mobility for CSAH 42. These
intersections would be spaced a minimum of mile apart, consistent with other segments of
CSAH 42,and consistent with the County's access spacing guidelines.
2. A long-term plan for signalized intersections at CR 73 and CSAH 71 due to expected land uses in
the area. These intersections are currently shown as unsignalized full accesses,but as traffic
volumes increase,it is likely that these intersections will become signalized as conditions warrant.
The resulting signal spacing is 1 —11/2 miles.
3. Inclusion of the current design for the TH 52/CSAH 42 interchange,along with the removal of a
right-in/right-out access east of CSAH 71,and removal of a signal with the interchange itself.
G:\Streets\COUNTY ROAD 42\UpdateCorridorStudyCC8-6-07.doc
i
PURPOSE/ACTION REQUESTED
• Adopt an update of the County Highway 42 Corridor Study recommendations for
Segment 15 of the County State Aid Highway(CSAH) corridor between Trunk
Highway(TH) 3 and TH 52 in Rosemount.
SUMMA
RY
An update to the CH 42 Corridor Study recommendations is proposed to ensure the
proper development of a roadway system that will adequately support changes in the City
of Rosemount's future land use plans, and to meet the intent of the CH 42 Corridor Study
to balance the need for mobility and safety on CSAH 42 with the need to maintain a
reasonable level of accessibility to support area businesses and residents.
Background. In 1999, Dakota County and the City of Rosemount adopted the CH 42
Corridor Study's recommendations to provide an overall vision for future planning along
CSAH 42, including a plan for access along Segment 15, between TH 3 and TH 52
(Attachment A). This plan was developed based as part of an overall vision for CSAH 42
that balances the need for mobility and safety with the need to maintain a reasonable
level of accessibility to support area businesses and residents.
Since 1999, a number of changes have taken place in the area of Segment 15. These
changes include:
1. At the time of the study, much of the land adjacent to the corridor between 145th
Street and TH 52 was guided for agricultural uses. The City now has a mixture of
urban commercial and residential uses planned for the area(Attachment B).
2. The City also adopted a plan for future collector streets to ensure the development
of a local roadway system that will adequately support this anticipated
development, and will support the principal arterial function of CSAH 42
(Attachment B).
3. Additional preliminary design work for a system interchange at TH 52 has been
completed, which is different from the single point interchange shown in the plan.
Updated Recommendations: Based on these changes, City and County staff worked
together to amend the access plan for Segment 15 consistent with the intent of the CH 42
Corridor Study. The updates are shown in Attachment A, and include:
1. The addition of three 3/4 intersections along the corridor to connect with future
City minor collector streets. These intersections will help reduce turning
movements at busier, signalized intersections, and are not expected to result in
any reductions in mobility for CSAH 42. These intersections would be spaced a
minimum of 1/4 mile apart, consistent with other segments of CSAH 42, and
consistent with the County's access spacing guidelines.
2. A long-term plan for signalized intersections at CR 73 and CSAH 71 due to
expected land uses in the area. These intersections are currently shown as
unsignalized full accesses,but as traffic volumes increase, it is likely that these
intersections will become signalized as conditions warrant. The resulting signal
spacing is 1 —1 1/2 miles.
3. Inclusion of the current design for the TH 52/CSAH 42 interchange, along with
the removal of a right-in/right-out access east of CSAH 71, and removal of a
signal with the interchange itself.
EN
I
All of the original partners of the study have been informed of this update, and all were
invited to a meeting held on June 27, 2007 to discuss the changes and their consistency
with the intent of the original CH 42 Corridor Study recommendations. The update was
approved by the Rosemount City Council on August 6, 2007.
EXPLANATION OF FISCAL/FTE IMPACT
This access plan will be implemented as opportunities arise through development
approvals and through roadway improvement projects (such as the TH 52 interchange
project). This update will have no impact on the current estimated costs for the
interchange project.
RESOLUTION
Adoption Of An Update To The County Highway 42 Corridor Study
Recommendations For Segment 15
WHEREAS, In 1999, a joint study of the CSAH 42 corridor was completed by Dakota and Scott
Counties; the Cities of Apple Valley, Burnsville, Lakeville, Prior Lake, Rosemount, Savage, and
Shakopee; the Metropolitan Council; the Minnesota Department of Transportation; and the
Minnesota Valley Transit Authority; and
WHEREAS, the agreed upon goal of the study was to improve the operations of CSAH 42 as a
regional highway, while accommodating existing and planned developments; and
WHEREAS, Dakota County and the City of Rosemount both adopted the CH 42 Corridor Study to
provide an overall vision for future planning along the CSAH 42 corridor; and
WHEREAS, Rosemount has since changed its plans for land use in the area of CSAH 42
between TH 3 and TH 52; and
WHEREAS, Rosemount has also developed a plan for a system of interconnected collector
roadways in the area to support this development and to support the function of CSAH 42 as a
principal arterial roadway; and
WHEREAS, Dakota County and the City of Rosemount have been working together on system
interchange design for the interchange of CSAH 42 and TH 52; and
WHEREAS,the County Engineer recommends adoption of this update to the CH 42 Corridor
Study recommendations.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Dakota County Board of Commissioners
hereby adopts this update of the CH 42 Corridor Study for Segment 15 in the City of Rosemount.
A
rn >%I
- A o § _
- V � ss :�.� rn �
— — - - -._.. HI
ZS HI i 1 A �/ v"
/1 f f73 0
41
11
E E
o
0 >
`._....lL HD �` V n.t IL HO \ Q )
r
•
u = Ch
5
co
1
co
o
t.
z'
r
f101 o
LL
Z Z ❑ n d
• W
r Q
t� W
1..-.._ .... EL 80
£L !!D w a.
V —a re
y «r. A 0 p'0
Yin r H
- W _
/ 1 LU
0
CC
A ;NI
rk Y E
CNI
ei
a
V •.I
2 e
q
-az 1 • c
1 N
o a a •
•
c v o v � 1. tt
N N is•to y- 3 'b ry. p
TO CO
lO N -- .,.• L� x d o 0 0 Hl 4s
so v " �!.,rr t ,y 0-Q 1
'3It •^t6Y.' ..y ,v>t`:.�1 �� N --4_-!__- _�; \ /' �'P bFF
N a sF , '_1 u N LL cvi I 1 � .
LL Q 14 L Y
>n camf , I u x i .1 J /,.! • zex _
� V ..I r!gg,! I N T •
x 1 'i C 0 i. �`�� �\ v A7 1' 0i�'.qn w:.-:' VS!.
tt
C O /F I{� a r•'1 I• o tr'N�s ~ §ki IIr rrr.=I _1
•tl:CR." :st ,..? 4vta.
I . . 44/A1• '714
_..
1! )
..., , •
•
• .,, . >.iiicv
m in
I
t,1
A
a)
.....i'-IL 1;'
Q.,,,')i i-..--15T, A " —70
(1'''ifj -I .•-•
\ V 1!,
._!_.. „, .,,, ..:-. 431
Irv:0._. ..........4i7-...
..., „
.---=',,r..;----------- 'ZS HI ..A,A.•
II ' ,J
:,. -cs cu co
,--,!1 1!;' cu cn
II u.,
4 ,
z
,,, '0 1
1
c CO 1_
•
3,..--- . (NI '' „ 1 .........______............
......... E E
......-
I 1
o 0
, u o >
• _. cc LI
. <F,,,,1 '-..,...,,,,,- , • ''-. ••••-,.I II
IL HD rZ, ,;,;7, IL HD \ ,E.• A =-1' • • " • ' - . E
,! ... -•• ,- -
.-1.t•',-':
[ ::.-y. • — •--,,:-, .
ccia) •i
', :•'.;
t.- , - , - cs)
, r 'A-
......t,
•— —1 ,.....
co
V !.
'AA kf 1
•
, I
,
I
LL
' 0 .a ,_
7t-,
cp,, A .
a / -. 5 • 451-)1 !!„,1/ ' - -r :,-,,,, 0
....,...,_,....
V :ii Lu t
Z - ' . A L1.1 1 1 1
i •,:r
I 1M a q g.
.....................................
-,•,-.. . LU z .
----3'7-------7 .1, z . EL 8D <1,'.--7: A
1 ,i- ... ,
.,,,.....„ • 2 "
'''''l
: •;-:: ,-.-:.1 ci) \ 5 ' 2 e .E!
, A...
X \ t,.''', 0 ii, '' .e
. 1 .
LLJ • \ / .:. . ._ .) ,±
E :
1 E '`-. Li..1 <
• c\J
t 0 0 los)
.......... .:-3 .
\-1"-- —
CC "
\ • ,::
,...
A ;nil
' ...,
E
1.0\ ,
, v er44411 0 pm'
\ „
11. hi
\
;10• -).i -
..
v
2..!--,:i;„ \ r-----<.A.
Z
,.! \'-'.,
g--
„
. .
. .,,
; •,._ ,,E
ci-
Eir \ 4 T
1E'i E''-; . .
,, rm
,a cr ch ' :' 4-, •zr 0 ..1". \. - +
0 •tt . .. 1. A';',1,1!4,.';'''f , d 1," ...fji,- - -
0 CV cr CAD A 4)Z;5,..;'; :.g . .':': :,1' . — )-. , ,- ,'-=4:-..:- .,.. ,A. = '•'''2.1 ';:i,,,t-':,,,.:„,:
:.----2-f--,r, ',. t i -- _,f4...i:-.1!:.'„ .. _ i•:,:i:';1.:•4 z
...,_. 1 -;,1 ',r11!:1''::-T,•':,:E1'.'- ' • - ..'::.Zq'ii'Fii-1..."1A.,. '1 — 1 ‘'''',1',:3.a'.;,..c: 0
To co 0 o
Tri co
N r••• . ‘ f.-.1-1i ''':'A ..,i,,,nr,tj.e,
'E 8 0 - - . -:;.-. co 0
co 0
el-<12-<
JL
A1 '", , ''""1 , 'EN '", EEEEE.. E'Er,EE: .!1.:#
!211.:14.1..,,,,,..,:::?,' :'F,. ..„,„ .,,I ..'.. -7. ,,,,-1:;..4:1141-;1,111,-
to
— 411:7.1'1' 2 1,,,.....i!.,1 . ,: .1...:4,, . 1 ,-t..;._ .:-1 .,..i.
,,:!.,,,..,„..,„.,.11.,„:,
u_ 8 c•J 1,-,,,,,i t;ii .1,:,,o, , ,,,:.....„J..,,,,I,:i. 11 .11;1 ''''''') 2
-,,,...::: 4,,,, II ...•Al A.'*!
T",,AA-, ;.:,i. Iii !AI, .1
'''''' 1 .. .......,,
. ...., .......
. . . . . 0
c
‘:i
,j.,k I ii, , ,,
,......
-•-••••. • `''15 ct) 1 '-'..,\4\q:•, 1 ..,',;1„;j1;1•,;„,),i1; ,-1-,,! 'i11-:,-,1 .1,1,..,1 21;1 a) 1..,j„...;„.,4.. ....:..7:::;_,/i i .:7, ;f:,1 I,.;; r,i „.,:„.••
Lna.) L•''77i .(-"'"r„: 5'i:i-,;c1 'ii
a) -, I 1,„7-,•:,„'.:.';''.'.I„...,-',4'...,,,,-..:!,I I r•„; ''''''''''-''',--7:•.;:;:,""C;i .P..,' -,>. t I'-',-! ! ,t,:-Z.--v, •,..::.-. ...-:,,-;',1 if,'.9.`'"-„;."...,:;.?5,.;NI.., ,
..... ,
),....-..il.,..t...,,;.\,._L !..ti II ‘,5.?-....--,....-4....i"
ROSEtvlOUt\11T EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
CITY COUNCIL
City Council Special Meeting: August 6, 2007
AGENDA ITEM: Livable Communities Demonstration AGENDA SECTION:
Account Revised Resolution Consent
PREPARED BY: Kim Lindquist, Community Development AGENDA NO. Lo• v .
Director
ATTACHMENTS: Original Resolution; Resolution
Rescinding Original Resolution; Revised APPROVED BY:
Resolution
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to Approve a Resolution Rescinding Resolution No. 2007-54 Identifying the Need
for Livable Communities Demonstration Account Funding and Authorizing Applications for
Grant Funds.
Motion to Approve a revised Resolution Identifying the Need for Livable Communities
Demonstration Account Funding and Authorizing Applications for Grant Funds.
DISCUSSION
An application for a Livable Communities Demonstration Grant was submitted to the Metropolitan
Council on July 16,2007,to request funding for items associated with the implementation of the '
Stonebridge,Core Block East project. This item was approved by the City Council at a special
meeting on July 11t. The Metropolitan Council has informed staff that additional information was
necessary in section 3 of the resolution.Attached are resolutions rescinding the original resolution
and a revised resolution with the necessary facts supporting No. 3 of the findings on page 2 of the
original resolution.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Approve the two Resolutions.
I
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2007-
A RESOLUTION RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 2007-54 IDENTIFYING THE
NEED FOR LIVABLE COMMUNITIES DEMONSTRATION ACCOUNT FUNDING
AND AUTHORIZING AN APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS
WHEREAS,the City Council for the City of Rosemount approved Resolution No. 2007-54 on
July 11,2007, supporting the submittal of an application for Metropolitan Council Livable
Communities Demonstration Account grant funds for the project component(s) identified in the
application;and
WHEREAS,the City Council has determined that it is appropriate to rescind Resolution No. 2007-
54.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council for the City of Rosemount hereby
rescinds Resolution No. 2007-54 in its entirety.
ADOPTED this 6th day of August,2007,by the City Council of the City of Rosemount.
William H. Droste,Mayor
ATTEST:
Amy Domeier, City Clerk
Motion by: Second by:
Voted in favor:
Voted against:
Member absent:
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2007-
A RESOLUTION IDENTIFYING THE NEED FOR
LIVABLE COMMUNITIES DEMONSTRATION ACCOUNT FUNDING AND
AUTHORIZING AN APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS
WHEREAS, the City of Rosemount is a participant in the Livable Communities Act's Housing
Incentives Program for 2007 as determined by the Metropolitan Council, and is therefore eligible
to apply for Livable Communities Demonstration Account funds;and
WHEREAS, the City has identified a proposed project within the City that meets the
Demonstration Account's purposes and criteria and is consistent with and promotes the purposes
of the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act and the policies of the Metropolitan Council's
adopted metropolitan development guide;and
WHEREAS, the City has the institutional, managerial and financial capability to ensure adequate
project administration; and
WHEREAS, the City certifies that it will comply with all applicable laws and regulations as stated
in the grant agreement;and
WHEREAS, the City agrees to act as legal sponsor for the project contained in the grant
application submitted on July 16, 2007; and
WHEREAS, the City acknowledges Livable Communities Demonstration Account grants are
intended to fund projects or project components that can serve as models, examples or prototypes
for development or redevelopment projects elsewhere in the region, and therefore represents that
the proposed project or key components of the proposed project can be replicated in other
metropolitan-area communities; and
WHEREAS, only a limited amount of grant funding is available through the Metropolitan
Council's Livable Communities Demonstration Account during each funding cycle and the
Metropolitan Council has determined it is appropriate to allocate those scarce grant funds only to
eligible projects that would not occur without the availability of Demonstration Account grant
funding.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that,after appropriate examination and due
consideration, the governing body of the City:
1. Finds that it is in the best interests of the City's development goals and priorities for the
proposed project to occur at this particular site and at this particular time.
2. Finds that the project component(s) for which Livable Communities Demonstration Account
funding is sought:
RESOLUTION 2007-
(a) will not occur solely through private or other public investment within the reasonably
foreseeable future; and
(b) will not occur within two years after a grant award unless Livable Communities
Demonstration Account funding is made available for this project at this time.
3. Represents that the City has undertaken reasonable and good faith efforts to procure funding
for the project component for which Livable Communities Demonstration Account funding
is sought but was not able to find or secure from other sources funding that is necessary for
project component completion within two years and states that this representation is based
on the following reasons and supporting facts:
The main source of local funding for future Downtown revitalization efforts will
come from the tax increment generated by new development, of which this project
is the first phase. The project is not expected to generate income until 2011, so no
increment will be available before that time.
The City and developer have received commitments for a Dakota County
Community Development Agency development grant, and the CDA is aiding the
project though a tax credit program and Hope funds. Additional funds from the
CDA are not expected.
While the redevelopment of Downtown has been a key priority for the City of
Rosemount for several years, the City faces the need for other investments to meet
community goals, a need intensified by the rapid growth of the community. An
increased expenditure from City funding sources beyond the already substantial
investment the City has committed would deplete resources that should be
directed to other community needs and goals.
4. Authorizes its City Administrator to submit on behalf of the City an application for
Metropolitan Council Livable Communities Demonstration Account grant funds for the
project component(s) identified in the application, and to execute such agreements as may be
necessary to implement the project on behalf of the City.
ADOPTED this 6th day of August,2007, by the City Council of the City of Rosemount.
William H. Droste,Mayor
ATTEST:
Amy Domeier, City Clerk
Motion by: Second by:
Voted in favor:
Voted against:
Member absent:
115 �P
v�
G•.)
SSG
0 OJT` cpv �0' \. , 0
�. G 2pp1 G*SOP �.l: ** NO
• u
Qom_
.
0
01
o J� � P�a�a v�s�,G ree�s • na�a •
N 9,� oQ �. ,e
‘S. k.
��QP� mil'• �p�ecko` eo���o�, eoes p, ' el$�,a1 00 0 o�
<G 'e e .4 ti c
PG �GQ � to bra yo4 �t 3 r os
�a QQ (e otae d
Da, e G��� �Q PGA G'ko` o4e0 c°� � 4� 9� e��
0P' O 9` s1 0k ��o
To: � ��C.� Ja��0cl'b�a� fie ' °pe GSl 0.
AGO 0-ca e�,�'s co e °bc °��°• e$��'c �200
S c ac stY t ,� •°,cs. °,O , 'c�,�
From: grad �Ov �''e4es �4 °�°� kSN)co e,�.O �N' � ��
-- P`G�� Ica °s� e�,Q k-'0V , C c.•° •oo. •NN°1 °�¢o
eG1� O{' • e c° 0�1� ,lfi o� odd l�'c
INCLUDES: ,°gab $ 1as�o,� °� ' Al''�'$Is, bk°�ae Ike4 4 49�'
�'e ceb o{'e lei ce.6 e es V''`'
����� ..,kS 4 e D� �00o't'Sc � se's1c0 'Seel
re Q�SGG1'c`10 0,o� 6.owe ti ed, '���2p1°�bl� yes°lid°4
c ��p0 ��s ze�ceea °�clti cNNe'
1S ! `v' e0-
IL
. $
NOT INCLUDED; So
I.) Removal or dispi
2.) Removal or dispos.
3.) Placement of topsoi
Respectfully submitted: _
RFS �g9or- r O
!1"1-ip
`zoo�.� S ett,-.q1A• F$0 �40 ' .yob
� `jF ° de C•IS �•i'CO'N �� SOT
iltie. s; 1 �Co,C ,q� G'�y pp� q
d% �` °�eh ' f°ra�e ford ,q,,40�F�
e
C '
N `
to 0,
•
.0
I
4..
� a i e 'j wad Est .i 6i�*,[4
•
R b< r 'p r '; ` t
3,h , @ .+,A b Y,�`'My', ro'k r .t b - : r C � g , „' k 1.r 14, . .. r 1 , j ; st E �A w "
V.
Y '�'
�� C r �. r;' - ,,i F',, 1 , . •.{ir f. t a,ya ''''''• a ,„ :'�� s' jai:: }F • n
.. ` 4$40,
44 ., a it '"J" , it i.s °' �, W.� a 4q ,� ,�
f�'' ' ,. , ., •' r �" .i� i.l 5'.... y F6 s 4'itio?y1All��,[f,W-aI• ,t 1.41 `it
--•-.;4 ' T"y' " �.� ..
.,' fit," L.:#.P .`'1' 0'`4 . I '.1. -K4...r,wr a£'. r.w , . C' 4 is 3. rr t c `1,', �. sr --- ''daz rs �'4::-. d'a. y c .,,,, .
y
�'�• yt � 4"f C .1 � 1«� k i
b ,;. t r k `4- itf tit..4 �7f .' q -"-i"2,," '' k �'?mo 'i f i ,ri,
t� . } .: t x fi i �.� � - . rt'• g t. ,.
3
7'i`sa�4� a? e' ' _ .w r a, •,$42u.4*- i°-: `"enri ° f. y ''' ' - -
i �k*' i74. ' i•' !,`,x. i•: `' a �u.k c;"' {� X_ r... 3 9 .F' _ +3- 4 C -
r "�a
•
� z'�i a°g` f - '�,,- .,,.'l. . .' - .. .' + 1 S. 1..' �'$a• ,,-fix`l.,'i�`.,, 'w y, r 4 4°'
t a b "
z ' �¢.
k
p a � �" $
..1 + y� �� r t F""'2
ittio
t # .f' 3a +''k& d^[l '+ „''�""3rf t `-. �A .F _ . ,Y,• ?" ,.� ,yF�: "y,';r i.£ t , "
�? ; � '�," '� +ram.^.-w^,.e _ 4r'_ :*y' '� �� > 9- �`w� ��� ��`k� ,> i
g r
V: a? t -rk -" fi of,-:,'• • q i ",4 .kk ,,j 1,,O'r t''�'g y.,' a+y,p 1r a >.
,�"'{ �,y� t 'M _;if r� tr`p T a; `e G�k �wBzV ,+ g
i qg q. p . 4 , .,,L a 'ipc h y.tws$. E .F }�zk-;!4i+��*
gyt'"'�, y, r3 , lrr> b 'n[iifw�� � �� 3 -*Y.. � �Y: 5 1Y K t,� •l „ 4,'�"y,;1 t+ F.cyx?-0 fi -
ye'@ ..at 'rw i. '".Y'"'k, '. 'eE'tksg' -"Y,: �"�' 3��. �}ayy17ffi a�: ,s -wt x,,a '.,. a. t, 1.�'i.`-S� , „w}y. ''' .�. 5'3sAy,
s ' t: e� '.Ss `a 4 4. s.w.+ , ,a ..x,,,,1- .:a... ,ST : ific .
1wX- `u ., .r,-, 'xe -•x-.M1 s / '+. p.'*n ,'R ,it't`v 3. d,�`` Csk,A '. ! >? ."1 "}' `
+v r'.i ':` Ti t ;T-lW „.. •4 • 4 a e h;_ * k'4' r ,. h {t • �r .
i k p� • •R k.: R �,P } : c4„ 1
.�•'!, . } F a t � ,"
�a t' - g? ' ,, ?Sk' 4 Lbe 7d.. .�
-} t ;,.,, . }%+3 c= ct,;clay, . :%-- F •IV:s,! . 43 , ,' � -'K, 4+ -m ;
.mo 1, sJ "4sg}:+r"�' ,,,,I.k ', -, t t C r' _i g .i yC $ :#�...c. Af �^h + . 17-!A {
l S xr# }s, �, MhXIs, . -
r " . I� v'�*; the frefschool The::: .. L. p l
` `( c rof slat(10)foot tall sty T}�t I. ,°�'
y Ig • s„_.i. 4: i :+.X1 ! u�r i h' .':xv k V 6 V," '-�'F T4 �W /x:<
i
t s ...� $4_t' K x a y' w k a$k s Lu ° :,. f" 3' . a 4 �e a rk
L.AH$ '.
1r
a ' d;F iL. s' lag h rega�,the CUP .�
die CtP
R ' `. " '., . 21..g• s. , : d 'w . 4 as v,'th� ta ; >5 � �kw xi.,+;: • "r .Y
it
ly
"'y, i.*+. .' I��KI fi. ..:bi' MR+T' sed thorn*" v er ry N;" t 'v' ra"- :x x.
� } �CCfMM ��M k ' is ze�11 •y X�C 1��i�{� • 4'•t t Y +y"isokt,` h �d`b u �}
y • N.,,
t *ill
�e A a{as�i 7 �y yY s+` •
py '�Nµdii b/ li +s 4 4 ryt f 4
V "k. } };k f s.' t ai au a -.dis f ir`' ' �1P fl�Wl.'4fO'l bF`, r' ,.1T.'�,,,.AAA.l"r "�
dos S ~' �9i wool', • ,P: ..q > r � r '.
. Y, .Y .''l:a ta', R'?}r th ' "Fab 4 �{• ' w i t, •' i t &at�1'!..'
;y !a 1' ..a ,N[v� "FE �'"*' , }.a. _
k btu p lack to e� � +.>. -. ",
d ; ', +5) feet i ( . ; r4. . 7: the - .. o� . f a
`r # i -will .be i�to V,e Y , r�::J+*:,-0r .
"P
y�,A,, t� & �" 7 s Kr a ? yF
qd�x{
,,a r 5 CJ;�#• A ga y,,:
4 ROSEI'4OLINJTF
EXECU
TIVE SUMMARY
CITY COUNCIL
City Council Regular Meeting: August 6, 2007
AGENDA ITEM: Award Demolition Bid AGENDA SECTION:
Consent
PREPARED BY: Kim Lindquist, Community Development
Director AGENDA NO. le. I.
ATTACHMENTS: Draft Resolution, Bid Sheets APPROVED BY:
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve the Resolution awarding the demolition contr to
Semple Excavating, Inc. for not more than $24,320.00.
BACKGROUND
The City acquired the St.Joseph's church property in 2004 to provide land for a new Dakota County
Library. One of the western lots of the library site contains a convent at 14400 Cameo Avenue.
The building is now empty and will need to be demolished in preparation for construction of the
library.
DISCUSSION
The City received three bids for the completion of the demolition: one from Dahn Construction in
the amount of$44,950.00; one from Lloyd's Construction Services, Inc. (LCS) in the amount of
$36,385.00;and one from Semple Excavating, Inc. in the amount of$24,320.00.
Based on the staffs review, the services needed for demolition of the building at 14400 Cameo
Avenue should not exceed $24,320.00 using the estimate provided by Semple Excavating, Inc. Staff
is recommending approval of the low bid by Semple Excavating, Inc. for not more than$24,320.00.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff is recommending approval of the attached resolution.
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2007-
RESOLUTION AWARDING THE DEMOLITION CONTRACT TO
SEMPLE EXCAVATING, INC. FOR $24,320.00
WHEREAS,the City Council for the City of Rosemount acquired the St.Joseph's church property
in 2004 to provide land for a new Dakota County Library;
WHEREAS,one building on the site has been slated for demolition located at 14400 Cameo
Avenue;
WHEREAS,the City of Rosemount's Building Official received three bids relating to the
demolition of the building;and
WHEREAS,the City Council reviewed the proposals submitted by three vendors and Semple
Excavating,Inc.was the lowest bidder for the project.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED the City Council has chosen Semple Excavating, Inc.
and awarded the contract not to exceed$24,320.00.
ADOPTED this 6th day of August,2007.
William H. Droste,Mayor
ATTEST:
Amy Domeier,City Clerk
Motion by: Second by:
Voted in favor:
Voted against:
Member absent: