HomeMy WebLinkAbout02262024 Packet Regular Meeting
AGENDA
Planning Commission Regular Meeting
Monday, February 26, 2024
6:30 PM
City Council Chambers, City Hall
1. CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2. ADDITIONS TO AGENDA
3. AUDIENCE INPUT
4. CONSENT AGENDA
a. Minutes of the January 23, 2024 Regular Meeting
b. Request by Maplewood Development for Approval of the Amber Fields 16th Addition
Final Plat.
c. Request by Spectro Alloys Corp for approval of the Spectro Alloys 3rd Addition Final
Plat
5. OLD BUSINESS
a. Request by Independent School District 196 for approval of a rezoning of the site
from AG-Agricultural to R1-Low Density Residential, minor subdivision, conditional
use permit, and site plan review for an elementary school to be constructed on site.
6. PUBLIC HEARINGS
7. NEW BUSINESS
8. DISCUSSION
9. ADJOURNMENT
Page 1 of 109
ROSEMOUNT PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING PROCEEDINGS
JANUARY 23, 2024
CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the Planning Commission was
held on Tuesday, January 23, 2024, at 6:30 PM. in Rosemount Council Chambers, 2875 145th
Street West.
Chairperson Kenninger called the meeting to order with Commissioners Reed, Hebert,
Thiagarajan, Rivera, and Whitman.
Staff present included the following: Community Development Director Kienberger, Senior
Planner Nemcek, Planner Hogan, and Community Development Technician Grant.
ADDITIONS TO AGENDA
None.
AUDIENCE INPUT
None.
CONSENT AGENDA
Commissioner Rivera abstained from voting to approve the Consent Agenda.
Motion by Kenninger Second by Hebert
Motion to approve the consent agenda with the discussed sentence change to item
4.a.
Ayes: 5.
Nays: None. Motion carried.
a. Minutes of the December 18, 2023 Regular Meeting
Commissioner Whitman noted a sentence needed revision due to grammatical structural
error under item 6.d. in the December 18, 2023 regular meeting minutes. Community
Development Technician Grant verified that the sentence, "Grant clarified that the soil tests
water content, density, and compaction for future research, construction, and development"
will be revised to state "Grant clarified that the testing reports on soil water content, density
and compaction for future research, construction, and development."
b. Request by Maplewood Development for Approval of the Amber Fields 13th Addition
Final Plat.
OLD BUSINESS
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Page 2 of 109
a. Request by Maplewood Development for Rezoning, a Major Amendment to the
Amber Fields Planned Unit Development Agreement, Preliminary and Final Plat
approval for Amber Fields 14th Addition.
Planner Hogan presented the application from Maplewood Development for rezoning, a
major amendment to the Planned Unit Development (PUD) agreement, and a preliminary and
final plat approval for the Amber Fields 14th Addition.
Chair Kenninger and Commissioner Reed asked questions about the minimum rear yard
setback and conditions. Planner Hogan stated that six southwestern parking stalls are closer
to the rear property line than the minimum setback requirement at 8 feet versus the standard
10 feet, only applicable to the preliminary plat area of those six stalls. Commissioner Rivera
asked for clarification on the decrease in open space by 5%. Planner Hogan clarified that
rezoning from R-1 to R-3 allows for higher density and meets the requirement for the major
amendment and that there is nothing to be owed by the applicant for the decrease in open
space. Community Development Director Kienberger commented that the decrease from 5%
open space is a factor in the proposed major amendment to the PUD for approval. Kienberger
deferred to the subdivision agreement within the final plat for information on fees associated
with the development. Commissioner Reed asked for further details about the internal Road
A extension. Planner Hogan verified that the final plat would show the internal Road A
extension for future integration into other roads per the Dakota County Plat Commission's
recommendation.
The Public Hearing opened at 6:47 p.m.
Mario Cocchiarella, Maplewood Development - 1128 Harmon Pl Minneapolis, MN 55403
Commissioner Reed asked the applicant for updates on park availability for new, incoming
residents. Cocchiarella answered that the park contract has now been let, with all six parks
and the trail system to be completed no later than September 1st. Cocchiarella noted that any
adjustments made from the initial concept plan are intended to allow diversity of the housing
products being built.
The Public Hearing closed at 6:50 p.m.
Motion by Kenninger Second by Reed
Motion to close the Public Hearing.
Ayes: 6.
Nays: None. Motion carried.
Commissioner Comments
Chair Kenninger thanked the applicant for the development in the area and the applicant's
due diligence. Commissioner Rivera expressed approval of the parks and trail system being
completed prior ahead of time.
Motion by Reed Second by Whitman
1. Motion to recommend the City Council approve a Zoning Map amendment to rezone
the site from R1 PUD – Low Density Residential Planned Unit Development to R3 PUD –
Medium Density Residential Planned Unit Development.
Ayes: 6.
Page 3 of 109
Nays: None. Motion carried.
Motion by Reed Second by Whitman
2. Motion to recommend the City Council approve the Preliminary and Final Plats for
Amber Fields 14thAddition, subject to:
a. Execution of a Subdivision Agreement.
b. Conformance with all requirements of the City Engineer as detailed in the attached
memorandum dated January 15, 2024.
c. Road A within Outlot D shall be extended to the south property boundary for future
connection.
d. Conformance with all requirements stated within the Dakota County Plat
Commission Memorandum.
e. Payment of $57,420 as a landscape surety.
f. Compliance with the conditions and standards within the Parks and Recreation
Director’s memorandum dated January 17, 2024.
g. Payment of trunk area charges in the amount of:
I. Sanitary Sewer Trunk Charge: $1,075/acre
II. Watermain Trunk Charge: $6,500/acre
III. Storm Sewer Trunk Charge: $6,865/acre
Ayes: 6.
Nays: None. Motion carried.
Motion by Reed Second by Whitman
3. Motion to recommend the City Council approve a Major Amendment to the Amber
Fields Planned Unit Development Agreement, subject to:
a. Secion 11-4-8. F.6.c. R-3 Minimum rear yard setback: The minimum rear yard
setback requirement for surface parking shall be 8-feet.
Ayes: 6.
Nays: None. Motion carried.
b. Request by Independent School District 196 for approval of a rezoning of the site
from AG-Agricultural to R1-Low Density Residential, minor subdivision, conditional
use permit, and site plan review for an elementary school to be constructed on site.
Planner Hogan presented the application from Independent School District (ISD) 196 for
approval of rezoning, a minor subdivision, a conditional use permit, and site plan review for
construction of a new elementary school.
Chair Kenninger asked about traffic at the Ardroe Avenue and Bonaire intersection and if
there are any traffic signal plans. Planner Hogan answered that access would be south of
Bonaire Path, and any traffic signal plans are unknown since there is no traffic study. Senior
Planner Nemcek commented that having access through Bonaire gives the city authority to
make decisions on what is needed at that intersection. Chair Kenninger expressed concern for
households crossing Bonaire Path from the neighborhood north of the site. Nemcek noted
there is a trail system planned for the south side of Bonaire and along Akron Avenue.
Commissioner Reed noted that he would be interested to see the results of the pending
Page 4 of 109
traffic study, and he was happy to see the trail south of Bonaire. Reed asked for further
explanation on stormwater and drinking water management and protection. Planner Hogan
deferred to the applicant and noted that the engineering department reviews all the plans to
work with the applicant in the process. Commissioner Hebert asked about pedestrian traffic
along Akron Avenue with the railroad. Planner Hogan and Senior Planner Nemcek deferred to
the applicant.
The public hearing opened at 7:06 p.m.
Rachel Thelen & Jacob Maeser - 13521 Carrakay Way Rosemount, MN 55068
Chair Kenninger acknowledged that all commissioners received a letter from these property
owners and have had a chance to read it it.
Kathleen Engesser - 13675 Applewood Trl Rosemount, MN 55068
Engesser approved of the new elementary school, but also expressed concern for safety and
traffic at the Akron Avenue and Bonaire Path intersection. Engesser stated she would like the
project delayed until the traffic study is done.
Scott McQueen, Wold Architects and Engineers - 332 Minnesota St Saint Paul, MN 55101
Bill Diede, Bolton & Menk - 7575 Golden Valley Rd Minneapolis, MN 55427
Mark Stotts, ISD 196 - 3455 153rd St W Rosemount, MN 55068
Commissioner Reed asked for clarification on the stormwater and drinking water
engineering review, and if it needs to be completed before final approval. Scott McQueen
deferred to the project engineer, Bill Diede. Diede shared that the higher level of
engineering review is due to the site location's drinking water's moderate vulnerability, and
the drinking water supply management area will require a more extensive review. Planner
Hogan commented that the review will need to be completed prior to approval.
Commissioner Hebert inquired about pedestrian traffic within that area and the expected
student capacity. McQueen elaborated on the potential outcomes and needs as a result of
the pending traffic study for nearby neighborhoods. Mark Stotts shared further that the
traffic study will provide insight into which roads are hazardous for students, and
speculated that the majority of students living to the north, south, and west of the site will
be bused to the new school. Stotts stated the capacity of the school is 638 students, not
including early-childhood programs. Commissioner Whitman asked for clarification on the
motion to continue the public hearing until the traffic study is complete. Scott McQueen
shared that there wouldn't be opposition to continuing the public hearing further.
The public hearing closed at 7:18 p.m.
Motion by Kenninger Second by Reed
Motion to close the Public Hearing
Ayes: 6.
Nays: None. Motion carried.
Commissioner Comments
Chair Kenninger expressed the desire to continue this item for the next meeting.
Commissioner Reed asked what authority the city has to change the current two-way stop to
a four-way stop. Senior Planner Nemcek stated that the city meets with Dakota County on a
regular basis, and that there are plans for Akron and Bonaire to be improved down the line,
but that improvement has not been decided yet. Community Development Director
Page 5 of 109
Kienberger noted that the city would like to see improvements at Bonaire and Akron prior to
the school being in operation and not after, which will be in further discussion with Dakota
County.
Motion by Kenninger Second by Reed
1. Motion to continue the Public Hearing until the Planning Commission Meeting on
February 26, 2024, so that a traffic study can be provided to the city for review.
Ayes: 6.
Nays: None. Motion carried.
c. Request by Spectro Alloys for approval of a preliminary plat, a site plan review, and a
variance to construct a 70,000 square foot addition to the existing building at 13135
Doyle Path and combine the site into a single parcel.
Senior Planner Nemcek presented the application from Spectro Alloys for approval of a
preliminary plat, site plan review, a variance to construct a 70,000 square foot expansion, and
to combine the site into a single parcel.
Chair Kenninger asked about the setback requirements for the existing building. Senior
Planner Nemcek answered that the existing building does meet the setback requirement.
Nemcek noted that the site is located in the Mississippi River Critical Corridor Area, therefore
subject to provisions in the city code for certain setback requirements. Nemcek shared that
the setback is consistent with the warehouse project that was reviewed.
The public hearing opened at 7:39 p.m.
Luke Palen, Spectro Alloys - 13220 Doyle Path Rosemount, MN 55068
Dan Lavender, Stantec -
Commissioner Reed asked about the gap in landscaping. Palen deferred to Lavender from
Stantec. Lavender shared that the required number of trees would not fit, and that there is a
significant number of trees on the site as a whole. Lavender shared that the trees east of the
site were planted years ago, and asked that the existing, untouched forests be considered as
well. Commissioner Whitman asked for clarification on expansion of outdoor storage. Palen
verified that there is no expansion of outdoor storage within the project and that all outdoor
storage will be completely screened from the road.
The public hearing closed at 7:45 p.m.
Motion by Kenninger Second by Hebert
Motion to close the Public Hearing
Ayes: 6.
Nays: None. Motion carried.
Commissioner Comments
Chair Kenninger confirmed with Senior Planner Nemcek that condition 5 would be omitted
from the site plan and condition 4 of the third motion would be changed to include
landscaping to cover the screening wall and outdoor storage area. Nemcek stated that
developers can receive credit for existing trees on site, and recommended a tree survey to
Page 6 of 109
the applicant. Commissioner Reed thanked Spectro Alloys for being a great partner for the
city and for their cooperation. Chair Kenninger shared her opinion that since the site is in an
industrial area, the 20 feet setback is a non-issue.
Motion by Kenninger Second by Whitman
1. Motion by the Board of Appeals and Adjustments to approve a variance from the GI-
General Industrial standards reducing the minimum setback from Courthouse Boulevard
from 75 ft to 55 ft, subject to the platting of the overall Spectro Alloys site into a single
parcel.
Ayes: 6.
Nays: None. Motion carried.
Motion by Kenninger Second by Whitman
2. Motion to recommend the City Council approve the Spectro Alloys Third Addition
preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions:
1. Vacation of the Doyle Path right of way prior to final plat approval.
2. Dedication of any easements required by the City Engineer.
3. The applicant shall update the City regarding any changes in status related to a
planned stormwater outlet beneath the railroad.
Ayes: 6.
Nays: None. Motion carried.
Motion by Kenninger Second by Whitman
3. Motion to approve the site plan for the Applicant’s proposed aluminum billet
production facility, subject to the following conditions with edits:
1. Approval of a variance to reduce the setback along Courthouse Boulevard from 75’
to 55’.
2. Approval of a final plat for Spectro Alloys Third Addition to combine the site into a
single parcel.
3. Vacation of existing easements within the development area.
4. The applicant shall update the landscape plan to cover the screening wall and
outdoor storage area.
5. Existing easements internal to the subject property where the proposed building
will be located shall be vacated prior to issuance of a building permit.
6. Conformance with all the requirements of the City’s engineer contained in the
memorandum dated January 15, 2024.
Ayes: 6.
Nays: None. Motion carried.
d. Request by Maplewood Development for Amber Fields 15th Addition preliminary and
final plat approval to create 167 single-family lots.
Senior Planner Nemcek presented the application from Maplewood Development for
approval of preliminary and final plats to create 167 single-family homes.
Commissioner Reed asked if there is a risk for ground contamination within the area. Senior
Planner Nemcek referred to the Remedial Investigation that found no contamination in the
Page 7 of 109
development area.
The public hearing opened at 7:58 p.m.
The public hearing closed at 7:58 p.m.
Motion by Kenninger Second by Reed
Motion to close the Public Hearing
Ayes: 6.
Nays: None. Motion carried.
Motion by Rivera Second by Reed
Motion to recommend the City Council approve the Amber Fields 15thAddition
Preliminary Plat and Final Plats, subject to the following conditions:
A. Execution of a Subdivision Agreement.
B. The plat shall be updated to provide a connection to a future 155th Street south of
the plat area.
C. The applicant shall work with public works to address snow storage in the northeast
corner of the plat area.
D. Submittal of a landscaping surety in the amount of $69,300
E. Conformance with all requirements of the City Engineer as detailed in the attached
memorandum dated January 15, 2024.
F. Conformance with all requirements stated within the Dakota County Plat
Commission Memorandum.
G. Compliance with the conditions and standards within the Parks and Recreation
Director’s memorandum dated January 17, 2024.
H. Payment of trunk area charges in the amount of:
1. Sanitary Sewer Trunk Charge: $1,075/acre
2. Watermain Trunk Charge: $6,500/acre
3. Storm Sewer Trunk Charge: $6,865/acre
Ayes: 6.
Nays: None. Motion carried.
e. Renewal of the Danner, Inc. Small Scale Mineral Extraction Permit for 2024.
Senior Planner Nemcek presented the application from Danner, Inc. for a small-scale
mineral extraction permit renewal for 2024.
The public hearing opened at 8:02 p.m.
The public hearing closed at 8:02 p.m.
Motion by Kenninger Second by Thiagarajan Motion to close the Public Hearing Ayes: 6.
Nays: None. Motion carried.
Motion by Reed Second by Hebert
Page 8 of 109
Motion to recommend the City Council renew the Danner, Inc. Small Scale Mineral
Extraction Permit for 2024, subject to the terms and conditions in the attached Draft
2024 Conditions for Mineral Extraction AND subject to the applicant verifying the lowest
elevation within the excavation area. Ayes: 6.
Nays: None. Motion .
NEW BUSINESS
None.
DISCUSSION
Senior Planner Nemcek reminded the Commissioners of the joint work session on February 6th
at 5:00 p.m. Commissioner Reed asked if landscape planning would be part of the discussion at
the joint work session. Community Development Director Kienberger answered that landscape
planning could be a discussion item for the upcoming meeting. Chair Kenninger asked about
receiving documentation for the zoning code update. Kienberger elaborated on the process for
review by the Commissioners and City Council. Commissioner Whitman noted his absence for
the upcoming February 6th joint work session.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Planning Commission, the meeting was
adjourned at 8:11 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Alysha Grant
Community Development Technician
Page 9 of 109
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Planning Commission Regular Meeting: February 26, 2024
Tenative City Council Meeting: March 19, 2024
AGENDA ITEM: Request by Maplewood Development for Approval
of the Amber Fields 16th Addition Final Plat.
AGENDA SECTION:
CONSENT AGENDA
PREPARED BY: Anthony Nemcek , Senior Planner AGENDA NO. 4.b.
ATTACHMENTS: Amber Fields Master Plan, Final Plat, Preliminary
Plat, Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Utility Plan, City
Engineer's Memo Dated February 19, 2024
APPROVED BY: AK
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to recommend the City Council approve the Amber Fields 16th
Addition Final Plat, subject to the following conditions:
a. Execution of a subdivision agreement.
b. Vacation of 10' of right-of-way that was provided as a hammerhead at Ashtown Lane and
Amber Fields Boulevard.
c. Drainage and utility easements with storm sewer infrastructure may contain fences but shall be
required to include gates to provide truck access; shall prohibit sheds or other accessory
structures; and shall prohibit landscaping that would impede drainage.
d. Conformance with all requirements of the City Engineer in their memo dated February 19, 2024
e. Provision of $29,040 as a landscaping surety.
BACKGROUND
Applicant: Maplewood Development
Comp Guide Plan Designation MUR-Mixed Use Residential
Current Zoning R1 PUD-Low Density Residential Planned Unit
Development.
Gross Area 18.82 Acres
Net Area 18.82 Acres
Lots Created 75 Single Family Lots
Gross Density: 3.98 Units Per Acre
Net (Met Council) Density: 3.98 Units Per Acre
The Planning Commission is being asked to consider a request by Maplewood Development for
approval of the Amber Fields 16th Addition final plat. Plat approval is required to subdivide a portion
of an existing outlot within the Amber Fields 12th Addition plat into 75 single-family parcels and
parcels containing the public streets within the plat area. Staff finds the application consistent with
the preliminary plat for this area of Amber Fields and recommends approval, subject to the conditions
listed above.
Page 10 of 109
The Planning Commission reviewed the Amber Fields 2nd Addition preliminary and final plats in April of
2022, and Council approved them at its meeting in May of that year. A portion of Amber Fields 2nd
Addition was subsequently subdivided as Amber Fields 12th Addition, an outlot of which contains the
area of the proposed Amber Fields 16th Addition. The preliminary plat contained townhomes in the
northwestern portion of the preliminary plat area, and single-family homes in the northeast and
southern portions. The proposed final plat is in the southern portion of the preliminary plat area, and
will contain single-family detached lots. Stormwater is managed regionally with ponding and
infiltration areas located centrally to the overall development. Therefore, no outlots are required for
onsite ponding. In addition to the buildable lots, the proposed final plat includes right of way for all
the streets located within the plat area.
ISSUE ANALYSIS
Legal Authority.
The final plat application is Quasi-Judicial because the City has a set of standards and requirements for
reviewing this type of application that is described in detail below. Generally, if the final plat meets the
ordinance requirements, it must be approved.
Land Use and Zoning
The site is designated for MUR-Mixed Use Residential land uses, which can include a range of housing
types from single-family homes on traditional sixty-five foot lots to townhomes. The preliminary plat
proposed 190 single family homes and 111 townhomes with a net density of approximately 5 units per
acre. The subject property is located in an area that has been zoned R1 PUD, which allows for single-
family parcels with some deviations granted by the PUD from the standards of the base R1 zoning
district.
The following table describes the approved standards for the overall Amber Fields PUD as well as those
provided within the preliminary plat area containing the single family homes, to which the proposed
Amber Fields 12th addition conforms.
Category Required (Amber Fields PUD) Amber Fields 2nd Addition
Preliminary Plat
Min. Lot Area (sf) 5,400 (interior)
7,200 (corner)
5,400 (interior)
8,450 (corner)
Min. Lot Width 45 ft. (interior)
55 ft. (corner)
45 ft (interior)
60 ft (corner)
Min. Front Yard Setback 25 ft 25 ft.
Min. Side Yard Setback 5 ft. dwelling/5 ft. garage/10 ft.
corner (45-ft. wide lots)
10 ft. dwelling/5 ft. garage/20 ft.
corner (55- and 65-ft. wide lots)
5 ft. dwelling/5 ft. garage/10 ft.
corner (45-ft. wide lots)
10 ft. dwelling/5 ft. garage/20 ft.
corner (55- and 65-ft. wide lots)
Min. Rear Yard Setback 20 ft. 25 ft.
The Amber Fields PUD also includes a deviation from the maximum lot coverage as follows: The
Page 11 of 109
maximum lot coverage shall be fifty-five percent (55%) for lots less than 8,000 square feet, fifty percent
(50%) for lots between 8,000 and 9,000 square feet, forty-five percent (45%) for lots between, 9000
and 10,000 square feet, and forty percent (40%) for lots over 10,000 square feet. This standard will be
reviewed as part of the building permitting process to ensure compliance.
Final Plat.
Standards for reviewing subdivision requests are detailed in Title 12 of the Rosemount City Code. This
section of the Code outlines the two-step Preliminary and Final Plat process for land subdivision. In this
case, the preliminary plat was approved by Council on May 17, 2022, consisting of 190 single-family
lots and 111 townhome lots. The current application proposes to plat an additional 75 of the remaining
unplatted 108 single-family lots for Amber Fields 16th Addition and to dedicate the rights of way for the
internal roadways. The final plat is consistent with the approved preliminary plat.
Parks and Open Space.
The park dedication requirements for Amber Fields are met through the multiple parks and trails
within the overall development area. The central open area within Amber Fields will be surrounded
by a trail system that is punctuated with neighborhood parks. A trail will run along the rear of the lots
within Block 4. A roadway connection to the east allows for pedestrian access to the trail system in this
neighborhood. Sidewalks will be built on at least one side of each street, consistent with the City’s
standards for placement and connecting with the sidewalks constructed in earlier phases within this
area of Amber Fields.
Landscaping.
The landscape plan submitted by the applicant shows a total of 372 trees to be planted throughout the
2nd Addition Preliminary Plat area. The bulk of those trees are within the townhome development
portion of the site. For single family homes, the City Code requires one tree per interior lot and two on
every corner lot. The landscape plan that was submitted conforms with those requirements. A total of
88 trees will be planted with this development. Therefore, its share of the total landscaping surety
would be $29,040 (88 trees x $300 plus 10%). Submittal of the surety is a requirement for the release
of mylars for recording. Staff will confirm that this amount was not included in the surety for the
previous phase of development in this area.
Engineering Review
The City’s engineer has provided a memorandum containing comments related to the plans provided.
The memorandum included comments related to design of site utilities, erosion and sediment control,
and landscaping. There were no additional comments related to water resources and storm water
management as the plans were consistent with previous reviews. A copy of the memorandum is
included in the attachments.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff is recommending approval of the final plat, subject to conditions, based on the information
provided by the applicant and reviewed within this report.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the final plat, subject to the conditions listed in the recommended
Page 12 of 109
action section at the top of the report. This recommendation is based on the information provided by
the applicant and reviewed in this report.
Page 13 of 109
Page 14 of 109
AMBER FIELDS SIXTEENTH ADDITION
CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA
This plat was approved by the City Council of ROSEMOUNT, Minnesota, this _________ day of _____________________, 20 ____
and hereby certifies compliance with all requirements as set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2.
By:___________________________________________________________________
Mayor Clerk
COUNTY SURVEYOR, COUNTY OF DAKOTA, STATE OF MINNESOTA
I hereby certify that in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 11, this plat has been reviewed and approved this
_________ day of _____________________, 20 ____.
_________________________________
Todd B. Tollefson
Dakota County Surveyor
DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION AND RECORDS, COUNTY OF DAKOTA, STATE OF MINNESOTA
Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 9, taxes payable in the year 20___ on the land hereinbefore described have been
paid. Also, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 272.12, there are no delinquent taxes and transfer entered this _________ day of
_____________________, 20 ____.
_________________________________________, Director
Amy A. Koethe, Department of Property Taxation and Records
COUNTY RECORDER, COUNTY OF DAKOTA, STATE OF MINNESOTA
I hereby certify that this plat of AMBER FIELDS SIXTEENTH ADDITION was filed in the office of the County Recorder for public record on
this _________ day of _____________________, 20 ____, at ___ o'clock ___.M. and was duly filed in Book_________________ of Plats,
Page______________________ , as Document Number _______________________ .
_______________________________________
Amy A. Koethe, County Recorder
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Earl Street Partners II, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability
company, owner of the following described property:
Outlot A, AMBER FIELDS TWELFTH ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Dakota
County, Minnesota.
And
That part of vacated Ashtown Lane as dedicated on the plat of AMBER FIELDS TWELFTH
ADDITION, described as follows:
Commencing at the most southerly corner of Lot 8, Block 3, said plat of AMBER FIELDS TWELFTH
ADDITION; thence North 38 degrees 17 minutes 49 seconds West, assumed bearing, along the
southwesterly line of said Lot 8, a distance of 97.57 feet to the southeasterly line of said Ashtown
Lane; thence South 51 degrees 42 minutes 11 seconds West, along said southeasterly line of
Ashtown Lane, 60.00 feet to the point of beginning; thence North 38 degrees 17 minutes 49
seconds West 112.89 feet; thence northwesterly 12.48 feet along a tangential curve concave to the
southwest having a radius of 220.00 feet and a central angle of 3 degrees 15 minutes 00 seconds
to the northwesterly line of said Ashtown Lane and said line there terminating.
Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as AMBER FIELDS SIXTEENTH ADDITION and does hereby
dedicate to the public for public use the public ways and the drainage and utility easements as created by this
plat.
In witness whereof said Earl Street Partners II, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, has caused these
presents to be signed by its proper officer this _________ day of _____________________, 20 ____.
Signed: Earl Street Partners II, LLC.
by ___________________________________________
Mario J. Cocchiarella, Chief Manager
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF ____________________
This instrument was acknowledged before me on _________ day of _____________________, 20 ____, by Mario J.
Cocchiarella, Chief Manager of Earl Street Partners II, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of
the company.
________________________________________
Signature
________________________________________
Printed Name
Notary Public, ___________County, Minnesota
My Commission Expires _________________
SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE
I Daniel Ekrem do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a
duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary
survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted
on this plat have been, or will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet lands, as
defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled
on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat.
Dated this ___________ day of _____________________ , 20 ____.
_________________________________________
Daniel Ekrem, Licensed Land Surveyor
Minnesota License No. 57366
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF _____________________
This instrument was acknowledged before me on ___________ day of _____________________ , 20 ____, by
Daniel Ekrem.
________________________________________
Signature
________________________________________
Printed Name
Notary Public, ___________County, Minnesota
My Commission Expires__________________
OFFICIAL PLAT
Page 15 of 109
SEE SHEET 4 OF
4 SHEETS
S0
9
°
1
4
'
0
3
"
W
10
7
.
1
9
S34°25'28"W 78.58
S44
°
5
4
'
4
2
"
W
6
6
2
.
7
2
S
3
8
°
1
7
'
5
4
"
E
6
0
2
.
1
2
S75°0
7
'
5
7
"
E
5
8
0
.
2
9
S3
1
°
5
9
'
0
1
"
W
13
4
.
5
5
S75°0
7
'
5
2
"
E
125.9
9
N1
2
°
0
9
'
5
9
"
E
13
4
.
9
0
N
3
7
°
5
8
'
2
5
"
W
8
4
.
3
7
INSET B
SEE SHEET 3 OF
4 SHEETS
INSET A
S
0
7
°
1
1
'
2
6
"
E
9
0
.
7
7
S82°48'29"W
98.78
R=120.00
L=46.20
Δ=22°03'39"
S75°0
7
'
5
2
"
E
127.7
4
N75°0
7
'
5
2
"
W
4
7
.
1
5
N
0
7
°
1
1
'
3
1
"
W
1
8
0
.
0
0
N2
9
°
1
9
'
2
8
"
E
12
6
.
0
2
N82°55'37"E
135.00
N66°14'12"E 37.16 N45
°
1
3
'
4
3
"
E
93.
1
1
S
5
0
°
5
3
'
1
5
"
E
5
1
.
6
8
S
3
4
°
0
6
'
3
0
"
E
9
9
.
9
6
S
1
2
°
2
6
'
1
3
"
E
1
0
7
.
1
9
S63°26'59"E 35.48
S30°54'20"W 47.92N1
4
°
5
2
'
0
8
"
E
60
.
0
0
N39
°
0
6
'
4
5
"
E
1
9
0
.
0
0
R=170.00
L=38.08
=12°50'01"
C.Brg=N57°18'15"W C.=38.00N3
0
°
5
4
'
2
0
"
E
1
9
5
.
8
4
N45
°
1
3
'
4
3
"
E
2
7
9
.
1
6
N35
°
3
7
'
0
5
"
E
79.
2
4
N51
°
4
2
'
1
1
"
E
86.9
5
N41
°
1
6
'
3
5
"
E
52.
1
7
N3
0
°
5
4
'
2
0
"
E
59
.
2
0
N45
°
1
3
'
4
3
"
E
2
9
3
.
0
7
R
=
7
3
0
.
0
0
L
=
6
3
3
.
3
1
Δ
=
4
9
°4
2'2
3
"
C
.B
rg
=
S
49°14'59"E
C.=613.63
R=280.00
L=86.58
=17°43'02"
C.Brg=N50°17'01"W C.=86.24
N49°01'18"E 60.00
R=220.00
L=12.48
=3°15'00"
C.Brg=N39°55'19"W C.=12.48 N
3
8
°
1
7
'
4
9
"
W
1
1
2
.
8
9
N51
°
4
2
'
1
1
"
E
60.0
0
S
3
8
°
1
7
'
4
9
"
E
9
7
.
5
7
N48
°
3
4
'
3
0
"
E
1
2
9
.
8
7
R
=
2
2
0
.
0
0
L =
0
.
4
7
Δ
=
0
°
0
7
'
1
9
"
R
=
2
2
0
.
0
0
L
=
1
2
.
0
1
Δ=
3
°
0
7
'
4
1
"
R
=
2
2
0
.
0
0
L
=
1
2
.
4
8
Δ
=
3
°
1
5
'
0
0
"
ASH
T
O
W
N
LAN
E
4
10
9
AMBER FIELDS SIXTEENTH ADDITION
OFFICIAL PLAT
DETAIL A
(NOT TO SCALE)
Page 16 of 109
ASH
T
O
W
N
L
A
N
E
1
4
2
3
4
90.27
L=
3
3
.
9
2
=1
6
°
1
1
'
5
2
"
N1
4
°
5
2
'
0
8
"
E
1
2
9
.
3
8
N1
4
°
5
2
'
0
8
"
E
1
3
0
.
0
1
N1
4
°
5
2
'
0
8
"
E
1
3
0
.
0
1
L=
1
2
.
2
8
=5
°
5
1
'
4
7
"
32.74
45.00
50.00
45.00
50.00
13
0
.
0
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
N1
2
°
0
9
'
5
9
"
E
1
3
1
.
2
1
N1
2
°
0
9
'
5
9
"
E
1
3
3
.
3
3
N1
2
°
0
9
'
5
9
"
E
1
3
5
.
4
6
N1
2
°
0
9
'
5
9
"
E
1
3
7
.
5
8
N1
2
°
0
9
'
5
9
"
E
1
3
9
.
7
0
N1
2
°
0
9
'
5
9
"
E
1
4
1
.
8
2
13
0
.
0
1
N1
2
°
0
9
'
5
9
"
E
1
4
3
.
9
5
N1
2
°
0
9
'
5
9
"
E
1
4
4
.
7
5
71.18
45.05
45.05
45.05
45.05
45.05
45.05
45.05
29.48
30.09
L=
2
5
.
0
0
=2
°
4
2
'
0
9
"
9.92
45.00
45.00
45.00
45.00
45.00
45.00
20.95
S1
2
°
0
9
'
5
9
"
W
1
3
9
.
7
4
S1
2
°
0
9
'
5
9
"
W
1
4
2
.
8
9
S1
2
°
0
9
'
5
9
"
W
1
4
5
.
6
1
S1
2
°
0
9
'
5
9
"
W
1
4
8
.
3
4
42.93
24.95
45.00
45.00
45.00
65.00
S
4
4
°
4
6
'
1
7
"
E
1
2
0
.
0
0
S
4
4
°
4
6
'
1
7
"
E
1
4
1
.
2
9
S
4
4
°
4
6
'
1
7
"
E
1
7
6
.
0
7
S
4
4
°
4
6
'
1
7
"
E
1
6
1
.
2
8
S5
7
°
3
5
'
1
8
"
E
1
4
0
.
4
2
S87°17'18"E 127.80
N63°0
0
'
4
2
"
E
1
3
6
.
6
2
N3
3
°
1
8
'
4
2
"
E
1
5
8
.
3
6
13.0356.87
56.87
8.23
74
.
6
2
51
.
4
0
5
4
.
1
6
9
8
.
8
9
2
6
.
9
5
59.8
7
45.
0
0
45.
0
0
18.8
2
L=58.33Δ=55°41'33"L =4 9 .3 5
Δ =4 7 °0 7 '2 8 "
L=31
.
1
0
=29°
4
2
'
0
0
"
L=31.10
=29°42'00"
L=3
1
.
1
0
=29
°
4
2
'
0
0
"
AMBER
F
I
E
L
D
S
B
L
V
D
L=
3
1
.
1
0
=2
9
°
4
2
'
0
0
"
L
=
3
1
.
1
0
=
2
9
°
4
2
'
0
0
"
L
=
1
9
.
5
6
=
1
8
°
4
0
'
5
9
"
16.
2
6
45
.
0
0
45.0
0
45.0
0
68.7
8
N0
3
°
3
6
'
4
2
"
E
1
3
9
.
3
1
N
2
6
°
0
5
'
1
8
"
W
1
4
0
.
5
7
S
4
4
°
4
6
'
1
7
"
E
1
3
0
.
0
0
S
4
4
°
4
6
'
1
7
"
E
1
3
0
.
0
0
S
4
4
°
4
6
'
1
7
"
E
1
3
0
.
0
0
S
4
4
°
4
6
'
1
7
"
E
1
3
0
.
0
0
L
=
1
3
0
.
18
Δ
=
1
0
°1
3'0
4
"
N45
°
1
3
'
4
3
"
E
3
2
4
.
7
2
S82°48'29"W 98
.
7
8
S
0
7
°
1
1
'
2
6
"
E
9
0
.
7
7
S75°0
7
'
5
2
"
E
1
2
5
.
9
9
S75°0
7
'
5
7
"
E
5
8
0
.
2
9
N1
2
°
0
9
'
5
9
"
E
1
3
4
.
9
0
N
3
7
°
5
8
'
2
5
"
W
8
4
.
3
7
N
0
7
°
1
1
'
3
1
"
W
1
8
0
.
0
0
N2
9
°
1
9
'
2
8
"
E
1
2
6
.
0
2
N82°55'37"E 135
.
0
0
N66°1
4
'
1
2
"
E
37.16
N45
°
1
3
'
4
3
"
E
9
3
.
1
1
67.1
4
45.0
0
45.0
0
45.0
0
45.0
0
20.8
7
67.1
4
45.0
0
45.0
0
45.0
0
80.
5
1
42.
0
7
56.7
1
S81°17'49"
E
180.3
2
45.08
45.08
45.08
45.08
108.61
71.71
L
=
1
2
4
.
6
7
Δ
=
9
°
4
7
'
0
6
"
L
=
12
5.6
2
Δ
=
9°5
1'3
4"
S1
2
°
0
9
'
5
9
"
W
1
4
8
.
9
1
N
5
1
°
0
7
'
0
6
"
W
1
3
1
.
9
1
S
4
4
°
4
6
'
1
7
"
E
1
3
0
.
0
0
S
4
4
°
4
6
'
1
7
"
E
1
3
0
.
0
0
S
4
4
°
4
6
'
1
7
"
E
1
3
0
.
0
0
S
4
4
°
4
6
'
1
7
"
E
1
3
0
.
0
0
S
4
4
°
4
6
'
1
7
"
E
1
3
0
.
0
0
25
.
6
0
L=83.93
Δ=26°42'56"
L
=
1
9
.
9
4
=
6
°
2
0
'
4
9
"
3
7
.
6
3
9
4
.
2
8
22.2
3
45.0
0
45.0
0
45.0
0
45.0
0
49.1
7
L
=
3
4
.
7
7
=
1
6
°
3
6
'
0
7
"
35.72
9.28
4.1
6
L =5 2.16
Δ =16°3 6'07"
45.0
0
45.
0
0
45.
0
0
45.0
0
45.0
0
26.4
0
L=132.18
Δ=10°22'28"
L=69.25
Δ=33°03'4 4"
25
.
6
0
15.92
L=91.34Δ=18°41'30"
N
4
4
°
4
6
'
1
7
"
W
1
3
0
.
0
0
N
4
4
°
4
6
'
1
7
"
W
1
3
0
.
0
0
N
4
4
°
4
6
'
1
7
"
W
1
3
0
.
0
0
N
4
4
°
4
6
'
1
7
"
W
1
3
0
.
0
0
N
4
4
°
4
6
'
1
7
"
W
1
3
0
.
0
0
N
4
4
°
4
6
'
1
7
"
W
1
3
0
.
0
0
N3
0
°
5
4
'
2
0
"
E
59
.
2
0
N41
°
1
6
'
3
5
"
E
52.
1
7
N45
°
1
3
'
4
3
"
E
2
9
3
.
0
7
68.0
7
45.0
0
45.0
0
45.
0
0
45.0
0
45.0
0
S45
°
1
3
'
4
3
"
W
2
2
3
.
7
3
RO
A
D
N
ASK
E
A
T
O
N
P
L
A
C
E
ATH
E
N
R
Y
B
A
Y
R
=
6
0
.
0
0
L
=
2
8
2
.7
4
Δ=270°0 0 '0 0 "
C
.B
r
g
=
S
0
°
1
3
'
4
3
"W
C.=8 4 .8 5
R =1 5 0.00
L =4 3.46
Δ =1 6 °3 6'07"
N45
°
1
3
'
4
3
"
E
2
5
1
.
4
0
R=150.00
L=86.56
Δ=33°03'44"
N1
2
°
0
9
'
5
9
"
E
55
.
6
0
S1
4
°
5
2
'
0
8
"
W
1
6
0
.
0
0
R=250.00
L=158.63
Δ
=
3
6°
2
1'1
8
"
C.Brg
=N59°39'22"W
C
.=
1
5
5
.9
8
N77°50'
0
1
"
W
3
0
0
.
8
7
N75°0
7
'
5
2
"
W
9
0
.
0
9
R=500.00
L=23.58Δ=2°42'09"
R
=
2
8
0.0
0
L
=
8
6.5
8
Δ
=
1
7°
4
3'0
2
"
L=
2
0
.
0
5
=2
°
2
6
'
4
1
"
254.95
45.92
R =12 0.00
L =4 6.20
Δ =2 2 °0 3'39"
S75°0
7
'
5
2
"
E
1
2
7
.
7
4
L
=
115.7
0
Δ
=30°0
7'5
5"
L=
2
4
.
1
0
=6
°
1
6
'
3
6
"
30.00
30.00
R
=
7
3
0
.
0
0
L
=
6
3
3
.3
1
Δ
=
4
9
°
4
2'2
3
"
C
.
B
rg
=
S
4
9°1
4'5
9"E
C.=
613.63
1 7
6
31
2
5
4
3
2
1
8
9 10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
N75°0
7
'
5
2
"
W
47.15
N1
4
°
5
2
'
0
8
"
E
60
.
0
0
30.00
30
.
0
0
30
.
0
0
60.09
4.1
6
N45
°
1
3
'
4
3
"
E
60.
0
0
S
4
4
°
4
6
'
1
7
"
E
6
0
.
0
0
3
0
.
0
0
3
0
.
0
0
L=3
0
.
4
1
=2°2
3
'
1
3
"
L=3
0
.
2
3
=2°2
2
'
2
1
"
30.0
0
30.0
0
N48
°
3
4
'
3
0
"
E
1
2
9
.
8
7
L
=30.01
Δ
=
2°21'19"L=30.01
Δ=2°21'19"
S49
°
0
1
'
1
8
"
W
6
0
.
0
0
30.0
0
30.0
0
N2
8
°
3
7
'
3
6
"
E
3.5
5
S1
2
°
0
9
'
5
9
"
W
1
3
9
.
7
4
L=2.12Δ=0°15'29"
27
1
4
9
10
L=0
.
4
7
=0°0
7
'
1
9
"
L
=
115.7
0
Δ
=
3
0°0
7'5
5
"
R
=
2
2
0.0
0
L
=
11
5.2
3
Δ
=
3
0
°
0
0'3
6
"
AMBER FIELDS SIXTEENTH ADDITION
OFFICIAL PLAT
INSET A
SEE SHEET 2 OF 4 SHEETS
DETAIL B
(NOT TO SCALE)
DETAIL C
(NOT TO SCALE)
Page 17 of 109
30.
0
0
30.
0
0
ASH
T
O
W
N
L
A
N
E
48
9
N51
°
4
2
'
1
1
"
E
1
2
9
.
9
9
N51
°
4
2
'
1
1
"
E
1
0
9
.
9
9
N3
2
°
0
1
'
4
1
"
E
1
4
6
.
1
1
N0
8
°
1
8
'
2
2
"
E
1
3
0
.
0
0
N
1
5
°
2
4
'
5
6
"
W
1
3
0
.
0
0
N
3
9
°
0
8
'
1
4
"
W
1
3
2
.
8
2
N
4
4
°
4
6
'
1
7
"
W
1
3
1
.
1
3
N
4
4
°
4
6
'
1
7
"
W
1
3
0
.
7
7
N
4
4
°
4
6
'
1
7
"
W
1
3
0
.
4
1
N
4
4
°
4
6
'
1
7
"
W
1
3
0
.
0
5
L
=
1
9
.
9
4
=
6
°
2
0
'
4
9
"
ASK
E
A
T
O
N
P
L
A
C
E
N51
°
4
2
'
1
1
"
E
8
6
.
9
5
N45
°
1
3
'
4
3
"
E
2
7
9
.
1
6
N35
°
3
7
'
0
5
"
E
7
9
.
2
4
N3
0
°
5
4
'
2
0
"
E
1
9
5
.
8
4
S
4
4
°
4
6
'
1
7
"
E
1
3
0
.
0
0
S
4
4
°
4
6
'
1
7
"
E
1
3
0
.
0
0
S
4
4
°
4
6
'
1
7
"
E
1
3
0
.
0
0
S
4
4
°
4
6
'
1
7
"
E
1
3
0
.
0
0
S
4
7
°
2
0
'
2
1
"
E
1
2
9
.
4
1
N
5
3
°
1
7
'
5
0
"
W
1
3
0
.
2
3
S5
9
°
0
5
'
4
0
"
E
1
3
0
.
0
0
S5
9
°
0
5
'
4
0
"
E
1
3
0
.
0
0
6
2
.
3
1
L=117.8 7
Δ=96°2 8 '2 8 "
23.8
7
65.0
0
65.
0
0
65.0
0
36.9
7
L
=
3
2
.
0
4
=
2
°
3
4
'
0
4
"
L =7 4.3 5
Δ =5 °5 7'2 9"
L =7 2.3 4
Δ =5°47'50"
10
9
.
0
2
65
.
0
0
21
.
8
2
39.
1
7
40.
0
7
20.9
6
63.2
0
65.
0
0
65.
0
0
65.0
0
S
3
8
°
1
7
'
5
4
"
E
6
0
2
.
1
2
N51
°
4
2
'
0
6
"
E
7
1
.
0
7
S81°41'38"E
5
4
.
6
1
N74°35'0
4
"
E
1
2
6
.
3
1
N44
°
5
4
'
4
2
"
E
4
0
5
.
6
3
6
5
.
0
0
6
5
.
0
0
6
5
.
0
0
1
0
5
.
7
4
8
5
.
6
7
6
9
.
9
2
54.61
71.70
39.
1
6
76
.
0
1
65.0
0
65.0
0
65
.
0
0
95
.
4
6
L
=
6
7
.
6 0
Δ
=
1
4
°
2
0
'4
6
"
6
6
.
3
4
L =7 4.4 1
Δ =5 °3 0'0 4 "
65.
0
0
65.
0
0
65.0
0
50.
2
1
10.6
3
L
=
1
2
.
7
8
=
5
°
3
8
'
0
3
"
L =5 3 .8 2
Δ =2 3 °4 3 '1 8 "
L =5 3 .8 2
Δ=2 3 °4 3 '18 "
L=53.82Δ=23°43'18"
L
=
4
4.6
4
Δ
=
19
°
4
0'3
1"
1
2
.
7
8
6
5
.
0
0
6
5
.
0
0
4
15
10
11
12
13
14
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
6
1
5
6
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
5
4
3
2
1
65
.
0
0
15
.
1
3
L=111.
2
4
Δ=7
0
°
4
8
'
5
8
"
L
=
3
2
.
5
7
Δ
=
1
0
°
5 8
'3
7
"
R
=170.0
0
L=
38.08
Δ=12°50'0
1"
C.Brg
=
N57°18'15"
W
C.=38.0
0
N39
°
0
6
'
4
5
"
E
1
9
0
.
0
0
130
.
0
0
S
5
0
°
5
3
'
1
5
"
E
5
1
.
6
8
S
3
4
°
0
6
'
3
0
"
E
9
9
.
9
6
S
1
2
°
2
6
'
1
3
"
E
1
0
7
.
1
9
S0
9
°
1
4
'
0
3
"
W
1
0
7
.
1
9
4
6
.
3
7
5
3
.
5
9
5
3
.
6
0
5
3
.
5
9
53
.
5
9
53
.
6
0
S55°
5
3
'
3
0
"
W
1
3
0
.
0
0
S77°33'47
"
W
1
3
0
.
0
0
N80°45'57"
W
1
3
0
.
0
0
N5
9
°
0
5
'
4
0
"
W
1
3
0
.
0
0
N5
9
°
0
5
'
4
0
"
W
1
3
0
.
0
0
S63°26'59"E
35.48
5.6
8
65
.
0
0
97
.
6
0
S34
°
2
5
'
2
8
"
W
7
8
.
5
8
S3
1
°
5
9
'
0
1
"
W
1
3
4
.
5
5
L
=
4
4
.0
6
Δ
=
1
0
°
5
8
'3
7
"
L=56.74
Δ=21°40'16"
L=5
6
.
7
4
Δ=21°
4
0
'
16
"
L
=
5
6
.
7
4
Δ
=
2
1
°
4
0
'
1
6
"
L=1
5
.
1
9
=5°4
8
'
0
9
"
65
.
0
0
16
.
9
2
L =59.31
Δ =4°23'06"
L
=
6
8
.
4
0
Δ
=
1
1°
5
2'3
0 "
6
5
.
9
0
S3
0
°
5
4
'
2
0
"
W
8
1
.
9
2
R=120.00
L=14
8
.
3
2
Δ
=
7
0
°
4
8
'
5
8
"
R =7 4 5.0 0
L =18 6.2 4
Δ =1 4°19'2 3"
L =86.08
Δ =6°37'12"
L =1 0 0.1 6
Δ =7 °4 2'1 1"
S45
°
1
3
'
4
3
"
W
2
5
5
.
8
4
R=100.0 0
L=168.3 8
Δ=96°2 8 '2 8 "
L=
2
4
.
1
0
=6
°
1
6
'
3
6
"
N48
°
3
4
'
3
0
"
E
1
2
9
.
8
7
31
16
17
18
19
20 2
3
4
5
6
7
N51
°
4
2
'
1
1
"
E
1
3
0
.
0
0
N51
°
4
2
'
1
1
"
E
1
3
0
.
0
0
R=200.00
L=38.32
Δ=10°58'37"
C.Brg=N45°23'57"W
C.=38.26
S
3
8
°
1
7
'
4
9
"
E
9
7
.
5
7
N51
°
4
2
'
1
1
"
E
6
0
.
0
0
30.0
0
30.0
0
N
3
8
°
1
7
'
4
9
"
W
1
5
9
.
8
8
6
5
.
0
0
4
7
.
8
9
1
7
.
1
0
S
5
2
°
5
4
'
3
7
"
E
9
5
.
5
4
R
=
3
0
0.0
0
L
=
7
6
.5
1
Δ
=
1
4
°3
6'
4
3
"
S
3
8
°
1
7
'
5
4
"
E
2
5
.
3
9
30
.
2
1
31
.
5
2
30
.
2
1
31
.
5
2
S44
°
5
4
'
4
2
"
W
6
6
2
.
7
2
L=1
5
.
7
6
=2°4
4
'
1
3
"
1
4
.
7
1
R
=
2
2
0
.
0
0
L
=
1
2
.
4
8
Δ
=
3
°
1
5
'
0
0
"
C
.Br
g
=
N
3
9
°
5
5
'
1
9
"
W
C
.
=
1
2
.
4
8
N
3
8
°
1
7
'
4
9
"
W
1
1
2
.
8
9
S3
0
°
5
4
'
2
0
"
W
47
.
9
2
S3
0
°
5
4
'
2
0
"
W
1
6
8
.
2
8
10
3
.
0
3
632
.
1
8
1
4
5
.
7
9 OUT
L
O
T
B
OU
T
L
O
T
A
AM
B
E
R
F
I
E
L
D
S
B
L
V
D
R
O
A
D
M
2
8
.
9
6
S
3
8
°
1
7
'
5
4
"
E
2
5
.
3
9
S44
°
5
4
'
4
2
"
W
66
2
.
7
2
0.33
31
.
5
2
30.
2
1
S3
1
°
5
9
'
0
1
"
W
13
4
.
5
5
O
U
T
L
O
T
B
OUTLOT
30
.
5
4
A
2
8
.
9
6
6 7
8
S5
9
°
0
5
'
4
0
"
E
1
3
0
.
0
0
1.7
9
S3
0
°
5
4
'
2
0
"
W
6
5
.
0
0
L =7 2.3 4
Δ =5°47'50"
L
=
6
7
.6
0
Δ
=
1
4
°
2
0 '
4
6
"
22 L
=
1
.
2
5
Δ
=
0
°
1
5
'
5
7
"
4
OUTLOT B
AMBER FIELDS SIXTEENTH ADDITION
OFFICIAL PLAT
INSET B
SEE SHEET 2 OF 4 SHEETS
DETAIL D
(NOT TO SCALE)
DETAIL E
(NOT TO SCALE)
DETAIL F
(NOT TO SCALE)
Page 18 of 109
B
L
O
C
K
1
4
1
2
3
4
OU
T
L
O
T
B
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8910
11
12
13
14
15
16
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11 12
13
14
15
16
17
B
L
O
C
K
1
B
L
O
C
K
2
B
L
O
C
K
3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
5
13
12
11
10
9
1
2
3
4
6
7
8
17
16
14
13
12
11
10
BL
O
C
K
4
BL
O
C
K
5
B
L
O
C
K
8
B
L
O
C
K
7
B
L
O
C
K
5
ST
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R
MA
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
AR
E
A
1
BA
S
I
N
1
9
1
8
PE
R
C
I
T
Y
BL
O
C
K
6
1
3
4
1
2
3
6
9
10
11
12
AUB
U
R
N
A
V
E
.
14
8
T
H
S
T
.
W
.
14
8
T
H
S
T
.
W
.
9
17
2
5
4
5
7
8
5
9
15
6
7
4
3
2
1
8
21
22
23
20
19
18
25
24
26
27
28
29
31
32
33
34
30
35
36
37
38 39
40
41
43
42
44
ROAD A
R
O
A
D
B
R
O
A
D
C
RO
A
D
I
R
O
A
D
J
R
O
A
D
K
ROAD L
ROA
D
M
ROAD
N
RO
A
D
D
RO
A
D
E
ROAD F
ROAD G
R
O
A
D
H
OU
T
L
O
T
E
BLOCK 17
2 3 41
BLOC
K
1
8
3
4
6
1
2
5
BLOC
K
1
9
2
3
4
1
BL
O
C
K
2
0
3
4
6
1
2
5
1
2
3
4
5
BL
O
C
K
2
2
BLOC
K
2
3
3
4
6
1
2
5BLOCK 24
234
1
BL
O
C
K
2
1
3
4
6
1
2
5
BLOCK 29
3 4 6125
12345
BLOCK 30
B
L
O
C
K
9
12345
BLOCK 31
AUB
U
R
N
A
V
E
.
AUBURN AVE.
RO
A
D
A
ROAD I
R
O
A
D
A
ROAD
A
RO
A
D
A
2
1
3
4
5
6
7
8
10
911121314151617
B
L
O
C
K
9
BLOCK 10
3
2
1
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
14
13
1516171819202122
B
L
O
C
K
1
0
1
2
3
4
5
BL
O
C
K
1
2
BL
O
C
K
1
3
2
3
4
1
1 2 3 4 5BLOCK 15 1 2 3 4 5BLOCK 16
BLOCK 25
234
1
BLOCK 26
234
1
1
2
3
4
5
B
L
O
C
K
2
7
BLOCK 32
234
1
BLOCK 33
234
1B
L
O
C
K
1
1
2
3
4
1
1 2 3 4 5
BLOCK 28
OUTLOT F
5
OU
T
L
O
T
A
OUTLOT C
OUTLOT D
O
U
T
L
O
T
A
OUTLOT A
OUTLOT A
OUTL
O
T
D
VIEW A
VIEW B
VIEW C
VIEW D
PARCEL AREA TABLE
PARCEL
B11-L1
B11-L2
B11-L3
B11-L4
B12-L1
B12-L2
B12-L3
B12-L4
B12-L5
B13-L1
B13-L2
B13-L3
B13-L4
B14-L1
B14-L2
B14-L3
B14-L4
B14-L5
B15-L1
B15-L2
B15-L3
B15-L4
B15-L5
B16-L1
B16-L2
B16-L3
B16-L4
B16-L5
AREA SF
2,129
1,836
1,836
2,129
2,129
1,836
1,836
1,836
2,129
2,129
1,836
1,836
2,129
2,129
1,836
1,836
1,836
2,129
2,129
1,836
1,836
1,836
2,129
2,129
1,836
1,836
1,836
2,129
AREA AC
0.05
0.04
0.04
0.05
0.05
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.05
0.05
0.04
0.04
0.05
0.05
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.05
0.05
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.05
0.05
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.05
PARCEL AREA TABLE
PARCEL
B17-L1
B17-L2
B17-L3
B17-L4
B18-L1
B18-L2
B18-L3
B18-L4
B18-L5
B18-L6
B19-L1
B19-L2
B19-L3
B19-L4
B20-L1
B20-L2
B20-L3
B20-L4
B20-L5
B20-L6
B21-L1
B21-L2
B21-L3
B21-L4
B21-L5
B21-L6
B22-L1
B22-L2
AREA SF
2,129
1,836
1,836
2,129
2,129
1,836
1,836
1,836
1,836
2,129
2,129
1,836
1,836
2,129
2,129
1,836
1,836
1,836
1,836
2,129
2,129
1,836
1,836
1,836
1,836
2,129
2,129
1,836
AREA AC
0.05
0.04
0.04
0.05
0.05
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.05
0.05
0.04
0.04
0.05
0.05
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.05
0.05
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.05
0.05
0.04
PARCEL AREA TABLE
PARCEL
B22-L3
B22-L4
B22-L5
B23-L1
B23-L2
B23-L3
B23-L4
B23-L5
B23-L6
B24-L1
B24-L2
B24-L3
B24-L4
B25-L1
B25-L2
B25-L3
B25-L4
B26-L1
B26-L2
B26-L3
B26-L4
B27-L1
B27-L2
B27-L3
B27-L4
B27-L5
B29-L1
B29-L2
AREA SF
1,836
1,836
2,129
2,129
1,836
1,836
1,836
1,836
2,129
2,129
1,836
1,836
2,129
2,129
1,836
1,836
2,129
2,129
1,836
1,836
2,129
2,129
1,836
1,836
1,836
2,129
2,129
1,836
AREA AC
0.04
0.04
0.05
0.05
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.05
0.05
0.04
0.04
0.05
0.05
0.04
0.04
0.05
0.05
0.04
0.04
0.05
0.05
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.05
0.05
0.04
PARCEL AREA TABLE
PARCEL
B29-L3
B29-L4
B29-L5
B29-L6
B30-L1
B30-L2
B30-L3
B30-L4
B30-L5
B31-L1
B31-L2
B31-L3
B31-L4
B31-L5
B32-L1
B32-L2
B32-L3
B32-L4
B33-L1
B33-L2
B33-L3
B33-L4
AREA SF
1,836
1,836
1,836
2,129
2,129
1,836
1,836
1,836
2,129
2,129
1,836
1,836
1,836
2,129
2,129
1,836
1,836
2,129
2,129
1,836
1,836
2,129
AREA AC
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.05
0.05
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.05
0.05
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.05
0.05
0.04
0.04
0.05
0.05
0.04
0.04
0.05
PARCEL AREA TABLE
PARCEL
OUTLOT A
OUTLOT B
OUTLOT C
OUTLOT D
OUTLOT E
OUTLOT F
ROW-EXTER
ROW-INTER
TOTAL
AREA SF
125,127
66,659
12,172
70,915
36,116
11,723
819
504,237
2,608,407
AREA AC
2.87
1.53
0.28
1.63
0.83
0.27
0.02
11.58
59.88
PARCEL AREA TABLE
PARCEL
B1-L1
B1-L2
B1-L3
B1-L4
B1-L5
B1-L6
B1-L7
B1-L8
B1-L9
B2-L1
B2-L2
B2-L3
B2-L4
B2-L5
B2-L6
B2-L7
B2-L8
B2-L9
B2-L10
AREA SF
10,602
8,125
8,125
8,125
9,450
9,073
9,581
9,000
9,081
10,054
7,964
8,193
8,422
9,283
8,260
7,718
9,000
7,800
9,666
AREA AC
0.24
0.19
0.19
0.19
0.22
0.21
0.22
0.21
0.21
0.23
0.18
0.19
0.19
0.21
0.19
0.18
0.21
0.18
0.22
PARCEL AREA TABLE
PARCEL
B2-L11
B2-L12
B2-L13
B2-L14
B2-L15
B2-L16
B2-L17
B3-L1
B3-L2
B3-L3
B3-L4
B3-L5
B3-L6
B3-L7
B3-L8
B3-L9
B3-L10
B3-L11
B3-L12
AREA SF
8,413
7,800
7,800
7,800
7,800
7,800
9,816
9,488
7,800
7,800
7,800
7,800
7,800
7,800
7,800
8,779
10,232
10,357
8,069
AREA AC
0.19
0.18
0.18
0.18
0.18
0.18
0.23
0.22
0.18
0.18
0.18
0.18
0.18
0.18
0.18
0.20
0.23
0.24
0.19
PARCEL AREA TABLE
PARCEL
B3-L13
B3-L14
B3-L15
B3-L16
B3-L17
B4-L1
B4-L2
B4-L3
B4-L4
B4-L5
B4-L6
B4-L7
B4-L8
B4-L9
B4-L10
B4-L11
B4-L12
B4-L13
B4-L14
AREA SF
7,800
7,800
7,800
7,800
9,122
8,604
8,446
8,530
8,976
8,976
8,976
8,976
8,976
8,976
8,976
8,976
8,976
8,976
8,976
AREA AC
0.18
0.18
0.18
0.18
0.21
0.20
0.19
0.20
0.21
0.21
0.21
0.21
0.21
0.21
0.21
0.21
0.21
0.21
0.21
PARCEL AREA TABLE
PARCEL
B4-L15
B4-L16
B4-L17
B4-L18
B4-L19
B4-L20
B4-L21
B4-L22
B4-L23
B4-L24
B5-L1
B5-L2
B5-L3
B5-L4
B5-L5
B5-L6
B5-L7
B5-L8
B5-L9
AREA SF
8,694
9,382
10,116
10,116
10,299
10,751
10,751
10,751
8,450
11,052
8,868
5,952
6,048
6,143
6,239
6,334
6,430
6,515
9,881
AREA AC
0.20
0.22
0.23
0.23
0.24
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.19
0.25
0.20
0.14
0.14
0.14
0.14
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.23
PARCEL AREA TABLE
PARCEL
B5-L10
B5-L11
B5-L12
B5-L13
B5-L14
B5-L15
B5-L16
B5-L17
B5-L18
B5-L19
B5-L20
B5-L21
B5-L22
B6-L1
B6-L2
B6-L3
B6-L4
B6-L5
B7-L1
AREA SF
9,550
8,450
8,450
8,450
10,844
13,986
10,699
10,942
9,132
8,512
8,488
8,465
12,188
7,266
5,850
5,850
5,850
8,450
13,842
AREA AC
0.22
0.19
0.19
0.19
0.25
0.32
0.25
0.25
0.21
0.20
0.19
0.19
0.28
0.17
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.19
0.32
PARCEL AREA TABLE
PARCEL
B7-L2
B7-L3
B7-L4
B7-L5
B7-L6
B7-L7
B7-L8
B7-L9
B7-L10
B7-L11
B7-L12
B7-L13
B7-L14
B7-L15
B7-L16
B7-L17
B8-L1
B8-L2
B8-L3
AREA SF
8,631
9,162
8,904
8,450
8,450
8,623
11,522
11,402
8,450
8,450
8,450
8,588
8,738
8,787
8,450
12,110
10,618
5,850
5,850
AREA AC
0.20
0.21
0.20
0.19
0.19
0.20
0.26
0.26
0.19
0.19
0.19
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.19
0.28
0.24
0.13
0.13
PARCEL AREA TABLE
PARCEL
B8-L4
B8-L5
B8-L6
B8-L7
B8-L8
B8-L9
B8-L10
B8-L11
B8-L12
B8-L13
B9-L1
B9-L2
B9-L3
B9-L4
B9-L5
B9-L6
B9-L7
B9-L8
B9-L9
AREA SF
5,850
5,850
5,850
11,227
10,823
8,450
8,450
8,450
9,031
11,327
10,669
5,850
5,850
5,850
6,634
6,364
6,368
9,028
7,552
AREA AC
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.26
0.25
0.19
0.19
0.19
0.21
0.26
0.24
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.21
0.17
PARCEL AREA TABLE
PARCEL
B9-L10
B9-L11
B9-L12
B9-L13
B9-L14
B9-L15
B9-L16
B9-L17
B9-L18
B9-L19
B9-L20
B9-L21
B9-L22
B9-L23
B9-L24
B9-L25
B9-L26
B9-L27
B9-L28
AREA SF
6,375
5,625
5,625
5,625
5,625
6,228
8,119
12,076
6,179
6,366
6,491
6,614
7,078
9,216
6,440
5,850
5,850
5,850
5,850
AREA AC
0.15
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.14
0.19
0.28
0.14
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.16
0.21
0.15
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.13
PARCEL AREA TABLE
PARCEL
B9-L29
B9-L30
B9-L31
B9-L32
B9-L33
B9-L34
B9-L35
B9-L36
B9-L37
B9-L38
B9-L39
B9-L40
B9-L41
B9-L42
B9-L43
B9-L44
B10-L1
B10-L2
B10-L3
AREA SF
9,806
8,583
5,850
5,850
5,850
7,630
10,182
9,848
10,285
8,214
9,219
9,485
7,794
7,141
5,809
8,958
8,131
5,400
5,400
AREA AC
0.23
0.20
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.18
0.23
0.23
0.24
0.19
0.21
0.22
0.18
0.16
0.13
0.21
0.19
0.12
0.12
PARCEL AREA TABLE
PARCEL
B10-L4
B10-L5
B10-L6
B10-L7
B10-L8
B10-L9
B10-L10
B10-L11
B10-L12
B10-L13
B10-L14
B10-L15
B10-L16
B10-L17
B10-L18
B10-L19
B10-L20
B10-L21
B10-L22
AREA SF
5,400
5,400
5,400
5,400
5,553
7,577
11,704
13,821
9,694
6,525
6,525
6,525
6,525
6,525
6,525
6,525
6,526
6,526
10,257
AREA AC
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.13
0.17
0.27
0.32
0.22
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.24
AM
B
E
R
F
I
E
L
D
S
-
2
N
D
A
D
D
I
T
I
O
N
PR
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
P
L
A
T
S
U
B
M
I
T
T
A
L
PR
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
P
L
A
T
-
O
V
E
R
A
L
L
V
I
E
W
733 Marquette Avenue
Minneapolis, MN 55402
612.758.3080
www.alliant-inc.com
Suite 700
5
FOR RE
V
I
E
W
O
N
L
Y
PRELIM
I
N
A
R
Y
NOT FO
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
LEGEND:
DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS:
Being 5 feet in width and adjoining lot lines and 10 feet in
width and adjoining right of way lines, unless otherwise
indicated on the plat.
NOT TO SCALE
Page 19 of 109
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13 14 15 16 17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
13
14
15 16
17
18
19
20
21
22
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
6
7
8
17
16
14
13
12
11
10
B
L
O
C
K
1
BLOCK
4
BLO
C
K
3
BLO
C
K
3
BLO
C
K
4
BLOCK
5
2 3
1 2 3
6
9
10
11
12
1
4
4 5
7 8
5
9
15
6
7
4
3
2
1
6
24 23 22
252627
20
21
19
18
17
16
14
13
12
11
15
109
8
7
6
5
4
2
3
1
ATHGOE DRIVE
ATH
E
N
R
Y
B
A
Y
ASK
E
A
T
O
N
P
L
A
C
E
ASH
T
O
W
N
L
A
N
E
R
O
A
D
M
RO
A
D
N
ACLARE RIDGE
OUTLOT B
BLO
C
K
2
A
U
B
U
R
N
A
V
E
.
AMBE
R
F
I
E
L
D
S
B
L
V
D
A
T
H
G
O
E
D
R
I
V
E
AMB
E
R
F
I
E
L
D
S
B
L
V
D
A
M
B
E
R
F
I
E
L
D
S
B
L
V
D
AM
B
E
R
F
I
E
L
D
S
B
L
V
D
2 1
345678
10
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
BLOCK 4
B
L
O
C
K
5
3 2 1
456789
10
12
14
13
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
BLOCK 5
12345
BLOCK 7
BLOCK 8
234
1
BLOCK 9
234
1
BLOCK 6
234
1
5
23
OUTLOT B
AMBER
F
I
E
L
D
S
B
L
V
D
BLO
C
K
2
OU
T
L
O
T
A
AM
B
E
R
F
I
E
L
D
S
-
1
6
T
H
A
D
D
I
T
I
O
N
PH
A
S
E
3
FI
N
A
L
P
L
A
T
S
U
B
M
I
T
T
A
L
SI
T
E
P
L
A
N
O
V
E
R
A
L
L
733 Marquette Avenue
Minneapolis, MN 55402
612.758.3080
www.alliant-inc.com
Suite 700
6
FOR RE
V
I
E
W
O
N
L
Y
PRELIM
I
N
A
R
Y
NOT FO
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
SITE PLAN NOTES:
LEGEND:
SINGLE FAMILY LOT DATA:
TOTAL DENSITY CALCULATIONS:
TYPICAL 65' LOT DETAIL
TYPICAL 60' ROW ROAD SECTION
TYPICAL 45' LOT DETAIL
Page 20 of 109
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13 14 15 16 17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
13
14
15 16
17
18
19
20
21
22
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
6
7
8
17
16
14
13
12
11
10
B
L
O
C
K
1
BLOCK
4
BLO
C
K
3
BLO
C
K
3
BLO
C
K
4
STORMWATER
MANAGEMENT
AREA 1
BLOCK
5
2 3
1 2 3
6
9
10
11
12
1
4
4 5
7 8
5
9
15
6
7
4
3
2
1
6
24 23 22
252627
20
21
19
18
17
16
14
13
12
11
15
109
8
7
6
5
4
2
3
1
ATHGOE DRIVE
ATH
E
N
R
Y
B
A
Y
ASK
E
A
T
O
N
P
L
A
C
E
ASH
T
O
W
N
L
A
N
E
R
O
A
D
M
RO
A
D
N
ACLARE RIDGE
OUTLOT B
BLO
C
K
2
A
U
B
U
R
N
A
V
E
.
AMBE
R
F
I
E
L
D
S
B
L
V
D
A
T
H
G
O
E
D
R
I
V
E
AM
B
E
R
F
I
E
L
D
S
B
L
V
D
A
M
B
E
R
F
I
E
L
D
S
B
L
V
D
AM
B
E
R
F
I
E
L
D
S
B
L
V
D
2 1
345678
10
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
BLOCK 4
B
L
O
C
K
5
3 2 1
456789
10
11
12
14
13
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
BLOCK 5
12345
BLOCK 7
BLOCK 8
234
1
1
2
3
4
5
B
L
O
C
K
1
0
1
2
B
L
O
C
K
1
8
3
4
B
L
O
C
K
1
9
2
3
4
1
1 2 3 4 5BLOCK 20
4
B
L
O
C
K
2
3
2
3
4
1
BLOCK 9
234
1
BLOCK 6
234
1
1
2
5
23
OUTLOT B
AMBER
F
I
E
L
D
S
B
L
V
D
BLO
C
K
2
OU
T
L
O
T
A
AM
B
E
R
F
I
E
L
D
S
-
1
6
T
H
A
D
D
I
T
I
O
N
PH
A
S
E
3
FI
N
A
L
P
L
A
T
S
U
B
M
I
T
T
A
L
LA
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
P
L
A
N
O
V
E
R
A
L
L
733 Marquette Avenue
Minneapolis, MN 55402
612.758.3080
www.alliant-inc.com
Suite 700
26
FOR RE
V
I
E
W
O
N
L
Y
PRELIM
I
N
A
R
Y
NOT FO
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
TREE PLANTING DETAIL1
LANDSCAPE NOTES:
MITIGATION & LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS:
LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE (PHASE THREE):
Page 21 of 109
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13 14 15 16 17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
13
14
15 16
17
18
19
20
21
22
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
6
7
8
17
16
14
13
12
11
10
B
L
O
C
K
1
BLOCK
4
BLO
C
K
3
BLO
C
K
3
BLO
C
K
4
STORMWATER
MANAGEMENT
AREA 1
STORMWATER
MANAGEMENT
AREA 2
BLOCK
5
2 3
1 2 3
6
9
10
11
12
1
4
4 5
7 8
5
9
15
6
7
4
3
2
1
6
24 23 22
252627
20
21
19
18
17
16
14
13
12
11
15
109
8
7
6
5
4
2
3
1
ATHGOE DRIVE
ATH
E
N
R
Y
B
A
Y
ASK
E
A
T
O
N
P
L
A
C
E
ASH
T
O
W
N
L
A
N
E
R
O
A
D
M
RO
A
D
N
ACLARE RIDGE
1 2
3
4
BLOCK 3
OUTLOT B
BLO
C
K
2
A
U
B
U
R
N
A
V
E
.
AMBE
R
F
I
E
L
D
S
B
L
V
D
A
T
H
G
O
E
D
R
I
V
E
AM
B
E
R
F
I
E
L
D
S
B
L
V
D
A
M
B
E
R
F
I
E
L
D
S
B
L
V
D
AM
B
E
R
F
I
E
L
D
S
B
L
V
D
2 1
345678
10
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
BLOCK 4
B
L
O
C
K
5
3 2 1
456789
10
11
12
14
13
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
BLOCK 5
12345
BLOCK 7
BLOCK 8
234
1
1
2
3
4
5
B
L
O
C
K
1
0
1
2
3
4
B
L
O
C
K
1
1
B
L
O
C
K
1
8
2
3
4
1
B
L
O
C
K
1
9
2
3
4
1
1 2 3 4 5BLOCK 20
B
L
O
C
K
2
4
2
3
4
1
B
L
O
C
K
2
3
2
3
4
1
BLOCK 9
234
1
BLOCK 6
234
1
1
2
3
4
B
L
O
C
K
2
1
5
23
OUTLOT B
AMBER
F
I
E
L
D
S
B
L
V
D
BLO
C
K
2
OU
T
L
O
T
A
AR
T
A
I
N
E
T
R
A
I
L
15
0
T
H
S
T
R
E
E
T
W
E
S
T
BL
O
C
K
3
BL
O
C
K
2
20
19
18
17
16 15 14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7 6
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
192021
AM
B
E
R
F
I
E
L
D
S
-
1
6
T
H
A
D
D
I
T
I
O
N
PH
A
S
E
3
FI
N
A
L
P
L
A
T
S
U
B
M
I
T
T
A
L
SA
N
I
T
A
R
Y
S
E
W
E
R
A
N
D
W
A
T
E
R
M
A
I
N
P
L
A
N
-
O
V
E
R
A
L
L
V
I
E
W
733 Marquette Avenue
Minneapolis, MN 55402
612.758.3080
www.alliant-inc.com
Suite 700
13
FOR RE
V
I
E
W
O
N
L
Y
PRELIM
I
N
A
R
Y
NOT FO
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
UTILITY NOTES:
LEGEND:
Page 22 of 109
C:\Users\jh\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\I8FO6670\024570-000 Amber Fields 16th Addition - Plan Review Memo
2024.02.19.docx
7
0
1
X
E
N
I
A
A
V
E
N
U
E
S
|
S
U
I
T
E
3
0
0
|
M
I
N
N
E
A
P
O
L
I
S
,
M
N
|
55
4
1
6
|
7
6
3
.
5
4
1
.
4
8
0
0
|
W
S
B
E
N
G
.
C
O
M
Memorandum
To: Brian Erickson, City Engineer
Nick Egger, Director of Public Works
Anthony Nemcek, Senior Planner
Jane Byron, Storm Water Specialist
From: Amanda Sachi, PE
Kendra Fallon, PE
Kris Keller, PE
Date: February 19, 2024
Re: Amber Fields 16th Addition –Final Plat Review
WSB Project No. 024570-000
We have reviewed the documents provided by Alliant Engineering on January 26, 2024.
Documents reviewed include:
• Amber Fields 16th Addition Final Plat Civil Set, dated 1/26/24
• Amber Fields 16th Addition Plat, dated 1/26/24
Additional redline comments are provided on the submitted civil plans. Applicant should provide
responses to each comment and redline comment. We offer the following comments below.
Civil Comments:
1. General
a. Update street names when available.
b. Provide benchmark elevations on future construction plans.
2. Utilities
a. Install hydrant lead valves behind curb as shown in City Details
b. Provide minimum vertical 18" separation between watermain and storm sewer
i. Insulate when separation is less than 36"
ii. Reference City Detail W-7 for all watermain offsets
c. There is a gate valve shown in the watermain offset in the intersection of Amber
Fields Blvd and Askeaton Place
i. Consider shifting the valve outside of the offset for consistency in valve
wrenches
d. Shift gate valves out of the wheel paths and far enough away from the curb line
to provide for adequate bituminous material and compaction.
e. Locate all hydrants and the highpoints of the watermain system
i. Adjust hydrant locations and watermain depth as necessary
f. Note areas where the water/sanitary services are in conflict with the utility mains
i. Provide how pipes will be adjusted/offset to accommodate
Page 23 of 109
Amber Fields 16th Addition – Final Plat Review
February 19, 2024
Page 2
3. Streets, Signage and Street Lighting
a. There are several horizontal curves that do not meet 30 mph design
i. Adjust curve radius or provide reduced speed signs
b. The vertical curve for Road M does not meet 30 mph stopping sight distance
requiements
c. Call out ‘Stop signs’ as ‘Stop sign & Street Sign’ on plans
d. Call out areas with barricade symbols as 'TEMPORARY BARRICADES W/
FUTURE ROAD SIGN'
4. Landscape
a. No comments
Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Comments:
5. General
a. No comments
6. Ponds and Wetlands
a. Include NWL/HWL callouts on the plans.
7. Emergency Overflow Routes
a. Grading plan with emergency overflow elevations should be provided.
8. Retaining Walls
a. No comments
9. Erosion Control
a. Provide additional rock construction exits at additional access points.
b. Grouted riprap in line with City Standard Plate SD-10 should be provided at FES
936. Plate SD-10 should be included in the plans.
10. Grading
a. A specific 16th Addition grading plan should be included in future submittals.
Stormwater Management Plan:
1. General Storm Sewer Design
a. Match pipe crowns when the size of the pipe increases where possible.
b. Provide updated rational method storm sewer sizing calculation and catch basin
drainage area map (including the area intended to drain to the proposed stubs)
along with storm sewer sizing calculations to confirm storm sewer is sized for a
10-year storm event.
c. Sheet piling will be required for FES 936 per City Standard plate SD-8. The City
Standard Detail should be added to the plans and sheet piling should be noted
for the aprons.
Page 24 of 109
Amber Fields 16th Addition – Final Plat Review
February 19, 2024
Page 3
2. Water Quantity
a. No comments.
3. Rate/Volume Control
a. No comments.
4. Freeboard
a. The City requires 1.5 feet of freeboard between low lying area EOFs and building
opening elevations – Provide building opening elevations and EOF elevations.
Applicant should confirm freeboard is being met for all proposed buildings.
5. Water Quality
a. No comments.
6. Easements
a. Structure CBMH 900A is currently shown on the existing easement line for Lot
23. Ten feet of drainage and utility easement is required on both sides of the
proposed storm sewer.
General
Infrastructure design shall be completed in accordance with the City of Rosemount’s Engineering
Guidelines and Standards. Infrastructure construction shall be completed in accordance with the
latest edition of the City’s General Specifications and Standard Detail Plates for Street and Utility
Construction.
Page 25 of 109
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Planning Commission Regular Meeting: February 26, 2024
Tenative City Council Meeting: March 5, 2024
AGENDA ITEM: Request by Spectro Alloys Corp for approval of the
Spectro Alloys 3rd Addition Final Plat
AGENDA SECTION:
CONSENT AGENDA
PREPARED BY: Anthony Nemcek , Senior Planner AGENDA NO. 4.c.
ATTACHMENTS: Site Location, Final Plat, Preliminary Plat, Building
Rendering, Landscape Plan, City Engineer's Memo
Dated February 23, 2024
APPROVED BY: AK
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to recommend the City Council approve the Spectro Alloys 3rd
Addition Final Plat, subject to the following conditions:
a. Execution of a subdivision agreement.
b. Vacation of the Doyle Path right-of-way and existing easements.
c. Dedication of any easements required by the City Engineer.
BACKGROUND
The Planning Commission is being asked to consider a request by Spectro Alloys for approval of the
Spectro Alloys 3rd Addition final plat. The proposed final plat will combine the entire Spectro Alloys
site into a single parcel. This is made possible by the acquisition by Spectro of the parcel formerly
owned by Dahn Construction. Platting of the property into a single parcel is a condition of the approval
of Spectro Alloys site plan to construct a billet production facility on the parcel. Another component of
this final plat request is the vacation of the Doyle Path right-of-way. Right-of-way vacations are the
sole purview of the City Council, therefore no action is required by the Planning Commission on the
vacation.
Applicant & Property Owner(s): Spectro Alloys Corporation (Luke Palen, President)
Location:
13130 Doyle Path (Lot 1, Block 1 Technical Erectors
Addition) and 13220 Doyle Path (Lot 1, Block 1
Spectro Alloys Addition)
Area in Acres: 28.67
Comp. Guide Plan Designation: GI – General Industrial
Current Zoning: GI – General Industrial/Mississippi River Critical
Area Overlay District (Urban Diversified)
The Planning Commission approved the site plan for a 70,000 square foot addition to the existing
building on the Dahn parcel at it's meeting on January 23, 2024. The site plan exceeded the maximum
Page 26 of 109
lot coverage within the subject parcel, and the consolidation of all the existing parcels along Doyle Path
into a single parcel was a condition of approval since the overall impervious for the site is below
maximum lot coverage standard for the GI-General Industrial zoning district.
One other aspect of the zoning ordinance that will be impacted by the increase in the parcel size is the
minimum building size requirement of the GI-General Industrial zoning district. The zoning ordinance
requires a minimum building size of 10% of the subject property. With the construction of the billet
expansion the building size for the site would be 15.6%, above the requirement for this district.
Final plat approval is the second step in the two-step platting process required by the City Code. The
Planning Commission reviewed and recommended approval of the Preliminary Plat, which was
approved by the City Council at its February 20th meeting. The proposed final plat is consistent with
the preliminary plat, and staff is recommending approval.
ISSUE ANALYSIS
Legal Authority
The approval of a final plat application is Quasi-Judicial because the City has a set of standards and
requirements for reviewing this type of application that is described in detail below. Generally, if the
plat meets the ordinance requirements, it must be approved.
Lot Standards
The following lot standards apply to newly created parcels in the GI-General Industrial zoning district.
Standard Required Proposed
Minimum Lot Size 5 acres 36.16 acres
Maximum Lot
Cover
70% 46%
Minimum Building
Area
10% of
parcel
15.6% of parcel
RECOMMENDATION
Staff is recommending approval of the Spectro Alloys 3rd Addition Final Plat based on information
provided by the applicant and reviewed in this report, subject to the conditions listed in the
recommended action above.
Page 27 of 109
Page 28 of 109
Page 29 of 109
C
O
U
R
T
H
O
U
S
E
B
L
V
D
C
O
U
R
T
H
O
U
S
E
B
L
V
D
CHICAGO
&
N
O
R
T
H
W
E
S
T
E
R
N
R
A
I
L
R
O
A
D
S
5
4
°
0
6
'
0
8
"
E
1
9
8
9
.
1
8
N41
°
3
6
'
0
6
"
E
1
9
4
.
8
3
L=1237.45 R =1960.08Δ=36°10'20"
N80°26'15"E
3
9
5
.
2
5
L
=
1
8
9
4
.
7
0
R
=
7
6
9
.
0
2
Δ
=
1
4
1
°
0
9
'
5
2
"
C
H
=
1
4
5
0
.
5
6
C
H
B
=
N
2
8
°
5
8
'
4
9
"
W
L=941.49
R
=5779.65
Δ
=9°20'00"
C
H
=940.45
C
H
B
=
N
58°46'08"
W
S6
3
°
2
3
'
2
5
"
E
27
8
.
2
4
LOT 1
BLOCK 1
The following described property is proposed to be replatted into 1 Block and 1
Lot by combining two plats vacated Doyle Path. The plat is proposed to be
named SPECTRO ALLOYS THIRD ADDITION.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY TO BE PLATTED
Parcel 1:
The plats of HOLLENBACK & NELSON, INC. FIRST ADDITION and SPECTRO
ALLOYS THIRD ADDITION, Dakota County, Minnesota, according to the record
plat thereof.
(Being Abstract Property)
Parcel 2:
Vacated Doyle Path dedicated as public right-of-way per the plats of
HOLLENBACK & NELSON, INC. FIRST ADDITION and SPECTRO ALLOYS
ADDITION.
(Doyle Path is proposed to be be vacated)
PID/OWNER / PROPERTY ADDRESS:
PID: 34-3340-02-031
Pine Bend Recycling LLC,
13135 Doyle Path, Rosemount, MN 55068
ZONING:
IP, INDUSTRIAL PARK
DATE OF PREPLAT
DECEMBER 20, 2023
AREA SUMMARY
TOTAL AREA TO BE PLATTED = 1,583,904 S.F. (36.361 AC.)
SURVEYOR:
STANTEC
GARY BJORKLUND LS 46563
PHONE: 763-479-5128
gary.bjorklund@stantec.com
LEGEND
Page 30 of 109
Spectro Alloys
Rosemount, MN 01-18-2024
32
2
7
3
1
0
0
Concept Rendering
EXISTING
INGOT FACILITY
PROPOSED
BUILDING
EXISTING CMU
BUILDING TO REMAIN
PROPOSED CANOPY
COVERED STORAGE AREA
HIGHWAY
5
5
Page 31 of 109
DOYLE PATH
COURTHOUSE BLVD (TRUNK HIGHWAY NO. 55)
TR
U
C
K
S
C
A
L
E
V
A
N
G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G
G
G
X X X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
X X X X X X X X X
EXISTING BUILDING
FFE: 897.67
CANOPY COVERED
STORAGE AREA
27,930 SF
20' WATERMAIN
EASEMENT
►
►
►
►
►
►►►►
►
►
►
►
►
►
►►
►►
►►
►►
►►
►►
►►
►►
►►
►►
►►
►►
►►
►►
►►►►►►
►►►►►►►►►►►►►►►►►►►►
►►►►►►►►►►
►►
►►
►►
►►
►►
►►►►►►►►►►►►
►►
►►
►►
►►
►►
►►
►►
►►
►
►
►►
I
895
9
0
0
893894
896897898899
9
0
1
90
2
902
903
9
0
3
904
90
4
9
0
7
908
909
890
89
5
89
5
88688
7
88
8
889891892893
893893893893
89
4
89
4
89
6
89
6
89
7
89
7
I
I
I
I
I
I
3'-0" LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE STRIP EDGER, TYPICAL
►►
I
I
I
I
I
ROCK MULCH
WOOD MULCH
EDGER, TYP.
►►►►►►
►►►►►►►►
►►►►
►►►►►►
►►►►
►►►►►►►►
►►
►►
►►
►►
►
►
►
I
I
►
►
►
►
►
►
►
►
►
►
SHEET NUMBER
SURVEY
APPROVED
DESIGNED
DRAWN
PROJ. NO.
WA
S
P
R
E
P
A
R
E
D
B
Y
M
E
O
R
U
N
D
E
R
M
Y
D
I
R
E
C
T
S
U
P
E
R
V
I
S
I
O
N
I
H
E
R
E
B
Y
C
E
R
T
I
F
Y
T
H
A
T
T
H
I
S
P
L
A
N
,
S
P
E
C
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
,
O
R
R
E
P
O
R
T
AN
D
T
H
A
T
I
A
M
A
D
U
L
Y
L
I
C
E
N
S
E
D
UN
D
E
R
T
H
E
L
A
W
S
O
F
T
H
E
S
T
A
T
E
O
F
M
I
N
N
E
S
O
T
A
PR
I
N
T
N
A
M
E
:
SI
G
N
A
T
U
R
E
:
DA
T
E
:
LI
C
.
N
O
.
CHECKED
Pl
o
t
D
a
t
e
:
0
2
/
0
1
/
2
0
2
4
-
3
:
1
5
p
m
Dr
a
w
i
n
g
n
a
m
e
:
\
\
U
S
0
2
4
2
-
P
P
F
S
S
0
1
\
s
h
a
r
e
d
_
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
1
9
3
8
0
6
0
0
6
\
1
9
3
8
0
6
0
0
6
B
I
L
L
E
T
P
R
O
D
U
C
T
I
O
N
S
F
A
C
I
L
I
T
Y
\
5
_
D
E
S
I
G
N
\
1
_
C
A
D
\
3
P
L
A
N
S
H
E
E
T
S
\
L
-
1
0
1
L
A
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
P
L
A
N
1
9
3
8
0
6
0
0
6
.
d
w
g
Xr
e
f
s
:
,
x
-
S
U
R
V
,
x
-
S
I
T
E
,
x
-
T
T
L
B
,
x
-
B
L
D
G
B
I
L
L
E
T
,
x
-
S
I
T
E
C
O
M
P
L
E
T
E
D
D
E
S
I
G
N
2
1
4
2
,
S
R
5
5
_
o
f
f
s
i
t
e
,
S
R
5
5
_
u
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
TH
E
C
O
N
T
R
A
C
T
O
R
S
H
A
L
L
V
E
R
I
F
Y
A
N
D
B
E
R
E
S
P
O
N
S
I
B
L
E
F
O
R
A
L
L
D
I
M
E
N
S
I
O
N
S
.
D
O
N
O
T
S
C
A
L
E
T
H
E
DR
A
W
I
N
G
-
A
N
Y
E
R
R
O
R
S
O
R
O
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
S
S
H
A
L
L
B
E
R
E
P
O
R
T
E
D
T
O
S
T
A
N
T
E
C
W
I
T
H
O
U
T
D
E
L
A
Y
.
TH
E
C
O
P
Y
R
I
G
H
T
S
T
O
A
L
L
D
E
S
I
G
N
S
A
N
D
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
S
A
R
E
T
H
E
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
O
F
S
T
A
N
T
E
C
.
R
E
P
R
O
D
U
C
T
I
O
N
OR
U
S
E
F
O
R
A
N
Y
P
U
R
P
O
S
E
O
T
H
E
R
T
H
A
N
T
H
A
T
A
U
T
H
O
R
I
Z
E
D
B
Y
S
T
A
N
T
E
C
I
S
F
O
R
B
I
D
D
E
N
.
SP
E
C
T
R
O
B
I
L
L
E
T
E
X
P
A
N
S
I
O
N
RO
S
E
M
O
U
N
T
,
M
N
193806006
73
3
M
a
r
q
u
e
t
t
e
A
v
e
n
u
e
,
S
u
i
t
e
1
0
0
0
Mi
n
n
e
a
p
o
l
i
s
,
M
N
5
5
4
0
2
ww
w
.
s
t
a
n
t
e
c
.
c
o
m
STANTEC
SAG
SAG
DML
DML
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
MI
N
N
E
S
O
T
A
.
02/01/20241CITY RESUBMITTAL
( IN FEET )
GRAPHIC SCALE
0
1 inch = 30 ft.
30 6030
L-101
LA
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
P
L
A
N
ZONED: IP - INDUSTRIAL PARK
1.1 TREE PER 3,000 SF LAND AREA: 246,114 SF
1.1.TOTAL TREES REQUIRED:82
1.2.TOTAL TREES PROPOSED 82
2.1 FOUNDATION PLANTING PER 10 LINEAR FEET OF BUILDING: 1,940 LF
2.1.TOTAL PLANTS REQUIRED:194
2.2.TOTAL PLANTS PROPOSED:198
3.VEGETATIVE SCREENING OF INDUSTRIAL STORAGE: PROVIDED
MUNICIPAL CALCULATIONS
1.SEE SHEET L-801 FOR DETAILS, NOTES AND PLANT SCHEDULE.
NOTES
LOT LINE
EASEMENT LINE
SETBACK LINE
RIGHT OF WAY LINE
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
LEGEND
ROCK MULCH,
SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES
LOW MAINTENANCE TURF,
SEE TURF RESTORATION NOTES
WA
S
P
R
E
P
A
R
E
D
B
Y
M
E
O
R
U
N
D
E
R
M
Y
D
I
R
E
C
T
S
U
P
E
R
V
I
S
I
O
N
I
H
E
R
E
B
Y
C
E
R
T
I
F
Y
T
H
A
T
T
H
I
S
P
L
A
N
,
S
P
E
C
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
,
O
R
R
E
P
O
R
T
AN
D
T
H
A
T
I
A
M
A
D
U
L
Y
L
I
C
E
N
S
E
D
L
A
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
UN
D
E
R
T
H
E
L
A
W
S
O
F
T
H
E
S
T
A
T
E
O
F
M
I
N
N
E
S
O
T
A
Page 32 of 109
C:\Users\jh\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\I8FO6670\024362-000 SPECTRO BILLETT EXPANSION - Engineering Review Memo
20240223.docx
7
0
1
X
E
N
I
A
A
V
E
N
U
E
S
|
S
U
I
T
E
3
0
0
|
M
I
N
N
E
A
P
O
L
I
S
,
M
N
|
55
4
1
6
|
7
6
3
.
5
4
1
.
4
8
0
0
|
W
S
B
E
N
G
.
C
O
M
Memorandum
To: Brian Erickson, City Engineer
Nick Egger, Director of Public Works
From: Amanda Sachi, PE
Kendra Fallon, PE
Kris Keller, PE
Date: February 23, 2024
Re: Spectro Billet – 2024 Expansion
Engineering Review
WSB Project No. 024362-000
We have reviewed the documents provided by Stantec on February 6, 2024. Documents reviewed
include:
• Spectro Billet Expansion - Preliminary Site Construction Drawings, dated 2/1/2024
• Spectro Billet Expansion – Stormwater Memo, dated 2/1/2024
Additional redline comments are provided on the submitted civil plans. Applicant should provide
responses to each comment and redline comment. We offer the following comments below.
Grayed out comments have been previously addressed. Comments highlighted in yellow may
need additional comments or consideration from the city.
Engineering Review:
1. General
a. The project consists of the expansion of the existing facility. The new addition is
70,000 sf to the existing 10,000 sf building.
b. The expansion also includes adding a 28,000 sf canopy-covered storage area.
2. Site Demolition Plan
a. Show the water and sanitary sewer services to the existing building
i. Confirm the presence of any existing sanitary sewer service piping
downstream of the septic existing tank
b. There appears to be an existing utility pedestal near the proposed northwest
entrance that will need to be relocated
c. Call out the existing easement crossing the lot that will need to be vacated as part
of the building expansion construction
3. Site Plan
a. There is a permanent landing, sidewalk, and stairs proposed in the watermain
easement on the east side of the building.
4. Grading Drainage and Erosion Control Plan
Page 33 of 109
Spectro Billet – 2024 Expansion Engineering Review
February 23, 2024
Page 2
a. Clarify the transitional grades around the perimeter of the building and site.
i. The northwest corner and east side of the building are shown as having
considerable exposed foundation relative to the 897.67 FFE
1. Maintain frost protection with construction
ii. Conversely the south side of the building is shown as burying the building
with 8-10’ of material
iii. Describe what is creating the 8-10’ grading transition around the parking
and canopy covered storage areas
b. There appears to be a low point that does not drain at the northeast corner of the
site on the south side of the road. Show the path of drainage and consider
installing a catch basin to intercept surface flow.
c. The drainage is proposed to run along the south edge of the roadway on Doyle
Path. Consider installing curb to prevent wear and erosion.
5. Utility Plans
a. Fire official to review fire coverage and emergency access During building permit
process
b. Provide the material grade proposed for all pipe segments
c. Label the septic tank as proposed or existing
d. Clarify whether a new structure is proposed at EX SSWR CO 03 northeast of the
site
e. Update the watermain linework in the profile to reflect the correct elevations
f. Show the existing gate vale just southwest of the existing blowoff hydrant
assembly
g. Update the existing and finished grades in the watermain profile
h. Eliminate the proposed blowoff valve by connecting closer to the existing blowoff
hydrant assembly
i. Show minimum 7.5’ of cover over watermain
j. Use RCP pipe for storm sewer under the roadway Verify vacation of Doyle Path to
private drive
6. Details & Specifications
a. No comments.
7. Landscape Plan
a. No comments.
Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Comments:
8. General
a. No comments.
9. Ponds and Wetlands
a. The NWL/HWL of the downstream stormwater basin should be noted on the
grading plan for reference.
i. Note the 100-year HWL for the basin should be determined with no
exfiltration in the HydroCAD model consistent with the City’s Engineering
Design Guidelines.
Page 34 of 109
Spectro Billet – 2024 Expansion Engineering Review
February 23, 2024
Page 3
ii. The existing basin NWL should be updated on the plans.
10. Emergency Overflow Routes:
a. No comments.
11. Retaining Walls:
a. Note retaining walls greater than 4 feet require engineering design.
12. Erosion Control:
a. No comments.
13. Grading:
a. Per the City’s Engineering Design Guidelines maximum slopes of 4:1 are allowed
above the NWL of a basin. There are several locations showing slopes steeper
than 4:1 throughout the site.
i. One location in the south corner of the site is still showing 3:1 side slopes
to build up the berm adjacent to the roadway. Applicant should confirm
with the City if this will be allowed or the berm should be lowered to meet
the 4:1 slope requirement.
Stormwater Management Plan:
1. General Storm Sewer Design
a. Provide an updated catch basin drainage area map along with storm sewer sizing
calculations to confirm storm sewer is sized for a 10-year storm event.
i. Provide calculations for proposed driveway culvert sizing.
b. All public storm sewer and/or storm sewer within the ROW should be RCP and
minimum 15” in diameter per the City’s Engineering Design Guidelines.
i. It should be noted on the plans what storm sewer is intended to be public
versus remaining private. Responses indicated that a note would be
added to sheet C501 but this was not seen on the plans.
c. An OCS structure is required to be constructed as the ultimate outlet from a site’s
BMP. The applicant should provide an update on the status of the OCS structure
from the infiltration area in the ravine. The applicant should continue to engage
with the City on the timing of the OCS construction.
d. A sump should be included prior to outletting to the forebay. Either a sump should
be added to structure STMH 110, or a sump should be included on both STMH
112 and CBMH 111.
i. From previous Spectro addition plans it appears CBMH 111 was
proposed with a sump; this should be confirmed to have been constructed
and if so noted on the plans.
e. Applicant should confirm with the City if there are plans in the future to convert
Doyle Path from rural to urban. If Doyle Path is planned to be converted to an
urban roadway, it should be discussed if the storm sewer manholes along Doyle
Path should be put in line with the anticipated future curb line.
f. Callout connect to existing storm sewer at the existing outlet location.
g. It should be confirmed if structure 102 is intended to be an open grate structure or
a closed grate structure as the structure ID in the storm sewer schedule and on
the plan view are inconsistent.
h. The castings for structures 102-104 should be confirmed as they appear to callout
castings with curb boxes even though they are not proposed along a curb line.
Page 35 of 109
Spectro Billet – 2024 Expansion Engineering Review
February 23, 2024
Page 4
i. The castings for structures 102 and 103 should be confirmed as they are
calling out raised castings within a paved area.
2. Water Quantity
a. No comments.
3. Rate/Volume Control
a. No comments.
4. Freeboard
a. No comments.
5. Water Quality
a. No comments.
6. Easements
a. No comments.
Page 36 of 109
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Planning Commission Regular Meeting: February 26, 2024
Tenative City Council Meeting: March 19, 2024
AGENDA ITEM: Request by Independent School District 196 for
approval of a rezoning of the site from AG-
Agricultural to R1-Low Density Residential, minor
subdivision, conditional use permit, and site plan
review for an elementary school to be constructed
on site.
AGENDA SECTION:
OLD BUSINESS
PREPARED BY: Julia Hogan, Planner AGENDA NO. 5.a.
ATTACHMENTS: Site Location, Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Site Plan,
Demolition Plan, Geometric Plan, Finishing Plan,
Erosion Control Plan, Grading and Drainage Plan,
Utilities Plan, Landscaping Plan, Photometric Plan,
Architectural Elevations , Draft Traffic Impact Study,
City Engineer's Memo Dated January 15, 2024,
Stormwater Review Memo Dated January 16, 2024,
Parks and Recreation Director's Memo Dated
January 17, 2024
APPROVED BY: AK
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
1. Motion to recommend the City Council approve a Zoning Map amendment to rezone the site from
AG-Agricultural to R1 – Low Density Residential.
2. Motion to recommend the City Council approve the minor subdivision for Rosemount School District
Third Addition, subject to all conditions approved as part of the City’s site and building design review
for the project.
3. Motion to approve the site plan and building design to allow Independent School District 196 to
construct a new elementary school on Rosemount School District Third Addition, subject to the
following conditions:
a. Approval of the Rosemount School District Third Addition minor subdivision.
b. The traffic study must be updated to address city staff and reviewer comments and completed
prior to City Council approval.
c. ISD 196 will be required to undertake a supplemental and more detailed examination of
pedestrian safety solutions in the immediate area, working in partnership with the City and
Dakota County. Solutions which are found to be warranted will need to be in place prior to the
school opening.
d. Conformance with all conditions of the City Engineer as outlined in the memo dated January 15,
2024, and associated stormwater review memo dated January 16, 2024.
Page 37 of 109
e. Applicant will need to verify that lumens on photometric plan do not exceed .05 at residential
property lines prior to City Council approval.
f. Conformance with the requirements of the Parks and Recreations Director contained within the
memo dated January 17, 2024.
g. Site signage shall require a separate sign permit and meet the requirement of signs in the PI
zoning district.
h. Light fixtures within 100 feet of a residential property line shall be no higher than 20 feet.
4. Motion to recommend the City Council approve a Conditional Use Permit for an elementary school
to be located on the Rosemount School District Third Addition subject to all conditions approved as
part of the City’s site and building design review for the project.
BACKGROUND
UPDATE
The Planning Commission held a public hearing at their January 23, 2024, meeting to review the
requests for a rezoning of the site, minor subdivision, site plan review, and conditional use permit for
an elementary school to be built on a 34.51 acres site located west of Akron Ave and south of Bonaire
Path West. Staff presented the requests to the Commission with the recommendation that they
continue the item until the February 26, 2024, Planning Commission meeting due to the lack of a traffic
study, which the city requested the applicant provide. There were several public comments from
residents regarding concerns for safety and traffic around the proposed school site. The Commission
voted unanimously to continue the item until the February Planning Commission meeting so that the
applicant could submit a traffic study to the city for review.
The applicant did provide the city with a draft traffic study that is being reviewed by the city and the
city’s consultant. The applicant also resubmitted updated engineering plans and an updated landscape
plan to offset the fee-in-lieu of replacement trees.
SUMMARY
Application & Property Owner(s): Independent School District 196 (Rosemount, Apple Valley,
Eagan Public Schools)
Location: West of Akron Avenue and South of Bonaire Path West
Areas in Acres: 34.51-Acres
Comp. Guide Plan Designation: LDR - Low Density Residential
Current Zoning: AG - Agricultural
Requested Zoning: R1 - Low Density Residential
The Planning Commission is being asked to consider requests submitted by Independent School District
196 (Rosemount, Apple Valley, Eagan Public Schools) for approval of a rezoning, minor subdivision, site
plan and building design review and conditional use permit to construct an elementary school on the
proposed 34.41 acre site located directly west of Akron Avenue and south of Bonaire Path West. The
Page 38 of 109
applicant is requesting the site be rezoned from AG-Agricultural to R1 – Low Density Residential
because elementary schools are not an allowed use within the AG zoning district but are an allowed
conditional use within the R1 zoning district, which is why a conditional use permit is being requested
as well. The applicant is requesting a minor subdivision to plat the land since the site is currently
unplatted. A site plan review and building design is being requested by the applicant because they are
required for all commercial, industrial, institutional, and multifamily development projects. Staff is
recommending approval of the four requested items, subject to the conditions listed in the
recommended actions.
BACKGROUND
The City of Rosemount currently has one large school campus area that includes the Rosemount High
School, Rosemount Middle School and Rosemount Elementary school, all of which have been located
on the present site west of Robert Trail South since the mid 1960’s when the high school was built in
that location. Portions of the middle school and elementary schools were on or near their present
locations prior to construction of the high school. Over time, each of the buildings on the campus have
been modified and expanded to accommodate the needs of a growing district and to add space for a
growing student population. Independent School District 196 is now the 4th largest district in
Minnesota with the current Rosemount schools serving over 4,500 students.
In recognition of the need for safety and security and space for growth around the school district, ISD
196 brought forward a combined $493 million dollar bond referendum in 2023. The first portion of the
referendum was for $374 million dollars, which would include safety and security improvements at all
district schools, a new elementary school, a new Rosemount middle school and repurposing the
current school. Additions were also proposed for various other schools within the district and
Rosemount High school. The second portion of the referendum was for $119 million dollars, which was
to include improvements and an activity center at each of the districts four high schools. The
referendum ultimately was approved and was the state’s largest successful public school funding
request in Minnesota history. ISD 196 has owned the 34.51-acre subject site for a number of years,
with the school district and the city anticipating an elementary school to be constructed on this site
when the need was there.
ISSUE ANALYSIS
Legal Authority
Minor Subdivisions, Conditional Use Permits, and Site Plan applications are quasi-judicial decisions for
the Planning Commission, meaning that the Planning Commission is acting as a judge to determine if
the regulations within the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Ordinance are being
followed. Generally, if these applications meet the City’s established requirements, they must be
approved.
Rezonings are a legislative decision for the city, but the rezoning must conform with the adopted
Comprehensive Plan to be approved. Therefore, while technically legislative in nature, if a rezoning is
in line with the Comprehensive Plan, it should be approved. Staff’s review of each application is
provided below.
Rezoning
The subject property is currently zoned AG- Agricultural and is guided for LDR – Low Density
Page 39 of 109
Residential. The applicant is requesting a rezoning of the site from AG-Agricultural to R1 – Low Density
Residential. The need for the rezoning is because elementary schools are not an allowed use within the
AG-Agricultural zoning district, but are an allowed conditional use within the R1 – Low Density
Residential zoning district. Within the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan it describes the Low Density
Residential Land Use as land that provides housing suitable for families with children, and as such,
should be located close to schools, churches, public parks, and neighborhood commercial. The primary
zoning for the LDR land use designation is the R1 zoning district, which is why the applicant is
requesting the rezoning to R1-Low Density Residential.
Minor Subdivision
The minor subdivision process is a platting alternative that combines the approval of the preliminary
and final plats into a single process. Additionally, some of the required engineering feasibility studies
are waived. In this case, the site's engineering and stormwater management was reviewed by staff
through the site plan review process. The 34.51-acre subject site is currently unplatted. When the
applicant came to the city with its request to build a new elementary school the city suggested the
applicant apply for a minor subdivision to plat the site to clean up the boundaries of the site and for
easements located on the site.
Site Plan and Design Review
The purpose of a site plan review is to evaluate each project as it relates to the performance and site
design standards of the zoning ordinance. Site plan approval is required for all commercial, industrial,
institutional and multifamily development projects.
Land Use & Zoning
The subject property is currently zoned AG-Agricultural, and the future land use designated is guided
for LDR – Low Density Residential. The applicant is requesting the site be rezoned to R1-Low Density
Residential. Elementary schools are not an allowed use within the AG zoning district but are an allowed
conditional use within the R1 zoning district. The rezoning of the site to R1-Low Density Residential is in
accordance with the 2040 Future Land Use Plan and Comprehensive Plan.
Site Layout
The 34.51-acre vacant site is located directly west of Akron Ave and south of Bonaire Path West. The
site is mostly rectangular with the western portion of the site being longer than the eastern portion
due to the railroad tracks and residential development to the south. The main principal building is
proposed to be located on the north end of the site, closer to Bonaire Path. There are two parking lots
proposed on the site as well. The eastern parking lot is designated as the main lot, with the
southwestern lot designated as the bus lot. West of the main building and northwest of the bus lot is a
hard play area and soft play area shown. A softball field is also planned to be constructed on site,
which will be located west of the bus lot area and east of the main entrance to the site off of
Kaylemore Trail.
There is one access point into the site which is off of Kaylemore Trail and Ardroe Ave, on the western
side of the site, south of Bonaire Path West. This access road continues east on the site from
Kaylemore Trail and loops around the main lot. There is a series of pedestrian trails shown on the site
plan as well. There are two trails off of the existing sidewalks on Ardroe Ave that lead to the main
building. There is also a trail shown off of the proposed sidewalk on Bonaire Path West which leads to
Page 40 of 109
the main building as well. On the southern portion of the site, it is shown to have stormwater ponding
and infiltration basin.
Lot and Building Standards.
The proposed elementary school site covers over 34 acres of land with a significant amount of open
space that will be dedicated to a ballfield, play areas, and open space at the southern end of the site.
The plans submitted for the proposed building show a combination of classrooms, common areas,
gymnasium, cafeteria, media area, art and music area, etc. Since elementary schools are a conditional
use within the R1-Low Density Residential zoning district, they are subject to the minimum lot
requirements, setbacks, and site and building standards of the PI – Public and Institutional zoning
district. The table below shows the required setbacks in comparison with those provided on the site
plan.
Building Performance Standards for the PI –
Public/Institutional
Category Standard Proposed Elementary
School
Standard Proposed Parking
Surfaces
Front (Ardroe Ave) 30 ft. >30-feet 20 ft. >20 ft.
Side (Railroad Tracks) 30 ft. >30-feet 10 ft. >10 ft.
Side (Bonaire Path West) 30 ft. >30-feet 10 ft. >10 ft.
Rear (Akron Ave) 30 ft. >30 ft. 10 ft. >10 ft.
Exterior Building Materials
The PI – Public Institutional building materials standards require the building to be at least 50% brick or
natural stone. The remaining 50% of the wall surface may be specialty integral colored concrete block,
tile, architectural textured concrete cast in place or better. Up to 10% of the building can be used for
materials not listed above as accents. Buildings are required to have “360 degree” architecture so that
all sides of the building meet the architectural standards. The building elevation plans that were
submitted by the applicant show that the exterior of the principal building will be a mixture of brick,
precast wall panels, and ornamental metal panels. While metal paneling and siding is not normally
permitted in the PI – Public Institutional zoning district, the metal panel/siding façade is of a quality
considered “equal to or better” in the permitted materials within the code. The applicant has
expressed that the proposed principal building will have a similar look and design to the newly built
elementary school in Lakeville called East Lake, which is south of County Road 46.
Traffic
Staff received a draft traffic study from the applicant earlier this month which included existing
conditions of the site, traffic forecasts, traffic analysis and conclusions and recommendations. The
city’s public works/engineering department as well as the city’s consultants were able to initially
review the draft study. Some takeaways that city staff and reviewers found from the draft report are
shown below:
• There is adequate space internal to the site to contain drop-off/pick-up queues.
• Additional traffic and peak hours do not substantially impact the level of service provided by
Page 41 of 109
the intersections at Bonaire/Ardhoe, or Bonaire/Akron, and no changes to the way these two
intersections are controlled are warranted at this time.
• With a change in configuration at the intersection of Ardroe Avenue/Kaylemore Trail, it is
recommended that the city modify the traffic controls such that Ardroe becomes the through
street and Kaylemore Trail to be stop-controlled on approach to Ardroe Ave.
• The City and School district will need to continue to collaborate on examining and developing
plans for pedestrian safety implements along Bonaire Path and will continue to consult with
Dakota County to address the same along Akron Avenue in the vicinity of the school site. There
is adequate time prior to the completion of the school and opening to provide such
enhancements where justified under City/County policies and warrants.
City staff are requiring conditions to be included with the recommended action. One of the conditions
requires the applicant to update the traffic study to address staff and reviewer comments prior to City
Council approval. City staff and the city’s consultant did not find any fatal flaws in the content of the
report but are requiring the comments be incorporated into the traffic study to make the report more
complete and usable toward future work. A second conditions will be included, which will require the
school district to undertake a supplemental and more detailed examination of pedestrian safety
solutions, working with the City and Dakota County, and implementing those solutions prior to the
opening of the school.
Access & Parking
The site is shown to be accessed by a road off of Kaylemore Trail and Ardroe Ave. Ardroe Ave extends
south from Bonaire Path West and leads into the newly developed Ardan Place subdivision. Off of
Ardroe Ave is Kaylemore Trail, which also extends into the Ardan Place subdivision, but the access road
to the proposed elementary site will extend off of that road to the east. The main access road enters
the site on the western site and extends east, looping south of the proposed ballfield and then goes
north to access the two parking lot areas. The eastern parking lot area is shown as the main lot with
the access road shown to loop around this main lot. The parking area that is southwest of the main
building is shown to be the secondary lot and bus lot with additional access to the main building.
There are 153 parking stalls proposed for the eastern main lot parking area. For the secondary
parking/bus lot area there are 15 proposed bus stalls and 77 parking stalls. Some of the parking stalls in
the secondary lot will be unusable during times when buses are parked there, but during non-school
times the additional parking will be beneficial with the additional recreational amenities on site. The
city’s parking requirements are the same for the various types of public schools: one parking stall for
each classroom and one per 20 students. The elementary school is proposed to have 638 students
attend it, which would require 32 parking stalls for the student portion. At this time, staff was not
provided an exact number of classrooms proposed for the building, but staff are confident that the
proposed 230 parking stalls planned for the site will be a sufficient amount of stalls for the site.
Parks and Trails
The proposed elementary school site has shown a network of sidewalks and trails providing access to
the site from neighboring communities and internally. Shown are trails off of Ardroe Ave to the site
which will provide access to the playground area, hard court area, softball field and main building.
There are also trails shown along the entirety of the site along Bonaire Path West and a trail off of that
Page 42 of 109
that leads to the main building. There are sidewalks connecting to the different entrances to the main
building which will help with safety to and from the different parking lots on site.
The City of Rosemount Parks and Recreation department reviewed the submitted development plans
and have provided review comments in the attached memorandum. The Parks and Rec department are
recommending that park dedication not be collected due to the public recreation spaces being created
on site, which consist of a large playground, hard court space, a ballfield, and greenspaces.
Landscaping
The applicant has provided an updated landscape plan showing additional trees to be planted on site.
The original landscape plan showed a total of 156 trees were to be planted, 116 of those trees were to
be deciduous and 40 were to conifer. The updated landscape plan now shows a total of 311 trees to be
planted throughout the site. 224 of the proposed trees will be deciduous and 87 will be conifers. The
trees are shown to be spread out along the right of way areas of Ardroe Ave, Bonaire Path West and
Akron Ave. They also have trees shown along the access road to the site and some along the
stormwater ponding in the southern portion of the site. Currently, on the site there is a 3-acre area of
existing trees on the western portion of the site, as well as existing trees along the railroad tracks that
run along the southern boundary of the site. A portion of the 3-acre area of existing trees will need to
be removed for the access road into the site, but the other existing trees will remain. A mixture of
different sods and seeds will be planted around the site. There will be sod planted around the main
building, the main parking area, and around the playground/hard court area. The proposed ballfield
will contain an athletic seed mix with area around the ballfield and playground areas as a general seed
mix.
The city’s tree removal and replacement requirements will apply to this site. The applicant is
proposing to eliminate a total of 2116 caliper inches. The city code states that 25% of existing caliper
inches of trees can be removed during development without obligation of replacement, but removal
beyond 25% will require replacement. The applicant was previously proposing to provide 389 caliper
inches of replacement trees on site, which was to be provided with 156 trees. That was a shortfall of
389 caliper inches of replacement. The updated landscape plan now shows 778 caliper inches of
replacement trees on site, which will be provided with 311 trees. There is no longer a shortfall in
caliper inches of replacement, so fee-in-lieu of replacement is now no longer needed.
Also required by the landscaping ordinance is one foundation planting for every 10 linear feet of
building exterior. The proposed building has 1,596 linear feet of perimeter, which requires a total of
160 foundation plantings. The landscape plan includes 160 total foundation plantings located around
the main entrance of the principal building and around the main parking area.
Signs
No signs are shown on the applicant’s plans. Generally, signs are reviewed and approved
administratively through the sign permitting process. Staff has included a condition reiterating that a
sign permit must be submitted for any site signage.
Site Lighting
The applicant has submitted an overall lighting and photometric plan as part of the request, and the
Page 43 of 109
plans demonstrate compliance with the City’s light intensity standards. Specifically, the light fixtures to
be used are shielded and will direct light towards the ground and not towards residential property. The
maximum level of lighting allowed by the code is 0.5 lumen at adjacent residential property lines and
1.0 lumen at non-residential property lines. The plan overall adheres to the lumen requirements, but
the applicant will need to verify that the levels of lighting does not exceed over 0.5 lumen across
Bonaire Path West to the residential development to the north and does not exceed 0.5 lumen near
the trail area off of Ardroe Ave and Kaylemore Trail prior to City Council approval. The plans do not
show the height of the poles on which the lights will be mounted, but the zoning ordinance maximum
is 30-feet except for if it is within 100-feet of a residential use, then the maximum height is 20-feet.
This standard will be called out as a condition of approval.
Engineering
Detailed grading, erosion control, and storm water management plans have been submitted with the
applications and these plans, along with the proposed connections to existing City utilities within and
adjacent to the project site, have been reviewed by the City Engineer. The engineer’s comments and
recommendations are included in a January 15, 2024, memorandum (attached), and include specific
recommendations concerning planned utility connections and the submitted geometric/finishing plans.
A stormwater management review memorandum was also completed and is attached as well.
Comments in that memo include specific recommendations concerning grading, drainage, and erosion
control and comments on the submitted stormwater management plan specifically regarding the
general storm sewer design.
Conditional Use Permit Review
A conditional use permit (CUP) is required for elementary and middle or special needs schools within
the R1-Low Density Residential zoning district. The City may approve a CUP upon finding that the use at
the proposed location:
1. Will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, or general welfare of the
neighborhood or the city.
2. Will be harmonious with the objectives of the comprehensive plan and city code provisions.
3. Will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained so as to be compatible or similar in an
architectural and landscape appearance with the existing or intended character of the general
vicinity and will not change the essential character of that area, nor substantially diminish or
impair property values within the neighborhood.
4. Will be served adequately by existing (or those proposed in the project) essential public
facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage, structures, refuse
disposal, water and sewer systems and schools.
5. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, material equipment and conditions of operation that
will be hazardous or detrimental to any persons, property, or the general welfare because of
excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors.
6. Will have vehicular ingress and egress to the property which does not create traffic congestion
or interfere with traffic on surrounding public streets.
7. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic, or historic feature of
major importance and will comply with all local, state, and federal environmental quality
standards.
8. These standards apply in addition to specific conditions as may be applied throughout this
Page 44 of 109
code.
Based on the staff review and analysis for the above site and building design analysis, staff has
determined that the proposed elementary school meets each of these required findings.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff is recommending approval of the rezoning of the site from AG-Agricultural to R1-Low Density
Residential, minor subdivision, site plan and building design review and conditional use permit for a
new elementary school to be built on a 34.51 acre site west of Akron Ave and south of Bonaire Path
West subject to conditions of approval outlined in the recommend action section above.
Page 45 of 109
Page 46 of 109
N
Page 47 of 109
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
N
SIT
E
Page 48 of 109
HakansonAnderson
Page 49 of 109
HakansonAnderson
N
SIT
E
Page 50 of 109
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
ONLY
BUS
ON
L
Y
BU
S
ON
L
Y
BU
S
ONLY
BUS
ONLY
BUS
D
R
O
P
O
F
F
BYPASS DROP
OFF
DROPOFF
DROP OFF
DROP
OFF
D
R
O
P
O
F
F
DROP OFF
BYPASS
B
Y
P
A
S
S
BYPASS
B
Y
P
A
S
S
BYPASS
BYPASS
10 9
8 7 6
5 4 3
2 1
10 9
8 7 6
5 4 3
2 1
10 9
8 7 6
5 4 3
2 1
10 9
8 7 6
5 4 3
2 1
10 9
8 7 6
5 4 3
2 1
10 9
8 7 6
5 4 3
2 1
10 9
8 7 6
5 4 3
2 1
PROJECT MATCH LINE
PROJECT MATCH LINE
PROPOSED BUILDING
STORMWATER POND
INFILTRATION AREA
REGIONAL BASIN
1618
REGIONAL BASIN
3060
C1.01
OVERALL SITE PLAN
R
FEETSCALE
0
HORZ.
60 120
DateRegistration Number
Check:
Drawn:
Date:
Comm:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by
me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
under the laws of the State of
H
G
F
E
D
C
B
A
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 109
C
MN
Revisions
Description Date Num
Scale:
North
3300 FERNBROOK LANE NORTH, SUITE 300
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
Phone: (763) 544-7129
Email: goldenvalley@bolton-menk.com
www.bolton-menk.com
R
XX/XX/XX
232104
XX/XX/2024
JDO
MINNESOTA
PUBLIC SCHOOLS
3455 153RD STREET WEST
APPLE VALLEY - EAGAN
NEW ELEMENTARY
ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068
SCHOOL #20
ISD #196: ROSEMOUNT -
DAVID A. REY
DAR
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
40180
Page 51 of 109
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
PROPOSED BUILDING
STORMWATER POND
INFILTRATION AREA
REGIONAL BASIN
1618
REGIONAL BASIN
3060
Pum
p
e
r
F
i
r
e
T
r
u
c
k
Pumper Fire Truck
C1.02
SITE TURNING
MOTIONS
R
FEETSCALE
0
HORZ.
40 80
DateRegistration Number
Check:
Drawn:
Date:
Comm:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by
me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
under the laws of the State of
H
G
F
E
D
C
B
A
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 109
C
MN
Revisions
Description Date Num
Scale:
North
3300 FERNBROOK LANE NORTH, SUITE 300
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
Phone: (763) 544-7129
Email: goldenvalley@bolton-menk.com
www.bolton-menk.com
R
XX/XX/XX
232104
XX/XX/2024
JDO
MINNESOTA
PUBLIC SCHOOLS
3455 153RD STREET WEST
APPLE VALLEY - EAGAN
NEW ELEMENTARY
ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068
SCHOOL #20
ISD #196: ROSEMOUNT -
DAVID A. REY
DAR
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
40180
Page 52 of 109
OU
T
L
O
T
C
OU
T
L
O
T
E
E1/2 of the SW1/4 E1/2 of the SW1/4
PROJECT MATCH LINE
PROJECT MATCH LINE
REMOVE ASPHALT
REMOVE CURB & GUTTER
REMOVE ASPHALT
REMOVE CURB & GUTTER
REMOVE PEDESTRIAN RAMP
REMOVE PEDESTRIAN RAMP
/
/
/
/////////////////
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
////////////
/////////////////////////////////////
/////////////////////
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
REMOVE TREES/SHRUBS
PROTECT WALK
PROTECT WALK
PROTECT WALK PROTECT WALK
REMOVE CONCRETE
REMOVE STOP SIGN
PROTECT UTILITIES
PROTECT STORM STRUCTURE
C1.11
DEMOLITION PLAN
NORTH
R
FEETSCALE
0
HORZ.
DateRegistration Number
Check:
Drawn:
Date:
Comm:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by
me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
under the laws of the State of
H
G
F
E
D
C
B
A
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 109
C
MN
Revisions
Description Date Num
Scale:
North
3300 FERNBROOK LANE NORTH, SUITE 300
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
Phone: (763) 544-7129
Email: goldenvalley@bolton-menk.com
www.bolton-menk.com
R
XX/XX/XX
232104
XX/XX/2024
JDO
MINNESOTA
PUBLIC SCHOOLS
3455 153RD STREET WEST
APPLE VALLEY - EAGAN
NEW ELEMENTARY
ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068
SCHOOL #20
ISD #196: ROSEMOUNT -
DAVID A. REY
DAR
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
40180
/////////////////////////////////
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER REMOVALS
UNDERGROUND UTILITY REMOVALS
CONCRETE PAVEMENT REMOVALS
ASPHALT PAVEMENT REMOVALS
SAWCUT
TREE REMOVAL
MASS TREE AND SHRUB REMOVALS
PROPERTY LINE
LEGEND
1.REFER TO SHEET C1.41, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN NORTH, FOR GENERAL NOTES.
2.MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE TO SITE AND PROTECT EXISTING VEGETATION AND SITE FEATURES (CURBS, WALKS, PAVEMENTS,
OVERHEAD AND UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, SIGNAGE, FENCING, ROADWAYS, ETC.) WHICH ARE TO REMAIN.
3.REPAIR OR REPLACE EXISTING PROPERTY AND SITE FEATURES, INCLUDING GRASS AND VEGETATION, WHICH IS TO REMAIN THAT
IS DAMAGED BY THE WORK, TO THE OWNER'S SATISFACTION AND AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER.
4.VISIT THE SITE PRIOR TO BIDDING; BE FAMILIAR WITH ACTUAL CONDITIONS IN THE FIELD. EXTRA COMPENSATION WILL NOT BE
ALLOWED FOR CONDITIONS WHICH COULD HAVE BEEN DETERMINED OR ANTICIPATED BY EXAMINATION OF THE SITE, THE
CONTRACT DRAWINGS AND THE INFORMATION AVAILABLE PERTAINING TO EXISTING SOILS, UTILITIES AND OTHER SITE
CHARACTERISTICS.
5.HIRE THE SERVICES OF A UTILITY LOCATOR COMPANY TO LOCATE ALL PRIVATELY OWNED UTILITIES THAT MAY BE DISTURBED BY
CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS.
NOTES
Page 53 of 109
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
OU
T
L
O
T
C
OU
T
L
O
T
E
OU
T
L
O
T
D
OUTLOT D
4
3
2
1
PREST
W
I
C
K
P
L
A
C
E
1
3
T
H
A
D
D
I
T
I
O
N
1
2
3
PREST
W
I
C
K
PLACE
1
6
T
H
ADDIT
I
O
N
5
4
3
2
1
PREST
W
I
C
K
P
L
A
C
E
1
9
T
H
A
D
D
I
T
I
O
N
13
12
11
10
PREST
W
I
C
K
P
L
A
C
E
2
0
T
H
A
D
D
I
T
I
O
N
AR
D
A
N
P
L
A
C
E
E1/2 of the SW1/4
E1/2 of the SW1/4
PROJECT MATCH LINE
PROJECT MATCH LINE
REMOVE TREES/SHRUBS
REMOVE ASPHALT
///////////////////////
REMOVE TREES/SHRUBS
REMOVE STOP SIGN
C1.12
DEMOLITION PLAN
SOUTH
R
FEETSCALE
0
HORZ.
DateRegistration Number
Check:
Drawn:
Date:
Comm:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by
me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
under the laws of the State of
H
G
F
E
D
C
B
A
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 109
C
MN
Revisions
Description Date Num
Scale:
North
3300 FERNBROOK LANE NORTH, SUITE 300
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
Phone: (763) 544-7129
Email: goldenvalley@bolton-menk.com
www.bolton-menk.com
R
XX/XX/XX
232104
XX/XX/2024
JDO
MINNESOTA
PUBLIC SCHOOLS
3455 153RD STREET WEST
APPLE VALLEY - EAGAN
NEW ELEMENTARY
ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068
SCHOOL #20
ISD #196: ROSEMOUNT -
DAVID A. REY
DAR
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
40180
1.REFER TO SHEET C1.11, DEMOLITION PLAN NORTH, FOR NOTES.
NOTES
/////////////////////////////////
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER REMOVALS
UNDERGROUND UTILITY REMOVALS
CONCRETE PAVEMENT REMOVALS
ASPHALT PAVEMENT REMOVALS
SAWCUT
TREE REMOVAL
MASS TREE AND SHRUB REMOVALS
PROPERTY LINE
LEGEND
Page 54 of 109
PROJECT MATCH LINE
PROJECT MATCH LINE
PROPOSED BUILDING
REGIONAL BASIN
3060
REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT
>>>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>>>>
R6
4
.
0
0
'
R1
7
.
0
0
'
R8.
0
0
'
R15.0
0
'
R
4
5
.
0
0
'
R
1
5
.
0
0
'
R15.00'
R
1
0
.
0
0
'
R
1
5
.
0
0
'
R15.00'
R
1
5
.
0
0
'
R8
8
.
0
0
'
R1
0
8
.
0
0
'
R15.00'
R
1
5
.
0
0
'
R15.00'
R
1
5
.
0
0
'
R1
0
8
.
0
0
'
R5.00'
R50
.
0
0
'
R
1
5
.
0
0
'
R10.00'
R5
0
.
0
0
'
R
1
0
.
0
0
'
R
3
0
.
0
0
'
R
7
9
.
5
0
'
R20.00'
R36.00
'
R
1
5
.
0
0
'
R15.0
0
'
R
1
0
0
.
0
0
'
R15.00'
R1
5
.
0
0
'
R9
2
.
5
0
'
R3
.
0
0
'
R5.00'
R15.
0
0
'
R5.
0
0
'
R4
.
0
0
'
R
4
.
0
0
'
R4
.
0
0
'
R
4
.
0
0
'
R4
.
0
0
'
R
4
.
0
0
'
R
4
.
0
0
'
R4
.
0
0
'
R
8
.
0
0
'
R4
.
0
0
'
R
4
.
0
0
'
R24.
0
0
'
R4.0
0
'
R4
.
0
0
'
R4
.
0
0
'
R
4
.
0
0
'
R4.00'
R5
.
0
0
'
R8
4
.
0
0
'
R60.00'
R
5
.
0
0
'
R4
.
0
0
'
R5
.
0
0
'
R
4
.
0
0
'
R
4
.
0
0
'
R4
.
0
0
'
R6
0
.
0
0
'
R
8
0
.
0
0
'
R5.00'
R1
4
7
.
5
0
'
R2
4
0
.
0
0
'
R
1
4
0
.
0
0
'
R
1
1
0
.
0
0
'
R1
5
7
.
5
0
'
R8
.
5
0
'
R44.00
'
R200.00'
R
2
5
.
0
0
'
R25.0
0
'
R
6
0
.
0
0
'
R50
.
0
0
'
R30.00'
R
2
0
.
6
9
'
R
1
0
.
0
0
'
R
6
0
.
0
0
'
R
2
1
0
.
0
0
'
R200
.
0
0
'
R
1
0
.
0
0
'
R10
.
0
0
'
6' WALK
6' WALK
36.3
3
'
5.67'
12
8
.
0
0
'
42.00'
24.00'
8' WALK
7
1
.
0
0
'
192.00'
24.00'
24.00'
24.00'
2
3
4
.
0
0
'
27
6
.
5
0
'
36.50'
22.00'
15' WALK
150.
0
0
'
11
0
.
0
0
'
8.00'
(TYP.)
6' WALK
10' WALK
10' WALK
10' WALK20.0
0
'
21.00'
21
.
0
0
'
60.00'
36.0
0
'
7' WALK
8' WALK
8' WALK
9' WALK
8
6
.
0
0
'
5
0
.
0
0
'
R1.50'
R1.50'
27
.
5
6
'
10
0
.
4
4
'
R40.0
0
'R20
.
0
0
'
R13
.
0
0
'
R3.0
0
'
6' WALK7' WALK
R4
4
.
0
0
'
R
1
4
3
.
5
0
'
R
1
8
6
.
0
0
'
3
9
0
.
0
0
'
240.
0
0
'
34
.
6
0
'
24.00'
24.00'
26.00
'
172.00'
R4.00'
24.0
0
'
8.92'
27.4
5
'
41
.
0
0
'
12
.
9
0
'
10' WALK
8' WALK
8' WALK
8' WALK
R47
.
0
0
'
C1.21
GEOMETRIC PLAN
NORTH
R
FEETSCALE
0
HORZ.
40 80
DateRegistration Number
Check:
Drawn:
Date:
Comm:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by
me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
under the laws of the State of
H
G
F
E
D
C
B
A
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 109
C
MN
Revisions
Description Date Num
Scale:
North
3300 FERNBROOK LANE NORTH, SUITE 300
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
Phone: (763) 544-7129
Email: goldenvalley@bolton-menk.com
www.bolton-menk.com
R
XX/XX/XX
232104
XX/XX/2024
JDO
MINNESOTA
PUBLIC SCHOOLS
3455 153RD STREET WEST
APPLE VALLEY - EAGAN
NEW ELEMENTARY
ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068
SCHOOL #20
ISD #196: ROSEMOUNT -
DAVID A. REY
DAR
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
40180
PI
PT
PCC
BASELINE FOR DIMENSIONS
POINT OF INTERSECTION
POINT OF CURVATURE
POINT OF TANGENCY
POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE
PROPOSED BUILDING STOOP - REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS
PROPERTY LINE
PC
LEGEND
1.REFER TO SHEET C1.41, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN NORTH, FOR GENERAL NOTES.
2.ALL APPLICABLE DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CURB, EDGE OF PAVEMENT, CENTERLINE OF FENCE, OR
PROPERTY LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
3.CHECK ALL PLAN AND DETAIL DIMENSIONS AND VERIFY SAME BEFORE FIELD LAYOUT.
4.TRAFFIC SIGNS SHALL BE INSTALLED 18" BEHIND THE BACK OF CURB OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT.
NOTES
Page 55 of 109
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
ONLY
BUS
ON
L
Y
BU
S
ON
L
Y
BU
S
ONLY
BUS
ONLY
BUS
DROP
OFF
D
R
O
P
O
F
F
BYPASS
B
Y
P
A
S
S
PROJECT MATCH LINE
PROJECT MATCH LINE
R1
7
.
0
0
'
R8.
0
0
'
R15.0
0
'
R
4
5
.
0
0
'
R8
.
5
0
'
R
2
1
0
.
0
0
'
42.00'
27
6
.
5
0
'
36.0
0
'
27
.
5
6
'
10
0
.
4
4
'
15.00'
39.00'
12.00'
12.00'
R1
6
0
.
0
0
'
R2
0
0
.
0
0
'
R
4
5
0
.
0
0
'
R
4
9
2
.
5
0
'
R40.0
0
'
R2
0
.
0
0
'
R13
.
0
0
'
R3.0
0
'
6' WALK7' WALK
R4
4
.
0
0
'
R
1
4
3
.
5
0
'
R
1
8
6
.
0
0
'
240.
0
0
'
3
9
0
.
0
0
'
240.
0
0
'
C1.22
GEOMETRIC PLAN
SOUTH
R
FEETSCALE
0
HORZ.
40 80
DateRegistration Number
Check:
Drawn:
Date:
Comm:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by
me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
under the laws of the State of
H
G
F
E
D
C
B
A
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 109
C
MN
Revisions
Description Date Num
Scale:
North
3300 FERNBROOK LANE NORTH, SUITE 300
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
Phone: (763) 544-7129
Email: goldenvalley@bolton-menk.com
www.bolton-menk.com
R
XX/XX/XX
232104
XX/XX/2024
JDO
MINNESOTA
PUBLIC SCHOOLS
3455 153RD STREET WEST
APPLE VALLEY - EAGAN
NEW ELEMENTARY
ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068
SCHOOL #20
ISD #196: ROSEMOUNT -
DAVID A. REY
DAR
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
40180
PI
PT
PCC
BASELINE FOR DIMENSIONS
POINT OF INTERSECTION
POINT OF CURVATURE
POINT OF TANGENCY
POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE
PROPOSED BUILDING STOOP - REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS
PROPERTY LINE
PC
LEGEND
1.REFER TO SHEET C1.21, GEOMETRIC PLAN NORTH, FOR NOTES.
NOTES
Page 56 of 109
D
R
O
P
O
F
F
BYPASS DROP
OFF
DROPOFF
DROP OFF
DROP
OFF
D
R
O
P
O
F
F
DROP OFF
BYPASS
B
Y
P
A
S
S
BYPASS
B
Y
P
A
S
S
BYPASS
BYPASS
10 9
8 7 6
5 4 3
2 1
10 9
8 7 6
5 4 3
2 1
10 9
8 7 6
5 4 3
2 1
10 9
8 7 6
5 4 3
2 1
10 9
8 7 6
5 4 3
2 1
10 9
8 7 6
5 4 3
2 1
10 9
8 7 6
5 4 3
2 1
PROJECT MATCH LINE
PROJECT MATCH LINE
PROPOSED BUILDING
REGIONAL BASIN
3060
SOFTBALL 1
HARD PLAY
SOFT PLAY
MAIN LOT
150 STALLS
BUS LOT
15 STALLS
30
.
0
0
'
S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
S
e
t
b
a
c
k
fr
o
m
E
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
30.00' Structure Setback
from Easement
5.00' Parking Setback
from Easement
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
S
S
S
D
D
>>>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>>>>
75.00'
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
4" YELLOW PAINT STRIPE
SENSORY PATH (BY OWNER)
FLAGPOLE - REFER TO
ARCHITECTURAL DETAIL C1/A8.01
TRANSITION OVER 10' TO
MATCH EXISTING CURB STYLE
REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT
3
C1.73
3
C1.73
3
C1.73
2
C1.73
2
C1.73
3
C1.73
3
C1.73
3
C1.73
1
C1.73
1
C1.73
1
C1.73
1
C1.73
2
C1.73
3
3
C1.73
7
C1.73
7
C1.73
9
C1.73
9
C1.73
10
C1.73
10
C1.73
4B
C1.73
4B
C1.73
4
C1.73
4
C1.73
PAINTED SINGLE WHITE STRIPE
PAINTED SINGLE WHITE STRIPE
PAINTED SINGLE WHITE STRIPE
TRANSITION OVER 10' TO
MATCH EXISTING CURB STYLE
11
C1.72
10
C1.72
10
C1.72
10
C1.72
8
C1.72
8
C1.72
11
C1.72
8
C1.72
8
C1.72
8
C1.72
8
C1.72
8
C1.72
8
C1.72
8
C1.72
8
C1.72
12
C1.72
12
C1.72
12
C1.72
12
C1.72
12
C1.72
12
C1.72
12
C1.72
12
C1.72
13
C1.72
PROPOSED LOADING DOCK -
REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS
FOR LAYOUT AND DIMENSIONS
3
C1.73
13
C1.72
11
C1.72
8
C1.72
8
C1.72 11
C1.72
10
C1.72
11
C1.72
8
C1.72
10
C1.72
10
C1.72
10
C1.72
11
C1.72
8
C1.72
8
C1.72
8 3
C1.73
3
C1.73
11
C1.72
10
C1.72
11
C1.7210
C1.72
1
C1.73
5.
0
0
'
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
S
e
t
b
a
c
k
fr
o
m
E
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
3
C1.73
8
C1.72
10
C1.72
11
C1.72
10
C1.72
RETAINING WALL - REFER TO
ARCHITECTURAL PLANS
BASES BY OWNER (TYP)
PITCHING MOUND BY OWNER
PAINTED SINGLE WHITE STRIPE
10
C1.72
PAINTED BYPASS LANE TEXT
WITH WORD "BYPASS"
(TYP.)
8
C1.72
5
C1.73
12
C1.73
6
C1.73
GAGA PIT
(BY OWNER)
C1.23
FINISHING PLAN
NORTH
R
FEETSCALE
0
HORZ.
40 80
DateRegistration Number
Check:
Drawn:
Date:
Comm:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by
me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
under the laws of the State of
H
G
F
E
D
C
B
A
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 109
C
MN
Revisions
Description Date Num
Scale:
North
3300 FERNBROOK LANE NORTH, SUITE 300
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
Phone: (763) 544-7129
Email: goldenvalley@bolton-menk.com
www.bolton-menk.com
R
XX/XX/XX
232104
XX/XX/2024
JDO
MINNESOTA
PUBLIC SCHOOLS
3455 153RD STREET WEST
APPLE VALLEY - EAGAN
NEW ELEMENTARY
ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068
SCHOOL #20
ISD #196: ROSEMOUNT -
DAVID A. REY
DAR
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
40180
4'
CLF
X
X
A
D
REFERENCE KEY TO SITE DETAILS
DETAIL I.D. NUMBER (TOP)
DETAIL SHEET NUMBER (BOTTOM)
PROPOSED CONCRETE WALK
PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB
PROPOSED LIGHT DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT
PROPOSED MEDIUM DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT
PROPOSED HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT
PROPOSED SOFT PLAY AREA
PROPOSED RETAINING WALL - REFER TO STRUCTURAL PLANS
PROPOSED CHAIN LINK FENCING
FENCING KEY NOTE
PROPOSED TRAFFIC SIGN
SIGNAGE KEY NOTE
PROPOSED BOLLARD
PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE SYMBOL
PROPOSED MANHOLE (MH)
PROPOSED CATCH BASIN (CB)
PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION (FES)
PROPOSED HYDRANT (HYD)
PROPOSED GATE VALVE (GV)
PROPOSED FLAGPOLE - REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS
PROPOSED BUILDING STOOP - REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS
PROPOSED LIGHT POLE - REFER TO ELECTRICAL PLANS
PROPERTY LINE
LEGEND
1.REFER TO SHEET C1.41, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN NORTH, FOR GENERAL NOTES.
2.CHECK ALL PLAN AND DETAIL DIMENSIONS AND VERIFY SAME BEFORE FIELD LAYOUT.
3.TRAFFIC SIGNS SHALL BE INSTALLED 18'' BEHIND THE BACK OF CURB OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT.
4.ALL DISTURBED AREAS OUTSIDE THE BUILDING PAD, WHICH ARE NOT DESIGNATED TO BE PAVED OR RECEIVE
AGLIME, SHALL RECEIVE AT LEAST 6” OF TOPSOIL AND SHALL BE SODDED OR SEEDED. ALL AREAS NOT
DESIGNATED FOR SOD OR A SPECIFIC SEED MIX, WHICH ARE DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION, SHALL BE SEEDED
WITH SEED MIX #1.
5.WHERE NEW SOD MEETS EXISTING SOD, CUT A CLEAN, SHARP EDGE TO ALLOW FOR A CONSISTENT, UNIFORM,
AND STRAIGHT JOINT BETWEEN NEW SOD AND EXISTING TURFGRASS. JAGGED OR UNEVEN JOINTS WILL NOT
BE ACCEPTED. REMOVE TOPSOIL AT THE JOINT BETWEEN NEW SOD AND EXISTING TURFGRASS, AS REQUIRED,
TO ALLOW NEW SOD SURFACE TO BE FLUSH WITH EXISTING TURFGRASS SURFACE.
6.FAILURE OF TURF DEVELOPMENT: IN THE EVENT THE CONTRACTOR FAILS TO PROVIDE AN ACCEPTABLE TURF,
RE-SOD OR RE-SEED ALL APPLICABLE AREAS, AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER, TO THE SATISFACTION
OF THE ENGINEER OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.
NOTES
12
C1.72
13
C1.72
1
C1.73
2
C1.73
3
C1.73
4
C1.73
4B
C1.73
SIGNAGE KEY NOTES
MnMUTCD R1-1
(30"x30")A
5
C1.73
8
C1.73
A
Page 57 of 109
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
ONLY
BUS
ON
L
Y
BU
S
ON
L
Y
BU
S
ONLY
BUS
ONLY
BUS
DROP
OFF
D
R
O
P
O
F
F
BYPASS
B
Y
P
A
S
S
PROJECT MATCH LINE
PROJECT MATCH LINE
STORMWATER POND
INFILTRATION AREA
REGIONAL BASIN
1618
D
D
D
D
D
D
S
S
D
1
2
3
TRANSITION OVER 10' TO
MATCH EXISTING CURB STYLE
3
C1.73
3
C1.73
3
C1.73
3
C1.73
3
C1.73
7
C1.73
7
C1.73
7
C1.73 11
C1.72
10
C1.72
10
C1.72
8
C1.72 8
C1.72
8
C1.723
C1.73
13
C1.72
8
C1.72
8
C1.72
8
C1.72
8
C1.72
8
C1.72
8
C1.72
8
C1.72
11
C1.72
10
C1.72
8
C1.72
3
C1.73
3
C1.73
3
C1.73
3
C1.73
3
C1.73
ARCHITECTURAL PLANS
PITCHING MOUND BY OWNER
PAINTED BUS LANE TEXT WITH
WORDS "BUS ONLY"
(TYP.)
PAINTED BYPASS LANE TEXT
WITH WORD "BYPASS"
(TYP.)
PAINTED DROP OFF LANE TEXT
WITH WORDS "DROP OFF"
(TYP.)
8
C1.72
5
C1.73
C1.24
FINISHING PLAN
SOUTH
R
FEETSCALE
0
HORZ.
40 80
DateRegistration Number
Check:
Drawn:
Date:
Comm:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by
me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
under the laws of the State of
H
G
F
E
D
C
B
A
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 109
C
MN
Revisions
Description Date Num
Scale:
North
3300 FERNBROOK LANE NORTH, SUITE 300
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
Phone: (763) 544-7129
Email: goldenvalley@bolton-menk.com
www.bolton-menk.com
R
XX/XX/XX
232104
XX/XX/2024
JDO
MINNESOTA
PUBLIC SCHOOLS
3455 153RD STREET WEST
APPLE VALLEY - EAGAN
NEW ELEMENTARY
ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068
SCHOOL #20
ISD #196: ROSEMOUNT -
DAVID A. REY
DAR
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
40180
1.REFER TO SHEET C1.23, FINISHING PLAN NORTH, FOR NOTES.
NOTES
4'
CLF
X
X
A
D
REFERENCE KEY TO SITE DETAILS
DETAIL I.D. NUMBER (TOP)
DETAIL SHEET NUMBER (BOTTOM)
PROPOSED CONCRETE WALK
PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB
PROPOSED LIGHT DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT
PROPOSED MEDIUM DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT
PROPOSED HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT
PROPOSED SOFT PLAY AREA
PROPOSED RETAINING WALL - REFER TO STRUCTURAL PLANS
PROPOSED CHAIN LINK FENCING
FENCING KEY NOTE
PROPOSED TRAFFIC SIGN
SIGNAGE KEY NOTE
PROPOSED BOLLARD
PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE SYMBOL
PROPOSED MANHOLE (MH)
PROPOSED CATCH BASIN (CB)
PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION (FES)
PROPOSED HYDRANT (HYD)
PROPOSED GATE VALVE (GV)
PROPOSED FLAGPOLE - REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS
PROPOSED BUILDING STOOP - REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS
PROPOSED LIGHT POLE - REFER TO ELECTRICAL PLANS
PROPERTY LINE
LEGEND
12
C1.72
13
C1.72
1
C1.73
2
C1.73
3
C1.73
4
C1.73
4B
C1.73
5
C1.73
8
C1.73
SIGNAGE KEY NOTES
MnMUTCD R1-1
(30"x30")A
Page 58 of 109
D
R
O
P
O
F
F
BYPASS DROP
OFF
DROPOFF
DROP OFF
DROP
OFF
D
R
O
P
O
F
F
DROP OFF
BYPASS
B
Y
P
A
S
S
BYPASS
B
Y
P
A
S
S
BYPASS
BYPASS
10 9
8 7 6
5 4 3
2 1
10 9
8 7 6
5 4 3
2 1
10 9
8 7 6
5 4 3
2 1
10 9
8 7 6
5 4 3
2 1
10 9
8 7 6
5 4 3
2 1
10 9
8 7 6
5 4 3
2 1
10 9
8 7 6
5 4 3
2 1
PROJECT MATCH LINE
PROJECT MATCH LINE
PROPOSED BUILDING
REGIONAL BASIN
3060
SOFTBALL 1
HARD PLAY
SOFT PLAY
MAIN LOT
150 STALLS
BUS LOT
15 STALLS
30
.
0
0
'
S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
S
e
t
b
a
c
k
fr
o
m
E
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
30.00' Structure Setback
from Easement
5.00' Parking Setback
from Easement
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
S
S
S
D
D
>>>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>>>>
75.00'
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
4" YELLOW PAINT STRIPE
SENSORY PATH (BY OWNER)
FLAGPOLE - REFER TO
ARCHITECTURAL DETAIL C1/A8.01
TRANSITION OVER 10' TO
MATCH EXISTING CURB STYLE
REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT
3
C1.73
3
C1.73
3
C1.73
2
C1.73
2
C1.73
3
C1.73
3
C1.73
3
C1.73
1
C1.73
1
C1.73
1
C1.73
1
C1.73
2
C1.73
3
3
C1.73
7
C1.73
7
C1.73
9
C1.73
9
C1.73
10
C1.73
10
C1.73
4B
C1.73
4B
C1.73
4
C1.73
4
C1.73
PAINTED SINGLE WHITE STRIPE
PAINTED SINGLE WHITE STRIPE
PAINTED SINGLE WHITE STRIPE
TRANSITION OVER 10' TO
MATCH EXISTING CURB STYLE
11
C1.72
10
C1.72
10
C1.72
10
C1.72
8
C1.72
8
C1.72
11
C1.72
8
C1.72
8
C1.72
8
C1.72
8
C1.72
8
C1.72
8
C1.72
8
C1.72
8
C1.72
12
C1.72
12
C1.72
12
C1.72
12
C1.72
12
C1.72
12
C1.72
12
C1.72
12
C1.72
13
C1.72
PROPOSED LOADING DOCK -
REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS
FOR LAYOUT AND DIMENSIONS
3
C1.73
13
C1.72
11
C1.72
8
C1.72
8
C1.72 11
C1.72
10
C1.72
11
C1.72
8
C1.72
10
C1.72
10
C1.72
10
C1.72
11
C1.72
8
C1.72
8
C1.72
8 3
C1.73
3
C1.73
11
C1.72
10
C1.72
11
C1.7210
C1.72
1
C1.73
5.
0
0
'
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
S
e
t
b
a
c
k
fr
o
m
E
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
3
C1.73
8
C1.72
10
C1.72
11
C1.72
10
C1.72
RETAINING WALL - REFER TO
ARCHITECTURAL PLANS
BASES BY OWNER (TYP)
PITCHING MOUND BY OWNER
PAINTED SINGLE WHITE STRIPE
10
C1.72
PAINTED BYPASS LANE TEXT
WITH WORD "BYPASS"
(TYP.)
8
C1.72
5
C1.73
12
C1.73
6
C1.73
GAGA PIT
(BY OWNER)
C1.25
FINISHING PLAN
NORTH -
ALTERNATE
R
FEETSCALE
0
HORZ.
40 80
DateRegistration Number
Check:
Drawn:
Date:
Comm:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by
me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
under the laws of the State of
H
G
F
E
D
C
B
A
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 109
C
MN
Revisions
Description Date Num
Scale:
North
3300 FERNBROOK LANE NORTH, SUITE 300
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
Phone: (763) 544-7129
Email: goldenvalley@bolton-menk.com
www.bolton-menk.com
R
XX/XX/XX
232104
XX/XX/2024
JDO
MINNESOTA
PUBLIC SCHOOLS
3455 153RD STREET WEST
APPLE VALLEY - EAGAN
NEW ELEMENTARY
ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068
SCHOOL #20
ISD #196: ROSEMOUNT -
DAVID A. REY
DAR
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
401804'
CLF
X
X
A
D
REFERENCE KEY TO SITE DETAILS
DETAIL I.D. NUMBER (TOP)
DETAIL SHEET NUMBER (BOTTOM)
PROPOSED CONCRETE WALK
PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB
PROPOSED LIGHT DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT
PROPOSED MEDIUM DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT
PROPOSED HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT
PROPOSED SOFT PLAY AREA
PROPOSED RETAINING WALL
PROPOSED CHAIN LINK FENCING
PROPOSED CHAIN LINK FENCING WITH MAINTENANCE STRIP
FENCING KEY NOTE
PROPOSED TRAFFIC SIGN
SIGNAGE KEY NOTE
PROPOSED BOLLARD
PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE SYMBOL
PROPOSED MANHOLE (MH)
PROPOSED CATCH BASIN (CB)
PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION (FES)
PROPOSED HYDRANT (HYD)
PROPOSED GATE VALVE (GV)
PROPOSED POST INDICATOR VALVE (PIV)
PROPOSED FLAGPOLE - REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS
PROPOSED BUILDING STOOP - REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS
PROPOSED LIGHT POLE - REFER TO ELECTRICAL PLANS
PROPERTY LINE
LEGEND
1.REFER TO SHEET C1.41, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN NORTH, FOR GENERAL NOTES.
2.CHECK ALL PLAN AND DETAIL DIMENSIONS AND VERIFY SAME BEFORE FIELD LAYOUT.
3.TRAFFIC SIGNS SHALL BE INSTALLED 18'' BEHIND THE BACK OF CURB OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT.
4.ALL DISTURBED AREAS OUTSIDE THE BUILDING PAD, WHICH ARE NOT DESIGNATED TO BE PAVED OR RECEIVE
AGLIME, SHALL RECEIVE AT LEAST 6” OF TOPSOIL AND SHALL BE SODDED OR SEEDED. ALL AREAS NOT
DESIGNATED FOR SOD OR A SPECIFIC SEED MIX, WHICH ARE DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION, SHALL BE SEEDED
WITH SEED MIX #1.
5.WHERE NEW SOD MEETS EXISTING SOD, CUT A CLEAN, SHARP EDGE TO ALLOW FOR A CONSISTENT, UNIFORM,
AND STRAIGHT JOINT BETWEEN NEW SOD AND EXISTING TURFGRASS. JAGGED OR UNEVEN JOINTS WILL NOT
BE ACCEPTED. REMOVE TOPSOIL AT THE JOINT BETWEEN NEW SOD AND EXISTING TURFGRASS, AS REQUIRED,
TO ALLOW NEW SOD SURFACE TO BE FLUSH WITH EXISTING TURFGRASS SURFACE.
6.FAILURE OF TURF DEVELOPMENT: IN THE EVENT THE CONTRACTOR FAILS TO PROVIDE AN ACCEPTABLE TURF,
RE-SOD OR RE-SEED ALL APPLICABLE AREAS, AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER, TO THE SATISFACTION
OF THE ENGINEER OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.
NOTES
Page 59 of 109
PROJECT MATCH LINE
PROJECT MATCH LINE
PROPOSED BUILDING
REGIONAL BASIN
3060
SF
SF
SF
SF
S
F
S
F
S
F
S
F
SF
SFSFSF
SF
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
S
S
S
D
D
>>>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>>>>
IP
IP
IP
IP
IP
IP
IP
IP
IP
IP
IP
IP
IP
IP
IP
IP
IP
IP
IP
IP
IP
IP
IP
IP
IP
IP
IP
IP
IP
PROVIDE DAILY SWEEPING
AT ALL PAVED AREAS (TYP)
PROVIDE DAILY SWEEPING
AT ALL PAVED AREAS (TYP)
PROVIDE DAILY SWEEPING
AT ALL PAVED AREAS (TYP)
PROVIDE DAILY SWEEPING
AT ALL PAVED AREAS (TYP)
PROVIDE DAILY SWEEPING
AT ALL PAVED AREAS (TYP)
C1.31
EROSION CONTROL
PLAN NORTH
R
FEETSCALE
0
HORZ.
40 80
DateRegistration Number
Check:
Drawn:
Date:
Comm:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by
me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
under the laws of the State of
H
G
F
E
D
C
B
A
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 109
C
MN
Revisions
Description Date Num
Scale:
North
3300 FERNBROOK LANE NORTH, SUITE 300
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
Phone: (763) 544-7129
Email: goldenvalley@bolton-menk.com
www.bolton-menk.com
R
XX/XX/XX
232104
XX/XX/2024
JDO
MINNESOTA
PUBLIC SCHOOLS
3455 153RD STREET WEST
APPLE VALLEY - EAGAN
NEW ELEMENTARY
ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068
SCHOOL #20
ISD #196: ROSEMOUNT -
DAVID A. REY
DAR
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
40180
IP
X
X
955
54.6
955
D
SD
>>>>
SF SF
REFERENCE KEY TO SITE DETAILS
DETAIL I.D. NUMBER (TOP)
DETAIL SHEET NUMBER (BOTTOM)
EXISTING CONTOUR
PROPOSED CONTOUR
PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION
ME = MATCH EXISTING
EOF = EMERGENCY OVERFLOW
TC = TOP OF CURB
TW = FINISH GRADE AT HIGH SIDE OF WALL
BW = FINISH GRADE AT LOW SIDE OF WALL
PROPOSED GRADING LIMITS
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
PROPOSED DRAIN TILE / SUBSURFACE DRAINS (SD)
PROPOSED MANHOLE (MH)
PROPOSED CATCH BASIN (CB)
INLET PROTECTION DEVICE AT STORM SEWER INLET
PROPOSED SILT FENCE
PROPOSED ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
PROPOSED BUILDING STOOP - REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS
PROPERTY LINE
LEGEND
1.REFER TO SHEET C1.41, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN NORTH, FOR GENERAL NOTES.
2.REFER TO SWPPP NARRATIVE, SHEET C1.34, FOR CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING AND EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS.
3.MAINTAIN ADJACENT PROPERTY AND PUBLIC STREETS CLEAN FROM CONSTRUCTION CAUSED DIRT AND DEBRIS ON A DAILY
BASIS. PROTECT DRAINAGE SYSTEMS FROM SEDIMENTATION AS A RESULT OF CONSTRUCTION RELATED DIRT AND DEBRIS.
4.MAINTAIN DUST CONTROL DURING GRADING OPERATIONS.
5.ALL EROSION CONTROL METHODS SHALL COMPLY WITH MPCA AND OTHER LOCAL REGULATIONS.
6.IF EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES TAKEN ARE NOT ADEQUATE AND RESULT IN DOWNSTREAM SEDIMENTATION,
CLEAN OUT DOWNSTREAM STORM SEWERS AND OTHER CONVEYANCE DEVICES AS NECESSARY, INCLUDING ASSOCIATED
RESTORATION.
7.INLET PROTECTION DEVICE AT STORM SEWER INLETS. AT THE INLETS TO ALL STORM SEWER STRUCTURES, PROVIDE A PRODUCT
FROM THE FOLLOWING LIST OF APPROVED PRODUCTS:
a.ROAD DRAIN "TOP SLAB", MANUFACTURED BY WIMCO
b.ROAD DRAIN "CURB & GUTTER", MANUFACTURED BY WIMCO
c.INFRASAFE "SEDIMENT CONTROL BARRIER", MANUFACTURED BY ROYAL ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, INC.
d.INFRASAFE "DEBRIS COLLECTION DEVICE", MANUFACTURED BY ROYAL ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, INC.
e.INFRASAFE "CULVERT INLET PROTECTOR", MANUFACTURED BY ROYAL ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, INC.
f.DANDY SACK, MANUFACTURED BY DANDY PRODUCTS, INC.
g.DANDY CURB SACK, MANUFACTURED BY DANDY PRODUCTS, INC.
h.OR APPROVED EQUAL.
8.PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, DELINEATE TURF AND VEGETATED AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED WITH ORANGE SNOW FENCE. DO
NOT ALLOW CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC, EQUIPMENT, OR MATERIALS TO UTILIZE, ACCESS, OR OTHERWISE ENTER THE DELINEATED
AREAS. MINIMIZE SOIL COMPACTION AND DISRUPTION OF TOPSOIL IN AREAS OUTSIDE THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS TO COMPLY
WITH THE MN CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER PERMIT.
9.FINAL INFILTRATION BASIN EXCAVATION SHALL ONLY BE PERFORMED ONCE SITE STABILIZATION HAS BEEN ACHIEVED.
NOTES
Page 60 of 109
PROJECT MATCH LINE
PROJECT MATCH LINE
STORMWATER POND
INFILTRATION AREA
REGIONAL BASIN
1618
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
S
F
S
F
S
F
S
F
S
F
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
S
F
S
F
S
F
S
F
S
F
S
F
S
F
S
F
S
F
S
F
SF
SF
SF
SF
S
F
SF
SF
SF
S
F
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[
]
[
]
[
][]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[][][][]
[
]
[
]
SF SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
S
F
S
F
S
F
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SFSF
SF
SF
S
F
S
F
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
S
F
S
F
S
F
SFSF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SFSF
SF
S
F
S
F
S
F
S
F
SF
SF
I
I
I
D
D
>>
>>
>>
D
>>
>>
>>
D
>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
D
D
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
S
>
>
>
>
S
D
>
>
>>
>>
>
>
>>
IP
IP
IP
IP
IP
IP
IP IP
IP
IP
IP
IP
IP
TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN
IP
IP
IP
C1.32
EROSION CONTROL
PLAN SOUTH
R
FEETSCALE
0
HORZ.
40 80
DateRegistration Number
Check:
Drawn:
Date:
Comm:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by
me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
under the laws of the State of
H
G
F
E
D
C
B
A
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 109
C
MN
Revisions
Description Date Num
Scale:
North
3300 FERNBROOK LANE NORTH, SUITE 300
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
Phone: (763) 544-7129
Email: goldenvalley@bolton-menk.com
www.bolton-menk.com
R
XX/XX/XX
232104
XX/XX/2024
JDO
MINNESOTA
PUBLIC SCHOOLS
3455 153RD STREET WEST
APPLE VALLEY - EAGAN
NEW ELEMENTARY
ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068
SCHOOL #20
ISD #196: ROSEMOUNT -
DAVID A. REY
DAR
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
40180
IP
X
X
955
54.6
955
D
SD
>>>>
SF SF
[][]
REFERENCE KEY TO SITE DETAILS
DETAIL I.D. NUMBER (TOP)
DETAIL SHEET NUMBER (BOTTOM)
EXISTING CONTOUR
PROPOSED CONTOUR
PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION
ME = MATCH EXISTING
EOF = EMERGENCY OVERFLOW
TC = TOP OF CURB
TW = FINISH GRADE AT HIGH SIDE OF WALL
BW = FINISH GRADE AT LOW SIDE OF WALL
PROPOSED GRADING LIMITS
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
PROPOSED DRAIN TILE / SUBSURFACE DRAINS (SD)
PROPOSED MANHOLE (MH)
PROPOSED CATCH BASIN (CB)
PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION (FES)
INLET PROTECTION DEVICE AT STORM SEWER INLET
PROPOSED SILT FENCE
PROPOSED SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG
PROPOSED ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
PROPOSED EROSION CONTROL BLANKET
PROPOSED TEMPORARY DIVERSION BERM
PROPOSED BUILDING STOOP - REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS
PROPERTY LINE
LEGEND
1.REFER TO SHEET C1.31, EROSION CONTROL PLAN NORTH, FOR NOTES.
NOTES
Page 61 of 109
STORMWATER
POLLUTION PREVENTION
PLAN (SWPPP)
PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM:
Type of storm water management used if more than 1 acre of new impervious surface is created:
PROJECT
LOCATION
1-MILE
BOUNDARY
RECEIVING
WATERS
ISD 196 NEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
#20 - 2024
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
PROJECT LOCATION:
RECEIVING WATERS:
Receiving waters, including surface water, wetlands, Public Waters, and stormwater ponds, within 1-mile of the project boundary are identified on the
USGS 7.5 min quad map above. Receiving waters that are impaired, the impairment, and WLA are listed as follows. All specific BMPs relative to
construction activities listed in the permit for special, prohibited, restricted, or impaired have been incorporated into this plan. All specific BMPs listed in
approved TMDLs and those BMPs listed for construction related waste load allocations have also been incorporated.
DESCRIPTION OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT:
Construction activities include: Site grading, sanitary sewer and water main extensions, road
construction, storm sewer installation, building construction, temporary erosion and sediment control,
and permanent stabilization.
Stormwater currently sheet flows to an onsite wetland, two onsite regional stormwater ponds, and one
offsite pond. Pond 1620 is the offsite pond to the southwest, which receives a small portion of runoff
from the southwest corner of the site. Ponds 1618 and 3060 are onsite in the southeast and northwest
corners, respectively.
After construction is complete stormwater will be directed into curb and gutter and discharged via storm
sewer into the existing regional basins and a proposed wet sedimentation basin for treatment. Existing
basin 1618 and the proposed wet pond will be connected with a swale. Stormwater will then discharge
into an infiltration basin and the existing wetland, in which live storage is provided. Roughly the same area
from the site will continue to sheet flow offsite into Pond 1620. The ultimate discharge point is an outlet
in pond 1618, which connects to existing municipal stormwater infrastructure in Akron Avenue. Rainfall
events exceeding the 100-year storm will discharge through this outlet.
This project includes the following stormwater management BMPs: a wet sedimentation basin and an
infiltration basin. Temporary diversion berms will be used around the infiltration basin to prevent inflow
of sediment during construction. A temporary sediment basin will be installed in the location of the
proposed permanent wet sedimentation basin.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE AND PHASING: The Contractor is required to provide an updated schedule and site management plan
meeting the minimum requirements of Section 1717 of the Minnesota Standard Specifications for Construction.
1)Submit SWPPP Updates to Engineer. Submittal shall include any requested changes to the SWPPP, including but not limited to:
Trained Personnel, Locations for Stockpiles, Concrete Washout, Sanitation Facilities, Types and Locations of Erosion &
Sediment Control. Failure to submit updates shall be considered acceptance of the SWPPP as designed with no changes.
2)Install perimeter sediment control, inlet protection, and construction exit.
3)Remove existing trees as needed
4)Grade site
5)Install utilities
6)Construct building
7)Construct roads and curb and curb & gutter
8)Construct permanent wet sedimentation basin and infiltration basin
9)Pave roads
10)Add additional temporary BMPs as necessary during construction based on inspection reports.
11)Ensure final stabilization measures are complete.
12)Provide digital copy of all Field SWPPP Documentation including Inspection Reports and SWPPP Revisions to the Owner.
13)Submit Notice of Termination (NOT) to MPCA. NOTE: The NOT must be submitted to MPCA before Final Stabilization is
considered complete.
The SWPPP Designer, Construction SWPPP Manager, and BMP Installer must have appropriate training. Documentation showing
training commensurate with the job duties and responsibilities is required to be included in the SWPPP prior to any work beginning on
the site. Training documentation for the SWPPP Designer is included on the Narrative sheet. The Contractor shall attach training
documentation to this SWPPP for the Construction SWPPP Manager and BMP Installer prior to the start of construction. This
information shall be kept up to date until the project NOT is filed.
RESPONSIBLE PARTIES:
The Contractor and Owner will be joint applicants under the MPCA's General Stormwater Permit for Construction Activity as required
by the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Phase II program.
The Contractor shall provide one or more trained Construction SWPPP Manager(s) knowledgeable and experienced in the application
of erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs that will oversee the implementation of the SWPPP, and the installation, inspection
and maintenance of the erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs.
A Construction SWPPP Manager must be available for an on-site inspection within 72 hours upon request by the MPCA.
ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION
Payment for all work associated with Erosion and Sediment Control shall be as described in the Project Manual. Unless otherwise
authorized by the Owner no additional payment shall be made for any work required to administer and maintain the site erosion and
sediment control in compliance with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) - General Stormwater Permit for Construction
Activity (MN R100001) including but not limited to inspection, maintenance, and removal of BMPs or addition of BMPs to
accommodate Contractor phasing.
DOCUMENT RETENTION
Permittees must make the SWPPP, including all inspection reports, maintenance records, training records and other information
required by this permit, available to federal, state, and local officials within three (3) days upon request for the duration of the permit
and for three (3) years following the NOT.
GENERAL STORMWATER DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS
All requirements listed in Section 5.1 of the Permit for the design of the permanent stormwater management system and discharge
have been included in the preparation of this SWPPP. These include but are not limited to:
1.The expected amount, frequency, intensity, and duration of precipitation.
2.The nature of stormwater runoff and run-on at the site
3.Peak flow rates and stormwater volumes to minimize erosion at outlets and downstream channel and stream bank erosion.
4.The range of soil particle sizes expected to be present on the site.
Permanent stormwater treatment systems for this project have been designed in accordance with the guidance in the MN Stormwater
Manual in place at the time of bidding. Copies of the design information and calculations are part of this SWPPP and will be provided in
digital format upon written request to the Engineer.
FEETSCALE
0 1200 2400
X Wet Sedimentation Basin
X Infiltration/Filtration
Regional Pond
Permanent Stormwater Management Not Required
COUNTY TOWNSHIP RANGE SECTION LATITUDE LONGITUDE
Dakota T115N R19W 22 44.7522°-93.9879°
BMP SUMMARY QUANTITY UNIT
ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 1 EACH
INLET PROTECTION DEVICE 42 EACH
SILT FENCE 3980 LF
EROSION CONTROL BLANKET 47920 SF
SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG 880 LF
TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN 1 EACH
TEMPORARY DIVERSION BERM 1090 LF
NAME OF WATER BODY TYPE (ditch, pond,
wetland, lake, etc.)
Special, Prohibited,
Restricted Water 1
Flows to Impaired
Water Within 1-Mile 2
USEPA Approved
Construction Related
TMDL 3
1618 POND NO NO -
3060 POND NO NO -
COMPANY CONTACT PERSON PHONE
OWNER:ISD 196 Mary Kreger 651-423-7723
SWPPP DESIGNER:Bolton & Menk, Inc.Paul Strong 651-247-8789
CONTRACTOR:TBD TBD TBD
CONSTRUCTION SWPPP MANAGER:TBD TBD TBD
PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR LONG TERM O&M:ISD 196 Mike Schwanke 651-423-7706
Total Project Size (disturbed area) =34.5 ACRES
Existing area of impervious surface =0.0 ACRES
Post construction area of impervious surface =8.0 ACRES
Total new impervious surface area created =8.0 ACRES
Planned Construction Start Date:04/2024
Estimated Construction Completion Date:10/2024
PROJECT AREAS:
PROJECT BOUNDARY
NATIONAL WETLANDS INVENTORY
IMPAIRED, SPECIAL OR PROTECTED WATERSOR
1-MILE BOUNDARY
LEGEND
R
1 Special, prohibited, and restricted waters are listed in Section 23 of the MN Construction Stormwater General Permit (MNR100001).
2 Identified as impaired under section 303 (d) of the federal Clean Water Act for phosphorus, turbidity, TSS, dissolved oxygen, and/or aquatic biota.
3 Construction Related TMDLs include those related to: phosphorus, turbidity, TSS, dissolved oxygen, and/or aquatic biota.
PROJECT LOCATION
DateRegistration Number
Check:
Drawn:
Date:
Comm:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by
me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
under the laws of the State of
H
G
F
E
D
C
B
A
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 109
C
MN
Revisions
Description Date Num
Scale:
North
3300 FERNBROOK LANE NORTH, SUITE 300
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
Phone: (763) 544-7129
Email: goldenvalley@bolton-menk.com
www.bolton-menk.com
R
XX/XX/XX
232104
XX/XX/2024
JDO
MINNESOTA
PUBLIC SCHOOLS
3455 153RD STREET WEST
APPLE VALLEY - EAGAN
NEW ELEMENTARY
ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068
SCHOOL #20
ISD #196: ROSEMOUNT -
DAVID A. REY
DAR
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
40180
C1.33
STORMWATER
POLLUTION
PREVENTION PLAN
- PROJECT
INFORMATION
Page 62 of 109
Information contained in this SWPPP narrative sheet summarizes requirements of the GENERAL PERMIT AUTHORIZATION TO
DISCHARGE STORMWATER ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE
ELIMINATION SYSTEM/STATE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PROGRAM - Permit No: MN Rl0000l (Permit) as they apply to this project. All
provisions of the Permit including those not specifically cited herein shall apply to this project. The Contractor is responsible to be
familiar with and comply with all conditions of the permit. The full text of the Permit is available at:
https://www.pca.state.mn.us/sites/default/files/wq-strm2-80a.pdf
SWPPP AMENDMENTS AND SUBMITTALS
Contractor must prepare and submit to the Engineer a SWPPP amendment as necessary to include additional Best Management
Practices (BMPs) to correct problems identified or address the following situations.
1.Contact information and training documentation for Construction SWPPP Manager and BMP Installer,
2.There is a change in construction method of phasing, operation, maintenance, weather or seasonal conditions not
anticipated during the design of the SWPPP including but not limited to:
a.Types and/or Locations of BMPs
b.Material Storage and Spill Response
c.Fueling Plans
d.Locations for Stockpiles, Concrete Washout, and Sanitation Facilities and
e.Project Phasing
3.It is determined that the SWPPP is not achieving objectives of minimizing pollutants in stormwater discharges associated with
construction activity, or
4.The SWPPP is not consistent with the terms and conditions of the permit.
The Contractor may implement SWPPP amendments immediately and is not required to wait for Engineer review of the submittal.
The responsibility for completeness of SWPPP amendments and compliance with the Permit lies with the Contractor. Review,
comment, or lack of comment by the Engineer on a SWPPP amendment shall not absolve the responsibilities of the Contractor in
any way.
If a change order is issued for a design change the SWPPP amendment will be prepared by the Engineer and included in the
change order.
In addition to SWPPP amendments, the Contractor shall submit to the Engineer Weekly Erosion and Sediment Control Schedule
meeting the requirements of MnDOT 1717.
The Contractor shall keep copies of all SWPPP amendments, Weekly Erosion and Sediment Control Schedules, inspection logs, and
maintenance logs with the field copy of the SWPPP. A PDF copy of these documents will be provided along with a copy of the
final Field Copy of the SWPPP to the Engineer along with the signed Notice of Termination when final stabilization is complete.
EROSION PREVENTION PRACTICES
Stormwater conveyance channels shall be routed around unstabilized areas. Erosion controls and velocity dissipation devices
shall be used at outlets within and along the length of any constructed conveyance channel.
The normal wetted perimeter of all ditches or swales, including storm water management pond slopes, that drain waters from the
site must be stabilized within 200' of any property edge or discharge point, including storm sewer inlets, within 24 hours of
connection.
Temporary or permanent ditches or swales used as sediment containment during construction do not need to be stabilized during
temporary period of use and shall be stabilized within 24 hours after no longer used as sediment containment.
Mulch, hydromulch, tackifier, or similar practice shall not be used in any portion of the wetted perimeter of a temporary or
permanent drainage ditch or swale section with a continuous slope of greater than 2 percent.
Energy dissipation shall be installed at all temporary or permanent pipe outlets within 24 hours of connection to a surface water
or permanent stormwater treatment system.
The Contractor shall phase construction and use construction methods to the extent practical to minimize exposed soils. The
project phasing shall be documented in the Weekly Erosion and Sediment Control Schedule.
SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES
Down gradient BMPs including perimeter BMPs must be in place before up gradient land- disturbing activities begin and shall
remain in place until final stabilization.
All BMPs that have been adjusted or removed to accommodate short-term activities shall be re-installed or replaced the earlier of
the end of the work day or before the next precipitation event even if the activity is not complete.
Inlet BMPs may be removed for specific safety concerns. The BMPs shall be replaced as soon as the safety concern is resolved.
The removal shall be documented in the SWPPP as a SWPPP amendment.
Temporary stockpiles must have sediment control BMPs. The Contractor shall prepare and submit to the Engineer a SWPPP
amendment showing the location of temporary stockpiles and the BMPs for each stockpile. The SWPPP amendment must meet
the minimum requirements of Section 9 of the Permit.
Soil compaction shall be minimized and topsoil shall be preserved, unless infeasible or if construction activities dictate soil
compaction or topsoil stripping.
Vehicle tracking BMPs shall be installed to minimize track out of sediment from the construction site. Method shall be approved
by engineer prior to commencement of construction activities. Street sweeping shall be used if vehicle tracking BMPs are not
adequate to prevent sediment from being tracked onto the street.
The use of polymers, flocculants, or other sedimentation treatment chemicals are not proposed as part of this SWPPP as designed
by the Engineer. If methods or phasing of construction require the use of any of these chemicals, the Contractor shall prepare and
submit to the Engineer a SWPPP amendment that meets the minimum requirements of Section 9 of the Permit.
TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS
A temporary sedimentation basin has not been included in this SWPPP as designed by the Engineer. If a basin is later determined
to be desirable or necessary the Contractor shall prepare and submit to the Engineer a SWPPP amendment. Temporary
sedimentation basins shall meet or exceed the minimum requirements of Section 14 of the Permit and shall include a basin
draining plan meeting or exceeding the minimum requirements of Section 10 of the Permit. Where the site discharges to Special
and/or Impaired Waters the SWPPP amendment shall also meet or exceed the minimum requirements of Section 23 of the
permit.
DEWATERING
A dewatering plan has not been included in this SWPPP as designed by the Engineer. If dewatering is required for this project, the
Contractor shall prepare and submit to the Engineer a SWPPP amendment. All dewatering shall meet or exceed the minimum
requirements of Section 10 of the Permit.
POLLUTION PREVENTION
Products and materials that have the potential to leach pollutants that are stored on the site must be stored in a manner designed
to minimize contact with stormwater. Materials that are not a source of potential contamination to stormwater or that are
designed for exposure to stormwater are not required to be covered.
Hazardous materials including but not limited to pesticides, fertilizer, petroleum products, curing compounds and toxic waste
must be properly stored and protected from stormwater exposure as recommended by the manufacturer in an access restricted
area.
Solid waste must be stored, collected and disposed of in compliance with Minnesota Administrative Rules Chapter 7035.
Portable toilets must be positioned so that they are secure and will not be tipped or knocked over. Sanitary waste must be
disposed of properly in accordance with Minn. R. CH 7041.
Exterior vehicle or equipment washing on the project site shall be limited to a defined area of the site. No engine degreasing is
allowed on site. A sign must be installed adjacent to each washout facility that requires site personnel to utilize the proper
facilities for disposal of concrete and other washout wastes.
The Contractor shall prepare and submit a SWPPP amendment detailing the location and BMPs proposed for storage of materials,
solid waste, portable toilets, and exterior vehicle or equipment washing on the site. The SWPPP amendment shall include a spill
prevention and response plan that is appropriate for the materials proposed to be on the site. The SWPPP amendment shall meet
or exceed the minimum requirements of Section 12 of the Permit.
INSPECTION & MAINTENANCE
A trained person shall routinely inspect the entire construction site at the time interval indicated on this sheet of the SWPPP
during active construction and within 24-hours after a rainfall event greater than 0.5 inches in 24 hours. Following an inspection
that occurs within 24-hours after a rainfall event, the next inspection must be conducted at the time interval indicated in the
Receiving Waters Table found on the SITE PLAN AND INFORMATION SHEET of the SWPPP.
All inspections and maintenance conducted during construction must be recorded on the day it is completed and must be retained
with the SWPPP. Inspection report forms are available in the Project Specifications. Inspection report forms other than those
provided shall be approved by the engineer.
The Contractor may request a change in inspection schedule for the following conditions:
a.Inspections of areas with permanent cover to be reduced to once per month,
b.Inspections of areas that have permanent cover and have had no construction activity for 12 months to be suspended
until construction resumes,
c.Inspections of areas where construction is suspended due to frozen ground conditions, inspections to be suspended until
the earlier of within 24 hours of runoff occurring, or upon resuming construction.
No change in inspection schedule shall occur until authorized by the Engineer.
Inspections must include:
1.All erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs and Pollution Prevention Management Measures to ensure integrity and
effectiveness.
2.Surface waters, including drainage ditches and conveyance systems for evidence of erosion and sediment deposition.
3.Construction site vehicle exit locations, streets and curb and gutter systems within and adjacent to the project for
sedimentation from erosion or tracked sediment from vehicles.
4.Infiltration areas to ensure that no sediment from ongoing construction activity is reaching the infiltration area and that
equipment is not being driven across the infiltration area.
All non-functioning BMPs and those BMPs where sediment reaches one-half (1/2) of the depth of the BMP, or in the case of
sediment basins one-half (1/2) of the storage volume, must be repaired, replaced, or supplemented by the end of the next
business day after discovery, or as soon as field conditions allow.
Permittees must repair, replace or supplement all nonfunctional BMPs with functional BMPs by the end of the next business day
after discovery, or as soon as field conditions allow.
Any sediment that escapes the site must be removed and the area stabilized within 7 calendar days of discovery unless precluded
by legal, regulatory, or physical access in which case the work shall be completed within 7 calendar days of authorization. Paved
surfaces such as streets shall have any escaped or tracked sediment removed by the end of the day that it is discovered.
Sediment release, other than paved surfaces that can be cleaned up with street sweeping shall be reported immediately upon
discovery to the Engineer.
PUBLIC WATER RESTRICTIONS:
For public waters that have been promulgated "work in water restrictions" during fish spawning time frames, all exposed soil
areas that are within 200 feet of the water's edge, and drain to these waters must complete stabilization within 24-hours during
the time period. MN DNR permits are not valid for work in waters that are designated as infested waters unless accompanied by
an Infested Waters Permit or written notification has been obtained from MN DNR stating that such permit is not required. There
is no exception for pre-existing permits. If a MN DNR Permit has been issued for the project and the water is later designated as
infested, the Contractor shall halt all work covered by the MN DNR Permit until an Infested Waters Permit is obtained or that
written notification is obtained stating that such permit is not required.
FINAL STABILIZATION
Final Stabilization is not complete until all the following requirements have been met:
1.Substantial Completion has been reached and no ground disturbing activities are anticipated.
2.Permanent cover has been installed with an established minimum uniform perennial vegetation density of 70 percent of its
expected final growth. Vegetation is not required in areas where no vegetation is proposed by this project such as
impervious surfaces or the base of a sand filter.
3.Accumulated sediment has been removed from all permanent stormwater treatment systems as necessary to ensure the
system is operating as designed.
4.All sediment has been removed from conveyance systems
5.All temporary synthetic erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs have been removed. BMPs designated on the SWPPP
to remain to decompose on-site may remain.
6.For residential construction only, permit coverage terminates on individual lots if the structures are finished and temporary
erosion prevention and downgradient perimeter control is complete, the residence sells to the homeowner, and the
permittee distributes the MPCA's "Homeowner Fact Sheet" to the homeowner.
7.For agricultural land only (e.g., pipelines across cropland), the disturbed land must be returned to its preconstruction
agricultural use prior to submitting the NOT.
SITE STABILIZATION COMPLETION:
SITE INSPECTION INTERVAL:
SPECIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS AND PERMITS:
TYPE OF PERMIT PERMITTING AGENCY PERMIT STATUS AND CONDITIONS
Construction Stormwater NPDES MPCA IN PROGRESS
DOLI Permit DOLI NOT STARTED
MDH Permit MDH NOT STARTED
Conditional Use Permit NOT STARTED
Rezoning Permit NOT STARTED
1)Was an environmental review required for this project or any part of a common plan of development
or sale that includes all or any portion of this project?NO
2)Does any portion of the site have the potential to affect threatened or endangered species or their
critical habitat?NO
3)Does any portion of this site discharge to a Calcareous fen.NO
4)Will any portion of the site potentially affect properties listed on the National Register of Historic Places
or a known or discovered archeological site?NO
5)Have any Karst features have been identified in the project vicinity?NO
6)Is compliance with temporary or permanent stormwater management design requirements infeasible
for this project?NO
7)Has the MN DNR promulgated "work in water restrictions" for any Public Water this site disharges to
during fish spawning?NO
A trained person shall routinely inspect the entire construction
site during active construction at an interval of no more than:7 calendar days
SWPPP DESIGNER TRAINING DOCUMENTATION:
Stabilization of exposed soils shall begin immediately and shall be
completed after the construction activity has temporarily or
permanently ceased no later than:
14 calendar days
DateRegistration Number
Check:
Drawn:
Date:
Comm:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by
me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
under the laws of the State of
H
G
F
E
D
C
B
A
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 109
C
MN
Revisions
Description Date Num
Scale:
North
3300 FERNBROOK LANE NORTH, SUITE 300
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
Phone: (763) 544-7129
Email: goldenvalley@bolton-menk.com
www.bolton-menk.com
R
XX/XX/XX
232104
XX/XX/2024
JDO
MINNESOTA
PUBLIC SCHOOLS
3455 153RD STREET WEST
APPLE VALLEY - EAGAN
NEW ELEMENTARY
ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068
SCHOOL #20
ISD #196: ROSEMOUNT -
DAVID A. REY
DAR
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
40180
C1.34
STORMWATER
POLLUTION
PREVENTION PLAN
- NARRATIVE
Page 63 of 109
320B
301B
39B2
301B
411B
454C 411A
611C
411B
301B
411B
415B
320C2
411B
611C 250
LEGEND
PROJECT BOUNDARY
SOIL TYPE
NATIONAL WETLANDS INVENTORY
DWSMA, HIGH VULNERABILITY
STEEP SLOPES (>33.3%)
RECEIVING WATERS
SOIL TYPE SUMMARY
Map Unit
Symbol Soil Name Hyd. Soil
Group
250 Kennebec silt loam C
301B Lindstrom silt loam, 1 to 4 percent slopes B
320B Tallula silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes B
320C2 Tallula silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded B
39B2 Wadena loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, eroded B
411A Waukegan silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes B
411B Waukegan silt loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes B
415B Kanaranzi loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes B
454C Mahtomedi loamy sand, 8 to 15 percent slopes A
611C Hawick coarse sandy loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes A
LOCATION OF SWPPP REQUIREMENTS IN PROJECT PLAN
DESCRIPTION SHEET NO.
SITE MAP C1.35
DIRECTION OF FLOW C1.41
FINAL STABILIZATION C1.31
SOILS C1.35
DRAINAGE STRUCTURES C1.52
DRAINAGE TABULATION C1.XX
STORM SEWER PLAN & PROFILE SHEETS C1.52
EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL DETAILS C1.71
EROSION CONTROL TABULATION C1.34
TURF ESTABLISHMENT TABULATION L1.61
NARRATIVE & NOTES C1.33-C1.34
FEETSCALE
0 100 200
R
DateRegistration Number
Check:
Drawn:
Date:
Comm:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by
me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
under the laws of the State of
H
G
F
E
D
C
B
A
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 109
C
MN
Revisions
Description Date Num
Scale:
North
3300 FERNBROOK LANE NORTH, SUITE 300
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
Phone: (763) 544-7129
Email: goldenvalley@bolton-menk.com
www.bolton-menk.com
R
XX/XX/XX
232104
XX/XX/2024
JDO
MINNESOTA
PUBLIC SCHOOLS
3455 153RD STREET WEST
APPLE VALLEY - EAGAN
NEW ELEMENTARY
ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068
SCHOOL #20
ISD #196: ROSEMOUNT -
RWK
RICHARD W. KOECHLEIN
26678
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
DAVID A. REY
DAR
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
40180
C1.35
STORMWATER
POLLUTION
PREVENTION PLAN
- SOIL MAP
Page 64 of 109
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
1.6
%
>
>
>
>
D
>>
D
>>
>>
D
>>
>>
D
>>
>>
D
>>
>>
D
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
D
>>
>>
>
>
D
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
D
D
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
S
>
>
>
>
S
>
>
S
D
>>
>>
D
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
D >>>>
>
>
>>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>>>
>>
1.
8
%
3.
1
%
1.9%
2.7%
3.1%
3.5
%
1.5
%
0.5%
NWL:940.0
BTM:931.0
HWL:944.68
SNOWMELT HWL: 945.09
BTM:940.0
WQV:944.5
HWL:944.68
SNOWMELT HWL: 945.09
1.5%
1.5
%
2
2
.
4
%
2
2
.
3
%
1
1
.
5
%
2
1
.
0
%
2.3
%
21.2%
18.3
%
1.5%
7.7
%
FFE = 970.5 = ARCH 100'-0"
FFE = 957.2 = ARCH 86'-8"
PROJECT MATCH LINE
PROJECT MATCH LINE
PROPOSED BUILDING
STORMWATER POND
INFILTRATION AREA
REGIONAL BASIN
1618
REGIONAL BASIN
3060
955
9
5
5
95
5
9
5
1
9
5
2
95
2
9
5
2
9
5
3
95
3
9
5
3
9
5
4
9
5
4
9
5
4
956
9
5
6
95
6
950
955
949
951
952
953
954
9
5
0
95
0
955
95
5
9
5
5
955
96
0
960
96
5
9
6
5
94
8
948
948
94
8
94
9
949
949
94
9
9
5
1
95
1
9
5
2
95
2
95
3
95
3
9
5
4
95
4
9
5
6
956
956
95
6
95
7
957
95
8
958
959
959
96
1
9
6
1
961
962
962
962
963
963
963
96
4
9
6
4
96
6
9
6
6
96
7
96
7
968
9
6
8
96
9
9
6
9
940
945
950
941
942
943
944
944
944
946
947
948
949
951
952
95
0
955
960
965
94
8
94
9
951
95
2
95
3
954
956
957
958
959
961962963964
966
967
940
945
950
955
941
942
943
944
946
947
948
949
951
952
953
954
956
957
958
945
942
94
2
943
9
4
3
944
9
4
4
946
947
945
945
942 942
94
3
943
9
4
4
944
944
946
9
6
2
9
6
1
9
6
0
9
5
9
9
5
8
9
5
7
9
5
6
9
5
5
9
6
0
9
5
9
952
954
957
958
955
96
0
95
6
956
95
7
957
957
957
95
7
95
895
9
9
6
1
9
6
2
9
6
3
96
0
96
1
96
0
96
1
96
2
9
6
3
9
6
4
9
6
1
9
6
5
965
966
960
9
6
5
95
8
95
9
96
1
96
2
9
6
3
9
6
4
955
954
956
957
958
959
955
954
954
945
950
944
946
947
948
949
955
9
6
0
952
953
954
956
957
95
8
9
5
9
95
0
94894
9
9
5
1
9
5
2
9
5
3
9
4
1
94
0
94
4
94
4
94
0
9
3
9
9
3
1
C1.40
GRADING AND
DRAINAGE PLAN
OVERALL
R
FEETSCALE
0
HORZ.
60 120
DateRegistration Number
Check:
Drawn:
Date:
Comm:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by
me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
under the laws of the State of
H
G
F
E
D
C
B
A
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 109
C
MN
Revisions
Description Date Num
Scale:
North
3300 FERNBROOK LANE NORTH, SUITE 300
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
Phone: (763) 544-7129
Email: goldenvalley@bolton-menk.com
www.bolton-menk.com
R
XX/XX/XX
232104
XX/XX/2024
JDO
MINNESOTA
PUBLIC SCHOOLS
3455 153RD STREET WEST
APPLE VALLEY - EAGAN
NEW ELEMENTARY
ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068
SCHOOL #20
ISD #196: ROSEMOUNT -
DAVID A. REY
DAR
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
40180
Page 65 of 109
1.6
%
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
D
>>
D
>>
>>
>>
D
>>
>>
>>
D
>>
>>
>>
>>
D
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
D
>>
>>
>>
>
>
D
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
S
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
S
>
>
>
>
S
>>
>>
>>
>>
D
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
D >>>>>>
>
>
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>>>>
52.5
62.5
52.2
52.5
52.3
56.9
57.257.256.7
57.2
57.2
56.7
57.2
56.7
56.7
56.7
57.2
57.2
56.6
56.7
57.2
56.5 56.5
56.5
56.5
56.5
57.2
56.7
56.7 56.7
57.2
57.0
70.0
70.2
70.5
70.5
70.5
69.9
68.5 68.5
55.9
54.2
54.2
52.9
66.2 TW67.9
61.8 TW
57.2 BW
57.5 BW
60.9 TW
52.9 BW
52.8 BW
58.1 TW
52.8
52.2
53.1
54.0
52.7
1.
8
%
3.
1
%
1.9%
2.7%
3.1%
???
3.5
%
???
1.5
%
???
0.5%
49.2
59.7
60.1
60.1
59.6
49.3
49.6 49.6
49.8
57.8
58.1
64.0
67.7
68.4
66.5
64.7
63.1
60.760.7
63.063.2
63.2
63.0
62.2
62.7
63.4
63.9
63.4
64.3
64.6
65.2
66.4
66.1
66.9
67.4
67.6
68.9
68.5
68.6
67.3
67.0
68.4
66.5
66.4
65.8
65.7
65.0
64.9
64.1
64.2
54.7
55.6
55.8
56.2
57.0
57.1
57.3
57.3
57.1
56.7
56.1
56.3
56.5
53.8
55.0
57.5
55.8
57.9
53.8
55.8
57.9
56.4
56.6
59.5
57.5
46.4
54.2
52.9
61.2
67.2
67.7
62.7
60.0
55.0 EOF
58.3
55.1
68.2
64.8
1.5%
2.3
%
7.7
%
FFE = 970.5 = ARCH 100'-0"
FFE = 957.2 = ARCH 86'-8"
57.1 BW
53.1 BW
PROJECT MATCH LINE
PROJECT MATCH LINE
PROPOSED BUILDING
REGIONAL BASIN
3060
69.0
69.570.5
68.6
65.9
58.4
57.9
57.6
57.2
55.3
55.8
54.6
55.3
54.9
55.4
55.3
56.1
65.5
67.6
53.6
63.4
52.6 EOF
55.4 EOF
54.9
55.2
56.0
53.6
60.4
59.359.2
65.0
66.3 66.4
53.2
52.8
55.0
55.8
55.4
56.2
55.755.5
56.4
51.9
57.6
53.1
50.4
50.8
69.2
68.2
68.2
69.1
67.5
67.1
68.368.5
54.7 ME
60.0 ME
58.0 ME
56.0 ME
54.0 ME
54.0 ME
60.0 ME
60.0 ME
58.0 ME
58.2
48.3
61.4 ME
64.0 ME
65.1 ME64.3 ME
55.0 ME
48.9
50.5
57.0
56.4
60.0 ME
58.0 ME
54.8
55.1
55.2
54.4 ME
54.2 EOF
55.5 ME
55.8 ME
61.7 ME
62.9 ME 60.8 ME 60.5 ME 60.5 ME 60.7 ME 62.0 ME 63.1 ME 64.0 ME 65.0 ME 66.0 ME 66.7 ME 66.1 ME 65.6 ME
65.0 ME
65.4 ME
65.1 ME
64.7 ME
56.1 EOF
56.8 EOF
53.5
53.2
53.5
53.4
53.7
55.3 EOF
56.1 EOF
55.7
64.9
62.0
61.9
66.0
65.9
62.3 EOF
61.2 EOF
61.2 EOF
56.4 EOF
56.2
49.6 EOF
48.3 EOF
62.6 EOF
60.3 EOF
61.0 ME
60.7 ME
61.6 ME
68.5
68.2
55.8
56.056.0
55.855.8
55.3
55.5
955
9
5
5
95
2
9
5
2
95
3
9
5
3
9
5
4
9
5
4
956
9
5
6
950
955
949
951
952
953
954
9
5
0
955
96
0
960
96
5
9
6
5
94
8
948
94
9
9
5
1
9
5
2
95
3
9
5
4
956
957
95
8
958
959
959
96
1
9
6
1
961
962
962
962
963
963
963
96
4
9
6
4
96
6
96
6
96
7
96
7
968
9
6
8
96
9
9
6
9
95
0
955
960
965
94
8
94
9
951
95
2
95
3
954
956
957
958
959
961
962
963
964
966
967
9
6
0
9
5
9
957
958
955
96
0
95
6
956
95
7
957
957
957
95
7
95
895
9
9
6
1
9
6
2
9
6
3
96
0
96
1
96
0
96
1
96
2
9
6
3
9
6
4
9
6
1
9
6
5
965
966
960
9
6
5
95
8
95
9
96
1
96
2
9
6
3
9
6
4
955
954
956
957
958
959
955
954
954
950
949
955
9
6
0
952
953
954
956
957
95
8
9
5
9
55.9
68.9
69.4
1.6
%
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
S
S
S
D
D
>>>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>>>>
52.5
62.5
52.2
52.5
52.3
56.9
57.257.256.7
57.2
57.2
56.7
57.2
56.7
56.7
56.7
57.2
57.2
56.6
56.7
57.2
56.5 56.5
56.5
56.5
56.5
57.2
56.7
56.7 56.7
57.2
57.0
70.0
70.2
70.5
70.5
70.5
69.9
68.5 68.5
55.9
54.2
54.2
52.9
66.2 TW67.9
61.8 TW
57.2 BW
57.5 BW
60.9 TW
52.9 BW
52.8 BW
58.1 TW
52.8
52.2
53.1
54.0
52.7
1.
8
%
3.
1
%
1.9%
2.7%
3.1%
???
3.5
%
???
1.5
%
???
0.5%
49.2
59.7
60.1
60.1
59.6
49.3
49.6 49.6
49.8
57.8
58.1
64.0
67.7
68.4
66.5
64.7
63.1
60.760.7
63.063.2
63.2
63.0
62.2
62.7
63.4
63.9
63.4
64.3
64.6
65.2
66.4
66.1
66.9
67.4
67.6
68.9
68.5
68.6
67.3
67.0
68.4
66.5
66.4
65.8
65.7
65.0
64.9
64.1
64.2
54.7
55.6
55.8
56.2
57.0
57.1
57.3
57.3
57.1
56.7
56.1
56.3
56.5
53.8
55.0
57.5
55.8
57.9
53.8
55.8
57.9
56.4
56.6
59.5
57.5
46.4
54.2
52.9
61.2
67.2
67.7
62.7
60.0
55.0 EOF
58.3
55.1
68.2
64.8
1.5%
2.3
%
7.7
%
FFE = 970.5 = ARCH 100'-0"
FFE = 957.2 = ARCH 86'-8"
57.1 BW
53.1 BW
PROJECT MATCH LINE
PROJECT MATCH LINE
PROPOSED BUILDING
REGIONAL BASIN
3060
69.0
69.570.5
68.6
65.9
58.4
57.9
57.6
57.2
55.3
55.8
54.6
55.3
54.9
55.4
55.3
56.1
65.5
67.6
53.6
63.4
52.6 EOF
55.4 EOF
54.9
55.2
56.0
53.6
60.4
59.359.2
65.0
66.3 66.4
53.2
52.8
55.0
55.8
55.4
56.2
55.755.5
56.4
51.9
57.6
53.1
50.4
50.8
69.2
68.2
68.2
69.1
67.5
67.1
68.368.5
54.7 ME
60.0 ME
58.0 ME
56.0 ME
54.0 ME
54.0 ME
60.0 ME
60.0 ME
58.0 ME
58.2
48.3
61.4 ME
64.0 ME
65.1 ME64.3 ME
55.0 ME
48.9
50.5
57.0
56.4
60.0 ME
58.0 ME
54.8
55.1
55.2
54.4 ME
54.2 EOF
55.5 ME
55.8 ME
61.7 ME
62.9 ME 60.8 ME 60.5 ME 60.5 ME 60.7 ME 62.0 ME 63.1 ME 64.0 ME 65.0 ME 66.0 ME 66.7 ME 66.1 ME 65.6 ME
65.0 ME
65.4 ME
65.1 ME
64.7 ME
56.1 EOF
56.8 EOF
53.5
53.2
53.5
53.4
53.7
55.3 EOF
56.1 EOF
55.7
64.9
62.0
61.9
66.0
65.9
62.3 EOF
61.2 EOF
61.2 EOF
56.4 EOF
56.2
49.6 EOF
48.3 EOF
62.6 EOF
60.3 EOF
61.0 ME
60.7 ME
61.6 ME
68.5
68.2
55.8
56.056.0
55.855.8
55.3
55.5
955
9
5
5
95
2
9
5
2
95
3
9
5
3
9
5
4
9
5
4
956
9
5
6
950
955
949
951
952
953
954
9
5
0
955
96
0
960
96
5
9
6
5
94
8
948
94
9
9
5
1
9
5
2
95
3
9
5
4
956
957
95
8
958
959
959
96
1
9
6
1
961
962
962
962
963
963
963
96
4
9
6
4
96
6
96
6
96
7
96
7
968
9
6
8
96
9
9
6
9
95
0
955
960
965
94
8
94
9
951
95
2
95
3
954
956
957
958
959
961
962
963
964
966
967
9
6
0
9
5
9
957
958
955
96
0
95
6
956
95
7
957
957
957
95
7
95
895
9
9
6
1
9
6
2
9
6
3
96
0
96
1
96
0
96
1
96
2
9
6
3
9
6
4
9
6
1
9
6
5
965
966
960
9
6
5
95
8
95
9
96
1
96
2
9
6
3
9
6
4
955
954
956
957
958
959
955
954
954
950
949
955
9
6
0
952
953
954
956
957
95
8
9
5
9
55.9
68.9
69.4
C1.41
GRADING AND
DRAINAGE PLAN
NORTH
R
FEETSCALE
0
HORZ.
40 80
X
X
SB-1 TP X
955
54.6
955
X.XX
D
REFERENCE KEY TO SITE DETAILS
DETAIL I.D. NUMBER (TOP)
DETAIL SHEET NUMBER (BOTTOM)
EXISTING CONTOUR
EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION
PROPOSED CONTOUR
PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION
ME = MATCH EXISTING
EOF = EMERGENCY OVERFLOW
TC = TOP OF CURB
TW = FINISH GRADE AT HIGH SIDE OF WALL
BW = FINISH GRADE AT LOW SIDE OF WALL
PROPOSED GRADING LIMITS
PROPOSED SAND SUBBASE AT FROST FOOTED STOOPS
APPROXIMATE SOIL BORING / TEST PIT LOCATION
PROPOSED MANHOLE (MH)
PROPOSED CATCH BASIN (CB)
PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION (FES)
PROPOSED HYDRANT (HYD)
PROPOSED GATE VALVE (GV)
PROPOSED STOOP - REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS
PROPERTY LINE
LEGEND
1.ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE STATE AND LOCAL ORDINANCES.
2.THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR AND SHALL PAY FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION STAKING / LAYOUT.
3.OBTAIN AND PAY FOR ALL RELATED CONSTRUCTION PERMITS, INCLUDING THE NPDES PERMIT FROM THE MPCA. SUBMIT A COPY OF ALL PERMITS TO THE
CITY.
4.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAGE (CONSTRUCTION ZONES) NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS.
ALL SIGNAGE LAYOUTS MUST BE DESIGNED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND APPROVED BY LOCAL AUTHORITIES.
5.INSTALL CONTROL FENCING AND BARRICADING AS NECESSARY TO PROTECT THE PUBLIC.
6.INSPECT SITE AND REVIEW SOIL BORINGS TO DETERMINE EXTENT OF WORK AND NATURE OF MATERIALS TO BE HANDLED.
7.REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR DEWATERING REQUIREMENTS.
8.CHECK ALL PLAN AND DETAIL DIMENSIONS AND VERIFY SAME BEFORE FIELD LAYOUT.
9.REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR BUILDING AND STOOP DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT.
10.REFER TO THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) NARRATIVE, SHEET C1.34, FOR EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS. SECTION 31 00 00
SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR FULL IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPP.
11.MAINTAIN ADJACENT PROPERTY AND PUBLIC STREETS CLEAN FROM CONSTRUCTION CAUSED DIRT AND DEBRIS ON A DAILY BASIS. PROTECT DRAINAGE
SYSTEMS FROM SEDIMENTATION AS A RESULT OF CONSTRUCTION RELATED DIRT AND DEBRIS.
12.MAINTAIN DUST CONTROL DURING GRADING OPERATIONS.
13.ALL EROSION CONTROL METHODS SHALL COMPLY WITH MPCA AND LOCAL REGULATIONS.
14.MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE TO SITE AND PROTECT EXISTING SITE FEATURES (INCLUDING TURF AND VEGETATION) WHICH ARE TO REMAIN.
15.PROPOSED CONTOURS AND SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN TO FINISH GRADE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
16.PROPOSED ELEVATIONS SHOWN TYPICALLY AS 55.1 OR 55 SHALL BE UNDERSTOOD TO MEAN 955.1 OR 955.
17.SPOT ELEVATIONS SHOWN IN PARKING LOTS, DRIVES AND ROADS INDICATE GUTTER GRADES, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. SPOT ELEVATIONS WITH LABELS
OUTSIDE THE BUILDING PERIMETER INDICATE PROPOSED GRADES OUTSIDE THE BUILDING. SPOT ELEVATIONS WITH LABELS INSIDE THE BUILDING PERIMETER
INDICATE PROPOSED FINISH FLOOR ELEVATIONS.
18.THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING QUANTITIES OF CUT, FILL AND WASTE MATERIALS TO BE HANDLED, AND FOR AMOUNT
OF GRADING TO BE DONE IN ORDER TO COMPLETELY PERFORM ALL WORK INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS. IMPORT SUITABLE MATERIAL AND EXPORT
UNSUITABLE / EXCESS / WASTE MATERIAL, AS REQUIRED, AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER.
19.IT IS INTENDED THAT EARTHWORK (CUT VS. FILL) BALANCE ON SITE. SUBMIT THE QUANTITY OF MATERIAL AND AMOUNT OF ANTICIPATED GRADE
ADJUSTMENT FOR REVIEW BY THE ENGINEER A MINIMUM OF FOUR WEEKDAYS PRIOR TO MAKING ADJUSTMENTS. ALL GRADE ADJUSTMENTS MUST BE
APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION WILL BE ALLOWED FOR WORK ASSOCIATED WITH GRADING ADJUSTMENTS, INCLUDING, BUT
NOT LIMITED TO, EARTHWORK OPERATIONS, STORM SEWER PIPING AND STRUCTURE ADJUSTMENTS, CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING FOR ADJUSTING FEATURE
LOCATIONS ACCORDINGLY, SILT FENCE, ETC.
20.NO FINISHED SLOPES SHALL EXCEED 4' HORIZONTAL TO 1' VERTICAL (4:1), UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
21.ALL DISTURBED AREAS OUTSIDE THE BUILDING PAD, WHICH ARE NOT DESIGNATED TO BE PAVED OR RECEIVE AGLIME, SHALL RECEIVE AT LEAST 6” OF
TOPSOIL AND SHALL BE SODDED OR SEEDED. REFER TO LANDSCAPING PLANS FOR SOD AND SEED LOCATIONS. ALL AREAS NOT DESIGNATED FOR SOD OR A
SPECIFIC SEED MIX, WHICH ARE DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION, SHALL BE SEEDED WITH SEED MIX #1.
22.WHERE NEW SOD MEETS EXISTING SOD, CUT A CLEAN, SHARP EDGE TO ALLOW FOR A CONSISTENT, UNIFORM, AND STRAIGHT JOINT BETWEEN NEW SOD
AND EXISTING TURFGRASS. JAGGED OR UNEVEN JOINTS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. REMOVE TOPSOIL AT THE JOINT BETWEEN NEW SOD AND EXISTING
TURFGRASS, AS REQUIRED, TO ALLOW NEW SOD SURFACE TO BE FLUSH WITH EXISTING TURFGRASS SURFACE.
23.FAILURE OF TURF DEVELOPMENT: IN THE EVENT THE CONTRACTOR FAILS TO PROVIDE AN ACCEPTABLE TURF, RE-SEED OR RE-SOD ALL APPLICABLE AREAS, AT
NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER, TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.
24.ALL WATERMAIN PIPE SHALL BE DIP, CLASS 52. ALL WATERMAIN SHALL HAVE MINIMUM 8'-0" BURY (TOP OF PIPE TO FINISH GRADE). DIP SHALL BE ENCASED
WITH POLYETHYLENE FILM CONFORMING TO ASTM D 1248-889.
25.ALL WATERMAIN SHALL BE AWWA C900, CAST IRON OD, DR 18, PVC PIPE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D2321. ALL WATERMAIN SHALL HAVE
MINIMUM 8'-0" BURY (TOP OF PIPE TO FINISH GRADE).
26.ALL SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE PVC PIPE (ASTM D 3034, SDR 26), UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SANITARY SEWER INSTALLATION SHALL BE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D2321.
27.ALL SANITARY SEWER PIPE CROSSING WATERMAIN, OUTSIDE OF THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY, SHALL BE ASTM D2665, SCHEDULE 40 PVC WITH SOLVENT WELD
JOINTS.
28.ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE RCP, CLASS III (MIN.), WITH FLEXIBLE WATERTIGHT JOINTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM C-361 OR PVC PIPE (ASTM D3034,
SDR 35) INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D2321, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
29.ALL STORM SEWER PIPE CROSSING WATERMAIN, OUTSIDE OF THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY, SHALL BE ASTM D2665, SCHEDULE 40 PVC WITH SOLVENT WELD
JOINTS.
30.FLEXIBLE JOINTS AT STORM SEWER PIPE CONNECTIONS TO STRUCTURES:
a.IN ACCORDANCE WITH MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE, PROVIDE FLEXIBLE JOINTS AT ALL PIPE CONNECTIONS TO ALL STORM SEWER STRUCTURES.
b.ACCEPTABLE MANUFACTURERS / PRODUCTS:
i. FERNCO, “CONCRETE MANHOLE ADAPTORS” OR “LARGE-DIAMETER WATERSTOPS”
ii. PRESS-SEAL, WATERSTOP GROUTING RINGS”
iii. OR APPROVED EQUAL.
31.INSTALL WATERMAIN AT LEAST 10 FEET HORIZONTALLY FROM ANY MANHOLE, CATCH BASIN, STORM SEWER, SANITARY SEWER, DRAIN TILE, OR OTHER
POTENTIAL SOURCE FOR CONTAMINATION PER MN PLUMBING CODE. THIS ISOLATION DISTANCE IS MEASURED FROM THE OUTER EDGE OF THE PIPE TO THE
OUTER EDGE OF THE CONTAMINATION SOURCE (OUTER EDGE OF STRUCTURES OR SIMILAR).
32.INSTALL MANOLES, CATCH BASINS, STORM SEWER, SANITARY SEWER, DRAIN TILE, AND OTHER POTENTIAL SOURCES OF CONTAMINATION AT LEAST 10 FEET
HORIZONTALLY FROM ANY WATERMAIN PER MN PLUMBING CODE. THIS ISOLATION DISTANCE IS MEASURED FROM THE OUTER EDGE OF THE PIPE TO THE
OUTER EDGE OF THE CONTAMINATION SOURCE (OUTER EDGE OF STRUCTURES OR SIMILAR).
33.LOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. VERIFY LOCATION, SIZE AND INVERT ELEVATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. BEFORE BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION.
34.PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF PROPOSED BUILDING UTILITY SERVICES (STORM, SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN), VERIFY ALL PROPOSED BUILDING UTILITY
SERVICE PIPE SIZES, LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS WITH MECHANICAL PLANS. COORDINATE CONSTRUCTION AND CONNECTIONS WITH MECHANICAL
CONTRACTOR.
35.MAINTAIN DRAINAGE FROM EXISTING BUILDING AT ALL TIMES. PROVIDE TEMPORARY STORM SEWER, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, CATCH BASINS,
MANHOLES, PIPING, AND SIMILAR. DO NOT REMOVE EXISTING STORM SEWER UNTIL TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT STORM SEWER IS INSTALLED AND
FUNCTIONAL. COORDINATE ALL REMOVALS WITH APPROPRIATE TRADES (SITE UTILITY CONTRACTOR, MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR, ETC.) AS REQUIRED.
36.STAKE LIMITS OF WALKS AND CURBING PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF GATE VALVES, CATCH BASINS, AND MANHOLES. ADJUST GATE VALVE AND MANHOLE
LOCATIONS TO AVOID PLACEMENT OF THESE STRUCTURES IN WALKS AND CURB AND GUTTER. STAKE CURB AND GUTTER ALIGNMENTS TO ALLOW CURB
INLET TYPE CATCH BASINS TO PROPERLY ALIGN WITH CURB AND GUTTER.
GENERAL NOTES
FFE = 970.50 = ARCH 100'-0"
FFE = 957.20 = ARCH 86'-8"
FFE = 953.00 = ARCH 82'-6"
PROPOSED BUILDNG FFE TABLE
1.) Proposed First
Elevation = XXX.XX
2.)
Elevation = XXX.XX
3).
Elevation = XXX.XX
BENCHMARKS (FIELD VERIFY BEFORE USING)
REFER TO SPEC 31 00 00 EARTHWORK AND UNIT PRICES. REFER TO SPECIFICATION 31 00 00 FOR PROCEDURE
ON HOW TO CALCULATE ACTUAL SOIL CORRECTION QUANTITIES.
INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING QUANTITY FOR THE BUILDING PAD SOIL CORRECTION IN THE LUMP SUM BASE BID:
XXX CUBIC YARDS
BUILDING PAD SOIL CORRECTION QUANTITY
DateRegistration Number
Check:
Drawn:
Date:
Comm:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by
me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
under the laws of the State of
H
G
F
E
D
C
B
A
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 109
C
MN
Revisions
Description Date Num
Scale:
North
3300 FERNBROOK LANE NORTH, SUITE 300
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
Phone: (763) 544-7129
Email: goldenvalley@bolton-menk.com
www.bolton-menk.com
R
XX/XX/XX
232104
XX/XX/2024
JDO
MINNESOTA
PUBLIC SCHOOLS
3455 153RD STREET WEST
APPLE VALLEY - EAGAN
NEW ELEMENTARY
ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068
SCHOOL #20
ISD #196: ROSEMOUNT -
DAVID A. REY
DAR
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
40180
Page 66 of 109
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
D
D
D
D
D
D
S
S
D
52.2
52.5
52.3
52.8
52.2
53.1
54.0
52.7
3.
1
%
49.2
47.5
48.5
53.5
56.0
54.3
56.5
59.7
60.1
60.1
59.6
56.4
54.1
55.8
53.3
48.2
48.5
47.8
49.3
49.6 49.6
49.8
57.8
58.1
53.9
53.9
57.5
55.8
40.0
31.0
50.6
46.4
40.0
52.9
NWL:940.0
BTM:931.0
HWL:944.68
SNOWMELT HWL: 945.09
BTM:940.0
WQV:944.5
HWL:944.68
SNOWMELT HWL: 945.09
1.5%
1.5
%
2
2
.
4
%
2
2
.
3
%
1
1
.
5
%
2
1
.
0
%
2.3
%
21.2%
18.3
%
1.5%
7.7
%
44.5
PROJECT MATCH LINE
PROJECT MATCH LINE
STORMWATER POND
INFILTRATION AREA
REGIONAL BASIN
1618
52.6 EOF
53.2
51.9
53.1
50.4
50.8
60.0 ME
58.0 ME
58.2
48.3
48.9
50.5
60.0 ME
58.0 ME
53.5
53.4
53.7
56.4 EOF
47.4 EOF
49.6 EOF
48.3 EOF
47.6 EOF
9
5
5
95
5
9
5
1
9
5
2
95
2
9
5
2
9
5
3
9
5
3
9
5
4
9
5
4
9
5
6
95
6
950
949
951
952
953
954
9
5
0
95
0
955
95
5
9
5
5
955
96
0
94
8
948
948
94
8
94
9
949
949
94
9
9
5
1
95
1
9
5
2
95
2
95
3
95
3
9
5
4
95
4
9
5
6
956
956
95
6
95
7
957
95
8
958
959
940
945
950
941
942
943
944
944
944
946
947
948
949
951
952
95
0
955
94
8
94
9
951
95
2
95
3
954
956
940
945
950
955
941
942
943
944
946
947
948
949
951
952
953
954
956
957
958
945
942
94
2
943
9
4
3
944
9
4
4
946
947
945
945
942
942
94
3
943
9
4
4
944
944
946
9
6
2
9
6
1
9
6
0
9
5
9
9
5
8
9
5
7
9
5
6
9
5
5
9
6
0
9
5
9
952
954
957
955
945
950
944
946
947
948
949
955
952
953
954
956
957
95
8
9
5
9
95
0
94894
99
5
1
9
5
2
9
5
3
9
4
1
94
0
94
4
94
4
94
0
9
3
9
9
3
1
C1.42
GRADING AND
DRAINAGE PLAN
SOUTH
R
FEETSCALE
0
HORZ.
40 80
1.REFER TO SHEET C1.41, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN NORTH, FOR NOTES.
NOTES
X
X
SB-1 TP X
955
54.6
955
X.XX
D
REFERENCE KEY TO SITE DETAILS
DETAIL I.D. NUMBER (TOP)
DETAIL SHEET NUMBER (BOTTOM)
EXISTING CONTOUR
EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION
PROPOSED CONTOUR
PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION
ME = MATCH EXISTING
EOF = EMERGENCY OVERFLOW
TC = TOP OF CURB
TW = FINISH GRADE AT HIGH SIDE OF WALL
BW = FINISH GRADE AT LOW SIDE OF WALL
PROPOSED GRADING LIMITS
PROPOSED SAND SUBBASE AT FROST FOOTED STOOPS
APPROXIMATE SOIL BORING / TEST PIT LOCATION
PROPOSED MANHOLE (MH)
PROPOSED CATCH BASIN (CB)
PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION (FES)
PROPOSED HYDRANT (HYD)
PROPOSED GATE VALVE (GV)
PROPOSED STOOP - REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS
PROPERTY LINE
LEGEND
DateRegistration Number
Check:
Drawn:
Date:
Comm:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by
me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
under the laws of the State of
H
G
F
E
D
C
B
A
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 109
C
MN
Revisions
Description Date Num
Scale:
North
3300 FERNBROOK LANE NORTH, SUITE 300
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
Phone: (763) 544-7129
Email: goldenvalley@bolton-menk.com
www.bolton-menk.com
R
XX/XX/XX
232104
XX/XX/2024
JDO
MINNESOTA
PUBLIC SCHOOLS
3455 153RD STREET WEST
APPLE VALLEY - EAGAN
NEW ELEMENTARY
ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068
SCHOOL #20
ISD #196: ROSEMOUNT -
DAVID A. REY
DAR
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
40180
Page 67 of 109
1.6
%
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
S
S
S
D
D
>>>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>>>>
52.5
62.5
52.2
52.5
52.3
56.9
57.257.256.7
57.2
57.2
56.7
57.2
56.7
56.7
56.7
57.2
57.2
56.6
56.7
57.2
56.5 56.5
56.5
56.5
56.5
57.2
56.7
56.7 56.7
57.2
57.0
70.0
70.2
70.5
70.5
70.5
69.9
68.5 68.5
55.9
54.2
54.2
52.9
66.2 TW67.9
61.8 TW
57.2 BW
57.5 BW
60.9 TW
52.9 BW
52.8 BW
58.1 TW
52.8
52.2
53.1
54.0
52.7
1.
8
%
3.
1
%
1.9%
2.7%
3.1%
???
3.5
%
???
1.5
%
???
0.5%
49.2
59.7
60.1
60.1
59.6
49.3
49.6 49.6
49.8
57.8
58.1
64.0
67.7
68.4
66.5
64.7
63.1
60.760.7
63.063.2
63.2
63.0
62.2
62.7
63.4
63.9
63.4
64.3
64.6
65.2
66.4
66.1
66.9
67.4
67.6
68.9
68.5
68.6
67.3
67.0
68.4
66.5
66.4
65.8
65.7
65.0
64.9
64.1
64.2
54.7
55.6
55.8
56.2
57.0
57.1
57.3
57.3
57.1
56.7
56.1
56.3
56.5
53.8
55.0
57.5
55.8
57.9
53.8
55.8
57.9
56.4
56.6
59.5
57.5
46.4
54.2
52.9
61.2
67.2
67.7
62.7
60.0
55.0 EOF
58.3
55.1
68.2
64.8
1.5%
2.3
%
7.7
%
FFE = 970.5 = ARCH 100'-0"
FFE = 957.2 = ARCH 86'-8"
57.1 BW
53.1 BW
PROJECT MATCH LINE
PROJECT MATCH LINE
PROPOSED BUILDING
REGIONAL BASIN
3060
69.0
69.570.5
68.6
65.9
58.4
57.9
57.6
57.2
55.3
55.8
54.6
55.3
54.9
55.4
55.3
56.1
65.5
67.6
53.6
63.4
52.6 EOF
55.4 EOF
54.9
55.2
56.0
53.6
60.4
59.359.2
65.0
66.3 66.4
53.2
52.8
55.0
55.8
55.4
56.2
55.755.5
56.4
51.9
57.6
53.1
50.4
50.8
69.2
68.2
68.2
69.1
67.5
67.1
68.368.5
54.7 ME
60.0 ME
58.0 ME
56.0 ME
54.0 ME
54.0 ME
60.0 ME
60.0 ME
58.0 ME
58.2
48.3
61.4 ME
64.0 ME
65.1 ME64.3 ME
55.0 ME
48.9
50.5
57.0
56.4
60.0 ME
58.0 ME
54.8
55.1
55.2
54.4 ME
54.2 EOF
55.5 ME
55.8 ME
61.7 ME
62.9 ME 60.8 ME 60.5 ME 60.5 ME 60.7 ME 62.0 ME 63.1 ME 64.0 ME 65.0 ME 66.0 ME 66.7 ME 66.1 ME 65.6 ME
65.0 ME
65.4 ME
65.1 ME
64.7 ME
56.1 EOF
56.8 EOF
53.5
53.2
53.5
53.4
53.7
55.3 EOF
56.1 EOF
55.7
64.9
62.0
61.9
66.0
65.9
62.3 EOF
61.2 EOF
61.2 EOF
56.4 EOF
56.2
49.6 EOF
48.3 EOF
62.6 EOF
60.3 EOF
61.0 ME
60.7 ME
61.6 ME
68.5
68.2
55.8
56.056.0
55.855.8
55.3
55.5
955
9
5
5
95
2
9
5
2
95
3
9
5
3
9
5
4
9
5
4
956
9
5
6
950
955
949
951
952
953
954
9
5
0
955
96
0
960
96
5
9
6
5
94
8
948
94
9
9
5
1
9
5
2
95
3
9
5
4
956
957
95
8
958
959
959
96
1
9
6
1
961
962
962
962
963
963
963
96
4
9
6
4
96
6
96
6
96
7
96
7
968
9
6
8
96
9
9
6
9
95
0
955
960
965
94
8
94
9
951
95
2
95
3
954
956
957
958
959
961
962
963
964
966
967
9
6
0
9
5
9
957
958
955
96
0
95
6
956
95
7
957
957
957
95
7
95
895
9
9
6
1
9
6
2
9
6
3
96
0
96
1
96
0
96
1
96
2
9
6
3
9
6
4
9
6
1
9
6
5
965
966
960
9
6
5
95
8
95
9
96
1
96
2
9
6
3
9
6
4
955
954
956
957
958
959
955
954
954
950
949
955
9
6
0
952
953
954
956
957
95
8
9
5
9
55.9
68.9
69.4
1.6
%
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
S
S
S
D
D
>>>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>>>>
52.5
62.5
52.2
52.5
52.3
56.9
57.257.256.7
57.2
57.2
56.7
57.2
56.7
56.7
56.7
57.2
57.2
56.6
56.7
57.2
56.5 56.5
56.5
56.5
56.5
57.2
56.7
56.7 56.7
57.2
57.0
70.0
70.2
70.5
70.5
70.5
69.9
68.5 68.5
55.9
54.2
54.2
52.9
66.2 TW67.9
61.8 TW
57.2 BW
57.5 BW
60.9 TW
52.9 BW
52.8 BW
58.1 TW
52.8
52.2
53.1
54.0
52.7
1.
8
%
3.
1
%
1.9%
2.7%
3.1%
???
3.5
%
???
1.5
%
???
0.5%
49.2
59.7
60.1
60.1
59.6
49.3
49.6 49.6
49.8
57.8
58.1
64.0
67.7
68.4
66.5
64.7
63.1
60.760.7
63.063.2
63.2
63.0
62.2
62.7
63.4
63.9
63.4
64.3
64.6
65.2
66.4
66.1
66.9
67.4
67.6
68.9
68.5
68.6
67.3
67.0
68.4
66.5
66.4
65.8
65.7
65.0
64.9
64.1
64.2
54.7
55.6
55.8
56.2
57.0
57.1
57.3
57.3
57.1
56.7
56.1
56.3
56.5
53.8
55.0
57.5
55.8
57.9
53.8
55.8
57.9
56.4
56.6
59.5
57.5
46.4
54.2
52.9
61.2
67.2
67.7
62.7
60.0
55.0 EOF
58.3
55.1
68.2
64.8
1.5%
2.3
%
7.7
%
FFE = 970.5 = ARCH 100'-0"
FFE = 957.2 = ARCH 86'-8"
57.1 BW
53.1 BW
PROJECT MATCH LINE
PROJECT MATCH LINE
PROPOSED BUILDING
REGIONAL BASIN
3060
69.0
69.570.5
68.6
65.9
58.4
57.9
57.6
57.2
55.3
55.8
54.6
55.3
54.9
55.4
55.3
56.1
65.5
67.6
53.6
63.4
52.6 EOF
55.4 EOF
54.9
55.2
56.0
53.6
60.4
59.359.2
65.0
66.3 66.4
53.2
52.8
55.0
55.8
55.4
56.2
55.755.5
56.4
51.9
57.6
53.1
50.4
50.8
69.2
68.2
68.2
69.1
67.5
67.1
68.368.5
54.7 ME
60.0 ME
58.0 ME
56.0 ME
54.0 ME
54.0 ME
60.0 ME
60.0 ME
58.0 ME
58.2
48.3
61.4 ME
64.0 ME
65.1 ME64.3 ME
55.0 ME
48.9
50.5
57.0
56.4
60.0 ME
58.0 ME
54.8
55.1
55.2
54.4 ME
54.2 EOF
55.5 ME
55.8 ME
61.7 ME
62.9 ME 60.8 ME 60.5 ME 60.5 ME 60.7 ME 62.0 ME 63.1 ME 64.0 ME 65.0 ME 66.0 ME 66.7 ME 66.1 ME 65.6 ME
65.0 ME
65.4 ME
65.1 ME
64.7 ME
56.1 EOF
56.8 EOF
53.5
53.2
53.5
53.4
53.7
55.3 EOF
56.1 EOF
55.7
64.9
62.0
61.9
66.0
65.9
62.3 EOF
61.2 EOF
61.2 EOF
56.4 EOF
56.2
49.6 EOF
48.3 EOF
62.6 EOF
60.3 EOF
61.0 ME
60.7 ME
61.6 ME
68.5
68.2
55.8
56.056.0
55.855.8
55.3
55.5
955
9
5
5
95
2
9
5
2
95
3
9
5
3
9
5
4
9
5
4
956
9
5
6
950
955
949
951
952
953
954
9
5
0
955
96
0
960
96
5
9
6
5
94
8
948
94
9
9
5
1
9
5
2
95
3
9
5
4
956
957
95
8
958
959
959
96
1
9
6
1
961
962
962
962
963
963
963
96
4
9
6
4
96
6
96
6
96
7
96
7
968
9
6
8
96
9
9
6
9
95
0
955
960
965
94
8
94
9
951
95
2
95
3
954
956
957
958
959
961
962
963
964
966
967
9
6
0
9
5
9
957
958
955
96
0
95
6
956
95
7
957
957
957
95
7
95
895
9
9
6
1
9
6
2
9
6
3
96
0
96
1
96
0
96
1
96
2
9
6
3
9
6
4
9
6
1
9
6
5
965
966
960
9
6
5
95
8
95
9
96
1
96
2
9
6
3
9
6
4
955
954
956
957
958
959
955
954
954
950
949
955
9
6
0
952
953
954
956
957
95
8
9
5
9
55.9
68.9
69.4
X
X
SB-1 TP X
955
54.6
955
X.XX
D
REFERENCE KEY TO SITE DETAILS
DETAIL I.D. NUMBER (TOP)
DETAIL SHEET NUMBER (BOTTOM)
EXISTING CONTOUR
EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION
PROPOSED CONTOUR
PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION
ME = MATCH EXISTING
EOF = EMERGENCY OVERFLOW
TC = TOP OF CURB
TW = FINISH GRADE AT HIGH SIDE OF WALL
BW = FINISH GRADE AT LOW SIDE OF WALL
PROPOSED GRADING LIMITS
PROPOSED SAND SUBBASE AT FROST FOOTED STOOPS
APPROXIMATE SOIL BORING / TEST PIT LOCATION
PROPOSED MANHOLE (MH)
PROPOSED CATCH BASIN (CB)
PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION (FES)
PROPOSED HYDRANT (HYD)
PROPOSED GATE VALVE (GV)
PROPOSED STOOP - REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS
PROPERTY LINE
LEGEND
1.ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE STATE AND LOCAL ORDINANCES.
2.THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR AND SHALL PAY FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION STAKING / LAYOUT.
3.OBTAIN AND PAY FOR ALL RELATED CONSTRUCTION PERMITS, INCLUDING THE NPDES PERMIT FROM THE MPCA. SUBMIT A COPY OF ALL PERMITS TO THE
CITY.
4.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAGE (CONSTRUCTION ZONES) NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS.
ALL SIGNAGE LAYOUTS MUST BE DESIGNED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND APPROVED BY LOCAL AUTHORITIES.
5.INSTALL CONTROL FENCING AND BARRICADING AS NECESSARY TO PROTECT THE PUBLIC.
6.INSPECT SITE AND REVIEW SOIL BORINGS TO DETERMINE EXTENT OF WORK AND NATURE OF MATERIALS TO BE HANDLED.
7.REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR DEWATERING REQUIREMENTS.
8.CHECK ALL PLAN AND DETAIL DIMENSIONS AND VERIFY SAME BEFORE FIELD LAYOUT.
9.REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR BUILDING AND STOOP DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT.
10.REFER TO THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) NARRATIVE, SHEET C1.34, FOR EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS. SECTION 31 00 00
SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR FULL IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPP.
11.MAINTAIN ADJACENT PROPERTY AND PUBLIC STREETS CLEAN FROM CONSTRUCTION CAUSED DIRT AND DEBRIS ON A DAILY BASIS. PROTECT DRAINAGE
SYSTEMS FROM SEDIMENTATION AS A RESULT OF CONSTRUCTION RELATED DIRT AND DEBRIS.
12.MAINTAIN DUST CONTROL DURING GRADING OPERATIONS.
13.ALL EROSION CONTROL METHODS SHALL COMPLY WITH MPCA AND LOCAL REGULATIONS.
14.MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE TO SITE AND PROTECT EXISTING SITE FEATURES (INCLUDING TURF AND VEGETATION) WHICH ARE TO REMAIN.
15.PROPOSED CONTOURS AND SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN TO FINISH GRADE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
16.PROPOSED ELEVATIONS SHOWN TYPICALLY AS 55.1 OR 55 SHALL BE UNDERSTOOD TO MEAN 955.1 OR 955.
17.SPOT ELEVATIONS SHOWN IN PARKING LOTS, DRIVES AND ROADS INDICATE GUTTER GRADES, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. SPOT ELEVATIONS WITH LABELS
OUTSIDE THE BUILDING PERIMETER INDICATE PROPOSED GRADES OUTSIDE THE BUILDING. SPOT ELEVATIONS WITH LABELS INSIDE THE BUILDING PERIMETER
INDICATE PROPOSED FINISH FLOOR ELEVATIONS.
18.THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING QUANTITIES OF CUT, FILL AND WASTE MATERIALS TO BE HANDLED, AND FOR AMOUNT
OF GRADING TO BE DONE IN ORDER TO COMPLETELY PERFORM ALL WORK INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS. IMPORT SUITABLE MATERIAL AND EXPORT
UNSUITABLE / EXCESS / WASTE MATERIAL, AS REQUIRED, AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER.
19.IT IS INTENDED THAT EARTHWORK (CUT VS. FILL) BALANCE ON SITE. SUBMIT THE QUANTITY OF MATERIAL AND AMOUNT OF ANTICIPATED GRADE
ADJUSTMENT FOR REVIEW BY THE ENGINEER A MINIMUM OF FOUR WEEKDAYS PRIOR TO MAKING ADJUSTMENTS. ALL GRADE ADJUSTMENTS MUST BE
APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION WILL BE ALLOWED FOR WORK ASSOCIATED WITH GRADING ADJUSTMENTS, INCLUDING, BUT
NOT LIMITED TO, EARTHWORK OPERATIONS, STORM SEWER PIPING AND STRUCTURE ADJUSTMENTS, CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING FOR ADJUSTING FEATURE
LOCATIONS ACCORDINGLY, SILT FENCE, ETC.
20.NO FINISHED SLOPES SHALL EXCEED 4' HORIZONTAL TO 1' VERTICAL (4:1), UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
21.ALL DISTURBED AREAS OUTSIDE THE BUILDING PAD, WHICH ARE NOT DESIGNATED TO BE PAVED OR RECEIVE AGLIME, SHALL RECEIVE AT LEAST 6” OF
TOPSOIL AND SHALL BE SODDED OR SEEDED. REFER TO LANDSCAPING PLANS FOR SOD AND SEED LOCATIONS. ALL AREAS NOT DESIGNATED FOR SOD OR A
SPECIFIC SEED MIX, WHICH ARE DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION, SHALL BE SEEDED WITH SEED MIX #1.
22.WHERE NEW SOD MEETS EXISTING SOD, CUT A CLEAN, SHARP EDGE TO ALLOW FOR A CONSISTENT, UNIFORM, AND STRAIGHT JOINT BETWEEN NEW SOD
AND EXISTING TURFGRASS. JAGGED OR UNEVEN JOINTS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. REMOVE TOPSOIL AT THE JOINT BETWEEN NEW SOD AND EXISTING
TURFGRASS, AS REQUIRED, TO ALLOW NEW SOD SURFACE TO BE FLUSH WITH EXISTING TURFGRASS SURFACE.
23.FAILURE OF TURF DEVELOPMENT: IN THE EVENT THE CONTRACTOR FAILS TO PROVIDE AN ACCEPTABLE TURF, RE-SEED OR RE-SOD ALL APPLICABLE AREAS, AT
NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER, TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.
24.ALL WATERMAIN PIPE SHALL BE DIP, CLASS 52. ALL WATERMAIN SHALL HAVE MINIMUM 8'-0" BURY (TOP OF PIPE TO FINISH GRADE). DIP SHALL BE ENCASED
WITH POLYETHYLENE FILM CONFORMING TO ASTM D 1248-889.
25.ALL WATERMAIN SHALL BE AWWA C900, CAST IRON OD, DR 18, PVC PIPE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D2321. ALL WATERMAIN SHALL HAVE
MINIMUM 8'-0" BURY (TOP OF PIPE TO FINISH GRADE).
26.ALL SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE PVC PIPE (ASTM D 3034, SDR 26), UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SANITARY SEWER INSTALLATION SHALL BE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D2321.
27.ALL SANITARY SEWER PIPE CROSSING WATERMAIN, OUTSIDE OF THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY, SHALL BE ASTM D2665, SCHEDULE 40 PVC WITH SOLVENT WELD
JOINTS.
28.ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE RCP, CLASS III (MIN.), WITH FLEXIBLE WATERTIGHT JOINTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM C-361 OR PVC PIPE (ASTM D3034,
SDR 35) INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D2321, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
29.ALL STORM SEWER PIPE CROSSING WATERMAIN, OUTSIDE OF THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY, SHALL BE ASTM D2665, SCHEDULE 40 PVC WITH SOLVENT WELD
JOINTS.
30.FLEXIBLE JOINTS AT STORM SEWER PIPE CONNECTIONS TO STRUCTURES:
a.IN ACCORDANCE WITH MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE, PROVIDE FLEXIBLE JOINTS AT ALL PIPE CONNECTIONS TO ALL STORM SEWER STRUCTURES.
b.ACCEPTABLE MANUFACTURERS / PRODUCTS:
i. FERNCO, “CONCRETE MANHOLE ADAPTORS” OR “LARGE-DIAMETER WATERSTOPS”
ii. PRESS-SEAL, WATERSTOP GROUTING RINGS”
iii. OR APPROVED EQUAL.
31.INSTALL WATERMAIN AT LEAST 10 FEET HORIZONTALLY FROM ANY MANHOLE, CATCH BASIN, STORM SEWER, SANITARY SEWER, DRAIN TILE, OR OTHER
POTENTIAL SOURCE FOR CONTAMINATION PER MN PLUMBING CODE. THIS ISOLATION DISTANCE IS MEASURED FROM THE OUTER EDGE OF THE PIPE TO THE
OUTER EDGE OF THE CONTAMINATION SOURCE (OUTER EDGE OF STRUCTURES OR SIMILAR).
32.INSTALL MANOLES, CATCH BASINS, STORM SEWER, SANITARY SEWER, DRAIN TILE, AND OTHER POTENTIAL SOURCES OF CONTAMINATION AT LEAST 10 FEET
HORIZONTALLY FROM ANY WATERMAIN PER MN PLUMBING CODE. THIS ISOLATION DISTANCE IS MEASURED FROM THE OUTER EDGE OF THE PIPE TO THE
OUTER EDGE OF THE CONTAMINATION SOURCE (OUTER EDGE OF STRUCTURES OR SIMILAR).
33.LOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. VERIFY LOCATION, SIZE AND INVERT ELEVATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. BEFORE BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION.
34.PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF PROPOSED BUILDING UTILITY SERVICES (STORM, SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN), VERIFY ALL PROPOSED BUILDING UTILITY
SERVICE PIPE SIZES, LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS WITH MECHANICAL PLANS. COORDINATE CONSTRUCTION AND CONNECTIONS WITH MECHANICAL
CONTRACTOR.
35.MAINTAIN DRAINAGE FROM EXISTING BUILDING AT ALL TIMES. PROVIDE TEMPORARY STORM SEWER, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, CATCH BASINS,
MANHOLES, PIPING, AND SIMILAR. DO NOT REMOVE EXISTING STORM SEWER UNTIL TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT STORM SEWER IS INSTALLED AND
FUNCTIONAL. COORDINATE ALL REMOVALS WITH APPROPRIATE TRADES (SITE UTILITY CONTRACTOR, MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR, ETC.) AS REQUIRED.
36.STAKE LIMITS OF WALKS AND CURBING PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF GATE VALVES, CATCH BASINS, AND MANHOLES. ADJUST GATE VALVE AND MANHOLE
LOCATIONS TO AVOID PLACEMENT OF THESE STRUCTURES IN WALKS AND CURB AND GUTTER. STAKE CURB AND GUTTER ALIGNMENTS TO ALLOW CURB
INLET TYPE CATCH BASINS TO PROPERLY ALIGN WITH CURB AND GUTTER.
GENERAL NOTES
C1.43
GRADING AND
DRAINAGE PLAN
NORTH -
ALTERNATE
R
FEETSCALE
0
HORZ.
40 80
FFE = 970.50 = ARCH 100'-0"
FFE = 957.20 = ARCH 86'-8"
FFE = 953.00 = ARCH 82'-6"
PROPOSED BUILDNG FFE TABLE
DateRegistration Number
Check:
Drawn:
Date:
Comm:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by
me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
under the laws of the State of
H
G
F
E
D
C
B
A
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 109
C
MN
Revisions
Description Date Num
Scale:
North
3300 FERNBROOK LANE NORTH, SUITE 300
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
Phone: (763) 544-7129
Email: goldenvalley@bolton-menk.com
www.bolton-menk.com
R
XX/XX/XX
232104
XX/XX/2024
JDO
MINNESOTA
PUBLIC SCHOOLS
3455 153RD STREET WEST
APPLE VALLEY - EAGAN
NEW ELEMENTARY
ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068
SCHOOL #20
ISD #196: ROSEMOUNT -
DAVID A. REY
DAR
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
40180
Page 68 of 109
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
PROJECT MATCH LINE
PROJECT MATCH LINE
PROPOSED BUILDING
STORMWATER POND
INFILTRATION AREA
REGIONAL BASIN
1618
REGIONAL BASIN
3060
1
1
1
1
1
1
11
BTM:940.0
WQV:945.0
HWL:944.68
SNOWMELT HWL:945.09
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
>
>
>
>
D
>>
D
>>
>>
D
>>
>>
D
>>
>>
D
>>
>>
D
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
D
>>
>>
>
>
D
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
D
D
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
S
>
>
>
>
S
>
>
S
D
>>
>>
D
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
D >>>>
>
>
>>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>>>
>>
NWL:940.0
BTM:931.0
HWL:944.68
SNOWMELT HWL: 945.09
C1.50
UTILITY PLAN
OVERALL
R
FEETSCALE
0
HORZ.
60 120
DateRegistration Number
Check:
Drawn:
Date:
Comm:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by
me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
under the laws of the State of
H
G
F
E
D
C
B
A
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 109
C
MN
Revisions
Description Date Num
Scale:
North
3300 FERNBROOK LANE NORTH, SUITE 300
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
Phone: (763) 544-7129
Email: goldenvalley@bolton-menk.com
www.bolton-menk.com
R
XX/XX/XX
232104
XX/XX/2024
JDO
MINNESOTA
PUBLIC SCHOOLS
3455 153RD STREET WEST
APPLE VALLEY - EAGAN
NEW ELEMENTARY
ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068
SCHOOL #20
ISD #196: ROSEMOUNT -
RWK
RICHARD W. KOECHLEIN
26678
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
DAVID A. REY
DAR
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
40180
Page 69 of 109
PROJECT MATCH LINE
PROJECT MATCH LINE
PROPOSED BUILDING
REGIONAL BASIN
3060
1
1
1
1
1
1
11
232'
-
6
"
P
V
C
@
2
.
0
8
%
134' - 6
"
P
V
C
@
2
.
0
8
%
20
6
'
-
6
"
P
V
C
@
2
.
0
8
%
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I I
I
I
I
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
D
>>
D
>>
>>
>>
D
>>
>>
>>
D
>>
>>
>>
>>
D
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
D
>>
>>
>>
>
>
D
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
S
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
S
>
>
>
>
S
I
>>
>>
>>
>>
D
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
D >>>>>>
>
>
>>
I
>>>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>>>>
SANMH 2
RIM: 948.27
INV (IN): 939.38
INV (OUT): 939.28
48" DIA
SANMH 1
RIM: 949.36
INV (IN): 936.50
INV (OUT): 929.50
48" DIA
INSIDE DROP MANHOLE
CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER STUB
WITH BOOTED CONNECTION
SANMH 3
RIM: 954.25
INV (IN): 945.22 6" N
INV (OUT): 944.20 6" SE
48" DIA, Standard
FIRE WATER LINE
DOMESTIC WATER LINE
BS1
INV. = 949.50 BD
INV. = 953.00
65,655 SF
CONNECT TO EXISTING WM
CONNECT TO EXISTING WM
6" WM
4" WM
8" WM
8" WM
8" WM
6" WM
HYD 3 & 6" GV
8" WM
8" WM
HYD1 & 6" GV
HYD 2 & 6" GV
8" x 8" TEE
8" 22.5° BEND
8" 45° BEND
8" 45° BEND
8" 22.5° BEND
8" x 6" TEE
8" 45° BEND
8" 22.5° BEND
8" 45° BEND
8" x 8" TEE
8" 22.5° BEND
8" 45° BEND
8" 22.5° BEND8" 22.5° BEND
8" 45° BEND
HYD 4 & 6" GV
8" x 4" TEE
8" x 6" TEE
8" 45° BEND
8" x 6" TEE
8" x 6" TEE
8" x 6" TEE
8" GV
8" GV
8" GV
8" GV
8" GV
8" GV
8" GV
8" GV
8" GV
8" GV
8" GV
C1.51
SANITARY SEWER
AND WATERMAIN
PLAN NORTH
R
FEETSCALE
0
HORZ.
40 80
DateRegistration Number
Check:
Drawn:
Date:
Comm:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by
me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
under the laws of the State of
H
G
F
E
D
C
B
A
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 109
C
MN
Revisions
Description Date Num
Scale:
North
3300 FERNBROOK LANE NORTH, SUITE 300
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
Phone: (763) 544-7129
Email: goldenvalley@bolton-menk.com
www.bolton-menk.com
R
XX/XX/XX
232104
XX/XX/2024
JDO
MINNESOTA
PUBLIC SCHOOLS
3455 153RD STREET WEST
APPLE VALLEY - EAGAN
NEW ELEMENTARY
ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068
SCHOOL #20
ISD #196: ROSEMOUNT -
RWK
RICHARD W. KOECHLEIN
26678
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
DAVID A. REY
DAR
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
40180
X
X
955
2
3
54.6
955
D
REFERENCE KEY TO SITE DETAILS
DETAIL I.D. NUMBER (TOP)
DETAIL SHEET NUMBER (BOTTOM)
EXISTING CONTOUR
PROPOSED CONTOUR
PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION
ME = MATCH EXISTING
EOF = EMERGENCY OVERFLOW
TC = TOP OF CURB
TW = FINISH GRADE AT HIGH SIDE OF WALL
BW = FINISH GRADE AT LOW SIDE OF WALL
PROPOSED GRADING LIMITS
PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
PROPOSED WATERMAIN
PROPOSED DRAIN TILE / SUBSURFACE DRAINS (SD)
PROPOSED MANHOLE (MH)
PROPOSED CATCH BASIN (CB)
PROPOSED SURGE BASIN (SB)
PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION (FES)
PROPOSED HYDRANT (HYD)
PROPOSED GATE VALVE (GV)
PROPOSED POST INDICATOR VALVE (PIV)
PROVIDE MINIMUM 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION AT CROSSING - PROVIDE
VERTICAL BENDS IN WATERMAIN AS REQUIRED TO ACCOMPLISH. CENTER
ONE LENGTH WATERMAIN PIPE ON CROSSING.
CONNECT DRAIN TILE TO STRUCTURE AND PROVIDE BACKWATER VALVE
CENTER ONE LENGTH OF SOLID PVC PIPE ON WATERMAIN AT CROSSING
PROPOSED BUILDING STOOP - REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS
PROPERTY LINE
I
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>>>>>
LEGEND
1.REFER TO SHEET C1.41, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN NORTH, FOR GENERAL NOTES.
2.ALL WATERMAIN PIPE SHALL BE DIP, CLASS 52. ALL WATERMAIN SHALL HAVE MINIMUM 8'-0" BURY (TOP OF PIPE TO FINISH
GRADE). DIP SHALL BE ENCASED WITH POLYETHYLENE FILM CONFORMING TO ASTM D 1248-889.
3.ALL WATERMAIN SHALL BE AWWA C900, CAST IRON OD, DR 18, PVC PIPE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D2321. ALL
WATERMAIN SHALL HAVE MINIMUM 8'-0" BURY (TOP OF PIPE TO FINISH GRADE).
4.ALL SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE PVC PIPE (ASTM D 3034, SDR 26), UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SANITARY SEWER
INSTALLATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D2321.
5.ALL SANITARY SEWER PIPE CROSSING WATERMAIN, OUTSIDE OF THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY, SHALL BE ASTM D2665, SCHEDULE
40 PVC WITH SOLVENT WELD JOINTS.
6.ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE RCP, CLASS III (MIN.), WITH FLEXIBLE WATERTIGHT JOINTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM C-361
OR PVC PIPE (ASTM D3034, SDR 35) INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D2321, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
7.ALL STORM SEWER PIPE CROSSING WATERMAIN, OUTSIDE OF THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY, SHALL BE ASTM D2665, SCHEDULE 40
PVC WITH SOLVENT WELD JOINTS.
8.FLEXIBLE JOINTS AT STORM SEWER PIPE CONNECTIONS TO STRUCTURES:
a.IN ACCORDANCE WITH MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE, PROVIDE FLEXIBLE JOINTS AT ALL PIPE CONNECTIONS TO ALL STORM
SEWER STRUCTURES.
b.ACCEPTABLE MANUFACTURERS / PRODUCTS:
i. FERNCO, “CONCRETE MANHOLE ADAPTORS” OR “LARGE-DIAMETER WATERSTOPS”
ii. PRESS-SEAL, WATERSTOP GROUTING RINGS”
iii. OR APPROVED EQUAL.
9.INSTALL WATERMAIN AT LEAST 10 FEET HORIZONTALLY FROM ANY MANHOLE, CATCH BASIN, STORM SEWER, SANITARY SEWER,
DRAIN TILE, OR OTHER POTENTIAL SOURCE FOR CONTAMINATION PER MN PLUMBING CODE. THIS ISOLATION DISTANCE IS
MEASURED FROM THE OUTER EDGE OF THE PIPE TO THE OUTER EDGE OF THE CONTAMINATION SOURCE (OUTER EDGE OF
STRUCTURES OR SIMILAR).
10.INSTALL MANOLES, CATCH BASINS, STORM SEWER, SANITARY SEWER, DRAIN TILE, AND OTHER POTENTIAL SOURCES OF
CONTAMINATION AT LEAST 10 FEET HORIZONTALLY FROM ANY WATERMAIN PER MN PLUMBING CODE. THIS ISOLATION
DISTANCE IS MEASURED FROM THE OUTER EDGE OF THE PIPE TO THE OUTER EDGE OF THE CONTAMINATION SOURCE (OUTER
EDGE OF STRUCTURES OR SIMILAR).
11.LOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. VERIFY LOCATION, SIZE AND INVERT ELEVATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE BEGINNING
CONSTRUCTION.
12.PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF PROPOSED BUILDING UTILITY SERVICES (STORM, SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN), VERIFY ALL
PROPOSED BUILDING UTILITY SERVICE PIPE SIZES, LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS WITH MECHANICAL PLANS. COORDINATE
CONSTRUCTION AND CONNECTIONS WITH MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR.
13.MAINTAIN DRAINAGE FROM EXISTING BUILDING AT ALL TIMES. PROVIDE TEMPORARY STORM SEWER, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
LIMITED TO, CATCH BASINS, MANHOLES, PIPING, AND SIMILAR. DO NOT REMOVE EXISTING STORM SEWER UNTIL TEMPORARY
OR PERMANENT STORM SEWER IS INSTALLED AND FUNCTIONAL. COORDINATE ALL REMOVALS WITH APPROPRIATE TRADES
(SITE UTILITY CONTRACTOR, MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR, ETC.) AS REQUIRED.
14.STAKE LIMITS OF WALKS AND CURBING PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF GATE VALVES, CATCH BASINS, AND MANHOLES. ADJUST
GATE VALVE AND MANHOLE LOCATIONS TO AVOID PLACEMENT OF THESE STRUCTURES IN WALKS AND CURB AND GUTTER.
STAKE CURB AND GUTTER ALIGNMENTS TO ALLOW CURB INLET TYPE CATCH BASINS TO PROPERLY ALIGN WITH CURB AND
GUTTER
NOTES
1
Page 70 of 109
OU
T
L
O
T
C
OU
T
L
O
T
E
E1/2 of the SW1/4 E1/2 of the SW1/4
PROJECT MATCH LINE
PROJECT MATCH LINE
PROPOSED BUILDING
REGIONAL BASIN
3060
1
1
1
1
1
1
11
232'
-
6
"
P
V
C
@
2
.
0
8
%
134' - 6
"
P
V
C
@
2
.
0
8
%
20
6
'
-
6
"
P
V
C
@
2
.
0
8
%
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I I
I
I
I
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
D
>>
D
>>
>>
>>
D
>>
>>
>>
D
>>
>>
>>
>>
D
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
D
>>
>>
>>
>
>
D
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
S
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
S
>
>
>
>
S
I
>>
>>
>>
>>
D
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
D >>>>>>
>
>
>>
I
>>>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>>>>
1
6
9
'
-
1
5
"
R
C
P
@
0
.
8
2
%
62
'
-
1
5
"
R
C
P
@
1
.
7
5
%
13
3
'
-
1
5
"
P
V
C
@
1
.
7
5
%
120
'
-
1
5
"
R
C
P
@
2
.
1
5
%
135' - 15"
R
C
P
@
2
.
1
5
%
109' - 24" R
C
P
@
0
.
3
2
%
44
'
-
1
8
"
R
C
P
@
0
.
3
8
%
14
8
'
-
1
8
"
R
C
P
@
0
.
6
6
%
24' - 15" RCP @ 0.33%
5
1
'
-
1
5
"
R
C
P
@
0
.
3
3
%
36' - 15" RCP @ 0.34%
46'
-
1
5
"
R
C
P
@
0
.
3
3
%
38' - 15
"
R
C
P
@
0.50%
37
'
-
1
8
"
R
C
P
@
0.
2
7
%
19' - 18" RCP @ 0.27%
20' - 15" RCP @ 0.50%
21' - 15" RCP @ 0.49%
37' - 15" RCP @
1.75%
24' - 15"
RCP @
1.00%
1
2
4
'
-
1
5
"
R
C
P
@
1
.
3
0
%
203' - 1
5
"
P
V
C
@
1
.
3
0
%
24' - 15"
RCP @
1.00%
137' - 1
5
"
R
C
P
@
0
.
3
3
%
14
1
'
-
1
5
"
P
V
C
@
0
.
3
3
%
6
0
'
-
1
5
"
R
C
P
@
0
.
3
3
%
59
'
-
1
8
"
R
C
P
@
0
.
3
4
%
11
3
'
-
1
8
"
P
V
C
@
1
.
1
8
%
13
9
'
-
2
1
"
R
C
P
@
1
.
0
3
%
12
6
'
-
2
1
"
R
C
P
@
1
.
2
7
%
1
0
3
'
-
2
1
"
R
C
P
@
1
.
3
5
%
90' - 15" PVC @ 3.00%
189' - 18
"
R
C
P
@
1
.
0
0
%
2
4
'
-
1
5
"
R
C
P
@
0
.
5
0
%
CB 111
RIM: 968.24
INV (OUT): 964.75 15" E
48" DIA, R-3067-V
CB 110
RIM: 968.29
INV (IN): 962.12 15" S
INV (IN): 964.51 15" W
INV (OUT): 961.64 15" E
48" DIA, R-3067-V
CB 112
RIM: 968.13
INV (IN): 964.31 15" W
INV (OUT): 963.73 15" N
48" DIA, R-3067-V
CB 113
RIM: 968.00
INV (OUT): 964.55 15" E
48" DIA, R-3067-V
CB 118
RIM: 964.00
INV (OUT): 960.25 15" E
48" DIA, R-3067-V
STMH 105
RIM: 963.29
INV (IN): 952.11 15" N
INV (IN): 959.61 15" W
INV (OUT): 952.11 15" S
60" DIA, R-1642
CB 109
RIM: 963.09
INV (IN): 957.54 15" E
INV (OUT): 957.55 15" S
48" DIA, R-3067-V
CB 107
RIM: 962.67
INV (IN): 957.47 15" N
INV (IN): 956.18 15" E
INV (IN): 959.01 15" W
INV (OUT): 954.59 15" S
48" DIA, R-3067-V
CB 106
RIM: 962.21
INV (IN): 953.20 15" N
INV (IN): 955.77 15" NE
INV (OUT): 953.20 15" S
48" DIA, R-3067-V
CB 115
RIM: 960.74
INV (IN): 956.47 15" E
INV (OUT): 956.47 15" NW
48" DIA, R-3067-V
CB 116
RIM: 960.70
INV (OUT): 956.55 15" W
48" DIA, R-3067-V
CB 127
RIM: 959.49
INV (OUT): 956.15 15" SW
48" DIA, R-2501-C
CB 114
RIM: 959.74
INV (IN): 956.30 15" SE
INV (OUT): 956.30 15" W
48" DIA, R-2501-C
STMH 104
RIM: 957.55
INV (IN): 949.79 15" N
INV (IN): 953.90 15" NW
INV (IN): 953.90 15" E
INV (OUT): 949.79 15" SW
72" DIA, R-1642
CB 120
RIM: 958.13
INV (OUT): 954.00 15" W
48" DIA, R-3067-V
CB 119
RIM: 957.85
INV (OUT): 954.00 15" SE
48" DIA, R-3067-V
STMH 231
RIM: 957.48
INV (OUT): 952.61 18" S
48" DIA, R-1642
CB 218
RIM: 956.20
INV (IN): 951.15 18" N
INV (OUT): 951.15 18" S
48" DIA, R-2501-V
CB 212
RIM: 955.70
INV (IN): 951.97 18" N
INV (OUT): 951.65 18" W
48" DIA, R-2501-C
STMH 209
RIM: 955.98
INV (IN): 949.04 15" N
INV (OUT): 948.93 15" SE
48" DIA, R-1642
CB 210
RIM: 954.33
INV (IN): 949.63 15" E
INV (IN): 949.65 15" W
INV (OUT): 949.50 15" S
48" DIA, R-2501-C
STMH 207
RIM: 954.38
INV (IN): 948.22 18" N
INV (IN): 949.76 18" E
INV (OUT): 948.22 18" SW
48" DIA, R-1642
CB 208
RIM: 954.83
INV (IN): 948.73 15" NW
INV (OUT): 948.42 18" S
48" DIA, R-2501-C
CB 211
RIM: 954.20
INV (IN): 950.08 15" SE
INV (OUT): 950.08 15" W
48" DIA, R-2501-C
CB 205
RIM: 952.88
INV (IN): 945.21 21" NW
INV (OUT): 945.21 21" SE
48" DIA, R-3508-C
CB 206
RIM: 952.44
INV (IN): 946.88 18" NE
INV (IN): 948.36 15" NW
INV (OUT): 946.63 21" SE
48" DIA, R-3508-C
CB 123
RIM: 951.87
INV (OUT): 946.45 15" SE
48" DIA, R-3067-V
STMH 103
RIM: 952.30
INV (IN): 947.20 15" NE
INV (OUT): 947.01 15" W
48" DIA, R-1642
CB 204
RIM: 952.22
INV (IN): 943.61 21" NW
INV (OUT): 943.61 21" S
48" DIA, R-3508-C
STMH-102
CB 121
RIM: 947.80
INV (IN): 943.40 18" NW
INV (OUT): 943.34 18" S
48" DIA, R-3067-V
CB 122
RIM: 946.42
INV (IN): 943.75 15" NW
INV (OUT): 943.50 18" SE
48" DIA, H-10 PEDESTRIAN
10
3
'
-
1
8
"
P
V
C
@
1
.
0
0
%
CB 232
RIM: 955.76
INV (IN): 949.29 15" N
INV (OUT): 949.29 15" S
48" DIA, R-2501-C
2
1
6
'
-
1
5
"
R
C
P
@
0
.
3
3
%
CB 228
RIM: 953.62
INV (OUT): 950.00 15" S
48" DIA, R-2501-C
STMH 226
RIM: 955.90
INV (IN): 949.12 15" N
INV (OUT): 949.12 15" E
48" DIA, R-1642
5
0
'
-
1
5
"
P
V
C
@
0
.
3
3
%
129' - 15" RCP @ 0.33%
CB 225
RIM: 953.48
INV (IN): 948.70 15" W
INV (OUT): 948.70 15" SE
48" DIA, R-2501-C
1
0
4
'
-
1
5
"
R
C
P
@
0
.
3
3
%
15
6
'
-
1
8
"
P
V
C
@
0
.
4
4
%
37' - 15" RCP @ 0.33%
CB 222
RIM: 955.31
INV (OUT): 952.10 15" E
48" DIA, R-2501-C
61' - 15"
R
C
P
@
0
.
5
0
%
CB 117
RIM: 961.17
INV (OUT): 957.85 15" W
48" DIA, R-2501-C
CB 125
RIM: 962.16
INV (IN): 955.92 15" E
INV (OUT): 955.92 15" SW
48" DIA, R-3067-V
CB 126
RIM: 962.16
INV (IN): 956.00 15" NE
INV (OUT): 956.00 15" W
48" DIA, R-3067-V
CB 229
RIM: 948.86
INV (OUT): 944.86 15" SE
48" DIA, R-2501-C
STMH 219
RIM: 956.06
INV (IN): 952.44 18" N
INV (IN): 951.98 15" W
INV (OUT): 951.84 18" S
48" DIA, R-1642
CB 230
RIM: 953.61
INV (OUT): 949.75 15" E
48" DIA, R-2501-C
CB 223
RIM: 955.45
INV (IN): 951.60 15" S
INV (OUT): 950.48 15" NW
48" DIA, R-2501-C
CB 224
RIM: 955.90
INV (OUT): 951.81 15" N
48" DIA, R-2501-C
C1.52
STORM SEWER
PLAN NORTH
R
FEETSCALE
0
HORZ.
40 80
DateRegistration Number
Check:
Drawn:
Date:
Comm:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by
me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
under the laws of the State of
H
G
F
E
D
C
B
A
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 109
C
MN
Revisions
Description Date Num
Scale:
North
3300 FERNBROOK LANE NORTH, SUITE 300
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
Phone: (763) 544-7129
Email: goldenvalley@bolton-menk.com
www.bolton-menk.com
R
XX/XX/XX
232104
XX/XX/2024
JDO
MINNESOTA
PUBLIC SCHOOLS
3455 153RD STREET WEST
APPLE VALLEY - EAGAN
NEW ELEMENTARY
ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068
SCHOOL #20
ISD #196: ROSEMOUNT -
RWK
RICHARD W. KOECHLEIN
26678
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
DAVID A. REY
DAR
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
40180
LEGEND
NOTES
X
X
955
1
2
3
54.6
955
D
REFERENCE KEY TO SITE DETAILS
DETAIL I.D. NUMBER (TOP)
DETAIL SHEET NUMBER (BOTTOM)
EXISTING CONTOUR
PROPOSED CONTOUR
PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION
ME = MATCH EXISTING
EOF = EMERGENCY OVERFLOW
TC = TOP OF CURB
TW = FINISH GRADE AT HIGH SIDE OF WALL
BW = FINISH GRADE AT LOW SIDE OF WALL
PROPOSED GRADING LIMITS
PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
PROPOSED WATERMAIN
PROPOSED DRAIN TILE / SUBSURFACE DRAINS (SD)
PROPOSED MANHOLE (MH)
PROPOSED CATCH BASIN (CB)
PROPOSED SURGE BASIN (SB)
PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION (FES)
PROPOSED HYDRANT (HYD)
PROPOSED GATE VALVE (GV)
PROPOSED POST INDICATOR VALVE (PIV)
PROVIDE MINIMUM 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION AT CROSSING - PROVIDE
VERTICAL BENDS IN WATERMAIN AS REQUIRED TO ACCOMPLISH. CENTER
ONE LENGTH WATERMAIN PIPE ON CROSSING.
CONNECT DRAIN TILE TO STRUCTURE AND PROVIDE BACKWATER VALVE
CENTER ONE LENGTH OF SOLID PVC PIPE ON WATERMAIN AT CROSSING
PROPOSED BUILDING STOOP - REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS
PROPERTY LINE
I
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>>>>>
1.REFER TO SHEET C1.51, SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN PLAN NORTH, FOR NOTES.
Page 71 of 109
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
OU
T
L
O
T
C
OU
T
L
O
T
E
OU
T
L
O
T
D
OUTLOT D
4
3
2
1
PREST
W
I
C
K
P
L
A
C
E
1
3
T
H
A
D
D
I
T
I
O
N
1
2
3
PREST
W
I
C
K
PLACE
1
6
T
H
ADDIT
I
O
N
5
4
3
2
1
PREST
W
I
C
K
P
L
A
C
E
1
9
T
H
A
D
D
I
T
I
O
N
13
12
11
10
PREST
W
I
C
K
P
L
A
C
E
2
0
T
H
A
D
D
I
T
I
O
N
AR
D
A
N
P
L
A
C
E
E1/2 of the SW1/4
E1/2 of the SW1/4
PROJECT MATCH LINE
PROJECT MATCH LINE
STORMWATER POND
INFILTRATION AREA
REGIONAL BASIN
1618
1
BTM:940.0
WQV:945.0
HWL:944.68
SNOWMELT HWL:945.09
232'
-
6
"
P
V
C
@
2
.
0
8
%
134' - 6
"
P
V
C
@
2
.
0
8
%
I
I
I
D
D
>>
>>
>>
D
>>
>>
>>
D
>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
D
D
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
S
>
>
>
>
S
D
>
>
>>
>>
>
>
>>
SANMH 2
RIM: 948.27
INV (IN): 939.38
INV (OUT): 939.28
48" DIA
INV (IN): 945.22 6" N
INV (OUT): 944.20 6" SE
48" DIA, Standard
120
'
-
1
5
"
R
C
P
@
2
.
1
5
%
135' - 15"
R
C
P
@
2
.
1
5
%
109' - 24" R
C
P
@
0
.
3
2
%
67'
-
2
4
"
R
C
P
@
0
.
3
3
%
14
8
'
-
1
8
"
R
C
P
@
0
.
6
6
%
1
8
3
'
-
1
8
"
R
C
P
@
0
.
8
5
%
76' - 18
"
R
C
P
@
0
.
5
9
%
15
9
'
-
2
4
"
R
C
P
@
0
.
3
2
%
4
3
'
-
2
4
"
R
C
P
@
0
.
3
2
%
198'
-
2
4
"
R
C
P
@
0
.
3
2
%
208'
-
2
4
"
R
C
P
@
0
.
3
2
%
70' - 3
6
"
R
C
P
@
3
.
5
9
%
39' - 15"
R
C
P
@
0.50%
38' - 15
"
R
C
P
@
0.50%
37
'
-
1
8
"
R
C
P
@
0.
2
7
%
19' - 18" RCP @ 0.27%
17' - 15" RCP @ 0.35%
20' - 15" RCP @ 0.50%
21' - 15" RCP @ 0.49%
13
9
'
-
2
1
"
R
C
P
@
1
.
0
3
%
12
6
'
-
2
1
"
R
C
P
@
1
.
2
7
%
1
0
3
'
-
2
1
"
R
C
P
@
1
.
3
5
%
42' - 24" RCP @ 1.00%
27' - 30"
RCP @
0.78%
90' - 15" PVC @ 3.00%
49'
-
1
5
"
R
C
P
@
2
.
0
3
%
51' -
1
8
"
R
C
P
@
-
4
.
9
2
%
333' -
1
5
"
R
C
P
@
0
.
4
8
%
13
9
'
-
1
5
"
R
C
P
@
3
.
3
9
%
CB 217
RIM: 958.28
INV (IN): 950.17 18" N
INV (IN): 952.53 15" W
INV (OUT): 949.60 18" S
48" DIA, R-3067-V
CB 120
RIM: 958.13
INV (OUT): 954.00 15" W
48" DIA, R-3067-V
CB 220
RIM: 957.53
INV (OUT): 952.72 15" E
48" DIA, R-3067-V
CB 218
RIM: 956.20
INV (IN): 951.15 18" N
INV (OUT): 951.15 18" S
48" DIA, R-2501-V
CB 216
RIM: 954.33
INV (IN): 948.04 18" N
INV (IN): 950.00 15" W
INV (OUT): 947.30 18" E
48" DIA, R-3067-V
CB 221
RIM: 954.08
INV (OUT): 950.20 15" E
48" DIA, R-3067-V
CB 214
RIM: 954.33
INV (IN): 945.59 24" NW
INV (OUT): 944.97 24" SE
48" DIA, R-3067-V
CB 213
RIM: 954.42
INV (IN): 944.83 24" NW
INV (OUT): 944.81 24" NE
48" DIA, R-3067-V
CB 205
RIM: 952.88
INV (IN): 945.21 21" NW
INV (OUT): 945.21 21" SE
48" DIA, R-3508-C
INV (OUT): 946.63 21" SE
48" DIA, R-3508-C
CB 123
RIM: 951.87
INV (OUT): 946.45 15" SE
48" DIA, R-3067-V
STMH 103
RIM: 952.30
INV (IN): 947.20 15" NE
INV (OUT): 947.01 15" W
48" DIA, R-1642
CB 204
RIM: 952.22
INV (IN): 943.61 21" NW
INV (OUT): 943.61 21" S
48" DIA, R-3508-C
CB 215
RIM: 950.60
INV (IN): 946.85 18" W
INV (OUT): 946.10 24" SE
48" DIA, R-2501-C CB 202
RIM: 950.74
INV (IN): 944.17 24" SW
INV (IN): 947.31 15" NW
INV (OUT): 943.02 24" NE
48" DIA, R-3067-V
STMH 101
RIM: 948.94
INV (IN): 942.37 24" E
INV (OUT): 942.37 24" SW
60" DIA, R-1642
STMH-102
RIM: 948.37
INV (IN): 944.10 15" E
INV (IN): 943.29 18" N
INV (IN): 943.69 15" S
INV (OUT): 942.72 24" W
60" DIA, R-1642
CB 121
RIM: 947.80
INV (IN): 943.40 18" NW
INV (OUT): 943.34 18" S
48" DIA, R-3067-V
CB 124
RIM: 947.23
INV (OUT): 943.75 15" N
48" DIA, R-3067-V
CB 203
RIM: 947.21
INV (IN): 942.22 21" N
INV (IN): 944.37 15" NW
INV (OUT): 942.28 24" SE
48" DIA, R-3067-V
CB 201
RIM: 946.90
INV (IN): 941.86 24" NW
INV (IN): 942.36 24" SW
INV (OUT): 941.86 30" E
60" DIA, R-3067-V
CB 122
RIM: 946.42
INV (IN): 943.75 15" NW
INV (OUT): 943.50 18" SE
48" DIA, H-10 PEDESTRIAN
FES 304
INV: 941.00 15"
FE 301
INV: 937.50 18"
FES 302
INV: 940.00 18"
15" FLAPGATE
INV: 940.00 15"
FES 300
INV: 937.50 18"
STMH 307
RIM: 953.21
INV (OUT): 947.30 15" NE
48" DIA, Standard
STMH 306
RIM: 959.47
INV (IN): 945.70 15" SW
INV (OUT): 944.70 15" NE
48" DIA, Standard
FES 305
INV: 940.00 15"
STMH 100
RIM: 947.40
INV (IN): 942.15 24" NE
INV (IN): 941.65 30" W
INV (OUT): 940.15 48" S
72" DIA, Standard55' - 48" RCP @ 0.11%
FES 101
INV: 940.09 48"
8" 45° BEND
8" 22.5° BEND
NWL:940.0
BTM:931.0
HWL:944.68
SNOWMELT HWL: 945.09
OCS 2
RIM: 945.79
BUILD OVER EXISTING PIPE.
15
C1.73
19
C1.74
CB 231
RIM: 950.98
INV (OUT): 947.55 15" SE
48" DIA, R-3067-V
4
2
'
-
1
5
"
R
C
P
@
0
.
5
7
%
CB 229
RIM: 948.86
INV (OUT): 944.86 15" SE
48" DIA, R-2501-C
8" GV
70' - 3
6
"
R
C
P
@
3
.
5
8
%
FES 308
INV: 937.50 18"
FES 306
INV: 937.50 18"
FES 307
INV: 937.50 18"
C1.53
STORM SEWER
PLAN SOUTH
R
FEETSCALE
0
HORZ.
40 80
DateRegistration Number
Check:
Drawn:
Date:
Comm:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by
me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
under the laws of the State of
H
G
F
E
D
C
B
A
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 109
C
MN
Revisions
Description Date Num
Scale:
North
3300 FERNBROOK LANE NORTH, SUITE 300
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
Phone: (763) 544-7129
Email: goldenvalley@bolton-menk.com
www.bolton-menk.com
R
XX/XX/XX
232104
XX/XX/2024
JDO
MINNESOTA
PUBLIC SCHOOLS
3455 153RD STREET WEST
APPLE VALLEY - EAGAN
NEW ELEMENTARY
ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068
SCHOOL #20
ISD #196: ROSEMOUNT -
RWK
RICHARD W. KOECHLEIN
26678
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
DAVID A. REY
DAR
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
40180
LEGEND
1.REFER TO SHEET C1.51, SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN PLAN NORTH, FOR NOTES.
NOTES
X
X
955
1
2
3
54.6
955
D
REFERENCE KEY TO SITE DETAILS
DETAIL I.D. NUMBER (TOP)
DETAIL SHEET NUMBER (BOTTOM)
EXISTING CONTOUR
PROPOSED CONTOUR
PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION
ME = MATCH EXISTING
EOF = EMERGENCY OVERFLOW
TC = TOP OF CURB
TW = FINISH GRADE AT HIGH SIDE OF WALL
BW = FINISH GRADE AT LOW SIDE OF WALL
PROPOSED GRADING LIMITS
PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
PROPOSED WATERMAIN
PROPOSED DRAIN TILE / SUBSURFACE DRAINS (SD)
PROPOSED MANHOLE (MH)
PROPOSED CATCH BASIN (CB)
PROPOSED SURGE BASIN (SB)
PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION (FES)
PROPOSED HYDRANT (HYD)
PROPOSED GATE VALVE (GV)
PROPOSED POST INDICATOR VALVE (PIV)
PROVIDE MINIMUM 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION AT CROSSING - PROVIDE
VERTICAL BENDS IN WATERMAIN AS REQUIRED TO ACCOMPLISH. CENTER
ONE LENGTH WATERMAIN PIPE ON CROSSING.
CONNECT DRAIN TILE TO STRUCTURE AND PROVIDE BACKWATER VALVE
CENTER ONE LENGTH OF SOLID PVC PIPE ON WATERMAIN AT CROSSING
PROPOSED BUILDING STOOP - REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS
PROPERTY LINE
I
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>>>>>
Page 72 of 109
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I I
I
I
I
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
D
>>
D
>>
>>
>>
D
>>
>>
>>
D
>>
>>
>>
>>
D
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
D
>>
>>
>>
>
>
D
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
S
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
S
>
>
>
>
S
I
>>
>>
>>
>>
D
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
D >>>>>>
>
>
>>
I
>>>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>>>>
PROJECT MATCH LINE
PROJECT MATCH LINE
PROPOSED BUILDING
REGIONAL BASIN
3060
ATHLETIC SEED MIX
GENERAL SEED MIX
IN ALL OTHER
DISTURBED AREAS
GENERAL SEED MIX
IN ALL OTHER
DISTURBED AREAS GENERAL SEED MIX
IN ALL OTHER
DISTURBED AREAS
GENERAL SEED MIX
IN ALL OTHER
DISTURBED AREASGENERAL SEED MIX
IN ALL OTHER
DISTURBED AREAS
GENERAL SEED MIX
IN ALL OTHER
DISTURBED AREAS
GENERAL SEED MIX
IN ALL OTHER
DISTURBED AREAS
NATIVE SEED MIX
NATIVE SEED MIX
(7) RG
(7) RG
(3) RG
(7) RG
(7) RG
(8) RG
(8) RG
(9) RG
(12) DL
(12) SL
(12) SL
(20) DL
BASE BID SOD WITHIN BUILDING AND SIDEWALK ALTERNATE AREA
(10) HB
(6) PN2
(6) DL
(6) DL
(6) DL
(6) RG
L1.61
LANDSCAPING
PLAN
NORTH
R
FEETSCALE
0
HORZ.
40 80
DateRegistration Number
Check:
Drawn:
Date:
Comm:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by
me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
under the laws of the State of
H
G
F
E
D
C
B
A
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 109
C
MN
Revisions
Description Date Num
Scale:
North
3300 FERNBROOK LANE NORTH, SUITE 300
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
Phone: (763) 544-7129
Email: goldenvalley@bolton-menk.com
www.bolton-menk.com
R
XX/XX/XX
232104
XX/XX/2024
JDO
MINNESOTA
PUBLIC SCHOOLS
3455 153RD STREET WEST
APPLE VALLEY - EAGAN
NEW ELEMENTARY
ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068
SCHOOL #20
ISD #196: ROSEMOUNT -
RWK
RICHARD W. KOECHLEIN
26678
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
X
X
REFERENCE KEY TO SITE DETAILS
DETAIL I.D. NUMBER (TOP)
DETAIL SHEET NUMBER (BOTTOM)
PROPOSED SOD LIMITS
PROPOSED SEED MIX #1 - GENERAL MIX
PROPOSED SEED MIX #2 - ATHLETIC MIX
PROPOSED NATIVE SEEDING
PROPOSED MULCH BED WITH SHRUBS OR PERENNIALS
PROPOSED LIGHT POLE - REFER TO ELECTRICAL PLANS
PROPERTY LINE
LEGEND
1.REFER TO SHEET C1.41, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN, FOR GENERAL NOTES.
2.REFER TO SWPPP NARRATIVE, SHEET C1.32, FOR CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING AND EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS.
3.LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST INSPECT AND APPROVE FINE GRADING BEFORE CONTRACTOR PROCEEDS WITH SODDING OR
SEEDING.
4.ALL DISTURBED AREAS OUTSIDE THE BUILDING PAD, WHICH ARE NOT DESIGNATED TO BE PAVED OR RECEIVE AGLIME, SHALL
RECEIVE AT LEAST 6” OF TOPSOIL AND SHALL BE SODDED OR SEEDED. ALL AREAS NOT DESIGNATED FOR SOD OR A SPECIFIC SEED
MIX, WHICH ARE DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION, SHALL BE SEEDED WITH SEED MIX #1.
5.WHERE NEW SOD MEETS EXISTING SOD, CUT A CLEAN, SHARP EDGE TO ALLOW FOR A CONSISTENT, UNIFORM, AND STRAIGHT
JOINT BETWEEN NEW SOD AND EXISTING TURFGRASS. JAGGED OR UNEVEN JOINTS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. REMOVE TOPSOIL
AT THE JOINT BETWEEN NEW SOD AND EXISTING TURFGRASS, AS REQUIRED, TO ALLOW NEW SOD SURFACE TO BE FLUSH WITH
EXISTING TURFGRASS SURFACE.
6.FAILURE OF TURF DEVELOPMENT: IN THE EVENT THE CONTRACTOR FAILS TO PROVIDE AN ACCEPTABLE TURF, RE-SOD OR
RE-SEED ALL APPLICABLE AREAS, AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER, TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER OR
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.
7.BEGIN TURF ESTABLISHMENT IMMEDIATELY AFTER SODDING OR SEEDING. REFER TO SPECIFICATION FOR PROCEDURE.
8.ALL TREES SHALL BE BALLED AND BURLAPPED.
9.ALL TREES AND SHRUBS SHALL RECEIVE 4" DEPTH OF WOOD MULCH, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED.
10.ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE NO. 1 QUALITY, NURSERY GROWN AND SPECIMENS MUST BE MATCHED.
11.ALL DECIDUOUS TREES ALONG DRIVES OR WITHIN PARKING LOTS SHALL BEGIN BRANCHING NO LOWER THAN 6'.
NOTES
OVERSTORY
DECIDUOUS TREE 224
CONIFER TREE 87
CONCEPT PLANT SCHEDULE
EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREES:
TOTAL CALIPER INCHES = 5353"
25% OF EXISTING = 1338.25"
ESTIMATED REMOVED TOTAL INCHES = 2116"
REPLACEMENT REQUIREMENTS:
2116" - 1338.15" (25% OF TOTAL) = 778"
IF ALL SIGNIFICANT, NO HERITAGE = 389" TO PROVIDE
TOTAL OF 311 TREES - 2.5" DECIDUOUS OR 6'H CONIFER TREES
PERIMETER OF BUILDING = 1596 LINEAR FEET
160 SHRUBS REQUIRED
TREE & SHRUB STATISTICS
PROVIDE VARIETY OF DECIDUOUS TREES BELOW. NO MORE THAN 8 OF ANY ONE VARIETY OR 40 OF ANY SPECIES. MINIMUM OF 39
CATEGORIZED AS A HARDWOOD. FINAL LOCATIONS DETERMINED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.
PROVIDE VARIETY OF CONIFER TREES BELOW. NO MORE THAN 6 OF ANY ONE VARIETY OR 12 OF ANY SPECIES. FINAL LOCATIONS
DETERMINED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.
SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE QTY
SHRUBS
DL DIERVILLA LONICERA BUSH HONEYSUCKLE #5 CONT.50
HB HYDRANGEA PANICULATA 'ILVOBO'BOBO® PANICLE HYDRANGEA #5 CONT.10
RG RHUS AROMATICA 'GRO-LOW'GRO-LOW FRAGRANT SUMAC #5 CONT.62
CONIFEROUS SHRUBS
PN2 PICEA ABIES 'NIDIFORMIS'BIRD'S NEST NORWAY SPRUCE #5 CONT.6
PERENNIALS / ORNAMENTAL GRASSES
SL SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM LITTLE BLUESTEM #1 CONT.24
PLANT SCHEDULE
Page 73 of 109
I
I
I
D
D
>>
>>
>>
D
>>
>>
>>
D
>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
D
D
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
S
>
>
>
>
S
D
>
>
>>
>>
>
>
>>
PROJECT MATCH LINE
PROJECT MATCH LINE
STORMWATER POND
INFILTRATION AREA
REGIONAL BASIN
1618
ATHLETIC SEED MIX
NATIVE SEED MIXES
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
NATIVE SEED MIXES
NATIVE SEED MIXES
ATHLETIC SEED MIX
GENERAL SEED MIX
IN ALL OTHER
DISTURBED AREASGENERAL SEED MIX
IN ALL OTHER
DISTURBED AREAS
GENERAL SEED MIX
IN ALL OTHER
DISTURBED AREAS
L1.62
LANDSCAPING
PLAN
SOUTH
R
FEETSCALE
0
HORZ.
40 80
DateRegistration Number
Check:
Drawn:
Date:
Comm:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by
me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
under the laws of the State of
H
G
F
E
D
C
B
A
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 109
C
MN
Revisions
Description Date Num
Scale:
North
3300 FERNBROOK LANE NORTH, SUITE 300
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
Phone: (763) 544-7129
Email: goldenvalley@bolton-menk.com
www.bolton-menk.com
R
XX/XX/XX
232104
XX/XX/2024
JDO
MINNESOTA
PUBLIC SCHOOLS
3455 153RD STREET WEST
APPLE VALLEY - EAGAN
NEW ELEMENTARY
ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068
SCHOOL #20
ISD #196: ROSEMOUNT -
RWK
RICHARD W. KOECHLEIN
26678
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
1.REFER TO SHEET L1.61 LANDSCAPING PLAN NORTH, FOR NOTES.
NOTES
OVERSTORY
DECIDUOUS TREE 224
CONIFER TREE 87
CONCEPT PLANT SCHEDULE
X
X
REFERENCE KEY TO SITE DETAILS
DETAIL I.D. NUMBER (TOP)
DETAIL SHEET NUMBER (BOTTOM)
PROPOSED SOD LIMITS
PROPOSED SEED MIX #1 - GENERAL MIX
PROPOSED SEED MIX #2 - ATHLETIC MIX
PROPOSED NATIVE SEEDING
PROPOSED MULCH BED WITH SHRUBS OR PERENNIALS
PROPOSED LIGHT POLE - REFER TO ELECTRICAL PLANS
PROPERTY LINE
LEGEND
TREES REMOVED
Page 74 of 109
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
S
S
S
D
D
>>>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>>>>
PROJECT MATCH LINE
PROJECT MATCH LINE
PROPOSED BUILDING
REGIONAL BASIN
3060
(7) RG
(7) RG
(3) RG
(7) RG
(7) RG
(8) RG
(8) RG
(9) RG
(12) DL
(12) SL
(12) SL
(20) DL
BASE BID SOD WITHIN BUILDING AND SIDEWALK ALTERNATE AREA
(10) HB
(6) PN2
(6) DL
(6) DL
(6) DL
(6) RG
M
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
1"
1"
114"
1"
2"
4.0
4.0
4.0
1"114"
1"
1"
1"
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
1"
1"
1"
1"
1"
112"
114"
112"
114"
112"
1"
114"
114"
112"
1"
114"
114"
112"
1"
114"
114"
112"
1"
114"
114"
112"
114"
112"
112"
2"
1"
114"
114"
112"
112"
1"
2"
114"
114"
114"
112"112"2"
1"
114"
114"
1"114"
114"
112"
1"
1"
114"
114"
1"
6.06.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
6.0
1"
1"
114"
1"
1"
112"
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0 1"
1"
1"
112"
1"
15
15
15
15
15
15
1"
3.0
3.0
3.0
6.0
6.0
1"
6.0
3.0
6.0
6.0
1"
1"
1"
114"
1"1"
15
15
15
1515
15
15
15
15
15
15
1515
15
15
15
114"
114"
1"
1"
1"
212"
12 12 12
12
1212
12
12
12
12
12
12
10
10
10
10
8
8
8
8
8
8
15
15
15
15
15
15
8
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
2.0
2.0
2.0
4.0
4.0
4.0 4.0
4.0
2.0
2.0
4.0
4.0
2.0
4.0
4.0
2.0
1"
1"
2"
114"
114"
1"1"
1"
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
1"
1"
114"
212"
2.0
2.0
4.0
4.0
2.0
4.0
4.04.0
4.0
4.0 4.0
4.0
2.0
1"
1"
1"
114"
112"1"
1"
114"112"
114"
1"
114"1"
112"
1"
1"
1"
114"
114"
2"
212"
212"
114"
212"
1"
1"
15
15
15
15
15
15 15
112"1"
114"
1"
2.0 2.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
2.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1"
1"
112"
112"
112"
1"
1"
1"
114"
114"
1"2"
1"2"
15
15
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
RS
FS
MV
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0 6.0
1"
1"1"
112"
112"3"
1"
1"
114"
2"
114"
1"
1"
114"
112"
114"
1"
112"
114"1"
1"
1"
114"
1"
1"114"
112"
1"1"114"
1"
1
2
3
4
6
7
8
9
10
12
14
15
16
19
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
13
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
1"
1"
11
1"
1"
1"
114"
114"
3"
4"
1"
112"
2"
3"
3"
4"
114"
3"
6"
6"
6"
6"
6"
6"
3"
6"
6"6"
4"
2"
6"
6"
6"
6"
6"
6"
6"
114"
1"
SP
SP
SP
114"
112"
4"
1"
1"
114"
1"
30
1"
5
8
8
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15 15
15 15
15
2"
114"
20
1"1"
114"
114"212"
1"
114"
212"
1"
4"
1515
1010
10
1"
1"114"
6"
17
88
1010
15
15
15
15 1"
1"1"114"
SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION QTY PSI
RAIN BIRD 1806-SAM-PRS 8 SERIES MPR
TURF SPRAY 6.0IN. POP-UP SPRINKLER WITH CO-MOLDED WIPER SEAL.
1/2IN. NPT FEMALE THREADED INLET. WITH SEAL-A-MATIC CHECK VALVE,
AND PRESSURE REGULATING.
4 30
RAIN BIRD 1806-SAM-PRS 10 SERIES MPR
TURF SPRAY 6.0IN. POP-UP SPRINKLER WITH CO-MOLDED WIPER SEAL.
1/2IN. NPT FEMALE THREADED INLET. WITH SEAL-A-MATIC CHECK VALVE,
AND PRESSURE REGULATING.
2 30
RAIN BIRD 1806-SAM-PRS 15 SERIES MPR
TURF SPRAY 6.0IN. POP-UP SPRINKLER WITH CO-MOLDED WIPER SEAL.
1/2IN. NPT FEMALE THREADED INLET. WITH SEAL-A-MATIC CHECK VALVE,
AND PRESSURE REGULATING.
18 30
RAIN BIRD 1812-SAM-PRS 8 SERIES MPR
SHRUB SPRAY 12IN. POP-UP SPRINKLER WITH CO-MOLDED WIPER SEAL.
1/2IN. NPT FEMALE THREADED INLET. WITH SEAL-A-MATIC CHECK VALVE,
AND PRESSURE REGULATING DEVICE.
7 30
RAIN BIRD 1812-SAM-PRS 10 SERIES MPR
SHRUB SPRAY 12IN. POP-UP SPRINKLER WITH CO-MOLDED WIPER SEAL.
1/2IN. NPT FEMALE THREADED INLET. WITH SEAL-A-MATIC CHECK VALVE,
AND PRESSURE REGULATING DEVICE.
32 30
RAIN BIRD 1812-SAM-PRS 12 SERIES MPR
SHRUB SPRAY 12IN. POP-UP SPRINKLER WITH CO-MOLDED WIPER SEAL.
1/2IN. NPT FEMALE THREADED INLET. WITH SEAL-A-MATIC CHECK VALVE,
AND PRESSURE REGULATING DEVICE.
12 30
RAIN BIRD 1812-SAM-PRS 15 SERIES MPR
SHRUB SPRAY 12IN. POP-UP SPRINKLER WITH CO-MOLDED WIPER SEAL.
1/2IN. NPT FEMALE THREADED INLET. WITH SEAL-A-MATIC CHECK VALVE,
AND PRESSURE REGULATING DEVICE.
39 30
RAIN BIRD R-VAN-STRIP 1806-SAM-P45
SHRUB ROTARY, 5FT.X15FT. (LCS AND RCS), 5FT.X30FT. (SST) HAND
ADJUSTABLE MULTI-STREAM ROTARY W/ 1800 TURF SPRAY BODY ON 6IN.
POP-UP, WITH CHECK VALVE AND 45 PSI IN-STEM PRESSURE
REGULATOR. 1/2IN. NPT FEMALE THREADED INLET.
6 45
RAIN BIRD R-VAN14 1806-SAM-P45
TURF ROTARY, 8FT.-14FT. 45-270 DEGREES AND 360 DEGREES. HAND
ADJUSTABLE MULTI-STREAM ROTARY W/1800 TURF SPRAY BODY ON 6IN.
POP-UP, WITH CHECK VALVE AND 45 PSI IN-STEM PRESSURE
REGULATOR. 1/2IN. NPT FEMALE THREADED INLET.
16 45
RAIN BIRD R-VAN18 1806-SAM-P45
TURF ROTARY, 13FT.-18FT. 45-270 DEGREES AND 360 DEGREES. HAND
ADJUSTABLE MULTI-STREAM ROTARY W/1800 TURF SPRAY BODY ON 6IN.
POP-UP, WITH CHECK VALVE AND 45 PSI IN-STEM PRESSURE
REGULATOR. 1/2IN. NPT FEMALE THREADED INLET.
12 45
RAIN BIRD R-VAN24 1806-SAM-P45
TURF ROTARY, 17FT.-24FT. 45-270 DEGREES AND 360 DEGREES. HAND
ADJUSTABLE MULTI-STREAM ROTARY W/1800 TURF SPRAY BODY ON 6IN.
POP-UP, WITH CHECK VALVE AND 45 PSI IN-STEM PRESSURE
REGULATOR. 1/2IN. NPT FEMALE THREADED INLET.
53 45
SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION QTY PSI GPM RADIUS
RAIN BIRD 3504-PC 2.0
TURF ROTOR, 4IN. POP-UP. ADJUSTABLE AND FULL CIRCLE.
11 25 1.4 24'
RAIN BIRD 3504-PC 4.0
TURF ROTOR, 4IN. POP-UP. ADJUSTABLE AND FULL CIRCLE.
18 25 2.97 28'
RAIN BIRD 5006-PC 1.5
TURF ROTOR, 6IN. POP-UP, PLASTIC RISER. ADJUSTABLE TO FULL
CIRCLE. STANDARD ANGLE NOZZLE.
6 25 1.12 30'
RAIN BIRD 5006-PC 2.0
TURF ROTOR, 6IN. POP-UP, PLASTIC RISER. ADJUSTABLE TO FULL
CIRCLE. STANDARD ANGLE NOZZLE.
3 25 1.5 32'
RAIN BIRD 5006-PC 3.0
TURF ROTOR, 6IN. POP-UP, PLASTIC RISER. ADJUSTABLE TO FULL
CIRCLE. STANDARD ANGLE NOZZLE.
17 25 2.26 32'
RAIN BIRD 5006-PC 4.0
TURF ROTOR, 6IN. POP-UP, PLASTIC RISER. ADJUSTABLE TO FULL
CIRCLE. STANDARD ANGLE NOZZLE.
25 25 2.91 32'
RAIN BIRD 5006-PC 6.0
TURF ROTOR, 6IN. POP-UP, PLASTIC RISER. ADJUSTABLE TO FULL
CIRCLE. STANDARD ANGLE NOZZLE.
34 25 4.25 33'
RAIN BIRD 5006-PC 8.0
TURF ROTOR, 6IN. POP-UP, PLASTIC RISER. ADJUSTABLE TO FULL
CIRCLE. STANDARD ANGLE NOZZLE.
5 25 5.9 30'
RAIN BIRD 6504-PC, FC 04
TURF ROTOR, 4.0IN. POP-UP, PLASTIC RISER, ADJUSTABLE AND FULL
CIRCLE. WITH REMOVABLE SEAL-A-MATIC CHECK VALVE, 1IN. FEMALE
THREADED INLET.
2 30 2.9 35'
RAIN BIRD 6504-PC, FC 06
TURF ROTOR, 4.0IN. POP-UP, PLASTIC RISER, ADJUSTABLE AND FULL
CIRCLE. WITH REMOVABLE SEAL-A-MATIC CHECK VALVE, 1IN. FEMALE
THREADED INLET.
131 30 4.2 39'
FHTQ
8 8 8 8
Q T H F
10 10 10 10
Q TQ FHT
15 15 15 15 15
FHTQ
8 8 8 8
Q T H F
10 10 10 10
Q TQ FHT
12 12 12 12 12
Q TQ FHT
15 15 15 15 15
LST RSTSST
14 ADJ 14 F
18 ADJ 18 F
24 ADJ 24 F
2.0
4.0
1.5
2.0
3.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION QTY PSI
RAIN BIRD PEB-IVM 1-1/2"
1IN., 1-1/2IN., 2IN. PLASTIC INDUSTRIAL SMART VALVES W/ FACTORY
INSTALLED IVM-SOL. LOW FLOW OPERATING CAPABILITY, GLOBE
CONFIGURATION.
31
RAIN BIRD PEB-IVM 1"
1IN., 1-1/2IN., 2IN. PLASTIC INDUSTRIAL SMART VALVES W/ FACTORY
INSTALLED IVM-SOL. LOW FLOW OPERATING CAPABILITY, GLOBE
CONFIGURATION.
18
RAIN BIRD 3-RC 3/4"
3/4IN. BRASS QUICK-COUPLING VALVE, WITH CORROSION-RESISTANT
STAINLESS STEEL SPRING, THERMOPLASTIC RUBBER COVER, AND
1-PIECE BODY.
4
LEEMCO LBT-SS
1IN.-4IN. (FPT X FPT) STAINLESS STEEL BALL VALVE
6
RAIN BIRD 300-BPES-PRS-D GLOBE 3"
3IN. BRASS MASTER VALVE, WITH GLOBE CONFIGURATION, AND
PRESSURE REGULATOR MODULE. WITH A PATENTED NYLON SCRUBBER
THAT SCRAPES A STAINLESS STEEL SCREEN TO PREVENT DEBRIS
BUILD-UP AND CLOGGING.
1
RAIN BIRD LSP-1TURF
LINE SURGE PROTECTION DECODER DIRECTLY TO THE GROUND ROD OR
GROUND PLATE
4
RAIN BIRD RSD-BEX
RAIN SENSOR, WITH METAL LATCHING BRACKET, EXTENSION WIRE.
1
RAIN BIRD FS-400-P
4IN. FLOW SENSOR, PLASTIC PVC MODEL. SUGGESTED OPERATING
RANGE 40.0 GPM TO 500.0 GPM. SIZE FOR FLOW NOT ACCORDING TO
PIPE SIZE. RAIN BIRD COMPATIBLE CONTROLLERS: ESP-LXIVM(P) | LXD |
LXME2(P) | ME3, OR CONTROLLERS ACCEPTING CUSTOM K-FACTOR AND
OFFSET. INSTALL IN RAIN BIRD VALVE BOX.
1
WATER METER 3"1
IRRIGATION LATERAL LINE: POLYETHYLENE PIPE SDR-7 1"8,954 L.F.
IRRIGATION LATERAL LINE: POLYETHYLENE PIPE SDR-7 1 1/4"2,347 L.F.
IRRIGATION LATERAL LINE: PVC CLASS 200 SDR 21 1 1/2"1,006 L.F.
IRRIGATION LATERAL LINE: PVC CLASS 200 SDR 21 2"525.6 L.F.
IRRIGATION MAINLINE: POLYETHYLENE PIPE SDR-7 1"11.9 L.F.
IRRIGATION MAINLINE: PVC CLASS 200 SDR 21 1 1/2"14.3 L.F.
IRRIGATION MAINLINE: PVC CLASS 200 SDR 21 2"7.3 L.F.
IRRIGATION MAINLINE: PVC CLASS 200 SDR 21 2 1/2"38.4 L.F.
IRRIGATION MAINLINE: PVC CLASS 200 SDR 21 3"1,469 L.F.
IRRIGATION MAINLINE: PVC CLASS 200 SDR 21 4"696.9 L.F.
PIPE SLEEVE: PVC SCHEDULE 40 2"129.6 L.F.
PIPE SLEEVE: PVC SCHEDULE 40 2 1/2"187.3 L.F.
PIPE SLEEVE: PVC SCHEDULE 40 3"9.9 L.F.
PIPE SLEEVE: PVC SCHEDULE 40 4"28.9 L.F.
PIPE SLEEVE: PVC SCHEDULE 40 6"409.1 L.F.
MV
SP
RS
FS
M
IRRIGATION SCHEDULE
NUMBER MODEL SIZE TYPE GPM PSI PSI @ POC PRECIP
1 RAIN BIRD PEB-IVM 1-1/2"TURF ROTOR 32.33 30.3 37.9 0.87 in/h
2 RAIN BIRD PEB-IVM 1"TURF ROTOR 17 30.1 37.6 1.49 in/h
3 RAIN BIRD PEB-IVM 1-1/2"TURF ROTOR 36.53 30.4 38.0 0.84 in/h
4 RAIN BIRD PEB-IVM 1"TURF ROTARY 17.24 50.0 57.3 0.67 in/h
5 RAIN BIRD PEB-IVM 1"TURF ROTARY 10.05 47.6 54.9 0.59 in/h
6 RAIN BIRD PEB-IVM 1-1/2"TURF ROTOR 30.29 30.5 37.6 1.13 in/h
7 RAIN BIRD PEB-IVM 1"SHRUB SPRAY 17.89 39.1 46.1 1.47 in/h
8 RAIN BIRD PEB-IVM 1"SHRUB SPRAY 20.28 36.7 43.7 1.44 in/h
9 RAIN BIRD PEB-IVM 1"TURF ROTARY 11.99 47.6 54.2 0.72 in/h
10 RAIN BIRD PEB-IVM 1"SHRUB SPRAY 8.31 32.3 38.7 1.6 in/h
11 RAIN BIRD PEB-IVM 1"TURF ROTOR 17 28.7 34.3 1.43 in/h
12 RAIN BIRD PEB-IVM 1-1/2"SHRUB SPRAY 15.81 34.5 40.7 1.35 in/h
13 RAIN BIRD PEB-IVM 1-1/2"SHRUB SPRAY 28.93 35.3 41.7 1.33 in/h
14 RAIN BIRD PEB-IVM 1-1/2"TURF ROTOR 21.87 31.7 38.5 0.63 in/h
15 RAIN BIRD PEB-IVM 1"TURF ROTOR 6.72 30.0 36.8 0.14 in/h
16 RAIN BIRD PEB-IVM 1"TURF ROTOR 20.46 33.4 40.3 0.59 in/h
17 RAIN BIRD PEB-IVM 1"TURF SPRAY 16.71 34.3 40.5 0.66 in/h
18 RAIN BIRD PEB-IVM 1"TURF SPRAY 16.56 49.3 55.6 0.69 in/h
19 RAIN BIRD PEB-IVM 1-1/2"TURF ROTOR 29.75 33.0 39.3 0.76 in/h
20 RAIN BIRD PEB-IVM 1"TURF ROTOR 33.6 41.5 47.9 0.66 in/h
21 RAIN BIRD PEB-IVM 1"TURF SPRAY 15.03 35.7 42.2 1.12 in/h
22 RAIN BIRD PEB-IVM 1-1/2"TURF ROTOR 21 36.0 42.6 0.3 in/h
23 RAIN BIRD PEB-IVM 1-1/2"TURF ROTOR 21 39.0 45.7 0.26 in/h
24 RAIN BIRD PEB-IVM 1-1/2"TURF ROTOR 25.2 35.6 42.5 0.25 in/h
25 RAIN BIRD PEB-IVM 1-1/2"TURF ROTOR 28.1 38.3 45.3 0.59 in/h
26 RAIN BIRD PEB-IVM 1-1/2"TURF ROTOR 32.3 37.2 44.4 0.67 in/h
27 RAIN BIRD PEB-IVM 1-1/2"TURF ROTOR 44.05 31.0 38.5 1.28 in/h
28 RAIN BIRD PEB-IVM 1-1/2"TURF ROTOR 20.37 30.4 37.9 1.09 in/h
29 RAIN BIRD PEB-IVM 1"TURF ROTARY 16.56 50.4 58.0 0.57 in/h
30 RAIN BIRD PEB-IVM 1"TURF ROTARY 11.75 49.3 56.9 0.6 in/h
31 RAIN BIRD PEB-IVM 1-1/2"TURF ROTOR 28.3 29.7 37.3 0.84 in/h
32 RAIN BIRD PEB-IVM 1-1/2"TURF ROTOR 28.3 31.4 38.9 0.81 in/h
33 RAIN BIRD PEB-IVM 1"TURF ROTARY 9.1 47.9 55.4 0.59 in/h
34 RAIN BIRD PEB-IVM 1-1/2"TURF ROTOR 32.28 31.3 38.8 0.75 in/h
35 RAIN BIRD PEB-IVM 1"TURF ROTARY 18.43 50.5 58.0 0.62 in/h
36 RAIN BIRD PEB-IVM 1-1/2"TURF ROTOR 33.6 39.0 47.0 0.54 in/h
37 RAIN BIRD PEB-IVM 1-1/2"TURF ROTOR 33.6 39.5 47.5 0.29 in/h
38 RAIN BIRD PEB-IVM 1-1/2"TURF ROTOR 33.6 38.7 46.9 0.32 in/h
39 RAIN BIRD PEB-IVM 1-1/2"TURF ROTOR 25.2 39.2 47.5 0.27 in/h
40 RAIN BIRD PEB-IVM 1-1/2"TURF ROTOR 25.2 39.2 47.6 0.27 in/h
41 RAIN BIRD PEB-IVM 1-1/2"TURF ROTOR 25.2 39.2 47.7 0.27 in/h
42 RAIN BIRD PEB-IVM 1-1/2"TURF ROTOR 37.8 37.5 46.0 0.6 in/h
43 RAIN BIRD PEB-IVM 1-1/2"TURF ROTOR 25.2 39.2 47.7 0.27 in/h
44 RAIN BIRD PEB-IVM 1-1/2"TURF ROTOR 29.4 37.0 45.6 0.61 in/h
45 RAIN BIRD PEB-IVM 1-1/2"TURF ROTOR 25.2 39.2 47.8 0.27 in/h
46 RAIN BIRD PEB-IVM 1-1/2"TURF ROTOR 25.2 39.2 47.9 0.27 in/h
47 RAIN BIRD PEB-IVM 1-1/2"TURF ROTOR 25.2 39.1 48.1 0.27 in/h
48 RAIN BIRD PEB-IVM 1-1/2"TURF ROTOR 25.2 39.0 48.2 0.27 in/h
49 RAIN BIRD PEB-IVM 1-1/2"TURF ROTOR 21 39.7 49.0 0.6 in/h
VALVE SCHEDULE
L1.64
IRRIGATION
PLAN
NORTH
R
FEETSCALE
0
HORZ.
40 80
DateRegistration Number
Check:
Drawn:
Date:
Comm:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by
me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
under the laws of the State of
H
G
F
E
D
C
B
A
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 109
C
MN
Revisions
Description Date Num
Scale:
North
3300 FERNBROOK LANE NORTH, SUITE 300
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
Phone: (763) 544-7129
Email: goldenvalley@bolton-menk.com
www.bolton-menk.com
R
XX/XX/XX
232104
XX/XX/2024
JDO
MINNESOTA
PUBLIC SCHOOLS
3455 153RD STREET WEST
APPLE VALLEY - EAGAN
NEW ELEMENTARY
ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068
SCHOOL #20
ISD #196: ROSEMOUNT -
RWK
RICHARD W. KOECHLEIN
26678
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
1.REFER TO SHEET C1.41, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN NORTH, FOR GENERAL NOTES.
2.IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS DESIGNED FOR 60(+/-) PSI AT THE BASE OF ALL TURF HEADS AND 65(+/-) PSI AT THE BASE OF INFILTRATION
HEADS. NOTIFY ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IF EXISTING PRESSURE DIFFERS.
3.WATER SOURCE: WATER WILL BE AVAILABLE FROM PROPOSED 4" CAPPED FLANGE 24" BELOW GRADE OUTSIDE THE
MECHANICAL ROOM.
4.LAYOUT WORK AS ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE. THE CONTRACTOR MAY MAKE MINOR ADJUSTMENTS TO THE LOCATION AND
SPACING AS NECESSARY TO ACCOMMODATE ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS. SPRINKLER LOCATIONS SHALL BE FLAGGED AND
REVIEWED BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
5.COORDINATE INSTALLATION WITH THE WORK OF OTHERS.
6.ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE INSTALLED AS DETAILED ON DRAWINGS, HOWEVER, IF THE CONTRACT DRAWINGS AND/OR
SPECIFICATIONS DO NOT THOROUGHLY DESCRIBE THE METHOD OR TECHNIQUES TO BE USED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOW
THE INSTALLATION METHODS ISSUED BY THE MANUFACTURER . ALL SUCH LITERATURE MUST BE SUBMITTED 48 HOURS PRIOR TO
INSTALLATION FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER.
7.CHECK AND VERIFY ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED SITE CONDITIONS, UTILITIES AND SERVICES PRIOR TO TRENCHING.
8.LATERAL PIPING SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 12 INCHES DEEP AND MAINLINE PIPING A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES DEEP. ENGINEER
SHALL BE NOTIFIED TO VERIFY TRENCH DEPTHS BEFORE BACKFILLING.
9.ALL MAIN LINE PIPING AND LATERAL PIPE of 1-1/2" AND LARGER SHALL BE PVC (SDR 26 / CLASS 160). ALL MAINLINE AND LATERAL
PIPE 1" TO 1 1/4" SHALL BE POLYETHYLENE. ALL SLEEVING SHALL BE SCHEDULE 40 PVC.
10.ALL PIPE WITH NO SIZE LABEL SHALL BE 1".
11.ALL SPRINKLERS SHALL BE AS NOTED ON LEGEND.
12.ADJUST HEADS FOR GRADE, AS NECESSARY, AFTER GRASS HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED AND ALL SETTLEMENT AT HEADS HAS
OCCURRED.
13.ALL RISERS, BACKFLOW PREVENTORS AND HOSE BIBBS SHALL BE SET PLUMB. SPRINKLER HEAD RISERS, QUICK COUPLER VALVES
AND ALL VALVES WITH STEMS SHALL BE SET PERPENDICULAR TO FINISHED GRADE.
14.CONTROL VALVE WIRES SHALL BE #14 GAUGE U.F.U.L. JACKETED DECODER CABLE APPROVED DIRECT BURIAL. UNDERGROUND
CONNECTIONS SHALL BE MADE WITH 3-M WIRE CONNECTORS (DBY), OR APPROVED EQUAL.
15.PLACE ALL VALVES IN APPROVED VALVE BOXES.
16.USE TEFLON TAPE ON ALL THREADED JOINTS.
17.CONDUCT PERFORMANCE TEST IN THE PRESENCE OF OWNER AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOLLOWING COMPLETION OF SYSTEM
INSTALLATION.
18.CONDUCT AND DEMONSTRATE TO OWNER THE WINTERIZATION AND SPRING START-UP PROCESS IN THE FALL OF COMPLETION.
19.ZONES PROVIDING OVER 50 GPM SHALL BE 2" PLASTIC GLOBE VALVES. ZONES PROVIDING OVER 20 SHALL BE 1-1/2" PLASTIC
GLOBE VALVES. ZONES PROVIDING LESS THAN 20 GPM SHALL BE 1" PLASTIC GLOBE VALVES.
20.IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING ALL EQUIPMENT NECESSARY TO MAKE THE SYSTEM FULLY
FUNCTIONAL.
21.IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH THE UTILITY CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT EXISTING UTILITIES.
22.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THE EXACT LOCATION AND DEPTH OF ELECTRIC LINES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF
IRRIGATION.
NOTES
Page 75 of 109
I
I
I
D
D
D
D
D
D
S
S
D
PROJECT MATCH LINE
PROJECT MATCH LINE
STORMWATER POND
INFILTRATION AREA
REGIONAL BASIN
1618
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
4.0
8.0
1"
114"
114"
112"
1"
114"
114"
1"
114"
114"
112"
1"
114"
114"
112"
1"
114"
114"
112"
1"
114"
114"
112"
1"
114"
114"
112"
1"
114"
114"
112"
1"
114"
114"
114"
112"
1"
2"
114"
1"
114"
1"
114"
114"
2"
114"
114"
1"
1"
114"
114"
1"
1"
1"
114"
112"
114"
1"
112"
114"1"
1"
1"
114"
1"
1"114"
112"
23
24
25
26
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
1"
1"
1"
114"
114"
1"
112"
212"
3"
4"
3"
6"
SP
88
1010
15
15
15
15 1"
1"1"114"
L1.65
IRRIGATION
PLAN
SOUTH
R
FEETSCALE
0
HORZ.
40 80
DateRegistration Number
Check:
Drawn:
Date:
Comm:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by
me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
under the laws of the State of
H
G
F
E
D
C
B
A
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 109
C
MN
Revisions
Description Date Num
Scale:
North
3300 FERNBROOK LANE NORTH, SUITE 300
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
Phone: (763) 544-7129
Email: goldenvalley@bolton-menk.com
www.bolton-menk.com
R
XX/XX/XX
232104
XX/XX/2024
JDO
MINNESOTA
PUBLIC SCHOOLS
3455 153RD STREET WEST
APPLE VALLEY - EAGAN
NEW ELEMENTARY
ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068
SCHOOL #20
ISD #196: ROSEMOUNT -
RWK
RICHARD W. KOECHLEIN
26678
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
Page 76 of 109
L1.66
LANDSCAPE &
IRRIGATION
DETAILS
DateRegistration Number
Check:
Drawn:
Date:
Comm:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by
me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
under the laws of the State of
H
G
F
E
D
C
B
A
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 109
C
MN
Revisions
Description Date Num
Scale:
North
3300 FERNBROOK LANE NORTH, SUITE 300
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
Phone: (763) 544-7129
Email: goldenvalley@bolton-menk.com
www.bolton-menk.com
R
XX/XX/XX
232104
XX/XX/2024
JDO
MINNESOTA
PUBLIC SCHOOLS
3455 153RD STREET WEST
APPLE VALLEY - EAGAN
NEW ELEMENTARY
ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068
SCHOOL #20
ISD #196: ROSEMOUNT -
RWK
RICHARD W. KOECHLEIN
26678
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
1'-0"
1'-0"1'-0"
1'-0"
BV
IC
V MV
QC
V
GR
JUMBO RECTANGULAR
VALVE BOX
(22" X 16" X 12")
STANDARD
RECTANGULAR
VALVE BOX
(18" X 12" X 12")
1'- 0"
Typ.# 1 # 2 # 2 # 3 # 4
EXAMPLE
POTABLE WATER SYSTEM ON CONTROLLER 'A', REMOTE CONTROL VALVE STATION # 3.
NOTES:
1. VALVE BOX # 1 THRU # 3 SHALL HAVE STAINLESS STEEL LOCKING HARDWARE.
2. VALVE BOXES SHALL BE LABELED BY HOT IRON BRANDING OR ALUMINUM ASPHALTIC BASE WATER PROOF
PAINT.
3. LOCATE VALVE ASSEMBLIES IN PLANTING AREA.
4. VALVE LOCATIONS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
5. VALVE BOXES SHALL BE CENTERED ABOVE VALVE ASSEMBLIES TO FACILITATE ACCESS AND MAINTENANCE.
6. VALVE BOXES SHALL BE FLUSH WITH FINISHED GRADE.
7. VALVE BOXES SHALL BE SET PARALLEL TO EACH OTHER AND PERPENDICULAR TO THE EDGE OF PAVEMENT.
8. SEE OTHER IRRIGATION DETAILS FOR FURTHER INFORMATION.
STANDARD
RECTANGULAR
VALVE BOX
(18" X 12" X 12")
CIRCULAR
VALVE BOX
(10" D)
CIRCULAR
VALVE BOX
(6" D)
PAVEMENT, WALL, OR BUILDING.
SERVICE BOX REQUIREMENTS12
L1.66
NOT TO SCALE
Wa
t
e
r
t
y
p
e
Co
n
t
r
o
l
l
e
r
De
s
i
g
n
a
t
i
o
n
Bo
x
s
i
z
e
Li
d
C
o
l
o
r
Identification Guide
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
MV
FS
HM
BV
BV
GV
ARV
QCV
RCV
MS
GR
SB
FC
# 2
# 2
# 2
# 2
# 1
# 2
# 2
# 3
# 2
# 2
# 4
# 3
# 3
Green
Green
Green
Green
Green
Green
Green
Green
Green
Green
Green
Green
Green
Master valve
Flow sensor
Hydrometer
Ball valve 3" or less
Ball valve 4" or more
Gate valve
Air release valve
Quick coupler valve
Remote control valve
Moisture sensor
Grounding rod
Splice box
Future connection
1'-0"
MIN
1'-0"
MIN
CONIFEROUS TREE14
L1.66
NOT TO SCALE
SET TREE WITH ROOT COLLAR AT
FINISH GRADE. ADJUST TREE AS
REQUIRED SO THAT ROOT COLLAR
STANDS LEVEL TO, OR SLIGHTLY
ABOVE, FINISH GRADE.
WOOD MULCH, MIN. 4'' DEPTH
PLANTING SOIL
TOPSOIL SOIL SAUCER
CUT ROPES AT TOP OF ROOT
BALL. REMOVE TOP 1/3 OF
BURLAP. REMOVE ALL
NON-BIODEGRADABLE MATERIAL.
6'' DEPTH PLANTING SOIL - FORM
PEDESTAL TO PREVENT SETTLING
NOTE: WATER TREE THOROUGHLY AT THE TIME
OF PLANTING. PRUNE TREE TO REMOVE DEAD,
DAMAGED, BROKEN, AND WEAKENED BRANCHES.
1'-0"
MIN
1'-0"
MIN
DECIDUOUS TREE15
L1.66
NOT TO SCALE
NOTE: WATER TREE THOROUGHLY AT THE TIME OF
PLANTING. PRUNE TREE TO REMOVE DEAD,
DAMAGED, BROKEN, AND WEAKENED BRANCHES.
SET TREE WITH ROOT COLLAR AT
FINISH GRADE. ADJUST TREE AS
REQUIRED SO THAT ROOT COLLAR
STANDS LEVEL TO, OR SLIGHTLY
ABOVE, FINISHED GRADE
WOOD MULCH, MIN. 4'' DEPTH
PLANTING SOIL
TOPSOIL SOIL SAUCER
CUT ROPES AT TOP OF ROOT
BALL. REMOVE TOP 1/3 OF
BURLAP. REMOVE ALL
NON-BIODEGRADABLE MATERIAL.
PREPARED SUBSOIL TO FORM
PEDESTAL TO PREVENT SETTLING
9"
(MIN.)
9"
(MIN.)
SHRUB16
L1.66
NOT TO SCALE
NOTE: WATER SHRUBS THOROUGHLY AT TIME OF
PLANTING. PRUNE SHRUBS TO REMOVE DEAD,
DAMAGED, AND BROKEN BRANCHES.
WOOD MULCH, MIN. 4'' DEPTH
EDGING
ROOT BALL OR POT
PLANTING SOIL
UNDISTURBED SOIL OR
COMPACTED SUBGRADE
SET SHRUB AT FINISH GRADE. ADJUST
SHRUB AS REQUIRED SO THAT ROOT
COLLAR STANDS LEVEL TO, OR
SLIGHTLY ABOVE, FINISH GRADE.
4"
M
I
N
.
WOOD MULCH BED18
L1.66
NOT TO SCALE
FINISH GRADE
6'' MIN TOPSOIL EDGING
FINISH GRADE
WOOD MULCH
SUBGRADE
IRRIGATION TRENCHING9
L1.66
NOT TO SCALE
12
"
I
N
PL
A
N
T
I
N
G
AR
E
A
24"
MIN.
1'
-
6
"
I
N
P
L
A
N
T
I
N
G
A
R
E
A
6"
NOTES:
1. SEE IRRIGATION LEGEND FOR MAINLINE AND LATERAL LINE PIPE SIZES AND TYPE.
2. DIRECT BURIAL CONTROL WIRES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN SCHEDULE 40 PVC ELECTRICAL CONDUIT
IF REQUIRED.
3. 2-WIRE IRRIGATION WIRE SHALL BE INSTALLED IN SCHEDULE 40 PVC ELECTRICAL CONDUIT.
4.DETECTABLE LOCATOR TAPE SHALL BE LOCATED SIX INCHES (6") ABOVE THE ENTIRE MAINLINE RUN.
PAVEMENT
NON-PRESSURIZED LINE
(LATERAL LINE).
DETECTABLE LOCATOR TAPE.
PRESSURIZED LINE (MAIN LINE).
FINISHED GRADE
DIRECT BURIAL LOW VOLTAGE
CONTROL WIRES.
FLOW SENSOR & MASTER VALVE8
L1.66
NOT TO SCALE
24" MINIMUM
5X
DIAMETER
OF
PIPE
10X
DIAMETER
OF
PIPE
FLOW
FLOW METER AS SPECIFIED
(2 WIRES TO CONTROLLER)
2 X 12 PVC SCH 80 PIPING.
4" PVC MAIN LINE WITH
2" REDUCING BUSHING.
FINISHED GRADE
2 X 6 X 16 CONCRETE WALL CAPS,
TWO PER BOX, ONE EACH SIDE.
WATER PROOF
CONNECTORS.
2 X 24 PVC SCH
80 TOE PIPING.
2" GALVANIZED FLANGE
X 1 PT ADAPTER.
2"X4" FLANGED
REDUCER.
4" FLANGED ELL.
18"X 18"X18" CONCRETE
SUPPORT BLOCK.
PVC SCH 80
2"X8" NIPPLE.
MASTER VALVE
AS SPECIFIED.
SPECIFIED RECTANGULAR
SERVICE BOXES WITH
EXTENTIONS AS NEEDED.
4" FLANGED
ELBOW P.O.C.
TO EXISTING
RP BACKFLOW
PIPE BENEATH PAVEMENT10
L1.66
NOT TO SCALE
NOTES:
1. SEE IRRIGATION LEGEND FOR MAINLINE AND LATERAL LINE PIPE SIZES AND TYPE.
2. ALL SLEEVES SHALL BE SCHEDULE 40 PVC PIPE.
3. ALL SLEEVES SHALL EXTEND 12" BEYOND THE EDGE OF PAVEMENT.
4.END OF SLEEVES SHALL BE LOCATED WITH A WOODEN STAKE OR PVC PIPE. LOCATORS SHALL RUN
CONTINUOUSLY FROM THE END OF THE SLEEVE TO FINISHED GRADE.
3'
-
0
"
CLEAN BACKFILL, 95% RELATIVE COMPACTION
UNDER PAVING OR PER CIVIL ENGINEER'S
PLANS
CONTROL WIRES, SLEEVE UNDER PAVING.
INSTALL ADJACENT TO PRESSURIZED MAINLINE.
BUNDLE SHALL BE NO MORE THAN 50% OF
PIPE DIAMETER.
MAINLINE, SLEEVE UNDER PAVING TO BE
TWO TIMES THE DIAMETER OF THE
PRESSURIZED MAINLINE PIPE.
NON-PRESSURIZED LINE, SLEEVE UNDER
PAVING TO BE TWO TIMES THE DIAMETER
OF THE LATERAL LINE.
PAVEMENT
BASE ROCK
NOTES:
A.ALL WIRE SPLICING SHALL BE MADE WITH APPROVED
CONNECTIONS.
B.MAKE ALL WIRE SPLICES IN VALVE BOXES.
C.LEAVE A MINIMUM OF 24" EXTRA WIRE AT ALL SPLICE
POINTS.
D.MAXIMUM DISTANCE FROM DECODER TO VALVE = 150 FT.
E.MAXIMUM WIRE LENGTH = 10,200 FT.
F.WIRE LENGTHS INCLUDE MASTER VALVE AND #16
2 WIRE
TWO-WIRE PATHS EXAMPLE6
L1.66
NOT TO SCALE
WIRE PATH #2
MASTER VALVE
WIRE PATH #1
120 VAC POWER
RAIN SENSOR
CONTROLLER SHOWN
AS REFERENCE ONLY
ROTAR SPRINKLER13
L1.66
NOT TO SCALE
FINISHED GRADE
SPRINKLER BODY
SWING JOINT
LATERAL TEE OR ELBOW
LATERAL PIPE
Vik
i
n
g
D
e
c
o
d
e
r
Surge ProtectorViking End
Vik
i
n
g
D
e
c
o
d
e
r
CONTROLLER
DECODER
WIRING TO ELECTRIC VALVE
DECODER
END-LINE SURGE PROTECTION
GROUND ROD
WIRING TO ELECTRIC VALVE
TWO WIRE PATH
GROUND ROD
IRRIGATION WIRING DIAGRAM7
L1.66
NOT TO SCALE
NOTES:
1. ESP-LXIVM CONTROLLER IS AVAILABLE IN TWO MODELS. THE LXIVM WITH 60 STATIONS
AND THE LMIVM-PRO WITH 240 STATIONS. REFER TO THE CHART BELOW FOR
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE TWO MODELS.
2. USE STEEL CONDUIT FOR ABOVE GRADE AND SCH 4O PVC CONDUIT FOR BELOW GRADE
CONDITIONS.
3. PROVIDE PROPER GROUNDING COMPONENTS TO ACHIEVE GROUND RESISTANCE OF 10
OHMS OR LESS. IF CONTROLLER IS MOUNTED INDOORS, USE POWER SUPPLY GROUND.
TWO-WIRE CONTROLLER
IN METAL CABINET
5
L1.66
NOT TO SCALE
TWO-WIRE CONTROLLER:
RAIN BIRD ESP-LXIVM/PRO IN LXMM METAL
CABINET WITH OUTSIDE WALL MOUNT.
INSTALL CONTROLLER AND CABINET ON WALL
PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS.
JUNCTION BOX
1-INCH CONDUIT AND FITTINGS FOR POWER
SUPPLY WIRE
2-INCH CONDUIT AND FITTINGS FOR TWO-WIRE
CABLE
MAXICABLE TWO-WIRE PATH TO FIELD DEVICES,
USE A DIFFERENT CABLE JACKET COLOR FOR
EACH PATH.
1-INCH CONDUIT AND FITTINGS FOR GROUND
WIRE. ONLY FOR OUTDOOR INSTALLATIONS.
12
"
(
M
I
N
)
NOTES:
1. COMPACT SOIL AROUND VALVE BOX TO SAME DENSITY AS
UNDISTURBED ADJACENT SOIL.
2. THOROUGHLY FLUSH ALL WATER LINES BEFORE INSTALLING VALVES.
3. ALL WIRES SPLICES TO BE MADE INSIDE VALVE BOXES.
VALVE BOX W/ COVER
WATER PROOF
CONNECTION (1 OF 2)
30" LINEAR LENGTH
OF WIRE, COILED
ELECTRIC ZONE VALVE
FINISH GRADE
WATER PROOF
CONNECTION (2 OF 2)
DECODER
PVC MAINLINEGRAVEL SUMP (1 CU. FT.)
BRICK
SUPPORTS
(1 OF 4)
DECODER / VALVE BOX AND SUMP11
L1.66
NOT TO SCALE
1'-0"
MIN
1'-0"
MIN
CONIFEROUS TREE14
L1.66
NOT TO SCALE
SET TREE WITH ROOT COLLAR AT
FINISH GRADE. ADJUST TREE AS
REQUIRED SO THAT ROOT COLLAR
STANDS LEVEL TO, OR SLIGHTLY
ABOVE, FINISH GRADE.
WOOD MULCH, MIN. 4'' DEPTH
PLANTING SOIL
TOPSOIL SOIL SAUCER
CUT ROPES AT TOP OF ROOT
BALL. REMOVE TOP 1/3 OF
BURLAP. REMOVE ALL
NON-BIODEGRADABLE MATERIAL.
6'' DEPTH PLANTING SOIL - FORM
PEDESTAL TO PREVENT SETTLING
NOTE: WATER TREE THOROUGHLY AT THE TIME
OF PLANTING. PRUNE TREE TO REMOVE DEAD,
DAMAGED, BROKEN, AND WEAKENED BRANCHES.
1'-0"
MIN
1'-0"
MIN
DECIDUOUS TREE15
L1.66
NOT TO SCALE
NOTE: WATER TREE THOROUGHLY AT THE TIME OF
PLANTING. PRUNE TREE TO REMOVE DEAD,
DAMAGED, BROKEN, AND WEAKENED BRANCHES.
SET TREE WITH ROOT COLLAR AT
FINISH GRADE. ADJUST TREE AS
REQUIRED SO THAT ROOT COLLAR
STANDS LEVEL TO, OR SLIGHTLY
ABOVE, FINISHED GRADE
WOOD MULCH, MIN. 4'' DEPTH
PLANTING SOIL
TOPSOIL SOIL SAUCER
CUT ROPES AT TOP OF ROOT
BALL. REMOVE TOP 1/3 OF
BURLAP. REMOVE ALL
NON-BIODEGRADABLE MATERIAL.
PREPARED SUBSOIL TO FORM
PEDESTAL TO PREVENT SETTLING
6'
'
EQUAL
EQ
U
A
L
PLAN
SECTION
12
"
PERENNIALS AND CONTAINER
GROWN PLANT STOCK
17
L1.66
NOT TO SCALE
EDGING
PLANT ALL PERENNIALS AND
CONTAINER GROWN PLANT STOCK
AT EQUAL TRIANGULAR SPACING
4" DEPTH WOOD MULCH
PLANTING SOIL
9"
(MIN.)
9"
(MIN.)
SHRUB16
L1.66
NOT TO SCALE
NOTE: WATER SHRUBS THOROUGHLY AT TIME OF
PLANTING. PRUNE SHRUBS TO REMOVE DEAD,
DAMAGED, AND BROKEN BRANCHES.
WOOD MULCH, MIN. 4'' DEPTH
EDGING
ROOT BALL OR POT
PLANTING SOIL
UNDISTURBED SOIL OR
COMPACTED SUBGRADE
SET SHRUB AT FINISH GRADE. ADJUST
SHRUB AS REQUIRED SO THAT ROOT
COLLAR STANDS LEVEL TO, OR
SLIGHTLY ABOVE, FINISH GRADE.
4"
M
I
N
.
WOOD MULCH BED18
L1.66
NOT TO SCALE
FINISH GRADE
6'' MIN TOPSOIL EDGING
FINISH GRADE
WOOD MULCH
SUBGRADE
Page 77 of 109
C1.71
DETAILS
DateRegistration Number
Check:
Drawn:
Date:
Comm:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by
me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
under the laws of the State of
H
G
F
E
D
C
B
A
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 109
C
MN
Revisions
Description Date Num
Scale:
North
3300 FERNBROOK LANE NORTH, SUITE 300
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
Phone: (763) 544-7129
Email: goldenvalley@bolton-menk.com
www.bolton-menk.com
R
XX/XX/XX
232104
XX/XX/2024
JDO
MINNESOTA
PUBLIC SCHOOLS
3455 153RD STREET WEST
APPLE VALLEY - EAGAN
NEW ELEMENTARY
ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068
SCHOOL #20
ISD #196: ROSEMOUNT -
DAVID A. REY
DAR
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
40180
6"
6"
12"
6"24
5
3B
1
3A
NOTES:
1. PREPARE SOIL BEFORE INSTALLING BLANKETS, INCLUDING ANY NECESSARY APPLICATION OF LIME,
FERTILIZER, AND SEED.
2. BEGIN AT THE TOP OF THE SLOPE BY ANCHORING THE BLANKET IN A 6" DEEP X 6" WIDE TRENCH WITH
APPROXIMATELY 12" OF BLANKET EXTENDED BEYOND THE UP-SLOPE PORTION OF THE TRENCH.
ANCHOR THE BLANKET WITH A ROW OF STAPLES/STAKES APPROXIMATELY 12" APART IN THE BOTTOM
OF THE TRENCH. BACKFILL AND COMPACT THE TRENCH AFTER STAPLING. APPLY SEED TO COMPACTED
SOIL AND FOLD REMAINING 12" PORTION OF BLANKET BACK OVER SEED AND COMPACTED SOIL.
SECURE BLANKET OVER COMPACTED SOIL WITH A ROW OF STAPLES/STAKES SPACED APPROXIMATELY
12" APART ACROSS THE WIDTH OF THE BLANKET.
3. ROLL THE BLANKETS (A.) DOWN OR (B.) HORIZONTALLY ACROSS THE SLOPE. BLANKETS SHALL UNROLL
WITH APPROPRIATE SIDE AGAINST THE SOIL SURFACE. ALL BLANKETS MUST BE SECURELY FASTENED
TO SOIL SURFACE BY PLACING STAPLES/STAKES IN APPROPRIATE LOCATIONS AS SHOWN IN THE STAPLE
PATTERN GUIDE. WHEN USING OPTIONAL DOT SYSTEM , STAPLES/STAKES SHOULD BE PLACED
THROUGH EACH OF THE COLORED DOTS CORRESPONDING TO THE APPROPRIATE STAPLE PATTERN.
4. THE EDGES OF PARALLEL BLANKETS MUST BE STAPLED WITH APPROXIMATELY 6" OVERLAP DEPENDING
ON BLANKET TYPE. TO ENSURE PROPER SEAM ALIGNMENT, PLACE THE EDGE OF THE OVERLAPPING
BLANKET (BLANKET BEING INSTALLED ON TOP) EVEN WITH THE COLORED SEAM STITCH ON THE
PREVIOUSLY INSTALLED BLANKET.
5. CONSECUTIVE BLANKETS SPLICED DOWN THE SLOPE MUST BE PLACED END OVER END (SHINGLE STYLE)
WITH AN APPROXIMATE 6" OVERLAP. STAPLE THROUGH OVERLAPPED AREA, APPROXIMATELY 12"
APART ACROSS ENTIRE BLANKET WIDTH.
6. BLANKET SHALL BE STAPLED AS PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION.
NOTE: *IN LOOSE SOIL CONDITIONS, THE USE OF STAPLE OR STAKE LENGTHS GREATER
THAN 6" MAY BE NECESSARY TO PROPERLY SECURE THE BLANKETS.
6"
5
C1.71
EROSION CONTROL BLANKET
NOT TO SCALE
6
D
51
5D
2'
-
0
"
D
5D
PLAN
SECTION A - A
SECTION B - B
12
"
18
"
B
B
A A
20
C1.71
RIPRAP AT FLARED END SECTION
NOT TO SCALE
CLASS III RIPRAP
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
PLAN FINISH GRADE
CLASS III RIPRAP
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
PLAN FINISH GRADE
FABRIC SHALL COVER THE AREA
OF THE RIPRAP AND EXTEND
UNDER THE APRON 3' MIN
12
"
10'
1'
18
"
13
C1.71
OVERFLOW SWALE
NOT TO SCALE
4:1 SLOPE (TYP)
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
CLASS III RIPRAP
4:1 SLOPE (TYP)
PLACE RIPRAP AT ELEVATION SUCH THAT FLOWLINE
DEPICTED BY PROPOSED GRADES IS MAINTAINED
FLOW
17
C1.71
BACKWATER VALVE
NOT TO SCALE
BACKWATER VALVE
SOLVENT WELD BACKWATER
VALVE TO DRAIN TILE
PROVIDE FLEXIBLE JOINT
6" DRAIN TILE
CONNECT DRAIN TILE TO
STRUCTURE AT ELEVATION
SHOWN ON THE DRAWING.
GROUT SECURE TO
STRUCTURE WALL.
MINIMIZE STUB THROUGH
WALL. STUB ONLY AS
REQUIRED TO ALLOW
BACKWATER VALVE TO BE
CONNECTED TO DRAIN TILE.
PROVIDE FLEXIBLE
JOINT AT CONNECTION
REFER TO PLAN FOR
STRUCTURE TYPE
10
"
6"
UNSUITABLE SOIL
TOPSOIL
REFER TO
STRUCTURAL
DRAWINGS
3'-0"
1
1
VA
R
I
E
S
NOTES:
1.BOTTOM OF EXCAVATION (INCLUDING ROCK EXCAVATION) MUST BE APPROVED BY THE
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER'S REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF ANY FILL.
2.IN SOME LOCATIONS, FOOTING WILL REST ON ROCK. REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS.
3.ROCK EXCAVATION WILL BE REQUIRED IN SOME LOCATIONS.
6
C1.71
ENGINEERED FILL
NOT TO SCALE
4" SLAB AND 6" STABILIZED AGGREGATE
BASE - VERIFY WITH ARCHITECTURAL PLANS
FINISH FLOOR
SUBGRADE
FINISH GRADE (TURF)
MINIMUM EXCAVATION
LIMITS
FOOTING
SUITABLE SOIL
ENGINEERED FILL
5'-0"20'-0"
5'
-
0
"
6'
-
0
"
4"
NOTE:
REFER TO GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN FOR LIMITS OF SAND SUBBASE
7
C1.71
SAND SUBBASE / DRAIN TILE AT
DOORS & FROST FOOTED STOOPS
NOT TO SCALE
FINISH GRADE AT
EDGE OF STOOP FINISH GRADE OF PAVEMENT
ADJACENT TO FOOTED STOOP
STOOP FOOTING -
REFER TO STRUCTURAL
DRAWINGS
6" DRAIN TILE (WHERE INDICATED
ON DRAWINGS) - EXTEND TO
STORM SEWER STRUCTURE WHERE
INDICATED ON DRAWINGS
SUBGRADE SOILS
SAND SUBBASE
C1.72
12
BUILDING PAD
(ENGINEERED FILL)
1
1
2'-0"
6'
'
8
C1.71
BELOW GRADE BUILDING WALLS
NOT TO SCALE
C1.71
6
FINISH GRADE (TURF AREAS)FINISH FLOOR
BACKFILL AT
BELOW GRADE
WALLS
FOOTING (REFER TO
STRUCTURAL PLANS)
FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION (FFE):
REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL
PLANS AND VERIFY LOWER
LEVEL FFE AND LOCATIONS
WHERE FFE VARIES
12" TOPSOIL OVER BACKFILL
6" TOPSOIL
INFILTRATION AREA CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING:
1.INFILTRATION AREA LIMITS SHALL BE SURVEYED AND A VISUAL BARRIER, SUCH AS ORANGE SNOW FENCE, SHALL BE PLACED
AROUND THE FULL PERIMETER TO KEEP ALL CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC, EQUIPMENT AND MATERIAL STOCKPILES OUT OF THE
PROPOSED INFILTRATION AREAS. THE VISUAL BARRIER MUST BE INSTALLED BEFORE NEW CONSTRUCTION BEGINS AND SHALL
BE MAINTAINED THROUGH THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT.
2.DELIVER SAMPLE MATERIALS ONSITE FOR PRIOR APPROVAL. PRIOR TO BEGINNING THE INSTALLATION, SUFFICIENT MATERIAL
QUANTITIES SHALL BE ONSITE TO COMPLETE THE INSTALLATION. STABILIZE EXPOSED SOIL AREAS WITHOUT DELAY.
3.CARE MUST BE TAKEN TO AVOID CONTAMINATION OF ENGINEERED SOILS WITH SEDIMENT, IN-SITU OR TOPSOIL DURING AND
AFTER INSTALLATION. MATERIALS MUST BE SEGREGATED.
4.INSTALLATION WITH DRY SOIL CONDITIONS IS CRITICAL TO PREVENT SMEARING AND COMPACTION. SCHEDULE WORK FOR
PERIODS OF DRY WEATHER. DO NOT WORK IF SOIL CONDITIONS ARE WET. EXCAVATION, SOIL PLACEMENT AND RAPID
STABILIZATION OF PERIMETER SLOPES WITH TURF SOD MUST COMPLETED BEFORE THE NEXT PRECIPITATION EVENT. TURF
SOD PLACED IN FLOW PATHS SHALL BE SECURED WITH AT LEAST 6 STAKES PER SQUARE YARD. PLACE STAKES ALONG UPHILL
SEAM EDGES TO PREVENT UNDERMINING FLOWS UNTIL SOD ROOTS ESTABLISH.
5.DO NOT LEAVE STORMWATER AREAS AND / OR PERIMETER SLOPES EXPOSED OVERNIGHT. SECURE THE SITE FROM RISK OF
PRECIPITATION DAMAGES AT THE END OF EVERY WORK DAY. IN THE EVENT OF RAIN, TAKE ACTION TO DIVERT STORMWATER
AWAY FROM THE WORK AREA AND TEMPORARILY COVER OF ALL EXPOSED SOILS WITH WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC OR
IMPERMEABLE SHEETING.
6.FIELD OBSERVATION OF EXCAVATION AND SOIL PLACEMENT IS REQUIRED. NOTIFY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER PRIOR TO
DIGGING. USE BACKHOE WITH TOOTH BUCKET FOR CELL EXCAVATION TO AVOID COMPACTING OR SMEARING OF SOILS. DO
NOT USE SKID STEER FOR EXCAVATION WITHIN THE CELL. USE TOOTH BUCKET TO SCARIFY (RIP) UNDERLYING SOILS 6" TO 9"
DEEP TO REMOVE COMPACTION. GENTLY MIX THE FIRST LIFT OF ENGINEERED SOILS WITH THE LOOSENED UNDERLYING SOILS
TO AVOID STRATIFICATION AND PROMOTE PERMEABILITY. USE EXCAVATOR BUCKET TO PLACE MATERIALS. CONSTRUCTION
EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED INTO THE STORMWATER AREAS. LEVELING AND FINAL GRADING WITHIN THE CELL
MUST BE COMPLETED BY HAND.
7.INFILTRATION AREA SOIL MIX SHALL BE MINNESOTA STORMWATER MANUAL 4.1.2 MIX B: ENHANCED FILTRATION BLEND
(WELL BLENDED MIXTURE OF 70% ASTM C-33 COARSE WASHED SAND (MN/DOT 3126) AND 30% MN/DOT 3890 GRADE 2 LEAF
LITTER COMPOST). THE MATERIAL SUPPLIER SHALL PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION THAT THE COMPOST HAS BEEN SAMPLED AND
TESTED AS REQUIRED BY THE SEAL OF TESTING ASSURANCE (STA) PROGRAM OF THE UNITED STATES COMPOSTING COUNCIL
(USCC) AND A GRADATION SIEVE ANALYSIS FOR THE WASHED SAND. THE ENGINEERED SOIL SHALL NOT CONTAIN ANY
TOPSOIL OR FILTER AGGREGATE WITH FINES.
8.INSTALL PLANTINGS BY HAND.
9.INSTALLED SOD AND PLANTINGS REQUIRE A TOTAL OF 1" OF WATER PER WEEK AND ACTIVE WEED MANAGEMENT UNTIL
WELL ESTABLISHED. INCLUDE ALL WATERING COSTS IN THE BID. CONSTRUCT A TEMPORARY IRRIGATION SYSTEM, CONSISTING
OF ABOVE GROUND HEADS, PIPING, VALVES, ETC., FOR WATERING UNTIL VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED. DO NOT USE A WATER
TRUCK AS THE FORCE OF THE WATER WILL ADVERSELY AFFECT THE STORMWATER AREA SOILS.
10.REMOVAL OF ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS SHALL BE DONE BY HAND OR, IF SELF-PROPELLED EQUIPMENT IS
REQUIRED, FROM OUTSIDE THE PERIMETER OF THE INFILTRATION AREAS.
12
C1.71
INFILTRATION AREA NOTES
NOT TO SCALE
INFILTRATION AREA
LIMITS AS SHOWN ON PLAN
1
1
11
C1.71
INFILTRATION AREA SECTION
NOT TO SCALE
NOTE:
SEE x OF xx / [Sheet#] FOR ENGINEERED SOIL MIXTURE
PLACE SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG AT EDGE OF INFILTRATION AREA -
FULL PERIMETER, AND REMOVE ONCE ALL UPSLOPE AREAS ARE
FULLY STABILIZED (PERMANENT STABILIZATION)
LANDSCAPE
EDGING (TYP)
FLAT BOTTOM
STAKE
STAKE
EXCAVATE TO SUBGRADE
ELEVATION WITH A TOOTHED
BUCKET BACKHOE. RIP SOILS 6" TO
9" TO REMOVE COMPACTION
CATEGORY 3N-WOOD EROSION
CONTROL BLANKET
PLANTS WITH MULCH
ROOT BALL
OR POT
INFILTRATION AREA SOIL
MIXTURE - SEE BELOW
FILL SOIL BETWEEN THE EXISTING SP SANDS
AND BOTTOM OF ENGINEERED SOIL
MIXTURE SHALL MEET THE SPECIFICATION
FOR SAND SUBBASE
GRASS
6" DEPTH
TOPSOIL
NOTES:
1.TRENCH SIDEWALLS TO MEET O.S.H.A REQUIREMENTS.
2.UPPER 3 FT. OF BACKFILL SHALL BE COMPACTED TO AT LEAST 100% STANDARD PROCTOR DRY
DENSITY. BELOW THIS ELEVATION, BACKFILL SHALL BE COMPACTED TO AT LEAST 95% STANDARD
PROCTOR DRY DENSITY.
3.INSTALLATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D2321.
DE
P
T
H
(
V
A
R
I
E
S
)
6"
M
I
N
.
1/
8
O
.
D
.
(6
"
M
I
N
.
)
O.D. + 2' (MAX)
PI
P
E
D
I
A
.
9
C1.71
PIPE BEDDING PVC
NOT TO SCALE
SUBGRADE
PIPE BEDDING
NOTES:
1.TRENCH SIDEWALLS TO MEET O.S.H.A REQUIREMENTS.
2.UPPER 3 FT. OF BACKFILL SHALL BE COMPACTED TO AT LEAST 100% STANDARD PROCTOR DRY
DENSITY. BELOW THIS ELEVATION, BACKFILL SHALL BE COMPACTED TO AT LEAST 95% STANDARD
PROCTOR DRY DENSITY.
DE
P
T
H
(
V
A
R
I
E
S
)
1/
8
D
E
P
T
H
(
1
2
"
M
I
N
.
)
1/
6
O
.
D
.
1/
8
O
.
D
.
(
4
"
M
I
N
.
)
O.D. + 2' (MAX)
10
C1.71
PIPE BEDDING - RCP & DIP
NOT TO SCALE
SUBGRADE
BACKFILL ABOVE
PIPE BEDDING
PIPE BEDDING
1
C1.71
NOT TO SCALE
3
C1.71
NOT TO SCALE
2
C1.71
NOT TO SCALE
4
C1.71
NOT TO SCALE
VARIES
FLOW
FLOW
6
1
CATCH BASIN14
C1.71
NOT TO SCALE
"RIM ELEVATION"
PRECAST COVER -
8" THICK
STEPS - INSTALL
ON DOWNSTREAM
SIDE @ 16" O.C.
RUBBER GASKET -
TYP AT ALL JOINTS
PRECAST
CONCRETE
SECTION
GROUT SHELF
AND CHANNELSBASES SHALL BE 8"
STANDARD PRECAST
WITH 2" LEAN GROUT,
OR POURED 8" SLAB
REINFORCED WITH 6" x
6" 10/10 MESH
PROVIDE FLEXIBLE
JOINT AT CONNECTION
- REFER TO SPECS
STORM SEWER PIPE- REFER
TO PLAN FOR LOCATION,
INVERT, AND SIZES
MIN. 2 AND MAX. 5
ADJUSTING RINGS. GROUT
BETWEEN RINGS, CASTING,
AND ALONG OUTSIDE.
METAL SEWER CASTING -
REFER TO PLAN FOR TYPE
3"3"
3"
SUBSURFACE DRAIN18
C1.71
NOT TO SCALE
C1.72
8
C1.73
1
C1.73
2
CURB AND GUTTER
ASPHALT PAVEMENT SECTION
REFER TO DETAIL
6"
3" MINIMUM
UNDER TILE
BURRITO WRAP TRENCH AND PEA
ROCK WITH GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
PEA ROCK AROUND TILE
6" DRAIN TILE - LENGTH OF INDIVIDUAL
FINGER DRAIN SHALL BE 30' MINIMUM
UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
C1.73
3
C1.72
10
PIPE SIZE
21" & LESS
24" TO 36"
42" TO 54"
60" & GREATER
"U" BOLT DIA.
1/2"
5/8"
3/4"
1"
WIDTH
24"
24"
24"
24"
"U" BOLT REQUIREMENTS
NOTE:
2 - "U" BOLT FASTENERS TO BE INSTALLED ACROSS EACH JOINT,
ONE EACH SIDE OF PIPE AT 60° FROM THE TOP OF THE PIPE.
FASTEN FIRST THREE JOINTS AS SHOWN.
RCP FLARED END SECTION (FES)19
C1.71
NOT TO SCALE
C1.71
20
CONCRETE PIPE TIES ("U" BOLTS)
TRASH GUARD WITH 5
8" DIA.
RODS AT 6" ON CENTER.
FASTEN TO FES WITH 3
HOT DIPPED GALV. CLIPS
RIPRAP - REFER
TO DETAIL
16
C1.71
NOT TO SCALE
15
C1.71
NOT TO SCALE
NOTE:
ATTACH TRACER WIRE WITH BROWN STRIPE TO PIPE AT 3' O.C. WITH PLASTIC ZIP-TIES (OR APPROVED EQUAL).
SEWER
15"
11 1
2"
4"
21
C1.71
CLEANOUT ASSEMBLY
NOT TO SCALE
MCDONALD 74M "A"
SERIES CAST IRON METER
PIT FRAME AND COVER
FITTING HUB WITH 4"
THREADED PLUG. APPLY TEFLON
THREAD TAPE, OR APPROVED
EQUAL, OVER THREADS.
FINISH GRADE
LEAVE 24" OF EXCESS WIRE
AT SURFACE
TRACER WIRE
24" DIA. x 8" THICK CONCRETE
SLAB POURED AROUND CASTING
(FLUSH WITH FINISH GRADE)
REFER TO PLAN FOR INVERT ELEVATION
6" DRAIN TILE
PLAN VIEW
SECTION A-A
A
A DISTURBED EARTH
2'
MIN.
24
"
M
I
N
.
2'
M
I
N
.
2
1
13C
C1.71
TEMPORARY DIVERSION BERM
NOT TO SCALE
C1.71
2
UNDISTURBED
EARTH
DISTURBED EARTH
2:1 SLOPE OR FLATTER
2:1 SLOPE OR FLATTER
SILT FENCE
SILT FENCE
WHERE POSSIBLE, 10' UNDISTURBED
EARTH UPHILL OF SILT FENCE
NOT TO SCALE
24" MIN. CLAY
13B
C1.71
POND CLAY LINER
NOT TO SCALE
FINISH GRADE
COMPACTED SOIL
Page 78 of 109
C1.72
DETAILS
DateRegistration Number
Check:
Drawn:
Date:
Comm:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by
me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
under the laws of the State of
H
G
F
E
D
C
B
A
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 109
C
MN
Revisions
Description Date Num
Scale:
North
3300 FERNBROOK LANE NORTH, SUITE 300
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
Phone: (763) 544-7129
Email: goldenvalley@bolton-menk.com
www.bolton-menk.com
R
XX/XX/XX
232104
XX/XX/2024
JDO
MINNESOTA
PUBLIC SCHOOLS
3455 153RD STREET WEST
APPLE VALLEY - EAGAN
NEW ELEMENTARY
ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068
SCHOOL #20
ISD #196: ROSEMOUNT -
DAVID A. REY
DAR
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
40180
NOTES:
1.DIRECTION OF TRANSVERSE GUTTER SLOPE SHALL MATCH DIRECTION OF ADJACENT PAVEMENT
SLOPE.
2.CONSTRUCT WITH CURBING MACHINE.
3.AT CURB INLET CATCH BASINS, ADJUST CASTING TO BE 1'' BELOW GUTTER GRADE. SLOPE GUTTER
5' EACH SIDE OF CATCH BASIN. PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE TO CATCH BASINS.
12"
6"
712"
13
1 2"
6"12"
1
2 AGGREGATE BASE TO BE
PLACED BY PAVING
CONTRACTOR (4" MIN.)
7"
B-612 CURB AND GUTTER8
C1.72
NOT TO SCALE
FACE OF CURB
1
2" RADIUS
3" RADIUS
SLOPE 3/4" PER FOOT TOWARDS
PAVEMENT ON HIGH SIDE OF LOT /
DRIVE (TIP OUT). SLOPE 3/4" PER FOOT
TOWARDS CURB FACE ON LOW SIDE OF
LOT / DRIVE (TIP BACK).
1
2" RADIUS
1:3 BATTER
6"
6"
12"
12"
5'-0" TAPER
SLOPE TOP OF CURB DOWN TO GUTTER
C1.72
8
B-612 CURB TERMINATOR9
C1.72
NOT TO SCALE
GUTTER UNIFORM ELEVATION
10' T
R
A
N
S
I
T
I
O
N
C1.72
8
C1.72
10
CURB TRANSITION D-412 TO B-61211
C1.72
NOT TO SCALE
PROVIDE EXPANSION
JOINT AT ENDS
OF TRANSITION (TYP.)
3"
3"
SOFT PLAY AREA16
C1.72
NOT TO SCALE
1" RADIUS (TYP) EXCEPT
FOR AREA ABUTTING RAMP
LANDING
PEA ROCK
PREPARED SUBGRADE
6" x 18" CONCRETE CURB
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
FINISH GRADE OF CURB SHALL
BE 1" ABOVE SOD A FLUSH
WITH PAVEMENT
6" DRAIN TILE
12'' DEPTH WOOD FIBER
SURFACING
FINISH GRADE OF SOFT
PLAY SURFACE
3'' MIN. PEA ROCK
AROUND DRAIN TILE
5
1 2"7"
2'-0"
1'-0"
C1.73
1
CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTER14
C1.72
NOT TO SCALE
CONCRETE VALLEY
GUTTER
MIN. 6" STABILIZED AGGREGATE BASE
TO BE PLACED BY PAVING CONTRACTOR
C1.73
2
C1.73
3
3'-0"
10
"
10
"
1'
'
T
Y
P
I
C
A
L
3'-0"
CONCRETE SLAB13
C1.72
NOT TO SCALE
8" CONCRETE SLAB
6" STABILIZED AGGREGATE BASE TO BE
PLACED BY PAVING CONTRACTOR
CURB
THICKENED
SLABPREPARED
SUBGRADE
8" CONCRETE SLAB
6" STABILIZED AGGREGATE BASE
THICKENED
SLAB
PREPARED
SUBGRADE
EXPANSION JOINT
12" LONG - #5
REBAR DOWEL
SPACED 2'-6" TYP.
REQUIRED AT COLD
JOINTS ONLY
EQUAL
15"
4"
3"
2"
PLAN
SECTION
CONCRETE MAINTENANCE STRIP15
C1.72
NOT TO SCALE
C1.73
1
1
2" RADIUS
(TYPICAL)
FINISH GRADE OF MAINTENANCE STRIP SHALL BE ONE
INCH ABOVE TURFGRASS AND FLUSH WITH PAVEMENT
(2) #4 REBAR
1" DEPTH CONSTRUCTION JOINT
COMPACTED SUBGRADE
1'' DEPTH CONSTRUCTION JOINT AT EACH
POST AND AT MIDPOINT BETWEEN POSTS
POST
(2) #4 REBAR
TOPSOIL 1'' BELOW CONCRETE
1"
NOTE:
PROVIDE EXPANSION JOINT AND CAULK SEALANT AT ALL WALK, BUILDING, AND STOOP JOINTS.
WALK WIDTH AS
LABELED ON PLAN
12"
MI
N
.
4
"
DE
P
T
H
C1.73
1
C1.73
2
C1.72
8
CONCRETE WALK12
C1.72
NOT TO SCALE
ASPHALT PAVEMENT
CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER
WALK FLUSH WITH TOP OF CURB AND PROVIDE
TOOLED EDGE WITH EXPANSION JOINT
4" CONCRETE WALK
MIN. 4" SAND BASE OR STABILIZED
AGGREGATE BASE THICKENED TO BOTTOM
OF CURB WHERE APPLICABLE
TYPICAL AT ALL
GRASS AREAS
PREPARED SUBGRADE
PROVIDE 2% CROSS SLOPE (MAX.)
C1.73
3
C1.72
10
1
C1.72
NOT TO SCALE
2
C1.72
NOT TO SCALE
4
C1.72
NOT TO SCALE
5
C1.72
NOT TO SCALE
3
C1.72
NOT TO SCALE
5''
1'
-
4
"
4'
-
0
"
27"
4'-0"
16
"
O
.
C
.
NOTE:
BASES SHALL BE 8" INTEGRAL CAST, REINFORCED STANDARD PRECAST WITH 2" LEAN GROUT
7"
VA
R
I
A
B
L
E
16
"
M
A
X
.
CL FLOW
FLOW
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE6
C1.72
NOT TO SCALE
COVER SHALL BE STAMPED
"SANITARY SEWER"
METAL SEWER CASTING - REFER TO
PLAN FOR TYPE
MIN. 2 AND MAX. 5 ADJUSTING
RINGS. GROUT BETWEEN RINGS,
CASTING, AND ALONG OUTSIDE.
PRECAST CONCRETE ECCENTRIC CONE
STEPS - INSTALL ON
DOWNSTREAM SIDE
@ 16'' O.C.
RUBBER GASKET - TYP
AT ALL JOINTS
SLOPE AT 2 IN./FT. (TYP)
RUBBER BOOTRUBBER
BOOT
GROUT TO 1/2 PIPE
INTEGRAL BASE SECTION
SLOPE @ 2 IN./FT.
(TYP)
"RIM ELEVATION"
5"
MIN.
4'
-
0
"
27"
4'-0"
16
"
O
.
C
.
BASES SHALL BE 8" STANDARD
PRECAST WITH 2" LEAN GROUT, OR
POURED 8" SLAB REINFORCED WITH
6" x 6" 10/10 MESH
VA
R
I
A
B
L
E
16
"
M
A
X
.
CL SLOPE
FLOW
SANITARY SEWER DROP MANHOLE7
C1.72
NOT TO SCALE
COVER SHALL BE STAMPED
"SANITARY SEWER"
PRECAST CONCRETE
ECCENTRIC CONE
MIN. 2 AND MAX. 5 ADJUSTING
RINGS. GROUT BETWEEN RINGS,
CASTING, AND ALONG OUTSIDE.
PRECAST CONCRETE
ECCENTRIC CONE
STEPS - INSTALL ON
DOWNSTREAM SIDE
@ 16'' O.C.
RUBBER GASKET - TYP
AT ALL JOINTS
RUBBER BOOT
DUCTILE IRON PIPE TO
UNDISTURBED SOIL
CONCRETE INFILL
INSIDE HORSESHOES
CONCRETE HORSESHOES
GRANULAR FILL
CONCRETE BASE SHALL
EXTEND 6" BEYOND CONCRETE
HORSESHOES
GROUT TO 1/2 PIPE CONCRETE INFILL
INSIDE HORSESHOES
CONCRETE
HORSESHOES
RUBBER BOOT
SLOPE @ 2
IN./FT.
(TYP)
"RIM ELEVATION"
2
3'-8"
2
3'-8"
A
4'
-
0
"
MI
N
.
4'-0"
M
I
N
4'
-
0
"
M
I
N
4'-0" UNLESS
OTHERWISE NOTED
ON PLAN
5'-8"5'-8"
2'
-
0
"
4
3
6'
-
0
"
(6
"
C
U
R
B
4'
-
0
"
(4
"
C
U
R
B
)
C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
W
A
L
K
A
6'-3" (6" CURB)
4'-2" (4" CURB)
4'-0" UNLESS
OTHERWISE NOTED
ON PLAN
6'-3" (6" CURB)
4'-2" (4" CURB)
1
6'-0" (6" CURB)
4'-0" (4" CURB)4'-0"
7
8" - 1 7
16"
1 5"50%-60% OF BASE
DIAMETER
5 8"
M
I
N
.
2'
-
0
"
5
8" MIN.
15
16" (TYP.)
15
8" - 23
8"
158"
-
2
3 8"
15 16
"
(
T
Y
P
.
)
6'-3"
(6" CURB & 0.08 FT./FT. SLOPE)
4'-2"
(4" CURB & 0.08 FT./FT. SLOPE)
4'-0"
6'-3"
(6" CURB & 0.08 FT./FT. SLOPE)
4'-2"
(4" CURB & 0.08 FT./FT. SLOPE)
0.
0
6
PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP17
C1.72
NOT TO SCALE
NOTES:
1.1/2 INCH PREFORMED JOINT FILLER MATERIAL, AASHTO M 213.
2.PROVIDE A PATH OF TRAVEL 4'-0'' WIDE BEHIND THE PEDESTRIAN RAMP. A RELATIVELY FLAT 4' X
4' LANDING WILL ALLOW WHEELCHAIRS TO NAVIGATE AROUND THE PEDESTRIAN RAMP.
3.6'' TO 8'' IS THE REQUIRED OFFSET OF THE DETECTABLE WARNINGS/TRUNCATED DOME AREA
FROM THE FRONT FACE OF CURB, OR PLACE THE DETECTABLE WARNINGS AT THE BACK OF CURB.
4.ADA REQUIRED TRUNCATED DOME AREA SHALL BE 2'-0'' MIN. IN DIRECTION OF TRAVEL AND
SHALL EXTEND THE FULL WIDTH (4'-0'' TYP.) OF THE CURB RAMP. THIS 2'-0'' BY 4'-0'' WIDTH (TYP.)
TRUNCATED DOME AREA SHALL CONTRAST VISUALLY WITH THE ADJACENT WALKING SURFACE.
THE ENTIRE TRUNCATED DOME AREA SHALL BE A LIGHT COLOR (LIGHT GRAY, WHITE, OR YELLOW)
WHEN THE ADJACENT SIDEWALK IS A DARK COLOR. THE ENTIRE TRUNCATED DOME AREA SHALL
BE A DARK COLOR (RED, BLACK, DARK GRAY, OR BRIGHT YELLOW) WHEN THE ADJACENT
SIDEWALK IS A "WHITE" OR LIGHT GREY CEMENT COLOR.
SECTION VIEW
PLAN VIEW
DOME SPACING
DOME SECTION
ELEVATION VIEW
C1.72
12
DISTURBED MINIMUM
OUTER LIMITS OF
CONCRETE WALK
BACK OF CURB
FRONT FACE
OF CURB
ROUND ALL SLOPED
INTERSECTIONS0.08 FT./FT. SLOPE OF FLARED SIDE
CURB OR, CURB
AND GUTTER
0.083 FT./FT. OR FLATTER
0.02 FT./FT. MAX
DOME (TYP)
CONCRETE WALK
12"6"6"R1 2"
4"
7"
AGGREGATE BASE TO BE
PLACED BY PAVING
CONTRACTOR (4" MIN.)
12"
NOTES:
1.DIRECTION OF TRANSVERSE GUTTER SLOPE SHALL MATCH DIRECTION OF ADJACENT PAVEMENT
SLOPE.
2.CONSTRUCT WITH CURBING MACHINE.
3.AT CURB INLET CATCH BASINS, ADJUST CASTING TO BE 1'' BELOW GUTTER GRADE. SLOPE GUTTER
5' ON EACH SIDE OF CATCH BASIN. PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE TO CATCH BASINS.
1
2
D-412 CURB & GUTTER10
C1.72
NOT TO SCALE
SLOPE 3
4" PER FOOT TOWARDS
PAVEMENT ON HIGH SIDE OF LOT /
DRIVE (TIP OUT). SLOPE 3/4" PER
FOOT TOWARDS CURB FACE ON LOW
SIDE OF LOT / DRIVE (TIP BACK).
FACE OF CURB
NOTES:
1.DIRECTION OF TRANSVERSE GUTTER SLOPE SHALL MATCH DIRECTION OF ADJACENT PAVEMENT
SLOPE.
2.CONSTRUCT WITH CURBING MACHINE.
3.AT CURB INLET CATCH BASINS, ADJUST CASTING TO BE 1'' BELOW GUTTER GRADE. SLOPE GUTTER
5' EACH SIDE OF CATCH BASIN. PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE TO CATCH BASINS.
12"
6"
7
1 2"
13
1 2"
6"
18"
1
2 AGGREGATE BASE TO
BE PLACED BY PAVING
CONTRACTOR (4" MIN.)
B-618 CURB AND GUTTER8B
C1.72
NOT TO SCALE
FACE OF CURB
1:3 BATTER
3" RADIUS
1
2" RADIUS SLOPE 3/4" PER FOOT TOWARDS
PAVEMENT ON HIGH SIDE OF LOT /
DRIVE (TIP OUT). SLOPE 3/4" PER
FOOT TOWARDS CURB FACE ON LOW
SIDE OF LOT / DRIVE (TIP BACK)
1
2" RADIUS
NOT TO SCALE
SLO
P
E
T
O
W
A
R
D
S
CAS
T
I
N
G
A
T
2
%
5' R.
C1.72
12
CONCRETE SLAB AT CATCH BASIN12B
C1.73
NOT TO SCALE
EDGE OF CONCRETE
WALK, PROJECTED
CATCH BASIN CASTING
CONCRETE
CONSTRUCTION JOINT
Page 79 of 109
C1.73
DETAILS
NOT TO SCALE
DateRegistration Number
Check:
Drawn:
Date:
Comm:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by
me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
under the laws of the State of
H
G
F
E
D
C
B
A
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 109
C
MN
Revisions
Description Date Num
Scale:
North
3300 FERNBROOK LANE NORTH, SUITE 300
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
Phone: (763) 544-7129
Email: goldenvalley@bolton-menk.com
www.bolton-menk.com
R
XX/XX/XX
232104
XX/XX/2024
JDO
MINNESOTA
PUBLIC SCHOOLS
3455 153RD STREET WEST
APPLE VALLEY - EAGAN
NEW ELEMENTARY
ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068
SCHOOL #20
ISD #196: ROSEMOUNT -
DAVID A. REY
DAR
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
40180
3/
4
"
-
1
"
22"
8'-0"
48"
10'-5"
7'
4'
FOOTING DETAIL
BASKETBALL GOAL10
C1.73
NOT TO SCALE
18'' DIAM. x 60''
DEPTH CONCRETE
FOOTING
GROUND ANCHORSLOPE AWAY FROM POLE
FINISH GRADE
UPPER YOKE LOWER YOKE
HEIGHT
ADJUSTMENT
HANDLE
MAST
GROUND ANCHOR
BACKBOARD AND RIM,
WITH RIM AT 10' ABOVE
FINISH GRADE
20'-0" CENTER SECTION
10'-0"
10
'
-
0
"
20'-
0
"
W
I
T
H
O
V
E
R
H
A
N
G
10'-0"
10
'
-
0
"
20'-0"
1
0
'
-
0
"
1
0
'
-
0
"
SECTION
5'
-
0
"
4'
-
6
"
18
'
-
0
"
12
'
-
0
"
2'
-
0
"
2'
-
0
"
2'
-
0
"
ELEVATION
20' WINGS
PLAN
12'' WHERE
A
P
P
L
I
C
A
B
L
E
20
'
-
0
"
HOODED BACKSTOP6
C1.73
NOT TO SCALE
C1.73
15
C1.72
15
4" NOM. DIAM.
POSTS (TYP)
MAINTENANCE STRIP
4" NOM. DIAM. POSTS (TYP)
15
8" NOM. DIAM. RAILS
TACK WELD HOOD MOUNTING BRACKETS
TO POSTS FOR SECURE ATTACHMENTS
MAINTENANCE STRIPFABRIC ON LOWER 6' OF BACKSTOP
(CENTER SECTION AND WINGS) SHALL
BE #6 GAUGE FABRIC. ALL OTHER
FABRIC SHALL BE #9 GAUGE
16" X 60" FOOTINGS
4'
-
0
"
3'
-
0
"
1'
-
0
"
1'-6"
C1.72
12
BOLLARD8
C1.73
NOT TO SCALE
5" PIPE CAP
2" WIDE BANDS OF REFLECTORIZED TAPE
10° SLOPE
EXPANSION JOINT (TYP.)
CONCRETE FOOTING
5'' SCH. 40 STEEL PIPE BOLLARD WITH ONE COAT
OF PRIMER AND TWO COATS OF PAINT. COLOR
SHALL BE SHERWIN WILLIAMS "SAFETY YELLOW"
OR EQUAL. VERIFY COLOR WITH ARCHITECT
FILL BOLLARD WITH CONCRETE
2"
66
"
T
O
B
O
T
T
O
M
O
F
S
I
G
N
(M
E
A
S
U
R
E
D
F
R
O
M
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
S
U
R
F
A
C
E
)
12"
18
"
SIGN: WHITE LEGEND AND
BORDER ON BLUE
BACKGROUND FULLY
REFLECTORIZED
NOTE:
SIGN SHALL BE PLACED NOT MORE THAN 96" FROM FACE OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT AT THE ACCESSIBLE STALL.
60
"
T
O
B
O
T
T
O
M
O
F
"V
A
N
-
A
C
C
E
S
S
I
B
L
E
"
SI
G
N
W
H
E
N
P
R
E
S
E
N
T
ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN AND
POST WITH BREAKAWAY BASE
4
C1.73
NOT TO SCALE
POST TOP
METAL SIGN ACCORDING
TO MN STATE STATUTE
169.346 (MNMUTCD R7-8m)
2" X 2" 12 GAUGE SQUARE
POST PER Mn/DOT 3402
PROVIDE "VAN-ACCESSIBLE"
LABELING (MNMUTCD R7-8bP)
- PROVIDE AT ONE STALL
BREAKAWAY SIGN BASE BOLTED TO
CONCRETE SURFACE
2"
7'
-
0
"
-
V
E
R
I
F
Y
WI
T
H
L
O
C
A
L
C
O
D
E
3'
-
0
'
'
TRAFFIC SIGN AND POST
IN GRASS
5
C1.73
NOT TO SCALE
POST TOP
REFER TO PLAN
FOR SPECIFIC SIGN
METAL SIGN
31
2" FLANGED CHANNEL SIGN
POST PER Mn/DOT 3401
6'-0''
6'-0"
12'-0"
4'
-
0
"
15
'
-
0
"
19
'
-
0
"
R6'-
0
"
C1.73
10
BASKETBALL COURT STRIPING9
C1.73
NOT TO SCALE
2" WIDE WHITE PAINT
STRIPE (TYPICAL)
16" LONG DASHED LINES
WITH 14" GAP BETWEEN
DASHES
END LINE OF COURT
6'-0"6'-0"
12'-0"
3'
-
0
"
2'
-
0
"
8'-0"
FOUR-SQUARE STRIPING11
C1.73
NOT TO SCALE
2" WIDE PAINT
STRIPE (TYP.)
10
98
7
65
4
32
1
14
'
-
0
"
2'-0"
2'
-
0
"
1'-0"
HOP SCOTCH STRIPING12
C1.73
NOT TO SCALE
2" WIDE WHITE
PAINT STRIPE (TYP.)
12'' HIGH PAINTED
NUMBERS TYP
9"
1
C1.73
LIGHT DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT
NOT TO SCALE
3" ASPHALT WEAR COURSE
6" STABILIZED AGGREGATE BASE
12" MIN. SUBGRADE PREPARATION
13
"
2
C1.73
MEDIUM DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT
NOT TO SCALE
1.5" ASPHALT WEAR COURSE
TACK COAT
1.5" ASPHALT BINDER COURSE
10" STABILIZED AGGREGATE BASE
12" MIN. SUBGRADE PREPARATION
16
"
3
C1.73
HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT
NOT TO SCALE
2" ASPHALT WEAR COURSE
TACK COAT
2" ASPHALT BINDER COURSE
12" STABILIZED AGGREGATE BASE
12" MIN. SUBGRADE PREPARATION
6'-0''
3"
6''
6''
6'
'
1'
-
6
"
VA
R
I
E
S
SECTION B-B
VA
R
I
E
S
5'-0"
3"
6''
6''
6'
'
1'
-
6
"
SECTION A-A
6"
6"
C1.72
16
C1.72
16
SOFT PLAY AREA ACCESSIBLE RAMP13
C1.73
NOT TO SCALE
12'' DEPTH WOOD
FIBER SURFACING
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
PEA ROCK
SAND BASE
5" CONCRETE
FINISH GRADE AT SOFT PLAY SURFACE
1
2" RADIUS TYP.
CONCRETE RAMP SLOPED @ 1:20 MAX
CONCRETE CURB
12'' DEPTH WOOD FIBER SURFACING
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
PEA ROCK
SAND BASE
5" CONCRETE
FINISH GRADE AT PLAY SURFACE
1
2" RADIUS TYP.
CONCRETE RAMP SLOPED @ 1:20 MAX
CONCRETE CURB
EXPANSION JOINTS
EXPANSION JOINTS
C1.72
12
C1.72
12
6'
'
6''
6''
6'
'
INSTALL AT CORNERS OF ALL FIELDS AND
AT OUTFIELD FOUL LINES OF SOFTBALL FIELDS
PINS SHALL BE INSTALLED BY A REGISTERED
LAND SURVEYOR
6"
1'
-
6
"
FIELD MARKING PINS7
C1.73
NOT TO SCALE
FINISH GRADE OF FIELD
3
4" DIAM. REBAR
2"
66
"
T
O
B
O
T
T
O
M
O
F
S
I
G
N
(M
E
A
S
U
R
E
D
F
R
O
M
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
S
U
R
F
A
C
E
)
3'
-
0
'
'
12"
18
"
SIGN: WHITE LEGEND AND
BORDER ON BLUE
BACKGROUND FULLY
REFLECTORIZED
NOTE:
SIGN SHALL BE PLACED NOT MORE THAN 96" FROM FACE OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT AT THE ACCESSIBLE STALL.
60
"
T
O
B
O
T
T
O
M
O
F
"
V
A
N
-
A
C
C
E
S
S
I
B
L
E
"
SI
G
N
W
H
E
N
P
R
E
S
E
N
T
ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN
AND POST IN GRASS
4B
C1.73
NOT TO SCALE
POST TOP
METAL SIGN ACCORDING TO
MN STATE STATUTE 169.346
(MNMUTCD R7-8m)
31
2" FLANGED CHANNEL
SIGN POST PER Mn/DOT 3401
PROVIDE "VAN-ACCESSIBLE"
LABELING (MNMUTCD R7-8bP)
- PROVIDE AT ONE STALL
5.00'
14
C1.73
AGLIME AND DRAIN TILE
NOT TO SCALE
TOPSOIL ON PLAYING FIELD
5" DEPTH AGLIME
EXTEND AGLIME DOWN TO DRAIN TILE WHERE
DEPTH TO TOP OF PIPE IS GREATER THAN 5"
6" DRAIN TILE - REFER TO PLAN FOR
LOCATION AND INVERT ELEVATIONS
BURRITO WRAP PEA ROCK IN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
4" MINIMUM PEA ROCK AROUND DRAIN TILE
5" MIN. TO TOP
OF DRAIN TILE
APPLY SOIL STERILANT TO SUBGRADE PRIOR TO AGLIME PLACEMENT
15
C1.73
NOT TO SCALE
Page 80 of 109
C1.74
DETAILS
DateRegistration Number
Check:
Drawn:
Date:
Comm:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by
me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
under the laws of the State of
H
G
F
E
D
C
B
A
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 109
C
MN
Revisions
Description Date Num
Scale:
North
3300 FERNBROOK LANE NORTH, SUITE 300
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
Phone: (763) 544-7129
Email: goldenvalley@bolton-menk.com
www.bolton-menk.com
R
XX/XX/XX
232104
XX/XX/2024
JDO
MINNESOTA
PUBLIC SCHOOLS
3455 153RD STREET WEST
APPLE VALLEY - EAGAN
NEW ELEMENTARY
ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068
SCHOOL #20
ISD #196: ROSEMOUNT -
DAVID A. REY
DAR
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
40180
1'-0"
MIN
1'-0"
MIN
CONIFEROUS TREE1
C1.74
NOT TO SCALE
SET TREE WITH ROOT COLLAR AT
FINISH GRADE. ADJUST TREE AS
REQUIRED SO THAT ROOT COLLAR
STANDS LEVEL TO, OR SLIGHTLY
ABOVE, FINISH GRADE.
WOOD MULCH, MIN. 4'' DEPTH
PLANTING SOIL
TOPSOIL SOIL SAUCER
CUT ROPES AT TOP OF ROOT
BALL. REMOVE TOP 1/3 OF
BURLAP. REMOVE ALL
NON-BIODEGRADABLE MATERIAL.
6'' DEPTH PLANTING SOIL - FORM
PEDESTAL TO PREVENT SETTLING
NOTE: WATER TREE THOROUGHLY AT THE TIME
OF PLANTING. PRUNE TREE TO REMOVE DEAD,
DAMAGED, BROKEN, AND WEAKENED BRANCHES.
1'-0"
MIN
1'-0"
MIN
DECIDUOUS TREE2
C1.74
NOT TO SCALE
NOTE: WATER TREE THOROUGHLY AT THE TIME OF
PLANTING. PRUNE TREE TO REMOVE DEAD,
DAMAGED, BROKEN, AND WEAKENED BRANCHES.
SET TREE WITH ROOT COLLAR AT
FINISH GRADE. ADJUST TREE AS
REQUIRED SO THAT ROOT COLLAR
STANDS LEVEL TO, OR SLIGHTLY
ABOVE, FINISHED GRADE
WOOD MULCH, MIN. 4'' DEPTH
PLANTING SOIL
TOPSOIL SOIL SAUCER
CUT ROPES AT TOP OF ROOT
BALL. REMOVE TOP 1/3 OF
BURLAP. REMOVE ALL
NON-BIODEGRADABLE MATERIAL.
PREPARED SUBSOIL TO FORM
PEDESTAL TO PREVENT SETTLING
9"
(MIN.)
9"
(MIN.)
SHRUB3
C1.74
NOT TO SCALE
NOTE: WATER SHRUBS THOROUGHLY AT TIME OF
PLANTING. PRUNE SHRUBS TO REMOVE DEAD,
DAMAGED, AND BROKEN BRANCHES.
WOOD MULCH, MIN. 4'' DEPTH
EDGING
ROOT BALL OR POT
PLANTING SOIL
UNDISTURBED SOIL OR
COMPACTED SUBGRADE
SET SHRUB AT FINISH GRADE. ADJUST
SHRUB AS REQUIRED SO THAT ROOT
COLLAR STANDS LEVEL TO, OR
SLIGHTLY ABOVE, FINISH GRADE.
4"
M
I
N
.
WOOD MULCH BED4
C1.74
NOT TO SCALE
FINISH GRADE
6'' MIN TOPSOIL EDGING
FINISH GRADE
WOOD MULCH
SUBGRADE
PLAN
SECTION
PERENNIALS AND CONTAINER
GROWN PLANT STOCK
5
C1.74
NOT TO SCALE
EDGING
PLANT ALL PERENNIALS AND
CONTAINER GROWN PLANT STOCK
AT EQUAL TRIANGULAR SPACING
4" DEPTH WOOD MULCH
PLANTING SOIL
1'-0"1'-0"1'-0"1'-0"
BV
IC
V MV
QC
V
GR
JUMBO
RECTANGULAR
VALVE BOX
(22" X 16" X 12")
STANDARD
RECTANGULAR
VALVE BOX
(18" X 12" X 12")
1'- 0"
Typ.
# 1 # 2 # 2 # 3 # 4
EXAMPLE
POTABLE WATER SYSTEM ON CONTROLLER 'A', REMOTE CONTROL VALVE STATION # 3.
NOTES:
1. VALVE BOX # 1 THRU # 3 SHALL HAVE STAINLESS STEEL LOCKING HARDWARE.
2. VALVE BOXES SHALL BE LABELED BY HOT IRON BRANDING OR ALUMINUM ASPHALTIC BASE WATER PROOF
PAINT.
3. LOCATE VALVE ASSEMBLIES IN PLANTING AREA.
4. VALVE LOCATIONS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
5. VALVE BOXES SHALL BE CENTERED ABOVE VALVE ASSEMBLIES TO FACILITATE ACCESS AND MAINTENANCE.
6. VALVE BOXES SHALL BE FLUSH WITH FINISHED GRADE.
7. VALVE BOXES SHALL BE SET PARALLEL TO EACH OTHER AND PERPENDICULAR TO THE EDGE OF PAVEMENT.
8. SEE OTHER IRRIGATION DETAILS FOR FURTHER INFORMATION.
STANDARD
RECTANGULAR
VALVE BOX
(18" X 12" X 12")
CIRCULAR
VALVE BOX
(10" D)
CIRCULAR
VALVE BOX
(6" D)
PAVEMENT, WALL, OR BUILDING.
SERVICE BOX REQUIREMENTS6
C1.74
NOT TO SCALE
Wa
t
e
r
t
y
p
e
Co
n
t
r
o
l
l
e
r
De
s
i
g
n
a
t
i
o
n
Bo
x
s
i
z
e
Li
d
C
o
l
o
r
Identification Guide
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
MV
FS
HM
BV
BV
GV
ARV
QCV
RCV
MS
GR
SB
FC
# 2
# 2
# 2
# 2
# 1
# 2
# 2
# 3
# 2
# 2
# 4
# 3
# 3
Green
Green
Green
Green
Green
Green
Green
Green
Green
Green
Green
Green
Green
Master valve
Flow sensor
Hydrometer
Ball valve 3" or less
Ball valve 4" or more
Gate valve
Air release valve
Quick coupler valve
Remote control valve
Moisture sensor
Grounding rod
Splice box
Future connection
BRASS ISOLATION VALVE7
C1.74
NOT TO SCALE
18" BELOW
GRADE
FOUR COMMON BRICK
SUPPORTS.
10" DIA. PVC PIPE EXTENSION,
LENGTH AS REQUIRED.
PVC MAIN LINE.
SLIP/THREAD COUPLING.
6" SCHEDULE 80
THREADED NIPPLE.
SET BOX FLUSH TO GRADE AT LAWN.
SET BOX 2" ABOVE GRADE AT SHRUBS.
ISOLATION VALVE AS SPECIFIED.
FINISH GRADE.
10" DIAMETER ROUND SERVICE
BOX, SEE SPECIFICATIONS.
FLOW SENSOR11
C1.74
NOT TO SCALE
24" MINIMUM
5X
DIAMETER
OF
PIPE
10X
DIAMETER
OF
PIPE
FLOW
FLOW METER AS SPECIFIED
(2 WIRES TO CONTROLLER)
2 X 12 PVC SCH 80 PIPING.
4" PVC MAIN LINE WITH
2" REDUCING BUSHING.
FINISHED GRADE
2 X 6 X 16 CONCRETE WALL CAPS,
TWO PER BOX, ONE EACH SIDE.
WATER PROOF
CONNECTORS.
2 X 24 PVC SCH
80 TOE PIPING.
2" GALVANIZED FLANGE
X 1 PT ADAPTER.
2"X4" FLANGED
REDUCER.
4" FLANGED ELL.
18"X 18"X18" CONCRETE
SUPPORT BLOCK.
PVC SCH 80
2"X8" NIPPLE.
MASTER VALVE
AS SPECIFIED.
SPECIFIED RECTANGULAR
SERVICE BOXES WITH
EXTENTIONS AS NEEDED.
4" FLANGED
ELBOW P.O.C.
TO EXISTING
RP BACKFLOW
IRRIGATION TRENCHING10
C1.74
NOT TO SCALE
12
"
I
N
PL
A
N
T
I
N
G
AR
E
A
24"
MIN.
1'
-
6
"
I
N
P
L
A
N
T
I
N
G
A
R
E
A
6"
NOTES:
1. SEE IRRIGATION LEGEND FOR MAINLINE AND LATERAL LINE PIPE SIZES AND TYPE.
2. DIRECT BURIAL CONTROL WIRES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN SCHEDULE 40 PVC ELECTRICAL CONDUIT
IF REQUIRED.
3. 2-WIRE IRRIGATION WIRE SHALL BE INSTALLED IN SCHEDULE 40 PVC ELECTRICAL CONDUIT.
4.DETECTABLE LOCATOR TAPE SHALL BE LOCATED SIX INCHES (6") ABOVE THE ENTIRE MAINLINE RUN.
PAVEMENT
NON-PRESSURIZED LINE
(LATERAL LINE).
DETECTABLE LOCATOR TAPE.
PRESSURIZED LINE (MAIN LINE).
FINISHED GRADE
DIRECT BURIAL LOW VOLTAGE
CONTROL WIRES.
NOTE: USE TEFLON TAPE ON ALL
THREADED FITTINGS EXCEPT AT
SPRINKLER HEAD.
12
"
M
I
N
I
M
U
M
B
E
L
O
W
G
R
A
D
E
4" TO
CURB OR
WALK
SHRUB SPRAY HIGHPOP ASSEMBLY8
C1.74
NOT TO SCALE
DO NOT USE SIDE INLET
HIGH POP HEAD
TRIPLE SWING ASSEMBLY: (1) 8"
SCH 80 THREADDED NIPPLE (3)
MARLEX STREET ELLS INLET SIZE
DIAMETERS
LATERAL LINE
6" ROTARY SPRINKLER13
C1.74
NOT TO SCALE
FINISHED GRADE
MODEL PROS-06-PRS30-CV
SWING JOINT
LATERAL TEE OR ELBOW
LATERAL PIPE
6" POP-UP SPRAY SPRINKLER14
C1.74
NOT TO SCALE
FINISHED GRADE
POP-UP SPRAY SPRINKLER
PVC SCH 80 NIPPLE
PVC SCH 40 ELL
PVC SCH 40 STREET ELL
PVC SCH 40 STREET ELL
PVC SCH 40 TEE OR ELL
NOTES:
A.ALL WIRE SPLICING SHALL BE MADE WITH APPROVED
CONNECTIONS.
B.MAKE ALL WIRE SPLICES IN VALVE BOXES.
C.LEAVE A MINIMUM OF 24" EXTRA WIRE AT ALL SPLICE
POINTS.
D.MAXIMUM DISTANCE FROM DECODER TO VALVE = 150 FT.
E.MAXIMUM WIRE LENGTH = 10,200 FT.
F.WIRE LENGTHS INCLUDE MASTER VALVE AND #16
2 WIRE
TWO-WIRE PATHS EXAMPLE15
C1.74
NOT TO SCALE
WIRE PATH #2
MASTER VALVE
WIRE PATH #1
120 VAC POWER
RAIN SENSOR
CONTROLLER SHOWN
AS REFERENCE ONLY
1
2
3
4
5
6
10
11
13
5
7
3
12
6
3
1
13 4 5 77
2
12
6 9
1
8
13
4
9
7
8
10
11
12
13
2
HUNTER HC FLOW METER HC-150 WITHUNION CONNECTIONS
SCH 80 PVC FEMALE ADAPTER (S X T)
RECTANGULAR VALVE BOX PERSPECIFICATIONS
SCH 80 PVC 45 DEGREE ELBOW (S X S) TO
LOWER MAIN LINE TO PROPER DEPTH (SIZEFOR LARGER MAIN LINE AS NEEDED)
SCH 80 PVC 45 DEGREE ELBOW (S X S) TOLOWER MAIN LINE TO PROPER DEPTH
2" DIA. (50 mm) MAIN LINE AT INLET &OUTLET
DETAIL LEGEND:
TOP VIEW
SIDE VIEW
FLOW
NOTE: INLET PIPE ENTERING METER: LENGTH MUST BE A MIN. OF 10 X PIPE DIA.
OUTLET PIPE LEAVING METER: LENGTH MUST BE MIN. OF 5 X PIPE DIA.
INLET AND OUTLET PIPE MUST BE STRAIGHT PIPE WITH NO FITTINGS OR TURNS UNTIL AFTER
THESE SPECIFIED LENGTHS. PIPE AND FITTINGS MAY BE SCH 80 PVC SOLVENT WELD,
THREADED SCH 80 PVC OR BRASS, AS REQUIRED FOR PROJECT.
10 x PIPE DIA.5 x PIPE DIA.
MAIN LINE TO SYSTEM (SEE LEGEND AND PLANSFOR TYPE AND SIZE)
TWO WIRES TO FLOW SENSOR TERMINALS AT
CONTROLLER. MIN. 18 AWG-UF (2.08 mm2)
SHIELDED WIRE WITH DIFFERENT COLOR FROM
CONTROL/COMMON WIRE.
WEATHERPROOF WIRE CONNECTOR
FINISH GRADE
SPECIFIED SOIL COVER (SEE LEGEND)
COMMON BRICK
GRAVEL BASE, 6" (15 cm) DEEP
FLOW METER16
C1.74
NOT TO SCALE
TYPICAL DRIPLINE REQUIREMENTS12
C1.74
NOT TO SCALE
EMITTER
FLOW
0.6 GPH
0.9 GPH
LATERAL FLOW PER 100 FT (GPM)
EMITTER FLOW RATE
12
18
24
GRID PRECIPITATION RATES (IN/HR)
MAX GPM PSI LOSS
SCHEDULE 40 PVC HEADER SIZE
1/2"
3/4"
1"
1-1/2"
2"
POLY PIPE HEADER SIZE
1/2"
3/4"
1"
1-1/2"
2"
MAXIMUM FLOW PER ZONE
EMITTER FLOW RATE GPH
PSI
10
20
30
40
50
60
MAXIMUM LATERAL LENGTH (FEET)
DOGBONE SHAPED
CORNER SHAPED CURVED POLYGON HOURGLASS SHAPED
POLYGON SHAPED"C" SHAPED
ODD SHAPED
F
A
F
A
A
F
F
A
A
F
F
AF
F
A
F
A
A
CENTER FEED EXAMPLE
F
A
END FEED EXAMPLE
F
0.6 0.9
125 96
249 191
307 236
350 268
125 96
125 96
12"
SPACING
18"
SPACING
24"
SPACING
0.6 0.9 0.6 0.9
218 171
442 340
550 422
627 171
218 171
218 171
175 135
350 171
434 333
495 380
175 135
175 135
1.0 GPM
1.5 GPM
0.67 GPM
1.0 GPM
0.50 GPM
0.75 GPM
12"
SPACING
18"
SPACING
24"
SPACING
EMITTER
SPACING
LATERAL
SPACING 0.6 0.9
0.96
0.69
0.28
1.44
1.03
0.41
12
18
24
4.7 GPM
8.3 GPM
13.5 GPM
33.9 GPM
52.4 GPM
7.7 PSI
5.6 PSI
4.2 PSI
2.9 PSI
1.9 PSI
4.7 GPM
8.3 GPM
13.5 GPM
31.8 GPM
52.4 GPM
8.8 PSI
6.3 PSI
4.8 PSI
2.9 PSI
2.2 PSI
SLOPED CONDITION NOTE:
1.DRIPLINE LATERALS SHOULD FOLLOW THE CONTOURS OF THE SLOPE WHENEVER
POSSIBLE.
2.INSTALL AIR RELIEF VALVE AT THE HIGHEST POINT.
3.NORMAL SPACING WITHIN THE TOP 2/3 OF SLOPE.
4.INSTALL DRIPLINE AT 25% GREATER SPACING AT THE BOTTOM 1/3 OF THE SLOPE.
5.WHEN ELEVATION CHANGE IS 10 FT OR MORE, ZONE THE BOTTOM ON A SEPARATE
VALVE.
MA
X
I
M
U
M
L
E
N
G
T
H
O
F
S
I
N
G
L
E
LA
T
E
R
A
L
,
S
E
E
C
H
A
R
T
MA
X
I
M
U
M
L
E
N
G
T
H
O
F
S
I
N
G
L
E
LA
T
E
R
A
L
,
S
E
E
C
H
A
R
T
WATER SOURCE DRIP VALVE
OR LATERAL FROM VALVE
LANDSCAPE DRIPLINE TUBING
PVC MANIFOLD LINE WITH PVC TEE
FLUSH VALVE
AIR RELIEF VALVE: INSTALL AT
HIGH POINT OF SYSTEM
PVC SCH 40 TEE OR ELL
PVC MANIFOLD LINE
EASY FIT COMPRESSION
ADAPTER
EAST FIT COMPRESSION
COUPLING
LANDSCAPE DRIPLINE
TUBING
FLUSH VALVE OR CAP
AT LOW END AS NOTED
TYPICAL DRIP LINE
WITH EMITTER SPACING
AS NOTED. TIE DOWN
STAKE AT ALL TEES, ELLS,
AND AT 4' O.C. AT CLAY,
3' O.C. AT LOAM, OR 2'
O.C. AT SAND
AIR RELIEF VALVE AT HIGH
POINT AS INDICATED
DRIPLINE SPACING AS
NOTED. EMITTERS OFFSET
FOR TRIANGULAR SPACING
TYPICAL OFFSET 2"
FROM HARDSCAPE.
4" FROM PLANTED
AREA.
TYPICAL OFFSET 2" FROM HARDSCAPE.
4" FROM PLANTED AREA.
DRIP VALVE/FILTER/
REGULATOR.
3
4" PVC LATERAL PIPE
POLYETHYLENE OR PVC
HEADER MANIFOLD, SIZE
AS PER "MAXIMUM FLOW
PER ZONE" CHART
PVC MAINLINE
TYPICAL
COMPRESSION
FITTING
TYPICAL FPT ADAPTER AND
COMPRESSION COUPLER
DRIP FLUSH VALVE IN BOX17
C1.74
NOT TO SCALE
2"
4" THICK LAYER OF WASHED
GRAVEL. THE BOX REST UPON
THE ROCK BED. DO NOT EXTEND
GRAVEL INTO BOX.
DRIPLINE OR 1
2"
DRIP TUBING.
3
4" PVC BALL VALVE
WITH SHORT NIPPLE
1
2" DRIP TUBING TO 3/4" FPT ADAPTER.
COIL 24" TO 30" OF DRIP TUBING
IN THE BOX.
10" DIAMETER VALVE BOX.
SET VALVE BOX 2" ABOVE FINISHED
GRADE OF SHRUB AREA.
DRIP AIR RELIEF VALVE IN BOX18
C1.74
NOT TO SCALE
1 2"
4" THICK LAYER OF WASHED
GRAVEL. THE BOX REST UPON
THE ROCK BED. DO NOT EXTEND
GRAVEL INTO BOX.
DRIP TUBING COUPLING.
3
4" FPT X 1" DRIP
TUBING ADAPTER.
AIR VALVE AS SPECIFIED.
1" FPTXMPT ELL.
DRIPLINE OR 1/2" DRIP TUBING.
FINISH GRADE
6" DRIP BOX
12
"
B
E
L
O
W
G
R
A
D
E
.
1" DRIP VALVE WITH BASKET FILTER9
C1.74
NOT TO SCALE
3"
M
I
N
.
20"X14" JUMBO PLASTIC
VALVE BOX.
PVC TRUE UNION BALL VALVE.
2" ABOVE GRADE
AT SHRUBS.
SET BOX FLUSH AT
TURF.
CONTROLLER WIRE WITH 30 INCH LINEAR
LENGTH OF COIL, WITH PLASTIC I.D. TAG
AND WATERPROOF CONNECTORS.
RCV AS SPECIFIED.
BASKET FILTER AS SPECIFIED.
PRESSURE REGULATOR AS SPECIFIED.
PVC UNION W/ SHORT NIPPLES.
SCH.80 RISER.
SXT TEE W/ 2" NIPPLE AT
MAINLINE.
1
2" WIRE CLOTH GOPHER
SCREEN, WRAP UP SIDES.
TWO 6X2X16 CONCRETE BLOCK CAPS, ONE
ON EACH SIDE OF THE BOX.
45° DOWN AS REQ. TO
LATERAL PIPE DEPTH.
OUTLET PIPE SAME SIZE AS VALVE, 24"
MIN. LENGTH TO FIRST FITTING.
NOT TO SCALE
19
C1.74
NOT TO SCALE
Page 81 of 109
IS
D
#
1
9
6
N
E
W
E
S
S
I
T
E
L
I
G
H
I
T
N
G
Designer
Date
12/26/2023
Scale
Not to Scale
Drawing No.
Summary
1 of 1
Schedule
Symbol Label Image QTY Manufacturer Catalog Description
Number
Lamps
Lamp
Output LLF Input
Power Polar Plot
AA2
19 Lithonia Lighting DSX2 LED P1 40K 80CRI
T1S HS EGS-F
D-Series Size 2 Area Luminaire P1
Performance Package 4000K CCT 80 CRI
Type 1 Short Houseside Shield Forward
External Glare Shield
1 13515 0.9 134.5
AA4
14 Lithonia Lighting DSX2 LED P4 40K 80CRI
T4M EGS
D-Series Size 2 Area Luminaire P4
Performance Package 4000K CCT 80 CRI
Type 4 Medium External Glare Shield
1 27094 0.9 272.6516
BB2
13 Lithonia Lighting DSX0 LED P1 40K 70CRI
T1S EGS-F
D-Series Size 0 Area Luminaire P1
Performance Package 4000K CCT 70 CRI
Type 1 Short Forward External Glare Shield
1 3818 0.9 33.21
Statistics
Description Symbol Avg Max Min Max/Min Avg/Min
Calc Zone #7 1.9 fc 8.9 fc 0.0 fc N/A N/A
Calc Zone #8 1.0 fc 7.1 fc 0.0 fc N/A N/A
Calc Zone #10 0.7 fc 6.4 fc 0.0 fc N/A N/A
Calc Zone #6 1.4 fc 4.3 fc 0.1 fc 43.0:1 14.0:1
0.2
0.5
1.3
0.6
1.2
1.9
2.5
0.6
0.3
0.3
1.1
2.0
3.3
3.6
2.0
1.0
0.3
0.5
1.6
2.1
2.6
2.6
1.9
1.1
0.3
1.0
2.2
2.0
1.8
1.8
1.9
1.4
0.4
3.5
3.2
2.1
1.4
1.7
2.2
2.1
0.5
0.6
2.8
3.0
1.8
1.3
1.7
3.1
3.8
0.9
0.3
1.6
1.9
1.6
1.3
1.8
2.8
3.1
0.7
1.0
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.7
1.8
1.1
0.3
0.2
1.2
1.6
1.6
1.7
1.6
1.3
0.3
0.2
0.6
2.1
2.0
1.6
1.6
1.8
1.6
0.2
0.3
2.5
3.9
2.5
1.4
1.5
2.3
2.4
0.6
0.3
0.9
2.7
2.1
1.3
1.5
2.9
4.1
1.8
0.5
1.5
1.4
1.2
1.4
2.1
2.2
0.6
0.4
1.0
1.3
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.0
0.2
0.9
1.5
2.0
1.2
0.8
0.3
0.8
1.6
2.6
1.5
0.2
0.6
1.2
2.5
3.2
1.4
0.2
0.7
1.4
1.8
1.3
0.4
0.7
1.0
0.7
0.4
0.5
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1
4.3
0.3
0.5
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.2
1.0
2.1
5.1
2.1
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.3
1.2
3.4
1.1
1.5
4.0
2.0
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.5
1.6
7.6
4.2
2.0
1.4
1.2
2.0
0.9
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.8
1.5
2.6
3.5
3.9
2.6
2.0
2.0
3.0
2.3
0.5
0.2
0.1
0.3
1.1
4.0
2.4
2.3
2.4
2.6
1.9
2.0
2.6
4.4
1.5
0.3
0.1
0.3
1.4
7.5
5.4
2.8
2.2
1.9
1.6
1.3
1.6
2.6
3.8
3.8
2.8
0.8
0.1
0.1
0.6
1.6
3.1
4.4
3.1
2.0
1.5
1.1
1.0
1.2
1.7
2.5
2.6
2.0
0.8
0.2
0.1
0.3
1.3
2.6
3.4
2.5
1.6
1.2
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.5
2.3
2.9
2.2
1.0
0.4
0.3
1.5
3.2
3.5
3.1
1.7
1.2
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.9
3.3
5.0
3.2
1.5
0.8
0.4
1.0
6.0
5.5
3.5
2.1
1.4
1.3
1.6
1.9
2.1
3.1
5.4
4.1
1.9
1.0
0.5
1.7
6.5
2.6
1.9
1.7
1.9
2.4
2.1
1.8
2.3
2.9
2.6
1.5
0.8
0.6
2.0
1.5
1.5
1.8
3.1
4.5
3.0
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.4
0.8
0.5
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.7
3.0
5.3
3.7
2.0
1.6
1.3
0.9
0.5
0.3
0.5
0.7
1.3
2.2
3.2
2.7
1.6
1.1
0.9
0.6
0.4
2.4
4.8
5.1
2.7
1.5
0.9
0.6
0.5
1.5
1.1
0.9
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.0
0.0
8.9
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.6
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.5
2.9
1.6
0.3
0.1
3.0
3.0
0.4
0.1
0.1
0.7
2.1
0.5
0.3
0.5
1.3
0.9
0.6
0.2
1.9
6.9
1.4
0.4
0.3
1.1
2.7
0.7
0.2
0.3
0.9
1.5
0.9
0.5
0.1
0.2
1.4
6.6
0.9
0.2
0.4
3.6
0.9
0.2
0.1
0.8
1.0
0.2
0.4
1.3
0.4
0.1
1.0
2.4
0.2
0.2
2.4
2.1
0.1
0.1
1.5
1.7
0.1
0.7
1.1
0.2
0.4
1.4
0.5
0.1
2.2
1.8
0.2
0.1
0.7
7.0
0.8
0.1
0.2
1.4
1.7
0.9
0.3
0.1
0.7
1.8
2.1
0.5
0.1
0.1
0.3
4.4
4.5
1.0
0.4
0.1
0.4
0.8
1.2
1.2
0.8
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.9
4.7
1.7
0.5
0.2
0.1
0.7
3.8
2.2
0.9
0.4
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.5
1.0
1.9
0.6
0.2
0.2
2.0
6.9
1.4
0.5
0.1
0.3
0.7
1.9
1.3
0.7
0.1
0.1
0.9
2.8
0.6
0.1
0.2
3.8
3.2
0.4
0.5
2.5
1.4
0.1
0.7
0.8
0.4
2.7
0.5
0.2
4.6
1.7
0.2
0.1
0.6
4.2
0.7
0.1
0.7
1.0
0.4
0.1
1.0
1.5
0.1
0.1
0.4
0.7
0.1
0.3
2.6
2.8
0.5
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
1.3
1.1
1.8
1.0
0.6
0.3
0.5
1.0
1.2
1.6
1.6
1.9
0.1
0.3
1.2
6.7
5.4
1.5
0.8
1.9
4.9
2.5
0.9
0.6
0.7
0.1
0.1
0.4
0.2
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
7.1
0.5
0.1
0.7
0.7
0.1
1.8 2.0
0.4
1.1
0.9
0.2
0.1
0.7
1.4
0.1
0.9
0.2
0.1
0.4
3.5
1.2
0.4
0.6
0.6
0.3
0.2
1.4
2.3
0.3
0.6
0.3
0.2
0.2
2.3
0.5
0.8
0.7
2.5
0.9
0.1
0.1
0.4
1.0
0.1
0.1
0.2
1.4
0.1
0.9
0.4
0.3
1.3
0.1
0.1
1.4
0.1
0.9
0.5
0.1 0.2
0.1
1.8
2.6
0.6
0.3
0.4
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.2
3.0 2.6
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
6.4
AA4
AA4
AA4
AA4
AA4
AA4
AA2
AA2
AA2
AA2
AA2
AA2
AA4
AA4
AA4
AA4
AA4
AA4
BB2
BB2
BB2
BB2BB2
BB2
AA2
AA2
AA2
AA2
AA2
AA2
AA2
AA2
BB2
BB2
BB2
BB2
BB2
BB2
BB2
AA2
AA2
AA2
AA2
AA4
AA4
AA2
Plan View
Scale - 1" = 60ft
Page 82 of 109
STAIR 'B'
ELEC
MECHELEV
MECH
KITCHEN
BUS & AFTER
HOURS ENTRY
CLASSROOM
CLASSROOM
CLASSROOM
COMMONS
CLASSROOMCLASSROOM
CLASSROOM
CLASSROOM
CLASSROOM
CLASSROOM
CLASSROOM
MEDIA CENTER
SMALL GROUP
CIRC
MEDIA COMMONS
CIRC
CONF
CLASSROOM
STOR
CONF
WASH
TOILET
CUSTODIAL
CLASSROOM
CLASSROOM
CLASSROOM
CLASSROOM
CLASSROOM
ART
MUSIC
KILN
MUSIC STOR
CIRC
ENSEMBLE INSTRUMENTS
STORVEST CAFETERIA
GYMNASIUM SOUTH
GYMNASIUM NORTH
WORKROOM
TOILET
TOILET
TOILET
OFFICE
RECEIVING/STOR
DRY STOR
DISHWASHER OFFICE
CUST
LOCKER
FREEZER
COOLER
OUTDOOR STOR
STORAGE
DATA
OFFICE
STORAGE
CENTER BASED
CENTER BASED
CENTER-BASED
CENTER-BASED
CIRC
SENSORY
CHANGING
STAFF TOILET
CALM
CIRC
COMMONS
COMMONS
LOADING DOCK
(BELOW GRADE)
FOOTPRINT OF MECHANICAL
PENTHOUSE ABOVE
MECH
MAIN ENTRY
CLASSROOM
CLASSROOM
CLASSROOM
CLASSROOM
CLASSROOM
CLASSROOM
CLASSROOM
CLASSROOM
CLASSROOM
CLASSROOM
CLASSROOM
CLASSROOM
CLASSROOM
ELEC STOR
SERVERCONFCOMMONS
CLASSROOMCLASSROOM
PRESCHOOL
PRESCHOOL
PRINCIPAL
CONF
WORKROOM
OFFICE
OFFICE
STORAGE
TOILET
TOILETOFFICE
SHARED OFFICE
BREAKROOM
CIRC
RECEPTIONNURSE
OFFICE
VEST
MECH
CIRC
CIRC
BOYS
GIRLS
WASH
TOILET
COMMONS
TOILET
WASH
TOILET CUST CONF
CONF
SMALL GROUP
CIRC
CONF
TOILET
COMMONS
F
E
D
C
B
A
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
A
MN
NorthCheck:
Drawn:
Date:
Comm:
License Number:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by
me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
under the laws of the State of
Scale:
Date
12
/
2
6
/
2
0
2
3
1
1
:
4
4
:
4
2
A
M
Au
t
o
d
e
s
k
D
o
c
s
:
/
/
I
S
D
#
1
9
6
-
N
e
w
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
#
2
0
-
R
e
p
li
c
a
t
i
o
n
/
2
3
2
1
0
4
_
N
E
W
E
S
#
2
0
(
C
E
N
T
R
A
L
)
.
r
v
t
1" = 20'-0"
Ce
n
t
r
a
l
:
\
\
W
a
e
-
s
r
v
-
m
n
.
w
o
l
d
a
e
.
c
o
m
\
S
t
P
a
u
l
\
I
S
D
1
9
6
\
E
S
_
N
ew
\
1
5
2
2
3
4
-
N
e
w
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
Sc
h
o
o
l
\
0
2
_
A
R
C
H
\
R
e
v
i
t
\
1
5
2
2
3
4
_
N
E
W
2
0
1
7
E
L
E
M
E
N
T
A
R
Y
(
C
e
nt
r
a
l
)
.
r
v
t
ISD #196: ROSEMOUNT -
APPLE VALLEY -EAGAN
PUBLIC SCHOOLS
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL #20
A1
FLOOR PLANS
ARDROE AVENUE
ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068
3455 153RD STREET WEST
ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
CITY SUBMITTAL
DK
JPOC
12/27/2023
232104
MINNESOTA
12/27/2023
R. SCOTT MCQUEEN
20155
ARCHITECT
0
1" = 20'-0"
FLOOR PLAN - LOWER LEVELF3
15'30'
0
1" = 20'-0"
FLOOR PLAN - MAIN LEVELC3
15'30'
Revisions
Description Date Num
Page 83 of 109
BRICK,
TYP.
LOWER LEVEL
86'-8"
MAIN LEVEL
100'-0"
T.O. WALL
115'-4"
T.O. PENTHOUSE
131'-7"
OVERALL
404'-2"
FLAGPOLE
PRECAST WALL
PANEL WITH
REVEAL PATTERN
MECHANICAL
LOUVER
ORNAMENTAL
METAL PANELS AT
CANOPY FACE
METAL COPING AT
ROOF EDGE, TYP.
BRICK,
TYP.
ORNAMENTAL METAL
PANELS, TYP.
ALUMUNUM
WINDOWS WITH
PRECAST SILLS, TYP.
ALUMINUM
CURTAINWALL DOOR/
WINDOWS, TYP.
ORNAMENTAL METAL
PANELS, TYP.
METAL COPING AT
ROOF EDGE, TYP.
INSULATED METAL
PANEL SYSTEM AT
PENTHOUSE
ALUMINUM
CURTAINWALL DOOR/
WINDOWS, TYP.
METAL COPING AT
ROOF EDGE, TYP.
ALUMUNUM
WINDOWS WITH
PRECAST SILLS, TYP.BRICK,
TYP.
ALUMINUM
CURTAINWALL DOOR/
WINDOWS, TYP.
ORNAMENTAL METAL
PANELS, TYP.
HOLLOW METAL DOOR
AND FRAME, PAINTED
SCREENED
MECHANICAL
UNIT, TYP.
LOWER LEVEL
86'-8"
MAIN LEVEL
100'-0"
T.O. WALL
115'-4"
T.O. PENTHOUSE
131'-7"
OVERALL
404'-2"
BRICK,
TYP.
METAL COPING AT
ROOF EDGE, TYP.
ORNAMENTAL METAL
PANELS, TYP.
ALUMUNUM
WINDOWS WITH
PRECAST SILLS, TYP.
ALUMINUM
CURTAINWALL DOOR/
WINDOWS, TYP.
INSULATED METAL
PANEL SYSTEM AT
PENTHOUSE
METAL COPING AT
ROOF EDGE, TYP.
BRICK,
TYP.
ORNAMENTAL METAL
PANELS, TYP.
ALUMINUM
CURTAINWALL DOOR/
WINDOWS, TYP.
BRICK,
TYP.
PRECAST WALL
PANEL WITH
REVEAL PATTERN
ORNAMENTAL
METAL PANELS AT
CANOPY FACE
SCREENED
MECHANICAL UNIT
ALUMUNUM WINDOWS
WITH PRECAST SILLS,
TYP.
METAL COPING AT
ROOF EDGE, TYP.
SCREENED
MECHANICAL
UNIT, TYP.
BRICK,
TYP.
HOLLOW METAL DOOR
AND FRAME, PAINTED
MECHANICAL
LOUVER
ALUMINUM STOREFRONT
ENTRANCE SYSTEM
ALUMINUM STOREFRONT
ENTRANCE SYSTEM
LOWER LEVEL
86'-8"
MAIN LEVEL
100'-0"
T.O. WALL
115'-4"
T.O. PENTHOUSE
131'-7"
LOADING DOCK
82'-5"
OVERALL
245'-9"
INSULATED METAL
PANEL SYSTEM AT
PENTHOUSE
ORNAMENTAL METAL
PANELS, TYP.
PRECAST WALL
PANEL WITH
REVEAL PATTERN
ORNAMENTAL
METAL PANELS AT
CANOPY FACE
METAL COPING AT
ROOF EDGE, TYP.
BRICK,
TYP.
HOLLOW METAL DOOR
AND FRAME, PAINTED
MECHANICAL
LOUVER
ALUMINUM STOREFRONT
ENTRANCE SYSTEM
MECHANICAL
LOUVER
ALUMUNUM WINDOWS
WITH PRECAST SILLS,
TYP.
ALUMUNUM WINDOWS
WITH PRECAST SILLS,
TYP.
ALUMUNUM WINDOWS
WITH PRECAST SILLS,
TYP.
METAL COPING AT
ROOF EDGE, TYP.
SCREENED
MECHANICAL
UNIT, TYP.
HOLLOW METAL DOOR
& FRAME, PAINTED
LOWER LEVEL
86'-8"
MAIN LEVEL
100'-0"
T.O. WALL
115'-4"
T.O. PENTHOUSE
131'-7"
OVERALL
203'-0"
INSULATED METAL
PANEL SYSTEM AT
PENTHOUSE
BRICK,
TYP.
MECHANICAL
LOUVER
ALUMUNUM WINDOWS
WITH PRECAST SILLS,
TYP.
METAL COPING AT
ROOF EDGE, TYP.
ORNAMENTAL METAL
PANELS, TYP.
ALUMINUM CURTAINWALL
WINDOWS/DOORS, TYP.
BRICK,
TYP.
ORNAMENTAL
METAL PANELS,
TYP.
METAL COPING AT
ROOF EDGE, TYP.
ALUMINUM CURTAINWALL
WINDOWS/DOORS, TYP.
BRICK,
TYP.
ORNAMENTAL METAL
PANELS, TYP.
BASEML
100'-0"
BASELL
86'-8"
T.O. FOOTING
SEE STRUCT
T.O. RTG WALL
103'-6"
CONCRETE
RETAINING WALL;
SEE STRUCTURAL
APPROXIMATE
GRADE; SEE CIVIL
LOADING DOCK,
OPPOSITE SIDE
BASELL
86'-8"
T.O. FOOTING
SEE STRUCT
T.O. RTG WALL
103'-6"
T.O. RTG WALL
99'-6"
CONCRETE
RETAINING WALL;
SEE STRUCTURAL
APPROXIMATE
GRADE; SEE CIVIL
LOADING DOCK,
OPPOSITE SIDE
BASELL
86'-8"
T.O. FOOTING
SEE STRUCT
T.O. RTG WALL
99'-6"
T.O. RTG WALL
98'-6"
CONCRETE
RETAINING WALL;
SEE STRUCTURAL
APPROXIMATE
GRADE; SEE CIVIL
LOADING DOCK,
OPPOSITE SIDE
BASELL
86'-8"
T.O. FOOTING
SEE STRUCT
T.O. RTG WALL
89'-6"
T.O. RTG WALL
98'-6"
CONCRETE
RETAINING WALL;
SEE STRUCTURAL
APPROXIMATE
GRADE; SEE CIVIL
LOADING DOCK,
OPPOSITE SIDE
A2
C1
A 2E2
A 2E1
A2
F1
A2
E4
A2
C2
A2
F5
A2
B2
F
E
D
C
B
A
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
A
MN
NorthCheck:
Drawn:
Date:
Comm:
License Number:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by
me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
under the laws of the State of
Scale:
Date
2/
9
/
2
0
2
4
3
:
2
6
:
2
3
P
M
Au
t
o
d
e
s
k
D
o
c
s
:
/
/
I
S
D
#
1
9
6
-
N
e
w
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
#
2
0
-
R
e
p
li
c
a
t
i
o
n
/
2
3
2
1
0
4
_
N
E
W
E
S
#
2
0
(
C
E
N
T
R
A
L
)
.
r
v
t
As indicated
Ce
n
t
r
a
l
:
\
\
W
a
e
-
s
r
v
-
m
n
.
w
o
l
d
a
e
.
c
o
m
\
S
t
P
a
u
l
\
I
S
D
1
9
6
\
E
S
_
N
ew
\
1
5
2
2
3
4
-
N
e
w
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
Sc
h
o
o
l
\
0
2
_
A
R
C
H
\
R
e
v
i
t
\
1
5
2
2
3
4
_
N
E
W
2
0
1
7
E
L
E
M
E
N
T
A
R
Y
(
C
e
nt
r
a
l
)
.
r
v
t
ISD #196: ROSEMOUNT -
APPLE VALLEY -EAGAN
PUBLIC SCHOOLS
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL #20
A2
EXTERIOR
ELEVATIONS
ARDROE AVENUE
ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068
3455 153RD STREET WEST
ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
CITY SUBMITTAL
SK
JPOC
02/09/2024
232104
MINNESOTA
01/26/2024
R. SCOTT MCQUEEN
20155
ARCHITECT
0
1/16" = 1'-0"B2 EXTERIOR ELEVATION - NORTH
12' 24'
0
1/16" = 1'-0"C2 EXTERIOR ELEVATION - SOUTH
12' 24'
0
1/16" = 1'-0"E4 EXTERIOR ELEVATION - EAST
12' 24'
0
1/16" = 1'-0"F5 EXTERIOR ELEVATION - WEST
12' 24'
NOT TO SCALE
EXT. ELEVATION LEGEND
Revisions
Description Date Num
0
1/8" = 1'-0"C1 RETAINING WALL ELEVATION - NORTH
6' 12'
0
1/8" = 1'-0"E2 RETAINING WALL ELEVATION - NORTHEAST
6' 12'
0
1/8" = 1'-0"E1 RETAINING WALL ELEVATION - SOUTH
6' 12'
0
1/8" = 1'-0"F1 RETAINING WALL ELEVATION - EAST
6' 12'
Page 84 of 109
F
E
D
C
B
A
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
A
MN
NorthCheck:
Drawn:
Date:
Comm:
License Number:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by
me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
under the laws of the State of
Scale:
Date
12
/
2
6
/
2
0
2
3
1
1
:
4
5
:
4
6
A
M
Au
t
o
d
e
s
k
D
o
c
s
:
/
/
I
S
D
#
1
9
6
-
N
e
w
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
#
2
0
-
R
e
p
li
c
a
t
i
o
n
/
2
3
2
1
0
4
_
N
E
W
E
S
#
2
0
(
C
E
N
T
R
A
L
)
.
r
v
t
1/8" = 1'-0"
Ce
n
t
r
a
l
:
\
\
W
a
e
-
s
r
v
-
m
n
.
w
o
l
d
a
e
.
c
o
m
\
S
t
P
a
u
l
\
I
S
D
1
9
6
\
E
S
_
N
ew
\
1
5
2
2
3
4
-
N
e
w
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
Sc
h
o
o
l
\
0
2
_
A
R
C
H
\
R
e
v
i
t
\
1
5
2
2
3
4
_
N
E
W
2
0
1
7
E
L
E
M
E
N
T
A
R
Y
(
C
e
nt
r
a
l
)
.
r
v
t
ISD #196: ROSEMOUNT -
APPLE VALLEY -EAGAN
PUBLIC SCHOOLS
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL #20
A3
RENDERINGS
ARDROE AVENUE
ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068
3455 153RD STREET WEST
ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
CITY SUBMITTAL
DK
JPOC
12/27/2023
232104
MINNESOTA
12/27/2023
R. SCOTT MCQUEEN
20155
ARCHITECT
Revisions
Description Date Num
NOT TO SCALE
RENDERING - OVERALL
NOT TO SCALE
RENDERING - MAIN ENTRY RENDERING - BUS ENTRY
Page 85 of 109
File #193806756
February 9, 2024
DRAFT
Prepared by:
Stantec Consulting
Services Inc.
One Carlson Pkwy, #100
Plymouth, MN 55447Phone:
7963-479-4200
Fax: 763-479-4242
Prepared for:
Independent School District 196
3455 153rd St W
Rosemount, MN 55068
Traffic Impact Study for
a Proposed Elementary School
in Rosemount, MN
Page 86 of 109
February 2024 i
DRAFT
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS ..................................................................................... I
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................... 1-1
2.0 PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND ........................................................... 2-1
3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS .................................................................... 3-1
4.0 TRAFFIC FORECASTS ........................................................................ 4-1
5.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ........................................................................... 5-1
6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................... 6-1
7.0 APPENDIX ........................................................................................ 7-1
FIGURES
FIGURE 1 PROJECT LOCATION .................................................................. 2-2
FIGURE 2 SITE PLAN ................................................................................ 2-3
FIGURE 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................................. 3-2
FIGURE 4 WEEKDAY AM AND PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES ................. 4-3
I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under
my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional
Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
__________________________________ DATE: February 9, 2024
Edward F. Terhaar
License No. 24441
Page 87 of 109
February 2024 1-1
DRAFT
1.0 Executive Summary
The purpose of this Traffic Impact Study is to evaluate the impacts of a proposed new
elementary school in Rosemount, MN. The project site is located in the southwest quadrant
of the Akron Avenue/Bonaire Path intersection.
This study examined weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic impacts of the proposed
project at the following intersections:
• Akron Avenue/Bonaire Path
• Bonaire Path/Ardroe Avenue
• Ardroe Avenue/Kaylemore Trail
The study also includes a review of pedestrian and bicycle connection impacts related to the
proposed project.
The proposed project includes the construction of a new 638 student elementary school.
Access for the project site will be via one driveway at the intersection of Ardroe Avenue and
Kaylemore Trail. The project will include approximately 230 parking stall s and 15 bus
parking stalls.
The school day for students will begin at 9:15 a.m. and end at 3:45 p.m. School district
staff estimate that approximately 85% of the students will reside in the bussing attendance
area of the school. The school is expected to be complete in the fall of 2025.
The conclusions drawn from the information and analyses presented in this report are as
follows:
• The proposed development is expected to generate 472 trips during the a.m. peak
hour (8:30-9:30 a.m.), 287 trips during the p.m. peak hour (3:30-4:30 p.m.), and
1,488 trips daily.
• All intersections operate at LOS B or better and all movements operate at LOS D or
better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours under all scenarios. Therefore, no
improvements are needed at the intersections to accommodate the proposed project.
• At the Bonaire Path/Ardroe Avenue intersection, stripe the northbound approach to
provide a left turn/through lane and a right turn lane. The existing pavement is wide
enough to accommodate this striping change.
• At the Ardroe Avenue/Kaylemore Trail intersection, relocate the existing stop sign on
the southbound approach to the eastbound approach.
• The number of crashes at the subject intersections do not indicate crash problems
exist at these locations.
Page 88 of 109
February 2024 1-2
DRAFT
• In order to accommodate the expected increase in pedestrian crossings, the
following improvements should be considered at the Akron Avenue/Bonaire Path and
Bonaire Path/Ardroe Avenue intersections:
o Crosswalk markings
o Enhanced LED crossing and warning signs
o Adequate nighttime lighting
o Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFB)
Further detailed review of these pedestrian locations by the City and School District
is recommended to develop a detailed pedestrian plan for this area prior to opening
the school.
• Consider using crossing guards at pedestrian crossings near the school in a manner
similar to other school locations within the district.
Page 89 of 109
February 2024 2-1
DRAFT
2.0 Purpose and Background
The purpose of this Traffic Impact Study is to evaluate the impacts of a proposed new
elementary school in Rosemount, MN. The project site is located in the southwest quadrant
of the Akron Avenue/Bonaire Path intersection. The project location is shown in Figure 1.
This study examined weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic impacts of the proposed
project at the following intersections:
• Akron Avenue/Bonaire Path
• Bonaire Path/Ardroe Avenue
• Ardroe Avenue/Kaylemore Trail
The study also includes a review of pedestrian and bicycle connection impacts related to the
proposed project.
Project Characteristics
The proposed project includes the construction of a new 638 student elementary school.
Access for the project site will be via one driveway at the intersection of Ardroe Avenue and
Kaylemore Trail. The project will include approximately 230 parking stalls and 15 bus
parking stalls. The proposed site plan is shown in Figure 2.
The school day for students will begin at 9:15 a.m. and end at 3:45 p.m. School district
staff estimate that approximately 85% of the students will reside in the bussing attendance
area of the school. The school is expected to be complete in the fall of 2025.
Page 90 of 109
February 2024 2-2
DRAFT
Page 91 of 109
February 2024 2-3
DRAFT
Page 92 of 109
February 2024 3-1
DRAFT
3.0 Existing Conditions
The proposed project site is currently undeveloped open space. The site is bounded by
Akron Avenue on the east, Bonaire Path on the north, Ardroe Avenue on the west, and
railroad tracks on the south.
Near the site location, Akron Avenue is a two lane roadway with turn lanes at major
intersections. Bonaire Path is a three lane road with a center left turn lane. Ardroe Avenue
is a two lane local roadway.
Existing conditions near the proposed project location are shown in Figure 3 and described
below.
Akron Avenue/Bonaire Path
This four-way intersection is controlled with stop signs on the eastbound and westbound
approaches. The northbound and southbound approaches provide one left turn lane, one
through lane, and one right turn lane. The eastbound and westbound approaches provide
one left turn and one through/right turn lane.
Bonaire Path/Ardroe Avenue
This four-way intersection is controlled with stop signs on the northbound and southbound
approaches. The eastbound and westbound approaches provide one left turn lane and one
through/right turn lane. The northbound and southbound approaches provide one left
turn/through/right turn lane.
Ardroe Avenue/Kaylemore Trail
This three-way intersection is controlled with a stop sign on the southbound approach. All
approaches provide a single lane for turn movements. The east leg of the intersection
currently ends at the subject property.
Traffic Volume Data
Weekday traffic volume data was recorded at the existing intersections in December, 2023
from 7:30 to 9:30 a.m. and 2:30 to 4:30 p.m. to capture the peak periods for school traffic .
Page 93 of 109
February 2024 3-2
DRAFT
Page 94 of 109
February 2024 4-1
DRAFT
4.0 Traffic Forecasts
Traffic Forecast Scenarios
To adequately address the impacts of the proposed project, forecasts and analyses were
completed for the year 2025. Specifically, weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic
forecasts were completed for the following scenarios:
• 2023 Existing. Existing volumes were determined through traffic counts at the subject
intersections. The existing volume information includes trips generated by existing
uses near the project site.
• 2025 No-Build. Existing volumes were increased by 3.9 percent per year to account
for background growth in the surrounding area. In addition, trips generated by
specific nearby developments were included in the 2025 No-Build volumes. The
growth rate and information on nearby development was provided by City of
Rosemount staff.
• 2025 Build. Trips generated by the proposed school were added to the 2025 No-Build
volumes to determine 2025 Build volumes.
Trip Generation for Proposed Project
The expected new development trips were calculated based on data presented in Trip
Generation, Eleventh Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. These
calculations represent total trips that will be generated by the proposed development. The
resultant trip generation estimates are shown in Table 4-1.
Table 4-1
Weekday Trip Generation for Proposed Elementary School
Land Use
Size
Weekday AM Peak Hour
8:30 to 9:30 a.m.
Weekday PM Peak Hour
3:30 to 4:30 p.m.
Weekday
Daily
In Out Total In Out Total Total
Elementary School
(ITE code 520)
638 students 255 217 472 132 155 287 1448
Page 95 of 109
February 2024 4-2
DRAFT
Trip Generation for Nearby Developments
The expected new trips for nearby developments were calculated based on data presented
in Trip Generation, Eleventh Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers.
These calculations represent total trips that will be generated by the proposed development.
The resultant trip generation estimates are shown in Table 4-2.
Table 4-2
Weekday Trip Generation for Nearby Developments
Land Use
Size
Weekday AM Peak Hour
8:30 to 9:30 a.m.
Weekday PM Peak Hour
3:30 to 4:30 p.m.
Weekday
Daily
In Out Total In Out Total Total
Apartments
(ITE code 221)
212 DU 18 60 78 50 32 82 962
Apartments
(ITE code 221)
305 DU 26 87 113 73 46 119 1385
Single family
(ITE code 210)
49 DU 9 26 35 29 17 46 462
Single family
(ITE code 210)
400 DU 70 210 280 237 139 376 3772
Totals 123 383 506 389 234 623 6581
Note: DU = dwelling units
Trips generated by the nearby development was distributed to the roadway system using
information provided by City staff.
Trip Distribution Percentages for the Elementary School
Trip distribution percentages for the school trips were established based on the expected
attendance area for the school and are described below:
• 60 percent to/from the south on Akron Avenue
• 10 percent to/from the north on Akron Avenue
• 10 percent to/from the west on Bonaire Path
• 20 percent to/from the east on Bonaire Path
Traffic Volumes
Development trips from Table 4-1 were assigned to the surrounding roadway network using
the preceding trip distribution percentages. Traffic volumes were established for all the
forecasting scenarios described earlier during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. The
resultant peak hour volumes are shown in Figure 4.
Page 96 of 109
February 2024 4-3
DRAFT
Page 97 of 109
February 2024 5-1
DRAFT
5.0 Traffic Analysis
Intersection Level of Service Analysis
Traffic analyses were completed for the subject intersections for all scenarios described
earlier during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours using Synchro software. Initial
analysis was completed using existing geometrics and intersection control.
Capacity analysis results are presented in terms of level of service (LOS), which is defined in
terms of traffic delay at the intersection. LOS ranges from A to F. LOS A represents the
best intersection operation, with little delay for each vehicle using the intersection. LOS F
represents the worst intersection operation with excessive delay. The following is a detailed
description of the conditions described by each LOS designation:
• Level of service A corresponds to a free flow condition with motorists virtually
unaffected by the intersection control mechanism. For a signalized or an
unsignalized intersection, the average delay per vehicle would be approximately 10
seconds or less.
• Level of service B represents stable flow with a high degree of freedom, but with
some influence from the intersection control device and the traffic volumes. For a
signalized intersection, the average delay ranges from 10 to 20 seconds. An
unsignalized intersection would have delays ranging from 10 to 15 seconds for this
level.
• Level of service C depicts a restricted flow which remains stable, but with significant
influence from the intersection control device and the traffic volumes. The general
level of comfort and convenience changes noticeably at this level. The delay range s
from 20 to 35 seconds for a signalized intersection and from 15 to 25 seconds for an
unsignalized intersection at this level.
• Level of service D corresponds to high-density flow in which speed and freedom are
significantly restricted. Though traffic flow remains stable, reductions in comfort and
convenience are experienced. The control delay for this level is 35 to 55 seconds f or
a signalized intersection and 25 to 35 seconds for an unsignalized intersection.
• Level of service E represents unstable flow of traffic at or near the capacity of the
intersection with poor levels of comfort and convenience. The delay ranges from 55
to 80 seconds for a signalized intersection and from 35 to 50 seconds for an
unsignalized intersection at this level.
• Level of service F represents forced flow in which the volume of traffic approaching
the intersection exceeds the volume that can be served. Characteristics often
experienced include long queues, stop-and-go waves, poor travel times, low comfort
and convenience, and increased accident exposure. Delays over 80 seconds for a
signalized intersection and over 50 seconds for an unsignalized intersection
correspond to this level of service.
Page 98 of 109
February 2024 5-2
DRAFT
The LOS results are described below. All LOS worksheets are included in the Appendix for
further detail.
2023 Existing
Weekday 8:30-9:30 A.M. and 3:30-4:30 P.M. Peak Hour LOS Results
Intersection Traffic
Control
AM Peak
Hour LOS
PM Peak
Hour LOS
Akron Avenue/Bonaire Path EB/WB stop A/B A/B
Bonaire Path/Ardroe Avenue NB/SB stop A/A A/B
Ardroe Avenue/Kaylemore Trail SB stop A/A A/A
Note: Level of service results presented with overall intersection LOS followed by worst movement LOS.
All intersections operate at LOS A and all movements operate at LOS B or better during the
a.m. and p.m. peak hours.
2025 No-Build
Weekday 8:30-9:30 A.M. and 3:30-4:30 P.M. Peak Hour LOS Results
Intersection Traffic
Control
AM Peak
Hour LOS
PM Peak
Hour LOS
Akron Avenue/Bonaire Path EB/WB stop A/B A/B
Bonaire Path/Ardroe Avenue NB/SB stop A/B A/B
Ardroe Avenue/Kaylemore Trail SB stop A/A A/A
Note: Level of service results presented with overall intersection LOS followed by worst movement LOS.
All intersections operate at LOS A and all movements operate at LOS B or better during the
a.m. and p.m. peak hours.
2025 Build
Weekday 8:30-9:30 A.M. and 3:30-4:30 P.M. Peak Hour LOS Results
Intersection Traffic
Control
AM Peak
Hour LOS
PM Peak
Hour LOS
Akron Avenue/Bonaire Path EB/WB stop B/D B/D
Bonaire Path/Ardroe Avenue NB/SB stop B/D A/C
Ardroe Avenue/Kaylemore Trail SB stop A/B A/B
Note: Level of service results presented with overall intersection LOS followed by worst movement LOS.
All intersections operate at LOS B or better and all movements operate at LOS D or better
during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours.
Overall Traffic Impacts
As shown in the LOS results, intersections operate at LOS B or better and all movements
operate at LOS D or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours under all scenarios.
Therefore, no improvements are needed at the intersections to accommodate the proposed
project.
Page 99 of 109
February 2024 5-3
DRAFT
Internal Site Layout
The proposed site layout includes a dedicated drop-off and pick-up area at the main
entrance. Adequate space for vehicle queueing is provided in the visitor and staff parking
lot for the expected drop-off and pick-up activities. The location of the bus loading and
unloading area is separate from the drop-off/pick-up area, allowing for efficient bus entry
and exit.
Pedestrian and Bicycle Needs
Under existing conditions, sidewalk is provided on the east side of Ardroe Avenue both north
and south of Bonaire Path. A multi-use trail is provided on the west side of Akron Avenue
north and south of Bonaire Path. Sidewalk is not provided on either side of Bonaire Path.
The proposed site plan shows trails connecting to the existing sidewalk on Ardroe Avenue
and the trail on Akron Avenue. These connections will lead to increased pedestrian
crossings occurring at the Akron Avenue/Bonaire Path and Bonaire Path/Ardroe Avenue
intersections. Under existing conditions, these intersections provide pedestrian ramps but
do not have marked crosswalks on any of the legs.
In order to accommodate the expected increase in pedestrian crossings, the following
improvements should be considered at these intersections:
• Crosswalk markings
• Enhanced LED crossing and warning signs
• Adequate nighttime lighting
• Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFB)
Consider using crossing guards at pedestrian crossings near the school in a manner similar
to other school locations within the district.
Further detailed review of these pedestrian locations by the City and School District is
recommended to develop a detailed pedestrian plan for this area prior to opening the
school.
Crash Data
Crash data for the study intersections was obtained from the Minnesota Department of
Transportation (MnDOT) for the period of 2019-2023. This data indicated the following
crashes had occurred:
• Akron Avenue/Bonaire Path – A total of five angle crashes have occurred, with one
serious injury, one possible injury, and three property damage only.
• Bonaire Path/Ardroe Avenue - A total of one angle crash has occurred with property
damage only.
• Ardroe Avenue/Kaylemore Trail – Zero crashes have occurred.
The number of crashes at the intersections do not indicate crash problems exist at these
locations.
Page 100 of 109
February 2024 6-1
DRAFT
6.0 Conclusions and Recommendations
The conclusions drawn from the information and analyses presented in this report are as
follows:
• The proposed development is expected to generate 472 trips during the a.m. peak
hour (8:30-9:30 a.m.), 287 trips during the p.m. peak hour (3:30-4:30 p.m.), and
1,488 trips daily.
• All intersections operate at LOS B or better and all movements operate at LOS D or
better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours under all scenarios. Therefore, no
improvements are needed at the intersections to accommodate the proposed project.
• At the Bonaire Path/Ardroe Avenue intersection, stripe the northbound approach to
provide a left turn/through lane and a right turn lane. The existing pavement is wide
enough to accommodate this striping change.
• At the Ardroe Avenue/Kaylemore Trail intersection, relocate the existing stop sign on
the southbound approach to the eastbound approach.
• The number of crashes at the subject intersections do not indicate crash problems
exist at these locations.
• In order to accommodate the expected increase in pedestrian crossings, the
following improvements should be considered at the Akron Avenue/Bonaire Path and
Bonaire Path/Ardroe Avenue intersections:
o Crosswalk markings
o Enhanced LED crossing and warning signs
o Adequate nighttime lighting
o Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFB)
Further detailed review of these pedestrian locations by the City and School District
is recommended to develop a detailed pedestrian plan for this area prior to opening
the school.
• Consider using crossing guards at pedestrian crossings near the school in a manner
similar to other school locations within the district.
Page 101 of 109
February 2024 7-1
DRAFT
7.0 Appendix
• Level of Service worksheets
• Crash data
• Turn movement data
Page 102 of 109
C:\Users\jh\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\I8FO6670\024361-000 ISD 196 Rosemount ES - Engineering Review Memo
20240115.docx
7
0
1
X
E
N
I
A
A
V
E
N
U
E
S
|
S
U
I
T
E
3
0
0
|
M
I
N
N
E
A
P
O
L
I
S
,
M
N
|
55
4
1
6
|
7
6
3
.
5
4
1
.
4
8
0
0
|
W
S
B
E
N
G
.
C
O
M
Memorandum
To: Brian Erickson, City Engineer
Nick Egger, Director of Public Works
From: Amanda Sachi PE
Kris Keller, PE
Date: January 15, 2024
Re: Independent School District 196 – Elementary School #20
Engineering Review
WSB Project No. 024361-000
We have reviewed the documents provided by Wold and by Bolton & Menk on January 4, 2024.
Documents reviewed include:
• ISD 196 Elementary School #20 Site Plans, dated 12/27/2023
• ISD 196 Elementary School #20 Stormwater Summary, dated 12/27/2023
Additional redline comments are provided on the submitted civil plans. Applicant should provide
responses to each comment and redline comment. We offer the following comments below.
Engineering Review:
1. General
a. The project consists of the construction of an elementary school campus with
building, parking, and adjacent recreational and stormwater facilities
2. Site Demolition Plan
a. No comments.
3. Geometric/Finishing Plans
a. Call out locations and types of curb used on the site
i. Identify areas of tipout curb
b. The Bituminous trail should be 3" bituminous over 6" Class 5 (currently proposed
as 2" bituminous over 6" Class 5 )
c. Intersection of Kaylemore Trail and Androe Avenue
i. Incorporate a small radius from catch basin for right turning traffic from
Kaylemore Trail
ii. Verify need for additional stop sign along Kaylemore Trail at Androe
Avenue for the rotation of the tee intersection
iii. Provide a pedestrian ramp where the trail meets the curb at An droe
Avenue near Kaylemore Trail
iv. Show transitions (beavertails) at all curb terminations
d. Verify the need for pedestrian ramps across the rear loading ramp
4. Grading Drainage and Erosion Control Plans
Page 103 of 109
Independent School District 196 – Elementary School #20 Engineering Review
January 15, 2024
Page 2
a. Provide/call out all EOFs for low points in the parking a reas and greenspaces
b. Show all storm sewer (screened out)
c. Provide all rim/inlet elevations
d. Retaining walls exceeding 4’ in height shall require a plan prepared by a licensed
engineer submitted for review and approval by the Building Official prior to permit
issuance.
i. Provide fences for safety
e. Provide proposed contours (54-57) in the area of the loading ramp
f. Direct drainage away from the building in the northern alternate area
5. Utility Plans
a. Call out all proposed water fittings
b. Fire Marshal to review fire coverage and emergency access
i. Provide turning movements for access to hydrants on site
c. Provide how access to the existing public sanitary sewer manholes in the
easement will be maintained
d. Insulate at crossings where the vertical separation between the water and the
storm sewer is less than 36”
e. Note the existing 8" gate valves on the water stubs from 2008 and 2021 are
redundant with the 8” gate valves proposed.
6. Landscape Plans
a. No comments.
7. Details & Specifications
a. No comments.
Page 104 of 109
C:\Users\jh\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\I8FO6670\024361-000 ISD196 Elementary School Review Memo 20240116.docx
7
0
1
X
E
N
I
A
A
V
E
N
U
E
S
|
S
U
I
T
E
3
0
0
|
M
I
N
N
E
A
P
O
L
I
S
,
M
N
|
55
4
1
6
|
7
6
3
.
5
4
1
.
4
8
0
0
|
W
S
B
E
N
G
.
C
O
M
Memorandum
To: Brian Erickson, City Engineer
Nick Egger, Director of Public Works
Anthony Nemcek, Senior Planner
From: Bill Alms, PE
Henry Meeker, EIT
Date: January 16, 2024
Re: ISD 196 Elementary School 20 Stormwater Review
WSB Project No. 024361-000
I have reviewed the documents provided by Bolton & Menk on January 4, 2024. Documents
reviewed include:
• ISD 196 Elementary School 20 Site Plans, dated 12/27/2023
• ISD 196 Elementary School 20 Stormwater Summary, dated 12/27/2023
Applicant should provide responses to each comment. I offer the following comments below.
Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Comments:
1. General
a. A NPDES permit will be required since over an acre of disturbance is proposed.
b. Signed plans will be required for final permit approval.
c. It is recommended to use existing regional basin 1618 (in the southeast corner of
the site) in combination with proposed NURP cell grading to simplify regional
system flows and increase site live storage. A sketch of this layout is provided on
the Engineering Comments plan set.
d. A higher level of engineering review is needed for the infiltration basin as it is
located within a high-risk DWSMA region.
i. More information on this higher level review can be found at
https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php?title=Guidance_and_recom
mendations_for_conducting_a_higher_level_of_engineering_review_for_s
tormwater_infiltration_in_DWSMAs_and_Wellhead_Protection_Areas .
2. Ponds and Wetlands
a. Applicant to label all regional basins on the plans with the corresponding existing
regional basin ID.
b. Applicant to note snowmelt event high water levels for all basins on the grading
plans.
c. Applicant to show maintenance access routes to the proposed basins on the
plans. The City Engineering guidelines note maintenance access paths should be
a minimum width of 10 feet at 8% maximum grade and a maximum 2% cross
slope.
Page 105 of 109
ISD 196 Elementary School 20 Stormwater Review
January 16, 2024
Page 2
C:\Users\jh\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\I8FO6670\024361-000 ISD196 Elementary School Review Memo 20240116.docx
d. Outfalls into proposed basins must be consolidated, FES 100 and 200 should be
combined.
e. Riprap at outfalls into proposed basins must be extended to the bottom of the
proposed grading. This is applicable for FES 100, 200, 3030, and 305.
f. The bottom elevation of the infiltration basin must match the NURP basin NWL of
940. An infiltration bench design may reduce earthwork and decrease the required
basin footprint.
g. The infiltration basin detail calls out shredded wood mulch on the basin surface, a
topsoil or compost mixture is recommended instead.
3. Emergency Overflow Routes:
a. Applicant to show the emergency overflow elevations and locations for all
proposed basins and site low points on the plans.
b. Localized low points north and west of the proposed building appear to have EOF
elevations near the FFE. Applicant to call out these EOF elevations to ensure that
1’ of freeboard is provided to the FFE.
4. Retaining Walls:
a. Not applicable.
5. Erosion Control:
a. The SWPPP narrative must include street sweeping for dust control.
b. Dual silt fence must be specified around proposed infiltrating surfaces until final
stabilization has been reached to maintain soil permeability.
c. Silt fence is required around delineated wetlands to ensure they are not degraded
as a result of site disturbance.
d. An erosion control note must be included specifying that final infiltration basin
excavation will only be graded once site stabilization has been achieved.
6. Grading:
a. Show grading limits on grading plan sheets.
Stormwater Management Plan:
1. General Storm Sewer Design
a. Storm sewer capacity calculations must be provided to confirm storm sewer is
sized for the 10-year storm event.
b. Roadway storm sewer design must match City standards of maximum 300’
spacing between catchbasins and a maximum inflow of 3 cfs for the 10-year storm
event.
c. Applicant to provide storm sewer profiles for review of routing and utility crossings.
i. Crown matching is recommended where pipe size increases.
d. Applicant to provide casting and structure tabulation summarizing proposed storm
sewer structures.
e. Applicant to use City storm sewer details.
f. Applicant to show proposed draintile routing and tie-ins to storm sewer where
specified for ag-lime and play area drainage.
g. The furthest downstream storm sewer structure prior to draining to a pond must
have a 3’ sump to capture sediment.
h. Per City standard details, sheet piling will be required for all flared end sections on
pipe diameters 24” and greater.
Page 106 of 109
ISD 196 Elementary School 20 Stormwater Review
January 16, 2024
Page 3
C:\Users\jh\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\I8FO6670\024361-000 ISD196 Elementary School Review Memo 20240116.docx
i. The final outlet of proposed stormwater basins must include a skimmer pipe to
prevent floatables clogging and a sluice gate within the struc ture to limit outflows
in major storm events. The City standard detail SD-12 is attached to this memo for
reference of this OCS design.
j. Storm sewer starting at STMH 219 must be 18” diameter or greater to prevent
adverse effects from flow constriction of the existing 18” CMP leaving the basin on
the northwest corner of the site.
k. A storm sewer inlet is required to drain the proposed low point northwest of the
baseball diamond.
l. The following pipe slopes must be reviewed:
i. STMH 104 to STMH 103 at 3% is too steep, full pipe flow velocities must
be demonstrated as less than 10 ft/s.
ii. STMH 105 to STMH 104 at 5.6% is too steep, full pipe flow velocities
must be demonstrated as less than 10 ft/s.
iii. CB 123 to CB 122 at 5.6% is too steep, full pipe flow velocities must be
demonstrated as less than 10 ft/s.
iv. CB 113 to CB 110 at 0.15% is too shallow, full pipe flow velocities must
be demonstrated as above 3 ft/s to prevent pipe sedimentation.
v. Any pipes to outfalls into ponds must have a full pipe flow velocity of 6 ft/s
or less to prevent excessive scour.
m. Landscaping plans should be reviewed to deconflict tree plantings over top utilities
to prevent future root intrusion.
2. Water Quantity
a. It appears that outdated storm event depths were specified for HydroCAD
modeling. Design event depths should match the values outlined in the 2018
Rosemount CSWMP Section 5.3, policy 5.
i. This CSWMP can be accessed at
https://www.rosemountmn.gov/DocumentCenter/View/3788/2018-
Rosemount-Surface-Water-Management-Plan.
b. Land cover in proposed conditions modeling should be reviewed to ensure it
matches proposed plan land cover. For example, proposed subbasin 33S shows
woods land cover, but the site plan indicates primarily grassed land cover for
pervious areas in the subbasin.
3. Rate/Volume Control
a. No outflows are allowed offsite for storm events besides the snowmelt event, this
includes the existing regional basin 1618 onsite. As noted, a City standard OCS is
required at the outlet of the existing basin to manage these flows.
b. The 10-day snowmelt modeling must be provided. The model must include time
ranges sufficient to capture peak flows of the storm event.
c. HydroCAD modeling must be set with Dyn-Stor-Ind routing to ensure tailwater
effects are sufficiently modeled.
4. Freeboard
a. No comments.
5. Water Quality
a. The provided proposed HydroCAD model generates approximately 68,000 cubic
feet of runoff in the 2.5” rain event from tributary areas to the stormwater basin.
This is the controlling NURP dead storage, and the proposed 129,196 cubic feet
of dead storage volume can be reduced accordingly.
Page 107 of 109
ISD 196 Elementary School 20 Stormwater Review
January 16, 2024
Page 4
C:\Users\jh\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\I8FO6670\024361-000 ISD196 Elementary School Review Memo 20240116.docx
b. Infiltration area (not counting basin side slopes) must be provided for 1/12 ac-
ft/ac/day for the entire site area. The following formula can be used to determine
this area:
𝑅𝑐𝑞𝑞�ℎ𝑞𝑐𝑐 𝐴𝑞𝑐𝑎 (𝑎𝑐)=𝑅�ℎ𝑞𝑐 𝐴𝑞𝑐𝑎 (𝑎𝑐)
𝐼𝑛𝑐�ℎ𝑙𝑞𝑞𝑎𝑞�ℎ𝑛𝑛 𝑅𝑎𝑞𝑐 (�ℎ𝑛�𝑞⁄)
∗0.0416 (𝑐𝑛𝑛𝑞𝑐𝑞𝑞�ℎ𝑛𝑛 𝑐𝑎𝑐𝑞𝑛𝑞)
c. For design purposes, a maximum infiltration rate of 3 in/hr will be considered by
the City Engineer based on the high infiltration rates demonstrated in the provided
infiltrometer testing.
d. Final infiltration rates of the constructed basin will need to be shown as less than
8.3 in/hr based on NPDES permit requirements. Soils amendments will be
required as needed to reach this upper limit.
6. Easements
a. The drainage and utility easement over the proposed pipe between STMH 307
and FES 305 does not appear to be sufficiently sized. The easement must cover
the excavation footprint of the pipe at a 1:1 ratio of pipe depth and horizontal
travel.
Page 108 of 109
M E M O R A N D U M
To: Adam Kienberger, Community Development Director
Anthony Nemcek, Senior Planner
Julia Hogan, Planner
From: Dan Schultz, Parks and Recreation Director
Date: January 17, 2024
Subject: ISD 196 Elementary School Development
The Parks and Recreation Department recently reviewed the plans for the ISD 196 Elementary
School Development plans. After reviewing the plans, the Parks and Recreation Department staff
has the following comments:
Parks Dedication
Staff is recommending that park dedication not be collected due to the public recreation spaces
being created by the ISD 196 development plans for the elementary school. A large playground,
hard court space, a ballfield and greenspaces are all part of the plans submitted by ISD 196.
Please let me know if you have any questions about this memo.
Page 109 of 109