The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About01282025 Meeting AGENDA Planning Commission Regular Meeting Tuesday, January 28, 2025 6:30 PM City Council Chambers, City Hall 1. CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. ADDITIONS TO AGENDA 3. AUDIENCE INPUT 4. CONSENT AGENDA a. Minutes of the December 16, 2024 Regular Meeting Minutes 5. OLD BUSINESS a. Request by Danner, Inc. for renewal of its Small Scale Mineral Extraction Permit for 2025. 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS a. Request by Greg Steininger for Renewal of a Small Scale Mineral Extraction Permit for 2025 and 2026 b. Request by Magellan Land Development for approval of rezoning land from A-2 - Agricultural to R-2 - Low to Medium Density Residential and a Preliminary Plat to development 58 townhome units. c. Request by North Wind Test, LLC., for Preliminary and Final Plat approval and rezoning of 60 acres from A-2 to B-2 7. NEW BUSINESS 8. DISCUSSION 9. ADJOURNMENT Page 1 of 155 ROSEMOUNT PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING PROCEEDINGS DECEMBER 16, 2024 CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE WƵƌƐƵĂŶƚƚŽĚƵĞĐĂůůĂŶĚŶŽƚŝĐĞƚŚĞƌĞŽĨĂƌĞŐƵůĂƌŵĞĞƚŝŶŐŽĨƚŚĞWůĂŶŶŝŶŐŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶǁĂƐŚĞůĚ ŽŶDŽŶĚĂǇ͕ĞĐĞŵďĞƌϭϲ͕ϮϬϮϰ͕Ăƚϲ͗ϯϬWD͘ŝŶZŽƐĞŵŽƵŶƚŽƵŶĐŝůŚĂŵďĞƌƐ͕ϮϴϳϱϭϰϱƚŚ ^ƚƌĞĞƚtĞƐƚ͘ ŚĂŝƌƉĞƌƐŽŶ<ĞŶŶŝŶŐĞƌĐĂůůĞĚƚŚĞŵĞĞƚŝŶŐƚŽŽƌĚĞƌǁŝƚŚŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶĞƌƐtŚŝƚŵĂŶ͕ĞĂĚŶĞƌ͕ ZĞĞĚ͕ĂŶĚZŝǀĞƌĂ͘ůůŝƐĂŶĚƵŐŐŝǁĞƌĞĂďƐĞŶƚ͘ ^ƚĂĨĨƉƌĞƐĞŶƚŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚƚŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐ͖ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚǇĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ;ͿŝƌĞĐƚŽƌĚĂŵ<ŝĞŶďĞƌŐĞƌ͕ ^ĞŶŝŽƌWůĂŶŶĞƌŶƚŚŽŶǇEĞŵĐĞŬ͕WůĂŶŶĞƌ:ƵůŝĂ,ŽŐĂŶ͕ĂŶĚdĞĐŚŶŝĐŝĂŶ>ŝǌ<ŽŚůĞƌ dŚĞWůĞĚŐĞŽĨůůĞŐŝĂŶĐĞǁĂƐƐĂŝĚ͘ ADDITIONS TO AGENDA EŽŶĞ͘ AUDIENCE INPUT EŽŶĞ͘ CONSENT AGENDA Ă͘ DŝŶƵƚĞƐŽĨƚŚĞEŽǀĞŵďĞƌϮϲ͕ϮϬϮϰZĞŐƵůĂƌDĞĞƚŝŶŐ Motion by<ĞŶŶŝŶŐĞƌSecond byZĞĞĚ MotionƚŽĂƉƉƌŽǀĞƚŚĞEŽǀĞŵďĞƌϮϲ͕ϮϬϮϰZĞŐƵůĂƌDĞĞƚŝŶŐDŝŶƵƚĞƐ Ayes: 5. Nays: None. Motion Carried. OLD BUSINESS EŽŶĞ͘ PUBLIC HEARINGS Ă͘ ZĞƋƵĞƐƚďǇ:ĂƐŽŶ>ĂƵďĞĨŽƌĂƉƉƌŽǀĂůŽĨĂƐŝƚĞƉůĂŶƌĞǀŝĞǁƚŽĂůůŽǁĨŽƌƚŚĞ ĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶŽĨĂϱϳϮƐƋƵĂƌĞĨŽŽƚĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶƚŽĂŶĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐŽĨĨŝĐĞďƵŝůĚŝŶŐĂƚϯϰϱϬϭϱϭƐƚ ^ƚƌĞĞƚtĞƐƚ͘ WůĂŶŶĞƌ:ƵůŝĂ,ŽŐĂŶƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĞĚŽŶĂŶĂƉƉůŝĐĂƚŝŽŶĨŽƌĂƐŝƚĞƉůĂŶƌĞǀŝĞǁƚŽĂůůŽǁĨŽƌƚŚĞĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶĂ ϱϳϮƐƋƵĂƌĞĨŽŽƚĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶƚŽĂŶĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐŽĨĨŝĐĞďƵŝůĚŝŶŐĂƚϯϰϱϬϭϱϭƐƚ^ƚƌĞĞƚtĞƐƚ͘dŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶ ŝƐϮϮĨĞĞƚďǇϮϲĨĞĞƚĂŶĚůŽĐĂƚĞĚŽŶƚŚĞĞĂƐƚƐŝĚĞŽĨƚŚĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ͘dŚĞǌŽŶŝŶŐŽĨƚŚĞƉƌŽƉĞƌƚǇŝƐ ϭͲŐĞŶĞƌĂůďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ͕ƚŚĞĐŽŵƉƌĞŚĞŶƐŝǀĞƉůĂŶůĂŶĚƵƐĞĚĞƐŝŐŶĂƚŝŽŶŝƐĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚǇĐŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂů͘ dŚĞĐƵƌƌĞŶƚďƵŝůĚŝŶŐŝƐďĞŝŶŐƵƐĞĚĂƐŽĨĨŝĐĞƐƉĂĐĞĨŽƌĂŶŝŶƐƵƌĂŶĐĞĐŽŵƉĂŶǇ͘dŚĞĂƉƉůŝĐĂŶƚǁŝůůďĞƵƐŝŶŐ Page 2 of 155 ƚŚĞĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĨŽƌĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůŽĨĨŝĐĞƐƉĂĐĞĨŽƌĐƵƌƌĞŶƚĂŶĚĨƵƚƵƌĞĞŵƉůŽǇĞĞƐ͘dŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚƉůĂŶŵĞĞƚƐĂůů ƚŚĞƐĞƚďĂĐŬ͕ůŽƚĐŽǀĞƌĂŐĞ͕ĂŶĚƉĂƌŬŝŶŐƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ͘,ŽŐĂŶƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĞĚƚŚĞƉůĂŶƐƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚďǇƚŚĞ ĂƉƉůŝĐĂŶƚ͕ƚŚĞďƵŝůĚŝŶŐŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐ͕ĂŶĚƚŚĞůĂŶĚƐĐĂƉŝŶŐŽĨƚŚĞƐŝƚĞ͘^ƚĂĨĨƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĞĚƚŚĂƚƚŚĞWůĂŶŶŝŶŐ ŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶĂƉƉƌŽǀĞƚŚĞƐŝƚĞƉůĂŶ͘ ŚĂŝƌƉĞƌƐŽŶ<ĞŶŶŝŶŐĞƌŽƉĞŶĞĚƚŚĞƉƵďůŝĐŚĞĂƌŝŶŐ͘ Motion by<ĞŶŶŝŶŐĞƌSecond byZĞĞĚ MotionƚŽĐůŽƐĞƉƵďůŝĐŚĞĂƌŝŶŐ Ayes: 5. Nays: None. Motion Carried. ŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶĞƌZĞĞĚƐƚĂƚĞĚƚŚĂƚŚĞƚŚŽƵŐŚƚŝƚǁĂƐĂŐŽŽĚƉůĂĐĞƚŽĞǆƉĂŶĚĂŶĚƚŚĂƚŝƚǁĂƐĂǀĞƌǇĐůĞĂƌ ƉůĂŶ͘ŚĂŝƌƉĞƌƐŽŶ<ĞŶŶŝŶŐĞƌŵĞŶƚŝŽŶĞĚƚŚĂƚƚŚĞĨŝŶĂůĚĞĐŝƐŝŽŶŽŶƚŚĞŝƚĞŵǁŽƵůĚďĞŵĂĚĞďǇƚŚĞ WůĂŶŶŝŶŐŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶĂŶĚƚŚĂƚƚŚĞŝƚĞŵǁŽƵůĚŶŽƚƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŝƚǇŽƵŶĐŝůĂƉƉƌŽǀĂůƵŶůĞƐƐŝƚǁĂƐĂƉƉĞĂůĞĚ͘ Motion by<ĞŶŶŝŶŐĞƌSecond byĞĂĚŶĞƌ MotionƚŽĂƉƉƌŽǀĞƚŚĞ^ŝƚĞWůĂŶĨŽƌĂϱϳϮƐƋƵĂƌĞĨŽŽƚĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶƚŽĂŶĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐŽĨĨŝĐĞďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ ĂƚϯϰϱϬϭϱϭƐƚ^ƚƌĞĞƚtĞƐƚ͕ƐƵďũĞĐƚƚŽƚŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶ͗ ϭ͘ dŚĞĂƉƉůŝĐĂŶƚͬƉƌŽƉĞƌƚǇŽǁŶĞƌƐŚĂůůĂƉƉůǇĨŽƌĂŶĚƌĞĐĞŝǀĞĂůůƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ ƉĞƌŵŝƚƐ͘ Ayes: 5. Nays: None. Motion Carried. ď͘ ZĞƋƵĞƐƚďǇ ĂŶŶĞƌ͕/ŶĐ͘ĨŽƌƌĞŶĞǁĂůŽĨŝƚƐ^ŵĂůů^ĐĂůĞDŝŶĞƌĂůǆƚƌĂĐƚŝŽŶWĞƌŵŝƚĨŽƌ ϮϬϮϱ͘ ŚĂŝƌƉĞƌƐŽŶ<ĞŶŶŝŶŐĞƌĂƐŬĞĚ,ŽŐĂŶŝĨƚŚĞŝƚĞŵǁŽƵůĚďĞĐŽŶƚŝŶƵĞĚƚŽƚŚĞŶĞǆƚWůĂŶŶŝŶŐŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶ ŵĞĞƚŝŶŐ͘,ŽŐĂŶĐŽŶĨŝƌŵĞĚƚŚĂƚŝƚǁĂƐ͘ ŚĂŝƌƉĞƌƐŽŶ<ĞŶŶŝŶŐĞƌŽƉĞŶĞĚƚŚĞƉƵďůŝĐŚĞĂƌŝŶŐ͘ Motion by<ĞŶŶŝŶŐĞƌSecond byZŝǀĞƌĂ Motion ƚŽĐŽŶƚŝŶƵĞƚŚĞWƵďůŝĐ,ĞĂƌŝŶŐƵŶƚŝůƚŚĞWůĂŶŶŝŶŐŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶDĞĞƚŝŶŐŽŶ:ĂŶƵĂƌǇ Ϯϴ͕ϮϬϮϱ͕ƐŽƚŚĂƚƚŚĞĂƉƉůŝĐĂŶƚĐĂŶƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƚŚĞŝƚǇƌĞƐƵůƚƐŽŶŚĂƵůͲďĂĐŬŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƚĞƐƚŝŶŐ͘ Ayes: 5. Nays: None. Motion Carried. Đ͘ ZĞƋƵĞƐƚďǇsĞƐƚĞƌƌĂ͕>>͕ĂŶĚ^ƚŽŶĞǆ͕>>͕ĨŽƌƌĞŶĞǁĂůŽĨŝƚƐ^ŵĂůů^ĐĂůĞDŝŶĞƌĂů ǆƚƌĂĐƚŝŽŶWĞƌŵŝƚĨŽƌϮϬϮϱ͘ ,ŽŐĂŶƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĞĚĂƌĞƋƵĞƐƚĨŽƌƌĞŶĞǁĂůŽĨĂ^ŵĂůů^ĐĂůĞDŝŶĞƌĂůǆƚƌĂĐƚŝŽŶƉĞƌŵŝƚĨŽƌϮϬϮϱĨŽƌsĞƐƚĞƌƌĂ >>͘ĂŶĚ^ƚŽŶĞǆ>>͘dŚĞƌĞĂƌĞƚŚƌĞĞŽƉĞƌĂƚŽƌƐĐƵƌƌĞŶƚůǇǁŽƌŬŝŶŐŽŶƚŚĞŵŝŶŝŶŐĂƌĞĂŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐ^ŽůďĞƌŐ ŐŐƌĞŐĂƚĞƐ͕ŽůĂŶĚĞƌĂŶĚ^ŽŶƐ͕ĂŶĚ&ƌĂƚƚĂůŽŶĞ͘dŚĞĂƉƉůŝĐĂŶƚŚĂƐďĞŐƵŶƌĞĐůĂŵĂƚŝŽŶŽŶƚŚĞĞĂƐƚƐŝĚĞŽĨ ƚŚĞŵŝŶŝŶŐĂƌĞĂĂŶĚĞǆƉĞĐƚƐƚŽĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞƚǁŽƚŽƚŚƌĞĞĂĐƌĞƐŽĨĨƵƌƚŚĞƌƌĞĐůĂŵĂƚŝŽŶŝŶϮϬϮϱ͘,ŽŐĂŶ ƐŚŽǁĞĚƚŚĞƵƉĚĂƚĞĚƐŝƚĞƉůĂŶĂŶĚƐŝƚĞƉŚŽƚŽƐ͘^ƚĂĨĨƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĞĚƚŚĂƚƚŚĞŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚ ĂƉƉƌŽǀĂůƚŽƚŚĞŝƚǇŽƵŶĐŝůŽĨƚŚĞƉĞƌŵŝƚƌĞŶĞǁĂů͘ Page 3 of 155 ŚĂŝƌƉĞƌƐŽŶ<ĞŶŶŝŶŐĞƌŽƉĞŶĞĚƚŚĞƉƵďůŝĐŚĞĂƌŝŶŐ͘ Motion by<ĞŶŶŝŶŐĞƌSecond byZĞĞĚ MotionƚŽĐůŽƐĞƚŚĞƉƵďůŝĐŚĞĂƌŝŶŐ͘ Ayes: 5. Nays: None. Motion Carried. ŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶĞƌZĞĞĚŵĞŶƚŝŽŶĞĚƚŚĂƚŝƚŝƐŶŝĐĞƚŽƐĞĞůŽŶŐƐƚĂŶĚŝŶŐƉĂƌƚŶĞƌƐŽĨƚŚĞĐŝƚǇĐŽŶƚŝŶƵŝŶŐƚŽďĞ ƐƚĂďůĞŝŶƚŚĞǁŽƌŬƚŚĂƚƚŚĞǇĂƌĞĚŽŝŶŐ͘ Motion byZĞĞĚSecond bytŚŝƚŵĂŶ Motion ƚŽƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚƚŚĞŝƚǇŽƵŶĐŝůĂƉƉƌŽǀĞƚŚĞƌĞŶĞǁĂůŽĨƚŚĞsĞƐƚĞƌƌĂ͕>>͕ĂŶĚ ^ƚŽŶĞǆ͕>>͕^ŵĂůů^ĐĂůĞDŝŶĞƌĂůǆƚƌĂĐƚŝŽŶWĞƌŵŝƚĨŽƌϮϬϮϱ͕ƐƵďũĞĐƚƚŽƚŚĞƚĞƌŵƐĂŶĚ ĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶƐŝŶƚŚĞĂƚƚĂĐŚĞĚϮϬϮϱŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶƐĨŽƌDŝŶĞƌĂůǆƚƌĂĐƚŝŽŶ͘ Ayes: 5. Nays: None. Motion Carried. Ě͘ ZĞƋƵĞƐƚďǇĂƌůŽůĂŶĚĞƌĂŶĚ^ŽŶƐ͕>>ĨŽƌƌĞŶĞǁĂůŽĨĂ^ŵĂůů^ĐĂůĞDŝŶĞƌĂů ǆƚƌĂĐƚŝŽŶWĞƌŵŝƚĨŽƌϮϬϮϱĂŶĚϮϬϮϲ dĞĐŚŶŝĐŝĂŶ>ŝǌ<ŽŚůĞƌƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĞĚĂƌĞƋƵĞƐƚĨŽƌĂƌĞŶĞǁĂůŽĨĂ^ŵĂůůͲ^ĐĂůĞDŝŶĞƌĂůǆƚƌĂĐƚŝŽŶƉĞƌŵŝƚ ĨŽƌϮϬϮϱĂŶĚϮϬϮϲĨŽƌĂƌůŽůĂŶĚĞƌĂŶĚ^ŽŶƐ>>͘dŚĞŵŝŶŝŶŐŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶŝƐĐƵƌƌĞŶƚůǇŝŶWŚĂƐĞĨŽƵƌĂŶĚ ŚĂƐƌĞĐůĂŝŵĞĚWŚĂƐĞƐŽŶĞĂŶĚƚǁŽ͕ĂƐǁĞůůĂƐŵŽƐƚŽĨWŚĂƐĞƚŚƌĞĞ͘<ŽŚůĞƌƐŚŽǁĞĚƚŚĞƐŝƚĞƉůĂŶ͕ ƌĞĐůĂŵĂƚŝŽŶƉůĂŶ͕ĂŶĚƐŝƚĞƉŚŽƚŽƐ͘^ƚĂĨĨƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĞĚƚŚĞŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƉƉƌŽǀĂůŽĨƚŚĞ ƌĞŶĞǁĂůŽĨƚŚĞƉĞƌŵŝƚ͘ ŚĂŝƌƉĞƌƐŽŶ<ĞŶŶŝŶŐĞƌŽƉĞŶĞĚƚŚĞƉƵďůŝĐŚĞĂƌŝŶŐ͘ Motion by<ĞŶŶŝŶŐĞƌSecond byZĞĞĚ MotionƚŽĐůŽƐĞƚŚĞƉƵďůŝĐŚĞĂƌŝŶŐ Ayes: 5. Nays: None. Motion Carried. ŚĂŝƌƉĞƌƐŽŶ<ĞŶŶŝŶŐĞƌƌĞŝƚĞƌĂƚĞĚŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶĞƌZĞĞĚΖƐƉƌĞǀŝŽƵƐƐƚĂƚĞŵĞŶƚƐƚŚĂƚŝƚǁĂƐŐŽŽĚƚŽƐĞĞ ďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĞƐƚŚĂƚŵĂŬĞƚŚĞƌĞŶĞǁĂůƉƌŽĐĞƐƐĞĂƐŝĞƌĂŶĚĐĂŶďĞƉĂƌƚŶĞƌƐƚŽƚŚĞĐŝƚǇ͘ Motion byĞĂĚŶĞƌSecond bytŚŝƚŵĂŶ Motion ƚŽƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚŝƚǇŽƵŶĐŝůĂƉƉƌŽǀĞƚŚĞƌĞŶĞǁĂůŽĨƚŚĞĂƌůŽůĂŶĚĞƌΘ^ŽŶƐ͕>> ^ŵĂůů^ĐĂůĞDŝŶĞƌĂůǆƚƌĂĐƚŝŽŶWĞƌŵŝƚĨŽƌϮϬϮϱĂŶĚϮϬϮϲ͕ƐƵďũĞĐƚƚŽƚŚĞƚĞƌŵƐĂŶĚĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶƐ ŝŶƚŚĞĂƚƚĂĐŚĞĚϮϬϮϱŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶƐĨŽƌDŝŶĞƌĂůǆƚƌĂĐƚŝŽŶ͘ Ayes: 5. Nays: None. Motion Carried. Ğ͘ ZĞŶĞǁĂůŽĨƚŚĞ^ŚĂĨĞƌŽŶƚƌĂĐƚŝŶŐŽ͕͘/ŶĐ͘^ŵĂůů^ĐĂůĞDŝŶĞƌĂůǆƚƌĂĐƚŝŽŶWĞƌŵŝƚĨŽƌ ϮϬϮϱĂŶĚϮϬϮϲ ^ĞŶŝŽƌWůĂŶŶĞƌEĞŵĐĞŬƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĞĚŽŶĂƌĞƋƵĞƐƚĨŽƌĂƌĞŶĞǁĂůŽĨƚŚĞ^ŚĂĨĞƌŽŶƚƌĂĐƚŝŶŐŽ͘/ŶĐ͘^ŵĂůůͲ ƐĐĂůĞDŝŶĞƌĂůǆƚƌĂĐƚŝŽŶWĞƌŵŝƚĨŽƌϮϬϮϱĂŶĚϮϬϮϲ͘EŽŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐǁĞƌĞďƌŽƵŐŚƚŽŶƚŽƚŚĞƐŝƚĞ͕ƐŽƐƚĂĨĨĚŽ Page 4 of 155 ŶŽƚƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĐŽŵƉĂĐƚŝŽŶƚĞƐƚŝŶŐĨŽƌƚŚĞǇĞĂƌ͘dŚĞǇĂƌĞĐƵƌƌĞŶƚůǇŵŝŶŝŶŐƉŚĂƐĞƐĨŽƵƌĂŶĚĨŝǀĞ͘^ŚĂĨĞƌ ƵƐĞƐƚŚĞŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐĨŽƌƚŚĞŝƌŽǁŶƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐƐƚŚĞĂŵŽƵŶƚŽĨŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůďĞŝŶŐƌĞŵŽǀĞĚǀĂƌŝĞƐĚĞƉĞŶĚŝŶŐŽŶ ǁŚĂƚŝƐŶĞĞĚĞĚ͘EĞŵĐĞŬƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĞĚƚŚĞƐŝƚĞƉůĂŶ͕ƌĞĐůĂŵĂƚŝŽŶƉůĂŶ͕ĂŶĚƐŝƚĞƉŚŽƚŽƐ͘^ƚĂĨĨƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĞĚ ƚŚĞŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƉƉƌŽǀĂůƚŽƚŚĞŝƚǇŽƵŶĐŝůĨŽƌƚŚĞƉĞƌŵŝƚ͘ ŚĂŝƌƉĞƌƐŽŶ<ĞŶŶŝŶŐĞƌŽƉĞŶĞĚƚŚĞƉƵďůŝĐŚĞĂƌŝŶŐ͘ Motion by<ĞŶŶŝŶŐĞƌSecond byZĞĞĚ MotionƚŽĐůŽƐĞƉƵďůŝĐŚĞĂƌŝŶŐ Ayes: 5. Nays: None. Motion Carried. Motion byZŝǀĞƌĂSecond byZĞĞĚ Motion toƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚƚŚĞŝƚǇŽƵŶĐŝůƌĞŶĞǁƚŚĞ^ŚĂĨĞƌŽŶƚƌĂĐƚŝŶŐŽ͕͘/ŶĐ͘^ŵĂůů^ĐĂůĞ DŝŶĞƌĂůǆƚƌĂĐƚŝŽŶWĞƌŵŝƚĨŽƌϮϬϮϱĂŶĚϮϬϮϲ͕ƐƵďũĞĐƚƚŽƚŚĞƚĞƌŵƐĂŶĚĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶƐŝŶƚŚĞ ĂƚƚĂĐŚĞĚƌĂĨƚŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶƐĨŽƌDŝŶĞƌĂůǆƚƌĂĐƚŝŽŶ͘ Ayes: 5. Nays: None. Motion Carried. Ĩ͘ ZĞŶĞǁĂůŽĨƚŚĞĂŬŽƚĂŐŐƌĞŐĂƚĞƐ>ĂƌŐĞ^ĐĂůĞDŝŶĞƌĂůǆƚƌĂĐƚŝŽŶWĞƌŵŝƚƚŚƌŽƵŐŚ ϮϬϮϲĂŶĚŝƚƐ/ŶƚĞƌŝŵhƐĞWĞƌŵŝƚĨŽƌĂŐŐƌĞŐĂƚĞƉƌŽĐĞƐƐŝŶŐ͘ EĞŵĐĞŬƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĞĚŽŶĂŬŽƚĂŐŐƌĞŐĂƚĞƐƌĞŶĞǁĂůŽĨĂ>ĂƌŐĞͲ^ĐĂůĞDŝŶĞƌĂůǆƚƌĂĐƚŝŽŶƉĞƌŵŝƚĂŶĚŝƚƐ /ŶƚĞƌŝŵhƐĞWĞƌŵŝƚƚŚƌŽƵŐŚϮϬϮϲ͘/ŶϮϬϮϰ͕ϵϭĂĐƌĞƐŚĂǀĞďĞĞŶƌĞƚƵƌŶĞĚƚŽƚŚĞhŶŝǀĞƌƐŝƚǇĨŽƌĂŐƌŝĐƵůƚƵƌĂů ƵƐĞĂŶĚĂŶĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůϲĂĐƌĞƐǁŝůůďĞƌĞƚƵƌŶĞĚŝŶϮϬϮϱ͘ϯϱĂĐƌĞƐŚĂǀĞďĞĞŶƌĞƚƵƌŶĞĚĂƐŽƉĞŶǁĂƚĞƌŝŶ ƚŚĞƐŽƵƚŚĞƌŶŵŝŶŝŶŐĂƌĞĂ͘EŽĂŐŐƌĞŐĂƚĞǁĂƐƐŽůĚŽƌŚĂƵůĞĚŽƵƚŽĨƚŚĞŶŽƌƚŚĞƌŶŵŝŶŝŶŐĂƌĞĂ͘ŐŐƌĞŐĂƚĞ ƉƌŽĐĞƐƐŝŶŐŝƐĐůĂƐƐŝĨŝĞĚĂƐĂŶŶĐŝůůĂƌǇhƐĞǁŚŝĐŚƌĞƋƵŝƌĞƐŝƚƐŽǁŶ/hW͘EĞŵĐĞŬƐƚĂƚĞĚƚŚĂƚƐƚĂĨĨĨŽƵŶĚ ƚŚĞĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶƐŽĨĂƉƉƌŽǀĂůĐŽŶƚŝŶƵĞƚŽďĞŵĞƚ͘ EĞŵĐĞŬŐĂǀĞĂŶŽǀĞƌǀŝĞǁŽĨĚŝĨĨĞƌĞŶƚĂƌĞĂƐŽŶƚŚĞƐŝƚĞ͘EĞŵĐĞŬĂůƐŽƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĞĚƚŚĞĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚǇŝŵƉĂĐƚƐ ŽĨƚŚĞŵŝŶĞ͘,ĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚƐŝƚĞƉŚŽƚŽƐŽĨƚŚĞŵŝŶŝŶŐĂŶĚƌĞĐůĂŵĂƚŝŽŶƉƌŽĐĞƐƐ͘,ĞĂůƐŽƐŚŽǁĞĚƉŚŽƚŽƐŽĨ ƌĞƐƚŽƌĞĚůĂŶĚ͘^ƚĂĨĨƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĞĚĂƉƉƌŽǀĂů͘dŚĞƉĞƌŵŝƚǁŝůůďĞƵƉĚĂƚĞĚƚŽƌƵŶŽŶĂƚǁŽͲǇĞĂƌĐǇĐůĞďƵƚ ǁŝůůƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĂĚŵŝŶŝƐƚƌĂƚŝǀĞƌĞǀŝĞǁƐŽĨƌĞůĞǀĂŶƚŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶƚŽĞŶƐƵƌĞĐŽŵƉůŝĂŶĐĞ͘ ^ƚĂĨĨƌĞĐĞŝǀĞĚĂůĞƚƚĞƌĂĨƚĞƌƚŚĞWůĂŶŶŝŶŐŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶƉĂĐŬĞƚŚĂĚĂůƌĞĂĚǇďĞĞŶƉƵďůŝƐŚĞĚ͘ Kristina Hays 14944 Athlone Place ΗĞĂƌƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐĐŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶ͕ /ŚŽƉĞĂƐŵĂŶǇŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌƐ/ŚĂǀĞƐƉŽŬĞŶƚŽĂďŽƵƚƚŚŝƐŝƐƐƵĞǁŝůůĂůƐŽďĞƐĞŶĚŝŶŐŝŶůĞƚƚĞƌƐ͘dŚĞŶĞŐĂƚŝǀĞ ŝŵƉĂĐƚŽĨƚŚĞĞǆƉĂŶƐŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞŐƌĂǀĞůƉŝƚ͘DĂŝŶĐŽŶĐĞƌŶŝƐƚŚĞŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞŝŶĚƵƐƚŝŶƚŚĞĂŝƌ͘DĂŶǇŚĂǀĞ ĨĂŵŝůǇŵĞŵďĞƌƐǁŝƚŚƌĞƐƉŝƌĂƚŽƌǇƐĞŶƐiƚŝǀŝƚŝĞƐ͘/ŵƉĂĐƚĂŶĚĐŽŶĐĞƌŶǁŝƚŚĚĞĐƌĞĂƐŝŶŐŚŽŵĞǀĂůƵĞ͘/ŵƉĂĐƚ ŽĨŝŶĐƌĞĂƐŝŶŐďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĐŽŶƐƵŵƉƚŝŽŶŽĨƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĐĂůůǇǁĂƚĞƌƵƐĞĂŶĚƋƵĂůŝƚǇ͘ dŚĂŶŬǇŽƵĨŽƌĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌŝŶŐƚŚĞĐŽŶĐĞƌŶƐŽĨƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐ͘Η Page 5 of 155 ŚĂŝƌƉĞƌƐŽŶ<ĞŶŶŝŶŐĞƌĂƐŬĞĚŝĨƚŚĞƌĞǁŽƵůĚďĞĂŶŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞŝŶŵŝŶŝŶŐǁŝƚŚƚŚĞĂƉƉƌŽǀĂůŽĨƚŚŝƐƉĞƌŵŝƚ ƌĞŶĞǁĂů͘EĞŵĐĞŬĐŽŶĨŝƌŵĞĚƚŚĂƚŶŽƚŚŝŶŐŝƐďĞŝŶŐĞǆƉĂŶĚĞĚ͕ĂŶĚĂŬŽƚĂŐŐƌĞŐĂƚĞƐŝƐĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐƚŚĞŝƌ ŽƌŝŐŝŶĂůŵŝŶŝŶŐƉůĂŶ͘ŚĂŝƌƉĞƌƐŽŶ<ĞŶŶŝŶŐĞƌĂƐŬĞĚĂďŽƵƚĐŽŵƉůĂŝŶƚƐĚƵƌŝŶŐƚŚĞƚǁŽͲǇĞĂƌƉĞƌŵŝƚ ƚŝŵĞůŝŶĞ͘EĞŵĐĞŬƌĞƐƉŽŶĚĞĚƚŚĂƚƚŚĞƌĞŚĂǀĞďĞĞŶƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚůǇůĞƐƐĐŽŵƉůĂŝŶƚƐŝŶƌĞĐĞŶƚǇĞĂƌƐ͕ďƵƚĂŶǇ ĐŽŵƉůĂŝŶƚƐĂƌĞĂĚĚƌĞƐƐĞĚĂƚƚŚĞƚŝŵĞŽĨĐŽŵƉůĂŝŶƚ͘ ŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶĞƌĞĂĚŶĞƌĂƐŬĞĚŝĨŵŝŶŝŶŐǁŝůůďĞĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚďǇϮϬϯϬ͘EĞŵĐĞŬƌĞƐƉŽŶĚĞĚƚŚĂƚŵŝŶŝŶŐǁŝůů ďĞĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞŝŶƚŚĞŶŽƌƚŚĞƌŶƉŽƌƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞƐŝƚĞĂŶĚƌĞĐůĂŵĂƚŝŽŶĐŽƵůĚůĂƐƚƵŶƚŝůϮϬϯϬ͘,ĞĂůƐŽƐĂŝĚƚŚĞ ŵŝŶŝŶŐŽŶƚŚĞƐŽƵƚŚĞƌŶƉŽƌƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞƐŝƚĞǁŝůůŶŽƚďĞĚŽŶĞďǇϮϬϯϬĂŶĚƚŚĞǇŚĂǀĞĂůĞĂƐĞƚŚĂƚƌƵŶƐƵŶƚŝů ϮϬϰϬ͘ŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶĞƌĞĂĚŶĞƌĂƐŬĞĚŝĨŵďĞƌ&ŝĞůĚƐǁĂƐĂǁĂƌĞŽĨƚŚĞŵŝŶŝŶŐƉƌŝŽƌƚŽĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͘ EĞŵĐĞŬƌĞƉůŝĞĚƚŚĂƚƚŚĞŵŝŶŝŶŐǁĂƐŝŶĞĨĨĞĐƚƉƌŝŽƌƚŽƚŚĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚŽĨŵďĞƌ&ŝĞůĚƐ͘ ŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶĞƌZĞĞĚĂƐŬĞĚĂďŽƵƚǁĂƚĞƌƵƐĞĂŶĚŝĨƚŚĞƌĞĐǇĐůĞĚǁĂƚĞƌŝƐƵƐĞĚŝŶƚŚĞƉƌŽĐĞƐƐƚŽƉƌĞǀĞŶƚ ƚŚĞĚƵƐƚ͘EĞŵĐĞŬĐŽŶĨŝƌŵĞĚƚŚĂƚƚŚĞǁĂƚĞƌƌĞĐǇĐůĞĚĨƌŽŵƚŚĞƉŽŶĚŝƐƵƐĞĚŝŶƚŚĞŵŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶƉƌŽĐĞƐƐ͘ ŚĂŝƌƉĞƌƐŽŶ<ĞŶŶŝŶŐĞƌŽƉĞŶĞĚƚŚĞƉƵďůŝĐŚĞĂƌŝŶŐ͘ Ruth Simon 14642 Bloomfield Path DƐ͘^ŝŵŽŶĂƐŬĞĚĂďŽƵƚƚƌĂĨĨŝĐŝŵƉĂĐƚƐĂŶĚŚŽƵƌƐŽĨŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶ͘ Motion by<ĞŶŶŝŶŐĞƌSecond byZĞĞĚ MotionƚŽĐůŽƐĞƉƵďůŝĐŚĞĂƌŝŶŐ Ayes: 5. Nays: None. Motion Carried. EĞŵĐĞŬƌĞƐƉŽŶĚĞĚƚŽDƐ͘^ŝŵŽŶΖƐƋƵĞƐƚŝŽŶƚŚĂƚƚŚĞŵŝŶĞŝƐĂůůŽǁĞĚϮϰͬϳŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶ͘,ĞĂůƐŽƐƚĂƚĞĚ ƚŚĂƚŝƐĐĂǇŶĞǀĞŶƵĞǁĂƐĚĞƐŝŐŶĞĚƚŽŚĂŶĚůĞƚŚĞƚƌĂĨĨŝĐ͕ďƵƚĂŬŽƚĂŐŐƌĞŐĂƚĞƐŚĂƐĂůƐŽďĞĞŶŐŝǀĞŶ ƉĞƌŵŝƐƐŝŽŶƚŽŽƚŚĞƌƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĞĚƌŽƵƚĞƐ͘EĞŵĐĞŬĐůĂƌŝĨŝĞĚƚŚĂƚƐƚĂĨĨŝƐĂǁĂƌĞŽĨƚŚĞĂŵŽƵŶƚŽĨƚƌĂĨĨŝĐŽŶ ŝƐĐĂǇŶĞǀĞŶƵĞĂŶĚŽƵŶƚǇZŽĂĚϰϮ͕ďƵƚƚŽŚŝƐŬŶŽǁůĞĚŐĞƚƌƵĐŬƐŐŽŝŶŐŝŶĂŶĚŽƵƚŽĨƚŚĞŵŝŶŝŶŐƐŝƚĞ ĂǀŽŝĚŝƚ͘ŚĂŝƌƉĞƌƐŽŶ<ĞŶŶŝŶŐĞƌŵĞŶƚŝŽŶĞĚƚŚĂƚĂŶǇŽƚŚĞƌƐŝŵŝůĂƌƋƵĞƐƚŝŽŶƐĐĂŶďĞĂŶƐǁĞƌĞĚďǇ ƌĞĂĐŚŝŶŐŽƵƚƚŽƚŚĞĐŝƚǇΖƐWůĂŶŶŝŶŐĚĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚ͘ ŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶĞƌĞĂĚŶĞƌĂƐŬĞĚĂďŽƵƚĂŝƌƋƵĂůŝƚǇƚĞƐƚƐŝŶƚŚĞŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚŶĞǆƚƚŽƚŚĞŵŝŶĞ͘EĞŵĐĞŬ ƌĞƐƉŽŶĚĞĚƚŚĂƚƚŚĞƌĞĂƌĞƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐĨŽƌŵŝŶŝŶŐŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐƚŽƵƐĞǁĂƚĞƌƚŽŵŝƚŝŐĂƚĞĚƵƐƚ͕ďƵƚŚĞǁĂƐ ŶŽƚƐƵƌĞĂďŽƵƚĂŶǇƚĞƐƚŝŶŐŝŶƚŚĂƚŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĐĂůůǇ͘ Motion byZĞĞĚSecond bytŚŝƚŵĂŶ Motion toƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚƚŚĞŝƚǇŽƵŶĐŝůƌĞŶĞǁƚŚĞĂŬŽƚĂŐŐƌĞŐĂƚĞƐ>ĂƌŐĞ^ĐĂůĞDŝŶĞƌĂů ǆƚƌĂĐƚŝŽŶWĞƌŵŝƚƚŚƌŽƵŐŚϮϬϮϲ͕ƐƵďũĞĐƚƚŽƚŚĞƚĞƌŵƐĂŶĚĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶƐŝŶƚŚĞĂƚƚĂĐŚĞĚƌĂĨƚ ŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶƐĨŽƌDŝŶĞƌĂůǆƚƌĂĐƚŝŽŶWĞƌŵŝƚ͘ Ayes: 5. Nays: None. Motion Carried. Motion byZĞĞĚSecond bytŚŝƚŵĂŶ Motion to ƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚƚŚĞŝƚǇŽƵŶĐŝůƌĞŶĞǁƚŚĞ/ŶƚĞƌŝŵhƐĞWĞƌŵŝƚĨŽƌĂŬŽƚĂŐŐƌĞŐĂƚĞƐ ƚŽŽƉĞƌĂƚĞĂŐŐƌĞŐĂƚĞƉƌŽĐĞƐƐŝŶŐĂŶĚƌĞĐǇĐůĞĚĂŐŐƌĞŐĂƚĞƉƌŽĚƵĐƚƐƉƌŽĐĞƐƐŝŶŐ͘ Page 6 of 155 Ayes: 5. Nays: None. Motion Carried. Ő͘ ZĞŶĞǁĂůŽĨƚŚĞĞŵƐƚŽŶĞ/ŶƚĞƌŝŵhƐĞWĞƌŵŝƚƐĨŽƌďŽƚŚŝƚƐƉƌŝŵĂƌǇĂŶĚƐĞĂƐŽŶĂů ĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐ͘ EĞŵĐĞŬƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĞĚŽŶƚŚĞĞŵƐƚŽŶĞ/ŶƚĞƌŝŵhƐĞWĞƌŵŝƚƌĞŶĞǁĂů͘ĞŵƐƚŽŶĞŝƐĂĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞƉůĂŶŝŶƚŚĞ ĂŶĐŝůůĂƌǇƵƐĞĨĂĐŝůŝƚǇŽĨƚŚĞĂŬŽƚĂŐŐƌĞŐĂƚĞƐƐŝƚĞ͘^ƚĂĨĨĨŽƵŶĚĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶƐƌĞŵĂŝŶŵĞƚďǇƚŚĞĂƉƉůŝĐĂŶƚ ĂŶĚƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĞĚĂƉƉƌŽǀĂů͘EĞŵĐĞŬƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĞĚƉŚŽƚŽƐŽĨƚŚĞƐŝƚĞĂŶĚƚŚĞĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶƐĨŽƌĂƉƉƌŽǀĂů͘ ŚĂŝƌƉĞƌƐŽŶ<ĞŶŶŝŶŐĞƌĂƐŬĞĚŝĨƚŚĞƌĞƐƚƌŝĐƚŝŽŶƐǁĞƌĞůŝĨƚĞĚŽĨĨŽĨŝƐĐĂǇŶĞǀĞŶƵĞ͘EĞŵĐĞŬƌĞƉůŝĞĚƚŚĂƚ ŝƚŝƐĂƉƵďůŝĐƌŽĂĚƚŚĂƚĐŽƵůĚďĞƵƐĞĚ͕ďƵƚƚŚĞĂƉƉůŝĐĂŶƚƚĞŶĚƐƚŽƵƐĞŽƚŚĞƌƌŽƵƚĞƐ͘ ŚĂŝƌƉĞƌƐŽŶ<ĞŶŶŝŶŐĞƌŽƉĞŶĞĚƚŚĞƉƵďůŝĐŚĞĂƌŝŶŐ͘ Motion by<ĞŶŶŝŶŐĞƌSecond byZĞĞĚ MotionĐůŽƐĞƉƵďůŝĐŚĞĂƌŝŶŐ Ayes: 5. Nays: None. Motion Carried. Motion byZĞĞĚSecond byĞĂĚŶĞƌ MotionƚŽZĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚƚŚĂƚƚŚĞŝƚǇŽƵŶĐŝůƉƉƌŽǀĞĂŶ/ŶƚĞƌŝŵhƐĞWĞƌŵŝƚ;/hWͿĨŽƌ ĞŵƐƚŽŶĞWƌŽĚƵĐƚƐŽŵƉĂŶǇƚŽKƉĞƌĂƚĞĂWƌŝŵĂƌǇZĞĂĚǇDŝǆĞĚŽŶĐƌĞƚĞWůĂŶƚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞ ĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶƐ͗ ϭ͘ ŽŵƉůŝĂŶĐĞǁŝƚŚƚŚĞ/ŶƚĞƌŝŵhƐĞWĞƌŵŝƚƉƉůŝĐĂƚŝŽŶĨŽƌƚŚĞWƌŝŵĂƌǇŽŶĐƌĞƚĞWůĂŶƚ ĚĂƚĞĚDĂƌĐŚϮϰ͕ϮϬϭϰ͘ Ϯ͘ ŽŵƉůŝĂŶĐĞǁŝƚŚƚŚĞ>ĂƌŐĞ^ĐĂůĞDŝŶĞƌĂůǆƚƌĂĐƚŝŽŶWĞƌŵŝƚĨŽƌĂŬŽƚĂŐŐƌĞŐĂƚĞƐ ;ZĞƐŽůƵƚŝŽŶϮϬϭϮͲϭϬϱͿ͘ ϯ͘ dŚĞ/ŶƚĞƌŝŵhƐĞWĞƌŵŝƚĞǆƉŝƌĞƐŽŶĞĐĞŵďĞƌϯϭ͕ϮϬϯϰ͘ ϰ͘ dŚĞŽƉĞƌĂƚŽƌŝƐƌĞƐƉŽŶƐŝďůĞĨŽƌƚŚĞĐůĞĂŶƵƉŽĨĂŶǇĚĞďƌŝƐůĞĨƚŽŶƌŽĂĚǁĂǇƐďǇƚƌƵĐŬƐ ůĞĂǀŝŶŐƚŚĞĨĂĐŝůŝƚǇ͘ ϱ͘ ^ƚŽĐŬƉŝůĞƐĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞƉůĂŶƚĐĂŶŶŽƚĞǆĐĞĞĚϲϬĨĞĞƚŝŶŚĞŝŐŚƚ͘ Ayes: 5. Nays: None. Motion Carried. Motion byZĞĞĚSecond byĞĂĚŶĞƌ Motion ƚŽZĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚƚŚĂƚƚŚĞŝƚǇŽƵŶĐŝůƉƉƌŽǀĞĂŶ/ŶƚĞƌŝŵhƐĞWĞƌŵŝƚ;/hWͿĨŽƌ ĞŵƐƚŽŶĞWƌŽĚƵĐƚƐŽŵƉĂŶǇƚŽKƉĞƌĂƚĞĂ^ĞĂƐŽŶĂůZĞĂĚǇDŝǆĞĚŽŶĐƌĞƚĞWůĂŶƚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞ ĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶƐ͗ ϭ͘ ŽŵƉůŝĂŶĐĞǁŝƚŚƚŚĞ/ŶƚĞƌŝŵhƐĞWĞƌŵŝƚƉƉůŝĐĂƚŝŽŶĨŽƌƚŚĞ^ĞĂƐŽŶĂůŽŶĐƌĞƚĞWůĂŶƚ ĚĂƚĞĚDĂƌĐŚ͕Ϯϰ͕ϮϬϭϰ͘ Ϯ͘ ŽŵƉůŝĂŶĐĞǁŝƚŚƚŚĞ>ĂƌŐĞ^ĐĂůĞDŝŶĞƌĂůǆƚƌĂĐƚŝŽŶWĞƌŵŝƚĨŽƌĂŬŽƚĂŐŐƌĞŐĂƚĞƐ ;ZĞƐŽůƵƚŝŽŶϮϬϭϮͲϭϬϱͿ͘ Page 7 of 155 ϯ͘ dŚĞƚĞƌŵŽĨƚŚŝƐ/ŶƚĞƌŝŵhƐĞWĞƌŵŝƚĞǆƉŝƌĞƐŽŶĞĐĞŵďĞƌϯϭ͕ϮϬϯϰ͘ ϰ͘ dŚĞŽƉĞƌĂƚŽƌŝƐƌĞƐƉŽŶƐŝďůĞĨŽƌƚŚĞĐůĞĂŶƵƉŽĨĂŶǇĚĞďƌŝƐůĞĨƚŽŶƌŽĂĚǁĂǇƐďǇƚƌƵĐŬƐ ůĞĂǀŝŶŐƚŚĞĨĂĐŝůŝƚǇ͘ ϱ͘ ^ƚŽĐŬƉŝůĞƐĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞƉůĂŶƚĐĂŶŶŽƚĞǆĐĞĞĚϲϬĨĞĞƚŝŶŚĞŝŐŚƚ͘ Ayes: 5. Nays: None. Motion Carried. NEW BUSINESS EŽŶĞ͘ DISCUSSION <ŝĞŶďĞƌŐĞƌďƌŽƵŐŚƚƵƉƚŚĞϮϬϮϱWůĂŶŶŝŶŐŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶŵĞĞƚŝŶŐƐĐŚĞĚƵůĞĂŶĚƐƚĂƚĞĚƚŚĂƚŝƚŝƐ ƉŽƐƚĞĚŽŶƚŚĞǁĞďƐŝƚĞ͘ŚĂŝƌƉĞƌƐŽŶ<ĞŶŶŝŶŐĞƌƐƚĂƚĞĚƚŚĂƚDĂƌĐŚĂŶĚĞĐĞŵďĞƌĂƌĞƚŚĞŽŶůǇ ŵŽŶƚŚƐƚŚĂƚƚŚĞŵĞĞƚŝŶŐĚŽĞƐŶŽƚĨĂůůŽŶƚŚĞĨŽƵƌƚŚdƵĞƐĚĂǇŽĨƚŚĞŵŽŶƚŚ͘ ZĞĞĚĂƐŬĞĚŝĨŝƚǁŽƵůĚďĞƉŽƐƐŝďůĞƚŽĚŽĂŶǇŵŝŶŝŶŐƚŽƵƌƐ͕ƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĐĂůůǇĞŵƐƚŽŶĞ͘<ŝĞŶďĞƌŐĞƌ ƌĞƉůŝĞĚƚŚĂƚƐƚĂĨĨĐĂŶƌĞĂĐŚŽƵƚĨŽƌŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚŝĞƐ͘ ADJOURNMENT dŚĞƌĞďĞŝŶŐŶŽĨƵƌƚŚĞƌďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐƚŽĐŽŵĞďĞĨŽƌĞƚŚĞWůĂŶŶŝŶŐŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶĂƚƚŚĞƌĞŐƵůĂƌ ŵĞĞƚŝŶŐĂƚŚĞŵĞĞƚŝŶŐǁĂƐĂĚũŽƵƌŶĞĚĂƚϳ͗ϮϯƉ͘ŵ͘ ZĞƐƉĞĐƚĨƵůůǇƐƵďŵŝƚƚĞĚ͕ >ŝǌ<ŽŚůĞƌ ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚǇĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚdĞĐŚŶŝĐŝĂŶ Page 8 of 155 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Planning Commission Regular Meeting: January 28, 2025 Tenative City Council Meeting: March 18, 2025 AGENDA ITEM: Request by Danner, Inc. for renewal of its Small Scale Mineral Extraction Permit for 2025. AGENDA SECTION: OLD BUSINESS PREPARED BY: Julia Hogan, Planner AGENDA NO. 5.a. ATTACHMENTS: Site Location , Applicant's Narrative, Updated Site Plan , Aerial Imagery , Panoramic Imagery, Site Photos APPROVED BY: AK RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to continue the Public Hearing until the Planning Commission Meeting on February 25, 2025, so that the applicant can provide the City results on haul-back material testing. BACKGROUND SUMMARY Applicant & Property Owner(s): Marlon L. Danner of Danner, Inc. Location: 4594 145th Street East – one half mile east of US Highway 52 and one quarter mile south of CSAH 42 Area: 75 Acres Comp. Guide Plan Designation: LDR Low Density Residential; MDR – Medium Density Residential; HDR – High Density Residential Current Zoning: A-2 - Agricultural The Planning Commission is being asked to consider an application from Danner, Inc. requesting renewal of their annual small-scale mineral extraction permit for the 2025 calendar year. The small- scale mineral extraction operation is located at 4594 145th Street East in the eastern portion of the City. Small Scale Mineral Extraction is permitted in the city as an Interim Use within specified areas, and the permit for this mineral extraction site expires after one year. The Danner site has been operating as a mine for several years, and the request for renewal is consistent with similar renewals that have previously been issued for the site. Staff is not aware of any significant issues associated with site mining and haul-back since the last review. Please note that the approved permit allows the applicant to perform grading work in the northern portion of the site, outside the approved mining area. While this work is acceptable under the terms of the permit, the applicant should ensure there is adequate fill and topsoil remaining for reclamation of the mining site. After requesting a modification to the phasing of the grading work that was ultimately approved by the City, the work commenced five years ago and has been part of the Page 9 of 155 ongoing mining and reclamation operation being conducted on the site. All such grading is taking place in the “Phase 1” grading area adjacent to County Road 42. It does not appear that much, if any, additional material was placed in the Phase 1 fill area in 2023 and that area has been stabilized with vegetation. The applicant did provide an updated status map with their submittal materials which verified that mining is not occurring below the 840’elevation requirement of their permit. As part of the approved 2024 permit for mineral extraction, there was a condition that stated that testing of all haul-back material brought to the site must be completed and results submitted to the city by May 2024. The city has not yet received those results but the applicant has stated that testing will occur at the end of this month and results will be submitted to the city once generated. Staff is recommending that this request be continued until the February 25, 2025, Planning Commission Meeting so that the applicant can provide staff with those results. BACKGROUND The Danner operation extracted approximately 40,000 tons of sand and gravel in 2014 and approximately 65,000 tons of material for each year from 2015 through 2017. For 2018 and 2019, the applicant reported the extraction of 60,000 tons of material and this was the case for 2020 as well. 2021 saw about 30,000 tons removed, and 22,000 tons were removed in 2022. In 2023 20,000 tons of material was removed and in 2024 the applicant stated that approximately 25,000 tons of sand and rock were removed from the site. For 2025 the applicant notes that they plan to be extracting 60,000 cubic yards of material from the site. In addition to the excavation activity, Danner continues to import material to the site for future reclamation. Over the past year, the applicant reports that there were 10,000 cubic yards of “haul- back” material brought to the site from a combination of local government road improvement projects and other redevelopment projects in the area. Testing of this material has not been performed since 2018; at that time the annual review included a report describing the testing performed by Braun Intertec on this haul-back material in late 2016 and early 2017. Braun Intertec’s testing found that the soils “meet the requirements of the 2014 Conditions for Small Scale Mineral Extraction Permit for Danner and the Borrow Pit Reclamation Protocol, along with complying with the MPCA guidance for Best Management Practices for the Off-Site reuse of Unregulated Fill.” The material brought to the site over the past few years originated in the same stockpiles from Danner’s South St. Paul yard. Given the relatively small amount of material brought to the site in recent years, and the fact it was coming from the same location, there hasn’t been a sense of urgency to have testing completed. Staff included a condition in the 2024 mineral extraction permit that the haul back testing would need to be done and results submitted to the City by May 2024. Staff has yet to receive those results and the applicant is aware those results are required. The active mining is shown to be continuing in the southernly portions of Phases One, Two and Three. Based upon the plan and site inspection, stockpiling is occurring in the northern portion of Phase one and two. The attached 2024 pit status drawing illustrates the area outlined in blue is a combination of stockpiling, circulation, and material handling activity. This work area is greater than just the mining function. The application previously stated that little restoration is occurring on the site due to stockpiling of Page 10 of 155 material. Staff recommended that some restoration work be completed in 2020 and 2021. The project narrative indicates that some filling has been occurring on the southern property line, and the updated aerial imagery for the property does show that restoration continues to be completed in the southeast corner of the mine. In general, the City expects reclamation to occur as mining reaches the approved elevations, and staff is recommending that this restoration continue in 2025. The applicant has started to run out of room for excavation in the first two phases and will need to continue restoration work in these phases while moving forward into Phase 3. Filling and sloping from east to west has been occurring. During the previous reviews, staff noted that there was storage taking place on the property unrelated to the mining activity. The permit was therefore updated in 2017 to limit the number of storage trailers allowed on the property. Based on staff’s site visit in 2024 and evidence from recent air photographs of the site, the applicant is following the requirement. Grading work is expected to continue throughout 2025 and must adhere to the approved grading plan (as updated to reflect the revised phasing plan). The intent of the grading is to create a level site with access from County Road 42 for future development. It is staff’s understanding that some of the material is from the mining site. The property/owner will be expected to fulfill the reclamation plans using additional on-site material or bring additional topsoil etc. from off site. ISSUE ANALYSIS The subject property is zoned A-2 – Agricultural and meets or exceeds the applicable performance standards for small scale mineral extraction. Small scale mineral extraction is listed as an interim use within the Agricultural district. The table below details the current land use, zoning, and future land use information for the surrounding properties. These properties are all currently zoned Agricultural or Agricultural Preserve and are located within the 2030 or 2040 Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). The 2040 Future Land Use Map anticipates a mixture of residential, business park, and industrial uses in this area. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning Information Direction Current Land Use Zoning Guided Land Use North Agriculture A-2 - Agricultural BP – Business Park and LI – Light Industrial South Agriculture A-1 - Agricultural Preserve LDR – Low Density Residential East Agriculture A-2 - Agricultural LDR – Low Density Residential and MDR – Medium Density Residential West Agriculture/Mining A-2 Agricultural LDR – Low Density Residential, MDR – Medium Density Residential and HDR – High Density Residential Access to the Danner mine comes from County Road 42 via a gravel road along the eastern edge of the property. This road is shared with the Bolander mine to the east. The applicant maintains a private access agreement with the neighboring property to coordinate mining levels and allow continued access to both the sites. The permit application notes that haul roads within the City will continue to be Page 11 of 155 County Road 42 to State Highway 52. The annual renewal for mineral extraction permits includes a site inspection and consultation with the Rosemount Police Department regarding any police activity. Police records noted no activity at (or calls to) the subject property in 2024. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the continuance of the renewal of the Small-Scale Mineral Extraction Permit for Danner Inc. to allow for the applicant to provide the City results of the haul-back material testing. Page 12 of 155 Page 13 of 155 Page 14 of 155 107221 PIT STATUS 2017 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 2422 Enterprise Drive,Mendota Heights, MN 55120 (651)681-1914 Fax:681-9488 CIVIL ENGINEERS LAND PLANNERS LAND SURVEYORS Date Designed Drawn OF 12-10-25 NAP NAP 11DANNER, INC. SOUTH ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55075 ROSEMOUNT PIT - CO. RD. 42 ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA MINERAL EXTRACTION PERMIT 843 HARDMAN AVENUE SOUTH 2025 - STATUS LOCATION MAP LOWEST VERIFIED ELEVATION: 840.01 12-10-24 Page 15 of 155 August 2023 October 2024 Page 16 of 155 April 2023 April 2024 Page 17 of 155 Page 18 of 155 Page 19 of 155 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Planning Commission Regular Meeting: January 28, 2025 Tenative City Council Meeting: February 18, 2025 AGENDA ITEM: Request by Greg Steininger for Renewal of a Small Scale Mineral Extraction Permit for 2025 and 2026 AGENDA SECTION: PUBLIC HEARINGS PREPARED BY: Liz Kohler, Community Development Technician AGENDA NO. 6.a. ATTACHMENTS: Site Location, Draft 2025 Conditions for Mineral Extraction, Applicant Narrative, Site Plan, Aerial Imagery, Site Photos APPROVED BY: AK RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to recommend that City Council approve the renewal of the Max Steininger Inc Small Scale Mineral Extraction Permit for 2025 and 2026 subject to terms and conditions in the attached Draft Conditions for Mineral Extraction. BACKGROUND Applicant and Property Owner: Greg Steininger, Max Steininger Inc. Location: Approximately one mile east of US Highway 52 along CSAH 42; adjacent to 4322 145th Street East Area in Acres: 79 acres Mining Area: 37 acres Comp. Guide Plan Designation: LDR– Low Density Residential, MDR – Medium Density Residential and HDR – High Density Residential Current Zoning: A2- Agricultural The Planning Commission is being asked to consider a request from Max Steininger, Inc. to renew the existing Small-Scale Mineral Extraction Permit for its operation located along County Highway 42 and east of State Highway 52 in the southeastern portion of Rosemount. Small Scale Mineral Extraction is permitted in the city as an Interim Use Permit (IUP) within specified areas, and the permit for such uses expires after one to two years. The applicant applied for the initial mining permit IUP in the summer of 2018 and has been granted renewal of the permit extending it through 2024. The current request would extend the mining permit for an additional two years through the end of 2026. The applicant, Max Steininger, Inc. (affiliated with the property owner County Road 42 Properties), owns a construction and excavation business in Eagan and received approval from the City in 2018 to start a new mining operation next to the Danner Inc. mine along Highway 42. Over the last six years, the applicant has commenced mining activities in the northern-most portions of their Phase 1 mining area, constructed an access road for the mine, and installed a berm along the access road using topsoil from the active mining area. Because the mineral extraction use is closely tied to the applicant’s primary business, there will be limited sales of materials to outside projects from the mine. The Page 20 of 155 applicant has provided a detailed application packet for the mining renewal, and has hired Sunde Engineering to help prepare plans for the site and to provide information as required under the City’s mineral extraction ordinance. Roughly 8 acres of the 15 acres in Phase 1 have been stripped and mining has progressed across 4.5 acres of that stripped area. Approximately 60,000 tons of material were removed in 2024. In addition to the mining, the applicant finished construction of the berm planned along the entrance road in early 2020. The berm was moved further to the east along the access road to provide a more direct and effective screen between the mining road and nearby residential structures. It was also completed to its planned height of 15 feet with an appropriate cover material to prevent erosion, dust, and soil loss. For 2025, the applicant anticipates extracting 50,000 tons of material. As noted by the applicant, material is excavated and processed on site. Processing consists of crushing and screening with portable processing equipment set up upon the floor of the mine recessed from the surrounding grade to reduce noise and dust emissions. Material is stockpiled on the floor of the mine. The applicant also intends to perform recycling of concrete and asphalt material on the property, which will be crushed and blended with on-site materials to produce recycled aggregate blends. The applicant will need to obtain approval by the Dakota County Environmental Management Department prior to the recycling operations. No haul back material was brought to the site in 2024, and no topsoil has been removed from the property. ISSUE ANALYSIS Aggregate mining is reviewed through an interim use permit which is a Quasi-Judicial action. As such, the city has a set of standards and requirements for review. Generally, if the applications meet the ordinance requirements they must be approved. The standards and requirements for this mineral extraction are detailed in Section 11-6-4M of the Zoning Ordinance and the attached Mineral Extraction permit. The subject property is zoned AG – Agriculture and meets or exceeds the applicable performance standards for small scale mineral extraction. Small scale mineral extraction is listed as an interim use within the Agriculture district. The table below details the current land use, zoning, and future land use information for the surrounding properties. These properties are all currently zoned Agricultural and are located within the 2030 Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). The 2040 Future Land Use Map anticipates a mixture of low, medium, and high density residential on the applicant’s parcel. Future reclamation of the site will need to be performed before an impacted area may be developed for housing in accordance with the City’s future land use plan. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning Information Direction Current Land Use Zoning Guided Land Use North Agriculture Agricultural BP- Business Park South Agriculture Agricultural LDR- Low Density Residential East Agriculture Agricultural LDR, MDR, and HDR- Page 21 of 155 Low, Medium, and High Density Residential West Agriculture Agricultural RC- Regional Commercial LDR, MDR, and HDR- Low, Medium, and High Density Residential Access to the Steininger mine comes from County Road 42 via a gravel road along the eastern edge of the property. The applicant has secured the necessary access permits from Dakota County for the access road and will need to continue to abide by the terms and conditions of this permit throughout the life of the mine. The permit application notes that haul routes within the city will continue to be County Road 42 to State Highway 52. As a part of the annual review of all mineral extraction permits, staff consults with the Rosemount Police Department regarding any police activity. Police records found no incidents at the subject property during 2024. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends renewal of the Small Scale Mineral Extraction Permit for Max Steininger, Inc. for 2025 and 2026 based upon a review of the information submitted by the applicant, the mineral extraction standards in Section 11-6-4 of the City Code, City Police records and the attached draft permit. Page 22 of 155 Page 23 of 155 Mineral Extraction Permit 2025 and 2026 2024 Conditions for Small Scale Mineral Extraction Permit MAX STEININGER, INC. A Max Steinnger Inc., hereinafter referred to as the “Property Owner”, shall sign a written consent to these conditions binding itself and its successors or assigns to the conditions of said permit. B The property Owner shall comply with all terms of this permit as well as the standards for mineral extraction listed in Section 11-6-4 M. 11-10-04 of the City Code. C This permit is granted for the area designated as Phase 1 (approximately 15 acres) on Exhibit A, Mineral Extraction Permit Mine Plan, which is attached hereto as an exhibit. Regrading and reclamation shall occur in the area designated Phase 1 on Exhibit A in accordance with the requirement of Section 11-6-4 M 11-10-4.4 of the City Code. Reclamation is not expected to occur in the 2024 calendar year. D The term of the permit shall extend from the date approved by the City Council until December 31, 2026 2024 unless revoked prior to that for failure to comply with the permit requirements. An Annual Mining Permit fee shall be paid to the City of Rosemount. E All required permits from the State of Minnesota, County of Dakota and City of Rosemount (hereinafter "City") or any of their agencies shall be obtained and submitted to the City prior to the issuance of the permit. Failure by the Property Owner to comply with the terms and conditions of any of the permits required under this paragraph shall be grounds for the City to terminate said mining permit. F The final grading for the permit area shall be completed in accordance with the Final Reclamation Plan, attached as Exhibit B, or as approved by the City Engineer, and any other conditions that may be imposed by the City from time to time. G All gravel trucks and other mining related traffic shall enter and exit the mining area from County State Aid Highway 42. It shall be the Property Owner's responsibility to obtain any access permits or easements necessary for ingress and egress. The location of the accesses and/or easements for ingress and egress shall be subject to approval by the City, as well as the County Highway Department if any changes occur relative to the mining process. H A plan for dust control shall be implemented and subject to approval by the City. The Property Owner shall clean dirt and debris from extraction or hauling operations related to the Mineral Extraction Permit from streets. After the Property Owner has received 24-hour verbal notice, the City may complete or contract to complete the clean-up at the Property Owner’s expense. In the event of a traffic hazard as determined by the Public Works Director or Rosemount Police Department, the City may proceed immediately to complete or contract cleanup at Property Owner’s expense without prior notification. I The surface water drainage of the mining area shall not be altered so as to interfere, contaminate, or otherwise affect the natural drainage of adjacent property. J No topsoil shall be removed from the site and the Property Owner shall take necessary measures to prevent erosion of the stockpiled topsoil. The location of the stockpiled topsoil shall be as indicated on Exhibit A. Page 24 of 155 K Any costs incurred now or in the future in changing the location of existing public or private utilities including but not limited to pipelines, transmission structures and sewer infrastructure located within the permit area shall be the sole obligation and expense of the Property Owner. L All costs of processing the permit, including but not limited to planning fees, engineering fees and legal fees, shall be paid by the Property Owner prior to the issuance of the permit. The Property Owner shall reimburse the City for the cost of periodic inspections by the City Engineer or any other City employee for the purpose of insuring that conditions of the permit are being satisfied. The Property Owner agrees to reimburse the City for any other costs incurred as a result of the granting or enforcing of the permit. M The daily hours of operation for the mining area shall be limited to 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday, subject, however, to being changed by the City Council. N The Property Owner shall deposit with the Planning Department a surety bond or cash escrow in the amount of Seven Thousand Five Hundred Dollars per acre ($7,500.00/acre) of active phase in favor of the City for the cost of restoration, regrading and/or revegetating land disturbed by mining activities and to assure compliance with these conditions by the Property Owner. The required surety bonds must be: (1) With good and sufficient surety by a surety company authorized to do business in the State of Minnesota with the right of the surety company to cancel the same only upon at least thirty (30) days written notice to the permit holder and the City. (2) Satisfactory to the City Attorney in form and substance. (3) Conditioned that the Property Owner will faithfully comply with all the terms, conditions and requirements of the permit; all rules, regulations and requirements pursuant to the permit and as required by the City and all reasonable requirements of the City Engineer, or any other City officials. (4) Conditioned that the Property Owner will secure the City and its officers harmless against any and all claims, or for which the City, the Council or any City officer may be made liable by reason of any accident or injury to persons or property through the fault of the Property Owner. (5) The surety bond or cash escrow shall remain in effect from January 1, 2025 December 31, 2023 to July 31, 2025 2027 Upon thirty (30) days’ notice to the permit holder and surety company, the City may reduce or increase the amount of the bond or cash escrow during the term of this permit in order to insure that the City is adequately protected. O. The Property Owner shall furnish a certificate of comprehensive general liability insurance issued by insurers duly licensed within the State of Minnesota in an amount of at least Five Hundred Thousand and no/100 ($500,000.00) Dollars for injury or death of any one person in any one occurrence, bodily injury liability in an amount of at least One Million Five Hundred Thousand and no/100 ($1,500,000.00) Dollars and property damage liability in an amount of at least Two Hundred Fifty Thousand and no/100 ($250,000.00) Dollars arising out of any one occurrence. The policy of insurance shall name the City as an additional insured and shall remain in effect from December 31, 2023 January 1, 2025 to July 31, 2025 2027 P. The storage of equipment (unrelated to the sand and gravel mining and processing), manure, construction debris, or hazardous materials of any kind shall not be permitted on site. The placement of construction debris, manure, or hazardous materials within the pit as fill shall be strictly prohibited. The placement of asphalt in any form shall also be prohibited unless specifically approved by the City as part of the aggregate and concrete recycling activities. Q. No processing or mixing of materials shall occur on the site, except as approved by the Dakota County Environmental Management Department as incidental to a sand and gravel mining operation. Any such Page 25 of 155 activities will be enclosed with snow or cyclone fencing or as approved by City staff. Construction of any ponding areas, wash plants or other processing or equipment brought to the site shall require additional site and grading plan information subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. R. The Property Owner shall hold the City harmless from all claims or causes of action that may result from the granting of the permit. The Property Owner shall indemnify the City for all costs, damages or expenses, including but not limited to attorney's fees that the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims. S. The Property Owner shall comply with such other requirements of the City Council as it shall from time to time deem proper and necessary for the protection of the citizens and general welfare of the community. T. Complete mining and reclamation is required in all phases before any additional mining is authorized. Modifications or expansion of the mining areas must be approved in writing to the City. Property Owner shall submit to the City semiannually a written report indicating the amount of material extracted from the site for the prior six-month period. U. The Property Owner shall incorporate best management practices for controlling erosion and storm water runoff as specified by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the United States Environmental Protection Agency. V. Reclamation shall include the replacement of the entire stockpile of topsoil on the mined area, reseeding and mulching necessary to re-establish vegetative cover for permanent slope stabilization and erosion control. The minimum depth of topsoil shall not be less than two inches after reclamation. No restored slopes may exceed a gradient of 25% or four to 1 (4:1). W. The Property Owner must show how materials stockpiled for recycling will be processed and inform the City of all stockpiled materials. No stockpiles shall exceed elevation of the grades adjacent to the mine (the height of the pit wall). X. The Property Owner may not assign this permit without written approval of the City. The Property Owner will be responsible for all requirements of this permit and all City ordinances on the licensed premises for the permit period unless the Property Owner gives sixty (60) days prior written notice to the City of termination and surrenders the permit to the City. The Property Owner shall identify all Operators prior to their commencement of mineral extraction-related activities in the pit area. The City shall have the authority to cause all mineral extraction activities to cease at any time there is an apparent breach of the terms of this Permit. Y. The Property Owner shall install and maintain a “stock” gate (or equivalent) at the entrance to the property where the mining operation is located. The gate must be secured at 7:00 p.m. and at any time the pit is not in use. Z. There shall be no “haul-back” of materials from any other property or job site that would be imported to the property for fill or other purposes other than incidental concrete recycling as referred to in paragraphs Q and W; topsoil imported for the purpose of re-establishing turf as accepted by the City; and earthen fill materials from projects that further meets the requirements of testing in documents by American Engineering Testing, Inc. (or other City approved geotechnical testing firm), and which is used to replace sand and gravel mined below approved finish grades. AA. Max Steininger., Inc. shall submit semi-annually to the City documentation of the American Engineering Testing, Inc. (or other City approved geotechnical testing firm) environmental and geotechnical testing Page 26 of 155 with documentation verifying the source and quantity of any “haul-back” material. These reports shall be provided by May 15th and November 15th of each year. BB. Max Stieninger., Inc. shall submit an incidence report to the City within three days of any testing that fails for contamination or hazardous materials, or will not produce a normal moisture-density relationship for compaction. CC. Max Steininger., Inc. shall compact the entire reclamation site to a minimum compaction of 95% of maximum dry density. DD. Mining to the elevation of 840 feet above mean sea level provided that the site is reclaimed to the elevation shown on Exhibit A with haul-back, clean-fill material. In no instance shall mining occur in the groundwater aquifer. EE. Blasting or the use of explosives is prohibited. FF. Truck operators within the pit area shall not engage in practices involving slamming tailgates, vibrating boxes, using of “jake” or engine brakes (except in emergency situations) or other such activities that result in excessive noise. GG. The City of Rosemount shall have the ability to collect independent soil and water samples. HH. The operator shall install and maintain “No Trespassing” signs consistent with the standards outlined in Minnesota State Statute 609.605. Max Steininger, Inc., Property Owner, hereby consents and agrees to the foregoing conditions of said mining permit. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Property Owner has hereunto set his hand this _____ day of __________________, 20____. MAX STEININGER, INC. By:__________________________________ Its: _________________________ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) § COUNTY OF __________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ______day of _________________, 20____, by __________________________________, on behalf of Max Stieninger, Inc., Property Owner. ______________________________________ Notary Public Page 27 of 155 Page 28 of 155 Page 29 of 155 Page 30 of 155 Page 31 of 155 Page 32 of 155 Page 33 of 155 Page 34 of 155 August 2023 October 2024 Page 35 of 155 Page 36 of 155 Page 37 of 155 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Planning Commission Regular Meeting: January 28, 2025 Tenative City Council Meeting: February 18, 2025 AGENDA ITEM: Request by Magellan Land Development for approval of rezoning land from A-2 - Agricultural to R-2 - Low to Medium Density Residential and a Preliminary Plat to development 58 townhome units. AGENDA SECTION: PUBLIC HEARINGS PREPARED BY: Julia Hogan, Planner AGENDA NO. 6.b. ATTACHMENTS: Site Location, Property Survey, Preliminary Plat, Site Plan, Grading Plan, Sanitary Utility Plan, Storm Sewer Utility Plan, Existing Conditions, Removal Plan, Landscape Plan, Architectural Renderings, Engineer's Memo Dated January 10, 2025, Parks and Recreation Director's Memo Dated January 21, 2025 APPROVED BY: AK RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to recommend the City Council approve a Zoning Map amendment to rezone the site from A-2 – Agricultural to R2 – Low to Medium Density Residential. Motion to recommend the City Council approve the Preliminary Plat for Akron Ridge, subject to: a. Execution of a Subdivision Agreement. b. Conformance with all requirements of the City Engineer as detailed in the attached memorandum dated January 10, 2025. c. Conformance with all requirements stated within the Dakota County Plat Commission Memorandum. d. Payment of $74,580 as a Landscape Surety. e. Compliance with the conditions and standards within the Parks and Recreation Director’s memorandum dated January 21, 2025. f. Payment of all applicable fees including GIS, Park Dedication and other fees identified in the current fee schedule. g. Incorporation of any easements necessary to accommodate drainage, ponding, streets and utilities. h. Payment of trunk area charges in the amount of: 1. Sanitary Sewer Trunk Charge: $1,075/acre 2. Watermain Trunk Charge: $6,500/acre 3. Storm Sewer Trunk Charge: $6,865/acre Page 38 of 155 BACKGROUND SUMMARY Owner: John and Joyce Remkus Applicant: Magellan Land Development Preliminary Plat Acres: 10 Acres Residential Lots Created: 58 Townhome Lots Gross Density: 6 Units/Acre Comprehensive Plan Guiding: LDR – Low Density Residential Current Zoning: A-2 – Agricultural Proposed Zoning: R-2 – Low to Medium Density Residential The Planning Commission is being asked to consider requests by Magellan Land Development for rezoning and preliminary plat approval to develop 58 townhome units on a 10-acre property east of Akron Avenue and north of Bonaire Path that will be called Akron Ridge. The property is currently zoned A-2 – Agricultural, and the applicant is requesting that the site be rezoned to R-2 – Low to Medium Density Residential to accommodate the townhome development. The site is shown to have a total of 12 townhome buildings with 5 of the buildings containing 6 units per building, and the remaining 7 buildings will contain 4 units per building. At this time only a preliminary plat is being requested with the applicant planning on submitting for a Final Plat for the project at a later date. Staff is recommending approval of the rezoning and preliminary plat requests, subject to the conditions listed in the recommended actions. BACKGROUND The subject property is located at 13040 Akron Avenue which is located directly east of Akron Avenue and approximately a ½ mile north of Bonaire Path. The 10-acre property is zoned A-2 – Agricultural and it contains a single-family home built in 1989. The land directly north and east of the site is owned by Flint Hills Resources and is also zoned A-2. There are currently no plans for development on land located adjacent to this property that is owned by Flint Hills Resources. The land directly west across Akron Avenue contains the Caramore Crossing development which contains traditional detached single-family homes. The land directly south of the subject site is zoned A-2 – Agricultural and contains a single-family home. The proposed development area is guided for LDR – Low Density Residential, which is outlined in the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan land use map. Low Density Residential housing types allows for detached single-family homes, duplexes, twin homes, and townhomes. This subject parcel and the parcel to the south are shown in the Land Use Plan to be one of the last areas in this portion of the city for additional residential growth. ISSUE ANAYLSIS Legal Authority Preliminary plat applications are quasi-judicial decisions for the Planning Commission, meaning that the Planning Commission is acting as judge to determine if the regulations within the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Ordinance are being followed. Generally, if these applications meet the City’s established requirements, they must be approved. Page 39 of 155 Rezonings are a legislative decision for the city, but the rezoning must conform with the adopted Comprehensive Plan to be approved. Therefore, while technically legislative in nature, if a rezoning is in line with the Comprehensive Plan, it should be approved. Staff's review of each application is provided below. General Subdivision Design The preliminary plat area is located directly east of Akron Avenue and approximately ½ mile north of Bonaire Path and north of the Flint Hills Recreation Complex. The site is shown to be accessed by a single public street that extends east and then south off of Akron Avenue. A private road extends east off a portion of the public street to access the proposed townhomes. There are also three private drives that extend south off of the main private road which will give access to a portion of the townhome units. There are guest parking stalls shown throughout the site, specifically on the southern portion of the main private road. There are two stormwater management areas shown on site, one located on the western side of the site east of Akron Avenue and adjacent to the public street. The other ponding area is shown to be on the most eastern side of the site adjacent to the eastern property line and east of the main private drive cul-de-sac. There are 58 townhome units proposed throughout the development area which are shown to be mixed throughout 4-unit and 6-unit townhome buildings. Rezoning and Land Use The site is designated for LDR – Low Density Residential land uses, which typically consists of single- family housing or townhomes with few units per building. The LDR land use designation allows for housing density for up to 6 units per acre. The subject property is currently zoned A-2 – Agricultural, which allows for 1 unit per 40 acres. The applicant is requesting the site be rezoned to R-2 – Low to Medium Density Residential to accommodate the 6 units per acre that is proposed throughout the development. The R-2 zoning district is an allowed secondary zoning district under the LDR – Low Density Residential land use category. The city has most recently seen developments such as Autumn Terrace and Ardan Place be rezoned to an R-2 zoning to accommodate the density of twin home and townhome units. The land north, east and south of the site are currently zoned A-2 – Agricultural and land west of the site is zoned R-1 – Low Density Residential. The land north and east of the site are owned by Flint Hill Resources and development is not yet planned for those areas. The land to the south is similar in nature to the subject site as it has a land use designation of LDR – Low Density Residential. The area to the west contains the Caramore Crossing development which contains detached single-family homes. The city is supportive of this site being rezoned to R-2 – Low to Medium Density Residential as it meets the density requirements laid out in the land use designation of the site. Phasing The applicant has provided a phasing schedule that shows development initially occurring on the most eastern portion of the site, the most western portion of the site, and the northern portion of the site. The public access road off of Akron Avenue, the main private road, both stormwater ponding areas and 30 townhome units will be apart of the first phase of development. The second phase will consist of the remaining 28 townhome units on the southern end of the site and as well as three of the private drive areas. Page 40 of 155 Streets and Parking There is one access road shown into the preliminary plat area extending east off of Akron Avenue. This access road is shown to be a public road and extends south up to the southern property line. There is a private road that extends east off of the public street and gives access to the townhomes throughout the site. The private road ends in a cul-de-sac in the eastern portion of the property adjacent to the future storm water ponding area. There are three private drive segments that extend south off of the main private drive road that gives access to the southern townhome units. The public street will be maintained by the developer until development occurs to the south, which then will transition to a publicly maintained road. On the site plan, there is a total of 29 guest parking stalls provided throughout the site. A majority of the guest parking is shown along the southern main private road that extends east off of Akron Avenue. Each townhome is shown to have two enclosed spaces per unit as well. The number of enclosed units and visitor parking stalls meet the minimum requirement outlined within the zoning code. Also shown throughout the site are 5-foot sidewalks along the southern portion of the main private road and along the southeastern portion of the public road off of Akron Avenue. The portion of the sidewalk along the public road is shown to end at the southern boundary of the property, but when development occurs to the south that will be extended with the road. The city and applicant met with the Dakota County Plat Commission at their January 15, 2025, meeting to discuss the proposed preliminary plat. The Plat Commission approved the preliminary and final plat for the site provided that the conditions outlined in the memorandum that was put together by the County be met. One of those conditions is a short right-turn lane will need to be installed with the access to the site on Akron Avenue. Parks And Open Space The Parks and Recreation staff has reviewed the plans for the proposed Akron Ridge development and has provided review comments in the attached memorandum. The Parks and Recreation department is recommending that an 8-foot-wide trail be benched in on the west side of the development along Akron Avenue. Staff is also recommending that the developer provide the city with a payment to cover the cost of installing the trail. Due to the City not looking to acquire parkland in this development area, the park dedication for Akron Ridge would be cash-in-lieu. The cash dedication for 58 townhome units is $165,300 (58 units x $2,850). Preservation and Landscaping A tree inventory was conducted on the 10-acre subject site and total of 1,443 significant tree inches was identified throughout the property. A total of 1,409 caliper inches will need to be removed from the site to allow for development which means a total of 524 caliper inches of trees will be required to be replaced on site following the formula laid out in the zoning code. In the submitted landscape plan it shows that that the required 524 caliper inches of trees will be met. The landscape plan shows that a total of 226 trees will be planted throughout the preliminary plat area. The zoning code states that multi-family residential sites that contain buildings that are one (1) or two (2) stories shall provide a minimum of eight (8) overstory or coniferous tress plus one (1) tree per Page 41 of 155 unit. There are 58 townhome units proposed for this development so a total of 66 trees is required for that standard. The landscape plan shows to meet that minimum requirement. Trees are shown to be located throughout the site within the open areas, along the public street and private streets, and along the northern, western, and southern property boundaries. Due to the location of transmission easements on the eastern end of the site, trees are unable to be planted in that area. A landscape surety in the amount of $74,580 (226 trees x $300 plus 10%) is required as a condition of approval. Engineering Review The City’s engineer has provided a memorandum containing comments related to the plans provided. The memorandum included comments related to utilities, grading, general storm sewer design and stormwater management. A copy of the memorandum is included in the attachments. RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending approval of the rezoning and preliminary plat requests to develop 58 townhome units on the 10-acre subject property based on the information provided by the applicant and reviewed in this report. Staff recommends several conditions of approval, which are listed in the Recommended Action above. Page 42 of 155 Page 43 of 155 14 100 FD RLS1 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XXX X X X X X X X X XXXXXXXXX GV AK R O N A V E N U E Now or Formerly: Now or Formerly: Now or Formerly: Now or Formerly: 2. 1 15 V GV for JASON PALMBY NWS Project No. 24694 13040 AKRON AVE, ROSEMOUNT, MN BASED UPON TITLE COMMITMENT NO. 696319 OF OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY BEARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF MAY 13, 2024 SITE 13 A GRAPHIC SCALE 0 1" = 50' 25' 50'100' 14 15 A 07/12/2024 Page 44 of 155 SITE PROJECT LOCATION DAKOTA COUNTY SITE MINNESOTA AKRON RIDGE CITY OF ROSEMOUNT SIT E RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT ROSEMOUNT, MN CI V I L E N G I N E E R I N G SI T E D E S I G N PO Box 302 Excelsior, MN 55331 Jason Palmby 612-220-6641 jason@palmby.com Magellan Land Development INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: SITE Page 45 of 155 Now or Formerly: Now or Formerly: Now or Formerly: | | | | | | | | | | 1 1 1 1 LEGEND:SURVEY DATATYPICAL LOT DIMENSION LAYOUT EXISTING ZONING SITE DATA EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION PROPOSED UNITS / DENSITY PROPOSED PHASE SCHEDULE CI V I L E N G I N E E R I N G SI T E D E S I G N PO Box 302 Excelsior, MN 55331 Jason Palmby 612-220-6641 jason@palmby.com Magellan Land Development INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: PROPOSED ZONING KEY NOTES: VISITOR PARKING Page 46 of 155 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1 1 1 1 LEGEND:SURVEY DATA GENERAL GRADING NOTES: CI V I L E N G I N E E R I N G SI T E D E S I G N PO Box 302 Excelsior, MN 55331 Jason Palmby 612-220-6641 jason@palmby.com Magellan Land Development INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: Page 47 of 155 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1 1 1 1 LEGEND: CI V I L E N G I N E E R I N G SI T E D E S I G N PO Box 302 Excelsior, MN 55331 Jason Palmby 612-220-6641 jason@palmby.com Magellan Land Development INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: SURVEY DATA Page 48 of 155 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1 1 1 1 LEGEND:GENERAL UTILITY NOTES:SANITARY AND WATER UTILITY NOTES: CI V I L E N G I N E E R I N G SI T E D E S I G N PO Box 302 Excelsior, MN 55331 Jason Palmby 612-220-6641 jason@palmby.com Magellan Land Development INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: SURVEY DATA Page 49 of 155 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1 1 1 1 LEGEND:GENERAL UTILITY NOTES STORM SEWER UTILITY NOTES: CI V I L E N G I N E E R I N G SI T E D E S I G N PO Box 302 Excelsior, MN 55331 Jason Palmby 612-220-6641 jason@palmby.com Magellan Land Development INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: SURVEY DATA Page 50 of 155 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1 1 1 1 SWPPP NARRATIVE POLLUTION PREVENTION NOTES EROSION CONTROL NOTES EROSION CONTROL INSTALLATION SCHEDULE EROSION CONTROL MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE VEGETATION GROUND COVER SCHEDULE RESPONSIBLE PARTY Owner: Contractor: Manager: EROSION CONTROL QUANTITIES: DESIGN CALCULATIONS SWPPP Designer: LEGEND: EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOCATION OF SWPPP REQUIREMENTS IN PLANS SURVEY DATA CI V I L E N G I N E E R I N G SI T E D E S I G N PO Box 302 Excelsior, MN 55331 Jason Palmby 612-220-6641 jason@palmby.com Magellan Land Development INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: SITE DATA Page 51 of 155 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XXX X X X X X X X X XXXXXXXXX Now or Formerly: Now or Formerly: Now Now or Formerly: 2. 1 | | | | | | | | | | LEGEND: DEMOLITION NOTES CI V I L E N G I N E E R I N G SI T E D E S I G N PO Box 302 Excelsior, MN 55331 Jason Palmby 612-220-6641 jason@palmby.com Magellan Land Development INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: SURVEY DATA EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION Page 52 of 155 HORIZ: 1"=50' VERT: 1"=5' CI V I L E N G I N E E R I N G SI T E D E S I G N PO Box 302 Excelsior, MN 55331 Jason Palmby 612-220-6641 jason@palmby.com Magellan Land Development INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: Page 53 of 155 HORIZ: 1"=50' VERT: 1"=5' CI V I L E N G I N E E R I N G SI T E D E S I G N PO Box 302 Excelsior, MN 55331 Jason Palmby 612-220-6641 jason@palmby.com Magellan Land Development INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: Page 54 of 155 CI V I L E N G I N E E R I N G SI T E D E S I G N PO Box 302 Excelsior, MN 55331 Jason Palmby 612-220-6641 jason@palmby.com Magellan Land Development INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: Page 55 of 155 CONCRETE PAVEMENT - LIGHT DUTY CI V I L E N G I N E E R I N G SI T E D E S I G N PO Box 302 Excelsior, MN 55331 Jason Palmby 612-220-6641 jason@palmby.com Magellan Land Development INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT Page 56 of 155 CI V I L E N G I N E E R I N G SI T E D E S I G N PO Box 302 Excelsior, MN 55331 Jason Palmby 612-220-6641 jason@palmby.com Magellan Land Development INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: Page 57 of 155 CI V I L E N G I N E E R I N G SI T E D E S I G N PO Box 302 Excelsior, MN 55331 Jason Palmby 612-220-6641 jason@palmby.com Magellan Land Development INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: BASIN OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE (OCS-1) INFILTRATION BASIN GENERAL NOTES: Page 58 of 155 Summary Inches Total Significant Tree Inches: 1,443 Heritage Inches:0 Significant Inches Removed: 1,409 Allowed Removals (25%) 361 Inches Removed Above Allowed:1,048 Mitigation Inches Owed (.5" per Inch Removed)524 Page 59 of 155 Page 60 of 155 Page 61 of 155 TAG NO. TREE DIA. (IN) SPECIES CONDITION SIGNIFICANT? HERITAGE? REMOVE? 238 12 BLUE SPRUCE FAIR Y N Y 239 6 BLUE SPRUCE FAIR Y N Y 240 13 BLUE SPRUCE FAIR Y N Y 241 7 BLUE SPRUCE FAIR Y N Y 242 8 BLUE SPRUCE FAIR Y N Y 243 10 BLUE SPRUCE FAIR Y N Y 244 8 BLUE SPRUCE FAIR Y N Y 245 7 BLUE SPRUCE FAIR Y N Y 246 18 COTTONWOOD GOOD Y N Y 247 19 COTTONWOOD FAIR Y N Y 248 16 COTTONWOOD FAIR Y N Y 249 16 COTTONWOOD FAIR Y N Y 250 30 COTTONWOOD GOOD Y N Y 251 6 BOXELDER FAIR Y N Y 252 21 COTTONWOOD FAIR Y N Y 253 8 BOXELDER POOR Y N Y 254 19 COTTONWOOD FAIR Y N Y 255 16 COTTONWOOD FAIR Y N Y 256 15 COTTONWOOD POOR Y N Y 257 22 COTTONWOOD FAIR Y N Y 258 14 COTTONWOOD FAIR Y N Y 259 8 BOXELDER FAIR Y N Y 260 12 COTTONWOOD GOOD Y N Y 261 8 BOXELDER POOR Y N Y 262 7 BOXELDER POOR Y N Y 263 23 COTTONWOOD FAIR Y N Y 264 27 COTTONWOOD GOOD Y N Y 265 20 COTTONWOOD FAIR Y N Y 266 7 BOXELDER POOR Y N Y 267 8 BOXELDER POOR Y N Y 268 7 BOXELDER POOR Y N Y 269 16 COTTONWOOD POOR Y N Y 270 16 COTTONWOOD FAIR Y N Y 271 14 COTTONWOOD FAIR Y N Y 272 15 COTTONWOOD FAIR Y N Y 273 13 COTTONWOOD FAIR Y N Y 274 9 BOXELDER POOR Y N Y 275 22 BOXELDER FAIR Y N Y 276 15 COTTONWOOD FAIR Y N Y 277 18 COTTONWOOD FAIR Y N Y 278 13 COTTONWOOD FAIR Y N Y 279 18 COTTONWOOD FAIR Y N Y 280 16 COTTONWOOD FAIR Y N Y 281 14 COTTONWOOD FAIR Y N Y 282 18 COTTONWOOD FAIR Y N Y 283 19 COTTONWOOD FAIR Y N Y 284 14 COTTONWOOD FAIR Y N Y 285 9 BOXELDER FAIR Y N Y 286 17 BOXELDER FAIR Y N Y 287 9 BOXELDER FAIR Y N Y 288 19 COTTONWOOD POOR Y N Y 289 19 COTTONWOOD FAIR Y N Y 290 22 COTTONWOOD FAIR Y N Y 291 7 BOXELDER POOR Y N Y 292 10 BOXELDER POOR Y N Y 293 11 NORWAY MAPLE GOOD Y N Y 294 9 WHITE OAK FAIR Y N Y 295 9 WHITE OAK FAIR Y N Y 296 12 WHITE PINE GOOD Y N Y 297 12 WHITE PINE GOOD Y N Y 298 12 WHITE PINE GOOD Y N Y 299 12 WHITE PINE GOOD Y N Y 300 12 WHITE PINE GOOD Y N Y 501 12 WHITE PINE GOOD Y N Y 502 12 WHITE PINE GOOD Y N Y 503 10 WHITE OAK GOOD Y N Y 504 24 SILVER MAPLE GOOD Y N Y 505 9 WHITE OAK GOOD Y N Y 506 12 SILVER MAPLE GOOD Y N Y 507 15 SILVER MAPLE GOOD Y N Y 508 15 SILVER MAPLE GOOD Y N Y 509 10 WHITE OAK GOOD Y N Y 510 14 NORWAY MAPLE POOR Y N Y 511 9 RED MAPLE GOOD Y N Y 512 15 SILVER MAPLE FAIR Y N Y 513 11 NORWAY MAPLE GOOD Y N Y 514 7 GREEN SPRUCE POOR Y N Y 515 10 BLUE SPRUCE POOR Y N Y 516 7 BLUE SPRUCE POOR Y N Y 517 6 BLUE SPRUCE FAIR Y N Y 518 9 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE FAIR Y N Y 519 10 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE FAIR Y N Y 520 8 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE FAIR Y N Y 521 6 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE FAIR Y N Y 522 16 COTTONWOOD GOOD Y N Y 523 26 COTTONWOOD GOOD Y N Y 524 20 COTTONWOOD GOOD Y N Y 525 17 SILVER MAPLE FAIR Y N Y 526 6 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE FAIR Y N Y 527 8 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE FAIR Y N Y 528 11 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE FAIR Y N Y 529 11 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE FAIR Y N Y 530 6 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE FAIR Y N Y 531 12 RED OAK GOOD Y N Y 532 6 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE FAIR Y N Y 533 8 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE FAIR Y N Y 534 8 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE FAIR Y N Y 535 9 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE FAIR Y N Y 536 8 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE FAIR Y N Y 537 8 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE FAIR Y N Y 538 8 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE FAIR Y N Y 539 6 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE FAIR Y N Y 540 8 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE FAIR Y N Y 541 8 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE FAIR Y N Y 542 8 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE FAIR Y N Y 543 8 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE FAIR Y N Y 544 10 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE FAIR Y N Y 545 8 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE FAIR Y N Y 546 8 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE FAIR Y N Y 547 9 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE FAIR Y N Y 548 8 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE FAIR Y N Y 549 9 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE FAIR Y N Y 550 8 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE FAIR Y N Y 551 8 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE GOOD Y N Y 552 8 GREEN APPLE TREE FAIR Y N Y 553 10 WHITE PINE GOOD Y N N 554 7 BOXELDER POOR Y N Y 555 6 AMERICAN BEECH POOR Y N N 556 18 BLACK CHERRY GOOD Y N N TAG NO. TREE DIA. (IN) SPECIES CONDITION SIGNIFICANT? HERITAGE? REMOVE? Page 62 of 155 Square Feet: 1,504 Bedrooms: 3 Full Baths: 2 Half Baths: 1 Garages: 2 Stories: 2 Madison Elevation Unit 2 Elevation Unit 3 Elevation 4 Units Page 63 of 155 Be c a u s e w e a r e c o n s t a n t l y i m p r o v i n g o u r p r o d u c t , w e r e s e r v e t h e r i g h t t o r e v i s e , c h a n g e , a n d / o r s u b s t i t u t e p r o d u c t f e a t u r e s , d i m e n s i o n s , s p e c i f i c a t i o n s , a r c h i t e c t u r a l d e t a i l s , a n d d e s i g n s w i t h o u t n o t i c e . In a d d i t i o n , o p t i o n s s h o w n m a y n o t b e a v a i l a b l e i n a l l c o m m u n i t i e s . T h i s b r o c h u r e i s f o r i l l u s t r a t i o n p u r p o s e s o n l y a n d i s n o t p a r t o f a l e g a l c o n t r a c t . P r i c e s a r e s u b j e c t t o c h a n g e w i t h o u t n o t i c e . R o o m di m e n s i o n s a r e a p p r o x i m a t e a n d c a l c u l a t e d f r o m i n s i d e o f p a r t i t i o n . P l e a s e s e e a N e w H o m e C o n s u l t a n t f o r d e t a i l s . P r i n t e d 0 8 - 2 3 . Page 64 of 155 Square Feet: 1,667 Bedrooms: 3 Full Baths: 2 Half Baths: 1 Garages: 2 Stories: 2 Bayfield Elevation Unit 1 Elevation Unit 4 Elevation 4 Units Page 65 of 155 Be c a u s e w e a r e c o n s t a n t l y i m p r o v i n g o u r p r o d u c t , w e r e s e r v e t h e r i g h t t o r e v i s e , c h a n g e , a n d / o r s u b s t i t u t e p r o d u c t f e a t u r e s , d i m e n s i o n s , s p e c i f i c a t i o n s , a r c h i t e c t u r a l d e t a i l s , a n d d e s i g n s w i t h o u t n o t i c e . In a d d i t i o n , o p t i o n s s h o w n m a y n o t b e a v a i l a b l e i n a l l c o m m u n i t i e s . T h i s b r o c h u r e i s f o r i l l u s t r a t i o n p u r p o s e s o n l y a n d i s n o t p a r t o f a l e g a l c o n t r a c t . P r i c e s a r e s u b j e c t t o c h a n g e w i t h o u t n o t i c e . R o o m di m e n s i o n s a r e a p p r o x i m a t e a n d c a l c u l a t e d f r o m i n s i d e o f p a r t i t i o n . P l e a s e s e e a N e w H o m e C o n s u l t a n t f o r d e t a i l s . P r i n t e d 0 2 - 2 4 . Page 66 of 155 Square Feet: 1,506 Bedrooms: 3 Full Baths: 2 Half Baths: 1 Garages: 2 Stories: 2 Ashland Elevation Unit 1 Elevation Unit 4 Elevation 4 Units Page 67 of 155 Be c a u s e w e a r e c o n s t a n t l y i m p r o v i n g o u r p r o d u c t , w e r e s e r v e t h e r i g h t t o r e v i s e , c h a n g e , a n d / o r s u b s t i t u t e p r o d u c t f e a t u r e s , d i m e n s i o n s , s p e c i f i c a t i o n s , a r c h i t e c t u r a l d e t a i l s , a n d d e s i g n s w i t h o u t n o t i c e . In a d d i t i o n , o p t i o n s s h o w n m a y n o t b e a v a i l a b l e i n a l l c o m m u n i t i e s . T h i s b r o c h u r e i s f o r i l l u s t r a t i o n p u r p o s e s o n l y a n d i s n o t p a r t o f a l e g a l c o n t r a c t . P r i c e s a r e s u b j e c t t o c h a n g e w i t h o u t n o t i c e . R o o m di m e n s i o n s a r e a p p r o x i m a t e a n d c a l c u l a t e d f r o m i n s i d e o f p a r t i t i o n . P l e a s e s e e a N e w H o m e C o n s u l t a n t f o r d e t a i l s . P r i n t e d 0 8 - 2 3 . Page 68 of 155 Square Feet: 1,722 Bedrooms: 3 Full Baths: 2 Half Baths: 1 Garages: 2 Stories: 2 Hayward Elevation Unit 2 Elevation Unit 3 Elevation 4 Units Page 69 of 155 Be c a u s e w e a r e c o n s t a n t l y i m p r o v i n g o u r p r o d u c t , w e r e s e r v e t h e r i g h t t o r e v i s e , c h a n g e , a n d / o r s u b s t i t u t e p r o d u c t f e a t u r e s , d i m e n s i o n s , s p e c i f i c a t i o n s , a r c h i t e c t u r a l d e t a i l s , a n d d e s i g n s w i t h o u t n o t i c e . In a d d i t i o n , o p t i o n s s h o w n m a y n o t b e a v a i l a b l e i n a l l c o m m u n i t i e s . T h i s b r o c h u r e i s f o r i l l u s t r a t i o n p u r p o s e s o n l y a n d i s n o t p a r t o f a l e g a l c o n t r a c t . P r i c e s a r e s u b j e c t t o c h a n g e w i t h o u t n o t i c e . R o o m di m e n s i o n s a r e a p p r o x i m a t e a n d c a l c u l a t e d f r o m i n s i d e o f p a r t i t i o n . P l e a s e s e e a N e w H o m e C o n s u l t a n t f o r d e t a i l s . P r i n t e d 0 2 - 2 4 . Page 70 of 155 G:\2025\Planning Cases\25-04 RZ Akron Ridge Rezoning\027331-000 - Akron Ridge - Plan Review Memo 2025.01.10.docx 70 1 X E N I A A V E N U E S | SU I T E 3 0 0 | MI N N E A P O L I S , M N | 55 4 1 6 | 76 3 . 5 4 1 . 4 8 0 0 | WS B E N G . C O M Memorandum To: Brian Erickson, City Engineer Nick Egger, Director of Public Works Anthony Nemcek, Senior Planner Jane Byron, Storm Water Specialist From: Amanda Sachi, PE Henry Meeker, EIT Kris Keller, PE Date: January 10, 2025 Re: Akron Ridge – Preliminary Plat/Site Plan Review WSB Project No. 0267331-000 We have reviewed the documents provided by Civil Engineering Site Design on December 31, 2024. Documents reviewed include: • Akron Ridge Civil Set, dated 12/31/24 • Akron Ridge Strom Sewer Pipe Size Analysis, dated 12/31/24 • Akron Ridge Drainage Analysis, dated 12/31/24 Applicant should provide responses to each comment. We offer the following comments below. 1. General a. Submit for and provide copies to the City of all required permits from regulatory agencies (MCES, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Minnesota Department of Health, NPDES, etc.) b. This site will need to pay some additional regional ponding fees to cover the portion of the site draining to CR 73 ROW. c. Address redline comments on attached plan sheets 2. Preliminary Plat & Site Plan a. Show all drainage and utility easements. b. Note locations of B-618 and D-412/Modified 'S' curb use c. Reference City Standard Detail ST-7 for all valley gutter crossings d. Provide stop/street name signs e. Provide 25' radii at development entrance f. Label all radii of private drives g. Call out ADA compliant ped ramps at all sidewalk crossings h. Provide barricades at private drives A-D for future Phase 2 streets with Phase 1 construction 3. Grading and Retaining Wall Plan a. Provide EOF locations, elevations, and routes for all low points in the roadway and green spaces Page 71 of 155 Akron Ridge – Preliminary Plat/Site Plan Review January 10, 2025 Page 2 i. EOFs must meet minimum 1' freeboard requirements from adjacent or impacted buildings b. Coordinate grading in electrical easement with utility provider i. Verify clearances are not impacted with fills nor structures undermined with cuts. c. Retaining walls exceeding 4’ in height shall require a plan prepared by a licensed engineer submitted for review and approval by the Building Official prior to permit issuance. i. Install fence as required for safety ii. Provide a maintenance agreement to the City on behalf of the homeowners' association as part of the development agreement Retaining wall changed to <4’ in height. 4. Utilities a. Provide limits of public and private facilities including storm sewer, sanitary sewer, water supply and surface improvements. i. Provide easements for all public improvements ii. Provide additional easement for northern storm sewer 1. Easement should be twice the depth of the utility with a minimum of 20' b. All sanitary structures and pipe to be a minimum 6' deep c. Show sanitary and water services on plans i. Show curb stops and cleanouts 1. Show or note that Ford A1 (or approved equal) castings are to be installed on curb stops or cleanouts in impervious surfaces d. Provide utility profiles for all streets i. Show all utility crossings in profile view ii. Call out all required adjustments and offsets at utility crossings iii. Maintain minimum 18" vertical separation between sewer and water iv. Insulate when separation between storm sewer and water is less than 36" e. Recommend installing draintile 25' in each direction of the low point catch basins as per City Standard Detail SD-7 f. Additional gate valves to be installed on private street stubs with Phase 2 i. Stubbed to the south and plugged with Phase 1 g. Verify whether there are utility service stubs present i. Only penetrations and a cross are shown on the as-built ii. Verify if a service stub is present, whether there is an existing gate valve iii. Show additional impacts and restoration required for connections if necessary iv. Match existing sanitary sewer pipe slope h. Realign utilities to the east and north along the future public road i. Stub utilities to southern development limits ii. Reduces required structures and main lengths i. 8" main required to the hydrant lead on the private drives i. Gate valves to be installed with Phase 2 extensions Page 72 of 155 Akron Ridge – Preliminary Plat/Site Plan Review January 10, 2025 Page 3 ii. Shift hydrants to the side of the road instead of at the end for snow removal j. Extend watermain along Private Drive D to the southern development limits for future looping i. Provide air bleed at the end of the pipe 5. Existing Conditions & Removal Plan a. No comments 6. Details a. No comments Stormwater Management Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Comments: 1. General a. A NPDES permit will be required since over an acre of disturbance is proposed. Remains an open comment. b. Soil infiltration testing is recommended to determine design infiltration rates. Rates of up to 3 in/hr will be considered by the City Engineer. Applicant continuing use of 0.8 in/hr per SP-SM soils data. c. Provide a vegetation restoration/landscaping plan. Remains an open comment. 2. Ponds and Wetlands a. The pretreatment cell for the proposed BMP must include a clay liner to ensure it does not drain between rain events. Infiltration basin cross section shown, should include dead storage and call out liner. 3. Emergency Overflow Routes: a. No comments. 4. Retaining Walls: a. Retaining walls exceeding 4’ in height shall require a plan prepared by a licensed engineer submitted for review and approval by the Building Official prior to permit issuance. Retaining wall changed to <4’ in height. 5. Erosion Control: a. Biorolls must surround the entire BMP surface, extend them around the whole 930 contour. b. Riprap must be specified to the bottom of the pretreatment cell in plan view. Remains an open comment. 6. Grading: a. The maximum allowable slope above the pond NWL is 4:1, the 3:1 slopes graded above 936 must be revised. These slopes are corrected on the grading plan, but must be corrected in cross- section detail. Page 73 of 155 Akron Ridge – Preliminary Plat/Site Plan Review January 10, 2025 Page 4 Stormwater Management Plan: 1. General Storm Sewer Design a. Provide a profile view of storm sewer, including callouts for any potential utility conflicts. • The minimum vertical separation between utilities is 18” and insulation is needed for any crossings of storm sewer and watermain within 36”. Remains an open comment. b. The pipes from FES-34 to CB-33 and CB-21 to FES-B must be revised to provide sufficient flow capacity. c. It is preferred that roof drains flow over pervious surface prior to capture in storm sewer. Provide reasoning for or revise roof drainage for units 19-36 north of Private Rd E. Response requested. d. Crown matching is recommended where pipes increase in diameter. Remains an open comment. e. Catchbasin inlets must not exceed 3 cfs of inflows for the 10-year storm event. Flows to each CB must be included in the capacity calculations. f. Flows through intersections should be reduced to the maximum extent practical, catchbasins should be shifted upgradient of intersections to capture flows. g. City standard practice is to have a drop inlet instead of a flared end section at FES-34. • All yard inlets should be reduced as much as feasible. Remains an open comment. This also extends to FES-F and FES-I h. Storm sewer outfalls must route to a pretreatment cell, it is recommended to route CBMH-13 to CBMH-32 to consolidate storm sewer and route to the pretreatment cell. Remains an open comment. i. The BMP must have a City standard OCS, including a weir wall set to at least the 100-yr HWL elevation and sluice gate to open for emergency operation. See attached detail. j. Permission is needed from Dakota County to outlet western BMP into the existing CBMH. k. Ensure weir wall is constructable with only 0.15’ of elevation difference to the OCS grate. 2. Water Quantity a. Required modeling events are the 2-, 10, and 100-year 24-hour events and the 10-day snowmelt event of 7.2 inches. The 1-year event is not required to be modeled. Remains an open comment. b. HydroCAD runoff modeling must be set to “Calculate separate Pervious/Impervious runoff (SBUH weighting)” rather than Weighted-CN. Remains an open comment. c. HydroCAD drainage areas must match between models, there is a 0.38 acre decrease from existing to proposed conditions. 3. Rate/Volume Control a. BMP outflows are not allowable for any rainfall events besides the 10-day snowmelt. This should be achieved with the City standard OCS referenced above. Page 74 of 155 Akron Ridge – Preliminary Plat/Site Plan Review January 10, 2025 Page 5 4. Freeboard a. Please confirm that proposed buildings are slab on grade. If basements are proposed, the low floor must be 1’ above the BMP EOF and HWL. Response requested. 5. Water Quality a. Infiltration calculations must be provided based on City requirements of basin area (not counting basin side slopes) sized to 1/12 ac-ft/ac/day for the entire site area. The following formula can be used to determine this area: 𝑅𝑐𝑞𝑞�ℎ𝑞𝑐𝑐 𝐴𝑞𝑐𝑎 (𝑎𝑐)=𝑅�ℎ𝑞𝑐 𝐴𝑞𝑐𝑎 (𝑎𝑐) 𝐼𝑛𝑐�ℎ𝑙𝑞𝑞𝑎𝑞�ℎ𝑛𝑛 𝑅𝑎𝑞𝑐 (�ℎ𝑛�𝑞⁄)∗0.0416 (𝑐𝑛𝑛𝑞𝑐𝑞𝑞�ℎ𝑛𝑛 𝑐𝑎𝑐𝑞𝑛𝑞) • The current infiltration surface appears to be undersized for the ~19 ac tributary area. Applying the above formula for the 9.62 site acres and 0.8 in/hr infiltration rate results in a required infiltration area of 0.50 acres. The proposed infiltration area of 0.36 acres (excludes side slopes and dead pool surface area) is not large enough. b. The pretreatment cell within the BMP must be designed according to NURP standards. This includes a 10’ safety bench and dead storage volume of at least the 2.5” storm event runoff volume. 6. Easements a. The proposed BMP must be fully contained in a drainage and utility easement. Extend D&U easement to cover entire east BMP up to HWL. General Infrastructure design shall be completed in accordance with the City of Rosemount’s Engineering Guidelines and Standards. Infrastructure construction shall be completed in accordance with the latest edition of the City’s General Specifications and Standard Detail Plates for Street and Utility Construction. Page 75 of 155 M E M O R A N D U M To: Adam Kienberger, Community Development Director Anthony Nemcek, Senior Planner Julia Hogan, Planner From: Dan Schultz, Parks and Recreation Director Date: January 21, 2025 Subject: Akron Ridge Development The Parks and Recreation Department recently reviewed the plans for the Akron Ridge Development and has the following comments: Local Trails and Sidewalks The sidewalk amenities appear to be designed in a manner that works toward the City’s goal of having a well-connected community. Staff does recommend that an 8-foot-wide trail be benched in on the west side of development along Akron Avenue. The developer will also provide the City with a payment to cover the cost of installing the trail. The amount that is paid will be agreed upon by City staff and the developer. Parks Dedication Because the City is not looking to acquire parkland in this development, the parks dedication for this development would be cash in-lieu of land. The cash dedication for 58 medium density units @ $2,850 per units would be $165,300. The Parks and Recreation Commission will review the preliminary plat on Monday, January 27. Please let know if you have any questions about this memo. Page 76 of 155 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Planning Commission Regular Meeting: January 28, 2025 Tenative City Council Meeting: February 18, 2025 AGENDA ITEM: Request by North Wind Test, LLC., for Preliminary and Final Plat approval and rezoning of 60 acres from A-2 to B-2 AGENDA SECTION: PUBLIC HEARINGS PREPARED BY: Anthony Nemcek , Senior Planner AGENDA NO. 6.c. ATTACHMENTS: Site Location, Rezoning Exhibit, Land Use Plan, Plat, Preliminary Site Plan, 151st Street & Blaine Avenue Improvements , Parks and Recreation Review Memo dated January 21, 2025, Engineer's memo dated January 23, 2025, Traffic Impact Analysis APPROVED BY: AK RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to recommend the City Council approve a rezoning of the subject parcel from A2 - Agriculture to B-2 Employment. Motion to recommend the City Council approve the North Wind Addition preliminary and final plats, subject to the following conditions: 1. Execution of a subdivision agreement. 2. Development fees not paid for Outlot A must be submitted are due prior to approval of a building permit for the future substation. 3. Payment of $515,950 in lieu of park land dedication. 4. The developer is responsible for the costs of constructing a bituminous trail along the western side of the Blaine Avenue extension. 5. Conformance with the comments contained within the engineer's memo dated January 23, 2025. 6. Approval of a rezoning of the subject property from A-2 to B-2 in conformance with the City's Comprehensive Plan. BACKGROUND The Planning Commission is being asked to consider requests by North Wind Test, LLC., for the approval of preliminary and final plats and a rezoning of the site from A-2 Agriculture to B-2 Employment. The applicant is planning to develop an aerospace research and testing facility on the 60- acres within the Plat area, which is located immediately south of Meta's data center project and west of Blaine Avenue. The plat includes a parcel in the northeast corner of the site that will be the location of a future substation to serve the site. A preliminary site plan is attached as reference. The Commission should note that in addition to the requests being made at this meeting, North Wind Test Page 77 of 155 will also require approval of a Planned Unit Development to allow for multiple principal uses on a single parcel, and final site and building plan approval prior to site development. The applicant will be making requests for those approvals at a later date. Staff finds the plat in conformance with the lot standards of the B-2 Employment zoning district, and the proposed rezoning is consistent with the City's comprehensive land use plan. Therefore, staff is recommending approval of these two requests. Applicant North Wind Test, LLC. Property Owner University of Minnesota Site Area 60.7 Acres Current Zoning A-2 Agriculture Proposed Zoning B-2 Employment Comp Plan Designation Business Park Legal Authority The Planning Commission is being asked to consider two requests. The first request, approval of preliminary and final plats, is quasi-judicial in nature, meaning the Planning Commission is acting as a judge to determine if the requested plats are in conformance with the requirements and standards of the zoning ordinance. If the proposed plat conforms with the code, it must be approved. The second request, rezoning the site from A-2 to B-2, is legislative in nature. This means the City has wide discretion when deciding to approve or deny the request. That being said, if a requested rezoning is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Land Use plan, it should generally be approved. Land Use and Zoning The site currently located within the A-2 Agriculture zoning district. The applicant is proposing a rezoning of the subject property from A-2 to B-2 Employment. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the City's adopted Comprehensive Land Use Plan, which designates the site for Business Park land uses. The BP-Business Park zoning district was replaced by the B-2 Employment zoning district in the City's 2024 zoning code update. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the rezoning and will be reviewing the proposed plat using the B-2 lot dimension standards. Plat The applicant is requesting approval of both the preliminary and final plats for the North Wind Addition. The proposed plat contains two parcels, one buildable and one an outlot that will be the site of a substation to serve the site. The plat also has land dedicated to a future 151st Street East right of way. This road runs east/west and will continue to be extended westward as development occurs. The preliminary site plan submitted by the applicant shows a temporary cul-de-sac at the western terminus of this road. The table below shows how the proposed plat compares to the dimensional standards of the B-2 Employment district. Standard Required Proposed Minimum Lot Width 120' 281.98' Minimum Lot Area 1 acre 3.67 acres Page 78 of 155 All other site development standards, such as setbacks and building height, will be reviewed with a formal site plan review that will be requested by the applicant at a later date. A preliminary site plan is included in the attachments as a reference and to provide context for the commission. Staff also notes that final plat approval will be required to convert the outlot to a buildable lot prior to the approval of a building permit or site plan for the future substation on that parcel. Park Dedication The Parks and Recreation department has reviewed the proposed plat and is making two recommendations. The first recommendation is for the applicant to pay a fee-in-lieu of land dedication. Based on the size of the plat area, that amounts to $515,950 (60.7 acres @ $8,500 per acre). The second recommendation from Parks and Rec staff relates to a future trail along Blaine Avenue. Meta's data center development included grading along Blaine Avenue to accommodate a future trail. When the time comes that Blaine receives full upgrades, the City will build the trail and assess the applicant for their share of the costs. Engineering The site will be served by newly constructed sewer and water within 151st Street East. This service will be brought down the Blaine Avenue extension. Plans for these improvements are attached to this report. The City's engineering staff has reviewed the preliminary plat and provided a memorandum, which is attached. The memorandum contains comments related to the street improvement and utility plans. Additionally, the applicant has drafted a traffic impact analysis (TIA) which the County reviewed and provided the following feedback: • Modeling Data: The County requested the Synchro traffic models be provided in Version 11 format for review and records. • Signal Timing and Warrants: A more detailed signal warrant analysis is needed for long-term (2040) conditions, including sensitivity analysis to predict when volume thresholds might be met. • Queueing and Storage: The report should include 95th percentile queue lengths and available storage capacity to address potential congestion at key intersections. • Future Geometry: Assumptions should align with planned road improvements, such as those funded by the TED Grant. • Mitigation Needs: Recommendations include adding turn lanes and signal timing adjustments at intersections like CSAH 42 & US Highway 52 ramps and CSAH 42 & Blaine Avenue to address projected traffic increases. • Safety Considerations: Long-term planning should address potential safety concerns, including excessive delays and queue spillbacks, especially at major intersections. These updates aim to ensure the TIA aligns with County standards and adequately addresses the impact of proposed developments on the roadway network. Page 79 of 155 RECOMMENDATION Staff finds the requested rezoning to be consistent with the designated land use of the site within the City's adopted Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Staff also finds the proposed plat to conform with the requirements and standards of the zoning ordinance. Staff is recommending approval of both requested actions subject to conditions. Page 80 of 155 Page 81 of 155 Page 82 of 155 Page 83 of 155 Page 84 of 155 Page 85 of 155 EN G I N E E R I N G / U O F M A M S C ±60 , 0 0 0 S . F . B L A I N E A V E N U E 1 5 1ST S T R E E T SIT E MAI N T E N A N C E BU I L D I N G AE R O D Y N A M I C TU N N E L B U I L D I N G ±46 , 5 0 0 S . F . AE R O - T H E R M A L TU N N E L ±80 , 5 0 0 S . F . CA M P U S H E A T I N G & C O O L I N G P L A N T ±1 3 , 8 0 0 S . F . FU T U R E TU N N E L EL E C T R I C A L B U I L D I N G ±4, 0 0 0 S . F . S E C U R I T Y ± 2 , 8 0 0 S . F . F U T U R E M E T A D A T A C E N T E R AI R S T O R A G E B U I L D I N G ±2 1 , 6 0 0 S . F . COM P R E S S O R C O O L I N G ± 2 , 2 0 0 S . F . AI R C O M P R E S S O R BU I L D I N G ±22 , 5 0 0 S . F . TR A N S F O R M E R S T T T T T FF E = 9 3 3 . 0 ' FFE = 9 3 5 . 1 ' FF E = 9 3 5 . 5 ' FFE = 9 3 4 . 0 ' FFE = 9 3 4 . 0 ' FF E = 9 3 5 . 0 ' FF E = 9 3 5 . 5 ' FF E = 9 3 5 . 5 ' FF E = 9 3 3 . 0 ' F F E = 9 2 9 . 5 ' ELECTRICAL SUBSTATION (BY XCEL) UNIVERSITY OF MN 1,000 FOOT HEAVY INDUSTRIAL SETBACK STORMWATER MANAGEMENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 10' BUILDING & PARKING SETBACK 10 ' B U I L D I N G & P A R K I N G S E T B A C K 10 ' B U I L D I N G & P A R K I N G S E T B A C K 30' BUILDING SETBACK 20' PARKING SETBACK REFER TO PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PLANS PROPOSED SECURITY FENCE REFER TO PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PLANS TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT Th i s d o c u m e n t , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e c o n c e p t s a n d d e s i g n s p r e s e n t e d h e r e i n , a s a n i n s t r u m e n t o f s e r v i c e , i s i n t e n d e d o n l y f o r t h e s p e c i f i c p u r p o s e a n d c l i e n t f o r w h i c h i t w a s p r e p a r e d . R e u s e o f a n d i m p r o p e r r e l i a n c e o n t h i s d o c u m e n t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n a u t h o r i z a t i o n a n d a d a p t a t i o n b y K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . s h a l l b e w i t h o u t l i a b i l i t y t o K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . SHEET NUMBER 20 2 4 K I M L E Y - H O R N A N D A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 11 9 9 5 S I N G L E T R E E L A N E , S U I T E 2 2 5 , E D E N P R A I R I E , M N 5 5 3 4 4 PH O N E : 6 1 2 - 3 1 5 - 1 2 7 2 WW W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ C a l S p a n \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ C 4 - S I T E P L A N . d w g D e c e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 2 4 - 2 : 3 3 p m © BY RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E PR E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N NORTH LEGEND SITE PLAN NOTES 1.REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF STOOPS, TRUCK DOCKS, TRASH ENCLOSURES & PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS. REFER TO THE SITE ELECTRICAL PLAN FOR LOCATIONS OF PROPOSED LIGHT POLES, CONDUITS, AND ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT. 2.REFER TO CERTIFIED SITE SURVEY OR PLAT FOR EXACT LOCATION OF EXISTING EASEMENTS, PROPERTY BOUNDARY DIMENSIONS, AND ADJACENT RIGHT-OF-WAY & PARCEL INFORMATION. 3.DIMENSIONS AND RADII ARE DRAWN TO THE FACE OF CURB, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT, AND AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT. 4.UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR RELOCATING EXISTING SITE IMPROVEMENTS THAT CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED WORK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO TRAFFIC SIGNS, LIGHT POLES, ABOVEGROUND UTILITIES, ETC. PERFORM WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING AUTHORITIES REQUIREMENTS AND PROJECT SITE WORK SPECIFICATIONS. COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID. 5.TYPICAL PARKING STALL DIMENSIONS SHALL BE 9.0-FEET IN WIDTH AND 20-FEET IN LENGTH UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. 6.MONUMENT SIGN(S) ARE DETAILED ON THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND ARE SHOWN FOR GRAPHICAL & INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY SIGN DIMENSIONS, LOCATION AND REQUIRED PERMITS WITH THE OWNER. PR E P A R E D F O R SI T E D I M E N S I O N PL A N C400 PR O J E C T F A L C O N NO R T H W I N D TE S T L L C RO S E M O U N T MN DA T E : I H E R E B Y C E R T I F Y T H A T T H I S P L A N , SP E C I F I C A T I O N O R R E P O R T W A S P R E P A R E D B Y ME O R U N D E R M Y D I R E C T S U P E R V I S I O N A N D TH A T I A M A D U L Y L I C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L EN G I N E E R U N D E R T H E L A W S O F T H E S T A T E O F MI N N E S O T A . MN LI C . N O . BR I A N M . W U R D E M A N , P . E . 12 / 2 7 / 2 0 2 4 53 1 1 3 DA T E CH E C K E D B Y SC A L E DE S I G N E D B Y DR A W N B Y KH A P R O J E C T 16 1 1 5 7 0 0 0 12 / 2 7 / 2 0 2 4 AS S H O W N CG M MO B BM W PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED FENCE SETBACK LINE RETAINING WALL DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVMENT SEE DETAILS FOR SECTION HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT SEE DETAILS FOR SECTION RIGHT OF WAY PAVEMENT SEE DETAILS FOR SECTION HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT SEE DETAILS FOR SECTION STANDARD DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT / SIDEWALK SEE DETAILS FOR SECTION ASPHALT TRAIL SEE DETAILS FOR SECTION GRAVEL PAVEMENT SEE DETAILS FOR SECTION STORM WATER AREA SEE GRADING PLAN FOR DETAILS SITE DATA EXISTING ZONING A-2 AGRICULTURAL PROPOSED ZONING B-2 EMPLOYMENT PARKING SETBACKS SIDE/REAR = 10' FRONT = 20' BUILDING SETBACKS SIDE/REAR = 10' FRONT = 30' NORMAL WATER LEVEL TOP OF BASIN Know what'sbelow. before you dig.Call R Page 86 of 155 EXISTING CABLE TVtvtv LEGEND CB D W EXISTING WATERMAIN MANHOLE EXISTING STORM MANHOLE S EXISTING GATE VALVE EXISTING HYDRANT EXISTING CURB BOX EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER EXISTING CATCH BASIN EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING WATERMAIN EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING POWER POLE EXISTING FENCE EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER EXISTING GAS MAIN EXISTING UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE LINE EXISTING UNDERGROUND POWER EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE EXISTING TREE LINE EXISTING STREET SIGN EXISTING TREE T EXISTING LIGHT POLE EXISTING CABLE TV BOX EXISTING SOIL BORING EXISTING MAILBOX EXISTING GAS VALVEGAS EXISTING ELECTRICAL MANHOLEE ELECTRANS.EXISTING ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER CTV EXISTING TELEPHONE BOX 10111010 1011 PROPOSED HYDRANT PROPOSED GATE VALVE EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR PROPOSED CATCH BASIN PROPOSED WATERMAIN PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER PROPOSED MANHOLE (STORM/SANITARY) EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY EXISTING EASEMENT EXISTING FIBER LINE PROPOSED DRAIN TILE DRAINAGE ARROW PROPOSED BUTTERFLY VALVE BA R B A R A BA B C O C K AU D R E Y BL A I N E AV E . AV E . AV E . AV E . AV E . ST. ST. ST. E. E. E. ST.E.BL A I N E CT . 42 71 152nd 153rd 145th BA R D A V E . CITY OF ROSEMOUNT 0LOCATION MAP PLAN ALIGNMENT PLAN SET SCALES PROFILE UTILITY PLAN 0 0 0 0 CROSS-SECTIONS 0 500 1000 2000 50 100 200 15 30 60 5 10 20 15 30 60 SCALE IN FEET SCALE IN FEET SCALE IN FEET SCALE IN FEET SCALE IN FEET SHEET INDEX (GEOGRAPHIC DESCRIPTION)FROMBLAINE AVENUE CONSTRUCTION PLAN FORGRADING, PAVING, AGGREGATE BASE, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, WATERMAIN, STORM SEWER AND INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 860' NORTH OF 151ST STREET E MAG N E T I C I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ C a l S p a n \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ O f f - S i t e \ F a l c o n - C O V E R . d w g D e c e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 2 4 - 1 0 : 4 3 a m DATE LIC. NO. ENGINEER MICHAEL J. KINNING, P.E. 6082612/31/2024 NOTE: THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CI/ASCE 38-22, ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR INVESTIGATING AND DOCUMENTING EXISTING UTILITIES". THE EXACT LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN IN THIS PLAN SET ARE UNKNOWN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE PRIOR TO STARTING ANY EXCAVATION. GOPHER STATE ONE CALL SYSTEM..........1-800-252-1166 PLAN REVISONS SHEET NO.OF SHEETS DATE SHEET NO.APPROVED BY 1 GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS THE 2020 EDITION OF THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION" SHALL GOVERN. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNING AND DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO THE MMUTCD, INCLUDING THE FIELD MANUAL FOR TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL ZONE LAYOUTS. PROJECT LOCATION DAKOTA COUNTY METRO DISTRICT 151ST STREET AND BLAINE AVENUE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS 48 1200' SOUTH OF 151ST STREET E BLAINE AVE EXCEPTION LENGTH NET LENGTH 2421 FEET 0.459 N/A GROSS LENGTH FEET 0.459 N/A FEET MILES MILES MILES 2421 SHEET NO. 1 2 3-12 13 14-15 16-27 28-36 37-48 DESCRIPTION COVER SHEET CONSTRUCTION NOTES AND UTILITY CONTACTS CITY STANDARD PLATES AND DETAILS TYPICAL SECTIONS ALIGNMENT PLAN AND TABULATION REMOVAL PLANS STREET AND STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION PLAN AND PROFILE SANITARY SEWER CONSTRUCTION PLAN AND PROFILE DAKOTA COUNTY CITY OF ROSEMOUNT LOCAL ROAD 2 30 STOPPING 3.5 N.A. N.A.N.A. X X X X N.A. N.A. X20 YR BESALS No. of Parking Lanes = Design Speed Based on Height of eye Design Speed not achieved at: STA.TO STA.MPH mph Sight Distance Height of Object Design Load ton No. of Traffic Lanes ADT (Current Year) 2022 ADT (Future Year) 2042 DHV (Design Hr. Vol.) 2042 D (Directional Distr.) T (Heavy Commercial) = = = = = = Functional Classification: 0 DESIGN DESIGNATION: % % STA. 50+00 TO STA. 71+69.37 151ST STREET 2.0' N.A. XR-VALUE= LOCATED ON: TO 151ST STREET EXCEPTION LENGTH NET LENGTH 2169 FEET 0.412 N/A GROSS LENGTH FEET 0.412 N/A FEET MILES MILES MILES 2169 LOCATED ON:151ST STREET BLAINE AVENUE1500' WEST OF BLAINE AVENUETOFROM 5 10 20 SCALE IN FEET LOCAL ROAD 2 55 STOPPING 3.5 N/A N/A 10 2300 4800 2150 N.A. N.A. 2,786,00020 YR BESALS No. of Parking Lanes = Design Speed Based on Height of eye Design Speed not achieved at: STA.TO STA.MPH mph Sight Distance Height of Object Design Load ton No. of Traffic Lanes ADT (Current Year) 2022 ADT (Future Year) 2042 DHV (Design Hr. Vol.) 2042 D (Directional Distr.) T (Heavy Commercial) = = = = = = Functional Classification: 0 DESIGN DESIGNATION: % % STA. 89+72.11 TO STA. 110+24+64 BLAINE AVENUE 30R-VALUE= 151ST STREET END CONSTRUCTION STA. 71+69.37 151ST STREET BEGIN CONSTRUCTION STA. 50+00 BLAINE AVENUE BEGIN CONSTRUCTION STA. 89+72.11 BLAINE AVENUE END CONSTRUCTION STA. 133+93.22 PRELIMINARY PLANS Page 87 of 155 PROPOSED TYPICAL SECTION - BLAINE AVE STA. 93+21 TO STA. 108+67 1:4 1:3 (TY P . ) ℄ BLAINE AVENUE 4' SHLD 12' THRU LANE 14' THRU LANE PROP. ROW120.0' PROP. ROW 2' GRVL 34' FUTURE MULTI-USE 2%2%2%2% 6" TOPSOIL AND SEED (TYP.) 6" TOPSOIL AND SEED (TYP.) PROPOSED TYPICAL SECTION - 151ST STREET STA. 50+00 TO STA. 71+69.37 ℄ 151ST STREET 12' THRU LANE 8' SHLD 20' FUTURE MULTI-USE 12' THRU LANE 8' SHLD 5' BLVD PROP. ROW 80.0' 1:4 1:4 PROP. ROW NOTES: 1.ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2.ALL CROSS SLOPES ARE IN PERCENT GRADE. 3.ALL STATIONING IS BASED ON 152ND STREET OR BLAINE AVENUE. 4.CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY INPLACE ELEVATIONS OF INPLACE PAVEMENT ALONG BLAINE AVENUE WHERE PROPOSED PAVEMENT TIES IN. IF ELEVATIONS DIFFER FROM PLANS, NOTIFY THE ENGINEER BEFORE INSTALLING CURB. 5.CENTERLINE OFFSET VARIES. SEE CONSTRUCTION PLAN FOR DETAILS. INSET A - BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT BITUMINOUS TACK COAT (INCIDENTAL) 2" TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MNDOT SPEC 2360 (SPWEA340C) 2" TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MNDOT SPEC 2360 (SPWEA340C) 8" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE (CV), MNDOT SPEC 2211 24" SELECT GRANULAR EMBANKMENT MNDOT SPEC 2106 (CV) 2.5" TYPE SP 12.5 NON-WEARING COURSE MNDOT SPEC 2360 (SPNWB330B) INSET B -CURB AND GUTTER 12:1 1' FROM BOC 6" TOPSOIL AND SEED 4" PERFORATED PE DRAIN TILE WITH COARSE AGGREGATE (MNDOT 3149.2H) WRAP WITH GEOTEXTILE (MN/DOT 3733, TYPE 1) (CITY STANDARD PLATE SD-7). 2' PROPOSED BLAINE AVENUE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT INSET C - SHOULDER & DITCH 6.5" CLASS 2 AGGREGATE SHOULDERING (CV) 24" SELECT GRANULAR EMBANKMENT (CV) MNDOT SPEC 2106 8" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE (CV) 6" TOPSOIL AND SEED SUBGRADE PREPARATION (INCIDENTAL) 24" SELECT GRANULAR EMBANKMENT EXTENDED TO SIDE SLOPE EXISTING SUBGRADE INSET D - BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT BITUMINOUS TACK COAT (INCIDENTAL) 3" TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MNDOT SPEC 2360 (SPWEA340C) 6" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE (CV), MNDOT SPEC 2211 24" SELECT GRANULAR EMBANKMENT (CV) MNDOT SPEC 2106 SUBGRADE PREPARATION (INCIDENTAL) GRANULAR FILL (INCIDENTAL) B418 OR B618 CURB & GUTTER (TYP.) PROPOSED TYPICAL SECTION - BLAINE AVE STA. 89+72 TO STA. 93+21 AND STA. 108+67 TO STA. 134+50 INPLACE ROW 66' INPLACE ROW 120' 2' GRVL 12' THRU LANE 12' THRU LANE 4' SHLD 2' GRVL 6" TOPSOIL AND SEED (TYP.) 1:4 T Y P . 4' (1:3 TY P . ) 1:4 TYP . 4' 1:3 ( T Y P . ) 6" TOPSOIL AND SEED (TYP.) INSET A ℄BLAINE AVE (S) INSET C 2%2% PROFILE GRADE 2% INSET C SEE NOTE 5 PROP. ROW PROP. ROW 66' INPLACE ROW INPLACE ROW INSET AINSET B INSET AINSET B INSET B 2%2%2%2% INSET C 2% 6" TOPSOIL AND SEED (TYP.) K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ C a l S p a n \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ O f f - S i t e \ F a l c o n - T Y P C . d w g D e c e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 2 4 - 1 0 : 4 8 a m DATE: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: PROJECT NO. DRAWING NAME MJK DAT MJK 161157000 Falcon-TYPC.dwg 12/31/2024 MN LIC. NO.DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 6082612/31/2024 MICHAEL J. KINNING, P.E. SHEET NO. 13 48 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT 151ST STREET AND BLAINE AVENUE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS TYPICAL SECTIONS BLAINE AVENUE & 151ST STREET Revisions App.DateNo. Page 88 of 155 85+00 86+00 87+00 88+00 89+00 90+00 91+00 92+00 93+00 94+00 95+00 96+00 97+00 98+00 99+00 100+00 101+00 102+00 103+00 104+00 105+00 106+00 107+00 108+00 109+00 110+00 111+00 112+00 BP : 8 5 + 0 0 . 0 0 67 + 0 0 68 + 0 0 69 + 0 0 70 + 0 0 71 + 0 0 PT: 68+41.54 ℄ BLAINE AVE ℄ 151ST ST L101 L1 0 5 50+00 51+00 52+00 53+00 54+00 55+00 56+00 57+00 58+00 59+00 60+00 61+00 62+00 63+0 0 64 + 0 0 6 5 + 0 0 6 6 + 0 0 67 + 0 0 BP : 5 0 + 0 0 . 0 0 PI : 5 5 + 8 8 . 6 8 PC : 6 2 + 1 3 . 1 7 PRC : 6 5 + 2 8 . 8 2 ℄ 151ST ST L106L107 C104 C1 0 5 112+00 113+00 114+00 115+00 116+00 117+00 118+00 119+00 120+00 121+00 122+00 123+00 124+00 125+00 126+00 127+00 128+00 129+00 130+00 131+00 132+00 133+00 134+00134+50 PC : 1 1 5 + 2 1 . 1 7 PT : 1 1 7 + 9 2 . 6 7 PC : 1 2 5 + 8 1 . 0 4 PT : 1 2 6 + 1 9 . 4 8 PC : 1 3 0 + 0 9 . 7 1 PT : 1 3 0 + 3 1 . 0 9 EP : 1 3 4 + 5 0 . 0 0 L102 L103 L104C101 C102 C103 DATE: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: PROJECT NO. DRAWING NAME MJK DAT MJK 161157000 Falcon-ALIGN.dwg 12/31/2024 MN LIC. NO.DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 6082612/31/2024 MICHAEL J. KINNING, P.E. CITY OF ROSEMOUNT 151ST STREET AND BLAINE AVENUE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS ALIGNMENT PLAN AND TABULATION Revisions App.DateNo.SHEET NO. 14 48 0 50 100 200 HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEET K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ C a l S p a n \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ O f f - S i t e \ F a l c o n - A L I G N . d w g D e c e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 2 4 - 1 0 : 5 0 a m 0 50 100 200 HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEET MATCH LINE 66+00 MA T C H L I N E 6 6 + 0 0 MA T C H L I N E 1 1 2 + 0 0 MA T C H L I N E 1 1 2 + 0 0 Page 89 of 155 ALIGNMENT DATA BLAINE AVE SEGMENT NUMBER L101 C101 L102 C102 L103 C103 L104 BEGINNING STATION 85+00.00 115+21.17 117+92.67 125+81.04 126+19.48 130+09.71 130+31.09 ENDING STATION 115+21.17 117+92.67 125+81.04 126+19.48 130+09.71 130+31.09 134+50.00 PI STATION 116+56.92 126+00.27 130+20.40 NOTES DELTA 1°17'47" 2°56'12" 1°37'58" DEGREE 0°28'38.87" 7°38'21.97" 7°38'21.97" RADIUS (FT) 12000.00 750.00 750.00 TANGENT (FT) 135.75 19.22 10.69 LENGTH (FT) 3021.17 271.50 788.38 38.44 390.23 21.37 418.91 BEGINNING COORDINATES NORTHING 192471.71 195492.76 195764.20 196552.19 196590.62 196980.77 197002.15 BEGINNING COORDINATES EASTING 567993.36 568019.93 568025.39 568050.16 568050.38 568042.64 568042.52 ENDING COORDINATES NORTHING 195492.76 195764.20 196552.19 196590.62 196980.77 197002.15 197421.05 ENDING COORDINATES EASTING 568019.93 568025.39 568050.16 568050.38 568042.64 568042.52 568046.15 AZIMUTH 0°30'14" 0°30'14" 1°48'01" 1°48'01" 1°48'01" 358°51'49" 358°51'49" 358°51'49" 0°29'47" 0°29'47" ALIGNMENT DATA 151ST ST SEGMENT NUMBER L107 L106 C105 C104 L105 BEGINNING STATION 50+00.00 55+88.68 62+13.17 65+28.82 68+41.54 ENDING STATION 55+88.68 62+13.17 65+28.82 68+41.54 71+69.37 PI STATION 63+84.24 66+98.04 NOTES DELTA 54°48'15" 54°17'44" DEGREE 17°21'44.49" 17°21'44.49" RADIUS (FT) 330.00 330.00 TANGENT (FT) 171.07 169.22 LENGTH (FT) 588.68 624.49 315.65 312.72 327.83 BEGINNING COORDINATES NORTHING 194529.48 194530.10 194530.75 194391.24 194251.74 BEGINNING COORDINATES EASTING 565931.29 566519.97 567144.47 567414.28 567681.17 ENDING COORDINATES NORTHING 194530.10 194530.75 194391.24 194251.74 194249.17 ENDING COORDINATES EASTING 566519.97 567144.47 567414.28 567681.17 568008.99 AZIMUTH 89°56'23" 89°56'23" 89°56'23" 144°44'39" 144°44'39" 90°26'54" 90°26'54" DATE: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: PROJECT NO. DRAWING NAME MJK DAT MJK 161157000 Falcon-ALIGN.dwg 12/31/2024 MN LIC. NO.DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 6082612/31/2024 MICHAEL J. KINNING, P.E. CITY OF ROSEMOUNT 151ST STREET AND BLAINE AVENUE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS ALIGNMENT PLAN AND TABULATION Revisions App.DateNo.SHEET NO. 15 48 K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ C a l S p a n \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ O f f - S i t e \ F a l c o n - A L I G N . d w g D e c e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 2 4 - 1 0 : 5 0 a m Page 90 of 155 88+00 89+00 90+00 91+00 92+00 93+00 94+00 ℄ BLAINE AVE INPLACE R/W INPLACE R/W 6 66 ' PROP. R/W PROP. R/W 12 0 ' LEGEND REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT GENERAL REMOVAL NOTES: CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002. ALL UTILITIES MUST BE LOCATED PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. ALL EXISTING ROADWAY & STREET SIGNS WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL BE SALVAGED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR REINSTALLATION CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL EXISTING UTILITY STRUCTURES 1) 2) 3) THAT ARE NOT BEING REMOVED OR RELOCATED. TRENCH BOXES OR OTHER TRENCH STABILIZATION METHODS MAY BE REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION TO MINIMIZE REMOVAL LIMITS. 4) CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY REMOVAL LIMITS WITH ENGINEER PRIOR TO SAWCUTTING. 5) CLEARING & GRUBBING UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. NOTES LEGEND REMOVE EXISTING SIGN PROTECT INPLACE STORM SEWER PIPE PROTECT INPLACE SIGN 1 2 3 PROTECT INPLACE UTILITY POLE4 PROTECT INPLACE UTILITY HANDHOLE5 6 RELOCATE UTILITY (BY OTHERS) FLARED END REMOVAL IS INCIDENTAL TO STORM SEWER PIPE REMOVAL.6) PROTECT INPLACE UTILITY MANHOLE7 REMOVE GRAVEL REMOVE STORM SEWER PIPE8 REMOVE STORM SEWER MANHOLE9 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER REMOVE UTILITY LINES ROCK ENTRANCE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS PAVEMENT SAWCUT (FULL DEPTH) PROTECT INPLACE FLARED-END SECTION10 DATE: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: PROJECT NO. DRAWING NAME MJK DAT MJK 161157000 Falcon-REM.dwg 12/31/2024 MN LIC. NO.DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 6082612/31/2024 MICHAEL J. KINNING, P.E. Revisions App.DateNo.SHEET NO. 16 48 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT 151ST STREET AND BLAINE AVENUE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS REMOVAL PLANS BLAINE AVENUE STA. 89+72 TO STA. 94+00 0 15 30 60 HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEET K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ C a l S p a n \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ O f f - S i t e \ F a l c o n - R E M . d w g D e c e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 2 4 - 1 0 : 5 1 a m MA T C H L I N E 9 4 + 0 0 SE E S H E E T 1 7 Page 91 of 155 C C CO 94+00 95+00 96+00 97+00 98+00 99+00 100+00 ℄ BLAINE AVE INPLACE R/W INPLACE R/W 6 66 6 6 1 1 6 6 6 6 PROP. R/W PROP. R/W 6 6 LEGEND REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT GENERAL REMOVAL NOTES: CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002. ALL UTILITIES MUST BE LOCATED PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. ALL EXISTING ROADWAY & STREET SIGNS WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL BE SALVAGED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR REINSTALLATION CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL EXISTING UTILITY STRUCTURES 1) 2) 3) THAT ARE NOT BEING REMOVED OR RELOCATED. TRENCH BOXES OR OTHER TRENCH STABILIZATION METHODS MAY BE REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION TO MINIMIZE REMOVAL LIMITS. 4) CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY REMOVAL LIMITS WITH ENGINEER PRIOR TO SAWCUTTING. 5) CLEARING & GRUBBING UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. NOTES LEGEND REMOVE EXISTING SIGN PROTECT INPLACE STORM SEWER PIPE PROTECT INPLACE SIGN 1 2 3 PROTECT INPLACE UTILITY POLE4 PROTECT INPLACE UTILITY HANDHOLE5 6 RELOCATE UTILITY (BY OTHERS) FLARED END REMOVAL IS INCIDENTAL TO STORM SEWER PIPE REMOVAL.6) PROTECT INPLACE UTILITY MANHOLE7 REMOVE GRAVEL REMOVE STORM SEWER PIPE8 REMOVE STORM SEWER MANHOLE9 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER REMOVE UTILITY LINES ROCK ENTRANCE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS PAVEMENT SAWCUT (FULL DEPTH) PROTECT INPLACE FLARED-END SECTION10 DATE: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: PROJECT NO. DRAWING NAME MJK DAT MJK 161157000 Falcon-REM.dwg 12/31/2024 MN LIC. NO.DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 6082612/31/2024 MICHAEL J. KINNING, P.E. Revisions App.DateNo.SHEET NO. 17 48 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT 151ST STREET AND BLAINE AVENUE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS REMOVAL PLANS BLAINE AVENUE STA. 94+00 TO STA. 100+00 0 15 30 60 HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEET K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ C a l S p a n \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ O f f - S i t e \ F a l c o n - R E M . d w g D e c e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 2 4 - 1 0 : 5 1 a m MA T C H L I N E 1 0 0 + 0 0 SE E S H E E T 1 6 MA T C H L I N E 9 4 + 0 0 SE E S H E E T 1 8 Page 92 of 155 C 71 + 0 0 71 + 6 9 100+00 101+00 102+00 103+00 104+00 105+00 106+00 ℄ BLAINE AVE ℄ 151ST ST INPLACE R/W INPLACE R/W 6 6 1 6 6 66 ' 12 0 ' PROP. R/W INPLACE HW ESMT 6 6 LEGEND REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT GENERAL REMOVAL NOTES: CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002. ALL UTILITIES MUST BE LOCATED PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. ALL EXISTING ROADWAY & STREET SIGNS WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL BE SALVAGED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR REINSTALLATION CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL EXISTING UTILITY STRUCTURES 1) 2) 3) THAT ARE NOT BEING REMOVED OR RELOCATED. TRENCH BOXES OR OTHER TRENCH STABILIZATION METHODS MAY BE REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION TO MINIMIZE REMOVAL LIMITS. 4) CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY REMOVAL LIMITS WITH ENGINEER PRIOR TO SAWCUTTING. 5) CLEARING & GRUBBING UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. NOTES LEGEND REMOVE EXISTING SIGN PROTECT INPLACE STORM SEWER PIPE PROTECT INPLACE SIGN 1 2 3 PROTECT INPLACE UTILITY POLE4 PROTECT INPLACE UTILITY HANDHOLE5 6 RELOCATE UTILITY (BY OTHERS) FLARED END REMOVAL IS INCIDENTAL TO STORM SEWER PIPE REMOVAL.6) PROTECT INPLACE UTILITY MANHOLE7 REMOVE GRAVEL REMOVE STORM SEWER PIPE8 REMOVE STORM SEWER MANHOLE9 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER REMOVE UTILITY LINES ROCK ENTRANCE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS PAVEMENT SAWCUT (FULL DEPTH) PROTECT INPLACE FLARED-END SECTION10 DATE: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: PROJECT NO. DRAWING NAME MJK DAT MJK 161157000 Falcon-REM.dwg 12/31/2024 MN LIC. NO.DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 6082612/31/2024 MICHAEL J. KINNING, P.E. Revisions App.DateNo.SHEET NO. 18 48 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT 151ST STREET AND BLAINE AVENUE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS REMOVAL PLAN BLAINE AVENUE STA. 100+00 TO STA. 106+00 0 15 30 60 HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEET K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ C a l S p a n \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ O f f - S i t e \ F a l c o n - R E M . d w g D e c e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 2 4 - 1 0 : 5 2 a m MA T C H L I N E 1 0 6 + 0 0 SE E S H E E T 1 7 MA T C H L I N E 1 0 0 + 0 0 SE E S H E E T 1 9 Page 93 of 155 106+00 107+00 108+00 109+00 110+00 111+00 112+00 ℄ BLAINE AVE INPLACE R/W INPLACE R/W BITUMINOUS SAWCUT (FULL DEPTH) 12 0 ' INPLACE HW ESMT INPLACE HW ESMT 66 ' LEGEND REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT GENERAL REMOVAL NOTES: CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002. ALL UTILITIES MUST BE LOCATED PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. ALL EXISTING ROADWAY & STREET SIGNS WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL BE SALVAGED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR REINSTALLATION CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL EXISTING UTILITY STRUCTURES 1) 2) 3) THAT ARE NOT BEING REMOVED OR RELOCATED. TRENCH BOXES OR OTHER TRENCH STABILIZATION METHODS MAY BE REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION TO MINIMIZE REMOVAL LIMITS. 4) CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY REMOVAL LIMITS WITH ENGINEER PRIOR TO SAWCUTTING. 5) CLEARING & GRUBBING UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. NOTES LEGEND REMOVE EXISTING SIGN PROTECT INPLACE STORM SEWER PIPE PROTECT INPLACE SIGN 1 2 3 PROTECT INPLACE UTILITY POLE4 PROTECT INPLACE UTILITY HANDHOLE5 6 RELOCATE UTILITY (BY OTHERS) FLARED END REMOVAL IS INCIDENTAL TO STORM SEWER PIPE REMOVAL.6) PROTECT INPLACE UTILITY MANHOLE7 REMOVE GRAVEL REMOVE STORM SEWER PIPE8 REMOVE STORM SEWER MANHOLE9 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER REMOVE UTILITY LINES ROCK ENTRANCE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS PAVEMENT SAWCUT (FULL DEPTH) PROTECT INPLACE FLARED-END SECTION10 DATE: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: PROJECT NO. DRAWING NAME MJK DAT MJK 161157000 Falcon-REM.dwg 12/31/2024 MN LIC. NO.DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 6082612/31/2024 MICHAEL J. KINNING, P.E. Revisions App.DateNo.SHEET NO. 19 48 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT 151ST STREET AND BLAINE AVENUE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS REMOVAL PLANS BLAINE AVENUE STA. 106+00 TO STA. 112+00 0 15 30 60 HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEET K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ C a l S p a n \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ O f f - S i t e \ F a l c o n - R E M . d w g D e c e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 2 4 - 1 0 : 5 2 a m SE E S H E E T 1 8 MA T C H L I N E 1 0 6 + 0 0 MA T C H L I N E 1 1 2 + 0 0 SE E S H E E T 2 0 Page 94 of 155 112+00 113+00 114+00 115+00 116+00 117+00 118+00 INPLACE R/W INPLACE R/W INPLACE HW ESMT INPLACE HW ESMT 66 ' 12 0 ' LEGEND REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT GENERAL REMOVAL NOTES: CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002. ALL UTILITIES MUST BE LOCATED PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. ALL EXISTING ROADWAY & STREET SIGNS WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL BE SALVAGED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR REINSTALLATION CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL EXISTING UTILITY STRUCTURES 1) 2) 3) THAT ARE NOT BEING REMOVED OR RELOCATED. TRENCH BOXES OR OTHER TRENCH STABILIZATION METHODS MAY BE REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION TO MINIMIZE REMOVAL LIMITS. 4) CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY REMOVAL LIMITS WITH ENGINEER PRIOR TO SAWCUTTING. 5) CLEARING & GRUBBING UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. NOTES LEGEND REMOVE EXISTING SIGN PROTECT INPLACE STORM SEWER PIPE PROTECT INPLACE SIGN 1 2 3 PROTECT INPLACE UTILITY POLE4 PROTECT INPLACE UTILITY HANDHOLE5 6 RELOCATE UTILITY (BY OTHERS) FLARED END REMOVAL IS INCIDENTAL TO STORM SEWER PIPE REMOVAL.6) PROTECT INPLACE UTILITY MANHOLE7 REMOVE GRAVEL REMOVE STORM SEWER PIPE8 REMOVE STORM SEWER MANHOLE9 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER REMOVE UTILITY LINES ROCK ENTRANCE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS PAVEMENT SAWCUT (FULL DEPTH) PROTECT INPLACE FLARED-END SECTION10 DATE: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: PROJECT NO. DRAWING NAME MJK DAT MJK 161157000 Falcon-REM.dwg 12/31/2024 MN LIC. NO.DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 6082612/31/2024 MICHAEL J. KINNING, P.E. Revisions App.DateNo.SHEET NO. 20 48 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT 151ST STREET AND BLAINE AVENUE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS REMOVAL PLANS BLAINE AVENUE STA. 112+00 TO STA. 118+00 0 15 30 60 HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEET SE E S H E E T 1 9 MA T C H L I N E 1 1 2 + 0 0 K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ C a l S p a n \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ O f f - S i t e \ F a l c o n - R E M . d w g D e c e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 2 4 - 1 0 : 5 2 a m MA T C H L I N E 1 1 8 + 0 0 SE E S H E E T 2 1 Page 95 of 155 118+00 119+00 120+00 121+00 122+00 123+00 124+00 INPLACE R/W INPLACE R/W INPLACE HW ESMT INPLACE HW ESMT 66 ' 12 0 ' LEGEND REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT GENERAL REMOVAL NOTES: CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002. ALL UTILITIES MUST BE LOCATED PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. ALL EXISTING ROADWAY & STREET SIGNS WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL BE SALVAGED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR REINSTALLATION CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL EXISTING UTILITY STRUCTURES 1) 2) 3) THAT ARE NOT BEING REMOVED OR RELOCATED. TRENCH BOXES OR OTHER TRENCH STABILIZATION METHODS MAY BE REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION TO MINIMIZE REMOVAL LIMITS. 4) CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY REMOVAL LIMITS WITH ENGINEER PRIOR TO SAWCUTTING. 5) CLEARING & GRUBBING UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. NOTES LEGEND REMOVE EXISTING SIGN PROTECT INPLACE STORM SEWER PIPE PROTECT INPLACE SIGN 1 2 3 PROTECT INPLACE UTILITY POLE4 PROTECT INPLACE UTILITY HANDHOLE5 6 RELOCATE UTILITY (BY OTHERS) FLARED END REMOVAL IS INCIDENTAL TO STORM SEWER PIPE REMOVAL.6) PROTECT INPLACE UTILITY MANHOLE7 REMOVE GRAVEL REMOVE STORM SEWER PIPE8 REMOVE STORM SEWER MANHOLE9 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER REMOVE UTILITY LINES ROCK ENTRANCE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS PAVEMENT SAWCUT (FULL DEPTH) PROTECT INPLACE FLARED-END SECTION10 DATE: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: PROJECT NO. DRAWING NAME MJK DAT MJK 161157000 Falcon-REM.dwg 12/31/2024 MN LIC. NO.DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 6082612/31/2024 MICHAEL J. KINNING, P.E. Revisions App.DateNo.SHEET NO. 21 48 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT 151ST STREET AND BLAINE AVENUE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS REMOVAL PLAN BLAINE AVENUE STA. 118+00 TO STA. 124+00 0 15 30 60 HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEET SE E S H E E T 2 0 MA T C H L I N E 1 1 8 + 0 0 K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ C a l S p a n \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ O f f - S i t e \ F a l c o n - R E M . d w g D e c e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 2 4 - 1 0 : 5 2 a m MA T C H L I N E 1 2 4 + 0 0 SE E S H E E T 2 2 Page 96 of 155 124+00 125+00 126+00 127+00 128+00 129+00 130+00 INPLACE R/W INPLACE R/W INPLACE HW ESMT INPLACE HW ESMT 66 ' 12 0 ' LEGEND REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT GENERAL REMOVAL NOTES: CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002. ALL UTILITIES MUST BE LOCATED PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. ALL EXISTING ROADWAY & STREET SIGNS WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL BE SALVAGED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR REINSTALLATION CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL EXISTING UTILITY STRUCTURES 1) 2) 3) THAT ARE NOT BEING REMOVED OR RELOCATED. TRENCH BOXES OR OTHER TRENCH STABILIZATION METHODS MAY BE REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION TO MINIMIZE REMOVAL LIMITS. 4) CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY REMOVAL LIMITS WITH ENGINEER PRIOR TO SAWCUTTING. 5) CLEARING & GRUBBING UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. NOTES LEGEND REMOVE EXISTING SIGN PROTECT INPLACE STORM SEWER PIPE PROTECT INPLACE SIGN 1 2 3 PROTECT INPLACE UTILITY POLE4 PROTECT INPLACE UTILITY HANDHOLE5 6 RELOCATE UTILITY (BY OTHERS) FLARED END REMOVAL IS INCIDENTAL TO STORM SEWER PIPE REMOVAL.6) PROTECT INPLACE UTILITY MANHOLE7 REMOVE GRAVEL REMOVE STORM SEWER PIPE8 REMOVE STORM SEWER MANHOLE9 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER REMOVE UTILITY LINES ROCK ENTRANCE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS PAVEMENT SAWCUT (FULL DEPTH) PROTECT INPLACE FLARED-END SECTION10 DATE: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: PROJECT NO. DRAWING NAME MJK DAT MJK 161157000 Falcon-REM.dwg 12/31/2024 MN LIC. NO.DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 6082612/31/2024 MICHAEL J. KINNING, P.E. Revisions App.DateNo.SHEET NO. 22 48 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT 151ST STREET AND BLAINE AVENUE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS REMOVAL PLAN BLAINE AVENUE STA. 124+00 TO STA. 130+00 0 15 30 60 HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEET SE E S H E E T 2 1 MA T C H L I N E 1 2 4 + 0 0 K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ C a l S p a n \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ O f f - S i t e \ F a l c o n - R E M . d w g D e c e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 2 4 - 1 0 : 5 2 a m MA T C H L I N E 1 3 0 + 0 0 SE E S H E E T 2 3 Page 97 of 155 130+00 131+00 132+00 133+00 134+00 134+50 INPLACE R/W INPLACE R/W INPLACE HW ESMT 66 ' INPLACE HW ESMT END CONSTRUCTION BLAINE AVE STA. 133+93.22 LEGEND REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT GENERAL REMOVAL NOTES: CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002. ALL UTILITIES MUST BE LOCATED PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. ALL EXISTING ROADWAY & STREET SIGNS WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL BE SALVAGED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR REINSTALLATION CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL EXISTING UTILITY STRUCTURES 1) 2) 3) THAT ARE NOT BEING REMOVED OR RELOCATED. TRENCH BOXES OR OTHER TRENCH STABILIZATION METHODS MAY BE REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION TO MINIMIZE REMOVAL LIMITS. 4) CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY REMOVAL LIMITS WITH ENGINEER PRIOR TO SAWCUTTING. 5) CLEARING & GRUBBING UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. NOTES LEGEND REMOVE EXISTING SIGN PROTECT INPLACE STORM SEWER PIPE PROTECT INPLACE SIGN 1 2 3 PROTECT INPLACE UTILITY POLE4 PROTECT INPLACE UTILITY HANDHOLE5 6 RELOCATE UTILITY (BY OTHERS) FLARED END REMOVAL IS INCIDENTAL TO STORM SEWER PIPE REMOVAL.6) PROTECT INPLACE UTILITY MANHOLE7 REMOVE GRAVEL REMOVE STORM SEWER PIPE8 REMOVE STORM SEWER MANHOLE9 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER REMOVE UTILITY LINES ROCK ENTRANCE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS PAVEMENT SAWCUT (FULL DEPTH) PROTECT INPLACE FLARED-END SECTION10 DATE: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: PROJECT NO. DRAWING NAME MJK DAT MJK 161157000 Falcon-REM.dwg 12/31/2024 MN LIC. NO.DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 6082612/31/2024 MICHAEL J. KINNING, P.E. Revisions App.DateNo.SHEET NO. 23 48 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT 151ST STREET AND BLAINE AVENUE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS REMOVAL PLAN BLAINE AVENUE STA. 130+00 TO STA. 133+93 0 15 30 60 HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEET SE E S H E E T 2 2 MA T C H L I N E 1 3 0 + 0 0 K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ C a l S p a n \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ O f f - S i t e \ F a l c o n - R E M . d w g D e c e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 2 4 - 1 0 : 5 2 a m Page 98 of 155 50+00 51+00 52+00 53+00 54+00 PROP. R/W EXIST. ROW 80 ' ℄ 151ST ST LEGEND REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT GENERAL REMOVAL NOTES: CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002. ALL UTILITIES MUST BE LOCATED PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. ALL EXISTING ROADWAY & STREET SIGNS WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL BE SALVAGED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR REINSTALLATION CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL EXISTING UTILITY STRUCTURES 1) 2) 3) THAT ARE NOT BEING REMOVED OR RELOCATED. TRENCH BOXES OR OTHER TRENCH STABILIZATION METHODS MAY BE REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION TO MINIMIZE REMOVAL LIMITS. 4) CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY REMOVAL LIMITS WITH ENGINEER PRIOR TO SAWCUTTING. 5) CLEARING & GRUBBING UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. NOTES LEGEND REMOVE EXISTING SIGN PROTECT INPLACE STORM SEWER PIPE PROTECT INPLACE SIGN 1 2 3 PROTECT INPLACE UTILITY POLE4 PROTECT INPLACE UTILITY HANDHOLE5 6 RELOCATE UTILITY (BY OTHERS) FLARED END REMOVAL IS INCIDENTAL TO STORM SEWER PIPE REMOVAL.6) PROTECT INPLACE UTILITY MANHOLE7 REMOVE GRAVEL REMOVE STORM SEWER PIPE8 REMOVE STORM SEWER MANHOLE9 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER REMOVE UTILITY LINES ROCK ENTRANCE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS PAVEMENT SAWCUT (FULL DEPTH) PROTECT INPLACE FLARED-END SECTION10 DATE: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: PROJECT NO. DRAWING NAME MJK DAT MJK 161157000 Falcon-REM.dwg 12/31/2024 MN LIC. NO.DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 6082612/31/2024 MICHAEL J. KINNING, P.E. SHEET NO. 24 48 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT 151ST STREET AND BLAINE AVENUE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS REMOVAL PLAN 151ST ST STA. 50+00 TO STA. 54+00 0 15 30 60 HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEET Revisions App.DateNo. 4 5/21/24 PLAN REVISION NO. 4 MJK K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ C a l S p a n \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ O f f - S i t e \ F a l c o n - R E M . d w g D e c e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 2 4 - 1 0 : 5 2 a m MA T C H L I N E 5 4 + 0 0 SE E S H E E T 2 6 Page 99 of 155 54+00 55+00 56+00 57+00 58+00 59+00 60+00 ℄ 151ST ST 6 6 6 80 ' EXIST. ROW EXIST. ROW LEGEND REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT GENERAL REMOVAL NOTES: CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002. ALL UTILITIES MUST BE LOCATED PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. ALL EXISTING ROADWAY & STREET SIGNS WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL BE SALVAGED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR REINSTALLATION CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL EXISTING UTILITY STRUCTURES 1) 2) 3) THAT ARE NOT BEING REMOVED OR RELOCATED. TRENCH BOXES OR OTHER TRENCH STABILIZATION METHODS MAY BE REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION TO MINIMIZE REMOVAL LIMITS. 4) CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY REMOVAL LIMITS WITH ENGINEER PRIOR TO SAWCUTTING. 5) CLEARING & GRUBBING UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. NOTES LEGEND REMOVE EXISTING SIGN PROTECT INPLACE STORM SEWER PIPE PROTECT INPLACE SIGN 1 2 3 PROTECT INPLACE UTILITY POLE4 PROTECT INPLACE UTILITY HANDHOLE5 6 RELOCATE UTILITY (BY OTHERS) FLARED END REMOVAL IS INCIDENTAL TO STORM SEWER PIPE REMOVAL.6) PROTECT INPLACE UTILITY MANHOLE7 REMOVE GRAVEL REMOVE STORM SEWER PIPE8 REMOVE STORM SEWER MANHOLE9 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER REMOVE UTILITY LINES ROCK ENTRANCE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS PAVEMENT SAWCUT (FULL DEPTH) PROTECT INPLACE FLARED-END SECTION10 DATE: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: PROJECT NO. DRAWING NAME MJK DAT MJK 161157000 Falcon-REM.dwg 12/31/2024 MN LIC. NO.DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 6082612/31/2024 MICHAEL J. KINNING, P.E. SHEET NO. 25 48 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT 151ST STREET AND BLAINE AVENUE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS REMOVAL PLAN 151ST ST STA. 54+00 TO STA. 60+00 0 15 30 60 HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEET Revisions App.DateNo. 4 5/21/24 PLAN REVISION NO. 4 MJK K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ C a l S p a n \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ O f f - S i t e \ F a l c o n - R E M . d w g D e c e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 2 4 - 1 0 : 5 2 a m MA T C H L I N E 6 0 + 0 0 SE E S H E E T 2 6 Page 100 of 155 60+00 61+00 62+00 63+0 0 64 + 0 0 6 5 + 0 0 6 6 + 0 0 ℄ 151ST ST 7 PROP. R/W PROP. R/W 80' EXIST. ROW LEGEND REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT GENERAL REMOVAL NOTES: CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002. ALL UTILITIES MUST BE LOCATED PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. ALL EXISTING ROADWAY & STREET SIGNS WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL BE SALVAGED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR REINSTALLATION CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL EXISTING UTILITY STRUCTURES 1) 2) 3) THAT ARE NOT BEING REMOVED OR RELOCATED. TRENCH BOXES OR OTHER TRENCH STABILIZATION METHODS MAY BE REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION TO MINIMIZE REMOVAL LIMITS. 4) CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY REMOVAL LIMITS WITH ENGINEER PRIOR TO SAWCUTTING. 5) CLEARING & GRUBBING UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. NOTES LEGEND REMOVE EXISTING SIGN PROTECT INPLACE STORM SEWER PIPE PROTECT INPLACE SIGN 1 2 3 PROTECT INPLACE UTILITY POLE4 PROTECT INPLACE UTILITY HANDHOLE5 6 RELOCATE UTILITY (BY OTHERS) FLARED END REMOVAL IS INCIDENTAL TO STORM SEWER PIPE REMOVAL.6) PROTECT INPLACE UTILITY MANHOLE7 REMOVE GRAVEL REMOVE STORM SEWER PIPE8 REMOVE STORM SEWER MANHOLE9 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER REMOVE UTILITY LINES ROCK ENTRANCE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS PAVEMENT SAWCUT (FULL DEPTH) PROTECT INPLACE FLARED-END SECTION10 DATE: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: PROJECT NO. DRAWING NAME MJK DAT MJK 161157000 Falcon-REM.dwg 12/31/2024 MN LIC. NO.DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 6082612/31/2024 MICHAEL J. KINNING, P.E. SHEET NO. 26 48 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT 151ST STREET AND BLAINE AVENUE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS REMOVAL PLAN 151ST ST STA. 60+00 TO STA. 66+00 0 15 30 60 HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEET Revisions App.DateNo. 4 5/21/24 PLAN REVISION NO. 4 MJK K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ C a l S p a n \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ O f f - S i t e \ F a l c o n - R E M . d w g D e c e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 2 4 - 1 0 : 5 2 a m MA T C H L I N E 6 6 + 0 0 SEE S H E E T 2 7 SE E S H E E T 2 5 MA T C H L I N E 6 0 + 0 0 Page 101 of 155 6 5 + 0 0 6 6 + 0 0 67 + 0 0 68+00 69+00 70+00 71+00 71+69 10 2 + 0 0 10 3 + 0 0 10 4 + 0 0 ℄ BLAINE AVE ℄ 151ST ST 80 ' PROP. R/W PROP. R/W LEGEND REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT GENERAL REMOVAL NOTES: CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002. ALL UTILITIES MUST BE LOCATED PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. ALL EXISTING ROADWAY & STREET SIGNS WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL BE SALVAGED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR REINSTALLATION CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL EXISTING UTILITY STRUCTURES 1) 2) 3) THAT ARE NOT BEING REMOVED OR RELOCATED. TRENCH BOXES OR OTHER TRENCH STABILIZATION METHODS MAY BE REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION TO MINIMIZE REMOVAL LIMITS. 4) CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY REMOVAL LIMITS WITH ENGINEER PRIOR TO SAWCUTTING. 5) CLEARING & GRUBBING UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. NOTES LEGEND REMOVE EXISTING SIGN PROTECT INPLACE STORM SEWER PIPE PROTECT INPLACE SIGN 1 2 3 PROTECT INPLACE UTILITY POLE4 PROTECT INPLACE UTILITY HANDHOLE5 6 RELOCATE UTILITY (BY OTHERS) FLARED END REMOVAL IS INCIDENTAL TO STORM SEWER PIPE REMOVAL.6) PROTECT INPLACE UTILITY MANHOLE7 REMOVE GRAVEL REMOVE STORM SEWER PIPE8 REMOVE STORM SEWER MANHOLE9 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER REMOVE UTILITY LINES ROCK ENTRANCE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS PAVEMENT SAWCUT (FULL DEPTH) PROTECT INPLACE FLARED-END SECTION10 DATE: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: PROJECT NO. DRAWING NAME MJK DAT MJK 161157000 Falcon-REM.dwg 12/31/2024 MN LIC. NO.DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 6082612/31/2024 MICHAEL J. KINNING, P.E. SHEET NO. 27 48 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT 151ST STREET AND BLAINE AVENUE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS REMOVAL PLAN 151ST ST STA. 66+00 TO STA. 71+69 0 15 30 60 HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEET Revisions App.DateNo. 4 5/21/24 PLAN REVISION NO. 4 MJK K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ C a l S p a n \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ O f f - S i t e \ F a l c o n - R E M . d w g D e c e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 2 4 - 1 0 : 5 2 a m SEE S H E E T 2 6 MAT C H L I N E 6 6 + 0 0 Page 102 of 155 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT 151ST STREET AND BLAINE AVENUE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS STREET AND STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE BLAINE AVENUE STA. 89+72 TO STA. 94+00 Page 103 of 155 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT 151ST STREET AND BLAINE AVENUE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS STREET AND STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE BLAINE AVENUE STA. 94+00 TO STA. 100+00 Page 104 of 155 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT 151ST STREET AND BLAINE AVENUE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS STREET AND STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE BLAINE AVENUE STA. 100+00 TO STA. 106+00 Page 105 of 155 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT 151ST STREET AND BLAINE AVENUE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS STREET AND STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE BLAINE AVENUE STA. 106+00 TO STA. 112+00 Page 106 of 155 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT 151ST STREET AND BLAINE AVENUE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS STREET AND STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE 151ST ST STA. 50+00 TO STA. 54+00 Page 107 of 155 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT 151ST STREET AND BLAINE AVENUE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS STREET AND STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE 151ST ST STA. 54+00 TO STA. 60+00 Page 108 of 155 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT 151ST STREET AND BLAINE AVENUE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS STREET AND STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE 151ST ST STA. 60+00 TO STA. 66+00 Page 109 of 155 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT 151ST STREET AND BLAINE AVENUE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS STREET AND STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE 151ST ST STA. 66+00 TO STA. 71+69 Page 110 of 155 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT 151ST STREET AND BLAINE AVENUE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS STREET AND STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE 151ST ST - BMPS Page 111 of 155 88+00 89+00 90+00 91+00 92+00 93+00 94+00 INPLACE R/W INPLACE R/W PROP. R/W ℄ BLAINE AVE BEGIN CONSTRUCTION BLAINE AVE STA. 89+72.03, 12.00' LT PROP. R/W HYDRANT STA. 90+81.11 42.75' LT HYDRANT STA. 93+81.15 46.21' LT SEE ONSITE PLANS FOR DETAILS 16" GATE VALVE & BOX STA. 89+77.44 0.69' LT 16" WM PLUG/CAP & THRUST BLOCK STA. 89+72.82 0.69' LT 6" GATE VALVE & BOX STA. 90+81.10 37.79' LT 16" X 6" TEE STA. 90+81.59 1.76' LT 6" GATE VALVE & BOX STA. 93+81.14 41.25' LT 16" X 6" TEE STA. 93+81.63 5.21' LT MA T C H L I N E 9 4 + 0 0 910 920 930 940 950 910 920 930 940 950 89+00 90+00 91+00 92+00 93+00 92 8 . 3 2 92 8 . 7 7 92 9 . 2 3 92 9 . 6 8 92 9 . 9 7 93 0 . 0 0 93 0 . 0 0 93 0 . 0 0 93 0 . 0 2 93 0 . 0 0 93 0 . 1 8 93 0 . 0 0 93 0 . 3 5 93 0 . 0 0 93 0 . 5 1 93 0 . 0 0 93 0 . 6 7 93 0 . 0 0 93 0 . 8 4 93 0 . 0 0 93 1 . 0 0 93 0 . 0 0 93 1 . 1 6 93 0 . 0 0 93 1 . 3 3 93 0 . 0 1 93 1 . 4 9 93 0 . 0 1 93 1 . 6 5 93 0 . 0 1 93 1 . 8 2 93 0 . 0 1 93 1 . 9 8 93 0 . 0 1 93 2 . 1 4 93 0 . 0 1 93 2 . 3 1 93 0 . 0 0 93 2 . 4 7 93 0 . 0 0 93 2 . 6 3 93 0 . 0 0 93 2 . 8 0 EG (TYP.)FG (TYP.) PROPOSED ℄ BLAINE AVE PROFILE INPLACE ℄ BLAINE AVE PROFILE 0.65% PV I : 8 9 + 7 2 . 1 1 EL : 9 3 0 . 0 0 0 UTILITIES TO BE SHOWN IN FUTURE SUBMITTALS GENERAL NOTES: 1.PIPE, HYDRANTS, SERVICES, STRUCTURES, AND APPURTENANCES TO BE CONSTRUCTED PER CITY OF ROSEMOUNT SPECIFICATIONS, STANDARD PLATES, DETAILS IN THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, AND CEAM STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 2.PROVIDE FITTINGS AND ADAPTERS AS NECESSARY TO CONNECT TO EXISTING. 3.ALL WATERMAIN CROSSING SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION BETWEEN OUTER PIPES. 4.PROVIDE INSULATION AS NECESSARY PER DETAIL ON SHEET 12. DATE: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: PROJECT NO. DRAWING NAME MJK DAT MJK 161157000 Falcon-SAN_WM_P&P.dwg 12/31/2024 MN LIC. NO.DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 6082612/31/2024 MICHAEL J. KINNING, P.E. Revisions App.DateNo.SHEET NO. 37 48 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT 151ST STREET AND BLAINE AVENUE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN PLAN AND PROFILE BLAINE AVENUE STA. 89+72 TO STA. 94+00K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ C a l S p a n \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ O f f - S i t e \ F a l c o n - S A N _ W M _ P & P . d w g D e c e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 2 4 - 1 0 : 5 6 a m MA T C H L I N E 9 4 + 0 0 SE E S H E E T 3 8 0 15 30 60 HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEET 0 5 10 20 VERTICAL SCALE IN FEET Page 112 of 155 94+00 95+00 96+00 97+00 98+00 99+00 100+00 INPLACE R/W INPLACE R/W ℄ BLAINE AVE PROP. R/W PROP. R/W HYDRANT STA. 96+81.17 47.00' LT HYDRANT STA. 99+56.18 47.00' LT SEE ONSITE PLANS FOR DETAILS 6" GATE VALVE & BOX STA. 96+81.17 42.03' LT 6" GATE VALVE & BOX STA. 99+56.18 42.03' LT 16" X 6" TEE STA. 96+81.48 6.00' LT 16" X 6" TEE STA. 99+56.49 6.00' LT MA T C H L I N E 9 4 + 0 0 MA T C H L I N E 1 0 0 + 0 0 910 920 930 940 950 910 920 930 940 950 95+00 96+00 97+00 98+00 99+00 93 0 . 0 0 93 2 . 8 0 93 0 . 0 0 93 2 . 9 6 93 0 . 0 0 93 3 . 1 2 93 0 . 0 0 93 3 . 2 9 93 0 . 0 0 93 3 . 4 5 93 0 . 0 0 93 3 . 6 1 93 0 . 0 0 93 3 . 7 3 93 0 . 0 0 93 3 . 8 1 93 0 . 0 0 93 3 . 8 5 93 0 . 0 0 93 3 . 8 5 93 0 . 0 0 93 3 . 8 0 93 0 . 0 0 93 3 . 7 2 93 0 . 0 0 93 3 . 6 0 93 0 . 1 2 93 3 . 4 4 93 0 . 1 1 93 3 . 2 8 93 0 . 1 1 93 3 . 1 1 93 0 . 1 2 93 2 . 9 5 93 0 . 1 1 93 2 . 7 9 93 0 . 0 2 93 2 . 6 2 93 0 . 0 1 93 2 . 4 6 93 0 . 0 1 93 2 . 3 0 93 0 . 0 1 93 2 . 1 3 93 0 . 0 1 93 1 . 9 7 93 0 . 1 9 93 1 . 8 1 93 0 . 9 0 93 1 . 6 5 EG (TYP.)FG (TYP.) PROPOSED ℄ BLAINE AVE PROFILE INPLACE ℄ BLAINE AVE PROFILE 0.65%-0.65% PVI STA: 96+11.61 PVI ELEV: 934.18 AD: 1.31% K: 153.15 200.00' VC BV C S : 9 5 + 1 1 . 6 1 BV C E : 9 3 3 . 5 3 EV C S : 9 7 + 1 1 . 6 1 EV C E : 9 3 3 . 5 3 HIGH POINT ELEV: 933.85 HIGH POINT STA: 96+11.70 UTILITIES TO BE SHOWN IN FUTURE SUBMITTALS GENERAL NOTES: 1.PIPE, HYDRANTS, SERVICES, STRUCTURES, AND APPURTENANCES TO BE CONSTRUCTED PER CITY OF ROSEMOUNT SPECIFICATIONS, STANDARD PLATES, DETAILS IN THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, AND CEAM STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 2.PROVIDE FITTINGS AND ADAPTERS AS NECESSARY TO CONNECT TO EXISTING. 3.ALL WATERMAIN CROSSING SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION BETWEEN OUTER PIPES. 4.PROVIDE INSULATION AS NECESSARY PER DETAIL ON SHEET 12. DATE: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: PROJECT NO. DRAWING NAME MJK DAT MJK 161157000 Falcon-SAN_WM_P&P.dwg 12/31/2024 MN LIC. NO.DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 6082612/31/2024 MICHAEL J. KINNING, P.E. Revisions App.DateNo.SHEET NO. 38 48 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT 151ST STREET AND BLAINE AVENUE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN PLAN AND PROFILE BLAINE AVENUE STA. 94+00 TO STA. 100+00 MA T C H L I N E 1 0 0 + 0 0 SE E S H E E T 3 7 MA T C H L I N E 9 4 + 0 0 SE E S H E E T 3 9 K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ C a l S p a n \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ O f f - S i t e \ F a l c o n - S A N _ W M _ P & P . d w g D e c e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 2 4 - 1 0 : 5 7 a m 0 15 30 60 HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEET 0 5 10 20 VERTICAL SCALE IN FEET Page 113 of 155 S S 71 + 0 0 71 + 6 9 100+00 101+00 102+00 103+00 104+00 105+00 106+00 INPLACE R/W INPLACE R/W ℄ 152ND ST ℄ BLAINE AVE PROP. R/W PROP. R/W INPLACE HW ESMT SEE ONSITE PLANS FOR DETAILS PROPOSED LIFT STATION DETAILS TO BE PROVIDED IN FUTURE SUBMITTAL HYDRANT STA. 102+41.20 47.00' LT HYDRANT STA. 105+81.19 44.71' LT 6" GATE VALVE & BOX STA. 102+41.20 42.03' LT 6" GATE VALVE & BOX STA. 105+81.14 39.75' LT 16" X 6" TEE STA. 102+41.20 6.00' LT 16" X 6" TEE STA. 105+80.83 3.71' LT PROP. SSWR FORCEMAIN MA T C H L I N E 1 0 0 + 0 0 MA T C H L I N E 1 0 6 + 0 0 910 920 930 940 950 910 920 930 940 950 101+00 102+00 103+00 104+00 105+00 93 0 . 9 0 93 1 . 6 5 93 0 . 9 1 93 1 . 4 8 93 0 . 8 0 93 1 . 3 2 93 0 . 7 4 93 1 . 1 6 93 0 . 5 8 93 0 . 9 7 93 0 . 3 9 93 0 . 7 4 93 0 . 1 4 93 0 . 4 8 92 9 . 8 7 93 0 . 1 7 92 9 . 5 5 92 9 . 8 3 92 9 . 2 2 92 9 . 4 4 92 8 . 8 7 92 9 . 0 1 92 8 . 5 2 92 8 . 5 5 92 8 . 1 0 92 8 . 0 4 92 7 . 6 7 92 7 . 5 0 92 7 . 1 7 92 6 . 9 3 92 6 . 6 4 92 6 . 3 7 92 6 . 0 0 92 5 . 8 1 92 5 . 3 5 92 5 . 2 4 92 4 . 7 1 92 4 . 6 8 92 4 . 0 7 92 4 . 1 2 92 3 . 5 3 92 3 . 5 6 92 3 . 0 2 92 2 . 9 9 92 2 . 3 8 92 2 . 4 3 92 1 . 7 6 92 1 . 9 0 92 1 . 2 5 92 1 . 4 0 EG (TYP.)FG (TYP.) PROPOSED ℄ BLAINE AVE PROFILEINPLACE ℄ BLAINE AVE PROFILE -2.25% -0.65% PVI STA: 101+98.16 PVI ELEV: 930.35 AD: 1.60% K: 156.30 250.00' VC BV C S : 1 0 0 + 7 3 . 1 6 BV C E : 9 3 1 . 1 7 EV C S : 1 0 3 + 2 3 . 1 6 EV C E : 9 2 7 . 5 4 PVI STA: 106+40.00 PVI ELEV: 920.40 AD: 1.02% K: 196.07 200.00' VC BV C S : 1 0 5 + 4 0 . 0 0 BV C E : 9 2 2 . 6 5 UTILITIES TO BE SHOWN IN FUTURE SUBMITTALS GENERAL NOTES: 1.PIPE, HYDRANTS, SERVICES, STRUCTURES, AND APPURTENANCES TO BE CONSTRUCTED PER CITY OF ROSEMOUNT SPECIFICATIONS, STANDARD PLATES, DETAILS IN THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, AND CEAM STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 2.PROVIDE FITTINGS AND ADAPTERS AS NECESSARY TO CONNECT TO EXISTING. 3.ALL WATERMAIN CROSSING SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION BETWEEN OUTER PIPES. 4.PROVIDE INSULATION AS NECESSARY PER DETAIL ON SHEET 12. DATE: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: PROJECT NO. DRAWING NAME MJK DAT MJK 161157000 Falcon-SAN_WM_P&P.dwg 12/31/2024 MN LIC. NO.DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 6082612/31/2024 MICHAEL J. KINNING, P.E. Revisions App.DateNo.SHEET NO. 39 48 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT 151ST STREET AND BLAINE AVENUE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN PLAN AND PROFILE BLAINE AVENUE STA. 100+00 TO STA. 106+00 MA T C H L I N E 1 0 6 + 0 0 SE E S H E E T 3 8 MA T C H L I N E 1 0 0 + 0 0 SE E S H E E T 4 0 K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ C a l S p a n \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ O f f - S i t e \ F a l c o n - S A N _ W M _ P & P . d w g D e c e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 2 4 - 1 0 : 5 7 a m 0 15 30 60 HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEET 0 5 10 20 VERTICAL SCALE IN FEET Page 114 of 155 D 106+00 107+00 108+00 109+00 110+00 111+00 112+00 INPLACE R/W INPLACE R/W ℄ BLAINE AVE INPLACE HW ESMT INPLACE HW ESMT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS TO ALIGN WITH RECENTLY COMPLETED BLAINE AVENUE RECONSTRUCTION PROP. SSWR FORCEMAIN MA T C H L I N E 1 0 6 + 0 0 MA T C H L I N E 1 1 2 + 0 0 900 910 920 930 940 900 910 920 930 940 107+00 108+00 109+00 110+00 111+00 92 1 . 2 5 92 1 . 4 0 92 0 . 6 9 92 0 . 9 2 92 0 . 1 7 92 0 . 4 9 91 9 . 6 9 92 0 . 0 8 91 9 . 2 8 91 9 . 7 0 91 8 . 8 7 91 9 . 3 6 91 8 . 4 8 91 9 . 0 5 91 8 . 1 1 91 8 . 7 4 91 7 . 7 9 91 8 . 4 3 91 7 . 4 7 91 8 . 1 2 91 7 . 2 1 91 7 . 8 2 91 6 . 9 9 91 7 . 5 1 91 6 . 7 7 91 7 . 2 0 91 6 . 5 5 91 6 . 9 3 91 6 . 3 5 91 6 . 6 8 91 6 . 2 1 91 6 . 4 6 91 6 . 0 6 91 6 . 2 7 91 5 . 9 0 91 6 . 1 1 91 5 . 7 4 91 5 . 9 8 91 5 . 6 2 91 5 . 8 8 91 5 . 5 0 91 5 . 8 1 91 5 . 3 6 91 5 . 7 7 91 5 . 2 3 91 5 . 7 6 91 5 . 2 0 91 5 . 7 8 91 5 . 1 9 91 5 . 8 0 EG (TYP.)FG (TYP.) PROPOSED ℄ BLAINE AVE PROFILE INPLACE ℄ BLAINE AVE PROFILE -1.23% 0.08% PVI STA: 106+40.00 PVI ELEV: 920.40 AD: 1.02% K: 196.07 200.00' VC EV C S : 1 0 7 + 4 0 . 0 0 EV C E : 9 1 9 . 1 7 PVI STA: 110+24.64 PVI ELEV: 915.66 AD: 1.31% K: 210.34 275.00' VC BV C S : 1 0 8 + 8 7 . 1 4 BV C E : 9 1 7 . 3 6 EV C S : 1 1 1 + 6 2 . 1 4 EV C E : 9 1 5 . 7 7 LOW POINT ELEV: 915.76 LOW POINT STA: 111+46.24 UTILITIES TO BE SHOWN IN FUTURE SUBMITTALS GENERAL NOTES: 1.PIPE, HYDRANTS, SERVICES, STRUCTURES, AND APPURTENANCES TO BE CONSTRUCTED PER CITY OF ROSEMOUNT SPECIFICATIONS, STANDARD PLATES, DETAILS IN THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, AND CEAM STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 2.PROVIDE FITTINGS AND ADAPTERS AS NECESSARY TO CONNECT TO EXISTING. 3.ALL WATERMAIN CROSSING SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION BETWEEN OUTER PIPES. 4.PROVIDE INSULATION AS NECESSARY PER DETAIL ON SHEET 12. DATE: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: PROJECT NO. DRAWING NAME MJK DAT MJK 161157000 Falcon-SAN_WM_P&P.dwg 12/31/2024 MN LIC. NO.DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 6082612/31/2024 MICHAEL J. KINNING, P.E. Revisions App.DateNo.SHEET NO. 40 48 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT 151ST STREET AND BLAINE AVENUE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN PLAN AND PROFILE BLAINE AVENUE STA. 106+00 TO STA. 112+00 SE E S H E E T 3 9 MA T C H L I N E 1 0 6 + 0 0 K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ C a l S p a n \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ O f f - S i t e \ F a l c o n - S A N _ W M _ P & P . d w g D e c e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 2 4 - 1 0 : 5 7 a m MA T C H L I N E 1 1 2 + 0 0 SE E S H E E T 4 1 0 15 30 60 HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEET 0 5 10 20 VERTICAL SCALE IN FEET Page 115 of 155 MA T C H L I N E 1 1 2 + 0 0 MA T C H L I N E 1 1 8 + 0 0 890 900 910 920 930 890 900 910 920 930 113+00 114+00 115+00 116+00 117+00 91 5 . 1 9 91 5 . 1 9 91 5 . 1 9 91 5 . 1 9 91 5 . 2 1 91 5 . 2 1 91 5 . 4 6 91 5 . 4 6 91 5 . 7 3 91 5 . 7 3 91 5 . 9 8 91 5 . 9 8 91 6 . 2 3 91 6 . 2 3 91 6 . 6 0 91 6 . 6 0 91 7 . 1 2 91 7 . 1 2 91 7 . 5 7 91 7 . 5 7 91 8 . 0 1 91 8 . 0 1 91 8 . 5 9 91 8 . 5 9 91 9 . 2 0 91 9 . 2 0 91 9 . 8 0 91 9 . 8 0 92 0 . 5 3 92 0 . 5 3 92 1 . 3 4 92 1 . 3 4 92 2 . 1 8 92 2 . 1 8 92 3 . 0 4 92 3 . 0 4 92 3 . 8 8 92 3 . 8 8 92 4 . 6 9 92 4 . 6 9 92 5 . 2 5 92 5 . 2 5 92 5 . 8 1 92 5 . 8 1 92 6 . 3 1 92 6 . 3 1 92 6 . 8 4 92 6 . 8 4 92 7 . 3 7 92 7 . 3 7 EG (TYP.)FG (TYP.) INPLACE ℄ BLAINE AVE PROFILE UTILITIES TO BE SHOWN IN FUTURE SUBMITTALS GENERAL NOTES: 1.PIPE, HYDRANTS, SERVICES, STRUCTURES, AND APPURTENANCES TO BE CONSTRUCTED PER CITY OF ROSEMOUNT SPECIFICATIONS, STANDARD PLATES, DETAILS IN THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, AND CEAM STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 2.PROVIDE FITTINGS AND ADAPTERS AS NECESSARY TO CONNECT TO EXISTING. 3.ALL WATERMAIN CROSSING SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION BETWEEN OUTER PIPES. 4.PROVIDE INSULATION AS NECESSARY PER DETAIL ON SHEET 12. 112+00 113+00 114+00 115+00 116+00 117+00 118+00 INPLACE HW ESMT INPLACE HW ESMT INPLACE R/W INPLACE R/W ℄ BLAINE AVE PROP. SSWR PROP. SSWR FORCEMAIN DATE: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: PROJECT NO. DRAWING NAME MJK DAT MJK 161157000 Falcon-SAN_WM_P&P.dwg 12/31/2024 MN LIC. NO.DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 6082612/31/2024 MICHAEL J. KINNING, P.E. Revisions App.DateNo.SHEET NO. 41 48 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT 151ST STREET AND BLAINE AVENUE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN PLAN AND PROFILE BLAINE AVENUE STA. 112+00 TO STA. 118+00K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ C a l S p a n \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ O f f - S i t e \ F a l c o n - S A N _ W M _ P & P . d w g D e c e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 2 4 - 1 0 : 5 7 a m SE E S H E E T 4 0 MA T C H L I N E 1 1 2 + 0 0 MA T C H L I N E 1 1 8 + 0 0 SE E S H E E T 4 2 0 15 30 60 HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEET 0 5 10 20 VERTICAL SCALE IN FEET Page 116 of 155 MA T C H L I N E 1 1 8 + 0 0 MA T C H L I N E 1 2 4 + 0 0 900 910 920 930 940 900 910 920 930 940 119+00 120+00 121+00 122+00 123+00 92 7 . 3 7 92 7 . 3 7 92 7 . 9 5 92 7 . 9 5 92 8 . 5 1 92 8 . 5 1 92 9 . 1 2 92 9 . 1 2 92 9 . 6 7 92 9 . 6 7 93 0 . 2 0 93 0 . 2 0 93 0 . 7 6 93 0 . 7 6 93 1 . 2 8 93 1 . 2 8 93 1 . 8 1 93 1 . 8 1 93 2 . 3 5 93 2 . 3 5 93 2 . 7 1 93 2 . 7 1 93 3 . 0 8 93 3 . 0 8 93 3 . 5 2 93 3 . 5 2 93 3 . 9 2 93 3 . 9 2 93 4 . 2 5 93 4 . 2 5 93 4 . 6 5 93 4 . 6 5 93 5 . 1 0 93 5 . 1 0 93 5 . 7 3 93 5 . 7 3 93 6 . 2 0 93 6 . 2 0 93 6 . 5 0 93 6 . 5 0 93 6 . 6 2 93 6 . 6 2 93 6 . 6 0 93 6 . 6 0 93 6 . 4 2 93 6 . 4 2 93 6 . 6 7 93 6 . 6 7 93 6 . 6 7 93 6 . 6 7 EG (TYP.)FG (TYP.) INPLACE ℄ BLAINE AVE PROFILE UTILITIES TO BE SHOWN IN FUTURE SUBMITTALS GENERAL NOTES: 1.PIPE, HYDRANTS, SERVICES, STRUCTURES, AND APPURTENANCES TO BE CONSTRUCTED PER CITY OF ROSEMOUNT SPECIFICATIONS, STANDARD PLATES, DETAILS IN THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, AND CEAM STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 2.PROVIDE FITTINGS AND ADAPTERS AS NECESSARY TO CONNECT TO EXISTING. 3.ALL WATERMAIN CROSSING SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION BETWEEN OUTER PIPES. 4.PROVIDE INSULATION AS NECESSARY PER DETAIL ON SHEET 12. 118+00 119+00 120+00 121+00 122+00 123+00 124+00 INPLACE R/W INPLACE R/W INPLACE HW ESMT INPLACE HW ESMT ℄ BLAINE AVE PROP. SSWR FORCEMAIN PROP. SSWR FORCEMAIN DATE: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: PROJECT NO. DRAWING NAME MJK DAT MJK 161157000 Falcon-SAN_WM_P&P.dwg 12/31/2024 MN LIC. NO.DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 6082612/31/2024 MICHAEL J. KINNING, P.E. Revisions App.DateNo.SHEET NO. 42 48 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT 151ST STREET AND BLAINE AVENUE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN PLAN AND PROFILE BLAINE AVENUE STA. 118+00 TO STA. 124+00K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ C a l S p a n \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ O f f - S i t e \ F a l c o n - S A N _ W M _ P & P . d w g D e c e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 2 4 - 1 0 : 5 8 a m SE E S H E E T 4 1 MA T C H L I N E 1 1 8 + 0 0 MA T C H L I N E 1 2 4 + 0 0 SE E S H E E T 4 3 0 15 30 60 HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEET 0 5 10 20 VERTICAL SCALE IN FEET Page 117 of 155 MA T C H L I N E 1 2 4 + 0 0 MA T C H L I N E 1 3 0 + 0 0 900 910 920 930 940 900 910 920 930 940 125+00 126+00 127+00 128+00 129+00 93 6 . 6 7 93 6 . 6 7 93 6 . 4 5 93 6 . 4 5 93 6 . 3 5 93 6 . 3 5 93 6 . 2 6 93 6 . 2 6 93 6 . 2 4 93 6 . 2 4 93 6 . 2 5 93 6 . 2 5 93 6 . 2 5 93 6 . 2 5 93 6 . 5 8 93 6 . 5 8 93 6 . 7 6 93 6 . 7 6 93 6 . 8 3 93 6 . 8 3 93 7 . 2 5 93 7 . 2 5 93 7 . 1 8 93 7 . 1 8 93 6 . 9 2 93 6 . 9 2 93 7 . 5 6 93 7 . 5 6 93 7 . 8 1 93 7 . 8 1 93 7 . 8 6 93 7 . 8 6 93 8 . 1 1 93 8 . 1 1 93 8 . 1 2 93 8 . 1 2 93 8 . 2 6 93 8 . 2 6 93 8 . 7 4 93 8 . 7 4 93 9 . 0 0 93 9 . 0 0 93 9 . 2 8 93 9 . 2 8 93 9 . 6 4 93 9 . 6 4 94 0 . 0 9 94 0 . 0 9 94 0 . 3 6 94 0 . 3 6 EG (TYP.)FG (TYP.) INPLACE ℄ BLAINE AVE PROFILE UTILITIES TO BE SHOWN IN FUTURE SUBMITTALS GENERAL NOTES: 1.PIPE, HYDRANTS, SERVICES, STRUCTURES, AND APPURTENANCES TO BE CONSTRUCTED PER CITY OF ROSEMOUNT SPECIFICATIONS, STANDARD PLATES, DETAILS IN THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, AND CEAM STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 2.PROVIDE FITTINGS AND ADAPTERS AS NECESSARY TO CONNECT TO EXISTING. 3.ALL WATERMAIN CROSSING SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION BETWEEN OUTER PIPES. 4.PROVIDE INSULATION AS NECESSARY PER DETAIL ON SHEET 12. 124+00 125+00 126+00 127+00 128+00 129+00 130+00 INPLACE HW ESMT INPLACE HW ESMT INPLACE R/W INPLACE R/W ℄ BLAINE AVE PROP. SSWR FORCEMAIN DATE: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: PROJECT NO. DRAWING NAME MJK DAT MJK 161157000 Falcon-SAN_WM_P&P.dwg 12/31/2024 MN LIC. NO.DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 6082612/31/2024 MICHAEL J. KINNING, P.E. Revisions App.DateNo.SHEET NO. 43 48 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT 151ST STREET AND BLAINE AVENUE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN PLAN AND PROFILE BLAINE AVENUE STA. 124+00 TO STA. 130+00K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ C a l S p a n \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ O f f - S i t e \ F a l c o n - S A N _ W M _ P & P . d w g D e c e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 2 4 - 1 0 : 5 8 a m SE E S H E E T 4 2 MA T C H L I N E 1 2 4 + 0 0 MA T C H L I N E 1 3 0 + 0 0 SE E S H E E T 4 4 0 15 30 60 HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEET 0 5 10 20 VERTICAL SCALE IN FEET Page 118 of 155 MA T C H L I N E 1 3 0 + 0 0 910 920 930 940 950 910 920 930 940 950 131+00 132+00 133+00 134+00 94 0 . 3 6 94 0 . 3 6 94 0 . 5 2 94 0 . 5 2 94 0 . 8 8 94 0 . 8 8 94 1 . 1 9 94 1 . 1 9 94 1 . 3 7 94 1 . 3 7 94 1 . 6 6 94 1 . 6 6 94 2 . 0 7 94 2 . 0 7 94 2 . 4 4 94 2 . 4 4 94 2 . 8 4 94 2 . 8 4 94 3 . 2 5 94 3 . 2 5 94 3 . 6 7 94 3 . 6 7 94 4 . 2 5 94 4 . 2 5 94 4 . 8 4 94 4 . 8 4 94 5 . 3 7 94 5 . 3 7 94 5 . 9 3 94 5 . 9 3 94 6 . 5 8 94 6 . 5 8 94 6 . 9 9 94 6 . 9 9 94 7 . 6 3 94 7 . 6 3 94 8 . 1 7 94 8 . 1 7 EG (TYP.)FG (TYP.) INPLACE ℄ 152ND ST PROFILE UTILITIES TO BE SHOWN IN FUTURE SUBMITTALS GENERAL NOTES: 1.PIPE, HYDRANTS, SERVICES, STRUCTURES, AND APPURTENANCES TO BE CONSTRUCTED PER CITY OF ROSEMOUNT SPECIFICATIONS, STANDARD PLATES, DETAILS IN THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, AND CEAM STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 2.PROVIDE FITTINGS AND ADAPTERS AS NECESSARY TO CONNECT TO EXISTING. 3.ALL WATERMAIN CROSSING SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION BETWEEN OUTER PIPES. 4.PROVIDE INSULATION AS NECESSARY PER DETAIL ON SHEET 12. S S 130+00 131+00 132+00 133+00 134+00 134+50 INPLACE R/W INPLACE R/W INPLACE HW ESMT ℄ BLAINE AVE END CONSTRUCTION BLAINE AVE STA. 133+93.22 CONNECT TO EXISTING MCES INTERCEPTOR WITH PROPOSED MH PROP. SSWR FORCEMAIN PROP. GRAVITY SSWR DATE: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: PROJECT NO. DRAWING NAME MJK DAT MJK 161157000 Falcon-SAN_WM_P&P.dwg 12/31/2024 MN LIC. NO.DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 6082612/31/2024 MICHAEL J. KINNING, P.E. Revisions App.DateNo.SHEET NO. 44 48 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT 151ST STREET AND BLAINE AVENUE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN PLAN AND PROFILE BLAINE AVENUE STA. 130+00 TO STA. 133+93K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ C a l S p a n \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ O f f - S i t e \ F a l c o n - S A N _ W M _ P & P . d w g D e c e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 2 4 - 1 0 : 5 8 a m SE E S H E E T 4 3 MA T C H L I N E 1 3 0 + 0 0 0 15 30 60 HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEET 0 5 10 20 VERTICAL SCALE IN FEET Page 119 of 155 SS 50+00 51+00 52+00 53+00 54+00 8" WM PLUG/CAP & THRUST BLOCK STA. 50+10.97 12.00' RT PROP. SSWR GRAVITY MAIN EXIST. ROW PROP. R/W SSWR PLUG/CAP & THRUST BLOCK STA. 50+10.97 0.00' HYDRANT STA. 53+71.82 25.67' RT 6" GATE VALVE & BOX STA. 53+71.82 25.67' RT 8" X 6" TEE STA. 53+71.82 25.67' RT MA T C H L I N E 6 0 + 0 0 900 910 920 930 940 900 910 920 930 940 55+00 56+00 57+00 58+00 59+00 92 2 . 9 5 92 5 . 4 4 92 2 . 8 6 92 5 . 4 9 92 4 . 3 1 92 5 . 6 0 92 5 . 3 7 92 5 . 7 3 92 5 . 7 4 92 5 . 8 5 92 6 . 0 2 92 5 . 9 8 92 5 . 5 4 92 6 . 1 0 92 5 . 0 7 92 6 . 2 3 92 4 . 9 3 92 6 . 3 5 92 4 . 7 4 92 6 . 4 8 92 4 . 7 1 92 6 . 6 0 92 4 . 7 2 92 6 . 7 3 92 4 . 9 0 92 6 . 8 5 92 4 . 9 9 92 6 . 9 8 92 5 . 0 1 92 7 . 1 0 92 4 . 9 4 92 7 . 2 3 92 4 . 8 5 92 7 . 3 5 92 4 . 6 4 92 7 . 4 8 92 4 . 5 6 92 7 . 6 0 92 4 . 6 5 92 7 . 7 3 92 4 . 7 9 92 7 . 8 5 92 5 . 0 8 92 7 . 9 8 92 5 . 1 6 92 8 . 1 0 92 5 . 2 2 92 8 . 2 3 92 5 . 2 9 92 8 . 3 5 EG (TYP.)FG (TYP.) PROPOSED ℄ 152ND ST PROFILE INPLACE ℄ 152ND ST PROFILE 0.50% PVI STA: 53+60.00 PVI ELEV: 925.15 AD: 1.50% K: 110.00 165.00' VC EV C S : 5 4 + 4 2 . 5 0 EV C E : 9 2 5 . 5 7 UTILITIES TO BE SHOWN IN FUTURE SUBMITTALS GENERAL NOTES: 1.PIPE, HYDRANTS, SERVICES, STRUCTURES, AND APPURTENANCES TO BE CONSTRUCTED PER CITY OF ROSEMOUNT SPECIFICATIONS, STANDARD PLATES, DETAILS IN THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, AND CEAM STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 2.PROVIDE FITTINGS AND ADAPTERS AS NECESSARY TO CONNECT TO EXISTING. 3.ALL WATERMAIN CROSSING SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION BETWEEN OUTER PIPES. 4.PROVIDE INSULATION AS NECESSARY PER DETAIL ON SHEET 12. DATE: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: PROJECT NO. DRAWING NAME MJK MJK MJK 161157000 Falcon-SAN_WM_P&P.dwg 12/31/2024 MN LIC. NO.DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 6082612/31/2024 MICHAEL J. KINNING, P.E. SHEET NO. 45 48 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT 151ST STREET AND BLAINE AVENUE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN PLAN AND PROFILE 151ST ST STA. 50+00 TO STA. 54+00 Revisions App.DateNo. 4 5/21/24 PLAN REVISION NO. 4 MJK K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ C a l S p a n \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ O f f - S i t e \ F a l c o n - S A N _ W M _ P & P . d w g D e c e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 2 4 - 1 0 : 5 8 a m MA T C H L I N E 5 4 + 0 0 SE E S H E E T 4 7 0 15 30 60 HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEET 0 5 10 20 VERTICAL SCALE IN FEET Page 120 of 155 POND 1P SSS54+00 55+00 56+00 57+00 58+00 59+00 60+00 ℄ 152ND ST EXIST. ROW PROP. R/W HYDRANT STA. 56+72.35 25.67' RT HYDRANT STA. 59+22.10 25.67' RT SEE ONSITE PLANS FOR DETAILS 6" GATE VALVE & BOX STA. 56+72.35 23.17' RT 6" GATE VALVE & BOX STA. 59+22.10 23.08' RT 8" X 6" TEE STA. 56+72.35 10.00' RT 8" X 6" TEE STA. 59+22.10 10.00' RT PROP. SSWR. GRAVITY MAIN MA T C H L I N E 6 0 + 0 0 900 910 920 930 940 900 910 920 930 940 55+00 56+00 57+00 58+00 59+00 92 2 . 9 5 92 5 . 4 4 92 2 . 8 6 92 5 . 4 9 92 4 . 3 1 92 5 . 6 0 92 5 . 3 7 92 5 . 7 3 92 5 . 7 4 92 5 . 8 5 92 6 . 0 2 92 5 . 9 8 92 5 . 5 4 92 6 . 1 0 92 5 . 0 7 92 6 . 2 3 92 4 . 9 3 92 6 . 3 5 92 4 . 7 4 92 6 . 4 8 92 4 . 7 1 92 6 . 6 0 92 4 . 7 2 92 6 . 7 3 92 4 . 9 0 92 6 . 8 5 92 4 . 9 9 92 6 . 9 8 92 5 . 0 1 92 7 . 1 0 92 4 . 9 4 92 7 . 2 3 92 4 . 8 5 92 7 . 3 5 92 4 . 6 4 92 7 . 4 8 92 4 . 5 6 92 7 . 6 0 92 4 . 6 5 92 7 . 7 3 92 4 . 7 9 92 7 . 8 5 92 5 . 0 8 92 7 . 9 8 92 5 . 1 6 92 8 . 1 0 92 5 . 2 2 92 8 . 2 3 92 5 . 2 9 92 8 . 3 5 EG (TYP.)FG (TYP.) PROPOSED ℄ 152ND ST PROFILE INPLACE ℄ 152ND ST PROFILE 0.50% PVI STA: 53+60.00 PVI ELEV: 925.15 AD: 1.50% K: 110.00 165.00' VC EV C S : 5 4 + 4 2 . 5 0 EV C E : 9 2 5 . 5 7 UTILITIES TO BE SHOWN IN FUTURE SUBMITTALS GENERAL NOTES: 1.PIPE, HYDRANTS, SERVICES, STRUCTURES, AND APPURTENANCES TO BE CONSTRUCTED PER CITY OF ROSEMOUNT SPECIFICATIONS, STANDARD PLATES, DETAILS IN THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, AND CEAM STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 2.PROVIDE FITTINGS AND ADAPTERS AS NECESSARY TO CONNECT TO EXISTING. 3.ALL WATERMAIN CROSSING SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION BETWEEN OUTER PIPES. 4.PROVIDE INSULATION AS NECESSARY PER DETAIL ON SHEET 12. DATE: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: PROJECT NO. DRAWING NAME MJK DAT MJK 161157000 Falcon-SAN_WM_P&P.dwg 12/31/2024 MN LIC. NO.DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 6082612/31/2024 MICHAEL J. KINNING, P.E. SHEET NO. 46 48 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT 151ST STREET AND BLAINE AVENUE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN PLAN AND PROFILE 151ST ST STA. 55+53 TO STA. 60+00 Revisions App.DateNo. 4 5/21/24 PLAN REVISION NO. 4 MJK K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ C a l S p a n \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ O f f - S i t e \ F a l c o n - S A N _ W M _ P & P . d w g D e c e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 2 4 - 1 0 : 5 8 a m MA T C H L I N E 6 0 + 0 0 SE E S H E E T 4 7 0 15 30 60 HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEET 0 5 10 20 VERTICAL SCALE IN FEET Page 121 of 155 POND 4P S S S S 60+00 61+00 62+00 63+0 0 64 + 0 0 6 5 + 0 0 6 6 + 0 0 ℄ 152ND ST PROP. R/W PROP. R/W PROP. R/W SEE ONSITE PLANS FOR DETAILS HYDRANT STA. 62+22.85 25.67' RT HYDRANT STA. 65+56.86 25.67' RT 6" GATE VALVE & BOX STA. 62+23.30 23.17' RT 6" GATE VALVE & BOX STA. 65+56.78 23.17' RT 8" X 6" TEE STA. 62+25.19 12.33' RT 8" X 6" TEE STA. 65+56.25 7.78' RT 22.5-DEG BEND STA. 62+65.78 7.92' RT 11.25-DEG BEND STA. 63+71.00 10.29' RT 11.25-DEG BEND STA. 64+51.20 10.00' RT EXIST. ROW MA T C H L I N E 6 0 + 0 0 MA T C H L I N E 6 6 + 0 0 910 920 930 940 950 910 920 930 940 950 61+00 62+00 63+00 64+00 65+00 92 5 . 2 9 92 8 . 3 5 92 5 . 2 7 92 8 . 4 8 92 5 . 2 1 92 8 . 6 0 92 5 . 4 3 92 8 . 7 3 92 5 . 4 8 92 8 . 8 5 92 4 . 9 9 92 8 . 9 8 92 4 . 9 4 92 9 . 1 0 92 4 . 9 9 92 9 . 2 3 92 5 . 1 2 92 9 . 3 5 92 5 . 1 1 92 9 . 4 8 92 5 . 2 9 92 9 . 6 0 92 5 . 8 9 92 9 . 7 3 92 7 . 2 7 92 9 . 8 5 92 8 . 1 2 92 9 . 9 8 92 7 . 6 4 93 0 . 1 0 92 8 . 7 0 93 0 . 2 3 93 0 . 6 9 93 0 . 3 5 93 1 . 0 2 93 0 . 4 8 93 1 . 1 8 93 0 . 6 0 93 1 . 3 9 93 0 . 7 3 93 1 . 5 8 93 0 . 8 2 93 1 . 6 0 93 0 . 8 8 93 1 . 5 4 93 0 . 9 0 93 1 . 4 9 93 0 . 8 8 93 1 . 3 3 93 0 . 8 2 EG (TYP.)FG (TYP.) PROPOSED ℄ 152ND ST PROFILE INPLACE ℄ 152ND ST PROFILE 0.50% PVI STA: 65+50.00 PVI ELEV: 931.10 AD: 1.00% K: 165.00 165.00' VC BV C S : 6 4 + 6 7 . 5 0 BV C E : 9 3 0 . 6 9 HIGH POINT ELEV: 930.90 HIGH POINT STA: 65+50.00 UTILITIES TO BE SHOWN IN FUTURE SUBMITTALS GENERAL NOTES: 1.PIPE, HYDRANTS, SERVICES, STRUCTURES, AND APPURTENANCES TO BE CONSTRUCTED PER CITY OF ROSEMOUNT SPECIFICATIONS, STANDARD PLATES, DETAILS IN THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, AND CEAM STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 2.PROVIDE FITTINGS AND ADAPTERS AS NECESSARY TO CONNECT TO EXISTING. 3.ALL WATERMAIN CROSSING SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION BETWEEN OUTER PIPES. 4.PROVIDE INSULATION AS NECESSARY PER DETAIL ON SHEET 12. DATE: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: PROJECT NO. DRAWING NAME MJK DAT MJK 161157000 Falcon-SAN_WM_P&P.dwg 12/31/2024 MN LIC. NO.DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 6082612/31/2024 MICHAEL J. KINNING, P.E. SHEET NO. 47 48 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT 151ST STREET AND BLAINE AVENUE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN PLAN AND PROFILE 151ST ST STA. 60+00 TO STA. 66+00 Revisions App.DateNo. 4 5/21/24 PLAN REVISION NO. 4 MJK K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ C a l S p a n \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ O f f - S i t e \ F a l c o n - S A N _ W M _ P & P . d w g D e c e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 2 4 - 1 0 : 5 9 a m MA T C H L I N E 6 6 + 0 0 SEE S H E E T 4 8 SE E S H E E T 4 6 MA T C H L I N E 6 0 + 0 0 0 15 30 60 HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEET 0 5 10 20 VERTICAL SCALE IN FEET Page 122 of 155 SS S S S 6 5 + 0 0 6 6 + 0 0 67 + 0 0 68+00 69+00 70+00 71+00 71+69 10 2 + 0 0 10 3 + 0 0 10 4 + 0 0 ℄ 152ND ST ℄ BLAINE AVE PROP. R/W PROP. R/W END CONSTRUCTION 152ND ST STA. 71+69.37 HYDRANT STA. 68+44.41 25.67' RT PR O P . S S W R 6" GATE VALVE & BOX STA. 68+44.41 10.00' RT 8" X 6" TEE STA. 68+44.41 10.00' RT 11.25-DEG BEND STA. 66+85.18 10.29' RT 11.25-DEG BEND STA. 67+62.75 10.00' RT MA T C H L I N E 6 6 + 0 0 910 920 930 940 950 910 920 930 940 950 67+00 68+00 69+00 70+00 71+00 93 1 . 3 3 93 0 . 8 2 93 1 . 1 5 93 0 . 7 3 93 0 . 9 5 93 0 . 6 0 93 0 . 7 2 93 0 . 4 8 93 0 . 9 7 93 0 . 3 5 93 1 . 2 0 93 0 . 2 3 93 1 . 4 3 93 0 . 1 0 93 1 . 5 1 92 9 . 9 8 93 1 . 5 7 92 9 . 8 5 93 1 . 5 2 92 9 . 7 3 93 1 . 1 7 92 9 . 6 0 93 0 . 9 1 92 9 . 4 8 93 0 . 6 8 92 9 . 3 5 93 0 . 8 4 92 9 . 2 3 93 1 . 2 6 92 9 . 1 0 93 1 . 6 3 92 8 . 9 8 93 1 . 5 2 92 8 . 8 5 93 1 . 2 6 92 8 . 7 3 93 0 . 9 1 92 8 . 6 0 93 0 . 3 5 92 8 . 4 8 92 9 . 9 7 92 8 . 3 5 92 9 . 2 6 92 8 . 2 3 92 7 . 2 2 92 8 . 2 3 EG (TYP.)FG (TYP.) PROPOSED ℄ 152ND ST PROFILE INPLACE ℄ 152ND ST PROFILE 2.00% -0.50% PV I : 7 1 + 4 4 . 8 7 EL : 9 2 8 . 1 3 0 PV I : 7 1 + 6 9 . 3 7 EL : 9 2 8 . 6 2 0 PVI STA: 65+50.00 PVI ELEV: 931.10 AD: 1.00% K: 165.00 165.00' VC EV C S : 6 6 + 3 2 . 5 0 EV C E : 9 3 0 . 6 9 UTILITIES TO BE SHOWN IN FUTURE SUBMITTALS GENERAL NOTES: 1.PIPE, HYDRANTS, SERVICES, STRUCTURES, AND APPURTENANCES TO BE CONSTRUCTED PER CITY OF ROSEMOUNT SPECIFICATIONS, STANDARD PLATES, DETAILS IN THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, AND CEAM STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 2.PROVIDE FITTINGS AND ADAPTERS AS NECESSARY TO CONNECT TO EXISTING. 3.ALL WATERMAIN CROSSING SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION BETWEEN OUTER PIPES. 4.PROVIDE INSULATION AS NECESSARY PER DETAIL ON SHEET 12. DATE: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: PROJECT NO. DRAWING NAME MJK DAT MJK 161157000 Falcon-SAN_WM_P&P.dwg 12/31/2024 MN LIC. NO.DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 6082612/31/2024 MICHAEL J. KINNING, P.E. SHEET NO. 48 48 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT 151ST STREET AND BLAINE AVENUE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN PLAN AND PROFILE 151ST ST STA. 66+00 TO STA. 71+69 Revisions App.DateNo. 4 5/21/24 PLAN REVISION NO. 4 MJK K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ C a l S p a n \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ O f f - S i t e \ F a l c o n - S A N _ W M _ P & P . d w g D e c e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 2 4 - 1 0 : 5 9 a m SEE S H E E T 4 7 MAT C H L I N E 6 6 + 0 0 0 15 30 60 HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEET 0 5 10 20 VERTICAL SCALE IN FEET Page 123 of 155 M E M O R A N D U M To: Adam Kienberger, Community Development Director Anthony Nemcek, Senior Planner Julia Hogan, Planner From: Dan Schultz, Parks and Recreation Director Date: January 21, 2025 Subject: Project Falcon The Parks and Recreation Department recently reviewed the plans for the Akron Ridge Development and has the following comments: Local Trails and Sidewalks The public trail shown on the east side of the property works toward the City’s goal of having a well-connected community. Staff does recommend that the 8-foot-wide trail shown on the plans be installed by the developer as part of this development. Parks Dedication Because the City is not looking to acquire parkland in this development, the parks dedication for this development would be cash in-lieu of land. The cash dedication for 60.7 acres @ $8,500 per acre would be $515,950. Please let know if you have any questions about this memo. Page 124 of 155 70 1 X E N I A A V E N U E S | SU I T E 3 0 0 | MI N N E A P O L I S , M N | 55 4 1 6 | 76 3 . 5 4 1 . 4 8 0 0 | WS B E N G . C O M Memorandum To: Brian Erickson, City Engineer Nick Egger, Director of Public Works Anthony Nemcek, Senior Planner From: Amanda Sachi Bill Alms Henry Meeker Mallori Fitzpatrick Kris Keller Date: January 23, 2025 Re: Project Falcon Engineering Review WSB Project No. 027776-000 We have reviewed the documents for project ‘Falcon’, a proposed research campus located south of future 151st/152nd Street west of Blaine Avenue in the eastern portion of the City provided by Kimley Horn on December 31, 2024. Documents reviewed include: •Project Falcon Site Development Plans, dated 12/27/2024 •Project Falcon Stormwater Report, dated 12/20/2024 •Project Falcon – Draft Traffic Impact Analysis Report, dated 12/2024 •151st Street and Blaine Avenue Roadway Improvements Plans, dated 12/31/2024 Applicant should provide responses to each comment. We offer the following comments below. General Comments: 1. General a. Submit for and provide copies to the City of all required permits from regulatory agencies (MCES, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Minnesota Department of Health, NPDES, etc.) b.Future submittals will need to be at City approved scales (maximum 50:1 plan view). Future reviews may include additional comments generated by the increased detail provided by the refined scale. Site Plan Comments: 1. General a.Provide typical pavement sections for all surfaces based on geotechnical information and recommendations for the site. b.Provide turning movements for all emergency, delivery and garbage vehicles. Page 125 of 155 Project Falcon Engineering Review January 23, 2025 Page 2 c.See additional redline comments on Sheet C400 Grading Plan Comments: 1. General a.Provide enlarged grading plans at maximum 1" = 50' scale meeting requirements found in City Engineering Guidelines. b.Provide EOF elevations and routes for all low points in the paved areas and green spaces Utility Comments: 1. General Sanitary sewer and watermain infrastructure for the Project Falcon site was not shown on the provided drawings and the storm sewer information was limited. Future utility submittals will need to meet all requirements found in the City Specifications, Engineering Guidelines, and Standard Detail Plates. Provide assumptions and calculations for sizing proposed sanitary sewer and watermain infrastructure. a.A detailed review of the layout and elevations of the utility piping, including storm sewer, will be conducted with the future submittals. b.Utility stubs are to be coordinated with the design of the 151st Street and Blaine Avenue Roadway Improvements. c.Clarify need for any separate “domestic/potable” and “fire water” water mains with the project 2. 151st Street and Blaine Avenue Project a.Further discussions with the City will need to be had regarding the size and location of the sanitary sewer, the breakdown of gravity main and forcemain in serving this site as well as adjacent areas, and with the location and design of the proposed lift station. b.Show the connection to the existing watermain and status of the existing hydrant installed at the south end with the original Blaine Ave reconstruction project c.Provide existing utility and surface features to all plan sheets to better identify the impact of new construction to existing facilities. d.The 151st Street watermain will need to be 12” to serve the commercial/industrial areas e.Provide a temporary hydrant at the west end of 151st Street f.Provide utility stubs on the south side of 151st Street to best match the location and size requirements of the Project Falcon site Page 126 of 155 Project Falcon Engineering Review January 23, 2025 Page 3 Stormwater Management Comments: 1. General a.A NPDES permit will be required since over an acre of disturbance is proposed. b.Signed plans will be required for final permit approval. c.An operations and maintenance agreement is required to specify parties responsible for specific stormwater maintenance obligations, especially with the mixed on- and offsite BMPs. d.Confirmation will be needed from the Meta site to allow access and reconstruction of the BMP E and G outlet control structures. e.The electronic version of the HydroCAD model is requested to be submitted with future submittals to aid in review. f.Additional comments are likely to be generated due to the lack of detailed grading and storm sewer plans in this submittal. 2. Ponds and Wetlands a.It is recommended that all pretreatment BMPs be consolidated into one contiguous basin rather than scattered across the site. This seems feasible for ponds 1P, 2P,and 3P without major site redesign. b.Applicant to show maintenance access routes to the proposed NURP basins on the plans. The City Engineering guidelines note maintenance access paths should be a minimum width of 10 feet at 8% maximum grade and a maximum 2% cross slope. 3. Emergency Overflow Routes: a.Applicant to show the emergency overflow elevations and locations for all proposed basins and site low points on the plans. 4. Retaining Walls: a.None apparent in plans, but comments may come up with more detailed submittals. 5. Erosion Control: a.Erosion control plans must be included with future submittals. b.A SWPPP narrative will be required with future submittals since the site will disturb over one acre. This narrative must include street sweeping for dust control. c.As the proposed site is greater than 50 acres, erosion control elements will be reviewed by the MPCA and City according to the checklist found at https://www.pca.state.mn.us/sites/default/files/wq-strm2-47.doc. 6. Grading: a.4:1 max slopes appear to be met around the site but will need to be confirmed with more detailed plans. Stormwater Management Plan: 1. General Storm Sewer Design Page 127 of 155 Project Falcon Engineering Review January 23, 2025 Page 4 a. Storm sewer capacity calculations must be provided in future submittals to confirm storm sewer is being sized for the 10-year storm event. b. Spread and run analysis must be provided for the full buildout conditions of Blaine Avenue. i. City standards require a maximum 10-yr flow of 3 cfs to any single inlet. Inlets should be placed so as to minimize flows across intersections. c. Applicant to provide storm sewer profiles for review of routing and utility crossings for any ROW, trunk storm sewer, or publicly maintained systems. d. Storm sewer should be consolidated to reduce the number of outfalls to the maximum extent possible. e. Per City standard details, sheet piling will be required for all flared end sections on pipe diameters 24” and greater. f. Flow velocities into BMPs must be 6 fps or less. 2. Water Quantity a. None currently, but comments may come up with more detailed submittals. 3. Rate/Volume Control a. Use of the Meta site regional BMPs for volume control is appreciated. However, the City’s volume control formula for infiltration area must still be met. The constructed BMPs E and G were designed assuming 0.8 in/hr infiltration, working backwards gives the allowable total inflow areas below. As designed, BMP E has too much contributing drainage area. However, rebalancing the tributary areas could allow the City rule to still be met as the total proposed drainage areas is still less than the total maximum allowable. Infiltration Area (ac) Planned Drainage Area (ac) Max Allowable Drainage Area (ac) Proposed Drainage Area (ac) BMP E 5.90 106.94 113.46 116.17 BMP G 1.45 22.33 27.88 24.69 Combined 7.35 129.27 141.34 140.86 4. Freeboard a. Site EOFs, including low points, will be needed to confirm freeboard. b. If buildings are proposed with subgrade floors, the low floor elevation must be kept with 1’ of freeboard above BMP EOFs and HWLs. 5. Water Quality a. There is a significant excess of dead storage in BMP G of the Meta site, 4.299 ac- ft of pond volume for a total 2.5” event inflow volume of 1.335 ac-ft. Proposed onsite NURP basin 4P may be eliminated if all runoff can be routed via storm sewer to the BMP G dead storage. Untreated stormwater runoff cannot be routed directly to the infiltration surface of BMP G though. 6. Easements Page 128 of 155 Project Falcon Engineering Review January 23, 2025 Page 5 a. Drainage and Utility Easements required over all publicly owned stormwater facilities and access routes. This comment will be reviewed in more detail with future submittals. Transportation Comments: 1. General a. Additional redline comments are on the attached draft Traffic Impact Analysis Report b. Appendices referenced in the report were not included i.Additional review to follow submittal of exhibits and analysis results Page 129 of 155 Traffic Impact Analysis PROJECT FALCON ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA DECEMBER 2024 Prepared By: DR A F T Page 130 of 155 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS PROJECT FALCON ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA REPORT CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. __________________________ ________ Jacob Rojer, P.E., PTOE Date License No. 56767DR A F T Page 131 of 155 1 Project Falcon │DRAFT Traffic Analysis December 2024 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 2 2. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS ........................................................................................ 4 3. ANALYSIS OF FUTURE BACKGROUND CONDITIONS ............................................................... 7 4. BUILD CONDITIONS ANALYSIS .................................................................................................. 14 5 TURN LANE WARRANT ANALYSIS ............................................................................................. 20 6 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................ 21 7 APPENDIX ..................................................................................................................................... 24 APPENDIX A. EXHIBITS B. TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS C. SITE LAYOUT EXHIBIT D. SIMTRAFFIC ANALYSIS RESULTS DR A F T Page 132 of 155 Project Falcon │DRAFT Traffic Analysis December 2024 2 1. INTRODUCTION Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., (Kimley-Horn) was retained to prepare a traffic impact study for a proposed research center in Rosemount, Minnesota. The site is located on the west side of Blaine Avenue and south of the under-construction data center located at the southwest corner of CSAH 42 & Blaine. The development consists of a campus-style research center which would include approximately 200,000 square feet of space dedicated to research and development in the short-term, expected to increase to 490,000 square feet in the long-term. An aerial view of the study location and surrounding roadway network is presented in Exhibit 1. As part of this study, the existing roadway network was analyzed to determine the current operations at the study intersections. In order to assess the potential impact of the development scenarios on the area roadway network, site-generated trips were established and added to the background traffic volumes. Background traffic volumes included the other major development projects in the vicinity. Future traffic conditions were evaluated for the approximate Opening Year of the proposed development (2029) and a long term “Design Year” (2040). The Design Year was selected as 2040 to align with recent traffic studies conducted in the area and the Dakota County 2040 Transportation Plan. This report presents and documents data collection, summarizes the evaluation of existing and projected future traffic conditions on the surrounding roadways, and identifies recommendations to address the potential impact of site-generated traffic on the adjacent roadway network. 1.1 ANALYSIS METHODOLOGIES Synchro/SimTraffic 12th edition capacity analysis software was used to evaluate existing operational conditions at the study intersections. The capacity of an intersection quantifies its ability to accommodate traffic volumes and is expressed in terms of level of service (LOS), measured in average delay per vehicle. LOS grades range from A to F, with LOS A as the highest (best traffic flow and least delay), LOS E as saturated or at-capacity conditions, and LOS F as the lowest (oversaturated conditions). The LOS grades shown below, which are provided in the Transportation Research Board’s Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), quantify and categorize the driver’s discomfort, frustration, fuel consumption, and travel times experienced as a result of intersection control and the resulting traffic queuing. A detailed description of each LOS rating can be found in Table 1-1. Table 1-1 Level of Service Grading Descriptions Level of Service Description1 A Minimal control delay; traffic operates at primarily free-flow conditions; unimpeded movement within traffic stream. B Minor control delay at signalized intersections; traffic operates at a fairly unimpeded level with slightly restricted movement within traffic stream. C Moderate control delay; movement within traffic stream more restricted than at LOS B; formation of queues contributes to lower average travel speeds. D Considerable control delay that may be substantially increased by small increases in flow; average travel speeds continue to decrease. E High control delay; average travel speed no more than 33 percent of free flow speed. F Extremely high control delay; extensive queuing and high volumes create exceedingly restricted traffic flow. 1Highway Capacity Manual, 7th Edition. DR A F T Page 133 of 155 3 Project Falcon │DRAFT Traffic Analysis December 2024 The range of control delay for each rating (as detailed in the HCM) is shown in Table 1-2. Table 1-2 Level of Service Grading Criteria Level of Service1 Average Control Delay (s/veh) at: Unsignalized Intersections Signalized Intersections A 0 – 10 0 – 10 B > 10 – 15 > 10 – 20 C > 15 – 25 > 20 – 35 D > 25 – 35 > 35 – 55 E > 35 – 50 > 55 – 80 F2 > 50 > 80 1Highway Capacity Manual, 7th Edition 2All movements with a Volume to Capacity (v/c) ratio greater than 1 receive a rating of LOS F. At side-street stop-controlled intersections, overall delay is not reported, and the worst side street delay is reported in its place. The overall delay at side-street stop-controlled intersections can misrepresent the actual level of delay drivers experience since most vehicles on the main road experience zero delay. DR A F T Page 134 of 155 Project Falcon │DRAFT Traffic Analysis December 2024 4 2. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Kimley-Horn conducted a review of the study area including existing land uses in the surrounding area, the adjacent street system, current traffic volumes and operating conditions, lane configurations and traffic controls at nearby intersections, and other key roadway characteristics. This section of the report details information on the existing conditions. An aerial view of the existing conditions and lane movements are shown in Exhibit 2. 2.1 AREA LAND USES The land uses of the site and the surrounding area are primarily agricultural, with some arterial commercial located north of the site on a frontage road east of US Highway 52. 2.2 EXISTING ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS The following provides a description of the roadways within the study area: CSAH 42 (145th Street) is an east-west roadway located north of the proposed development. Within the study area, CSAH 42 is a four-lane, divided roadway with turn lanes provided at most intersections. The 2021 Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) is 5,742 vehicles per day (VPD) east of US 52 and 18,317 VPD west of US 52. The speed limit on CSAH 42 is 55 miles per hour (MPH). US Highway 52 (TH 52) is a north-south roadway that is located east of the proposed development. TH 52 is a four-lane divided roadway with interchanges provided at major intersecting roadways. The 2021 AADT is 38,588 VPD north of CSAH 42 and 32,275 VPD south of CSAH 42. The speed limit on TH 52 is 65 MPH. Blaine Avenue (CSAH 71) is a north-south roadway that runs along the eastern boundary of the AUAR development. Blaine Avenue is a two-lane undivided roadway. The 2021 ADT is 5,347 VPD. The speed limit on Blaine Avenue is 50 MPH. Audrey Avenue is a north-south roadway south of the AUAR development. Audrey Avenue is a two-lane undivided roadway. The speed limit on Audrey Avenue is 35 MPH. Akron Avenue (CR 73) is a north-south roadway that is located west of the AUAR development. South of CSAH 42, Akron Avenue is a two-lane undivided roadway with dedicated turn lanes provided at major intersection roadways. North of CSAH 42, Akron Avenue is a two-lane divided roadway with dedicated turn lanes provided at major intersecting roadways. The 2021 ADT, north of CSAH 42, is 2,750 VDT. No speed limit is posted, so a speed limit of 55 MPH was assumed. 140th Street is an east-west roadway east of the AUAR development. 140th Street is a two-lane undivided roadway. The 2019 AADT is 285 VPD east of the site. Connemara Trail is an east-west roadway west of the AUAR development. Connemara Trail is a two-lane undivided with dedicated turn lanes provided at major intersecting roadways. The posted speed limit is 40 PM. West of Akron Avenue, the 2018 AADT is 1,400 VPD. The existing geometry and intersection control for the intersections in the study area that will be included in this analysis are shown in Exhibit 2. DR A F T Page 135 of 155 5 Project Falcon │DRAFT Traffic Analysis December 2024 2.3 PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE INFRASTRUCTURE Based on review of the Dakota County 2040 Transportation Plan, a greenway is planned north of CSAH 42 which would cross MN 55 at the intersection with CSAH 42. There is no existing or planned pedestrian or bicycle infrastructure at the proposed development site. 2.4 TRAFFIC COUNT DATA Turning Movement Counts (TMCs) were collected at the study intersections on Thursday, June 2, 2022. For each study intersection as listed below, a 13-hour TMC was collected:  CSAH 42 & US Highway 52 Southbound Ramps  CSAH 42 & US Highway 52 Northbound Ramps  CSAH 42 & Blaine Avenue  CSAH 42 & Audrey Avenue  CSAH 42 & Akron Avenue The traffic count data indicates that peak hour traffic volumes occur within the study area from 7:00 to 8:00 AM and 4:30 to 5:30 PM on a typical weekday. Traffic volumes were then normalized to the Existing year (2024) by applying the selected growth rates for each respective roadway (see Section 3.2). Existing (2024) peak hour traffic volumes are shown on Exhibit 3. 2.5 EXISTING (2024) CONDITIONS CAPACITY ANALYSIS Existing (2024) conditions capacity analysis was conducted to develop an understanding of the baseline operating conditions currently present at the study area. Existing geometry and intersection control are shown in Exhibit 2, while the existing traffic volumes are shown in Exhibit 3. The results of Existing (2024) conditions capacity analysis are summarized in Table 2-1. Based on the analysis results, the study intersection movements are estimated to currently operate at LOS D or better under Existing (2024) conditions with the exception of a few movements. The northbound left turn at CSAH 42 & US 52 Northbound Ramps which operates at LOS F during the AM peak hour and LOS E during the PM peak hour. The northbound through movement at this intersection operates at LOS F during the PM peak hour, but this movement sees a volume of less than five (5) vehicles per hour during this period. Based on mitigation recommendations for other traffic studies completed in the area, it is anticipated that both ramps will be signalized by the Opening Year (2029) which will help mitigate the existing side street delays. The southbound left and through movements at CSAH 42 & Blaine Avenue operate at LOS E during the PM peak hour, with the northbound through seeing a volume of less than five (5) vehicles per hour. This intersection is planned for signalization in the long-term as the side street delays rise, but the delays under the Existing (2024) conditions do not necessitate any mitigation changes. The queueing results from SimTraffic were reviewed, and all 95th percentile queues remain within their respective storage bays. SimTraffic analysis reports are provided in the appendix. DR A F T Page 136 of 155 Project Falcon │DRAFT Traffic Analysis December 2024 6 Table 2-1 Existing Year (2024) Level of Service Intersection Control Approach Operations by Movement AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Left Through Right Overall Left Through Right Overall CSAH 42 & US 52 Northbound Ramps Side Street Stop EB A (7.2) A (0.5) - - (-) A (4.9) A (1.8) - - (-) WB - A (1.3) A (0.3) - A (1.3) A (0.3) NB F (84.2) - A (4.1) E (42.7) F (51.9) A (3.6) SB - - - - - - CSAH 42 & US 52 Southbound Ramps Side Street Stop EB - A (1.0) A (0.0) - (-) - A (0.8) A (0.5) - (-) WB A (6.0) A (1.0) - A (4.5) A (2.3) - NB - - - - - - SB B (13.0) C (16.2) A (4.6) C (21.3) B (10.6) B (10.0) CSAH 42 & Blaine Avenue Side Street Stop EB A (5.1) A (2.7) - - (-) A (7.5) A (4.1) A (2.8) - (-) WB A (5.8) A (1.5) A (1.4) - A (2.6) A (2.8) NB - (-) A (0.0) A (1.7) C (16.0) D (26.4) A (5.0) SB C (16.0) B (14.0) A (4.9) E (38.3) E (41.5) B (13.4) CSAH 42 & Audrey Avenue Side Street Stop EB - A (3.7) A (4.3) - (-) - A (3.0) A (3.5) - (-) WB A (3.9) A (2.1) - A (4.0) A (2.9) - NB C (15.1) - - C (18.0) - A (2.6) SB - - - - - - CSAH 42 & Akron Avenue Signal EB B (16.9) A (5.1) A (1.7) A (7.4) C (20.5) A (4.2) A (0.6) B (11.6) WB - A (8.5) A (3.8) C (25.3) B (14.7) A (7.6) NB B (17.6) C (21.4) A (3.5) C (23.1) C (34.3) A (3.5) SB B (14.1) B (19.0) A (4.0) C (24.2) B (17.4) A (6.3) DR A F T Page 137 of 155 7 Project Falcon │DRAFT Traffic Analysis December 2024 3. ANALYSIS OF FUTURE BACKGROUND CONDITIONS Analysis of the future background conditions was carried out to determine the baseline operating conditions for the Opening Year (2029) and Design Year (2040) of the proposed development. A review of future traffic growth and planned geometric changes for the study roadways was conducted for the analysis. 3.1 FUTURE GEOMETRY Review of the Dakota County 2040 Transportation Plan and other Traffic Impact Studies conducted in the project vicinity indicated that the following changes are expected to occur under future conditions, regardless of the proposed development:  Highway 52/42 Interchange realignment: A study will be conducted focusing on Highway 55 traffic traveling to/from Hastings. Options are being explored regarding the realignment of the interchanges between these highways. For the purposes of this analysis, it is assumed that the existing roadway layouts are maintained, and the intersections are instead improved with smaller geometric and control changes. o It is assumed that a permanent signal will be installed at MN 55 & CSAH 42 by Opening Year (2029). o Based on traffic studies conducted for parcels which are currently under development, it is anticipated that both US Highway 52 Ramp intersections along CSAH 42 will be signalized by Opening Year (2029).  CSAH 42 & Blaine Avenue: A signal is assumed to be installed in the long-term—this is included in all Design Year (2040) conditions.  CSAH 42 & Audrey Avenue: A southbound approach is planned which will connect to Connemara Trail to the north, with Connemara Trail itself planned for an extension to Blaine Avenue. This would include the installation of a signal at the intersection of CSAH 42 & Audrey Avenue. Both the northbound and southbound approaches would be reconstructed with one through lane and turn lanes for each movement. This is included in all Design Year (2040) conditions. The mitigations listed above are included in all future analysis conditions (No-Build and Build). Further analysis along the CSAH 42 and MN 55 corridor will be conducted when determining the final alignment of the highways. 3.2 FUTURE BACKGROUND GROWTH The growth factor for the nearby study roadways was determined by comparing recent AADT data to the 2040 projected AADTs included in the Dakota County 2040 Transportation Plan. Table 3-1 provides the Historical AADTs, Projected AADTs and average growth rate at each location. With a range of growth rates between differing roadways, individual growth rates were used for each study roadway. DR A F T Page 138 of 155 Project Falcon │DRAFT Traffic Analysis December 2024 8 Table 3-1: Roadway AADT Projections and Growth Rates Roadway Segment Projected 2040 Traffic Volume Adjusted Existing Growth Rate AADT Year AADT CSAH 42 West of US 52 17,100 2016 12,900 1.2% East of US 52 12,200 2019 6,100 3.4% US Highway 52 North of CSAH 42 46,100 2022 35,450 1.5% South of CSAH 42 37,200 2022 29,180 1.4% Blaine Avenue North of CSAH 42 1,650 2021 4,800 5.8% Akron Avenue North of CSAH 42 2,500 2019 9,400 6.5% South of CSAH 42 5,400 2019 405 13.1% Based on review of historical AADT trends in the area and consideration the future developments anticipated to occur, the following growth rates were applied to the TMCs:  A 1.0% growth rate was applied to the US Highway 52 ramp volumes, per the Rosemount Industrial AUAR.  A 1.5% growth rate was applied to CSAH 42 in order to account for other possible developments in the area (per Rosemount Industrial AUAR). This is much lower than the shown growth rates in the table above since the inclusion of background development trips will account for further growth.  A 3.5% growth rate was applied to Blaine Avenue and Audrey Avenue.  A 6.5% growth rate was applied to Akron Avenue north of CSAH 42 and 13.1% south of CSAH 42. Note that growth rates selected do not align exactly with the growth rate determined by the table above. Knowledge of future developments in the area and the effects that these will have on the future daily traffic volumes was also taken into account so as to present a more precise estimation of the traffic growth. 3.3 FUTURE BACKGROUND DEVELOPMENT Based on the future development plans of nearby projects, there are many developments anticipated to occur along the CSAH 42 corridor in the coming years. The following developments are expected to occur under future background conditions:  Project Bigfoot: A data center which is currently under construction directly north of the proposed development (at the southwest corner of CSAH 42 & Blaine Avenue). This is expected to be complete by the studied Opening Year (2029).  Rich Valley Golf Course (RVGC) redevelopment: A Fed-Ex distribution center is nearly finished along CSAH 42 east of US Highway 52. A smaller industrial area to the south of the distribution center is also slated for near-term development. The full site development is included in the Opening Year (2029) analysis scenarios.  Rosemount Industrial: The site on the northwest corner of CSAH 42 & Blaine Avenue had an AUAR update completed in 2024. Along with this development, Audrey Avenue would see the addition of a north approach connecting to Connemara Trail. This is included in the Design Year (2040) analysis scenarios. An adjustment was made for the Audrey Avenue connection to Connemara Trail under the Design Year (2040) conditions to account for trips rerouting from Akron Avenue to Audrey Avenue when the connection from Connemara Trail to CSAH 42 is completed. DR A F T Page 139 of 155 9 Project Falcon │DRAFT Traffic Analysis December 2024  Connemara Trail Residential: Multiple developments (primarily residential) are expected to occur along Akron Avenue. Many of these developments have already begun construction while others will occur in the future. These developments are accounted for with high growth rates along Akron Avenue and site trips were not added separately from growth.  Blaine Avenue Industrial: This development is expected to occur in the long-term and will draw additional trips to Blaine Avenue. It is located at the southeast corner of CSAH 42 & Blaine Avenue and is expected to be an Industrial Park or similar development, but the details of the development are largely unknown at this time. Based on the site’s characteristics and the UMore AUAR assumptions, it is expected could reasonably be developed to provide 1,000,000 square feet of industrial space. Background site trips for this development were included in the Design Year (2040) analysis conditions.  Rich Valley East Site: The site directly east of the RVGC development is slated for development in the long-term. Because the timeline and details of this development are not known at this time, this development will not be included for in the future analysis scenarios. The Opening Year (2029) No-Build traffic volumes were calculated by growing the Existing (2024) traffic volumes (Exhibit 3) by the selected growth rates for 5 years to the anticipated opening year of the proposed development (2029) and adding the background traffic for the RVGC and Project Bigfoot developments, as described above. The resultant Opening Year (2029) No-Build traffic volumes are shown in Exhibit 4. The Design Year (2040) No-Build traffic volumes were calculated by growing the Existing (2024) traffic volumes (Exhibit 3) by the selected growth rates for 16 years to the selected Design Year (2040) and adding the background traffic for the RVGC, Project Bigfoot, Rosemount Industrial, and Blaine Avenue Industrial developments, as described above. A small adjustment was also made for the Audrey Avenue connection to Connemara Trail. The adjustment accounts for trips which currently make a southbound left or westbound right turn at Akron Avenue but could save time by turning at Audrey Avenue instead if possible. This predominately applies to trips to or from the new fitness center and residential developments east of Akron Avenue. The resultant Design Year (2040) No-Build traffic volumes are shown in Exhibit 5. 3.4 OPENING YEAR (2029) NO-BUILD CAPACITY ANALYSIS An Opening Year (2029) No-Build Condition analysis was completed to develop an understanding of the baseline operating conditions for the study area in the opening year without the addition of the development traffic. Existing (2024) geometry and intersection control was assumed for the analysis, along with the background changes to intersection control discussed in Section 3.2. The Opening Year (2029) No-Build traffic volumes are shown in Exhibit 4. Results of the Opening Year (2029) No-Build conditions capacity analysis are provided in Table 3-2. Most movements at the study intersections are anticipated to operate at LOS D or better during the AM and PM peak hours, with a few exceptions. The eastbound left turn movement at CSAH 42 & US 52 Northbound Ramps operates at LOS E during the PM peak hour. The eastbound left turn movement is anticipated to be nearing capacity under Opening Year (2029) No-Build conditions, with over 500 left turns. It is expected that this movement will require mitigation in the long-term if the existing diamond interchange configuration is maintained. At the CSAH 42 & US 52 Southbound Ramps intersection, the westbound left is expected to operate at LOS F during the AM Peak hour. This is primarily due to the long cycle length applied for the CSAH 42 corridor and is not expected to pose an issue, with the movement seeing a volume of less than 30 vehicles per hour during the AM peak hour. DR A F T Page 140 of 155 Project Falcon │DRAFT Traffic Analysis December 2024 10 The intersection of CSAH 42 & Blaine Avenue is expected to see poor side street operations during the PM peak hour, with multiple movements on the northbound and south approaches anticipated to operate at LOS F. The southbound left turn movement is expected to see the highest delays at just under 100 seconds per vehicle. The intersection is planned for future signalization, though it is not anticipated that a signal will be done in the short-term. The intersection should be monitored to ensure delays don’t begin to pose a serious issue at the intersection, and a signal should be installed if or when that occurs. Short-term background growth is anticipated to have some impact on the A review of the queueing results indicated that all 95th percentile queues are anticipated to remain within their respective storage bay, except for the eastbound left turns at CSAH 42 & US 52 Northbound Ramps which is expected to see queues reach as far as the southbound ramps intersection. No immediate mitigation is required for this, but dual eastbound left turn lanes are expected to be required in the long- term. The SimTraffic analysis reports are provided in the appendix. Table 3-2: Opening Year (2029) No-Build Level of Service Intersection Control Approach Operations by Movement AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Left Through Right Overall Left Through Right Overall CSAH 42 & US 52 Northbound Ramps Signal EB C (29.9) A (4.1) - C (21.5) E (68.6) A (5.9) - D (39.0) WB - C (30.8) B (11.8) - C (28.0) B (13.5) NB D (54.0) - A (6.2) D (45.8) D (39.0) A (6.7) SB - - - - - - CSAH 42 & US 52 Southbound Ramps Signal EB - B (12.1) A (1.2) B (14.0) - B (19.0) A (2.4) B (16.8) WB F (92.8) A (4.3) - D (51.0) B (11.6) - NB - - - - - - SB D (41.0) D (45.8) B (11.5) D (39.5) A (0.0) B (16.3) CSAH 42 & Blaine Avenue Side Street Stop EB A (5.8) A (3.1) A (2.4) - (-) A (8.5) A (4.8) A (2.1) - (-) WB A (5.5) A (2.5) A (2.2) - A (3.3) A (3.2) NB - (-) A (0.0) A (2.3) F (76.3) F (87.4) B (11.6) SB D (33.7) C (19.2) A (9.4) F (99.5) F (56.4) F (69.7) CSAH 42 & Audrey Avenue Side Street Stop EB - A (4.2) A (4.2) - (-) - A (3.8) A (3.3) - (-) WB A (7.8) A (2.6) - A (4.9) A (3.2) - NB B (12.6) - A (3.2) D (25.0) - A (5.6) SB - - - - - - CSAH 42 & Akron Avenue Signal EB C (20.8) A (6.1) A (2.5) A (9.3) C (25.2) A (5.2) A (1.8) B (14.3) WB - B (10.5) A (5.1) B (19.3) B (17.3) A (8.3) NB C (21.3) C (25.0) A (5.5) C (26.8) D (38.5) A (4.7) SB B (17.1) B (19.9) A (4.8) C (29.6) C (21.6) A (9.3) 3.5 DESIGN YEAR (2040) NO-BUILD CAPACITY ANALYSIS The Design Year (2040) No-Build Condition analysis was completed to develop an understanding of the baseline operating conditions for the study area in the long-term without the addition of the development DR A F T Page 141 of 155 11 Project Falcon │DRAFT Traffic Analysis December 2024 traffic. Existing (2024) geometry and intersection control was assumed for the analysis, along with the background changes to intersection control discussed in Section 3.2. The Design Year (2040) No-Build Traffic Volumes are shown in Exhibit 5. Results of the Design Year (2040) No-Build capacity analysis is included below in Table 3-3. Under Design Year (2040) No-Build conditions, the study intersections are expected to see significantly higher levels of delay due to background growth and development. Some mitigation measures will be required, with numerous movements expected to operate at LOS E or F. At CSAH 42 & US 52 Southbound Ramps, the southbound right turn is over capacity during the AM and PM peak hours, operating at LOS F during each. An additional southbound right turn lane will be required in order to mitigate this issue. At CSAH 42 & US 52 Northbound Ramps, the eastbound left turn movement is significantly above capacity, and the resultant queues extend through the CSAH 42 & US 52 Southbound Ramps intersection and well beyond. Installation of an additional eastbound left turn lane will likely be necessary under the Design Year (2040) No-Build conditions. At CSAH 42 & Blaine Avenue and CSAH 42 & Audrey Avenue, a traffic control change will likely be required to alleviate the side street delays. The SimTraffic Queueing results were reviewed, and the following 95th percentile queues are expected to exceed their storage bays:  Eastbound left at CSAH 42 & US 52 Northbound Ramps  Southbound Right at CSAH 42 & US 52 Southbound Ramps DR A F T Page 142 of 155 Project Falcon │DRAFT Traffic Analysis December 2024 12 Table 3-3 Design Year (2040) No-Build Level of Service Intersection Control Approach Operations by Movement AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Left Through Right Overall Left Through Right Overall CSAH 42 & US 52 Northbound Ramps Signal EB D (42.8) A (3.3) - C (31.3) E (63.9) A (5.7) - D (43.2) WB - C (34.3) B (18.7) - D (35.2) B (19.6) NB E (59.7) - A (7.1) D (50.3) E (75.7) A (6.6) SB - - - - - - CSAH 42 & US 52 Southbound Ramps Signal EB - C (21.9) A (1.2) D (48.8) - F (96.1) A (7.1) E (68.3) WB F (88.5) A (4.4) - F (86.5) A (8.0) - NB - - - - - - SB F (88.8) F (100+) F (100+) E (62.6) E (74.6) F (83.3) CSAH 42 & Blaine Avenue Side Street Stop Control EB F (50.0) D (26.0) B (11.8) - (-) F (83.6) F (70.2) E (35.0) - (-) WB F (100+) D (34.0) B (10.9) F (70.8) B (14.3) A (6.4) NB - (-) E (38.0) B (10.2) F (80.3) F (90.3) F (97.1) SB E (47.2) E (42.6) B (10.3) F (55.8) E (44.4) B (14.5) CSAH 42 & Audrey Avenue Side Street Stop Control EB - B (13.8) A (8.2) - (-) - A (9.6) A (5.7) - (-) WB F (77.1) C (17.8) - F (78.6) B (13.5) - NB E (42.1) - A (4.0) E (44.5) - A (9.6) SB - - - - - - CSAH 42 & Akron Avenue Signal EB C (31.2) B (11.0) A (3.4) B (17.9) D (44.4) B (12.7) A (2.5) C (31.1) WB - B (16.2) A (9.3) D (53.9) D (42.9) B (17.5) NB C (30.6) D (41.4) A (9.6) D (44.9) E (55.1) A (6.7) SB D (42.3) C (25.8) B (10.4) D (39.2) D (41.3) C (21.0) 3.6 DESIGN YEAR (2040) NO-BUILD MITIGATED CAPACITY ANALYSIS A Design Year (2040) No-Build Mitigated conditions capacity analysis was conducted to determine the anticipated long-term background operating conditions with the installation of necessary capacity improvements. In addition to the improvements discussed in Section 3.5, the following mitigation measures were included in this analysis:  Install an additional eastbound left turn lane at CSAH 42 & US Highway 52 Northbound Ramps  Install an additional southbound right turn lane at CSAH 42 & US Highway 52 Southbound Ramps The Design Year (2040) No-Build conditions traffic volumes are shown in Exhibit 5. Results of the Design Year (2040) capacity analysis are shown below in Table 3-4. With the mitigations implemented, the overall operations are anticipated to improve significantly. Some side street movements and left turn movements along CSAH 42 continue to operate at LOS E or LOS F, but the overall operations are acceptable for all intersections and none of the movements operating below LOS D are expected to pose a significant issue. The traffic operations are acceptable with the mitigations listed above. DR A F T Page 143 of 155 13 Project Falcon │DRAFT Traffic Analysis December 2024 Table 3-4 Design Year (2040) No-Build Mitigated Level of Service Intersection Control Approach Operations by Movement AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Left Through Right Overall Left Through Right Overall CSAH 42 & US 52 Northbound Ramps Signal EB B (19.8) A (2.9) - C (22.3) B (16.0) A (4.1) - B (19.5) WB - D (35.1) A (9.9) - D (36.2) B (16.4) NB E (64.0) - A (7.8) D (49.6) F (92.6) A (6.5) SB - - - - - - CSAH 42 & US 52 Southbound Ramps Signal EB - A (7.7) A (0.7) B (16.2) - C (26.7) A (3.0) C (20.6) WB F (86.7) A (4.8) - F (86.1) A (8.0) - NB - - - - - - SB D (42.8) D (52.3) C (25.7) D (36.9) A (0.0) B (19.2) CSAH 42 & Blaine Avenue Signal EB D (54.2) C (27.5) B (13.3) C (31.4) E (62.3) C (27.6) A (9.4) C (25.0) WB E (60.3) C (30.5) B (11.5) E (55.4) B (17.0) A (6.6) NB D (45.6) D (49.8) A (9.3) D (41.9) D (39.5) C (28.2) SB D (48.7) D (38.8) A (9.7) D (43.4) D (36.5) B (12.8) CSAH 42 & Audrey Avenue Signal EB - B (14.5) A (8.4) B (17.8) - B (10.5) A (5.8) B (15.6) WB E (57.0) B (15.6) - E (64.2) B (13.8) - NB D (48.0) - B (12.1) D (48.6) - A (9.7) SB - - - - - - CSAH 42 & Akron Avenue Signal EB C (33.4) B (11.2) A (3.1) B (18.1) D (49.2) B (12.7) A (2.6) C (27.9) WB - B (16.4) A (8.0) E (69.5) C (33.1) B (15.6) NB C (34.7) D (39.7) B (10.7) D (40.1) E (60.3) A (7.5) SB D (40.3) C (27.2) B (11.9) D (37.1) D (37.7) C (26.9) DR A F T Page 144 of 155 Project Falcon │DRAFT Traffic Analysis December 2024 14 4. BUILD CONDITIONS ANALYSIS This section of the report outlines the proposed development scenario, summarizes site-specific traffic characteristics, and develops future traffic projections for the build condition of the proposed research center. 4.1 DEVELOPMENT CHARACTERISTICS AND SITE ACCESS The proposed development is anticipated to include up to 490,000 square feet of research and development center. Access to the site would be provided on Blaine Avenue on the east side of the site. 4.2 TRIP GENERATION Proposed development traffic was determined based on data from the Institute of Transportation Engineers’ (ITE) Trip Generation, 11th Edition. The manual provides peak hour trips rates/equations, inbound-outbound percentages that can be attributed to the proposed site. Based on a review of land uses provided in the manual, LUC 760 (Research and Development Center) was determined to be the most appropriate fit to represent the trip generation of the proposed development. Table 4-1 provides a summary of trip generation for the proposed development. Based on the trip generation calculation, the short-term development is anticipated to generate 2,216 daily trips, including 206 total trips during the AM Peak Hour (169 entering and 37 exiting), and 196 total trips during the PM Peak Hour (31 entering, 165 exiting). In the long-term, additional development is expected to increase the trip generation of the site to 5,429 daily trips, with 505 AM peak hour trips (414 entering and 91 exiting) and 480 PM peak hour trips (77 entering and 403 exiting). Table 4-1: Proposed Development Trip Generation Land Use Description Intensity / Units Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour In Out Total In Out Total Short-Term Trip Generation LUC 760 - Research and Development Center 200 kSF 2,216 169 37 206 31 165 196 Long-Term Trip Generation (Total) LUC 760 - Research and Development Center 490 kSF 5,429 414 91 505 77 403 480 4.3 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION The estimated distribution of site-generated traffic on the surrounding roadway network was developed based on a review of the roadway network, area development pattern, and distributions used for previous Traffic Studies. The anticipated directional distribution of passenger vehicle site traffic for the proposed development is listed below.  60% to/from the north on US Highway 52  25% to/from the west on CSAH 42  15% to/from the south on US Highway 52 DR A F T Page 145 of 155 15 Project Falcon │DRAFT Traffic Analysis December 2024 The full site trip distribution is shown in Exhibit 6. In general, most vehicles are anticipated to access the development from Highway 52 north of the site. Note that Blaine Avenue is not expected to be paved south of the site and therefore trips to/from the south along Blaine Avenue are not expected to represent a significant portion of the total site trips. The site traffic assignment, representing traffic volumes associated with the proposed development at the study intersections, is a function of the estimated trip generation (Table 4-1) and the directional distribution listed above. The site trip assignment is shown in Exhibit 7. The Opening Year (2029) Build traffic volumes were calculated by adding the total Development Site Trips (Exhibit 7) to the Opening Year (2029) No-Build traffic volumes (Exhibit 4). The Opening Year (2029) Build traffic volumes are shown in Exhibit 8. The Design Year (2040) Build traffic volumes were calculated by adding the total Development Site Trips (Exhibit 7) to the Design Year (2040) No-Build traffic volumes (Exhibit 5). The Design Year (2040) Build traffic volumes are shown in Exhibit 9. 4.4 OPENING YEAR (2029) BUILD CAPACITY ANALYSIS The Opening Year (2029) Build conditions analysis was conducted to determine the impacts of the proposed development on the short-term operations of the adjacent roadway network. Existing (2024) geometry and intersection control was assumed for the analysis, along with the background changes to intersection control discussed in Section 3.2. Based on the results of the Opening Year (2029) Build conditions analysis, the westbound left turn movement at the MN 50 & US 52 Southbound Ramps intersection is anticipated to operate at LOS F during the AM and PM peak hour. Delays here are not beyond what is anticipated for busy corridor such as CSAH 42 and with the overall delay at the intersection being acceptable, this level of operations does not necessitate mitigation. The intersection of CSAH 42 & Blaine Avenue is expected to see poor side street operations, particularly during the PM peak hour with delays of more than 100 seconds anticipated for many of the side street movements. As discussed previously, the intersection will be signalized in the future, but it is not expected to happen in the short-term. A signal warrant analysis for the Opening Year (2029) Build conditions is included in Section 5. Until signalization occurs, the side street approaches of intersection are expected to operate with longer delays. The SimTraffic 95th percentile queueing results and the following queueing issues were identified:  CSAH 42 & US 52 Northbound Ramps: Queues from the eastbound left turn lane reach the CSAH 42 & US Highway 52 intersection during the PM peak hour. o However, this is not expected to cause significant operational issues and does not require immediate mitigation.  CSAH 42 & 52 Southbound Ramps: Queues for the southbound right turn lane are approaching the storage bay’s capacity during the PM peak hour. o In the long-term, installation of a second southbound right turn was recommended based on the results shown in Section 3.5. This will reduce the anticipated southbound right turn queues significantly.  CSAH 42 & Blaine Avenue: During both peak hours, significant queues are present, particularly at the southbound approach which sees 95th percentile queues of 350’ during the PM peak hour. DR A F T Page 146 of 155 Project Falcon │DRAFT Traffic Analysis December 2024 16 o Installation of a signal at CSAH 42 & Blaine Avenue will resolve the queueing issues and excessive delays. The results of the Opening Year (2029) Build scenario analysis is shown in Error! Not a valid bookmark self-reference.. SimTraffic analysis reports are included in the appendix. Table 4-2: Opening Year (2029) Build Level of Service Intersection Control Approach Operations by Movement AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Left Through Right Overall Left Through Right Overall CSAH 42 & US 52 Northbound Ramps Signal EB C (32.5) A (4.3) - C (22.5) D (36.8) A (4.7) - C (28.4) WB - C (31.0) B (12.5) - D (37.6) B (17.1) NB D (49.6) - A (6.1) D (46.3) D (44.5) A (5.6) SB - - - - - - CSAH 42 & US 52 Southbound Ramps Signal EB - B (12.5) A (1.5) B (14.9) - C (20.8) A (2.6) B (18.3) WB F (93.7) A (4.4) - F (88.1) A (5.2) - NB - - - - - - SB D (43.0) D (49.2) B (14.9) D (37.8) D (46.3) C (20.5) CSAH 42 & Blaine Avenue Side Street Stop EB A (6.3) A (3.7) A (3.1) - (-) A (9.0) A (5.0) A (3.2) - (-) WB A (9.5) A (2.7) A (1.8) B (12.1) A (3.4) A (2.7) NB E (47.5) E (36.4) A (4.0) F (100+) F (100+) C (17.5) SB F (75.8) D (31.2) D (30.5) F (100+) F (100+) F (100+) CSAH 42 & Audrey Avenue Side Street Stop EB - A (4.6) A (4.5) - (-) - A (3.8) A (3.3) - (-) WB A (9.1) A (2.6) - A (5.8) A (3.4) - NB C (20.9) - A (9.0) D (32.7) - A (5.4) SB - - - - - - CSAH 42 & Akron Avenue Signal EB C (20.3) A (6.6) A (2.3) A (9.8) C (26.4) A (5.3) A (1.8) B (14.5) WB - B (11.3) A (5.1) C (25.1) B (18.0) A (8.9) NB B (18.5) C (27.7) A (7.2) C (27.0) D (40.4) A (4.7) SB B (18.6) B (19.0) A (5.3) C (27.1) C (33.9) A (9.9) Blaine Avenue & Falcon Access Side Street Stop EB A (4.3) - - - (-) A (0.5) - - - (-) WB - - - - - - NB - A (0.0) - - A (0.1) - SB - A (1.1) A (1.7) - A (6.6) A (3.3) 4.5 DESIGN YEAR (2040) BUILD CAPACITY ANALYSIS Capacity analysis was conducted for the Design Year (2040) build conditions to determine the long-term effects of the proposed development. Existing (2024) geometry and intersection control was assumed for the analysis, along with the background changes to intersection control discussed in Section 3.2. The Design Year (2040) build traffic volumes are shown in Exhibit 9. Capacity analysis results for the Design Year (2040) build conditions are provided in Table 4-3. DR A F T Page 147 of 155 17 Project Falcon │DRAFT Traffic Analysis December 2024 Results of the Design Year (2040) Build conditions analysis shows that with the addition of the proposed development site traffic and long-term background growth, operations at the US 52 Ramps and at Blaine Avenue will be poor unless mitigation is implemented. The southbound approach at CSAH 42 & US 52 Southbound Ramps operates at LOS F during the AM peak hour due to the amount of southbound right turning vehicles here. The eastbound left turn movement at CSAH 42 & US 52 Northbound Ramps are significantly over capacity during the PM peak hour and queues from this movement cause severe issues at the downstream intersections. As was recommended under Design Year (2040) No-Build conditions, all A review of queueing results indicated that all 95th percentile queue lengths are maintained within their existing storage length. Table 4-3 Design Year (2040) Build Level of Service Intersection Control Approach Operations by Movement AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Left Through Right Overall Left Through Right Overall CSAH 42 & US 52 Northbound Ramps Signal EB D (49.8) A (4.5) - D (42.9) E (65.4) A (6.3) - D (44.7) WB - D (35.6) C (20.8) - D (35.3) C (22.2) NB F (100+) - C (20.3) D (49.8) C (31.5) A (5.8) SB - - - - - - CSAH 42 & US 52 Southbound Ramps Signal EB - D (37.4) A (2.0) D (53.8) - F (98.1) A (6.6) E (76.1) WB F (90.3) A (4.1) - F (89.6) A (8.2) - NB - - - - - - SB F (89.5) F (100+) F (100+) E (77.9) C (34.9) F (100+) CSAH 42 & Blaine Avenue Signal EB E (64.8) D (44.9) C (20.9) E (72.4) F (100+) F (100+) F (100+) F (151.7) WB F (100+) C (29.4) A (9.6) F (100+) B (16.6) A (7.2) NB D (48.5) D (40.9) B (13.0) F (100+) F (100+) F (100+) SB D (50.4) D (47.7) A (7.3) E (68.7) C (30.6) B (17.5) CSAH 42 & Audrey Avenue Signal EB - B (15.3) A (9.1) B (16.6) - A (9.8) A (5.3) B (15.2) WB D (53.4) B (11.3) - E (64.0) B (13.7) - NB D (48.3) - B (10.8) D (48.0) - A (9.2) SB - - - - - - CSAH 42 & Akron Avenue Signal EB C (31.8) B (11.2) A (3.5) C (21.6) D (53.0) B (12.9) A (2.4) C (29.5) WB - B (14.8) A (6.0) F (80.7) D (36.0) B (15.9) NB C (33.3) D (35.7) B (10.7) D (43.0) E (58.6) A (7.7) SB E (66.6) C (34.9) B (13.0) D (38.3) C (33.1) C (27.4) Blaine Avenue & Falcon Access Side Street Stop EB A (4.7) - - - (-) C (15.0) - - - (-) WB - - - - - - NB - A (0.1) - - A (0.4) - SB - A (3.2) A (6.1) - A (2.5) A (3.7) DR A F T Page 148 of 155 Project Falcon │DRAFT Traffic Analysis December 2024 18 4.6 DESIGN YEAR (2040) BUILD MITIGATED CAPACITY ANALYSIS A Design Year (2040) Build Mitigated capacity analysis was conducted in order to test the effects of the proposed mitigations on the roadway network. The Design Year (2040) build traffic volumes are shown in Exhibit 9. Along with the background mitigations discussed in Section 3.1, the following mitigations were included in the analysis:  Install an additional eastbound left turn lane at CSAH 42 & US 52 Northbound Ramps  Install an additional southbound right turn lane at CSAH 42 & US 52 Southbound Ramps  Install an additional westbound left turn lane at CSAH 42 & Blaine Avenue. o This will require an additional receiving lane at the south leg of Blaine Avenue.  Install an overlap phase for CSAH 42 & Blaine Avenue northbound rights. Results of the Design Year (2040) Build Mitigated capacity analysis are included in Table 4-4. All intersections operate at LOS C or better in the AM and PM peak hours. Some side street and left turning movements operate at LOS E or F, but the overall delays for the intersections are acceptable considering the traffic levels anticipated for the Design Year (2040) Build conditions. The SimTraffic 95th percentile queueing results were reviewed, and the following potential queueing issues were identified:  CSAH 42 & Blaine Avenue: Westbound left turn queues are at the storage capacity during the AM peak hour. Northbound Right turns are at the storage capacity during the PM peak hour. All other 95th percentile queues are expected to remain within their storage bays. Based on the expected 95th percentile queue lengths for their respective movements, it is recommended that at least 350’ of storage length should be provided for the westbound left turn movement at CSAH 42 & Blaine Avenue. The northbound right turn movement would require 500’ of storage to contain the anticipated PM peak hour queues. Alternatively, installation of an additional northbound right turn lane could be considered. The final need for these mitigations is heavily influenced by the buildout of the industrial parcel at the southeast corner of Blaine Avenue & CSAH 42. The mitigation needs at CSAH 42 & Blaine should be reevaluated when the development plans for this parcel become clearer. DR A F T Page 149 of 155 19 Project Falcon │DRAFT Traffic Analysis December 2024 Table 4-4 Design Year (2040) Build Mitigated Level of Service Intersection Control Approach Operations by Movement AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Left Through Right Overall Left Through Right Overall CSAH 42 & US 52 Northbound Ramps Signal EB C (27.5) A (5.5) - C (24.3) C (31.5) A (6.2) - C (28.2) WB - C (34.4) A (9.5) - C (33.7) B (17.8) NB D (47.3) - A (7.3) D (53.8) D (51.1) A (7.0) SB - - - - - - CSAH 42 & US 52 Southbound Ramps Signal EB - B (13.1) A (1.6) C (21.2) - D (40.1) A (5.0) C (28.0) WB D (48.1) A (5.9) - F (87.3) A (9.3) - NB - - - - - - SB D (40.5) - C (34.1) D (44.8) E (58.5) C (21.6) CSAH 42 & Blaine Avenue Signal EB D (49.1) C (30.8) B (16.0) C (29.2) E (74.1) D (45.6) B (13.2) D (40.0) WB D (50.1) B (18.8) A (9.5) E (62.5) C (22.3) A (8.1) NB D (45.9) E (59.4) B (13.7) D (44.3) E (69.6) E (66.8) SB E (62.8) E (58.6) B (13.3) D (36.2) D (47.9) B (15.5) CSAH 42 & Audrey Avenue Signal EB - B (16.9) B (10.0) B (18.9) - B (13.4) A (7.0) C (20.6) WB E (58.8) B (15.3) - E (71.0) C (22.5) - NB D (53.5) - B (11.6) D (44.8) - A (9.7) SB - - - - - - CSAH 42 & Akron Avenue Signal EB D (37.1) B (14.2) A (3.5) B (18.8) D (54.4) B (12.7) A (2.6) C (31.3) WB - C (21.6) B (10.3) E (59.2) D (38.4) B (19.8) NB D (37.1) D (44.4) B (13.1) D (41.4) E (59.3) A (7.5) SB C (26.3) C (25.6) B (11.6) D (41.8) C (32.5) C (28.4) Blaine Avenue & Falcon Access Side Street Stop EB A (4.7) - - - (-) A (7.1) - - - (-) WB - - - - - - NB - A (0.0) - - A (0.5) - SB - A (2.9) A (5.8) - A (1.4) A (2.0) DR A F T Page 150 of 155 Project Falcon │DRAFT Traffic Analysis December 2024 20 5. SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS A signal warrant analysis was conducted at the intersection of CSAH 42 & CSAH 71 (Blaine Avenue) for the Opening Year (2029) Build conditions to determine if the installation of a signal is justifiable at the intersection in the short-term. Volumes for the signal warrant were developed using the 13-hour turning movement count as a basis. Since there is no ITE time-of-day distribution given for the Research and Development Center land use, the time-of-day distribution for the Project Falcon development was instead taken as the average of two similar land uses. The time-of-day distribution was estimated based on LUC 110 (Warehousing) and LUC 710 (General Office Building) which are similar in nature to the proposed development and result in peaking characteristics which are relatively similar to the Research and Development Center land use. The signal warrant was conducted following the MnMUTCD signal warrant guidelines, with warrants 1a, 1b, 1c, 2, and 3 being analyzed. Analysis of the signal warrant results is included below in Table 5-1. Because there is a northbound right turn lane, northbound right turns were excluded from the warrant analysis. Southbound left turns were not excluded as they share an approach lane with through and left turning vehicles. Table 5-1: Signal Warrant Analysis Summary Warrant Description Hours Met Hours Required Satisfied/ Not Satisfied Opening Year (2029) Build Traffic Volumes Warrant 1A Eight-Hour (Min. Vehicular Volume) 0 8 Not Satisfied Warrant 1B Eight-Hour (Interruption of Continuous Traffic) 4 8 Not Satisfied Warrant 1C Eight-Hour (Combination of 1A and 1B) 2 8 Not Satisfied Warrant 2 Four-Hour 4 4 Satisfied Warrant 3 Peak Hour 2 1 Satisfied Based on the results of the signal warrant analysis, Warrant 1A, 1B, and 1C are not met under Opening Year (2029) Build conditions while Warrant 2 and Warrant 3 are met. Based on the guidance from Dakota County, a signal will likely not be installed at this intersection until Warrant 1A, 1B, or 1C is met. DR A F T Page 151 of 155 21 Project Falcon │DRAFT Traffic Analysis December 2024 6. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS A traffic analysis was performed to quantify the impacts of a proposed research center development on the adjacent roadway network and study intersections. The proposed site is located south of the Country Road 42 along the west side of Blaine Avenue in Rosemount, Minnesota. An Existing Year (2024) analysis was conducted, with No-Build, and Build conditions each analyzed for the Opening Year (2029) and the Design Year (2040). 6.1 PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS The proposed research center is located south of the on the west side of Blaine Avenue south of CSAH 42 in Rosemount, Minnesota. The site is directly south of the under-construction data center located at the southwest corner of CSAH 42 & Blaine Avenue. The site is mostly used for agriculture, with some University of Minnesota owned buildings on site. The development would include about 200,000 square feet of space dedicated to research and development in the short-term, which could increase to about 490,000 square feet in the long-term. The proposed access point would be along Blaine Avenue. The study area intersections include the following:  CSAH 42 & US Highway 52 Southbound Ramps  CSAH 42 & US Highway 52 Northbound Ramps  CSAH 42 & Blaine Avenue  CSAH 42 & Audrey Avenue  CSAH 42 & Akron Avenue The listed intersections were analyzed in the following scenarios:  Existing Year (2024)  Opening Year (2029) No-Build  Opening Year (2029) Build  Design Year (2040) No-Build  Design Year (2040) Build Based on the need for mitigations, additional analysis was performed for Design Year (2040) Build mitigated conditions. 6.2 EXISTING YEAR (2024) CAPACITY ANALYSIS SUMMARY A capacity analysis was conducted for Existing Year (2024) traffic conditions at the study intersections to determine baseline existing conditions. Based on the analysis, all intersections are anticipated to operate at acceptable LOS except for CSAH 42 & US Highway 52 Northbound Ramps which is expected to be signalized by the Opening Year (2029). There are no queuing issues at the study intersections. 6.3 OPENING YEAR (2029) NO-BUILD CAPACITY ANALYSIS SUMMARY A capacity analysis was conducted for the Opening Year (2029) No-Build traffic conditions at the study intersections to determine baseline conditions for the 2029 analysis year. Traffic signals were assumed at the US Highway 52 Ramps for the analysis. Based on the analysis, all intersections are expected to operate at a generally acceptable LOS with the exception of CSAH 42 & Blaine Avenue which sees LOS F operations for some side street movements. This intersection is planned for long-term signalization, and it DR A F T Page 152 of 155 Project Falcon │DRAFT Traffic Analysis December 2024 22 is recommended the signal should be installed as soon as reasonably achievable, to prevent excessive delays along Blaine Avenue and potential safety issues which could result from these delays. 6.4 OPENING YEAR (2029) BUILD CAPACITY ANALYSIS SUMMARY A capacity analysis was conducted for the Opening Year (2029) Build traffic conditions at the study intersections. Traffic signals were assumed at the US Highway 52 Ramps for the analysis. Based on the analysis, all intersections are expected to operate at a generally acceptable LOS, except for CSAH 42 & Blaine Avenue, which sees multiple side street movements operate at LOS F. The buildout of the research center does further increase the need for a traffic signal, results of a signal warrant analysis showed that the Opening Year (2029) Build conditions are meets volume Warrants 2 and 3. However, it does not meet Warrant 1 which is required per Dakota County Guidance. 6.5 DESIGN YEAR (2040) NO-BUILD CAPACITY ANALYSIS SUMMARY A capacity analysis was conducted for the Design Year (2040) No-Build traffic conditions at the study intersections to determine baseline conditions for the 2040 analysis year. Traffic signals were assumed at the US Highway 52 Ramps, at Blaine Avenue, and at Audrey Avenue for the analysis. Based on the analysis, the US Highway 52 Ramps are expected to operate poorly without further mitigation. It is recommended that an additional eastbound left turn lane at CSAH 42 & US Highway 52 Northbound Ramps be installed, as well as an additional southbound right turn lane at CSAH 42 & US Highway 52 Southbound Ramps. 6.6 DESIGN YEAR (2040) BUILD CAPACITY ANALYSIS SUMMARY A capacity analysis was conducted for the Design Year (2040) Build traffic conditions at the study intersections. Traffic signals were assumed at the US Highway 52 Ramps, Blaine Avenue, and Audrey Avenue for the analysis. Based on the analysis, the US Highway 52 Ramps and CSAH 42 & Blaine Avenue intersections operate poorly with long delays and will require further mitigation. In addition to the added eastbound left and southbound right at US Highway 52 Ramps proposed for the Design Year (2040) No- Build conditions, it is recommended that an additional westbound left turn lane be installed at CSAH 42 & Blaine Avenue. The northbound right turn lane at CSAH 42 & Blaine Avenue would need to be at least 500’ in length plus an overlap phase implemented in order to store the anticipated 95th percentile queues. Alternatively, an additional northbound right turn lane could be considered. 6.7 DESIGN YEAR (2040) BUILD MITIGATED CAPACITY ANALYSIS SUMMARY A capacity analysis was conducted for the Design Year (2040) Build Mitigated traffic conditions at the study intersections to ensure the proposed mitigation is sufficient to fix the operational issues anticipated at the study intersections. Based on the analysis, all study intersections operate at LOS D or better with no significant queueing issues and no major movements seeing operations at worse than LOS E. The proposed mitigations are sufficient to maintain acceptable operations throughout the Design Year (2040) Build scenario. 6.8 MITIGATION PLAN The following provides a summary of mitigation improvements that were identified as part of the traffic analysis for the proposed development. DR A F T Page 153 of 155 23 Project Falcon │DRAFT Traffic Analysis December 2024 Existing (2024) Conditions  No recommended mitigation Opening Year (2029) No-Build Conditions  Install traffic signals at CSAH 42 & US Highway 52 Northbound and Southbound Ramps. Opening Year (2029) Build Conditions  All Opening Year (2029) No-Build Mitigations  Install side street stop control at the site access point. Design Year (2040) No-Build Conditions  All Opening Year (2029) No-Build Mitigations  Install a traffic signal at CSAH 42 & Blaine Avenue  With the buildout of the north approach of Audrey Avenue at CSAH 42: install a traffic signal.  Install an additional westbound left turn lane at CSAH 42 & US 52 Northbound Ramps (assuming the existing interchange configuration is maintained).  Install an additional southbound right turn lane at CSAH 42 & US 52 Southbound Ramps (assuming the existing interchange configuration is maintained). Design Year (2040) Build Conditions  All Design Year (2040) No-Build Mitigations  With the buildout of the north approach of Audrey Avenue at CSAH 42: install a traffic signal.  Install an additional westbound left turn lane at CSAH 42 & US 52 Northbound Ramps (assuming the existing interchange configuration is maintained).  Install an additional southbound right turn lane at CSAH 42 & US 52 Southbound Ramps (assuming the existing interchange configuration is maintained).  Install an additional westbound left turn lane at CSAH 42 & Blaine Avenue with at least 300’ of storage.  Install an overlap phase and increase the northbound right storage length to at least 500’ at CSAH 42 & Blaine Avenue (an additional northbound right turn lane could be installed instead). DR A F T Page 154 of 155 Project Falcon │DRAFT Traffic Analysis December 2024 24 7. APPENDIX Appendix A: Exhibits Appendix B: Turning Movement Counts Appendix C: SimTraffic Reports DR A F T Page 155 of 155