Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2.a. CSAH 42 Visioning Study Update\\rsm-file\Common\City Clerk\Agenda Items\Approved Items\2.a. CSAH 42 Visioning Study Update.docx EXECUTIVE SUMMARY City Council Work Session: January 31, 2022 AGENDA ITEM: CSAH 42 Visioning Study Update AGENDA SECTION: Discussion PREPARED BY: Brian Erickson, City Engineer AGENDA NO. 2.a. ATTACHMENTS: Executive Summary; Recommendation Maps APPROVED BY: LJM RECOMMENDED ACTION: Discussion BACKGROUND Dakota County and the cities of Rosemount, Apple Valley and Burnsville are nearing the completion of the County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 42 Visioning Study. As a result, Dakota County Engineer Mark Krebsbach, Assistant County Engineer Erin Laberee, and Senior Project Manager Doug Abere will be attending the work session to discuss the status of the study as well as the upcoming actions that will be requested of the cities. In addition, Dakota County Commissioners Atkins and Hamann-Roland plan to attend as well. The attached executive summary and maps provide the current status of the study on the entire corridor and are provided for Council background. The primary focus areas for Rosemount have been: • Development and access along the CSAH 42 corridor between Biscayne and Akron • Future intersection improvements at S. Robert Trail and CSAH 42 • Access management future improvements in the area west of U.S. Highway 52 • Pedestrian improvements including trails and other accommodations for crossings County staff will present the current status of the study and then be available for further discussion. During the study process, county and city staff have worked to explore potential solutions that meeting both the needs of Rosemount and its rapid development and Dakota County’s needs related to CSAH 42 as a principle arterial. Three areas have been identified as additional study areas based on the relatively limited corridor study scope and relative complexity of these areas. Those areas are: • S. Robert Trail and CSAH 42 intersection and related improvements • Full access locations and traffic control for the corridor between Biscayne and Auburn • Future U.S. Highway 52 improvements RECOMMENDATION Discussion of proposed long-term plans for CSAH 42 as well as next steps for proposed adoption of this plan. 1 2040 Corridor Management Plan for Dakota County Highway 42 DRAFT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Dakota County’s Highway 42 Management Plan for 2040 updates the current long-term plan (adopted in 1999 and 2007). The Management Plan provides 20-year guidance for managing County Highway 42 from the County’s west border in Burnsville to Highway 52 in Rosemount (15 miles). County Highway 42 (Highway 42) is a an east-west principal arterial in Dakota and Scott Counties, and as such, is managed for efficient and safe travel. It serves thousands of users each day, providing connections to other major arterials such as I-35W/I-35E and Hwy 52. It also provides local access to residential and commercial areas. Why was Highway 42 studied? Today’s vehicle traffic volumes (2019) are 20% -50% below the levels forecast in 1999, yet they are still growing. This study looked at current data and best practices to understand how the highway can best be managed in the future. It considered the roles of existing and future parallel routes and frontage roads and the increasing need for safe and efficient walking, biking and transit to plan for the future of the transportation system in Dakota County and the surrounding area. Updates to the plan leveraged 2040 transportation plans and forecasts (Dakota County and Cities), incorporated local comprehensive planning, and created short- and long-term guidance to manage the corridor. Study Goals The Management Plan aimed to address the following goals for Highway 42: Improve Safety Reduce Traffic congestions and delay Balance access to adjacent propertied and the local roadway network Design for pedestrians, bicyclists and transit users Prepare for future transportation needs (ex. land development and growth) Key Findings A review of technical analysis and public feedback found that overall, Highway 42 can be effectively managed through the year 2040 by using approaches similar to those of the past. Therefore, the updated plan is mostly consistent with the 1999 corridor plan, with modifications to incorporate innovations and best practices and provide a more concrete vision for multimodal improvements such as walking, biking and transit facilities. The overall management plan revolves around: • Maintaining and improving corridor functions to serve all travelers • Controlling access and traffic • Reducing or deferring the need for Highway 42 expansion The following pages provide a summary of the recommended improvements by community. County Highway 42 Study Area ! 1 2 3 4 5 6 LAKE MARION GREENWAY TRAIL UNDERPASS (BUILT 2020) 6 LANE DIVIDED HIGHWAY 4 LANE DIVIDED HIGHWAY CITY BOUNDARY EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL FULL ACCESS - NO SIGNAL 3/4 ACCESS Portland AveLac Lavon DrNicollet Ave35W 35E 35 1111 55 Southcross Dr Burnsville Pkw yBURNSVILLE 1 1 3 3 54 2 Minor changes at many Minor changes at many intersections to improve intersections to improve safety for all travelerssafety for all travelers 1 Burnsville Center Hwy 42 bus-stop improvements and transit- station upgrades at Burnsville Center 2 Intersection redesign at Aldrich Ave, allowing traffic and pedestrians/bicyclists to cross under Hwy 42 3 Freeway interchange ramp changes to improve land access and Hwy 42 connections 4 Improvements around Portland Ave to address the eastbound lane drop and other issues 5 Possible bus-stop improvements in Burnsville in segments east of I-35E LAKE MARION GREENWAY TRAIL UNDERPASS (BUILT 2020) 6 LANE DIVIDED HIGHWAY 4 LANE DIVIDED HIGHWAY CITY BOUNDARY EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL FULL ACCESS - NO SIGNAL 3/4 ACCESS Portland AveLac Lavon DrNicollet Ave35W 35E 35 1111 55 Southcross Dr Burnsville Pkw yBURNSVILLE 1 1 3 3 54 2 Minor changes at many Minor changes at many intersections to improve intersections to improve safety for all travelerssafety for all travelers 1 Burnsville Center Hwy 42 bus-stop improvements and transit- station upgrades at Burnsville Center 2 Intersection redesign at Aldrich Ave, allowing traffic and pedestrians/bicyclists to cross under Hwy 42 3 Freeway interchange ramp changes to improve land access and Hwy 42 connections 4 Improvements around Portland Ave to address the eastbound lane drop and other issues 5 Possible bus-stop improvements in Burnsville in segments east of I-35E LAKE MARION GREENWAY TRAIL UNDERPASS (BUILT 2020) 6 LANE DIVIDED HIGHWAY 4 LANE DIVIDED HIGHWAY CITY BOUNDARY EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL FULL ACCESS - NO SIGNAL 3/4 ACCESS Portland AveLac Lavon DrNicollet Ave35W 35E 35 1111 55 Southcross Dr Burnsville Pkw yBURNSVILLE 1 1 3 3 54 2 Minor changes at many Minor changes at many intersections to improve intersections to improve safety for all travelerssafety for all travelers 1 Burnsville Center Hwy 42 bus-stop improvements and transit- station upgrades at Burnsville Center 2 Intersection redesign at Aldrich Ave, allowing traffic and pedestrians/bicyclists to cross under Hwy 42 3 Freeway interchange ramp changes to improve land access and Hwy 42 connections 4 Improvements around Portland Ave to address the eastbound lane drop and other issues 5 Possible bus-stop improvements in Burnsville in segments east of I-35E 2 DRAFT Summary of Hwy 42 Recommendations City of Burnsville Context Highway 42 in Burnsville has major commercial areas west of I-35W and I-35E, with residential and some retail to the east. Highway 42 through Burnsville has six through lanes west of Portland Ave to accommodate high traffic volumes (29,000 to 51,000 vehicles per day). The City is planning for redevelopment of the Burnsville Center/Mall area, including a more mixed-use pattern around Burnsville Center (retail, office, and residential). The highest traffic volumes/ complexity Segments of Highway 42 in Burnsville carry more than 50,000 vehicles per day, which include the freeway interchanges and other connections serving complex traffic movements and several safety and congestion issues. Plans for redevelopment and “rethinking” highway connections The City’s redevelopment vision will help create opportunities to rework access points and connections along Highway 42, the freeways, and other roadways. Proven bus transit services opportunities Highway 42 in Burnsville includes several bus stops and has a strong history and positive future for serving riders. Routes include connections traveling west to Scott County and several routes traveling to Burnsville Center. Need to better serve pedestrians and bicyclists There are several challenges identified in Burnsville for pedestrians and bicyclists, which include crossing Highway 42 and cross-streets. Recommended Improvements Portland AveLac Lavon DrNicollet Ave35W 35E 35 1111 55 Southcross Dr Burnsville Pkw y1 1 3 3 54 2 Minor changes at many Minor changes at many intersections to improve safety for intersections to improve safety for all travelersall travelers Burnsville Center 6 The Management Plan’s direction for Burnsville includes planning for future connections for traffic and pedestrians/bicyclists to cross Highway 42, which supports the planned redevelopment and addresses other needs. The Plan also identifies the need for safer and more efficient connections between Highway 42 and I-35W / I-35E. Highway 42 bus-stop improvements at existing stops and transit-station upgrades at Burnsville Center Intersection redesigns at or near Aldrich Avenue, allowing traffic and pedestrians/ bicyclists to cross under Highway 42 Freeway interchange ramp changes to improve land access and Highway 42 connections Improvements around Portland Avenue to address the eastbound lane drop and other issues Possible bus-stop improvements east of I-35E Maintain stop-controlled intersection at Redwood Drive, minimizing traffic diversions in Burnsville 1 2 3 4 5 LAKE MARION GREENWAY TRAIL UNDERPASS (BUILT 2020) 6 LANE DIVIDED HIGHWAY 4 LANE DIVIDED HIGHWAY CITY BOUNDARY EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL FULL ACCESS - NO SIGNAL 3/4 ACCESS Portland AveLac Lavon DrNicollet Ave35W 35E 35 1111 55 Southcross Dr Burnsville Pkw yBURNSVILLE 1 1 3 3 54 2 Minor changes at many Minor changes at many intersections to improve intersections to improve safety for all travelerssafety for all travelers 1 Burnsville Center Hwy 42 bus-stop improvements and transit- station upgrades at Burnsville Center 2 Intersection redesign at Aldrich Ave, allowing traffic and pedestrians/bicyclists to cross under Hwy 42 3 Freeway interchange ramp changes to improve land access and Hwy 42 connections 4 Improvements around Portland Ave to address the eastbound lane drop and other issues 5 Possible bus-stop improvements in Burnsville in segments east of I-35E LAKE MARION GREENWAY TRAIL UNDERPASS (BUILT 2020) 6 LANE DIVIDED HIGHWAY 4 LANE DIVIDED HIGHWAY CITY BOUNDARY EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL FULL ACCESS - NO SIGNAL 3/4 ACCESS Portland AveLac Lavon DrNicollet Ave35W 35E 35 1111 55 Southcross Dr Burnsville Pkw yBURNSVILLE 1 1 3 3 54 2 Minor changes at many Minor changes at many intersections to improve intersections to improve safety for all travelerssafety for all travelers 1 Burnsville Center Hwy 42 bus-stop improvements and transit- station upgrades at Burnsville Center 2 Intersection redesign at Aldrich Ave, allowing traffic and pedestrians/bicyclists to cross under Hwy 42 3 Freeway interchange ramp changes to improve land access and Hwy 42 connections 4 Improvements around Portland Ave to address the eastbound lane drop and other issues 5 Possible bus-stop improvements in Burnsville in segments east of I-35E LAKE MARION GREENWAY TRAIL UNDERPASS (BUILT 2020) 6 LANE DIVIDED HIGHWAY 4 LANE DIVIDED HIGHWAY CITY BOUNDARY EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL FULL ACCESS - NO SIGNAL 3/4 ACCESS Portland AveLac Lavon DrNicollet Ave35W 35E 35 1111 55 Southcross Dr Burnsville Pkw yBURNSVILLE 1 1 3 3 54 2 Minor changes at many Minor changes at many intersections to improve intersections to improve safety for all travelerssafety for all travelers 1 Burnsville Center Hwy 42 bus-stop improvements and transit- station upgrades at Burnsville Center 2 Intersection redesign at Aldrich Ave, allowing traffic and pedestrians/bicyclists to cross under Hwy 42 3 Freeway interchange ramp changes to improve land access and Hwy 42 connections 4 Improvements around Portland Ave to address the eastbound lane drop and other issues 5 Possible bus-stop improvements in Burnsville in segments east of I-35E LAKE MARION GREENWAY TRAIL UNDERPASS (BUILT 2020) 6 LANE DIVIDED HIGHWAY 4 LANE DIVIDED HIGHWAY CITY BOUNDARY EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL FULL ACCESS - NO SIGNAL 3/4 ACCESS Portland AveLac Lavon DrNicollet Ave35W 35E 35 1111 55 Southcross Dr Burnsville Pkw yBURNSVILLE 1 1 3 3 54 2 Minor changes at many Minor changes at many intersections to improve intersections to improve safety for all travelerssafety for all travelers 1 Burnsville Center Hwy 42 bus-stop improvements and transit- station upgrades at Burnsville Center 2 Intersection redesign at Aldrich Ave, allowing traffic and pedestrians/bicyclists to cross under Hwy 42 3 Freeway interchange ramp changes to improve land access and Hwy 42 connections 4 Improvements around Portland Ave to address the eastbound lane drop and other issues 5 Possible bus-stop improvements in Burnsville in segments east of I-35E 6 6 3 DRAFT Summary of Hwy 42 Recommendations City of Apple Valley Context Highway 42 in Apple Valley has residential and parkland on the western end of the corridor, major commercial development around Cedar Avenue (Highway 77/23), and a mix of commercial and residential properties adjacent to the corridor to the east. Highway 42 in Apple Valley has four through lanes serving 20,300 to 36,000 vehicles per day. Plan recommendations do not include the addition of through lanes. High volume intersection at Cedar Avenue With almost 80,000 vehicles per day using the intersection of Cedar Avenue and Highway 42, this location has impacts on operations from Pennock Avenue to Flagstaff Avenue. Safety is also a concern based on the amount of crashes, including some with injuries and fatalities. Aging Infrastructure The segment of Highway 42 from Redwood Drive to Pennock Avenue has some of the oldest pavement and signals. Replacement of this aging infrastructure may put priority on improvements within this segment. Plans for development Potential redevelopment of commercial areas around the Cedar Avenue intersection, and new development between Flagstaff Avenue and Pilot Knob Road, will create opportunities to streamline access and traffic. Need to better serve pedestrians and bicyclists There are several challenges identified in Apple Valley for pedestrians and bicyclists, which include crossing Highway 42 and cross-streets. Recommended Improvements The Management Plan’s guidance for Apple Valley includes future connections for pedestrians/bicyclists to cross Highway 42 and improvements at the highest volume intersections. The County and City also have an opportunity to rethink how the segment between Elm Drive and Hayes Road functions with the current frontage road system. Coordinated changes with the removal of the signal at Elm Drive concurrent with a new underpass at Redwood Park to accommodate pedestrians and bicyclists Improvements at Garden View to address capacity issues with possible one-way frontage road system to provide more space for pedestrians and bicyclists, filling a gap in the trail system Potential grade-separated crossings for pedestrians and bicyclists Grade-separated crossing of the high-volume intersection of Cedar Ave/Hwy 77 Updated plan recommends keeping a signal at Garrett New intersection configuration options to provide additional capacity at Pilot Knob Road 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 4 The Management Plan’s guidance for Rosemount will allow for full-access locations for future development, improvements for adjacent trails and future trail crossings of Highway 42 and other improvements. DRAFT Summary of Hwy 42 Recommendations City of Rosemount Context Highway 42 in Rosemount has a mix of commercial and residential areas west of S. Robert Trail/Highway 3 with plans for future mixed-use development south of the corridor to the east. The City has referenced the intersection recommendations adopted by Dakota County in 2007 to implement access for current and future developments. Highway 42 in Rosemount has four through lanes serving 13,800 to 19,500 vehicles per day. High volume intersection adjacent to at-grade railroad crossing The S. Robert Trail/Highway 3 intersection is one of the few remaining major arterials in the metro area with an at-grade railroad crossing. With high traffic volumes also present, a bridge over the intersection and railroad should be considered. Plans for development and planned highway connections The City will use the recommendations from this plan to understand the needs for supporting roadway networks and plan access for future developments. Need to better serve pedestrians and bicyclists There are several challenges identified in Rosemount for pedestrians and bicyclists, which include crossing Highway 42 and cross- streets. There is also a safety concern at Shannon Parkway due to high number of crashes with pedestrians and bicyclists. Important connection to Highway 52 The interchange at Highway 52 provides an important connection for the region. Previous studies identified potential improvements that will be driven by development and traffic. Recommended Improvements Pedestrian and bicycle crossing treatments to address current safety concerns Grade-separated crossing of both the S. Robert Trail intersection and the adjacent railroad crossing of Highway 42 Trails to fill current gaps in the system between S. Robert Trail and Akron Avenue Manage series of full- and partial-access intersections, including new signals when needed for traffic, from Biscayne Ave to the east Planned access along Highway 42 to support future roadway network as area is developed Possible loop ramps to provide for the heaviest traffic movements at Highway 52 and supporting road systems east of Blaine Avenue to manage direct accessBlaine AveAudrey AveChippendale AveBiscayne AveShannon PkwyDiamond Path145th St Bonnaire Path 5252 3333 33 S Robert Trail Co n n e m ara Trail Akron Ave71717373 New traffic signal (mid-2021 construction) 3 3 5 4 1 2 VERMILLION HIGHLANDS GREENWAY UNDERPASS (CONCEPT) 6 LANE DIVIDED HIGHWAY 4 LANE DIVIDED HIGHWAY CITY BOUNDARY EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL FULL ACCESS - NO SIGNAL 3/4 ACCESS 6 4 4 4 4 DRAFT CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATION MAPS 2040 Corridor Management Plan for Dakota County Highway 42 This Corridor Management plan provides 20-year guidance for managing Highway 42 from the County’s west border in Burnsville to Highway 52 in Rosemount. The Corridor Management Plan is based on the recommendations from the Visioning Study that provided a data driven approach that considered both existing and future traffic operations, reviewed existing safety issues, and documented pedestrian, bicyclist and transit users needs on the corridor. The Visioning Study identified multiple strategies to improve capacity, infrastructure, pedestrian/bicycle facilities and connectivity, and access management that can be prioritized for implementation. More details on the Visioning Study can be found in the Technical Memorandum documentation. RECOMMENDATION MAPS The following recommendations maps summarize the various tools and management strategies for roadway, pedestrian, bicyclist and transit improvements. These recommendations can address the existing or future needs of the corridor and help reach the goals of improving safety, reducing congestion and delays, providing access to adjacent properties and planning for future transportation needs. Recommends a right-in/right-out intersection that removes the ability for local street and Highway 42 traffic to make left turns. In some locations the right-in/right-out is only in one direction and is depicted with white arrows in the icon. Recommends a 3/4 intersection that allows left-turns from Highway 42 to the local street but does not allow left turns from the local street onto Highway 42. In some locations the left-in is only in one direction and is depicted with only one white arrow in the icon. Denotes a full-access location where the local street stops but has the ability to make a left, right or go through at the Highway 42 intersection. These locations will continue to be monitored for safety or capacity issues. Justification for future signals or for alternative traffic controls will be based on assessment of traffic needs. Recommendation for a future grade-separation of the local street and Highway 42 at the highest volume intersections. Further study needed to determine final configuration. CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATION MAPS LEGEND These locations represent a recommendation for enhancements to an existing signal such as re-timing, adding yellow-flashing arrows or light enhancements to improve visibility of signal head or can show locations of planned new signals. Recommends either adding additional turn lanes or lengthening existing turn lanes to accommodate future traffic volumes. Removal of an existing signal, typically recommended to be replaced with a 3/4 access intersection configuration instead. Icon represents new freeway loop ramps at locations with freeway connections with Highway 42. Priority locations for intersection improvements for pedestrian and bicyclists. Recommended locations for tunnels or bridges for pedestrians and bicyclists. Locations for future transit stop improvements including sidewalk connections, platforms for loading, benches, lighting or shelters. Identifies locations where either new frontage/ backage roadways or improvements to existing frontage roads are recommended. Locations that require further study to determine the final roadway and intersection configurations. Coordinated improvements will be grouped together inside boxes to note items that should be implemented together. NOTE: These pages are formatted for 11 x 17 printing 2040 Vision Plan Co Hwy 42 and Segments Figure A City of Burnsville Section 1 of 2 Ewing AveEwing AveHuntington AveHuntington AveBurnsville PkwyBurnsville PkwyJudicial RdJudicial RdIrving AveIrving AveBurngarten DrBurngarten DrCounty Rd 5County Rd 5Aldrich AveAldrich AveMorgan Ave Morgan Ave Southcross DrSouthcross Dr Newto n A v e Newto n A v e Burnhaven Dr Burnhaven DrBusiness AccessBusiness AccessMall AccessMall AccessSHORT/MEDIUM TERM RECOMMENDATION Scott CountyScott CountyDakota CountyDakota CountyLONG TERM RECOMMENDATION Corridor Management Recommendations Trail Completed 2021 EXISTING CONDITIONSEXISTING CONDITIONS Future Orange Line BRT Station PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED RECOMMENDATIONSPREVIOUSLY ADOPTED RECOMMENDATIONS In vicinity of Aldrich (future study to determine location) Ped/bike improvement to the local street crossing, not Hwy 42 crossing Ped/bike improvement to the local street crossing, not Hwy 42 crossing Ped/bike improvement to the local street crossing, not Hwy 42 crossing Ped/bike improvement to the local street crossing, not Hwy 42 crossing Ped/bike improvement to the local street crossing, not Hwy 42 crossing Business AccessBusiness AccessDRAFT #ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ # ÖÖ ÖÖ G± !`# %c %d( G± City of Apple ValleyCity of BurnsvilleCity of Savage 2040 Visioning Study County Highway 42 I 0 0.50.25 Miles Sources: Minnesota GeoSpatial Commons, ESRI Legend ÖÖ Existing Traffic Signal #Existing 3/4 Access CH 42 City Boundary City Boundary Figure 1.1 CH 42 Overview Map City of Burnsville County Line to County Road 5 SEGMENT NEEDS: Most 1999 study recommendations have been implemented. Corridor needs to 2040 focus on transit and pedestrian/bicycle improvements. RECOMMENDATIONS: A new grade-separated regional trail crossing between Judicial Road and Newton Avenue would provide needed pedestrian/bike connection. Transit stop improvements are suggested at key intersections. County Road 5 to Aldrich Avenue SEGMENT NEEDS: Segment includes coordinated signals influenced by the I-35W/I-35E interchange area, causing long delays. RECOMMENDATIONS: Remove the signal at Irving Avenue to improve corridor mobility and remove the Aldrich signal as part of a recommended grade separation project to serve local traffic, pedestrians and bicyclists (a future study will determine details). The timing of improvements will depend on redevelopment and future traffic conditions. Planning for new connections and supporting roadways is also essential, especially in implementing the Center Village Redevelopment Vision Area network improvements or other local projects. Improvements at the freeway ramps will provide opportunities to re-time remaining signals and improve operations for this segment. Hwy 42 City Boundary Lake Marion Greenway Trail Crossing Intersection Pedestrian and Bicycle Enhancements Future Study Recommended Locations where follow-up studies are recommended to review improvement options are outlined in red Right-in/Right-out Intersection Full-access Intersection Locations will be evaluated for future traffic control needs* 3/4 Intersection Roadway Grade Separation Freeway Loop Grade Separation Intersection Turn Lane or Capacity Improvement Existing Signal Enhancements Signal Removal CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS LEGEND Transit Stop Improvements Pedestrian and Bicycle Underpass/Overpass Center Village Center Village Redevelopment Redevelopment Vision AreaVision Area 0 0.25 mile 0.5 mile Approximate Scale *Justification for future signals at full-access intersections will be based on assessment of traffic needs. Frontage/Backage Road Improvements Potential Grade Separation Study Area 2040 Vision Plan Co Hwy 42 and Segments Figure B City of Burnsville Section 2 of 2 Portland AvePortland AveChicago AveChicago Ave10th Ave10th AveSummit Ridge CirSummit Ridge CirLac Lavon DrLac Lavon DrElm DrElm DrBuck Hill RdBuck Hill Rd Nicollet Ave Nicollet Ave Plymouth Ave Plymouth AveParson H ill D rParson H ill D r Southcross Dr Southcross Dr Redwood DrRedwood Dr35W 35E Grand A v e Grand A v e Summit Oaks DrSummit Oaks Dr1111 SHORT/MEDIUM TERM RECOMMENDATION LONG TERM RECOMMENDATION EXISTING CONDITIONSEXISTING CONDITIONS PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED RECOMMENDATIONSPREVIOUSLY ADOPTED RECOMMENDATIONS PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED RECOMMENDATIONSPREVIOUSLY ADOPTED RECOMMENDATIONS Concurrent Improvements Trail Trail I-35E Interchange improvement when needed Evaluate aging signal and long-term options OR OR Based on safety or operational needs Based on safety or operational issuesBased on safety or operational needs * * Improvement to the local street crossing, not Hwy 42 crossing I-35W/I-35E Interchange (to Plymouth Avenue) SEGMENT NEEDS: The segment experiences weaving and safety issues and high demand for westbound left-turning vehicles to travel north on I-35W and I-35E. RECOMMENDATIONS: One option includes adding a loop ramp for southbound I-35W to eastbound Hwy 42, which will balance traffic across all lanes and reduce weaving and safety issues. As part of this improvement, Buck Hill would be realigned to utilize a new Aldrich connection to access Hwy 42. Other alternatives should also be considered, including replacing aging signals and coordinating improvements through the segment. Pedestrian and bike accommodations are needed to provide more comfort in this high-traffic volume segment. Portland Avenue to Lac Lavon Drive SEGMENT NEEDS: Current sidewalk/trail gap and multiple full- access locations for local street and private parcels should be considered for a reduction in access. RECOMMENDATIONS: Extend three lanes eastbound through the Portland Avenue intersection. Coordinate transit improvement opportunities. Fill trail gap from Portland Avenue to Lac Lavon Drive. Lac Lavon Drive to Southcross Drive SEGMENT NEEDS: Multiple full-access locations for local street and private parcels need to be managed. RECOMMENDATIONS: Consider the option to convert Parson Hill Drive to a 3/4 access in the long term. This would retain U-turn opportunities for traffic movements in this segment while managing safety where needed. Southcross Drive to Elm Drive SEGMENT NEEDS: Close spacing of existing signals at Southcross Drive, Elm Drive and Garden View Drive impacts mobility on Hwy 42. Elm Drive’s current and future local street volumes do not justify the need for the signal (also reference Figure C). RECOMMENDATIONS: Maintain/enhance the signal at Southcross Drive. Keep Redwood Drive as full-access (unless safety issues arise). Remove the Elm Drive signal concurrent with a new pedestrian underpass. Corridor Management Recommendations DRAFT #ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ # ÖÖ ÖÖ G± !`# %c %d( G± City of Apple ValleyCity of BurnsvilleCity of Savage 2040 Visioning Study County Highway 42 I 0 0.50.25 Miles Sources: Minnesota GeoSpatial Commons, ESRI Legend ÖÖ Existing Traffic Signal #Existing 3/4 Access CH 42 City Boundary City Boundary Figure 1.1 CH 42 Overview Map City of Burnsville Hwy 42 City Boundary Intersection Pedestrian and Bicycle Enhancements Future Study Recommended Locations where follow-up studies are recommended to review improvement options are outlined in red. Right-in/Right-out Intersection Full-access Intersection Locations will be evaluated for future traffic control needs* 3/4 Intersection Roadway Grade Separation Freeway Loop Grade Separation Intersection Turn Lane or Capacity Improvement Existing Signal Enhancements Signal Removal CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS LEGEND Transit Stop Improvements Pedestrian and Bicycle Underpass/Overpass New Trail *Justification for future signals at full-access intersections will be based on assessment of traffic needs. Frontage/Backage Road Improvements 0 0.25 mile 0.5 mile Approximate Scale 2040 Vision Plan Co Hwy 42 and Segments Figure C City of Apple Valley Section 1 of 2 Foliage AveFoliage AveGalaxie AveGalaxie AveCedar AveCedar AveGranada AveGranada Ave147th St147th StKent LnKent LnMcI n t o s h D rMcI n t o s h D rElm DrElm DrGarret AveGarret AveGardenia AveGardenia AveForum PathForum PathGleason PathGleason PathHayes RdHayes RdPennock AvePennock Ave2323Garden View DrGarden View DrRedwood DrRedwood DrCoordinated ImprovementsConcurrent Improvements May be part of roadway grade separationBased on safety or operational needs * * Ped/bike improvement to the local street crossing, not Hwy 42 crossing Garden View Drive Intersection INTERSECTION NEED: There are delays and issues with limited storage for left-turning vehicles on Hwy 42 and blocking vehicles on Garden View Drive using the frontage roads as they wait to turn on to Hwy 42. The signal is aging and modernization is needed. RECOMMENDATION: Extending the westbound left-turn lane on Hwy 42 would better accommodate future traffic volumes. Upgrades to signals, including pedestrian and bicycle crossing features, and transit stop improvements are recommended. Elm Drive to 147th Street – Frontage Road Options SEGMENT NEEDS: Current gap in sidewalk/trail system with pedestrian crossing needs near Elm Drive limit safety and mobility. RECOMMENDATION: Trails could be added within the existing right- of-way by converting to one-way frontage roads on both sides of Hwy 42. This conversion would also simplify traffic operations. Such options may allow more space for pedestrian and bicycle amenities and boulevard space for vegetation, as well as provide a better buffer between the residential neighborhood and Hwy 42. INTERSECTION RECOMMENDATION: Remove the Elm Drive intersection signal and replace with a 3/4 access, concurrent with construction of a new pedestrian underpass (reference Figure B). Pennock Avenue to Galaxie Avenue INTERSECTION NEED: The Cedar Avenue intersection has the highest entering volumes of traffic within the study area. The cycle lengths of adjacent signalized intersections are based on accommodating this one intersection. SEGMENT NEEDS: The Hwy 42 segment east of Cedar Avenue (to Diamond Path) is at risk of being over capacity by 2040 and beyond. The overall vision and recommendations are intended to manage intersections and limit or defer expansion to six lanes. RECOMMENDATION: By the year 2040, a grade-separated crossing at Cedar Avenue may be required to manage traffic and safety. Multiple design options exist that would minimize property impacts as well as accommodate future traffic and improve safety for all modes, including pedestrians and bicyclists. OR PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED RECOMMENDATIONSPREVIOUSLY ADOPTED RECOMMENDATIONS Consideration of Frontage Road Options Corridor Management Recommendations SHORT/MEDIUM TERM RECOMMENDATION LONG TERM RECOMMENDATION EXISTING CONDITIONSEXISTING CONDITIONS DRAFT #ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ # ÖÖ ÖÖ G± !`# %c %d( G± City of Apple ValleyCity of BurnsvilleCity of Savage 2040 Visioning Study County Highway 42 I 0 0.50.25 Miles Sources: Minnesota GeoSpatial Commons, ESRI Legend ÖÖ Existing Traffic Signal #Existing 3/4 Access CH 42 City Boundary City Boundary Figure 1.1 CH 42 Overview Map City of Burnsville Hwy 42 City Boundary Intersection Pedestrian and Bicycle Enhancements Future Study Recommended Locations where follow-up studies are recommended to review improvement options are outlined in red. Right-in/Right-out Intersection Full-access Intersection Locations will be evaluated for future traffic control needs* 3/4 Intersection Roadway Grade Separation Freeway Loop Grade Separation Intersection Turn Lane or Capacity Improvement Existing Signal Enhancements Signal Removal CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS LEGEND Transit Stop Improvements Pedestrian and Bicycle Underpass/Overpass Frontage Road Improvements 0 0.25 mile 0.5 mile Approximate Scale *Justification for future signals at full-access intersections will be based on assessment of traffic needs. Frontage/Backage Road Improvements 2040 Vision Plan Co Hwy 42 and Segments Figure D City of Apple Valley Section 2 of 2 Foliage AveFoliage AvePilot Knob RdPilot Knob RdDiamond PathDiamond PathEmbry PathEmbry PathEaster AveEaster AveFlanders PathFlanders PathForum PathForum Path Flagstaf Ave Flagstaf AveDundee AveDundee AveJohnny Cake Ridge RdJohnny Cake Ridge RdFuture RdFuture RdFuture RdFuture Rd3131 3333Dove TrDove TrSHORT/MEDIUM TERM RECOMMENDATION LONG TERM RECOMMENDATION EXISTING CONDITIONSEXISTING CONDITIONS PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED RECOMMENDATIONSPREVIOUSLY ADOPTED RECOMMENDATIONS Coordinated Improvements Trail High-capacity intersection options Based on safety or operational issues * * Access to north only Access to north only OR DRAFT #ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ # ÖÖ ÖÖ G± !`# %c %d( G± City of Apple ValleyCity of BurnsvilleCity of Savage 2040 Visioning Study County Highway 42 I 0 0.50.25 Miles Sources: Minnesota GeoSpatial Commons, ESRI Legend ÖÖ Existing Traffic Signal #Existing 3/4 Access CH 42 City Boundary City Boundary Figure 1.1 CH 42 Overview Map City of Burnsville Hwy 42 City Boundary Intersection Pedestrian and Bicycle Enhancements Future Study Recommended Locations where follow-up studies are recommended to review improvement options are outlined in red. Right-in/Right-out Intersection Full-access Intersection Locations will be evaluated for future traffic control needs* 3/4 Intersection Roadway Grade Separation Freeway Loop Grade Separation Intersection Turn Lane or Capacity Improvement Existing Signal Enhancements Signal Removal CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS LEGEND Transit Stop Improvements Pedestrian and Bicycle Underpass/Overpass New Trail Flagstaf Avenue to Pilot Knob Road SEGMENT NEEDS: The future roadway network should be designed as part of the development of the land south of Hwy 42. The Hwy 42 segment east of Cedar Avenue (to Diamond Path) is at risk of being over capacity by 2040 and beyond. The overall vision and recommendations are intended to manage intersections and limit or defer expansion. RECOMMENDATION: Complete the planned grade-separated greenway trail between Flagstaff Avenue and Johnny Cake Ridge Road with a combination of 3/4 and right-in/right-out intersections as development fills in. Pilot Knob Road will be reaching the capacity of the current configuration near 2040. Various high-capacity intersection designs exist and should be considered in coordination with future development. One option would be a median U-turn design that restricts left turns at the Hwy 42 and Pilot Knob Road intersection by directing traffic to take a right turn, navigate through the roundabout to make a U-turn on Pilot Knob Road and continue back through the Hwy 42 and Pilot Knob Road intersection. Other options should also be considered. Pilot Knob Road to Diamond Path SEGMENT NEEDS: This segment has good signal spacing and access control. Easter Avenue, a T-intersection with full access, should be monitored for traffic operations or safety concerns. RECOMMENDATION: Evaluate options including limiting access at Easter Avenue if safety or capacity issues arise in the future. Corridor Management Recommendations *Justification for future signals at full-access intersections will be based on assessment of traffic needs. North Creek Greenway Trail Frontage/Backage Road Improvements 0 0.25 mile 0.5 mile Approximate Scale 2040 Vision Plan Co Hwy 42 and Segments Figure E City of Rosemount Section 1 of 3 Diamond PathDiamond PathShannon PkwyShannon PkwyBusiness PkwyBusiness PkwyCrestone AveCrestone AveClaret AveClaret AveCimarron AveCimarron AveChippendale AveChippendale AveBiscayne AveBiscayne Ave S. Robert Tr S. Robert TrCanada AveCanada Ave333333 SHORT/MEDIUM TERM RECOMMENDATION LONG TERM RECOMMENDATION EXISTING CONDITIONSEXISTING CONDITIONS PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED RECOMMENDATIONSPREVIOUSLY ADOPTED RECOMMENDATIONS Coordinated Improvements Area Study for Biscayne, 145th and Auburn (full-access locations and traffic control) Trail on south side Future signal based on safety and operational needs Trail on north side Trail Access to south only * * Trail DRAFT Diamond Path to Chippendale Avenue SEGMENT NEEDS: This segment has good access control and signal spacing. There are demands for pedestrian and bicycle mobility and some history of related safety problems. RECOMMENDATIONS: Improvement options include signal enhancements, turn lane improvements and enhanced pedestrian/ bicycle accommodations. Chippendale Avenue to Biscayne Avenue SEGMENT NEEDS: High-volume intersections and the at-grade railroad crossing near Hwy 3 and S. Robert Trail require continued planning. RECOMMENDATIONS: The S. Robert Trail intersection will operate for a time with acceptable mobility and levels of delay. However, future traffic volumes will cause additional delay and increase safety concerns. A grade separation would address these future mobility and safety concerns while also addressing the at-grade railroad crossing east of the intersection. A quadrant roadway configuration would include a Hwy 42 bridge over Hwy 3 and S. Robert Trail and the railroad. Canada Avenue or a similar route would connect to move traffic between Hwy 42 and S. Robert Trail. Other options should also be considered. Future traffic growth will determine if or when the Biscayne Avenue intersection meets signal justification. Hwy 3/Robert Trail to Biscayne Avenue SEGMENT NEEDS: The trail gap between Hwy 3 and Biscayne Avenue limits pedestrian/bicyclist mobility. RECOMMENDATIONS: Provide trail along Hwy 42 for pedestrians and bicyclists. The north side of Hwy 42 is the immediate priority, with a trail along the south side with development. Corridor Management Recommendations #ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ # ÖÖ ÖÖ G± !`# %c %d( G± City of Apple ValleyCity of BurnsvilleCity of Savage 2040 Visioning Study County Highway 42 I 0 0.50.25 Miles Sources: Minnesota GeoSpatial Commons, ESRI Legend ÖÖ Existing Traffic Signal #Existing 3/4 Access CH 42 City Boundary City Boundary Figure 1.1 CH 42 Overview Map City of Burnsville Hwy 42 City Boundary Intersection Pedestrian and Bicycle Enhancements Future Study Recommended Locations where follow-up studies are recommended to review improvement options are outlined in red. Right-in/Right-out Intersection 0 0.25 mile 0.5 mile Approximate Scale Full-access Intersection Locations will be evaluated for future traffic control needs* 3/4 Intersection Roadway Grade Separation Freeway Loop Grade Separation Intersection Turn Lane or Capacity Improvement Existing Signal Enhancements Signal Removal CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS LEGEND Transit Stop Improvements Pedestrian and Bicycle Underpass/Overpass New Trail *Justification for future signals at full-access intersections will be based on assessment of traffic needs. Frontage/Backage Road Improvements 2040 Vision Plan Co Hwy 42 and Segments Figure F City of Rosemount Section 2 of 3 Biscayne AveBiscayne Ave145th St145th St Akron AveAkron AveAudrey AveAudrey AveAbbeyf eld AveAbbeyf eld AveAuburn AveAuburn Ave7373 2021 Project2021 Project 2021 Project2021 Project 2021 Project2021 Project Trail Trail Area Study for Biscayne, 145th and Auburn (full and partial access locations, local road network and intersection design) Add signals if warranted and based on options for the area Trail on north side Trail on south side Range of options (see details in text) (option) PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED RECOMMENDATIONSPREVIOUSLY ADOPTED RECOMMENDATIONS DRAFT Biscayne Avenue to Auburn Avenue SEGMENT NEEDS: The intersection of 145th Street is on a tight curve with sight distance issues, and therefore not recommended as a future full-access intersection in the current location and configuration. Biscayne Avenue and Auburn Avenue are more suited for full access, with intermediate partial accesses unless the 145th Street intersection is reconfigured in coordination with development. RECOMMENDATIONS: Potential changes should be studied further to address safety concerns of full-access locations and the need to accommodate the future roadway network as the area develops. The intersection at 145th Street, in particular, will require a review of system access, location and a range of design options. Issues and long- term options include: • Change intersection to partial access or offset-T intersections that may use U-turns or T-intersection designs to accommodate left-turn movements from the side streets. If justified based on traffic growth and redevelopment, such options would allow for future signals at Auburn Avenue and Biscayne Avenue. • Consider relocation and design of the intersection to improve sight distance and geometry for a possible fourth leg to the east. It should be noted that the County would not permit long-term full-access intersections at both 145th Street and Auburn Avenue. • Other options to be determined, including structure for pedestrians and bicycles nearby if needed with no signal. Auburn Avenue to Audrey Avenue SEGMENT NEEDS: The Akron Avenue signal, added in 2021, provides full signalized access to Hwy 42 for this developing portion of the corridor. Additional trail connections are needed on Hwy 42. RECOMMENDATION: Potential signals at Auburn Avenue and Audrey Avenue should be considered based on future traffic and new, local roadway connections to Hwy 42. Signal justification will be dependent on actual development and traffic growth. A higher priority trail gap is on the north side of Hwy 42 between Biscayne Avenue and Akron Avenue. The trail on the south side of Hwy 42 will likely be completed with future development. Corridor Management Recommendations SHORT/MEDIUM TERM RECOMMENDATION LONG TERM RECOMMENDATION EXISTING CONDITIONSEXISTING CONDITIONS *Justification for future signals at full-access intersections will be based on assessment of traffic needs. **** Vermillion Highlands Greenway Concept Plan #ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ # ÖÖ ÖÖ G± !`# %c %d( G± City of Apple ValleyCity of BurnsvilleCity of Savage 2040 Visioning Study County Highway 42 I 0 0.50.25 Miles Sources: Minnesota GeoSpatial Commons, ESRI Legend ÖÖ Existing Traffic Signal #Existing 3/4 Access CH 42 City Boundary City Boundary Figure 1.1 CH 42 Overview Map City of Burnsville Hwy 42 City Boundary Intersection Pedestrian and Bicycle Enhancements Future Study Recommended Locations where follow-up studies are recommended to review improvement options are outlined in red. Right-in/Right-out Intersection Full-access Intersection Locations will be evaluated for future traffic control needs* 3/4 Intersection Roadway Grade Separation Freeway Loop Grade Separation Intersection Turn Lane or Capacity Improvement Existing Signal Enhancements Signal Removal CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS LEGEND Transit Stop Improvements Pedestrian and Bicycle Underpass/Overpass New Trail Frontage/Backage Road Improvements 0 0.25 mile 0.5 mile Approximate Scale 2040 Vision Plan Co Hwy 42 and Segments Figure G City of Rosemount Section 3 of 3 Audrey AveAudrey Ave151st St151st StConley AveConley AveBlaine AveBlaine Ave5252 7171 SHORT/MEDIUM TERM RECOMMENDATION LONG TERM RECOMMENDATION EXISTING CONDITIONSEXISTING CONDITIONS PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED RECOMMENDATIONSPREVIOUSLY ADOPTED RECOMMENDATIONS Supporting Roads or Access Consolidation Options Potential Improvements for Further Study Long-term managed access subject to studies and options Option to shift Conley Avenue east DRAFT Possible Frontage Road Options (consider backage roads as well) Audrey Avenue to Blaine Avenue SEGMENT NEEDS: Access to Hwy 42 needs to be planned as part of development reviews and the supporting local roadway network. RECOMMENDATIONS: Future signals at Audrey Avenue and Blaine Avenue and reconfiguration of the intersection of 151st St to a 3/4 intersection should be considered. Similar to the segment to the west, adding signals is considered a long-term need and should be evaluated through coordinated plans. Options for non-signalized and signalized intersections on Hwy 42 should be considered as part of the development of supporting roadways. Blaine Avenue to Hwy 52 SEGMENT NEEDS: Access to Hwy 42 needs to be planned for future development and improvements to the local roadway network. The many full-access openings and private accesses onto 42 need to be addressed. RECOMMENDATIONS: In coordination with interchange improvements at Hwy 52 and the recommendation of half-mile spacing of full-access on Hwy 42, long-term access management options should be considered, including frontage and backage roads connecting to Blaine Avenue. Hwy 52 INTERCHANGE NEEDS: Existing and future congestion and delay is caused by high volumes of vehicles going eastbound and turning left to go northbound on Hwy 52 in the morning and traffic exiting from southbound Hwy 52 in the evening. RECOMMENDATIONS: Interchange improvements are dependent on traffic growth on Hwy 42 as it relates to the potential realignment of Hwy 55 onto Hwy 42 that MnDOT intends to analyze in a future study. Recommendations from the study will be used to determine future interchange needs. The previous Hwy 52/42/55 study conducted in 2002 outlined steps and tools to ensure the viability of a future interchange. These include: • Implementing the Official Map adopted by the City of Rosemount • Local roadway connection of 138th Street and 140th street (under existing Hwy 52 bridge) • Relocating Conley Avenue east to meet 0.5-mile access spacing to accommodate future interchange ramps; managing existing location to a right-in/right-out Interim improvement options to address traffic growth include: • Dual left-turn lanes from eastbound to northbound Hwy 52 • Traffic signals at the ramps to manage traffic operations as they become justified • Creating a lane on Hwy 42 solely for southbound right-turning traffic, coming from the exit ramp, to merge onto Hwy 42 Corridor Management Recommendations ** * #ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖÖÖ ÖÖ ÖÖ # ÖÖ ÖÖ G± !`# %c %d( G± City of Apple ValleyCity of BurnsvilleCity of Savage 2040 Visioning Study County Highway 42 I 0 0.50.25 Miles Sources: Minnesota GeoSpatial Commons, ESRI Legend ÖÖ Existing Traffic Signal #Existing 3/4 Access CH 42 City Boundary City Boundary Figure 1.1 CH 42 Overview Map City of Burnsville Hwy 42 City Boundary Intersection Pedestrian and Bicycle Enhancements Future Study Recommended Locations where follow-up studies are recommended to review improvement options are outlined in red. Right-in/Right-out Intersection Full-access Intersection Locations will be evaluated for future traffic control needs* 3/4 Intersection Roadway Grade Separation Freeway Loop Grade Separation Intersection Turn Lane or Capacity Improvement Existing Signal Enhancements Signal Removal CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS LEGEND Transit Stop Improvements Pedestrian and Bicycle Underpass/Overpass *Justification for future signals at full-access intersections will be based on assessment of traffic needs. Frontage/Backage Road Improvements 0 0.25 mile 0.5 mile Approximate Scale