Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout5.b. Landco EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Planning Commission Regular Meeting: May 24, 2022 Tentative City Council Meeting: June 21, 2022 AGENDA ITEM: 22-36-SP, 22-37-RZ: Request by Landco Investments of Rosemount for a Rezoning and Site Plan Review Approval to Construct a Memory Care and Assisted Living Facility. AGENDA SECTION: Public Hearing PREPARED BY: Anthony Nemcek, Senior Planner AGENDA NO. 5.b. ATTACHMENTS: Site Location; Rosewood Commons PUD layout; Rezoning Exhibit; Site Plan; Utility Plan; Landscape Plan; Photometric Plan; Building Elevations and Architectural Renderings; Engineer’s Memo dated April 26, 2022. APPROVED BY: AK RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Motion to recommend the City Council approve a rezoning of the subject parcel from C4 PUD-General Commercial Planned Unit Development to R4 PUD-High Density Residential Planned Unit Development. 2. Motion to approve the site plan to allow Landco Investments of Rosemount to construct a 32-unit assisted living and memory care facility on Lot 1, Block 1, Rosewood Commons, subject to the following conditions: a. Approval of a Minor Amendment to the Rosewood Commons Planned Unit Development Agreement. b. The applicant shall update the landscape plan to provide a total of 25 trees. c. Site signage shall require a separate sign permit and meet the requirement of signs in the R4 zoning district. d. The maximum height for pole-mounted lighting is 20’. e. Conformance with the requirements contained in the Engineer’s memo dated April 26, 2022. SUMMARY The Planning Commission is being asked to consider a request by Landco Investments of Rosemount for approval of a rezoning and site plan review for a site in the Rosewood Commons Planned Unit Development to construct a 32-suite assisted living and memory care facility. The owner of the property had originally received approval to construct a hotel on the site alongside six apartment and mixed-use buildings to the east. The request before the commission is to replace the hotel with the proposed assisted living and memory care facility and eventually build the hotel further west on the site. Even though the specific site is designated for commercial uses, Section 11-10-6: Planned Unit Developments of the City Code allows for the rezoning of the site from commercial to residential through the PUD process. With the rezoning, the proposed building meets the site and building requirements of the R4-High Density 2 Residential zoning district. To memorialize the change and formalize its approval, the applicant is also requesting approval of a minor amendment to the Rosewood Commons Planned Unit Development Agreement. No additional deviations from the zoning ordinance are being requested with the minor amendment. Minor amendments are reviewed and approved by the City Council in a single step, therefore no action is required by the Planning Commission to recommend approval of that request. Staff is recommending approval of the rezoning and site plan review and will be recommending to the City Council approval of the minor planned unit development. Owner: Warren and Kathleen Israelson Applicant: Landco Investments of Rosemount Site Area in Acres: 1.67 acres Total Dwelling Units: 32 private suites (20 Assisted Living/12 Memory Care) Gross Density: 19.6 units/acre Net Density: 19.6 units/acre Comprehensive Plan Guiding: CC-Community Commercial and HDR-High Density Residential Current Zoning: C4 PUD-General Commercial Planned Unit Development Requested Zoning: R4 PUD-High Density Residential PUD Surrounding Land Uses North: High Density Residential East: High Density Residential South: Community Commercial West: High Density Residential/Community Commercial. BACKGROUND The Planning Commission reviewed and recommended approval of the Rosewood Commons Planned Unit Development, Preliminary Plat, and Site Plan for the first phase of development at its meeting in September of 2020. Initially, the landowner had proposed a memory care facility on a parcel adjacent to County Road 42 immediately east of Business Parkway. Because the City has been intent on maintaining the commercial land use designation for properties along County Road 42, the proposed memory care facility was removed from the original plan. On October 5, 2020, the City Council subsequently approved the proposed development plan. The Rosewood Commons development area has seen continued interest from developers of the proposed type of facility, while the market has not shown much interest in a hotel at this time. The subject parcel is a good fit for the proposed use because it is adjacent to the future apartment buildings which will contain 55-plus/senior housing units, and its quasi-commercial nature allows for a transition between the heavier commercial uses to the west such as a future hotel. Because the Planned Unit Development area contains both high density residential and commercial uses, the proposed rezoning is considered in conformance with the comprehensive plan as the overall unit mix still falls within the anticipated range of the original PUD as approved. ISSUE ANALYSIS Legal Authority . Site plan reviews and rezonings, are quasi-judicial decisions for the City meaning that the City is acting as a judge to determine if the regulations within the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and Subdivision Ordinance are being followed. Generally, if these applications meet the City’s established requirements they must be approved. Staff review of each application is provided below. Rezoning 3 The subject parcel is located within the Rosewood Commons Planned Unit Development. The original anticipated use for the site was a hotel, which is a permitted use in the C4-General Commercial zoning district. The applicant is proposing an assisted living facility on the site, which is not a permitted use in the C4-General Commercial zoning district but is permitted in the R4-High Density Residential zoning district. Rosemount City Code Section 11-10-6: Planned Unit Developments allows for planned unit developments with a mix of uses so long as the overall area of the planned unit development is designated for those uses in the Comprehensive Plan. In this case, the comprehensive plan shows a mix of high density residential and commercial uses. Further, that section of the code also requires that “each residential PUD or the residential portion of each mixed-use PUD shall have a density within the range specified in the comprehensive plan for the PUD site. The density of individual buildings or lots within a PUD may exceed these standards, provided the density for the entire PUD does not exceed the permitted standards.” In this case, rezoning the former hotel parcel to High Density Residential to accommodate the assisted living and memory care facility will result in a gross residential density for the site of 21.33 units per acres within the residential portion of the Rosewood Commons planned unit development, which falls within the 12-30 units per acre range anticipated for high density residential uses in the comprehensive plan. The developer of Rosewood Commons anticipates additional apartments to be constructed in the future to the west of the subject area, and a comprehensive plan amendment would be required to accommodate that additional residential density as there is no more land within the Rosewood Commons planned unit development designated for residential uses in the comprehensive plan. Site Plan Review Land Use and Zoning The applicant is requesting a rezoning of this portion of the Rosewood Commons planned unit development from C4-PUD to R4-PUD. The proposed assisted living and memory care facility is a permitted use in the R4 zoning district. While the use is quasi-commercial in nature, for the purposes of this review, each assisted living and memory care suite is treated as a dwelling unit for the calculation of density. The subject parcel on which the facility will be constructed is 1.67 acres in area, resulting in a density of 19.16 units per acre. The maximum density within the R4 zoning district is 30 units per acre. The Rosemount Comprehensive Land Use Plan anticipates a density range of 12 to 30 units per acre, and the proposed facility falls within that range. Within the overall Rosewood Commons planned unit development, the inclusion of the assisted living facility brings the density up to 21.33 units per acre within the residential portion of the PUD. Site Layout The subject parcel is rectangular in shape and positioned in a north/south orientation. The building is also rectangular and positioned on the site along the parcel’s north/south axis. The main entrance to the building will be located near the center of the eastern façade of the building with parking. The parking and two access points will be located east of the building. A patio area will be located between the western building façade and the western parcel boundary. The Rosewood Commons Planned Unit Development has been designed to provide access to the various uses within the development via internal drive aisles. Therefore, the original approval allowed for minimal setbacks from most parcel boundaries not adjacent to public rights of way. In the case of the proposed assisted living and memory care facility, all the building setback requirements of the R4 zoning district are met while some surface parking and drive aisles have been placed closer to the eastern property boundary. The table on the following page compares the dimensional standards of the R4-High Density Residential zoning district with the dimensions of the proposed development. 4 Building Performance Standards for the R4 – High Density Residential District Standard Required Proposed Minimum Lot Size 22,500 square feet 72,745 square feet Front (East) 30 ft. 65.1 ft. Side (South) 10 ft. 63 ft. Side (North) 10 ft. 49 ft. Rear (West) 10 ft. 30 ft. Maximum Lot Coverage 75% 62.7% Exterior Materials and Massing The building will be a single story, well below the maximum building height for the High Density Residential zoning district, with a hipped roof featuring gables to create visual interest. The exterior walls of the building are articulated to break up the long facades, and combination of brick, lap siding, and shakes is used on the exterior. Exterior elevations are included in the attachments. The exterior materials and massing meet the requirements of the R4 zoning district. Landscaping The applicant has provided a landscaping plan that uses the standards for a commercial district to calculate the number of trees needed. While the proposed use is listed as a permitted use in the R4 zoning district, its quasi-commercial nature provides an argument for a landscaping treatment based on the commercial districts’ zoning standards. In that case, one tree per 3,000 square feet of site area is the standard, whereas residential uses in the R4 district the requirement is one tree per unit. Based on a requirement of one tree per 3,000 square feet the number of trees required is 25. The plan indicates a total of 25 trees on the table within the landscape plan, but only 24 trees are shown. Updating the plan to provide a total of twenty-five trees is listed as a condition of approval in the recommended action. Access and Parking Access into the site is made from the east and is provided by an internal drive being constructed by the developer of Rosewood Commons. Entry into the site comes from two access points near the northeast and southeast corners of the subject parcel. Along that internal drive are 19 angled parking stalls, which are separate from the off-street parking provided by the applicant’s plans. Within the subject parcel the applicant’s plans show 24 parking stalls. The zoning ordinance requires one stall per employee for nursing homes, which is much lower than the number of stalls provided by the applicant’s plans. Pedestrian Circulation The Rosewood Commons planned unit development includes sidewalks along the internal drives, within the development a sidewalk extends along the entire parking area. Additional sidewalks provide access to the building entrances at the northwest corner and south end of the building. The sidewalk extends further to connect with the concrete patio at the rear of the building. At the building entrance, the bituminous pavement is flush with the sidewalk surface to accommodate the residents of the facility. Trash Enclosure A trash enclosure will be located at the south end of the parking area. Elevations provided by the applicant show the enclosure constructed of materials that are consistent with the principal structure as required by the zoning ordinance. Signs No signs are shown on the applicant’s plans. Generally, signs are reviewed and approved administratively 5 through the sign permitting process. Staff has included a condition reiterating that a sign permit must be submitted for any site signage. Site Lighting The site will be lit by three pole mounted lights placed evenly between the building and the parking area. The photometric plan provided by the applicant shows the lighting plan meeting the standards of the zoning ordinance, with the illumination not exceeding 0.4 lumens at the eastern property boundary. The maximum allowed by code is 0.5 lumens. The plans do not show the height of the poles on which the lights will be mounted, but the zoning ordinance maximum is twenty feet. This standard is called out in the conditions of approval. Utilities The developer of Rosewood Commons is constructing utilities within the site to serve the parcel. Sewer and water lines will be run from the internal drive located along the eastern side of the subject parcel. Stormwater is handled for the entire planned unit development area, which negates the need for onsite stormwater management within the subject parcel. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION Staff finds the plans submitted by the applicant meet the requirements of the zoning ordinance and the Rosewood Commons planned unit development agreement but for the lack of a single tree in the landscape plan, which is addressed in the conditions of approval. Staff is recommending approval of the requests based on the information provided by the applicant and contained within this report. 3536383937434140421 2 3 48'RESTAURANTRESTAURANT RETAIL/RESTAURANT RETAIL RETAIL 40 UNIT APARTMENTS40 UNIT APARTMENTS8'RETAIL 8'8'8'8'8'1 8" PVC @ 0.40%952954954956952956952956956MH2 T=57.15 I=35.33 MH1 T=52.30 I=33.73 EX-MH6030 T=49.23 I=32.77 MH2 T=56.6 I=34.74 MH2 T=55.75 I=36.61 TEMP FIRE HYDRANT TEMP FIRE HYDRANT 8'960 958 6001 Egan Drive, Ste 100, Savage, MN 55378 Phone: 952.226.3200 Web: www.kjwalk.com Date:Revision: Original Preliminary Utilities SHEET 4 of 6 Date: 8/7/2020 FILE PATH: G:\My Drive\Work Files\Rosemount Projects\Rosewood Center Apartments Hotel\Engineering\CAD\DWGs\RCE-Site Plan revised-1.dwg I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly registered engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Luke Warren Israelson Registration #: 51362 0 60 120 180 02/21/2020 Revised03/02/2020 ROSEMOUNT, MN Revised05/06/2020 For Review August 7, 2020 Revised08/07/2020 Figure 3: Existing Zoning Designations S ROBERT TRL (STH 3)BURMA AVEBUSINESS PKY148TH ST WBOXWOODPATH BUSINESSPKWYBOYSENBERRY CT B L U E B E R R Y C T BRENNER CT BOSTONCIRBOISE CIRL 147TH CT W 149TH ST W Proposed Change :C4 PUD to R4 PUD Figure 4: Proposed Zoning Designations MXD: T:\Project\CommDev\LandUse\ProposedChanges\RosewoodEstates\RosewoodEstatesZoning.mxd PDF: I:\GIS\M ap_Library\Comm Dev\LandUse Pro po sed Z on ing Am endment PUDZoning Residential:R1 - Low Density ResidentialR4 - High Density Residential Commercial:DT - Downtown DistrictC3 - Highway Service Commercial C4 - General CommercialIndustrial:BP - Business Park 150TH ST (CSAH 42)150TH ST (CSAH 42) 5/20/2022 0 540270 Feet 1214BUSINESS PARKWAY 35363837 1 13176 76 1311 3RETAIL8'111241524.0024.0024.0024.0028.00 28.00 28.00 20 UNIT APARTMENT BLDGWITH COMMERCIALFFE=953.520 UNIT APARTMENT BLDGWITH COMMERCIALFFE=957.576.00140.83 68.50 40.5931.97110100GREEN SPACELP56.056.556.48" WATERMAIN8" PVC @ 0.40%956MH2T=56.6TEMP FIRE HYDRANTTEMP FIRE HYDRANT911111121350.851.452.152.653.053.254.354.154.711010087 VALLEY GUTTERUSE PED RAMP TOTRANSITION FROMB618VALLEY GUTTERUSE PED RAMP TOTRANSITION FROMB618 TO B41856.055.3MH1MH3T=957.02I=945.2515161748" STANDSTEAMER EXHAUST HOOD8931306030710DISPOSECLEAN TBLE 41560HAND SINK 3 COMP SINK6'-0" SHELF 29(2) 7' SHELVES 23REFRIGERATOR 7531FREEZER 7531MOP SINK415601213MOP BUCKETFD11TRASH1 PAN COLD WELL3 PAN HOT WELL 30601AICEFDFDVEG SINKUNDERCTR REF 30601A30601ADRAWERDRAWERCOFFEEDRAWER1B1B343318222425212328193031629520202032FDICE/WATER NO PARKING ACCESSIBLEPARKINGSPACE, INCL.SIGNAGE,STRIPINGAND RAMPSCONC. SIDEWALK, TYP.CONC. DRIVE AISLE, TYP.10' PARKING SETBACK30' BUILDING SETBACKTRASH ENCLOSURETERMINATE CURB ANDGUTTER @ FUTURE CURBALL IMPROVEMENTSEXTERIOR TO THE SUITELIVING PROJECT PROPERTYLINES TO BE CONSTRUCTEDBY OTHERS. COORD. W/KJWALK INC. PLANSB612 CURB AND GUTTER, TYP.THICKENEDEDGESIDEWALKWITH BIT.PVMT FLUSHWITH WALKSURFACECONC. PATIOB612 CURB ANDGUTTER, TYP.CONC.SIDEWALK9.3'4.3'24.0'R25.0'R12.0'R5.0'R 5 . 0 'R15.0'30.0'63.0'65.0'7.0'25.0'20.0'25.0'10.0'TERMINATE B612 CURB INTOTHICKENED EDGE SIDEWALKWITH BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTFLUSH WITH WALKWAY10.0'CONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITS3' CURB TAPER, TYP.CONC. SIDEWALK PER CITYSTANDARDS, TYP.CONC. SIDEWALK PER CITYSTANDARDS, TYP.7.9'8.1'8.0'5.0'3' CURBTAPER, TYP.PED RAMP TO BE COMPLETEDBY OTHERSPED RAMP TO BECOMPLETED BY OTHERSCURB, PAVEMENT, ANDSTRIPING TO BE COMPLETEDBY OTHERSGRADES OF CURB AREASSUMED PER PLANS BYKJWALK, COORD. WITHSUBDIVISION CONTRACTORFOR FINAL GRADES PRIOR TOSIDEWALK CONSTRUCTIONCivil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060ROSEMOUNT MEMORY CARE 150TH ST W & BUSINESS PKWY, ROSEMOUNT, MN 55068 1824 BUERKLE RD, WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110 HAMPTON COMPANIES, LLC. PROJECT ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:21488............04/26/2022CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:RL, MD, EHRL, RB..............COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cP R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N59612ROBERT A. LATTALICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.04/26/22REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC2.0SITE PLAN............SITE AREA TABLE:SITE LAYOUT NOTES:SITE PLAN LEGEND:TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL ARROW PAVEMENT MARKINGS(IF APPLICABLE)CITY OF ROSEMOUNT SITE SPECIFIC NOTES:SIGN AND POST ASSEMBLY (IF APPLICABLE).SHOP DRAWINGS REQUIRED.HC = ACCESSIBLE SIGNNP = NO PARKING FIRE LANEST = STOPCP = COMPACT CAR PARKING ONLY01" = 30'-0"30'-0"15'-0"N1.RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC NOTES.Know what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRPROPERTY LINECURB AND GUTTER-SEE NOTES (T.O.) TIP OUTGUTTER WHERE APPLICABLE-SEE PLANLIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (IF APPLICABLE).SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE& WEAR COURSE DEPTH, SEE DEATIL.HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (IFAPPLICABLE). SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FORAGGREGATE BASE & WEAR COURSE DEPTH, SEEDETAIL.CONSTRUCTION LIMITSTOPERVIOUS PAVEMENT (IF APPLICABLE) - CONCRETEPAVER PERVIOUS SYSTEM. INCLUDE ALL BASEMATERIAL AND APPURTENANCES AS SPECIFIED PERMANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS & INSTRUCTIONS.MAKE: BELGARD, OR EQUIVILANTMODEL: AQUASTONE, OR EQUIVILANTCOLOR: T.B.D. - PROVIDE SAMPLES, SHOP DRAWINGS & PRODUCT DATA REQUIRED PRIORTO CONSTRUCTION.SPECIALTY PAVEMENT (IF APPLICABLE) - PROVIDE BIDFOR THE FOLLOWING OPTIONS, INCLUDE VARIATIONSOF BASE MATERIAL AND OTHER NECESSARYCOMPONENTS.1. STAMPED & COLORED CONCRETE2. CONCRETE PAVERSMAKERS, COLORS, MODELS, & PATTERN TO BEINCLUDED IN SHOP DRAWING SUBMITTAL PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION.ACCESSIBILITY ARROW (IF APPLICABLE) DO NOTPAINT.OPERATIONAL NOTES:SNOW REMOVALALL SNOW SHALL BE STORED ON-SITE OUTSIDEPARKING LOT. WHEN FULL, REMOVAL CO.SHALL REMOVE EXCESS OF-SITETRASH REMOVAL:TRASH SHALL BE PLACED IN EXTERIOR TRASHAREA AND REMOVED BY COMMERCIAL CO.WEEKLY.DELIVERIES:DELIVERIES SHALL OCCUR AT THE FRONTDOOR VIA STANDARD COMMERCIAL DELIVERYVEHICLES (UPS, FED-EX, USPS).1.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR ORREPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.2.CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS AND LAYOUT OF ALL SITE ELEMENTS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION,INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, LOCATIONS OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED PROPERTY LINES, EASEMENTS, SETBACKS,UTILITIES, BUILDINGS AND PAVEMENTS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FINAL LOCATIONS OF ALL ELEMENTS FOR THESITE. ANY REVISIONS REQUIRED AFTER COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION, DUE TO LOCATIONAL ADJUSTMENTS SHALLBE CORRECTED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER. ADJUSTMENTS TO THE LAYOUT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THEENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF MATERIALS. STAKE LAYOUT FOR APPROVAL.3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING A RIGHT-OF-WAY ANDSTREET OPENING PERMIT.4.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY RECOMMENDATIONS NOTED IN THE GEO TECHNICAL REPORT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OFSITE IMPROVEMENT MATERIALS.5.CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY COORDINATES AND LOCATION DIMENSIONS & ELEVATIONS OF THE BUILDING AND STAKEFOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF FOOTING MATERIALS.6.LOCATIONS OF STRUCTURES, ROADWAY PAVEMENTS, CURBS AND GUTTERS, BOLLARDS, AND WALKS ARE APPROXIMATEAND SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPEARCHITECT.7.CURB DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB. BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CONCRETE FOUNDATION.LOCATION OF BUILDING IS TO BUILDING FOUNDATION AND SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS.8.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS OR SAMPLES AS SPECIFIED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THEENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO FABRICATION FOR ALL PREFABRICATED SITE IMPROVEMENT MATERIALS SUCHAS, BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING, FURNISHINGS, PAVEMENTS, WALLS, RAILINGS, BENCHES, FLAGPOLES, LANDINGPADS FOR CURB RAMPS, AND LIGHT AND POLES. THE OWNER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT INSTALLED MATERIALS NOTPREVIOUSLY APPROVED.9.PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH TRUNCATED DOME LANDING AREAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH A.D.A.REQUIREMENTS-SEE DETAIL.10.CROSSWALK STRIPING SHALL BE 24" WIDE WHITE PAINTED LINE, SPACED 48" ON CENTER PERPENDICULAR TO THE FLOW OFTRAFFIC. WIDTH OF CROSSWALK SHALL BE 5' WIDE. ALL OTHER PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE WHITE IN COLOR UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED OR REQUIRED BY ADA OR LOCAL GOVERNING BODIES.11.SEE SITE PLAN FOR CURB AND GUTTER TYPE. TAPER BETWEEN CURB TYPES-SEE DETAIL.12.ALL CURB RADII ARE MINIMUM 3' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.13.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO FINAL PLAT FOR LOT BOUNDARIES, NUMBERS, AREAS AND DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO SITEIMPROVEMENTS.14.FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS, DIMENSIONS.15.PARKING IS TO BE SET PARALLEL OR PERPENDICULAR TO EXISTING BUILDING UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.16.ALL PARKING LOT PAINT STRIPPING TO BE WHITE, 4" WIDE TYP.17.BITUMINOUS PAVING TO BE "LIGHT DUTY" UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SEE DETAIL SHEETS FOR PAVEMENT SECTIONS.18.ALL TREES THAT ARE TO REMAIN ARE TO BE PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE WITH A CONSTRUCTION FENCE AT THE DRIP LINE.SEE LANDSCAPE DOCUMENTS.CONCRETE PAVEMENT (IF APPLICABLE) ASSPECIFIED (PAD OR WALK) SEE GEOTECHNICALREPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE & CONCRETEDEPTHS, WITHIN ROW SEE CITY DETAIL, WITHINPRIVATE PROPERTY SEE CSG DETAIL 1214BUSINESS PARKWAY952 96235363837 1 13176 76 1311 3RETAIL8'111241524.0024.0024.0024.0028.00 28.00 28.00 20 UNIT APARTMENT BLDGWITH COMMERCIALFFE=953.520 UNIT APARTMENT BLDGWITH COMMERCIALFFE=957.576.00140.83 68.50 40.5931.97110100GREEN SPACEHP57.5LP56.056.556.48" WATERMAIN8" PVC @ 0.40%954 952956 9 5 6MH2T=56.6TEMP FIRE HYDRANTTEMP FIRE HYDRANT9111111213956960954956 50.851.452.152.653.053.254.354.154.711095410087 VALLEY GUTTERUSE PED RAMP TOTRANSITION FROMB618VALLEY GUTTERUSE PED RAMP TOTRANSITION FROMB618 TO B41856.055.3958958956 958 15161748" STANDSTEAMER EXHAUST HOOD8931306030710DISPOSECLEAN TBLE 41560HAND SINK 3 COMP SINK6'-0" SHELF 29(2) 7' SHELVES 23REFRIGERATOR 7531FREEZER 7531MOP SINK415601213MOP BUCKETFD11TRASH1 PAN COLD WELL3 PAN HOT WELL 30601AICEFDFDVEG SINKUNDERCTR REF 30601A30601ADRAWERDRAWERCOFFEEDRAWER1B1B343318222425212328193031629520202032FDICE/WATER NO PARKING CONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITS4 - SS4 - HG24 - SH26 - AB23 - LDN4 - SH26 - AB23 - LDN3 - SH22 - CA22 - AB21 - SS3 - HG22 - SS2 - SS2 - CA22 - CA22 - SS2 - SS5 - AB26 - LDN22 - TT1 - AN1 - AN7 - PT3 - SH5 - BV4 - PSG3 - EKREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONL1.0LANDSCAPE PLAN............Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060ROSEMOUNT MEMORY CARE 150TH ST W & BUSINESS PKWY, ROSEMOUNT, MN 55068 1824 BUERKLE RD, WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110 HAMPTON COMPANIES, LLC. PROJECT ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:21488............04/26/2022CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:RL, MD, EHRL, RB..............COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cP R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDERTHE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.25821Robert L. Binder04/26/22LANDSCAPE NOTES:01" = 30'-0"30'-0"15'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRPROPOSED PERENNIAL PLANT SYMBOLS - SEE PLANTSCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZESPROPOSED DECIDUOUS AND EVERGREEN SHRUB SYMBOLS - SEEPLANT SCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZESPROPOSED ORNAMENTAL TREE SYMBOLS - SEE PLANTSCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZESPROPOSED EVERGREEN TREE SYMBOLS - SEE PLANTSCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZESPROPOSED CANOPY TREE SYMBOLS - SEEPLANT SCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIESAND PLANTING SIZESDECORATIVE BOULDERS (ROUNDED & BLOCK STYLE), 18"-30" DIA.LEGENDMULCH SCHEDULEAREAMULCH TYPEEDGINGFABRICREMARKSTREE RINGS4" DEPTH, SHREDDED CEDARYESNOSEE DETAIL SHT. L1.1PLANTING BEDS4" DEPTH, SHREDDED CEDARYESNOMAINT. STRIP AT BUILDING FOUNDATIONNANANADOG PARK MULCH4" DEPTH, SHREDDED WOOD, SEEREMARKSYESYESORGANIC MULCH SPECIFICALLY FOR USEIN DOG PARKS. SHALL KNIT TOGETHERTO FORM MATTED, ACCESSIBLESURFACE, SHALL BE TREATED WITHANTI-MICROBIAL AGENT.NATIVE SEED AREASNANANANOTE: COORDINATE ALL MULCH AND PLANTING BED MATERIAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, PROVIDE SAMPLES AND SHOP DRAWINGS/PHOTOS/DATA SHEETS OF ALLMATERIALSEDGING - SHALL BE COMMERCIAL GRADE, 4" DEPTH ALUMINUM,BLACK OR DARK GREEN IN COLOR, INCLUDE ALL CONNECTORS,STAKES, & ALL APPURTENANCES PER MANUF. INSTALL PER MANUF.INSTRUC./SPECS.1.WHERE SHOWN, SHRUB & PERENNIAL BEDS SHALL BE MULCHED - SEE SCHEDULE BELOW2.ALL TREES SHALL BE MULCHED TO OUTER EDGE OF SAUCER OR TO EDGE OF PLANTING BED, IF APPLICABLE. ALL MULCHSHALL BE KEPT WITHIN A MINIMUM OF 2" FROM TREE TRUNK. SEE MULCH SCHEDULE BELOW.3.IF SHOWN ON PLAN, RANDOM SIZED LIMESTONE BOULDERS COLOR AND SIZE TO COMPLIMENT NEW LANDSCAPING.OWNER TO APPROVE BOULDER SAMPLES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.4.PLANT MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM WITH THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN STANDARDS AND SHALL BE OFHARDY STOCK, FREE FROM DISEASE, DAMAGE AND DISFIGURATION. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAININGPLUMPNESS OF PLANT MATERIAL FOR DURATION OF ACCEPTANCE PERIOD.5.UPON DISCOVERY OF A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE QUANTITY OF PLANTS SHOWN ON THE SCHEDULE AND THEQUANTITY SHOWN ON THE PLAN, THE SCHEDULE SHALL GOVERN AND CONTRACTOR SHALL RECONCILE BETWEEN THETWO BEFORE INSTALLATION.6.CONDITION OF VEGETATION SHALL BE MONITORED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OFTHE CONTRACT. LANDSCAPE MATERIALS PART OF THE CONTRACT SHALL BE WARRANTED FOR ONE (1) FULL GROWINGSEASONS FROM SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION DATE.7.ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL RECEIVE MIN. 6" LAYER TOPSOIL AND SOD AS SPECIFIEDUNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS.8.COORDINATE LOCATION OF VEGETATION WITH UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD UTILITIES, LIGHTING FIXTURES, DOORSAND WINDOWS. CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE IN THE FIELD FINAL LOCATION OF TREES AND SHRUBS FOR REVIEW ANDAPPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.9.ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE WATERED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL ACCEPTANCE.10.REPAIR AT NO COST TO OWNER ALL DAMAGE RESULTING FROM LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'S ACTIVITIES.11.SWEEP AND MAINTAIN ALL PAVED SURFACES FREE OF DEBRIS GENERATED FROM LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'SACTIVITIES.12.PROVIDE SITE WIDE IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN AND INSTALLATION. SYSTEM SHALL BE FULLY PROGRAMMABLE ANDCAPABLE OF ALTERNATE DATE WATERING. THE SYSTEM SHALL PROVIDE HEAD TO HEAD OR DRIP COVERAGE AND BECAPABLE OF DELIVERING ONE INCH OF PRECIPITATION PER WEEK. SYSTEM SHALL EXTEND INTO THE PUBLICRIGHT-OF-WAY TO THE EDGE OF PAVEMENT/BACK OF CURB.13.CONTRACTOR SHALL SECURE APPROVAL OF PROPOSED IRRIGATION SYSTEM INLCUDING PRICING FROM OWNER, PRIORTO INSTALLATION.SEE SHEET L1.1 FOR PLANTING SCHEDULE REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONLT1.0PHOTOMETRIC PLAN............ CITY SUBMITTALN O T F O RCONSTRUCTIONDRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:REVISIONS:PROJECT #:cCOPYRIGHT 2022DATE:RRROSA ARCHITECTURAL GROUPSHEET1084 Sterling StreetSt. Paul, MN 55119tel: 651-739-7988fax: 651-739-3165RosaArchitecturalGroupInc.PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDERTHE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.REG. NO.SIGNED:PRINT NAME:DATE:PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.REG. NO.SIGNED:PRINT NAME:DATE:22216APR. 4, 2022JLPROPOSEDA4.1COLORELEVATIONSA4.113/32" = 1'-0" (ON 24x36 SHEET)PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATIONA4.123/32" = 1'-0" (ON 24x36 SHEET)PROPOSED SIDE ELEVATIONA4.133/32" = 1'-0" (ON 24x36 SHEET)PROPOSED SIDE ELEVATIONA4.143/32" = 1'-0" (ON 24x36 SHEET)PROPOSED REAR ELEVATIONA4.153/16" = 1'-0" (ON 24x36 SHEET)TRASH ENCLOSURE ELEV.A4.163/16" = 1'-0" (ON 24x36 SHEET)TRASH ENCLOSURE ELEV.A4.173/16" = 1'-0" (ON 24x36 SHEET)TRASH ENCLOSURE ELEV.A4.183/16" = 1'-0" (ON 24x36 SHEET)TRASH ENCLOSURE ELEV.150th St. W & Business PkwySuite LivingRosemount, MN 55068of RosemountRUSSELL R ROSA180394/4/2022 K:\020371-000\Admin\Docs\2022.04.26 - Preliminary Site Plan Review.docx Memorandum To: Anthony Nemcek, Senior Planner CC: Stacy Bodsberg, Planning & Personnel Secretary Brian Erickson, City Engineer From: Tim Hanson PE, WSB Engineering Consultant Date: April 26, 2022 Re: Suite Living Preliminary Plans WSB File Number 020371-000 City Project Number SUBMITTAL: Hampton Companies, LLC. has submitted preliminary construction plans for the development of lot 6, Block 1, Rosewood Commons, which is located north of County Road 42, east of Canadian Pacific Railroad and west of Business Parkway. The plans submitted were prepared by Civil Site Group. Review comments were generated from preliminary construction plan submittal dated 04.26.2022. The submittal included the following: ▪ Cover Sheet ▪ Site Survey ▪ Removal Plans ▪ Site Plan ▪ Grading Plan ▪ Utility Plan ▪ Details ▪ Landscape Plan ▪ SWPP Plan SITE SURVEY Lot 6, Block 1, Rosewood Commons is located in the interior portion of the Rosewood commons Plat, north and adjacent to the private drive of 149th Street. The lot is also adjacent to the westside of the north-south private street that extends north from 149th Street. Access to the lot is provided by two driveway connections along the north-south private street. These driveways were identified in the development plans for Rosewood Commons. The site survey identifies an existing 60-foot-wide drainage and utility easement extending into lot 6. It does not appear that this easement is currently utilized as no public utilities or ponding are located within the easement area. This easement must be vacated as it extends into the proposed building. REMOVAL PLAN The current site does not have any improvements on the lot nor is it forested. SITE PLAN Anthony Nemcek April 27, 2022 Page 2 K:\020371-000\Admin\Docs\2022.04.26 - Preliminary Site Plan Review.docx Access to the lot extends from the north-south private drive into the sites parking lot which has 24 parking stalls. A 5-foot concrete sidewalk extends around the south, east, north and a portion of the west side of the building, the sidewalk is 7-foot wide adjacent to the parking lot. The sidewalk provides exterior access to a patio area on the west side of the building and to an emergency exit on the south side of the building. An 8-foot-wide sidewalk extends around the outer perimeter of the lot which is for the publics use within the Rosewood Commons development. GRADING AND DRAINAGE The single lot has its runoff extend away from the building in each direction. Runoff to the east flows to the east side of the parking lot where it is collected in a storm sewer system. The north and south sides of the building has their runoff flow to t he private streets proposed along each side of the lot and is collected by storm sewer proposed with Rosewood Commons. The western side of the building has its runoff flow to the west. There are no existing or proposed improvements, (at this time) to the west of the building so this runoff will flow to an open area. Future improvements identify a parking lot being constructed adjacent to the west of the building. The storm sewer system provided for this parking lot will have to have capacity for the run off extending from lot 6. A maintenance agreement will be needed for the off-site storm sewer systems which collect runoff from this site. There is one low point in the parking lot. The Emergency overflow for the low point is along the curb line of the parking lot, however it is only 1.07 feet below the lowest floor of the building. The site plan needs to be adjusted to increase the height of the building above the emergency overflow to 1.5 feet. SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN – UTILITY PLAN The proposed 6-inch sanitary sewer that serves the building extends from an eight-inch sanitary sewer line within the north-south private street. The proposed 6-inch watermain extends from an 8-inch watermain within the same street. STORM SEWER Storm sewer is proposed along the easterly curb line of the parking lot. The storm sewer flows south connecting to a storm sewer system proposed with Rosewood Commons. The last manhole structure prior to its connection with the Rosewood Commons storm sewer needs to have a 3-foot sump. Storm sewer design and layout will be reviewed with the Surface Water Management submittal. SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT The proposed Surface Water Management plan for the preliminary plat is currently being reviewed. Comments included in the Surface Water Management review shall be incorporated in the project design. LANDSCAPE PLAN The Landscape plan was reviewed for conflicts with infrastructure. Tree plantings should allow space for access and maintenance of proposed infrastructure. General Infrastructure design shall be completed in accordance with the City of Rosemount’s Engineering Guidelines and Standards. Infrastructure construction shall be completed in accordance with the latest edition of the City’s General Specifications and Standard Detail Plates for Street and Utility Construction.