HomeMy WebLinkAbout6.h. Case 21-06-FP Final Plat for Rosewood Crossing Second Addition
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Council Regular Meeting Date: April 20, 2021
AGENDA ITEM: Case 21-06-FP Final Plat for Rosewood
Crossing Second Addition
AGENDA SECTION:
Consent
PREPARED BY: Kyle Klatt, Senior Planner AGENDA NO. 6.h.
ATTACHMENTS: Resolution (Final Plat); Resolution (PUD
Agreement Amendment); Subdivision
Agreement; Site Location Map;
Rosewood Crossing Final Plat; Final Site
Plan; Final Grading Plan, Storm Water
Management Plan; Final Utility Plans
(Water, Sewer, Storm Sewer); Final
Landscape Plan; Revised Phasing Plan;
Architectural Plans (approved); City
Engineer Review Memo Dated 3-25-21
APPROVED BY: LJM
RECOMMENDED ACTION: The Planning Commission and Staff recommend the City
Council adopt the following motions:
1) Motion to adopt a resolution approving the final plat for Rosewood Crossing 2nd
Addition subject to conditions.
2) Motion to approve the subdivision development agreement for Rosewood Crossing
2nd Addition and authorizing the Mayor and Clerk to enter into this agreement.
3) Motion to adopt a resolution approving a minor amendment to the Rosewood
Crossing Planned Unit Development Agreement updating the development and
phasing plans.
SUMMARY
The City Council is being asked to consider a request by Luke Israelson (Rosewood Crossing, LLC.) for
final plat approval of the Rosewood Crossing Second Addition. The proposed final plat incorporates the
southern portion of the Rosewood Crossing Planned Unit Development (PUD), a 225-unit, seven building
apartment development approved by the City in 2016 and located south of 145th Street and east of
downtown Rosemount. The developer has proposed building the project in seven different phases that
correspond to each of the buildings, and previously received approval of a final plat for the first two
phases. The current request is a final plat for all remaining phases and specifically the five remaining 32-
unit apartment buildings. In conjunction with the initial Rosewood Crossing plat, the City also approved
final development plans associated with the PUD. All submitted final construction plans for the second
addition are consistent with the approved PUD plans. The attached architectural plans are included for
reference only.
Please note that the submitted plans include some minor changes to the approved PUD development
plans based on actual field conditions. The applicant has also provided a slightly updated drawing
2
associated with the approved phasing plan to more specifically call out the timing of the private road
improvements. These updated plans should be added to the ones included in the original PUD agreement
for Rosewood Crossing; therefore, staff has drafted a resolution updating the original agreement in
addition to updated language for the agreement itself. The Planning Commission reviewed the updated
documents, but is not required to act on them since they represent a minor amendment to the PUD (the
City Council has the responsibility to update the agreement).
Applicant: Rosewood Crossing, LLC (Luke Israelson)
Property Owner: Rosewood Crossing, LLC
Property Location: Outlot A – Rosewood Crossing
Size of Property: 9.62 Acres
Comprehensive Plan Designation: HDR High Density Residential
Zoning: R-4/PUD High Density Residential/PUD
Number of Units: 160 units overall/5 32-unit buildings
Site Density: 16.6 units/acre overall
Current Neighboring Land Uses: North – Rosewood Crossing Apartments (2) and Light Industrial
South – Residential and Future Commercial
East – Detached Townhomes
West – Railroad and Rosemount Park and Ride
PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT
The Planning Commission reviewed and recommended approval the request at their March 30, 2021
meeting. The item was on the consent agenda as no public hearing is required for approval of a final plat.
One of the Commissioners did ask for clarification that the plans still include a connection to Boxwood
Path; staff noted that there is a planned connection that will provide limited, gated access for emergency
vehicles.
BACKGROUND
The overall development plans for Rosewood Crossing include seven 32-unit apartment buildings and one
caretaker’s residence/office/meeting space structure that will all access a private street system that loops
around the site. The site plans also include 320 parking stalls located either along the private street or
within detached garage structures near the apartment buildings they serve. The applicant has proposed
building the individual buildings in phases moving from the north part of the property to the south, and
received final plat approval for the first two buildings in 2017. With construction of the first two
apartment buildings complete, and work on the caretaker’s residence and office underway, the applicant is
now seeking final plat approval for the remaining building areas within the PUD area. Originally, the
applicant was planning to plat each building as a separate final plat, but has decided to combine the
remaining final phases into the proposed Rosewood Crossing Second Addition. The applicant still intends
to build approximately one building each year.
The master development and final PUD plans were approved in 2016 with the preliminary plat and 2017
with the final plat. These plans included detailed information concerning site grading, storm water
management, access, private street design, parking layouts, landscaping, and building architectural designs.
All the construction plans submitted with the final plat application are consistent with these plans, but
have been updated in two ways:
• The private access drive across the rail spur between Rosewood Crossing and the adjacent
Rosewood Village townhouses to the east has been modified to provide a separated curb cut for
the driveway, which was a requirement of the preliminary plat approval. The grading has also been
slightly modified in this area to accommodate the existing topography in the area.
3
• As a result of the grading changes, the garage structures serving building four have been
reconfigured from two buildings into one with a net reduction of two parking stalls.
In addition, the applicant submitted an upgraded overall phasing plan depicting the timing for private
roadway improvements by tying these improvements to specific project phases. Each of these changes are
minor in nature, and can be approved administratively by staff separate from the platting approvals.
All previous conditions of approval required under the master development plan will carry forward with
the final plat, including a condition that caps the overall number of apartment buildings permitted at six.
This condition requires the developer to conduct a parking study prior to construction of the fourth
building, and if no issues are identified as part of this review, the applicant will be able to proceed with all
seven buildings.
ISSUE ANALYSIS
Legal Authority . This application is a Quasi-Judicial action. The final plat application is Quasi-Judicial
because the City has a set of standards and requirements for reviewing this type of application that is
described in detail below. Generally, if the final plat meets the ordinance requirements it must be
approved.
Final Plat. The final plat replats Outlot A of Rosewood Crossing into separate lots for the five remaining
apartment buildings and accessory garage structures. The remainder of the site will be platted as either an
outlot along the south/southeastern property boundary for storm water management or Lot 12, Block 1
which will include all the common open space around each building and the private play area between two
of the buildings. The plat includes easements for drainage and utility purposes, and these easements will
be subject to final approval by the City Engineer.
Land use and Zoning . The proposed final plat will facilitate the construction of 160 apartment units
spread out between five structures, and the plat is consistent with the current land use and zoning
classifications (as amended in 2016 with the preliminary plat). The subject property is guided HDR – High
Density Residential and is zoned R-4/PUD High Density Residential Planned Unit Development. The
overall site density will be 18.9 units per acre once complete, which is well within the range of 12 to 30
units per acre allowed under the high-density residential zoning standards. All buildings constructed
within the subdivision will need to comply with the final PUD development plans approved for Rosewood
Crossing. The approved building design is attached for reference.
Lot and Building Standards . As noted above, each apartment building and detached garage will be
placed on a separate lot of record. The caretakers building and common gathering space was also
previously platted as a separate lot within the first Rosewood Commons plat. Because it is a PUD, there
are no issues associated with internal lot lines, only setbacks from the a0djoining properties. Building
setback requirements are 30’ for the principal structures from all sides of the PUD and 50’ front yard and
10’ side yard setbacks for accessory structures which would include the parking garages. The plan meets
these standards.
Building and Architecture. The final development plans approved in 2017 included elevations and
architectural plans for the apartment buildings and garages. The applicant is not proposing any changes to
the approved plans, which were found to meet all applicable requirements from the zoning ordinance and
PUD conditions. These plans are included for reference, but are not part of the formal final plat approval.
4
The composition of apartment unit types within the project are listed as follows (the percentages are
consistent with the preliminary development plans):
Proposed Types of Apartment Units for Rosewood Commons
Type of Unit Size Number of Units Percentage of Units
One Bedroom 700 Square Feet 100 63%
Two Bedroom 829-894 Square Feet 60 37%
Parks and Open Space. The developer is being asked to pay a fee in lieu of park land for the project
based on the current approved rate of $2,500 per unit for a high-density residential project. This amount
will be collected with the building permit for each of the buildings. To date the City has collected
$162,500 in part fees for the two existing buildings and caretaker’s residence.
The master plan includes a small private playground area on the southern portion of the site in the back of
buildings four, six, and seven. As noted in the master plan review, the final details for the play area should
be submitted to the City for review prior to construction. The PUD phasing plan identifies that the
playground will be installed as part of phase four.
Access and Parking . The City’s approval of the master development plan included several conditions
related to parking and access across the site. The final development plans were updated to address
maneuvering concerns at the 145th Street entrance, and now provide adequate stacking for vehicles waiting
to exit the site onto 145th Street. The phasing plan also includes the construction of a specific number of
parking stalls within each project phase. Overall the applicant is proposing 448 parking stalls of which 111
will be located within the detached accessory garage structures and 337 will be exterior surface parking
stalls, around each building. 130 of these stalls were constructed with the first two buildings, while the
remainder will be constructed within the final plat area. The number and location of parking stalls is
consistent with the preliminary development plan approval.
The conditions of preliminary plan approval specified that the project was approved for six buildings and
the office building, and that the parking situation had to be evaluated before a seventh building could be
constructed. The parking evaluation must be completed before the fourth phase is constructed, at which
point the City will have the ability to either find that the parking provided is adequate and the developer
can proceed with all seven buildings, or that the parking is not adequate to meet the actual demand on the
site. If parking is not adequate, one building will need to be eliminated from the plan. Because the last five
phases are all included in the proposed final plat area, staff is recommending a condition of approval that
will only allow a building permit to be issued for a seventh building upon the completion of a parking
study that finds no issues with the demand for parking on the site.
The updated phasing plan includes two temporary loop roads that will be constructed with phases three
and five respectively. The temporary roads will provide a secondary outlet to the private rail spur crossing
or will provide a connection around the southern portion of the site. These connections will be useful for
maintaining good emergency vehicle access throughout the site and for providing an alternate exit in case
on of the access drives is blocked. The applicant is proposing to use a class 5 gravel surface for the
temporary connections; staff is willing to accept the temporary gavel surface provided it is designed to
accommodate emergency vehicles. Additionally, staff is recommending a condition of approval that
requires a turn-around area approved by the City at the termination of the private streets prior to
completion of the access road loop.
5
Phasing Plan. The Rosewood Crossing Second Addition final plat covers the last five phases of the
project and will allow construction to commence on the remaining buildings without any additional
approvals (other than a building permit) from the City. Each remaining phase of the project will
essentially include one of the 32-unit apartment buildings, detached garage structure with 16 parking stalls,
surface parking around each building, access road extension, fencing to the furthest extent of each phase,
and landscaping. Water and sewer service will be extended in each phase with the other improvements;
roughly half of the sewer was installed with the first two project phases.
Landscaping and Tree Preservation. The landscaping plan provided with the previous site approvals
indicates a total of 240 trees across the entire development. This exceeds the 233 trees required by code
(eight plus one tree per unit); and leaves 172 trees to planted with the 2nd Addition final plat area. The
majority of the new trees are located along the eastern property line to help provide screening and
buffering to the residences east of the rail spur.
The tree preservation plan provided with the original PUD application indicated that the developer will be
removing 196 caliper inches of existing vegetation beyond the threshold for removal without replacement
being required. Because of the amount of landscaping required for the site before any replacement, the
City allowed the applicant pay in lieu of planting for the trees. The $11,700 fee was paid with the first
building permit within the development, and will be used to fund the plating of trees on public property in
the City.
Signage. The applicant is proposing a monument sign that will be located at the entrance along 145th
Street. A sign permit for the sign may be approved administratively so long as it meets all the
requirements of the Sign Ordinance
Engineering . The City’s project engineer has reviewed the final plat and final construction plans and
provided comments in the Engineer’s Memo dated March 25, 2021. Generally, the comments pertain to
information that must be included for review prior to building permit approval. A portion of the
development fees for the project were paid with the first addition; the remainder of the fees will be due
with this development as follows (for 9.62 acres): $10,341.50 for sanitary sewer trunk charges, $53,821.60
for storm sewer trunk charges (estimated, may be adjusted once final lot areas are calculated), and $62,530
for water main trunk charges.
CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATION
Staff and the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council approve the application for a Final
Plat for Rosewood Crossing Second Addition subject to the conditions of approval outlined in the
recommended action section above.
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2021- 33
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT
FOR ROSEWOOD CROSSING SECOND ADDITION
WHEREAS, KJ Walk Inc., 6001 Egan Drive, Suite 100, Savage, MN (Applicant) has submitted an
application to the City of Rosemount for a Final Plat concerning property legally described as follows:
Outlot A, Rosewood Crossing, Dakota County, Minnesota
WHEREAS, on March 30, 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount reviewed the Final
Plat for Rosewood Crossing Second Addition; and
WHEREAS, on March 30, 2021, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Final Plat for
Rosewood Crossing Second Addition, subject to conditions; and
WHEREAS, on April 20, 2021, the City Council of the City of Rosemount reviewed the Planning
Commission’s recommendation and the Final Plat for Rosewood Crossing Second Addition.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Rosemount hereby
approves the Final Plat for Rosewood Crossing Second Addition, subject to the following conditions:
1)Execution of a subdivision agreement.
2)Incorporation of recommendations from the City Engineer in a review memorandum dated March
25, 2021 relative to drainage, grading, street design, easements, utilities and the adjacent sidewalks.
3)Payment of a fee in lieu of park land dedication for each unit consistent with the City’s adopted fee
schedule.
4)Execution of a minor amendment to the Rosewood Crossing PUD Agreement to incorporate the
updated site and phasing plans.
5)Provision of all easements as required by the City Engineer.
6)No building permit may be issued for the seventh building (Lot 8, Block 1) until a parking study is
conducted after completion and occupancy of the third building. If the study identifies a shortage of
parking within the PUD area, the applicant will need to construct more off-street parking in lieu of a
seventh building. If there are no issues identified with the parking study, the City will allow the
developer to proceed with all seven buildings as depicted on the site plans.
7)The temporary loop roads associated with phases three and five shall be constructed of a material
deemed suitable by the City for emergency vehicle access. A turn-around area with a width and
surface approved by the City Fire Marshall shall be provided at the termination of any private street
(prior to construction of the temporary loop road).
ADOPTED this 20th day of April 2021, by the City Council of the City of Rosemount.
__________________________________________
William H. Droste, Mayor ATTEST:
___________________________________
Erin Fasbender, City Clerk
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2021- 34
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A MINOR AMENDMENT TO THE ROSEWOOD
CROSSING PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) AGREEMENT TO UPDATE
THE PHASING PLAN AND CERTAIN DEVELOPMENT PLANS
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department of the City of Rosemount received a
request from Rosewood Crossing, LLC., to amend the Rosewood Crossing Planned Unit
Development (PUD) Agreement to updating the phasing plan and to update development plans for
the area located within Rosewood Crossing Second Addition; and
WHEREAS, staff has prepared and recommends approval of a Minor PUD Amendment to add the
updated phasing and development plans to the PUD Agreement; and
WHEREAS, on April 20, 2021, the City Council of the City of Rosemount reviewed the application
and staff recommendation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Rosemount hereby
approves the Minor Amendment to the Rosewood Crossing Planned Unit Development Agreement
to add updated phasing and development plans to the agreement.
ADOPTED this 20th day of April 2021, by the City Council of the City of Rosemount.
__________________________________________
William H. Droste, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________________
Erin Fasbender, City Clerk
Rosewood Crossing 2nd
April / 2021
G:\ENGPROJ\2021-09 Rosewood Crossing 2nd\Subdivision Agreement\Subdivisionagreement - 2021-09.docx
Page 1 of 11
SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT
Rosewood Crossing 2nd
AGREEMENT dated this ________ day of ________________________, 2021, by and between the
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT, a Minnesota municipal corporation, (the "City"), and KJ WALK, INC., a Florida
corporation, (the "Developer").
1. Request for Plat Approval. The Developer has asked the City to approve the subdivision of land and
a plat of land to be known as Rosewood Crossing 2nd Addition, which land is legally described on
ATTACHMENT ONE, attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof (hereinafter referred to as the
“subject property”).
2. Conditions of Plat Approval. The City has approved the subdivision and the plat on the following
conditions:
a. Incorporation of recommendations of the City Engineer concerning design and installation of
public and private infrastructure, and including grading, erosion control, streets and utilities.
b. Execution of a Subdivision or Development Agreement to secure the public and private
improvements.
c. Payment of all applicable fees including GIS, Park Dedication and other fees identified in the
current fee schedule.
d. Incorporation of any easements necessary to accommodate drainage, ponding, trails, underpasses,
conservation areas, streets and utilities.
3. Phased Development. The City may refuse to approve final plats of subsequent additions of the plat
if the Developer has breached this Agreement and the breach has not been remedied. Development of
subsequent phases may not proceed until Subdivision Agreements for such phases are approved by the
City.
4. Effect of Subdivision Approval. For two (2) years from the date of this Agreement, no amendments
to the City's Comprehensive Plan, except an amendment placing the plat in the current urban service
area, or official controls shall apply to or affect the use, development density, lot size, lot layout or
dedications of the approved plat unless required by state or federal law or agreed to in writing by the
City and the Developer. Thereafter, notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, to the
full extent permitted by state law, the City may require compliance with any amendments to the City's
Comprehensive Guide Plan, official controls, platting or dedication requirements enacted after the date
of this Agreement.
Rosewood Crossing 2nd
April / 2021
G:\ENGPROJ\2021-09 Rosewood Crossing 2nd\Subdivision Agreement\Subdivisionagreement - 2021-09.docx
Page 2 of 11
5. Development Plans. The subject property shall be developed in accordance with the following plans,
specifications and contract documents, original copies of which are on file with the City Engineer. The
plans and contract documents may be prepared, subject to City approval, after entering this Agreement,
but before commencement of any work on the Subject Property. If the plans vary from the written
terms of this Agreement, the written terms shall control. The plans are:
Plan A - Plat
Plan B - Soil Erosion Control Plan and Schedule
Plan C - Drainage and Storm Water Runoff Plan
Plan D - Plans and Specifications for Public and Private Improvements
Plan E - Grading Plan and House Pad Elevations
Plan F - Street Lights
Plan G - Landscape Improvements
All Improvements, including Developer Improvements and City-Installed Public Infrastructure
Improvements (if any) that lie within the public right-of-way or easements and are improvements listed
in Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.021 (hereinafter the Improvements) will be designed by the
Developer at the Developer’s expense, and approved by the City Engineer. The Developer will prepare
plans and specifications for the Improvements and will perform all construction administration for the
Improvements, all at Developer expense. Construction administration includes but is not limited to
documentation, as-builts, surveying, field staking, and testing. The City Engineer will perform
inspection services at Developer’s expense.
6. Installation by Developer. The Developer shall install or cause to be installed and pay for the
following, hereinafter referred to as the “Developer Improvements”:
A. Surveying and staking
B. Surface improvements (paved streets, sidewalks, trails, etc.)
C. Water main improvements
D. Sanitary sewer improvements
E. Storm sewer improvements
F. Setting of lot and block monuments
G. Gas, electric, telephone, and cable lines
H. Site grading
I. Landscaping
J. Streetlights
K. Other items as necessary to complete the development as stipulated herein or in other
agreements
7. Time of Performance. The Developer shall install all required improvements enumerated in Paragraph
6 that will serve the subject property by December 31, 2021, subject to delays due to inclement weather,
casualty, labor strikes, material shortages, or other force majeure not within the Developer’s reasonable
Rosewood Crossing 2nd
April / 2021
G:\ENGPROJ\2021-09 Rosewood Crossing 2nd\Subdivision Agreement\Subdivisionagreement - 2021-09.docx
Page 3 of 11
control. The Developer may, however, request an extension of time from the City. If an extension is
granted, it shall be conditioned upon updating the security posted by the Developer to reflect cost
increases and the extended completion date.
8. City-Installed Public Infrastructure. The following improvements, hereinafter referred to as “City-
Installed Public Infrastructure Improvements” (known as City Project 2021-09), shall be designed,
inspected, surveyed and administered by the City, and installed in the Subject Property at Developer
expense by a Contractor selected by the City through the public bidding process:
A. None
9. [This Section Intentionally Left Blank]
10. Security for Developer Improvements. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Agreement,
payment of the costs of all Developer Improvements, and construction of all Developer Improvements
(as noted in Paragraph 6), the Developer shall furnish the City with a cash deposit or irrevocable letter
of credit from a local bank (“security”) in the amount of Two Hundred Fifty Eight Thousand Seven
Hundred Forty Eight ($258,748). The amount of the security was calculated as follows:
Refer to Exhibit A and Exhibit B for an explanation of each item.
The bank and form of the letter of credit or other security shall be subject to the a pproval of the City
Administrator. The letter of credit shall be automatically renewable until the City releases the developer
from responsibility. The letter of credit shall secure compliance with all terms of this Agreement and
all obligations of the Developer under it. The City may draw down on the letter of credit without notice
if the obligations of the Developer have not been completed as required by this Agreement. In the
event of a default under this Subdivision Agreement by the Developer, the City shall furnish the
Developer with written notice by certified mail of Developers default(s) under the terms of this
Subdivision Agreement. If the Developer does not remove said default(s) within two (2) weeks of
receiving notice, the City may draw on the letter of credit and take such steps as it deems necessary to
remedy the default. With City approval, the letter of credit may be reduced from time to time as financial
obligations are paid and Developer Improvements and other Developer obligations are completed to
the City’s requirements.
11. Grading Plan/Site Grading. Site grading shall be completed by the Developer at its cost and approved
by the City Engineer. The completion of grading activities will need to be coordinated by the City in
conjunction with the installation of utilities. Developer shall furnish the City Engineer satisfactory proof
of payment for the site grading work and shall submit a certificate of survey of the development to the
Cost 110%
Grading and Erosion Control 50,000$ 55,000$
Pond Restoration and Erosion Control Removal 25,000$ 27,500$
Survey Monumentation 5,500$ 6,050$
Landscaping (172 trees @ $300/tree)51,600$ 56,760$
Street Lights -$
Cost 110%
Surface Improvements -$
Water Main Improvements 90,750$ 113,438$
Sanitary Sewer Improvements -$
Storm Sewer Improvements -$
Total 222,850$ 258,748$
Rosewood Crossing 2nd
April / 2021
G:\ENGPROJ\2021-09 Rosewood Crossing 2nd\Subdivision Agreement\Subdivisionagreement - 2021-09.docx
Page 4 of 11
City as the site grading is completed by phase, with street and lot grades. If the installation of utilities
by the City is occurring simultaneously with the grading, the utility contractor shall have preference over
the grading activities. No substantial grading activities can be completed over installed utilities unless
otherwise protected. All improvements to the lots and the final grading shall comply with the grading
plan as submitted and shall be the responsibility of the Developer.
12. License. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license
to enter the Subject Property to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City. Such
license shall terminate as to all residential lots within the subject property upon acceptance by the City
of the public infrastructure improvements.
13. Erosion Control. Prior to site grading, and before any utility construction is commenced or building
permits are issued, the erosion control plan, Plan B, shall be implemented, inspected and approved by
the City. All areas disturbed by the excavation and backfilling operations shall be reseeded within 72
hours after the completion of the work in that area. Except as otherwise provided in the erosion control
plan, seed shall be rye grass or other fast-growing seed suitable to the existing soil to provide a temporary
ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be mulched and disc-anchored as necessary
for seed retention.
All basement and/or foundation excavation spoil piles shall be kept completely off City right-of-way
and shall be completely surrounded with an approved erosion control silt fence. Approved erosion
control fencing shall be installed around the perimeter of each lot or at City-approved locations at the
time of building permit issuance and remain in place until the lot is seeded or sodded. A 20-foot opening
will be allowed on each lot for construction deliveries.
The parties recognize that time is critical in controlling erosion. If development does not comply with
the erosion control plan and schedule, or supplementary instructions received from the City, the City
may take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion. This right also applies to the required
erosion control for basement and/or foundation excavation spoil piles. The City will attempt to notify
the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the
Developer’s or City’s rights or obligations hereunder. If the Developer does not reimburse the City for
any cost the City incurred for such work within thirty (30) days, the City may draw down the letter of
credit to pay any costs. No development will be allowed, and no building permits will be issued unless
the Subject Property is in full compliance with the erosion control requirements.
14. Planting and Seeding. Landscaping shall be in accordance with Landscape Plans approved by the City
Planner.
15. Clean up. The Developer shall clean streets of dirt and debris that has resulted from construction work
by the Developer, its agents or assignees. The City will inspect the site on a weekly basis and determine
whether it is necessary to take additional measures to clean dirt and debris from the streets. After 24
hours verbal notice to the Developer, the City will complete or contract to complete the clean-up at the
Developer’s expense in accordance with the procedures specified in Paragraph 13. The Developer shall
inspect and, if necessary, clean all catch basins, sumps, and ponding areas of erosion/siltation and restore
to the original condition at the end of home construction within this development. All silt fence and
other erosion control should be removed following the establishment of turf. These items are to be
secured through the letter of credit as is noted in Exhibit A.
16. Ownership of Improvements. Upon completion and City acceptance of the work and construction
required by this Agreement, the Public Improvements lying within public rights-of-way and easements
shall become City property without further notice or action unless the improvements are specifically
Rosewood Crossing 2nd
April / 2021
G:\ENGPROJ\2021-09 Rosewood Crossing 2nd\Subdivision Agreement\Subdivisionagreement - 2021-09.docx
Page 5 of 11
identified herein as private infrastructure. Water main is a Public Improvement. All other
improvements are Private Improvements.
17. Warranty. The Developer warrants all work required to be performed by it against poor material and
faulty workmanship for a period of two (2) years after its completion and acceptance by the City or such
longer period as is specified in plans and specifications prepared by the City Engineer for Developer
Improvements that are Public Improvements. All trees, grass and sod shall be warranted to be alive, of
good quality and disease free for twenty-four (24) months after planting. Vegetation surrounding ponds
and/or wetlands shall be warranted to be alive, of good quality and weed free for three (3) years after
planting. For each pond/wetland in the development, the developer shall provide to the City Engineer
an inspection report by July 31 each year which includes the following:
A. Date of inspection
B. Name of person responsible for inspection
C. Photos of the pond/wetland area confirming the vegetation is established as intended
D. Maintenance plan describing the required maintenance activities and tentative schedule.
18. Responsibility for Costs.
A. Except as otherwise specified herein, the Developer shall pay all costs incurred by it or the City in
conjunction with the development of the Subject Property including, but not limited to, Soil and
Water Conservation District charges, legal, planning, engineering and inspection expenses
incurred in connection with approval and acceptance of the subdivision and the plat, the
preparation of this Agreement and any amendments hereto, and all costs and expenses incurred
by the City in monitoring and inspecting the development of the Subject Property.
B. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers and employees harmless from claims made by
itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from plat or subdivision
approval and development of the Subject Property, except for any costs or expenses arising from
the negligence or other wrongful acts or omissions of the City, it’s agents, employees or
contractors. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers and employees for all costs,
damages or expenses that the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including
attorney’s fees.
C. The Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the preparation and enforcement of
this Agreement, including engineering and attorney’s fees. Upon request, the City shall provide
invoices, in reasonable detail, as to any such fees. The estimated City fees of $26,418 shall be
deposited with the City at the time this Agreement is signed, and represent the following amounts:
If the actual City fees exceed this estimate, the Developer shall pay the additional costs to the City
within ten (10) days of the request. If actual City fees are lower than this estimate, any surplus
funds will be returned to the developer when the project fund is reconciled and closed.
Cost
Engineering Review Fees (estimate)10,000$
Construction and Monitoring Fees 9,075$
Attorney Fees 2,000$
City Administrative Fee (5% of Construction Estimate)4,538$
GIS Fees 805$
Total 26,418$
Rosewood Crossing 2nd
April / 2021
G:\ENGPROJ\2021-09 Rosewood Crossing 2nd\Subdivision Agreement\Subdivisionagreement - 2021-09.docx
Page 6 of 11
D. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under
this Agreement within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the City may
halt development work and construction including, but not limited to, the issuance of building
permits for lots that the Developer may or may not have sold, until the bills are paid in full. Bills
not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of nine percent (9%) per year.
E. The Developer shall pay all energy costs for street lights installed within the Subject Property.
19. The Developer agrees to pay fees, charges and assessments set forth in this Section prior to, or at the
time of execution of any plat by the City:
A. Storm Sewer Trunk Area Charges in the amount of $35,976
B. Sanitary Sewer Trunk Area Charges in the amount of $7,211
C. Watermain Trunk Area Charges in the amount of $43,599
Or other amounts for such fees as in effect at the time of plat approval.
20. The Developer understands that builders will be required to pay for the Subject Property fees, charges
and assessments in effect at the time of issuance of building permits. The rates for each of these items
will be set according to the current rate structure at the time the building permit is received. The fees,
charges, and assessments in effect as of the date of this agreement are:
A. Metropolitan Council Environmental Services Availability Charges per SAC unit (current rate is
$2,485).
B. Storm Sewer Connection Charges per single family unit and per multiple family unit (single family
currently at $770; multi-family currently at $290 per housing unit).
C. Sanitary Sewer Availability Charges per SAC unit (currently at $1,200/SAC unit).
D. Water Availability Charges per SAC unit (currently at $2,300/SAC unit for single family residential
and multi-family residential).
E. Park dedication fees in the amount of $2,500 per unit (total of $400,000 for Phase 2, which is 160
units x $2,500)
21. Building Permits. No occupancy permits shall be issued until:
A. The site grading is completed and approved by the City.
B. All utilities are tested, approved by the City Engineer, and in service.
C. All curbing is installed and backfilled.
D. The first lift of bituminous is in place and approved by the City.
E. All building permit fees are paid in full.
F. No early building permits will be issued.
The Developer, in executing this Agreement, assumes all liability and costs for damage or delays incurred
by the City in the construction of the Improvements caused by the Developer, its employees,
contractors, subcontractors, material men or agents. No occupancy permits shall be issued until the
streets and utilities referred to in paragraph 6 are installed and approved by the City (excluding the final
wear course of bituminous), unless otherwise authorized in writing by the City Engineer.
Rosewood Crossing 2nd
April / 2021
G:\ENGPROJ\2021-09 Rosewood Crossing 2nd\Subdivision Agreement\Subdivisionagreement - 2021-09.docx
Page 7 of 11
22. Record Drawings. At project completion, Developer shall submit record drawings of all public and
private infrastructure improvements in accordance with the City’s Engineering Guidelines. No
securities will be fully released until all record drawings have been submitted and accepted by the City
Engineer.
23. Developer’s Default. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed
by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly
reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer is first given notice of
the work in default, not less than 48 hours in advance. This Agreement is a license for the City to act,
and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a court order for permission to enter the land. When
the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, draw on the letter of credit
or other security described in section 10, or levy the cost in whole or in part as a special assessment
against the Subject Property. Developer waives its rights to notice of hearing and hearing on such
assessments and its right to appeal such assessments pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.081.
24. Miscellaneous.
A. The Developer represents to the City that the development of the Subject Property, the
subdivision and the plat comply with all city, county, metropolitan, state and federal laws and
regulations including, but not limited to: subdivision ordinances, zoning ordinances and
environmental regulations. If the City determines that the subdivision, or the plat, or the
development of the Subject Property does not comply, the City may, at its option, refuse to allow
construction or development work on the Subject Property until the Developer does comply.
Upon the City’s demand, the Developer shall cease work until there is compliance.
B. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Agreement.
C. Breach of the terms of this Agreement by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of building
permits, including lots sold to third parties.
D. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph or phase of this Agreement is for
any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this
Agreement.
E. If building permits are issued prior to the completion and acceptance of the Improvements, the
Developer assumes all liability and costs resulting in delays in completion of the Improvements
and damage to the Improvements caused by the City, the Developer, its contractors,
subcontractors, material men, employees, agents or third parties.
F. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of
this Agreement. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties
and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City’s failure to promptly take legal
action to enforce this Agreement shall not be a waiver or release.
G. This Agreement shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the subject
property. The Developer shall take such steps, including execution of amendments to this
Agreement, as are necessary to effect the recording hereof. After the Developer has completed
the work required of it under this Agreement, at the Developer’s request, the City will execute and
deliver to the Developer a release.
H. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every
other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to the City, at
Rosewood Crossing 2nd
April / 2021
G:\ENGPROJ\2021-09 Rosewood Crossing 2nd\Subdivision Agreement\Subdivisionagreement - 2021-09.docx
Page 8 of 11
law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein
set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order
as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any
time thereafter any other right, power or remedy.
I. The Developer may not assign this Agreement without the written permission of the City Council.
25. Notices. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to
the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by registered mail at the following
address:
Mr. Warren Israelson
KJ Walk, Inc.
6001 Egan Drive, Suite 100
Savage, MN 55378
952-226-3200
warren@kjwalk.com
Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Administrator, or
mailed to the City by registered mail in care of the City Administrator at the following address:
City Administrator
Rosemount City Hall
2875 145th Street West
Rosemount, Minnesota 55068
Rosewood Crossing 2nd
April / 2021
G:\ENGPROJ\2021-09 Rosewood Crossing 2nd\Subdivision Agreement\Subdivisionagreement - 2021-09.docx
Page 9 of 11
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands the day and year first above written.
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
BY:
William H. Droste, Mayor
BY:
Erin Fasbender, City Clerk
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) SS
COUNTY OF DAKOTA )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of _____________________, 2021,
by William H. Droste, Mayor, and Erin Fasbender, City Clerk, of the City of Rosemount, a Minnesota
municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council.
Notary Public
KJ WALK, INC.
BY:
Its
BY:
Its
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) SS
COUNTY OF _____________)
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ______________________, 2021
by __ , its ______________________________________, and
_____________________________, its_________________________________ ________________ of
KJ Walk, Inc., a Florida corporation, on behalf of said corporation.
Notary Public
Drafted By:
City of Rosemount
2875 145th Street West
Rosemount, MN 55068
Rosewood Crossing 2nd
April / 2021
G:\ENGPROJ\2021-09 Rosewood Crossing 2nd\Subdivision Agreement\Subdivisionagreement - 2021-09.docx
Page 10 of 11
EXHIBIT A
The following clarifies the various portions of the letter of credit for Developer Improvements that are
outlined in the Subdivision Agreement:
Survey Monumentation – An amount equal to 110% of the cost to monument all lots within the development.
Landscaping – An amount equal to 110% of the cost to complete the minimum required landscaping. If
additional landscaping is planned, a surety for that cost is not required.
Street Lighting – An amount equal to 110% of the cost to complete the minimum required lighting. If
additional lighting is planned, a surety for that cost is not required ($4,000 per light has been used to calculate
this cost).
Buffer Monumentation – An amount equal to 110% of the cost to manufacture and install the necessary
buffer monumentation signs around all ponds and wetlands ($50 per sign has been used to calculate this cost).
Rosewood Crossing 2nd
EXHIBIT B (Page 1 of 2)
No. Item Cost 110% Calculation
1 Grading and Erosion Control 50,000$ 55,000$
2 Pond Restoration and Erosion Control Removal 25,000$ 27,500$ $25,000 minimum
3 Survey Monumentation 5,500$ 6,050$ $500/lot x 11 lot/parcel
4 Landscaping 51,600$ 56,760$ Per City Planner, 172 trees x $300
5 Surface Improvements -$ 125%
6 Water Main Improvements 90,750$ 113,438$ 125%
7 Sanitary Sewer Improvements -$ -$ 125%
8 Storm Sewer Improvements -$ -$ 125%
Total 222,850$ 258,748$
No. Item Cost
Estimated Construction Cost 90,750$
1 Engineering Review Fees 10,000$
2 Construction Monitoring Fees 9,075$
3 Attorney Fees 2,000$
4 5% City Administrative Fees 4,538$
5 GIS Fees 805$
Total 26,418$
No. Item Cost
1 Storm Sewer Trunk Charge 35,976$
2 Sanitary Sewer Trunk Charge 7,211$
3 Water Trunk Charge 43,599$
4 Stormwater Ponding Fee -$
Total 86,786$
No. Item Cost
1 Park Dedication 400,000$
Total 400,000$
Estimate
5% of Estimated Construction Cost
$120/acre x 6.71 acres
10% of Estimated Construction Cost
Letter of Credit for Developer Improvements (due with signed agreement)
City Fees (due with signed agreement)
Calculation
Developer estimate
City Engineer Estimation
$6500/acre x 6.71 acres
Development Fees (due before signed plat is released)
160 units x $2,500 per unit/$80,000 to be paid with building permit
Development Fees (due with building permit application)
Calculation
Calculation
$6865/net developable acre 5.24 acres
$1075/acre x 6.71 acres
N/A
Block Lots Units Block Lot Units SQ FT Acres
1 11 160 1 1 0 4,312 0.099
1 2 32 15,096 0.347
1 3 32 15,096 0.347
1 4 0 4,312 0.099
1 5 0 3,784 0.087
1 6 32 15,096 0.347
1 7 32 15,096 0.347
Total 160 1 8 32 15,096 0.347
1 9 0 4,312 0.099
Total Plat Area = 6.71 acres 1 10 0 4,312 0.099
Total Park Area = 0.00 acres 1 11 0 195,669 4.492
Future Plat Area = 0.00 acres 0.000
Developable Area = 6.71 acres *0.000
Ponding to HWL = 1.47 acres 0.000
Net Developable Area = 5.24 acres 0.000
0.000
* Excludes future plat and park areas 0.000
0.000
Outlot A 126,712 0.000
Total Boundary 418,893 6.708
Rosewood Crossing 2nd
EXHIBIT B (Page 2 of 2)
Totals
Rosewood Crossing 2nd
April / 2021
G:\ENGPROJ\2021-09 - Rosewood Crossing 2nd\Subdivision Agreement\Subdivisionagreement - 2021-09.docx
Page 11 of 11
ATTACHMENT ONE
Rosewood Crossing 2nd
Final Plat
LOCATION MAPSITEI hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me,or under my direct supervision, and that I am aduly registered engineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.Luke Warren Israelson6001 Egan Drive, Ste 100, Savage, MN 55378Phone: 952.226.3200 Web: www.kjwalk.comDate:02/18/2021Revision:OriginalLocation MapRegistration #: 51362SHEET 1 of 1Date: 2/18/2021FILE PATH: G:\My Drive\Work Files\Rosemount Projects\Rosewood Crossing\Engineering\CAD\DWGs\RWC2-2.dwgFebruary 18, 2021 LAST SAVED: February 18, 2021CrossingRosemount, MNSecond Addition
1TWO STORY APARTMENT2870 145TH ST W
963.00
TWO STORY APT.2860 145TH ST W
963.00
TWO STORY APARTMENT2830 145TH ST W
963.00
TWO STORY APT.2850 145TH ST W
961.80
1617111915171041GARAGE 7
16 STALLS- 962.60
GARAGE 416 STALLS- 961.40GARAGE 3
16 STALLS 161112128121212
12 2820
G
A
R
A
G
E
16 ST
A
L
L
S
EXISTINGTWO STORY APARTMENT2810 145TH ST W
FFE=966.10
EXISTINGTWO STORY APARTMENT2820 145TH ST W
FFE = 964.10
EXISTINGCOMMONBLDG
970.50
2810
G
A
R
A
G
E
16 ST
A
L
L
S
FFE=
9
6
5
.
8
9
FFE=
9
6
5
.
5
6
FFE=
9
6
5
.
2
3
FFE=
9
6
3
.
2
3
FFE=
9
6
3
.
5
6
FFE=
9
6
3
.
8
928.0056.00110TWO STORY APT.2840 145TH ST W
962.00
FFE=961.90
FFE=962.409 1010111161110128.0028.0028.0028.0028.0028.00TOT LOT
PAVILION
PAVILION1328
GARAGE 6 14 STALLS1195FFE=963.00FFE=962.70Rosewood Crossing
Cover
SHEET 1 of 7
0 50 100 150
FILE PATH: G:\My Drive\Work Files\Rosemount Projects\Rosewood Crossing\Engineering\CAD\DWGs\RWC2-2.dwg
SHEET INDEX1 Cover
2 Grading and Erosion Control/ Landscaping Plan3 SWPPP4 Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Construction5 Storm Sewer6 Street Construction7 Details
Legend
Existing watermain
Proposed watermain
Existing sanitary
Proposed sanitary
Existing storm
Proposed storm
Existing hydrant
Proposed hydrant
Existing gate valve
Proposed gate valve
Existing manhole
Proposed manhole
Proposed catchbasin
Silt fence
Inlet protectors
Parking lot lights
Building Lights
Rip Rap
TYPICAL PARKING SPACE
(NOT TO SCALE)
BLDG
CONCRETE SIDEWALK6.5'4'17.5'8.5'
DUMPSTER LOCATION
NOTES
LIGHTS ALSO INSTALLED ON EXTERIOR OFBUILDINGS.
LAST SAVED: March 16, 2021
PARKING
REQUIRED
2 STALLS PER UNIT (160 UNITS)320
PROVIDED
GARAGE STALLS 80
PARKING STALLS 240
TOTAL 320
I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me,
or under my direct supervision, and that I am a
duly registered engineer under the laws of the
State of Minnesota.
Warren John Israelson
6001 Egan Drive, Ste 100, Savage, MN 55378
Phone: 952.226.3200 Web: www.kjwalk.com
02/16/2021
Revision:
Original
Registration #: 40175
RosewoodCrossing
Date: 3/16/2021
For Review
March 16, 2021
Date:
Second Addition Rosemount, MN
03/16/2021 Revised
1TWO STORY APARTMENT2870 145TH ST W963.00TWO STORY APT.2860 145TH ST W963.00TWO STORY APARTMENT2830 145TH ST W963.00TWO STORY APT.2850 145TH ST W961.8016
1
7
1
1
1
9
1
5
1
7
10
4
1GARAGE 7 16 STALLS- 962.60G
A
R
A
G
E
4
16
S
T
A
L
L
S
-
9
6
1
.
4
0GARAGE 316 STALLS
16
30
202020
20
1
1
20
2
0 201281220
2012121220
962.85
962.40
962.80
20 20 2820 GARAGE16 STALLSEXISTINGTWO STORY APARTMENT2810 145TH ST WFFE=966.10EXISTINGTWO STORY APARTMENT2820 145TH ST WFFE = 964.10EXISTINGCOMMONBLDG970.502810 GARAGE16 STALLSFFE=965.89FFE=965.56FFE=965.23FFE=963.23FFE=963.56FFE=963.89962.65
963.61
1
10
TWO STORY APT.2840 145TH ST W962.00962.10
962.40
962.80
962.40
962.40
FFE=961.90FFE=962.40
962.00
9
10
10
961.30
961.10
961.40
961.40
961.85
961.85
961.40
961.40
960.10
960.60
1
11
960.10
961.35
961.45
961.75
964.50
16
1
1
10
961.55
961.40
962.95
962.75
961.50
961.30
961.00
960.70
961.00
961.50
960.50
961.10
961.10
960.70
960.80
960.60
959.60
959.25
960.00
960.50
960.33
966.50
964.10
961.75
961.50
962.10
961.50
961.80
963.85963.95 963.50 963.20 964.08
1TOT LOTPAVILIONPAVILION20
2020 30
3024'X 50' ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE963.15
963.10
962.20
962.40
962.90
962.90
962.40
961.20
961.90
961.90
962.85
962.40
962.90
963.00
963.00
962.20
961.40
961.30
960.80
961.30
960.60
960.90
960.80
960.80
960.90
961.30
961.10
960.40
960.75
960.80
961.30
961.30
961.75
962.85
961.45
961.35
960.20
961.00
959.75
959.40
959.75
962.10
962.40
962.40
962.40
961.60
960.80
(NO BACK OF CURB)
MAINTAIN 5% MAX
SLOPE ON WALK
961.70
13
28
GARAGE 6
14 STALLS
1
1
9
963.20
963.50
963.30
962.50
965.40
964.80
965.40
966.00
965.40
963.70
962.20
962.50
963.60
965.30
962.30
962.00
5
962.70
FFE=963.00FFE=962.70
964964966.50
Grading & Erosion ControlSHEET 2 of 7FILE PATH: G:\My Drive\Work Files\Rosemount Projects\Rosewood Crossing\Engineering\CAD\DWGs\RWC2-2.dwg LAST SAVED: March 16, 2021 LAST SAVED: March 16, 2021Silt Fence to be installed along perimeter ofconstruction area prior to the start of work.NOTES:MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SLOPE 3:1PONDS MAY BE USED AS TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATIONBASINS DURING CONSTRUCTION, IF A POND IS USED ASA TEMP. SED. BASIN IT MUST BE CLEANED OUT PRIORTO BEING PUT INTO SERVICE.DRAINAGE TO THE TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATIONBASINS MUST BE MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT THECONSTRUCTION PROCESS.SEED MIXES AS SHOWN IN LEGEND , WHERE NOTSPECIFIED USE MN DOT MIX 250 AS GENERAL SITESTABILIZATION.STOCKPILES TO BE STABILIZED IF NOT UTILIZED FORMORE THAN 7 DAYS.I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me,or under my direct supervision, and that I am aduly registered engineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.Warren John Israelson6001 Egan Drive, Ste 100, Savage, MN 55378Phone: 952.226.3200 Web: www.kjwalk.com02/16/2021Revision:OriginalRegistration #: 40175RosewoodCrossingDate: 3/16/2021For ReviewMarch 16, 2021Date:Second Addition Rosemount, MN03/16/2021 Revised04080120CB & DROP IN INLET PROTECTORSSEED & BLANKETLEGEND RIP RAPSILT FENCE
SWPPP
SHEET 3 of 7
FILE PATH: G:\My Drive\Work Files\Rosemount Projects\Rosewood Crossing\Engineering\CAD\DWGs\RWC2-2.dwg
SWPPP (STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN)
LAST SAVED: March 16, 2021
I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me,
or under my direct supervision, and that I am a
duly registered engineer under the laws of the
State of Minnesota.
Warren John Israelson
6001 Egan Drive, Ste 100, Savage, MN 55378
Phone: 952.226.3200 Web: www.kjwalk.com
02/16/2021
Revision:
Original
Registration #: 40175
RosewoodCrossing
Date: 3/16/2021
For Review
March 16, 2021
Date:
Second Addition Rosemount, MN
03/16/2021 Revised
16860602068
192TWO STORY APARTMENT2870 145TH ST W
963.00
TWO STORY APT.2860 145TH ST W
963.00
TWO STORY APARTMENT2830 145TH ST W
963.00
TWO STORY APT.2850 145TH ST W
961.80
1616871686811710416868200
68200
6820068
200
200
68
202002020068
68
68
192
192
1922019219220202020
8" C900 PVC
8" C900 PVC8" CL52 DIP
8" C900 PVC
GARAGE 7
16 STALLS- 962.60
GARAGE 416 STALLS- 961.40CONNECT TO EXISTING 8" WATER16302010201017.47
2036.44 201
5
6
.
0
2
1120202012122
28"
C
9
0
0
P
V
C812 2
270
192
192
20202
70702 70702 602 7070
60 270
70
60
702260
70
702
260 707020208" CL52 DIP121212
REMOVE 8" DI PLUG
CONNECT TO
EXISTING WATERMAIN
REMOVE 8" DI PLUG
CONNECT TO
EXISTING WATERMAIN20
8" 11.25 BEND202020
EXISTINGTWO STORY APARTMENT2810 145TH ST W
FFE=966.10
EXISTINGTWO STORY APARTMENT2820 145TH ST W
FFE = 964.10
EXISTINGCOMMONBLDG
970.50
2810
G
A
R
A
G
E
16 ST
A
L
L
S
FFE=
9
6
5
.
8
9
FFE=
9
6
5
.
5
6
FFE=
9
6
5
.
2
3
FFE=
9
6
3
.
8
9
VAN ACCESSIBLE
TRASH ENCLOSURE
S27°
4
8
'
4
9
"
W
N89°50'17"WS00°09'44"W
N
4
8
°
4
0
'
4
6
"
E
N00°25'44"E
TRASH11.74RESERVED
VALLEY GUTTER
TWO STORY APT.2840 145TH ST W
962.00
101011116111018"x4" TEE
4" GV
ADD FIRE HYDRANT
8"x4" TEE4" GV
8"x4" TEE
4" GV
8"x4" TEE
4" GV
TOT LOT
PAVILION
PAVILION20 202030308" 45° BEND
8" X 8" TEE8" 45° BEND
8" X 8" TEE
8"x6 REDUCER
6" GATE VALVE
FIRE HYDRANT
8"x6 TEE
6" GATE VALVE
FIRE HYDRANT
PROPOSED 20'
UTILITY EASEMENT
8"x6 REDUCER
6" GATE VALVE
FIRE HYDRANT
8" C900 PVC13
28GARAGE 6 14 STALLS1195FFE=963.00FFE=962.70WATERMAIN 3
955
960
965
970
955
960
965
970
0+00 1+00 1+50
PROPOSED GRADE
EXISTING GRADE
8"x8" TEE
7.5' MIN. COVER
8" C
L
5
2
D
I
P
CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN
CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOCATION
WATERMAIN
950
955
960
965
970
950
955
960
965
970
0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 8+00
7.5' MIN. COVER 7.5' MIN. COVER
8" CL52 DIP 8" CL52 DIP 8" CL52 DIP
CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAINCONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOCATION
8"x8" TEE
8"x8" TEE
8"X6" REDUCER
INSTALL 6" GATE VALVE
AND FIRE HYDRANT
PROPOSED GRADE
EXISTING GRADE
WATERMAIN 2
950
955
960
965
970
950
955
960
965
970
0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00
7.5' MIN. COVER
8" CL52 DIP
8"x8" TEE
8"X6" REDUCER
INSTALL 6" GATE VALVE
AND FIRE HYDRANT
PROPOSED GRADE
EXISTING GRADE
8" SDR 35 PVCINV=956.42
15" HDPE
INV=956.44
Water Main Construction
SHEET 4 of 7
0 50 100 150
FILE PATH: G:\My Drive\Work Files\Rosemount Projects\Rosewood Crossing\Engineering\CAD\DWGs\RWC2-2.dwg LAST SAVED: March 16, 2021
I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me,
or under my direct supervision, and that I am a
duly registered engineer under the laws of the
State of Minnesota.
Warren John Israelson
6001 Egan Drive, Ste 100, Savage, MN 55378
Phone: 952.226.3200 Web: www.kjwalk.com
02/16/2021
Revision:
Original
Registration #: 40175
RosewoodCrossing
Date: 3/16/2021
For Review
March 16, 2021
Date:
Second Addition Rosemount, MN
03/16/2021 Revised
NOTES
6" C900 PVC FOR ALL WATER SERVICES6" PVC PIPE FOR ALL SEWER SERVICES
Water main to be installed in strictaccordance with the most currentedition of the CEAM specifications.
1TWO STORY APARTMENT2870 145TH ST W
963.00
TWO STORY APT.2860 145TH ST W
963.00
TWO STORY APARTMENT2830 145TH ST W
963.00
TWO STORY APT.2850 145TH ST W
961.80
1617111915171041GARAGE 7
16 STALLS- 962.60
GARAGE 416 STALLS- 961.40GARAGE 3
16 STALLS 16118 2820
G
A
R
A
G
E
16 ST
A
L
L
S
EXISTINGTWO STORY APARTMENT2810 145TH ST W
FFE=966.10
EXISTINGTWO STORY APARTMENT2820 145TH ST W
FFE = 964.10
FFE=
9
6
5
.
2
3
FFE=
9
6
3
.
2
3
FFE=
9
6
3
.
5
6
FFE=
9
6
3
.
8
9
S23°5
4
'
3
1
"
W
526.1
2 N89°50'17"W414.21S00°09'44"W
110TWO STORY APT.2840 145TH ST W
962.00
FFE=961.90
FFE=962.409 10101111611101TOT LOT
PAVILION
PAVILION
FE1
I=48.00
45 - 18" HDPE @ 0.51%
45 - 18" HDPE @ 0.89%
95 - 18" H
D
P
E
@
1.
0
0
%
132 - 18" HDP
E
@
0
.
4
9
%
51 - 16" HDPE @ 0.79%
EX-CB4
T=961.40
I=957.63 139 - 18" HDPE @ 0.86%80 - 12" HDPE @ 0.50%77 -
1
8
"
H
D
P
E
@
1
.
1
4
%
42 - 18" HDPE @ 1.12%
10
3
-
1
8
"
H
D
P
E
@
2
.
1
6
%
1
0
2
-
1
8
"
H
D
P
E
@
0
.
0
0
%
EX-CB5T=961.60
I=958.28
EX-CB3AT=960.50
I=958.10
STMH14
T=961.30
I=950.70
CB4T=963.20
I=960.00
CB5
T=961.50
I=958.14 CBMH11T=960.80
I=952.76
CBMH18T=960.60
I=950.23
FE19
I=948.00
CB6
T=961.50
I=957.12
CBMH10T=961.00
I=954.45
CB8T=961.60I=957.12
EX-CBMH3
T=960.70
I=956.68
EX-CBMH2T=960.70
I=948.23
CBMH9
T=961.50I=956.31 1328GARAGE 6 14 STALLS1195CB2T=959.40
I=955.56
FFE=963.00FFE=962.701
5
5
-
1
2
"
H
D
P
E
@
0
.
5
0
%
CB13A
T=962.00
I=959.00 964964CB7T=961.70
I=957.56
CB1
T=959.25I=956.00
CBMH13
T=960.80
I=951.57
CB12
T=960.80I=957.80
CB1 TO FE3
955
960
965
970
955
960
965
970
0+001+001+50
34' - 12" CL5 RCP @ 1.00%
44' - 12" CL5 RCP @ 1.00%CB13.25 BUILDCB23.85 BUILDRim =
959.25
Rim =
959.40
Inv =
955.56
Inv =
956.00
EXISTING GRADE
PROPOSED GRADE
Inv =
954.07
Rim =
960.65EX- MH6.58 BUILDInv =
955.21
EXISTING GRADE
PROPOSED GRADE
CB4 TO FE19
950
955
960
965
970
975
950
955
960
965
970
975
0+001+002+003+004+005+006+007+008+009+009+50
Rim =
960.60
Rim =
961.30
Inv =
950.23
Inv =
950.70STMH14 10.60 BUILDCBMH1810.37 BUILD139 - 18" HDPE @ 0.86%
71 - 15" HD
P
E
@
2
.
0
9
%
96 - 15" HDP
E
@
1
.
9
4
%
88 - 15" HDPE @ 0.93%
127 - 15" HDPE @ 0.80%
166 - 12" HDPE @ 1.00%
Inv = 952.76
Inv = 954.45
Inv = 956.31Inv = 957.12
Inv = 958.14
Inv = 960.00
Rim = 963.20
Rim = 961.50 Rim = 961.50 Rim = 961.50 Rim = 961.00 Rim = 960.80
77 - 18" HDPE @ 1.14
%
42 - 18" HDPE @ 1.12%
103 - 18" H
D
P
E
@
2
.
1
6
%CB43.20 BUILDCB53.36 BUILDCB64.38 BUILDCBMH95.19 BUILDCBMH106.55 BUILDCBMH118.04 BUILDInv =948.00FE19Inv = 951.57
Rim = 960.80CBMH139.23 BUILD8" PVC
I= 956.70Inv =958.34
Inv =952.96
4" FOAM INSULATION
CB12 TO CBMH13
955
960
965
970
955
960
965
970
0+00 1+00 1+50CBMH139.23 BUILDCB123.00 BUILDRim = 960.80Rim = 960.80
Inv = 957.80
Inv = 951.57
EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED GRADE
80 - 12" HDPE @ 0.50%
Inv =957.40
Inv = 946.00 Inv =946.00
102 - 18" HDPE @ 0.00%
EXISTING GRADE
CBMH7 TO CBMH9
955
960
965
970
975
955
960
965
970
975
0+00 1+00 2+00CB74.15 BUILDCB84.49 BUILDCBMH95.19 BUILD67 - 12" HDPE @ 0.50%87 - 12" HDPE @ 0.50%
Rim = 961.50 Rim = 961.60 Rim = 961.70
Inv = 956.31 Inv = 957.12 Inv = 957.56
EXISTING GRADEPROPOSED GRADE
Inv =956.78
CB17 TO CB15
950
955
960
965
970
950
955
960
965
970
-1+00 0+00 1+00 2+00 2+50CB173.60 BUILDCBMH1810.37 BUILDCB163.59 BUILDCB153.10 BUILDRim = 960.60 Rim = 960.60 Rim = 960.10 Rim = 960.10
Inv = 957.00Inv = 956.51
Inv = 950.23
Inv = 957.00
99 - 12" HDPE @ 0.50%
62 - 12" HDPE @ 0.50%
93 - 12" HDPE @ 0.50%
EXISTING GRADE
PROPOSED GRADE
Inv =
956.54 Inv =
956.20
CB13A TO CBMH13
955
960
965
970
975
955
960
965
970
975
0+00 1+00 2+00
EXISTING GRADE
PROPOSED GRADE
Inv =958.22 CB13A3.00 BUILDCBMH139.23 BUILDRim = 962.00
Rim = 960.80
Inv = 959.00
Inv = 951.57
155 - 12" HDPE @ 0.50%
Storm Sewer Construction
SHEET 5 of 7
0 50 100 150
FILE PATH: G:\My Drive\Work Files\Rosemount Projects\Rosewood Crossing\Engineering\CAD\DWGs\RWC2-2.dwg LAST SAVED: March 16, 2021
I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me,
or under my direct supervision, and that I am a
duly registered engineer under the laws of the
State of Minnesota.
Warren John Israelson
6001 Egan Drive, Ste 100, Savage, MN 55378
Phone: 952.226.3200 Web: www.kjwalk.com
02/16/2021
Revision:
Original
Registration #: 40175
RosewoodCrossing
Date: 3/16/2021
For Review
March 16, 2021
Date:
Second Addition Rosemount, MN
03/16/2021 Revised
TWO STORY APARTMENT2870 145TH ST W963.00TWO STORY APT.2860 145TH ST W963.00TWO STORY APARTMENT2830 145TH ST W963.00TWO STORY APT.2850 145TH ST W961.80GARAGE 7 16 STALLS- 962.60G
A
R
A
G
E
4
16
S
T
A
L
L
S
-
9
6
1
.
4
0GARAGE 316 STALLSDECORATIVE FENCEDECORATIVE FENCE 2820 GARAGE16 STALLSEXISTINGTWO STORY APARTMENT2810 145TH ST WFFE=966.10EXISTINGTWO STORY APARTMENT2820 145TH ST WFFE = 964.102810 GARAGE16 STALLSFFE=965.23FFE=963.23FFE=963.56FFE=963.89TWO STORY APT.2840 145TH ST W962.00FFE=961.90FFE=962.40
28.00
28.0028.0028.0028.0028.00
TOT LOTPAVILIONPAVILIONGARAGE 6
14 STALLS
FFE=963.00FFE=962.70AMAL
LAMLAMLMLMMMMMLLLLLLMMAALMMLLLLLLLLMMMLLMLLLLRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRLM105- SHRUBS SPACED 30" ON CENTERPOLY LANDSCAPING EDGEMULCH BEDSODLandscape PlanSHEET 6 of 7050100 150FILE PATH: G:\My Drive\Work Files\Rosemount Projects\Rosewood Crossing\Engineering\CAD\DWGs\RWC2-2.dwgX963 EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVEDEXISTING TREE AND TAG NUMBER963 COLORADO BLUE SPRUCE (70 TREES)NOTES:* CONIFEROUS TREES STAGGERED WITH15' SPACING* DECIDUOUS TREES-20' SPACING* SHRUBS TO BE PLANTED IN FRONT OFALL BLDGS*DECORATIVE FENCE TO BE JERITH EP-1OR EQUIVALENT1/3 TREE
HEIGHT ROOT CROWN ATFINISH GRADE,OR 1-2" ABOVE GRADEFINISH GRADETILLED OR BROKEN UPSOIL MIN 12" DEEP2" SETTLED LAYER OF MULCH2X WIDTH OF ROOTBALLLEGEND RIVER BIRCH (29 TREES)1/3 TREE
HEIGHT ROOT CROWN ATFINISH GRADE,OR 1-2" ABOVE GRADEFINISH GRADETILLED OR BROKEN UPSOIL MIN 12" DEEP2" SETTLED LAYER OF MULCH2X WIDTH OF ROOTBALLLINDEN (33 TREES)MAPLE (37 TREES)RLMROOT CROWN ATFINISH GRADE,OR 1-2" ABOVE GRADEFINISH GRADETILLED OR BROKEN UPSOIL MIN 12" DEEP2" SETTLED LAYER OF MULCH2X WIDTH OF ROOTBALL LAST SAVED: March 16, 2021DECORATIVE FENCE LAST SAVED: March 16, 2021I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me,or under my direct supervision, and that I am aduly registered engineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.Warren John Israelson6001 Egan Drive, Ste 100, Savage, MN 55378Phone: 952.226.3200 Web: www.kjwalk.com02/16/2021Revision:OriginalRegistration #: 40175RosewoodCrossingDate: 3/16/2021For ReviewMarch 16, 2021Date:Second Addition Rosemount, MN03/16/2021 RevisedLandscape PlantingCommon NameBotanical NameSize #Colorado Blue SprucePicea pungens8' 70Autumn Blaze Maple Acre Freemanii 'Jeffsred'2.5" 37River BirchBetula Nigra2.5" 30LindenTilia2.5" 35Total172
116171119151710411611121281212 1212
11091010111161110113281195Phasing Plan
SHEET 1 of 1
0 50 100 150
FILE PATH: G:\My Drive\Work Files\Rosemount Projects\Rosewood Crossing\Engineering\CAD\DWGs\RWC2-2.dwg LAST SAVED: March 19, 2021
PHASE 1 PHASE 3
PHASE 2 PHASE 5
PHASE 4
PHASE 6
PHASE 3 TEMPORARYPHASE 5 TEMPORARY LOOPPHASE 7 LOOPI hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me,
or under my direct supervision, and that I am a
duly registered engineer under the laws of the
State of Minnesota.
Warren John Israelson
6001 Egan Drive, Ste 100, Savage, MN 55378
Phone: 952.226.3200 Web: www.kjwalk.com
03/19/2021
Revision:
Original
Registration #: 40175
RosewoodCrossing
Date: 3/19/2021
For Review
March 19, 2021
Date:
Second Addition Rosemount, MN
PHASE 2 HAMMER HEAD
5" CASING LP LAP 6" REVEAL
COVERED VENT
LP LAP 4" REVEAL
SINGLE DOOR WITH SIDELITES
IN COVERED ENTRY
STONE VENEER
LP SHINGLES
ASPHALT SHINGLES
LP LAP 6" REVEAL
LP LAP 4" REVEAL
STONE VENEER
5" CASING
COVERED VENT
ASPHALT SHINGLES
LP LAP 6" REVEAL 5" CASING
LP SHINGLES
COVERED VENT
LP LAP 4" REVEAL
COVERED VENT
LP LAP 4" REVEAL
5" CASING
LP SHINGLES
STONE VENEERSTONE VENEER
LP LAP 6" REVEAL
ASPHALT SHINGLESASPHALT SHINGLES
24'.+/Á
(4106'.'8#6+10Á
4'#4'.'8#6+10Á'ICP&TKXG5VG5CXCIG/02JQPG9GDYYYMLYCNMEQO4+)*6'.'8#6+10Á.'(6'.'8#6+10Á#22#46/'065)#4#)'524'.+/Á
5KFKPI
5VQPG
4GXKUGFÁ
K:\02235-260\Admin\Docs\Rosewood Cossing Second Addition\Rosewood Crossing 2nd Constrution Plan Memo.docx
Memorandum
To: Kyle Klatt, Planner
CC: Stacy Bodsberg, Planning & Personnel Secretary
Brian Erickson, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
From: Tim Hanson PE, WSB Engineering Consultant
Date: March 24, 2021
Re: Rosewood Crossing Second Addition
Final Plat Review
Construction Plan – Engineering Review
SUBMITTAL:
The final plat and construction plans for Rosewood Crossing Second Addition have been
submitted. They were prepared by Rehder and Associates, and KJ Walk, Inc. The developer of
the site is by KJ Walk, Inc. Engineering review comments were generated from the following plat
documents included in the submittal consisting of:
▪ Final Plat Rosewood Second Addition, Received March 17.
▪ Rosewood Crossing Construction Plan dated 2-16-2021 and revised 3-16-2021
▪ Consisting of these plan sheets
▪ Grading & Erosion Control Plan
▪ SWPPP
▪ Water Main Construction
▪ Storm Sewer Construction
▪ Landscape Plan
▪ Construction Detail Plan Sheet
GENERAL COMMENTS – FINAL PLAT:
1. The development Fees are indicated below based on the 2021 Schedule of Rates and
Fees. These fees are due with the final plat and subdivision agreement.
▪ Sanitary Sewer Trunk Charge: $1075/acre
▪ Watermain Trunk Charge: $6500/acre
▪ Storm Sewer Trunk Charge: $6865/acre
2. A recommended water main extension will require an easement dedication on the final
plat.
3. Outlot A is an infiltration area for storm water management. Outlot A shall be dedicated
to the City for maintenance of the ponding area.
GRADING AND EROSION CONTOL
1. Spot elevations are needed between the apartment buildings identifying the high points
2. Identify the Emergency Overflow Route for the low points in the project.
3. The grading plan does not provide for a foot of freeboard between the highpoints and the
lowest floor elevation. EOF require 1 foot of grade separation between the building
lowest floor and the highpoint.
Kyle Klatt
3/2021
Page 2
K:\02235-260\Admin\Docs\Rosewood Cossing Second Addition\Rosewood Crossing 2nd Constrution Plan Memo.docx
4. Grading away from the building needs to be at a minimum 2% grade.
5. The drainage system does not provide for surface runoff from the adjacent lot that is
east-northeast of the proposed site. Extend storm sewer to the east plat line.
6. A drainage swale will be needed along the north side of garage 6 and the east side of
garage 7. The drainage swale needs to be located in the platted easement area.
7.
SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN
Sanitary sewer for the second addition was constructed with the development of the original plat.
Private sanitary sewer extends from a public sanitary sewer located within a private street
extending from Boysenberry Court. This sanitary sewer was extended west into the middle of
Rosewood Crossing and then north to provide sewer connection access to the eight lots.
Water main is extended from the private street on the east side of the Rosewood Crossing into
the development and then along the east/north east driveway connecting to a watermain
constructed with the first phase. This water main extension provides a watermain loop for lots 3
and 6. Lots 2, 7, & 8 are provided water service from watermain stubs extending from the looped
water main. The water main stub extensions are about 200 feet in length.
1. The sanitary sewer service to lot 8 is in excess of 100 feet. Sewer service extensions in
excess of 100 feet require cleanouts. Recommend extending a lateral line with a manhole
access near the building to improve maintenance accessibility.
2. The construction plan does not identify the type of sewer service connection to the
existing sewer main.
3. The two water main stubs to lots 3, 7, & 8 must be connected to provide a looped
watermain and for the installation of a fire hydrant on the front side of lot 8.
4. Provide fire hydrant spacing at 400 feet where practical.
5. The plan view indicates C900 water main. Ductile iron pipe is required.
6. A plan note indicates the sewer services to the lots is C900 pipe. For locating purposes,
it is recommended to utilize ductile iron pipe to maintain connectivity.
STORM SEWER
A storm sewer system is proposed in the southern portion of the site. The storm sewer extends
from the infiltration basin located on the south west side of the site into the central area and then
north between lots 3 and 6 to the private drive. Storm sewer is extended within the private drive
collecting runoff within an inverted crown on the street. The inverted crown extends long the
backside of the parking isles. Storm sewer improvements are also extended along the private
drive from an existing system constructed with the first phase of this development.
1. Storm sewer design must be submitted for review.
2. A storm sewer extension is required to the north easterly plat boundary to collect runoff
from the El Dorado Packaging site.
3. CBMH 18 must be a sump manhole to collect sediments prior to discharging to the
infiltration basin.
4. A maintenance plan is required for the private storm sewer system.
LANDSCAPE PLAN
Evergreen and deciduous trees area proposed within and on the perimeter of the site. The
underground utilities need to be ghosted into the plan sheets so plantings are not installed on top
of the infrastructure. Trees should not be planted over the storm sewer that extends into the
infiltration area.
Kyle Klatt
3/2021
Page 3
K:\02235-260\Admin\Docs\Rosewood Cossing Second Addition\Rosewood Crossing 2nd Constrution Plan Memo.docx
PRIVATE DRIVE AND PARKING STALLS
The private drive extends around the perimeter of the site and apartment buildings with garages
located on the outer edge of the drive isle. The drive lane appears to be 24 feet wide, there is
about 28 feet from the face of the garages to the bump outs on the curb. The parking stalls are
identified to be 8.5 feet wide and 17.5 feet deep with bumper overhang. The adjacent concrete
sidewalk is 6.5 feet wide.
An emergency access is identified along the easterly plat line extending from Boxwood Path. This
access road must have a minimum width of 14 feet and have a Knox Box for access control
allowing emergency vehicle access.
1. The plan should identify a typical street section the private drive and the emergency
access. The typical section needs to identify street widths crowns and street section.
2. The emergency access must be signed NO PARKING FIRE LANE.
3. A turnaround will be required if the buildings are constructed in phases and the private
drive is not looped around the site.
4. The alignment of the private drive was reviewed for appropriate turning radii and verified
to provide for fire equipment accessibility. The Fire Marshall provide the turning radii
detail.
SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT
The construction plans for Rosewood Crossing must be reviewed for surface water
management, erosion and sediment control and for storm sewer pipe sizing. This review has not
been completed on this submittal.
1. Plat approval is subject to Surface Water Management Review.