Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout7. 132nd Court West Street and Utility Improvements, City Project #393AGENDA ITEM: 132 Court West Street and Utility Improvements, City Project #393 AGENDA SECTION: Public Hearing PREPARED BY: Andrew J Brotzler, P.E., City Engineer 1 A AGEN ATTACHMENTS: Resolution APPROVED BY:11A) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt a Resolution Ordering the Project and Authorizing the Preparation of Plans and Specifications for the 132 Court West Street and Utility Improvements, City Project #393. 4 City Council Meeting: February 7, 2006 BACKGROUND: CITY COUNCIL EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On October 4, 2005, the Rosemount City Council received a petition from residents along 132nd Court West requesting City sanitary sewer and water service. Since greater than 35 of the impacted residents requested the improvements, a simple majority council vote authorized the preparation of a Feasibility Report for the 132nd Court Improvements Project This project has been designated as City Project No. 393. 1. Location The project is located on 132nd Court West in the north central portion of the City, and is north of Old County Road 38 and west of Trunk Highway 3. 2. Proposed Street Improvements With the reconstruction and upgrade of Old County Road 38 (City Project 387), it is proposed that 132nd Court West be paved as a rural section, maintaining the existing ditches and drainage patterns. Curb and gutter will not be installed as a part of this project Bituminous pavement is recommended to reduce the trackmg of gravel onto Old County Road 38, as well as protect the existence of utilities placed under the road. 3. Sanitary Sewer It is proposed that a new 21 inch trunk sanitary sewer would be installed along the west leg of 132nd Court where it can be extended to the north in the future to service areas north of Old County Road 38. An 8 -inch lateral PVC sanitary sewer will be installed along the remauung portions of 132nd Court The sanitary sewer will connect to new sanitary sewer being installed as part of the Old County Road 38 project (City Project 387). 4. Water Main It is proposed that a new 8 -inch ductile iron pipe (DIP) watermain be installed with the sanitary sewer along 132nd Court West G ENGPROJ 393 PHOrdPO SPECI32ndCourtCC2 -7 -06 doc 5. Funding The total estimated project cost is $216,900, which includes a 5% contingency and 30% indirect costs Funding for the project will consist of special assessments, 2006 Street Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) funds, and Samtary Sewer Uuhty funds Properties with front footage or accessible acreage along 132n Court West are proposed to be assessed on a per unit basis for surface, sanitary sewer, and water main improvements According to the City of Rosemount's 2006 Fee Resolution, the cost of street reconstruction of existing gravel roads is to be assessed to benefiting properties at a rate of 100% of the total cost. To determine the street assessments, the total cost for street improvements was divided by the properties within 132n Court West Street assessments are estimated at $6,657 per unit, and are levied against all properties with driveway access onto 132n Court West. The total cost for new lateral sanitary sewer and watermam are to be borne by the benefiting properties. Each property is proposed to be assessed an equal amount for sanitary sewer and watermain improvements. The estimated sanitary sewer assessment is $5,345 per property. The estimated watermam assessment is $4,055 per property. The total funds proposed to be recovered through assessments for this project is $183,300 The City Sanitary Sewer Utility Fund and the City Street CIP Fund will fund the remaining portion of the project. It is proposed that construction occur in 2006 and rs anticipated to be completed, including all restoration items, by the fall of 2006. SUMMARY: Staff is requesting that the City Council adopt the attached resolution ordering the project and authorizing the preparation of plans and specifications for City Project 393 2 A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 132 COURT WEST STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY PROJECT #393 WHEREAS, the City Council has received and accepted the Feasibility Report on January 17, 2006 for City Project #393, and WHEREAS, the City Council held a Public Hearing on February 7, 2006. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rosemount hereby orders the improvements of the 132nd Court West Street and Utility Improvements City Project #393. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rosemount orders the preparation of plans and specifications for said unprovements of City Project No 393 ADOPTED this 7th day of February, 2006. ATTEST: Linda Jentmk City Clerk CITY OF ROSEMOUNT DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2006 William H Droste, Mayor Motion by: Seconded by. Voted m favor: Voted against. The Rosemount Town Pages AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF MINNESOTA) )ss. COUNTY OF DAKOTA Chad Richardson, being duly swam, on oath says that he is an authorized agent and employee of the publisher of the newspaper, known as The Rosemount Town Pages, and has full knowledge of the facts which are stated below (A) The newspaper has complied with all of the requirements constituting qualification as a legal newspaper as provided by Minnesota Statutes 311A 02, 331A 07-arnf o er applicable laws. as amended (B The printed Oc >CA which is attached was cut from the columns of said newspaper, and was printed and published once each week for 4c --b(it X� successive eks it was firs published on Thursday, the day of ,2006 and was thereafter printed and pp blished on every T rsday to an eluding Thursday, the J t' day of 2006, and pnnted below is a copy of the lower case alpha. 'Tom A to 4 both inclusive, which is heieby acknowledged as being the size and land of type used in the composition and publication of the notice: Sub cribed and s abcdefghalklmnopgrstuvwxyz orn to before me on this 2006. By. otary Pub AFFIDAVIT IN M SMITH 1 'WARY PUBLIC-MINNESOTA Conmtszon Expires Jan 31 2010 .Ar�rrannnrv+ AvAS WV FEES: First Insertion: 1 /00/Qc File a(' (n(�� inches, @$L Jt4O /in =6) I Additional Insertions: inches, @S5, tin= 31. Affidavit fee Total $1 �t day PUBLIC NOTICE CITY 01 ROSEMOUNT DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON IMPROVEMENTS 132nd COURT WEST STREET AND IJTILI9 Y IMPROVEMENTS AND APPURTENANT WORK CITY PROJECT #393 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Rosemount, Minnesota will meet a 7 30 o'clock p m or a) tope thereafter as pos- sible Tuesday, February 7, 2006 m the Council Chambers of the Cary Hall, 2875 145th Street West,to consider the following mtproaements City Project 1393 132nd Court West Street Utility Improvements The namm of improvements shall be installation of approxuwtety 400 feet of 21 -mch PVC trunk sanitary sewer, approxwately 300 feet of 8-mch Y4 C sewer and 8" dtCde iron pipe (DIP) water main Service Imes will be extended to mdmdual propemes, wbere property owners may connect at a future time The road will be replaced as a coral secnon roadway with bituminous pavement, and will not include the instal- lation ofa.tb and gutter The total estimated cost of said improvements is 1216,900 The area proposed to be assessed for the foregoing imprmements would be all that area generally described as the following Parcel Identification Numbers 34-44300 -010 -01, 020 -01, 030 -01, 040- 01, 050-01, 060 -01, 070 -01, 080 -01, 090 -01, 100 -01, 020-02, and 030 -02 as mwrded m the City of Rosemount, Dakota Counn, Minnesota Such person(s) as desires to be heard with reference to the proposed improvements will be head at tins meet mg Written or oral opinion will be considered Dated rims 18th day of January, 2006 BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL Linda lentnk, Cny Clerk City of Rosemount Dakota County, Minnesota Auxdrary aids and services am evadable Please con- tact Linda tenth( at (612)322-2003, or TOO No (612)423-6219, no later than February 1, 2006, m make arequea Examples of auxiliary a or services may include sign language interpreter a s smstme hs- telling fen, accessible meeting location, eta 1 -20 1 -27 REC'D JAN 3 0 2006 4ROSEMOUN1 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT AFFIDAVIT OF MAILED AND POSTED HEARING NOTICE FOR 132 COURT WEST STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS AND APPURTENANT WORK CITY PROJECT #393 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF DAKOTA )ss. CITY OF ROSEMOUNT Linda Jentink, being first duly sworn, deposes and says: I am a United States Citizen and the duly qualified Clerk of the City of Rosemount, Minnesota. On January 19, 2006, acting on behalf of the said City, I posted at the City Hall, 2875 145th Street West, and on January 19, 2006 deposited in the United States Post Office of Rosemount, Minnesota, copies of the attached notice of public hearing regarding the proposed Improvements to the 132nd Court West Street and Utility Improvements and Appurtenant Work, enclosed m sealed envelopes, with postage thereon fully prepaid, addressed to the persons hsted on the attached hsungs at the addresses hsted with their names. There is delivery service by United States Mail between the place of mailing and the places so addressed. Linda Jennnk, Cit'p Clerk City of Rosemount Dakota County, Minnesota Subscribed and sworn to before me this 1 9 day of January, 2006. SPIRIT OF PRIDE AND PROGRESS 2875 145th Street West Rosemount, MN 55068 -4997 651- 423 -4411 TDD /TTY 651- 423 -6219 Fax 651- 322 -2694 www.ci.rosemount.mn.us 4 ROSEMOUNT NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON IMPROVEMENTS 132 COURT WEST STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS AND APPURTENANT WORK CITY PROJECT #393 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Rosemount, Minnesota will meet at 7:30 o'clock p.m or as soon thereafter as possible, Tuesday, February 7, 2006 in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, 2875 145th Street West, to consider the following improvements: City Project #393 132nd Court West Street Utility Improvements The nature of improvements shall be installation of approximately 400 feet of 21 -inch PVC trunk sanitary sewer, approximately 300 feet of 8 -inch PVC sewer and 8" ductile iron pipe (DIP) water main Service lines will be extended to individual properties, where property owners may connect at a future time. The road will be replaced as a rural section roadway with bituminous pavement, and will not include the installation of curb and gutter. The total estimated cost of said improvements is $216,900. The area proposed to be assessed for the foregoing improvements would be all that area generally descnbed as the following Parcel Identification Numbers: 34- 44300 010 -01, 020 -01, 030 -01, 040 -01, 050 -01, 060 -01, 070 -01, 080 -01, 090 -01, 100 -01, 020 -02, and 030 -02 as recorded m the City of Rosemount, Dakota County, Minnesota Such person(s) as desires to be heard with reference to the proposed improvements will be heard at this meeting. Written or oral opuuon will be considered Dated this 18th day of January, 2006. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Linda Jenunk, C-erk City of Rosemount Dakota County, Minnesota Auxiliary aids and services are available Please contact Linda Jentink at (612)322- 2003, or TDD No. (612)423 -6219, no later than February 1, 2006, to make a request. Examples of auxiliary aids or services may include sign language interpreter, assistive listening kit, accessible meeting location, etc. SPIRIT OF PRIDE AND PROGRESS 2875 145th Street West Rosemount, MN 55068 -4997 651- 423 -4411 TDD /TTY 651- 423 -6219 Fax 651- 322 -2694 wwwa rosemount.mn us 4ROSEMOUNT M E M O R A N D U M PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT To: Property Owner From: Andrew J. Brotzler, P.E., City Engineer Date: January 18, 2006 Subject: Notice of Public Hearing for 132 Court West Street Utility Improvements, City Project No. 393 This correspondence is in addition to the notice of public hearmg being mailed to you that is scheduled for February 7, 2006 for the 132n Count West Street Utility Improvements, City Project No. 393. You are receiving this notice because your property is within the proposed project area As part of the City's ongoing pavement management program, a feasibility report has been prepared for improvements proposed to be completed in 2006 The proposed improvements include installation of approximately 400 feet of 21 -inch PVC trunk sanitary sewer, approximately 300 feet of S -inch PVC sewer and 8" ductile iron pipe (DIP) water main Service lines will be extended to individual properties, where property owners may connect at a future time The road will be replaced as a rural section roadway with bituminous pavement, and will not include the installation of curb and gutter The feasibility report will be presented at the regular City Council meeting on February 7, 2006 The presentation will include an overview of the proposed improvements, estimated costs and assessments proposed to be charged to property owners for the project. The pubhc hearing is an opportunity for property owners to address the City Council regarding the proposed project G ENGPAON93\ Standardl .etterNatfpngAssessments132ndet doc SPIRIT OF PRIDE AND PROGRESS 2875 145th Street West Rosemount, MN 55068 -4997 651- 423 -4411 TDD /TTY 651- 423 -6219 Fax 651- 322 -2694 www.ci.rosemount.mn.us 34 Chris A Gerlach 1 CR 42 Apple Valley, MN 55124 344430004001 Edwin J Mary E Ahrens 2665 132 Court West Rosemount, MN 55068 344430007001 Iaxman S Sundae Alexte C Sundae 2055 128" Street West Rosemount, MN 55068 344430010001 Todd R Hendry 2605 132 Street West Rosemount, MN 55068 344430002001 Forrest D Fern Krogh 2685 132n Court West Rosemount, MN 55068 344430005001 Adrian H Barbara A Zorn 2655 132n Court West Rosemount, MN 55068 344430008001 Dale R Lois M Jahnz 2625 132n Court West Rosemount, MN 55068 344430002002 Charles Betty West 2684 132n Court West Rosemount, MN 55068 344430003001 Rick D Emily 1. Wood Pavltk 2675 132n Court West Rosemount, MN 55068 344430006001 Charles E. Dora Lewis 2645 132n Court West Rosemount, MN 55068 344430009001 Ramona R Meers 2615 132n Court West Rosemount, MN 55068 344430003002 Shawn M Loge 2686 132n Court West Rosemount, MN 55068 February 1, 2006 To. Rosemount City Council City Administrator Re City Project #393 -132nd Court West Street Utility Improvements A NO vote on this project would be appropriate. Respectfully, orrest and Fern Krogh 132nd Ct W Gs This letter is in opposition of the City project #393 and also a follow up from the letter to the City Engineer dated August 26, 2005 Before the city reaches a decision, written information as to existing wells, septic systems, inside plumming and all other involved expenses should be given to home owners by the city and not the responsibility of the home owner to research The meeting on January 4, 2006 provided information to the home owners on the proposed project showing 50% m favor and 50% against the project. This information seemed to be gathered by the residents living on 132nd Ct W The gathering of information from the residents w as improperly handled by the City Engineer. Each home owner should has e been sent a project outline from the city asking the owners opinion for or against the project. As this was not done, a divided neighborhood thus sent their own petition picking residents who they thought could be convinced Some owners were not reached to has a written opportunity on the petitions The letter written August 26 2005 (copy enclosed), stated two residents out of compliance. Now the city has the authonty to burden those who have updated their septic system and wells Several home owners are retired and living on fixed incomes Is it fair to put these home owners in a financial cnsis because of two home owners? The answer is NO. The city has done little to lower the cost of the project only to offer low interest rates. This does not change the cost of the project. Maybe it will benefit future des elopers or the project on the Brockway land We were also told at the Janurary 4th meeting if the project is completed, 132nd Ct. W. could be rezoned When asked by residents, if this would raise our taxes, the answer was, It could Where does it end to burden residents who do not want or need the project' The assesment cost is extremely high along with the required fees There is no guarantee of the estimated cost of the project, there is no cap on the assesment charges This project will not improve our property August 26, 2005 To City Engineer Andy Srotzler Re: City Serivces 132nd Court W. This is a follow up from the meeting August 17, 2005 at City Hall. Several people were interested in the proposal and the cost. The figures are very costly and staggering. 'rhe total cost of the project could rouge between 522,000- S30,000 per resident. We have two residents out of compliance while the other residents are in compliance, thus making the project not necessary to proceed. The two residence that are not in compliance can be brought up to compliance with many dollars saved by them and other residence who are compliant. L%{any of the residence have spent many dollars already to stay compliant as, should the two residence who are out of compliance. Resident at 2655 has a mound system that will last indefinite. Due to great friendship, teaming with the resident at 2625 who is not in compliance, are now canvasing for the sewer. Yes, even cities have problems with sewer lines. Ha\ ing city sewer and water does not make for a perfect system for ever. We still t, ant to drink our water which is much better tasting than city treated water. Allowing or.!y for out side use of our current welts is not a fair practice regardless of the reasons given by the city. If a petition once again is brought to the residence, this should be generated by the city and not just a few residences of 132nd 0. W. This project has divided the longevity of a stable neighborhood. At an earlier meeting, we were told residence on Cty. Rd 38, had to hook up and now at the last meeting told they could vote. What is it? Too many variables and questions !eft unanswered. It is in the best interest of the residents of 132nd Ct. W to eliminate this project and have the non compliant systems updated like the remainder of the court has already done. Respectfully, `#arr est a ern ogh 132nd, Ct. W. cc: Mayor Droste Council members Andrew J. Brotzler, P.E., City Engineer City of Rosemount Rosemount, MN 55068 Public Hearing on 132" Court West Street Utility Improvements, City Project No. 393 As we will not be able to attend this meeting, Aim sending this letter to express our opinion on this matter. We have no objections to what is being proposed and to the feasibility report Our objection is to the price that is being forced upon us to take care of the problems of two of our neighbors. We have lived at our present address for 35 years and just received our latest compliance letter from the city for our septic system and in 2002 we had new well installed. I might add we did not go to the city to have the whole neighborhood put in waterlines. I feel that there should be some relief for Senior citizens in this case. My husband has been retired for 15 years due to a medical problem and I have been retired for 10 years. If this had been forced upon us in our early years of retirement it would have been easier to justify spending the money. We have intended this to be our final retirement home, but with a rise in our property tax of 16.6% this year and the rising cost of health insurance which is a must with heart disease it will be putting us in a bind that one does not need at this stage of life. We feel the city should offer some kind of alternate plan for Seniors. If it was not for the Seniors in Rosemount there would not be a Rosemount. Stop and think about that! -1,--rt,,--- dwig Ahrens 2665 132n C[. W Rosemount, MN 55068