HomeMy WebLinkAbout6.a. PCAttachments_Rosewood Commons
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Planning Commission Regular Meeting: December 19, 2022
Tentative City Council Meeting: January 17, 2023
AGENDA ITEM: 22-91-FP and 22-98-PP Request by KJ Walk,
Inc for preliminary and final plat approval for
Rosewood Commons 2nd Addition
AGENDA SECTION:
Public Hearing
PREPARED BY: Julia Hogan, Planner AGENDA NO. 6.a.
ATTACHMENTS: Site Location; Plat; Preliminary Site Plan and
Landscape Plan; City Engineer’s Memo dated
December 8, 2022; Stormwater Memo dated
December 13, 2022; Parks and Recreation
Memo dated December 15, 2022.
APPROVED BY: AK
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to recommend the City Council approve the Preliminary and Final Rosewood
Commons Second Addition Plats subject to the following conditions:
1. Execution of a subdivision agreement.
2. Approval of a Minor Amendment to the Rosewood Commons Planned Unit
Development Agreement to allow for the reduction in the minimum lot width
requirement for Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Rosewood Commons Second Addition.
3. Incorporation of recommendations and requirements contained in the Engineer’s
memorandum dated December 8, 2022.
4. Vacation of existing easements that will be platted as right of way or as easements
on final plat for Lot 1, Block 2.
5. Payment of $42,930 cash-in-lieu of park land dedication.
SUMMARY
Property Owner: Warren and Kathleen Israelson
Applicant: KJ Walk, Inc
Site Location: Northeast quadrant of the intersection of Highway 3 and County
Road 46 and the northeast quadrant of the intersection of Business
Parkway and County Road 46 Parkway and County Road 46.
Site Area in Acres:
Comp. Guide Plan Designation: CC – Community Commercial
Current Zoning: C4 – General Commercial & C3 – Highway Service Commercial
The Planning Commission is being asked to consider a request by KJ Walk, Inc for preliminary and final
plat approval for Rosewood Commons Second Addition in anticipation of future commercial
development at two sites located west of the intersection of Business Parkway and CSAH 42 and one site
located east of the intersection of Business Parkway and CSAH 42. Commercial development projects
require site plan review, so if the preliminary and final plats for Rosewood Commons 2nd Addition are
approved site plan reviews will be required for each site when. A minor amendment to the Rosewood
2
Commons Planned Unit Development Agreement is required with the approval of the preliminary and
finals plats. Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 do not meet the minimum lot width requirements for the C4 – General
Commercial zoning district so an amendment to the Rosewood Commons PUD is needed to allow for the
two lots to be approved as is. Approval of a minor amendment to the Rosewood Commons PUD will be
included as condition of approval with the plats. Staff is recommending approval of the preliminary and
final plats and will be recommending to the City Council approval of the minor amendment to the
Rosewood Commons PUD.
BACKGROUND
The Planning Commission reviewed and recommend approval of the Rosewood Commons Planned Unit,
Preliminary Plat, and Site Plan for the first phase of development at its meeting in September 2020. The
site was originally approved for a mixture of High Density Residential and Commercial Use which could
include senior housing, a hotel, various retail, and a memory care facility. The proposed memory care and
assisted living facility was approved by the City Council in June 2022 and is located within the Rosewood
Commons Plat.
The Rosewood Commons final plat was approved by the City Council in April 2022. This final plat was
the final step in the subdivision process and was necessary to allow for construction to being on the six
apartment buildings that received final site and building plan approval in 2020. With the submittal of that
final plat the applicant did include two additional parcels in the southern portion of the preliminary plat
area for future commercial use, but because the parcels were not included in the original preliminary plat,
they were not able to be platted with Rosewood Commons. The Planning Commission is required to hold
a public hearing to review commercial parcels as part of the preliminary and final plat process so that is
why the applicant was required to go through the preliminary and final plat process for the proposed
commercial lots that are being proposed.
ISSUE ANALYSIS
Legal Authority Legal Authority. Preliminary and final plat requests are quasi-judicial decisions for the
Planning Commission. This means the Planning Commission is acting as a judge to determine if the
regulations within the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and Subdivision Ordinance are being
followed. Generally, if the proposed preliminary and final plats meet the standards and requirements for
reviewing this type of request it must be approved.
Plat
The applicant is proposing a plat that will contain three buildable lots that were originally apart of the
Rosewood Commons Plat and the Rosewood Estates Plat. Two of the proposed lots are located in the
northwestern quadrant of CSAH 42 and Business parkway intersection and are adjacent to the south side
of the private street of 149th Street, which is constructed within Rosewood Commons. The proposed third
lot is located in the northeastern quadrant of CSAH 42 and Business Parkway intersection and is also
adjacent to the south side of 149th Street. The land located west of the proposed Lot 1 and 2, Block 1 will
be outloted on the plat as Outlot A.
The Zoning Ordinance contains standards related to the dimensions of lots within the C3 – Highway
Commercial and C4 – General Commercial zoning districts. There is no minimum lot depth specified in
the City Code, but a minimum lot width and area is required to be followed. The plat shows that Lots 1
and 2 of Block 1 do not meet the required 120-foot minimum lot width requirement. Lot 1, Block 1 has a
minimum lot width of 106-feet in the northern portion of the site and Lot 2, Block 1 has a minimum lot
width of 119.49-feet in the southern portion of the site. A minor amendment to the Rosewood Commons
Planned Unit Development Agreement to allow for the reduced minimum lot width is required for Lots 1
and 2, Block 2 and will be included as a condition of approval for the preliminary and final plats. The
standards and a comparison of the proposed plat is provided in the table below. Standards related to
setbacks, lot coverage, building height, etc. will be reviewed by staff and the Planning Commission when
3
site plan review applications are submitted.
Lot Standard Required Lot 1, Block 1 Lot 2, Block 1 Lot 1, Block 2
Minimum Width 120 feet 106 feet 119.49 feet 291 feet
Minimum Area 20,000 sq ft >20,000 sq ft >20,000 sq ft >20,000 sq ft
Engineering
The request was reviewed by the City Engineer, with comments provided in a memorandum included with
the attachments. The main access to Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 will be from a common driveway centered on
the westerly property line of Lot 1, Block 1, which also extends into Outlot A. Shared driveway easements
and maintenance agreements will be required between the two lots of Block 1 and the future lot to be
platted with the development of Outlot A. The main access to Lot 1, Block 2 comes from an existing
driveway extending from 149th Street at the northeast corner of the parcel. This driveway location will need
to be the access and egress location for the lot. Noted in the engineer’s memo is that 149th street adjacent
to Lot 1, Block 2 is located within a roadway easement as it is not on platted right of way. The platting of
149th street must include the vacating of roadway and drainage and utility easements in that area.
Sanitary sewer and water services have been extended to each of the three lots. Services were extended to
Block 1 with the development of Rosewood Commons. Services to Block 2 extend from 149th Street
midway along the lot. Also noted was tree plantings will need to allow space for access and maintenance
for future proposed infrastructure.
Park Dedication
The City’s Parks and Recreation staff reviewed the proposed plat and is recommending a fee-in-lieu of
land dedication for the proposed commercial sites. The cash dedication for the 4.77 acres of commercial
development would be $42,930 (4.77 acres x $9,000 per acre).
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
Staff is recommending approval of the preliminary and final plat based on the information provided by the
applicant and reviewed in this report, subject to the conditions listed in the recommended action.
33
5
.
6
9
4
0
.
5
3
E
Ϭ
ϲ
Σ
Ϭ
ϳ
Ζ
ϰ
Ϭ
Η
t
4
0
.
5
3
E
ϭ
Ϭ
Σ
ϯ
ϵ
Ζ
ϯ
ϲ
Η
t
3
6
.
7
1
E
Ϭ
ϴ
Σ
ϭ
Ϭ
Ζ
Ϭ
ϯ
Η
t
4
3
.
5
9
^Ϭ
Ϭ
Σ
ϯ
ϱ
Ζ
Ϯ
ϯ
Η
97
.
5
4
EϬ
Ϯ
Σ
Ϯ
ϯ
Ζ
Ϭ
ϵ
Η
12
3
.
3
1
E
ϭ
ϵ
Σ
ϯ
ϲ
Ζ
Ϯ
ϰ
Η
t
1
8
.
0
0
12
3
.
3
1
18
9
.
7
2
55
.
0
0
89
.
5
0
35.50
18
9
.
7
2
148.75
26.76
119.49
9
5
6
0+001+002+003+004+00
0+
0
0
95
2
6001 Egan Drive, Ste 100, Savage, MN 55378
Phone: 952.226.3200 Web: www.kjwalk.com
Date:Revision:
Original
Site Plan-Cover
SHEET 1 of 2
Date: 11/2/2022
FILE PATH: G:\.shortcut-targets-by-id\0B7rlATRBOKEBSGQ2T0JkZi0xUTg\Work Files\Rosemount Projects\Rosewood Commons\Engineering\CAD\DWGs\ROSEWOOD COMMONS2-Site Plan.dwg
ROSEWOOD COMMONS SECOND ADDITION
I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me,
or under my direct supervision, and that I am a
duly registered engineer under the laws of the
State of Minnesota.
Luke Warren Israelson
Registration #: 51362
Legend
Existing watermain
Proposed watermain
Existing sanitary
Proposed sanitary
Existing storm
Proposed storm
Existing hydrant
Proposed hydrant
Existing gate valve
Proposed gate valve
Existing manhole
Proposed manhole
Proposed catchbasin
Silt fence
Inlet protectors
Parking lot lights
Building Lights
Rip Rap
Drainage Arrow
Spot Elevation963.90
DEVELOPER/ENGINEER/BUILDER
KJ Walk, Inc.Luke Israelson
6001 Egan Drive, Ste 100 952.826.9068
Savage, MN 55378
Legal Description:
Lot 1 and 2, Block 1, Rosewood Commons Second Addition,
Dakota County, Minnesota.
11/28/2022
For Review
November 28, 2022
Impervious vs Pervious
Area Sq Ft Percent
Total Area 74963
Building Foot Print 11200 14.94%
Green Space 13355 17.82%
Parking/Sidewalks 50408 67.24%
Rosewood Commons
Use and Parking Requirements
USE UNITS /
AREA
PARKING
STANDARD
REQUIRED
PARKING
Retail 11200 Sq Ft 5 per 1000 56
Total Provided 105
BENCHMARK
T.N.H AT BRENNER COURT AND
BUSINESS PARKWAY - ELEV. 955.74
DATUM: NAD83
0 30 60 90
ROSEMOUNT, MN
SHEET INDEX
1 Cover
2 Grading and Landscape Plan
Surface materials for the streets/parking, sidewalks
and driveways will be a combination of blacktop,
concrete and stamped concrete.
0+001+002+003+00
0+
0
0
953.00
951.00
955.66956.13 9
5
6
0+001+002+003+004+00
0+
0
0
951.75
954.61 951.32
951.38
952.05
951.81
951.50
953.10
953.30
95
2
950.9
953.05 953.00
6001 Egan Drive, Ste 100, Savage, MN 55378
Phone: 952.226.3200 Web: www.kjwalk.com
Date:Revision:
Original
Site Plan- Grading and
Landscape Plan
SHEET 2 of 2
Date: 11/2/2022
FILE PATH: G:\.shortcut-targets-by-id\0B7rlATRBOKEBSGQ2T0JkZi0xUTg\Work Files\Rosemount Projects\Rosewood Commons\Engineering\CAD\DWGs\ROSEWOOD COMMONS2-Site Plan.dwg
I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me,
or under my direct supervision, and that I am a
duly registered engineer under the laws of the
State of Minnesota.
Luke Warren Israelson
Registration #: 51362
963.90
11/28/2022
For Review
November 28, 2022
1/
3
T
R
E
E
HE
I
G
H
T
ROOT CROWN AT
FINISH GRADE,
OR 1-2" ABOVE GRADE
FINISH GRADE
TILLED OR BROKEN UP
SOIL MIN 12" DEEP
2" SETTLED LAYER OF MULCH
2X WIDTH OF ROOTBALL
SCALE: NOT TO SCALE
TREE PLANTING
ROOT CROWN AT
FINISH GRADE,
OR 1-2" ABOVE GRADE
FINISH GRADE
TILLED OR BROKEN UP
SOIL MIN 12" DEEP
2" SETTLED LAYER OF MULCH
2X WIDTH OF ROOTBALL
SCALE: NOT TO SCALE
TYP. SHRUB PLANTING
Landscape Planting
Common Name Botanical Name Size
Autumn Blaze Maple Acre Freemanii 'Jeffsred'2.5"8
Ash Fraxinus 2.5"5
Total Trees 13
Shrubs 180
St. John's Wort, Low Grow Sumac, Tor Spirea, Hyperion Daylily,
Dwarf Lilac, Or similar
Total 193
ROSEMOUNT, MN
COLORADO BLUE SPRUCE
LEGEND
ASH
LINDEN
MAPLE
A
L
M
NOTES:
* CONIFEROUS TREES STAGGERED WITH 15' SPACING
* DECIDUOUS TREES-20' SPACING
* SHRUBS TO BE PLANTED IN FRONT OF ALL BLDGS
* THERE ARE NO SIGNIFICANT TREES ON SITE
SHRUB
FEATHER REED GRASS OR SIMILAR
DRAINAGE ARROW
SPOT ELEVATION
GRADING PLAN
0 30 60 90
LANDSCAPE PLAN
0 30 60 90
K:\021893-000\Admin\Docs\2022.11.30 Submittal\2022.12.07 - Preliminary Plat Review.docx
Memorandum
To: Anthony Nemcek, Senior Planner
CC: Brian Erickson, City Engineer
From: Tim Hanson PE, WSB Engineering Consultant
Date: December 8, 2022
Re: Rosewood Commons Second Addition
Preliminary Plat, Lots 1 & 2, Block 1
Final Plat Review
WSB File Number 021893-000
City Project Number
SUBMITTAL:
KJ Walk Inc. has submitted a final plat for the development of a portion of Outlot A, Rosewood
Commons and Outlot F Rosewood Estates which are located north of County Road 42, east of
Canadian Pacific Railroad and adjacent to the east and west side of Business Parkway. The
plans submitted were prepared by KJ Walk. Review comments were generated from Final Plat
submittal, dated 11.28.2022. The submittal included the following:
▪ Preliminary Plat consisting of
▪ Cover Sheet for Lots 1 & 2, Block 1
▪ Grading and Landscape Plan for Lots 1 & 2, Block 1
▪ Final Plat
PRELIMINARY PLAT – Lots 1 & 2, Block 1
Lots 1 & 2 Rosewood Commons are located in the northwest quadrant of the County State Aid
Highway 42 and Business Parkway intersection. and are adjacent to the south side of the private
street of 149th Street constructed with Rosewood Commons. Access and egress to the lots
extends from a common driveway centered on the westerly property line of Lot 1, Block 1, which
also extends into Outlot A, Rosewood Commons Second Addition. Shared driveway easements
and maintenance agreements will be required between the two lots of block 1 and the f uture lot to
be platted with the development of Outlot A Rosewood Commons Second Addition.
The north parking lot curb line for both lots 1 & 2, block 1 extends into Lot 7, Block 1, Rosewood
Commons. A parking easement and maintenance agreement will also be needed between the
proposed lots and Lot 7, Block 1. Rosewood Commons.
Access and egress to Lots 1 & 2, Block 1 is provided by 3 access isles extending from the
primary access drive on the west side of the site. The access isles extend across lot 1 to lot 2
providing access to parking areas in lot 1 and parking areas in lot 2. Lot 2 is identified to have a
drive-up service window. Access to the drive-up window is from the southerly access isle. The
access isles are identified at 24 feet wide, parking stalls scale to 9 feet wide with 18-foot depth for
head-to-head parking and 17-foot depth for bumper overhang parking stalls. The layout is
somewhat congested.
Anthony Nemcek
December 8, 2022
Page 2
K:\021893-000\Admin\Docs\2022.11.30 Submittal\2022.12.07 - Preliminary Plat Review.docx
Existing sidewalks extend along the perimeter of the lots within 149th Street and Business
Parkway.
1. Access and egress cross easements are required for Lot 1, & 2, Block 1 and the
future lot within Outlot A, Rosewood Commons Second Addition.
2. Maintenance agreement will be required for the northly curb line of the parking lot for
Lots 1 & 2, Block 1.
3. The driveway location for Lot 1, Block 2 must remain as currently constructed.
PRELIMINARY PLAT - Lot 1, Block 2
A Preliminary Plat for Lot 1, Block 2 was not included in the submittal. Lot 1 Block 2 is in the
northeast quadrant of the County State Aid Highway 42 and Business Park Boulevard
intersection. An existing driveway extends from 149th Street at the northeast corner of the parcel.
This driveway location must be the access and egress location for the lot.
149th Street adjacent to Lot 1, Block 2, is located within a roadway easement as it is not on
platted right of way. The platting of 149th Street must include the vacating of roadway and
drainage and utility easements in this area.
Sidewalks extend along the perimeter of the lot within 149th Street and Business Parkway.
4. Vacation of existing easements that will be platted as right of way or as easements
on the final plat.
The development Fees are indicated below based on the 2022 Schedule of Rates and Fees.
▪ Sanitary Sewer Trunk Charge: $1,075/acre
▪ Watermain Trunk Charge: $6,500/acre
▪ Storm Sewer Trunk Charge: $6,865/acre
GRADING AND DRAINAGE – Lots 1 & 2, Block 1.
Lots 1 & 2 Block 1 are proposed to be graded primarily towards the common lot line between the
two lots. Runoff from west of lots is identified to flow to the east unto the proposed lots. The
runoff from the lots and adjacent area is identified to be collected by storm sewer catchbasins
located in the parking lot pavement area. Runoff from the site is conveyed to existing ponding
areas located east of the site adjacent to 149th Street.
A grading plan was not submitted for Lot 1, Block 2. Detail drainage review will be completed
upon submittal of a site plan for the lot.
SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN – UTILITY PLAN
Sanitary sewer and water services have been extended to each of the 3 lots. Services were
extended to Block 1 with the development of Rosewood Commons. Services to Block 2 extend
from 149th street midway along the lot. Detail review of service extensions and fire protection
needs will be completed with the submittal of a site plan for the lots.
STORM SEWER
Storm sewer design and layout will be reviewed with the Surface Water Management submittal.
SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT
The proposed Surface Water Management plan for the preliminary plat was not submitted.
Surface water management design must be submitted with the site plan for the proposed lots.
Comments from the Surface Water Management review shall be incorporated in the project
design.
Anthony Nemcek
December 8, 2022
Page 3
K:\021893-000\Admin\Docs\2022.11.30 Submittal\2022.12.07 - Preliminary Plat Review.docx
LANDSCAPE PLAN
The Landscape plan was reviewed for conflicts with infrastructure. Tree plantings should allow
space for access and maintenance of proposed infrastructure.
General
Infrastructure design shall be completed in accordance with the City of Rosemount’s Engineering
Guidelines and Standards. Infrastructure construction shall be completed in accordance with the
latest edition of the City’s General Specifications and Standard Detail Plates for Street and Utility
Construction.
K:\016162-000\Admin\Docs\2022.08.24 - Submittal\WR Review\019979-000 Rosewood Commons Stormwater Review Memo 20221213.docx
7
0
1
X
E
N
I
A
A
V
E
N
U
E
S
|
S
U
I
T
E
3
0
0
|
M
I
N
N
E
A
P
O
L
I
S
,
M
N
|
55
4
1
6
|
7
6
3
.
5
4
1
.
4
8
0
0
|
W
S
B
E
N
G
.
C
O
M
Memorandum
To: Brian Erickson, City of Rosemount
From: Bill Alms, PE
Henry Meeker, EIT
Date: December 13, 2022
Re: Rosewood Commons Plan Review
WSB Project No. 019979-000
I have reviewed the documents provided by KJwalk on 8/24/2022 for the Rosewood Commons
development project. Documents reviewed include:
Rosewood Commons 08182022SUB Date: August 18, 2022 Author: KJwalk
RW SWMP Date: August 24, 2022 Author: KJwalk
RCOM Rational Method Calcs Date: August 24, 2022 Author: KJwalk
RCOM Drainage Map Date: August 18, 2022 Author: KJwalk
Applicant should provide responses to each comment. Updated comments per the 8/24/2022
submittal are shown in red. I offer the following comments below.
Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Comments on Plan Set
1. General
a. An NPDES permit will be required prior to the start of construction.
b. Inlets required every 300’ on streets to prevent runoff from flowing through
intersections.
c. Inlets should be located such that 3 cfs is max flow at the inlet for 10-year design
and does not exceed applicable spread design for road. Provide calculations
showing inlets 1-3, 1-4, and 3-1 meet this requirement.
While structures 1-2 and 3-1 still show rates much greater than 3 cfs, it appears
the tributary area to these will likely change with future development. No action
required
d. Street catchbasins require 3 foot sumps prior to discharging to public storm
sewer and the final structure before outletting to a water basin requires a 3 foot
sump.
e. Indicate drainage structure type and size on storm sewer profiles. Ensure
structures are constructable based on pipe sizes and angles. As designed,
structure CB 3-2 would require an 84” manhole to be constructable with the angle
between the two pipes.
f. Correct SWPPP to include proper contact for long term O&M of stormwater
facilities.
g. Provide response to comments provided by the City from previous review.
2. Ponds and Wetlands
Brian Erickson
December 13, 2022
Page 2
K:\016162-000\Admin\Docs\2022.08.24 - Submittal\WR Review\019979-000 Rosewood Commons Stormwater Review Memo 20221213.docx
a. Show Regional Basin ID, NWL, HWL, and storage volume for all BMPs receiving
drainage from the site.
b. Show/define access routes for maintenance purposes to all manholes, inlets,
and/or outlets at ponding areas that are outside of public ROW. See Section 6,
Grading, in the City of Rosemount Engineer Guidelines for more detail on the
construction requirements of these access routes.
c. Show existing or proposed city standard regional OCS on BMPs receiving
drainage from the site.
3. Emergency Overflow Routes:
a. Show EOF routes. All EOF routes need to be encompassed by a drainage/utility
easement. Overland EOF routes shall be provided for all basins in addition to the
normal pipe outlet. Show EOF routes from all low points and show high point
elevation along EOF routes and the directional flow arrows. Show EOF route
typical section with bottom width and side slopes. If a pipe is installed to provide
an EOF, label it as EOF.
4. Retaining Walls:
a. No comments.
5. Erosion Control:
a. A separate erosion control plan sheet is required that will accompany grading
plan. See Section 5, Erosion Control, of the City of Rosemount Engineering
Guidelines for more information on requirements.
6. Grading:
a. Provide the datum used for grading elevations.
Stormwater Management Plan:
1. General Report Requirements
a. Include narrative describing existing and proposed drainage conditions for site.
b. Offsite drainage must be considered in site modeling.
Offsite drainage to Pond B can be reduced based on new storm sewer
development in the area, the area can be reduced to 12.61 acres and the extents
shown in the included drainage exhibit.
c. Include an approximate timeline for anticipated improvements to Pond C.
2. General Storm Sewer Design
a. Label all storm sewer as public or private. Storm sewer within public ROW or
trunk conveyances shall be public owned and maintained.
b. Include drainage area maps showing existing and proposed conditions.
c. Include catch basin drainage area map and pipe size calculations.
d. Modeling should show storm events as defined in the City of Rosemount’s
Engineering Guidelines, Section 2.f.:
i. 2-year
ii. 10-year
iii. 100-year
iv. 10-day snowmelt
Modeling must be consolidated, using different models to determine certain
HWLs is not allowable. HWLs must be determined with offsite drainage included ,
Brian Erickson
December 13, 2022
Page 3
K:\016162-000\Admin\Docs\2022.08.24 - Submittal\WR Review\019979-000 Rosewood Commons Stormwater Review Memo 20221213.docx
no exfiltration to be included in modeling. Pond B has no NURP pretreatment
volume included in the modeling.
e. Proposed drainage calculations should incorporate stormwater analysis of the
future development to the west (Outlot E) and be sized for future impervious
areas. Include analysis and narrative of these calculations in stormwater report.
f. Show building roof leader connections to storm sewer throughout entire project
site.
g. Provide insulation for storm sewer crossings within 1 8” of vertical separation to
watermain.
h. Move CB 1-3, 1-4, 3-6, 3-7, 3-10, 3-11 and 3-12 to a curb line.
i. The pipe between CB1-5 and FE 1-6 must be sized appropriately to convey the
drainage needs of the site after full development. Future development must route
to CB 1-5 instead of constructing additional outfalls into Pond B.
One additional future outfall to Pond B is acceptable.
j. Include storm sewer connecting Pond A culvert outlet, north of 2717 148th St W
parcel, to CB 1-3 and ultimately Pond B .
k. The maximum allowable velocity in storm sewer is 10 fps generally and 6 fps
prior to an outfall to a BMP. Pipes between structures 1-1 and 1-6 must have
shallower slopes to reduce this velocity. Pipe velocity into the pond currently
shows 12.2 ft/sec.
3. Water Quantity
a. See supplemental review information from 2017 modeling regarding regional
basin storage requirements. Indicate which option has been chosen or specify
other proposed storage design.
4. Rate/Volume Control
a. Include summary table for onsite and offsite runoff to each Pond in the
stormwater report in existing and proposed conditions.
b. Include existing and proposed runoff rates for all storm events.
5. Freeboard
a. Include basement floor elevations analysis (Section 2.l.i-iii.)
6. Water Quality
a. Include NURP analysis (see Section 3.a.i-viii.)
Modeling a 2.5” storm event is recommended to determine the required dead
storage volume for Pond B, this includes offsite areas.
b. Provide calculations of required and provided water quality volumes.
See above comment.
c. Show locations of basins providing water quality treatment.
7. Easements
a. Provide D&U Easement over outfalls to basins.
M E M O R A N D U M
To: Adam Kienberger, Community Development Director
Anthony Nemcek, Senior Planner
Julia Hogan, Planner
From: Dan Schultz, Parks and Recreation Director
Date: December 15, 2022
Subject: Rosewood Commons Second Addition Preliminary and Final Plats
The Parks and Recreation Department recently reviewed the plans for the Rosemount Commons
second addition development plans and has the following comments:
Parks Dedication
Because the City is not looking to acquire parkland in this development, thus the parks dedication
for this will be cash in-lieu of land. The cash dedication for the 4.77 acres of commercial
development would be $42,930 ($9,000 per acre x 4.77 acres = $42,930).
Please let know if you have any questions about this memo.