Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
20230523 PC RM - Packet
AGENDA Planning Commission Regular Meeting Tuesday, May 23, 2023 6:30 PM City Council Chambers, City Hall 1. CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. ADDITIONS TO AGENDA 3. AUDIENCE INPUT 4. CONSENT AGENDA a. Minutes of the April 25, 2023 Regular Meeting b. Request by Schafer Richardson for approval of a Final Plat to Construct Two Multi- Family Buildings 5. DISCUSSION 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS a. Request by New Horizon Academy for a Site Plan Review 7. NEW BUSINESS 8. ADJOURNMENT Page 1 of 49 PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES APRIL 25, 2023 PAGE 1 I. Regular Meeting Call to Order: Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission was held on April 25, 2023. Chair Kenninger called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. with Commissioners Kenninger, Reed, Rivera, Powell, Thiagarajan, Whitman, and Hebert present. Also, in attendance were Community Development Director Kienberger, Senior Planner Nemcek, Planner Hogan and Community Development Technician Rooney. The Pledge of Allegiance was said. Oath of Office. Riley Rooney gave the oath of office to Chair Kenninger and Commissioner Whitman. Election of Chair and Vice Chair Chair Kenninger asked for nominations of Chair. Commissioner Reed nominated Commissioner Kenninger asked for nominations of Chair. There were no further nominations. MOTION by Reed to elect Commissioner Kenninger by unanimous consent to the position of Chairperson. Second by Hebert. Ayes: 7. Nays: 0. Motion approved. Commissioner Kenninger is appointed as Chairperson. Chair Kenninger asked for nominations of Vice-Chair. Commissioner Kenninger nominated Commissioner Reed for the position of Vice-Chairperson. There were no further nominations. MOTION by Kenninger to elect Commissioner Reed by unanimous consent to the position of Vice- Chairperson. Second by Hebert. Ayes: 7. Nays: 0. Motion approved Commissioner Reed is appointed as Vice-Chairperson. Additions to Agenda: None. Audience Input: None. Consent Agenda: 4.a. Approval of the March 20, 2023, Regular Meeting Minutes. MOTION by Kenninger. Second by Reed. Ayes: 5. Nays: 0. Abstain: 2. Public Hearing: 5a. Request by Las Tortillas for a conditional use permit for additional outdoor seating/dining area. Senior Planner Nemcek provided a presentation and summary of the staff report for the Planning Commission. The approval of the request by Las Tortillas would provide a permanent patio with provided screening on the North side of the building. The temporary patio has been used since 2020 and the dining area would seat 40 people if approved. Page 2 of 49 PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES APRIL 25, 2023 PAGE 2 Commissioner comments: Chair Kenninger asked a question regarding the public address system and its audibility. Senior Planner Nemcek noted the public address system could not be audible to residents in the noncommercial district. Commissioner Reed asked about the public address system and how noise from the restaurant would managed. Senior Planner Nemcek noted that it is a complaint-based enforcement which would be overseen by the police department. Commissioner Reed asked about the process and procedure if there is a consistent pattern of noise complaints. CD Director Kienberger noted that steps can be taken to mitigate any noise complaints via the police department and, if needed, by the planning commission to revoke the CUP. It is the City’s teeth to ensure the conditions in the CUP are followed. Chair Kenninger asked if any complaints were received at Las Tortillas. Senior Planner Nemcek noted there have been no complaints received by the Police Department. Commissioner Whitman inquired about the standards for seating, clarifying they were not only a condition in the CUP, but also a restatement of the City Code. He also asked if the restaurant would be subject to other noise standards set by the city. Senior Planner Nemcek said yes, that is correct. Commissioner Thiagarajan asked about the fence on the patio and if there was a type required. Senior Planner Nemcek noted that there was no requirement so long as it is continuous and non-interrupted. Chair Kenninger asked if Senior Planner Nemcek knew what type of fence the applicant was going to construct. Senior Planner Nemcek said in the site plan the applicant had a type of cable fence with shown, but he was not certain. Chair Kenninger also asked if the fence would be permanent. Senior Planner Nemcek noted that the patio would be permeant if the applicant would like to have a liquor license. Commissioner Rivera asked about the parking stalls and requirements. Senior Planner Nemcek noted the parking is currently within code requirements with the variance they previously received. The public hearing opened at 6:50 pm. Public Comments: None. MOTION by Kenninger to close the public hearing. Second by Powell. Ayes: 7. Nays: 0. Motion Passes. The public hearing closed at 6:51 pm. Additional Comments: Commissioner Powell noted that the restaurant is well supported by the community and does not create any adverse concerns. MOTION by Powell to approve the request by Las Tortillas for a conditional use permit for additional outdoor seating/dining area subject to the terms and conditions. Second by Reed. Ayes: 7. Nays: 0. Motion Passes. 5b. Request by Frattalone-Berger for a Small-Scale Mineral Extraction Permit for 2023. Senior Planner Nemcek provided a presentation and summary of the staff report. The project site sits at the intersection of County Road 42 and Emory Avenue. Page 3 of 49 PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES APRIL 25, 2023 PAGE 3 Commissioner comments: Commissioner Powell required clarification about the road the project site sits on. Corrected by Senior Planner Nemcek. Commissioner Whitman asked if there were any other permits required by the city for the use. Senior Planner Nemcek noted there were none. He also mentioned the City has not received any County or State permits yet at this time. Commissioner Whitman clarified that the use could not commence until the City receives the permits from the County and State of Minnesota. The public hearing opened at 7:01 pm. Public Comments: Scott Spizack (Frattalone Representative) He gave a short speech regarding Frattalone Companies including its history, its services, and pervious projects in Rosemount. Commissioner Whitman asked about permits required. Mr. Spizack noted there would be a county permit required. MOTION by Kenninger to close the public hearing. Second by Powell. Ayes: 7. Nays: 0. Motion Passes. The public hearing closed at 7:10 pm. Additional Comments: None. MOTION by Powell to approve the request by Frattalone-Berger for a Small-Scale Mineral Extraction Permit for 2023 subject to the terms and conditions. Second by Reed. Ayes: 7. Nays: 0. Motion Passes. 5c. Request by North 20 for an amendment to their existing Conditional Use Permit to extend the hours of operation and to allow for outdoor live music and food trucks onsite. Planner Hogan provided a presentation and summary of the staff report. Planner Hogan also noted the public comments and police reports received by the City. Commissioner comments: Chair Kenninger inquired about where the placement of food trucks might be located, what the current parking requirements are, and how the parking requirements might be impacted by the placement of food trucks on site. Planner Hogan and CD Director Kienberger deferred to applicant. Chair Kenninger requested more information on the city code for mobile food trucks and the current noise ordinance. Planner Hogan made note of the city code as well as the special events permit, stating under this purview a business may only have food trucks on four (4) occasions throughout a calendar year. Chair Kenninger inquired about the length that might count as one (1) of the four (4) occasions under the special events permit. Planner Hogan stated that the length of one (1) occasion could be between one (1) day or one (1) weekend depending on the event, but that she would need to refer to the City Clerk to verify the specifics. Chair Kenninger clarified that the maximum length of time a food truck could be on the premise, based on City Code, would be no more than four (4) weekends. Page 4 of 49 PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES APRIL 25, 2023 PAGE 4 Planner Hogan then noted the noise ordinance stating that the owner would still need to adhere to the City Code regardless of what could be amended. Chair Kenninger requested more clarification about the noise ordinance, specifically regarding the distance to which the music shall not be heard from. Planner Hogan noted that if noise could be heard at fifty (50) feet from the site, police presence could be requested to determine the amount of noise and if steps would need to be taken to deal with the user. Commissioner Reed requested clarification regarding the revocation of the CUP, were it to be recommended by the Planning Commission. CD Director Kienberger noted that staff is referencing a nuisance violation under city code rather than was tied to the use of the district as was noted in the Las Tortillas staff report. Commissioner Reed requested further clarification regarding the nuisance violation for noise from the site and how the nuisance might be enforced. CD Director Kienberger clarified stating that, yes, the CUP can be revoked by the planning commission. However, enforcement of the code for a nuisance would need to be done through the police department. Commissioner Reed asked whether food trucks can park along Bacardi Avenue. Senior Planner Nemcek noted that the City’s mobile food ordinance does not allow food trucks to park along Bacardi Avenue. Chair Kenninger clarified that residents or visitors with passenger vehicles could park on Bacardi Avenue. Commissioner Whitman requested clarification on the application of standards from the code referring to public address systems and the agricultural land use district. Planner Hogan stated that while it is not specifically noted in the CUP, the code still applies to the use of the site. Senior Planner Nemcek noted that aspects of the city code can be added to the CUP to future memorialize what is already required if the Planning Commission desires, but it is not necessary as it will still apply to the use regardless. Commissioner Hebert asked whether the City makes any distinction between noise disturbances or live music. Planner Hogan noted that they are grouped together per the city’s code. Commissioner Rivera asked if the owner of the site intends to have live music outside or have it remained inside as it is not specified in the application. Planner Hogan deferred to the applicant. Commissioner Thiagarajan asked if there was a limit to the number of food trucks allowed on site at one time. Planner Hogan noted the City Clerk has the decision to approve or deny the special events permit. CD Director Kienberger noted that the avenue the applicant can take to have food trucks is limited based on the special events permit. Chair Kenninger asked if the City Clerk would review the special event permits and take into consideration the number of parking spaces the food trucks take up. CD Director Kienberger noted that a number of different departments would review the special events permit. The public hearing opened at 7:32 pm. Public Comments: David Schmitz 2100 126th Street West, Rosemount, MN Mr. Schmitz is speaking as the owner of North 20 and hopes to bring clarity to some of the issues brought by the Commissioners. He stated that the reason he brought this request to the City is largely in reaction from customers requesting food trucks, live music, and extended hours. Regarding the food trucks, he would only like to have them on site for a special occasion, not as a common occurrence. On the topic of live music, he mentioned that North 20 would prefer an indoor option on occasion as opposed to an outdoor setting. Mr. Schmitz noted that the music, if permitted, would be quieter, not so loud that you would not be able to have a conversation with someone across the table from you. He mentioned the goal of the brewery has always been to build community and bring people together. His largest request would be to allow the brewery to open earlier, closer to 3pm, to allow customers to come in during the day Page 5 of 49 PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES APRIL 25, 2023 PAGE 5 especially on vacations or special events. He noted that he would not like to have the establishment open very late, as it would often not make sense economically and so as not to disturb the peace. Chair Kenninger requested clarity on what constitutes as outdoor music, if the garage doors to the brewery were open in the warmer weather months. Planner Hogan noted if the doors were open then it could constitute as outdoor music, even if the music itself was situated indoors. Chair Kenninger also asked if the owner had any concerns of the music being heard fifty (50) feet from the property. Mr. Schmitz noted that he hoped it would not impact neighbors at the fifty (50) foot mark. Chair Kenninger asked Mr. Schmitz where the placement of the food trucks would be. Mr. Schmitz noted they would be by the patio, parked in existing parking spaces. He also noted that North 20 is working on building an overflow parking lot to accommodate for the amount of cars parking on Bacardi Avenue. Chair Kenninger confirmed that the overflow parking area would compensate for the parking spaces that the food trucks would occupy during a special event. Commissioner Whitman shared his concern for the noise requirement of fifty (50) from the building. Mr. Schmitz noted again that the music being played would not be onerous. Instead, likely it would be a artist with an acoustic guitar, or something of the like. Commissioner Whitman clarified that the live music would not be like a concert or anything abrasive and that Mr. Schmitz would be comfortable with having a special event permit limited to four (4) times a year for food trucks rather than having one every weekend. Commissioner Whitman asked if the Mr. Schmitz had heard any noise complaints from the neighbors surrounding the brewery. Mr. Schmitz said that he had not. Jeff Wilcziek 12800 Bacardi Avenue West, Rosemount, MN Mr. Wilcziek questioned the sudden change in decision to allow for food trucks and live music. He shared his concern for excessive traffic, parking, and noise in the area and surrounding neighborhood. He noted that even with the excess parking lot, visitors of the brewery were still parking on both sides of Bacardi. He noted that music with a single musician would be nice, but the places I have known for this to happen has been in commercial area not a residential one. Mr. Wilcziek noted that while he is a patron of North 20, the request the applicant has brought forth is too much. In specific he mentioned that this change will disrupt the wildlife quiet atmosphere of the area. Debbie Rupee 12050 Bacardi Avenue, Rosemount, MN Ms. Rupee shared her concern for the amendment to the CUP stating, the business has already broken a few of the conditions of approval for the initial development of the project. She stated since the business opened, there has been an increase in foot traffic, trucks, bikes, and motorcycles and that the road has become more of a hazard every day. She noted that by extending the hours of operation, increases the risk of danger for residents in the area. Mrs. Rupee shared her frustration with the failure of the city to complete a speed study in the area. She also noted that her well water has been impacted by the business. She said that dust has become an issue on her property because of the increase in traffic. She then listed the conditions for issuance of a CUP. Fred Rupee 12050 Bacardi Avenue, Rosemount, MN Mr. Rupee noted that his neighborhood is a great place to live, but he is concerned with the amount of noise they hear from the brewery as it effects their lives daily. He mentioned that he bought this property to enjoy it and not to listen to the noise coming from the brewery and the increase in traffic in the area. He recommends that the Planning Commission recommends a landscaping sound buffer put in at the very least. He noted that he came to the original meeting for the construction of North 20 and he mentioned the same issues he is now regarding noise and traffic, but nothing has been done. He is frustrated and feels like he has not been heard. Mr. Rupee concluded by stating that he is glad the business is doing well, he but feels like more can be done to protect and preserve the neighborhood surrounding the use. Mara Schotttenbauer 12483 Bacardi Avenue West Ms. Schotttenbauer noted that her home is elevated slightly above the property that North 20 is situated on. She stated that while her family is not greatly impacted by the noise, she is concerned with the parking and increase in traffic along Page 6 of 49 PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES APRIL 25, 2023 PAGE 6 Bacardi Avenue. She acknowledged the effort that the owners have taken to add an additional parking area to mitigate parking on the street, but she does still have concerns for safety especially for her kids. She noted that while it is not the job of the owners of North 20 to keep residents safe, it is their job to control the impact their business has on the neighborhood. She would like to see further action taken by the City to keep the neighborhood safe including a speed study, additional signage, overflow parking areas, landscaping to prevent glare, and keeping the hours as what was set originally. Joe Casella 4962 Sycamore Eagan, MN Mr. Casella lives in Eagan, but his backyard abuts Bacardi Avenue. He shared his frustration with the speed at which this project has moved. He noted that the city should slow down the development of this use (North 20) until it has been around for a while longer and then make a determination later; there is no need to jump to any conclusions. He asked if parking along Bacardi Avenue is legal. He stated the issue is about safety. Mr. Casella said he was completely against the increase in hours and is concerned about the traffic and patrons of the brewery who leave inebriated. He noted that he has had cars parked in the yard and will continue to call the police as needed. Richard Gertrick 12420 Bacardi Avenue Mr. Gertrick noted that he has lived 54 years. He gave a brief history of Bacardi Avenue stating that it was not a road when he moved in; his driveway was a half mile long but did not mind it. He shared that he was surprised when this issue came up and noted that before this issue, he was not familiar with his neighbors. He shared is concern for the property values in the neighborhood especially in an agricultural area. He noted his general concern for the use in a low density residential and agricultural area. He shared his frustration with the amount of notice he was given. He also asked how deep the well is on site. He noted that the issue is a tough problem. He does not want to hurt the folks who are trying to make a living but mentioned that there should be some kind of agreement. He also asked if the property is a commercially zoned property? Mike McMenomy 12380 Bonaire Path Mr. McMenomy used to live here and has recently sold the property. He noted the Wildlife Preserve and its impact on the community. He mentioned that the owner of the Preserve is not in attendance today because it is too overwhelming of an issue for her. He noted that Schmitz’s are wonderful people and are running a wonderful business, even though it did not belong there to begin with. He noted that while the Schmitz’s are responsible people and business owners, his concern is that down the road, they will sell their property/business to individuals who are not responsible. MOTION by Kenninger to close the public hearing. Second by Reed. Ayes: 7. Nays: 0. Motion Passes. The public hearing closed at 8:21 pm. Additional Comments: Chair Kenninger addressed the issue of parking on Bacardi stating that while the street does allow for parking in the right of way, as part of the Conditional Use Permit the brewery is not allowed to have patrons park on Bacardi. Planner Hogan confirmed and pointed to condition 9 in the approved CUP for the use in 2020. Chair Kenninger also noted condition 10 which states that the City may sign Bacardi Avenue for no parking, if necessary. Chair Kenninger inquired to that the next steps were to be to address the issue of parking brought up by residents. Planner Hogan deferred to the CD Director. CD Director Kienberger noted that the Planning Department would typically refer to the Police Department as they are the ones who would actively monitor and document any types of calls or issues that would occur in the neighborhood. Any recommendation would be made internally by staff to move ahead with a change that could be implemented through their conditional use permit. Commissioner Reed asked is this type of decision is actionable now and what would trigger that. CD Director Kienberger noted that all the above would trigger a decision including the public comments received before and during the hearing. Chair Kenninger mentioned that the course of action for the residents would be to call the police to monitor the parking on Bacardi, have the police observe it and report back to city staff. And asked the CD Director to confirm that this would be the best course of action for residents. Page 7 of 49 PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES APRIL 25, 2023 PAGE 7 CD Director Kienberger confirmed and noted that all comments written and through the testimony here this evening all weigh into the decisions made by staff. Commissioner Whitman weighed in stating that the Planning Commission should assess the whole CUP and the findings brought forward to decide whether this should be approved or not, parking being a part of the CUP. Chair Kenninger clarified for the public that Bacardi Avenue does allow for parking in the right of way, but as part of the Conditional Use Permit, the brewery is not allowed to have patrons park on the street. Further stating that if there are concerns, residents should contact the police department. Senior Planner Nemcek also added that the police department is probably not aware of specific conditions of every properties CUP. Additionally, staff would like to see the overflow parking constructed and if that alleviates the parking on the street, that would be sufficient. Further stating that eliminating parking Bacardi and adding signage would not be in everyone’s benefit as it would become a bigger enforcement issue. Chair Kenninger brought up the zoning of the property, whether it was zoned agricultural or commercial. Planner Hogan noted that the property is zoned Agricultural, and that microbreweries are permitted in the Agricultural zoning district. Chair Kenninger addressed the question regarding landscaping on site and asked Planner Hogan to speak to the landscaping requirements initially adopted. Planner Hogan noted that six (6) feet is the planting requirement for coniferous trees and normally City staff will look at the landscaping a year after the planting of landscaping to ensure the plantings have survived a full winter and growing season. She mentioned that since the site has not been open for a year yet, staff has not identified that. However, upon the one-year inspection, the city will work with the applicant to make sure they are in compliance with the landscaping requirements. Chair Kenninger clarified the landscaping requirements set by the council upon the approval last year. Planner Hogan noted that the review would take place in late summer. Chair Kenninger addressed the concerns by residents for a traffic and or speed study. Senior Planner Nemcek mentioned that prior to the approval of North 20 last year, the City received a traffic study. This was done to understand the number of trips anticipated with the use and if there would be sufficient capacity on Bacardi, which was found that there would be. Regarding a speed analysis, that is not usually done, but a follow-up would need to be taken with the City Engineering staff. CD Director Kienberger provided clarification on the difference between the traffic study and speed analysis. Chair Kenninger asked is a recommendation to lower the speed limit on Bacardi would be a part of a speed analysis taken by the City staff. CD Director Kienberger noted that it could be included in the recommendation from City staff. Chair Kenninger addressed the question about the depth of the well on site. Senior Planner Nemcek noted that the well is permitted by Dakota County and is visited on an annual basis. Chair Kenninger remembered questions on the well from the initial review of the site. Senior Planner Nemcek noted that it does get pumped, but not in the fashion of a typical residential septic system. Chair Kenninger addressed the topic of dust and asked if there have been any discussions on what can be done. Senior Planner Nemcek noted that he was unsure what the public works department does for the treatment of gravel roads. Commissioner Reed noted that for traffic concerns among other reasons, he does not believe the City is in the right place to approve the amendment to the CUP and that he will not vote to recommend the amendment to the CUP. Commissioner Rivera shared that while North 20 is a good neighbor and a good business, she recommends the business go on a little longer before the Planning Commission approve of the amendment to the CUP. Chair Kenninger addressed the public notice notification and process. Planner Hogan noted the process for public notices and the amount of notice that is given for residents in the surrounding area. Chair Kenninger noted the comment on polluted well water. CD Director Kienberger noted that there will be contact with the Public Works department on the issue. Page 8 of 49 PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES APRIL 25, 2023 PAGE 8 Chair Kenninger addressed the process for notification of complaints by residents. CD Director Kienberger noted that any complaints should be shared with the Police Department. Commissioner Hebert noted that there might be a misunderstanding of the applicant’s intent and that the largest priority is to have flexibility over hours of operation. While a lot of the complaints were around the noise, there was not a lot of opposition to allow the business to open earlier. Chair Kenninger asked about adjustments to the wording of conditions to the CUP. Senior Planner Nemcek restated the request. CD Director Kienberger noted that the Planning Commission can change or alter any recommendations within the CUP. Chair Kenninger noted that one of her largest concerns is that this CUP will exist on the site in perpetuity. CD Director Kenninger noted the enforcement of the conditions in the CUP. Commissioner Whitman shared a question about the capacity of seating on site. Dave Schmitz, the Owner of North 20 Brewing, stated that the interior has 89 seats and 100 outdoors. Commissioner Whitman noted that he has trouble with some of the findings and for that reason will not approve of the amendments to the CUP. Commissioner Powell noted that there has not been verification that the original conditions have not been met. Senior Planner Nemcek clarified his mention of the septic tank. Dave Schmitz shared the type septic he has on site. Commissioner Powell reinstated that they cannot verify the other conditions have not met fully. He finds the amendment to the CUP premature, and for that reason he will not move to approve the CUP. Commissioner Thiagarajan shared that the owners of North 20 Brewing should capitalize on what they have on site including the nature and wildlife component. She also noted that the owner should look to improve landscaping to integrate with nature and educate your guests on parking. She also mentioned that there should be actions taken to lower the speed limit in the area via a speed analysis. Chair Kenninger noted that she recognizes the comments shared in the meeting. She noted that she is not in favor of all the amendments in the CUP but would not be opposed to the amendment to the hours of operation. A thought she had was to keep this item into the next meeting. CD Director Kienberger noted the options the Planning Commission can take. Commissioner Reed mentioned that he did not see approving any of the amendment items other than an earlier hours of operation timeframe. Chair Kenninger echoed Commissioner Reeds comment. Commissioner Hebert seconded the earlier hours of operation amendment. Commissioner Thiagarajan seconded the earlier hours of operation amendment. Commissioner Whitman shared that there were still too many issues to resolve and suggested that the item should be brought back for further review. Commissioner Rivera seconded Commissioner Whitman’s comment. Commissioner Powell seconded Commissioner Whitman and Commissioner Reed’s comment further suggesting more time should be put in to review the item. MOTION by Kenninger to recommend the City Council approve an amendment to the existing conditional use permit for North 20 Brewing located at 12266 Bacardi Avenue to extend the hours of operation subject to condition one in which the hours would be limited to 11 AM to 9 PM Monday through Thursday, 11 AM to 10 PM Friday and Saturday, and 11 AM to 9 PM on Sunday. Second by Hebert. Roll Call: Powell – No, Whitman – No, Rivera – No, Chair Kenninger – Yes, Commissioner Reed – No, Commissioner Hebert – Yes, Commissioner Thiagarajan – Yes. The motion fails 3 to 4. Page 9 of 49 PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES APRIL 25, 2023 PAGE 9 MOTION by Reed to deny an amendment to the existing conditional use permit for North 20 Brewing located at 12266 Bacardi Avenue to extend the hours of operation, outdoor live music, and food trucks on site subject to the terms and conditions listed Second by Powell. Ayes: 7. Nays: 0. Motion Passes. 5c. Request by Holiday Stationstores for a Condition Use Permit to allow for the expansion of the existing canopy onsite. Planner Hogan provided a presentation and summary of the request by the applicant. Commissioner comments: Commissioner Rivera shared a question of the parking stalls on site in regard to the expansion of the canopy. Commissioner Powell asked a question regarding the site modifications and grading. MOTION by Powell to close the public hearing. Second by Kenninger. Ayes: 7. Nays: 0. Motion Passes. Discussion: None. New Business: None. Adjournment: There being no further business to come before this Commission, Chair Kenninger adjourned the meeting at 9:14 pm. Respectfully submitted, Riley Rooney, Community Development Technician Page 10 of 49 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Planning Commission Regular Meeting: May 23, 2023 AGENDA ITEM: Request by Schafer Richardson for approval of a Final Plat to Construct Two Multi-Family Buildings AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT AGENDA PREPARED BY: Julia Hogan, Planner AGENDA NO. 4.b. ATTACHMENTS: Site Location, Final Plat, Site Survey , Prestwick Place East (2007), Site Plan, Preliminary Plat, Developers Narrative , Landscaping Plan, Elevations , Building Height Sections, Engineer's Memo Dated September 16, 2022, Park and Recreation Director's Memo Dated October 21, 2022 APPROVED BY: RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to recommend the City Council approve the Final Plat for the subdivision of Outlot A, Prestwick Place Townhomes, subject to the following conditions: a. Execution of a Subdivision Agreement b. Adherence with conditions of the Preliminary Plat and PUD Final Site and Building Plan approvals. c. Conformance with all requirements of the City Engineer as detailed in the attached memorandum dated September 16, 2022. d. Compliance with the conditions and standards within the Parks and Recreation Director’s Memorandum dated October 21, 2022. e. Drainage and utility easements with storm sewer infrastructure, except ponding or infiltration areas, may contain fences, but shall be required to include gates to provide trunk access, shall prohibit sheds or other accessory structures; and shall prohibit landscaping that would impede drainage. f. Payment of all applicable fees including GIS, Park Dedication, and other fees identified in the current fee schedule. g. Incorporation of any easements necessary to accommodate drainage, ponding trails, underpasses, conservation areas, streets and utilities. BACKGROUND Property Owner Dakota County CDA Applicant: SRD2.0, LLC & SRPB Strategic Housing, LLC (Schafer Richardson) Surrounding Land Uses: North: Medium Density Residential East: Medium Density Residential South: Community Commercial West: Low and High Density Residential Page 11 of 49 Existing Zoning District: R4 PUD - High Density Residential PUD Comprehensive Plan Desig. HDR - High Density Residential The Planning Commission is being asked to consider a request by SRD2.0, LLC & SRPB Strategic Housing, LLC (Schafer Richardson) for approval of a final plat to construct two multi-family buildings containing a total of 305 dwelling units. This final plat comes after the approval of a preliminary plat and PUD final site and building plan for this project. These items were reviewed by the Planning Commission at their September 27th, 2022 regular meeting and as well as their October 25, 2022 regular meeting. The Planning Commission approved the final site and building plan, since they are the approving body for that action, at their October 25th meeting and recommended the City Council approve the preliminary plat. The City Council approved the preliminary plat at their November 15, 2022 regular meeting. Staff is recommending approval of the final plat request, subject to the conditions listed in the recommended action. BACKGROUND The subject property is part of a larger 290-acre mixed use development approved by the City in 2007 on the northwest and northeast quadrants of County Road 42 and Akron Avenue. At the time it was approved, the PUD Master Development and Rezoning included approximately 50 acres of commercial, 90 acres of residential, and 130 acres platted as outlots for future development. All the approved development areas west of Akron Avenue received final plan approval and have since been developed, and the City Council recently approved a request to change the designation of approximately eight acres of land from commercial to high-density residential. Other than the subject parcel, most of the land within the Prestwick Place Planned Unit Development remaining to be constructed is guided for commercial uses in the northeast and northwest of the intersection of Akron Avenue and County Road 42, except for eight acres southwest of the intersection of Connemara Trail and Akron Avenue. The subject parcel is part of the Prestwick Place Planned Unit Development that was approved in 2007. With that approval, the site was rezoned to its current R4 PUD-High Density Residential Planned Unit Development zoning district. Contained within the attachments is the Prestwick Place East site plan showing the anticipated development of the subject parcel and surrounding area, which contemplated 200 high-density units within the subject parcel. The 2007 PUD included townhomes on the west side of Akron that were replaced with single-family development through PUD amendments. So, while the concept for the subject parcel anticipated fewer units to be developed on the subject parcel, the overall number of housing units in the Prestwick Place PUD remains balanced and within the anticipated overall density for the Prestwick Place development. ISSUE Legal Authority Plat requests are considered quasi-judicial actions. In such cases, the City is acting as a judge to determine if the regulations within the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and Subdivision Ordinance are being followed. Generally, if the application meets these requirements it must be Page 12 of 49 approved. Preliminary Plat The applicant proposed a preliminary plat that would subdivide the existing outlot into two buildable lots, each containing one of the buildings. The existing outlot contains land that was dedicated as right-of-way for Adalyn Avenue, resulting in a net developable area of 12.44 acres. Lot 1, located adjacent to Akron Avenue, is 6.97 acres in area, and Lot 2 is 5.46 acres. Both lots far exceed the minimum lot size of 22,500 square feet (.516 acres), and any minimum dimensional standards such as lot width or lot depth. Site Layout The proposed multi-family community is comprised of two buildings located within separate parcels, but the applicant conceived of the site as a single community with shared access and open space for amenities. The site plan provides two accesses from Adalyn Avenue to the east. A common, private drive separates the surface parking on the two parcels and access to the underground parking is provided by the internal drives. The eastern building features a smaller footprint in order to fit between the two existing easements that cross the site. Access into its underground parking is located on the southern elevation. In addition to the common open space, the eastern building will offer a swimming pool as an amenity to the residents of that building. The building located on the west side of the site has a larger footprint and two accesses into its underground garage. One access will be located at the northern-most point of its eastern elevation, and the other access will be on the south face of the building. The western building will contain a playground within the courtyard facing Akron Avenue. In addition to the amenities related to each individual building, the site will also feature on the north and south ends of the shared common drive a dog park and picnic area, respectively. Surface parking is, for the most part, located internally between the two buildings to create a more pleasing view of the site from public rights of way. Unit Mix The two buildings differ in that Building A will contain units leased at rents that are market-rate, while the units in Building B will feature rents that are affordable to residents within incomes below a certain threshold. Therefore, the mix of units is reflective of the anticipated residents of each building. The applicant anticipates more families will live in Building B and has provided a unit mix that contains more bedrooms per unit. Building A is expected to have fewer families and more single residents and the unit mix is reflective of that. The following tables show the number of each type of unit as well as the percentage of each type of unit in each building. Unit Mix Building A (East Building) - 141 units Studio 31 22% 1 Bedroom & 1 Bedroom + Den 48 34% 2 Bedroom 55 39% 3 Bedroom 7 5% Page 13 of 49 Unit Mix Building B (West Building) - 164 units 1 Bedroom 52 32% 2 Bedroom 67 41% 3 Bedroom 45 27% Phasing The applicant is planning to construct the project in two phases, with the building on the eastern parcel being built first. Once the second building is complete, the applicant’s narrative indicates that the surface parking will be shared across the entire site. Because construction of Adalyn Avenue is already complete, the applicant will not have to wait for public streets to be constructed in order to begin sitework. Park Dedication The proposed development has been reviewed by the City’s parks and recreation department for conformance with the City’s adopted Master Plan. The City’s Parks Master Plan does not call for a park in this area, so staff is recommending the City collect cash in-lieu of land to meet the parks dedication requirements for the 305 units. The park dedication requirement for 305 high density residential units is .02 acres of land per unit or $2,500 per unit. The cash dedication for 305 units would be $762,500 (305 units x $2,500 per unit). Landscaping The original landscape plan was short by one tree. The landscape requirement for multi-family buildings taller than three stories is 8 trees plus one per every two units, or a total of 161 trees based on 305 units. The landscape plan includes 175 trees, which now exceeds the City Code requirement. Type Calculation Required Provided Trees 1 per 2 units plus 8* 161 Trees 175 Trees Foundation Plantings 1 per 10’ of bldg. perimeter** 291 Plants 2,373 Plants * 305 units/2 trees + 8, must include placement along boulevard at 50’ intervals ** 2,922 linear feet Access and Parking Vehicular access into the site will be made via two entry points along Adalyn Avenue on the eastern site boundary. The northern entrance will align with a driveway into the neighborhood on the east side of Adalyn Avenue. The private drive aisles will lead directly to the surface parking in the northeast and southwest areas of the site as well as to the entrances into the underground parking facilities. The applicant’s site plan provides a total of 520 parking stalls, 269 surface stalls and 251 underground stalls divided between the two buildings. This results in parking ratio of 1.70 parking stalls per unit. The parking standard for the R4 district is a ratio of 2 parking stalls per unit. The applicant indicates that this is consistent with the actual usage they’ve seen at other projects in suburban communities, particularly with this unit mix containing so many three-bedroom units. It is also a similar ratio to what Page 14 of 49 staff has heard from other developers of multi-family communities about the usage they’ve seen. The applicant has included a proof of parking that would provide an additional 90 parking stalls if needed. With the proof of parking the ratio increased to 2.0 parking stalls per unit, which meets the required 2 parking stalls per unit. The table below shows the breakdown of the parking provided on the applicant’s plans. The second table provides a comparison of other apartments that have been approved with a reduced parking ratio. Underground 251 Stalls Surface 269 Stalls (90 proof of parking) Total 520 Stalls (610 proof of parking Parking Ratio (2 stalls per unit required) 1.70 Stalls per unit (2.0 stalls per unit proof) Traffic The site has been designated as High Density Residential in the last three Comprehensive Plan updates. The street system in the vicinity has been designed taking this project into account since at least 2008. The traffic and parking analysis provided by the applicant used the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan to analyze long term impacts of the proposed development. The City’s engineer provided a review of the study that did not dispute the findings of the original analysis that the existing roadway system has sufficient reserve capacity to absorb the traffic anticipated from the proposed development. During the public hearing for the preliminary plat and PUD final site and building plan for this item the Planning Commission received many comments related to the ability of Adalyn Avenue to handle the volume of traffic generated by the proposed development during . While Adalyn Avenue is a local street, it differs significantly from other local streets in the City in that there are no driveways directly accessing Adalyn Avenue. Other local streets would have 28 or more driveways entering the street over a similar distance. Adalyn Avenue is similar to a collector since only 5 private drives will be accessing that street, and the street system in this area was designed with the proposed development in mind. That being said, all local streets in any part of the city are designed to accommodate parking on both sides with traffic moving in both directions. Currently, parking is permitted along Adalyn Avenue. If needed, parking can be restricted to one or neither side of the street. Plans for the area include at least two connections from Connemara Trail to County Road 42 between Akron Avenue and Blaine Avenue, one of which will be a full intersection allowing traffic to move eastbound on County Road 42. Coordination with Dakota County’s transportation department is ongoing, and an areawide study to ensure needed improvements to intersections in the vicinity of Akron and 42 are made in a timely manner. Site Lighting The R4-High Density Residential district does not contain any regulations related to site lighting within the City Code. The Code contains those regulations in other zoning districts to minimize the effects of site lighting on adjacent residential properties. The applicant has provided a photometric study that shows the level of lighting at the property lines. Because there is not a maximum light level in the City Code for residential districts, the submittal of a photometric study is not a requirement for requests such as this. Nevertheless, the photometric study provided by the applicant shows little to no impact on adjacent residential properties and the height of pole mounted lights to be twenty feet or shorter, which is the standard for pole mounted lights. Page 15 of 49 RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending approval of the final plat based on the information provided by the applicant and reviewed in this report, subject to the conditions listed in the recommended action. Page 16 of 49 Page 17 of 49 AD A L Y N A V E N U E LOT 1LOT 2 L=395.05 R=900.00 Δ=25°08'59" L =231.0 4 R = 5 29.0 0 Δ = 25°01'25" S2 5 ° 3 8 ' 4 4 " W 1 1 3 . 8 2 N64°21'16"W 24.91 N90°00'00"E 372.45 N0 ° 2 7 ' 4 5 " E 8 0 4 . 6 9 N89°30'15"W 163.28 N51° 2 8 ' 5 3 " E 2 4 9 . 3 0 S2 4 ° 5 0 ' 1 7 " W 1 5 3 . 8 1 S5 ° 3 1 ' 5 8 " E 1 5 8 . 9 8 L=345.08 R=651.00 Δ=30°22'15" L=189.91 R=349.00 Δ=31°10'42" BLOCK 1 ROSECOTT PLACE APARTMENTS OFFICIAL PLAT LEGEND SUBJECT PROPERTY VICINITY MAP Page 18 of 49 NOTES CORRESPONDING TO SCHEDULE B - 2 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION TABLE "A" OPTIONAL ITEMS CERTIFICATION 1 2 STATEMENT OF POSSIBLE ENCROACHMENTS Page 19 of 49 COUNTY ROAD NO. 73 (AKRON AVENUE) N9 0 ° 0 0 ' 0 0 " E 3 7 2 . 4 5 N 5 1 ° 2 8 ' 5 3 " E 2 4 9 . 3 0 S24 ° 5 0 ' 1 7 " W 1 5 3 . 8 1 L=345.08 R=651.00 Δ=30°22'16"S5°31'58"E 158.98 L=189.91 R=349.00 Δ=31°10'40" S25 ° 3 8 ' 4 4 " W 1 1 3 . 8 2 L=395.05 R=900.00 Δ=25°08'59" N8 9 ° 3 0 ' 1 5 " W 1 6 3 . 2 8 ADD I S O N A V E N U E ADALYN AVENUE AS P E N A V E N U E N64°21'16"W 24.91 L =2 3 1.0 4 R =5 2 9.0 0 Δ =25°01'26" AD D I S O N W A Y N0°27'45"E 804.69 1 2 2 GENERAL NOTES LEGEND VICINITY MAP SUBJECT PROPERTY Page 20 of 49 0 8V Oe w I o A 1 4 N897812'0' 132.183 4a 1 I 111 7 o j 09 111 I v I 1 slila11___I I,. 1 k 1 I 1 VB. I _i j OUTLOT S I MIIII I Ni 1[ —;411- 4I I L-- I1 1 1 7 i 4 1 I t E.IC '4 ...9ire 11 I I I 93215 1 1 1 1 1 irpl I Til__ J BULDIN A 6P 4 I L,1 LJL I 1 i fi 16311 Q 3 7 z a N I I Q 1 L 29 -':'rINC S - f__,„1, il 0'4 BUiLDINC D LiBUILDINSB AAn t; i 5 .r N 1 resE12jiI.:20471 r j 1 i j rif.rJzosIz L iINJrairbite t W 7.42 11/ 1ifiSriS Q 2 41 I A 1 BUILDING CA °l'7 AE''JAI_`7 !'J!• KS V {'4 J i' I te g r lc lc 1 ____,---- 2 1 adFFtir yE N8930'15'W 417.42 ,I' p r ILL im± mss i't 5eiGlaf. -,1r4Xr. CORSEMARA TRAI c'''fi I uYA 1' I.l.i.ij1111.1 7 I C4P 4 %01 irargeormi X k I cauuagur m a, 13 7 A i AE 0 z C cy. I 0rti1. 1 r, O 11,tP1• w OU2OT O 1 Li Io1 I z II I lII IV 1 I 1 2 li, 1 el ii A 1 N8942'19 "W 3374.40 CO. RD. 42 1 1 1 a C I X f:o g 1 g Sa g G I W D v 7 e rt M ro U8RoN, o m8 I.§ms mNCi s F0Page 21 of 49 COUNTY ROAD NO. 73 (AKRON AVENUE) ADD I S O N A V E N U E ADALYN AVENUE CO N N E M A R A T R A I L AD D I S O N W A Y R999' R1023' R1023' NO P A R K I N G NO P A R K I N G NO P A R K I N G 9 9 20 20 20 8 20 4 10 18 2 6 4 6 12 11 15 10 10 11 2 8 10 10 3 11 BUILDING B 52,445 +/- SF. BUILDING A 39,370 +/- SF. R 1 5 ' R5' R15' R1 0 ' R3.6 7 ' R10 ' R3.67 ' R288' R312' R 1 0 ' R10' R2 8 4 . 5 ' R 1 0 ' R10 ' R10' R3 . 6 7 ' R3 . 6 7 ' R3.67' R1 0 ' R10' R3.6 7 ' R3.6 7 ' R 1 0 ' R3 . 6 7 ' R10 ' R3.67' R 3 . 6 7 ' R3. 6 7 ' R3.6 7 ' R3 . 6 7 ' R3.67 ' R 3 . 6 7 ' R10'R 3 . 6 7 ' R 1 0 ' R3. 6 7 ' R10 ' R 3 . 6 7 ' R 1 0 ' R3.6 7 ' R3 4 ' R 1 0 ' R 5 ' R 5 'R5' R10' R 3 . 6 7 ' R10' R3. 6 7 ' R 3 . 6 7 ' R10' R3.67' R3. 6 7 ' R10 ' R1 0 ' R3.67' R62' R38' R38' R1 5 ' R15' R3 . 6 7 ' R3.67 ' R 3 . 6 7 ' R3.67 ' R 1 0 ' R10' R3.67' R3.67' R3.67' R 1 0 ' R10' R3 . 6 7 ' R10' R 3 . 6 7 ' R3 . 6 7 ' R3.67 ' R 3 . 6 7 ' R3.67' R1 0 ' R1 5 2 ' R15 ' R10' R 3 . 6 7 ' R1 1 2 ' R62' TYP TYP TYP F-F TY P TYP F- F F-F F-F TY P DOG PARK SEE LA SHARED AMENITY AREA SEE LA SNOW STORAGE AREA B612 CURB & GUTTER (TYP) LIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION (TYP) 7 C-501 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN (TYP) 14 C-501 SNOW STORAGE AREA ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN (TYP) 5 C-501 ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP (TYP) PROOF OF PARKING STOP SIGN INFILTRATION BASIN EXISTING POND NURP PRE-TREATMENT IN F I L T R A T I O N B A S I N 30' PARKING SETBACK 40' BUILDING SETBACK 30 ' P A R K I N G S E T B A C K 30' BUILDING SETBACK HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION (TYP) 8 C-501 ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP (TYP) 13 C-501 INTEGRAL CURB & WALK (TYP) INTEGRAL CURB & WALK (TYP) MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL SNOW STORAGE AREAMONUMENT SIGNSTOP SIGN 11 C-501 SIDEWALK JOINT (TYP) 10 C-501 CONCRETE WALKWAY PAVEMENT SECTION (TYP) 9 C-501 CONCRETE PAVEMENT SECTION (TYP) PATIO OR DECK (TYP) SEE ARCH B612 CURB & GUTTER (TYP) B612 CURB & GUTTER (TYP) INTEGRAL CURB & WALK (TYP) LIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION (TYP) B612 CURB & GUTTER (TYP) B612 CURB & GUTTER (TYP) MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP (TYP) 1 C-501 TRAFFIC SIGN (TYP) B612 CURB & GUTTER (TYP) 2 C-501 DRIVEWAY APRON (TYP) 3 C-501 12 C-501 CONCRETE PAVEMENT JOINT (TYP) 6' CROSSWALK 2' WIDE BARS SPACE 5' ON CENTER (TYP) GAS PIPELINE EASEMENT GAS PIPELINE EASEMENT SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT 10' DRAINAGE & UTILITY E A S E M E N T UNDERGROUND INFILTRATION NURP PRE-TREATMENT REPLACE BITUMINOUS TRAIL MATCH EXISTING PLAYGROUND SEE LA POOL/SPA BO T T O M HW L MONUMENT SIGN CAST IN PLACE RETAINING WALL BO T T O M HW L LIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION (TYP) LIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION (TYP) 16 C-501 STAIRS (TYP) MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP (TYP) EMERGENCY EGRESS/ NON-ACCESSIBLE CONCRETE WALK 251.2' 24 6 . 2 ' 17 . 7 ' 6. 7 ' 8. 5 ' 13 . 5 ' 7' 12 ' 9. 4 ' 6. 6 ' 21' 21' 25'17'6'26.4'6' 4.5' 272.2' 24 5 . 1 ' 40 . 1 ' 112.1' 42 . 8 ' 25'17'6'19.1'10.9' 8' 8' 8' 8' 8' 24 ' 24' 17 ' 6. 6 7 ' 9. 3 ' 12 ' 7' 13 . 5 ' 8. 5 ' 6. 6 7 ' 16 . 1 ' 8' 79' 19 ' 24 ' 19 ' 19 ' 24 ' 19 ' 17 ' 24 ' 6' 11 . 8 ' 64 . 8 ' 9' 6' 24' 24' 19 ' 19 ' 24 ' 17 ' 24 ' 17 ' 24' 24 ' 6' 11'6'8.7' 3.3' 6' 6' 4. 7 3 ' 24' 9' 9' 8' 8' 8' 6' 24' 10' 9' 19' 19' 17' 24' 24' 17' 6.67 ' 27.9 ' 6.67 ' 6' 30 . 4 ' 6' 6' 6.7 ' 30 ' 30 ' 24' 17' 20' 9. 5 ' 37.2 ' 6' 15'10 ' 18 ' 6' PATIO OR DECK (TYP) SEE ARCH PATIO OR DECK (TYP) SEE ARCH PATIO (TYP) SEE ARCH PATIO (TYP) SEE ARCH PATIO (TYP) SEE ARCH PATIO (TYP) SEE ARCH 6' 6' 40 . 7 ' 17.7 ' 2.3' DRIVEWAY DROP (TYP) 4 C-501 CURB TRANSITION (TYP) 6 C-501 3' CURB TRANSITION FROM 6" TO 2" CURB 3' CURB TRANSITION FROM 6" TO 2" CURB ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP (TYP) DRIVEWAY DROP (TYP) ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP (TYP) CONCRETE APPROACH NOSE (TYP) 15 C-501 CONCRETE APPROACH NOSE (TYP) CONCRETE APPROACH NOSE (TYP) CONCRETE APPROACH NOSE (TYP) GAS PIPELINE EASEMENT 30' P A R K I N G S E T B A C K EMERGENCY EGRESS/ NON-ACCESSIBLE CONCRETE WALK PARKING BELOW DRIVEWAY DROP (TYP) EXISTING DRAINAGE EASEMENT SEE GRADING FOR EXISTING INFILTRATION BENCH DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT EASEMENT 30' P A R K I N G S E T B A C K 162.1 ' 141' STAIRS (TYP) PROOF OF PARKING 9030 SCALE IN FEET Know what's below. Call before you dig. R 1 SITE PLAN 1" = 30' © U R B A N W O R K S A R C H I T E C T U R E L L C , 2 0 2 2 90 1 N O R T H T H I R D S T R E E T / S U I T E 1 4 5 / M I N N E A P O L I S , M N 5 5 4 0 1 CONSULTANT PRELIMINARY REVISIONS DATE PROJECT # PHASE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 00.00.0000 AK R O N A V E / R O S E M O U N T , M N 14 5 T H & A K R O N B U I L D I N G S A & B Date:Date:Reg No: 18914 Stephen M. Johnston 08/30/2022 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of MINNESOTA. 08/30/2022 22-0005 PRELIMINARY Author SMJ D E S I G N CIVIL ENGINEERING | LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 310 4TH AVE SOUTH, SUITE 1006 M I N N E A P O L I S , M N 5 5 4 1 5 www.elanlab.comp 612.260.7980 f 612.260.7990 LEGEND PERVIOUS AREA HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY CONCRETE PAVEMENT ZONED: R4- HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AREA SUMMARY SITE AREA 570,537 SF. (13.10 AC.) RIGHT-OF-WAY 28,851 SF. (0.66 AC.) NET AREA 541,686 SF. (12.44 AC.) LOT 1 303,665 SF. (6.97 AC.) LOT 2 238,021 SF. (5.46 AC.) EXISTING PROPOSED BUILDING 0 SF (0%)91,815 SF (17%) PAVEMENT 0 SF (0%)169,338 SF (31%) (WALK/ DRIVE/ PARKING) TOTAL IMPERVIOUS 326 SF (0%)261,153 SF (48%) PERVIOUS 541,712 SF (100%)280,533 SF (52%) PARKING SUMMARY PROVIDED 520 STALLS 610 STALLS (INCLUDING PROOF OF PARKING) OUTDOOR 6 - 8' X 17' ACCESSIBLE STALLS 122 - 9' X 17' STANDARD STALLS AT CURB 121 - 9' X 19' PARALLEL STALLS 20 - 8.5' X 21' STANDARD STALLS 90 - 8' X 18' PROOF OF PARKING (COMPACT) INDOOR BUILDING A: 105 STALLS BUILDING B: 146 STALLS 1.DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE TO FACE OF CURB AND EXTERIOR FACE OF BUILDING UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 2.ON-SITE CURB TO BE B612 AND D412 CURB & GUTTER AS NOTED. 3.ALL CURBS TO HAVE 3/4" EXPANSION JOINTS AT A MAXIMUM OF 100'-0" AND CONTROL JOINTS AT A MAXIMUM OF 10'-0". 4.ALL PARKING STALLS TO BE PAINTED WITH A 4" WIDE WHITE STRIPING. ACCESSIBLE SYMBOLS TO BE PAINTED IN WHITE AND ACCESSIBILITY ACCESS AISLES TO BE PAINTED WITH A 4" WIDE WHITE PAINTED STRIPE 18 INCHES ON CENTER AND AT 45 DEGREE ANGLE TO STALL, WITH 'NO PARKING' MARKED NEAR THE DRIVE AISLE. REFLECTORIZED PAINT SHALL COMPLY WITH MNDOT 3592. SITE PLAN NOTES SITE PLAN C-101 POROUS PAVERS (SEE LAND ARCH PLAN) Page 22 of 49 NO P A R K I N G NO P A R K I N G NO P A R K I N G ADALYN AVENUE LOT 2 LOT 1 L=395.05 R=900.00 Δ=25°08'59" L =2 3 1.0 4 R =5 2 9.00 Δ =25°01'26" S2 5 ° 3 8 ' 4 4 " W 1 1 3 . 8 2 N64°21'16"W 24.91 N9 0 ° 0 0 ' 0 0 " E 3 7 2 . 4 5 N0°27'45"E 804.69 N8 9 ° 3 0 ' 1 5 " W 1 6 3 . 2 8 N 5 1 ° 2 8 ' 5 3 " E 2 4 9 . 3 0 S24 ° 5 0 ' 1 7 " W 1 5 3 . 8 1 S5°31'58"E 158.98 L=345.08 R=651.00 Δ=30°22'15" L=189.91 R=349.00 Δ=31°10'42" BLOCK 1 SUBJECT PROPERTY GENERAL NOTES 1. Bearings shown hereon are based on the Dakota County Coordinate System relative to the NAD83(11) control adjustment. 2.Elevations and contours, if any, shown hereon were established with GPS and are relative to the NAVD88 vertical datum. MNDOT Benchmark: 1906 N 5 elevation = 933.09 3. The partial site plan overlay shown was prepared by Stantec and is for reference only. It may not depict or represent the city approved signed plan. LEGEND VICINITY MAP Outlot A, PRESTWICK PLACE TOWNHOMES CITY OF ROSEMOUNT, DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA. (ABSTRACT PROPERTY) Part of Section 27, T. 115, R. 19 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY TO BE PLATTED PROPERTY OWNERS DAKOTA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY 1228 TOWN CENTRE DR EAGAN, MN 55123 PROPERTY ADDRESS: UNASSIGNED PARCEL ID NUMBERS: 345864000010 PRESENT ADDRESSES / PARCEL ID NO. STANTEC 6920 PROFESSIONAL PARKWAY SARASOTA, FL 34240 CONTACT: GARY BJORKLUND PHONE: (763) 479-5128 EMAIL: GARY.BJORKLUND@STANTEC.COM MN LICENSE NUMBER: 46563 LAND SURVEYOR AREA SUMMARY 8/26/2022 DATE OF PRELIMINARY PLAT ZONING R4 - HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (PUD) *CITY OF ROSEMOUNT ZONING MAP PLAT BOUNDARY AREA = 570,536 S.F. (13.10 acres) LOT 1 = 303,663 S.F. OR 6.97 ± ACRES LOT 2 = 238,022 S.F. OR 5.46 ± ACRES ADALYN AVENUE = 28,851 OR 0.67 ± ACRES Page 23 of 49 900 North Third Street, Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.371.3000 .3000 sr-re.com 145th & Akron Redevelopment: Summary of Changes from Original Submittal Based on public comment received during the neighborhood meeting hosted by the applicant on September 22nd as well public comment and feedback from the Planning Commission on September 27th, the applicant decided to revise the project plans to reduce the height of Building A from five stories to four stories (from 55’-6” to 43’). This revision would reduce the visual impact along Adalyn Avenue, reduce the number of parking stalls needed, and would also reduce traffic and circulation associated with site. In reducing the height of Building A from five stories to four stories, the total unit count between both buildings was reduced from 336 residential units to 305. A revised site plan is provided, showing an additional 2 parking spaces being paved during construction and an additional 3 parking spaces provided as proof of parking. With reduction in height to four stories (and reduction of 31 units total), the project is able to meet the parking requirement of 2 stalls per unit with 520 parking stalls being constructed and 90 stalls available for proof of parking (610 total). The proposed revisions would bring the project in full compliance to zoning regulations within the site’s current zoning R4 PUD-High Density Residential PUD. In effect, the applicant is not requesting any deviations to City Code. The table on the next page provides a comparison of revisions from the original submittal on August 30th, 2022 to the current plans as amended. Page 24 of 49 900 North Third Street, Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.371.3000 .3000 sr-re.com ORIGINAL DESIGN 8.30.2022 CURRENT DESIGN Building A: 193,872 SF Building B: 206,972 SF TOTAL: 400,844 SF Gross Area (Above Ground) *With the reduction in height, Building A’s gross area above ground was reduced. Building A: 154,950 SF Building B: 206,972 SF TOTAL: 361,922 SF Building A: Five stories (55’-6”) Building B: Four stories (44’-10.5”) Height *Reduction in height after public comment and Planning Commission feedback. Building A: Four stories (43’) Building B: Four stories (44’-10.5”) Studios: 29 1-Bedroom (+ Dens): 65 2-Bedroom: 68 3-Bedroom: 10 TOTAL: 172 Building A - Unit Count/Mix *With the reduction in height, unit mix and count was adjusted accordingly. Studios: 31 1-Bedroom: 48 2-Bedroom: 55 3-Bedroom: 7 TOTAL: 141 336 Units 27 Units per Acre TOTAL UNIT COUNT 305 Units 24.5 Units per Acre Underground: 251 Surface: 267 (87 proof of parking) TOTAL: 518 (605 proof of parking) Parking Ratio: 1.54 Stalls per unit (1.80 proof of parking) Parking Count Parking Ratio *Parking ratio adjusted to meet with unit reduction. Underground: 251 Surface: 269 (90 proof of parking) TOTAL: 520 (610 proof of parking) Parking Ratio: 1.70 Stalls per unit (2.00 proof of parking) 175 Trees Provided (176 needed) (1 tree short per code with 336 units) Landscaping *Requirement = 1 tree per 2 units. The reduction in unit count resulted in excess trees being provided on site. 175 Trees Provided (161 needed) (14 trees in excess with per code with 305 units) Page 25 of 49 NO PARKINGNO PARKING NO PARKING 1,53M60"0,92M36" 60 ' - 0 " U T I L I T Y E A S E M E N T 4 0 ' - 0 " UT I L I T Y E A S E M E N T 30 ' - 0 " FR O N T YA R D SE T B A C K 30'-0" FRONT YARD SETBACK 4 0 ' - 0 " U T I L I T Y E A S E M E N T 60 ' - 0 " U T I L I T Y E A S E M E N T 6 0 ' - 0 " U T I L I T Y E A S E M E N T 40'-0" SETBACK ON A COLLECTOR STREET 40'-0" SETBACK ON A COLLECTOR STREET 30'- 0 " F R O N T YAR D S E T B A C K BUILDING A BUILDING B BUILDING B CONNEMARA TRAIL W AR K O N A V E AR K O N A V E CON N E M A R A T R A I L W ADD I S O N W A Y AD A L Y N A V E AD A L Y N A V E A D D I S O N A V E PROOF OF PARKING INFILTRATION BASIN NURP PRE - TREATMENT POND INFILTRATION BASIN EXISTING STORMWATER POND NURP PRE - TREATMENT POND BUILDING A COURTYARD BUILDING B COURTYARD AMENITY POOL / SPA PLAYGROUND DOG PARK PICNIC AREA DECIDUOUS TREES QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME 9 ACER RUBRUM `ARMSTRONG' ARMSTRONG MAPLE 6 BETULA NIGRA `CULLY` TM HERITAGE RIVER BIRCH 7 BETULA PAPYRIFERA `OENCI` TM RENAISSANCE OASIS PAPER BIRCH 18 BETULA PLATYPHYLLA 'FARGO' TM DAKOTA PINNACLE WHITE BIRCH 12 CORNUS ALTERNIFOLIA PAGODA DOGWOOD 26 GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS INERMIS `SKYCOLE` TM SKYLINE THORNLESS HONEY LOCUST 7 GYMNOCLADUS DIOICA `ESPRESSO` KENTUCKY COFFEETREE 10 POPULUS TREMULOIDES `NE ARB` PRAIRIE GOLD ASPEN 30 QUERCUS BICOLOR SWAMP WHITE OAK 15 QUERCUS ELLIPSOIDALIS `MAJESTIC SKIES` MAJESTIC SKIES NORTHERN PIN OAK 10 TILIA AMERICANA `BOULEVARD` BOULEVARD LINDEN 3 ULMUS AMERICANA `VALLEY FORGE` VALLEY FORGE AMERICAN ELM EVERGREEN TREES QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME 6 LARIX LARICINA TAMARACK 5 PINUS STROBUS WHITE PINE ORNAMENTAL TREES QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME 6 AMELANCHIER X GRANDIFLORA `AUTUMN BRILLIANCE` AUTUMN BRILLIANCE SERVICEBERRY 5 MALUS X `SPRING SNOW` SPRING SNOW CRABAPPLE PLANT SCHEDULE SHRUBS QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME 131 ARONIA MELANOCARPA `UCONNAM165` LOW SCAPE MOUND CHOKEBERRY 188 CORNUS RACEMOSA `MUSZAM` MUSKINGUM DOGWOOD 16 CORNUS SERICEA 'BAILADELINE' TM FIREDANCE DOGWOOD 137 DIERVILLA LONICERA DWARF BUSH HONEYSUCKLE 173 EUONYMUS FORTUNEI WINTERCREEPER 157 HYDRANGEA PANICULATA 'JANE' TM LITTLE LIME PANICLE HYDRANGEA 149 PHYSOCARPUS OPULIFOLIUS `DART`S GOLD` DART`S GOLD NINEBARK 379 RHUS AROMATICA `GRO-LOW` GRO-LOW FRAGRANT SUMAC 24 SALIX PURPUREA 'CANYON BLUE' ARCTIC BLUE PURPLE OSIER WILLOW 163 SORBARIA SORBIFOLIA 'SEM' SEM ASH LEAF SPIREA 48 SPIRAEA BETULIFOLIA 'TOR GOLD' TM GLOW GIRL BIRCHLEAF SPIREA EVERGREEN SHRUBS QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME 70 THUJA OCCIDENTALIS `HOLMSTRUP` HOLMSTRUP CEDAR GRASSES QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME 77 CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA `KARL FOERSTER` FEATHER REED GRASS 256 CAREX VULPINOIDEA FOX SEDGE PERENNIALS QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME 18 ARUNCUS AETHUSIFOLIUS DWARF GOATSBEARD 9 ASTILBE X 'ROCK AND ROLL' ROCK AND ROLL ASTILBE 13 ATHYRIUM NIPONICUM PICTUM JAPANESE PAINTED FERN 16 BAPTISIA AUSTRALIS BLUE WILD INDIGO 30 ECHINACEA PURPUREA 'RUBINSTERN' RUBY STAR CONEFLOWER 153 NEPETA X FAASSENII 'WALKER'S LOW' WALKER'S LOW CATMINT 151 PEROVSKIA ATRIPLICIFOLIA 'BLUE JEAN BABY' BLUE JEAN BABY RUSSIAN SAGE 15 TIARELLA X 'SUGAR AND SPICE' SUGAR AND SPICE FOAMFLOWER GROUND COVERS QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME 190,855 SF NO-MOW SEED MIX 33,601 SF SOD SOD/SEED QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME 12,431 SF NATIVE SEED MIX TYPE 2 - DETENTION BASIN MIX © U R B A N W O R K S A R C H I T E C T U R E L L C , 2 0 2 2 90 1 N O R T H T H I R D S T R E E T / S U I T E 1 4 5 / M I N N E A P O L I S , M N 5 5 4 0 1 CONSULTANT PRELIMINARY REVISIONS DATE PROJECT # PHASE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SITE PLAN APPLICATION 08.30.2022 6/ 1 5 / 2 0 2 2 1 : 1 8 : 5 6 P M C: \ ! R e v i t P r o j e c t F i l e s \ 2 2 - 0 0 0 5 A 2 2 C e n t r a l _ M S k i l l i n g @ u r b a n - w o r k s . c o m . r v t AK R O N A V E / R O S E M O U N T , M N 08/26/2022 22-0005 SITE PLAN 14 5 T H & A K R O N B U I L D I N G S A & B 310 South 4th Avenue, Suite 7050 Minneapolis, MN 55415 p: 612.332.7522 CR JS NORTH 0 SCALE:1"=40' 40'80'120' LANDSCAPE PLAN L110 SEE SHEET L113 SEE SHEET L112 SEE SHEET L111 Page 26 of 49 GENERAL EXTERIOR NOTES: KEYNOTES: A -LEVEL 1950'-0" A -LEVEL 2 961'-5 7/8" A -ROOF992'-11 1/2" A -LEVEL 3 971'-11 3/4" A.A A.B A.C A.D A.E A.F A.G A.H A.I A.J A.K A.L A.MA.N A.P A.Q A.R A.S A.T A.U A.V A -LEVEL 1.1951'-0" A -AVERAGE GRADE948'-0" 44 ' - 1 1 1 / 2 " [B R I C K -1] [F C P -1] [F C S -2] [W D W -FG ] [D R -SL I D I N G -FG ] [R A I L -BA L C -ME S H ] [F C S -2] [B R I C K -1] [B R I C K -1] [M A S O N R Y -1] [L O U V E R -MP ] [A F S -SF -1] [M A S O N R Y -1] [F C S -2] [B R I C K -1] [M A S O N R Y -1] [M A S O N R Y -1] [F C P -1] [F C P -2] [M A S O N R Y -1] [D R -SL I D I N G -FG ] [W D W -FG ] [L O U V E R -MP ] [R A I L -BA L C -ME S H ] [F C P -1] [B R I C K -1] [M A S O N R Y -1] A -LEVEL 4982'-5 5/8" [F C P -2] [M E T -SM C -1] [F C S -5] [F C S -5] [M E T -FA B -CO R N I C E ] [F C P -2] [F C S -5] [F C P -1] [M E T -SM C -1] [F C P -1] [F C P -2] [M E T -FA B -CO R N I C E ] [F C S -5] A -LEVEL 1950'-0" A -LEVEL 2 961'-5 7/8" A -ROOF992'-11 1/2" A -SUBLEVEL 939'-0" A -LEVEL 3 971'-11 3/4" A.AA.BA.CA.DA.EA.FA.GA.HA.IA.JA.KA.LA.MA.NA.PA.QA.RA.SA.TA.UA.V A -LEVEL 1.1951'-0" A -AVERAGE GRADE 948'-0" 44 ' - 1 1 1 / 2 " [D R -SL I D I N G -FG ] [R A I L -BA L C -ME S H ] [L O U V E R -MP ] [W D W -FG ] [L O U V E R -MP ] [R A I L -BA L C -ME S H ] [R A I L -BA L C -ME S H ] [L O U V E R -MP ] [W D W -FG ] [D R -SL I D I N G -FG ] [F C P -2] [M A S O N R Y -1] [F C P -1] [F C P -2] [M A S O N R Y -1] [M A S O N R Y -1] [B R I C K -1] [F C S -1] [F C P -1] [F C S -2] [F C P -1] [B R I C K -1] [F C P -1] [M A S O N R Y -1] A -LEVEL 4982'-5 5/8" [M E T -FA B -CO R N I C E ] [F C P -2] [F C P -2] [F C P -2] [F C P -1] [M E T -SM C -1] [F C P -2] [F C P -2] [F C P -2] [F C P -1] [W D W -FG ] [D R -SL I D I N G -FG ] [R A I L -BA L C -ME S H ] A -LEVEL 1950'-0" A -LEVEL 2 961'-5 7/8" A -ROOF992'-11 1/2" A -SUBLEVEL 939'-0" A -LEVEL 3 971'-11 3/4" 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A -LEVEL 1.1951'-0" A -AVERAGE GRADE948'-0" 44 ' - 1 1 1 / 2 " [R A I L -BA L C -ME S H ] [L O U V E R -MP ] [B R I C K -1] [B R I C K -1] [M A S O N R Y -1] [F C S -1] [B R I C K -1] [F C P -1] [M A S O N R Y -1] [F C P -1] [M A S O N R Y -1] [B R I C K -1] [W D W -FG ] [D R -SL I D I N G -FG ] [L O U V E R -MP ] [W D W -FG ] [A F S -SF -1] [M E T -FA B -TR I M -1] A -LEVEL 4982'-5 5/8" [F C S -5] [F C P -1] [F C P -2] [F C P -2] [R A I L -GL A S S ] [F C P -2] [M E T -FA B -CO R N I C E ] [DR-OVHD-SEC] A -LEVEL 1950'-0" A -LEVEL 2 961'-5 7/8" A -ROOF992'-11 1/2" A -LEVEL 3 971'-11 3/4" 123456789 A -LEVEL 1.1951'-0" 44 ' - 1 1 1 / 2 " A -AVERAGE GRADE 948'-0" [B R I C K -1] [F C P -1] [B R I C K -1] [M A S O N R Y -1] [F C P -1] [L O U V E R -MP ] [R A I L -BA L C -ME S H ] [F C S -2] [M A S O N R Y -1] [A F S -SF -1] [A F S -SF -1] [W D W -FG ] [B R I C K -1] [B R I C K -1] [S I G N -EX T -1] [M E T -FA B -CA N O P Y ] [M A S O N R Y -1] [M E T -FA B -TR I M -1] [M E T -FA B -TR I M -1] A -LEVEL 4982'-5 5/8" [F C P -2] [F C P -1] [F C P -2] [F C P -2] [F C P -2] [F C P -1] © U R B A N W O R K S A R C H I T E C T U R E L L C , 2 0 2 2 90 1 N O R T H T H I R D S T R E E T / S U I T E 1 4 5 / M I N N E A P O L I S , M N 5 5 4 0 1 CONSULTANT PRELIMINARY REVISIONS DATE PROJECT # PHASE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SITE PLAN APPLICATION 08.30.2022 11 / 9 / 2 0 2 2 7 : 0 4 : 1 5 A M C: \ U s e r s \ d a v i d . m i l l e r \ D o c u m e n t s \ 2 2 - 0 0 0 5 A 2 2 C e n t r a l _ d a v i d . m i l l e r ( R e c o v e r y ) . r v t AK R O N A V E / R O S E M O U N T , M N 11.09.2022 22-0005 SITE PLAN DWM BUILDING A - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A.A301 14 5 T H & A K R O N B U I L D I N G S A & B [AFS-SF-1] (08 41 13) ALUMINUM-FRAMED STOREFRONT, EXTERIOR APPLICATION, THERMALLY-BROKEN; CROSS-SECTION DIMENSIONS: 2" X 4.5"; FINISH: ANODIZED; COLOR: BLACK; GLAZING METHOD: CAPTURED PERIMETER, CAPTURED INTERIOR [BRICK-1] (04 20 01) BRICK MASONRY VENEER, NORMAN HALF BOND, COLOR 1 [DR-OVHD-SEC] (08 36 13) OVERHEAD SECTIONAL DOOR [DR-SLIDING-FG] (08 16 73) FIBERGLASS SLIDING DOORS [FCP-1] (07 46 46) FIBER CEMENT PANELS, COLOR 1, BLACK [FCP-2] (07 46 46) FIBER CEMENT PANELS, COLOR 2 [FCS-1] (07 46 46) FIBER CEMENT SIDING, 10.75 INCH EXPOSURE, COLOR 1 [FCS-2] (07 46 46) FIBER CEMENT SIDING, 8 INCH AND 4 INCH EXPOSURE, COLOR 2 [FCS-5] (07 46 46) FIBER CEMENT SIDING, 4 INCH EXPOSURE, COLOR 5 [LOUVER-MP] (23 80 00) LOUVER FOR PACKAGED THROUGH-THE-WALL HVAC UNIT, EXTRUDED ALUMINUM, CUSTOM COLOR SELECTED BY ARCHITECT [MASONRY-1] (04 20 01) MASONRY VENEER, ALTERNATING 4" AND 8" HEIGHT, HALF BOND, COLOR 1 [MET-FAB-CANOPY] ALUMINUM CANOPY STRUCTURE [MET-FAB-CORNICE] ALUMINUM PROFILE CORNICE [MET-FAB-TRIM-1] (05 50 00) METAL TRIM, COLOR VARIES [MET-SMC-1] (07 62 00) SHEET METAL COPING, PREFINISHED ALUMINUM, COLOR 1 [RAIL-BALC-MESH] (05 73 00) ALUMINUM BALCONY, DECK, AND MESH RAILING [RAIL-GLASS] (05 73 13) GLAZED RAILING SYSTEM [SIGN-EXT-1] (10 14 00) EXTERIOR BUILDING SIGNGAGE, ALUMINUM CHANNEL LETTERS ON STANDOFF, WHITE ACRYLIC FACE, INTERNAL ILLUMINATION [WDW-FG] (08 54 13) FIBERGLASS WINDOW, COLOR: BLACK 1/16" = 1'-0"A.A301 A - EXTERIOR ELEVATION WEST2 1/16" = 1'-0"A.A301 A - EXTERIOR ELEVATION EAST4 1/16" = 1'-0"A.A301 A - EXTERIOR ELEVATION SOUTH3 1/16" = 1'-0"A.A301 A - EXTERIOR ELEVATION NORTH1 Page 27 of 49 B -LEVEL 1 950'-0" B -LEVEL 2 961'-2 7/8" B -ROOF 992'-8 1/2" B -LEVEL 3 971'-8 3/4" B -LEVEL 4 982'-2 5/8" B.1 B.2 B.3 B.4 B.5 B.6 B.7 B.8 B.9 B.10B.11 B.12 B.13 B.14 B.15 B.16 B.17 B.18 B.19 B.20 B.21 B.22 B -LEVEL 1.1 950'-9" 44'-10 1/2" B -AVERAGE GRADE 947'-10" [R A I L -BA L C -ME S H ] [D R -SL I D I N G -FG ] [L O U V E R -MP ] [W D W -FG ] [M E T -SM C -1] [B R I C K -3] [F C S -3] [B R I C K -3] [F C S -4] [F C P -1] [F C S -4] [F C P -1] [F C P -1] [F C S -3] [F C S -3] [B R I C K -3] [B R I C K -3] [A F S -SF -1] [B R I C K -3] [B R I C K -3] [B R I C K -3] [F C S -3] [F C S -4] [F C P -1] [F C S -4] [B R I C K -3] [F C P -1] [F C S -3] [C M U -1] B -LEVEL 1 950'-0" B -LEVEL 2 961'-2 7/8" B -ROOF 992'-8 1/2" B -SUBLEVEL 939'-0" B -LEVEL 3 971'-8 3/4" B -LEVEL 4 982'-2 5/8" 2021222324252627282930 B -LEVEL 1.1 950'-9" B -AVERAGE GRADE 947'-10" 44'-10 1/2" [D R -SL I D I N G -FG ] [R A I L -BA L C -ME S H ] [L O U V E R -MP ] [M E T -SM C -1] [W D W -FG ] [M E T -SM F ] [M E T -SM C -1] [R A I L -BA L C -ME S H ] [L O U V E R -MP ] [B R I C K -3] [F C S -3] [F C P -1] [F C S -3] [F C P -1] [F C P -1] [F C S -3] [B R I C K -3] [B R I C K -3] [F C P -1] [M E T -FA B -TR I M -1] [C M U -1] B -LEVEL 1 950'-0" B -LEVEL 2 961'-2 7/8" B -ROOF 992'-8 1/2" B -LEVEL 3 971'-8 3/4" B -LEVEL 4 982'-2 5/8" 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 B -LEVEL 1.1 950'-9" B -AVERAGE GRADE 947'-10" 44'-10 1/2" [R A I L -BA L C -ME S H ] [D R -SL I D I N G -FG ] [L O U V E R -MP ] [W D W -FG ] [M E T -SM C -1] [B R I C K -3] [F C S -3] [F C P -1] [F C P -1] [F C P -1] [F C S -3] [F C S -3] [B R I C K -3] B -LEVEL 1 950'-0" B -LEVEL 2 961'-2 7/8" B -ROOF 992'-8 1/2" B -LEVEL 3 971'-8 3/4" B -LEVEL 4 982'-2 5/8" 313233343536373839 B -LEVEL 1.1 950'-9" B -AVERAGE GRADE 947'-10" 44'-10 1/2" [R A I L -BA L C -ME S H ] [D R -SL I D I N G -FG ] [M E T -SM C -1] [L O U V E R -MP ] [M E T -SM F ] [M E T -FA B -TR I M -1] [M E T -SM C -1] [A F S -SF -1] [B R I C K -3] [F C S -3] [F C P -1] [F C P -1] [F C S -4] [B R I C K -3] [B R I C K -3] [A F S -SF -1] B -LEVEL 1 950'-0" B -LEVEL 2 961'-2 7/8" B -ROOF 992'-8 1/2" B -SUBLEVEL 939'-0" B -LEVEL 3 971'-8 3/4" B -LEVEL 4 982'-2 5/8" B.1B.2B.3B.4B.5B.6B.7B.8B.9B.10B.11B.12B.13B.14B.15B.16B.17B.18B.19B.20B.21B.22 B -LEVEL 1.1 950'-9" B -AVERAGE GRADE 947'-10" 44'-10 1/2" [D R -SL I D I N G -FG ] [L O U V E R -MP ] [R A I L -BA L C -ME S H ] [W D W -FG ] [M E T -SM C -1] [F C S -3] [F C S -4] [B R I C K -3] [M E T -FA B -TR I M -1] [F C P -1] [F C P -1] [F C S -4] [B R I C K -3] [F C S -4] [F C P -1] [F C P -1] [B R I C K -3] [F C S -4] [F C P -1] [B R I C K -3] [F C P -1] [F C P -1] [F C S -4] [B R I C K -3] [F C S -3] [F C P -1] [B R I C K -3] [W D W -FG ] [R A I L -BA L C -ME S H ] [W D W -FG ] [M E T -SM C -1] [M E T -SM C -1] [A F S -SF -1] [D R -OV H D -SE C ] [C M U -1] B -LEVEL 1 950'-0" B -LEVEL 2 961'-2 7/8" B -ROOF 992'-8 1/2" B -SUBLEVEL 939'-0" B -LEVEL 3 971'-8 3/4" B -LEVEL 4 982'-2 5/8" 27 28 29 30313233343536373839 B -LEVEL 1.1 950'-9" 44'-10 1/2" B -AVERAGE GRADE 947'-10" [R A I L -BA L C -ME S H ] [D R -SL I D I N G -FG ] [W D W -FG ] [L O U V E R -MP ] [M E T -SM C -1] [A F S -SF -1] [S I G N -EX T -1] [A F S -SF -1] [R A I L -BA L C -ME S H ] [D R -SL I D I N G -FG ] [W D W -FG ] [M E T -SM C -1] [M E T -SM F ] [F C S -3] [B R I C K -3] [C M U -1] [D R -OV H D -SE C ] [F C S -3] [F C P -1] [B R I C K -3] [B R I C K -3] [F C S -4] [F C P -1] [F C S -4] [F C P -1] [F C S -4] [B R I C K -3] [M E T -FA B -CA N O P Y ] GENERAL EXTERIOR NOTES: KEYNOTES: © U R B A N W O R K S A R C H I T E C T U R E L L C , 2 0 2 2 90 1 N O R T H T H I R D S T R E E T / S U I T E 1 4 5 / M I N N E A P O L I S , M N 5 5 4 0 1 CONSULTANT PRELIMINARY REVISIONS DATE PROJECT # PHASE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SITE PLAN APPLICATION 08.30.2022 8/ 2 9 / 2 0 2 2 3 : 5 1 : 1 5 P M C: \ U s e r s \ d a v i d . m i l l e r \ D o c u m e n t s \ 2 2 - 0 0 0 5 A 2 2 C e n t r a l _d a v i d . m i l l e r . r v t AK R O N A V E / R O S E M O U N T , M N 08.30.2022 22-0005 SITE PLAN DWM BUILDING B - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS B.A301 14 5 T H & A K R O N B U I L D I N G S A & B 1/16" = 1'-0"B.A301 B -EXTERIOR ELEVATION WEST6 1/16" = 1'-0"B.A301 B -EXTERIOR ELEVATION NORTH5 1/16" = 1'-0"B.A301 B -EXTERIOR ELEVATION COURTYARD NORTH1 1/16" = 1'-0"B.A301 B -EXTERIOR ELEVATION COURTYARD SOUTH4 1/16" = 1'-0"B.A301 B -EXTERIOR ELEVATION EAST3 1/16" = 1'-0"B.A301 B -EXTERIOR ELEVATION SOUTH2 [AFS-SF-1] (08 41 13) ALUMINUM-FRAMED STOREFRONT, EXTERIOR APPLICATION, THERMALLY-BROKEN; CROSS-SECTION DIMENSIONS: 2" X 4.5"; FINISH: ANODIZED; COLOR: BLACK; GLAZING METHOD: CAPTURED PERIMETER, CAPTURED INTERIOR [BRICK-3] (04 20 01) BRICK MASONRY VENEER, NORMAN HALF BOND, COLOR 3 [CMU-1] (04 27 31) REINFORCED CONCRETE UNIT MASONRY, BURNISHED ARCHITECTURAL FINISH, COLOR 1 [DR-OVHD-SEC] (08 36 13) OVERHEAD SECTIONAL DOOR [DR-SLIDING-FG] (08 16 73) FIBERGLASS SLIDING DOORS [FCP-1] (07 46 46) FIBER CEMENT PANELS, COLOR 1, BLACK [FCS-3] (07 46 46) FIBER CEMENT SIDING, 10.75 INCH EXPOSURE, COLOR 3 [FCS-4] (07 46 46) FIBER CEMENT SIDING, 8 INCH AND 4 INCH EXPOSURE, COLOR 4 [LOUVER-MP] (23 80 00) LOUVER FOR PACKAGED THROUGH-THE-WALL HVAC UNIT, EXTRUDED ALUMINUM, CUSTOM COLOR SELECTED BY ARCHITECT [MET-FAB-CANOPY] ALUMINUM CANOPY STRUCTURE [MET-FAB-TRIM-1] (05 50 00) METAL TRIM, COLOR VARIES [MET-SMC-1] (07 62 00) SHEET METAL COPING, PREFINISHED ALUMINUM, COLOR 1 [MET-SMF] (07 62 00) SHEET METAL FLASHING, PREFINISHED ALUMINUM [RAIL-BALC-MESH] (05 73 00) ALUMINUM BALCONY, DECK, AND MESH RAILING [SIGN-EXT-1] (10 14 00) EXTERIOR BUILDING SIGNGAGE, ALUMINUM CHANNEL LETTERS ON STANDOFF, WHITE ACRYLIC FACE, INTERNAL ILLUMINATION [WDW-FG] (08 54 13) FIBERGLASS WINDOW, COLOR: BLACK Page 28 of 49 © U R B A N W O R K S A R C H I T E C T U R E L L C , 2 0 2 2 90 1 N O R T H T H I R D S T R E E T / S U I T E 1 4 5 / M I N N E A P O L I S , M N 5 5 4 0 1 CONSULTANT PRELIMINARY REVISIONS DATE PROJECT # PHASE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SITE PLAN APPLICATION 08.30.2022 11 / 9 / 2 0 2 2 7 : 0 4 : 5 0 A M C: \ U s e r s \ d a v i d . m i l l e r \ D o c u m e n t s \ 2 2 - 0 0 0 5 A 2 2 C e n t r a l _ d a v i d . m i l l e r ( R e c o v e r y ) . r v t AK R O N A V E / R O S E M O U N T , M N 11.09.2022 22-0005 SITE PLAN DWM EXTERIOR AXONOMETRIC AL351 14 5 T H & A K R O N B U I L D I N G S A & B AL351 AXONOMETRIC VIEW FROM NORTHWEST1 Page 29 of 49 © U R B A N W O R K S A R C H I T E C T U R E L L C , 2 0 2 2 90 1 N O R T H T H I R D S T R E E T / S U I T E 1 4 5 / M I N N E A P O L I S , M N 5 5 4 0 1 CONSULTANT PRELIMINARY REVISIONS DATE PROJECT # PHASE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SITE PLAN APPLICATION 08.30.2022 11 / 9 / 2 0 2 2 7 : 0 5 : 1 5 A M C: \ U s e r s \ d a v i d . m i l l e r \ D o c u m e n t s \ 2 2 - 0 0 0 5 A 2 2 C e n t r a l _ d a v i d . m i l l e r ( R e c o v e r y ) . r v t AK R O N A V E / R O S E M O U N T , M N 11.09.2022 22-0005 SITE PLAN DWM EXTERIOR AXONOMETRIC AL352 14 5 T H & A K R O N B U I L D I N G S A & B AL352 AXONOMETRIC VIEW FROM SOUTHEAST1 Page 30 of 49 K:\021280-000\Admin\Docs\2022.09.01 Submittal\2022.09.15 - Site Plan Review.docx Memorandum To: Anthony Nemcek, Senior Planner CC: Stacy Bodsberg, Planning & Personnel Secretary Brian Erickson, City Engineer From: Tim Hanson PE, WSB Engineering Consultant Date: September 16, 2022 Re: Shafer Richardson Apartments Site Plan Review Grading Plan Review Utility Plan Review WSB File Number 021280-000 SUBMITTAL: Shafer Richardson has submitted a site plan for the development of Outlot A, Prestwick Place Townhomes. The proposed project develops two lots and two apartment buildings consisting of 336 units with 267 surface parking stalls. The plans submitted were prepared by Urban Works and Elan Design both of Minneapolis, MN. Review comments were generated from the Site Plan Submittal, not dated, received on 09.01.2022. The submittal included the following: ▪ Existing Conditions ▪ Site Plan ▪ Grading Plan ▪ Utility Plan ▪ Landscape Plan EXISTING CONDITIONS Shafer Richardson apartments is in the northeast quadrant of Akron Avenue, County Road 73, and Connemara Trail intersection, and west of Adalyn Avenue. The parent parcel is 12.44 acres in size and is currently grassland with no noticeable use. Shafer Richardson will create two lots with an apartment building and surface parking located on each lot. The replating of Outlot A, Prestwick Place townhomes will require the vacation of existing drainage and utility easements platted with Prestwick Place Townhomes. 1. Vacate existing drainage and utility easements within Outlot A, Prestwick Place Townhomes. SITE PLAN The proposed site plan identifies the development of two apartment buildings with 3 parking lots and site amenities. Access to the site is from Adalyn Avenue at two locations. The southerly driveway is located 150 feet north of Connemara Trail midway between Connemara Trail and Upper 143rd Court. The second driveway is located 190 feet south of Addison Avenue, across from 142nd Street. The two driveways form a loop street which extends thru the site between the two buildings. The lot line extends down the centerline of the southerly driveway and then north Page 31 of 49 Anthony Nemcek September 16, 2022 Page 2 K:\021280-000\Admin\Docs\2022.09.01 Submittal\2022.09.15 - Site Plan Review.docx along the centerline of the north-south driveway alignment. The southerly driveway provides direct access to each building’s sublevel garage door and to the surface parking lot for the westerly building. The northerly entrance provides direct access to two surface parking lots for the easterly building and a second sublevel garage door of the westerly building. The driveway widths are 24 feet wide for access and circulation of the site. The proposed surface parking stalls are identified to be 9-feet-wide and 17-feet deep with bumper overhang, 19-feet-deep on head-to-head stalls with 24 feet wide drive isles. A few compact parking stalls and parallel parking stalls are also included in the site plan. Access and circulation within the parking lots appears to be adequate. Pedestrian facilities are identified within the two lots, adjacent to the parking lots and extending out to Connemara Trail, Adalyn Avenue, and Akron Avenue. These facilities connect to existing pedestrian facilities along the public streets. A pipeline and pipeline easement extends diagonally across the central portion of the site. The building footprint extends adjacent to the pipeline easement. Parking lots and portions of the proposed driveways are proposed to be constructed over the pipeline easement. The grading plan identifies significant fills over the pipeline alignment. The developer needs to verify the ability to change the grade over the pipeline. A Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) sanitary sewer interceptor extends across the southern portion of the site. A proof of parking area, driveway and ponding area is proposed to be constructed over the sanitary sewer easement. A fill area and cut area are proposed over the sewer line. The developer needs to verify the ability to change the grade over the pipeline. 2. The proposed pavement section should include a 2-foot sand core. The development Fees are indicated below based on the 2022 Schedule of Rates and Fees. The lot is subject to these fees. ▪ Sanitary Sewer Trunk Charge: $1,075/acre ▪ Watermain Trunk Charge: $6,500/acre ▪ Storm Sewer Trunk Charge: $6,865/acre GRADING AND DRAINAGE The proposed grading plan directs runoff away from the building within the parking lots to proposed storm sewer. Four ponding areas are shown on the plan, two NURP ponds and two infiltration basins. The infiltration basins are shown on one lot and the NURP ponds are shown on the other lot. Drainage from the westerly lot is treated in NURP basins located in the easterly lot. These basins discharge to infiltration basins located on the westerly lot. A maintenance agreement between the two lot owners is required for perpetual maintenance of the ponding areas. 3. The maximum slope is 4:1. 4. A maintenance agreement is required between the two lots for perpetual maintenance of the ponding and infiltration areas. SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN – UTILITY PLAN Sanitary sewer service is proposed to extend from an existing stub located on the west side of Adalyn Avenue. The utility plan identifies the sanitary sewer extending across the north side of the easterly building to the westerly building. The service location for the easterly building is not shown on the plan. An existing eight-inch watermain stub located on the west side of Adalyn Page 32 of 49 Anthony Nemcek September 16, 2022 Page 3 K:\021280-000\Admin\Docs\2022.09.01 Submittal\2022.09.15 - Site Plan Review.docx Avenue will be connected to and extended through the site to the southwest corner of the site where the watermain connects at a hydrant location. A third watermain connection is also proposed from a watermain stub located along the north plat line extending from the Prestwick Place Townhouse plat. The proposed watermain extensions are identified as 8-inch. The developer must show that there is sufficient capacity in the watermain for fire protection needs. Domestic and fire flows will be obtained from the watermain extension. 5. Location of hydrants and valves will be detail reviewed with the construction plans. 6. The sanitary sewer connection manhole (San MH 1) cannot be located in the bituminous trail. 7. The sanitary sewer and watermain must be placed within drainage and utility easements. STORM SEWER Several storm sewer runs are proposed for the site. The proposed storm sewers collect runoff from the parking lots and driveway and convey the runoff to the NURP basins. The plan also identifies storm sewer connections from the buildings to the NURP basin and to the proposed infiltration basin. An underground infiltration basin is identified at the east end of the northerly driveway. The storm sewer, ponds, and underground infiltration system will be privately maintained. 8. Detail review of the storm sewer system and design will be completed with the construction plans for the site. 9. An existing interceptor storm sewer extending from Connemara Trail will need to be extended to the proposed ponding area. SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT The proposed Surface Water Management plan for the preliminary plat is under reviewed. Comments included in the Surface Water Management plan review shall be incorporated in the project design. LANDSCAPE PLAN The Landscape plan was reviewed for plant location conflicts with proposed infrastructure. Several proposed tree locations conflict with underground infrastructure. Tree plantings should allow space for access of maintenance equipment. GENERAL Infrastructure design shall be completed in accordance with the City of Rosemount’s Engineering Guidelines and Standards. Infrastructure construction shall be completed in accordance with the latest edition of the City’s General Specifications and Standard Detail Plates for Street and Utility Construction. Page 33 of 49 M E M O R A N D U M To: Adam Kienberger Community Development Director Anthony Nemcek, Senior Planner Julia Hogan, Planner From: Dan Schultz, Parks and Recreation Director Date: October 21, 2022 Subject: Schaefer Richardson Development The Parks and Recreation Department recently reviewed the development plans for the Schaefer Richardson apartment complex project. After reviewing the plans, the Parks and Recreation Department staff has the following comments: PARKS DEDICATION The parks dedication requirement for 305 high density residential units is .02 acres of land per unit or $2,500 per unit. The City’s Parks Master Plan does not call for a park in this area, so staff is recommending the City collect cash in-lieu of land to meet the parks dedication requirements for the 336 units. The cash dedication for 305 units would be $762,500 (305 units x $2,500 per unit). Staff is recommending that City not provide any parks dedication credit for any amenities being proposed on their site. The Parks and Recreation Commission will be reviewing this item at the regular meeting on Monday, October 24. Please let me know if you have any questions about this memo. Page 34 of 49 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Planning Commission Regular Meeting: May 23, 2023 AGENDA ITEM: Request by New Horizon Academy for a Site Plan Review AGENDA SECTION: PUBLIC HEARINGS PREPARED BY: Anthony Nemcek , Senior Planner AGENDA NO. 6.a. ATTACHMENTS: Site Location, Zoning Map, Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Architectural Elevations, Trash Enclosure Elevations, Utility Plan, Engineer's Memo Dated May 2, 2023, Parks and Rec Director's Memo dated May 18, 2023 APPROVED BY: RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to approve a site plan review allowing New Horizon Academy to construct a child care center at 2730 149th Street West, subject to the following conditions: 1. Recording of the Rosewood Commons 2nd Addition Plat. 2. Council approval of the vacation of existing easements located within the site. 3. If the proposed future expansion is constructed, a revised landscape plan must be submitted prior to approval of any building permits. 4. The architectural elevations shall be updated to provide a minimum of 50% natural stone or brick. 5. A sign permit is required for any on-site signage. 6. Conformance with all comments contained in the engineer’s memo dated May 2, 2023. 7. Payment of $19,710 in lieu of park land dedication, to be collected with the building permit fee. BACKGROUND The Planning Commission is being asked to review the site plan submitted by New Horizon Academy to construct a child care center at 2730 149th Street West. The subject parcel is located within the Rosewood Commons 2nd Addition plat area on the north side of CSAH 42, approximately ¼ mile east of Highway 3. The plans provided by the applicant generally meet all requirements of the zoning ordinance within the City Code with the exception being the ratio of building materials used. Staff is recommending approval of the site plan review to allow for the construction of the child care center, subject to the conditions listed in the recommended action section above. Applicant New Horizon Academy Property Owner KJ Walk, Inc. Site Location 2730 149th Street West (NE of Business Pkwy and CSAH 42) Site Area In Acres Approximately 2.2 Acres Page 35 of 49 Current Zoning C3-Highway Commercial Comp Plan Designation CC-Community Commercial GENERAL INFORMATION The site of the proposed child care center is within the Rosewood Commons 2nd Addition plat area. The subject parcel was originally an outlot of the Rosewood Estates single-family neighborhood immediately to the north of the commercial area along CSAH 42. The commercial land to the east of the subject parcel was platted as Rosewood Center in 2014. The City Council approved the Rosewood Commons 2nd Addition Plat in 2022, which incorporates the existing outlot. The initial Rosewood Commons plat is located entirely west of Business Parkway and includes several parcels upon which the developer of the area received approval to construct a mixed-use neighborhood comprised of 6 apartment buildings, two of which will contain some commercial uses, and a memory care facility. The subject parcel is zoned C3-Highway Commercial. The application of this zoning district to the site was done in anticipation of a potential convenience store and filling station being built on the land. Due to the County adopting access spacing guidelines that will lead to the eventual conversion of the full intersection of CSAH 42 and Business Parkway to a ¾ access, the site was no longer attractive for a gas station use and remained undeveloped. It should be noted that a future signal is planned at Biscayne Avenue, which will allow for full traffic movement. In 2020, the developer inquired with the City about changing the site from commercial to residential use to construct a memory care facility, but the City reiterated its vision to maintain the land adjacent to CSAH 42 for commercial development and the applicant did not move forward with a request to change the site’s land use designation. A memory care facility is currently under construction northwest of the subject parcel. Childcare centers are permitted uses in the C3-Highway Commercial zoning district. In addition to the general site plan, the applicant has provided architectural drawings, a grading plan, a utility plan, and a landscape plan, all of which are included in the attachments. A formal review and analysis of this information and how it relates to the Zoning Ordinance is provided in the next section. No variances are being requested for the construction of the addition, and, subject to the conditions listed above, the proposed development meets the requirements of the zoning ordinance. SITE PLAN REVIEW The purpose of a site plan review is to evaluate each project as it relates to the performance and site design standards of the zoning ordinance. Site plan approval is required for all commercial, industrial, institutional and multi-family development projects. Site plan applications are approved by the Planning Commission and considered a quasi-judicial action. As such, the City has a set of standards and requirements for review. Generally, if a site plan application meets the ordinance requirements, it must be approved. These standards are outlined in Section 11-4-13 (Highway Commercial District) and 11-10-3 (Site and Building Plan Review). Setbacks The proposed building is placed somewhat centrally on the subject parcel with the main entrance facing toward the northeast. The northeast portion of the site contains the parking lot, while the Page 36 of 49 building is surrounded on the other three sides by fenced-in play areas. The table below shows the required setbacks in comparison with those provided on the site plan. The table includes an additional setback of 20’ from CSAH 42, an arterial road, for structures. Required Setback Provided Setback Frontage Building Parking Building Parking North (149th Street West) 30 feet 20 feet 92 feet 21.6 feet East (Outlot C, Rosewood Center) 10 feet 10 Feet 120 feet 33 feet South (CSAH 42) 10+20 feet 10 feet 40 feet 100 feet West (Business Parkway) 10 feet 10 feet 47.6 feet 133 feet The site plan also shows a storage shed just outside the play area in the southwest portion of the site. The shed is located 30’ from both the west and south parcel boundaries and meets the setback requirements of the City Code. The applicant has also indicated in the plans provided that they may wish to construct a future expansion of the building and parking lot. The ghost plans for those improvements indicate that they will also meet the setback requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. Parking and Access The site will be accessed from 149th Street West via a single drive near the northeast corner of the parcel and a sidewalk that connects the main entrance of the building with 149th Street West. The parking requirement for a childcare center is 1 parking stall per 20 children, plus one parking stall per staff member. Based on the number of children the facility will be able to accommodate and required staffing for that number of children (179 students and 23 staff members), a total of 34 parking stalls are required. The site plan includes 50 stalls. The potential future addition is anticipated to provide space for three preschool classrooms of up to 22 children each, which will be staffed with a total of six adults. Therefore, an additional 10 stalls would be required. The proof of parking for the expansion includes 22 stalls, bringing the total to 72 stalls. Required Provided Initial phase 34 Stalls (1 per 20 children plus 1 per staff) 11+23=34 50 Expansion 10 Stalls (1 per 20 children plus 1 per staff) 4+6=10 22 Exterior Building Materials and Massing The building elevations provided show a mix of materials being used on the exterior. Natural stone wainscoting will extend around the entire building. Two vertical elements on either side of the main entrance also feature natural stone. James Hardie and vertical board and batten siding make up the remainder of the unwindowed portions of the façade. A blue accent band will be applied around all four sides of the building. No EIFS or masonry stucco, of which 10% of the façade can be comprised, Page 37 of 49 will be used. The C3-Highway Commercial zoning district has a requirement that at least 50% of the exterior must contain natural stone or brick. The elevations do not meet that minimum threshold. Therefore, staff is recommending a condition of approval that calls for the submittal of updated elevations that increase the amount of natural stone or brick to the 50% threshold. The central portion of the building projects above the surrounding structure to a total height of 22.5 feet, which is below the maximum building height of 35’ allowed in the C3 zoning district. The majority of the structure is approximately 17’ tall. Trash Enclosure A 6’7” tall trash enclosure featuring materials like those used on the principal structure is shown on the applicant’s plans. It will be located in a landscaped island in the center of the parking lot along the main entrance drive aisle. Fencing Fences are approved administratively by staff. They can be constructed up to, but not on, the property line. In non-residential zoning districts, the maximum fence height is 8’. The applicant’s plans show fencing surrounding each outdoor play area. The fence will be 5’ tall black steel open picket decorative fence, except internally between play areas where the fence will be 4’ in height. Signage The applicant’s elevations show wall signage that appears to meet the requirements of the zoning ordinance, including on the rear of the storage shed facing southwest. The applicant will have to apply for and receive a sign permit for any site signage, including any freestanding signs. Sign permits are approved administratively by staff separately from the site plan review process. Staff is recommending a condition of approval that highlights this requirement. Landscaping A landscaping plan was provided by the applicant that includes a total of 41 trees, which is the minimum required by the City Code. The formula to determine the required number of trees is 1 tree per 3,000 square feet of site area, which in this case equals 32 trees. The zoning ordinance also requires landscaping in and around the parking lot in addition to the 32 trees. Based on the size of the parking lot, 9 additional trees are required for a total of 41 trees on site. The parking lot landscaping formula requires 10% of the parking lot area to be landscaped with islands and peninsulas. Within that landscaped area, one tree per 250 square feet is required. The parking lot area is 22,816 square feet in area, which means 2,283 square feet of the parking lot must be landscaped. The landscape plan includes 5,808 square feet of landscaping within the parking lot. This area is comprised of islands, peninsulas, and areas within the perimeter of the parking lot. Also required by the landscaping ordinance is one foundation planting for every 10 linear feet of building exterior. The proposed building has 502 linear feet of perimeter, which requires a total of 50 foundation plants. The landscape plan includes 75 total foundation plantings located along the front of the building. The landscape plan shows landscaping in the southwest corner of the site at the rear of the storage shed. Additional shrubs will be planted to provide some screening of the parking lot along 149th Street West and within the parking lot islands and peninsulas. Page 38 of 49 Calculation Formula Number Required Number Provided Site Trees 1 per 3,000 sf 95,817/3,000=32 trees 32 trees Parking Lot Trees 1 per 250 sf 2,283/250=9 trees 9 trees Foundation Plantings 1 per 10 linear feet 502/10=50 foundation plants 75 foundation plants Lighting The applicant is proposing site lighting that consists of pole mounted lights and wall mounted lights. The wall mounted lights will be mounted at a height of 10’, while the pole mounted lights will be 20’ in height. The zoning ordinance allows pole mounted lights to be up to 30’ tall except in areas within 100’ of a residential use. In those areas, the maximum height for lighting is 20’. The maximum level of lighting allowed by the code is 0.5 lumen at adjacent residential property lines and 1.0 lumen at non- residential property lines. The applicant has submitted a photometric study that shows the highest level of light at the subject parcel’s property line is 0.3 lumen. Park Dedication The developer of the Rosewood Commons 2nd Addition plat has requested that park dedication fees be collected at the time a building permit is issued. The park dedication requirement for commercial developments is either 10% of the total property area as land dedication or cash in-lieu of land dedication. The cash dedication for the 2.19-acre site is $19,710 (.219 acres x $90,000/acre). Staff has included the payment of the park dedication fee with the building permit fee as a recommended condition of approval. Engineering Sewer and water service will be provided by existing stubs located at 149th Street West, and stormwater will exit the site to the pond to the east and also into a storm sewer line to the south. The City’s engineer has reviewed the construction plans and provided a memorandum dated May 2, 2023. The memo contains general comments related to the grading of the site and stormwater management. Site stormwater will make use of the adjacent stormwater pond located immediately east of the subject parcel. Engineering staff is reviewing the plans provided by the applicant to validate the applicant’s assumptions related to the volume of stormwater the adjacent pond is able to accommodate and to determine if expansion of the pond is necessary. Conformance with all requirements of the City Engineer is a recommended condition of approval. RECOMMENDATION Staff finds the plans provided by the applicant meet the standards of the zoning ordinance except where noted, and is recommending approval of the site plan allowing New Horizon Academy to construct a childcare center at 2730 149th Street West. Page 39 of 49 Page 40 of 49 Page 41 of 49 C O U N T Y S T A T E A I D H I G H W A Y 4 2 149TH STREET WEST BUSINESS PARKWAY NEW HORIZON ACADEMY12,106 SF PRESCHOOL FIELD PLAY AREA 11,200 SF 149 CHILDREN PRESCHOOL PLAY YARD 9,119 SF 121 CHILDREN TODDLER PLAY YARD 6,016 SF 80 CHILDREN INFANT CRAWL YARD 580 SF 16 CHILDREN FUTURE ADDITION 2,562 SF SHADE STRUCTURE TE 171 SFSTORAGE SHEDW/SIGN10' - 0" PARKING SETBACK 20' - 0" BUILDING SETBACK 30' - 0" TRUE PROJECT FALL ZONE 2,156 SF FALL ZONE 1,354 SF PERIMETER FENCE 72" HIGHPERIMETER FENCE 72" HIGHPERIMETER FENCE72" HIGHPE R I M E T E R F E N C E 72 " H I G H 4 8 " O R 7 2 " H I G H F E N C E (2) BIKE RACKS 48" HIGH FENCE 48 " H I G H FE N C E RUMBLE STRIPS (1 3) 8'-6" S T A L L S & (1) 8'-0" AIS L E = 1 1 8' - 6" 8' - 0" T Y P. 8' - 6" (8) 8'-6" S T A L L S = 6 8' - 0" (4) 8'-6" STALLS = 34' - 0"13 (8'-6") STALLS = 110' - 6" (5) 8'-6" STALLS = 42' - 6" (7) 8'-6" STALLS = 59' - 6" 7 13 8 5 13 4 16' - 0" 11' - 4 " 15' - 7 3/8" 6' - 0" 1 9' - 0" 2 4' - 0" 1 9' - 0" T Y P. 19' - 0" 24' - 0" 19' - 0" 24' - 0" 24' - 0" 19' - 0" PROJECT INFORMATION: RYLAUR, LLC. 14 PHEASANT LANE NORTH OAKS, MN 55127 P: 612.868.3636 philger@rylaur.com ©2023 RYLAUR LLC. CLIENT INFORMATION: SHEET TITLE: DRAFTED: REVIEWED: SHEET DATE: 4/ 2 5 / 2 0 2 3 2 : 5 9 : 1 2 P M A1 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN PRG APH CI T Y S U B M I T T A L 4/ 2 5 / 2 0 2 3 4/25/2023 NEW HORIZON ACADEMY 3405 ANNAPOLIS LN N STE 100 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447-5343 NEW HORIZON ACADEMY ROSEMOUNT, MN 1" = 20'-0"1 Site Plan REVISION SCHEDULE NO DESCRIPTION DATE Page 42 of 49 4' 3' 3' 3' 5'4' RYLAUR, LLC 14 PHEASANT LANE NORTH OAKS, MN 55127 P: 612.868.3636 philger@rylaur.com PROJECT INFORMATION: CLIENT INFORMATION: NEW HORIZON ACADEMY ROSEMOUNT, MN NEW HORIZON ACADEMY 3405 ANNAPOLIS LANE N. PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 2022 RYLAUR, LLCC Sheet No.: SHEET TITLE: LANDSCAPE PLAN Project Architect: Drawing History/Revisions: Drawing Date: 04.25.2023 A. PETER HILGER, AIA L1 Carmen Simonet Design LLC 354 Stonebridge Blvd. St. Paul, MN 55105 (651) 695-0273 carmen@simonetdesign.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: April 25, 2023 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" SECTION: PARKING LOT SCREENING PLANTING BED SOD DECIDUOUS TREE, MIN. 5' BOLE EVERGREEN SHRUB 4' HT. 1 BUILDING PRESCHOOL PLAY FIELD TODDLER PLAY YARD INFANT PLAY YARD LIGHT POLE (TYP.) FENCE (TYP.) SIDEWALK BU S I N E S S P A R K W A Y 149TH STREET WEST COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAY 42 PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PR O P E R T Y L I N E STORAGE SHED W/ SIGN PRESCHOOL PLAY YARD FUTURE ADDITION BIKE RACK TRASH ENCLOSURE SI D E W A L K EASEMENT LINE PR O P E R T Y L I N E HR 13 HB 12 5 CO 3 PG 2 TA 2 MS 6 AF 4 PG 2 MS 6 QB 3 MP16 HP AB 34 5 TA 24 JS 2 MP 1 QB 16 NF 30 HB 15 SB 22 SB 12 SB EDGER (TYP.) 8 CS 6 HP SOD KEY NOTES: 1.SEE SHEET L2 FOR PLANTING DETAILS & LANDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONS. 2.ALL TURF (SODDED AND SEEDED AREAS) AND PLANTING BEDS TO BE IRRIGATED. 1 SEED WITH MNDOT 25-131 LOW MAINTENANCE TURF LANDSCAPE PLAN1 PLAY AREA PLAY AREA Page 43 of 49 T/SLAB 100' -0" B/ACCENT BAND 110' -0" T/ROOF EDGE 117' -1" T/LO PARAPET 119' -0" T/HI PARAPET 124' -0" T/STONE SILL 102' -8" T/MID PARAPET 122' -6" 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 22 4 6 5 14 2 1 22 4 6 5 14 3 4 7 7 4 355 22 15 6 18 8 15 15 15 6 66 9 10 10 1010 5 19 23 25 T/SLAB 100' -0" B/ACCENT BAND 110' -0" T/ROOF EDGE 117' -1" T/LO PARAPET 119' -0" T/HI PARAPET 124' -0" T/STONE SILL 102' -8" T/MID PARAPET 122' -6" 1 1 1 2 1 22 4 6 2 1 22 4 6 5 14 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 14 15 6 3 4 6 3 4 6 3 4 8 10 10 10 18 18 24 T/SLAB 100' -0" B/ACCENT BAND 110' -0" T/ROOF EDGE 117' -1" T/LO PARAPET 119' -0" T/HI PARAPET 124' -0" T/STONE SILL 102' -8" T/MID PARAPET 122' -6" 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 4 6 3 3 3 3 5 5 5 514 15 16 14 16 14 16 6 15 17 5 5 5 2222 5 44 4 66 1010 131818 18 20 2121 24 T/SLAB 100' -0" B/ACCENT BAND 110' -0" T/ROOF EDGE 117' -1" T/LO PARAPET 119' -0" T/HI PARAPET 124' -0" T/STONE SILL 102' -8" T/MID PARAPET 122' -6" 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 4 6 3 6 4 3 6 4 8 5 5 55 14 16 14 16 15 17 14 16 6 10 10 10 5 5 5 5 18181818 21 21 24 1. STONE VENEER -CULTURED STONE-CHARDONNAY COUNTRY LEDGESTONE 2. PRECAST CAPSTONE -COLUMN PILLAR CAP & WINDOW SILL NATURAL LIMESTONE COLOR. 3. HORIZONTAL LAP SIDING -JAMES HARDIE HARDIE PLANK LAP SIDING, SMOOTH, 5" EXPOSURE COLOR: SHERWIN-WILLIAMS #7053, ADAPTIVE SHADE 4. VERTICAL BOARD & BATTEN SIDING -JAMES HARDIE FIBER CEMENT BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING -HARDIEPANEL VERTICAL SIDING -SMOOTH, W/ HARDIETRIM BOARD -SMOOTH BATTEN BOARD COLOR: SHERWIN-WILLIAMS #9628, WINTER WALK 5. ALUMIUNUM STOREFRONT FRAMING / GLAZING ASSEMBLY -CLEAR INSULATED LOW-E GLASS WITH 'DARK BRONZE' ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMES 6. HORIZONTAL ACCENT BAND -JAMES HARDIE 1x FIBER CEMENT TRIM COLOR: SHERWIN-WILLIAMS #6811, HONORABLE BLUE 7. SQUARE MEDALLION TILES -PAINTED METAL COLOR: SHERWIN-WILLIAMS #6811, HONORABLE BLUE. SEE 8. ILLUMINATED EXTERIOR WALL SIGNAGE 4 THUS CHANNEL LETTERS AND SUN LOGO 34 SQUARE FEET MAX AREA 9. EXPOSED TUBULAR STEEL COLUMN COLOR: SHERWIN-WILLIAMS #6811, HONORABLE BLUE 10. EXTERIOR WALLPACK LIGHTS -SEE PHOTOMETRICS 11. PLAY YARD FENCE -60" HIGH METAL PICKET COLOR: BLACK 12. TRASH ENCLOSURE GATE -TREX FENCING COLOR: WOODLAND BROWN 13. HOLLOW METAL DOORS COLOR: SHERWIN-WILLIAMS #7053, ADAPTIVE SHADE 14. PREFINISHED METAL COPING -PARAPET COLOR: WHITE 15. PREFINISHED METAL COPING -PARAPET COLOR: DARK BRONZE 16. BUILT-UP CORNICE -JAMES HARDIE COLOR: SHERWIN-WILLIAMS #9628, WINTER WALK 17. BUILT-UP CORNICE -JAMES HARDIE COLOR: SHERWIN-WILLIAMS #7053, ADAPTIVE SHADE 18. ALUMINUM DOOR / GLAZING ASSEMBLY -CLEAR INSULATED LOW-E GLASS WITH 'DARK BRONZE' ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMES 19. FIRE DEPARTMENT LOCK BOX MOUNTED 48"MIN TO 60" MAX. ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR. MODEL R3-RECESSED BY THE DAMA COMPANY. VERIFY LOCATION WITH LOCAL FIRE OFFICIAL 20. PROVIDE 'FIRE SPRINKLER ROOM' SIGNAGE ON EXTERIOR FACE OF UTILITY ROOM DOOR 21. COW TONGUE OVERFLOW ROOF DRAIN OUTLET WITH BIRD SCREEN - 'DARK BRONZE' 22. BRAKE METAL TRIM AT WINDOW CORNERS COLOR: DARK BRONZE ANODIZED ALUMINUM 23. PREFINISHED FLASHING AROUND METAL COLUMN TO STONE CAP 24. 8"x8" SMOOTH PRECAST BLOCK @ HOSE BIBB & ROOF DRAIN OUTLET 25. 12"x12" SMOOTH PRECAST BLOCK @ FD SIAMESE CONNECTION 26. CONDUCTOR HEAD & DOWNSPOUT COLOR: DARK BRONZE ANODIZED ALUMINUM 27. ILLUMINATED SIGN. 20 SF #EXTERIOR ELEVATION KEYNOTES PROJECT INFORMATION: RYLAUR, LLC. 14 PHEASANT LANE NORTH OAKS, MN 55127 P: 612.868.3636 philger@rylaur.com ©2023 RYLAUR LLC. CLIENT INFORMATION: SHEET TITLE: DRAFTED: REVIEWED: SHEET DATE: 4/ 2 5 / 2 0 2 3 2 : 3 5 : 3 2 P M A2 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PRG APH CI T Y S U B M I T T A L 4/ 2 5 / 2 0 2 3 4/25/2023 NEW HORIZON ACADEMY 3405 ANNAPOLIS LN N STE 100 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447-5343 NEW HORIZON ACADEMY ROSEMOUNT, MN 3/16" = 1'-0"1 NORTHEAST ELEVATION 3/16" = 1'-0"2 SOUTHWEST ELEVATION 3/16" = 1'-0"3 SOUTHEAST ELEVTION 3/16" = 1'-0"4 NORTHWEST ELEVATION REVISION SCHEDULE NO DESCRIPTION DATE Page 44 of 49 1 2 3 2 1 2 3 2 1 2 3 2 6' - 7 " 1 2 3 2 12 10 ' - 5 " 1 2 3 6 16 14 13 26 1 2 3 6 16 14 26 1 2 3 6 16 14 2627 1 2 3 6 16 14 1. STONE VENEER -CULTURED STONE-CHARDONNAY COUNTRY LEDGESTONE 2. PRECAST CAPSTONE -COLUMN PILLAR CAP & WINDOW SILL NATURAL LIMESTONE COLOR. 3. HORIZONTAL LAP SIDING -JAMES HARDIE HARDIE PLANK LAP SIDING, SMOOTH, 5" EXPOSURE COLOR: SHERWIN-WILLIAMS #7053, ADAPTIVE SHADE 4. VERTICAL BOARD & BATTEN SIDING -JAMES HARDIE FIBER CEMENT BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING -HARDIEPANEL VERTICAL SIDING -SMOOTH, W/ HARDIETRIM BOARD -SMOOTH BATTEN BOARD COLOR: SHERWIN-WILLIAMS #9628, WINTER WALK 5. ALUMIUNUM STOREFRONT FRAMING / GLAZING ASSEMBLY -CLEAR INSULATED LOW-E GLASS WITH 'DARK BRONZE' ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMES 6. HORIZONTAL ACCENT BAND -JAMES HARDIE 1x FIBER CEMENT TRIM COLOR: SHERWIN-WILLIAMS #6811, HONORABLE BLUE 7. SQUARE MEDALLION TILES -PAINTED METAL COLOR: SHERWIN-WILLIAMS #6811, HONORABLE BLUE. SEE 8. ILLUMINATED EXTERIOR WALL SIGNAGE 4 THUS CHANNEL LETTERS AND SUN LOGO 34 SQUARE FEET MAX AREA 9. EXPOSED TUBULAR STEEL COLUMN COLOR: SHERWIN-WILLIAMS #6811, HONORABLE BLUE 10. EXTERIOR WALLPACK LIGHTS -SEE PHOTOMETRICS 11. PLAY YARD FENCE -60" HIGH METAL PICKET COLOR: BLACK 12. TRASH ENCLOSURE GATE -TREX FENCING COLOR: WOODLAND BROWN 13. HOLLOW METAL DOORS COLOR: SHERWIN-WILLIAMS #7053, ADAPTIVE SHADE 14. PREFINISHED METAL COPING -PARAPET COLOR: WHITE 15. PREFINISHED METAL COPING -PARAPET COLOR: DARK BRONZE 16. BUILT-UP CORNICE -JAMES HARDIE COLOR: SHERWIN-WILLIAMS #9628, WINTER WALK 17. BUILT-UP CORNICE -JAMES HARDIE COLOR: SHERWIN-WILLIAMS #7053, ADAPTIVE SHADE 18. ALUMINUM DOOR / GLAZING ASSEMBLY -CLEAR INSULATED LOW-E GLASS WITH 'DARK BRONZE' ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMES 19. FIRE DEPARTMENT LOCK BOX MOUNTED 48"MIN TO 60" MAX. ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR. MODEL R3-RECESSED BY THE DAMA COMPANY. VERIFY LOCATION WITH LOCAL FIRE OFFICIAL 20. PROVIDE 'FIRE SPRINKLER ROOM' SIGNAGE ON EXTERIOR FACE OF UTILITY ROOM DOOR 21. COW TONGUE OVERFLOW ROOF DRAIN OUTLET WITH BIRD SCREEN - 'DARK BRONZE' 22. BRAKE METAL TRIM AT WINDOW CORNERS COLOR: DARK BRONZE ANODIZED ALUMINUM 23. PREFINISHED FLASHING AROUND METAL COLUMN TO STONE CAP 24. 8"x8" SMOOTH PRECAST BLOCK @ HOSE BIBB & ROOF DRAIN OUTLET 25. 12"x12" SMOOTH PRECAST BLOCK @ FD SIAMESE CONNECTION 26. CONDUCTOR HEAD & DOWNSPOUT COLOR: DARK BRONZE ANODIZED ALUMINUM 27. ILLUMINATED SIGN. 20 SF #EXTERIOR ELEVATION KEYNOTES A4 2 A4 3 A4 4 A459' - 4 " 14' - 0" 10' - 0" A4 7 A4 8 A4 9 A4106' - 0 " 15' - 6" EXTERIOR FINISH PALETTE COUNTRY LEDGESTONE PROJECT INFORMATION: RYLAUR, LLC. 14 PHEASANT LANE NORTH OAKS, MN 55127 P: 612.868.3636 philger@rylaur.com ©2023 RYLAUR LLC. CLIENT INFORMATION: SHEET TITLE: DRAFTED: REVIEWED: SHEET DATE: 4/ 2 5 / 2 0 2 3 2 : 3 5 : 3 7 P M A4 OUTBUILDINGS, EXTERIOR FINISH PALETTE PRG APH CI T Y S U B M I T T A L 4/ 2 5 / 2 0 2 3 4/25/2023 NEW HORIZON ACADEMY 3405 ANNAPOLIS LN N STE 100 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447-5343 NEW HORIZON ACADEMY ROSEMOUNT, MN 3/16" = 1'-0"3 T.E. - LEFT SIDE 3/16" = 1'-0"4 T.E. - REAR 3/16" = 1'-0"5 T.E. - RIGHT SIDE 3/16" = 1'-0"2 TRASH ENCLOSURE 3/16" = 1'-0"7 STORAGE BUILDING 3/16" = 1'-0"8 S.B. - LEFT SIDE 3/16" = 1'-0"9 S.B. - REAR 3/16" = 1'-0"10 S.B. - RIGHT SIDE 3/16" = 1'-0"1 TRASH ENCLOSURE 3/16" = 1'-0"6 STORAGE BUILDING REVISION SCHEDULE NO DESCRIPTION DATE Page 45 of 49 20'X 75' ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 948.36 948.46 948.93 949.55 949.23949.60949.86950.34 950.66 950.74 951.06 951.28 951.28 951.28 951.28 951.28 951.28 950.94 950.14 HP-950.94 948.91 949.98 950.81 950.49 950.47950.73 HP-950.85 950.73 950.72 950.68 950.30 950.37 950.14 950.43 950.49 950.58 HP-950.71 950.84 951.11 951.19 951.19 950.85 950.28 950.38 950.06 0.5%--> 0. 5 % - - > 2.0% - - > CONNECT DRAINTILE TO EXISTING STORM MANHOLE 1.0%--> 2. 0 % - - > 2. 5 3 % - - > <- - 2 . 0 % 2. 0 % - - > 0. 5 % - - > 3.16 % - - > 1.0%--> DAYCARE SLAB @ 951.50 3. 3 1 % - - > 950.03 950.51 2. 5 3 % - - > 1.0%--> HP-949.63 951.35 951.43 951.43 951.43 951.15 950.84 950.56 950.56 950.93 951.22 950.95 950.63 950.89951.43 951.37 951.07 951.12 1 CONNECT TO EXISTING 6" PVC SANITARY SERVICE STUB CONNTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOCATION 4" D R A I N T I L E 8" CLEANOUT 6" P V C 8" P V C 952.34 951.86 951.60 ROOF DRAIN CONNECTIONS TRASH ENCLOSER 951.19 950.34 950.56 EX-MH T=47.95 I=36.00 951.43 6001 Egan Drive, Ste 100, Savage, MN 55378 Phone: 952.226.3200 Web: www.kjwalk.com Date:Revision: Original Grading and Erosion Control Plan SHEET 2 of 5 Date: 4/18/2023 FILE PATH: G:\.shortcut-targets-by-id\0B7rlATRBOKEBSGQ2T0JkZi0xUTg\Work Files\Rosemount Projects\Rosewood Commons\Engineering\CAD\DWGs\ROSEWOOD NHA.dwg I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly registered engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Luke Warren Israelson Registration #: 51362 0 20 40 60 ROSEMOUNT, MN NOTES: SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG PERIMETER OF CONSTRUCTION AREA PRIOR TO THE START OF WORK. DISTURBED AREAS TO BE TEMPORARY SEEDED AND MULCHED WITHIN 14 DAYS OF STOPPAGE OF WORK. PERMANENT COVER TO BE INSTALLED WITHIN 14 DAYS OF FINAL GRADE BEING ESTABLISHED. TEMPORARY SEEDING AND PERMANENT SEEDING IN UNDEVELOPED AREAS TO BE EROSION CONTROL MIX FINISH SEED/SOD TO BE BLUEGRASS AND/OR FESCUES. 4" CONCRETE WALK 4" SAND TYPICAL SIDEWALK SECTION NOT TO SCALE 1.5% TYP PLAYGROUND DRAIN TILE DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 04/18/2023 For Review April 18, 2023 Page 46 of 49 K:\021893-000\Admin\Docs\2022.05.02 - Submittal\2023.05.02 - Construction Plan Review.docx 17 8 E 9 T H S T R E E T | SU I T E 2 0 0 | SA I N T P A U L , M N | 55 1 0 1 | 65 1 . 2 8 6 . 8 4 5 0 | WS B E N G . C O M Memorandum To: Brian Erickson PE, City Engineer Anthony Nemcek, Senior Planner From: Tim Hanson PE, WSB Engineering Consultant Date: May 02, 2023 Re: New Horizon Academy Lot 1, Block 2, Rosewood Commons Second Addition Grading and Erosion Control Plan Paving and Storm Sewer Plan WSB Project No. 021893-000 SUBMITTAL KJ Walk Inc. has submitted construction plans for Lot 1, Block 2, Rosewood Commons Second Addition. The lot is proposed to be developed by New Horizon Academy for a child care center. The plans submitted were prepared by KJ Walk, dated 4/18/23. The submittal included the following plan sheets. ▪ Grading and Erosion Control Plan ▪ SWPP Plan ▪ Paving and Storm Sewer Plan ▪ Details ▪ Landscape Plan GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN Sheet 2 of 5 – The proposed grading in the northwest corner of the site appears to be very flat. Provide existing elevations of the adjacent sidewalk along Business Parkway. Proposed lot line elevations along the westerly lot line and at lot corners will be required for the building permit. Sheet 2 of 5 – The drainage arrow in the northwest corner along 149th Street should point to the northwest. Sheet 2 of 5 – Recommend installation of an onsite fire hydrant located in the southerly lobe of the parking island. Sheet 2 of 5 – The proposed drain tile for the play ground extends to an existing structure within Dakota County Right of Way. Recommend relocating the outlet to the ponding area east of the site. The property owner would be responsible to locate the facility if any work occurred in the County Right of Way and a permit would be required from the County. STORM SEWER Provide stormwater memo with storm sewer calculations for review. SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT The proposed drainage plan utilizes the regional BMP system of Rosewood Commons for storm water treatment. Outstanding comments exist from the review of Rosewood Commons Second Page 47 of 49 Name Date Page 2 K:\021893-000\Admin\Docs\2022.05.02 - Submittal\2023.05.02 - Construction Plan Review.docx Addition, dated December 13, 2022, which must be resolved. The surface water management plan will be reviewed upon submittal of these documents. GENERAL Infrastructure design shall be completed in accordance with the City of Rosemount’s Engineering Guidelines and Standards. Infrastructure construction shall be completed in accordance with the latest edition (2023) of the City’s General Specifications and Standard Detail Plates for Street and Utility Construction. Page 48 of 49 M E M O R A N D U M To:Adam Kienberger, Community Development Director Anthony Nemcek, Senior Planner Julia Hogan, Planner From:Dan Schultz, Parks and Recreation Director Date:May 18, 2023 Subject:New Horizon Project The Parks and Recreation Department recently reviewed the plans for the New Horizon project. After reviewing the plans, the Parks and Recreation Department staff has the following comments: Parks Dedication The parks dedication requirement for a commercial development is either a 10% of the total property area as land dedication, a cash dedication in-lieu of land or combination of the two. Staff is recommending that the City collect cash in-lieu of land for the development that is currently being processed. The cash dedication for the 2.19 acre development $19,710 (.219 acres x $90,000 per acre). This amount is to be paid when the building permit is issued. Please let me know if you have any questions about this memo. Page 49 of 49