Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout6.h. Case 21-06-FP Final Plat for Rosewood Crossing Second Addition EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Council Regular Meeting Date: April 20, 2021 AGENDA ITEM: Case 21-06-FP Final Plat for Rosewood Crossing Second Addition AGENDA SECTION: Consent PREPARED BY: Kyle Klatt, Senior Planner AGENDA NO. 6.h. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution (Final Plat); Resolution (PUD Agreement Amendment); Subdivision Agreement; Site Location Map; Rosewood Crossing Final Plat; Final Site Plan; Final Grading Plan, Storm Water Management Plan; Final Utility Plans (Water, Sewer, Storm Sewer); Final Landscape Plan; Revised Phasing Plan; Architectural Plans (approved); City Engineer Review Memo Dated 3-25-21 APPROVED BY: LJM RECOMMENDED ACTION: The Planning Commission and Staff recommend the City Council adopt the following motions: 1) Motion to adopt a resolution approving the final plat for Rosewood Crossing 2nd Addition subject to conditions. 2) Motion to approve the subdivision development agreement for Rosewood Crossing 2nd Addition and authorizing the Mayor and Clerk to enter into this agreement. 3) Motion to adopt a resolution approving a minor amendment to the Rosewood Crossing Planned Unit Development Agreement updating the development and phasing plans. SUMMARY The City Council is being asked to consider a request by Luke Israelson (Rosewood Crossing, LLC.) for final plat approval of the Rosewood Crossing Second Addition. The proposed final plat incorporates the southern portion of the Rosewood Crossing Planned Unit Development (PUD), a 225-unit, seven building apartment development approved by the City in 2016 and located south of 145th Street and east of downtown Rosemount. The developer has proposed building the project in seven different phases that correspond to each of the buildings, and previously received approval of a final plat for the first two phases. The current request is a final plat for all remaining phases and specifically the five remaining 32- unit apartment buildings. In conjunction with the initial Rosewood Crossing plat, the City also approved final development plans associated with the PUD. All submitted final construction plans for the second addition are consistent with the approved PUD plans. The attached architectural plans are included for reference only. Please note that the submitted plans include some minor changes to the approved PUD development plans based on actual field conditions. The applicant has also provided a slightly updated drawing 2 associated with the approved phasing plan to more specifically call out the timing of the private road improvements. These updated plans should be added to the ones included in the original PUD agreement for Rosewood Crossing; therefore, staff has drafted a resolution updating the original agreement in addition to updated language for the agreement itself. The Planning Commission reviewed the updated documents, but is not required to act on them since they represent a minor amendment to the PUD (the City Council has the responsibility to update the agreement). Applicant: Rosewood Crossing, LLC (Luke Israelson) Property Owner: Rosewood Crossing, LLC Property Location: Outlot A – Rosewood Crossing Size of Property: 9.62 Acres Comprehensive Plan Designation: HDR High Density Residential Zoning: R-4/PUD High Density Residential/PUD Number of Units: 160 units overall/5 32-unit buildings Site Density: 16.6 units/acre overall Current Neighboring Land Uses: North – Rosewood Crossing Apartments (2) and Light Industrial South – Residential and Future Commercial East – Detached Townhomes West – Railroad and Rosemount Park and Ride PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT The Planning Commission reviewed and recommended approval the request at their March 30, 2021 meeting. The item was on the consent agenda as no public hearing is required for approval of a final plat. One of the Commissioners did ask for clarification that the plans still include a connection to Boxwood Path; staff noted that there is a planned connection that will provide limited, gated access for emergency vehicles. BACKGROUND The overall development plans for Rosewood Crossing include seven 32-unit apartment buildings and one caretaker’s residence/office/meeting space structure that will all access a private street system that loops around the site. The site plans also include 320 parking stalls located either along the private street or within detached garage structures near the apartment buildings they serve. The applicant has proposed building the individual buildings in phases moving from the north part of the property to the south, and received final plat approval for the first two buildings in 2017. With construction of the first two apartment buildings complete, and work on the caretaker’s residence and office underway, the applicant is now seeking final plat approval for the remaining building areas within the PUD area. Originally, the applicant was planning to plat each building as a separate final plat, but has decided to combine the remaining final phases into the proposed Rosewood Crossing Second Addition. The applicant still intends to build approximately one building each year. The master development and final PUD plans were approved in 2016 with the preliminary plat and 2017 with the final plat. These plans included detailed information concerning site grading, storm water management, access, private street design, parking layouts, landscaping, and building architectural designs. All the construction plans submitted with the final plat application are consistent with these plans, but have been updated in two ways: • The private access drive across the rail spur between Rosewood Crossing and the adjacent Rosewood Village townhouses to the east has been modified to provide a separated curb cut for the driveway, which was a requirement of the preliminary plat approval. The grading has also been slightly modified in this area to accommodate the existing topography in the area. 3 • As a result of the grading changes, the garage structures serving building four have been reconfigured from two buildings into one with a net reduction of two parking stalls. In addition, the applicant submitted an upgraded overall phasing plan depicting the timing for private roadway improvements by tying these improvements to specific project phases. Each of these changes are minor in nature, and can be approved administratively by staff separate from the platting approvals. All previous conditions of approval required under the master development plan will carry forward with the final plat, including a condition that caps the overall number of apartment buildings permitted at six. This condition requires the developer to conduct a parking study prior to construction of the fourth building, and if no issues are identified as part of this review, the applicant will be able to proceed with all seven buildings. ISSUE ANALYSIS Legal Authority . This application is a Quasi-Judicial action. The final plat application is Quasi-Judicial because the City has a set of standards and requirements for reviewing this type of application that is described in detail below. Generally, if the final plat meets the ordinance requirements it must be approved. Final Plat. The final plat replats Outlot A of Rosewood Crossing into separate lots for the five remaining apartment buildings and accessory garage structures. The remainder of the site will be platted as either an outlot along the south/southeastern property boundary for storm water management or Lot 12, Block 1 which will include all the common open space around each building and the private play area between two of the buildings. The plat includes easements for drainage and utility purposes, and these easements will be subject to final approval by the City Engineer. Land use and Zoning . The proposed final plat will facilitate the construction of 160 apartment units spread out between five structures, and the plat is consistent with the current land use and zoning classifications (as amended in 2016 with the preliminary plat). The subject property is guided HDR – High Density Residential and is zoned R-4/PUD High Density Residential Planned Unit Development. The overall site density will be 18.9 units per acre once complete, which is well within the range of 12 to 30 units per acre allowed under the high-density residential zoning standards. All buildings constructed within the subdivision will need to comply with the final PUD development plans approved for Rosewood Crossing. The approved building design is attached for reference. Lot and Building Standards . As noted above, each apartment building and detached garage will be placed on a separate lot of record. The caretakers building and common gathering space was also previously platted as a separate lot within the first Rosewood Commons plat. Because it is a PUD, there are no issues associated with internal lot lines, only setbacks from the a0djoining properties. Building setback requirements are 30’ for the principal structures from all sides of the PUD and 50’ front yard and 10’ side yard setbacks for accessory structures which would include the parking garages. The plan meets these standards. Building and Architecture. The final development plans approved in 2017 included elevations and architectural plans for the apartment buildings and garages. The applicant is not proposing any changes to the approved plans, which were found to meet all applicable requirements from the zoning ordinance and PUD conditions. These plans are included for reference, but are not part of the formal final plat approval. 4 The composition of apartment unit types within the project are listed as follows (the percentages are consistent with the preliminary development plans): Proposed Types of Apartment Units for Rosewood Commons Type of Unit Size Number of Units Percentage of Units One Bedroom 700 Square Feet 100 63% Two Bedroom 829-894 Square Feet 60 37% Parks and Open Space. The developer is being asked to pay a fee in lieu of park land for the project based on the current approved rate of $2,500 per unit for a high-density residential project. This amount will be collected with the building permit for each of the buildings. To date the City has collected $162,500 in part fees for the two existing buildings and caretaker’s residence. The master plan includes a small private playground area on the southern portion of the site in the back of buildings four, six, and seven. As noted in the master plan review, the final details for the play area should be submitted to the City for review prior to construction. The PUD phasing plan identifies that the playground will be installed as part of phase four. Access and Parking . The City’s approval of the master development plan included several conditions related to parking and access across the site. The final development plans were updated to address maneuvering concerns at the 145th Street entrance, and now provide adequate stacking for vehicles waiting to exit the site onto 145th Street. The phasing plan also includes the construction of a specific number of parking stalls within each project phase. Overall the applicant is proposing 448 parking stalls of which 111 will be located within the detached accessory garage structures and 337 will be exterior surface parking stalls, around each building. 130 of these stalls were constructed with the first two buildings, while the remainder will be constructed within the final plat area. The number and location of parking stalls is consistent with the preliminary development plan approval. The conditions of preliminary plan approval specified that the project was approved for six buildings and the office building, and that the parking situation had to be evaluated before a seventh building could be constructed. The parking evaluation must be completed before the fourth phase is constructed, at which point the City will have the ability to either find that the parking provided is adequate and the developer can proceed with all seven buildings, or that the parking is not adequate to meet the actual demand on the site. If parking is not adequate, one building will need to be eliminated from the plan. Because the last five phases are all included in the proposed final plat area, staff is recommending a condition of approval that will only allow a building permit to be issued for a seventh building upon the completion of a parking study that finds no issues with the demand for parking on the site. The updated phasing plan includes two temporary loop roads that will be constructed with phases three and five respectively. The temporary roads will provide a secondary outlet to the private rail spur crossing or will provide a connection around the southern portion of the site. These connections will be useful for maintaining good emergency vehicle access throughout the site and for providing an alternate exit in case on of the access drives is blocked. The applicant is proposing to use a class 5 gravel surface for the temporary connections; staff is willing to accept the temporary gavel surface provided it is designed to accommodate emergency vehicles. Additionally, staff is recommending a condition of approval that requires a turn-around area approved by the City at the termination of the private streets prior to completion of the access road loop. 5 Phasing Plan. The Rosewood Crossing Second Addition final plat covers the last five phases of the project and will allow construction to commence on the remaining buildings without any additional approvals (other than a building permit) from the City. Each remaining phase of the project will essentially include one of the 32-unit apartment buildings, detached garage structure with 16 parking stalls, surface parking around each building, access road extension, fencing to the furthest extent of each phase, and landscaping. Water and sewer service will be extended in each phase with the other improvements; roughly half of the sewer was installed with the first two project phases. Landscaping and Tree Preservation. The landscaping plan provided with the previous site approvals indicates a total of 240 trees across the entire development. This exceeds the 233 trees required by code (eight plus one tree per unit); and leaves 172 trees to planted with the 2nd Addition final plat area. The majority of the new trees are located along the eastern property line to help provide screening and buffering to the residences east of the rail spur. The tree preservation plan provided with the original PUD application indicated that the developer will be removing 196 caliper inches of existing vegetation beyond the threshold for removal without replacement being required. Because of the amount of landscaping required for the site before any replacement, the City allowed the applicant pay in lieu of planting for the trees. The $11,700 fee was paid with the first building permit within the development, and will be used to fund the plating of trees on public property in the City. Signage. The applicant is proposing a monument sign that will be located at the entrance along 145th Street. A sign permit for the sign may be approved administratively so long as it meets all the requirements of the Sign Ordinance Engineering . The City’s project engineer has reviewed the final plat and final construction plans and provided comments in the Engineer’s Memo dated March 25, 2021. Generally, the comments pertain to information that must be included for review prior to building permit approval. A portion of the development fees for the project were paid with the first addition; the remainder of the fees will be due with this development as follows (for 9.62 acres): $10,341.50 for sanitary sewer trunk charges, $53,821.60 for storm sewer trunk charges (estimated, may be adjusted once final lot areas are calculated), and $62,530 for water main trunk charges. CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATION Staff and the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council approve the application for a Final Plat for Rosewood Crossing Second Addition subject to the conditions of approval outlined in the recommended action section above. CITY OF ROSEMOUNT DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2021- 33 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT FOR ROSEWOOD CROSSING SECOND ADDITION WHEREAS, KJ Walk Inc., 6001 Egan Drive, Suite 100, Savage, MN (Applicant) has submitted an application to the City of Rosemount for a Final Plat concerning property legally described as follows: Outlot A, Rosewood Crossing, Dakota County, Minnesota WHEREAS, on March 30, 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount reviewed the Final Plat for Rosewood Crossing Second Addition; and WHEREAS, on March 30, 2021, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Final Plat for Rosewood Crossing Second Addition, subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, on April 20, 2021, the City Council of the City of Rosemount reviewed the Planning Commission’s recommendation and the Final Plat for Rosewood Crossing Second Addition. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Rosemount hereby approves the Final Plat for Rosewood Crossing Second Addition, subject to the following conditions: 1)Execution of a subdivision agreement. 2)Incorporation of recommendations from the City Engineer in a review memorandum dated March 25, 2021 relative to drainage, grading, street design, easements, utilities and the adjacent sidewalks. 3)Payment of a fee in lieu of park land dedication for each unit consistent with the City’s adopted fee schedule. 4)Execution of a minor amendment to the Rosewood Crossing PUD Agreement to incorporate the updated site and phasing plans. 5)Provision of all easements as required by the City Engineer. 6)No building permit may be issued for the seventh building (Lot 8, Block 1) until a parking study is conducted after completion and occupancy of the third building. If the study identifies a shortage of parking within the PUD area, the applicant will need to construct more off-street parking in lieu of a seventh building. If there are no issues identified with the parking study, the City will allow the developer to proceed with all seven buildings as depicted on the site plans. 7)The temporary loop roads associated with phases three and five shall be constructed of a material deemed suitable by the City for emergency vehicle access. A turn-around area with a width and surface approved by the City Fire Marshall shall be provided at the termination of any private street (prior to construction of the temporary loop road). ADOPTED this 20th day of April 2021, by the City Council of the City of Rosemount. __________________________________________ William H. Droste, Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________________ Erin Fasbender, City Clerk CITY OF ROSEMOUNT DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2021- 34 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A MINOR AMENDMENT TO THE ROSEWOOD CROSSING PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) AGREEMENT TO UPDATE THE PHASING PLAN AND CERTAIN DEVELOPMENT PLANS WHEREAS, the Community Development Department of the City of Rosemount received a request from Rosewood Crossing, LLC., to amend the Rosewood Crossing Planned Unit Development (PUD) Agreement to updating the phasing plan and to update development plans for the area located within Rosewood Crossing Second Addition; and WHEREAS, staff has prepared and recommends approval of a Minor PUD Amendment to add the updated phasing and development plans to the PUD Agreement; and WHEREAS, on April 20, 2021, the City Council of the City of Rosemount reviewed the application and staff recommendation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Rosemount hereby approves the Minor Amendment to the Rosewood Crossing Planned Unit Development Agreement to add updated phasing and development plans to the agreement. ADOPTED this 20th day of April 2021, by the City Council of the City of Rosemount. __________________________________________ William H. Droste, Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________________ Erin Fasbender, City Clerk Rosewood Crossing 2nd April / 2021 G:\ENGPROJ\2021-09 Rosewood Crossing 2nd\Subdivision Agreement\Subdivisionagreement - 2021-09.docx Page 1 of 11 SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT Rosewood Crossing 2nd AGREEMENT dated this ________ day of ________________________, 2021, by and between the CITY OF ROSEMOUNT, a Minnesota municipal corporation, (the "City"), and KJ WALK, INC., a Florida corporation, (the "Developer"). 1. Request for Plat Approval. The Developer has asked the City to approve the subdivision of land and a plat of land to be known as Rosewood Crossing 2nd Addition, which land is legally described on ATTACHMENT ONE, attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof (hereinafter referred to as the “subject property”). 2. Conditions of Plat Approval. The City has approved the subdivision and the plat on the following conditions: a. Incorporation of recommendations of the City Engineer concerning design and installation of public and private infrastructure, and including grading, erosion control, streets and utilities. b. Execution of a Subdivision or Development Agreement to secure the public and private improvements. c. Payment of all applicable fees including GIS, Park Dedication and other fees identified in the current fee schedule. d. Incorporation of any easements necessary to accommodate drainage, ponding, trails, underpasses, conservation areas, streets and utilities. 3. Phased Development. The City may refuse to approve final plats of subsequent additions of the plat if the Developer has breached this Agreement and the breach has not been remedied. Development of subsequent phases may not proceed until Subdivision Agreements for such phases are approved by the City. 4. Effect of Subdivision Approval. For two (2) years from the date of this Agreement, no amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, except an amendment placing the plat in the current urban service area, or official controls shall apply to or affect the use, development density, lot size, lot layout or dedications of the approved plat unless required by state or federal law or agreed to in writing by the City and the Developer. Thereafter, notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, to the full extent permitted by state law, the City may require compliance with any amendments to the City's Comprehensive Guide Plan, official controls, platting or dedication requirements enacted after the date of this Agreement. Rosewood Crossing 2nd April / 2021 G:\ENGPROJ\2021-09 Rosewood Crossing 2nd\Subdivision Agreement\Subdivisionagreement - 2021-09.docx Page 2 of 11 5. Development Plans. The subject property shall be developed in accordance with the following plans, specifications and contract documents, original copies of which are on file with the City Engineer. The plans and contract documents may be prepared, subject to City approval, after entering this Agreement, but before commencement of any work on the Subject Property. If the plans vary from the written terms of this Agreement, the written terms shall control. The plans are: Plan A - Plat Plan B - Soil Erosion Control Plan and Schedule Plan C - Drainage and Storm Water Runoff Plan Plan D - Plans and Specifications for Public and Private Improvements Plan E - Grading Plan and House Pad Elevations Plan F - Street Lights Plan G - Landscape Improvements All Improvements, including Developer Improvements and City-Installed Public Infrastructure Improvements (if any) that lie within the public right-of-way or easements and are improvements listed in Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.021 (hereinafter the Improvements) will be designed by the Developer at the Developer’s expense, and approved by the City Engineer. The Developer will prepare plans and specifications for the Improvements and will perform all construction administration for the Improvements, all at Developer expense. Construction administration includes but is not limited to documentation, as-builts, surveying, field staking, and testing. The City Engineer will perform inspection services at Developer’s expense. 6. Installation by Developer. The Developer shall install or cause to be installed and pay for the following, hereinafter referred to as the “Developer Improvements”: A. Surveying and staking B. Surface improvements (paved streets, sidewalks, trails, etc.) C. Water main improvements D. Sanitary sewer improvements E. Storm sewer improvements F. Setting of lot and block monuments G. Gas, electric, telephone, and cable lines H. Site grading I. Landscaping J. Streetlights K. Other items as necessary to complete the development as stipulated herein or in other agreements 7. Time of Performance. The Developer shall install all required improvements enumerated in Paragraph 6 that will serve the subject property by December 31, 2021, subject to delays due to inclement weather, casualty, labor strikes, material shortages, or other force majeure not within the Developer’s reasonable Rosewood Crossing 2nd April / 2021 G:\ENGPROJ\2021-09 Rosewood Crossing 2nd\Subdivision Agreement\Subdivisionagreement - 2021-09.docx Page 3 of 11 control. The Developer may, however, request an extension of time from the City. If an extension is granted, it shall be conditioned upon updating the security posted by the Developer to reflect cost increases and the extended completion date. 8. City-Installed Public Infrastructure. The following improvements, hereinafter referred to as “City- Installed Public Infrastructure Improvements” (known as City Project 2021-09), shall be designed, inspected, surveyed and administered by the City, and installed in the Subject Property at Developer expense by a Contractor selected by the City through the public bidding process: A. None 9. [This Section Intentionally Left Blank] 10. Security for Developer Improvements. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Agreement, payment of the costs of all Developer Improvements, and construction of all Developer Improvements (as noted in Paragraph 6), the Developer shall furnish the City with a cash deposit or irrevocable letter of credit from a local bank (“security”) in the amount of Two Hundred Fifty Eight Thousand Seven Hundred Forty Eight ($258,748). The amount of the security was calculated as follows: Refer to Exhibit A and Exhibit B for an explanation of each item. The bank and form of the letter of credit or other security shall be subject to the a pproval of the City Administrator. The letter of credit shall be automatically renewable until the City releases the developer from responsibility. The letter of credit shall secure compliance with all terms of this Agreement and all obligations of the Developer under it. The City may draw down on the letter of credit without notice if the obligations of the Developer have not been completed as required by this Agreement. In the event of a default under this Subdivision Agreement by the Developer, the City shall furnish the Developer with written notice by certified mail of Developers default(s) under the terms of this Subdivision Agreement. If the Developer does not remove said default(s) within two (2) weeks of receiving notice, the City may draw on the letter of credit and take such steps as it deems necessary to remedy the default. With City approval, the letter of credit may be reduced from time to time as financial obligations are paid and Developer Improvements and other Developer obligations are completed to the City’s requirements. 11. Grading Plan/Site Grading. Site grading shall be completed by the Developer at its cost and approved by the City Engineer. The completion of grading activities will need to be coordinated by the City in conjunction with the installation of utilities. Developer shall furnish the City Engineer satisfactory proof of payment for the site grading work and shall submit a certificate of survey of the development to the Cost 110% Grading and Erosion Control 50,000$ 55,000$ Pond Restoration and Erosion Control Removal 25,000$ 27,500$ Survey Monumentation 5,500$ 6,050$ Landscaping (172 trees @ $300/tree)51,600$ 56,760$ Street Lights -$ Cost 110% Surface Improvements -$ Water Main Improvements 90,750$ 113,438$ Sanitary Sewer Improvements -$ Storm Sewer Improvements -$ Total 222,850$ 258,748$ Rosewood Crossing 2nd April / 2021 G:\ENGPROJ\2021-09 Rosewood Crossing 2nd\Subdivision Agreement\Subdivisionagreement - 2021-09.docx Page 4 of 11 City as the site grading is completed by phase, with street and lot grades. If the installation of utilities by the City is occurring simultaneously with the grading, the utility contractor shall have preference over the grading activities. No substantial grading activities can be completed over installed utilities unless otherwise protected. All improvements to the lots and the final grading shall comply with the grading plan as submitted and shall be the responsibility of the Developer. 12. License. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the Subject Property to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City. Such license shall terminate as to all residential lots within the subject property upon acceptance by the City of the public infrastructure improvements. 13. Erosion Control. Prior to site grading, and before any utility construction is commenced or building permits are issued, the erosion control plan, Plan B, shall be implemented, inspected and approved by the City. All areas disturbed by the excavation and backfilling operations shall be reseeded within 72 hours after the completion of the work in that area. Except as otherwise provided in the erosion control plan, seed shall be rye grass or other fast-growing seed suitable to the existing soil to provide a temporary ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be mulched and disc-anchored as necessary for seed retention. All basement and/or foundation excavation spoil piles shall be kept completely off City right-of-way and shall be completely surrounded with an approved erosion control silt fence. Approved erosion control fencing shall be installed around the perimeter of each lot or at City-approved locations at the time of building permit issuance and remain in place until the lot is seeded or sodded. A 20-foot opening will be allowed on each lot for construction deliveries. The parties recognize that time is critical in controlling erosion. If development does not comply with the erosion control plan and schedule, or supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion. This right also applies to the required erosion control for basement and/or foundation excavation spoil piles. The City will attempt to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developer’s or City’s rights or obligations hereunder. If the Developer does not reimburse the City for any cost the City incurred for such work within thirty (30) days, the City may draw down the letter of credit to pay any costs. No development will be allowed, and no building permits will be issued unless the Subject Property is in full compliance with the erosion control requirements. 14. Planting and Seeding. Landscaping shall be in accordance with Landscape Plans approved by the City Planner. 15. Clean up. The Developer shall clean streets of dirt and debris that has resulted from construction work by the Developer, its agents or assignees. The City will inspect the site on a weekly basis and determine whether it is necessary to take additional measures to clean dirt and debris from the streets. After 24 hours verbal notice to the Developer, the City will complete or contract to complete the clean-up at the Developer’s expense in accordance with the procedures specified in Paragraph 13. The Developer shall inspect and, if necessary, clean all catch basins, sumps, and ponding areas of erosion/siltation and restore to the original condition at the end of home construction within this development. All silt fence and other erosion control should be removed following the establishment of turf. These items are to be secured through the letter of credit as is noted in Exhibit A. 16. Ownership of Improvements. Upon completion and City acceptance of the work and construction required by this Agreement, the Public Improvements lying within public rights-of-way and easements shall become City property without further notice or action unless the improvements are specifically Rosewood Crossing 2nd April / 2021 G:\ENGPROJ\2021-09 Rosewood Crossing 2nd\Subdivision Agreement\Subdivisionagreement - 2021-09.docx Page 5 of 11 identified herein as private infrastructure. Water main is a Public Improvement. All other improvements are Private Improvements. 17. Warranty. The Developer warrants all work required to be performed by it against poor material and faulty workmanship for a period of two (2) years after its completion and acceptance by the City or such longer period as is specified in plans and specifications prepared by the City Engineer for Developer Improvements that are Public Improvements. All trees, grass and sod shall be warranted to be alive, of good quality and disease free for twenty-four (24) months after planting. Vegetation surrounding ponds and/or wetlands shall be warranted to be alive, of good quality and weed free for three (3) years after planting. For each pond/wetland in the development, the developer shall provide to the City Engineer an inspection report by July 31 each year which includes the following: A. Date of inspection B. Name of person responsible for inspection C. Photos of the pond/wetland area confirming the vegetation is established as intended D. Maintenance plan describing the required maintenance activities and tentative schedule. 18. Responsibility for Costs. A. Except as otherwise specified herein, the Developer shall pay all costs incurred by it or the City in conjunction with the development of the Subject Property including, but not limited to, Soil and Water Conservation District charges, legal, planning, engineering and inspection expenses incurred in connection with approval and acceptance of the subdivision and the plat, the preparation of this Agreement and any amendments hereto, and all costs and expenses incurred by the City in monitoring and inspecting the development of the Subject Property. B. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers and employees harmless from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from plat or subdivision approval and development of the Subject Property, except for any costs or expenses arising from the negligence or other wrongful acts or omissions of the City, it’s agents, employees or contractors. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers and employees for all costs, damages or expenses that the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorney’s fees. C. The Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the preparation and enforcement of this Agreement, including engineering and attorney’s fees. Upon request, the City shall provide invoices, in reasonable detail, as to any such fees. The estimated City fees of $26,418 shall be deposited with the City at the time this Agreement is signed, and represent the following amounts: If the actual City fees exceed this estimate, the Developer shall pay the additional costs to the City within ten (10) days of the request. If actual City fees are lower than this estimate, any surplus funds will be returned to the developer when the project fund is reconciled and closed. Cost Engineering Review Fees (estimate)10,000$ Construction and Monitoring Fees 9,075$ Attorney Fees 2,000$ City Administrative Fee (5% of Construction Estimate)4,538$ GIS Fees 805$ Total 26,418$ Rosewood Crossing 2nd April / 2021 G:\ENGPROJ\2021-09 Rosewood Crossing 2nd\Subdivision Agreement\Subdivisionagreement - 2021-09.docx Page 6 of 11 D. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under this Agreement within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the City may halt development work and construction including, but not limited to, the issuance of building permits for lots that the Developer may or may not have sold, until the bills are paid in full. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of nine percent (9%) per year. E. The Developer shall pay all energy costs for street lights installed within the Subject Property. 19. The Developer agrees to pay fees, charges and assessments set forth in this Section prior to, or at the time of execution of any plat by the City: A. Storm Sewer Trunk Area Charges in the amount of $35,976 B. Sanitary Sewer Trunk Area Charges in the amount of $7,211 C. Watermain Trunk Area Charges in the amount of $43,599 Or other amounts for such fees as in effect at the time of plat approval. 20. The Developer understands that builders will be required to pay for the Subject Property fees, charges and assessments in effect at the time of issuance of building permits. The rates for each of these items will be set according to the current rate structure at the time the building permit is received. The fees, charges, and assessments in effect as of the date of this agreement are: A. Metropolitan Council Environmental Services Availability Charges per SAC unit (current rate is $2,485). B. Storm Sewer Connection Charges per single family unit and per multiple family unit (single family currently at $770; multi-family currently at $290 per housing unit). C. Sanitary Sewer Availability Charges per SAC unit (currently at $1,200/SAC unit). D. Water Availability Charges per SAC unit (currently at $2,300/SAC unit for single family residential and multi-family residential). E. Park dedication fees in the amount of $2,500 per unit (total of $400,000 for Phase 2, which is 160 units x $2,500) 21. Building Permits. No occupancy permits shall be issued until: A. The site grading is completed and approved by the City. B. All utilities are tested, approved by the City Engineer, and in service. C. All curbing is installed and backfilled. D. The first lift of bituminous is in place and approved by the City. E. All building permit fees are paid in full. F. No early building permits will be issued. The Developer, in executing this Agreement, assumes all liability and costs for damage or delays incurred by the City in the construction of the Improvements caused by the Developer, its employees, contractors, subcontractors, material men or agents. No occupancy permits shall be issued until the streets and utilities referred to in paragraph 6 are installed and approved by the City (excluding the final wear course of bituminous), unless otherwise authorized in writing by the City Engineer. Rosewood Crossing 2nd April / 2021 G:\ENGPROJ\2021-09 Rosewood Crossing 2nd\Subdivision Agreement\Subdivisionagreement - 2021-09.docx Page 7 of 11 22. Record Drawings. At project completion, Developer shall submit record drawings of all public and private infrastructure improvements in accordance with the City’s Engineering Guidelines. No securities will be fully released until all record drawings have been submitted and accepted by the City Engineer. 23. Developer’s Default. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer is first given notice of the work in default, not less than 48 hours in advance. This Agreement is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, draw on the letter of credit or other security described in section 10, or levy the cost in whole or in part as a special assessment against the Subject Property. Developer waives its rights to notice of hearing and hearing on such assessments and its right to appeal such assessments pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.081. 24. Miscellaneous. A. The Developer represents to the City that the development of the Subject Property, the subdivision and the plat comply with all city, county, metropolitan, state and federal laws and regulations including, but not limited to: subdivision ordinances, zoning ordinances and environmental regulations. If the City determines that the subdivision, or the plat, or the development of the Subject Property does not comply, the City may, at its option, refuse to allow construction or development work on the Subject Property until the Developer does comply. Upon the City’s demand, the Developer shall cease work until there is compliance. B. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Agreement. C. Breach of the terms of this Agreement by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of building permits, including lots sold to third parties. D. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph or phase of this Agreement is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Agreement. E. If building permits are issued prior to the completion and acceptance of the Improvements, the Developer assumes all liability and costs resulting in delays in completion of the Improvements and damage to the Improvements caused by the City, the Developer, its contractors, subcontractors, material men, employees, agents or third parties. F. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Agreement. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City’s failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Agreement shall not be a waiver or release. G. This Agreement shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the subject property. The Developer shall take such steps, including execution of amendments to this Agreement, as are necessary to effect the recording hereof. After the Developer has completed the work required of it under this Agreement, at the Developer’s request, the City will execute and deliver to the Developer a release. H. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to the City, at Rosewood Crossing 2nd April / 2021 G:\ENGPROJ\2021-09 Rosewood Crossing 2nd\Subdivision Agreement\Subdivisionagreement - 2021-09.docx Page 8 of 11 law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. I. The Developer may not assign this Agreement without the written permission of the City Council. 25. Notices. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by registered mail at the following address: Mr. Warren Israelson KJ Walk, Inc. 6001 Egan Drive, Suite 100 Savage, MN 55378 952-226-3200 warren@kjwalk.com Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Administrator, or mailed to the City by registered mail in care of the City Administrator at the following address: City Administrator Rosemount City Hall 2875 145th Street West Rosemount, Minnesota 55068 Rosewood Crossing 2nd April / 2021 G:\ENGPROJ\2021-09 Rosewood Crossing 2nd\Subdivision Agreement\Subdivisionagreement - 2021-09.docx Page 9 of 11 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands the day and year first above written. CITY OF ROSEMOUNT BY: William H. Droste, Mayor BY: Erin Fasbender, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of _____________________, 2021, by William H. Droste, Mayor, and Erin Fasbender, City Clerk, of the City of Rosemount, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. Notary Public KJ WALK, INC. BY: Its BY: Its STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS COUNTY OF _____________) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ______________________, 2021 by __ , its ______________________________________, and _____________________________, its_________________________________ ________________ of KJ Walk, Inc., a Florida corporation, on behalf of said corporation. Notary Public Drafted By: City of Rosemount 2875 145th Street West Rosemount, MN 55068 Rosewood Crossing 2nd April / 2021 G:\ENGPROJ\2021-09 Rosewood Crossing 2nd\Subdivision Agreement\Subdivisionagreement - 2021-09.docx Page 10 of 11 EXHIBIT A The following clarifies the various portions of the letter of credit for Developer Improvements that are outlined in the Subdivision Agreement: Survey Monumentation – An amount equal to 110% of the cost to monument all lots within the development. Landscaping – An amount equal to 110% of the cost to complete the minimum required landscaping. If additional landscaping is planned, a surety for that cost is not required. Street Lighting – An amount equal to 110% of the cost to complete the minimum required lighting. If additional lighting is planned, a surety for that cost is not required ($4,000 per light has been used to calculate this cost). Buffer Monumentation – An amount equal to 110% of the cost to manufacture and install the necessary buffer monumentation signs around all ponds and wetlands ($50 per sign has been used to calculate this cost). Rosewood Crossing 2nd EXHIBIT B (Page 1 of 2) No. Item Cost 110% Calculation 1 Grading and Erosion Control 50,000$ 55,000$ 2 Pond Restoration and Erosion Control Removal 25,000$ 27,500$ $25,000 minimum 3 Survey Monumentation 5,500$ 6,050$ $500/lot x 11 lot/parcel 4 Landscaping 51,600$ 56,760$ Per City Planner, 172 trees x $300 5 Surface Improvements -$ 125% 6 Water Main Improvements 90,750$ 113,438$ 125% 7 Sanitary Sewer Improvements -$ -$ 125% 8 Storm Sewer Improvements -$ -$ 125% Total 222,850$ 258,748$ No. Item Cost Estimated Construction Cost 90,750$ 1 Engineering Review Fees 10,000$ 2 Construction Monitoring Fees 9,075$ 3 Attorney Fees 2,000$ 4 5% City Administrative Fees 4,538$ 5 GIS Fees 805$ Total 26,418$ No. Item Cost 1 Storm Sewer Trunk Charge 35,976$ 2 Sanitary Sewer Trunk Charge 7,211$ 3 Water Trunk Charge 43,599$ 4 Stormwater Ponding Fee -$ Total 86,786$ No. Item Cost 1 Park Dedication 400,000$ Total 400,000$ Estimate 5% of Estimated Construction Cost $120/acre x 6.71 acres 10% of Estimated Construction Cost Letter of Credit for Developer Improvements (due with signed agreement) City Fees (due with signed agreement) Calculation Developer estimate City Engineer Estimation $6500/acre x 6.71 acres Development Fees (due before signed plat is released) 160 units x $2,500 per unit/$80,000 to be paid with building permit Development Fees (due with building permit application) Calculation Calculation $6865/net developable acre 5.24 acres $1075/acre x 6.71 acres N/A Block Lots Units Block Lot Units SQ FT Acres 1 11 160 1 1 0 4,312 0.099 1 2 32 15,096 0.347 1 3 32 15,096 0.347 1 4 0 4,312 0.099 1 5 0 3,784 0.087 1 6 32 15,096 0.347 1 7 32 15,096 0.347 Total 160 1 8 32 15,096 0.347 1 9 0 4,312 0.099 Total Plat Area = 6.71 acres 1 10 0 4,312 0.099 Total Park Area = 0.00 acres 1 11 0 195,669 4.492 Future Plat Area = 0.00 acres 0.000 Developable Area = 6.71 acres *0.000 Ponding to HWL = 1.47 acres 0.000 Net Developable Area = 5.24 acres 0.000 0.000 * Excludes future plat and park areas 0.000 0.000 Outlot A 126,712 0.000 Total Boundary 418,893 6.708 Rosewood Crossing 2nd EXHIBIT B (Page 2 of 2) Totals Rosewood Crossing 2nd April / 2021 G:\ENGPROJ\2021-09 - Rosewood Crossing 2nd\Subdivision Agreement\Subdivisionagreement - 2021-09.docx Page 11 of 11 ATTACHMENT ONE Rosewood Crossing 2nd Final Plat LOCATION MAPSITEI hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me,or under my direct supervision, and that I am aduly registered engineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.Luke Warren Israelson6001 Egan Drive, Ste 100, Savage, MN 55378Phone: 952.226.3200 Web: www.kjwalk.comDate:02/18/2021Revision:OriginalLocation MapRegistration #: 51362SHEET 1 of 1Date: 2/18/2021FILE PATH: G:\My Drive\Work Files\Rosemount Projects\Rosewood Crossing\Engineering\CAD\DWGs\RWC2-2.dwgFebruary 18, 2021 LAST SAVED: February 18, 2021CrossingRosemount, MNSecond Addition 1TWO STORY APARTMENT2870 145TH ST W 963.00 TWO STORY APT.2860 145TH ST W 963.00 TWO STORY APARTMENT2830 145TH ST W 963.00 TWO STORY APT.2850 145TH ST W 961.80 1617111915171041GARAGE 7 16 STALLS- 962.60 GARAGE 416 STALLS- 961.40GARAGE 3 16 STALLS 161112128121212 12 2820 G A R A G E 16 ST A L L S EXISTINGTWO STORY APARTMENT2810 145TH ST W FFE=966.10 EXISTINGTWO STORY APARTMENT2820 145TH ST W FFE = 964.10 EXISTINGCOMMONBLDG 970.50 2810 G A R A G E 16 ST A L L S FFE= 9 6 5 . 8 9 FFE= 9 6 5 . 5 6 FFE= 9 6 5 . 2 3 FFE= 9 6 3 . 2 3 FFE= 9 6 3 . 5 6 FFE= 9 6 3 . 8 928.0056.00110TWO STORY APT.2840 145TH ST W 962.00 FFE=961.90 FFE=962.409 1010111161110128.0028.0028.0028.0028.0028.00TOT LOT PAVILION PAVILION1328 GARAGE 6 14 STALLS1195FFE=963.00FFE=962.70Rosewood Crossing Cover SHEET 1 of 7 0 50 100 150 FILE PATH: G:\My Drive\Work Files\Rosemount Projects\Rosewood Crossing\Engineering\CAD\DWGs\RWC2-2.dwg SHEET INDEX1 Cover 2 Grading and Erosion Control/ Landscaping Plan3 SWPPP4 Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Construction5 Storm Sewer6 Street Construction7 Details Legend Existing watermain Proposed watermain Existing sanitary Proposed sanitary Existing storm Proposed storm Existing hydrant Proposed hydrant Existing gate valve Proposed gate valve Existing manhole Proposed manhole Proposed catchbasin Silt fence Inlet protectors Parking lot lights Building Lights Rip Rap TYPICAL PARKING SPACE (NOT TO SCALE) BLDG CONCRETE SIDEWALK6.5'4'17.5'8.5' DUMPSTER LOCATION NOTES LIGHTS ALSO INSTALLED ON EXTERIOR OFBUILDINGS. LAST SAVED: March 16, 2021 PARKING REQUIRED 2 STALLS PER UNIT (160 UNITS)320 PROVIDED GARAGE STALLS 80 PARKING STALLS 240 TOTAL 320 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly registered engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Warren John Israelson 6001 Egan Drive, Ste 100, Savage, MN 55378 Phone: 952.226.3200 Web: www.kjwalk.com 02/16/2021 Revision: Original Registration #: 40175 RosewoodCrossing Date: 3/16/2021 For Review March 16, 2021 Date: Second Addition Rosemount, MN 03/16/2021 Revised 1TWO STORY APARTMENT2870 145TH ST W963.00TWO STORY APT.2860 145TH ST W963.00TWO STORY APARTMENT2830 145TH ST W963.00TWO STORY APT.2850 145TH ST W961.8016 1 7 1 1 1 9 1 5 1 7 10 4 1GARAGE 7 16 STALLS- 962.60G A R A G E 4 16 S T A L L S - 9 6 1 . 4 0GARAGE 316 STALLS 16 30 202020 20 1 1 20 2 0 201281220 2012121220 962.85 962.40 962.80 20 20 2820 GARAGE16 STALLSEXISTINGTWO STORY APARTMENT2810 145TH ST WFFE=966.10EXISTINGTWO STORY APARTMENT2820 145TH ST WFFE = 964.10EXISTINGCOMMONBLDG970.502810 GARAGE16 STALLSFFE=965.89FFE=965.56FFE=965.23FFE=963.23FFE=963.56FFE=963.89962.65 963.61 1 10 TWO STORY APT.2840 145TH ST W962.00962.10 962.40 962.80 962.40 962.40 FFE=961.90FFE=962.40 962.00 9 10 10 961.30 961.10 961.40 961.40 961.85 961.85 961.40 961.40 960.10 960.60 1 11 960.10 961.35 961.45 961.75 964.50 16 1 1 10 961.55 961.40 962.95 962.75 961.50 961.30 961.00 960.70 961.00 961.50 960.50 961.10 961.10 960.70 960.80 960.60 959.60 959.25 960.00 960.50 960.33 966.50 964.10 961.75 961.50 962.10 961.50 961.80 963.85963.95 963.50 963.20 964.08 1TOT LOTPAVILIONPAVILION20 2020 30 3024'X 50' ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE963.15 963.10 962.20 962.40 962.90 962.90 962.40 961.20 961.90 961.90 962.85 962.40 962.90 963.00 963.00 962.20 961.40 961.30 960.80 961.30 960.60 960.90 960.80 960.80 960.90 961.30 961.10 960.40 960.75 960.80 961.30 961.30 961.75 962.85 961.45 961.35 960.20 961.00 959.75 959.40 959.75 962.10 962.40 962.40 962.40 961.60 960.80 (NO BACK OF CURB) MAINTAIN 5% MAX SLOPE ON WALK 961.70 13 28 GARAGE 6 14 STALLS 1 1 9 963.20 963.50 963.30 962.50 965.40 964.80 965.40 966.00 965.40 963.70 962.20 962.50 963.60 965.30 962.30 962.00 5 962.70 FFE=963.00FFE=962.70 964964966.50 Grading & Erosion ControlSHEET 2 of 7FILE PATH: G:\My Drive\Work Files\Rosemount Projects\Rosewood Crossing\Engineering\CAD\DWGs\RWC2-2.dwg LAST SAVED: March 16, 2021 LAST SAVED: March 16, 2021Silt Fence to be installed along perimeter ofconstruction area prior to the start of work.NOTES:MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SLOPE 3:1PONDS MAY BE USED AS TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATIONBASINS DURING CONSTRUCTION, IF A POND IS USED ASA TEMP. SED. BASIN IT MUST BE CLEANED OUT PRIORTO BEING PUT INTO SERVICE.DRAINAGE TO THE TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATIONBASINS MUST BE MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT THECONSTRUCTION PROCESS.SEED MIXES AS SHOWN IN LEGEND , WHERE NOTSPECIFIED USE MN DOT MIX 250 AS GENERAL SITESTABILIZATION.STOCKPILES TO BE STABILIZED IF NOT UTILIZED FORMORE THAN 7 DAYS.I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me,or under my direct supervision, and that I am aduly registered engineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.Warren John Israelson6001 Egan Drive, Ste 100, Savage, MN 55378Phone: 952.226.3200 Web: www.kjwalk.com02/16/2021Revision:OriginalRegistration #: 40175RosewoodCrossingDate: 3/16/2021For ReviewMarch 16, 2021Date:Second Addition Rosemount, MN03/16/2021 Revised04080120CB & DROP IN INLET PROTECTORSSEED & BLANKETLEGEND RIP RAPSILT FENCE SWPPP SHEET 3 of 7 FILE PATH: G:\My Drive\Work Files\Rosemount Projects\Rosewood Crossing\Engineering\CAD\DWGs\RWC2-2.dwg SWPPP (STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN) LAST SAVED: March 16, 2021 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly registered engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Warren John Israelson 6001 Egan Drive, Ste 100, Savage, MN 55378 Phone: 952.226.3200 Web: www.kjwalk.com 02/16/2021 Revision: Original Registration #: 40175 RosewoodCrossing Date: 3/16/2021 For Review March 16, 2021 Date: Second Addition Rosemount, MN 03/16/2021 Revised 16860602068 192TWO STORY APARTMENT2870 145TH ST W 963.00 TWO STORY APT.2860 145TH ST W 963.00 TWO STORY APARTMENT2830 145TH ST W 963.00 TWO STORY APT.2850 145TH ST W 961.80 1616871686811710416868200 68200 6820068 200 200 68 202002020068 68 68 192 192 1922019219220202020 8" C900 PVC 8" C900 PVC8" CL52 DIP 8" C900 PVC GARAGE 7 16 STALLS- 962.60 GARAGE 416 STALLS- 961.40CONNECT TO EXISTING 8" WATER16302010201017.47 2036.44 201 5 6 . 0 2 1120202012122 28" C 9 0 0 P V C812 2 270 192 192 20202 70702 70702 602 7070 60 270 70 60 702260 70 702 260 707020208" CL52 DIP121212 REMOVE 8" DI PLUG CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN REMOVE 8" DI PLUG CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN20 8" 11.25 BEND202020 EXISTINGTWO STORY APARTMENT2810 145TH ST W FFE=966.10 EXISTINGTWO STORY APARTMENT2820 145TH ST W FFE = 964.10 EXISTINGCOMMONBLDG 970.50 2810 G A R A G E 16 ST A L L S FFE= 9 6 5 . 8 9 FFE= 9 6 5 . 5 6 FFE= 9 6 5 . 2 3 FFE= 9 6 3 . 8 9 VAN ACCESSIBLE TRASH ENCLOSURE S27° 4 8 ' 4 9 " W N89°50'17"WS00°09'44"W N 4 8 ° 4 0 ' 4 6 " E N00°25'44"E TRASH11.74RESERVED VALLEY GUTTER TWO STORY APT.2840 145TH ST W 962.00 101011116111018"x4" TEE 4" GV ADD FIRE HYDRANT 8"x4" TEE4" GV 8"x4" TEE 4" GV 8"x4" TEE 4" GV TOT LOT PAVILION PAVILION20 202030308" 45° BEND 8" X 8" TEE8" 45° BEND 8" X 8" TEE 8"x6 REDUCER 6" GATE VALVE FIRE HYDRANT 8"x6 TEE 6" GATE VALVE FIRE HYDRANT PROPOSED 20' UTILITY EASEMENT 8"x6 REDUCER 6" GATE VALVE FIRE HYDRANT 8" C900 PVC13 28GARAGE 6 14 STALLS1195FFE=963.00FFE=962.70WATERMAIN 3 955 960 965 970 955 960 965 970 0+00 1+00 1+50 PROPOSED GRADE EXISTING GRADE 8"x8" TEE 7.5' MIN. COVER 8" C L 5 2 D I P CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOCATION WATERMAIN 950 955 960 965 970 950 955 960 965 970 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 8+00 7.5' MIN. COVER 7.5' MIN. COVER 8" CL52 DIP 8" CL52 DIP 8" CL52 DIP CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAINCONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOCATION 8"x8" TEE 8"x8" TEE 8"X6" REDUCER INSTALL 6" GATE VALVE AND FIRE HYDRANT PROPOSED GRADE EXISTING GRADE WATERMAIN 2 950 955 960 965 970 950 955 960 965 970 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 7.5' MIN. COVER 8" CL52 DIP 8"x8" TEE 8"X6" REDUCER INSTALL 6" GATE VALVE AND FIRE HYDRANT PROPOSED GRADE EXISTING GRADE 8" SDR 35 PVCINV=956.42 15" HDPE INV=956.44 Water Main Construction SHEET 4 of 7 0 50 100 150 FILE PATH: G:\My Drive\Work Files\Rosemount Projects\Rosewood Crossing\Engineering\CAD\DWGs\RWC2-2.dwg LAST SAVED: March 16, 2021 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly registered engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Warren John Israelson 6001 Egan Drive, Ste 100, Savage, MN 55378 Phone: 952.226.3200 Web: www.kjwalk.com 02/16/2021 Revision: Original Registration #: 40175 RosewoodCrossing Date: 3/16/2021 For Review March 16, 2021 Date: Second Addition Rosemount, MN 03/16/2021 Revised NOTES 6" C900 PVC FOR ALL WATER SERVICES6" PVC PIPE FOR ALL SEWER SERVICES Water main to be installed in strictaccordance with the most currentedition of the CEAM specifications. 1TWO STORY APARTMENT2870 145TH ST W 963.00 TWO STORY APT.2860 145TH ST W 963.00 TWO STORY APARTMENT2830 145TH ST W 963.00 TWO STORY APT.2850 145TH ST W 961.80 1617111915171041GARAGE 7 16 STALLS- 962.60 GARAGE 416 STALLS- 961.40GARAGE 3 16 STALLS 16118 2820 G A R A G E 16 ST A L L S EXISTINGTWO STORY APARTMENT2810 145TH ST W FFE=966.10 EXISTINGTWO STORY APARTMENT2820 145TH ST W FFE = 964.10 FFE= 9 6 5 . 2 3 FFE= 9 6 3 . 2 3 FFE= 9 6 3 . 5 6 FFE= 9 6 3 . 8 9 S23°5 4 ' 3 1 " W 526.1 2 N89°50'17"W414.21S00°09'44"W 110TWO STORY APT.2840 145TH ST W 962.00 FFE=961.90 FFE=962.409 10101111611101TOT LOT PAVILION PAVILION FE1 I=48.00 45 - 18" HDPE @ 0.51% 45 - 18" HDPE @ 0.89% 95 - 18" H D P E @ 1. 0 0 % 132 - 18" HDP E @ 0 . 4 9 % 51 - 16" HDPE @ 0.79% EX-CB4 T=961.40 I=957.63 139 - 18" HDPE @ 0.86%80 - 12" HDPE @ 0.50%77 - 1 8 " H D P E @ 1 . 1 4 % 42 - 18" HDPE @ 1.12% 10 3 - 1 8 " H D P E @ 2 . 1 6 % 1 0 2 - 1 8 " H D P E @ 0 . 0 0 % EX-CB5T=961.60 I=958.28 EX-CB3AT=960.50 I=958.10 STMH14 T=961.30 I=950.70 CB4T=963.20 I=960.00 CB5 T=961.50 I=958.14 CBMH11T=960.80 I=952.76 CBMH18T=960.60 I=950.23 FE19 I=948.00 CB6 T=961.50 I=957.12 CBMH10T=961.00 I=954.45 CB8T=961.60I=957.12 EX-CBMH3 T=960.70 I=956.68 EX-CBMH2T=960.70 I=948.23 CBMH9 T=961.50I=956.31 1328GARAGE 6 14 STALLS1195CB2T=959.40 I=955.56 FFE=963.00FFE=962.701 5 5 - 1 2 " H D P E @ 0 . 5 0 % CB13A T=962.00 I=959.00 964964CB7T=961.70 I=957.56 CB1 T=959.25I=956.00 CBMH13 T=960.80 I=951.57 CB12 T=960.80I=957.80 CB1 TO FE3 955 960 965 970 955 960 965 970 0+001+001+50 34' - 12" CL5 RCP @ 1.00% 44' - 12" CL5 RCP @ 1.00%CB13.25 BUILDCB23.85 BUILDRim = 959.25 Rim = 959.40 Inv = 955.56 Inv = 956.00 EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED GRADE Inv = 954.07 Rim = 960.65EX- MH6.58 BUILDInv = 955.21 EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED GRADE CB4 TO FE19 950 955 960 965 970 975 950 955 960 965 970 975 0+001+002+003+004+005+006+007+008+009+009+50 Rim = 960.60 Rim = 961.30 Inv = 950.23 Inv = 950.70STMH14 10.60 BUILDCBMH1810.37 BUILD139 - 18" HDPE @ 0.86% 71 - 15" HD P E @ 2 . 0 9 % 96 - 15" HDP E @ 1 . 9 4 % 88 - 15" HDPE @ 0.93% 127 - 15" HDPE @ 0.80% 166 - 12" HDPE @ 1.00% Inv = 952.76 Inv = 954.45 Inv = 956.31Inv = 957.12 Inv = 958.14 Inv = 960.00 Rim = 963.20 Rim = 961.50 Rim = 961.50 Rim = 961.50 Rim = 961.00 Rim = 960.80 77 - 18" HDPE @ 1.14 % 42 - 18" HDPE @ 1.12% 103 - 18" H D P E @ 2 . 1 6 %CB43.20 BUILDCB53.36 BUILDCB64.38 BUILDCBMH95.19 BUILDCBMH106.55 BUILDCBMH118.04 BUILDInv =948.00FE19Inv = 951.57 Rim = 960.80CBMH139.23 BUILD8" PVC I= 956.70Inv =958.34 Inv =952.96 4" FOAM INSULATION CB12 TO CBMH13 955 960 965 970 955 960 965 970 0+00 1+00 1+50CBMH139.23 BUILDCB123.00 BUILDRim = 960.80Rim = 960.80 Inv = 957.80 Inv = 951.57 EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED GRADE 80 - 12" HDPE @ 0.50% Inv =957.40 Inv = 946.00 Inv =946.00 102 - 18" HDPE @ 0.00% EXISTING GRADE CBMH7 TO CBMH9 955 960 965 970 975 955 960 965 970 975 0+00 1+00 2+00CB74.15 BUILDCB84.49 BUILDCBMH95.19 BUILD67 - 12" HDPE @ 0.50%87 - 12" HDPE @ 0.50% Rim = 961.50 Rim = 961.60 Rim = 961.70 Inv = 956.31 Inv = 957.12 Inv = 957.56 EXISTING GRADEPROPOSED GRADE Inv =956.78 CB17 TO CB15 950 955 960 965 970 950 955 960 965 970 -1+00 0+00 1+00 2+00 2+50CB173.60 BUILDCBMH1810.37 BUILDCB163.59 BUILDCB153.10 BUILDRim = 960.60 Rim = 960.60 Rim = 960.10 Rim = 960.10 Inv = 957.00Inv = 956.51 Inv = 950.23 Inv = 957.00 99 - 12" HDPE @ 0.50% 62 - 12" HDPE @ 0.50% 93 - 12" HDPE @ 0.50% EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED GRADE Inv = 956.54 Inv = 956.20 CB13A TO CBMH13 955 960 965 970 975 955 960 965 970 975 0+00 1+00 2+00 EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED GRADE Inv =958.22 CB13A3.00 BUILDCBMH139.23 BUILDRim = 962.00 Rim = 960.80 Inv = 959.00 Inv = 951.57 155 - 12" HDPE @ 0.50% Storm Sewer Construction SHEET 5 of 7 0 50 100 150 FILE PATH: G:\My Drive\Work Files\Rosemount Projects\Rosewood Crossing\Engineering\CAD\DWGs\RWC2-2.dwg LAST SAVED: March 16, 2021 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly registered engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Warren John Israelson 6001 Egan Drive, Ste 100, Savage, MN 55378 Phone: 952.226.3200 Web: www.kjwalk.com 02/16/2021 Revision: Original Registration #: 40175 RosewoodCrossing Date: 3/16/2021 For Review March 16, 2021 Date: Second Addition Rosemount, MN 03/16/2021 Revised TWO STORY APARTMENT2870 145TH ST W963.00TWO STORY APT.2860 145TH ST W963.00TWO STORY APARTMENT2830 145TH ST W963.00TWO STORY APT.2850 145TH ST W961.80GARAGE 7 16 STALLS- 962.60G A R A G E 4 16 S T A L L S - 9 6 1 . 4 0GARAGE 316 STALLSDECORATIVE FENCEDECORATIVE FENCE 2820 GARAGE16 STALLSEXISTINGTWO STORY APARTMENT2810 145TH ST WFFE=966.10EXISTINGTWO STORY APARTMENT2820 145TH ST WFFE = 964.102810 GARAGE16 STALLSFFE=965.23FFE=963.23FFE=963.56FFE=963.89TWO STORY APT.2840 145TH ST W962.00FFE=961.90FFE=962.40 28.00 28.0028.0028.0028.0028.00 TOT LOTPAVILIONPAVILIONGARAGE 6 14 STALLS FFE=963.00FFE=962.70AMAL LAMLAMLMLMMMMMLLLLLLMMAALMMLLLLLLLLMMMLLMLLLLRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRLM105- SHRUBS SPACED 30" ON CENTERPOLY LANDSCAPING EDGEMULCH BEDSODLandscape PlanSHEET 6 of 7050100 150FILE PATH: G:\My Drive\Work Files\Rosemount Projects\Rosewood Crossing\Engineering\CAD\DWGs\RWC2-2.dwgX963 EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVEDEXISTING TREE AND TAG NUMBER963 COLORADO BLUE SPRUCE (70 TREES)NOTES:* CONIFEROUS TREES STAGGERED WITH15' SPACING* DECIDUOUS TREES-20' SPACING* SHRUBS TO BE PLANTED IN FRONT OFALL BLDGS*DECORATIVE FENCE TO BE JERITH EP-1OR EQUIVALENT1/3 TREE HEIGHT ROOT CROWN ATFINISH GRADE,OR 1-2" ABOVE GRADEFINISH GRADETILLED OR BROKEN UPSOIL MIN 12" DEEP2" SETTLED LAYER OF MULCH2X WIDTH OF ROOTBALLLEGEND RIVER BIRCH (29 TREES)1/3 TREE HEIGHT ROOT CROWN ATFINISH GRADE,OR 1-2" ABOVE GRADEFINISH GRADETILLED OR BROKEN UPSOIL MIN 12" DEEP2" SETTLED LAYER OF MULCH2X WIDTH OF ROOTBALLLINDEN (33 TREES)MAPLE (37 TREES)RLMROOT CROWN ATFINISH GRADE,OR 1-2" ABOVE GRADEFINISH GRADETILLED OR BROKEN UPSOIL MIN 12" DEEP2" SETTLED LAYER OF MULCH2X WIDTH OF ROOTBALL LAST SAVED: March 16, 2021DECORATIVE FENCE LAST SAVED: March 16, 2021I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me,or under my direct supervision, and that I am aduly registered engineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.Warren John Israelson6001 Egan Drive, Ste 100, Savage, MN 55378Phone: 952.226.3200 Web: www.kjwalk.com02/16/2021Revision:OriginalRegistration #: 40175RosewoodCrossingDate: 3/16/2021For ReviewMarch 16, 2021Date:Second Addition Rosemount, MN03/16/2021 RevisedLandscape PlantingCommon NameBotanical NameSize #Colorado Blue SprucePicea pungens8' 70Autumn Blaze Maple Acre Freemanii 'Jeffsred'2.5" 37River BirchBetula Nigra2.5" 30LindenTilia2.5" 35Total172 116171119151710411611121281212 1212 11091010111161110113281195Phasing Plan SHEET 1 of 1 0 50 100 150 FILE PATH: G:\My Drive\Work Files\Rosemount Projects\Rosewood Crossing\Engineering\CAD\DWGs\RWC2-2.dwg LAST SAVED: March 19, 2021 PHASE 1 PHASE 3 PHASE 2 PHASE 5 PHASE 4 PHASE 6 PHASE 3 TEMPORARYPHASE 5 TEMPORARY LOOPPHASE 7 LOOPI hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly registered engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Warren John Israelson 6001 Egan Drive, Ste 100, Savage, MN 55378 Phone: 952.226.3200 Web: www.kjwalk.com 03/19/2021 Revision: Original Registration #: 40175 RosewoodCrossing Date: 3/19/2021 For Review March 19, 2021 Date: Second Addition Rosemount, MN PHASE 2 HAMMER HEAD 5" CASING LP LAP 6" REVEAL COVERED VENT LP LAP 4" REVEAL SINGLE DOOR WITH SIDELITES IN COVERED ENTRY STONE VENEER   LP SHINGLES ASPHALT SHINGLES       LP LAP 6" REVEAL LP LAP 4" REVEAL STONE VENEER 5" CASING COVERED VENT ASPHALT SHINGLES     LP LAP 6" REVEAL 5" CASING LP SHINGLES COVERED VENT LP LAP 4" REVEAL COVERED VENT LP LAP 4" REVEAL 5" CASING LP SHINGLES   STONE VENEERSTONE VENEER LP LAP 6" REVEAL ASPHALT SHINGLESASPHALT SHINGLES  24'.+/Á (4106'.'8#6+10žÁ 4'#4'.'8#6+10žÁ'ICP&TKXG5VG5CXCIG/02JQPG9GDYYYMLYCNMEQO4+)*6'.'8#6+10žÁ.'(6'.'8#6+10žÁ#22#46/'065)#4#)'524'.+/Á 5KFKPI 5VQPG 4GXKUGFÁ K:\02235-260\Admin\Docs\Rosewood Cossing Second Addition\Rosewood Crossing 2nd Constrution Plan Memo.docx Memorandum To: Kyle Klatt, Planner CC: Stacy Bodsberg, Planning & Personnel Secretary Brian Erickson, Director of Public Works/City Engineer From: Tim Hanson PE, WSB Engineering Consultant Date: March 24, 2021 Re: Rosewood Crossing Second Addition Final Plat Review Construction Plan – Engineering Review SUBMITTAL: The final plat and construction plans for Rosewood Crossing Second Addition have been submitted. They were prepared by Rehder and Associates, and KJ Walk, Inc. The developer of the site is by KJ Walk, Inc. Engineering review comments were generated from the following plat documents included in the submittal consisting of: ▪ Final Plat Rosewood Second Addition, Received March 17. ▪ Rosewood Crossing Construction Plan dated 2-16-2021 and revised 3-16-2021 ▪ Consisting of these plan sheets ▪ Grading & Erosion Control Plan ▪ SWPPP ▪ Water Main Construction ▪ Storm Sewer Construction ▪ Landscape Plan ▪ Construction Detail Plan Sheet GENERAL COMMENTS – FINAL PLAT: 1. The development Fees are indicated below based on the 2021 Schedule of Rates and Fees. These fees are due with the final plat and subdivision agreement. ▪ Sanitary Sewer Trunk Charge: $1075/acre ▪ Watermain Trunk Charge: $6500/acre ▪ Storm Sewer Trunk Charge: $6865/acre 2. A recommended water main extension will require an easement dedication on the final plat. 3. Outlot A is an infiltration area for storm water management. Outlot A shall be dedicated to the City for maintenance of the ponding area. GRADING AND EROSION CONTOL 1. Spot elevations are needed between the apartment buildings identifying the high points 2. Identify the Emergency Overflow Route for the low points in the project. 3. The grading plan does not provide for a foot of freeboard between the highpoints and the lowest floor elevation. EOF require 1 foot of grade separation between the building lowest floor and the highpoint. Kyle Klatt 3/2021 Page 2 K:\02235-260\Admin\Docs\Rosewood Cossing Second Addition\Rosewood Crossing 2nd Constrution Plan Memo.docx 4. Grading away from the building needs to be at a minimum 2% grade. 5. The drainage system does not provide for surface runoff from the adjacent lot that is east-northeast of the proposed site. Extend storm sewer to the east plat line. 6. A drainage swale will be needed along the north side of garage 6 and the east side of garage 7. The drainage swale needs to be located in the platted easement area. 7. SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN Sanitary sewer for the second addition was constructed with the development of the original plat. Private sanitary sewer extends from a public sanitary sewer located within a private street extending from Boysenberry Court. This sanitary sewer was extended west into the middle of Rosewood Crossing and then north to provide sewer connection access to the eight lots. Water main is extended from the private street on the east side of the Rosewood Crossing into the development and then along the east/north east driveway connecting to a watermain constructed with the first phase. This water main extension provides a watermain loop for lots 3 and 6. Lots 2, 7, & 8 are provided water service from watermain stubs extending from the looped water main. The water main stub extensions are about 200 feet in length. 1. The sanitary sewer service to lot 8 is in excess of 100 feet. Sewer service extensions in excess of 100 feet require cleanouts. Recommend extending a lateral line with a manhole access near the building to improve maintenance accessibility. 2. The construction plan does not identify the type of sewer service connection to the existing sewer main. 3. The two water main stubs to lots 3, 7, & 8 must be connected to provide a looped watermain and for the installation of a fire hydrant on the front side of lot 8. 4. Provide fire hydrant spacing at 400 feet where practical. 5. The plan view indicates C900 water main. Ductile iron pipe is required. 6. A plan note indicates the sewer services to the lots is C900 pipe. For locating purposes, it is recommended to utilize ductile iron pipe to maintain connectivity. STORM SEWER A storm sewer system is proposed in the southern portion of the site. The storm sewer extends from the infiltration basin located on the south west side of the site into the central area and then north between lots 3 and 6 to the private drive. Storm sewer is extended within the private drive collecting runoff within an inverted crown on the street. The inverted crown extends long the backside of the parking isles. Storm sewer improvements are also extended along the private drive from an existing system constructed with the first phase of this development. 1. Storm sewer design must be submitted for review. 2. A storm sewer extension is required to the north easterly plat boundary to collect runoff from the El Dorado Packaging site. 3. CBMH 18 must be a sump manhole to collect sediments prior to discharging to the infiltration basin. 4. A maintenance plan is required for the private storm sewer system. LANDSCAPE PLAN Evergreen and deciduous trees area proposed within and on the perimeter of the site. The underground utilities need to be ghosted into the plan sheets so plantings are not installed on top of the infrastructure. Trees should not be planted over the storm sewer that extends into the infiltration area. Kyle Klatt 3/2021 Page 3 K:\02235-260\Admin\Docs\Rosewood Cossing Second Addition\Rosewood Crossing 2nd Constrution Plan Memo.docx PRIVATE DRIVE AND PARKING STALLS The private drive extends around the perimeter of the site and apartment buildings with garages located on the outer edge of the drive isle. The drive lane appears to be 24 feet wide, there is about 28 feet from the face of the garages to the bump outs on the curb. The parking stalls are identified to be 8.5 feet wide and 17.5 feet deep with bumper overhang. The adjacent concrete sidewalk is 6.5 feet wide. An emergency access is identified along the easterly plat line extending from Boxwood Path. This access road must have a minimum width of 14 feet and have a Knox Box for access control allowing emergency vehicle access. 1. The plan should identify a typical street section the private drive and the emergency access. The typical section needs to identify street widths crowns and street section. 2. The emergency access must be signed NO PARKING FIRE LANE. 3. A turnaround will be required if the buildings are constructed in phases and the private drive is not looped around the site. 4. The alignment of the private drive was reviewed for appropriate turning radii and verified to provide for fire equipment accessibility. The Fire Marshall provide the turning radii detail. SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT The construction plans for Rosewood Crossing must be reviewed for surface water management, erosion and sediment control and for storm sewer pipe sizing. This review has not been completed on this submittal. 1. Plat approval is subject to Surface Water Management Review.