HomeMy WebLinkAbout5.a. SKB
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Planning Commission Meeting Date: August 10, 2021
Tentative City Council Meeting Date: August 17, 2021
AGENDA ITEM: Cases 21-22-CPA, 21-23-RZ, 21-24-PP,
21-25-IUP; Request by SKB
Environmental, Inc. for approval of a
Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Zoning
Map Amendment, Preliminary Plat, and
amended Interim Use Permit associated
with an expansion of the SKB landfill
facility.
AGENDA SECTION:
Public Hearing
(REPOSTED)
PREPARED BY: Kyle Klatt, Senior Planner AGENDA NO.
ATTACHMENTS: Staff Report from 7/13/21 Meeting, EAW
Traffic Section, Attachments from 7/13/21
Meeting
APPROVED BY:
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission make the
following motions associated with the SKB Landfill expansion request:
1) Motion to recommend the City Council approve a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to
change the future land use designation of 113 acres east of the existing SKB Landfill
from GI – General Industrial, LI – Light Industrial, and BP – Business Park to WM –
Waste Management.
2) Motion to recommend the City Council approve a Zoning Map Amendment to change
the zoning of 113 acres east of the existing SKB Landfill from GI – General Industrial
and AG – Agricultural to WM – Waste Management.
3) Motion to recommend the City Council approve the SKB Rosemount 2nd Addition
Preliminary Plat subject to the following conditions:
a) Dedication of an 80-foot right of way for the planned new City street connecting
Courthouse Boulevard and Ehlers Path along the east side of Lot 1, Block 1 of the
plat.
b) Dedication of a minimum of 50 feet of right-of-way along the southern edge of the
plat for Ehlers Path.
c) Execution of a subdivision agreement concerning the extension of a City water main
to the project site and construction of a new public street east of Lot 1, Block 1.
d) Provision of all easements on the final plat as required by the City Engineer.
e) Compliance with the City Engineer’s review memorandum dated July 7, 2021.
f) Payment of development fees specified in the City Engineer’s review memorandum
dated July 7, 2021.
2
g) Payment of a fee in lieu of park land dedication of $260,000 for 52.41 acres of
platted industrial land.
4) Motion to recommend the City Council approve an Interim Use Permit amendment
allowing an expansion of the SKB Environmental Landfill and related building
construction subject to the following conditions:
a) Approval of the expansion plans by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and
Dakota County.
b) The utility plans must be updated to include the extension of trunk water main
service along the northern boundary of Lot 1, Block 1 and within the right-of-way for
the new City street immediately east of Lot 1, Block 1.
c) Provision of a minimum of a 30-foot easement outside of the street right-of-way for
the planned regional trail along Ehlers Path/140th Street. The grading plans must be
updated to include grades that will support future construction of a trail.
d) The existing private access driveway to Courthouse Boulevard (State Highway 55)
will be eliminated upon completion of the new public street east of Lot 1, Block 1.
e) Payment of all City costs associated with the design and construction of the new
public road east of Lot 1, Block 1.
f) The septic treatment area shall be clearly delineated on the development plans and
conflicts with other activities in this area, including utilities, vehicle access,
landscaping and other site improvements, must be avoided.
g) The septic system must comply with all applicable city and state regulations with a
final design and location approved by City.
h) The buildings on the site will be required to connect to public sanitary sewer service
within one year of this service being extended and available to the site. The City will
plan on a service connection in the location shown on the site development plans.
i) All new buildings within the landfill expansion area will be subject to the City of
Rosemont’s site plan review process. This review shall verify compliance with the
City’s building design, parking, and other site development requirements.
j) The landscape plan shall be updated to include all required replacement plantings
above and beyond any previous payments to the City as a fee in lieu of required
trees.
k) All buildings shall comply with fire code requirements for access around buildings.
l) No outside storage around the recycling buildings is allowed unless specifically
authorized in the interim use permit.
m) Incorporation of all review comments from MnDOT.
n) Submission of route maps of truck circulation within the facility and off-site.
Additional information concerning routing of trucks one the site and further
information concerning traffic counts and updated route maps may be requested by
the City when deemed necessary in the future.
o) Tree clearing and grubbing will occur between August and March to avoid impacts to
endangered species within the project area.
p) Compliance with the mitigation strategies included in the EAW for the project.
q) Compliance the City Engineer’s review memorandum dated April 19, 2018.
r) Entry signs shall be subject to sign permits and normal zoning standards.
Appropriate sight distances must be maintained.
s) Compliance with conditions from 2018 Interim Use Permit renewal, including the
3
following:
i) Stormwater Basins 6A, 6B, 6C and associated grading shall be removed from
within 50 feet of the 140th Street East centerline in conjunction with the updated
storm water modeling. As an alternative, SKB may direct storm water that would
have otherwise been accommodated within these basins to the adjacent property
east of the landfill provided it does not require a substantial change to the
approved PUD and grading plans on the adjacent site.
ii) SKB Environmental shall maintain an MPCA approved ground water monitoring
system on the site and notify the City prior to the construction of any replacement
wells.
iii) Implement sediment control best management practices to reduce sediment
tracking and dust on and off-site.
iv) Approval of the transfer facility and composting operation will be removed from
IUP if operations not commenced prior to November of 2023.
v) Compliance with all other requirements of the City Engineer’s review
memorandum dated October 23, 2018.
ISSUE
The Planning Commission is being asked to conduct a new public hearing concerning a series of requests
from SKB Environmental, Inc. for a proposed expansion of its non-hazardous industrial waste containment
facility (landfill) at 13425 Courthouse Boulevard into an area immediately east of the current landfill
boundary. The Commission conducted a public hearing concerning the request on July 10th and adopted
motions to recommend approval of the zoning applications associated with the project at this meeting;
however, after being contacted by two of the property owners near the expansion site staff determined that
they were not provided with proper mailed notification concerning the hearing. After further reviewing the
City’s records, it appears only a small percentage of the property owners within the required notification area
(1,320 feet from the project site) received the notification due to a clerical/technical error. To address the
public hearing deficiency and to ensure that all property owners required to be notified receive the
opportunity provide public comment, the City has decided to republish the hearing and resend notices to all
property owners within the required notification area. As part of this review, the Commission will be asked
to reconsider their original motions to address any public comments and concerns that may be brought
forward at the meeting.
As a brief summary from the previous meeting, please note that SKB currently owns several parcels with a
combined area of around 183 acres east of the landfill site, 113 of which would be replatted into the landfill
expansion area and the remainder of which would be retained for a future business park or commercial
development. The separate components of the application include the following:
• Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the future land use designation of 113 acres east of the
existing landfill from GI – General Industrial, LI – Light Industrial, and BP – Business Park to WM
– Waste Management.
• Zoning Map Amendment to change the zoning of the same 113 acres from GI – General Industrial
and AG – Agricultural to WM – Waste Management
• Preliminary Plat to plat the 113-acre expansion area as the SKB Landfill 2nd Addition. The plat will
also include a new public road and outlot for future business park development.
• Interim Use Permit revision to allow an expansion of the landfill into the 113 acres east of the
present facility, the moving of existing and proposed buildings in the northwest part of the landfill
4
into the expansion area, and expansion of the landfill into the northwest (former building) area.
The permit was last renewed by Rosemount in 2018 with no significant modifications to the previously
approved plans except for a minor reconfiguration of the distribution between construction and demolition
waste and industrial waste between two of the existing cells. The applicant is now requesting an expansion
of the existing operational parameters for the site which requires a modification of the approved interim use
permit.
Staff is attaching the original staff report concerning this item to this memorandum, along with all previous
attachments. Since traffic has been a major concern, staff is also including the “Transportation” section of
the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) completed earlier this year related to the expansion
project.
ISSUES/ANALYSIS (UPDATE)
Neighborhood Meeting
A neighborhood meeting was voluntarily hosted by the applicant on Friday afternoon (August 6, 2021) to
discuss the proposed project in greater detail with adjacent property owners. Since this meeting occurred
after the publication of this memo, an update can be provided by SKB and staff during the public hearing.
Traffic
While the amendment will expand the overall footprint of the landfill, it will not result in a significant
increase in activity since the applicant intends to maintain the current volume of material entering the
facility on an annual basis. The expansion further provides opportunities to improve operations by moving
access to a new public road and avoiding direct turning movements the adjacent state highway into and
out of the facility.
The City’s long-range plans will require improvements to 140th St E/Ehler’s Path/142nd St E to support
future planned development in the area.
Comprehensive Plan Surrounding Land Uses
It should be noted that the City’s Comprehensive Plan includes a mix of BP–Business Park, LI–Light
Industrial, and CC–Community Commercial uses surrounding the project area south of Highway 55.
Agricultural land use designation is guided for the areas at the edge of the City’s municipal boundary
adjacent to the Emerald Greens Golf Course south to County Highway 46/160th Street E and west to
Coates, and north of Highway 55 adjacent to the Spring Lake Park Reserve.
As is the case with this application, land will be considered for rezoning to bring it into conformance with
the Comp Plan as development occurs generally along the County Highway 42 and Highway 55 corridor.
Additional Impacts
Questions were raised about timing for filling the landfill, what happens when full, and other related issues.
SKB has indicated that once the landfill is closed it is fitted with a composite cap and planted with grasses
as a greenspace. As of the October 30, 2020 annual survey and based on 2020 annual tonnages, it is
estimated there is approximately 9.84 years remaining for the industrial/C&D Cell. This could fluctuate
depending on actual annual volumes.
5
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the Comprehensive Plan
Amendment, Zoning Map Amendment, Preliminary Plat, and Interim Use Permit to allow SKB
Environmental to expand the SKB Landfill into an adjacent 113 acres of land immediately east of the
present facility with the conditions provided in the draft motions at the beginning of this report.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Planning Commission Meeting Date: July 13, 2021
Tentative City Council Meeting Date: August 20, 2021
AGENDA ITEM: Cases 21-22-CPA, 21-23-RZ, 21-24-PP,
21-25-IUP; Request by SKB
Environmental, Inc. for approval of a
Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Zoning
Map Amendment, Preliminary Plat, and
amended Interim Use Permit associated
with an expansion of the SKB landfill
facility.
AGENDA SECTION:
Public Hearing
PREPARED BY: Kyle Klatt, Senior Planner AGENDA NO. 5.b.
ATTACHMENTS: Location Map, Cover Letter, Future Land
Use Map Amendment, Zoning Map
Amendment, Preliminary Plat, Project
Description and Operations Narrative; Aerial
Location Map, Preliminary Site Construction
Plans – Cover Sheet, Existing Conditions,
Removals, Site Plan, Grading Plan, Utility
Plan, Landscape Plan, Soil Borings (not
attached), Tree Survey, SSTS Assessment
(not attached), Storm Water Management
Plan (not attached), Cultural Resource
Investigation (not attached), Interim Use
Permit Narrative, Existing IUP Agreement,
Dakota County License, Gem-Ash License,
IUP Plans – Existing Conditions, Site Plans,
Expansion Grades, Leachate Piping Plan,
Final Cover Grades, Cross Sections,
Northwest Expansion Plans, Overall Storm
Water Management Plan, Utility Plans,
Design Details, City Engineer Review Memo
(with storm water review comments)
APPROVED BY: AK
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission make the
following motions associated with the SKB Landfill expansion request:
1)Motion to recommend the City Council approve a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to
change the future land use designation of 113 acres east of the existing SKB Landfill
from GI – General Industrial, LI – Light Industrial, and BP – Business Park to WM –
2
Waste Management.
2) Motion to recommend the City Council approve a Zoning Map Amendment to change
the zoning of 113 acres east of the existing SKB Landfill from GI – General Industrial
and AG – Agricultural to WM – Waste Management.
3) Motion to recommend the City Council approve the SKB Rosemount 2nd Addition
Preliminary Plat subject to the following conditions:
a) Dedication of an 80-foot right of way for the planned new City street connecting
Courthouse Boulevard and Ehlers Path along the east side of Lot 1, Block 1 of the
plat.
b) Dedication of a minimum of 50 feet of right-of-way along the southern edge of the
plat for Ehlers Path.
c) Execution of a subdivision agreement concerning the extension of a City water main
to the project site and construction of a new public street east of Lot 1, Block 1.
d) Provision of all easements on the final plat as required by the City Engineer.
e) Compliance with the City Engineer’s review memorandum dated July 7, 2021.
f) Payment of development fees specified in the City Engineer’s review memorandum
dated July 7, 2021.
g) Payment of a fee in lieu of park land dedication of $260,000 for 52.41 acres of
platted industrial land.
4) Motion to recommend the City Council approve an Interim Use Permit amendment
allowing an expansion of the SKB Environmental Landfill and related building
construction subject to the following conditions:
a) Approval of the expansion plans by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and
Dakota County.
b) The utility plans must be updated to include the extension of trunk water main
service along the northern boundary of Lot 1, Block 1 and within the right-of-way for
the new City street immediately east of Lot 1, Block 1.
c) Provision of a minimum of a 30-foot easement outside of the street right-of-way for
the planned regional trail along Ehlers Path/140th Street. The grading plans must be
updated to include grades that will support future construction of a trail.
d) The existing private access driveway to Courthouse Boulevard (State Highway 55)
will be eliminated upon completion of the new public street east of Lot 1, Block 1.
e) Payment of all City costs associated with the design and construction of the new
public road east of Lot 1, Block 1.
f) The septic treatment area shall be clearly delineated on the development plans and
conflicts with other activities in this area, including utilities, vehicle access,
landscaping and other site improvements, must be avoided.
g) The septic system must comply with all applicable city and state regulations with a
final design and location approved by City.
h) The buildings on the site will be required to connect to public sanitary sewer service
within one year of this service being extended and available to the site. The City will
plan on a service connection in the location shown on the site development plans.
i) All new buildings within the landfill expansion area will be subject to the City of
Rosemont’s site plan review process. This review shall verify compliance with the
3
City’s building design, parking, and other site development requirements.
j) The landscape plan shall be updated to include all required replacement plantings
above and beyond any previous payments to the City as a fee in lieu of required
trees.
k) All buildings shall comply with fire code requirements for access around buildings.
l) No outside storage around the recycling buildings is allowed unless specifically
authorized in the interim use permit.
m) Incorporation of all review comments from MnDOT.
n) Submission of route maps of truck circulation within the facility and off-site.
Additional information concerning routing of trucks one the site and further
information concerning traffic counts and updated route maps may be requested by
the City when deemed necessary in the future.
o) Tree clearing and grubbing will occur between August and March to avoid impacts to
endangered species within the project area.
p) Compliance with the mitigation strategies included in the EAW for the project.
q) Compliance the City Engineer’s review memorandum dated April 19, 2018.
r) Entry signs shall be subject to sign permits and normal zoning standards.
Appropriate sight distances must be maintained.
s) Compliance with conditions from 2018 Interim Use Permit renewal, including the
following:
i) Stormwater Basins 6A, 6B, 6C and associated grading shall be removed from
within 50 feet of the 140th Street East centerline in conjunction with the updated
storm water modeling. As an alternative, SKB may direct storm water that would
have otherwise been accommodated within these basins to the adjacent property
east of the landfill provided it does not require a substantial change to the
approved PUD and grading plans on the adjacent site.
ii) SKB Environmental shall maintain an MPCA approved ground water monitoring
system on the site and notify the City prior to the construction of any replacement
wells.
iii) Implement sediment control best management practices to reduce sediment
tracking and dust on and off-site.
iv) Approval of the transfer facility and composting operation will be removed from
IUP if operations not commenced prior to November of 2023.
v) Compliance with all other requirements of the City Engineer’s review
memorandum dated October 23, 2018.
ISSUE
The Planning Commission is being asked to consider a series of requests from SKB Environmental, Inc.
concerning a proposed expansion of its non-hazardous industrial waste containment facility (landfill) at
13425 Courthouse Boulevard into an area immediately east of the current landfill boundary. SKB currently
owns several parcels with a combined area of around 183 acres east of the landfill site, 113 of which would
be replatted into the landfill expansion area and the remainder of which would be retained for a future
business park or commercial development. The separate components of the application include the
following:
• Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the future land use designation of 113 acres east of the
existing landfill from GI – General Industrial, LI – Light Industrial, and BP – Business Park to WM
4
– Waste Management.
• Zoning Map Amendment to change the zoning of the same 113 acres from GI – General Industrial
and AG – Agricultural to WM – Waste Management
• Preliminary Plat to plat the 113-acre expansion area as the SKB Landfill 2nd Addition. The plat will
also include a new public road and outlot for future business park development.
• Interim Use Permit revision to allow an expansion of the landfill into the 113 acres east of the
present facility, the moving o165Cellf existing and proposed buildings in the northwest part of the
landfill into the expansion area, and expansion of the landfill into the northwest (former building)
area.
The permit was last renewed by Rosemount in 2018 with no significant modifications to the previously
approved plans except for a minor reconfiguration of the distribution between construction and demolition
waste and industrial waste between two of the existing cells. The applicant is now requesting an expansion
of the existing operational parameters for the site which requires a modification of the approved interim use
permit.
Please note that prior City IUP reviews coincided with the timing of the facility’s required Minnesota
Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) permit (every five years). With its last approval in 2013, the MPCA
granted the SKB landfill a permit that is valid for 10 years. The 2013 MPCA permit therefore continues to
serve as the primary regulatory instrument for the site; however, the expansion will require a new MPCA
permit which will result in a new 10-year permit for the facility (through 2031). Staff is recommending that
the City continue to review the permit every five years, which means that the City would need to review the
IUP in 2026 halfway through the MPCA permitting period. There is substantially more information
required for the MPCA permit; the City’s current review will focus primarily on any changes or issues that
have occurred since the last review. Dakota County also permits the facility and their permit process is on a
two-year cycle; the county will not issue a permit until both the City and State permitting process is
completed.
BACKGROUND/HISTORY
In 1992, Union Pacific Railroad (USPCI) was approved to construct and operate an industrial solid waste
land disposal facility (landfill). The landfill was designed with ten containment cells with a total capacity of
2,520,000 cubic yards. In 1995, USPCI sold the landfill to Laidlaw, Inc. and in 1998 Laidlaw combined
with Safety Kleen Corporation. In 1997, municipal solid waste (MSW) ash from the Hennepin County
incinerator was permitted to be accepted at the landfill. In 2000, SKB purchased the landfill from Safety
Kleen. At that time, the landfill was permitted to accept industrial waste and MSW ash with a total landfill
capacity of 6,037,983 cubic yards covering approximately 70 acres of area with a permitted finish grade to
the 930 foot elevation (100 feet measured from 140th Street East).
In 2003, SKB requested and was approved for an expansion of their facility to add construction and
demolition debris to their approved fill material and an additional 9,320,608 cubic yards of waste (154%
increase) for a total permitted capacity of 15,358,591 cubic yards of waste. The approved expansion
permitted a total disposal area of 112 acres (60% increase) and finish grade to the 970 foot elevation (40%
increase).
In 2008, SKB requested and was approved for an increase the disposal capacity by 11,515,512 cubic yards
(75% increase) to a total capacity of 26,874,103 cubic yards. The expansion increased the permitted
disposal area to 151 acres (35% increase) and a finish grade of 1,010 foot elevation (29% increase). The
approved finish elevation is about 40 feet taller than the power lines on the site.
5
In 2012, SKB requested and was approved to accept source separate compostable material and process
that material with yard waste into compost.
In early 2013, SKB requested and was approved to deposit low level industrial waste in their
construction& demolition debris landfill cell. As part of SKB’s 2013 IUP renewal, the City approved an
increase the disposal capacity by 8,475,814 cubic yards (32% increase) to a total capacity of 35,349,917
cubic yards. The expansion also increased the permitted disposal area to 167.1 acres (11% increase) and a
finish grade of 1,060 foot elevation (28% increase). The approved finish elevation is about 90 feet taller
than the power lines on the site and 130 feet taller than the approved finish grade when the applicant
bought the site in 2000.
In 2014, SKB requested and was approved to modify the previously approved IUP plans for a non-ferrous
metal recycling facility to allow for a 4,200 square foot outdoor concrete waste depositing pad in addition
to the 14,976 square foot recycling building.
In 2018, the City approved a subdivision and Planned Unit Development (PUD) final site development
plan for 52 acres immediately east of the landfill site for three metals recycling buildings and a maintenance
shop. In addition, SKB proposed as part of the PUD development that trucks emptying loads at the
landfill would obtain fill material from the property to the east prior to departing from the landfill. The
waste exchange has been occurring on this property over the last two years. The PUD will be replaced by
the new interim use permit, if approved, and any recycling activity will be moved to the locations shown in
the IUP plans and incorporated into the overall landfill operations.
The most recent permit issued for the SKB Landfill was a renewal of the Interim Use Permit approved by
the City in November of 2018. The applicant did not request any revisions to the plans at that time, and
the City found all work performed in the previous five years adhered to the permit requirements. One
minor modification approved by the PCA and Dakota County, was the reconfiguration of waste materials
to be buried between cells three and five. Since this reconfiguration did not alter the approved final grades
in any manner, it did not require any modification to the previous permit.
Surrounding Land Uses: North: General Industrial (Spectro Alloys and Endres) and Agricultural
East: Future Business Park
South: Agriculture
West: Public/Institutional (Rosemount Wastewater Treatment Plant) and
Agriculture
Planned Land Uses: North: General Industrial and Agricultural
East: General Business Park
South: Light Industrial
West: Public/Institutional and General Industrial
Existing Zoning District: WM - Waste Management, LI – Light Industrial, AG – Agricultural
Site Area: 370 Acres (230 existing landfill, 121 expansion, 19 future business park)
Approved Disposal Area: 167 Acres
Proposed Disposal Area: 236 Acres
Approved Disposal Capacity: 35,349,917 Cubic Yards
Proposed Disposal Capacity: 55,849,917 (increase of 20,500,000)
Approved Height: 1,060 foot elevation (230 feet, measured from 140th Street East)
6
Proposed Height: No Changes
SUMMARY
Landfill Configuration
The SKB landfill facility is currently divided into six (6) different cells that accept three (3) different types
of waste. Cells 1, 2, 3, and 6 are designed to accept industrial waste. Cells 1, 2, and 3 have a double liner.
Cells 1, 2, and 3 are approved as designed while Cell 6 was expanded by 16 acres as part of the 2013
approval. SKB proposed a different liner construction for Cell 6 from the double-liner constructed in
Cells 1,2, and 3 in 2013; this proposal was ultimately approved by the CPA and Dakota County after
approval of the interim use permit renewal that year. The approved design will offer similar or more
protection than the existing double-liner design.
Cell 3 contains a sub-cell (Cell 3M) that contains industrial waste containing PFCs from the 3M landfill
clean up from Washington County. Each cell has its own liner and leachate collection system. The Cell
3M was approved by Dakota County and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) with its own
liner and leachate collection system. The leachate collected from Cell 3M is transported to the 3M
Chemlite incinerator in Cottage Grove and burned. Cell 3M is now closed and being covered with
traditional industrial waste.
Cell 4 is designed to accept mixed municipal waste (MSW) ash from the Hennepin Energy Recovery
Center (HERC) MSW incinerator in Minneapolis. The liner for Cell 4 is identical to that installed in Cells
1, 2, and 3. The operations of Cell 4 are similar to Cells 1, 2, and 3 other than SKB is removing and
recycling metals from the MSW ash.
Cell 5 is designed to accept construction & demolition (C&D) debris. Cell 5 has a single liner unlike the
industrial waste and MSW ash cells that have a double liner. In early 2013, SKB received approval from
the City and Dakota County to deposit industrial waste in Cell 5 that is no more than 25% of the soil
reference value (SRV). The SRV is the value by which the material is considered hazardous. The MPCA
allows industrial waste to be deposited into C&D cell provided that the industrial waste does not exceed
50% of the total cell volume.
SKB proposed one change to their vertical configuration in 2013 that was not approved until recently.
Specifically, the area between Cell 3 and Cell 5 (referred to as a “saddle”) was approved in 2008 to accept
C&D waste. As part of its 2013 permit, SKB proposed to draw an imaginary vertical line between Cells 3
and 5 and place industrial waste on the Cell 3 side of the line and C&D and low level industrial waste on
the Cell 5 side of this line. SKB’s rationale was the industrial waste leachate will drain straight down into
the Cell 3 collection system and the C&D leachate will drain straight down into the Cell 5 collection
system. The City and Dakota County expressed concern about this design and some of the assumptions
that went into the proposal; however, the MPCA reviewed the modification and determined that the
proposed design changes will not create an increased risk to the environment and approved the minor
modification to the permit in August of 2018. The modification did not alter the overall permitted
capacity of the landfill, and only revised the overall mixture of different waste types in the facility with
more industrial waste and less construction and demolition waste. This change is reflected in the updated
plans included with the IUP revisions.
7
Proposed Expansion and Site Modifications
SKB Environmental approached the City in 2019 with concerns that, based on the projected volumes of
materials being deposited at the facility, it was nearing the capacity of certain cells on the site. In
particular, SKB has estimated that it has roughly 5 ½ years of capacity of demolition materials and a little
over 18 years to accept industrial waste. The MSW contributor ash cells will have a much longer period of
time remaining. In order to be able to plan for continued operation of the landfill, SKB proposes to
eliminate the planned PUD/metals recycling project previously approved by the City and instead use this
property as part of an expansion of the facility to the east. When the applicant purchased the PUD land, it
was part of a much larger land acquisition that resulted in SKB owning most of the land located east of the
landfill site between Courthouse Boulevard, Ehlers Path, and County Highway 42 (with the exception of a
12-acre agricultural property right at the Highway 42/55 intersection and a 3.25-acre residential parcel
along Highway 55).
The proposed expansion would add a new cell to the facility, Cell 7, that would accept industrial and
demolition waste streams similar to several of the existing cells within the landfill. This cell would be
located immediately east of Cell 5 at the eastern edge of the present operation, and tie directly into the
existing planned slope in this area. The resulting expansion would not raise the overall permitted height of
the landfill (1,060-foot elevation), but would match the approved maximum height while pushing the fill
area further to the east. The expansion will create more usable space within the new Cell 7 area and
provide additional capacity in the slope that would now be filled between Cells 5 and 7. From a horizontal
perspective, the permit revision for Cell 7 will add 65.7 additional acres to the footprint of the landfill.
Vertically, the eastern expansion area will add 16,600,000 cubic yards of volume to the facility.
A secondary expansion area will add a smaller amount of additional waste storage volume within the
existing permitted landfill area as part of the applicant’s plan to move the shop, office, scale, and recycling
building to new locations in the eastern expansion area. By removing these buildings, SKB will be able to
add a new cell, referenced as Cell 8 in the plans, to the area east of Cells 1 and 4 at the western edge of
their property. Similar to the Cell 7 situation, the proposed Cell 8 expansion will not increase the
approved height of the landfill, and will push the exterior slope outward to cover the former building area.
Cell 8 will add approximately 3 acres to the overall surface area of the landfill, with a corresponding
volume increase of 3,900,000 cubic yards of material.
One of the more significant changes proposed for the landfill with the revised interim use permit is the
construction of a new public street running north and south connecting State Highway 55 (Courthouse
Boulevard) and Ehlers Path (140th Street) at the far eastern edge of the expansion area. All access to the
landfill will occur from this street, and the existing private access to the State Highway will be eliminated.
The creation of this new road should help significantly improve safety along the highway by moving all
truck movements turning movements into and out of the site to the new entrance. The new entrance will
also provide much more stacking room for trucks and other vehicles by increasing the length of the private
driveway between the access point and truck weighing station. Presently, there is limited space on the site
for the stacking of vehicles entering the landfill, and there is potential for a line of trucks to back up onto
the highway right-of-way. Although trucks will still need to turn from the highway to the new public road
to access the site, the new intersection will be designed to meet MnDOT intersection requirements and
will provide room for turn lanes for both northbound and southbound traffic. Finally, MnDOT is
planning a large project in 2022 to improve safety along the Highway 55 corridor near the SKB site, and
the City will be able to coordinate the construction its street with the other safety improvements.
8
The other site changes mentioned above will include the relocation of all existing buildings and structures
in the western side of the existing landfill to new locations within the northern portion of the expansion
area. In addition to moving these exiting buildings, the applicant is also proposing to integrate the
recycling and maintenance buildings planned as part of the 2018 PUD approval within the revised interim
use permit. The proposed site plans show a series of buildings, including a maintenance building, storage
bunker, gem ash recycling building, secondary recycling building, office building, scales, and scale houses
near the northern property boundary (and Highway 55 right-of-way), all of which would be accessed via
the new driveway that extends back to the public north/south street. The new buildings will be phased
with other improvements within the expansion area, and will be constructed over time rather than all at
once. In the meantime, the applicant plans to access the existing buildings through the same private
driveway once the Highway 55 access is eliminated. The updated interim use permit will require SKB to
close off its existing access once the construction of the public road is completed.
The other significant site changes include the construction of a series of storm water retention ponds
around the periphery of the existing landfill and proposed expansion area. The new or modified ponds
will be located within the far northwestern area, along the Highway 55 right-of-way, along the new public
street, and south of the expansion area along Ehlers Path. The latter ponding area will require the removal
of the existing trees and slope immediately north of Ehlers Path. Under the previous PUD development
plans the applicant would have preserved most of this slope; however, the landfill will substantially alter
the finished grade in the area and will leave limited space to accommodate storm water runoff from the
new grades. The applicant has inventoried all trees to be removed, and the project plans are subject to the
City’s tree protection and replacement requirements.
2018 Permit Update
The 2018 interim use permit renewal included an update on a few outstanding items within the previous
permit, and incorporated updated conditions and requirements accordingly. A quick update on the status
of these items is as follows:
Wetland Filling and Mitigation. SKB previously received approval from the City and other permitting
agencies to fill wetlands in the southwest corner of the existing landfill area (Cell 6 area) through
the State’s wetland credit program. The grading work for this filling activity has commenced and is
continuing this summer. The wetlands permit is valid until November of 2021, and the applicant
will either need to complete all work specified in the permit by then or may need to apply for an
extension. Please note that the wetland credits associated with the work have already been
purchased and approved.
Grading/140th Street. Under previous permits, the applicant was given the ability to move some of
the required ponding area into the right-of-way for 140th Street. The City required modifications to
the grading plans with the 2018 permit to eliminate the use of any future City right-of-way for
storm water purposed. The revised grading and storm water management plans associated with
the present permit request must follow this requirement.
Vertical Expansion. The 2013 permit and subsequent 2018 renewal authorized an increase in the
overall size and capacity of the landfill, and specifically an expansion of the finished elevation to
1,060 feet (an increase of 50 feet from the 2008 permit). The approved landfill height will result in
a berm 230 feet higher than 140th Street East at the western edge of the site. This will also be 90
9
feet taller than the existing power lines and 130 feet taller (3.6 times) than the landfill that was
permitted for when SKB purchased the landfill in 2000. The overall plan creates a ridge 230 feet
tall along 140th Street East that slopes over the entire landfill to the north. Because 140th Street
increases in elevation as it moves the east, the overall difference in the finished landfill height in
comparison to the road will be somewhat less in the expansion area.
Recycling/Transfer Facility/Composting Site. The City authorized construction of the gem ash recycling
building with the 2013 permit, and this facility has been in operation for the past seven years. The
applicant has not constructed a transfer facility or source separated compostable material
composting site that were authorized under permits as far back as 2003. Staff expressed concern
about the amount of time that has passed since these specific components of the landfill were
approved, and added a condition to the 2018 permit that the transfer and composting facilities
would no longer be included in any future permits beyond the next five years (until 2023). Should
the City issue a new, revised interim use permit for 2021, staff is recommending the deadline for
construction of these two facilities remain as stated in the last permit. The new IUP agreement
will be drafted to provision that if they are not constructed and operational by November 5, 2023,
they will no longer be considered allowed activities within the permit area. Staff is suggesting that
if the applicant does want to conduct these activities on site, they should make use of the permit
within the next 2 years or they can come before the Council in the future to again ask for the use
and modify the permit.
ISSUE ANALYSIS
The applicant’s submission materials provide a very thorough description of the operation and proposed
expansion plans. For the purposes of this review, staff will be focusing on those aspects of the plans that
will require modifications or further discussion with the City before implementation. The permit
approved in 2018 will serve as the basis for the new permit since the overall operation and activity on the
site will be substantially similar to the previous permit, just in new or different areas. Also note that while
the interim use permit will identify the types and locations of buildings to be constructed, the applicant will
need to follow the City’s site plan review process prior to construction of any new buildings on the
property.
MPCA/Dakota County Permits
In addition to the City, the applicant must secure permits for the landfill expansion from the Minnesota
Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and Dakota County. The facility cannot operate without these permits
in place, and staff is recommending a condition that ties the state and county permitting to the City’s
interim use permit process. The MPCA permit is valid for 10 years while the Dakota County permit is
valid for two years. Staff is not aware of any past issues associated with either of these permits, and will
continue to reach out to these agencies if any issues or concerns arise within the landfill operation.
Comprehensive Plan Update
The landfill expansion area is presently guided for either GI – General Industrial, LI – Light Industrial, or
BP – Business Park land uses in Rosemount’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan. None of these land use
categories allow for a landfill use, which is restricted to a special WM – Waste Management designation in
the Plan. The existing landfill is guided for this land category, which is intended to “accommodate the
need for management of waste generated by society while regulating the inherent environmental problems
associated with waste management”. Although the area presently guided for GI land uses does allow for
the metals recycling buildings and other industrial activity, it does not allow for the waste management
activities proposed in the expansion area. The WM category allows the landfill use in addition to recycling
10
centers and related waste management activities (i.e. the office, lab, maintenance, and other uses).
Staff is supportive of the proposed land use amendment to expand the WM district partially because the
proposed public street construction and existing roads around the site will help establish a defined limit fir
the landfill with limited opportunities for further expansion outside of these borders. While the
amendment will expand the overall footprint of the landfill, it will not result in a significant increase in
activity since the applicant intends to maintain the current volume of material entering the facility on an
annual basis. The expansion further provides opportunities to improve operations by moving access to a
new public road and avoiding direct turning movements the adjacent state highway into and out of the
facility. The WM expansion will leave room for additional business park development in the area, and will
still provide a gradual transition from the heavy industrial uses further to the north to the planned
residential uses south of Highway 42.
Storm Water Management.
The City has completed its initial review of the proposed storm water plan associated with the revised
interim use permit plans. The City’s consulting engineer has provided comments concerning the plan, and
some modification will be needed to meet all applicable City standards. One of the areas that does need
some attention is the proposed retention basin located directly north of Ehlers Path. The current design
acts as a dam due to the existing slope and the placement of a pond within this slope. This grading of this
area will need to be revised in order to comply with Minnesota dam safety requirements. The overall plans
will must be revised to address all comments from the Engineer. The overall storm water plan was
previously updated to remove any ponding from the 140th Street right-of-way, and the proposed plans will
conform to this requirement.
Utilities
The site is not presently served by pubic sanitary sewer, but is partially within the 2030 MUSA (urban
service boundary). Trunk water main is presently located within the Highway 55 right-of-way and service
is stubbed into the site at the current private entrance. Trunk water main will need to be extended further
to the east to serve the proposed buildings. The City Engineering is also requesting that this main be
extended along the northern boundary of the expansion area and within the new north/south public street
right-of-way connecting Highway 55 and Ehlers Path. The applicant’s plans must be updated to address
this requirement because they presently show the trunk watermain terminating near the proposed
maintenance and recycling buildings. As new lots are platted within the City’s urban service area,
developers are required to extend services to their project/property boundaries.
Because City sewer services are still a considerable distance to the subject site, the applicant is proposing to
serve the new buildings with a new private sewage treatment system. Given the relatively limited need for
public sanitary sewer services on the site, staff is supportive of a private system, but only until the public
service is extended to the area. Staff is recommending a condition of approval that requires all buildings
on the site to connect to public sanitary sewer service within one year of this service being extended and
available to the site. The City will plan on a service connection in the location shown on the site
development plans.
11
Grading – Excavation Activities
As part of the City’s approval of the PUD for recycling activities in 2018, the applicant requested the
ability to perform a waste exchange operation with its truck drivers. The approved grading plans for the
PUD therefore show a significant amount of gravel material being removed from the site and made
available to trucks leaving the site after depositing their waste products into the landfill. This excavation
activity has been occurring over the last several years in accordance with the permit. The City ultimately
approved the lowest grade that could be mined prior to construction of any buildings within the project
area, which was approximately 18 feet below the current (at the time) grade.
With the request to now convert this area to be part of the active landfill area, the previous grading
restrictions will be replaced by the proposed landfill plans. All the cells within the landfill area created by
first excavating down to a base elevation much lower than the surrounding grades, placing a liner down to
collect and prevent waste leachate from entering the ground water, and then placing waste material in the
lined pit until it reaches the planned maximum elevation (which is limited based on the final slope to the
peak of the landfill). The landfill interim use permit would allow excavation to a much lower elevation
than was planned with the PUD waste exchange program, which in some portions of the landfill
expansion area could be up to 50 feet lower. All cells within the landfill include a base, excavation level in
addition to a final, covered elevation that will be reached upon closing of the cell. The ability for the
applicant to go further down is limited by the current sub-surface conditions and the boundaries of the
site. In addition, the amount of surface fill is limited for similar reasons since the applicant is required to
maintain a 25% slope for the final vegetative cover.
Access/Traffic/New Public Road
Previous sections of this report discuss the proposed realignment of access to the landfill from the present
private entrance along State Highway 55 to a new public road along the east side of the expansion area.
SKB has agreed to pay for construction of the new public road and will dedicate right-of-way with the
SKB 2nd Addition plat; however, they have also asked that the City assume responsibility for design and
construction of the road. The City will be working on the design for this road, and expects that the
required subdivision agreement will address the City and applicant’s responsibilities concerning
construction of the road. The proposed plat provides 66-feet of right-of-way for the new public street;
staff is recommending that this be increased to 80 feet because it is planned to be a major connection
point between State Highway 55 and County Highway 42 in the future.
From a traffic perspective, the proposed expansion is not expected to generate any additional truck traffic
beyond the current levels. The applicant has noted that the additional landfill space is needed to give them
more time to operate the facility, not to give them the ability to process more waste on a daily basis. With
the construction of a new public road and removal of direct access to the landfill from Highway 55, the
overall safety for both the trucks entering the exiting the facility and the daily drivers along the highway
should improve considerably under the proposed development plans. The timing of the interim use
permit revision is also beneficial since MnDOT is planning on making safety improvements along this
corridor that can be timed to match the closing of the current entrance.
One of the major areas of focus during the most recent public review of the landfill and PUD area
involved the number of trucks that are expected enter and exit the facility on a typical operational day.
With past reviews, SKB has indicated that there are between 200 to 1,000 trucks using the facility each day,
with some variability based on the season, construction activity in the region, and other factors. While this
12
amount of traffic can be accommodated by the major highways around the site, MnDOT did require
specific improvements at the private entrance in conjunction with the construction of additional recycling
buildings on the site. Without the private connection, these improvements are no longer necessary;
however, the design of the new public road connection and intersection (which SKB’s trucks will be using)
will need to incorporate all of MnDOT’s standards and requirements.
During previous reviews, the City has asked SKB to submit route maps of truck circulation within the
facility and off-site, with the potential to require further information concerning traffic counts and updated
route maps when deemed necessary in the future. The applicant should provide updated circulation maps
for the new access and building areas; these maps can be provided at the time the new buildings are
constructed.
Wetland Update
The filling of the wetlands is underway and will continue throughout this summer. If the applicant is not
able to complete this work before November of this year, they will need to request an extension of the
wetland mitigation permit.
Parks and Trails
Both the Met Council and Dakota County have commented that the interim use permit plans do not
identify or reserve space for the planned future regional trail corridor through this area. Under previous
permits, the applicant agreed to provide a 30-foot wide easement outside of the dedicated right-of-way
along Ehlers Path/140th Street to accommodate the future regional. Staff is recommending that the
proposed plans be revised to accommodate a trail easement along Ehlers Path/140th street consistent with
those previous approvals. The trail is expected to cross Highway 55 near its intersection with County
Highway 42, and will eventually provide a connection between the developed and developing portions of
Rosemount west of State Highway 52 and the Mississippi River Trail and Spring Lake Park Preserve.
With the platting of land for new building construction and expansion of the landfill, the applicant will
need to pay fees in lieu of land dedication based on the City’s current fee schedule. SKB previously paid
these fees for the portion of the landfill expansion area that was platted with the metals recycling project.
The new fees will therefore be based only on the 52.41 acres platted as Lot 1, Block 1 of the SKB
Rosemount 2nd Addition subdivision. This fee is established at $50,000 per acre for an industrial
subdivision.
Screening/Buffering - Adjacent Residential Lot
The owner of the residential lot directly north and adjacent to the landfill area has previous called the City
to express concern about noise and debris from the current operation. She has also been made aware of
the pending expansion of the landfill, and requested that the applicant provide a more robust screen and
berm between her property and the planned access road and buildings. In response, the applicant is
proposing to construct an eight-foot high berm along the southern property line of the residential lot, and
will provide a fairly robust planting plan for this area as well. The berm and landscaping screening are
primarily intended to minimize impacts from the access road while providing a physical and visual screen
from the landfill expansion area.
13
Site Plan Review Process
The proposed development plans do not include detailed plans for each of the future buildings, and
instead show a general location and arrangement for these structures within the facility. Prior to
construction of any new buildings, the applicant will need to follow the City’s site plan review and
approval process, which means the Planning Commission will have the opportunity to review additional
details concerning each building before it is constructed. The buildings will need to conform to the City’s
building standards and the standards established for structures on the landfill site under previous permits.
Staff will review other site requirements, including building height, setbacks, parking, and landscaping with
future permit submissions. The interim use permit will establish the overall plan for construction of future
buildings, and future site plan approvals will need to be consistent with these plans.
Tree Preservation and Landscaping
The applicant has previously prepared a landscape plan associated with the metals recycling/PUD
development area, and was short of the number of trees require for a GI – General Industrial project. The
City accepted a cash payment in lieu of 227 tree that would have otherwise been required on the plans.
With the elimination of the PUD and rezoning back to Waste Management, the overall landscape numbers
will look different than were previously calculated and paid on the property. Because the City does not
specify a specific plating requirement for the WM district, the applicant has calculated the landscaping
requirements based on the “disturbed area” of the site rather than the entire landfill expansion area. Staff
is not clear exactly how this was calculated and will need to have further conversations with the applicant
to further clarify these numbers. There are also substantially more trees being removed from the property
to provide room for storm water management than under this previous plan. The tree preservation
calculations provided by the applicant indicate that they would need to replace 1,145 caliper inches of trees
to meet the City’s requirements, but they have also requested flexibility from this requirement because so
many of the impacted trees are considered non-native or undesirable for this region.
Staff will need to review the previous approvals on the site and have some additional conversations with
the applicant to determine how to best calculate the landscape requirements and any additional plantings
that may be required to meet the City’s standards. The landscape plan that has been prepared does
provide a robust number of trees around the perimeter of the landfill expansion area, and as noted above,
will offer screening for the residential property owner to the north of the site. Staff will review the
previous project files and will reach out to the applicant prior to the Planning Commission to determine a
recommended number of trees for the landscape and tree preservation plan.
Final Plat
SKB has submitted a preliminary plat request in conjunction the interim use permit application, and will
need to receive approval for a final plat from the City before proceeding with development of the landfill
expansion. In conjunction with a final plat, staff will be drafting a subdivision agreement to clarify the
expectations and requirements for construction of the new public road and water services to the site.
Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW)
The proposed landfill expansion meets the threshold for a mandatory EAW, and this environmental
review process was completed earlier this year. The EAW and comments on it were reviewed in
accordance with Minnesota Rules 4410.1700 to determine if the project has potential for significant
environmental effects.
14
The City of Rosemount received seven comments concerning the SKB Environmental EAW within the
30-day comment period, and all are included as part of the record and decision-making document
approved by the City Council in May of this year. None of the comments received indicated the potential
for significant environmental impacts (these comments were described in the adopted findings of fact).
The response from the Met Council did include an indication that the EAW was incomplete or missing
data; however, the City and project proposer participated in a follow-up meeting to discuss the comments
with Met Council staff, and determined that the comments could be address as part of the findings of fact.
SKB Environmental has agreed to continue working with the Met Council to address any future regulatory
changes concerning disposal of landfill leachate into the regional wastewater system and treatment of
PFAS pollutants in particular. The City also committed to identifying a regional trail corridor on future
development plans to address another aspect of the Met Council’s comments.
Revised IUP Agreement
The primary City regulatory document for the SKB landfill has been the IUP Agreement approved with
the original permit and subsequent revisions at the end of each five-year renewal period. Staff is not
recommending any significant changes to the present agreement document (included as one of the
attachments to this report), but is planning to incorporate any conditions added during the present review
that go above and beyond those presently included in the agreement. A revised agreement will be
presented to the City Council along with the Planning Commission recommendation.
Engineering Review
The City Engineer has provided the attached review document concerning the interim use permit request,
including a separate document focusing on the storm water management plans for the site. Compliance
with these comments has been included as a recommended condition of approval. The applicant will need
to pay development-related fees, including water trunk area and storm water area charges based on the
City’s current fee schedule. These fees will be calculated for Lot, 1, Block 1 of the subdivision, with future
payments due once the outlot is platted into buildable lots.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the Comprehensive Plan
Amendment, Zoning Map Amendment, Preliminary Plat, and Interim Use Permit to allow SKB
Environmental to expand the SKB Landfill into an adjacent 113 acres of land immediately east of the
present facility with the conditions provided in the draft motions at the beginning of this report.
page 32
By state law, the Facility must comply with state noise standards. The MPCA is not aware of any
documented noise complaints associated with the Facility and does not expect increased noise from
the proposed expansion. The future developments within the business park will also be required to
comply with the appropriate state noise standards for their designated use.
4) Quality of life:
The Facility has been in operation since 1992. The proposed industrial waste landfill expansion
would not degrade the quality of life at abutting residences, as there are no significant proposed
design or operational changes.
18. Transportation
a. Describe traffic-related aspects of project construction and operation. Include: 1) existing and
proposed additional parking spaces, 2) estimated total average daily traffic generated, 3) estimated
maximum peak hour traffic generated and time of occurrence, 4) indicate source of trip generation
rates used in the estimates, and 5) availability of transit and/or other alternative transportation
modes.
SKB Environmental, Inc. (SKB) is proposing to expand the SKB Rosemount Industrial Waste
Disposal Facility located at 13425 Courthouse Boulevard (TH 55). There are currently multiple
disposal areas at the Facility that receive different waste streams, which include demolition debris,
industrial waste, and municipal solid waste combustor ash disposal. The expansion area would
receive only industrial waste and demolition debris, which will be comingled into the same disposal
area and SKB is proposing to increase the industrial waste landfill capacity by expanding onto
approximately 113 acres of adjacent land immediately east of the current landfill disposal area.
This eastern expansion will provide approximately 20 years of industrial waste disposal operations
beyond what is currently permitted for the Facility.
Once the eastern expansion is approved by all necessary entities (City, Dakota County, MPCA),
the new City road and entrance road design will begin. As the expansion moves east within the site,
a new access will be provided on a new north/south public street located west of CSAH 42. The
existing access to TH 55 will be closed when the new access is constructed. These changes will
help fulfill safety improvements on TH 55 that are needed to accommodate existing and future
traffic volumes. SKB has worked closely with the City and the Minnesota Department of
Transportation (MnDOT) to develop and implement roadway safety improvements for this area.
The proposed new north/south roadway will assist in these improvements by removing existing and
future private access points from TH 55. The proposed new north/south roadway will also provide
an entrance to the future business park area, which will be located directly across from the new
designated access point to the landfill expansion area, immediately to the east. The proposed new
north/south roadway will be designed by the City to accommodate the traffic from both the landfill
as well as the developments within the future business park area.
The proposed project will not increase the number of trips generated by the site. The existing trip
generation is expected to continue in the future through the life of the facility. Existing trip
generation for the site was determined through driveway counts completed on September 24 and
25, 2019. The resultant trip generation totals are shown in Table 5.
page 33
Table 5 – Existing Weekday Site Trip Generation
Date Trucks Other Vehicles (cars, pickups, etc.)
AM Peak
Hour
(715-815)
PM Peak
Hour
(430-530)
Daily AM Peak
Hour
(715-815)
PM Peak
Hour
(430-530)
Daily
September 24,
2019
97 6 1,329 19 22 156
September 25,
2019
110 6 1,310 12 16 125
There are approximately 30 parking spaces currently on site. The number of parking spaces in the
future is expected to be approximately 100 to serve the new office location.
b. Discuss the effect on traffic congestion on affected roads and describe any traffic improvements
necessary. The analysis must discuss the project’s impact on the regional transportation system.
If the peak hour traffic generated exceeds 250 vehicles or the total daily trips exceeds 2,500, a
traffic impact study must be prepared as part of the EAW. Use the format and procedures described
in the Minnesota Department of Transportation’s Access Management Manual, Chapter 5
(available at: http://www.dot.state.mn.us/accessmanagement/resources.html) or a similar local
guidance.
As described above, the proposed project will not increase the number of trips currently generated
by the site. Therefore, based on the EAW guidance, a Traffic Impact Study is not required.
However, the following traffic analysis was completed to document impacts to the surrounding
roadway system.
This analysis examined weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic impacts of the proposed project
the following intersections:
• TH 55/SKB access (existing)
• TH 55/future public street (future)
• TH 55/CSAH 42
• CSAH 42/142nd Street
• Future public street/142nd Street (future)
• SKB access/future public street (future)
To adequately address the impacts of the proposed project, forecasts and analyses were completed
for the year 2040. Specifically, weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic forecasts were completed
for the following scenarios:
• 2020 Existing. Existing volumes were determined through traffic counts at the subject
intersections. The existing volume information includes trips generated by the existing
facility.
• 2040-Build. Existing volumes at the subject intersections were increased by 1.3 percent per
year to determine 2040 Build volumes. The 1.3 percent per year growth rate was calculated
based on recent growth experienced near the site.
page 34
The property east of the proposed future public street may be developed at some point in the future.
Detailed information on the uses and sizes for any potential future development are not yet known
and therefore were not included in the study. Additional analysis will be needed when future
development is proposed.
The 2040 forecasts assume a new access will be provided on a north/south public street located
west of CSAH 42. The existing access to TH 55 will be closed when the new access is constructed.
Traffic volumes were established for the forecasting scenarios described during the weekday a.m.
and p.m. peak hours. The resultant traffic volumes are presented in Figure 10.
Traffic analyses were completed for the subject intersections for all scenarios during the weekday
a.m. and p.m. peak hours using Synchro/Sim Traffic software. Initial analysis was completed using
existing geometrics and intersection control.
Capacity analysis results are presented in terms of level of service (LOS), which is defined in terms
of traffic delay at the intersection. LOS ranges from A to F. LOS A represents the best intersection
operation, with little delay for each vehicle using the intersection. LOS F represents the worst
intersection operation with excessive delay.
The LOS results for the study intersections are discussed below.
TH 55/SKB access (driveway stop control) - During the a.m. peak hour under existing conditions,
all movements operate at LOS E or better and the overall intersection operates at LOS A. Under
the 2040 scenario, the SKB access (south leg) is removed from the intersection. All remaining
movements operate at LOS D or better and the overall intersection operates at LOS A.
During the p.m. peak hour under existing conditions, all movements operate at LOS D or better and
the overall intersection operates at LOS A. Under the 2040 scenario, the SKB access (south leg) is
removed from the intersection. All remaining movements operate at LOS C or better and the overall
intersection operates at LOS A.
TH 55/CSAH 42 (minor street stop control) – During the a.m. peak hour under existing conditions,
the northbound left turn lane operates at LOS F while all other movements operate at LOS B or
better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A. Under the 2040 scenario, the northbound left
turn operates at LOS F while all other movement operate at LOS B or better. The overall
intersection operates at LOS A.
During the p.m. peak hour under existing conditions, the northbound left turn operates at LOS F
while all other movements operate at LOS E or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A.
Under the 2040 scenario, the northbound left turn lane and northbound right turn operate at LOS F
while all other movement operate at LOS C or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS D.
CSAH 42/142nd Street (minor street stop control) - During the a.m. peak hour under existing
conditions, all movements operate at LOS A and the overall intersection operates at LOS A. Under
the 2040 scenario, all movements operate at LOS B or better and the overall intersection operates
at LOS A.
page 35
During the p.m. peak hour under existing conditions, all movements operate at LOS B and the
overall intersection operates at LOS A. Under the 2040 scenario, all movements operate at LOS B
or better and the overall intersection operates at LOS A.
TH 55/future public street (minor street stop control) - During the a.m. peak hour under the 2040
scenario, the northbound left turn operates at LOS E while all other movement operate at LOS B
or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A.
During the p.m. peak hour under the 2040 scenario, the northbound left turn operates at LOS E
while all other movement operates at LOS C or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A.
Future public street/142nd Street (minor street stop control) - During the a.m. peak hour under the
2040 scenario, all movements operate at LOS A or better and the overall intersection operates at
LOS A.
During the p.m. peak hour under the 2040 scenario, all movements operate at LOS A or better and
the overall intersection operates at LOS A.
SKB access/future public street (minor street stop control) - During the a.m. peak hour under the
2040 scenario, all movements operate at LOS A or better and the overall intersection operates at
LOS A.
During the p.m. peak hour under the 2040 scenario, all movements operate at LOS A or better and
the overall intersection operates at LOS A.
The analysis shows that due to the amount of background growth by 2040, the TH 55/CSAH 42
intersection is expected to operate at poor levels of service with the existing intersection geometrics
and control. All other intersections are expected to operate at acceptable levels of service. The TH
55/CSAH 42 intersection would require dual westbound left turn lanes and traffic signal control.
With these improvement in place, all movements operate at LOS D or better and the overall
intersection operates at LOS D.
The safe operation of trucks entering and exiting the site on TH 55 will be a priority given vehicle
speeds and future traffic volumes on TH 55. The following improvements should be incorporated
into the future SKB access point on TH 55:
• Westbound left turn lane
• Eastbound right turn lane
• Eastbound acceleration lane
• Separate northbound left turn and right turn lanes exiting the site
c. Identify measures that will be taken to minimize or mitigate project related transportation effects.
The traffic forecasts and analyses indicate the proposed project alone would not require specific
improvement to accommodate the expected traffic volumes. The City will design the proposed new
north/south roadway to accommodate traffic from both the new landfill expansion area as well as
the future developments within the business park. As indicated, the expected increase in
background traffic and safety of traffic entering and exiting the site will require the following
mitigation improvements:
page 36
Existing Conditions
• All intersections operate at acceptable levels of service; therefore, no mitigation is
recommended.
• Consider constructing an eastbound acceleration lane at the existing SKB access on TH 55.
2040 Conditions
• The TH 55/CSAH 42 intersection is expected to operate at poor levels of service with the
existing intersection geometrics and control. All other intersections are expected to operate
at acceptable levels of service. The TH 55/CSAH 42 intersection would require dual
westbound left turn lanes and traffic signal control.
• The new public street intersection located west of CSAH 42 will be constructed with the
following geometrics:
o Westbound left turn lane
o Eastbound right turn lane
o Eastbound acceleration lane
o Separate northbound left turn and right turn lanes
• The SKB entrance on the future north/south street should be constructed to accommodate
truck turning requirements. Access to property to the east will be located across from this
entrance.
• The future public street/142nd Street intersection will be constructed to City of Rosemount
standards.
19. Cumulative potential effects: (Preparers can leave this item blank if cumulative potential effects are
addressed under the applicable EAW Items)
a. Describe the geographic scales and timeframes of the project related environmental effects that
could combine with other environmental effects resulting in cumulative potential effects.
As described in responses to items 9 through 18 herein this EAW, there are no new or increased
adverse environmental impacts related to the proposed industrial waste landfill expansion. The
Facility has been operated since 1992 to manage and dispose of industrial wastes. Prior to and
during site operations, site evaluations and detailed geologic and hydrologic investigations have
been completed to determine and characterize the Facility’s environmental monitorability and
potential receptors. Based on the data collected to date, there are no impacts to groundwater and no
otherwise known environmental impacts related to the release of leachate, wastes, or landfill gas.
Groundwater quality is reflective of industrial activities, primarily related to construction and
maintenance of bituminous access roads, site infrastructure, and vehicle traffic. Potential receptors
to landfill operations will continue to be evaluated through the City’s review and permitting
process.
The proposed industrial waste landfill expansion directly benefits all member community industries
and business which need solid waste management services. The proposed industrial waste landfill
expansion will allow for the region to continue to dispose of industrial wastes generated without
having to find an alternative disposal locations.
SKB ROSEMOUNT
Site Location Map Figure 1
2,000 0 2,0001,000
Feet ±Path: L:\3053\0166\pro\EAW\EAW.aprxDate: 8/24/2020 Time: 9:05 PM User: BerKA1064
AUG 2020MinnesotaWisconsinHennepin
County
Saint
Croix
County
Ramsey
County
Dakota County
Pierce
County
Scott
County
Goodhue
CountyRice County
EAW Project Area
SKB Property
Stantec Consulting Services Inc.
1800 Pioneer Creek Center, Maple Plain, Mn 55359
June 1, 2021
File: 3053-20-511
Attention: Mr. Kyle Klatt
Senior Planner
Rosemount City Hall
2875 145th Street West
Rosemount, MN 55068
Reference: SKB Environmental Application for the Proposed Landfill Expansion on the property
located immediately east of the current SKB Rosemount Landfill site – 13425
Courthouse Boulevard
Dear Mr. Klatt,
On behalf of SKB Environmental, Inc. (SKB), enclosed are the following applications to support expansion
of the SKB Rosemount Landfill:
• Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment Application
• Rezoning Application
• Preliminary Plat Application
• Final Plat Application (to be submitted at later date following approval of preliminary plat)
• Interim Use Permit Application
The Applications are being submitted because SKB is proposing to increase the industrial waste and C&D
landfill capacity by expanding onto approximately 163 acres of adjacent land immediately east of the
current landfill disposal area. The landfill expansion will be approximately 113 acres in size, while the
remaining 50 acres is being designated for business park development. The existing landfill is located
within an area of the City that is classified as a “Waste Management Area” on the City’s zoning map. The
City’s zoning code for the Waste Management District state that this district is intended to accommodate
waste management, disposal, and recycling operations and that uses within this district shall be permitted
by an Interim Use Permit. The approximately 113 acres of the 163 acres of adjacent land will also need to
be rezoned to reflect WM “Waste Management Area”. The 50 acres east of the new proposed city road,
guided as a future business park to be developed according to the City’s Zoning and Comprehensive Plan.
An Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) was completed for this proposed landfill expansion. The
Findings of Fact, Conclusions, and Record of Decision was issued on May 13, 2021 and found that the
proposed project does not have the potential for significant environmental effects to trigger the need for an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).
June 1, 2021
Mr. Kyle Klatt
Page 2 of 2
Reference: SKB Environmental Application for the Proposed Landfill Expansion on the property located immediately east of the current
SKB Rosemount Landfill site – 13425 Courthouse Boulevard
Attached again in support of this application are the following:
1.Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment Application
2.Rezoning Application
3.Preliminary Plat Application with Preliminary Plat Drawing
4.Interim Use Permit Renewal Application
5.Project Description and Operations narrative with Preliminary Site Construction Plan Drawings
6.IUP Technical Memorandum and IUP Plan Drawings
The appropriate application fees are attached. If you have any questions, comments, please do not hesitate
to contact me at 763-479-4226.
Sincerely,
Stantec Consulting Services Inc.
Tom Shustarich, PE
Project Manager
Attachments Attachments 1-6
c.Dave Wiggins, SKB
Ryan O’Gara, SKB
Geoff Strack, SKB
142ND ST E
C
O
U
R
T
H
O
U
S
E
B
L
V
D
S
(
S
T
H
5
5
)
EHL
E
R
S
P
A
T
H
ROSEMOUNT
MINNESOTA
7/8/2021
T:\Project\CommDev\LandUse\LandUseChanges.aprx I:\GIS\Map_Library\CommDev\LandUse\ProposedAmendments\SKB.pdf
Proposed Land Use Amendment
0 475 950237.5 Feet
142ND ST E
C
O
U
R
T
H
O
U
S
E
B
L
V
D
S
(
S
T
H
5
5
)
EHL
E
R
S
P
A
T
H
AG Agriculture
CC Community Commercial
BP Business Park
LI Light Industrial
GI General Industrial
WM Waste Management
Proposed Land Use Plan
Waste Management
MUSA
2030
2040
Existing Land Use Plan Proposed Land Use Plan
ROSEMOUNT
MINNESOTA
7/8/2021
T:\Project\CommDev\Zoning\ZoningAmendments\ZoningAmendments.aprx I:\GIS\Map_Library\CommDev\Zoning\Amendments\SKB
Proposed Zoning Amendment
145TH ST E (CSAH 42)
142ND ST E
C
O
U
R
T
H
O
U
S
E
B
L
V
D
S
(
S
T
H
5
5
)
EHL
E
R
S
P
A
T
H
145TH ST E (CSAH 42)
142ND ST E
C
O
U
R
T
H
O
U
S
E
B
L
V
D
S
(
S
T
H
5
5
)
EHL
E
R
S
P
A
T
H
GI - General Industrial
AG - Agricultural
WM - Waste Management
Proposal Area
Right Of Way
Existing Proposed
\
l.U'I" I 111.nr..: , .<;g;, .'WS/;i-/O{JNT 1 Mt'll'II"■ UIUl
1 , ' / / , Ii/ ' I' I, I ' , I
I
en " D:J
;o "'C 0 ;o en mm, s: -0 3: cz z )>
--i ;o
I\) ..(z .,, Cr)> )>
C --i c•::; -0 z
1
PROJECT DESCRIPTIONANDOPERATIONS NARRATIVE
SKB ENVIRONMENTAL PROPOSED LANDFILL EXPANSION
SKB Environmental Proposed
Landfill Expansion
Project Description and Operations
Narrative
June 2021
Prepared for:
City of Rosemount
Rosemount City Hall
2875 145th Street West
Rosemount, MN 55068
Prepared by:
Stantec Consulting Services Inc.
1800 Pioneer Creek Center
Maple Plain, MN 55359
SKB ENVIRONMENTAL PROPOSED LANDFILL EXPANSION
Introduction
i
Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1.1
1.1 PURPOSE .................................................................................................................... 1.1
1.2 GENERAL INFORMATION .......................................................................................... 1.2
1.3 CONSISTENCY WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ....................................................... 1.2
1.4 BENEFITS TO THE CITY ............................................................................................. 1.3
GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION ......................................................................... 2.1
2.1 SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION ......................................................................... 2.1
2.2 GENERAL FACILITY DESCRIPTION........................................................................... 2.1
2.3 TREE INVENTORY AND PRESERVATION PLAN ....................................................... 2.2
2.4 SITE GRADING ............................................................................................................ 2.2
2.5 LANDSCAPING ............................................................................................................ 2.3
2.6 SITE UTILITIES ............................................................................................................ 2.4
2.7 EROSION CONTROL PLAN ........................................................................................ 2.6
2.8 FLOOR PLANS ............................................................................................................ 2.6
2.9 LOT LIGHTING ............................................................................................................ 2.6
2.10 SIGNAGE ..................................................................................................................... 2.6
PROPOSED FACILITY OPERATIONS ........................................................................ 3.1
3.1 GENERAL FACILITY OPERATIONS ........................................................................... 3.1
3.2 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT ................................................................................. 3.2
3.3 HOURS OF OPERATION AND SERVICE .................................................................... 3.3
3.4 TRAFFIC, NOISE, DUST AND ODOR.......................................................................... 3.3
3.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY ........................................................................... 3.3
3.6 REGIONAL CONSIDERATIONS .................................................................................. 3.3
LIST OF TABLES
Table 2-1 Design Wastewater Flow Calulation ......................................................................... 2.5
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1 USGS Site Location Map ...............................................................................................
Figure 2 Aerial Site Location Map ................................................................................................
LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX A - PRELIMINARY SITE CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR SITE IMPROVEMENTS
APPENDIX B - ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS
APPENDIX C - SOIL BORINGS
APPENDIX D - TREE INVENTORY
APPENDIX E - WASTE WATER FLOWS
APPENDIX F - STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CALCULATIONS
APPENDIX G - CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY REPORT
SKB ENVIRONMENTAL PROPOSED LANDFILL EXPANSION
Introduction
1.1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 PURPOSE
SKB Environmental, Inc. (SKB) respectfully submits to the City of Rosemount this Project Description and
Operations Narrative in support of the Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment Application, Rezoning
Application, Preliminary Plat Application, and an Interim Use Application for the proposed expansion of
the SKB Rosemount Industrial Waste Disposal Facility. The Facility is located at 13425 Courthouse
Boulevard within sections 19, 20, and 29, Township 115N, Range 18W, Dakota County, Minnesota.
There are currently multiple disposal areas at the Facility that receive different waste streams, which
include demolition debris, industrial waste, and municipal solid waste combustor ash disposal. The
expansion areas would receive only industrial waste and construction and demolition debris (C&D). SKB
is proposing to increase the industrial waste and C&D landfill capacity by expanding onto 113 acres of
adjacent land immediately east of the current landfill disposal area as well as in the area where the
current office and scale are located. The two expansion areas will together provide approximately
19,500,000 cubic yards of disposal capacity. Although detailed development plans are not included as
part of this project, a future business park is proposed for development on 50 acres east of the landfill.
The Preliminary Plat Drawing is titled – SKB Rosemount 2nd Addition and is provided with the Preliminary
Plat Application. The legal description of the property for landfill expansion is on the Preliminary Plat. The
proposed eastern landfill expansion is designated as Lot 1, Block 1. There is also an Outlot A detailed as
part of the plat. The Preliminary Plat Application have been prepared in accordance with the applicable
City codes.
The expansion project will provide for a new site entrance/exit off of a new City road to be designed and
constructed by the City of Rosemount (City) which connects to Highway 55. The new entrance/exit is
intended to improve traffic safety on Highway 55. In an effort to support environmental initiatives
consistent with SKB and City values, the proposed landfill development will allow SKB the opportunity to
continue to make investments in and expand its recycling operations. SKB will relocate the facility
sustainability campus which will include buildings to serve recycling activities at the landfill. The Gem Ash
building and storage bunker currently exist at the existing landfill and will be relocated to make room for
when Cell 8 is built. The recycling and maintenance buildings approved as part of a previous PUD and
will be relocated as part of the expansion. There is no change to previously approved activities only
relocation.
Preliminary Site Construction Plans for Site Improvements detailing the proposed landfill expansion are
provided in Appendix A.
SKB ENVIRONMENTAL PROPOSED LANDFILL EXPANSION
Introduction
1.2
.
1.2 GENERAL INFORMATION
Land Owner
SKB Environmental, Inc.
Attn: David Wiggins
251 Starkey Street
St. Paul, MN 55107
(651) 224-6329
Applicant
SKB Environmental, Inc.
Attn: David Wiggins
251 Starkey Street
St. Paul, MN 55107
(651) 224-6329
Professional Consultants
Wenck now part of Stantec
Attn: Mr. Tom Shustarich, PE
1800 Pioneer Creek Center
PO Box 249
Maple Plain, MN 55359
(763) 479-4226
1.3 CONSISTENCY WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The proposed landfill expansion is consistent with nearby existing industrial uses and is consistent with a
transition between planned use categories. The landfill and proposed business park meets the spirit and
intent of the following goals and objectives as referenced in the Rosemount 2030 Comprehensive Land
Use Plan:
• Chapter 4 – Economic Development. This project meets goal 2 to expand Rosemount’s
employment base to provide jobs that can support an entire household (p. 27). Grow Rosemount
by attracting and supporting businesses.
• Chapter 6 - Environment and Natural Resources. This project meets goal 4 to encourage
activities that reduce the consumption of finite resources and ensure there are opportunities to
reuse or recycle natural resources (p. 43).
• Chapter 7 – Land Use. This project meets goal 7 to encourage and promote sustainable
development, green building, and resource conservation (p.80).
SKB ENVIRONMENTAL PROPOSED LANDFILL EXPANSION
Introduction
1.3
1.4 BENEFITS TO THE CITY
In order to continue providing a valuable service to the region and as part of long-term business planning,
SKB is proposing to expand the SKB Rosemount Industrial Waste Disposal Facility (the Facility). The
proposed development will benefit the City of Rosemount in the following ways:
• Facilitate safe traffic conditions on Highway 55 by providing new City road and site access point
• New Business Park
• Continued Host Fees
• Local employment
• Park dedication fees
• A more rigorous cell capping schedule to reduce the amount of leachate generated.
The above benefits offered to the City by the landfill expansion is provided in more detail in the following
text.
As the expansion moves east within the site, a new access will be provided on a new north/south public
street located west of CSAH 42. This new road will provide a new entrance to the landfill expansion area
as well as an entrance to the future business park. The existing access to TH 55 will be closed when the
new access is constructed. The new proposed road will be designed by the City to accommodate traffic
volumes from both the landfill and the future business park and provide for increased vehicle queuing
capacity at the landfill. These proposed traffic improvements associated with the landfill and business
park development will help fulfill safety improvements on TH 55 that are needed to accommodate existing
and future traffic volumes.
A new business park is proposed for 50 acres to the east of the 113- acre landfill expansion area. The
business park will allow for the expansion of commercial and industrial type businesses within the City of
Rosemount and generate additional property tax revenue as well as provide for jobs.
The landfill has paid host fees to the City of Rosemount for many years. The amount of host fee paid to
the City by SKB in 2020 was $2,356,051.04. The continued payment of host fees as part of the landfill
expansion will continue to help reduce the tax burden on the City as well as fund various community
development projects that City residents can benefit from.
The landfill expansion will continue to provide jobs for the 23 current employees at the landfill. In addition,
the landfill expansion will result in the payment of park dedication fees for the 113- acre expansion area.
SKB ENVIRONMENTAL PROPOSED LANDFILL EXPANSION
General Project Description
2.1
GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2.1 SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
Both USGS and Aerial site location maps are presented as Figures 1 and 2, respectively. A list of
adjacent property owners within a 350- foot radius of the site is provided in Appendix B. The proposed
facilities for the landfill expansion are proposed to be served by city water and sewer in the future upon
the extension of sanitary sewer by the City.
The soils beneath the site consist predominantly of sands and gravels. This information is based on soil
boring logs completed along the eastern boundary of the landfill as well as a site investigation completed
in July 2015. Soil boring logs and a boring location map from the July 2015 investigation are provided in
Appendix C.
2.2 GENERAL FACILITY DESCRIPTION
The existing SKB disposal facility in Rosemount consists of approximately 237 acres of which 170 acres
is designed to accept non-hazardous industrial wastes, mixed municipal solid waste incinerator ash, and
non-hazardous debris resulting from construction and demolition, including asbestos into the landfill.
Other permitted activities at the site include a recycling/processing building, transfer station, and compost
facility. The landfill is located at 13425 Courthouse Boulevard within sections 19, 20, and 29, Township
115N, Range 18W, Dakota County, Minnesota.
The landfill has been in operation since 1992 and was purchased in 2000 by SKB who has been
operating the facility since that time. An initial Interim Use Permit (IUP) was issued by the City for the
landfill when the facility opened in 1992, and SKB assumed the obligations of the IUP at the time it began
operating the facility in 2000. The landfill has an existing IUP from the City of Rosemount that was
renewed by the City on November 5, 2018 and expires on November 5, 2023. The landfill operates under
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) solid waste permit number SW-383 (available upon request).
The MPCA reissued SW-383 for the landfill in 2014 with a ten-year term until 2024. The landfill also
operates under various solid waste facility licenses issued by Dakota County.
The existing landfill is located within an area of the City that is classified as a “Waste Management Area”
on the City of Rosemount’s zoning map. The City’s zoning code for the Waste Management District state
that this district is intended to accommodate waste management, disposal, and recycling operations and
that uses within this district shall be permitted by an Interim Use Permit. The proposed project will expand
onto 113 acres of adjacent land to the east and support the existing operations and maintenance of the
SKB Rosemount facility. The eastern expansion area zoning will need to be changed to reflect WM –
Waste Management area. Again, the northwest expansion area lies within the existing landfill which is
zoned WM.
SKB ENVIRONMENTAL PROPOSED LANDFILL EXPANSION
General Project Description
2.2
It is important to describe the existing landfill site and the operations, since SKB is proposing an
extension of these with the industrial waste landfill expansion onto the adjacent eastern property.
The drive and parking areas in and around the proposed buildings will be mainly bituminous paved with a
small area of Class 5 near the maintenance building. The Class 5 in this area is needed to adequately
support the types of heavy equipment that will be around the maintenance building. There is
approximately 305,000 square feet of bituminous paving proposed for the landfill expansion development.
The landfill expansion area will be accessed via an entrance/exit gate off of the proposed new City road.
The landfill expansion development has sufficient area to allow for the safe passage of all vehicles.
2.3 TREE INVENTORY AND PRESERVATION PLAN
A tree inventory and preservation plan was completed and is provided in Appendix D of this Project
Description Narrative. As identified in the EAW completed for this project, SKB will clear and grub trees
outside the prime nesting season of the Loggerhead Shrike, from August through March, to avoid adverse
impacts to this State and Federally listed endangered species. The calculations for the number of trees to
be removed are also provided in the Tree Inventory and Preservation Plan provided in the Preliminary
Construction Plan Drawings (Appendix A).
2.4 SITE GRADING
Similar to the existing landfill operations and as required by MPCA rules, the proposed eastern industrial
waste landfill expansion will be developed in phases or cells. As shown on the Preliminary Design Plan
Sheets (Attachment 1), the proposed eastern expansion will be identified as Phase 7 and be developed
with three (3) cells. Due to the size of the northwestern expansion, it will be developed in one phase and
identified as Phase 8. The Phase 7 cells, and estimated waste capacity (including final cover) of each
cell, and Phase 8 are as follows:
Phase 7 - Eastern Expansion:
Cell 7A - 5,600,000 Cubic Yards
Cell 7B - 5,400,000 Cubic Yards
Cell 7C - 5,600,000 Cubic Yards
Phase 8 - Northwestern Expansion:
Cell 8 - 3,900,000 Cubic Yards
SKB expects construction of new industrial waste cells or closure of cells once every two to five years for
approximately three to four consecutive months at a time.
Upon completion of landfill development, the site will be final covered. The final cover is designed to
prevent precipitation from entering the waste. SKB is committed to a more rigorous cell capping schedule,
which will reduce the amount of leachate generated. The MPCA approved final capping system from top
down is as follows:
SKB ENVIRONMENTAL PROPOSED LANDFILL EXPANSION
General Project Description
2.3
• 6” topsoil and vegetative cover
• 30” cover soil
• A geocomposite drainage net
• 40 mil LLDPE geomembrane
• 12” buffer soil or intermediate cover layer
As final cover technologies advance, SKB may substitute, with MPCA and Dakota County approval, an
item in the approved final cover profile with an equivalent or superior alternative.
Slopes on the final cover system will range from 2 percent on top to 25 percent on the side slopes. The
highest elevation of the eastern expansion area will be approximately 1060 ft. NGVD where it ties into the
highest elevation of the existing landfill. The existing land surface is approximately 900 to 908 ft NGVD.
The construction of the expansion area will increase the height of the existing land surface by
approximately 160 ft. The proposed final contours were designed not to maximize capacity, but rather
improve the overall aesthetics of the landfill. Stormwater runoff from the landfill site will be controlled on-
site by strategic placement of drainage swales, erosion control mats, and riprap, concrete, or gabion
downslope structures. Runoff will be directed to a perimeter ditch system that takes surface water to the
sedimentation ponds located around the site.
Stormwater run-on into the industrial waste disposal area will be prevented by site grading. Run-off from
off-site and undeveloped areas will be collected in external perimeter channels and natural drainage
pathways and routed away from the site.
Appropriate native seed mixes will be evaluated by SKB for use in open space areas around the
stormwater ponds and other setback areas.
2.5 LANDSCAPING
Proposed landscaping plans were prepared by a landscape architect and presented in Appendix A-
Preliminary Site Construction Plans. The required calculations with regards to landscaping are also
provided on Plan Sheet No.L-101. Landscaping along the new site access road and site parking area are
detailed on the Landscaping Plan Sheets. Based on City code requirements, calculations performed
indicate that the number of trees required for development is 492 trees. The proposed landscaping plans
provides for 492 trees. As shown on the Landscaping Plan Sheets, the new proposed trees adequately
screen the proposed buildings and site operations on all sides. SKB has provided for foundation plantings
around the proposed parking areas and around the proposed buildings. SKB has provided a total of 341
foundation plantings to meet the city requirements were planting space is available.
SKB is also proposing to construct a screening berm for the adjacent property owner on the North portion
of the site. The proposed screening berm location as shown on the preliminary site construction plans in
Appendix A and will generally be 6 to 8 feet high with maximum 3to 1 sideslopes and have a 6-foot wide
top. As-built drawings of the screening berm will be prepared upon completion of berm construction.
SKB ENVIRONMENTAL PROPOSED LANDFILL EXPANSION
General Project Description
2.4
2.6 SITE UTILITIES
As previously stated, the proposed landfill expansion and associated buildings will be served by City
sewer and water. Sanitary service is proposed at 6-inches and is to connect at a future City trunk line at
140th Street. Future watermain and sewer connection are based on the City East Side Study Plan and
input from City staff. The proposed utility plan has been developed based on previous conversations and
meetings with the City engineer and staff as part of previous PUD applications for this area. A proposed
utility plan is provided on the Plan Sheets in Appendix A.
With regards to water service, a 6-inch water service connection is proposed for the landfill expansion
development. The 6-inch water service will connect to a future 16-inch watermain in the northwest corner
of the property. The proposed recycling building will not have potable water. The water service extension
is based on a meeting with the City Engineer and is detailed on Plan Sheet C-401 in Appendix A.
To accommodate any uncertainties with the City’s schedule and plans to extend the city trunk sewer, SKB
is proposing a subsurface sewage treatment system (SSTS) for sanitary services for the landfill
expansion including the office/shop building and recycling buildings on the sustainability campus. The
septic system design will conform with city standards to provide adequate separation between the drain
field and the groundwater. SKB will connect to the municipal sanitary sewer when extended to the site.
A site and soil assessment following methodologies laid out in Minnesota Rules Chapter 7080 and Title 9,
Chapter 6 of the City of Rosemount Code of Ordinances was conducted at the proposed SSTS location
on November 19, 2020. State code sets forth two methods for sizing a soil treatment area: utilize detailed
USDA soil profile descriptions and/or in-field hydraulic percolation test (MN 7080.2150 Subp. 3 Tables IX
and IXa). Rosemount SSTS ordinance requires using both methods and to use the more restrictive sizing
factor of the two.
The site assessment was performed by Matthew Summers, a licensed Professional Soil Scientist and
MPCA-certified SSTS Inspector. Five soil borings were conducted to a depth of 70 inches within or near
the proposed drainfield locations. The observed soil profiles were consistent with one another and
featured approximately 24 inches of clay loam and loam over sand and coarse sand. Coarse fragments
did not exceed 35% in any observed soil horizon. No redoximorphic features or other indicators of
seasonally saturated soil were observed within any boring. The observed soils were consistent with Web
Soil Survey, which indicates the presence of well-drained sandy outwash subsoils under a mantle of
loamy glaciofluvial deposits. Saturated hydraulic conductivity (ksat) testing was conducted using a
constant-head permeameter (Amoozemeter). Two test attempts were made within the sandy receiving
soils below 24 inches. In both cases, the test holes drained rapidly and thus conducting measurements
with the Amoozemeter was not feasible. SSTS site assessment information is provided in Appendix E.
Per state and local codes, a standard SSTS requires at least 36 inches of vertical separation from
seasonal high groundwater. The five soil observations did not feature any indicators of seasonal soil
saturation above 70 inches. This site is suitable for a subsurface trench or bed system with a maximum
depth of 34 inches. Using the tables from MN 7080.2150 Subp. 3, the USDA soil profile descriptions
generate a more restrictive soil loading rate than the in-field ksat testing. Per City code, the more
SKB ENVIRONMENTAL PROPOSED LANDFILL EXPANSION
General Project Description
2.5
restrictive result is to be used for determining the soil loading rate. The Table IX loading rate for sand or
coarse sand with less than 35% coarse fragments is 1.2 gallons per day per square foot. However, MN
7080.2150 Subp. 3(L) states that drainfield distribution media cannot be placed directly on sandy soil with
a percolation rate faster than 0.1 minutes per inch. It is Stantec’s recommendation that the drainfield
distribution media be placed within the clay loam soils immediately above the sandy outwash, and the
drainfield be sized using a 0.45 gallons per day per square foot loading rate.
The design wastewater flow (DWF) was computed based off MN Rules Chapters 7080 – 7083 and
Dakota County Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) Ordinance 113 using MN Rules
7081.0130, Subpart 1, Table I Estimated Design Sewage Flow from Other Establishments. Specifically,
the DWF is based on the number of employees and people visiting the office. The DWF is used to size
SSTS components including the septic tank, dose tank, and soil dispersal system. Table 2-1 below
summarizes DWF calculation.
Table 2-1 Design Wastewater Flow Calculation
Flow Generator No. Flow/Generator
(gpd) Total Flow (gpd)
Employee 23 18 414
Office Visitor 6 13 78
Wastewater Flow Subtotal: 492
Total Design Wastewater Flow: 500
The proposed SSTS to serve the office would provide primary treatment prior to being dispersed to the
soil. Raw sewage from the building would be conveyed to a septic tank equipped with an effluent screen
to prevent large suspended solids from flowing downstream to the dose tank. The dose tank would deliver
settled wastewater to the absorption bed from submersible pumps within the tank. Pumps and floats
would be controlled by a main control panel located adjacent the dose tank. The soil absorption bed
would maintain a minimum vertical separation to seasonally saturated soil of 36-inches and be sized at a
0.45 gpd/ft2 soil loading rate. Therefore, the total minimum infiltrative area required would be 1,115 ft2.
Effluent would be pumped to the soil dispersal area and distributed evenly by a network of PVC
distribution laterals within a drainfield rock bed.
SKB ENVIRONMENTAL PROPOSED LANDFILL EXPANSION
General Project Description
2.6
2.7 EROSION CONTROL PLAN
It is also important to note that the existing NPDES stormwater permit and associated Storm Water
Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for the existing landfill will need to be updated to include the landfill
expansion area. A detailed erosion control plan will be included within the updated SWPPP.
2.8 FLOOR PLANS
Building sizes and sections for the Gem Ash, Recycling building and maintenance building to be relocated
are shown on the attached Plan sheets. The new office building is proposed to be 10,000 square feet.
The buildings have not been designed and finalized at this early stage in the project, but will be
completed and submitted to the City as part of the building permit approval process.
2.9 LOT LIGHTING
Lighting will also be provided along the entrance/exit driveway areas. It is important to note that all
outdoor lighting will be LED low profile. The outdoor lighting will be aimed downward and have bulb caps
or shields to minimize any light pollution. All non-essential lighting will be turned off after business hours.
2.10 SIGNAGE
The appropriate signage for the landfill expansion will be placed at the new site entrance/exit. The
proposed signage will be provided to the City for approval prior to installation.
SKB ENVIRONMENTAL PROPOSED LANDFILL EXPANSION
Proposed Facility Operations
3.1
PROPOSED FACILITY OPERATIONS
3.1 GENERAL FACILITY OPERATIONS
There are multiple disposal areas at the Rosemount Industrial Waste Landfill that receive separate waste
streams. The disposal areas include demolition debris disposal, industrial waste disposal, and municipal
solid waste combustor ash disposal. The landfill does not include municipal solid waste (MSW) disposal
areas. Each solid waste disposal area has an allowable list of acceptable waste types that can be placed
within the cells, specific to the demolition, industrial, and municipal solid waste combustor ash disposal.
Acceptable wastes are defined and managed under the terms of the solid waste plans that are attached
to the permit SW-383. Unacceptable wastes are rejected by the facility and waste haulers are required to
take them offsite to an acceptable disposal facility.
Waste for disposal and/or recycling is transported to the facility via trucks which enter the facility at the
main site access from Courthouse Boulevard (State Highway 55), where they access one of the scales at
the facility before proceeding to the appropriate waste disposal area. Historically, the landfill receives
between 100 and 1,000 trucks per day delivering waste to the facility. SKB is not proposing to change the
solid waste transport methods or daily volumes received at the facility from the existing conditions under
which the landfill has been operating but is proposing to create a new site entrance/exit to serve the
existing landfill as well as proposed expansion areas. The existing site entrance/exit to the SKB facility
located on MN Hwy 55 will be closed. The new site entrance/exit is shown on the attached Plan Drawings
and was discussed in more detail in the traffic section of the project EAW.
There are currently seven disposal cells that comprise the SKB Rosemount Industrial Waste Landfill. The
surface area of the disposal cells are as follows:
• Cell 1 (Industrial Waste) covers 5.1 acres and is closed
• Cell 2 (Industrial Waste) covers 17.1 acres
• Cell 3 (Industrial Waste) covers 39.4 acres
• Cell 3M area included within industrial waste areas and is closed
• Cell 4 (Combustor Ash) covers 12.5 acres
• Cell 5 (Demolition Waste) covers 41.2 acres
• Cell 6 (Permitted but not constructed Industrial Waste) covers 51.8 acres
Each disposal area is permitted for a total disposal capacity based on waste type. Cell 1 has been closed
including the final cover and will not receive additional waste. Additionally, the Cell 3M disposal area is
also closed. Cell 6 has been permitted, but not yet constructed. It should be noted that construction of
Cell 6 is scheduled to begin in 2021. SKB has submitted a minor modification application to the current
SKB ENVIRONMENTAL PROPOSED LANDFILL EXPANSION
Proposed Facility Operations
3.2
MPCA permit to alter the proposed base grades in Cell 6 to provide and maintain for a 5-foot separation
from the subgrade to the groundwater table. This redesign of the base grades will result in a loss of
approximately 464,000 cubic yards of currently permitted disposal capacity in Cell 6. SKB will also be
submitting to the MPCA as part of the eastern landfill expansion a permit application which will detail a
redesign of the final cover grades. This final cover grade redesign will not increase the height of the
landfill, but will recoup approximately 200,000 CY of the 464,000 CY of disposal capacity lost due to
raising the currently permitted base grades in Cell 6. The redesign of the Cell 6 base grades and the
redesign of the final cover grades over the existing landfill are shown and detailed on the Plan Drawings
provided with the IUP memorandum.
3.2 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
The surface water management system has been designed to manage the 100-year, 24-hour storm event
of 7.42 inches. A narrative and all calculations and details for the proposed stormwater management
system in accordance with City requirements are provided in Appendix F.
To help clarify, a summary of basin order/flow is as follows:
• Basin 11 to Basin 12 to Basin 1 to Basin 2 to Basin 3 & 4 to Basin 5 to Basin 6A in Conjunction
with Basin 6B discharges off-site.
• Basin 10 to Basin 9 to Basin to Basin 8 and Basin 7 also goes to Basin 8 which could be the
ultimate discharge point off-site for that series of basins.
Many of the basins act as a combination of stormwater and infiltration basins. A summary of basin
function can be found in the table below:
Pond Infiltration Area Provided Dead Storage Area Provided
Basin #1 Yes Yes
Basin #2 Yes Yes
Basin #3&4 Yes Yes
Basin #5 Yes Yes
Basin #6A Yes No
Basin #6B Yes No
Basin #7 Yes Yes
Basin #8 Yes Yes
Basin #9 Yes No
SKB ENVIRONMENTAL PROPOSED LANDFILL EXPANSION
Proposed Facility Operations
3.3
Pond Infiltration Area Provided Dead Storage Area Provided
Basin #10 No Yes
Basin #11 Yes Yes
Basin #12 Yes Yes
The volume for dead storage and infiltration area meets City requirements.
Run-off from the facility will be controlled in accordance with an NPDES General Stormwater
Management Permit for the site. As discussed previously, the driving surfaces on-site are proposed to be
mainly bituminous and the site will be graded for stormwater to drain to the proposed pond located on the
southern portion of the property and away from the building in all directions. Regular inspections will be
conducted to prevent stormwater run-off and/or run-on problems. If problems are found, they will be
immediately corrected, and action will be taken to prevent a future occurrence. Recycling processing and
maintenance operations will take place within the enclosed facilities.
3.3 HOURS OF OPERATION AND SERVICE
Hours of operation of the Facility are authorized as 6:00 a.m. through 8:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday
under the terms of the existing IUP. The hours of operation for the Facility can be amended by the City
Council to accommodate special projects at the landfill. SKB is not currently proposing changes to the
hours of operation listed in the IUP.
3.4 TRAFFIC, NOISE, DUST AND ODOR
It is important to note that a noise analysis, detailed traffic analysis, and dust and odor evaluation were
completed as part of the EAW process for this project. There are no negative impacts anticipated with the
landfill expansion related to traffic, noise, dust, or odor. Please refer to the EAW for more detailed
information.
3.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY
To supplement the EAW completed for this project a Cultural Resources Survey was completed at the
site. No cultural resources were found and the findings are provided in a report in Appendix G.
3.6 REGIONAL CONSIDERATIONS
SKB is committed to working with the City and Dakota County to ensure that there is a path for a
Regional trail. The trail can be accommodated with the proposed development project
FIGURES
Figure 1 USGS Site Location Map
Figure 2 Aerial Site Location Map
$+42
¾¾Ç5555
SKB ROSEMOUNT
Site Aerial Photo Figure 2
600 0 600300
Feet ±Path: L:\3053\0166\pro\EAW\EAW.aprxDate: 8/24/2020 Time: 9:06 PM User: BerKA1064
2016 Aerial Photograph (Source: MN GEO)
AUG 2020
EAW Project Area
SKB Property
APPENDIX A
Preliminary Site Construction Plans for Site Improvements
PROPOSEDLANDFILLEXPANSION145TH STREET E140TH STREET EUS HWY 52
MISSISSIPPI RIVERMN HWY 55EMERY AVE E
FUTURE BUSINESS PARKEXISTING LANDFILLENGINEERSTANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC.1800 PIONEER CREEK CENTERMAPLE PLAIN, MINNESOTA 55359(P) - 763-479-4200CONTACT: TOM SHUSTARICH, P.E.VICINITY MAPNOT TO SCALEPRELIMINARY SITE CONSTRUCTION PLANSFORSKB ENVIRONMENTAL SITE IMPROVEMENTSDAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA 55068MAY 2021PROJECT LOCATIONCITY: ROSEMOUNTCOUNTY: DAKOTATHIS PLANSET CONTAINS 27 SHEETSDWN BY:ISSUE DATE:PROJECT NO.:M:\3053\20-511 Rosemount East Expansion\DESIGN\CAD\PLANSHEETS\C-001 COVER SHEET.dwg 5/28/2021 ROSHAAN A. GRIEME
DESCRIPTION:DATE:ISSUE NO.:ISSUE NO.:SHEET NO.:SHEET TITLE:5/28/2021 12:12:21 PM
PROJECT TITLE:CHK'D BY: APP'D BY:CERTIFICATION:NO
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N 7500 OLSON MEMORIAL HWYSUITE 300GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55427PHONE: 763-252-6800FAX: 952-831-1268WWW.WENCK.COMSKB ENVIRONMENTAL
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA 550683053-20-511MDH RAG TJS05/27/2021312/15/2020 CLIENT REVIEW SET 1
02/26/2021 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 2
05/27/2021 FINAL SUBMITTAL TO CITY 3C-001COVER SHEETSHEET INDEXSheet NumberSheet TitleC-001COVER SHEETC-003EXISTING CONDITIONS PLANC-004 REMOVALS AND PRECONSTRUCTION EROSION CONTROL PLANC-101OVERALL SITE PLANC-102ENLARGED SITE PLANC-103ENLARGED SITE PLANC-104ENLARGED SITE PLANC-201POST-CONSTRUCTION STABILIZATION PLANC-301OVERALL GRADING PLANC-302ENLARGED GRADING PLAN - WESTC-303ENLARGED GRADING PLAN - NORTHC-304ENLARGED GRADING PLAN - EASTC-305ENLARGED GRADING PLAN - SOUTHC-401ENLARGED UTILITY PLANC-402ENLARGED UTILITY PLANC-801DETAILSC-802DETAILSC-803DETAILSC-804DETAILSC-805DETAILSC-806DETAILSL-101OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLANL-102ENLARGED LANDSCAPE PLANL-103ENLARGED LANDSCAPE PLANL-104ENLARGED LANDSCAPE PLANL-105ENLARGED LANDSCAPE PLANL-801LANDSCAPE NOTES & DETAILS
℄℄℄℄℄PROPOSED LANDFILLEXPANSION AREAPROPOSEDBUSINESSPARK AREASCALESEXISTING SITEENTRANCE/ EXITSHOPOFFICESCALESASH RECYCLINGBUILDINGHIGHWAY 55EHLER'S PATH140TH ST E142ND ST E14
5
T
H
S
T
E EXISTING LANDFILL87088089090091092093094095096097098099088
0880 8
9
0
8
9
0
90
0
90
0
9
1
0
9
1
0
92
0
9
2
0
9
3
0
9
3
0
9
4
0
9
4
0
9
5
0
950960
97
0
9
8
0
99
0 860870880890900910920930940950
89090091092093094095096096086087088089089089090090090090090090090086286486686887287487687888288
4884
8848868868868888888888928928928948948948968968968988988989029029029
0
2 9029029049049049
0
4 904904906906906906906906908908880890900
8728748768788828848868888928948968
9
8 9029029
0
2 904904904906 9069
0
0
9
0
0 894894
8
9
6
8968
9
8
89890290
2904 904906850860870880890
844846848852854856858862864866868872874876878882884886888892894896
86
0
860860
8
7
0
870870
8
8
0
8
8
0 8808808808
9
0890
890
890
89
0
90
0
90
0
900 85285
2
852854
854854856
8
5
6
856858
8
5
8
858858858862
86
2
8
62
86
4
8
6
4
864
86
6
8
6
6
866
86
8
868868872
8
7
2
8728
7
4
874874876
8
7
6
8768
7
8
8
7
8
878
8828
8
2
8
8
2 8848
8
4
884 8868
8
6
886
88
8
888 8888
8
8
88
8
8
9
2892
8
9
2
892
89
2
8
94894
8
9
4
894
89
4
8
9
6
896 8968
9
8
898
89
8
902
9
0
2
902904906880890900910920920920930940950878882884886888892894896898902904906908912914916918918918922924926928932934936938942944946948948948948948 880880890 890900900910 876876876876 878878882 882884 884886886888 888892 892894 894896 896896896898898898898 898898 902902 904904906908912914914914914830830830830840
840
840
840
840
840
840840
850
860870
8808
8
0 880880
880
890890
824824826826826826828828828828832832832832834834836836838838
842 842842844844
844
846
848
852
854
856
858858858862864866866
866868872874
8768
7
6
876
8788
7
8
878
878
878882
882
8828
8
2882
8
8
2
8828
8
2
882
8
8
2
884
884
88488
4
884
8
8
4
884
88
4
886
886
886886888888 840836836838842864866832864 880890878882884886888880890890 878878878882884886888NEW CITY ROADDWN BY:ISSUE DATE:PROJECT NO.:M:\3053\20-511 Rosemount East Expansion\DESIGN\CAD\PLANSHEETS\C-003 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN 3053-20-511.dwg 5/28/2021 ROSHAAN A. GRIEME
DESCRIPTION:DATE:ISSUE NO.:ISSUE NO.:SHEET NO.:SHEET TITLE:5/28/2021 12:12:42 PM
PROJECT TITLE:CHK'D BY: APP'D BY:CERTIFICATION:NO
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N 7500 OLSON MEMORIAL HWYSUITE 300GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55427PHONE: 763-252-6800FAX: 952-831-1268WWW.WENCK.COMSKB ENVIRONMENTAL
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA 550683053-20-511MDH RAG TJS05/27/2021312/15/2020 CLIENT REVIEW SET 1
02/26/2021 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 2
05/27/2021 FINAL SUBMITTAL TO CITY 3C-003EXISTING CONDITIONSLOT LINEEASEMENT LINERIGHT OF WAY LINESECTION LINEQUARTER LINEEXISTING EASEMENT LINEEXISTING PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY BOUNDARYLEGENDEXISTING TREE LINEEXISTING BUILDINGEXISTING MINOR CONTOUREXISTING MAJOR CONTOURXXEXISTING FENCE LINEIEXISTING WATERMAIN
PROPOSED LANDFILLEXPANSION AREAPROPOSED BUSINESSPARK AREAEXISTING SHOP TO BE REMOVEDEXISTING OFFICE TO BE REMOVEDEXISTING SCALES TO BE REMOVEDEXISTING ASH RECYCLING BUILDING TO BE REMOVEDHIGHWAY 55EHLER'S PATH140TH ST E142ND ST E14
5
T
H
S
T
E EXISTING LANDFILLEXISTING HOUSE TOBE REMOVEDCLEAR AND GRUB AREA.SEE TREE PRESERVATIONPLANCLEAR AND GRUB AREA.SEE TREE PRESERVATIONPLANSILT FENCESILT FENCESILT FENCEREMOVE GRAVELSURFACINGREMOVE BITUMINOUSPAVEMENTSAWCUT PAVEMENTREMOVE FENCEREMOVE FENCEREMOVE TREEROCK CONSTRUCTIONENTRANCEROCK CONSTRUCTIONENTRANCEREMOVE TREESREMOVE EXISTINGFIRE HYDRANT,WATER SERVICE,AND BOLLARDSREMOVE EXISTING UTILITYPOLES (TYP.). COORDINATEWITH UTILITY PROVIDER FORRELOCATION.DWN BY:ISSUE DATE:PROJECT NO.:M:\3053\20-511 Rosemount East Expansion\DESIGN\CAD\PLANSHEETS\C-004 REMOVAL AND PRE-CONSTRUCTION EROSION CONTROL.dwg 5/28/2021 ROSHAAN A. GRIEME
DESCRIPTION:DATE:ISSUE NO.:ISSUE NO.:SHEET NO.:SHEET TITLE:5/28/2021 12:13:04 PM
PROJECT TITLE:CHK'D BY: APP'D BY:CERTIFICATION:NO
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N 7500 OLSON MEMORIAL HWYSUITE 300GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55427PHONE: 763-252-6800FAX: 952-831-1268WWW.WENCK.COMSKB ENVIRONMENTAL
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA 550683053-20-511MDH RAG TJS05/27/2021312/15/2020 CLIENT REVIEW SET 1
02/26/2021 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 2
05/27/2021 FINAL SUBMITTAL TO CITY 3C-004REMOVALS ANDPRECONSTRUCTIONEROSION CONTROL PLANLEGENDLOT LINERIGHT OF WAY LINESECTION LINEQUARTER LINEEXISTING EASEMENT LINEEXISTING PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY BOUNDARYXXREMOVE FENCEREMOVE TREEREMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTREMOVE GRAVEL SURFACINGNOTES1. SEE SHEET C-002 FOR ADDITIONAL PROJECT NOTES.2. CONSTRUCTION SITE SHALL HAVE STABILIZATION EXIT AT ALLTIMES THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT.CONTRACTOR IS ULTIMATELY RESPONSIBLE TO PROTECTDOWNSTREAM WATERS FROM CONSTRUCTION RUNOFF.3. CONSTRUCTION LIMITS, SILT FENCE, AND PROPERTY LINESHOWN OFFSET FOR CLARITY WHERE APPLICABLE.4. CLEAR AND GRUB AS NEEDED FOR CONSTRUCTION WITHINLIMITS OF DISTURBANCE.CLEAR AND GRUB AREAREMOVE BUILDING
FMFMFMRECYCLING BUILDING(150'X350')52,500 SFGEM ASH BUILDING(150'X150')22,500 SFMAINTENANCEBUILDING(75'X200'-15,000 SF) OFFICE10,000 GSF (55'X217')STORAGE BUNKER(125' X 30')3,750 SFHIGHWAY 55EHLER'S PATH142ND ST EEXISTING LANDFILLPROPOSED LANDFILLEXPANSION AREAPROPOSED BUSINESSPARK AREAPROPOSED SITE ACCESSPROPOSED PLAT BOUNDARYSEPTIC DRAINFIELDSCALESPROPOSED LANDFILLEASTERN EXPANSIONWASTE LIMITSPROPOSED LANDFILLEASTERN EXPANSIONCELL BOUNDARYPROPOSED LANDFILLEASTERN EXPANSIONCELL BOUNDARYDRY STORMWATER BASININFILTRATION BASINEXISTING RESIDENCEPROPOSED PLAT BOUNDARYINFILTRATION BASINPROPOSED PLAT BOUNDARYPROPOSED PLAT BOUNDARYPROPOSED PLAT BOUNDARYPROPOSED PLAT BOUNDARYPROPERTY BOUNDARYPROPERTY BOUNDARYPROPERTY BOUNDARYPROPERTY BOUNDARYPROPOSED LANDFILLEXPANSION AREASTORMWATER POND INFILTRATION BASIN INFILTRATION BASINOUTLOT ALOT 1BLOCK 1305.6'8.5'TYP.8.5'TYP.34.5'R5'TYP.NEW CITY ROAD(DESIGNED BY OTHERS)20'PROPOSED SCREENINGBERM FOOTPRINT(8' HIGH, 6' WIDE TOP)DWN BY:ISSUE DATE:PROJECT NO.:M:\3053\20-511 Rosemount East Expansion\DESIGN\CAD\PLANSHEETS\C-101 SITE PLAN 3053-20-511.dwg 5/28/2021 ROSHAAN A. GRIEME
DESCRIPTION:DATE:ISSUE NO.:ISSUE NO.:SHEET NO.:SHEET TITLE:5/28/2021 12:14:17 PM
PROJECT TITLE:CHK'D BY: APP'D BY:CERTIFICATION:NO
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N 7500 OLSON MEMORIAL HWYSUITE 300GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55427PHONE: 763-252-6800FAX: 952-831-1268WWW.WENCK.COMSKB ENVIRONMENTAL
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA 550683053-20-511MDH RAG TJS05/27/2021312/15/2020 CLIENT REVIEW SET 1
02/26/2021 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 2
05/27/2021 FINAL SUBMITTAL TO CITY 3 LOT LINEEASEMENT LINESETBACK LINERIGHT OF WAY LINESECTION LINEQUARTER LINEEXISTING EASEMENT LINEEXISTING PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY BOUNDARYLEGENDROAD CENTERLINEBITUMINOUS PAVEMENTC-101OVERALL SITE PLANCONCRETE SIDEWALKTOP OF STORMWATER BASIN
FMFMFMFMFMRECYCLING BUILDING(150'X350')52,500 SFMAINTENANCE BUILDING( 75' X 200' - 15,000 S.F. )GEM ASH BUILDING(150' X 150')22,500 SFSTORAGE BUNKER(125' X 30')3,750 SFHIGHWAY 55PROPOSED LANDFILL EASTERNEXPANSION WASTE LIMITSEXISTING LANDFILLPROPOSED LANDFILLEXPANSION AREABUILDING SETBACK: 50'PARKING SETBACK: 25'PROPERTY BOUNDARYPROPERTY BOUNDARYPARKING SETBACK: 25'BUILDING SETBACK: 50'20'20'45'35'20'20'
62'
62'
36'62'75.6'
23.6'FENCE SETBACK: 200'75'
40'
36'
200'
40'INFILTRATION BASININFILTRATION BASININFILTRATION BASINDWN BY:ISSUE DATE:PROJECT NO.:M:\3053\20-511 Rosemount East Expansion\DESIGN\CAD\PLANSHEETS\C-101 SITE PLAN 3053-20-511.dwg 5/28/2021 ROSHAAN A. GRIEME
DESCRIPTION:DATE:ISSUE NO.:ISSUE NO.:SHEET NO.:SHEET TITLE:5/28/2021 12:14:25 PM
PROJECT TITLE:CHK'D BY: APP'D BY:CERTIFICATION:NO
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N 7500 OLSON MEMORIAL HWYSUITE 300GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55427PHONE: 763-252-6800FAX: 952-831-1268WWW.WENCK.COMSKB ENVIRONMENTAL
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA 550683053-20-511MDH RAG TJS05/27/2021312/15/2020 CLIENT REVIEW SET 1
02/26/2021 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 2
05/27/2021 FINAL SUBMITTAL TO CITY 3 LEGENDC-102ENLARGED SITE PLANLOT LINEEASEMENT LINESETBACK LINERIGHT OF WAY LINESECTION LINEQUARTER LINEEXISTING EASEMENT LINEEXISTING PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY BOUNDARYROAD CENTERLINEBITUMINOUS PAVEMENTCONCRETE SIDEWALKTOP OF STORMWATER BASIN
FMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMHIGHWAY 55PROPOSED LANDFILLEASTERN EXPANSIONWASTE LIMITSR5'TYP.R
5
'
T
Y
P
.
R10'R5'TYP.R5'TYP.R10'R34'24'
6'
24'50.8'36'
20'
16.5'
7.8'
16.5'
52.2'217'19'
(TYP.)PARKING SETBACK: 25'BUILDING SETBACK: 50'FENCE SETBACK: 200' OFFICE10,000 GSF (55'X217')70'(TYP.)8'
(TYP.)PROPOSED LANDFILLEASTERN EXPANSIONWASTE LIMITSPROPOSED LANDFILLEXPANSION AREAPROPOSED PLATBOUNDARYPROPOSED LANDFILLEASTERN EXPANSIONCELL BOUNDARYSTORMWATER PONDPROPERTY BOUNDARYPROPERTY BOUNDARYEXISTING RESIDENCEPROPERTY BOUNDARYPARKING SETBACK: 25'BUILDING SETBACK: 50'BUILDING SETBACK: 50'SEPTIC DRAINFIELDPUMPING VAULTSEPTIC TANKTRUCK SCALES (TYP.)SCALE HOUSE (TYP.)SCALES (TYP.)AUXILLARY LOCATION FOR MOUNDED SEPTIC DRAINFIELDPROPOSED SCREENINGBERM FOOTPRINT(8' HIGH, 6' WIDE TOP)DWN BY:ISSUE DATE:PROJECT NO.:M:\3053\20-511 Rosemount East Expansion\DESIGN\CAD\PLANSHEETS\C-101 SITE PLAN 3053-20-511.dwg 5/28/2021 ROSHAAN A. GRIEME
DESCRIPTION:DATE:ISSUE NO.:ISSUE NO.:SHEET NO.:SHEET TITLE:5/28/2021 12:14:30 PM
PROJECT TITLE:CHK'D BY: APP'D BY:CERTIFICATION:NO
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N 7500 OLSON MEMORIAL HWYSUITE 300GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55427PHONE: 763-252-6800FAX: 952-831-1268WWW.WENCK.COMSKB ENVIRONMENTAL
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA 550683053-20-511MDH RAG TJS05/27/2021312/15/2020 CLIENT REVIEW SET 1
02/26/2021 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 2
05/27/2021 FINAL SUBMITTAL TO CITY 3 LEGENDC-103ENLARGED SITE PLANLOT LINEEASEMENT LINESETBACK LINERIGHT OF WAY LINESECTION LINEQUARTER LINEEXISTING EASEMENT LINEEXISTING PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY BOUNDARYROAD CENTERLINEBITUMINOUS PAVEMENTCONCRETE SIDEWALKTOP OF STORMWATER BASIN
FMR15'HIGHWAY 5524'50.8'55'
55'
5
5
'
4
2
'BUILDING SETBACK: 50'FENCE SETBACK: 200'42'DRY STORMWATER BASINPROPOSED LANDFILLEASTERN EXPANSIONCELL BOUNDARYSTORMWATER PONDOUTLOT A6
6
'LOT 1BLOCK 1PROPOSED PLATBOUNDARYPROPOSED LANDFILLEXPANSION AREAPROPOSED LANDFILLEASTERN EXPANSIONCELL BOUNDARYPROPOSED BUSINESSPARK AREAPROPOSED SITEACCESSPROPOSED LANDFILL EASTERNEXPANSION WASTE LIMITSPARKING SETBACK: 25'BUILDING SETBACK: 50'FENCE SETBACK: 200'R15'NEW CITY ROAD (DESIGNED BY OTHERS)DWN BY:ISSUE DATE:PROJECT NO.:M:\3053\20-511 Rosemount East Expansion\DESIGN\CAD\PLANSHEETS\C-101 SITE PLAN 3053-20-511.dwg 5/28/2021 ROSHAAN A. GRIEME
DESCRIPTION:DATE:ISSUE NO.:ISSUE NO.:SHEET NO.:SHEET TITLE:5/28/2021 12:14:35 PM
PROJECT TITLE:CHK'D BY: APP'D BY:CERTIFICATION:NO
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N 7500 OLSON MEMORIAL HWYSUITE 300GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55427PHONE: 763-252-6800FAX: 952-831-1268WWW.WENCK.COMSKB ENVIRONMENTAL
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA 550683053-20-511MDH RAG TJS05/27/2021312/15/2020 CLIENT REVIEW SET 1
02/26/2021 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 2
05/27/2021 FINAL SUBMITTAL TO CITY 3 LEGENDC-104ENLARGED SITE PLANLOT LINEEASEMENT LINESETBACK LINERIGHT OF WAY LINESECTION LINEQUARTER LINEEXISTING EASEMENT LINEEXISTING PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY BOUNDARYROAD CENTERLINEBITUMINOUS PAVEMENTCONCRETE SIDEWALKTOP OF STORMWATER BASIN
FMFMFM►►2211155544444433333333HIGHWAY 55EHLER'S PATH142ND ST E514777778DWN BY:ISSUE DATE:PROJECT NO.:M:\3053\20-511 Rosemount East Expansion\DESIGN\CAD\PLANSHEETS\C-201 POST-CONSTRUCTION EROSION CONTROL.dwg 5/28/2021 ROSHAAN A. GRIEME
DESCRIPTION:DATE:ISSUE NO.:ISSUE NO.:SHEET NO.:SHEET TITLE:5/28/2021 12:15:05 PM
PROJECT TITLE:CHK'D BY: APP'D BY:CERTIFICATION:NO
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N 7500 OLSON MEMORIAL HWYSUITE 300GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55427PHONE: 763-252-6800FAX: 952-831-1268WWW.WENCK.COMSKB ENVIRONMENTAL
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA 550683053-20-511MDH RAG TJS05/27/2021312/15/2020 CLIENT REVIEW SET 1
02/26/2021 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 2
05/27/2021 FINAL SUBMITTAL TO CITY 31. SEE SHEET C-002 FOR ADDITIONAL PROJECT NOTES.2. CONSTRUCTION SITE SHALL HAVE STABILIZATION EXIT AT ALLTIMES THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT.CONTRACTOR IS ULTIMATELY RESPONSIBLE TO PROTECTDOWNSTREAM WATERS FROM CONSTRUCTION RUNOFF.3. CONSTRUCTION LIMITS, SILT FENCE, AND PROPERTY LINESHOWN OFFSET FOR CLARITY WHERE APPLICABLE.NOTESLOT LINEEASEMENT LINESETBACK LINERIGHT OF WAY LINESECTION LINEQUARTER LINEEXISTING EASEMENT LINEEXISTING PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY BOUNDARYLEGENDROCK CONSTRUCTION EXITSILT FENCEINLET PROTECTIONDITCH CHECKEROSION CONTROL BLANKETRIPRAPCULVERT PROTECTIONEXISTING MINOR CONTOUREXISTING MAJOR CONTOURPROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR901PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR900STORM CATCH BASINFLARED END SECTION►►SANITARY SEWERIIWATERMAINHYDRANT►►►►STORM SEWERC-201POST-CONSTRUCTIONSTABILIZATION PLAN1. SILT FENCE - SEE DETAIL 1/C-8012. ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE - SEE DETAIL EC-1/C-8013. EROSION CONTROL BLANKET - SEE DETAIL 3/C-8014. RIP RAP CLASS 3 - SEE DETAIL SD-9/C-8015. CULVERT END PROTECTION - SEE DETAIL 2/C-8026. NOT USED7. DITCH CHECK DAM (TYP.) - SEE DETAIL 3/C-8038. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION - SEE DETAIL 4/C-801KEYNOTES#
FMFMFMRECYCLING BUILDINGGEM ASH BUILDINGMAINTENANCEBUILDINGOFFICEHIGHWAY 55PROPOSED LANDFILLEXPANSION AREAPROPOSED LANDFILLEASTERN EXPANSIONWASTE LIMITSPROPOSED LANDFILLEASTERN EXPANSIONCELL BOUNDARYPROPOSED LANDFILLEASTERN EXPANSIONCELL BOUNDARYPROPERTY BOUNDARYPROPERTY BOUNDARYPROPOSED LANDFILLEXPANSION AREADRY STORMWATER BASININFILTRATION BASININFILTRATION BASINSTORMWATER PONDFUTURE INFILTRATION BASIN INFILTRATION BASINPROPOSED FINAL COVERGRADES - SEE LANDFILL PLANSPROPOSED LANDFILLEASTERN EXPANSIONWASTE LIMITSEXISTING INFILTRATION BASININFILTRATION BASIN142ND ST EEOF=84.25EOF=93.00EOF=2.00EOF=99.21EOF=77.97EHLER'S PATHPROPOSED SCREENINGBERM FOOTPRINT(8' HIGH, 6' WIDE TOP)DWN BY:ISSUE DATE:PROJECT NO.:M:\3053\20-511 Rosemount East Expansion\DESIGN\CAD\PLANSHEETS\C-301 GRADING PLAN 3053-20-511.dwg 5/28/2021 ROSHAAN A. GRIEME
DESCRIPTION:DATE:ISSUE NO.:ISSUE NO.:SHEET NO.:SHEET TITLE:5/28/2021 12:15:38 PM
PROJECT TITLE:CHK'D BY: APP'D BY:CERTIFICATION:NO
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N 7500 OLSON MEMORIAL HWYSUITE 300GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55427PHONE: 763-252-6800FAX: 952-831-1268WWW.WENCK.COMSKB ENVIRONMENTAL
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA 550683053-20-511MDH RAG TJS05/27/2021312/15/2020 CLIENT REVIEW SET 1
02/26/2021 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 2
05/27/2021 FINAL SUBMITTAL TO CITY 3 LEGENDC-301OVERALL GRADINGPLANLOT LINEEASEMENT LINESETBACK LINERIGHT OF WAY LINESECTION LINEQUARTER LINEEXISTING EASEMENT LINEEXISTING PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY BOUNDARYPROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR902PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR900GRADING LIMITSSURFACE GRADE & FLOW DIRECTIONSURFACE SLOPE (H:V) & FLOWDIRECTION3.0:11.00%3.0:1
FMFMFMFMFM890 888892
894
896898880890880880890890 884884 886886 888888
892
894
896
898
9008968981.8
%
1.5%
3.0%
3.0%
1.5%
2.0%
2.0%
4.0%
2.0%
0.
0
%21.0%14.0%5.0%
1.5%
3.
1
%
2.4
%3.1%2.5%
2.4
%
2.4
%
2.4
%1.5%2.0%2.1
%2.1%3:1 3:1 3:1 3:13:1 3:13:1
7:1
3:1?
?
?
3:1
3:1
3:12.2%0.4%3:14:1
12.9%
17.7%
3.6%
9.0%
15.2%0.1%INFILTRATION BASINNWL=883.00100-YR HWL=885.13910920900
892
894
896
898
902
90
4
890
9008888928948968989028908868888929009009009043:
1
4:1
3:1
4:1
7:1
9:1 3:13:1
48:12.0
%
9:1872874876878880872874876878882884886
PROPOSED LANDFILL EASTERNEXPANSION WASTE LIMITSEXISTING LANDFILLPROPOSED LANDFILLEXPANSION AREARECYCLING BUILDINGFFE=900.00MAINTENANCE BUILDINGFFE=892.00GEM ASH BUILDINGFFE=899.00HIGHWAY 55FES-1115" INV=889.0034 LF OF 15" RCP @ 5.91%FES-1215" INV=891.00FES-1315" INV=885.50119 LF OF 15" RCP @ 0.84%FES-1415" INV=886.50INFILTRATION BASINNWL=879.00100-YR HWL=885.08884886888890884886888890884886888880880878878882882884886888880880896898INFILTRATION BASINNWL=885.00100-YR HWL=890.238808828848908868888928948968983:1
4:1
4:1
3:13:1
10:
1
10:1
3:1
5:13.0%89088688889289410:110:1 10:1
3:1
3:
1 3:18
9
0 9008868888
9
2894896898 902884
886
888890884886888892892896898890900892894896898880890882884886888880890882884886888890888892890
886888
892
890888
892 EXISTING INFILTRATION BASINFES-1512" INV=898.0041 LF OF 12" RCP @ 0.37%FES-1612" INV=898.15EOF=84.25EOF=93.00DWN BY:ISSUE DATE:PROJECT NO.:M:\3053\20-511 Rosemount East Expansion\DESIGN\CAD\PLANSHEETS\C-301 GRADING PLAN 3053-20-511.dwg 5/28/2021 ROSHAAN A. GRIEME
DESCRIPTION:DATE:ISSUE NO.:ISSUE NO.:SHEET NO.:SHEET TITLE:5/28/2021 12:15:49 PM
PROJECT TITLE:CHK'D BY: APP'D BY:CERTIFICATION:NO
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N 7500 OLSON MEMORIAL HWYSUITE 300GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55427PHONE: 763-252-6800FAX: 952-831-1268WWW.WENCK.COMSKB ENVIRONMENTAL
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA 550683053-20-511MDH RAG TJS05/27/2021312/15/2020 CLIENT REVIEW SET 1
02/26/2021 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 2
05/27/2021 FINAL SUBMITTAL TO CITY 3LEGENDC-302ENLARGED GRADINGPLAN - WESTLOT LINEEASEMENT LINESETBACK LINERIGHT OF WAY LINESECTION LINEQUARTER LINEEXISTING EASEMENT LINEEXISTING PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY BOUNDARYPROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR902PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR900GRADING LIMITSSURFACE GRADE & FLOW DIRECTIONSURFACE SLOPE (H:V) & FLOWDIRECTION3.0:11.00%3.0:1
FMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFM906906906906 9069069049029028909001.9%
3.4%
2.0%
2.0%
2
.
4%
2.2%
2.7%
2.2%2.1%0.8%2.1%1.8%1.9%2.3%2.0%0.4%1.3%2.4%2.1%15.2%
9.1%
11.0%
25.0%
1.
6
%
10.8%
13.3%910920930940950960970980902904906904906906904906908908
9
0
8904904906906900900902902904904906908PROPOSED LANDFILLEASTERN EXPANSIONCELL BOUNDARYPROPOSED LANDFILLEASTERN EXPANSIONWASTE LIMITSPROPOSED LANDFILLEXPANSION AREAPROPOSED PLATBOUNDARYPROPOSED LANDFILLEASTERN EXPANSIONCELL BOUNDARYPROPOSED PLATBOUNDARYPROPOSED LANDFILLEASTERN EXPANSIONCELL BOUNDARYOFFICE BUILDINGFFE=907.00HIGHWAY 55FES-830" INV=898.37141 LF OF 30" RCP @ 0.97%FES-730" INV=897.00FES-915" INV=899.6441 LF OF 15" RCP @ 0.89%CB-10RIM=904.1615" INV OUT=900.00 (SE)PROPOSED SCREENINGBERM FOOTPRINT(8' HIGH, 6' WIDE TOP)DWN BY:ISSUE DATE:PROJECT NO.:M:\3053\20-511 Rosemount East Expansion\DESIGN\CAD\PLANSHEETS\C-301 GRADING PLAN 3053-20-511.dwg 5/28/2021 ROSHAAN A. GRIEME
DESCRIPTION:DATE:ISSUE NO.:ISSUE NO.:SHEET NO.:SHEET TITLE:5/28/2021 12:15:59 PM
PROJECT TITLE:CHK'D BY: APP'D BY:CERTIFICATION:NO
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N 7500 OLSON MEMORIAL HWYSUITE 300GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55427PHONE: 763-252-6800FAX: 952-831-1268WWW.WENCK.COMSKB ENVIRONMENTAL
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA 550683053-20-511MDH RAG TJS05/27/2021312/15/2020 CLIENT REVIEW SET 1
02/26/2021 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 2
05/27/2021 FINAL SUBMITTAL TO CITY 3 LEGENDC-303ENLARGED GRADINGPLAN - NORTHLOT LINEEASEMENT LINESETBACK LINERIGHT OF WAY LINESECTION LINEQUARTER LINEEXISTING EASEMENT LINEEXISTING PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY BOUNDARYPROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR902PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR900GRADING LIMITSSURFACE GRADE & FLOW DIRECTIONSURFACE SLOPE (H:V) & FLOWDIRECTION3.0:11.00%3.0:1
FM900898898 902904900896898902904
900902904906906906906890900890900
8909008909008909002.7%3:13:1
3:1
3:1
3:1
3:1
3:1
3:1
3:
1
3:
1
3:
1
3:
1
8:
1
0.1%1.9%2.0%2.0%
2.0%
2.0
%
2.0
%
2.2
%
2.2
%
2.2
%
2.1
%2.1%2.1%
2.
2
%2.1%2.1%2.9%0.6%1.1%2.4%15.2%9.1%11.0%25.0%25.1%FES-424" INV=896.00FES-630" INV=897.00FES-530" INV=896.001
6
9
LF
OF
3
0
"
RCP
@
0
.
5
9%123 LF OF 24" RCP @ 3.26%STORMWATER PONDNWL=897.00100-YR HWL=902.68DRY STORMWATER BASIN100-YR HWL= 898.41910910920930940950960970980990100010101020103010401050910910910910908904
904906908900900902902904904906908906
902904900896 898902902902HIGHWAY 55OUTLOT ALOT 1BLOCK 1PROPOSED LANDFILLEASTERN EXPANSIONCELL BOUNDARYPROPOSED PLATBOUNDARYPROPOSED LANDFILLEXPANSION AREAPROPOSED LANDFILLEASTERN EXPANSIONCELL BOUNDARYPROPOSED BUSINESSPARK AREAPROPOSED LANDFILLEASTERN WASTE LIMITSFES-830" INV=898.37141 LF OF 30" RCP @ 0.97%FES-730" INV=897.00FES-915" INV=899.6441 LF OF 15" RCP @ 0.89%15" INV OUT=900.00 (SE)FES-324" INV=892.00EOF=2.00EOF=99.21DWN BY:ISSUE DATE:PROJECT NO.:M:\3053\20-511 Rosemount East Expansion\DESIGN\CAD\PLANSHEETS\C-301 GRADING PLAN 3053-20-511.dwg 5/28/2021 ROSHAAN A. GRIEME
DESCRIPTION:DATE:ISSUE NO.:ISSUE NO.:SHEET NO.:SHEET TITLE:5/28/2021 12:16:08 PM
PROJECT TITLE:CHK'D BY: APP'D BY:CERTIFICATION:NO
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N 7500 OLSON MEMORIAL HWYSUITE 300GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55427PHONE: 763-252-6800FAX: 952-831-1268WWW.WENCK.COMSKB ENVIRONMENTAL
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA 550683053-20-511MDH RAG TJS05/27/2021312/15/2020 CLIENT REVIEW SET 1
02/26/2021 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 2
05/27/2021 FINAL SUBMITTAL TO CITY 3 LOT LINEEASEMENT LINESETBACK LINERIGHT OF WAY LINESECTION LINEQUARTER LINEEXISTING EASEMENT LINEEXISTING PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY BOUNDARYLEGENDPROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR902PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR900GRADING LIMITSSURFACE GRADE & FLOW DIRECTIONSURFACE SLOPE (H:V) & FLOWDIRECTION3.0:11.00%3.0:1C-304ENLARGED GRADINGPLAN - EAST
890900884886888892894896896
896898880 890878 882884886888892894896898900860
870
880
890
860870880890870870
880880
890
8808903:1
5:13:18:
13:13:13:13:1
3:1
3:13:
1
4:
1
4:1
2.2%2.9%4.1%4.2%4.2%2.7%2.1%2.1%123 LF OF 24" RCP @ 3.26%INFILTRATION BASINNWL= 866.00100-YR HWL= 874.998
8
0
890
8908768788
8
2
88
4
886
886
888
888
892
892
894
894
896
896 8988
9
8870870872880890860870
880890862864866868872874876878882884886888892
894860858862864866870862864866868872874862
864 8668708708708808808808903:13:1 3:1 3:13:1 896 898FES-324" INV=892.00FES-224" INV=876.50FES-124" INV=875.0038 LF OF 24" RCP @ 3.96%FUTURE INFILTRATION BASINEOF=99.21EOF=77.97DWN BY:ISSUE DATE:PROJECT NO.:M:\3053\20-511 Rosemount East Expansion\DESIGN\CAD\PLANSHEETS\C-301 GRADING PLAN 3053-20-511.dwg 5/28/2021 ROSHAAN A. GRIEME
DESCRIPTION:DATE:ISSUE NO.:ISSUE NO.:SHEET NO.:SHEET TITLE:5/28/2021 12:16:18 PM
PROJECT TITLE:CHK'D BY: APP'D BY:CERTIFICATION:NO
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N 7500 OLSON MEMORIAL HWYSUITE 300GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55427PHONE: 763-252-6800FAX: 952-831-1268WWW.WENCK.COMSKB ENVIRONMENTAL
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA 550683053-20-511MDH RAG TJS05/27/2021312/15/2020 CLIENT REVIEW SET 1
02/26/2021 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 2
05/27/2021 FINAL SUBMITTAL TO CITY 3 LOT LINEEASEMENT LINESETBACK LINERIGHT OF WAY LINESECTION LINEQUARTER LINEEXISTING EASEMENT LINEEXISTING PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY BOUNDARYLEGENDPROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR902PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR900GRADING LIMITSSURFACE GRADE & FLOW DIRECTIONSURFACE SLOPE (H:V) & FLOWDIRECTION3.0:11.00%3.0:1C-305ENLARGED GRADINGPLAN - SOUTH
FMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFM22.5° BEND22.5° BEND6" DIP WM6" DIP WM90° BEND16"x6" TEE6" DIP WM22.5° BEND6" DIP WM22.5° BEND6" DIP WM45° BEND6" DIP WM6"x6" TEE6" GV6" GV6"x6" TEE6" GV6"x6" TEE6" DIP WM6
"
D
IP
WM6" GV6"x6" TEEHIGHWAY 55SSMH-018" PVCSEPTIC TANK(8' X10')PUMPING TANK(8' X 15')MOUNDED SEPTIC DRAINFIELD(40' X 60')AUXILLARY LOCATION FOR MOUNDED SEPTIC DRAINFIELD900905
905
905
905897898899901
902
902
902
903
903
903
904
904
904906
906
906
906907
907908908
895
9
0
0
905891
89
2
893
894
89689
7
8
9
8
8
9
9
9
0
1
9
0
2
9
0
3
9
0
4
90689
0
895
89589
5
895
900 900886
887
888
889
89
1
89
2
89
3
894
89489
4
896
89689
6
896
89
7 897898 898899 899901 901902
9
0
2905902903904906RECYCLING BUILDINGFFE=900.00MAINTENANCE BUILDINGFFE=892.00GEM ASH BUILDINGFFE=899.00OFFICE BUILDINGFFE=907.00STORAGEBUNKER8" PVC880890882884886888892894896898890900886888892894896898880878882890884886888880890882884886888892900892894896898
902904906 904906906906900 902 904 906 890900886888892894896898890
885884900900
895895 895 890895
940950960970980990895900CONNECT TO PROPOSED 16" WATERMAIN.VERIFY LOCATION AND ELEVATION IN THEFIELD.16" WATERMAIN AS INDICATED IN THE CITY OFROSEMOUNT'S EAST SIDE STUDYCONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN.VERIFY LOCATION, ELEVATION AND SIZEIN THE FIELD.6" GVHYDRANTHYDRANTHYDRANTDWN BY:ISSUE DATE:PROJECT NO.:M:\3053\20-511 Rosemount East Expansion\DESIGN\CAD\PLANSHEETS\C-401 UTILITY PLAN 3053-20-511.dwg 5/28/2021 ROSHAAN A. GRIEME
DESCRIPTION:DATE:ISSUE NO.:ISSUE NO.:SHEET NO.:SHEET TITLE:5/28/2021 12:16:54 PM
PROJECT TITLE:CHK'D BY: APP'D BY:CERTIFICATION:NO
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N 7500 OLSON MEMORIAL HWYSUITE 300GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55427PHONE: 763-252-6800FAX: 952-831-1268WWW.WENCK.COMSKB ENVIRONMENTAL
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA 550683053-20-511MDH RAG TJS05/27/2021312/15/2020 CLIENT REVIEW SET 1
02/26/2021 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 2
05/27/2021 FINAL SUBMITTAL TO CITY 3 SANITARY SEWERIIWATERMAINHYDRANTGATE VALVELOT LINEEASEMENT LINESETBACK LINERIGHT OF WAY LINESECTION LINEQUARTER LINEEXISTING EASEMENT LINEEXISTING PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY BOUNDARYPROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR902PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR900SANITARY MANHOLELEGENDC-401ENLARGED UTILITYPLAN
FMFMFMFMFMFMRECYCLING BUILDINGGEM ASH BUILDINGMAINTENANCEBUILDINGSTORAGE BUNKERSTORMWATER PONDEXISTING RESIDENCEINFILTRATION BASINSTORMWATER POND INFILTRATION BASINHIGHWAY 55OFFICEPROPOSED SCREENINGBERM FOOTPRINT(8' HIGH, 6' WIDE TOP)DWN BY:ISSUE DATE:PROJECT NO.:M:\3053\20-511 Rosemount East Expansion\DESIGN\CAD\PLANSHEETS\L-101 LANDSCAPE PLAN 3053-20-511.dwg 5/28/2021 ROSHAAN A. GRIEME
DESCRIPTION:DATE:ISSUE NO.:ISSUE NO.:SHEET NO.:SHEET TITLE:5/28/2021 12:17:55 PM
PROJECT TITLE:CHK'D BY: APP'D BY:CERTIFICATION:NO
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N 7500 OLSON MEMORIAL HWYSUITE 300GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55427PHONE: 763-252-6800FAX: 952-831-1268WWW.WENCK.COMSKB ENVIRONMENTAL
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA 550683053-20-511MDH RAG TJS05/27/2021312/15/2020 CLIENT REVIEW SET 1
02/26/2021 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 2
05/27/2021 FINAL SUBMITTAL TO CITY 3L-101OVERALL LANDSCAPEPLANLOT LINEEASEMENT LINESETBACK LINERIGHT OF WAY LINESECTION LINEQUARTER LINEEXISTING EASEMENT LINEEXISTING PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY BOUNDARYLEGENDDECIDUOUS TREECONIFEROUS TREEORNAMENTALTREESHRUB/PERENNIAL PLANTMINNESOTA STATE SEED MIX 25-131:LOW MAINTENANCE TURFROCK MULCHMINNESOTA STATE SEED MIX 33-262:DRY SWALE / PONDLANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT CALCULATIONSCODE CALCULATIONS FOR GENERAL INDUSTRIAL (GI)1 TREE PER 3,000 SQ FT LAND AREADISTURBED AREA = 1,474,468 SQ FT (33.8 ACRES)NUMBER OF TREES NEEDED = 1,474,468 / 3,000 = 492 TREESTOTAL TREES REQUIRED FOR LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE = 492 TREES1 FOUNDATION PLANTING PER 10 LINEAR FEET OF BUILDING PERIMETERPROPOSED BUILDING PERIMETER LENGTH = 3,004 LINEAR FEET3,004 / 10 = 341 FOUNDATION PLANTINGSTOTAL FOUNDATION PLANTINGS REQUIRED FOR LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE = 341 SHRUBSTOTAL TREES PROPOSED = 492DECIDUOUS = 333 OR 68%CONIFEROUS = 159 OR 32%TOTAL SHRUBS PROPOSED = 341NUMBER OF TREES NEEDED FOR FEE IN LIEU OF = 0 (FOR 33.8 ACRE DISTURBED AREA)
FMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMRECYCLING BUILDINGMAINTENANCE BUILDINGGEM ASH BUILDINGHIGHWAY 55INFILTRATION BASININFILTRATION BASININFILTRATION BASINSTORAGE BUNKER
DWN BY:ISSUE DATE:PROJECT NO.:M:\3053\20-511 Rosemount East Expansion\DESIGN\CAD\PLANSHEETS\L-101 LANDSCAPE PLAN 3053-20-511.dwg 5/28/2021 ROSHAAN A. GRIEME
DESCRIPTION:DATE:ISSUE NO.:ISSUE NO.:SHEET NO.:SHEET TITLE:5/28/2021 12:18:01 PM
PROJECT TITLE:CHK'D BY: APP'D BY:CERTIFICATION:NO
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N 7500 OLSON MEMORIAL HWYSUITE 300GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55427PHONE: 763-252-6800FAX: 952-831-1268WWW.WENCK.COMSKB ENVIRONMENTAL
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA 550683053-20-511MDH RAG TJS05/27/2021312/15/2020 CLIENT REVIEW SET 1
02/26/2021 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 2
05/27/2021 FINAL SUBMITTAL TO CITY 3L-102ENLARGEDLANDSCAPE PLANLOT LINEEASEMENT LINESETBACK LINERIGHT OF WAY LINESECTION LINEQUARTER LINEEXISTING EASEMENT LINEEXISTING PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY BOUNDARYLEGENDROCK MULCH(CO) HACKBERRY(AS) NORTHERN FLARE MAPLE(QE) NORTHERN PIN OAK(MP) PRAIRIE ROSE CRABAPPLE(PR) RED NORWAY PINE(PS) EASTERN WHITE PINE(CS) ARCTIC FIRE DOGWOOD(DL) DWARF HONEYSUCKLEMINNESOTA STATE SEED MIX 25-131:LOW MAINTENANCE TURFMINNESOTA STATE SEED MIX 33-262:DRY SWALE / POND
FMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMOFFICE10,000 GSF (55'X217')HIGHWAY 55STORMWATER PONDEXISTING RESIDENCEPROPOSED SCREENINGBERM FOOTPRINT(8' HIGH, 6' WIDE TOP)DWN BY:ISSUE DATE:PROJECT NO.:M:\3053\20-511 Rosemount East Expansion\DESIGN\CAD\PLANSHEETS\L-101 LANDSCAPE PLAN 3053-20-511.dwg 5/28/2021 ROSHAAN A. GRIEME
DESCRIPTION:DATE:ISSUE NO.:ISSUE NO.:SHEET NO.:SHEET TITLE:5/28/2021 12:18:06 PM
PROJECT TITLE:CHK'D BY: APP'D BY:CERTIFICATION:NO
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N 7500 OLSON MEMORIAL HWYSUITE 300GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55427PHONE: 763-252-6800FAX: 952-831-1268WWW.WENCK.COMSKB ENVIRONMENTAL
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA 550683053-20-511MDH RAG TJS05/27/2021312/15/2020 CLIENT REVIEW SET 1
02/26/2021 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 2
05/27/2021 FINAL SUBMITTAL TO CITY 3L-103ENLARGEDLANDSCAPE PLANLOT LINEEASEMENT LINESETBACK LINERIGHT OF WAY LINESECTION LINEQUARTER LINEEXISTING EASEMENT LINEEXISTING PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY BOUNDARYLEGENDROCK MULCH(CO) HACKBERRY(AS) NORTHERN FLARE MAPLE(QE) NORTHERN PIN OAK(MP) PRAIRIE ROSE CRABAPPLE(PR) RED NORWAY PINE(PS) EASTERN WHITE PINE(CS) ARCTIC FIRE DOGWOOD(DL) DWARF HONEYSUCKLEMINNESOTA STATE SEED MIX 25-131:LOW MAINTENANCE TURFMINNESOTA STATE SEED MIX 33-262:DRY SWALE / POND
INFILTRATION BASINEHLERS PATHDWN BY:ISSUE DATE:PROJECT NO.:M:\3053\20-511 Rosemount East Expansion\DESIGN\CAD\PLANSHEETS\L-101 LANDSCAPE PLAN 3053-20-511.dwg 5/28/2021 ROSHAAN A. GRIEME
DESCRIPTION:DATE:ISSUE NO.:ISSUE NO.:SHEET NO.:SHEET TITLE:5/28/2021 12:18:11 PM
PROJECT TITLE:CHK'D BY: APP'D BY:CERTIFICATION:NO
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N 7500 OLSON MEMORIAL HWYSUITE 300GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55427PHONE: 763-252-6800FAX: 952-831-1268WWW.WENCK.COMSKB ENVIRONMENTAL
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA 550683053-20-511MDH RAG TJS05/27/2021312/15/2020 CLIENT REVIEW SET 1
02/26/2021 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 2
05/27/2021 FINAL SUBMITTAL TO CITY 3L-104ENLARGEDLANDSCAPE PLANLOT LINEEASEMENT LINESETBACK LINERIGHT OF WAY LINESECTION LINEQUARTER LINEEXISTING EASEMENT LINEEXISTING PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY BOUNDARYLEGENDROCK MULCH(CO) HACKBERRY(AS) NORTHERN FLARE MAPLE(QE) NORTHERN PIN OAK(MP) PRAIRIE ROSE CRABAPPLE(PR) RED NORWAY PINE(PS) EASTERN WHITE PINE(CS) ARCTIC FIRE DOGWOOD(DL) DWARF HONEYSUCKLEMINNESOTA STATE SEED MIX 25-131:LOW MAINTENANCE TURFMINNESOTA STATE SEED MIX 33-262:DRY SWALE / POND
L-105ENLARGEDLANDSCAPE PLANLOT LINEEASEMENT LINESETBACK LINERIGHT OF WAY LINESECTION LINEQUARTER LINEEXISTING EASEMENT LINEEXISTING PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY BOUNDARYLEGENDROCK MULCH(CO) HACKBERRY(AS) NORTHERN FLARE MAPLE(QE) NORTHERN PIN OAK(MP) PRAIRIE ROSE CRABAPPLE(PR) RED NORWAY PINE(PS) EASTERN WHITE PINE(CS) ARCTIC FIRE DOGWOOD(DL) DWARF HONEYSUCKLEMINNESOTA STATE SEED MIX 25-131:LOW MAINTENANCE TURFMINNESOTA STATE SEED MIX 33-262:DRY SWALE / PONDDWN BY:ISSUE DATE:PROJECT NO.:M:\3053\20-511 Rosemount East Expansion\DESIGN\CAD\PLANSHEETS\L-101 LANDSCAPE PLAN 3053-20-511.dwg 5/28/2021 ROSHAAN A. GRIEME
DESCRIPTION:DATE:ISSUE NO.:ISSUE NO.:SHEET NO.:SHEET TITLE:5/28/2021 12:18:17 PM
PROJECT TITLE:CHK'D BY: APP'D BY:CERTIFICATION:NO
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N 7500 OLSON MEMORIAL HWYSUITE 300GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55427PHONE: 763-252-6800FAX: 952-831-1268WWW.WENCK.COMSKB ENVIRONMENTAL
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA 550683053-20-511MDH RAG TJS05/27/2021312/15/2020 CLIENT REVIEW SET 1
02/26/2021 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 2
05/27/2021 FINAL SUBMITTAL TO CITY 3
DWN BY:ISSUE DATE:PROJECT NO.:M:\3053\20-511 Rosemount East Expansion\DESIGN\CAD\PLANSHEETS\L-101 LANDSCAPE PLAN 3053-20-511.dwg 5/28/2021 ROSHAAN A. GRIEME
DESCRIPTION:DATE:ISSUE NO.:ISSUE NO.:SHEET NO.:SHEET TITLE:5/28/2021 12:18:18 PM
PROJECT TITLE:CHK'D BY: APP'D BY:CERTIFICATION:NO
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N 7500 OLSON MEMORIAL HWYSUITE 300GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55427PHONE: 763-252-6800FAX: 952-831-1268WWW.WENCK.COMSKB ENVIRONMENTAL
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA 550683053-20-511MDH RAG TJS05/27/2021312/15/2020 CLIENT REVIEW SET 1
02/26/2021 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 2
05/27/2021 FINAL SUBMITTAL TO CITY 3L-801LANDSCAPE NOTES &DETAILS1. TREES AND SHRUBS SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE QUANTITY, SIZE, GENUS, SPECIES, AND VARIETY ASCHOSEN BY THE OWNER/OWNER AS LISTED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN L 101.2. TREES AND SHRUBS SHALL BE HEALTHY, VIGOROUS STOCK, GROWN IN RECOGNIZED NURSERY INACCORDANCE WITH GOOD HORTICULTURAL PRACTICE AND FREE OF DISEASE, INSECTS, EGGS, LARVAE,AND DEFECTS.3. OWNER RETAINS THE RIGHT TO INSPECT TREES AND SHRUBS FOR SIZE AND CONDITION OF BALLS ANDROOT SYSTEMS, INSECTS, INJURIES, AND LATENT DEFECTS, AND TO REJECT UNSATISFACTORY ORDEFECTIVE MATERIAL AT ANY TIME DURING PROGRESS OF WORK.4. NURSERY STOCK SHALL BE DELIVERED DIRECTLY FROM NURSERY. HEEL IN IMMEDIATELY UPONDELIVERY IF NOT TO BE PLANTED WITHIN FOUR HOURS, COVERING WITH MOIST SOIL OR MULCH TOPROTECT FROM DRYING. STORE PLANTS IN SHADE AND PROTECT FROM WEATHER.5. PROTECTION FROM EXTREMES IN EXPOSURE AND ROUGH HANDLING SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR ALLPLANT MATERIALS DURING TRANSPORT AND STORAGE.6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER 48 HOURS PRIOR TO PLANTING SO THAT A MUTUALLYAGREEABLE TIME MAY BE ARRANGED FOR INSPECTION.7. LAY OUT INDIVIDUAL TREE AND SHRUB LOCATIONS WITH STAKES CENTERED AT PROPOSED PLANTINGLOCATIONS FOR APPROVAL BY OWNER.8. DO NOT START PLANTING WORK UNTIL LAYOUT IS APPROVED BY THE OWNER.1. UPON APPROVAL OF STAKING LOCATIONS CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE PLANTING HOLES CENTEREDAT STAKED LOCATIONS.2. DIG HOLES AS DETAILED AND TO A DIAMETER A MINIMUM OF TWO TIMES THE DIAMETER OF THE ROOTBALL OR CONTAINER.3. REMOVE STICKS, RUBBISH, FOREIGN MATERIALS AND UNDESIRABLE PLANTS AND THEIR ROOTS.REMOVE STONES MEASURING OVER 1-1/2 INCHES IN ANY DIMENSIONS.4. SET BALLED AND BURLAPPED (B&B) STOCK ON LAYER OF COMPACTED PLANTING SOIL MIXTURE, PLUMBAND IN CENTER OF PIT OR TRENCH WITH TOP OF ALL AT SAME ELEVATION AS ADJACENT FINISHEDLANDSCAPE GRADES.5. ROOT FLARE OF THE TREE MUST BE ABOVE FINISHED GRADE.6. CUT ALL CORDS AND TWIN AND REMOVE WIRE BASKET AND BURLAP FROM TOP AND SIDES OF BALLS;RETAIN BURLAP ON BOTTOMS.7. WHEN SET, PLACE ADDITIONAL PLANTING SOIL BACKFILL AROUND BASE AND SIDES OF BALL, AND WORKEACH LAYER TO SETTLE BACKFILL AND ELIMINATE VOIDS AND AIR POCKETS.8. WHEN EXCAVATION IS APPROXIMATELY 2/3 FULL, WATER THOROUGHLY BEFORE PLACING REMAINDEROF BACKFILL.9. REPEAT WATERING UNTIL NO MORE IS ABSORBED. WATER AGAIN AFTER PLACING FINAL LAYER OFBACKFILL.10. FOR CONTAINER GROWN STOCK, SAME AS FOR BALLED AND BURLAPPED STOCK, EXCEPT CUTCONTAINERS ON SIDES INTO QUARTERS WITH SHEAR. REMOVE CONTAINER BEFORE SETTING PLANTSO AS NOT TO DAMAGE ROOT BALLS.11. WATER EACH PLANT WITHIN 2 HOURS OF PLANTING.12. ALL PLANTINGS TO BE MULCHED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE PLAN.13. PLACE 4-INCH THICKNESS OF MULCH AROUND TREES AND SHRUBS WITHIN A PERIOD OF 48 HOURSAFTER THE SECOND WATERING.14. DO NOT PLACE MULCH IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH TRUNKS OR STEMS.1. LANDSCAPE WORK WILL BE INSPECTED FOR ACCEPTANCE IN PARTS AGREEABLE TO THE OWNER,PROVIDED WORK OFFERED FOR INSPECTION IS COMPLETE, INCLUDING MAINTENANCE, FOR THEPORTION IN QUESTION.2. AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE ESTABLISHMENT PERIOD, WHICH WILL BE ONE YEAR FOLLOWING INITIALINSTALLATION A FINAL INSPECTION OF PLANTING WILL BE MADE TO DETERMINE THE CONDITIONS OFAREAS SPECIFIED FOR LANDSCAPING.3. WHEN INSPECTED LANDSCAPE WORK DOES NOT COMPLY WITH REQUIREMENTS, REPLACE REJECTEDWORK AND CONTINUE SPECIFIED MAINTENANCE UNTIL RE-INSPECTED BY OWNER AND FOUND TO BEACCEPTABLE. REMOVE REJECTED PLANTS AND MATERIALS FROM SITE.1. WHEN INSPECTED LANDSCAPE WORK DOES NOT COMPLY WITH REQUIREMENTS, REPLACE REJECTEDWORK AND CONTINUE SPECIFIED MAINTENANCE UNTIL RE-INSPECTED BY OWNER AND FOUND TO BEACCEPTABLE. REMOVE REJECTED PLANTS AND MATERIALS FROM SITE.2. BEGIN MAINTENANCE IMMEDIATELY AFTER PLANTING.3. MAINTAIN TREES AND BUSHES INCLUDING WATERING FOR ONE YEAR AFTER ACCEPTANCE BY OWNER.IT IS CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY FOR COORDINATE WATERING.4. TRIM, PRUNE, REMOVE CLIPPINGS AND DEAD OR BROKEN BRANCHES, AND TREAT PRUNED AREAS ANDOTHER WOUNDS.5. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S OPTION WHETHER OR NOT TO STAKE TREES. THE CONTRACTOR ISRESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING TREES IN AN UPRIGHT POSITION THROUGHOUT THE ONE-YEARGUARANTEE PERIOD.1. PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE GUARANTEED FOR ONE FULL YEAR AFTER OWNER ACCEPTANCE AND SHALLBE ALIVE AND IN SATISFACTORY CONDITION AT THE END OF THE GUARANTEE PERIOD. SUCHGUARANTEE EXCLUDES VANDALISM.2. AT THE END OF THE ONE-YEAR GUARANTEE PERIOD, INSPECTION WILL BE MADE BY THE OWNER UPONWRITTEN NOTICE BY THE CONTRACTOR AT LEAST FIVE DAYS BEFORE THE ANTICIPATED DATE. ANYPLANT MATERIAL REQUIRED UNDER THE CONTRACT THAT IS DEAD OR NOT IN SATISFACTORYCONDITION, AS DETERMINED BY THE OWNER, SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE, AND SHALL BEREPLACED AS SOON AS CONDITIONS PERMIT DURING THE NORMAL PLANTING SEASONS.3. THE OPINION OF THE OWNER SHALL GOVERN IN ANY AND ALL DISPUTES BY THE CONTRACTORREGARDING THE CONDITION AND DISPOSITION OF UNSATISFACTORY MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES ORREJECTED PLANTS.4. ALL REPLACEMENTS SHALL BE PLANT MATERIAL OF THE SAME KIND AND SIZE AS SPECIFIED IN THEPLANT LIST. REPLACEMENT COSTS SHALL BE BORNE BY THE CONTRACTOR.5. REPLACEMENT PLANTINGS REQUIRED AT THE END OF THE GUARANTEE PERIOD ARE NOT TO BEGUARANTEED. THE PLANT MATERIAL IS SUBJECT TO INSPECTION AND REJECTION BY THE OWNERBEFORE AND AFTER PLANTING.1. EDGE RESTRAINT BETWEEN PLANTING BEDS AND TURF SHALL BE BLACK COMMERCIAL GRADELANDSCAPE EDGING BY COL-MET OR APPROVED EQUAL, 6"x12 GAUGE STEEL.2. THE ESTABLISHMENT PERIOD FOR SEED SHALL BEGIN IMMEDIATELY AFTER INSTALLATION, WITH THEAPPROVAL OF THE OWNER, AND CONTINUE UNTIL THE DATE THAT THE OWNER PERFORMS A FINALINSPECTION.3. THE ESTABLISHMENT PERIOD FOR SEEDED AREAS IS 1 YEAR.4. SEED SHALL CONFORM TO MNDOT SPEC. 3878 SEED; SEED SPECIES COMPOSITION SHALL BE MINNESOTASTATE SEED MIX 25-131 - LOW MAINTENANCE TURF AND MINNESOTA STATE SEED MIX 33-262 - DRYSWALE/POND.5. FERTILIZER SHALL CONFORM TO MNDOT SPEC. 3881, TYPE 2 PHOSPHOROUS-FREE.6. FERTILIZER SHALL HAVE A FORMULA (N-P-K) AS DETERMINED BY THE RESULTS OF A SOIL TEST.CONTRACTOR TO CONDUCT SOIL TEST AND PROVIDE RESULTS ALONG WITH RECOMMENDED FERTILIZERFORMULA TO OWNER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO APPLICATION.7. TOPSOIL SHALL BE IMPORTED AND CONFORM TO MNDOT SPEC. 3877.2B LOAM TOPSOIL BORROW.TOPSOIL SHALL BE SCREENED, PULVERIZED, AND CONTAIN LESS THAN 30% CLAY.8. 6" OF TOPSOIL SHALL BE PLACED IN ALL SEEDING AREAS.9. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR WATER DURING THE PLANTING ESTABLISHMENT PERIOD.LANDSCAPE NOTESTURF RESTORATION NOTESINSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCEPLANTING NOTESMAINTENANCE NOTESGUARANTEE AND REPLACEMENTSPRUNE ANY DAMAGED OR BROKENBRANCHES. DO NOT CUT LEADER.ROOT FLARE MUST BE ABOVE FINISHED GRADE.DO NOT COVER ROOT FLARE WITH MULCHDOUBLE SHRED, HARD WOOD MULCH (4") MIN.ROUGH THE SIDES OF THE HOLE SO THEYARE NOT GLAZED FROM DIGGING.LOOSEN SIDES OF ROOT BALL AND PRUNEDAMAGED, DESICCATED, OR GIRDLING ROOTS.SET ROOT BALL ON SOIL BACKFILL SO THAT TOPOF ROOT BALL IS ABOVE FINISHED GRADE.BACKFILL AROUND THE ROOT BALL WITH LOOSESOIL. WORK SOIL TO SETTLE AND ELIMINATE VOIDSAND AIR POCKETS. WATER THOROUGHLY WHENBACKFILLED 2/3 FULL AND ALLOW TO SETTLE.2X ROOT BALL DIA. MINDECIDUOUS TREE PLANTINGSPECIES AS SHOW ON PLAN1L-107NOT TO SCALECONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING2L-107NOT TO SCALE2X ROOT BALL DIA. MINPRUNE ANY DAMAGED OR BROKEN BRANCHES. DONOT CUT LEADER.ROOT FLARE MUST BE ABOVE FINISHED GRADE.DO NOT COVER ROOT FLARE WITH MULCHDOUBLE SHRED, HARD WOOD MULCH (3") MIN.ROUGH THE SIDES OF THE HOLE SO THEY ARE NOTGLAZED FROM DIGGING.LOOSEN SIDES OF ROOT BALL AND PRUNE DAMAGED,DESICCATED, OR GIRDLING ROOTS.SET ROOT BALL ON SOIL BACKFILL SO THAT TOP OF ROOTBALL IS ABOVE FINISHED GRADE.BACKFILL AROUND THE ROOT BALL WITH LOOSE SOIL.WORK SOIL TO SETTLE AND ELIMINATE VOIDS AND AIRPOCKETS. WATER THOROUGHLY WHEN BACKFILLED 2/3FULL AND ALLOW TO SETTLE.SPECIES AS SHOW ON PLANPERENNIAL PLANTINGROCK MULCH (2") MIN.COMMERCIAL METALEDGING, SEE PLANCONTAINER GROW MATERIALSSHALL HAVE ROOTS HANDLOOSENED UPON PLANTINGUNDISTURBED SUBGRADESCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OFENTIRE BED WITH SPADE BY HANDTO BIND WITH PLANTING SOIL6"MINPREPARE SOIL FORTHE ENTIRE BEDPLANTING SOIL18" MIN.SEE PLAN3L-107NOT TO SCALE
PROPOSED LANDFILLEXPANSION AREAPROPOSED BUSINESSPARK AREA870880890900910920930940950960970980990880880 890890900900910910920920930930940 940950950960970980990 890900910920930940950960960880890900
8728748768788828848868888928948968
9
8 9029029
0
2 904904904906 9069
0
0
8
9
8 902904870880890
890
890900900
900
86286486686887287487687888288488688
8
888
888
8
9
2
892 892
8
9
4
894 894
8
9
6
896 896898898
89
8
902902
902904906840 840840840
850
860870
880
880
890890
842844846848
852
854
856
858858858862864866
866
866868872874876
878
878882
882
884
884
886
886 888888 880890890 878878878882884886888FMFMFM1652176221923032304231023322334233523492421244024572673267526762678955763666869707288971212309267268926902691269726982699270031632856779498397194195196236426432670267426822696270427052706270727082709271227142715271627272728283284285286291297347393393111268726932695273138712012212512616316418718819120102018201920202021202220752196236023822402240324042552632642640264426452646264726512652265826592662664266526662670267126722674267726792683268827327302752762772782993003173213263333363403543553563603613623633643713723733743753803936773788287939620742102210321052106210721082109211021112114211521172118211921202121212221232125212721282129213021322134213521362138213921402141214321462148214921502151215221542155215821592161216221702171218121852199220023202325232723282329233123332336233723382346234824062411245224792495249627202722294318352359367368385386xx101671712399272829319269226942686268610110210310410510610710911110112113117119121241314161718185186189191971982003201720502076210421162131213321422163216421652166218621952198222201220623012305232123222323232423262330233923402341234223432344234523472351235923972398242401240524162417242824292430243724412442244424482449245024622466246824722490249124972525626263826712672268026812684268527012702270327102711271327172718271927212729322325333323535335735836536937037938138839391440400414243435444647495515253545558597717475767980818485899192329168366xx2661100177209721012137215321562177218222092312231523162352235824462451246124642471247624772969920162355254273527353422085236325225326412642282287289290292295382383394396432433434436438439440442443445460461462491495496274026391161761801811821831841921931992002002200620072008201120122013201420232024202520262027202820292030203120322033203520362037203820392040204120422043204420452046204720482049205220532054207820992157219121982318231923542361236523662367236823692370237123722373237423752376237723782379238023812383238423852386238723882389239023922393239423952470257259260262264826492650265326542655265626572660266226632669267267626826927027127322733274274127422743274427452746274727482749275027932332417020012079211321242145214721602167216921722173217521792180218321922193219423072317235023572361236224262445245824632473266833434134434537640745916921973312015273627372738273911081141151181231661791902202004200520092098212112212621682174217821902323022306230823112313231423532356239824002407240824382474249424992582612667272280281288330313232032733533733833934343348363737737838384389390395399401437441444463464477484904995066061626465886990HIGHWAY 55EHLER'S PATH142ND ST EDWN BY:ISSUE DATE:PROJECT NO.:M:\3053\20-511 Rosemount East Expansion\DESIGN\CAD\PLANSHEETS\C-005 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN 3053-20-511.dwg 5/28/2021 ROSHAAN A. GRIEME
DESCRIPTION:DATE:ISSUE NO.:ISSUE NO.:SHEET NO.:SHEET TITLE:5/28/2021 2:56:00 PM
PROJECT TITLE:CHK'D BY: APP'D BY:CERTIFICATION:NO
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N 7500 OLSON MEMORIAL HWYSUITE 300GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55427PHONE: 763-252-6800FAX: 952-831-1268WWW.WENCK.COMSKB ENVIRONMENTAL
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA 550683053-20-511MDH RAG TJS05/27/2021312/15/2020 CLIENT REVIEW SET 1
02/26/2021 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 2
05/27/2021 FINAL SUBMITTAL TO CITY 3 LOT LINEEASEMENT LINERIGHT OF WAY LINESECTION LINEQUARTER LINEEXISTING EASEMENT LINEEXISTING PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY BOUNDARYLEGENDEXISTING TREE LINEEXISTING BUILDINGEXISTING MINOR CONTOUREXISTING MAJOR CONTOURXXEXISTING FENCE LINEIEXISTING WATERMAINC-005OVERALL TREEPRESERVATION PLANEXISTING DECIDUOUS TREEEXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE
890
900
892
894
8
9
6
89
8
902FMFMFM26732675267626782689269026912697269826992700397267026742682269627042705270627072708270927122714271527162727272834739326872693269527313872677267926832688273033335435535636036136236336437137237337437538039327202722352359367368385386xx269226942686268626712672268026812684268527012702270327102711271327172718271927212729332353357358365369370379381388391400435366xx2735273538238339439643243343443643843944044244344546046146249149549627402732273327412742274327442745274627472748274927503764074592736273727382739348377378384389390395745399401437441444463464477490499HIGHWAY 5588087287487687888288488616521762219230323042310233223342335234924212440245795576366686970728897121230926731632856779498194195196236426432832842852862912973931111201221251261631641871881912010201820192020202120222075219623602382240224032404255263264264026442645264626472651265226582659266266426652666267026712672267427327527627727829930031732132633634067737882879396207421022103210521062107210821092110211121142115211721182119212021212122212321252127212821292130213221342135213621382139214021412143214621482149215021512152215421552158215921612162217021712181218521992200232023252327232823292331233323362337233823462348240624112452247924952496294318101671712399272829319101102103104105106107109111101121131171191212413141617181851861891919719820032017205020762104211621312133214221632164216521662186219521982222012206230123052321232223232324232623302339234023412342234323442345234723512359239723982424012405241624172428242924302437244124422444244824492450246224662468247224902491249725256262638322325333539440414243444647495515253545558597717475767980818485899192329168266110017720972101213721532156217721822209231223152316235223582446245124612464247124762477296992016235525434220852363252253264126422822872892902922952639116176180181182183184192193199200200220062007200820112012201320142023202420252026202720282029203020312032203320352036203720382039204020412042204320442045204620472048204920522053205420782099215721912198231823192354236123652366236723682369237023712372237323742375237623772378237923802381238323842385238623872388238923902392239323942395247025725926026226482649265026532654265526562657266026622663266926726762682692702712742793233241702001207921132124214521472160216721692172217321752179218021832192219321942307231723502357236123622426244524582463247326683343413443451692197331201511081141151181231661791902202004200520092098212112212621682174217821902323022306230823112313231423532356239824002407240824382474249424992582612667272280281288330313232032733533733833934343363738485066061626465886990EHLER'S PATHDWN BY:ISSUE DATE:PROJECT NO.:M:\3053\20-511 Rosemount East Expansion\DESIGN\CAD\PLANSHEETS\C-005 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN 3053-20-511.dwg 5/28/2021 ROSHAAN A. GRIEME
DESCRIPTION:DATE:ISSUE NO.:ISSUE NO.:SHEET NO.:SHEET TITLE:5/28/2021 12:13:56 PM
PROJECT TITLE:CHK'D BY: APP'D BY:CERTIFICATION:NO
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N 7500 OLSON MEMORIAL HWYSUITE 300GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55427PHONE: 763-252-6800FAX: 952-831-1268WWW.WENCK.COMSKB ENVIRONMENTAL
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA 550683053-20-511MDH RAG TJS05/27/2021312/15/2020 CLIENT REVIEW SET 1
02/26/2021 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 2
05/27/2021 FINAL SUBMITTAL TO CITY 3C-006ENLARGED TREEPRESERVATION PLAN1C-006TREE PRESERVATION PLAN - NORTH1C-006TREE PRESERVATION PLAN - SOUTH
DWN BY:ISSUE DATE:PROJECT NO.:M:\3053\20-511 Rosemount East Expansion\DESIGN\CAD\PLANSHEETS\C-005 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN 3053-20-511.dwg 5/28/2021 ROSHAAN A. GRIEME
DESCRIPTION:DATE:ISSUE NO.:ISSUE NO.:SHEET NO.:SHEET TITLE:5/28/2021 12:13:58 PM
PROJECT TITLE:CHK'D BY: APP'D BY:CERTIFICATION:NO
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N 7500 OLSON MEMORIAL HWYSUITE 300GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55427PHONE: 763-252-6800FAX: 952-831-1268WWW.WENCK.COMSKB ENVIRONMENTAL
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA 550683053-20-511MDH RAG TJS05/27/2021312/15/2020 CLIENT REVIEW SET 1
02/26/2021 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 2
05/27/2021 FINAL SUBMITTAL TO CITY 3C-007TREE PRESERVATIONTABLE
APPENDIX D
Tree Inventory
Technical
Memo
Wenck | Colorado | Georgia | Minnesota | North Dakota | Wyoming
Toll Free 800-472-2232 Web wenck.com
To: Geoffrey Strack – Central Region Engineer – Waste Connections/SKB
From: Lucas Mueller, Wenck Associates, Inc.
Copy: Tom Shustarich, Wenck Associates, Inc.
Date: 12/18/2020
Subject: SKB Rosemount Tree Survey
This technical memorandum describes the tree survey methods and results of the SKB site
in Rosemount, MN. The specific location of the project can be seen in Figure 1.
Tree Survey Methods
Wenck Associates (Wenck) completed a tree survey for the area bounded in red on Figure 2.
The survey was completed in two phases. Phase I was conducted in 2016, with the south
and southwest portion of the site being surveyed and tagged. Phase II of the tre e survey
was done in 2020 and consisted of the southeast portion and northwest portion of the site.
In accordance with Rosemount City Code Section 11 -6-3 part E, Tree Preservation, Wenck
staff tagged, identified and measured healthy deciduous hardwoods , deciduous softwoods,
and conifers that met or exceeded the following minimum sizes:
•Deciduous softwoods: minimum 12 inches diameter at breast height (DBH, 4.5 feet
above ground). As defined by City Code, softwoods are cottonwood, aspen, popl ar,
box elder, willow, silver maple, and elm.
•Deciduous hardwoods: minimum 6 inches DBH
•Conifers: minimum 12 feet in height
Numbered aluminum tags were attached to eligible trees. For deciduous trees, DBH was
estimated to the nearest inch, calibrated with a DBH tape measure. For conifers, height was
estimated to the nearest foot by comparing tree height to the height of the surveyors.
Tag number, species, size, and GPS coordinates for each tree were logged into a submeter
Trimble R1 and Tablet GPS.
Results
As a result of following the City of Rosemount’s City Code, a total of 743 trees were
surveyed and tagged within the project area in 2016 and 2020. Trees tagged in 2016 are
classified as yellow, while trees tagged in 2020 are classified as green. Details including Tag
#, Tree Species, DBH, Height, Comments, Northing, and Easting can be seen in Table 1 of
this memo. In addition to the 763 individually tagged trees, two monoculture areas were
observed on the north side of the project area. Th ese areas were surveyed by creating a
GPS’d polygon around the monoculture areas and conducting a stem count within the
polygon. Only trees meeting or exceeding City Code were counted. These monoculture
areas (42 Eastern Red Cedar and 64 Red Pine) were then added to the individual tagged
trees for a total of 849 trees.
2
Sincerely,
Wenck Associates, Inc.
12/18/2020
Lucas Mueller
3
Figures
WisconsinMinnesotaRice
County
Hennepin
County
Ramsey
County
Scott
County
Goodhue
County
Dakota
County
Pierce
County
St. Croix
County
Path: L:\3053\20-511\Pro\Tree_Survey\Tree_Survey.aprx
12/18/2020 10:08 AM MueKJ0907 Layout: Site Location
Figure 1
DEC 2020
Site Location
WASTE CONNECTIONS
¯2,000 0 2,0001,000
Feet
USGS 7.5 Minute Quadrangle (2016)
Project Area
k
k kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
kkkkkkkkkkkk
kkkkkkkkk kkkkkk
kkkkkkkkk kkkk
kk
kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
kk
k kkkkkkkkk
kkkkkkk
kk
kkkkkkkkkk
k kkkkk
kkk kkkkkkkk
k
k k
kk
k
kkkkkkkk
kkkk k
kkk
kkkkkk
kkk
kk
kkkkkkkkkkkkk
kkkk
kkk
kk
kk
kkkkkkkk
kkkkkk
kkkk
kkkkkk
kkkkkk
kkkkkkk
kkkkkkkkkk
kkkkkkkkkkk
kkkkk
kkkk
kk
kk
k k
kkkkkkkk
kkk
kkk
kkk
kkk
k
kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
kkkk
kkkk
kk
kkkk
k
kkkkkkkk
kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
k
kkkkkkkkkkkk
kkkkkkkkk
k
k
kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
kk
k
kkkk
kk
k kk kk
k
k
k
kkkkkkkkkk
k
k
k
kk
kkk
kk kk
k kkkk
kkkkkkkkk
kkk
kkkk
kk
kk kk
kk
k
kkk
kkk
k
k k
kkkk
kk
kk
k
k
kk
kk
kk
k
k
k kk
k
k k
k
k
k
k
k k
k
k
k
kk
k
k
k
kk
k
kk
kk
k
k
k
k
kkk
k
k
k
k
k
kk
k
k
kkk
k
k
kk
kkk
k
k
k
kk
k
kk
k
kkk
k
k
kkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
k kkkk
kk
k
k
k
k
k
kk
kkkk
k
k
k
k
k
k kkk
kk
kkk
k
k
k
kkk
k
k
kk
k
k
k
k
k
k
kkk
kkkkkkkkkk
64 Red pine
(20-30 ft tall)
42 Eastern red cedar
(15-25 ft tall)¾¾Ç5555
Emery Ave E140th
S
t
E
Path: L:\3053\20-511\Pro\Tree_Survey\Tree_Survey.aprx
12/18/2020 10:21 AM MueKJ0907 Layout: Tree Survey Results Map
2020 Aerial Photograph (Source: MnGeo)
Figure 2
DEC 2020
Tree Survey Results Map
WASTE CONNECTIONS
¯450 0 450225
Feet
k Tree Survey Locations - 2017
k Tree Survey Locations - 2020
Tree Survey Location Areas 2020
Project Area
4
Table 1 – Tree Survey Results
TagID Species DBH Ht__ft_Comments Northing Easting
100 American Elm 15 199354.6174 581966.5324
165 American Elm 18 199398.3961 582047.9014
177 American Elm 18 199271.1748 582122.6033
2097 American Elm 16 199237.6198 582292.3045
2101 American Elm 14 199782.123 580992.0867
2137 American Elm 15 199680.3054 581177.9463
2153 American Elm 17 199681.7622 581179.2257
2156 American Elm 13.5 199679.6623 581156.391
2176 American Elm 12.5 199587.8608 581630.0137
2177 American Elm 13 199638.4666 581279.0495
2182 American Elm 14 199654.7513 581403.1109
2209 American Elm 16 199656.5795 581355.6463
2219 American Elm 19 199673.7423 581655.878
2303 American Elm 13 199902.7452 581204.2892
2304 American Elm 8 199898.7944 581204.2419
2310 American Elm 13 199860.4624 581153.9253
2312 American Elm 28 199956.1362 581120.6833
2315 American Elm 12 199965.0965 581058.5484
2316 American Elm 21 199935.0996 581056.1997
2332 American Elm 24 199825.7917 581312.241
2334 American Elm 18 199794.2615 581279.2094
2335 American Elm 12.5 199822.478 581287.7236
2349 American Elm 17 199717.8714 581549.6731
2352 American Elm 13 200101.9617 581004.2679
2358 American Elm 30 200014.0381 581019.1179
2421 American Elm 27 199655.7611 581513.8977
2440 American Elm 12 199706.9335 581420.5529
2446 American Elm 10 199566.9296 581509.9082
2451 American Elm 14 199484.3699 581616.0801
2457 American Elm 7 199657.3672 581485.1139
2461 American Elm 9 199680.8551 581304.0888
2464 American Elm 22 199659.518 581358.4127
2471 American Elm 12 199582.3578 581466.0433
2476 American Elm 13 199593.1085 581476.0364
2477 American Elm 12.5 199545.8838 581526.9483
267 American Elm 12 199128.2655 582816.2428
2673 American Elm 26 201932.9599 580990.4109
2675 American Elm 16 201858.335 581025.7265
2676 American Elm 15 201852.3283 581033.7206
2678 American Elm 35 201756.8376 581004.674
296 American Elm 20 198958.9997 583095.5262
95 American Elm 15 199486.0173 582040.6474
99 American Elm 12 199376.2195 581977.583
57 Basswood 9 199419.6129 581941.0746
63 Basswood 9 199466.7968 581919.0051
66 Basswood 8 199409.1079 581954.3972
68 Basswood 8 199413.4541 581963.5435
69 Basswood 10 199409.7518 581964.9992
70 Basswood 6 199410.2036 581977.8782
72 Basswood 6 199422.9139 581985.0393
88 Basswood 12 2 trunks 199452.8335 581942.3755
97 Basswood 6 199419.4934 581993.7349
121 Black Cherry 25 multi trunk bc 199503.076 582207.9937
2016 Black Cherry 15 199215.5349 582419.861
2309 Black Cherry 8 199897.2935 581147.6248
2355 Black Cherry 18.5 200043.6214 581033.2894
254 Black Cherry 6 198927.5914 583237.6766
267 Black Cherry 13 199128.2655 582816.2428
2689 Black Cherry 8 201741.9491 581349.8042
2690 Black Cherry 9 201737.1787 581338.0764
2691 Black Cherry 7 201751.0001 581328.4627
2697 Black Cherry 9 201856.4584 581210.8788
2698 Black Cherry 7 201842.3151 581183.245
2699 Black Cherry 8 x 201823.4647 581185.5525
2700 Black Cherry 6 201842.512 581168.4568
2735 Black Cherry 12 201870.2823 581404.6411
2735 Black Cherry 10 201833.6118 581424.3744
316 Black Cherry 10 199317.2544 582162.2725
328 Black Cherry 9 199296.2887 582228.878
342 Black Cherry 10 199549.1382 582385.6748
56 Black Cherry 8 199426.7444 581932.8913
77 Black Cherry 6 199430.0044 581980.6787
94 Black Cherry 24 black cherry,2 trunks 199472.5335 582056.4618
98 Black Cherry 7 199417.485 581992.1367
397 Boxelder 16 X 202108.2263 581267.4088
194 Boxelder 22 multi trunk 199099.6436 582882.6766
195 Boxelder 21 multi trunk 199078.5712 582883.4941
196 Boxelder 29 multi trunk 199035.7954 582949.3681
2085 Boxelder 13 199321.2248 582071.5855
2363 Boxelder 14 198967.7118 582966.5268
2364 Boxelder 14 199100.4862 582873.2196
252 Boxelder 23 198961.2259 582890.9785
253 Boxelder 12 198891.7648 583253.3832
2641 Boxelder 15 199012.7242 582972.8603
2642 Boxelder 16 198998.9726 582972.4923
2643 Boxelder 12 199114.9483 582818.1813
2670 Boxelder 24 201981.9836 580997.7564
2674 Boxelder 14 201910.7687 580994.1494
2682 Boxelder 15 201728.6524 581215.7412
2696 Boxelder 14 201834.4212 581230.0835
2704 Boxelder 13 201853.5933 581061.1465
2705 Boxelder 14 201890.0295 581046.9152
2706 Boxelder 15 201887.4057 581062.0473
2707 Boxelder 12 201927.5215 581040.9818
2708 Boxelder 15 201962.2855 581045.9302
2709 Boxelder 22 x 201940.2239 581069.5022
2712 Boxelder 12 201944.6598 581099.4296
2714 Boxelder 12 201920.9901 581158.4829
2715 Boxelder 18 201896.8275 581164.0619
2716 Boxelder 14 201887.5254 581175.1818
2727 Boxelder 13 201942.0176 581259.555
2728 Boxelder 20 201933.9601 581253.6986
282 Boxelder 22 198988.0992 582976.6864
283 Boxelder 13 199042.4686 582947.5044
284 Boxelder 13 199050.4263 582951.3321
285 Boxelder 13 199052.2976 582954.4729
286 Boxelder 14 199043.2049 582922.1212
287 Boxelder 14 198995.4483 582972.1184
289 Boxelder 12 199044.7861 582895.5494
290 Boxelder 12 199019.4271 582865.4417
291 Boxelder 14 199048.8893 582907.6221
292 Boxelder 28 199006.6565 582884.5471
295 Boxelder 12 198939.4147 583012.6731
297 Boxelder 14 198905.3123 583129.4284
347 Boxelder 17 201948.5935 581278.1637
382 Boxelder 14 201997.1519 581319.62
383 Boxelder 16 202009.421 581318.8203
393 Boxelder 14 199041.8186 582946.8784
393 Boxelder 14 202123.098 581196.4974
394 Boxelder 14 201998.4 581252.7374
396 Boxelder 12 202047.6308 581278.5525
432 Boxelder 32 201922.897 581345.3308
433 Boxelder 16 X 201978.2347 581343.1551
434 Boxelder 14 X 201969.2056 581300.9339
436 Boxelder 14 201982.9829 581406.3941
438 Boxelder 14 201996.0537 581374.33
439 Boxelder 12 201971.2024 581416.0922
440 Boxelder 16 201987.3321 581425.5074
442 Boxelder 14 X 201952.2798 581424.8491
443 Boxelder 16 201923.5251 581500.1879
445 Boxelder 14 201959.9589 581364.8569
460 Boxelder 17 X 201906.9602 581389.1531
461 Boxelder 14 201956.1207 581508.8209
462 Boxelder 16 201900.7758 581471.9826
491 Boxelder 13 201911.72 581347.3197
495 Boxelder 13 202001.9174 581381.4777
496 Boxelder 17 201960.8199 581378.9014
2740 Bur Oak 18 201890.5999 581484.856
111 Cottonwood 45 199582.1697 581714.0968
2687 Cottonwood 18 201715.8819 581431.2052
2693 Cottonwood 31 201765.741 581293.3786
2695 Cottonwood 35 201797.8687 581254.3584
2731 Cottonwood 25 201837.008 581358.627
387 Cottonwood 23 202155.3582 581174.3119
2639 Crab Apple 11 crab apple 198991.433 583121.9381
116 Eastern Red Cedar 30 199491.3841 581640.4547
120 Eastern Red Cedar 35 199507.2432 582225.9596
122 Eastern Red Cedar 15 199463.8246 582144.5981
125 Eastern Red Cedar 35 199324.3778 582147.8096
126 Eastern Red Cedar 15 199403.768 582198.8649
163 Eastern Red Cedar 15 199377.0129 582070.8815
164 Eastern Red Cedar 35 199380.4603 582044.7948
176 Eastern Red Cedar 15 rc 199247.1335 582220.2171
180 Eastern Red Cedar 25 199263.5561 582198.5045
181 Eastern Red Cedar 15 199254.9397 582196.1357
182 Eastern Red Cedar 20 199272.2068 582205.3227
183 Eastern Red Cedar 20 199269.7149 582177.8989
184 Eastern Red Cedar 35 199283.3726 582173.4337
187 Eastern Red Cedar 35 199417.7819 582303.7146
188 Eastern Red Cedar 35 199287.9532 582289.6244
191 Eastern Red Cedar 12 199365.817 582289.2254
192 Eastern Red Cedar 35 199220.0467 582336.2056
193 Eastern Red Cedar 35 199219.524 582328.4847
199 Eastern Red Cedar 15 198879.606 583301.4485
200 Eastern Red Cedar 15 198835.1682 583260.1505
2002 Eastern Red Cedar 40 199200.4222 582489.9204
2006 Eastern Red Cedar 20 199135.2226 582471.583
2007 Eastern Red Cedar 15 199145.0215 582471.729
2008 Eastern Red Cedar 12 199136.6242 582449.7473
2010 Eastern Red Cedar 40 199204.4383 582485.9861
2011 Eastern Red Cedar 35 199192.2134 582479.3423
2012 Eastern Red Cedar 40 199193.1165 582471.7002
2013 Eastern Red Cedar 30 199159.6365 582408.0619
2014 Eastern Red Cedar 35 199165.5256 582430.0994
2018 Eastern Red Cedar 25 199229.4776 582425.904
2019 Eastern Red Cedar 25 199249.8891 582418.6745
2020 Eastern Red Cedar 25 199250.6392 582428.4226
2021 Eastern Red Cedar 20 199284.4532 582448.283
2022 Eastern Red Cedar 15 199284.175 582495.0689
2023 Eastern Red Cedar 20 199148.5956 582509.5515
2024 Eastern Red Cedar 25 199124.8891 582518.6333
2025 Eastern Red Cedar 25 199113.0522 582528.0246
2026 Eastern Red Cedar 35 199104.7844 582532.4075
2027 Eastern Red Cedar 30 199109.585 582537.8604
2028 Eastern Red Cedar 35 199102.7165 582536.4587
2029 Eastern Red Cedar 35 199106.3361 582551.682
2030 Eastern Red Cedar 30 199090.8372 582561.7592
2031 Eastern Red Cedar 25 199102.1971 582570.0064
2032 Eastern Red Cedar 30 199092.0886 582567.5669
2033 Eastern Red Cedar 20 199094.187 582575.5873
2035 Eastern Red Cedar 25 199081.8637 582577.0295
2036 Eastern Red Cedar 15 199078.2006 582593.8271
2037 Eastern Red Cedar 25 199081.3623 582590.758
2038 Eastern Red Cedar 15 199077.4672 582607.2871
2039 Eastern Red Cedar 15 199069.7601 582609.0751
2040 Eastern Red Cedar 25 199075.199 582620.3516
2041 Eastern Red Cedar 12 199069.8971 582630.2903
2042 Eastern Red Cedar 12 199070.5478 582635.4892
2043 Eastern Red Cedar 20 199079.9005 582637.698
2044 Eastern Red Cedar 25 199090.4967 582643.194
2045 Eastern Red Cedar 15 199074.8013 582652.263
2046 Eastern Red Cedar 20 199087.7038 582657.4474
2047 Eastern Red Cedar 20 199084.8666 582654.506
2048 Eastern Red Cedar 15 199083.5625 582664.0288
2049 Eastern Red Cedar 15 199077.421 582669.0204
2052 Eastern Red Cedar 15 199078.4781 582659.6841
2053 Eastern Red Cedar 15 199191.3576 582361.1537
2054 Eastern Red Cedar 20 199188.7888 582360.7783
2075 Eastern Red Cedar 35 199279.3526 582285.983
2078 Eastern Red Cedar 35 199228.8838 582265.3432
2099 Eastern Red Cedar 15 199081.6121 582647.2303
2157 Eastern Red Cedar 25 199658.6287 581196.5792
2191 Eastern Red Cedar 15 199311.8456 581997.0305
2196 Eastern Red Cedar 12 199515.8554 582056.25
2198 Eastern Red Cedar 20 199301.7663 582035.1949
2318 Eastern Red Cedar 25 199719.9895 581042.8501
2319 Eastern Red Cedar 15 199716.07 581045.095
2354 Eastern Red Cedar 20 200047.1595 581032.3835
2360 Eastern Red Cedar 15 198970.7904 583161.5369
2361 Eastern Red Cedar 15 199066.9213 582664.2077
2365 Eastern Red Cedar 20 199078.8995 582665.5778
2366 Eastern Red Cedar 15 199077.1938 582713.4639
2367 Eastern Red Cedar 12 199070.7273 582717.2526
2368 Eastern Red Cedar 20 199053.5422 582731.1986
2369 Eastern Red Cedar 15 199084.4162 582710.0137
2370 Eastern Red Cedar 12 199086.1699 582710.3604
2371 Eastern Red Cedar 12 199081.7401 582702.4174
2372 Eastern Red Cedar 20 199069.5979 582699.05
2373 Eastern Red Cedar 12 199075.9316 582711.1663
2374 Eastern Red Cedar 12 199052.0542 582701.127
2375 Eastern Red Cedar 15 199037.9647 582713.3007
2376 Eastern Red Cedar 15 199058.0176 582690.2532
2377 Eastern Red Cedar 12 199059.1597 582688.3762
2378 Eastern Red Cedar 15 199054.3597 582681.7968
2379 Eastern Red Cedar 20 199066.0853 582672.4715
2380 Eastern Red Cedar 20 199074.6501 582677.0242
2381 Eastern Red Cedar 20 199077.0535 582680.9461
2382 Eastern Red Cedar 12 199486.3128 582100.7639
2383 Eastern Red Cedar 20 199078.4472 582674.1946
2384 Eastern Red Cedar 25 199080.7491 582678.0998
2385 Eastern Red Cedar 20 199081.6579 582696.8916
2386 Eastern Red Cedar 15 199084.8069 582704.6509
2387 Eastern Red Cedar 25 199086.1193 582692.1012
2388 Eastern Red Cedar 20 199084.9325 582680.9916
2389 Eastern Red Cedar 20 199074.8273 582687.8193
2390 Eastern Red Cedar 15 199069.8169 582670.2756
2392 Eastern Red Cedar 25 199074.8573 582657.8965
2393 Eastern Red Cedar 15 199083.4431 582673.4159
2394 Eastern Red Cedar 20 199087.9469 582679.3709
2395 Eastern Red Cedar 20 199089.6795 582678.5879
2402 Eastern Red Cedar 12 198968.3297 583232.2803
2403 Eastern Red Cedar 12 198976.0027 583173.946
2404 Eastern Red Cedar 15 198964.2385 583171.5645
2470 Eastern Red Cedar 15 199564.452 581532.9126
255 Eastern Red Cedar 15 198927.2967 583153.9467
257 Eastern Red Cedar 40 199163.9481 582517.8686
259 Eastern Red Cedar 20 198861.6736 583254.7035
260 Eastern Red Cedar 25 199146.4879 582640.7601
262 Eastern Red Cedar 25 199134.1624 582638.8678
263 Eastern Red Cedar 20 199238.0567 582541.1446
264 Eastern Red Cedar 25 199208.9236 582589.2274
2640 Eastern Red Cedar 25 198983.5213 583135.3452
2644 Eastern Red Cedar 20 199129.5243 582784.6704
2645 Eastern Red Cedar 20 199126.1182 582773.7651
2646 Eastern Red Cedar 12 199146.7059 582756.0808
2647 Eastern Red Cedar 15 199175.2582 582728.7175
2648 Eastern Red Cedar 18 199171.5 582599.2441
2649 Eastern Red Cedar 20 199149.5426 582614.304
2650 Eastern Red Cedar 15 199148.2494 582598.3751
2651 Eastern Red Cedar 20 199201.079 582564.5379
2652 Eastern Red Cedar 15 199191.3023 582574.8262
2653 Eastern Red Cedar 15 199174.8791 582583.7933
2654 Eastern Red Cedar 20 199130.6304 582609.955
2655 Eastern Red Cedar 20 199152.5005 582587.525
2656 Eastern Red Cedar 14 199161.3532 582596.9098
2657 Eastern Red Cedar 15 199123.9015 582630.7509
2658 Eastern Red Cedar 25 199242.4669 582525.3843
2659 Eastern Red Cedar 20 199233.5385 582524.0739
266 Eastern Red Cedar 30 199188.2943 582742.0727
2660 Eastern Red Cedar 20 199188.7411 582500.7817
2661 Eastern Red Cedar 20 199198.879 582500.844
2662 Eastern Red Cedar 20 199166.3578 582542.8943
2663 Eastern Red Cedar 15 199155.8393 582532.7745
2664 Eastern Red Cedar 18 199282.4247 582536.7291
2665 Eastern Red Cedar 15 199298.4398 582464.6584
2666 Eastern Red Cedar 15 199394.2415 582436.5508
2669 Eastern Red Cedar 25 199625.8459 582500.7401
267 Eastern Red Cedar 20 199102.0562 582591.4279
2670 Eastern Red Cedar 22 199375.441 582417.6105
2671 Eastern Red Cedar 15 199334.3171 582325.4355
2672 Eastern Red Cedar 20 199328.9243 582371.43
2674 Eastern Red Cedar 15 199240.5844 582444.585
2676 Eastern Red Cedar 18 199120.885 582544.6289
2677 Eastern Red Cedar 30 201824.9823 581020.7605
2679 Eastern Red Cedar 20 201768.4993 581052.6989
268 Eastern Red Cedar 12 199129.8193 582667.4226
2683 Eastern Red Cedar 30 201715.7985 581312.2649
2688 Eastern Red Cedar 25 201730.5381 581420.829
269 Eastern Red Cedar 15 199122.6267 582644.1811
270 Eastern Red Cedar 15 199116.9629 582669.359
271 Eastern Red Cedar 20 199162.3837 582620.4881
273 Eastern Red Cedar 25 199234.2849 582520.9476
2730 Eastern Red Cedar 30 201864.16 581246.0095
2732 Eastern Red Cedar 30 201852.4298 581396.5192
2733 Eastern Red Cedar 20 201873.3853 581402.1736
274 Eastern Red Cedar 30 199143.4198 582622.2496
2741 Eastern Red Cedar 20 201847.6883 581467.4347
2742 Eastern Red Cedar 20 201843.8694 581479.6176
2743 Eastern Red Cedar 20 201844.6296 581469.9211
2744 Eastern Red Cedar 32 201828.2116 581466.465
2745 Eastern Red Cedar 27 201824.1823 581449.5995
2746 Eastern Red Cedar 22 201829.4009 581445.3962
2747 Eastern Red Cedar 34 201825.4483 581439.9692
2748 Eastern Red Cedar 27 201824.0711 581432.3012
2749 Eastern Red Cedar 16 201841.492 581442.0423
275 Eastern Red Cedar 20 199219.9053 582573.819
2750 Eastern Red Cedar 32 201806.1205 581437.8669
276 Eastern Red Cedar 15 199270.4793 582539.5583
277 Eastern Red Cedar 25 199188.678 582592.5015
278 Eastern Red Cedar 25 199201.6919 582581.1752
279 Eastern Red Cedar 30 199092.5183 582818.0883
299 Eastern Red Cedar 35 198907.0526 583153.3085
300 Eastern Red Cedar 30 198922.7421 583145.9034
317 Eastern Red Cedar 17 199318.7702 582146.9363
321 Eastern Red Cedar 13 199388.9715 582234.8281
323 Eastern Red Cedar 28 199290.7073 582198.6963
324 Eastern Red Cedar 24 199280.3086 582160.5341
326 Eastern Red Cedar 16 199374.8479 582237.9011
333 Eastern Red Cedar 22 202194.5634 581035.0011
336 Eastern Red Cedar 25 X 199373.2107 582347.7217
340 Eastern Red Cedar 23 199419.6677 582411.1132
354 Eastern Red Cedar 28 202263.5365 581052.0864
355 Eastern Red Cedar 32 202122.1539 581141.4326
356 Eastern Red Cedar 27 202127.2662 581146.5072
360 Eastern Red Cedar 26 202240.6988 581044.815
361 Eastern Red Cedar 26 202229.2034 581043.7707
362 Eastern Red Cedar 32 202214.2254 581035.0228
363 Eastern Red Cedar 25 202270.7324 581044.7934
364 Eastern Red Cedar 26 202111.6643 581141.7517
371 Eastern Red Cedar 24 202139.9629 581153.0539
372 Eastern Red Cedar 32 202144.1487 581159.7663
373 Eastern Red Cedar 22 202154.8644 581157.5659
374 Eastern Red Cedar 25 202163.5209 581167.0466
375 Eastern Red Cedar 35 202173.1926 581169.4245
380 Eastern Red Cedar 27 202139.742 581241.0072
393 Eastern Red Cedar 24 202085.1218 581183.225
67 Eastern Red Cedar 14 199439.4686 581956.2886
73 Eastern Red Cedar 25 199440.9193 581988.2525
78 Eastern Red Cedar 25 199458.9763 581972.4998
82 Eastern Red Cedar 20 199543.3721 581977.1328
87 Eastern Red Cedar 30 199482.3749 581945.2468
93 Eastern Red Cedar 12 199511.336 582060.1427
96 Eastern Red Cedar 15 199438.451 582034.256
170 Green Ash 6 199282.0031 582109.4343
2001 Green Ash 10 199618.1501 581437.7295
2074 Green Ash 7 199425.9335 582314.9415
2079 Green Ash 10 199228.4361 582271.1727
2102 Green Ash 8 199748.3542 581218.7531
2103 Green Ash 8 199727.3178 581216.9377
2105 Green Ash 10 199748.8771 581211.5041
2106 Green Ash 13.5 199747.7119 581183.8126
2107 Green Ash 13 199736.6267 581228.6754
2108 Green Ash 12.5 199737.3445 581210.4234
2109 Green Ash 12.5 199731.7919 581202.5031
2110 Green Ash 7.5 199745.9113 581202.7522
2111 Green Ash 12 199711.5228 581206.2316
2113 Green Ash 16 199755.2264 581083.3023
2114 Green Ash 12 199754.952 581110.8882
2115 Green Ash 13 199768.0293 581084.5622
2117 Green Ash 10 199765.7212 581106.751
2118 Green Ash 10 199782.5526 581099.2688
2119 Green Ash 17 199795.3671 581072.7949
2120 Green Ash 9 199770.3119 581092.8638
2121 Green Ash 16 199788.4471 581090.0364
2122 Green Ash 10 199778.0848 581085.5219
2123 Green Ash 12 199755.4809 581106.7954
2124 Green Ash 6 199744.9842 581109.1036
2125 Green Ash 9 199756.7654 581110.6356
2127 Green Ash 7 199761.5664 581119.4148
2128 Green Ash 10 199768.3642 581139.2765
2129 Green Ash 13 199722.5696 581279.3097
2130 Green Ash 16 199760.2496 581131.9921
2132 Green Ash 6 199771.4385 581151.4569
2134 Green Ash 9 199758.7464 581156.1458
2135 Green Ash 7 199723.4458 581286.7755
2136 Green Ash 11.5 199740.8685 581201.6916
2138 Green Ash 9.5 199745.4466 581140.3936
2139 Green Ash 16 199719.201 581210.0341
2140 Green Ash 9 199758.9892 581155.7897
2141 Green Ash 12.5 199758.4121 581145.567
2143 Green Ash 9 199775.4813 581130.9567
2145 Green Ash 17 199734.4187 581130.4189
2146 Green Ash 10 199740.1537 581155.8768
2147 Green Ash 10 199735.8728 581143.7739
2148 Green Ash 9.5 199725.6441 581205.8688
2149 Green Ash 13.5 199749.8809 581161.3059
2150 Green Ash 12 199753.6318 581173.4309
2151 Green Ash 10 199736.1157 581163.6965
2152 Green Ash 11 199740.7815 581167.6525
2154 Green Ash 12 199725.6005 581173.897
2155 Green Ash 15.5 199722.2065 581175.4027
2158 Green Ash 8.5 199743.3599 581225.8639
2159 Green Ash 13 199709.1871 581232.9992
2160 Green Ash 7.5 199702.1103 581231.1769
2161 Green Ash 15 199709.0295 581249.0982
2162 Green Ash 7.5 199722.2594 581258.1144
2167 Green Ash 12 199705.756 581271.3613
2169 Green Ash 9 199707.6033 581270.0258
2170 Green Ash 10.5 199709.9237 581292.189
2171 Green Ash 9 199714.8002 581294.0324
2172 Green Ash 15 199681.887 581267.8705
2173 Green Ash 9 199702.5364 581270.9445
2175 Green Ash 16 199677.9333 581281.2603
2179 Green Ash 19 199674.6801 581279.4407
2180 Green Ash 7 199698.6458 581301.0645
2181 Green Ash 26 199704.1431 581308.0909
2183 Green Ash 15.5 199694.1282 581305.2437
2185 Green Ash 11 199715.1922 581310.4368
2192 Green Ash 12 199681.0329 581263.2954
2193 Green Ash 9 199683.9247 581259.2049
2194 Green Ash 12 199676.514 581270.3679
2199 Green Ash 13 199721.7617 581239.6137
2200 Green Ash 8 199724.5527 581233.1272
2307 Green Ash 15 199924.111 581183.7016
2317 Green Ash 6 199901.538 581014.8961
2320 Green Ash 8.5 199890.1566 581210.783
2325 Green Ash 6.5 199835.312 581190.8807
2327 Green Ash 12 199777.7595 581175.337
2328 Green Ash 9.5 199779.282 581188.9684
2329 Green Ash 7.5 199776.0251 581206.715
2331 Green Ash 21 199828.4279 581298.9473
2333 Green Ash 18 199829.5744 581309.8555
2336 Green Ash 11 199777.026 581222.3578
2337 Green Ash 6.5 199766.0149 581233.3527
2338 Green Ash 10 199770.3768 581253.4453
2346 Green Ash 6 199763.349 581374.8048
2348 Green Ash 7 199742.3083 581437.5434
2350 Green Ash 16.5 199637.7656 581433.8005
2357 Green Ash 7 200021.9127 581009.3349
2361 Green Ash 12 198973.3998 583099.6767
2362 Green Ash 30 198959.3344 583111.1243
2406 Green Ash 11.5 199838.8056 581066.0164
2411 Green Ash 11.5 199819.3802 581117.5488
2426 Green Ash 14.5 199647.4348 581432.3144
2445 Green Ash 7.5 199572.1005 581543.3997
2452 Green Ash 9 199662.6791 581498.3314
2458 Green Ash 13 199652.7794 581367.8621
2463 Green Ash 9 199656.9206 581349.6056
2473 Green Ash 7 199660.3847 581365.6219
2479 Green Ash 19 199718.2966 581345.8749
2495 Green Ash 7 199691.0317 581483.5975
2496 Green Ash 8 199649.3602 581478.3237
2668 Green Ash 16 199629.3722 582497.234
2720 Green Ash 14 201981.5602 581206.3065
2722 Green Ash 16 201994.5956 581207.3596
294 Green Ash 8 198892.7045 583149.8989
318 Green Ash 9 199372.4604 582191.7551
334 Green Ash 12 199586.7528 582353.4733
341 Green Ash 15 199614.4221 582408.5631
344 Green Ash 10 199604.3697 582351.9097
345 Green Ash 12 199599.3564 582349.2236
352 Green Ash 13 202183.8426 581116.0759
359 Green Ash 13 202232.5901 581097.6948
367 Green Ash 13 202199.5293 581135.2229
368 Green Ash 17 202161.0322 581109.9834
376 Green Ash 14 X 202059.1663 581327.386
385 Green Ash 12 202135.647 581182.0081
386 Green Ash 15 202151.9634 581212.9138
407 Green Ash 13 201929.2512 581505.3631
459 Green Ash 12 201939.8772 581531.249
xx Green Ash 12 202212.8616 581064.8826
10 Hackberry 6 199526.7443 581736.4107
167 Hackberry 7 199357.9935 582093.6998
169 Hackberry 11 199340.6988 582072.1226
171 Hackberry 9 199340.732 582107.3222
2197 Hackberry 6 199669.6527 581260.5628
2399 Hackberry 8 199534.9596 582157.4481
27 Hackberry 6 199547.1145 581820.9872
28 Hackberry 8 199535.9605 581844.4052
29 Hackberry 6 199536.4766 581839.8765
319 Hackberry 13 199468.4748 582221.4419
331 Hackberry 11 199273.1476 582246.7085
2015 Northern Red Oak 9 199152.7814 582409.5843
2692 Northern Red Oak 8 201767.2817 581336.1639
2694 Quaking Aspen 12 201798.4815 581282.291
2736 Quaking Aspen 14 201846.7773 581450.1011
2737 Quaking Aspen 12 201858.8311 581464.9362
2738 Quaking Aspen 16 201827.491 581499.257
2739 Quaking Aspen 12 201855.1831 581492.8551
2686 Red Pine 30 201687.8525 581460.6924
2686 Red Pine 25 201684.1815 581465.1496
1 Siberian Elm 34 siberian elm 2 trunk 199438.4938 581764.5159
101 Siberian Elm 30 siberian elm 3 trunk 199630.9092 581796.4006
102 Siberian Elm 14 199651.1632 581807.0198
103 Siberian Elm 12 199657.7381 581791.5156
104 Siberian Elm 12 199639.2683 581734.3835
105 Siberian Elm 18 199616.9117 581760.7315
106 Siberian Elm 40 199690.2125 581747.6081
107 Siberian Elm 38 siberian elm 3 trunk 199692.3148 581813.6998
108 Siberian Elm 14 199698.2427 581849.0816
109 Siberian Elm 16 199647.2988 581790.9335
11 Siberian Elm 19 199555.5544 581760.4981
110 Siberian Elm 19 199603.5852 581748.4048
112 Siberian Elm 13 199688.6165 581834.1832
113 Siberian Elm 12 199697.6682 581812.6854
114 Siberian Elm 14 multi trunk se 199513.324 582284.9028
115 Siberian Elm 15 199565.5894 582337.0765
117 Siberian Elm 30 barbed wire in trunk 199548.4144 581691.6193
118 Siberian Elm 12 199513.622 582273.0768
119 Siberian Elm 35 199502.1811 582243.4805
12 Siberian Elm 25 siberian elm 2 trunk 199577.3704 581817.9496
123 Siberian Elm 15 199493.6613 581641.7053
124 Siberian Elm 14 199539.3636 581689.2728
13 Siberian Elm 12 199579.4379 581821.5722
14 Siberian Elm 14 199597.6623 581771.9507
16 Siberian Elm 16 199529.875 581713.9847
166 Siberian Elm 30 multi trunk se 199355.2381 582006.1293
17 Siberian Elm 12 199542.7995 581713.4237
179 Siberian Elm 50 multi trunk se 199299.9613 582081.7534
18 Siberian Elm 12 199548.0573 581736.1805
185 Siberian Elm 16 199314.8211 582144.2759
186 Siberian Elm 24 multi trunk se 199407.5355 582284.3761
189 Siberian Elm 17 199443.8377 582193.9776
19 Siberian Elm 12 199538.9476 581722.9331
190 Siberian Elm 12 199526.3357 582309.9503
197 Siberian Elm 12 multi trunk se 198875.1982 583168.4161
198 Siberian Elm 20 multi trunk se 198935.0044 583195.6938
2 Siberian Elm 12 199441.9973 581758.2741
20 Siberian Elm 60 199467.8885 581673.887
2003 Siberian Elm 13.5 199864.0106 581037.9617
2004 Siberian Elm 19 200090.1035 581000.734
2005 Siberian Elm 29 multi trunk se 199155.8061 582487.7684
2009 Siberian Elm 30 multi trunk se 199141.6927 582434.8746
2017 Siberian Elm 15 199245.1037 582421.1945
2050 Siberian Elm 14 199372.5031 582080.5158
2076 Siberian Elm 12 199375.7983 582283.4501
2098 Siberian Elm 17 199230.0695 582257.4335
21 Siberian Elm 13 199456.3873 581710.2661
2104 Siberian Elm 13 199756.1782 581238.5907
2112 Siberian Elm 14 199731.5384 581060.6921
2116 Siberian Elm 16 199790.7112 581115.5222
2126 Siberian Elm 12 199747.7195 581061.0244
2131 Siberian Elm 13 199782.7615 581149.3707
2133 Siberian Elm 13 199775.5174 581154.6538
2142 Siberian Elm 13 199751.0837 581184.642
2163 Siberian Elm 13.5 199725.4906 581262.0246
2164 Siberian Elm 14 199738.2261 581282.8475
2165 Siberian Elm 14.5 199714.8391 581296.7723
2166 Siberian Elm 22.5 199726.9803 581301.0834
2168 Siberian Elm 14 199636.114 581258.0753
2174 Siberian Elm 15 199637.1404 581262.6435
2178 Siberian Elm 16 199625.5299 581266.2634
2186 Siberian Elm 14 199666.25 581697.2126
2190 Siberian Elm 16 199337.6891 582048.27
2195 Siberian Elm 11.5 199572.763 581631.814
2198 Siberian Elm 12.5 199718.8987 581270.1207
22 Siberian Elm 13 199602.7394 581832.7441
2201 Siberian Elm 22.5 199669.4761 581700.9104
2206 Siberian Elm 12 199688.8069 581366.2551
23 Siberian Elm 17 199449.1228 581734.0339
2301 Siberian Elm 15 199890.2256 581027.0741
2302 Siberian Elm 32 199913.6452 581235.2334
2305 Siberian Elm 12 199895.428 581191.1465
2306 Siberian Elm 15 199921.1428 581190.2962
2308 Siberian Elm 16 199912.0789 581138.9195
2311 Siberian Elm 13 199937.8758 581109.9625
2313 Siberian Elm 12 199994.9133 581126.0951
2314 Siberian Elm 12 199979.712 581100.6917
2321 Siberian Elm 25 199877.2769 581204.041
2322 Siberian Elm 15.5 199841.8418 581194.9985
2323 Siberian Elm 12 199829.066 581213.3638
2324 Siberian Elm 17.5 199839.2686 581217.5816
2326 Siberian Elm 13.5 199808.9434 581168.8458
2330 Siberian Elm 12 199830.9637 581243.7249
2339 Siberian Elm 13 199765.6719 581307.8746
2340 Siberian Elm 12 199773.3596 581310.2073
2341 Siberian Elm 12.5 199770.8844 581303.1085
2342 Siberian Elm 13 199745.4683 581334.6173
2343 Siberian Elm 12 199731.9139 581358.8792
2344 Siberian Elm 16.5 199734.8941 581359.1174
2345 Siberian Elm 25 199743.117 581369.429
2347 Siberian Elm 19.5 199683.3931 581391.7534
2351 Siberian Elm 13 199874.6465 581158.7293
2353 Siberian Elm 28 200108.425 580991.4608
2356 Siberian Elm 12 200025.8633 581012.1233
2359 Siberian Elm 12 198957.3507 583138.0731
2397 Siberian Elm 14 199262.4084 582310.3907
2398 Siberian Elm 14 199236.2845 582305.6368
2398 Siberian Elm 20 199527.9074 582196.3917
24 Siberian Elm 26 199581.1834 581854.6522
2400 Siberian Elm 13 199555.5062 582178.9798
2401 Siberian Elm 15.5 199701.1091 581646.9353
2405 Siberian Elm 17.5 199655.527 581592.5332
2407 Siberian Elm 13 199036.4739 582810.284
2408 Siberian Elm 12 199057.0133 582785.5649
2416 Siberian Elm 16 199670.0658 581593.85
2417 Siberian Elm 17.5 199626.0664 581538.7735
2428 Siberian Elm 13 199654.6417 581670.4167
2429 Siberian Elm 16 199682.2827 581714.3305
2430 Siberian Elm 22 199599.0879 581707.3161
2437 Siberian Elm 15 199688.8725 581587.8727
2438 Siberian Elm 13 199550.4056 581495.1673
2441 Siberian Elm 12 199685.4364 581436.426
2442 Siberian Elm 12 199672.0472 581406.5183
2444 Siberian Elm 18.5 199618.4785 581715.4599
2448 Siberian Elm 13.5 199646.176 581707.3155
2449 Siberian Elm 12 199662.7074 581459.1738
2450 Siberian Elm 14 199655.366 581708.2926
2462 Siberian Elm 13 199668.0147 581473.7511
2466 Siberian Elm 12 199658.5667 581474.4512
2468 Siberian Elm 12.5 199705.6233 581624.2305
2472 Siberian Elm 17 199608.5858 581602.9884
2474 Siberian Elm 15 199542.8453 581515.0375
2490 Siberian Elm 14 199607.5264 581599.9656
2491 Siberian Elm 11.5 199634.7406 581531.4494
2494 Siberian Elm 16 199553.5906 581488.7068
2497 Siberian Elm 18.5 199585.3285 581689.0153
2499 Siberian Elm 19 199491.382 581614.3391
25 Siberian Elm 26 199619.2718 581832.6059
256 Siberian Elm 12 198940.0265 583171.0127
258 Siberian Elm 18 multi trunk se 199103.1762 582809.2066
26 Siberian Elm 15 199615.2512 581835.19
261 Siberian Elm 15 199022.7465 582829.3209
2638 Siberian Elm 19 199031.7405 583035.8009
2667 Siberian Elm 13 199640.2748 582474.3783
2671 Siberian Elm 17 201962.0221 581024.3764
2672 Siberian Elm 17 201932.5445 581012.3114
2680 Siberian Elm 22 201778.7724 581063.7896
2681 Siberian Elm 18 201755.5115 581098.5073
2684 Siberian Elm 13 201646.0467 581473.305
2685 Siberian Elm 14 201666.9175 581455.4092
2701 Siberian Elm 18 201852.5468 581110.412
2702 Siberian Elm 22 201858.2354 581097.3532
2703 Siberian Elm 15 201857.9 581083.6001
2710 Siberian Elm 20 201929.4653 581071.8731
2711 Siberian Elm 20 201934.1362 581066.6079
2713 Siberian Elm 20 201916.1838 581137.6364
2717 Siberian Elm 19 201902.1172 581197.1486
2718 Siberian Elm 12 201913.5917 581199.9048
2719 Siberian Elm 21 201933.0493 581215.0527
272 Siberian Elm 20 199026.0548 582833.2041
2721 Siberian Elm 15 202004.4925 581154.6245
2729 Siberian Elm 12 201886.4242 581231.4906
280 Siberian Elm 24 multi trunk se 199040.4356 582817.8786
281 Siberian Elm 26 se 199033.0004 582822.3974
288 Siberian Elm 20 198956.826 582974.0423
3 Siberian Elm 32 siberian elm 199424.6244 581762.3963
30 Siberian Elm 13 siberian elm 199694.0691 581881.4563
31 Siberian Elm 12 siberian elm 199677.5408 581879.4416
32 Siberian Elm 14 siberian elm 199654.6826 581922.4288
320 Siberian Elm 12 199530.0011 582252.5782
322 Siberian Elm 12 X 199325.8955 582204.0934
325 Siberian Elm 15 199332.8158 582202.1346
327 Siberian Elm 13 X 199281.5673 582227.8646
33 Siberian Elm 49 siberian elm 4 trunk 199635.6691 581891.1594
332 Siberian Elm 33 202190.3857 581056.6868
335 Siberian Elm 18 199658.6478 582362.4826
337 Siberian Elm 16 199687.7396 582402.6938
338 Siberian Elm 12 X 199631.2599 582340.4963
339 Siberian Elm 13 199675.9025 582400.287
34 Siberian Elm 12 199651.5369 581924.548
343 Siberian Elm 12 199544.4483 582325.8091
348 Siberian Elm 14 201951.173 581295.6966
35 Siberian Elm 24 199656.7364 581883.0218
353 Siberian Elm 14 202291.5621 580993.5197
357 Siberian Elm 14 202250.2183 580994.0458
358 Siberian Elm 12 202208.3939 580988.0286
36 Siberian Elm 14 199456.2619 581796.1824
365 Siberian Elm 29 202123.9923 581103.2759
369 Siberian Elm 13 202291.8142 580990.241
37 Siberian Elm 20 199448.6284 581829.2221
370 Siberian Elm 14 X 202226.2985 581141.1543
377 Siberian Elm 12 202057.1311 581313.8151
378 Siberian Elm 13 201992.4637 581294.4545
379 Siberian Elm 15 202080.9473 581145.824
38 Siberian Elm 12 199442.8327 581841.3334
381 Siberian Elm 24 X 202069.6753 581231.9301
384 Siberian Elm 16 X 202077.4822 581313.9595
388 Siberian Elm 18 X 202054.142 581236.0162
389 Siberian Elm 17 202035.3351 581265.056
39 Siberian Elm 16 199458.0156 581854.5919
390 Siberian Elm 28 201973.932 581268.8298
391 Siberian Elm 36 X 202109.0286 581237.8979
395 Siberian Elm 14 202002.9906 581325.131
398 Siberian Elm 12 202022.2801 581305.7445
399 Siberian Elm 18 202006.9326 581283.8594
4 Siberian Elm 13 199570.1125 581808.8813
40 Siberian Elm 28 199517.6282 581851.9246
400 Siberian Elm 16 202128.6095 581256.5522
401 Siberian Elm 14 201950.0914 581410.7234
41 Siberian Elm 14 199504.2036 581866.7846
42 Siberian Elm 12 199550.1838 581900.833
43 Siberian Elm 15 199555.4342 581923.2891
435 Siberian Elm 15 201951.2119 581283.4154
437 Siberian Elm 13 201945.6315 581370.9829
44 Siberian Elm 12 199513.9943 581818.3156
441 Siberian Elm 15 201968.2265 581433.6933
444 Siberian Elm 14 201952.1262 581366.7596
46 Siberian Elm 18 199552.3341 581927.4214
463 Siberian Elm 12 201888.6891 581357.4535
464 Siberian Elm 13 201944.1773 581403.0129
47 Siberian Elm 20 199603.0461 581921.3223
477 Siberian Elm 15 201910.3872 581451.8573
48 Siberian Elm 18 199654.1114 581932.1023
49 Siberian Elm 24 199627.261 581910.2688
490 Siberian Elm 23 X 201925.2664 581440.8661
499 Siberian Elm 12 202014.6089 581350.6201
5 Siberian Elm 12 199567.8372 581824.5736
50 Siberian Elm 13 199650.108 581960.9883
51 Siberian Elm 40 siberian elm 4 trunk 199622.5977 581975.6421
52 Siberian Elm 14 199620.0983 581981.4211
53 Siberian Elm 26 199585.917 581952.4411
54 Siberian Elm 16 199596.4883 581940.6224
55 Siberian Elm 24 siberian elm 2 trunk 199509.6818 581908.6678
58 Siberian Elm 12 199445.4021 581909.8729
59 Siberian Elm 17 199500.7575 581931.1764
6 Siberian Elm 13 199467.652 581732.9207
60 Siberian Elm 15 199422.3069 581898.6768
61 Siberian Elm 18 199360.2645 581921.6772
62 Siberian Elm 14 199380.6275 581931.2145
64 Siberian Elm 16 199398.6183 581929.6619
65 Siberian Elm 12 199375.4612 581821.4913
7 Siberian Elm 13 199508.8771 581755.2333
71 Siberian Elm 14 199426.0505 581982.0031
74 Siberian Elm 15 199513.0578 581983.8232
75 Siberian Elm 12 199547.7612 581866.736
76 Siberian Elm 14 199513.8202 581843.7655
79 Siberian Elm 12 199533.8021 581992.3937
8 Siberian Elm 12 199448.3039 581748.6367
80 Siberian Elm 12 199561.094 581975.3072
81 Siberian Elm 14 199595.8178 582044.3568
84 Siberian Elm 13 199537.9315 582013.813
85 Siberian Elm 15 199584.2869 582027.955
86 Siberian Elm 13 199599.8138 582060.6828
89 Siberian Elm 12 199473.6503 581960.2018
9 Siberian Elm 12 199443.5798 581718.8843
90 Siberian Elm 12 199602.9511 582068.4874
91 Siberian Elm 14 199570.9638 582076.9124
92 Siberian Elm 14 199574.932 582079.3344
329 Siberian Elm 14 199299.8789 582250.9096
168 Silver Maple 25 multi trunk 199352.1358 582073.3398
366 Silver Maple 26 202103.5192 581118.0156
xx Silver Maple 23 202198.3018 581060.4592
Tree Species Count
American Elm 43
Basswood 9
Black Cherry 21
Boxelder 63
Burr Oak 1
Cottonwood 6
Crab Apple 1
Eastern Red Cedar 250
Green Ash 118
Hackberry 11
Northern Red Oak 2
Quaking Aspen 5
Red Pine 66
Siberian Elm 250
Silver Maple 3
Total 849
Tree Survey Total
ATTACHMENT 1
EXISTING INTERUM USE PERMIT
INTERIM USE PERMIT AGREEMENT
REISSUANCE to SKB, INC.
MINNESOTA INDUSTRIAL CONTAINMENT FACILITY
THIS AGREEMENT, is made this C:j� day of t.J OV� \u(, 2018 by and between SKB
Environmental Inc. (hereinafter "SKB ") and the City of Rosemount, a Minnesota municipal
corporation (hereinafter the "City").
1.Interim Use Permit. SKB assumed the obligations of an Interim Use Permit (IUP)
originally granted by the City on March 19, 1992 (Resolution 2000-29) for the construction,
operation, and maintenance of the Minnesota Industrial Containment Facility (MICF). The
execution of this Agreement by the parties shall constitute approval and reissuance of the IUP by
the City subject to the provision of this Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the reissued IUP,
as amended. Compliance with Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Permit No. SW-383, dated
March 2013 (MPCA Permit) as renewed and amended, and Dakota County Solid Waste License
associated with SW-383 (DC License) as renewed and amended, which are incorporated herein
by reference, and conformance with the application of SKB to the City as amended by the plan
for finished design approved by the MPCA and Dakota County, are conditions of the IUP. This
IUP is issued by the City in accordance with Ordinance B, City of Rosemount Zoning Ordinance,
adopted September 19, 1996, as amended, including Section 11.3.
2.Term. The MICF Permit Renewal Application for Permit No. 383 Minnesota
Industrial Containment Facility, prepared by Conestoga Rovers and Associates, dated April 2013,
(the "MICF Permit Application") and revised plan sheets dated March, 2013 in response to the
Planning Commission review, details the revised design, construction, operation, closure,
corrective actions, and revisions thereto, and financial assurances for a six cell non-hazardous
industrial waste containment and construction and demolition facility, with an anticipated
operating life of forty ( 40) years. Construction, operation, and closure of the individual cells will
be phased throughout the operating life of the facility. Consistent with the term of MPCA Permit
and the provisions of Ordinance B, this IUP is valid for five years from the effective date of this
agreement, or until terminated or amended by the City. Prior to expiration of the IUP, or to apply
for an amended IUP, SKB shall request that the City review and reissue the IUP. To avoid
possible termination of the IUP at the time the IUP expires, an application for reissuance of the
permit must be submitted no later than 180 calendar days before the expiration date of the permit.
The reissuance of the IUP may, at the option of the City, be approved without modification to this
Agreement, or the City may require SKB to modify this Agreement.
3.MICF Description. MICF is located on property legally described on attached
Exhibit A. The 236-acre site is located between TH55 and 140th Street East, lying easterly of the
Chicago and Northwestern Railroad. The location ofMICF is illustrated on attached Exhibit B.
MICF consists of six (6) containment cells, each occupying a surface area and
waste volume capacity as follows:
(a)Cell 1 contains 5.1 acres and 341,454 cubic yards;
(b)Cell 2 contains 17.1 acres and 1,458,507 cubic yards;
(c)Cell 3 contains 39.4 acres and 10,592,188 cubic yards; and
(d)Cell 3M contains 158,300 cubic yards; and
(e)Cell 4 contains 12.5 acres and 2,648,950 cubic yards; and
(f)Cell 5 contains 41.2 acres and 7,490,591 cubic yards; and
(g)Cell 6 contains 51.8 acres and 12,659,927 cubic yards.
The anticipated operating life ofMICF is (40) years based on a total capacity of 35,191,617 cubic
yards. The facility also consists of an office/laboratory building, a container management
building, rail and truck unloading facilities, leachate storage tanks, metals recycling facility and
on-site stormwater retention areas. The general site plan is illustrated on attached Exhibit C.
This Agreement allows for the construction and maintenance of all the roadways,
railways, buildings, leachate storage tanks, stormwater retention structures, sanitary sewer,
henning, landscaping, and other ancillary components of MICF. Such construction and
maintenance is subject to the provisions of this Agreement, compliance with City ordinances and
issuance of necessary permits. Subject to the provisions of Section 14, this Agreement also
allows for the construction, operation, closure and post-closure care of cells 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6
and all related earth work and excavation, subject to the provisions of this Agreement, compliance
with City ordinances and issuance of necessary permits. Wetland mitigation for filling 9 .19 acres
of wetlands has been accomplished through the purchase of 18.28 acres of wetland credit in
accordance with the Wetland Conservation Act and the Rosemount Wetland Management Plan. 2
4.Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW). The City, as the Responsible Unit
of Government (RGU), conducted on EA W in accordance with State Rules for, the proposed
landfill expansion to create Cell 6. On November 19, 2013, the City Council found that the
proposed expansion does not have the potential for significant environmental effects and issued a
negative declaration of need for an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).
5.Design Plans and Specifications. SKB shall construct MICF in accordance with
plans, specifications and procedures approved by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
(MPCA), Dakota County (DC) and the City. Landscaping shall be completed in accordance with
the plan for finished design approved by the MPCA, DC and the City. Any exceptions to the
approved plans and specifications made during construction shall be listed in the Construction
Certification provided pursuant to Section 9. SKB shall not make any alteration or addition to
MICF that would materially alter the method or effect of disposal without first obtaining the
written approval of the City Administrator.
6.Tree Replacement. SKB has provided a landscape and tree replacement plan that
meets the Ordinance requirement of 769 replacement trees. The landscaping and tree replacement
plans approved are intended to serve as a guideline and not the exact location of all the
replacement trees. The city recognizes that this plan may represent an instance where the total
amount of tree replacement required cannot occur on site . .In this instance, the city may,at its
option, accept a fee in lieu of tree placement or allow the planting of replacement trees in public
areas. Tree replacement is encouraged to happen on site as much as possible and replacement in
public areas will be considered after the site has been revegetated to a reasonable extent. A
revised tree replacement plan which includes some tree installation off-site must be approved by
the City Council. Until approval of the revised plan the currently approved tree replacement plan
of 2008 is in effect.
7.Quality Assurance/Quality Control. SKB shall construct, operate, and monitor
MICF in accordance with the quality assurance/quality control plan(s) approved by MPCA. Any
modifications to the quality assurance/quality control plan(s) require the written approval of the
City Administrator.
8.Additional Construction Permits. SKB shall obtain all required construction
permits, such as grading, excavation, building, plumbing, heating, electrical, and occupancy
permits, in accordance with the adopted standards, procedures, and requirements of the City. All 3
construction permits for improvements identified in Section 3 and authorized by Issuance of the
IUP are administratively issued and administered.
9.Construction Inspection. SKB shall instruct its contractors and subcontractors to
contact the City at least two (2) working days in advance of routine inspections (building,
plumbing, electrical, etc.) required by the City. SKB shall contact the City at least ten (10)
working days in advance of the commencement of construction of liner installations, leachate
collection systems, and final cell cover. During hours of construction, SKB shall grant the City
and its agent, upon presentation of proper credentials, access to MICF for the purpose of
inspections and enforcement related to construction.
10.Sanitary Sewer Connection. MICF shall remain connected to the MCES Interceptor.
SKB will be responsible for all costs resulting from the sewer connection including, but not
limited to, the City's engineering, construction, permitting, easement, and legal costs.
11.Construction Certification. Within thirty (30) days of construction completion,
SKB shall submit to the City a copy of the construction certification as required by MPCA.
12.Soil Protective Cover. The City acknowledges the ongoing nature of soil cover
placement and will not require notice for inspections. The City and its agents may make random
inspections throughout the life of MICF.
13. Operations and Maintenance, SKB shall operate and maintain MICF in
accordance with the "Operational Plans" (Tab 4, 2013 MICF Permit Application), MPCA Permit,
and DC License. No amendments may be made to the "Operational Plans" without the written
approval of the City Administrator.
14.Waste Acceptance. SKB shall accept reject, and manage wastes according to the
approved "Waste Acceptance Plan" (Tab 3, 2013 MICF Permit Application). SKB shall not
dispose of any wastes identified as unacceptable wastes in the "Waste Acceptance Plan", City
Zoning Ordinance, DC License or MPCA Permit. No amendments may be made to the "Waste
Acceptance Plan" without the written approval of the City Administrator.
A.Disposal of Ash/Conditions. Despite the provision of Section 12 above, SKB may
dispose of ash at MICF, but only pursuant to the following conditions:
1)SKB shall not use ash as cover over waste when fill heights exceed the height of
the perimeter berm at the MICF.
4
2)During transport of all ash to the MICF, trucks carrying ash must be covered with
tarpaulins adequate to limit dusting.
3)SKB shall take adequate steps to prevent dust migration from ash disposal at the
MICF. SKB may utilize, but is not limited to, one or more of the following
methods for dust control: a) conditioning the ash by addition of moisture; b)
handling ash when wind conditions are calm; c) immediately covering ash with
cover materials. All methods utilized must be in conformance with all other
provisions of the permit.
4)Ash disposal at MICF must not result in leachate discharges to the Empire Waste
Water Treatment Plant (WWTP) that fail to comply with Industrial Discharge
Permit requirements of the MWCC.
5)SKB shall submit with its annual report a summary of the quantity (in tons and
cubic yards), type and source of ash deposited into MICF and shall provide an
evaluation of the effects of ash on the chemical composition of leachate discharged
from the MICF to the Rosemount WWTP.
6)Any ash disposal that requires an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EA W)
and/or an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) shall not be permitted under this
permit without first securing approval by the City Council following completion of
the environmental review process.
B.Composting Operation. Composting shall be subject to the following:
1)Petroleum Contaminated Soil shall not be used in the composting operation.
2)Sewage Sludge used in the composting shall not exceed the Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency and Environmental Protection Agency Region 5 Residential Soil
Reference Values (SRVs) for perfluorocarbons (PFCs).
3)The composting operation will not be included in any subsequent IUP renewal if
SKB fails to establish said operation by the expiration date of the current 2018
agreement.
C.The Industrial Waste deposited in the saddle area of Cell 3F/5D shall not exceed the
contamination limits set in the Dakota County Solid Waste Ordinance Variance.
15. Recycling/ Transfer Facility. SKB shall operate and maintain the
Recycling/Transfer Facility in accordance with Section 14, Tab 4, 2013 MICF Permit 5
Application, subject to the following conditions:
A.Any MSW brought to the recycling and transfer facility shall be stored indoors during
the entire time that it is on site.
B.Prior to acceptance of any compostable materials a vermin control plan for the
recycling and transfer facility shall be prepared and approved by City staff that may
include the plan being prepared by a pest and vermin control professional and periodic
inspections of the facility by a pest or vermin control professional. The Plan may be
amended from time to time subject to approval by the City Staff.
C.The recycling and transfer facility shall be constructed of a minimum of 40% masonry
for each side of the facility.
D.The transfer facility will not be included in any subsequent IUP renewal if SKB fails
to establish said facility and use by the expiration date of the current 2018 agreement.
16.Wetland Mitigation. Wetland mitigation shall comply with the conditions and
standards Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Notice of Wetland Conservation Act
Decision/Findings and Conclusions dated November 19, 2013.
17.Construction Plans. The construction plans shall be modified as directed in the
Assistant City Engineer's Memoranda dated November 12, 2013 and October 23, 2018. SKB
shall update its storm water management plan and storm water modeling to incorporate the
requirements from the WSB the Technical Memorandum dated May 19, 2016 concerning the use
of Atlas 14 precipitation data for storm water modeling
18.140th Right of Way. In recognition of the 2013 expansion, SKB will dedicate to the
City a 50' easement from the existing centerline of 140th for public road and utility purposes.
Stormwater Basins 6A, 6B, 6C and associated grading shall be removed from within 50 feet of
the 140th Street East centerline in conjunction with the updated storm water modeling. All
development stormwater will be brought into compliance with existing regulations and addressed
on site or the applicant shall pay the fee at the time of construction of off-site ponding. As an
alternative, SKB may direct storm water that would have otherwise been accommodated within
these basins to the adjacent property east of the landfill provided it does not require a substantial
change to the approved PUD and grading plans on the adjacent site.
19.Personnel Training. All SKB personnel involved in the operations and maintenance
ofMICF shall be trained, qualified, and certified as identified in the "Operational Plans". 6
20.Incident Reporting. For any incident during operations at MICF resulting in
emergency shutdown, release, explosion or fire, SKB shall notify the City's Police Department by
telephone within two (2) hours of the detection of the incident; emergencies shall require
immediate notification. SKB shall promptly furnish the City with written reports of the incident,
as specified in the plans.
21.General inspections, Records, Reporting, Enforcement. SKB shall, during normal
operating hours, grant the City and its agents, upon presentation of proper credentials, access to
MICF for the purpose of inspections and enforcement of this agreement. Except for information
deemed privileged in accordance with state law, SKB shall allow the City to inspect written
documentation pertaining to compliance by SKB with the terms of this IUP. Records pertaining to
compliance at MICF shall include but are not limited to, operating records as described in the
"Operational Plans", the "Corrective Action Plan", and MPCA Permit; inspection records;
monitoring, investigation and modeling data; personnel training records, reports and plans
required by regulatory agencies; correspondence with regulatory agencies; and records and
correspondence regarding waste characterization, evaluation, management, inspection and
acceptance/rejection. All information obtained during the course of inspections shall be used
solely by the City or its agents for matters pertaining to this IUP.
SKB shall simultaneously submit to the City an electronic copy of annual reports required
to be submitted to the MPCA, Dakota County, and any other governmental regulatory agencies,
unless such submission is waived in writing by the City Administrator.
22.Contingency Actions. SKB shall implement contingency and/or corrective actions
as specified in the permit application and MPCA Permit and DC License. SKB shall furnish the
City with a copy of the remedial measures report or remedial measures plan, according to the
timetable specified in MPCA Permit. No amendments may be made to the Corrective Action
Plan" or the "Postclosure Contingency Action Plan" without the written approval of the City
Administrator.
23.Monitoring/Reporting. SKB shall monitor MICF in accordance with MPCA
Permit. Nothing shall be construed to prevent SKB from exceeding MPCA Permit requirements.
24.Closure. SKB shall close MICF in accordance with the Requirements of MPCA
Permit. SKB shall notify the City at least ten (10) working days prior to the date closure activities
for each cell are scheduled to begin. SKB shall notify the City at least ninety (90) days prior to the
7
date final closure activities for MICF are scheduled to begin. Upon completion of closure of a
cell or MICF, SKB shall notify the City to provide the opportunity for a final inspection. A copy
of the closure certification and supporting documentation that is required by MPCA Permit shall
be submitted to the City upon submittal to the MPCA. No amendment may be made to the
"Closure Plan" (Tab 5, 2013 MICF Permit Application), as amended by Exhibit E of this
Agreement, without the written approval of the City Administrator.
25.Postclosure. SKB shall provide postclosure care of MICF in accordance with the
requirements of MPCA Permit. No amendments may be made to the "Postclosure Plan" (Tab 5,
2013 MICF Permit Application) without the written approval of the City Administrator.
26. Financial Assurances. SKB shall comply with the financial assurance
requirements of the MPCA and DC. No reduction in the financial assurance requirements may be
made without the written approval of the City Administrator.
27.Development Commitment. The provisions of the Development Commitment,
approved by the City Council on November 19, 2013 are incorporated by reference as conditions
of the IUP and attached as Exhibit D.
The provisions of this Section and Section 11 of Exhibit D shall survive the termination of
the Agreement and shall remain in effect for one year following closure of the MICF.
Notwithstanding any provision of Section 2 of this Agreement, the City will not require
any amendment of the Development Commitment for 15 years from the date of this Agreement,
unless there are material differences in the operation at the landfill that negatively affects the
municipal revenues as contemplated in this agreement.
28.Responsibility for Costs. SKB and the City agree to fund the out-of-pocket
expenses incurred by the City in the review and issuance of the reissued IUP, according to the
provisions of the Development Commitment. Costs incurred by the City for ongoing monitoring
of the operation of MICF and administration of the IUP shall be paid by the City.
Notwithstanding any provision of Section 2 of this Agreement, the City will not require any
amendment of the Development Commitment for 15 years from the date of this Agreement, ,
unless there are material differences in the operation at the landfill that negatively affects the
municipal revenues as contemplated in this agreement.
29.Hours of Operation and Traffic Control. MICF operations are restricted to the
hours of 6: 00 a. m. to 8: 00 p. m., Monday through Saturday. The hours of operation may be
8
amended to accommodate special projects by the City Council. The City Council may impose
traffic circulation and routing requirements on the operation of MICF at any time it deems such
requirements necessary or convenient in the public interest. Such requirements, which may
include restricting trucks entering or leaving MICF to right-in and right-out turning movements to
and from CR 42 and TH 55, shall be given in writing and shall specify the days, times or
circumstances during which such requirements apply.
A.SKB shall submit route maps of truck circulation within the facility and off-site, with
the potential to require further information concerning traffic counts and updated route
maps when deemed necessary by the City.
30.Indemnification. SKB shall defend, indemnify and save the City, its officers, and
employees harmless from and against any and all claims, suits, demands, actions, fines, damages
and liabilities, and all costs and expenses related thereto (including, without limitation, reasonable
attorneys' fees) arising out of or in any way related to MICF.
The provisions of the Section shall survive the termination of this Agreement and shall
remain in effect until final resolution of any and all of the various claims and actions made as
defined in this Section.
31. Other Laws and regulations. SKB agrees to comply with all other laws,
regulation, permits, or licenses that apply to MICF.
32.Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is found to be invalid, such
finding shall have no effect on the validity of the remainder of this Agreement.
33.Notice of Violation. Notice of violation of any provision of the IUP shall be given
to SKB by the City in writing. Such written notice shall specify the violation and request that the
violation be corrected. SKB shall have ten (10) days after receipt of notice to correct the violation.
Upon evidence that the health, safety, and welfare of the public is not in jeopardy and upon
evidence of diligent cooperation by SKB to correct the violation, the City Administrator may
agree in writing to extend the ten-day period.
34.Termination. This IUP shall terminate on the happening of any of the following
events, whichever first occurs:
(1)Five (5) years effective date of this agreement;
(2)Upon change in the City's zoning regulation that renders the use nonconforming;
(3)By the City Council (Council) for violation of any provisions of the IUP, in9
accordance with the following procedures: Termination shall not occur earlier than ten
(10)working days from the time the written notice of termination is served on SKB or, if a
hearing is requested, until written notice of the Council action has been served on SKB.
Notice to SKB shall be served personally or by registered or certified mail at the address
designated in the IUP. Such written notice of termination, the nature of the violation or
violations constituting the basis for the termination, the facts that support the conclusion
that a violation or violations has occurred and a statement that if SKB desires to appeal, it
must within ten (10) working days, exclusive of the day of service, file a request for a
hearing. The hearing request shall be in writing stating the grounds for appeal and be
served personally or by registered or certified mail on the City by midnight of the tenth
(10th) working day following service. Following receipt of a request for a hearing, the
City shall set a time and a place for the hearing.
HEARINGS:
A.If SKB properly requests a hearing on termination of the IUP, such hearing shall be
held before the Council, or a hearing examiner as provided below, and shall be open to the
public.
B.Unless an extension of time is requested by SKB in writing directed to the City and is
granted, the hearing will be held no later than forty-five ( 45) calendar days after the date
of service of request for a hearing, exclusive of the date of such service. In any event, such
hearing shall be held no later than sixty (60) calendar days after the date of service of
request for a hearing, exclusive of the date of such service.
C.The city shall mail notice of the hearing to SKB at least fifteen (15) working days prior
to the hearing. Such notice shall include a statement of time, place, and nature of hearing.
D.Hearing Examiner. The Council may by resolution appoint an individual, to be known
as the hearing examiner, to conduct the hearing and to make findings of fact, conclusions,
and recommendations to the Council. The hearing examiner shall submit the findings of
fact, conclusions and recommendations to the Council in written report, and the Council
may adopt, modify, or reject the report.
E.Conduct of the Hearing. SKB may be represented by counsel. The City, SKB, and
additional parties, as determined by the Council or hearing examiner, in that order, shall
10
present evidence. All testimony shall be sworn under oath. All parties shall have full
opportunity to respond to and present evidence, cross examine witnesses, and present
argument. The Council or hearing examiner may also examine witnesses.
F.The City shall have the burden of proving its position by a preponderance of the
evidence, unless a different burden is provided by substantive law, and all findings of fact,
conclusions, and decisions by the Council shall be based on evidence presented and
matters officially noticed.
G.All evidence that possesses probative value, including hearsay, may be admitted if it is
the type people are accustomed to rely on in the conduct of their serious affairs. Evidence
that is incompetent, irrelevant, immaterial, or unduly repetitious may be excluded. The
hearing shall be confined to matters raised in the City's written notice of termination or in
SKB's written request for a hearing.
H.At the request of the City, SK.B, or the hearing examiner, a pre-hearing conference
shall be conducted by the hearing examiner, if the Council has chosen to use one, or by a
designated representative of the Council. The pre-hearing conference shall be held no later
than five (5) working days before the hearing. The purpose of the pre-hearing conference
is to:
(1)Clarify the issues to be determined at the hearing.
(2)Provide an opportunity for discovery of all relevant documentary,
photographic, or other demonstrative evidence in the possession of each party. The
hearing examiner or City's representative may require each party to supply a
reasonable number of copies of relevant evidence capable of reproduction.
(3)Provide an opportunity for discovery of the full name and address of all
witnesses who will be called at the hearing and a brief description of the facts and
opinions to which each is expected to testify. If the names and addresses are not
known, the party shall describe them thoroughly by job duties and involvement
with the facts at issue.
I.If a pre-hearing conference is held, evidence not divulged as provided above may be
excluded at the hearing.
J.If SK.B fails to appear at the hearing, it shall forfeit any right to a hearing before the
11
Council or hearing examiner.
35.Amendments. Any changes in the provisions of this Agreement requested by SKB
require the express written consent of the City. The City may at its option impose addition
requirements for the IUP when changes or amendments in waste management rules, laws, or
technology are in the best interest of public health, safety, and welfare, or if there are changes in
the MPCA Permit or DC License. The procedure to amend the IUP shall be the same as the
procedure required to issue the IUP.
36.Enforcement. SKB shall reimburse the City for its reasonable costs (including
without limitation engineering and legal fees) incurred in the enforcement of the IUP, that results
in a City Council decision to terminate the IUP. Payment of these costs will be in addition to the
City Service Charge, provided for in the Development Commitment.
3 7. Interpretation. In any challenge of the provisions of this Agreement, the
interpretation of the provisions shall be liberally construed to protect the public health, safety, and
welfare.
38.Assignment. The IUP is not assignable or transferable without the express written
consent of the City. In the event an assignment of the IUP is proposed, the City may at its option
impose additional requirements to this Agreement or may require a new agreement.
39.Notice. Notices given pursuant to this Agreement shall be personally delivered or
sent by certified mail to City of Rosemount, 2875 145th St. W., Rosemount, Minnesota 55068-
0510 and to SKB, Inc., 13425 Courthouse Boulevard, Rosemount, Minnesota 55068. All notices
shall be effective upon receipt.
40.Recording. This Agreement shall run with the subject land and may be recorded in
the Dakota County Recorder's Office.
SKB ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
By:
Its: ---'----"----'---"-L...=>.'--'------"'""=
Andby: -=-----7"--"'--=---:7"---===-t!G...-=---e,,,-"'"
Its: __ ....:,..._---=._:_:=c::..,,.__---==--=:::....:...!..--"'--"---Y
12
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF__ )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this __ day of t�hfu.a<".\, 201K.l
by \p,ve,, W,l'.11 �s and ---��:::._·..:._"'_,,, the ·Y and y�1�s,� G+,;vhr¥1A.r,
respectively, of'SKB Environmental, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of the corporation.
(
� "
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF DAKOTA )
,/ / I I �yViccL, flX< £�I Notary ublic
By: £d..&��C4�____!:_�>..u£�'r""�
Its: Mayor
And by:�
Its: Clerk
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this £ day of f\lo\kJrtlY,2018,
by William Droste and Erin Fasbender, the Mayor and Clerk, respectively, of the City of Rosemount,
a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation. __
13
Stacy Joy Bodsberg Notary Public Minnesota !hi Commission Er.piles January 31, 2023
ATTACHMENT 2
DAKOTA COUNTY LICENSE
Solid Waste Facility License
DAKOTA COUNTY PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT DIVISION
14955 Galaxie Avenue, Apple Valley, MN 55124
Licensee: SKB Environmental, Inc.
251 Starkey Street
St. Paul, MN 55107
Facility: SKB Rosemount
13425 Courthouse Boulevard
Rosemount, MN 55068
Contact: David Wiggins
(651)224-6329
Facility Types: Special Waste Landfill, Type A (>50,000 tons/yr)
Demolition Landfill, Type A (>5,000 cy/yr)
Waste Processing, Type A (>400 tons/day)
Transfer Station, Type A (>400 tons/day)
SW Composting -Segregated, Type A (>100 tons/day)
License Term: January 01, 2020 through December 31, 2021
Having complied with all the requirements of Dakota County Ordinance No. 110 necessary to
obtain this License, and having been duly authorized by the Dakota County Board of
Commissioners, Dakota County grants to SKB Environmental, Inc. a License to operate a
solid waste facility from January 01, 2020 through December 31, 2021. This License is
subject to the Licensee's compliance with: (1) Dakota County Ordinance No. 11 O; (2) all
applicable federal, state, and local laws, rules, ordinances, and permits; (3) all applicable
resolutions passed by the Dakota County Board of Commissioners; and (4) the attached
conditions. Failure to abide by the requirements of this License may subject the Licensee to
one or more of the enforcement actions set forth in Dakota County Ordinance No. 110.
nvironmental Resources Director
Non-Transferable This License is conditional by attachment
ATTACHMENT 3
GEM-ASH LICENSE
Solid Waste Facility License
DAKOTA COUNTY PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT DIVISION
14955 Galaxie Avenue, Apple Valley, MN 55124
Licensee: Gem-Ash Processing LLC/ SKB Environmental Inc
251 Starkey Street
Facility:
Contact:
St Paul, MN 55107
Gem-Ash/SKB Rosemount Solid Waste Processing Facility
13425 Courthouse Boulevard
Rosemount, MN 55068
David Wiggins
(651)224-6329
Facility Type: Waste Processing, Type A (>400 tons/day)
License Te rm: January 01, 2020 through December 31, 2021
Having complied with all the requirements of Dakota County Ordinance No. 110 necessary to
obtain this License, and having been duly authorized by the Dakota County Board of
Commissioners, Dakota County grants to Gem-Ash Processing LLC/ SKB Environmental Inc a
License to operate a solid waste facility from January 01, 2020 through December 31, 2021.
This License is subject to the Licensee's compliance with: (1) Dakota County Ordinance No.
11 O; (2) all applicable federal, state, and local laws, rules, ordinances, and permits; (3) all
applicable resolutions passed by the Dakota County Board of Commissioners; and (4) the
attached conditions. Failure to abide by the requirements of this License may subject the
Licensee to one or more of the enforcement actions set forth in Dakota County Ordinance No.
110.
G org . Fis che r
Environmental Resources Directo r
Non-Transferable This License is conditional by attachment
Gem-Ash Processing LLC/SKB Environmental Inc
Waste Processing Facility
Solid Waste License for 2020 and 2021
In accordance with Minn. Stat. 473 and Dakota Ordinance No. 110, Dakota County
hereby issues this license and authorizes the Licensee listed on the previous page to
operate the Gem-Ash/SKB Rosemount Solid Waste Processing Facility, under the
conditions set forth in this license. The facility license authorizes the processing of solid
waste subject to the following conditions.
1.The licensee shall operate the facility in accordance with all plans and
specifications approved as part of the initial license application to the County
Board, all applicable County Ordinance requirements, and all subsequent
modifications or additions as approved by the respective state and local agencies
and the Dakota County Board of Commissioners. Certain approved plans are
listed below:
•License Application -"GEM-ASH and SKB Rosemount Recycling/Transfer
Facility" dated June 18, 2014.
•Operations Plan -dated March 2014 and updated May 9, 2014.
2.The licensee shall obtain and keep in effect, during the term of the license, the
insurance coverages required by Ordinance 110, Section 3.07, and shall provide
evidence of said coverages in accordance with Ordinance No. 110, Section
3.0?(E).
3.The licensee shall keep in effect financial assurance as required by Ordinance No.
110, Section 3.06, and as approved by the County Board:
•Surety bond in the amount of $10,000.
4.The Licensee shall pay the annual license fee for a "Waste Processing, Type A",
facility, as established by the County Board for 2020, by December 31, 2019, and
the license fee for 2021, by December 31, 2020.
ATTACHMENT 4
INTERIM USE PERMIT PLANS
900
890
880
870
860
870
860 850840
830
830
832.00
840.00
850.00
838.00
835.00
844.00
858.00
857.00
829.93
880
840
850
870
900
890
880
870
860
870
860
850
OFFICE
20,000 GSF
RECYCLING
BUILDING
(150'X350')
52,500 SFMAINTENANCE
BUILD
ING
(
75
'
X 203
' -
15
,200 S
.F
.
)
STORAGE
BUNKER
(125' X 30')
3,750 SF
GEM ASH
BUILDING
(150' X 150')
22,500 SF
900
890
880
870
860
870
860
850
OFFICE
20,000 GSF
RECYCLING
BUILDING
(150'X350')
52,500 SFMAINTENANCE
BU
ILD
ING( 75
'
X
203
'
- 15,200
S.F
. )
STORAGE
BUNKER
(125' X 30')
3,750 SF
GEM ASH
BUILDING
(150' X 150')
22,500 SF
900
890
880
870
860
870
860
850
OFFICE
20,000 GSF
RECYCLING
BUILDING
(150'X350')
52,500 SFMAINTENANCE
BU
ILD
ING( 75
'
X
203
'
- 15,200
S.F
. )
STORAGE
BUNKER
(125' X 30')
3,750 SF
GEM ASH
BUILDING
(150' X 150')
22,500 SF
900
890
880 870860
870
860
850
OFFICE
20,000 GSF
RECYCLING
BUILDING
(150'X350')
52,500 SF
(125' X 30')
3,750 SF
GEM ASH
BUILDING
(150' X 150')
22,500 SF
858.00
870
RECYCLING
BUILDING
(150'X350')
52,500 SFMAINTENANCE BUILD
ING( 75
'
X 203
'
-
15
,200 S
.F
.
)
STORAGE
BUNKER
(125' X 30')
3,750 SF
GEM ASH
BUILDING
(150' X 150')
22,500 SF
858.00
870
RECYCLING
BUILDING
(150'X350')
52,500 SFMAINTENANCE
BU
ILDING( 75'
X
203
'
- 15
,200
S
.F.
)
STORAGE
BUNKER
(125' X 30')
3,750 SF
GEM ASH
BUILDING
(150' X 150')
22,500 SF
840.00
850.00
838.00
844.00
858.00
857.00
856.00
855.00
850.00
840
850
860
870
FES-11
15" INV=889.00
MH-36
RIM=0.00
60 LF OF 6" @ 0.00%
FES-12
RIM=897.04
15" INV OUT=891.00 (W)
FES-14
RIM=886.54
15" INV OUT=886.50 (SW)
858.00
870
900
890880
870
860
870
860
850
840830 830 832.00 840.00 850.00838.00835.00 844.00 858.00857.00856.00855.00850.00829.93 880 840 850 860 870
K:\018532-000\Admin\Docs\2021.07.07 - SKB Environmental Site Improvements.docx
Memorandum
To: Kyle Klatt, Senior Planner
CC: Stacy Bodsberg, Planning & Personnel Secretary
Brian Erickson, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
From: Tim Hanson PE, WSB Engineering Consultant
Date: July 7, 2021
Re: SKB Environmental Site Improvements
Site Plan Review
Grading Plan Review
Utility Plan Review
WSB File Number 018532-000
SUBMITTAL:
SKB Environmental has submitted site plan and construction plans for expansion of their site to
the east included expanded landfill area, building relocation (construction), revised access
location and public street. The plans submitted were prepared by Stantec. The owner of the site
is SKB Environmental. Engineering review comments were generated from the Preliminary Site
Construction Plans, dated 05.27.2021 included in the submittal are the following:
▪ Existing Conditions
▪ Removals and Preconstruction Erosion Control Plans
▪ Overall Tree Preservation Plan
▪ Overall Site Plan
▪ Overall Grading Plan
▪ Utility Plan
▪ Details
▪ Overall Landscape Plan and Details
GENERAL COMMENTS – Site Expansion:
SKB Environmental is located adjacent to the south side of TH 55 between the railroad spur
crossing of TH 55 and 145th Street. The existing developed site consists of four unplatted parcels,
the landfill expansion area consists five unplatted parcels with a sixth parcel located east of the
improvements identified in the submittal.
1. The proposed expansion of SKB Environmental site to the east includes the
dedication of a public street extending north to south from TH 55 to Ehler’s Path.
The proposed street will require subdividing the existing parcels and platting the
public Right-of-Way.
2. One of the existing parcels is the platted lot of Lot 1, Block 1, Pine Bend
Development Co.1st Addition. This lot and an adjacent parcel will need to be
subdivided to create the proposed street alignment.
Kyle Klatt
July 7, 2021
Page 2
K:\018532-000\Admin\Docs\2021.07.07 - SKB Environmental Site Improvements.docx
3. The development Fees are indicated below based on the 2021 Schedule of Rates
and Fees. Review of the fees paid with the previous site expansions needs to be
completed to determine if City fees were previously paid. Outstanding fees will be
due with the final plat and subdivision (development) agreement.
▪ Sanitary Sewer Trunk Charge: Not Applicable
▪ Watermain Trunk Charge: $6,500/acre
▪ Storm Sewer Trunk Charge: $6,865/acre
4. There are 7 proposed storm water basins/infiltration basins which must be placed
within drainage and utility easements.
5. The unplatted parcels should be platted with appropriate Right-of-Way and
drainage and utility easements dedicated. 140th Street and Ehler’s Path are
identified as a minor collector street in the City which requires an 80 foot wide
Right-of-Way for rural section roads, (40 foot ½ Right-of-Way) and the proposed
local street which has a 66 foot wide Right-of-way.
PROPOSED BUILDING REMOVALS AND RELOCATIONS
SKB Environmental proposes to remove the existing buildings located on the western edge of the
existing site and relocate them adjacent to TH 55 along the northern portion of the site. The
existing office building, maintenance building, and ash recycling building are identified to be
removed. New and expanded office building, recycling building, gem ash building, and
maintenance building are proposed to be constructed midpoint of the sites length adjacent to
TH55. Access to the buildings will be from the proposed City street and the sites private
driveway. The only identified parking area is adjacent to the office building.
ACCESS AND EGRESS
Access and egress for the site is proposed to be relocated from its current location which is just
east of the northwest corner of the parcel and the railroad crossing, to extend from the proposed
local street at the east end of the proposed landfill area. The proposed local street extends south
from TH 55 1,900 feet to Ehler’s Path. The driveway into the site is identified to be located 1000
feet south of TH 55, which is good spacing from TH 55.
The driveway extends into the site roughly 1,800 feet before reaching the scales. The driveway is
identified to be 55 feet wide which provides additional width for queuing trucks waiting for the
scales. The proposed access layout should eliminate trucks from queuing along TH 55. After
passing through the scales the trucks would access the landfill area and depart heading west
utilizing the existing access and egress driveway on to TH 55. In this traffic pattern the driveway
would only be utilized for vehicles departing the site.
Access to the office and maintenance building would utilize the same traffic patten.
6. The site plan identifies paved lanes around the proposed buildings, however, the
lanes are adjacent to the building not providing space between the building and a
potential wall collapse during a fire. The Fire Marshal must comment on the
location and size of the fire lanes.
7. The new drive must be reviewed for appropriate turning radii to provide for fire
equipment accessibility. The minimum turn radius can be requested from the Fire
Marshal.
Kyle Klatt
July 7, 2021
Page 3
K:\018532-000\Admin\Docs\2021.07.07 - SKB Environmental Site Improvements.docx
8. The site plan identifies curb along the access aisles of the car parking area and
the parking lot. All other access aisles utilize roadside swales to collect runoff.
9. The access extending from the proposed City Street identifies a 15 radius for the
driveway. The volume of truck traffic would warrant a larger radius at the
driveway entrance.
GRADING PLAN
Seven storm water management/infiltration basins are identified on the plan. These basins
collect runoff from the impervious surface areas. The landfill area is collected by a separate
storm water system and pumped to the Metropolitan Councils Wastewater Treatment Facility.
Runoff from the office building and parking lot flows to the east, southeast to an infiltration basin
in the southeast corner of the development. This ponding area overtops to the roadside swale of
Ehler’s Path.
Runoff from west of the office building also flows through a series of ponds, culverts and
infiltration areas to an infiltration basin just west of the maintenance building. This infiltration basin
overtops to the west into an existing infiltration basin.
10. The grading plan identifies the proposed landfill area and slopes of the landfill at
1:4, There are several locations adjacent to the storm water ponds and infiltration
ponds in which the proposed slopes are 1:3. Rosemount standards identify a 1:4
slope as the maximum slope.
SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN
Sanitary sewer for SKB Environmental is a private system consisting of septic tanks and a
mound drain field. The preliminary plans identify the location of the drain field and alternate drain
field site, and the septic tank location.
Public sanitary sewer will have to be extended from the northeast, across TH 55 to serve the site.
There is no public sanitary sewer in this area.
11. The proposed septic system must be reviewed by the City Building Official.
Existing 12-inch watermain extends along the north side of TH 55 and terminates 1,200 feet west
of the northwest corner of the existing landfill. This watermain is identified to be extended as a
16-inch trunk watermain to serve the proposed site. The trunk watermain is terminated in the
utility plan at the office building location. The utility plan identifies a 6-inch watermain extending
from the trunk water main to serve the buildings and provide fire protection in the area. No other
water main improvements are identified.
12. Multiple hydrants are identified to extend from the 6-inch watermain. The 6 inch
watermain will have to be an eight inch main to provide adequate fire flow to the
hydrants.
13. The eight-inch watermain will have to be connected back to the 16-inch trunk
watermain providing a loop for the system
14. Show a service line and curb stop for a domestic service line into the office
building.
15. The 16-inch watermain must be extended the length of the site and then south
with in the proposed street.
16. Detail review of the watermain plans shall conform to City design guidelines and
standards.
Kyle Klatt
July 7, 2021
Page 4
K:\018532-000\Admin\Docs\2021.07.07 - SKB Environmental Site Improvements.docx
17. The 6-inch watermain proposed with this project shall be privately maintained.
STORM SEWER
SKB Environmental identifies storm sewer culverts to convey runoff across paved areas to
surface water management ponding areas and infiltration basins.
18. Detail design review will be completed on the storm sewer culverts. the storm
sewer system must conform to the City’s Engineering Guidelines and Standards.
19. The storm sewer culverts must also be shown in profile view.
20. The downstream end of the culvert must have rip rap installed to the bottom of
the ponding basin.
SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT
The site improvements must be reviewed for surface water management, erosion and sediment
control and for storm sewer pipe sizing. The stabilization plan identifies erosion and sediment
control infrastructure proposed for the grading of the site. All erosion and sediment control items
may be adjusted or modified during construction.
21. The Surface water management review comments are attached.
G:\2021\Planning Cases\21-22-CPA SKB Expansion Comp Plan Amendment\SKB Stormwater Review 2021-07-07.docx 701 XENIA AVENUE S | SUITE 300 | MINNEAPOLIS, MN | 55416 | 763.541.4800 | WSBENG.COM Memorandum
To: Kyle Klatt, City of Rosemount
From: Bill Alms, PE
Laura Cummings, EIT
Henry Meeker, EIT
Date: July 7th, 2021
Re: SKB Proposed Landfill Expansion Plan Review
WSB Project No. 017611-000
I have reviewed the documents provided by SKB Environmental on 6.29.2021 for the proposed
landfill expansion at 13425 Courthouse Boulevard, Rosemount, Minnesota 55068. Documents
reviewed include:
• SKB Application for Proposed Landfill Expansion - Dated 6.1.2021
Applicant should provide responses to each comment. I offer the following comments below.
Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Comments:
1. General
a. Indicate Basin 6A-1 on Figure 1 of Appendix F.
2. Ponds and Wetlands
a. No comment.
3. Emergency Overflow Routes:
a. The emergency overflow location and elevation for Basin 12 should be noted on
the grading plans.
4. Retaining Walls:
a. Not applicable.
5. Erosion Control:
a. An updated SWPPP and erosion control plan is required for the next submittal.
6. Grading:
a. Proposed basin grading of 3:1 exceeds maximum allowable of 4:1 basin slopes.
Stormwater Management Plan:
1. General Storm Sewer Design
a. All proposed buildings and bituminous roadway need curb and gutter to direct
runoff through storm sewer to NURP pretreatment basins on site.
b. All basins that overflow off the site (Basin 6A/B and Basin 8) must have an outlet
control structure with a weir wall and sluice gate. See included recommended
designs.
c. MN Dam Safety laws do not apply as long as the berm is below 6 ft or holds back
less than 15 ac-ft of water. Basin 6A/B as proposed are exempt from additional
Kyle Klatt
07/07/2021
Page 2
G:\2021\Planning Cases\21-22-CPA SKB Expansion Comp Plan Amendment\SKB Stormwater Review 2021-07-07.docx
dam safety regulation. However, Basin 8 as proposed is not exempt as it reaches
16.4 ac-ft of water under the 100-year storm event. In addition, the 100-year
HWL of 874.99’ for Basin 8 is well above the 140th St. shoulder elevation of 870’
near the basin. Grading of this basin must be revised to meet MN Dam Safety
laws.
2. Water Quantity
a. Clarify “…peak flow attenuation of runoff for .” on page 103.
b. Include HydroCAD modeling results of the 2- and 10-year storm event runoff as
well as the 10-day snowmelt and 2.5” storm runoff in the next submittal.
c. Include 100-year basin volumes on plan sheets in the next submittal.
d. Indicate additional impervious surface area due to proposed buildings in the
narrative of Appendix F.
3. Rate/Volume Control
a. Infiltration cannot be included in HydroCAD modeling. For newly developing
areas, no discharge or infiltration can be assumed for the purposes of
establishing the 100-year HWL.
b. While the infiltration rate of 3.0 in/hr was used in drainage modeling, greater
infiltration rates will be considered by the City Engineer based on percolation
tests or other pertinent information conducted by a professional soil scientist or
Professional Engineer.
4. Freeboard
a. No comments.
5. Water Quality
a. No comments.
6. Easements
b. No comments.