Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
9.b. Request by Omni Orchards Farm Winery for a Conditional Use Permit and PUD Master Development Plan to Allow Construction of an 8,000 Square Foot Farm Winery Tasting Room and 4,000 Square Foot Patio
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY City Council Regular Meeting Date: September 21, 2021 AGENDA ITEM: Case 21-42-CUP and 21-43-MS Request by Omni Orchards Farm Winery for a Conditional Use Permit and PUD Master Development Plan to Allow Construction of an 8,000 Square Foot Farm Winery Tasting Room and 4,000 Square Foot Patio. AGENDA SECTION: New Business PREPARED BY: Eric Van Oss, Economic Development Coordinator AGENDA NO. 9.b. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution, PUD Agreement, Excerpt from the August 24, 2021 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes, Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Architectural Plans, Utility and Grading Plan, Exterior Elevations, Photometric Site Plan, City Engineer Memorandum APPROVED BY: LJM RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve a resolution approving a Conditional Use Permit for a winery facility with tasting room in the BP-Business Park District at 15701 Biscayne Avenue. 2. Motion to approve the Planned Unit Development, Final Site and Building Plan for Omni Brew Holdings, LLC to allow the construction of a of an 8,000 SF winery facility with tasting room, a 4,000 SF outdoor front patio, and parking lot at 15701 Biscayne Avenue, subject to the following conditions: 1. A landscape surety for 110% of the site landscaping is required. 2. Execution of a PUD agreement. 3. Conformance with all conditions of the City Engineer as outlined in the memo dated September 15, 2021 prior to issuance of a building permit, including compliance with the stormwater standards and removal of the spillways. 4. Dedicate all easements listed in the City Engineer’s memo dated September 15, 2021. 5. Review and approval of the trash enclosure by City staff, including use of complementary materials to the principal structure. 6. A deviation from City Code Section 11-4-15-1 G.3 to allow for the exterior wall surface to be metal paneling in lieu of brick, natural stone, specialty integral colored concrete block, tile, architectural textured concrete panels cast in place, or precast concrete panels. 7. A deviation from City Code Section 11-4-15-1 G.9 to allow for the use of vinyl decal signage. 2 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION The Planning Commission held a public hearing to receive comment on this request as well as a request for a site plan review of the proposed farm wintery. The neighbors to the north and south of the property commented during public hearing on their concerns regarding fencing for their animals and possible stormwater runoff. In subsequent follow-up, the applicant has confirmed they are working with the neighbors to address those concerns. The Commission voted unanimously to recommend the City Council approve the request for a CUP and PUD. SUMMARY The Council is being asked to consider an approval from Omni Brew Holdings, LLC to a new community winery and tasting room within the City of Rosemount. The proposed facility, located at 15701 Biscayne Avenue, will be multi-phased with the initial phase consisting of an 8,000 SF winery facility with tasting room, a 4,000 SF outdoor front patio, and parking lot. Future phases will include outdoor amenities such as a rear patio, event space, orchard – vineyard, game areas, additional paved parking, and an outbuilding. Food and drink will be available to the public as well as opportunities for special events such as live music, competitive lawn games, weddings, and other celebratory milestones. The winery building will contain a private event room, tasting room with bar, office, commercial kitchen, production area, restrooms, and storage areas. BACKGROUND Applicant & Property Owner(s): Omni Brew Holdings, LLC Location: 15701 Biscayne Avenue Area in Acres: 4.23 Acres Comp. Guide Plan Designation: BP – Business Park Current Zoning: BP – Business Park PUD Master Development Plan, Site Plan and Design Review The purpose of a site plan review is to evaluate the project as it relates to the performance and site design standards of the zoning ordinance. Site plan approval is required for all commercial, industrial, institutional and multi-family development projects. In this case, the applicant is proposing to construct an 8,000 square foot commercial building with a 4,000 square foot patio that is subject to the site plan review process. Legal Authority . Conditional Use Permit requests are considered quasi-judicial actions. In such cases, the City is acting as a judge to determine if the regulations within the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and Subdivision Ordinance are being followed. Generally, if the application meets these requirements it must be approved. The Planned Unit Development Master Development Plan is a legislative decision because of the Code deviations being requested. Legislative decisions give the Planning Commission more latitude, but consideration should be given to the PUD standards of previously approved developments in the City as well as the PUD standards of the nearby business park. The purpose of a Planned Unit Development review is to evaluate each project as it relates to the performance and site design standards of the zoning ordinance. Site plan approval is required for all commercial, industrial, institutional, and multi- family development projects and is also considered a quasi-judicial action. As a Planned Unit Development Master Development Plan, the winery and tasting room is subject to the general PUD standards outlined in Section 11-10-6(E). These standards evaluate the City’s land use and zoning performance standards and the potential impact of the proposed use on the surrounding neighborhood; draft findings for each are provided below. 3 1. Compatibility of the proposed plan with this chapter and the goals and policies of the comprehensive plan. The proposed plan is consistent with 2040 Comprehensive Plan, which anticipated development on this site. The amendment would help meet the Economic Development Element Goals and Policies from the Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan by providing a lot to “promote development of businesses with a large number of employees that offer wages to support an entire family and that are further constructed of high-quality buildings providing both beauty and tax base to the community.” 2. Effect of the proposed plan on the neighborhood in which it is to be located. The development is consistent with the type of development anticipated in the BP-Business Park. The business will help grow Rosemount’s business community and will be a positive addition to the community. 3. Internal organization and adequacy of various uses or densities, circulation and parking facilities, public facilities, recreation areas, open spaces, screening and landscaping. The parking and landscaping are both consistent with BP district standards. 4. Consistency with the standards of section 11-10-3 of this chapter pertaining to site and building plan review. The plan is consistent with the standards in Section 11-10-3 of the zoning ordinance. 5. Such other factors as the planning commission or city council deems relevant. The applicant has stated they will work with the City to address any concerns about the project. Land Use & Zoning . The subject property is guided for BP-Business Park uses in accordance with the current 2040 Future Land Use Plan, which is intended to provide for the establishment of corporate headquarters, businesses, healthcare offices and related professional and service uses that do not require outdoor storage in an environment that provides a high level of amenities. The present zoning of the property BP-Business Park is consistent with the land use designation, and the proposed farm winery use is consistent with the land use plan and compatible with other professional services in the vicinity. Lot and Building Standards. As proposed, the subject property is consistent with the BP – Business Park lot and building standards. The subject property is an existing lot of record and exceeds the minimum lot requirements. In addition, the proposed building exceeds all setback requirements. The lot and building standards for the BP district are detailed in the table below. Building Performance Standards for the BP – Business Park District Standard Required Proposed Minimum Lot Size 1 acre 4.23 acres Front (South) 30 ft. 180 ft. Side (East) 10 ft. 166 ft. Side (West) 10 ft. 177 ft. Rear (North) 10 ft. 126 ft. Maximum Lot Coverage 75% 20.55% 4 Exterior Building Materials. The majority of the building is metal panel siding and includes burnished concrete masonry block as a wainscot to be on the most public sides of the building – the east elevation along Biscayne and the south elevation along the new public street. The specialty integral colored block aligns with the City’s intent for exterior materials for the business parks. The architectural appearance has a “360 degree” design achieved by utilizing a vocabulary of window bays, metal panel, garage doors, perforated panels, steel members, plane changes, change in materials (metal/CMU block) and “cut-outs.” The roof and walls are extended on the south edge of the building so that the corners on each side have a distinctive “piano leg” feature. The southeast corner is wider and greets the public prominently with a vertical Omni logo. The building footprint is 100’ x 80’ and is 44’ at the peak of the gable and 26’ at the eaves. While the Biscayne elevation is less than one hundred feet long and not subject to the façade articulation required by the City code the building mass is subdivided using panel color change, signage, windows, and the accent block base. The south façade is an articulated one hundred feet wide elevation using a combination of building plane change, window and garage door bays, material breaks (metal, concrete block, perforated panel, and landscape feature), and sloping roof plane. While metal panel siding is not normally permitted in a business park zone, this Planned Unit Development application is requesting metal panel siding be allowed. Metal panel siding is not permitted to discourage the use of outdoor storage sites, such as pole barns. However, in this instance metal panel façade is of a quality considered “equal to or better” than the permitted materials. Additionally, there is not any outdoor storage associated with the metal panel building. The exterior metal building panel fits a farm- agricultural aesthetic envisioned by this project and is incorporated into an attractive aesthetic with many other visual upgrades. Metal buildings are present throughout the Rosemount community and Minnesota at-large, and the winery endeavors to respect its historic roots in the agricultural community and surrounding architectural context. Access & Parking. The public will access the site via Biscayne Avenue onto the newly proposed city street (i.e., 157th Street) and turn north into the Omni Orchard paved parking lot, which will be striped for 38 parking stalls, including 3 accessible stalls. There is a new public street planned along the southern property boundary utilizing a 60-foot easement, with 22% (i.e., 1.3 acres) of the total property dedicated towards this city road easement. Utilities and sewer will follow the new street before continuing onto the proposed facility. The driveway access into the parking lot is setback approximately 133’ from Biscayne to center of the driveway. As previously discussed with the City, overflow parking would be allowed on grass up to an additional 33 stalls (shown as proof of parking). Delivery trucks will pull up to the dock doors on the north and east side of the building. The north dock is for straight trucks up to 40’ in length; those will back down 4’ in elevation so that the bed is level with the dock floor. The east dock is for smaller box trucks. Beyond the paved parking lot, trucks will be driving on class 5; the owner intends to pave the class 5 and grass overflow parking areas in the future. The applicant is also proposing temporary parking at the “dead end” of what will become a new public street. Staff find this acceptable with the acknowledgement the temporary parking spots will go away when construction of the public road (157th Street) moves forward. Landscaping . The City’s landscape ordinance (Section 11-6-3) requires that new developments include a minimum amount of landscaping, which includes a minimum number of trees based on the size of the site and exterior dimensions of the building. These requirements, and the amount provided on the landscape plan, are as follows: Trees Requirement: 1 tree per 3,000 square feet of land area Trees Required/Provided 48/48 (30 Phase 1 and 18 for Phase 2) Foundation Plantings Requirement: 1 per 10 feet of building perimeter Foundation Plants Required/Provided: 36/66 (44 Phase 1 and 24 Phase 2) 5 All of the trees meet the City’s requirements for at least 75% deciduous trees on the site, with a mix of Maple, Oak, Hackberry, and Honey Locust. Various other ornamental trees and shrubs will be used for landscape islands, foundation plantings, and screening of the parking lot. From a staff perspective, it appears that the applicant has prepared a landscape plan that provides a good mix of plants that will provide screening of parking and storage areas and will break up any larger expanses of pavement, walls, and similar elements from the public roadway. Due to the nature of the winery setting and stormwater requirements, much of the property will be developed as open space; the building itself will be 8,000 square feet on a 184,000 square feet site. The building coverage plus impervious areas will be 21.8% of the site leaving 78.2% as landscaped areas. Guests will be able to typically wander through the vineyards, orchards and event areas A landscape surety for 110% of the site landscaping is required. Signage. Omni is asking for a deviation from 11-8-6 C.3.(2), “(2) All permanent wall signs shall be individual channel letters mounted flush with the building or on a raceway. Channel letters shall have a minimum depth of at least three inches (3"). Box or panel signs are prohibited.” The applicant is proposing the use of vinyl decal signage that is not compliant with the 3” deep channel requirement. After consulting with Omni, staff supports a deviation from the signage ordinance. The farm winery is not a traditional Business Park office or industrial facility and the vinyl signage is more in line with the existing agriculture use and feel. Additionally, the vinyl siding will not take up more than 20% of wall space. Exterior Lighting . The attached site photometric plan indicates that the site lighting will comply with code height (30’ max), business hour, and light level limits. While there are grandfathered-in single family homes to the north and south of the subject property, there are no residential districts within 100’. The adjacent districts are BP and AG (across Biscayne). Lights will be downturned to be sensitive to the existing neighbors; light levels will drop to no more than 0.5 lumens at the property boundaries. The design will include a combination of building wall packs and site light fixtures to accent/define patio edges. Trash Enclosure . The trash enclosure will be located on the north side of the building, meeting minimum setback requirements, and will be consistent with the exterior materials of the primary structure – see the attached renderings. Engineering . The applicant has provided stormwater information which has been reviewed by our engineering group. The ALTA survey identifies a private easement to Mid-America Pipeline Company that is undefined as to its location. This easement must be defined or vacated. The ALTA survey also identifies a temporary easement located in the north east corner of the parcel. This easement needs to be vacated. A 10-foot drainage and utility easement should be dedicated along the perimeter of the parcel and along the north side of the existing street easement. The proposed building is identified to be a foot lower than the access elevation from the future street on the south side of the project. It is recommended to raise the first-floor elevation. Detailed grading, erosion control, and storm water management plans have been submitted with the application, and these plans have been reviewed by the City’s Project Engineer. The Engineer’s comments and recommendations are included in the attached memorandum. The applicant will have to revise some of the stormwater infrastructure to comply with City requirements. These modifications should not adversely impact the project and require significant changes to the site plan. 6 Lot Development Fees. The City has adopted a fee schedule that includes various access charges that apply any development of the subject property. This property will not be platted. The applicant will be required to pay these fees at the time the Conditional Use Permit and building permit are issued; these fees include the following: • Sanitary Sewer Trunk Charge: $1075/acre • Watermain Trunk Charge: $6,500/acre • Storm Sewer Trunk Charge: $6,865/ net developable acre Conditional Use Permit Legal Authority. Conditional use permits (CUP) are considered quasi-judicial actions. In such cases, the City is acting as a judge to determine if the regulations within the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Ordinance are being followed. Generally, if the application meets these requirements it must be approved. Purpose. The purpose of conditional use permits is to allow for those uses which are not generally suitable by right within a given zoning district but may be suitable under some circumstances. The burden of demonstrating the proposed use meets the criteria for granting a conditional use permit and meeting all applicable standards lies with the applicant. As a conditional use, the farm winery is subject to the general CUP standards outlined in Section 11-10-7 as well as the standards specific to this use in Section 11-4-7 (C), of which there are none. These standards evaluate the City’s land use and zoning performance standards and the potential impact of the proposed use on the surrounding neighborhood; draft findings for each are provided below. 1. Will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, or general welfare of the neighborhood or the city. Finding: The proposed winery and tasting room space will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or general welfare of the neighborhood or the City of Rosemount. The use will function similar to other permitted Business Park uses. The addition of a new commercial and outdoor community gathering space will enhance the general welfare of the City. 2. Will be harmonious with the objectives of the comprehensive plan and city code provisions. Finding: The subject property is guided Business Park Planned Unit Development, BP-PUD. City code dictates farm winery space is a conditional use in this zoning district. According to the comprehensive plan, the Business Park land use designation is intended to promote development of businesses with a large number of employees that offer wages to support an entire family and that are further constructed of high-quality buildings providing both beauty and tax base to the community. Establishments within the business park district are intended to have little or no outdoor storage, with the majority of the business activities occurring completely indoors. The proposed winery and tasting room largely fits within the purpose of the land use designation. All business activities will take place in the enclosed space and the new facility will bring new employment with competitive wages to Rosemount. 7 3. Will be designed, constructed, operated, and maintained so as to be compatible or similar in an architectural and landscape appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and will not change the essential character of that area, nor substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. Finding: The building fits a farm-agricultural aesthetic that combines the historic use of the property with surrounding Business Park uses. Metal buildings are present throughout the Rosemount community and the winery endeavors to respect its historic roots in the agricultural community and surrounding architectural context. The project incorporates an attractive aesthetic with many other visual upgrades that fits within the existing character of the Business Park and general vicinity. 4. Will be served adequately by existing (or those proposed in the project) essential public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage, structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems and schools. Finding: The proposed winery is served adequately by existing essential public facilities and services. At a future date a new public street is planned along the southern property boundary utilizing a 60 feet easement; however, staff determined the construction of the new street can be delayed until future surrounding parcels are developed. 5. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, material equipment and conditions of operation that will be hazardous or detrimental to any persons, property, or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors. Finding: The proposed use will not generate any additional external impacts that would be expected from the Business Park. The winery is compatible with the existing uses in the building and the adjacent property. There are grandfathered-in single family homes to the north and south of the property; however, there are no residential districts within 100 feet. All other surrounding uses are either agricultural or Business Park. 6. Will have vehicular ingress and egress to the property which does not create traffic congestion or interfere with traffic on surrounding public streets. Finding: Vehicular circulation will be designed for ingress and egress to the property so that that does not create traffic congestion or interfere with traffic on surrounding public streets. It will comply with the City access spacing and design requirements. 7. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic, or historic feature of major importance and will comply with all local, state, and federal environmental quality standards. Finding: The proposed use will not result in the destruction, loss, or damage of a natural, scenic, or historic feature of major importance and will comply with all local, state, and federal environmental quality standards. 8. These standards apply in addition to specific conditions as may be applied throughout this code. Finding: The zoning ordinance does not include specific standards for a farm winery. 8 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the Planned Unit Development and Conditional Use Permit for Omni Brew Holdings, LCC to allow the construction of an 8,000 square foot winery and tasting room at 15701 Biscayne Avenue near the Rosemount Business Park. This recommendation is based on the plan submitted by the applicant, the findings made in this report and the conditions outlined in the Recommended Actions section above. CITY OF ROSEMOUNT DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2021- 80 A RESOLUTION APPROVIN G A CONDITIONAL U SE PERMIT (CUP) FOR A FARM WINTERY IN THE BP-BUSINESS PARK DISTRICT WHEREAS, the City of Rosemount received an application for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) from Omni Brew Holdings, LLC.; and WHEREAS, on August 24, 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount held a public hearing to review the CUP application from Omni Brew Holdings, LLC., for a Farm Winery at 15701 Biscayne Avenue; and WHEREAS, the Planning C ommission adopted a motion recommending that the City Council approve the CUP for Omni Brew Holdings, LLC.; and WHEREAS, on September 21, 2021, the City Council of the City of Rosemount reviewed the Planning Commission’s recommendation and the CUP application for a farm winery. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Council of the City of Rosemount hereby approves the CUP for a farm winery at 15701 Biscayne Avenue. ADOPTED this 21st day of September, 2021, by the City Council of the City of Rosemount. __________________________________________ William H. Droste, Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________________ Erin Fasbender, City Clerk 1 DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS OMNI ORCHARDS FARM WINERY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THIS DECLARATION made this ______ day of _________________, 2021, by Omni Brew Holdings, LLC. (hereinafter referred to as the “Declarant”); WHEREAS, Declarant is the owner of the real property as described on Attachment One, attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof (hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Subject Property”); and WHEREAS, the Subject Property is subject to certain zoning and land use restrictions imposed by the City of Rosemount (hereinafter referred to as the “City”) in connection with the approval of an application for a final site and building plan planned unit development for a farm winery development on the Subject Property; and WHEREAS, the City has approved such development on the basis of the determination by the City Council of the City that such development is acceptable only by reason of the details of the development proposed and the unique land use characteristics of the proposed use of the Subject Property; and that but for the details of the development proposed and the unique land use characteristics of such proposed use, the master development plan planned unit develo pment would not have been approved; and WHEREAS, as a condition of approval of the master development plan planned unit development, the City has required the execution and filing of this Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (hereinafter the “Declaration”); and 2 WHEREAS, to secure the benefits and advantages of approval of such planned unit development, Declarant desires to subject the Subject Property to the terms hereof. NOW, THEREFORE, the Declarant declares that the Subject Property is, and shall be, held, transferred, sold, conveyed and occupied subject to the covenants, conditions, and restrictions, hereinafter set forth. 1. The use and development of the Subject Property shall conform to the following documents, plans and drawings: a. City Resolution No. 2021-XX, Attachment 1 b. Overall Utility Plan (Sheet C1), Attachment 3 c. Site Plan-Overall (Sheet CS01), Attachment 4 d. Grading Plan-Overall (Sheet C1), Attachment 5 e. Landscape Plan (Sheet L1.01), Attachment 6 f. Architectural Plan and Renderings, Attachment 7 All of which attachments are copies of original documents on file with the City and are made a part hereof. 2. Development and maintenance of structures and uses on the Subject Property shall conform to the following standards and requirements: a. Maintenance of the stormwater basins, infiltration basins and associated stormwater infrastructure necessary for the long term operation and function will be performed by the City. All other maintenance including but not limited to garbage collection, or landscape replacement or the like shall be the responsibility of the of the private property owners. All maintenance of the stormwater basin and infiltration basin shall be the resp onsibility of the City after the basins have been established. 3 b. Maintenance and replacement of trees and landscaping other than that associated with the stormwater basin and infiltration basin described in standard a. shall be the responsibility of the Declarant. 3. The Subject Property may only be developed and used in accordance with Paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Declaration unless the owner first secures approval by the City Council of an amendment to the planned unit development plan or a rezoning to a zoning classification that permits such other development and use. 4. In connection with the approval of development of the Subject Property, the following deviations from City Zoning or Subdivision Code provisions were approved: a. Section 11-4-15 -1 G.3.: The exterior wall surface shall allow metal paneling in lieu of brick, natural stone, specialty integral colored concrete block, tile, architectural textured concrete panels case in place, or precast concrete panels. b. Section 11-4-15-1 G.9: The tarping station shall allow for the use of vinyl decal signage. In all other respects the use and development of the Subject Property shall conform to the requirements of the Paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Declaration and the City Code of Ordinances. 5. The obligations and restrictions of this Declaration run with the land of the Subject Property and shall be enforceable against the Declarant, its successors and assigns, by the City of Rosemount acting through its City Council. This Declaration may be amended from time to time by a written amendment executed by the City and the owner or owners of the lot or lots to be affected by said amendment. 4 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned as duly authorized agents, officers or representatives of Declarant have hereunto set their hands and seals as of the day and year first above written. DECLARANT Omni Brew Holdings, LLC. By Its STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF __________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of _________, 20___, by _____________________, the _________________, for and on behalf of _________________________, a ____________________, by and on behalf of said _______________________. _______________________________ Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: CITY OF ROSEMOUNT 2875 145TH STREET WEST ROSEMOUNT, MN 55068 651-423 -4411 4.a. Request by Omni Orchards Farm Winery for Approval of a Conditional Use Permit and PUD Master Development Plan to Allow Construction of an 8,000 Square Foot Farm Winery Tasting Room and 4,000 Square Foot Patio. (21-42-CUP & 21-43-MS) Economic Development Coordinator Van Oss gave a presentation and summary of the staff report for the Planning Commission. Chair Kenninger inquired how many parking stalls are required for this project. Van Oss stated that it is 38. Kenninger inquired when there will be a stop light put in at the County Road 42 and Biscayne Ave intersection. Klatt stated that there is no timeline for when that stop light will be complete. Kenninger inquired if the buildings white panels are also metal. Van Oss stated that both the white and black panels are metal. Commissioner Reed inquired about the landscape buffer between the north and south properties on either side of the proposed project. Van Oss stated that the building is 300 feet from the northern property. Reed questioned if there was any thought of adding landscape buffering. Van Oss stated that staff thought there was enough distance between the buildings. Commissioner Hebert inquired if there are any existing sidewalks. Van Oss stated that there are not any sidewalks, and no plans on creating any. Commissioner Schmisek inquired if the applicant has any plans to turn this building into an event venue. Van Oss stated that if the applicant would like to have music, they would have to go through the process of obtaining a permit through the City. Chair Kenninger inquired about the house to the north of the property and how it will be closer to the potential additional building. Van Oss stated that the applicant would have to do a planned unit development amendment in order for that building to proceed. The public hearing opened at 6:47 pm. Public Comments: Sandra Rahn, 15725 Biscayne Ave West, stated that she resides in the home south to this proposed project. Ms. Rahn would like to see a fence be placed so that people from the business do not trespass onto her property and try to play with her horses. LeeAnn Wachter, 15675 Biscayne Ave West, stated that she resides in the home north to this proposed project. Ms. Wachter questioned if the proposed building will be on City sewer and water. Van Oss stated that they will be. Ms. Wachter is concerned that her hay field may be flooded due to the elevation differences. Al Tsai, 7300 147th Street West, Suite 504, Apple Valley, CNH Architects, stated that they are comfortable with City staff’s recommendations. Justin Walsh, 14962 64th Ave North, Maple Grove, Applicant, stated that he is one of the owners of the potential business. Mr. Walsh explained the business plan for the proposed business. Mr. Walsh would like to work with the neighbors on potentially adding a fence between the properties. Commissioner Thiagarajan inquired about the potential idea of changing the exterior colors. Mr. Tsai stated that the property is mostly surrounded by open fields. There are no buildings near the potential building to work off or compare too. Commissioner Hebert inquired about the elevation with the surrounding properties. Mr. Tsai stated that they have been working closely with the City Engineer on storm water and ponding on site. MOTION by Reed to close the public hearing. Second by Schmisek. Ayes: 6. Nays: 0. Motion Passes. The public hearing closed at 7:02 pm. Additional Comments: Commissioner Reed inquired if there is a standard with the business hours and with the business having outdoor events. Van Oss stated that for each event the business would have to obtain a permit through the City of Rosemount. Commissioner Schmisek stated that he was initially concerned about changing the exterior siding but with reading the staff report understands why that exterior was chosen. Chair Kenninger stated that the proposed project will be a nice addition to the City. Kenninger would also like to see staff work with the applicant and the neighbors to work out a fence or boundary of some sort. Commissioner Reed stated that he would like to also see the applicant work with the surrounding neighbors. MOTION by Schmisek to recommend the City Council adopt a resolution approving a Conditional Use Permit for a winery facility with tasting room in the BP-Business Park District at 15700 Biscayne Avenue. Second by Hebert. Ayes: 6. Nays: 0. Motion Passes. CITY SPEC'S FOR PUBLIC STREET CONSTRUCTION. CONSTRUCT FUTURE ROAD SEGMENT PER (171-FT X 32-FT MODIFIED WIDTH)BISCAYNE AVENUE(PUBLIC ROADWAY)WOOD POST CONCRETE CURB & GUTTERCONCRETE CURB & GUTTERWOOD POSTSEDGE OF FIELDFIELDNO PARKING SIGNFIELDBENCHMARK SPIKE IN UTILITY POLE ELEV: 947.99 8" PVC8" PVC SAN. STUB 15" RCP 18" RCP18" RCP10" PVC10" PVC12" WM12" WMSAN MH R=949.21 S W N 941.47I= 941.45I= I=941.51I=I=I= SAN MH R=951.72 N W S 942.36I= 942.33I= I=942.31I=I=I= CB R=950.23 E 946.57I=I=I=I=I=I= CB R=950.18 N W S 945.08I= 946.07I= I=945.18I=I=I= 171.10'32.00'171.00' SB SB SB SB SB SB SB SB SB CB 3 TOP 947.25 CB 1 TOP 948.3 FE INV 941.5 HYD GV GV GV GV MH 102 TOP 949.6 MH 101 TOP 951.8 CS 2 TOP 945.0 S S P P P Winery Tasting room 8,000 SF Future Out Building 4,000 SF Dock NURP Pond Future Rear Patio 1,500 SF Front Patio 3,000 SF PHASE 1 Class 5 Dock (33 proof of parking) (48) Future Game Area Future Vineyard Future Outdoor Event Area Future Orchard Future Pavement Asphalt Infiltration Basin 1 Infiltration Basin 2 Compact 60' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"40' - 0" 30' - 0"333' - 11 1/2"433' - 8 3/4" 433' - 8 1/2"334' - 9 5/8"133' - 0 1/4" 100' - 3"177' - 2 1/4" 20' - 0"24' - 0"20' - 0"8' - 6"8' - 0"17' - 0" 8' - 6"19' - 0"120' - 0 1/8"80' - 3"7' - 1"Property Line Setback Property Line Easement Setback Structure SetbackParking SetbackAssumed Property LineSetbackProperty LineTrash 8' - 6" 4' - 3" 19' - 0"8' - 6"19' - 0"Parking stalls to be removed, driveway and street to be restored should the public street be extended in the future Location Map 160th St W Biscayne AveProject Site 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 A B C D E F G H J K L M A B C D E F G H J K L M © CNH ARCHITECTS, INC. CNH NO.: 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 151 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFDATE:LIC. NO.:21234Quinn S. HutsonPRINT NAME:SIGNATURE:REVISIONS: DATE: 7300 147TH WEST STREET SUITE 504 APPLE VALLEY, MN 55124 (952) 431-4433 C:\REVIT (local)\REVIT 2021\21030 - Omni Rosemount_atsai47WSB.rvt9/10/2021 9:21:12 AMNot For Construction CS01Omni Orchards Rosemount15701 Biscayne Avenue, Rosemount, MN21030 9/21/2021 9/21/2021MINNESOTASite Plan 1" = 30'-0"CS01 1 Site Plan Zoning Business Park (BP) Proposed Use Winery with Tasting Room, Food, and Retail Building Height 50 feet allowed 44 feet proposed Lot (after ROW deduction) 145,018.52 SF (3.3 acres) Coverage Building 8,000.00 SF (5.52%) Bituminous 11,201.60 SF (7.72%) Concrete 2,647.10 SF (1.83%) Class 5 7,947.03 SF (5.48%) Total 31,290.09 SF 20.55% proposed coverage < 75% allowed Parking 3,814.33 GFA / 500 GFA per parking stall = 7.62 stalls (Farm wineries) 219 seats / 3 seats per parking stall = 73 stalls (for taproom, assembly hall, restaurant) 81 total required stalls including 3 accessible stalls 48 standard stalls proposed on pavement 25 standard stalls proposed as proof of parking on grass or class 5 8 compact stalls proposed as proof of parking on grass* 81 total parking stalls Type Size Standard stall 8.5' x 19' (or 20') Accessible stall 8.5' x 20' with 8' aisle Compact stall 8' x 17' * Up to 15% of total parking stalls are allowed to be compact (i.e. 10.2 stalls) WOOD POSTCONCRETE CURB & GUTTERUTTERWOOD POSTSEDGE OF FIELDFIELDNO PARKING SIGNFIELD8" PVC8" PVCSAN.STUB15" RCP18" RCP18" RCP10" PVCVCWM12" WMSAN MHR=949.21SWN941.4I=941.I=I=941.5I=I=I=CBR=950.23E946.57I=I=I=I=I=I=CBR=950.18NWS945.0I=946.0I=I=945.18I=I=I=SAN MHR=951.72NWS942.36I=942.33I=I=942.31I=I=I=BISCAYNE AVENUE(PUBLIC ROADWAY)FUTURE PATIOORCHARD/VINEYARDYARD GAMESFUTURE EVENT SPACEW/ FUTURE 3.5'RETAINING WALLCITY SPEC'S FOR PUBLIC STREET CONSTRUCTION.CONSTRUCT FUTURE ROAD SEGMENT PER(32O )7/13/2021 4:51:10 PML1.01060'30'15'C:\REVIT (local)\REVIT 2021\21030 - Omni Rosemount_atsai47WSB.rvt1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101112131415ABCDEFGHJKLMABCDEFGHJKLMCNH NO.:08.11.21234567891011121314151REVISIONS:DATE:7300 147TH WEST STREET SUITE 504APPLE VALLEY, MN 55124(952) 431-4433DATE:LIC. NO.:PRINT NAME:SIGNATURE:09/21/21LICENSED PROFESSIONAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATIONTHE STATE OF MINNESOTA.UNDER THE LAWS OFPAUL PAIGE, LALandscape Architecture /Planning / Urban Designwww.hkgi.comMinneapolis, Minnesota23594Omni Orchards RosemountRosemount, MN21030City Submittal 9.21.21 - Not For Construction 43' - 11 3/8"9' - 3 1/8"7' - 5 3/8"3' - 5 3/8"23' - 9 3/8"14' - 3 3/4"2' - 5 1/8"33' - 3 5/8"43' - 8 3/4"2' - 5 1/4" 3' - 11 1/2" 4 " / 1 2 "4" / 12" Metal buildng rake trim Metal building panel Welded wire mesh screen Overhead door Aluminum curtainwall system Concrete burnished concrete block Gabion landscape wall27' - 2 7/8"16' - 8 1/2"43' - 11 3/8"100' - 3 1/8" 25' - 4 5/8"18' - 4 7/8"56' - 5 1/8" 4 " / 1 2 "4" / 12" 4' - 6"8' - 0"4' - 10 3/4"5' - 0"5' - 4"3' - 4"45' - 5 3/4"3' - 4"8' - 4"8' - 0"4' - 1 1/2" Metal building rake trim Metal building siding Metal building siding Aluminum curtainwall system Overhead door Hollow metal door 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 A B C D E F G H J K L M A B C D E F G H J K L M © CNH ARCHITECTS, INC. CNH NO.: 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 151 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFDATE:LIC. NO.:21234Quinn S. HutsonPRINT NAME:SIGNATURE:REVISIONS: DATE: 7300 147TH WEST STREET SUITE 504 APPLE VALLEY, MN 55124 (952) 431-4433 C:\REVIT (local)\REVIT 2021\21030 - Omni Rosemount_atsai47WSB.rvt7/27/2021 8:20:23 AMCity Submittal -Not For Construction CS02Omni Orchards Rosemount15700 Biscayne Avenue, Rosemount, MN21030 7/27/2021 7/27/2021MINNESOTAExterior Elevations 1/8" = 1'-0"CS02 2 Schematic South Elevation 1/8" = 1'-0"CS02 3 Schematic North Elevation Burnished Concrete Color Block Gabion Landscape Wall Welded Wire Mesh >50% open Metal Building Panel 80' - 3"5' - 0"2' - 0" 87' - 3"43' - 11 3/8"27' - 11 3/8"16' - 0"2' - 0"16' - 0"2' - 0"5' - 0"3' - 0"8' - 0"2' - 0"5' - 0"3' - 0"5' - 0"4' - 0"5' - 0"4' - 0"5' - 0" 1' - 10 1/4" 8' - 0" 1' - 4 3/4"4' - 11" 2' - 2" Metal building roof panel Metal building eave trim Metal building paenl Aluminum curtainwall system Welded wire mesh pergola Color burnished concrete block Gabion landscape wall Steel column, paint or galvanized Steel beam, paint or galvanized Welded wire mesh screen 87' - 3" 2' - 0"5' - 0"67' - 10 3/4"10' - 0" 2' - 4 1/4"16' - 0"27' - 11 3/8"43' - 11 3/8"Metal building roof panel Metal building eave trim Metal building panel Overhead door Hollow metal door Color burnished concrete block 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 A B C D E F G H J K L M A B C D E F G H J K L M © CNH ARCHITECTS, INC. CNH NO.: 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 151 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFDATE:LIC. NO.:21234Quinn S. HutsonPRINT NAME:SIGNATURE:REVISIONS: DATE: 7300 147TH WEST STREET SUITE 504 APPLE VALLEY, MN 55124 (952) 431-4433 C:\REVIT (local)\REVIT 2021\21030 - Omni Rosemount_atsai47WSB.rvt7/27/2021 8:16:59 AMCity Submittal -Not For Construction CS03Omni Orchards Rosemount15700 Biscayne Avenue, Rosemount, MN21030 7/27/2021 7/27/2021MINNESOTAExterior Elevations 1/8" = 1'-0"CS03 1 Schematic West Elevation 1/8" = 1'-0"CS03 2 Schematic East Elevation 2' - 8 1/8"12' - 5"3' - 3 3/4" 18' - 4 7/8"8' - 2"5' - 8"2' - 6"Prefinished metal coping Color burnished concrete block Steel frame, paint or galvanize Corrugated metal infill panel, prefinished or galvanized 17' - 9 1/4"8' - 2"Prefinished metal coping Color burnished concrete block 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 A B C D E F G H J K L M A B C D E F G H J K L M © CNH ARCHITECTS, INC. CNH NO.: 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 151 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFDATE:LIC. NO.:21234Quinn S. HutsonPRINT NAME:SIGNATURE:REVISIONS: DATE: 7300 147TH WEST STREET SUITE 504 APPLE VALLEY, MN 55124 (952) 431-4433 C:\REVIT (local)\REVIT 2021\21030 - Omni Rosemount_atsai47WSB.rvt7/27/2021 8:18:41 AMCity Submittal -Not For Construction CS04Omni Orchards Rosemount15700 Biscayne Avenue, Rosemount, MN21030 7/27/2021 7/27/2021MINNESOTAExterior Elevations 1/2" = 1'-0"CS04 1 Trash Enclosure - North Elevation 1/2" = 1'-0"CS04 2 Trash Enclosure - East and West Elevation Event Space 1 103 Men's Restroom 104 Women's Restroom 105 Kitchen 106 Hallway 150 Production 107 Barrel Cellar 108 Office 109 Future Cooler 110 Warehouse 111 Bar 102 Tasting 101 Cooler 112 Event Space 2 114 Utility 115 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 A B C D E F G H J K L M A B C D E F G H J K L M © CNH ARCHITECTS, INC. CNH NO.: 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 151 REVISIONS: DATE: 7300 147TH WEST STREET SUITE 504 APPLE VALLEY, MN 55124 (952) 431-4433 P:\Projects\2021\21030\Central\21030 - Omni Rosemount_VER6.rvt8/11/2021 3:42:25 PMCity Submittal -Not For Construction CS08Omni Orchards Rosemount15700 Biscayne Avenue, Rosemount, MN21030 8/18/2021 Floor Plan 3/16" = 1'-0"CS08 1 First Floor Plan Copy 1 Page M of 1Project #:Date:8/12/2021Calculated light levels shown areestimates based on informationavailable at time of layout request.Due to unknown site conditionsJTH Lighting assumes no responsibilityfor installed light levels.1. Lighting Reflectance of 80/50/20 used unless noted otherwise2. Interior calc points shown at 30" A.F.F. unless noted otherwise3. Exterior calc points shown at grade unless noted otherwise4. Emergency egress calc points shown at 0" A.F.F.5. Photometric drawings are for Design purposes only, not for Construction documentsPaper Size: ARCH D - 24X36"MN, ND, SD, W. WI6885 146TH ST WAPPLE VALLEY, MN 55124952.223.6300WWW.JTHLIGHTING.COMOMNI ORCHARDSLuminaire ScheduleSymbolQtyLabelManufacturerDescriptionArrangementLum. LumensLum. WattsLLFCalculation SummaryLabelCalcTypeUnitsAvgMaxMin6AAASL2-320L-145-4K7-4W-USINGLE204921430.950Avg/MinMax/Min10WP1RWL1-48L-20-4K7-4W-USINGLE267119.9LOT_PlanarIlluminanceFc0.9502.235.80.0N.A.N.A.Not to ScaleWP1MH: 10WP1MH: 10MH: 10WP1WP1MH: 10WP1MH: 10WP1MH: 10MH: 10WP1MH: 10WP1WP1MH: 10WP1MH: 10AAMH: 28AAMH: 28AAMH: 28MH: 28AAMH: 28AAMH: 28AA0.3 0.9 1.8 2.4 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.5 2.2 1.4 0.6 0.20.4 1.2 2.6 3.4 3.8 4.0 3.9 3.6 3.1 1.9 0.7 0.30.5 1.3 2.8 4.0 4.4 4.5 4.5 4.2 3.5 2.0 0.7 0.30.6 1.2 2.5 3.8 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.1 3.3 1.8 0.8 0.50.8 1.3 2.3 3.5 4.0 3.9 3.9 3.9 2.9 1.7 1.0 0.60.9 1.5 2.3 3.4 4.0 3.9 4.0 3.9 2.9 1.8 1.1 0.70.9 1.4 2.4 3.7 4.1 4.1 4.2 4.1 3.1 1.8 1.0 0.60.8 1.4 2.8 4.1 4.6 4.7 4.7 4.6 3.7 2.1 1.0 0.50.1 0.1 0.3 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.6 3.3 4.6 5.25.5 5.5 5.4 4.6 2.7 1.0 0.50.1 0.3 0.7 1.5 1.8 2.0 1.8 1.3 1.3 1.8 2.1 2.0 1.6 1.8 3.5 4.7 5.35.7 5.8 5.8 5.1 3.2 1.2 0.40.2 0.7 1.5 2.4 2.2 2.2 2.0 1.2 1.2 2.1 2.3 2.2 1.3 1.5 3.8 4.5 4.74.9 5.2 5.4 4.8 3.0 1.1 0.40.2 0.9 1.9 2.33.9 4.1 3.7 3.8 4.2 4.5 4.0 2.3 1.0 0.50.2 0.9 2.0 2.23.9 3.7 3.1 2.9 3.3 3.7 3.1 1.9 1.0 0.60.2 1.0 2.0 2.14.3 4.0 3.1 2.5 2.9 3.2 2.6 1.7 1.1 0.60.3 1.1 1.8 1.84.1 3.8 2.9 2.5 2.8 3.2 2.6 1.7 1.0 0.60.3 1.0 2.0 2.34.3 4.0 3.1 2.7 3.0 3.4 2.9 1.7 0.9 0.50.2 1.0 2.2 2.55.0 4.5 3.5 3.1 3.5 4.0 3.6 2.2 0.9 0.40.3 1.1 2.4 2.74.3 4.2 3.7 3.6 4.2 4.6 4.3 2.8 1.0 0.40.3 1.3 2.6 2.83.7 3.7 3.5 3.7 4.3 4.8 4.6 3.0 1.1 0.40.4 1.5 3.5 4.7 4.4 4.1 3.7 3.4 3.1 1.6 1.7 2.7 2.8 3.2 2.9 3.0 3.43.9 4.4 4.1 2.5 0.9 0.40.4 1.4 3.6 4.8 4.7 4.5 4.0 3.3 2.7 1.5 1.5 2.4 2.3 2.1 2.0 2.4 2.83.3 3.8 3.4 2.0 0.9 0.50.5 1.2 2.8 3.8 3.7 3.4 3.0 2.2 1.6 1.2 0.8 1.2 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 2.12.6 3.1 3.6 3.0 1.8 1.1 0.60.6 1.1 2.0 2.9 2.9 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.5 1.8 2.32.8 3.4 3.7 3.0 1.9 1.2 0.70.7 1.1 1.8 2.6 2.7 2.2 1.7 1.3 1.1 1.1 1.4 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.8 2.2 2.73.4 3.9 4.2 3.3 1.9 1.1 0.70.7 1.1 1.7 2.6 2.7 2.2 1.7 1.3 1.1 1.2 1.7 2.2 2.3 2.2 2.3 2.7 3.34.1 4.7 4.8 3.8 2.1 1.0 0.50.5 0.9 1.8 2.8 2.7 2.3 1.8 1.4 1.1 1.3 1.9 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.9 3.3 3.94.8 5.4 5.2 4.2 2.3 0.9 0.40.4 0.9 2.1 3.1 2.9 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.2 1.4 2.1 3.0 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.6 4.24.9 5.4 4.9 3.8 2.3 0.9 0.40.3 0.9 2.2 3.0 2.8 2.4 1.9 1.4 1.2 1.3 2.0 2.8 2.9 2.7 2.6 2.9 3.34.0 4.3 3.8 2.8 1.7 0.7 0.30.2 0.8 1.7 2.1 2.0 1.8 1.5 1.2 0.9 1.0 1.3 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.7 1.9 1.92.1 2.3 2.2 1.6 0.9 0.4 0.20.5 1.0 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.8 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.01.0 0.9 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.10.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.40.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 K:\018668-000\Admin\Docs\2021.09.15 - Omi Orchard Site Review Memo.docx Memorandum To: Eric Van Oss, Economic Development Coordinator CC: Adam Kleinberg, Community Development Director Stacy Bodsberg, Planning & Personnel Secretary Nick Egger, PE, Director of Public Works Brian Erickson, PE City Engineer From: Tim Hanson PE, WSB Engineering Consultant Date: September 15, 2021 Re: Omni Orchards Rosemount Site Plan Review Grading, Drainage, Erosion Control & Utility Plan Review WSB File No 0018668-000 SUBMITTAL: A Site Plan, Grading, Drainage, Erosion Control & Utility Plan for Omni Orchards Rosemount have been submitted. They were prepared by CNH Architects of Apple Valley, MN and Rehder & Associates of Eagan MN for the Omni Orchards Project. Engineering review comments were generated from the following plat documents dated 9-21-2021, consisting of: ▪ ALTA Survey ▪ Grading, Drainage, Erosion Control ▪ Grading, Drainage, Erosion Control and Utility Plan GENERAL COMMENTS – ALTA SURVEY: Omni Orchard is located on the west side of Biscayne Avenue between CSAH 42 and CSAH 46, north of Biscayne Business Park and the Donald Wachter parcel. The current parcel is vacant land with some trees located in the southeast area of the parcel. The proposed development proposes a single building with adjacent patio, parking lot and ponding/infiltration areas. The site plan identifies a “future building” located in the north central portion of parcel, additional parking, patio, yard game area and orchard/vineyard area. 1. The development Fees are indicated below based on the 2021 Schedule of Rates and Fees. Fees will be due with the Conditional Use Permit/Building Permit (development agreement). ▪ Sanitary Sewer Trunk Charge: $1075/acre ▪ Watermain Trunk Charge: $6,500/acre ▪ Storm Sewer Trunk Charge: $6,865/ net developable acre 2. The ALTA survey identifies a private easement to Mid-America Pipeline Company that is undefined as to its location. This easement must be defined or vacated. Kyle Klatt September 15, 2021 Page 2 K:\018668-000\Admin\Docs\2021.09.15 - Omi Orchard Site Review Memo.docx 3. The ALTA survey also identifies a temporary easement located in the north east corner of the parcel. This easement needs to be vacated. 4. The ALTA survey identifies existing utility poles located beyond the Biscayne Right of Way. A drainage and utility easement must be dedicated under the facilities or the poles need to be relocated. 5. The southern 60 feet of the parcel has an existing easement for street and utilities extending east to west across the parcel. This easement was previously dedicated for the extension of public street and utilities west across the parcel to provide service to the land to the west. 6. A 10-foot drainage and utility easement is shown around the perimeter of the site on the civil plan sheets. This easement must be dedicated. GRADING AND EROSION CONTOL The existing site drains from the southwest corner to the north east. There is 16 feet of fall across the site. The proposed grading plan identifies constructing a small berm along the north property line creating an infiltration area and NURP pond south of the berm. The proposed building is in the central area of the site with the parking lot extending along the east side of the proposed building. Runoff from the impervious area flows to the east to a NURP basin and then into an infiltration basin located on the east side of the drive lane and parking area. Runoff from a 1 percent chance storm would discharge from the infiltration basin north to a land locked area on the west side of Biscayne Avenue. To the south and west of the proposed building a shallow swale is proposed that conveys runoff to a second infiltration area located to the northwest of the building. The two infiltration areas are connected by a storm sewer pipe. 7. The grading plan terminates grading at the Right of Way of Biscayne Avenue. The boulevard of Biscayne can be graded out to the curb to blend in with the site grading if needed. ACCESS AND EGRESS The driveway to the site is identified to be extended from the future street along the south side of the parcel. The future street extends west from Biscayne Avenue within the dedicated easement for street and utilities. The future street must have the vertical profile designed across the length of the parcel for future extension. 8. The future street must be constructed to City design standards from Biscayne Avenue to the west side of the proposed driveway. Curb and gutter must be placed on the north side, the south side can be a rural section with a 14-foot bituminous lane and a two-foot shoulder provided drainage within a roadside swale can be provided on the south side of the street. 9. The cross section of the future street must crown to the north and south. 10. Parking is identified on the future street alignment and within the easement area. This parking will be eliminated upon extension of the street. SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN Sanitary sewer and watermain laterals are stubbed to the west from Biscayne Avenue at the 60- foot street and utility easement on the southerly edge of the parcel. These stubs are extended west to the mid-point of the parcel and terminated. The watermain must be terminated with a Kyle Klatt September 15, 2021 Page 3 K:\018668-000\Admin\Docs\2021.09.15 - Omi Orchard Site Review Memo.docx hydrant. Sewer and water services are extended north from the laterals to serve the proposed building. 11. The utility extensions within the site will be privately maintained. The utility extension within the 60 foot easement will be publicly maintained. SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT The plans for Omni Orchard Project are being reviewed for surface water management, erosion and sediment control and for storm sewer pipe sizing. 12. Plat approval is subject to the comments of the final Surface Water Management Plan Review. K:\018668-000\Admin\Docs\WR Review\018668-000 Omni Brewing SW Review Memo 20210915.docx 701 XENIA AVENUE S | SUITE 300 | MINNEAPOLIS, MN | 55416 | 763.541.4800 | WSBENG.COM Memorandum To: Brian Erickson, City of Rosemount From: Bill Alms, PE Kendra Fallon, PE Date: September 15, 2021 Re: Omni Brewing Plan Review WSB Project No. 018668-000 I have reviewed the documents provided by Rehder & Associates on September 13, 2021. Documents reviewed include: · STORM WATER MANAGEMENT REPORT_9-13-21 · CIVIL SET_8-13-21 · Civil Response Memo_9-13-21 · 21-0866 Omni Orchards Infiltration Tests 8-9-21 · 21-0866A Omni Orchards DRAFT Logs and Sketch Applicant should provide responses to each comment. I offer the following comments below. Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Comments: 1. General a. Draft soil borings were to confirm compliance for groundwater separation. Applicant should submit the final geotechnical report when completed. 2. Ponds and Wetlands a. It is recommended Infiltration Basin 2 be restored with the proposed water quality basin seed mix rather than the short grass prairie seed mix. 3. Emergency Overflow Routes: a. No comments. 4. Retaining Walls: a. No comments. 5. Erosion Control: a. A NPDES permit and SWPPP will be required for this site since over an acre will be disturbed. Applicant noted that the SWPPP will be incomplete until a contractor is awarded however a draft of the SWPPP (excluding contractor information) should be submitted for review. b. A rock entrance should be shown coming from Biscayne Avenue at the planned entrance to the site. Brian Erickson 9/15/2021 Page 2 K:\018668-000\Admin\Docs\WR Review\018668-000 Omni Brewing SW Review Memo 20210915.docx 6. Grading: a. Maximum slopes of 4:1 are allowed above the NWL of the NURP basin. Side slopes for Infiltration Basin 1 and on the east side of Infiltration 2 appear to be 3:1 and should be updated to 4:1. i. Note 4:1 slopes are the maximum allowed for the entire site, excluding what is below the NWL of the NURP basin. Applicant should confirm all other areas not noted above are in compliance. Stormwater Management Plan: 1. General Storm Sewer Design a. A stub along Biscayne Avenue was not provided for this site so an OCS from Infiltration Basin 1 is not required. b. Storm sewer sizing calculations should be provided for the storm sewer onsite to confirm storm sewer is being sized for the 10-year storm event. i. The City adopts MnDOT guidance that storm sewer should be designed for 3 fps full flow velocities to deter settling of particles. Table 8.8 in the MnDOT Drainage Manual provides the minimum grades required for differing pipe diameter to provide 3 fps. c. Onsite storm sewer should be upsized to a minimum of 15” to be in line with the City’s Engineering Guidelines. d. The last runs of pipe prior to outlettting into the pond (and FES) should be updated to RCP. i. It is recommended the storm sewer below driving surfaces be changed to RCP. 2. Water Quantity a. No comments 3. Rate/Volume Control a. No comments. 4. Freeboard a. No comments. 5. Water Quality a. No comments. 6. Easements a. No comments.