The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20250204 CC RM Packet AGENDA City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, February 4, 2025 7:00 PM Council Chambers 1. CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 3. PRESENTATIONS, PROCLAMATIONS AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS a. Presentation and Acceptance of Rebate 4. RESPONSE TO PUBLIC COMMENT 5. PUBLIC COMMENT Individuals will be allowed to address the Council on subjects that are not a part of the meeting agenda. Typically, replies to the concerns expressed will be made via letter or phone call within a week or at the following council meeting. 6. CONSENT AGENDA a. Bill Listings b. Minutes of the January 21, 2025, Regular Meeting Minutes c. Resolution and Consent Order Imposing Civil Penalty d. Renewal of Consumption and Display (Set Up) Permit e. Order Preparation of an AUAR for Dakota East f. Application to Conduct Off-Site Gambling for Rosemount Area Hockey Association g. On-Sale License on Public Premise h. Approve Right of Way Easement - Amber Fields Commercial Road i. Request by Maplewood Development for AF 22nd Final Plat 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS 8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 9. NEW BUSINESS 10. ANNOUNCEMENTS a. City Staff Updates b. Upcoming Community Calendar Page 1 of 218 11. ADJOURNMENT Page 2 of 218 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY City Council Regular Meeting: February 4, 2025 AGENDA ITEM: Presentation and Acceptance of Rebate AGENDA SECTION: PRESENTATIONS, PROCLAMATIONS AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS PREPARED BY: Logan Martin, City Administrator AGENDA NO. 3.a. ATTACHMENTS: APPROVED BY: LJM RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends the City Council accept the rebate check from MN Energy Resources. BACKGROUND The design of the newly completed PW PD Campus had a strong focus on energy efficiency. As such, the project team utilized energy design / modeling assistance from MN Energy Resources to analyze the design and test its level of energy efficiency. By participating in that program and implementing best practices, the City is receiving a $15,915 rebate check from MERC. MERC representatives will be on hand at formally present this check to the City. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Council accept the rebate check from MN Energy Resources. Page 3 of 218 Page 4 of 218 Page 5 of 218 Page 6 of 218 Page 7 of 218 Page 8 of 218 Page 9 of 218 Page 10 of 218 Page 11 of 218 Page 12 of 218 Page 13 of 218 Page 14 of 218 Page 15 of 218 Page 16 of 218 Page 17 of 218 Page 18 of 218 Page 19 of 218 Page 20 of 218 Page 21 of 218 Page 22 of 218 Page 23 of 218 Page 24 of 218 Page 25 of 218 Page 26 of 218 Page 27 of 218 Page 28 of 218 Page 29 of 218 Page 30 of 218 Page 31 of 218 Page 32 of 218 Page 33 of 218 Page 34 of 218 Page 35 of 218 Page 36 of 218 Page 37 of 218 Page 38 of 218 Page 39 of 218 Page 40 of 218 Page 41 of 218 Page 42 of 218 Page 43 of 218 Page 44 of 218 Page 45 of 218 Page 46 of 218 Page 47 of 218 Page 48 of 218 Page 49 of 218 Page 50 of 218 Page 51 of 218 ROSEMOUNT CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING PROCEEDINGS JANUARY 21, 2025 CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the Rosemount City Council was held on Tuesday, January 21, 2025, at 7:00 PM. in Rosemount Council Chambers, 2875 145th Street West. Mayor Weisensel called the meeting to order with Councilmembers Essler, Theisen and Klimpel. Councilmember Freske was absent. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Motion by Weisensel Second by Theisen Motion to approve the agenda Ayes: 4. Nays: None. Motion carried. PRESENTATIONS, PROCLAMATIONS AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS None. RESPONSE TO PUBLIC COMMENT None. PUBLIC COMMENT None. CONSENT AGENDA Motion by Theisen Second by Klimpel Motion to Approve Items A-P of the Consent Agenda with item 6.q. pulled for further discussion Ayes: 4. Nays: None. Motion carried. a. Bill Listings b. Minutes of the January 7, 2025 Regular Meeting Minutes c. Minutes of the January 7, 2025 Work Session Proceedings d. Award Brockway Pond Contract e. DEED Redevelopment Grant Resolution of Support f. 2025 Joint Powers Agreement – Solid Waste and Recycling Page 52 of 218 g. Renewal of the Shafer Contracting Co., Inc. Small Scale Mineral Extraction Permit for 2025 and 2026 h. Renewal of the Dakota Aggregates Large Scale Mineral Extraction Permit through 2026 and its Interim Use Permit for aggregate processing. i. Approval of Council Travel j. Renewal of the Carl Bolander and Sons Small Scale Mineral Extraction Permit k. Renewal of the Cemstone Interim Use Permits for both its primary and seasonal concrete facilities. l. Request by Vesterra, LLC, and Stonex, LLC, for renewal of its Small Scale Mineral Extraction Permit m. Approve Entry into JPA - Biscayne & CSAH 42 Right of Way Purchase n. Amendment to the 2025 Schedule of Rates and Fees o. City Code Amendments - Administrative Citation Fees p. Donation Acceptance from Kaiser Manufacturing q. Pay Equity Compliance Report Councilmember Essler pulled this item for further discussion, specifically questioning any ramifications of a failed test. City Administrator Logan Martin provided information regarding a pay equity report that is due to the state every three years. This ensures that pay classes are staying competitive and equitable among gender types. Recently the city has had long time employees retire with many of them being of the same gender, along with broadening out the pay ranges so employees are reaching their highest step later. The solution is that we have submitted a letter to the state explaining our logic. Mr. Martin believes the state will help provide guidance through this process and there will be no penalties or ramifications. Motion by Theisen Second by Essler Motion to approve the 2025 Pay Equity Compliance Report for 2024 Compliance Ayes: 4. Nays: None. Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARINGS None. Page 53 of 218 UNFINISHED BUSINESS a. Report on Annual Evaluation of City Administrator Mr. Logan Martin spoke about the closed-door session regarding his performance as City Administrator for 2024. Mr. Martin started here in 2017, and continual growth has been seen throughout his tenure. Mr. Martin praised the team here at Rosemount for his success. He concluded it was a positive conversation, and he is very appreciative. Council Members are very pleased with Mr. Martin's professional and personal development, along with his love for our community, and his consistent success as City Administrator both with fellow employees and residents. NEW BUSINESS a. Rosemount Sustainable Purchasing Framework Jane Byron, Stormwater Specialist, gave a brief overview of the project. Rosemount is part of the organization Minnesota GreenStep Cities. Rosemount is currently at Step 2; in order to reach the next step, staff needs to adopt a sustainable purchasing policy. To further elaborate on this, Violet Penman, Solid Waste and Recycling Coordinator, spoke about the contents of the policy which are purchasing, paper reduction, waste reduction, financial flexibility, and implementation. Ms. Penman advised that this is a starting point, and all information will go to department heads internally. Motion by Klimpel Second by Theisen Motion to Approve the Sustainable Purchasing Framework Policy. Ayes: 4. Nays: None. Motion Carried. ANNOUNCEMENTS a. City Staff Updates City Administrator Logan Martin relayed to the public that the City Council will be meeting with the leadership team on Thursday, January 30, 2025 for the annual goal setting session. Dan Schultz, Parks and Recreation Director announced an Open House meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, January 28, 2025, at 6:30-7:30PM at Steeple Center regarding the Dunmore Neighborhood easement, the intention is to have further discussion with those neighborhood residents. The second item is the Bonaire Path Trail project relating to the second stretch of trail that will back up to residents' homes. Staff wants residents to be informed and be able to ask any questions that they may have. b. Upcoming Community Calendar Mayor Weisensel reviewed the calendar of events and upcoming meetings. Page 54 of 218 ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the City Council at the regular council meeting and upon a motion by Weisensel and a second by Klimpel the meeting was adjourned at 7:27 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Sarah Saunders Deputy City Clerk Page 55 of 218 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY City Council Regular Meeting: February 4, 2025 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution and Consent Order Imposing Civil Penalty AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT AGENDA PREPARED BY: Erin Fasbender, City Clerk AGENDA NO. 6.c. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution - Carbones, Resolution - Green Leaf, Resolution - Rosemount BP, Resolution - Rosemount Tobacco & Vape Center APPROVED BY: LJM RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to approve a resolution and consent order imposing civil penalty for a violation of the City's liquor & tobacco license regulation for the following establishments: • JSDL Enterprises DBA Carbone's Pizza & Pub for a violation of the City's liquor license regulation • Green Leaf Tobacco, Inc. for a violation of the City's tobacco license regulation • Rosemount BP for a violation of the City's tobacco license regulation • Rosemount Tobacco & Vape Center for a violation of the City's tobacco license regulation BACKGROUND Compliance checks utilizing a cooperating underage purchaser were conducted on December 11, 2024 at the City's licensed liquor license establishments. The purchaser entered all the licensed establishments and was sold an alcohol beverage by an employee at Carbone's and tobacco at Rosemount BP, Green Leaf and Rosemount Tobacco & Vape. All of these establishments had their first violation within the allowed time period (liquor is three years and tobacco is twenty-four months). This is a criminal violation by the employee of the establishment and a violation of the City's ordinance regarding liquor & tobacco licenses. The sale of an alcoholic beverage to an underage person is a violation of City Code 3-1: Liquor Regulations. The sale of tobacco products to an underage person is a violation of City Code 3-9: Tobacco Products and Tobacco Related Devices. Following the illegal service, police staff met with the management of the establishment to discuss the violation. In addition, the expectations and requirements of the City Code were reviewed, and the policies and procedures of the business related to the proper identification of persons purchasing alcohol and tobacco were discussed. The submitted policies and procedures have been reviewed and approved by staff and Rosemount Chief of Police. The licensees have all agreed to the terms of the attached Resolution and Consent Order imposing a fee for a civil penalty for a first-time violation. The penalty amount is the minimum required for the violation within the time period. All establishments have made their payment to the city. The minimum administrative (civil) penalties for liquor and tobacco are set by Minnesota Statute. Page 56 of 218 RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending that the City Council approve the resolutions as attached. Page 57 of 218 1 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2025 - XX RESOLUTION AND CONSENT ORDER IMPOSING CIVIL PENALTY ON JSDL ENTERPRISES LCC DBA CARBONE’S PIZZA & PUB WHEREAS, the City of Rosemount (the “City”) has issued a license for the sale of alcoholic beverages to JSDL Enterprises LLC DBA Carbone's Pizza & Pub (the “Licensee”); and WHEREAS, an illegal activity has occurred on the licensed premises of the Licensee, specifically, service of an alcoholic beverage to a person under the age of 21 by an employee of Licensee on December 11, 2024 in violation of Minnesota Statutes, Section 340A.503 (the “Violation”); and WHEREAS, the occurrence of the Violation is not disputed by the Licensee; and WHEREAS, the City Council regards such activities as very serious matters warranting the sanctions hereinafter set forth; and WHEREAS, this is the first liquor violation at the establishment of the Licensee within a three year period; and WHEREAS, the Licensee has been generally cooperative in the investigation of this matter, has demonstrated a willingness and desire to work with City staff in resolving this matter without putting the City to the expense of an administrative hearing, has expressed an understanding of the seriousness of the offenses, and has committed to ensuring that such offenses do not reoccur; and WHEREAS, Licensee has worked with staff to identify personnel policies and training, operational practices, and other means intended to minimize or eliminate such violations in the future and to assure a more safe, responsible and lawful liquor operation, which have been set forth in written policies and procedures adopted by Licensee, a copy of which is attached hereto as Attachment One, and hereby made a part hereof (hereinafter the “Policies and Procedures”); and WHEREAS, Licensee has represented, and by execution of a copy of this consent order agreed, that it will faithfully and fully comply with all of the Policies and Procedures set forth in Attachment One; and WHEREAS, on the basis of such representation and agreement by Licensee and assuming continuing compliance therewith, the City is willing to limit sanctions for the Violation to a civil penalty in the amount of Five Hundred Dollars ($500); and WHEREAS, were it not for such representation and agreement of continuing compliance with the Policies and Procedures by Licensee, the City would not be willing to so limit Page 58 of 218 2 sanctions and is doing so solely on the basis of such representation and agreements of Licensee and on the basis of the agreement by Licensee that the matter of the sanctions to be imposed for the Violations may be reopened and reconsidered, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 340A.415, in the event Licensee fails to comply fully with all of the Policies and Procedures at any time during the three (3) year period following the date of this Resolution, all as hereinafter provided; and WHEREAS, the Council has determined that this Consent Order, resolving issues relating to sanctions to be imposed by reason of the above-described violations is reasonable, necessary and in the best interests of the public; and WHEREAS, the Licensee has freely agreed to waive a statement of written charges and a hearing thereon and to pay the civil penalty hereinafter described, for the consideration set forth herein. The Licensee acknowledges and agrees that it freely executed this agreement, without threat of criminal prosecution, for the purpose of avoiding a public hearing and resolving issues relating to sanctions to be imposed by the City as the licensing authority, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 340A.415. ON THE BASIS OF THE FOREGOING, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ORDERS AND AGREES AS FOLLOWS: 1. The Licensee will pay to the City Clerk, within ten days of receipt of written notification of approval of this Consent Order by the City Council, the sum of One Five Hundred Dollars ($500). 2. Licensee waives a written statement of charges, notice of hearing and hearing to which it is entitled by Minnesota Statutes, Section 340A.415. 3. The undersigned admits the occurrence of the Violation. 4. The City will impose, as the sole civil sanction for the Violations, a civil penalty in the amount of $500 payable as set forth in paragraph 1 hereof. This agreement shall not limit the right of the City to pursue civil remedies or to take any action with respect to the license that is authorized by state law or City Code for any activity to which this agreement does not specifically apply and that is a violation of state law or City Code. 5. Except as provided in paragraph 6, in the event of future violations of state law or City Code by Licensee, no additional penalty shall be imposed for unlawful activity covered by this agreement. However, admissions of unlawful activity described herein may be taken into consideration in determining appropriate sanctions in any future cases. 6. In the event the City Council determines that Licensee has failed to comply fully with the Policies and Procedures at any time during the three year period following the date of this Resolution, Licensee agrees that the City may revoke or suspend the Licensee’s license or impose civil penalties for the Violations pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 340A.415, provided the total penalty including the penalty agreed to pursuant to paragraph 1 hereof shall not exceed amounts authorized by law. Page 59 of 218 3 7. Licensee understands and agrees: a. That this agreement does not constitute an agreement not to bring criminal charges for activities described herein; b. That a decision whether to bring any charges rests within the discretion of the City prosecuting attorney, the County attorney, or other authorized law enforcement agencies; c. That the Licensee freely enters into this agreement without any promises from the City that no criminal charges will be brought; d. That this agreement is entered into for the sole purpose of resolving and settling any potential civil sanctions imposed pursuant to Minnesota Statute Section 340A.415, and not for the purpose of resolving or settling any potential criminal issues; and e. That in the event criminal charges are brought against the undersigned, the Licensee or any of its employees for activities described herein, Licensee will not contest the validity of this agreement, repudiate, or otherwise challenge this agreement in any way, by reason of the initiation or prosecution of such criminal proceedings. LICENSEE BUSINESS NAME _____ Print Name Title _____ Signature ADOPTED this 4th day of February, 2025. Jeffery D. Weisensel, Mayor ATTEST: ____ Erin Fasbender, City Clerk Page 60 of 218 A-1 ATTACHMENT ONE LICENSEE ALCOHOL SALES & SERVICE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES Page 61 of 218 Page 62 of 218 Page 63 of 218 Page 64 of 218 Page 65 of 218 Page 66 of 218 Page 67 of 218 Page 68 of 218 Page 69 of 218 Page 70 of 218 Page 71 of 218 Page 72 of 218 Page 73 of 218 Page 74 of 218 Page 75 of 218 1 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2025 - XX RESOLUTION AND CONSENT ORDER IMPOSING CIVIL PENALTY ON GREEN LEAF TOBACCO, INC. FOR TOBACCO LICENSE VIOLATIONS WHEREAS, the City of Rosemount (the “City”) has issued a license for the sale of tobacco and tobacco-related products to Green Leaf Tobacco, Inc. (the “Licensee”); and WHEREAS, an illegal activity has occurred on the licensed premises of the Licensee, specifically, sales of tobacco products to a person under the age of 21 by an employee of Licensee on December 11, 2024, in violation of Minnesota Statutes, Section 609.685 (the “Violation 1”); and WHEREAS, the occurrence(s) of the Violation(s) is not disputed by the Licensee; and WHEREAS, the City Council regards such activities as very serious matters warranting the sanctions hereinafter set forth; and WHEREAS, Violation 1 is the first (1st) tobacco violation at the establishment of the Licensee within a twenty-four (24) month period; and WHEREAS, the Licensee has been generally cooperative in the investigation of this matter, has demonstrated a willingness and desire to work with City staff in resolving this matter without putting the City to the expense of an administrative hearing, has expressed an understanding of the seriousness of the offenses, and has committed to ensuring that such offenses do not reoccur; and WHEREAS, Licensee has worked with staff to identify personnel policies and training, operational practices, and other means intended to minimize or eliminate such violations in the future and to assure a more safe, responsible and lawful tobacco operation, which have been set forth in written policies and procedures adopted by Licensee, a copy of which is attached hereto as Attachment One, and hereby made a part hereof (hereinafter the “Policies and Procedures”); and WHEREAS, Licensee has represented, and by execution of a copy of this consent order agreed, that it will faithfully and fully comply with all of the Policies and Procedures set forth in Attachment One; and WHEREAS, on the basis of such representation and agreement by Licensee and assuming continuing compliance therewith, the City is willing to limit sanctions for Violation 1 to a civil penalty in the amount of Seventy-Five Dollars ($75); and Page 76 of 218 2 WHEREAS, the Council has determined that this Consent Order, resolving issues relating to sanctions to be imposed by reason of the above-described violations is reasonable, necessary and in the best interests of the public; and WHEREAS, the Licensee has freely agreed to waive a statement of written charges and a hearing thereon and to pay the civil penalty hereinafter described, for the consideration set forth herein. The Licensee acknowledges and agrees that it freely executed this agreement, without threat of criminal prosecution, for the purpose of avoiding a public hearing and resolving issues relating to sanctions to be imposed by the City as the licensing authority, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 461.12. ON THE BASIS OF THE FOREGOING, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ORDERS AND AGREES AS FOLLOWS: 1. The Licensee will pay to the City Clerk, within ten days of receipt of written notification of approval of this Consent Order by the City Council, the sum of Seventy-Five ($75). 2. Licensee waives a written statement of charges, notice of hearing and hearing to which it is entitled by Minnesota Statutes, Section 461.12. 3. The undersigned admits the occurrence of Violation 1. 4. The City will impose, as the sole civil sanction for the Violations, a total civil penalty in the amount of $75 payable as set forth in paragraph 1 hereof. This agreement shall not limit the right of the City to pursue civil remedies or to take any action with respect to the license that is authorized by state law or City Code for any activity to which this agreement does not specifically apply and that is a violation of state law or City Code. 5. Except as provided in paragraph 6, in the event of future violations of state law or City Code by Licensee, no additional penalty shall be imposed for unlawful activity covered by this agreement. However, admissions of unlawful activity described herein may be taken into consideration in determining appropriate sanctions in any future cases. 6. In the event the City Council determines that Licensee has failed to comply fully with the Policies and Procedures at any time during the 24 month period following the date of this Resolution, Licensee agrees that the City may revoke or suspend the Licensee’s license or impose civil penalties for the Violations pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 461.12, provided the total penalty including the penalty agreed to pursuant to paragraph 1 hereof shall not exceed amounts authorized by law. Page 77 of 218 3 7. Licensee understands and agrees: a. That this agreement does not constitute an agreement not to bring criminal charges for activities described herein; b. That a decision whether to bring any charges rests within the discretion of the City prosecuting attorney, the County attorney, or other authorized law enforcement agencies; c. That the Licensee freely enters into this agreement without any promises from the City that no criminal charges will be brought; d. That this agreement is entered into for the sole purpose of resolving and settling any potential civil sanctions imposed pursuant to Minnesota Statute Section 340A.415, and not for the purpose of resolving or settling any potential criminal issues; and e. That in the event criminal charges are brought against the undersigned, the Licensee or any of its employees for activities described herein, Licensee will not contest the validity of this agreement, repudiate, or otherwise challenge this agreement in any way, by reason of the initiation or prosecution of such criminal proceedings. LICENSEE BUSINESS NAME _____ Print Name Title _____ Signature ADOPTED this 4th day of February, 2025. Jeffery D. Weisensel, Mayor ATTEST: ____ Erin Fasbender, City Clerk Page 78 of 218 A-1 ATTACHMENT ONE LICENSEE TOBACCO & TOBACCO RELATED PRODUCTS SALES & SERVICE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES Page 79 of 218 Page 80 of 218 1 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2025 - XX RESOLUTION AND CONSENT ORDER IMPOSING CIVIL PENALTY ON ROSEMOUNT BP FOR TOBACCO LICENSE VIOLATIONS WHEREAS, the City of Rosemount (the “City”) has issued a license for the sale of tobacco and tobacco-related products to Rosemount BP (the “Licensee”); and WHEREAS, an illegal activity has occurred on the licensed premises of the Licensee, specifically, sales of tobacco products to a person under the age of 21 by an employee of Licensee on December 11, 2024, in violation of Minnesota Statutes, Section 609.685 (the “Violation 1”); and WHEREAS, the occurrence(s) of the Violation(s) is not disputed by the Licensee; and WHEREAS, the City Council regards such activities as very serious matters warranting the sanctions hereinafter set forth; and WHEREAS, Violation 1 is the first (1st) tobacco violation at the establishment of the Licensee within a twenty-four (24) month period; and WHEREAS, the Licensee has been generally cooperative in the investigation of this matter, has demonstrated a willingness and desire to work with City staff in resolving this matter without putting the City to the expense of an administrative hearing, has expressed an understanding of the seriousness of the offenses, and has committed to ensuring that such offenses do not reoccur; and WHEREAS, Licensee has worked with staff to identify personnel policies and training, operational practices, and other means intended to minimize or eliminate such violations in the future and to assure a more safe, responsible and lawful tobacco operation, which have been set forth in written policies and procedures adopted by Licensee, a copy of which is attached hereto as Attachment One, and hereby made a part hereof (hereinafter the “Policies and Procedures”); and WHEREAS, Licensee has represented, and by execution of a copy of this consent order agreed, that it will faithfully and fully comply with all of the Policies and Procedures set forth in Attachment One; and WHEREAS, on the basis of such representation and agreement by Licensee and assuming continuing compliance therewith, the City is willing to limit sanctions for Violation 1 to a civil penalty in the amount of Seventy-Five Dollars ($75); and Page 81 of 218 2 WHEREAS, the Council has determined that this Consent Order, resolving issues relating to sanctions to be imposed by reason of the above-described violations is reasonable, necessary and in the best interests of the public; and WHEREAS, the Licensee has freely agreed to waive a statement of written charges and a hearing thereon and to pay the civil penalty hereinafter described, for the consideration set forth herein. The Licensee acknowledges and agrees that it freely executed this agreement, without threat of criminal prosecution, for the purpose of avoiding a public hearing and resolving issues relating to sanctions to be imposed by the City as the licensing authority, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 461.12. ON THE BASIS OF THE FOREGOING, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ORDERS AND AGREES AS FOLLOWS: 1. The Licensee will pay to the City Clerk, within ten days of receipt of written notification of approval of this Consent Order by the City Council, the sum of Seventy-Five ($75). 2. Licensee waives a written statement of charges, notice of hearing and hearing to which it is entitled by Minnesota Statutes, Section 461.12. 3. The undersigned admits the occurrence of Violation 1. 4. The City will impose, as the sole civil sanction for the Violations, a total civil penalty in the amount of $75 payable as set forth in paragraph 1 hereof. This agreement shall not limit the right of the City to pursue civil remedies or to take any action with respect to the license that is authorized by state law or City Code for any activity to which this agreement does not specifically apply and that is a violation of state law or City Code. 5. Except as provided in paragraph 6, in the event of future violations of state law or City Code by Licensee, no additional penalty shall be imposed for unlawful activity covered by this agreement. However, admissions of unlawful activity described herein may be taken into consideration in determining appropriate sanctions in any future cases. 6. In the event the City Council determines that Licensee has failed to comply fully with the Policies and Procedures at any time during the 24 month period following the date of this Resolution, Licensee agrees that the City may revoke or suspend the Licensee’s license or impose civil penalties for the Violations pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 461.12, provided the total penalty including the penalty agreed to pursuant to paragraph 1 hereof shall not exceed amounts authorized by law. Page 82 of 218 3 7. Licensee understands and agrees: a. That this agreement does not constitute an agreement not to bring criminal charges for activities described herein; b. That a decision whether to bring any charges rests within the discretion of the City prosecuting attorney, the County attorney, or other authorized law enforcement agencies; c. That the Licensee freely enters into this agreement without any promises from the City that no criminal charges will be brought; d. That this agreement is entered into for the sole purpose of resolving and settling any potential civil sanctions imposed pursuant to Minnesota Statute Section 340A.415, and not for the purpose of resolving or settling any potential criminal issues; and e. That in the event criminal charges are brought against the undersigned, the Licensee or any of its employees for activities described herein, Licensee will not contest the validity of this agreement, repudiate, or otherwise challenge this agreement in any way, by reason of the initiation or prosecution of such criminal proceedings. LICENSEE BUSINESS NAME _____ Print Name Title _____ Signature ADOPTED this 4th day of February, 2025. Jeffery D. Weisensel, Mayor ATTEST: ____ Erin Fasbender, City Clerk Page 83 of 218 A-1 ATTACHMENT ONE LICENSEE TOBACCO & TOBACCO RELATED PRODUCTS SALES & SERVICE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES Page 84 of 218 Rosemount Auto Service o acco o c State and Federal Law prohibits the sale of all Tobacco products to MINORS ! It is your responsibility to ask for identification for ALL TOBACCO PURCHASES ! Review the picture and information on the ID and swipe the ID through the Register. Failure to follow these procedures will lead to T rmination . In addition, If you are caught selling to a Minor you will be required to Pay a Fine and answer to the Governing Authorities. We All need to be very diligent in making sure that there are no Tobacco sales to Minors ! WHEN IN DOUBT, REFUSE THE SALE ! Sign Date Page 85 of 218 1 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2025 - XX RESOLUTION AND CONSENT ORDER IMPOSING CIVIL PENALTY ON ROSEMOUNT TOBACCO & VAPE CENTER FOR TOBACCO LICENSE VIOLATIONS WHEREAS, the City of Rosemount (the “City”) has issued a license for the sale of tobacco and tobacco-related products to Rosemount Tobacco & Vape Center (the “Licensee”); and WHEREAS, an illegal activity has occurred on the licensed premises of the Licensee, specifically, sales of tobacco products to a person under the age of 21 by an employee of Licensee on December 11, 2024, in violation of Minnesota Statutes, Section 609.685 (the “Violation 1”); and WHEREAS, the occurrence(s) of the Violation(s) is not disputed by the Licensee; and WHEREAS, the City Council regards such activities as very serious matters warranting the sanctions hereinafter set forth; and WHEREAS, Violation 1 is the first (1st) tobacco violation at the establishment of the Licensee within a twenty-four (24) month period; and WHEREAS, the Licensee has been generally cooperative in the investigation of this matter, has demonstrated a willingness and desire to work with City staff in resolving this matter without putting the City to the expense of an administrative hearing, has expressed an understanding of the seriousness of the offenses, and has committed to ensuring that such offenses do not reoccur; and WHEREAS, Licensee has worked with staff to identify personnel policies and training, operational practices, and other means intended to minimize or eliminate such violations in the future and to assure a more safe, responsible and lawful tobacco operation, which have been set forth in written policies and procedures adopted by Licensee, a copy of which is attached hereto as Attachment One, and hereby made a part hereof (hereinafter the “Policies and Procedures”); and WHEREAS, Licensee has represented, and by execution of a copy of this consent order agreed, that it will faithfully and fully comply with all of the Policies and Procedures set forth in Attachment One; and WHEREAS, on the basis of such representation and agreement by Licensee and assuming continuing compliance therewith, the City is willing to limit sanctions for Violation 1 to a civil penalty in the amount of Seventy-Five Dollars ($75); and Page 86 of 218 2 WHEREAS, the Council has determined that this Consent Order, resolving issues relating to sanctions to be imposed by reason of the above-described violations is reasonable, necessary and in the best interests of the public; and WHEREAS, the Licensee has freely agreed to waive a statement of written charges and a hearing thereon and to pay the civil penalty hereinafter described, for the consideration set forth herein. The Licensee acknowledges and agrees that it freely executed this agreement, without threat of criminal prosecution, for the purpose of avoiding a public hearing and resolving issues relating to sanctions to be imposed by the City as the licensing authority, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 461.12. ON THE BASIS OF THE FOREGOING, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ORDERS AND AGREES AS FOLLOWS: 1. The Licensee will pay to the City Clerk, within ten days of receipt of written notification of approval of this Consent Order by the City Council, the sum of Seventy-Five ($75). 2. Licensee waives a written statement of charges, notice of hearing and hearing to which it is entitled by Minnesota Statutes, Section 461.12. 3. The undersigned admits the occurrence of Violation 1. 4. The City will impose, as the sole civil sanction for the Violations, a total civil penalty in the amount of $75 payable as set forth in paragraph 1 hereof. This agreement shall not limit the right of the City to pursue civil remedies or to take any action with respect to the license that is authorized by state law or City Code for any activity to which this agreement does not specifically apply and that is a violation of state law or City Code. 5. Except as provided in paragraph 6, in the event of future violations of state law or City Code by Licensee, no additional penalty shall be imposed for unlawful activity covered by this agreement. However, admissions of unlawful activity described herein may be taken into consideration in determining appropriate sanctions in any future cases. 6. In the event the City Council determines that Licensee has failed to comply fully with the Policies and Procedures at any time during the 24 month period following the date of this Resolution, Licensee agrees that the City may revoke or suspend the Licensee’s license or impose civil penalties for the Violations pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 461.12, provided the total penalty including the penalty agreed to pursuant to paragraph 1 hereof shall not exceed amounts authorized by law. Page 87 of 218 3 7. Licensee understands and agrees: a. That this agreement does not constitute an agreement not to bring criminal charges for activities described herein; b. That a decision whether to bring any charges rests within the discretion of the City prosecuting attorney, the County attorney, or other authorized law enforcement agencies; c. That the Licensee freely enters into this agreement without any promises from the City that no criminal charges will be brought; d. That this agreement is entered into for the sole purpose of resolving and settling any potential civil sanctions imposed pursuant to Minnesota Statute Section 340A.415, and not for the purpose of resolving or settling any potential criminal issues; and e. That in the event criminal charges are brought against the undersigned, the Licensee or any of its employees for activities described herein, Licensee will not contest the validity of this agreement, repudiate, or otherwise challenge this agreement in any way, by reason of the initiation or prosecution of such criminal proceedings. LICENSEE BUSINESS NAME _____ Print Name Title _____ Signature ADOPTED this 4th day of February, 2025. Jeffery D. Weisensel, Mayor ATTEST: ____ Erin Fasbender, City Clerk Page 88 of 218 A-1 ATTACHMENT ONE LICENSEE TOBACCO & TOBACCO RELATED PRODUCTS SALES & SERVICE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES Page 89 of 218 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY City Council Regular Meeting: February 4, 2025 AGENDA ITEM: Renewal of Consumption and Display (Set Up) Permit, The Meeting Point AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT AGENDA PREPARED BY: Erin Fasbender, City Clerk AGENDA NO. 6.d. ATTACHMENTS: APPROVED BY: LJM RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Approve the Renewal of a Consumption and Display Permit for The Meeting Point on the premise located at 14537 Dodd Blvd BACKGROUND On October 1, 2019 the City Council issued a Consumption and Display (Set Up) Permit to The Meeting Point, LLC. The Consumption and Display (Set Up) Permit expires annually on March 31st. The license will not be effective until approved by the City of Rosemount and final approval is received by the Department of Public Safety/Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division. The State fee for the license is $250 and the City fee is $140. City Code allows for Consumption and Display (Set Up) Permits to be issued to business establishments in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 340A.414 for the consumption or display of intoxicating liquor or the serving of any liquid for the purpose of mixing with intoxicating liquor. The permit does not authorize the sale of intoxicating liquor. The Meeting Point will be subject to inspection by the commissioner and the commissioner’s representative and by peace officers, who may enter and inspect during reasonable hours. Intoxicating liquor sold, served or displayed in violation of law may be seized. The Police Department and City Clerk have reviewed the application and have found no reason to deny the request. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends renewal of the Consumption and Display Permit for The Meeting Point, LLC on the premise located at 14537 Dodd Blvd. Page 90 of 218 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY City Council Regular Meeting: February 4, 2025 AGENDA ITEM: Order Preparation of an Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) for Dakota East (South of CSAH 42 between Fisher and Emery Avenues) AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT AGENDA PREPARED BY: Anthony Nemcek , Senior Planner AGENDA NO. 6.e. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution, Final Order, Scoping Document with Responses, Comments Received APPROVED BY: LJM RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt a Resolution Ordering the Preparation of an AUAR for Dakota East. BACKGROUND The City Council is being asked to adopt a resolution ordering the preparation of an Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) for the potential development currently referred to as Dakota East, which covers approximately 447 acres over 8 parcels south of CSAH 42 between Emery Avenue and Fisher Avenue. The AUAR is being developed by Kimley-Horn on behalf of a user that is interested in developing the site as a technology park containing multiple data centers. Based on the size of the study area and anticipated total size of the potential project, the development would meet the criteria for a mandatory Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW). Given the size and scope of planned future development on the site, the developer has chosen instead to study the entire site through the AUAR process rather than completing multiple EAWs (or an EIS) over the project area. The advantages of preparing an AUAR for a larger project are as follows: • One comprehensive review is completed for multiple building areas versus individual EAW/EIS with each development proposal. • The AUAR will outline mitigative measures to impacts identified for the proposed development area. • The AUAR allows for the environmental review to be completed earlier in the development process than an EAW or EIS. • The preparation of an AUAR is more cost-effective than multiple EAW’s. An AUAR is required to include a minimum of two development scenarios for the subject area when a site consists of multiple land use designations. The proposed AUAR will include the following 3 scenarios: Scenario 1: This scenario includes 1,450 residential units and 500,000 sf of commercial and is consistent with the City's adopted Land Use Plan. Scenario 2: This scenario includes 2,300,000 sf of mixed business campus (technology park). Page 91 of 218 Scenario 3: This scenario includes 2,500,000 sf of mixed business campus (light industrial). The City’s future land use map identifies the project area for future business park, light industrial, and community commercial uses. Both scenario 2 and scenario 3 would require amending the City's Comprehensive Plan. The state’s environmental rules specify that the City of Rosemount is the Responsible Government Unit for the AUAR. Kimley-Horn has been contracted by the developer to prepare the document, and the City plans to contract with WSB to review and process the AUAR on behalf of the City. Once a draft document has been prepared, the City Council will be asked to review the AUAR and authorize distribution of the document for public comment. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Council order the preparation of an AUAR for Dakota East. Page 92 of 218 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XX A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF AN ALTERNATIVE URBAN AREAWIDE REVIEW FOR DAKOTA EAST WHEREAS, Minnesota Rules Chapter 4410.3610 provides for a substitute form of Environmental Review known as an Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) process; and WHEREAS, an Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) process allows for the environmental review of development and associated infrastructure in a particular geographic area within a jurisdiction if the local government unit has an adopted Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the City of Rosemount has an adopted Comprehensive Plan that identifies future growth and development in the study area; and WHEREAS, the City recognizes the need to plan for future development of land identified in the study area so a coherent development results over the long term and infrastructure facilities are utilized in the most efficient manner; and WHEREAS, the City of Rosemount is the Responsible Governmental Unit (RGU) pursuant to Minnesota Rules Part 4410.3610 Subp. 1; and WHEREAS, the City of Rosemount anticipates development within the Dakota East site; and WHEREAS, the study area is approximately 447 acres located south of County Road 42, between Fisher Avenue and Emery Avenue; and WHEREAS, three proposed development scenarios have been identified to be evaluated as part of the AUAR: Scenario 1: This scenario includes 1,450 residential units and 500,000 sf of commercial. Scenario 2: This scenario includes 2,300,000 sf of mixed business campus (technology park). Scenario 3: This scenario includes 2,500,000 sf of mixed business campus (light industrial). Page 93 of 218 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rosemount deems an Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) to be the most appropriate form of environmental review for the development of the Dakota East site. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Rosemount, MN that the City of Rosemount orders the preparation an Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) for the Dakota East study area. ADOPTED this 4th day of February 2025, by the City Council of the City of Rosemount. ______________________________ Jeffery D. Weisensel, Mayor ATTEST: ______________________________ Erin Fasbender, City Clerk Page 94 of 218 1 TO: Interested Parties (Including Minnesota Environmental Quality Board Distribution List) FROM: Anthony Nemcek Senior Planner City of Rosemount DATE: February 4, 2025 SUBJECT: Final Order for the Dakota East Area AUAR Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) As the Responsible Governmental Unit (RGU), the City of Rosemount has determined that an Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) is required for the proposed Dakota East AUAR Area. The project is proposed by MNLCO Dakota County, LLC. The notice of availability of the Draft AUAR Order and Scoping Document was published in the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board’s EQB Monitor on December 17, 2024. The Scoping Document, included as Attachment A, was available for review and comment as part of the AUAR process as described in Minnesota Rules, part 4410.3610, subpart 5a. The 30-day comment period began on December 17, 2024, and closed at 4:00 PM on January 16, 2025. During the public comment period, comments were received from four government and regional agencies. One public comment was received. The comment letters received, and responses are included in Attachment B. AUAR Study Area The AUAR study area encompasses an area totaling approximately 447 acres on 8 parcels in Rosemount, Dakota County, Minnesota (shown on Figure 1). MNLCO Dakota County, LLC is proposing to develop the study area from existing farmland to one of the scenarios being proposed. Development Scenarios Three development scenarios, defined in Table 1 and shown on Figures 2, 3, and 4 are proposed to be evaluated in the AUAR. Table 1: AUAR Development Scenarios Land Use Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Residential Units 1,450 Units - - Commercial 500,000 SF - - Mixed Business Campus (Light Industrial) - - 2,500,000 SF Mixed Business Campus (Technology Park) - 2,300,000 SF - Total Project Area 447 acres 447 acres 447 acres Page 95 of 218 2 Figure 1: AUAR Study Area Page 96 of 218 3 Figure 2: AUAR Study Area – Scenario 1 Page 97 of 218 4 Figure 3: AUAR Study Area – Scenario 2 Page 98 of 218 5 Figure 4 AUAR Study Area – Scenario 3 Page 99 of 218 Attachment A Page 100 of 218 Dakota East Area AUAR – Scoping Document JANUARY 2025 DAKOTA EAST AREA AUAR SCOPING DOCUMENT PREPARED FOR: PREPARED BY: Page 101 of 218 Dakota East Area AUAR – Scoping Document January 2025 i Table of Contents 1. Project Title ..................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Proposer .......................................................................................................................................... 1 3. RGU ................................................................................................................................................. 1 4. Reason for Preparation .................................................................................................................... 2 5. Project Location ............................................................................................................................... 2 6. Project Description .......................................................................................................................... 4 7. Climate Adaption and Resilience ...................................................................................................... 9 8. Cover Types ................................................................................................................................... 11 9. Permits and Approvals Required .................................................................................................... 13 10. Land Use ........................................................................................................................................ 14 11. Geology, Soils, and Topography/Land Forms .................................................................................. 20 12. Water Resources ........................................................................................................................... 25 13. Contamination/Hazardous Materials/Wastes ................................................................................ 33 14. Fish, Wildlife, Plant Communities, and Sensitive Ecological Resources (Rare Features) ................... 34 15. Historic Properties ......................................................................................................................... 37 16. Visual ............................................................................................................................................. 38 17. Air ................................................................................................................................................. 38 18. Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions/Carbon Footprint ...................................................................... 39 19. Noise ............................................................................................................................................. 41 20. Transportation ............................................................................................................................... 42 21. Cumulative Potential Effects .......................................................................................................... 45 22. Other Potential Environmental Effects ........................................................................................... 46 List of Tables Table 1: Development Scenarios .............................................................................................................. 5 Table 2: Climate Considerations and Adaptions ....................................................................................... 9 Table 3: Cover Types.............................................................................................................................. 11 Table 4: Anticipated Permits and Approvals ........................................................................................... 13 Table 5: Soil Types ................................................................................................................................. 21 Table 6: Wells within AUAR Study Area .................................................................................................. 27 Page 102 of 218 Dakota East Area AUAR – Scoping Document January 2025 ii List of Figures Figure 1: USGS Map ................................................................................................................................. 2 Figure 2: AUAR Study Area ...................................................................................................................... 3 Figure 3: Development Scenario 1 ........................................................................................................... 6 Figure 4: Development Scenario 2 ........................................................................................................... 7 Figure 5: Development Scenario 3 ........................................................................................................... 8 Figure 6: Cover Types ............................................................................................................................ 12 Figure 7: Existing Land Use .................................................................................................................... 18 Figure 8: Future Land Use ...................................................................................................................... 19 Figure 9: Soil Types ................................................................................................................................ 24 Figure 10: Surface Water Resources ...................................................................................................... 26 Figure 11: Groundwater Resources ........................................................................................................ 28 Figure 12: Traffic Study Intersections ..................................................................................................... 44 Page 103 of 218 Dakota East Area AUAR – Scoping Document January 2025 1 Draft Scoping Document This EAW form is being used to delineate the issues and analyses to be reviewed in an Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR). Where the AUAR guidance provided by the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board (EQB) indicates that an AUAR response should differ notably from what is required for an EAW, the guidance is noted in italics. Note to reviewers: Comments must be submitted to the Responsible Governmental Unit (RGU ) during the 30-day comment period following notice of the Scoping Document in the EQB Monitor. 1. PROJECT TITLE Dakota East Area AUAR 2. PROPOSER Proposer: MNLCO Dakota County, LLC Contact Person: Kristin Dean Title: Senior Director of Entitlements Address: 3300 E. 1st Ave, Ste. 600 City, State, ZIP: Denver, CO 80206 Phone: 303-276-7950 Email: kristin.dean@tract.com 3. RGU RGU: City of Rosemount Contact Person: Anthony Nemcek Title: Senior Planner Address: 2875 145th Street West City, State, ZIP: Rosemount, MN 55068 Phone: 651-322-2090 Email: anthony.nemcek@rosemountmn.gov Page 104 of 218 Dakota East Area AUAR – Scoping Document January 2025 2 4. REASON FOR PREPARATION AUAR Guidance: Not applicable to an AUAR. 5. PROJECT LOCATION County: Dakota City/Township: Rosemount PLS Location (¼, ¼, Section, Township, Range): Section 28, Township 115N, Range 18W Watershed (81 major watershed scale): Mississippi River – Lake Pepin Tax Parcel: 340280030030, 340280025030, 340280036011, 340280015010, 340280010010, 340280050010, 340280075010, 340280085010. At a minimum, attach each of the following to the AUAR: • US Geological Survey 7.5 minute, 1:24,000 scale map indicating project boundaries (see Figure 1) Map depicting the boundaries of the AUAR and any subdistricts used in the AUAR analysis (see Figure 2 through Figure 5) • List of data sources, models, and other resources (from the Item-by-Item Guidance: Climate Adaptation and Resilience or other) used for information about current Minnesota climate trends and how climate change is anticipated to affect the general location of the project during the life of the project (as detailed below in Item 7) • Cover type map as required for Item 8 (see Figure 6) • Land use and planning maps as required in conjunction with Item 10 (see Figure 7 and Figure 8) Page 105 of 218 Dakota East Area AUAR – Scoping Document November 2024 5 Figure 1: USGS Map Page 106 of 218 Dakota East Area AUAR – Scoping Document January 2025 3 Figure 2: AUAR Study Area Page 107 of 218 Dakota East Area AUAR – Scoping Document January 2025 4 6. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AUAR Guidance: Instead of the information called for on the EAW form, the description section of an AUAR should include the following elements for each major development scenario included: • Anticipated types and intensity (density) of residential and commercial/warehouse/light industrial development throughout the AUAR area. • Infrastructure planned to serve development (roads, sewers, water, stormwater system, etc.). Roadways intended primarily to serve as adjoining land uses within an AUAR area are normally expected to be reviewed as part of an AUAR. More “arterial” types of roadways that would cross an AUAR area are an optional inclusion in the AUAR analysis; if they are included, a more intensive level of review, generally including an analysis of alternative routes, is necessary. • Information about the anticipated staging of various developments, to the extent known, and of the infrastructure, and how the infrastructure staging will influence the development schedule. The AUAR study area encompasses an area totaling approximately 447 acres on 8 parcels in Rosemount, Dakota County, Minnesota (shown on Figure 2). MNLCO Dakota County, LLC is proposing to develop the study area from existing farmland to a one of the scenarios being proposed. Three scenarios are proposed for evaluation in the AUAR as outlined in Table 1. Scenario 1 proposes uses that are consistent with the Rosemount Comprehensive Plan, which includes 1,450 residential units and commercial buildings for a total of 500,000 square feet (see Figure 3). It is anticipated that some of the 447 acres will remain in agricultural land as part of Scenario 1. Scenario 2 includes multiple buildings for a total of 2,300,000 square feet for mixed business campus uses (see Figure 4). Scenario 3 includes multiple buildings for a total of 2,500,000 square feet for mixed-business campus, involving light industrial uses (see Figure 5). The proposed development within the AUAR study area is anticipated to begin construction in 2025. A general development timeline and potential phasing will be discussed in the AUAR. The intent of the AUAR is to recognize the worst-case potential impacts and identify mitigation measures that may be taken to compensate for those impacts. Development of the study area would include new infrastructure, including water service, sewer, stormwater, streets, and utilities. All new services would be extensions to existing infrastructure or upgrades to existing systems to support the new development. A more detailed discussion of infrastructure needs will be included in the AUAR. Page 108 of 218 Dakota East Area AUAR – Scoping Document January 2025 5 Table 1: Development Scenarios Land Use Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Residential Units 1,450 Units - - Commercial 500,000 SF - - Mixed Business Campus (Light Industrial) - - 2,500,000 SF Mixed Business Campus (Technology Park) - 2,300,000 SF - Total Project Area 447 acres 447 acres 447 acres Page 109 of 218 Dakota East Area AUAR – Scoping Document January 2025 6 Figure 3: Development Scenario 1 Page 110 of 218 Dakota East Area AUAR – Scoping Document January 2025 7 Figure 4: Development Scenario 2 Page 111 of 218 Dakota East Area AUAR – Scoping Document January 2025 8 Figure 5: Development Scenario 3 Page 112 of 218 Dakota East Area AUAR – Scoping Document January 2025 9 7. CLIMATE ADAPTION AND RESILIENCE Describe the climate trends in the general location of the project (see guidance: Climate Adaptation and Resilience) and how climate change is anticipated to affect that location during the life of the project. The AUAR will describe trends in temperature, urban heat island, precipitation, flood risk, and cooling degree days for the general project location. Climate projections will use Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs), which are greenhouse gas concentration scenarios used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. RCP 4.5 is an intermediate scenario in which emissions decline after peaking around 2040, and RCP 8.5 is a worst-case scenario in which emissions continue to rise through the 21st century.1 For each resource category in the table below, describe the project’s proposed activities and how the project’s design will interact with those climate trends. Describe proposed adaptations to address the project effects identified. Table 2: Climate Considerations and Adaptions Resource Category Climate Considerations Project Information Climate Change Risks and Vulnerabilities Adaptions Project Design The AUAR will discuss aspects of building architecture/ materials choices and site design that could impact climate. To be discussed in AUAR, Section 6 and 18 To be discussed in AUAR, Section 6 and 18 Land Use The AUAR will discuss critical facilities and flood risk. To be discussed in AUAR, Section 10 and 12 To be discussed in AUAR Water Resources The AUAR will discuss current Minnesota climate trends and anticipated climate change in the general location of the project and how that may influence water resources. To be discussed in AUAR, Section 12 To be discussed in AUAR 1 Climate Explorer Metadata. Available at https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/climate/climate-explorer-metadata.html. Page 113 of 218 Dakota East Area AUAR – Scoping Document January 2025 10 Resource Category Climate Considerations Project Information Climate Change Risks and Vulnerabilities Adaptions Contamination/ Hazardous Materials/ Wastes The AUAR will discuss current Minnesota climate trends and anticipated climate change in the general location of the project and how that may influence the potential environmental effects of generation/use/storage of hazardous waste and materials. To be discussed in AUAR, Section 13 To be discussed in AUAR Fish, Wildlife, Plant Communities, and Sensitive Ecological Resources (Rare Features) The AUAR will discuss current Minnesota climate trends and anticipated climate change in the general location of the project how that may influence the local species and suitable habitat. To be discussed in AUAR Section 14 To be discussed in AUAR Page 114 of 218 Dakota East Area AUAR – Scoping Document January 2025 11 8. COVER TYPES AUAR Guidance: The following information should be provided: • A cover type map, at least at the scale of a USGS topographic map, depicting: o Wetlands (identified by Circular 39 type) o Watercourses (rivers, streams, creeks, ditches) o Lakes (identify public waters status and shoreland management classification) o Woodlands (break down by classes where possible) o Grassland (identify native and old field) o Cropland o Current development • An overlay map showing anticipated development in relation to the cover types. This map should also depict any “protection areas,” existing or proposed, that will preserve sensitive cover types. Separate maps for each major development scenario should be generally provided. The AUAR study area is approximately 447 acres of agriculture, grasslands, wetland, woodlands, and some disturbed surfaces which include the existing sand mining area. Refer to Table 3 for complete acreage of each cover type within the AUAR study area. There are few existing buildings and structures within the study area. The AUAR will include an analysis of existing and proposed cover types within the study area that are shown on Figure 6. These cover types were determined by reviewing recent aerial photography and the field delineated resources.. Table 3: Existing Cover Types Cover Type Acreage Agriculture 424 Grasslands 3 Woodlands 5 Extractive Uses 14 Delineated Wetlands 1 Total 447 Page 115 of 218 Dakota East Area AUAR – Scoping Document January 2025 12 Figure 6: Cover Types Page 116 of 218 Dakota East Area AUAR – Scoping Document January 2025 13 9. PERMITS AND APPROVALS REQUIRED AUAR Guidance: A listing of major approvals (including any comprehensive plan amendments and zoning amendments) and public financial assistance and infrastructure likely to be required by the anticipated types of development projects should be given for each major development scenario. This list will help orient reviewers to the framework that will protect environmental resources. The list can also serve as a starting point for the development of the implementation aspects of the mitigation plan to be developed as part of the AUAR. Table 4: Anticipated Permits and Approvals Unit of Government Type of Application Status Federal US Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 Permit To be applied for, if applicable State Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Section 401 Water Quality Certification To be applied for, if applicable National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Stormwater Permit for Construction Activities To be applied for, if applicable Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit To be applied for, if applicable Construction Contingency Plan and Response Action Plan approval To be applied for, if applicable Notice of Intent of Demolition To be applied for, if applicable Industrial Wastewater Permit To be applied for, if applicable Significant Industrial User Permit To be applied for, if applicable Construction Stormwater Permit To be applied for, if applicable Fuel Storage Tank To be applied for, if applicable Air Permit To be applied for, if applicable Discharge Permit To be applied for, if applicable Water Treatment Plant To be applied for, if applicable Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Temporary Groundwater Appropriation Permit for Construction Dewatering To be applied for, if applicable Water Appropriation Permit To be applied for, if applicable Minnesota Department of Health Water Main Installation Permit To be applied for, if applicable Notification of Intent to Perform a Demolition To be applied for, if applicable Notification of Asbestos Related Work To be applied for, if applicable Minnesota Department of Labor Industry Plumbing Review To be applied for, if applicable Electrical Permit To be applied for, if applicable Regional Metropolitan Council Sewer Extension Permit To be applied for, if applicable Sewer Connection Permit to Connect To be applied for, if applicable Page 117 of 218 Dakota East Area AUAR – Scoping Document January 2025 14 Unit of Government Type of Application Status Direct Connection Permit To be applied for, if applicable Industrial Waste Discharge Permit To be applied for, if applicable Comprehensive Plan Amendment To be applied for, if applicable County Dakota County Shoreland/Floodplain Alteration To be applied for, if applicable Public Drainage Permit To be applied for, if applicable Well Closure Permit To be applied for, if applicable City City of Rosemount Preliminary/Final Plat To be applied for, if applicable Sign Permit To be applied for, if applicable Site Plan Review To be applied for, if applicable Building Permit To be applied for, if applicable Erosion Control, Grading, and Stormwater Permit To be applied for, if applicable Right-of-Way permit To be applied for, if applicable WCA Review and Approval To be applied for, if applicable Comprehensive Plan Amendment To be applied for, if applicable Demolition Permit To be applied for, if applicable AUAR Adoption In process Regional Vermillion River Watershed JPO Plan Review To be applied for, if applicable 10. LAND USE Describe: i. Existing land use of the site as well as areas adjacent to and near the site, including parks, trails, and prime or unique farmlands. The AUAR study area is located in a semirural area approximately 20 miles southeast of Minneapolis, in Dakota County, Minnesota. The study area consists of 8 existing parcels. According to the Existing Land Use Map (2016), the study consists of agricultural, undeveloped, and extractive land uses.2 The study area is generally bounded by Courthouse Boulevard and 145th St to the north, Emery Avenue E to the west, mostly undeveloped land to the south, and Fischer Avenue to the east. Land uses adjacent to the study area include the Emerald Greens Golf Course to the east and primary vacant, undeveloped land to the north, south, and west. There are no existing parks within the study area or immediate vicinity. The Spring Lake l Park Reserve is located approximately 3,567 ft (0.68 miles) to the north of the study 2 City of Rosemount. 2020. Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 3: Land Use, page 3-15. Available at: https://www.rosemountmn.gov/DocumentCenter/View/4097/Chapter-3---Land-Use---FINAL-3-18-20. Page 118 of 218 Dakota East Area AUAR – Scoping Document January 2025 15 area boundary. Additionally, a portion of the Pine Bend Trail is located along the Spring Lake Park Reserve. According to the Web Soil Survey for the study area, 55 percent of the study area is considered prime farmland and 22 percent is considered farmland of statewide importance, while the remaining percentage of the study area is not identified as prime farmland. ii. Planned land use as identified in comprehensive plans (if available) and any other applicable plan for land use, water, or resource management by a local, regional, state, or federal agency. City of Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan The City of Rosemount adopted the Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan (2040 Comprehensive Plan) in 2020.3 The 2040 Comprehensive Plan aims to guide the City’s growth with respect to land use, housing, community facilities, transportation, and parks and trails. Additionally, the 2040 Comprehensive Plan discusses the City’s plan for economic competitiveness and resilience. As shown in Figure 8, the future land uses within the study area are a include Community Commercial, High Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, Low Density Residential, and Agriculture. If development under Scenarios 2 or 3 occurs, a Comprehensive Plan amendment would be required. iii. Zoning, including special districts or overlays such as shoreland, floodplain, wild and scenic rivers, critical area, agricultural preserves, etc. AUAR Guidance: Water-related land use management districts should be delineated on appropriate maps, and the land use restrictions applicable in those districts should be described. If any variances or deviations from these restrictions within the AUAR area are envisioned, this should be discussed. Existing Zoning The City of Rosemount Zoning Code was recently updated in 2024 to align with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and included an updated Zoning Map. According to the adopted 2024 Zoning District Map, the entirety of the study area is zoned A-2 Agricultural District.4 If development under Scenarios 2 or 3 occurs, a Comprehensive Plan amendment and Zoning District Map amendment would be required. FEMA National Flood Hazard According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (panel number 27037C0251E, dated 12/2/2011, not printed, the AUAR study area is not located in a special flood hazard area.5, 3 City of Rosemount. 2020. Comprehensive Plan. Available at: https://www.rosemountmn.gov/185/Comprehensive-Plan. 4 City of Rosemount. 2024. 2024 Adopted Zoning Map. Available at: https://www.rosemountmn.gov/DocumentCenter/View/6983/2024-Proposed -Zoning-Map-PDF?bidId=. 5 FEMA. 2024. FEMA Flood Map 27037C0251E. Available at: https://map1.msc.fema.gov/firm?id=27037CIND2B. Page 119 of 218 Dakota East Area AUAR – Scoping Document January 2025 16 Comprehensive Wetland Management Plan6 The Wetland Management Plan (WMP) is an inventory and assessment of wetlands and a plan designed to maximize the surface water resources for the community. The City will use the WMP to guide and supplement the regulations within the Wetland Overlay District. The WMP also includes associated goals and policies that address wetland management. The policies within the WMP apply to wetlands and projects that will be reviewed through a site development process and are subject to the City’s Comprehensive Plan. iv. If any critical facilities (i.e., facilities necessary for public health and safety, those storing hazardous materials, or those housing occupants who may be insufficiently mobile) are proposed in floodplain areas and other areas identified as at risk for localized flooding, describe the risk potential considering changing precipitation and event intensity. No critical facilities are proposed as part of the project. b. Discuss the project’s compatibility with nearby land uses, zoning, and plans listed in Item 9a above, concentrating on implications for environmental effects. AUAR Guidance: The extent of conversion of existing farmlands anticipated in the AUAR should be described. If any farmland will be preserved by special protection programs, this should be discussed. If development of the AUAR will interfere or change the use of any existing designated parks, recreation areas, or trails, this should be described in the AUAR. The RGU may also want to discuss under this item any proposed parks, recreation areas, or trails to be developed in conjunction with development of the AUAR area. The AUAR must include a statement of certification from the RGU that its comprehensive plan complies with the requirements set out at Minnesota Rules, part 4410.3610, subpart 1. The AUAR document should discuss the proposed AUAR area development in the context of the comprehensive plan. If this has not been done as part of the responses to Items 6, 9, 11, 18, and others, it must be addressed here; a brief synopsis should be presented here if the material has been presented in detail under other items. Necessary amendments to comprehensive plan elements to allow for any of the development scenarios should be noted. If there are any management plans of any other local, state, or federal agencies applicable to the AUAR area, the document must discuss the compatibility of the plan with the various development scenarios studied, with emphasis on any incompatible elements. The AUAR will discuss the project’s compatibility with nearby land uses, zoning, parks and trails, and other relevant plans. The AUAR will also include a statement of certification from the RGU 6 City of Rosemount. 2021. Comprehensive W etland Management Plan. Available at: https://www.rosemountmn.gov/DocumentCenter/View/7154/Rsmt-Wetland-Mgmt -Plan. Page 120 of 218 Dakota East Area AUAR – Scoping Document January 2025 17 that its comprehensive plan complies with the requirements set out at Minnesota Rules, part 4410.3610, subpart 1. 1 Identify measures incorporated into the proposed project to mitigate any potential incompatibility as discussed in Item 9b above. The proposed development scenarios (2 and 3) would require a Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Additionally, the AUAR will identify measures to mitigate any potential incompatibilities. Page 121 of 218 Dakota East Area AUAR – Scoping Document January 2025 18 Figure 7: Existing Land Use Page 122 of 218 Dakota East Area AUAR – Scoping Document January 2025 19 Figure 8: Future Land Use Page 123 of 218 Dakota East Area AUAR – Scoping Document January 2025 20 11. GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND TOPOGRAPHY/LAND FORMS Geology – Describe the geology underlying the project area and identify and map any susceptible geologic features such as sinkholes, shallow limestone formations, unconfined/shallow aquifers, or karst conditions. Discuss any limitations of these features for the project and any effects the project could have on these features. Identify any project designs or mitigation measures to address effects to geologic features. AUAR Guidance: A map should be included to show any groundwater hazards identified. According to the Geologic Atlas of Dakota County, the majority of the AUAR study area is underlain by Paleozoic bedrocks. The two types of Paleozoic rocks are characterized by relatively thick widespread layers of sandstone, shale, and carbonate deposited in shallow seas during the Cambrian and Ordovician Periods. The St. Peter Sandstone, from the Middle to Lower Ordovician, is mostly a white to tan, fine- to medium-grained, friable quartzose sandstone and referred to as the Tonti Member and is present in a small area in the northeastern corner of the study area. The majority of the study area is dominated by the Shakopee Formation, a heterolithic unit composed of tan- to orangish-brown dolostone, sand dolostone, sandstone, and shale, that sits beneath the St. Peter Sandstone.7 There are no known sinkholes or unconfined/shallow aquifers located within the AUAR study area. Additionally, there are no karst conditions located within or near the study area. The AUAR will discuss any limitations of these features for future development and any effects development could have on these features and will review the mining potential within the AUAR Study Area. Soils and Topography – Describe the soils on the site, giving NRCS (SCS) classifications and descriptions, including limitations of soils. Describe topography, any special site conditions relating to erosion potential, soil stability, or other soil limitations, such as steep slopes or highly permeable soils. Provide estimated volume and acreage of soil excavation and/or grading. Discuss impacts from project activities (distinguish between construction and operational activities) related to soils and topography. Identify measures during and after project construction to address soil limitations including stabilization, soil corrections, or other measures. Erosion/sedimentation control related to stormwater runoff should be addressed in response to Item 11.b.ii. AUAR Guidance: The number of acres to be graded and number of cubic yards of soil to be moved need not be given; instead, a general discussion of the likely earthmoving needs for development of the area should be given, with an emphasis on unusual or problem areas. In discussing mitigation measures, both the standard requirements of the local ordinances and any 7 University of Minnesota. 2023. Bedrock Geology. Available at: https://conservancy.umn.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/699a0e2d-0666-491d-89d9-ffda1c6b2ed0/content. Page 124 of 218 Dakota East Area AUAR – Scoping Document January 2025 21 special measures that would be added for AUAR purposes should be included. A standard soils map for the area should be included. According to the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Web Soil Survey, the study area is comprised of 16 different soil types. Soil information is included in Table 5: Soil Types and Soils are classified by the NRCS into four hydrologic soil groups, A, B, C, and D, with A having the lowest runoff potential and D having the greatest runoff potential. The erosion hazard rating included in Table 5: Soil Types indicates the hazard of soil loss from off-road areas after disturbance activities that expose the soil surface. Within the study area, 5.2 percent of the soil surface is mapped with a “moderate” rating, indicating that some erosion is likely in these areas and that erosion control measures may be needed. The remaining 94.8 percent of the study area is mapped with a “slight” rating, meaning that erosion is unlikely under ordinary climatic conditions. Topography within the study area varies from 880 feet in elevation in the northern portion of the site to 835 feet in elevation in the southern portion of the site as shown in Figure 1. The site generally drains to the southwest towards linear drainage features. The AUAR will include a general discussion of the likely earthmoving needs for the development and identify measures to minimize erosion and identify short-term and long-term establishment and erosion control plans that account for seasonal changes and comply with permit conditions. Additional information may be utilized to supplement the information provided above. Table 5: Soil Types Map unit symbol Map unit name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI Farmland Rating Hydric Rating Erosion Hazard Rating Hydrologic Soil Group 7B Hubbard loamy sand, 1 to 6 percent slopes 9.4 2.2% Not prime farmland 0 Slight A 7C Hubbard loamy sand, 6 to 12 percent slopes 10.5 2.3% Not prime farmland 0 Slight A 39A Wadena loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 6.8 1.5% All areas are prime farmland 1 Slight B 39B Waden loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes 136.9 30.4% All areas are prime farmland 0 Slight B 39C Wadena loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes 2.0 0.5% Farmland of statewide importance 0 Moderate B Page 125 of 218 Dakota East Area AUAR – Scoping Document January 2025 22 Map unit symbol Map unit name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI Farmland Rating Hydric Rating Erosion Hazard Rating Hydrologic Soil Group 39D Wadena loam 12 to 18 percent slopes 0.5 0.2% Not prime farmland 0 Moderate B 41B Estherville sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes 48.7 10.9% Farmland of statewide importance 1 Slight A 250 Kennebec slit loam 6.7 1.5% All areas are prime farmland 0 Slight C 301B Lindstrom slit loam, till plain, 2 to 6 percent slopes 4.3 1.0% All areas are prime farmland 5 Moderate B 411A Waukegan slit loam, till plain, 2 to 6 percent slopes 17.8 3.9% All areas are prime farmland 0 Slight B 411B Waukegan slit loam, till plain, 0 to 1 percent slopes 73.2 16.3% All areas are prime farmland 0 Slight B 415B Kanaranzi loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes 45.6 10.3% Farmland of statewide importance 0 Slight B 415C Kanaranzi loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes 16.5 3.7% Not prime farmland 0 Moderate B 611C Hawick gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes 51.4 11.4% Not prime farmland 0 Slight A 611D Hawick gravelley sandy loam, 12 to 20 percent slopes 16.7 3.7% Not prime farmland 0 Slight A 1815 Zumbro loamy fine sand 1.1 0.3% Not prime farmland 0 Slight A Page 126 of 218 Dakota East Area AUAR – Scoping Document January 2025 23 Map unit symbol Map unit name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI Farmland Rating Hydric Rating Erosion Hazard Rating Hydrologic Soil Group Source: United States Department of Agriculture. 2024. Web Soil Survey. https://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx. Page 127 of 218 Dakota East Area AUAR – Scoping Document January 2025 24 Figure 9: Soil Types Page 128 of 218 Dakota East Area AUAR – Scoping Document January 2025 25 12. WATER RESOURCES AUAR Guidance: The information called for on the EAW form should be supplied for any of the infrastructure associated with the AUAR development scenarios, and for any development expected to physically impact any water resources. Where it is uncertain whether water resources will be impacted depending on the exact design of future development, the AUAR should cover the possible impacts through a “worst case scenario” or else prevent impacts through the provisions of the mitigation plan. Describe surface water and groundwater features on or near the site below. i. Surface Water – lakes, streams, wetlands, intermittent channels, and county/judicial ditches. Include any special designations such as public waters, trout stream/lake, wildlife lakes, migratory waterfowl feeding/resting lake, and outstanding resource value water. Include water quality impairments or special designations listed on the current MPCA 303d Impaired Waters List that are within one mile of the project. Include DNR Public Waters Inventory number(s), if any. A field wetland delineation has been completed to confirm the extents of wetlands and waterways within the project study area. There currently are two identified wetlands within the study area as shown in Figure 10. The AUAR will include a summary of the findings from the wetland delineation. The closest MPCA 303d Impaired Waters to the study area are the Mississippi River, located approximately 2 miles to the north and the Vermilion River, located approximately 3.3 miles to the southeast.8 The Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area is located within one mile of the AUAR Study Area, to the north.9 All surface water resources located within and within the vicinity of the study area are depicted in Figure 10. Runoff from the study area generally drains southeast, towards the linear drainage features. 8 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. 2024. Impaired Waters. Available at: https://mpca.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=fcfc5a12d2fd4b16bc95bb535d09ae82 9 Minnesota Department of Natural Resource. 2024. Background and Purpose – MRCCA. Available at: https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/waters/watermgmt_section/critical_area/background-and-purpose.html. Page 129 of 218 Dakota East Area AUAR – Scoping Document January 2025 26 Figure 10: Surface Water Resources Page 130 of 218 Dakota East Area AUAR – Scoping Document January 2025 27 ii. Groundwater – aquifers, springs, and seeps. Include 1) depth to groundwater; 2) if project is within a MDH well protection area; and 3) identification of any onsite and/or nearby wells, including unique numbers and well logs, if available. If there are no wells known on site or nearby, explain the methodology used to determine this. According to the Geologic Atlas of Dakota County the hydrogeology surveys, which include discussion of depth to groundwater, have yet to be completed. However, the majority of the groundwater that supplies Dakota County comes from the Paleozoic bedrock formations. The depth to the bedrock within the study area ranges from 51 feet to 125, and even down to 150 in some areas. 10 Based on Minnesota Department of Health well records, one well is located within the study area. A description of the well is identified in Table 6 and shown in Figure 11. Wells located within the AUAR study area would be properly sealed by a licensed well contractor prior to redevelopment within the AUAR study area per MPCA and MDH well sealing requirements. As shown in Figure 11, the southeastern portion of the AUAR study area is located within a wellhead protection area (Hastings) and a majority of the study is located within a Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA) (Hastings).11 The AUAR will discuss any potential impacts to the Hastings wellhead protection area and DWSMA. Table 6: Wells within AUAR Study Area Well ID Number Index Status Well Use Well Depth (feet) 214196 Active Irrigation 278 Source: Minnesota Department of Health. Minnesota Well Index. Available at: https://mnwellindex.web.health.state.mn.us/; https://mnwellindex.web.health.state.mn.us/mwi/index.xhtml?wellId=0000214196. 10 Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. 2023. Geological Atlas of Wright County, Minnesota Part A, Geology. Available at: https://conservancy.umn.edu/items/5d8d0fa7-2cc7-4db5-ba02-e33702bf3573. 11 Minnesota Department of Health. Source Water Protection Web Map Viewer. Available at: https://mdh.maps.arcgis.com/apps/View/index.html?appid=8b0db73d3c95452fb45231900e977be4 Page 131 of 218 Dakota East Area AUAR – Scoping Document January 2025 28 Figure 11: Groundwater Resources Page 132 of 218 Dakota East Area AUAR – Scoping Document January 2025 29 Describe effects from project activities on water resources and measures to minimize or mitigate the effects below. i. Wastewater – For each of the following, describe the sources, quantities, and composition of all sanitary, municipal/domestic, and industrial wastewaters projected or treated at the site. AUAR Guidance: Observe the following points of guidance in an AUAR: • Only domestic wastewater should be considered in an AUAR—industrial wastewater would be coming from industrial uses that are excluded from review through an AUAR process • Wastewater flows should be estimated by land use subareas of the AUAR area; the basis of flow estimates should be explained • The major sewer system features should be shown on a map and the expected flows should be identified • If not explained under Item 6, the expected staging of the sewer system construction should be described • The relationship of the sewer system extension to the RGU’s comprehensive sewer plan and (for metro area AUARs) to Metropolitan Council regional systems plans, including MUSA expansions, should be discussed. For non-metro area AUARs, the AUAR must discuss the capacity of the RGU’s wastewater treatment system compared to the flows from the AUAR area; any necessary improvements should be described. • If on-site systems will serve part of the AUAR, the guidance in the February 2000 edition of the EAW Guidelines on page 16 regarding item 18b under Residential development should be followed. 1) If the wastewater discharge is to a publicly owned treatment facility, identify any pretreatment measures and the ability of the facility to handle the added water and waste loadings, including any effects on, or required expansion of, municipal wastewater infrastructure. It is assumed that sanitary sewer service for the AUAR study area will be provided by existing City sanitary sewer connections in the area. The AUAR will discuss Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) requirements and potential pretreatment measures for industrial wastewater. The AUAR will evaluate the estimated wastewater flows for the proposed development scenarios, and the existing City sanitary sewer system will be evaluated to determine if there is adequate capacity to convey wastewater. Appropriate mitigation measures or system improvements will be identified, if needed. Page 133 of 218 Dakota East Area AUAR – Scoping Document January 2025 30 2) If the wastewater discharge is to a subsurface sewage treatment system (SSTS), describe the system used, the design flow, and suitability of site conditions for such a system. No subsurface sewage treatment systems (SSTS) are anticipated within the AUAR study area for the proposed development scenario. 3) If the wastewater discharge is to surface water, identify the wastewater treatment methods, discharge points, and proposed effluent limitations to mitigation impacts. Discuss any effects to surface or groundwater from wastewater discharges. No wastewater discharge to surface waters is anticipated for the proposed development scenario. ii. Stormwater – Describe changes in surface hydrology resulting from change of land cover. Describe the routes and receiving water bodies for runoff from the project site (major downstream water bodies as well as the immediate receiving waters). Discuss environmental effects from stormwater discharges on receiving waters post- construction, including how the project will affect runoff volume, discharge rate, and change in pollutants. Consider the effects of current Minnesota climate trends and anticipated changes in rainfall frequency, intensity, and amount with this discussion. For projects requiring NPDES/SDS Construction Stormwater permit coverage, state the total number of acres that will be disturbed by the project and describe the stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP), including specific best management practices to address soil erosion and sedimentation during and after project construction. Discuss permanent stormwater management plans, including methods of achieving volume reduction to restore or maintain the natural hydrology of the site using green infrastructure practices or other stormwater management practices. Identify any receiving waters that have construction-related water impairments or are classified as special as defined in the Construction Stormwater permit. Describe additional requirements for special and/or impaired waters. AUAR Guidance: For an AUAR the following additional guidance should be followed in addition to that in EAW Guidelines: • It is expected that an AUAR will have a detailed analysis of stormwater issues • A map of the proposed stormwater management system and of the water bodies that will receive stormwater should be provided • The description of the stormwater systems would identify on-site and “regional” detention ponding and also indicate whether the various ponds will be new water bodies or converted existing ponds or wetlands. Where on-site ponds will be used but have not yet been designed, the discussion should indicate the design standards that will be followed. Page 134 of 218 Dakota East Area AUAR – Scoping Document January 2025 31 • If present in or adjoining the AUAR area, the following types of water bodies must be given special analyses: o Lakes: Within the Twin Cities metro area, a nutrient budget analysis must be prepared for any “priority lake” identified by the Metropolitan Council. Outside of the metro area, lakes needing a nutrient budget analysis must be determined by consultation with the MPCA and DNR staffs. o Trout streams: If stormwater discharges will enter or affect a trout stream, an evaluation of the impacts on the chemical composition and temperature regime of the stream and the consequent impacts on the trout population (and other species of concern) must be included. There is currently minimal impervious surface area within the study area. The total amount of impervious surface under the development scenarios will be described in the AUAR. The AUAR will address stormwater rates, water quality, and volumes for the AUAR study area, and any temporary and permanent stormwater run-off controls will be identified. An existing and proposed conditions analysis will be completed showing the locations of the temporary and permanent stormwater run-off controls. The National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit requirements will be adhered to. Special or impaired waters on or near the site will be identified. Based on the results of the climate trends analysis and flooding risk assessment, any additional volume and rate control needed for stormwater management will be discussed in the AUAR. Stormwater management strategies including any proposed green infrastructure will be documented in the AUAR. iii. Water Appropriation – Describe if the project proposes to appropriate surface or groundwater (including dewatering). Describe the source, quantity, duration, use, and purpose of the water use and if a DNR water appropriation permit is required. Describe any well abandonment. If connecting to an existing municipal water supply, identify the wells to be used as a water source and any effects on, or required expansion of, municipal water infrastructure. Discuss environmental effects from water appropriation, including an assessment of the water resources available for appropriation. Discuss how the proposed water use is resilient in the event of changes in total precipitation, large precipitation events, drought, increased temperatures, variable surface water flows and elevations, and longer growing seasons. Identify any measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate environmental effects from the water appropriation. Describe contingency plans should the appropriation volume increase beyond infrastructure capacity or water supply for the project diminish in quantity or quality, such as reuse of water, connections with another water source, or emergency connections. Page 135 of 218 Dakota East Area AUAR – Scoping Document January 2025 32 AUAR Guidance: If the area requires new water supply wells, specific information about that appropriation and its potential impacts on groundwater levels should be given; if groundwater levels would be affected, any impacts resulting on other resources should be addressed. The water supply for the study area will be obtained from the City of Rosemount. Groundwater resources are the main sources of water supply for the city via nine municipal wells and four elevated water storage tanks.12 The AUAR will evaluate the existing and proposed infrastructure needs and will discuss the viability of supplementing City water with alternative water sources. Handling of any required construction dewatering discharge will be addressed in the AUAR. The AUAR will also discuss the water demands for the site and the existing city water system capacity. Mitigation strategies or system improvements, if applicable, will be identified in the AUAR. iv. Surface Waters 1) Wetlands – Describe any anticipated physical effects or alterations to wetland features, such as draining, filling, permanent inundation, dredging, and vegetative removal. Discuss direct and indirect environmental effects from physical modification of wetlands, including the anticipated effects that any proposed wetland alterations may have to the host watershed, taking into consideration how current Minnesota climate trends and anticipated climate change in the general location of the project may influence the effects. Identify measures to avoid (e.g., available alternatives that were considered), minimize, or mitigate environmental effects to wetlands. Discuss whether any required compensatory wetland mitigation for unavoidable wetland impacts will occur in the same minor or major watershed and identify those probable locations. A wetland delineation has been completed for this project. The AUAR will address potential wetland impacts based on the proposed scenarios, and mitigation strategies will be identified, if applicable. 2) Other surface waters – Describe any anticipated physical effects or alterations to surface water features (lakes, streams, ponds, intermittent channels, county/judicial ditches) such as draining, filling, permanent inundation, dredging, diking, stream diversion, impoundment, aquatic plant removal, and riparian alteration. Discuss direct and indirect environmental effects from physical modification of water features, taking into consideration how current Minnesota climate trends and anticipated climate change in the general location of the project may influence the effects. Identify measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate environmental effects to surface water features, including in-water Best Management Practices that are proposed to avoid or minimize turbidity/sedimentation while physically altering the water features. Discuss how 12 City of Rosemount. 2020. 2040 Comprehensive Plan – Appendix A: Water Supply, page 3-4. Available at: https://www.rosemountmn.gov/DocumentCenter/View/4108/Appendix-A---Water-Supply-3-18-20. Page 136 of 218 Dakota East Area AUAR – Scoping Document January 2025 33 the project will change the number or type of watercraft on any water body, including current and projected watercraft usage. AUAR Guidance: Water surface use need only be addressed if the AUAR area would include or adjoin recreational water bodies. Wetlands are present within the AUAR study area, as shown in Figure 10. Surface water alterations will be discussed in the AUAR. 13. CONTAMINATION/HAZARDOUS MATERIALS/WASTES Pre-project Site Conditions – Describe existing contamination or potential environmental hazards on or in close proximity to the project site, such as soil or groundwater contamination, abandoned dumps, closed landfills, existing or abandoned storage tanks, and hazardous liquid or gas pipelines. Discuss any potential environmental effects from pre- project site conditions that would be caused or exacerbated by project construction and operation. Identify measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects from existing contamination or potential environmental hazards. Include development of a Contingency Plan or Response Action Plan. The AUAR will review the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency’s (MPCA) What’s In My Neighborhood database and Dakota County’s MPCA site inventory to determine if any known contaminated properties or potential environmental hazards are located within and adjacent to the AUAR study area. Project Related Generation/Storage of Solid Wastes – Describe solid wastes generated/stored during construction and/or operation of the project. Indicate method of disposal. Discuss potential environmental effects from solid waste handling, storage, and disposal. Identify measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects from the generation/storage of solid waste including source reduction and recycling. AUAR Guidance: Generally, only the estimated total quantity of municipal solid waste generated and information about any recycling or source separation programs of the RGU need to be included. The AUAR will provide information on the estimated quantity of municipal solid waste to be generated during construction and operational phases of the development scenarios. Project Related Use/Storage of Hazardous Materials – Describe chemicals/hazardous materials used/stored during construction and/or operation of the project including method of storage. Indicate the number, location, and size of any above or below ground tanks to store petroleum or other materials. Discuss potential environmental effects from accidental spills or releases of hazardous materials. Identify measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects from the use/storage of chemicals/hazardous materials including source reduction and recycling. Include development of a spill prevention plan. Page 137 of 218 Dakota East Area AUAR – Scoping Document January 2025 34 AUAR Guidance: Not required for an AUAR. Potential locations of storage tanks associated with commercial uses in the AUAR should be identified (e.g., gasoline tanks at service stations). The AUAR will identify any potential future storage tanks anticipated as part of the proposed development and if any existing storage tanks are anticipated to be used under the development scenarios. Project Related Generation/Storage of Hazardous Wastes – Describe hazardous wastes generated/stored during construction and/or operation of the project. Indicate method of disposal. Discuss potential environmental effects from hazardous waste handling, storage, and disposal. Identify measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects from the generation/storage of hazardous wastes including source reduction and recycling. AUAR Guidance: Not required for an AUAR. Not applicable. 14. FISH, WILDLIFE, PLANT COMMUNITIES, AND SENSITIVE ECOLOGICAL RESOURCES (RARE FEATURES) Describe fish and wildlife resources as well as habitats and vegetation on or near the site. AUAR Guidance: The description of fish and wildlife resources should be related to the habitat types depicted on the cover types map. Any differences in impacts between development scenarios should be highlighted in the discussion. Proposed final critical habitat areas for Rusty Patch Bumble Bee appear to be located within the study area under the jurisdiction of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS).13 Habitats that can be found within the study area include grassland and wetlands. Wildlife that can be found within the study area include birds, small mammals, clams, and insects. There are two areas of biodiversity significance within one mile of the study area, adjacent to the southern boundary of Spring Lake. Additionally, there are a few ecologically significant areas within one mile of the study area, also along the southern boundary of Spring Lake. The AUAR will address potential impacts to any habitats and vegetation near the study area. The AUAR will address the critical habitat areas, cover types for the existing conditions, and the post-construction scenarios. Describe rare features such as state-listed (endangered, threatened, or special concern) species, native plant communities, Minnesota County Biological Survey Sites of Biodiversity Significance, and other sensitive ecological resources on or within close proximity to the site. Provide the license agreement number and/or correspondence number (ERDB) from which the data were obtained and attach the Natural Heritage letter from the DNR. Indicate if any 13 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. ND. Critical Habitat for Threatened & Endangered Species (USFWS). https://fws.maps.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=9d8de5e265ad4fe09893cf75b8dbfb77) Page 138 of 218 Dakota East Area AUAR – Scoping Document January 2025 35 additional habitat or species survey work has been conducted within the site and describe results. AUAR Guidance: For an AUAR, prior consultation with the DNR Division of Ecological Resources for information about reports of rare plant and animal species in the vicinity is required. Include the reference numbers called for on the EAW form in the AUAR and include the DNR’s response letter. If such consultation indicates the need, an on-site habitat survey for rare species in the appropriate portions of the AUAR area is required. Areas of on-site surveys should be depicted on a map, as should any “protection zones” established as a result. State-Listed Species Kimley-Horn submitted a DNR Natural Heritage Information System (NHIS) review for the study area and area within a one-mile radius for state-listed threatened, endangered, and special concern species. The results of the review, if available, will be discussed in the AUAR. Any potential impacts to wildlife habitat, federally listed species, and state-listed species will be provided in the AUAR. Federally-Listed Species The U.S. Fish and Wildlife (USFWS) Service Information for Planning and Conservation (IPaC) tool was used to identify federally-listed species within or near the AUAR Study Area. This review identified three federally-listed endangered species, Northern Long-eared Bat (Myotis septentrionalis), Higgins Eye (Lampsilis higginsii), and Rusty Patched Bumble Bee (Bombus affinis). This review also identified, one federally-listed candidate species, monarch butterfly (Danaus Plexippus); one experimental population, whooping crane (Grus americana); and two proposed endangered species, tricolored bat (Perimyotis subflavus) and Salamander mussel (Simpsonaias ambigua). Northern Long-Eared Bat Northern long-eared bat (NLEB) was designated a federally endangered species by FWS in May 2015.14 According to the Minnesota DNR, NLEB have been found in the winter in Minnesota in natural caves, sand mines, and iron mines. In summer, the species is often found within forested habitats, especially around wetlands. Roosting sites include loose bark, broken tree limbs, cavities, and cracks in a tree.15 Once tree removal areas have been identified for future development, the USFWS Dkey for NLEB will be completed to determine if potential impacts to listed species will occur. Tricolored Bat During the winter, tricolored bats are often found in caves and abandoned mines. During the spring, summer, and fall, tricolored bats are found in forested habitats where they roost in trees. Tricolored bats face extinction primarily due to white-nose syndrome, which is a deadly 14 USFWS. Northern Long-Eared Bat. Available at: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9045 15 Minnesota DNR. Rare Species Guide. Available at: https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/rsg/profile.html?action=elementDetail&selectedElement=AMACC01150 Page 139 of 218 Dakota East Area AUAR – Scoping Document January 2025 36 disease affecting cave-dwelling bats.16 Tricolored bat is currently proposed endangered and is not yet listed; consultation with USFWS is not required for proposed endangered species. Monarch Butterfly The Monarch Butterfly is designated as a candidate species for official listing by the USFWS. The preferred habitat for this species is prairie where milkweed and flowers are present. According to the USFWS, there are many potential reasons for the butterfly’s decline, including habitat loss at breeding and overwintering sites, disease, pesticides, logging at overwintering sites, and climate change.17 The monarch butterfly is currently a candidate species and is not yet listed or proposed for listing; consultation with USFWS is not required for candidate species. Rusty Patched Bumble Bee Rusty patched bumble bees live in colonies that include a single queen and female workers. The colony produces males and new queens in late summer. Rusty patched bumble bees mostly occupy grasslands and tall grass prairies.18 The Rusty patched bumble bee is federally listed as endangered. The AUAR will discuss potential impacts to rusty patched bumble bees and provide necessary mitigation measures, if applicable. Whooping Crane The Whooping Crane is designated as an experimental population, non-essential species by the USFWS. Non-essential experimental populations are treated as threatened species on National Wildlife Refuge and National Park land (require consultation under 7(a)(2) of the ESA) and as a proposed species on private land (no section 7(a)(2) requirements, but Federal agencies must not jeopardize their existence (section 7(a)(4))). The preferred habitats for the species include shallow mashes and adjacent, open grasslands.19 The project will not occur on federal land; therefore, consultation with USFWS is not required for the species. Higgins Eye Pearly Mussel Higgins eye is a freshwater mussel of larger rivers where it is found in areas with deep water and moderate currents. Higgins eye mussels will bury themselves in the sand and gravel of river bottoms and use the river’s currents to siphon microorganisms for food.20 Considering the study is not within a river nor do any of the scenarios propose direct impacts to a river, potential impacts to Higgins eye would be indirect. The AUAR will discussion potential indirect impacts to Higgins eye and provide necessary mitigation measures, if applicable. Salamander Mussel Salamander mussels inhabit rivers, streams, and some lakes. Appropriate flow and temperature are critical to delivering necessary oxygen and nutrients for the mussels’ survival. Salamander 16 USFWS. Tricolored Bat. Available at: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10515. 17 USFWS. Monarch Butterfly. Available at: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743 18 USFWS. Rusty Patched Bumble Bee. Available at: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9383. 19 USFWS. Whopping Crane. Available at: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/758 20 USFWS. Higgins Eye. Available at: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5428. Page 140 of 218 Dakota East Area AUAR – Scoping Document January 2025 37 mussels are found in habitats that include rocks, where they settle in the crevices that are dark and provide close contact with other solid surfaces and protection from swift currents.21 The salamander mussel is proposed endangered and is not yet listed; consultation with USFWS is not required for this species. Discuss how the identified fish, wildlife, plant communities, rare features, and ecosystems may be affected by the project. Include a discussion on introduction and spread of invasive species from the project construction and operation. Separately discuss effects to known threatened and endangered species. Invasive Species Invasive species are a major cause of biodiversity loss and are considered biological pollutants by the DNR. Invasive species can be moved on construction equipment, landscaping equipment, and other debris. The AUAR will include a discussion on best management practices to prevent the introduction and spread of invasive species during construction and operation. Stormwater Stormwater run-off can cause a number of environmental problems. When stormwater drains off a construction site, it can carry sediment and pollutants that harm lakes, rivers, streams, and wetlands which in turn may harm wildlife. Strategies for stormwater management and treatment of stormwater run-off within the study area will be discussed in Section 12 of the AUAR. Impacts to protected species and habitats The AUAR will further investigate the potential for impacts to any federally listed species, state- listed species, or protected wildlife habitats. Identify measures that will be taken to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects to fish, wildlife, plant communities, and sensitive ecological resources. The AUAR will address any potential mitigation measures identified by the DNR and USFWS to minimize and avoid adverse impacts to any protected species and wildlife habitats. 15. HISTORIC PROPERTIES Describe any historic structures, archeological sites, and/or traditional cultural properties on or in close proximity to the site. Include 1) historic designations; 2) known artifact areas; and 3) architectural features. Attach letter received from the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). Discuss any anticipated effects to historic properties during project construction and operation. Identify measures that will be taken to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects to historic properties. AUAR Guidance: For an AUAR, contact with the State Historic Preservation Office and State Archeologist is required to determine whether there are areas of potential impacts to these 21 USFWS. Salamander Mussel. Available at: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6208. Page 141 of 218 Dakota East Area AUAR – Scoping Document January 2025 38 resources. If any exist, an appropriate site survey of high probability areas is needed to address the issue in more detail. The mitigation plan must include mitigation for any impacts identified. According to the State Historic Preservation Office, no known above-ground historic resources are identified on the available public map that reside within the study area.22 According to the State Office of Archaeologist, no known archaeological resources have been identified within the AUAR study area. However, due to the location of the proposed Study Area, an archeological site assessment will be completed. The AUAR will discuss the results of this review and any potential impacts to archaeological, historical, and/or architectural resources as well as any applicable mitigation strategies. 16. VISUAL Describe any scenic views or vistas on or near the project site. Describe any project related visual effects such as vapor plumes or glare from intense lights. Discuss the potential visual effects from the project. Identify any measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate visual effects. AUAR Guidance: Any impacts on scenic views and vistas present in the AUAR should be addressed. This would include both direct physical impacts and impacts on visual quality or integrity. EAW Guidelines contains a list of possible scenic resources. If any non-routine visual impacts would occur from the anticipated development, this should be discussed here along with appropriate mitigation. There are no scenic views or vistas on or near the AUAR study area. The AUAR will discuss any potential visual impacts of the proposed development scenarios on the surrounding area and any applicable mitigation strategies. 17. AIR Stationary Source Emissions – Describe the type, sources, quantities, and compositions of any emissions from stationary sources such as boilers or exhaust stacks. Include any hazardous air pollutants, criteria pollutants, and any greenhouse gases. Discuss effects to air quality including any sensitive receptors, human health, or applicable regulatory criteria. Include a discussion of any methods used to assess the project’s effect on air quality and the results of that assessment. Identify pollution control equipment and other measures that will be taken to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects from stationary source emissions. AUAR Guidance: This item is not applicable to an AUAR. Any stationary air emissions source large enough to merit environmental review requires individual review. Not applicable to an AUAR. Vehicle Emissions – Describe the effect of the project’s traffic generation on air emissions. Discuss the project’s vehicle-related emissions effect on air quality. Identify measures (e.g., 22 MnDOA. Minnesota’s Statewide Historic Inventory. Available at: https://mnship.gisdata.mn.gov/ Page 142 of 218 Dakota East Area AUAR – Scoping Document January 2025 39 traffic operational improvements, diesel idling minimization plan) that will be taken to minimize or mitigate vehicle-related emissions. AUAR Guidance: Although the MPCA no longer issues Indirect Source Permits, traffic-related air quality may still be an issue if the analysis in Item 18 indicates that development would cause or worsen traffic congestion. The general guidance from the EAW form should still be followed. Questions about the details of air quality analysis should be directed to MPCA staff. The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) has developed a screening method designed to identify intersections that will not cause a carbon monoxide (CO) impact above state standards. MnDOT has demonstrated that even the 10 highest traffic volume intersections in the Twin Cities do not experience CO impacts. Therefore, intersections with traffic volumes lower than these 10 highest intersections will not cause a CO impact above state standards. MnDOT’s screening method demonstrates that intersections with total daily approaching traffic volumes below 82,300 vehicles per day will not have the potential for causing CO air pollution problems. None of the intersections in the study area exceed the criteria that would lead to a violation of the air quality standards.23 No further air quality analysis is anticipated for the AUAR. Dust and Odors – Describe sources, characteristics, duration, quantities, and intensity of dust and odors generated during project construction and operation. (Fugitive dust may be discussed under Item 16a). Discuss the effect of dust and odors in the vicinity of the project including nearby sensitive receptors and quality of life. Identify measures that will be taken to minimize or mitigate the effects of dust and odors. AUAR Guidance: Dust and odors need not be addressed in an AUAR, unless there is some unusual reason to do so. The RGU might want to discuss as part of the mitigation plan, however, any dust control ordinances in effect. The AUAR will include discussion of dust control ordinances, including best management practices that would be applicable during demolition and construction within the AUAR study area. Any demolition activities must comply with state and federal regulations that require inspection of the structure for hazardous materials such as asbestos, lead based paint, light ballasts, thermostats, stored chemicals, and ozone depleting chemicals. 18. GREENHOUSE GAS (GHG) EMISSIONS/CARBON FOOTPRINT a. GHG Quantification – For all proposed projects, provide quantification and discussion of project GHG emissions. Include additional rows in the tables as necessary to provide project- specific emission sources. Describe the methods used to quantify emissions. If calculation methods are not readily available to quantify GHG emissions for a source, describe the 23 MnDOT. Traffic Mapping Application. Available at: https://mndot.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=7b3be07daed84e7fa170a91059ce63bb Page 143 of 218 Dakota East Area AUAR – Scoping Document January 2025 40 process used to come to that conclusion and any GHG emission sources not included in the total calculation. About Greenhouse Gases (GHGs) Certain gases in the earth’s atmosphere, classified as greenhouse gases (GHGs), play a critical role in determining the earth’s surface temperature. Solar radiation enters the earth’s atmosphere from space. A portion of the radiation is absorbed by the earth’s surface and a smaller portion of this radiation is reflected back toward space. This absorbed radiation is then emitted from the earth as low-frequency infrared radiation. The frequencies at which bodies emit radiation are proportional to temperature. Because the earth has a much lower temperature than the sun, it emits lower-frequency radiation. Most solar radiation passes through GHGs; however, infrared radiation is absorbed by these gases. As a result, radiation that otherwise would have escaped back into space is instead “trapped,” resulting in a warming of the atmosphere. This phenomenon, known as the greenhouse effect, is responsible for maintaining a habitable climate on earth. The primary GHGs contributing to the greenhouse effect are carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O). Fluorinated gases also make up a small fraction of the GHGs that contribute to climate change. Examples of fluorinated gases include chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), and nitrogen trifluoride (NF3); however, it is noted that these gases are not associated with typical land use development. Human-caused emissions of GHGs exceeding natural ambient concentrations are believed to be responsible for intensifying the greenhouse effect and leading to a trend of unnatural warming of the earth’s climate, known as global climate change or global warming.24 Project Related GHG Emissions The AUAR will include an estimated quantification of the following GHG emissions associated with the proposed scenarios: • Carbon dioxide (CO2) • Nitrous oxide (N2O) • Methane (CH4) The projected GHG emissions will be provided on an average annual basis using the CO2 equivalent (CO2e) and include the proposer’s best estimate of average annual emissions over the proposed life/design service life of future development. The estimates will also include emissions from the construction and operating phases of the scenario. Emissions will be estimated using the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Simplified GHG Emissions Calculator (SGEC) (Version 7 June 2021)25 and will be summarized by project phase (i.e., construction and operations) and source type (e.g., combustion from mobile equipment, off-site electricity). b. GHG Assessment 24 Summarized from U.S. EPA, Overview of Greenhouse Gases: https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/overview-greenhouse-gases 25 Source: https://www.epa.gov/climateleadership/simplified-ghg-emissions-calculator Page 144 of 218 Dakota East Area AUAR – Scoping Document January 2025 41 i. Describe any mitigation considered to reduce the project’s GHG emissions. The AUAR will describe potential design strategies and sustainability measures for the proposed scenarios to reduce emissions. ii. Describe and quantify reductions from selected mitigation, if proposed to reduce the project’s GHG emissions. Explain why the selected mitigation was preferred. The AUAR will describe and quantify reductions from selected mitigation options. iii. Quantify the proposed project’s predicted net lifetime GHG emissions (total tons per number of years) and how those predicted emissions may affect achievement of the Minnesota Next Generation Energy Act goals and/or other more stringent state or local GHG reduction goals. The Next Generation Energy Act requires the state to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the state by 80 percent between 2005 and 2050, while supporting clean energy, energy efficiency, and supplementing other renewable energy standards in Minnesota. The MPCA’s biennial GHG emissions reduction report from 2023 identifies strategies for reducing emissions in the three economic sectors with the highest emissions – transportation, electricity generation, and agriculture, forestry, and land use. The AUAR will discuss the expected lifespan of the project and calculate how many estimated metric tons of CO2 will be emitted over the project’s lifespan. The proposer will evaluate implementing the sustainability measures described in the AUAR. To reduce operational emissions to the extent practicable. The proposed project will be built in compliance with state regulations and city code. 19. NOISE Describe sources, characteristics, duration, quantities, and intensity of noise generated during project construction and operation. Discuss the effect of noise in the vicinity of the project including 1) existing noise levels/sources in the area; 2) nearby sensitive receptors; 3) conformance to state noise standards; and 4) quality of life. Identify measures that will be taken to minimize or mitigate the effects of noise. AUAR Guidance: Construction noise need not be addressed in an AUAR, unless there is some unusual reason to do so. The RGU might want to discuss as part of the mitigation plan, however, any construction noise ordinances in effect. If the area will include or adjoin major noise sources, a noise analysis is needed to determine if any noise levels in excess of standards would occur, and if so, to identify appropriate mitigation measures. With respect to traffic-generated noise, the noise analysis should be based on the traffic analysis of Item 18. Existing Noise The AUAR study area is currently agricultural land. The existing noise sources at the site consist mainly of the surrounding roadways. Page 145 of 218 Dakota East Area AUAR – Scoping Document January 2025 42 Construction Noise As stated in the AUAR guidelines, construction noise need not be addressed unless there is some unusual reason to do so. No unusual circumstances have been identified that would necessitate a detailed construction noise analysis. The City’s municipal code regulates the hours of operation for construction equipment. Construction activities are only permitted between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. Monday through Friday; 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. on Saturdays, and 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Sundays.26 Construction of the proposed project would comply with these requirements. Traffic Generated Noise A sound increase of 3 dBA is barely noticeable by the human ear, a 5 dBA increase is clearly noticeable, and a 10 dBA increase is heard as twice as loud. For example, if the sound energy is doubled (i.e., the amount of traffic doubles), there is a 3 dBA increase in noise, which is just barely noticeable to most people. On the other hand, if traffic increases by a factor of 10, the resulting sound level will increase by about 10 dBA and be heard as twice as loud. Traffic volumes in the project area are either on roadways that do not have receivers that are sensitive to noise, or the traffic levels attributable to the project are well below the amount that would generate a sound increase that could be noticeable. The change in traffic noise levels is not anticipated to be readily perceptible. Operational Noise The City’s Code of Ordinances regulates noise levels through the standards of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA).27 As such, all future development will be required to comply with these requirements. The AUAR will include a discussion of operational noise and identify potential operational noise mitigation measures. 20. TRANSPORTATION Describe traffic-related aspects of project construction and operation. Include 1) existing and proposed additional parking spaces; 2) estimated total average daily traffic generated; 3) estimated maximum peak hour traffic generated and time of occurrence; 4) source of trip generation rates used in the estimates; and 5) availability of transit and/or other alternative transportation modes. The information listed above will be provided in the traffic and transportation analysis that will be included in the AUAR. Coordination will occur with the City of Rosemount to determine analysis scenarios and trip generation for the traffic study. The trip generation will be calculated based on the latest edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation, 11th Edition. 26 City of Rosemount. 2024. Rosemount, MN Code of Ordinances Section 9-7-2. Available at: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/rosemountmn/latest/rosemount_mn/0-0-0-8794. 27 City of Rosemount. 2024. Rosemount, MN Code of Ordinances Section 11-7-1. Available at: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/rosemountmn/latest/rosemount_mn/0-0-0-12277. Page 146 of 218 Dakota East Area AUAR – Scoping Document January 2025 43 Transit Currently, there are no convenient alternative transportation routes serving the study area. It is not anticipated that there will be significant change in transit usage. Bike and Pedestrian Infrastructure There is currently no dedicated bike or pedestrian infrastructure serving the study area. Discuss the effect on traffic congestion on affected roads and describe any traffic improvements necessary. The analysis must discuss the project’s impact on the regional transportation system. If the peak hour traffic generated exceeds 250 vehicles or the total daily trips exceeds 2,500, a traffic impact study must be prepared as part of the EAW. Use the format and procedures described in the Minnesota Department of Transportation’s Access Management Manual, Chapter 5 (available at: http://www.dot.state.mn.us/accessmanagement/resources.html) or a similar local guidance. AUAR Guidance: For AUAR reviews, a detailed traffic analysis will be needed, conforming to the MnDOT guidance as listed on the EAW form. The results of the traffic analysis must be used in the response to Items 16 and 17. A traffic impact study will be completed as part of the AUAR because the trip generation is anticipated to exceed the 250-trip peak hour vehicle threshold. The traffic impact study will be summarized in the AUAR, including information on estimated traffic generation, traffic impacts, relevant information from relevant transportation plans and traffic studies, and potential improvements and mitigation measures. The analysis will be completed for existing conditions as well as future no-build and build conditions for the opening year of the development and the 20 year forecasted condition. The AUAR will include intersection capacity analyses for intersections adjacent to the AUAR study area and will include the review of intersection operations at site access points. The following intersections will be included in the analysis and are shown in Figure 12: • US 52 Southbound Ramps & CSAH 42 • US 52 Northbound Ramps & CSAH 42 • CSAH 42 & Emery Avenue • CSAH 42 & MN 55 • MN 55 & Fischer Avenue • Future Site Accesses along Emery Avenue and Fischer Avenue Identify measures that will be taken to minimize or mitigate project related transportation effects. The AUAR will address any mitigation measures identified through the traffic analysis. Page 147 of 218 Dakota East Area AUAR – Scoping Document January 2025 44 Figure 12: Traffic Study Intersections Page 148 of 218 Dakota East Area AUAR – Scoping Document January 2025 45 21. CUMULATIVE POTENTIAL EFFECTS AUAR Guidance: Because the AUAR process by its nature is intended to deal with cumulative potential effects from all future developments within the AUAR area, it is presumed that the responses to all items on the EAW form automatically encompass the impacts from all anticipated developments within the AUAR area. However, the total impact on the environment with respect to any of the items on the EAW form may also be influenced by past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects outside of the AUAR area. The cumulative potential effect descriptions may be provided as part of the responses to other appropriate EAW items, or in response to this item. Describe the geographic scales and timeframes of the project related environmental effects that could combine with other environmental effects resulting in cumulative potential effects. Cumulative effects are defined as the “effect on the environment that results from the incremental effects of a project in addition to other projects in the environmentally relevant area that might reasonably be expected to affect the same environmental resources, including future projects actually planned or for which a basis of expectation has been laid, regardless of what person undertakes the other projects or what jurisdictions have authority over the projects.”28 The geographic areas considered for cumulative effects are those areas adjacent to the AUAR study area, and the timeframe considered includes projects that would be constructed in the reasonably foreseeable future (by 2030). Describe any reasonably foreseeable future projects (for which a basis of expectation has been laid) that may interact with environmental effects of the proposed project within the geographic scales and timeframes identified above. The AUAR will identify any additional reasonably foreseeable projects that may interact with the environmental effects of either development scenario. Discuss the nature of the cumulative potential effects and summarize any other available information relevant to determining whether there is potential for significant environmental effects due to these cumulative effects. The AUAR will include a discussion of potential cumulative effects associated with nearby ongoing or planned projects. 28 Minnesota Rules, part 4410.0200, subpart 11a Page 149 of 218 Dakota East Area AUAR – Scoping Document January 2025 46 22. OTHER POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS AUAR Guidance: If the project may cause any additional environmental effects not addressed by Items 1 to 19, describe the effects here, discuss the how the environment will be affected, and identify measures that will be taken to minimize and mitigate these effects. Additional Environmental Effects Any other potential environmental effects will be addressed in the AUAR. Page 150 of 218 Attachment B Page 151 of 218 1 Introduction Pursuant to Minnesota Rules, part 4410.3610, subpart 5c, the Responsible Governmental Unit (RGU) shall revise the environmental analysis document based on comments received during the comment period. The RGU shall include in the document a section specifically responding to each timely, substantive comment received that indicates in what way the comment has been addressed. The 30-day Scoping Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) comment period began December 17, 2024, and comments were accepted through January 16, 2025. Four (4 ) comment letters were received from government agencies. One (1) comment letter was received from a member of the public. Responses to those comments are included in the following sections. 1. Dakota County Comment Response Environmental Resources No known or suspected environmental concerns were identified on the subject property. SKB Environmental – SKB Rosemount Industrial Waste Facility, is located northwest of the subject property. The Furlong Gravel Pit, sand and gravel mining area is in the southeast parcel of the subject property. Xcel Energy, Inc electric transmission lines cross the southwest parcel of the subject property. These items may need additional evaluation to determine compatibility with some of the proposed development scenarios. Comment noted. Dakota County is a delegated well program responsible for permitting well drilling and sealing activities. A well sealing permit will be required for any well sealing activities and. Dewatering well construction and sealing permits are also required for dewatering activities during construction. Comment noted. More information about the wells within the Study Area will be discussed in the AUAR. Page 152 of 218 2 Comment Response Water Resources a.i. References to a map have in the text “Error! Reference sources not found.”, in two places. a.ii. The well if not in use is required to be sealed according to the MDH well sealing requirements and the Dakota County Delegated Well Programs. The MPCA is not involved with well sealings. b.iii. Water Appropriation: Drilling a private well for industrial purposes would be allowed by the Dakota County Delegated Well Program should the proposed construction of the well meet both MDH rules 4725 and Dakota County Ordinance No. 114. Comment noted. The references have been updated. More information on wells will be discussed in the AUAR. Transportation Dakota County Transportation staff agrees that the intersections listed in the scoping document are appropriate to include in the traffic analysis when conducting the AUAR. We have no other comments. Comment noted. 2. Metropolitan Council Comment Response Permits and Approvals The Scenario 1 land uses are consistent with the Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Scenarios 2 and 3 represent a change in designated land use and would require a Comprehensive Plan amendment. Table 4 should identify that comprehensive plan amendment approval would be required from the City of Rosemount and the Metropolitan Council for Scenarios 2 and 3. Comment noted. This will be added to the permits and approvals table. Page 153 of 218 3 Comment Response Land Use A planned segment of the Rosemount Greenway Regional Trail (Dakota County) is < 0.1 mile north of the AUAR area. A long-range plan developed by Dakota County was approved by the Metropolitan Council in 2012. The AUAR should acknowledge the Rosemount Greenway Regional Trail in Section 10. Land Use, parts a.ii. and b. Comment noted. The Rosemount Greenway trail will be acknowledged in the AUAR. Met Council Parks and Trails staff encourage the City of Rosemount (RGU) and MNLCO Dakota County, LLC (proposer) to coordinate with Dakota County to connect to the Rosemount Greenway Regional Trail in this area. Regional trails benefit residents and businesses alike, providing healthy recreation options and access to key local and regional destinations. Comment noted. Water Resources Section a.i. Surface Water and b.ii. Stormwater There are multiple references to figures that are incomplete and state ERROR! Reference not found. Climate change is expected to increase the number of extreme rainfall and flooding events within the metro, and development in flood prone areas should be limited. The Council’s Localized Flood Map Screening Tool can help identify areas at risk for localized flooding. Impacts to wetlands should be minimized. If impacts must occur, we encourage the developer look within the same watershed/subwatershed to do the wetland banking replacement. Additionally, stormwater must be treated before entering wetlands. Stormwater BMP design should take into account with changing weather patterns and rainfall events caused by climate change. Use best management practices to limit and prevent the spread/introduction of invasive species. Comment noted. The reference error has been corrected. More information on wetland banking and stormwater management will be discussed in the AUAR. Page 154 of 218 4 Comment Response Section b.i. Wastewater Scenario 1 utilizes the higher level of system capacity utilization. That system capacity utilization closely represents the system capacity that was provided for this area of Rosemount. The Scoping EAW Draft AUAR shows a project location to the west that is within the 2040 MUSA and to the east within the 2050 MUSA. Prior to the installation of any sanitary sewer improvements for this project location, the City will need to re-guide staging from future 2040 and 2050 MUSA to current 2030 MUSA through the submittal and approval of a Comprehensive Plan amendment. The CPA needs to show the proposed method and means of providing wastewater service. Comment noted. A comprehensive plan amendment will be discussed in the AUAR. Page 155 of 218 5 Section b.iii. Groundwater (John Clark, 651-602-1452) The Scoping EAW and Draft AUAR Order states “The water supply for the study area will be obtained from the City of Rosemount. Groundwater resources are the main sources of water supply for the City via nine municipal wells and four elevated water storage tanks. The AUAR will evaluate the existing and proposed infrastructure needs and will discuss the viability of supplementing City water with alternative water sources.” • The City’s evaluation of needed infrastructure and increases in water demands should be completed to assess potential impacts on their public water supply system, water supply sources, and surrounding natural systems. Additional water demands beyond those expressed in the City’s current Local Water Supply Plan, as well as any additional well infrastructure needed to supply development of these parcels, will need to be evaluated by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) as the permitting authority. Alternatively, commercial and industrial land holders within the development area could seek their own water appropriation permits for water supplies. • Updates to Local Water Supply Plans approved by the DNR need to align with Regional Water Policy Plan Policies regarding sustainable water supplies and will need to be evaluated by the Council as part of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment. • Conversion of this site to a residential or industrial development could have significant impacts to land cover, significantly increasing the amount of impervious surface. Evaluation of the impacts of this conversion on groundwater and surface water should inform development approaches and post-development strategies to mitigate water quality and quantity concerns. Some examples may include limiting chloride use, drought tolerant and native landscaping, and limiting the loss of natural areas, wetlands, and soil disturbance during the development and post-development phases. • The AUAR should describe potential future water demands and associated impacts on source waters and surrounding natural systems, as well as the City’s municipal infrastructure, if connected. • The AUAR should describe any wells within the study area, as well as any wells that will be abandoned and sealed as a part of the development. Comment noted. The AUAR will discuss groundwater resources, potential water demands, potential impacts on the City’s water system, and potential mitigation strategies for the proposed Scenarios. Page 156 of 218 6 Comment Response • The development area lies within the highly vulnerable Hastings Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA). The Hastings DWSMA currently falls under a special Minnesota Department of Agriculture program to address Nitrate-Nitrogen groundwater contamination. The City of Rosemount should coordinate with the City of Hastings and Dakota County Water Resources Staff to ensure best management practices are followed and land use controls are in place to address potential groundwater pollution during the development and post-development phases of the project. Item 20: Transportation The Scoping EAW and Draft AUAR Order identifies three possible scenarios: 1. Residential scenario with 1,450 units and 500,000 sq feet of commercial GFA 2. Technology park campus with 2.3 million sq ft 3. Light industrial scenario with 2.5 million sq ft. If the second or third scenario is pursued, this could add 1,200 – 2,500 jobs in this part of Rosemount; either scenario 2 or 3 exceeds the City’s transportation analysis zone allocation of employment in the 2040 planning horizon. The subject site is a part of TAZ #728 in the southeast corner of Rosemount, east of Coates. The City’s Comprehensive Plan expects TAZ #728 to gain 1,623 households, 4,435 population, and 677 jobs during 2020-2040. City and Council staff can discuss the TAZ allocation as Rosemount prepares its 2050 Plan Update. Comment noted. The City will continue to work with Council staff on TAZ allocations for the 2025 Comprehensive Plan update. Page 157 of 218 7 3. State Historic Preservation Office 4. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Comment Response Project Description. It is unclear if Scenario 3, which is described as “light industrial,” also proposes the development of data centers? The AUAR should clearly describe the type of use that is proposed for each scenario. Comment noted. The Scenarios will be clearly defined in the AUAR. Scenario 3 is defined as a technology campus which could include a data center. Page 9, Table 2. Climate Considerations and Adaptations. As energy needs and renewable energy goals put further pressure on agricultural lands, some communities have started to tap into industrial facilities to combine development with energy production through the use of rooftop solar. Installing solar panels on industrial facilities has the added benefit of producing energy right where it is needed without any additional facility footprint. We encourage the City as well as local energy providers to explore the feasibility of combining these land uses to help meet state climate goals as the City plans for the future. A recent news article mentioned that the data centers proposed for this site under Scenario 2 and Scenario 3 would require 500 MW of electricity, the equivalent use of a small city. The AUAR should clearly describe the electricity needs of the proposed scenarios, how this energy would be obtained, and how this use would impact other users and Minnesota’s 2040 renewable energy goals. We encourage the developer (especially for Scenario 2 and Scenario 3) to consider installing water reuse systems to reduce water usage, and utilize other water conservation measures to the greatest extent possible. Comment noted. More information will be discussed in the AUAR. Comment Response Due to the nature and location of the proposed development, we recommend that a literature search and archaeological survey be completed. The survey must meet the requirements of the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Identification and Evaluation and should include an evaluation of National Register eligibility for any properties that are identified. Comment noted. A literature search will be completed for AUAR study area and the results will be document in the AUAR. Page 158 of 218 8 Comment Response Page 11, Cover Types. Table 3 should show the before and after acreage that is proposed for each cover type under all three scenarios. Comment noted. This will be identified in the AUAR. Page 20, Geology. We encourage each city to fully explore mining potential for sand and gravel prior to encumbering an area with development in order to balance the need for resources with development expansion. The project area is mapped as a possible source for sand and gravel. It is not clear if this area has already been mined. This should be discussed further in the AUAR. Comment noted. A portion of the site has been previously mined. This will be documented in the AUAR. Page 24, Surface Water. Please note that this section shows an error instead of the wetland delineation reference. Comment noted. This has been corrected. Page 29, Stormwater. DNR recommends utilizing stormwater for landscape irrigation. The re-use of stormwater for irrigation would reduce the volume of stormwater and conserve valuable groundwater. Comment noted. Stormwater reuse will be evaluated as design progresses for the proposed development Scenarios. Page 31, Water Appropriation. A DNR Water Appropriation Permit is required if the water pumped exceeds 10,000 gallons in a day, or one million gallons in one year. The DNR General Permit for Temporary Appropriation, with its lower permit application fee and reduced time for review, may be used for the dewatering if the dewatering volume is less than 50 million gallons and the time of the appropriation is less than one year. The project area is within the Vermillion River Watershed and within the vicinity of designated trout streams, which are protected by the DNR. Additional regulation and review may be required when permitting within five miles of a designated trout stream. Comment noted. The AUAR will discuss the need for a water appropriations permit and if additional BMPs are needed due to project being in the vicinity of identified trout streams. Page 159 of 218 9 Page 31, Water Appropriation. The AUAR should address the water demands for each of the Dakota East area development scenarios, the existing and proposed infrastructure needs for the city water system to fulfill those water supply demands, and specific volumes that may be available from alternative water sources. It will be important for the upcoming AUAR to follow the AUAR Guidance in the instructions that says, “If the area requires new water supply wells, specific information about that appropriation and its potential impacts on groundwater levels should be given; if groundwater levels would be affected, any impacts resulting on other resources should be addressed.” In the upcoming AUAR, please include: a. Details on water demand for each of the scenarios, and compare that demand with the City’s current permitted volume and production capabilities. If the area requires new water supply wells, specific information about that appropriation and its potential impacts on groundwater levels should be given; if groundwater levels would be affected, any impacts resulting on other resources should be addressed. The siting of new well(s) would be very important to this analysis. b. Evaluation of an amendment to DNR Water Appropriation Permit 1976-6069 must include consideration of the sustainability standard (MN statute 103G.287 Subd.5). As per instructions for completing 12.b.iii, please: i. Discuss how the proposed water use is resilient in the event of changes in total precipitation, large precipitation events, drought, increased temperatures, variable surface water flows and elevations, and longer growing seasons. ii. Identify any measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate environmental effects from the water appropriation. iii. Describe contingency plans should the appropriation volume increase beyond infrastructure capacity or water supply for the project diminish in quantity or quality, such as reuse of water, connections with another water source, or emergency connections. Comment noted. More information related to water demand, permitting volume, and production capabilities will be documented in the AUAR. The AUAR will also discuss if a need to modify the existing water appropriations permits is required for the proposed development. Page 160 of 218 10 Comment Response Page 32, Contaminants. Because the project area is located within a wellhead protection area (Hastings) and a DWSMA (Hastings, high vulnerability), potential pollutants need to be handled with care to protect the drinking water of the city. Comment noted. The AUAR will include more information related to the wellhead protection area and DWSMA. Page 33, Rare Features. Please note that DNR issued a Natural Heritage Review letter (MCE# 2024-00412) on June 13, 2024 for what appears to be the same project. Please refer to this letter when completing the rare features section of the upcoming AUAR, and include the letter (attached) in the Appendix. Please note the following with respect to rare features: a. Endangered Species i. Loggerhead shrike (Lanius ludovicianus)- Avoid tree and shrub removal from April through July. If this is not feasible, hire a DNR qualified surveyor to check trees and shrubs for active nests. Requirements for surveys and lists of DNR certified lists of surveyors can be found at the Natural Heritage Review website. b. Species of Special Concern i. Lark sparrow (Chondestes grammacus) and Bell’s vireo (Vireo bellii) – Avoid initial disturbance to grassland areas and tree/shrub removal from May 15 through August 15 to avoid disturbance of nesting birds. ii. Bats - Avoid tree removal be avoided from June 1 through August 15. c. U.S Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Rusty Patched Bumble Bee High Potential Zone i. DNR recommends reseeding disturbed soils with native species of grasses and forbs using BWSR Seed Mixes or MnDOT Seed Mixes. ii. To ensure compliance with federal law, please conduct a federal regulatory review using the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's online Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) tool. Comment noted. More information related to Threatened, Endangered, and Rare species will be documented in the AUAR. Page 37, Visual. The project area is in close proximity to the Mississippi River and directly borders the Mississippi River Twin Cities Important Bird Area and the Mississippi Flyway, a significant migratory corridor. The AUAR should discuss project lighting and potential impacts to wildlife. Comment noted. More information related to migratory birds will be included in the AUAR. Page 161 of 218 11 Comment Response Page 44, Cumulative Potential Effects. It is unclear to what extent the development of multiple data centers in the region will increase water demand from existing aquifers. It is important to evaluate if the cumulative increase in water use will be sustainable. It is also important to identify the energy demands for the proposed data centers in the region and describe how these energy needs will compare to current city needs, and energy availability. Comment noted. More information related to water demand and use will be documented in the AUAR. 5. Public Comment – Kim Dimmick Comment Response There are 2 wells missing in Figure 11:Groundwater Resources. There are 7 properties just south of the intended development and only 5 wells are addressed. Comment noted. The well information included in the scoping document was based on publicly available well information. More information related to wells will be included in the AUAR. I would also be interested in the Cities thoughts on what is to happen with our properties if the city approves commercial/industrial development in our area. MNLCO has been involved in all possible data centers locations around us so I am assuming that is what the area is actually being studied for. Comment noted. The AUAR will include an assessment of environmental impacts and potential mitigation strategies for the AUAR study area. How many Data Centers can the cities utilities handle? How will effect our private wells, soil contamination, etc.? Comment noted. The City is evaluating development proposals for various parcels in the City. The AUAR will address water demand and appropriations and contamination. Identified mitigation strategies will be documented in the AUAR. Page 162 of 218 12 Comment Response Will our properties be aloud to be rezoned industrial/commercial? Comment noted. Property owners may request to be rezoned through the City’s zoning process. Rezoning of adjacent parcels is not identified for any of the Scenarios to be studied in the AUAR. Will there be a buyout by the developers to purchase our properties who's obvious land values will be diminished by a commercial/industrial development? Comment noted. Property values are not addressed in an AUAR. Also MNLCO Dakota County, LLC. is not listed as an active business in Minnesota with the Secretary of States Office. How can they conduct business in the state without being registered? Comment noted. Business registration is not addressed in an AUAR. Page 163 of 218 Physical Development Division P 952‐891‐7000 F 952‐891‐7031 W www.dakotacounty.us A Dakota County Western Service Center • 14955 Galaxie Ave. • Apple Valley • MN 55124 January 14, 2025 Anthony Nemcek City of Rosemount 2875 145th Street W Rosemount, MN 55068 Thank you for the opportunity to review the Scoping Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) for a study area totaling approximately 447 acres on eight parcels in Rosemount. County Physical Development staff reviewed the document and offer the following comments for consideration. Environmental Resources No known or suspected environmental concerns were identified on the subject property. SKB Environmental –SKB Rosemount Industrial Waste Facility, is located northwest of the subject property. The Furlong Gravel Pit, sand and gravel mining area is in the southeast parcel of the subject property. Xcel Energy, Inc electric transmission lines cross the southwest parcel of the subject property. These items may need additional evaluation to determine compatibility with some of the proposed development scenarios. 9.Dakota County is a delegated well program responsible for permitting well drilling and sealing activities. A well sealing permit will be required for any well sealing activities and. Dewatering well construction and sealing permits are also required for dewatering activities during construction. 12.Water Resources a.i. References to a map have in the text “Error! Reference sources not found.”, in two places. a.ii. The well if not in use is required to be sealed according to the MDH well sealing requirements and the Dakota County Delegated Well Programs. The MPCA is not involved with well sealings. b.iii. Water Appropriation: Drilling a private well for industrial purposes would be allowed by the Dakota County Delegated Well Program should the proposed construction of the well meet both MDH rules 4725 and Dakota County Ordinance No. 114. Please contact Environmental Resources at 952‐891‐7000 or environ@co.dakota.mn.us with questions or if additional information is needed. Page 164 of 218 Physical Development Division P 952‐891‐7000 F 952‐891‐7031 W www.dakotacounty.us A Dakota County Western Service Center • 14955 Galaxie Ave. • Apple Valley • MN 55124 Transportation Dakota County Transportation staff agrees that the intersections listed in the scoping document are appropriate to include in the traffic analysis when conducting the AUAR. We have no other comments. If you have any questions relating to our comments, please contact me at 952‐891‐7007 or Georg.Fischer@co.dakota.mn.us Sincerely, Georg T Fischer, Director Physical Development Division cc: Commissioner William Droste, District 4 Heidi Welch County Manager Page 165 of 218 Metropolitan Council (Regional Office & Environmental Services) 390 Robert Street North, Saint Paul, MN 55101-1805 P 651.602.1000 | F 651.602.1550 | TTY 651.291.0904 metrocouncil.org An Equal Opportunity Employer January 10, 2025 Anthony Nemcek, Senior Planner City of Rosemount 2875 145th Street W Rosemount, MN 55068 RE: City of Rosemount – Scoping Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) – Dakota East Area Metropolitan Council Review File No. 23039-1 Metropolitan Council District No. 12 Dear Anthony Nemcek: Metropolitan Council staff completed its review of the Dakota East Area Scoping AUAR to determine its accuracy and completeness in addressing regional concerns. Staff conclude that the Scoping AUAR is complete and accurate with respect to regional concerns and does not raise major issues of consistency with Council policies. However, staff offers the following comments for your consideration: Item 9: Permits and Approvals Required (Merritt Clapp-Smith, 651-602-1567) The Scenario 1 land uses are consistent with the Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Scenarios 2 and 3 represent a change in designated land use and would require a Comprehensive Plan amendment. Table 4 should identify that comprehensive plan amendment approval would be required from the City of Rosemount and the Metropolitan Council for Scenarios 2 and 3. Item 10: Land Use (Colin Kelly, 651-602-1361) A planned segment of the Rosemount Greenway Regional Trail (Dakota County) is < 0.1 mile north of the AUAR area. A long-range plan developed by Dakota County was approved by the Metropolitan Council in 2012. The AUAR should acknowledge the Rosemount Greenway Regional Trail in Section 10. Land Use, parts a.ii. and b. Met Council Parks and Trails staff encourage the City of Rosemount (RGU) and MNLCO Dakota County, LLC (proposer) to coordinate with Dakota County to connect to the Rosemount Greenway Regional Trail in this area. Regional trails benefit residents and businesses alike, providing healthy recreation options and access to key local and regional destinations. Item 12: Water Resources Section a.i. Surface Water and b.ii. Stormwater (Maureen Hoffman, 651-602-8026) There are multiple references to figures that are incomplete and state ERROR! Reference not found. Climate change is expected to increase the number of extreme rainfall and flooding events within the metro, and development in flood prone areas should be limited. The Council’s Localized Flood Map Screening Tool can help identify areas at risk for localized flooding. Impacts to wetlands should be minimized. If impacts must occur, we encourage the developer look within the same watershed/subwatershed to do the wetland banking replacement. Additionally, stormwater must be treated before entering wetlands. Stormwater BMP design should take into account with changing Page 166 of 218 Page - 2 | January 10, 2025 | METROPOLITAN COUNCIL weather patterns and rainfall events caused by climate change. Use best management practices to limit and prevent the spread/introduction of invasive species. Section b.i. Wastewater (Roger Janzig, 651-602-1119) Scenario 1 utilizes the higher level of system capacity utilization. That system capacity utilization closely represents the system capacity that was provided for this area of Rosemount. The Scoping EAW Draft AUAR shows a project location to the west that is within the 2040 MUSA and to the east within the 2050 MUSA. Prior to the installation of any sanitary sewer improvements for this project location, the City will need to re-guide staging from future 2040 and 2050 MUSA to current 2030 MUSA through the submittal and approval of a Comprehensive Plan amendment. The CPA needs to show the proposed method and means of providing wastewater service. Section b.iii. Groundwater (John Clark, 651-602-1452) The Scoping EAW and Draft AUAR Order states “The water supply for the study area will be obtained from the City of Rosemount. Groundwater resources are the main sources of water supply for the City via nine municipal wells and four elevated water storage tanks. The AUAR will evaluate the existing and proposed infrastructure needs and will discuss the viability of supplementing City water with alternative water sources.” • The City’s evaluation of needed infrastructure and increases in water demands should be completed to assess potential impacts on their public water supply system, water supply sources, and surrounding natural systems. Additional water demands beyond those expressed in the City’s current Local Water Supply Plan, as well as any additional well infrastructure needed to supply development of these parcels, will need to be evaluated by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) as the permitting authority. Alternatively, commercial and industrial land holders within the development area could seek their own water appropriation permits for water supplies. • Updates to Local Water Supply Plans approved by the DNR need to align with Regional Water Policy Plan Policies regarding sustainable water supplies and will need to be evaluated by the Council as part of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment. • Conversion of this site to a residential or industrial development could have significant impacts to land cover, significantly increasing the amount of impervious surface. Evaluation of the impacts of this conversion on groundwater and surface water should inform development approaches and post-development strategies to mitigate water quality and quantity concerns. Some examples may include limiting chloride use, drought tolerant and native landscaping, and limiting the loss of natural areas, wetlands, and soil disturbance during the development and post-development phases. • The AUAR should describe potential future water demands and associated impacts on source waters and surrounding natural systems, as well as the City’s municipal infrastructure, if connected. • The AUAR should describe any wells within the study area, as well as any wells that will be abandoned and sealed as a part of the development. • The development area lies within the highly vulnerable Hastings Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA). The Hastings DWSMA currently falls under a special Minnesota Department of Agriculture program to address Nitrate-Nitrogen groundwater contamination. The City of Rosemount should coordinate with the City of Hastings and Dakota County Water Resources Staff to ensure best management practices are followed and land use controls are in place to address potential groundwater pollution during the development and post- development phases of the project. Page 167 of 218 Page - 3 | January 10, 2025 | METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Item 20: Transportation (Todd Graham, 651-602-1322) The Scoping EAW and Draft AUAR Order identifies three possible scenarios: 1. Residential scenario with 1,450 units and 500,000 sq feet of commercial GFA 2. Technology park campus with 2.3 million sq ft 3. Light industrial scenario with 2.5 million sq ft. If the second or third scenario is pursued, this could add 1,200 – 2,500 jobs in this part of Rosemount; either scenario 2 or 3 exceeds the City’s transportation analysis zone allocation of employment in the 2040 planning horizon. The subject site is a part of TAZ #728 in the southeast corner of Rosemount, east of Coates. The City’s Comprehensive Plan expects TAZ #728 to gain 1,623 households, 4,435 population, and 677 jobs during 2020-2040. City and Council staff can discuss the TAZ allocation as Rosemount prepares its 2050 Plan Update. The Council will not take formal action on the Scoping AUAR. If you have any questions regarding the review please contact Merritt Clapp-Smith, Principal Reviewer, at 651-602-1567 or via email at merritt.clapp-smith@metc.state.mn.us. As always, you can also contact your Sector Representative, Emma Dvorak, at 651-602-1399 or via email at emma.dvorak@metc.state.mn.us. Sincerely, Angela R. Torres, AICP, Senior Manager Local Planning Assistance CC: Tod Sherman, Development Reviews Coordinator, MnDOT - Metro Division Susan Vento, Metropolitan Council District No. 12 Judy Sventek, Water Resources Manager Merritt Clapp-Smith, Principal Reviewer Emma Dvorak, Sector Representative Reviews Coordinator N:\CommDev\LPA\Communities\Rosemount\Letters\Rosemount 2024 Dakota East Area Draft AUAR Ok with Comments 23039-1.docx Page 168 of 218 MINNESOTA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE 50 Sherburne Avenue ▪ Administration Building 203 ▪ Saint Paul, Minnesota 55155 ▪ 651-201-3287 mn.gov/admin/shpo ▪ mnshpo@state.mn.us AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY AND SERVICE PROVIDER January 14, 2025 Anthony Nemcek Senior Planner 2875 145th Street W Rosemount, MN, 55068 RE: Draft AUAR Order and Scoping Document for the Dakota East Area AUAR Rosemount, Dakota County SHPO Number: 2025-0332 Dear Anthony Nemcek: Thank you for consulting with our office on the Draft AUAR Order and Scoping Document for the Dakota East Area AUAR. We note that the AUAR guidance under Item 15. Historic Properties states, "For an AUAR, contact with the State Historic Preservation Office and State Archeologist is required to determine whether there are areas of potential impacts to these resources. If any exist, an appropriate site survey of high probability areas is needed to address the issue in more detail. The mitigation plan must include mitigation for any impacts identified." We understand this guidance to mean that an assessment of archaeological potential, developed in consultation with our office and the Office of the State Archaeologist, is required to address this portion of the document. The current information included under Item 15 addresses the presences or absence of previously documented archaeological resources and does not address the potential for undocumented archaeological resources. Due to the nature and location of the proposed development, we recommend that a literature search and archaeological survey be completed. The survey must meet the requirements of the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Identification and Evaluation and should include an evaluation of National Register eligibility for any properties that are identified. For a list of consultants who have expressed an interest in undertaking such surveys, please visit the website www.mnhs.org/preservation/directory, and select “Archaeologists” in the “Specialties” box. Please note that this comment letter does not address the requirements of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and 36 CFR § 800. If this project is considered for federal financial assistance, or requires a federal permit or license, then review and consultation with our office will need to be initiated by the lead federal agency. Be advised that comments and recommendations provided by our office for this state-level review may differ from findings and determinations made by the federal agency as part of review and consultation under Section 106. Please contact me at 651-201-3285 or kelly.graggjohnson@state.mn.us if you have any questions regarding our comments. Sincerely, Kelly Gragg-Johnson Environmental Review Program Specialist Page 169 of 218 1 Division of Ecological and Water Resources Transmitted by Email Region 3 Headquarters 1200 Warner Road Saint Paul, MN 55106 January 15, 2025 Anthony Nemcek, Senior Planner City of Rosemount 2875 145th Street West Rosemount, MN 55068 Dear Anthony Nemcek, Thank you for the opportunity to review the Dakota East Area Scoping Document in preparation for an Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) for the project area located in Dakota County. The DNR respectfully submits the following comments for your consideration: 1. Page 4, Project Description. It is unclear if Scenario 3, which is described as “light industrial,” also proposes the development of data centers? The AUAR should clearly describe the type of use that is proposed for each scenario. 2. Page 9, Table 2. Climate Considerations and Adaptations. As energy needs and renewable energy goals put further pressure on agricultural lands, some communities have started to tap into industrial facilities to combine development with energy production through the use of rooftop solar. Installing solar panels on industrial facilities has the added benefit of producing energy right where it is needed without any additional facility footprint. We encourage the City as well as local energy providers to explore the feasibility of combining these land uses to help meet state climate goals as the City plans for the future. A recent news article mentioned that the data centers proposed for this site under Scenario 2 and Scenario 3 would require 500 MW of electricity, the equivalent use of a small city. The AUAR should clearly describe the electricity needs of the proposed scenarios, how this energy would be obtained, and how this use would impact other users and Minnesota’s 2040 renewable energy goals. We encourage the developer (especially for Scenario 2 and Scenario 3) to consider installing water reuse systems to reduce water usage, and utilize other water conservation measures to the greatest extent possible. 3. Page 11, Cover Types. Table 3 should show the before and after acreage that is proposed for each cover type under all three scenarios. 4. Page 20, Geology. We encourage each city to fully explore mining potential for sand and gravel prior to encumbering an area with development in order to balance the need for resources with Page 170 of 218 2 development expansion. The project area is mapped as a possible source for sand and gravel. It is not clear if this area has already been mined. This should be discussed further in the AUAR. 5. Page 24, Surface Water. Please note that this section shows an error instead of the wetland delineation reference. 6. Page 29, Stormwater. DNR recommends utilizing stormwater for landscape irrigation. The re- use of stormwater for irrigation would reduce the volume of stormwater and conserve valuable groundwater. 7. Page 31, Water Appropriation. A DNR Water Appropriation Permit is required if the water pumped exceeds 10,000 gallons in a day, or one million gallons in one year. The DNR General Permit for Temporary Appropriation, with its lower permit application fee and reduced time for review, may be used for the dewatering if the dewatering volume is less than 50 million gallons and the time of the appropriation is less than one year. The project area is within the Vermillion River Watershed and within the vicinity of designated trout streams, which are protected by the DNR. Additional regulation and review may be required when permitting within five miles of a designated trout stream. 8. Page 31, Water Appropriation. The AUAR should address the water demands for each of the Dakota East area development scenarios, the existing and proposed infrastructure needs for the city water system to fulfill those water supply demands, and specific volumes that may be available from alternative water sources. It will be important for the upcoming AUAR to follow the AUAR Guidance in the instructions that says, “If the area requires new water supply wells, specific information about that appropriation and its potential impacts on groundwater levels should be given; if groundwater levels would be affected, any impacts resulting on other resources should be addressed.” In the upcoming AUAR, please include: a. Details on water demand for each of the scenarios, and compare that demand with the City’s current permitted volume and production capabilities. If the area requires new water supply wells, specific information about that appropriation and its potential impacts on groundwater levels should be given; if groundwater levels would be affected, any impacts resulting on other resources should be addressed. The siting of new well(s) would be very important to this analysis. b. Evaluation of an amendment to DNR Water Appropriation Permit 1976-6069 must include consideration of the sustainability standard (MN statute 103G.287 Subd.5). As per instructions for completing 12.b.iii, please: i. Discuss how the proposed water use is resilient in the event of changes in total precipitation, large precipitation events, drought, increased temperatures, variable surface water flows and elevations, and longer growing seasons. ii. Identify any measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate environmental effects from the water appropriation. iii. Describe contingency plans should the appropriation volume increase beyond infrastructure capacity or water supply for the project diminish in quantity or quality, such as reuse of water, connections with another water source, or emergency connections. Page 171 of 218 3 9. Page 32, Contaminants. Because the project area is located within a wellhead protection area (Hastings) and a DWSMA (Hastings, high vulnerability), potential pollutants need to be handled with care to protect the drinking water of the city. 10. Page 33, Rare Features. Please note that DNR issued a Natural Heritage Review letter (MCE# 2024-00412) on June 13, 2024 for what appears to be the same project. Please refer to this letter when completing the rare features section of the upcoming AUAR, and include the letter (attached) in the Appendix. Please note the following with respect to rare features: a. Endangered Species i. Loggerhead shrike (Lanius ludovicianus)- Avoid tree and shrub removal from April through July. If this is not feasible, hire a DNR qualified surveyor to check trees and shrubs for active nests. Requirements for surveys and lists of DNR certified lists of surveyors can be found at the Natural Heritage Review website. b. Species of Special Concern i. Lark sparrow (Chondestes grammacus) and Bell’s vireo (Vireo bellii) – Avoid initial disturbance to grassland areas and tree/shrub removal from May 15 through August 15 to avoid disturbance of nesting birds. ii. Bats - Avoid tree removal be avoided from June 1 through August 15. c. U.S Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Rusty Patched Bumble Bee High Potential Zone i. DNR recommends reseeding disturbed soils with native species of grasses and forbs using BWSR Seed Mixes or MnDOT Seed Mixes. ii. To ensure compliance with federal law, please conduct a federal regulatory review using the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's online Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) tool. 11. Page 37, Visual. The project area is in close proximity to the Mississippi River and directly borders the Mississippi River Twin Cities Important Bird Area and the Mississippi Flyway, a significant migratory corridor. The AUAR should discus project lighting and potential impacts to wildlife. 12. Page 44, Cumulative Potential Effects. It is unclear to what extent the development of multiple data centers in the region will increase water demand from existing aquifers. It is important to evaluate if the cumulative increase in water use will be sustainable. It is also important to identify the energy demands for the proposed data centers in the region and describe how these energy needs will compare to current city needs, and energy availability. Thank you again for the opportunity to review this document. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, Page 172 of 218 4 Melissa Collins Regional Environmental Assessment Ecologist | Ecological and Water Resources Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Phone: 651-259-5755 Email: melissa.collins@state.mn.us CC: Kristin Dean, MNLCO Dakota County, LLC Equal Opportunity Employer Page 173 of 218 Page 1 of 3 Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Ecological & Water Resources 500 Lafayette Road, Box 25 St. Paul, MN 55155-4025 June 13, 2024 Twin Cities - Environmental (Kimley-Horn) Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. RE: Natural Heritage Review of the proposed Gillys Farm, T115N R18W Sections 27, 28, & 33; Dakota County Dear Twin Cities - Environmental (Kimley-Horn), For all correspondence regarding the Natural Heritage Review of this project please include the project ID MCE-2024-00412 in the email subject line. As requested, the Minnesota Natural Heritage Information System has been reviewed to determine if the proposed project has the potential to impact any rare species or other significant natural features. Based on the project details provided with the request, the following rare features may be impacted by the proposed project: State-listed Species • Loggerhead shrikes (Lanius ludovicianus), a state-listed endangered bird, have been documented in the vicinity of the project site. Loggerhead shrikes use grasslands that contain short grass and scattered perching sites such as hedgerows, shrubs, or small trees. They can be found in native prairie, pastures, shelterbelts, old fields or orchards, cemeteries, grassy roadsides, and farmyards. Minnesota’s Endangered Species Statute (Minnesota Statutes, section 84.0895) and associated Rules (Minnesota Rules, part 6212.1800 to 6212.2300 and 6134) prohibit the take of endangered or threatened plants or animals, including their parts or seeds, without a permit. Given the potential for this species to be found in the vicinity of the project, tree and shrub removal is required to be avoided during the breeding season, April through July. Please contact Review.NHIS@state.mn.us to confirm that the above avoidance measure will be implemented or to inform us that avoidance is not feasible. If avoidance is not feasible, a qualified surveyor needs to conduct a survey for active nests before any trees or shrubs will be removed. Requirements for surveys and lists of DNR certified lists of surveyors can be found at the Natural Heritage Review website. Page 174 of 218 Page 2 of 3 • Lark sparrow (Chondestes grammacus) and Bell’s vireo (Vireo bellii), both state-listed bird species of special concern, has been documented in the vicinity of the project. Lark sparrows are found in open, dry grassland areas with scattered trees and shrubs. Bell’s vireo prefers shrub thickets within or bordering open habitats such as grasslands or wetlands. Both birds build their nest on the ground, in a shrub or a small tree. If feasible, avoid initial disturbance to grassland areas and tree/shrub removal from May 15th through August 15th to avoid disturbance of nesting birds. • The Natural Heritage Information System (NHIS) tracks bat roost trees and hibernacula plus some acoustic data, but this information is not exhaustive. Even if there are no bat records listed nearby, all of Minnesota’s bats, including the federally endangered northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis), can be found throughout Minnesota. During the active season (approximately April-November) bats roost underneath bark, in cavities, or in crevices of both live and dead trees. Tree removal can negatively impact bats by destroying roosting habitat, especially during the pup rearing season when females are forming maternity roosting colonies and the pups cannot yet fly. To minimize these impacts, the DNR recommends that tree removal be avoided from June 1 through August 15. • Please visit the DNR Rare Species Guide for more information on the habitat use of these species and recommended measures to avoid or minimize impacts. Federally Protected Species • The area of interest overlaps with a U.S Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Rusty Patched Bumble Bee High Potential Zone. The rusty patched bumble bee (Bombus affinis) is federally listed as endangered and is likely to be present in suitable habitat within High Potential Zones. From April through October this species uses underground nests in upland grasslands, shrublands, and forest edges, and forages where nectar and pollen are available. From October through April the species overwinters under tree litter in upland forests and woodlands. The rusty patched bumble bee may be impacted by a variety of land management activities including, but not limited to, prescribed fire, tree-removal, haying, grazing, herbicide use, pesticide use, land-clearing, soil disturbance or compaction, or use of non-native bees. If applicable, the DNR recommends reseeding disturbed soils with native species of grasses and forbs using BWSR Seed Mixes or MnDOT Seed Mixes. To ensure compliance with federal law, please conduct a federal regulatory review using the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's online Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) tool. Please note that all projects, regardless of whether there is a federal nexus, are subject to federal take prohibitions. The IPaC review will determine if prohibited take is likely to occur and, if not, will generate an automated letter. The USFWS RPBB guidance provides guidance on avoiding impacts to rusty patched bumble bee and a key for determining if actions are likely to affect the species; the determination key can be found in the appendix. Page 175 of 218 Page 3 of 3 Environmental Review and Permitting • Please include a copy of this letter and the MCE-generated Final Project Report in any state or local license or permit application. Please note that measures to avoid or minimize disturbance to the above rare features may be included as restrictions or conditions in any required permits or licenses. • For additional information regarding solar projects, please see Commercial Solar Siting Guidance and Prairie Establishment & Maintenance Technical Guidance for Solar Projects documents. The Natural Heritage Information System (NHIS), a collection of databases that contains information about Minnesota’s rare natural features, is maintained by the Division of Ecological and Water Resources, Department of Natural Resources. The NHIS is continually updated as new information becomes available, and is the most complete source of data on Minnesota's rare or otherwise significant species, native plant communities, and other natural features. However, the NHIS is not an exhaustive inventory and thus does not represent all of the occurrences of rare features within the state. Therefore, ecologically significant features for which we have no records may exist within the project area. If additional information becomes available regarding rare features in the vicinity of the project, further review may be necessary. For environmental review purposes, the results of this Natural Heritage Review are valid for one year; the results are only valid for the project location and project description provided with the request. If project details change or the project has not occurred within one year, please resubmit the project for review within one year of initiating project activities. The Natural Heritage Review does not constitute project approval by the Department of Natural Resources. Instead, it identifies issues regarding known occurrences of rare features and potential impacts to these rare features. Visit the Natural Heritage Review website for additional information regarding this process, survey guidance, and other related information. For information on the environmental review process or other natural resource concerns, you may contact your DNR Regional Environmental Assessment Ecologist. Thank you for consulting us on this matter and for your interest in preserving Minnesota's rare natural resources. Sincerely, Molly Barrett Natural Heritage Review Specialist Molly.Barrett@state.mn.us Cc: Melissa Collins, Regional Environmental Assessment Ecologist, Central (Region 3) Page 176 of 218 1 Payne, Ashley Subject:FW: Dakota East Area AUAR From: Kim Dimmick <dakotaridgestables@yahoo.com> Sent: Thursday, January 2, 2025 10:53 AM To: Anthony Nemcek <Anthony.Nemcek@rosemountmn.gov> Subject: Dakota East Area AUAR My name is Kimberly Dimmick, I am located at 15001 Fischer Avenue, just south of the dakota East Area AUAR. In reviewing the documents I have found an error in the data. There are 2 wells missing in Figure 11:Groundwater Resources. There are 7 properties just south of the intended development and only 5 wells are addressed. I would also be interested in the Cities thoughts on what is to happen with our properties if the city approves commercial/industrial development in our area. MNLCO has been involved in all possible data centers locations around us so I am assuming that is what the area is actually being studied for. How many Data Centers can the cities utilities handle? How will effect our private wells, soil contamination, etc.? Will our properties be aloud to be rezoned industrial/commercial? Will there be a buyout by the developers to purchase our properties who's obvious land values will be diminished by a commercial/industrial development? Also MNLCO Dakota County, LLC. is not listed as an active business in Minnesota with the Secretary of States Office. How can they conduct business in the state without being registered? There are many others concerns and questions I will have once the AUAR is finalized. I would hope as adjacent residence of the area we will not be left in the dark as to what is really happening. Sincerely, Kim Dimmick Page 177 of 218 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY City Council Regular Meeting: February 4, 2025 AGENDA ITEM: Application to Conduct Off-Site Gambling for Rosemount Area Hockey Association AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT AGENDA PREPARED BY: Erin Fasbender, City Clerk AGENDA NO. 6.f. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution APPROVED BY: LJM RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to approve Resolution Approving an application to Conduct Off-Site Gambling for Rosemount Area Hockey Association BACKGROUND Rosemount Area Hockey Association (RAHA) is requesting consideration of an Application to Conduct Off-Site Gambling (MN Gambling Control Board - Form LG230). RAHA is in the process of submitting their application with the State of Minnesota, which requires approval from the City Council to proceed. The activity will be on March 1, 2025 beginning at 4 p.m. at the Rosemount Community Center and will be a part of a fundraiser event for Leprechaun Days. RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending that the City Council approve the resolution as attached. Page 178 of 218 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2025 - XX A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN APPLICATION TO CONDUCT OFF-SITE GAMBLING FOR ROSEMOUNT AREA HOCKEY ASSOCIATION WHEREAS, the Rosemount Area Hockey Association currently hold a Charitable Gambling Premise Permit at Carbone’s Pizza & Pub, 14550 S Robert Trail and Tops Pizza & Grill, 14533 Dodd Blvd in Rosemount; and WHEREAS, the Rosemount Area Hockey Association is requesting permission to conduct off-site gambling, on March 1, 2025 to March 2, 2025 should the event go past midnight at Rosemount Community Center, 13885 South Robert Trail. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rosemount, hereby approves the Application to Conduct Off-Site Gambling (Form LG230) submitted by the Rosemount Area Hockey Association to conduct charitable gambling at the Rosemount Community Center, 13885 South Robert Trail. ADOPTED this 4th day of February, 2025, by the City Council of the City of Rosemount. Jeffery D. Weisensel, Mayor ATTEST: Erin Fasbender, City Clerk Page 179 of 218 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY City Council Regular Meeting: February 4, 2025 AGENDA ITEM: On-Sale License on Public Premise AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT AGENDA PREPARED BY: Erin Fasbender, City Clerk AGENDA NO. 6.g. ATTACHMENTS: APPROVED BY: LJM RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff is recommending that the City Council approve JSDL Enterprises LLC DBA Carbones Rosemount On-Sale License on Public Premise Liquor License to serve intoxicating beverages valid upon approval through December 31, 2025. BACKGROUND JSDL Enterprises LLC DBA Carbones Rosemount has applied for an On-Sale License on Public Premise liquor license. City Code 3-1-13 On-Sale License on Public Premise states the City Council may issue to the holder of an on-sale intoxicating liquor license issued by the city or a municipality adjacent to the city, a license to allow the dispensing of intoxicating liquor at any convention, banquet, conference, meeting or social affair conducted on the premises of a sports, convention or cultural facility owned by the City. The fee for obtaining such license is $350.00. The City also requires a copy of the applicant’s current Certificate of Liability Insurance. The duration of the granted license shall remain in effect from its issuance until December 31 of the year it is issued. No public hearing is required for the granting of an on-sale license on public premises. The required fee and insurance documents have been submitted. RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending that the City Council approve JSDL Enterprises LLC DBA Carbones Rosemount On-Sale License on Public Premise Liquor License to serve intoxicating beverages valid upon approval through December 31, 2025. Page 180 of 218 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY City Council Regular Meeting: February 4, 2025 AGENDA ITEM: Approve Right of Way Easement - Amber Fields Commercial Road AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT AGENDA PREPARED BY: Nick Egger, Public Works Director AGENDA NO. 6.h. ATTACHMENTS: Amber Fields Commercial Road Map, Right of Way Easement Document APPROVED BY: LJM RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve Right of Way Easement and Authorize Mayor's and Clerk's Signatures BACKGROUND Maplewood Development has approached the City with a proposal to reclassify a road segment in the northeastern portion of Amber Fields development as a public roadway. Currently, only the western end of this road is partially constructed near Abbeyfield Avenue, between The Landing apartments and the Echelon at Amber Fields townhomes. The remaining portion is slated for construction in 2025, connecting to Akron Avenue. A reference map is attached. Originally, this road was designed as a private street serving only adjacent properties without contributing to the broader public street network. As such, it was intended to remain privately owned and maintained. However, Maplewood Development has identified the road's public status as a key factor in its negotiations with a buyer for the commercial lot at Akron Avenue and County State Aid Highway 42. The prospective owner strongly prefers to avoid infrastructure maintenance responsibilities, further complicated by the fact that the road spans multiple private parcels, making coordinated maintenance and repairs challenging. City staff have negotiated terms with Maplewood Development to accept the road as public infrastructure. These conditions include right-of-way boundaries, platting requirements, road and utility design standards, and the level of ongoing City maintenance services. The attached Right-of-Way easement grants the City the authority to maintain, repair, and replace the existing portion of the road. The segment to be constructed in 2025 will be done under a forthcoming, but separate agreement between Maplewood Development and the City. This segment will receive a platted right-of-way corridor when the commercial lot is formally platted, which may occur within the next one to two years. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached Right of Way Easement. Page 181 of 218 Page 182 of 218 1 RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT THIS INSTRUMENT is made this ____ day of _________, 2025, by Rosemount AH I LLLP, a Minnesota limited liability limited partnership, (“Grantor”) in favor of the City of Rosemount, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the “City”). Recitals A. Grantor is the fee owner of certain property located in Dakota County, Minnesota (PID No. 341125701010), legally described on the attached Exhibit A (the “Property”). B. Grantor desires to grant to the City an easement for right-of-way purposes as hereinafter described in, over, across, beneath, and above the portion of the Property legally described on Exhibit B and depicted on Exhibit C attached hereto (the “Easement Area”) according to the terms and conditions contained herein. Terms of Easement 1. Recitals. The recitals and attached exhibits are hereby incorporated and made part of this Instrument. 2. Grant of Easement. For good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged by Grantor, Grantor grants and conveys to the City a permanent easement for right- of-way purposes in, over, across, beneath, above, and through the Easement Area. 3. Scope of Easement. The above-described permanent, non-exclusive right-of-way easement includes the rights of the City, its contractors, agents, and employees to enter the Easement Area at all reasonable times for the purpose of locating, constructing, reconstructing, improving, operating, maintaining, inspecting, altering and repairing within the described Easement Area public lighting, electrical, storm sewer, sanitary sewer and water facilities, a sidewalk, and all other public facilities or improvements of any type that are not inconsistent with its use as a public right- of-way, all at the City’s sole cost and expense. The easement granted herein also includes the right to cut, trim, or remove from the Easement Area trees, shrubs, or other vegetation as in the City’s judgment unreasonably interfere with the Page 183 of 218 2 easement or facilities of the City, its successors or assigns, and to prohibit obstructions and grading alterations now or in the future as in City’s judgment unreasonably interfere with the use or maintenance of the Easement Area or the function of the facilities located therein. Notwithstanding the foregoing, all boulevard vegetation, and sidewalk related maintenance/replacement remains the responsibility of the applicable adjacent property owner on either side of the street. 3. Warranty of Title. Grantor warrants that it is the fee owner of the Property and has the right, title, and capacity to convey to the City the easement herein. 4. Environmental Matters. The City shall not be responsible for any costs, expenses, damages, demands, obligations, including penalties and reasonable attorneys’ fees, or losses resulting from any claims, actions, suits, or proceedings based upon a release or threat of release of any hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants which may have existed on, or that relate to, the Easement Area or the Property prior to the date of this Instrument. 5. Snow, Ice, and Landscaping maintenance; Grantor retaining wall. Grantor agrees that the City shall provide snow and ice control only on the street space between the curbs and shall not provide those services within any sidewalk areas, and that no priority will be given by the City for snow and ice control within the Easement Area above any other residential-level street. Grantor agrees that the City shall not perform any mowing, tree trimming, or landscaping services within the Easement Area. Grantor acknowledges that the City shall not be responsible for any inspections of or maintenance or care of the Grantor’s retaining wall or fence, either or both of which may be located partially or wholly within the Easement Area (and may, for the avoidance of doubt, so remain within the Easement Area); provided, however, that any damage caused by the City, its contractors, agents, and/or employees to such retaining wall or fence shall be repaired and restored at the City’s sole cost and expense. 6. Binding Effect. The terms and conditions of this Instrument shall run with the land and be binding on Grantor and its successors and assigns. STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: NONE Page 184 of 218 3 Dated this _____ day of ___________, 2025. GRANTOR: ROSEMOUNT AH I, LLLP, a Minnesota limited liability limited partnership By: Rosemount AH I, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company Its: General Partner By: __________________________________ Name: Patrick Ostrom Its: Vice President STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ____________ ) ) ) ss.: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of __________, 2025, by Patrick Ostrom, the Vice President of Rosemount AH I, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, the General Partner of Rosemount AH I, LLLP, a Minnesota limited liability limited partnership, on behalf of the limited liability limited partnership as Grantor. Notary Public NOTARY STAMP OR SEAL Page 185 of 218 4 THE CITY: THE CITY OF ROSEMOUNT, a Minnesota municipal corporation By: __________________________________ Name: Jeffery D. Weisensel Its: Mayor By: __________________________________ Name: Erin Fasbender Its: City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ____________ ) ) ) ss.: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of __________, 2025, by _________________, Mayor, and ___________________, City Clerk, of the City of Rosemount, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public NOTARY STAMP OR SEAL THIS INSTRUMENT DRAFTED BY: Kennedy & Graven, Chartered 150 South Fifth Street, Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 337-9300 Page 186 of 218 A-1 EXHIBIT A Legal Description of the Property Lot 1, Block 1, Amber Fields Eighth Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota. Page 187 of 218 B-1 EXHIBIT B Legal Description of Easement Area An easement for roadway purposes over, under, and across the southerly 80.00 feet of Lot 1, Block 1, AMBER FIELDS EIGHTH ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota. Page 188 of 218 C-1 EXHIBIT C Depiction of Easement Area Page 189 of 218 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY City Council Regular Meeting: February 4, 2025 AGENDA ITEM: Request by Maplewood Development for approval of the Amber Fields 22nd Addition Final Plat AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT AGENDA PREPARED BY: Julia Hogan, Planner AGENDA NO. 6.i. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution, Site Location, Final Plat, Existing Conditions, Phasing Plan, Site Plan, Grading and Drainage Plan, Erosion Control Plan, Utility Plan; Landscape Plan, Parks and Recreation Memorandum dated January 17, 2024 APPROVED BY: LJM RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to adopt a resolution approving the Amber Fields 22nd Addition Final Plat, subject to the conditions in the attached resolution. BACKGROUND Owner: Earl Street Partners II, LLC. Area in Acres: 18.42 Acres Residential Lots Created: 84 Townhome lots Gross Density: 9.45 Units/Acre Net Density: 9.45 Units/Acre Comprehensive Plan Guiding: MUR - Mixed Use Residential Current Zoning: R-3 PUD - Medium Density Residential Planned Unit Development The City Council is being asked to consider a request by Maplewood Development for approval of a final plat for Amber Fields 22nd Addition to create 84 townhome lots. The proposed subdivision is the second phase of the Amber Fields 14th Addition preliminary plat. The applicant initially came forward to the city with a rezoning, a major amendment to the Amber Fields Planned Unit Development Agreement, preliminary and final plat requests for the 14th addition to create 174 townhome lots. The request to rezone the western portion of the property from R-1 PUD – Low Density Traditional Residential Planned Unit Development to R-3 PUD – Medium Density Residential Planned Unit Development was necessary to accommodate townhome/single-family attached units and the higher density of units throughout the site. The eastern portion of the 14th addition was already zoned R-3 PUD. The request for a major amendment to the Amber Fields PUD Agreement was to allow for six guest parking to be closer than 10-feet to the rear property line. The amendment was also needed because the 14th addition increased the number of residential dwelling units by more than five percent and decreased the amount of open space by more than five percent from what was originally approved in the PUD. A total of 25 buildings were planned to be constructed throughout the preliminary plat Page 190 of 218 area with 14 of the buildings consisting of 8 dwelling units, 9 of the buildings consisting of 6 dwelling units and 2 of the buildings consisting of 4 dwelling units. The City Council approved the rezoning, major amendment to the Amber Fields Planned Unit Development Agreement, preliminary and final plat requests for the 14th addition at its meeting on February 20, 2024. Staff is recommending approval of the final plat, subject to conditions listed in the attached resolution. ISSUE ANALYSIS Legal Authority Final Plat approvals are quasi-judicial in nature because the City has a set of standards and requirements for reviewing this type of application. The proposed plat is reviewed against these standards in detail below. Generally, if the final plat meets the ordinance requirements, it must be approved. General Subdivision Design The preliminary plat area is located in the southeastern portion of the Amber Fields development area directly west of Akron Avenue and south of the connection road that will extend off of Akron Ave. The preliminary plat area is shown to be accessed by two private streets directly off the connection road off of Akron Ave called Aster Blvd. The eastern access road is shown as Annagaire Curve which extends south and then northwest and ends at the western access into the site. The third road is shown as Anmeadle Row which connects between the eastern and western access roads on the northern end of the site. There are guest parking stalls shown throughout the site and also open space that will be maintained by the HOA. There will be a mixture of 4-unit, 6-unit, and 8-unit townhome buildings throughout the development area. All roads within the development area are private. There are no pedestrian facilities planned for this addition of Amber Fields. There is a total of 783 parking stalls proposed to be provided throughout the development area. 348 garage stalls, 348 driveway stalls, and 87 guest parking stalls. The proposed number of stalls meets the City’s requirements. Rezoning and Land Use The site is designated for MUR-Mixed Use Residential land use, which can include a range of housing types, from single-family homes on traditional sixty-five foot lots to townhomes. Prior to the rezoning approval of the site the preliminary plat area was located in the R-1 PUD – Low Density Traditional Residential Planned Unit Development district and the R-3 PUD – Medium Density Residential Planned Unit Development district. The eastern 12.74 acres of the site was zoned R-3 PUD and the remaining 5.68 acres was zoned R-1 PUD. The applicant requested the western portion be rezoned to R-3 PUD to accommodate the development of the townhome lots. The city code does not allow for single-family attached dwellings/townhomes within the R-1 PUD zoning district. By rezoning the preliminary plat area to R-3 PUD it allowed for the site to have the 9.45 units per acre that was proposed. Phasing The proposed plat is the second phase within the Amber Fields 14th Addition preliminary plat area. The first phase consisted of the most eastern portion of the development. It contained 90 townhome lots and the eastern access road into the site and portions of the looped road and internal connecting road. Page 191 of 218 This phase will consist of the remaining 84 townhome lots in the western/northwestern portion of the site and along with the second access to the site and the remaining internal road system. Parks The Parks and Recreation staff reviewed the park dedication requirement with Amber Fields 14th Addition as part of the overall Master Development Plan in order to take into account the multiple playgrounds and extensive open space within the development. Therefore, there is no park dedication requirement for this phase of Amber Fields. Utilities The site will be served by existing sanitary sewer located within the connection road that extends off of Akron Avenue. The sanitary sewer system will extend throughout the private roads and will service the entire development area. Water will be provided to the site via an existing 8” watermain that is proposed to be extended within the private streets of the preliminary plat area. Stormwater is managed across the entire site with detention and retention ponds located in the central open area of Amber Fields. Final Plat Standards for reviewing subdivision requests are detailed in Title 12 of the Rosemount City Code. This section of the Code outlines the two-step Preliminary and Final Plat process for land subdivision. The final plat for Amber Fields 22nd Addition includes 84 townhome units throughout 11 buildings. 9 of the buildings will contain 8 units per building and 2 of the buildings will contain 6 units per building. Additionally, there are 6 outlots identified on the plat. Outlots A, B, C, E and F are open areas that will be HOA owned with drainage and utility easements located over them. Outlot D contains the private streets within the second phase of development. Staff finds the Final Plat is consistent with the Preliminary Plat and meets the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending approval of the Amber Fields 22nd Addition Final Plat, subject to conditions listed in the resolution. This recommendation is based on information provided by the applicant and reviewed in this report. Page 192 of 218 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2025-XX A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT FOR AMBER FIELDS 22ND ADDITION WHEREAS, Maplewood Development Inc. (Applicant) has submitted applications to the City of Rosemount for Final Plat approval concerning property legally described as follows: Outlot E, AMBER FIELDS FOURTEENTH ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, on February 4, 2025, the City Council of the City of Rosemount reviewed the Final Plat for Amber Fields 22nd Addition. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Rosemount hereby approves the Final Plat for Amber Fields 22nd Addition, subject to the following conditions: 1. Execution of a Subdivision Agreement. 2. Conformance with all requirements that are outlined by the City Engineer. 3. Adherence with all conditions associated with the Amber Fields 14th Addition Preliminary Plat. 4. Compliance with the conditions and standards within the Parks and Recreation Directors Memorandum dated January 17, 2024. 5. No structures or mechanical equipment are allowed within any easement areas. 6. Payment of trunk area charges in the amount of: i. Sanitary Sewer Trunk Charge: $1,705/acre ii. Watermain Trunk Charge: $6,500/acre iii. Storm Sewer Trunk Charge: $6,865/acre ADOPTED this 4th day of February 2025, by the City Council of the City of Rosemount. __________________________________________ Jeffery D. Weisensel, Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________________ Erin Fasbender, City Clerk Page 193 of 218 Page 194 of 218 CO U N T Y RO A D N O . 7 3 C. S. A. H. NO. 42(145TH ST. W.) (A K R O N A V E . ) AK R O N A V E . C. S. A. H. NO. 42 (145TH ST. W.) AK R O N A V E . AK R O N A V E . AK R O N A V E . AK R O N A V E . STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREA 1 BASIN 1918PER CITY STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREA 2 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREA 3 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREA 3 WETLANDWE-18-00611258-000 WETLAND WE-18-006 11258-000 WETLAND WE-18-00611258-000 AU B U R N A V E . AB B E Y F I E L D A V E . 148TH ST. W. 148TH ST. W. 148 T H S T . W . 148TH ST. W. AK R O N A V E . ( C . R . 7 3 ) AB B E Y F I E L D A V E . AR T A I N E T R A I L 149TH STREET WEST ADA ADA ADAADAADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADAADAADA ADA ADAADAADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADAADAADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADAADAADA ADA ADAADAADAELEC RISER ADA ADA ADA ELEC RISER ADA ADA ADA ADAADA 48" 36" * 3" WINDOW 24"x24" 5" WINDOW 5" WINDOW 5" WINDOW 5" WINDOW 5" WINDOW 6" WINDOW 6" WINDOW 6" WINDOW 6" WINDOW 6" WINDOW 6" WINDOW 5" WINDOW 5" WINDOW 5" WINDOW 5" WINDOW 6" WINDOW 6" WINDOW 6" WINDOW 6" WINDOW 6" WINDOW 6" WINDOW ADAADA ADAADA ADAADA ADAADA ADAADA ADAADA ADAADA ADAADA 10' DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT 5' DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT 5' D R A I N A G E A N D U T I L I T Y E A S E M E N T 10 ' D R A I N A G E A N D U T I L I T Y E A S E M E N T HWY 42 T B L O C K 2 BLO C K 1 BL O C K 5ARDARA RIDGE RDARDA R A R I D G E R D ARDCURRA R O W ART E R M O N P A T H AR T E R M O N P A T H BLO C K 2 BLO C K 3 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 8 9 10 11 12 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 2 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7891 234 5 6 B L O C K 2 OUT L O T C OU T L O T A OUT L O T B OUT L O T A OUT L O T B A M B E R F I E L D S P A S S BLO C K 4 OUT L O T E O F 1 4 T H A D D I T I O N OUT L O T B O F 1 3 T H A D D I T I O N OUT L O T B O F 1 6 T H A D D I T I O N OUT L O T A O F 1 6 T H A D D I T I O N 1 OUT L O T C BLOC K 4 1 BLOCK 6 BL O C K 5 BLO C K 1 BLOC K 3 AN N A G A I R E C U R V E A N N E S T O W N R O A D ANMEADLE R O W ANN A G A I R E C U R V E A N N E S T O W N R O A D A N M E A D L E R O W AN N A G A I R E C U R V E 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 HOA O W N E D D&U E A S E M E N T O V E R ENT I R E O U T L O T A HOA OWNED D&U EASEMENT OVER ENTIRE OUTLOT B HO A O W N E D D& U E A S E M E N T O V E R EN T I R E O U T L O T C HO A O W N E D D& U E A S E M E N T O V E R EN T I R E O U T L O T A HOA OWNED D&U EASEMENT OVER ENTIRE OUTLOT A AK R O N A V E . HOA OWNED D&U EASEMENT OVER ENTIRE OUTLOT B HOA OWN E D D&U EASE M E N T O V E R ENTIRE OUT L O T C HO A O W N E D D& U E A S E M E N T O V E R EN T I R E O U T L O T A HOA OWNED D&U EASEMENT OVER ENTIRE OUTLOT A H O A O W N E D D & U E A S E M E N T O V E R E N T I R E O U T L O T B AN N A G A I R E C U R V E A N N E S T O W N R O A D ANMEADLE R O W AN N A G A I R E C U R V E 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 81 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 OUTLOT B OU T L O T A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 BLO C K 9 BL O C K 1 0 BL O C K 1 1 BL O C K 1 2 BLOCK 13 BLOCK 1 4 BLOCK 1 BL O C K 3 B L O C K 2 BL O C K 4 BL O C K 5 BL O C K 6 BL O C K 7 BL O C K 8 OUTLOT A OU T L O T D OUTLOT C O U T L O T D OUTLOT D OUTLOT E BLOC K 1 ( P H 2 ) BL O C K 2 ( P H 2 ) BL O C K 3 ( P H 2 ) BLO C K 4 ( P H 2 ) BLO C K 5 ( P H 2 ) BL O C K 6 ( P H 2 ) BL O C K 7 ( P H 2 ) BLO C K 8 ( P H 2 ) BLO C K 9 ( P H 2 ) BL O C K 1 0 ( P H 2 ) BL O C K 1 1 ( P H 2 ) AK R O N A V E . BLO C K 2 ( P H 2 ) B L O C K 3 ( P H 2 ) B L O C K 1 ( P H 2 ) ASTER BOULEVARD AN N A G A I R E C U R V E A N N A C O T T E L A N E ANN A G A I R E C U R V E BL O C K 1 BLOC K 3 BLOC K 2 13 12 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 11 1234 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 123 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ASTER BOULEVARD AN N A G A I R E C U R V E AN N A C O T T E L A N E A S T E R B O U L E V A R D OUTLOT B 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 5 4 3 2 16 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 A S T E R B O U L E V A R D BLO C K 1 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 OUT L O T A OUT L O T B OUT L O T E O F 1 4 T H A D D I T I O N 1 9 T H A D D I T I O N 13TH A D D I T I O N 14 T H A D D I T I O N AN N A G A I R E C U R V E A N N E S T O W N R O A D ANMEADLE R O W ANN A G A I R E C U R V E A N N E S T O W N R O A D A N M E A D L E R O W AN N A G A I R E C U R V E 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 HOA O W N E D D&U E A S E M E N T O V E R ENT I R E O U T L O T A HOA OWNED D&U EASEMENT OVER ENTIRE OUTLOT B HO A O W N E D D& U E A S E M E N T O V E R EN T I R E O U T L O T C HO A O W N E D D& U E A S E M E N T O V E R EN T I R E O U T L O T A HOA OWNED D&U EASEMENT OVER ENTIRE OUTLOT A AK R O N A V E . HOA OWNED D&U EASEMENT OVER ENTIRE OUTLOT B HOA OWN E D D&U EASE M E N T O V E R ENTIRE OUT L O T C HO A O W N E D D& U E A S E M E N T O V E R EN T I R E O U T L O T A HOA OWNED D&U EASEMENT OVER ENTIRE OUTLOT A H O A O W N E D D & U E A S E M E N T O V E R E N T I R E O U T L O T B AN N A G A I R E C U R V E A N N E S T O W N R O A D ANMEADLE R O W AN N A G A I R E C U R V E 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 81 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 OUTLOT B OU T L O T A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 BLO C K 9 BL O C K 1 0 BL O C K 1 1 BL O C K 1 2 BLOCK 13 BLOCK 1 4 BLOCK 1 BL O C K 3 B L O C K 2 BL O C K 4 BL O C K 5 BL O C K 6 BL O C K 7 BL O C K 8 OUTLOT A OU T L O T D OUTLOT C O U T L O T D OUTLOT D OUTLOT E BLOC K 1 ( P H 2 ) BL O C K 2 ( P H 2 ) BL O C K 3 ( P H 2 ) BLO C K 4 ( P H 2 ) BLO C K 5 ( P H 2 ) BL O C K 6 ( P H 2 ) BL O C K 7 ( P H 2 ) BLO C K 8 ( P H 2 ) BLO C K 9 ( P H 2 ) BL O C K 1 0 ( P H 2 ) BL O C K 1 1 ( P H 2 ) PROJECT LOCATION AM B E R F I E L D S - 2 2 N D A D D I T I O N PH A S E 2 FI N A L P L A T S U B M I T T A L CO V E R S H E E T 733 Marquette Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com Suite 700 SHEET INDEX SHEET TITLENO. COVER SHEET1 STANDARD DETAILS 5 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN 2-4 SITE, LIGHTING, AND SIGNAGE PLAN7 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN8 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES AND DETAILS SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN PLAN STREET AND STORM SEWER PLAN 12 LANDSCAPE PLAN 9 PHASING PLAN6 SUITE 700 ALLIANT ENGINEERING, INC. 733 MARQUETTE AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402 PH: 612-758-3080 CONSULTANT FX: 612-758-3099 SURVEYOR ENGINEER DANIEL EKREM LICENSE NO. 57366 CLARK WICKLUND LICENSE NO. 40922 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT EM: cwicklund@alliant-inc.com EM: dekrem@alliant-inc.com MARK KRONBECK LICENSE NO. 26222 EM: mkronbeck@alliant-inc.com VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1" = 4000' DEVELOPER MAPLEWOOD DEVELOPMENT 1128 HARMON PLACE SUITE 320 PH: 612-746-4046 CONTACT: MARIO J. COCCHIARELLA MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55403 AMBER FIELDS - 22ND ADDITION ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 1 SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN PLAN AND PROFILES STREET AND STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILES STREET INTERSECTION DETAILS 10 11 13 14-15 18-## 16-17 APPROVED CITY OF ROSEMOUNT PROJECT NO: 2022-16 2875 145TH STREET WEST ROSEMOUNT, MN 55068 (651) 423-4411 BENCHMARK TURKEY MN037, LOCATED IN ROSEMOUNT, 2.25 MILES E ALONG COUNTY ROAD 43 (150TH STREET W) FROM THE JUNCTION OF COUNTY ROAD 42 AND TRUNK HIGWAY 3 IN ROSEMOUNTM THEN 0.85 MILE S ON AKRON AVE, THEN 0.3 MILE W ON 154TH STREET, 21.0 FEET W OF A FIELS ROAD, 72.0 FEET N OF A POWER POLE, 33.6 FEET SE OF A TELEPHONE PEDESTAL, 11.0 FEET N 154TH STREET, 4.0 FEET S OF A WITNESS POST AND HAS AN ELEVATION OF 943.59 FEET (NAVD 88) Page 195 of 218 AM B E R F I E L D S - 2 2 N D A D D I T I O N PH A S E 2 FI N A L P L A T S U B M I T T A L ST A N D A R D D E T A I L S 733 Marquette Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com Suite 700 2 Page 196 of 218 AM B E R F I E L D S - 2 2 N D A D D I T I O N PH A S E 2 FI N A L P L A T S U B M I T T A L ST A N D A R D D E T A I L S 733 Marquette Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com Suite 700 3 Page 197 of 218 AM B E R F I E L D S - 2 2 N D A D D I T I O N PH A S E 2 FI N A L P L A T S U B M I T T A L ST A N D A R D D E T A I L S 733 Marquette Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com Suite 700 4 Page 198 of 218 Δ BL O C K 1 A R D A R A R I D G E R D A R D A R A R I D G E R D 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 OU T L O T A OU T L O T B ASTER BOULEVARD OU T L O T E O F 1 4 T H A D D I T I O N 19TH ADDITION 13TH A D D I T I O N 14TH ADDITION BLOCK 1(PH 2) AST E R B O U L E V A R D ASTER BOULEVARD HOA O W N E D D&U E A S E M E N T O V E R ENT I R E O U T L O T B HOA O W N E D D&U E A S E M E N T O V E R ENTIR E O U T L O T C H O A O W N E D D & U E A S E M E N T O V E R E N T I R E O U T L O T A HOA O W N E D D&U E A S E M E N T O V E R ENT I R E O U T L O T A A N N A G A I R E C U R V E ANNESTOWN ROAD ANM E A D L E R O W A N N A G A I R E C U R V E OUT L O T B O U T L O T A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 BLOCK 9 BLOCK 10 B L O C K 1 1 B L O C K 1 2 BLO C K 1 3 BLOC K 1 4 BLO C K 1 B L O C K 3 BLO C K 2 B L O C K 4 B L O C K 5 BLOCK 6BLOCK 7BLOCK 8 OUT L O T A O U T L O T D OUT L O T C OUTLOT D OUT L O T D OUT L O T E LEGENDNOTES: AM B E R F I E L D S - 2 2 N D A D D I T I O N PH A S E 2 FI N A L P L A T S U B M I T T A L 733 Marquette Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com Suite 700 5 EX I S T I N G C O N D I T I O N S P L A N Page 199 of 218 AST E R B O U L E V A R D AST E R B O U L E V A R D ASTER BOULEVARD ASTER BOULEVARD A N N A G A I R E C U R V E ANNESTOWN ROAD ANM E A D L E R O W AN N A G A I R E C U R V E ANNESTOWN ROAD ANMEADLE ROW A N N A G A I R E C U R V E 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 A K R O N A V E . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 OUT L O T B O U T L O T A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 BLOCK 9 BLOCK 10 B L O C K 1 1 B L O C K 1 2 BLO C K 1 3 BLOC K 1 4 BLO C K 1 B L O C K 3 BLO C K 2 B L O C K 4 B L O C K 5 BLOCK 6BLOCK 7BLOCK 8 OUT L O T A O U T L O T D OUT L O T C OUTLOT D OUT L O T D OUT L O T E BLOCK 1 ( P H 2 ) BLOCK 2(PH 2)BLOCK 3(PH 2) BL O C K 4 ( P H 2 ) BL O C K 5 ( P H 2 ) BLOCK 6(PH 2)BLOCK 7(PH 2) BLOCK 8 ( P H 2 ) BLOCK 9(P H 2 ) BLOCK 10(PH 2)BLOCK 11(PH 2) BL O C K 1 A R D A R A R I D G E R D 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 OU T L O T A OU T L O T B ASTER BOULEVARD OU T L O T E O F 1 4 T H A D D I T I O N 19TH ADDITION 13TH A D D I T I O N 14TH ADDITION AM B E R F I E L D S - 2 2 N D A D D I T I O N PH A S E 2 FI N A L P L A T S U B M I T T A L 733 Marquette Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com Suite 700 LEGEND: PH A S I N G P L A N 6 Page 200 of 218 ASTER BOULEVARD ASTER BOULEVARD ANM E A D L E R O W AN N A G A I R E C U R V E ANNESTOWN ROAD ANMEADLE ROW 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 HOA O W N E D D&U E A S E M E N T O V E R ENTIR E O U T L O T C HOA O W N E D D&U E A S E M E N T O V E R ENT I R E O U T L O T A ANM E A D L E R O W 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 BLOCK 9 BLOC K 1 4 BLO C K 1 OUT L O T A OUT L O T C OUT L O T D OUT L O T E BLOCK 1 ( P H 2 ) BLOCK 2(PH 2)BLOCK 3(PH 2) BL O C K 4 ( P H 2 ) BL O C K 5 ( P H 2 ) BLOCK 6(PH 2)BLOCK 7(PH 2) BLOCK 8 ( P H 2 ) BLOCK 9( P H 2 ) BLOCK 10(PH 2)BLOCK 11(PH 2) BL O C K 1 OU T L O T A OU T L O T B OU T L O T E O F 1 4 T H A D D I T I O N 19TH ADDITION 13TH A D D I T I O N 14TH ADDITION AM B E R F I E L D S - 2 2 N D A D D I T I O N PH A S E 2 FI N A L P L A T S U B M I T T A L SI T E , L I G H T I N G , A N D S I G N A G E P L A N - O V E R A L L V I E W 733 Marquette Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com Suite 700 LEGEND: 7 SITE PLAN NOTES:TOWNHOME LOT DATA: TOTAL DENSITY CALCULATIONS: TYPICAL PRIVATE ROAD SECTION TYPICAL 25' WIDE TOWNHOME LOT DETAIL 10' SEE TYP. SECTION 1.0' 1.0' 1.50 % 3" WEARING COURSE MIXTURE 6" AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 EXISTING SUBGRADE BITUMINOUS TRAIL - SHEET FLOW 1 : 50 M I N 1 : 4 M A X 1 : 5 0 M I N 1 : 4 M A X VARIES VARIES 2% - 4 % 2% - 4 % SOD BENCH SOD BENCH INSET B Page 201 of 218 ASTER BOULEVARD ASTER BOULEVARD ANM E A D L E R O W AN N A G A I R E C U R V E ANNESTOWN ROAD ANMEADLE ROW 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ANM E A D L E R O W 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 BLOCK 9 BLOC K 1 4 BLO C K 1 OUT L O T A OUT L O T C OUT L O T E BLOCK 1 ( P H 2 ) BLOCK 2(PH 2)BLOCK 3(PH 2) BL O C K 4 ( P H 2 ) BL O C K 5 ( P H 2 ) BLOCK 6(PH 2)BLOCK 7(PH 2) BLOCK 8 ( P H 2 ) BLOCK 9( P H 2 ) BLOCK 10(PH 2)BLOCK 11(PH 2) BL O C K 1 7 OU T L O T A OU T L O T B ASTER BOULEVARD OU T L O T E O F 1 4 T H A D D I T I O N 19TH ADDITION 13TH A D D I T I O N 14TH ADDITION AM B E R F I E L D S - 2 2 N D A D D I T I O N PH A S E 2 FI N A L P L A T S U B M I T T A L 733 Marquette Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com Suite 700 LEGEND: GR A D I N G A N D D R A I N A G E P L A N - O V E R A L L V I E W 8 GRADING NOTES: TOWNHOME HOLD DOWN DETAILS Page 202 of 218 ASTER BOULEVARD ASTER BOULEVARD 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ANM E A D L E R O W 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 BLOCK 1 ( P H 2 ) BLOCK 2(PH 2)BLOCK 3(PH 2) BL O C K 4 ( P H 2 ) BL O C K 5 ( P H 2 ) BLOCK 6(PH 2)BLOCK 7(PH 2) BLOCK 8 ( P H 2 ) BLOCK 9( P H 2 ) BLOCK 10(PH 2)BLOCK 11(PH 2) BL O C K 1 OU T L O T A OU T L O T B OU T L O T E O F 1 4 T H A D D I T I O N 19TH ADDITION 13TH A D D I T I O N 14TH ADDITION AM B E R F I E L D S - 2 2 N D A D D I T I O N PH A S E 2 FI N A L P L A T S U B M I T T A L 733 Marquette Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com Suite 700LEGEND: DND ER O S I O N A N D S E D I M E N T C O N T R O L P L A N - O V E R A L L V I E W 9 ACTIVE SWPPP MAP LEGEND SWPPP BMP QUANTITIES EROSION CONTROL RESPONSIBLE PARTY: CONTRACTOR: (PER PLAN): NOTE TO CONTRACTOR: CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING: NOTES: Page 203 of 218 AM B E R F I E L D S - 2 2 N D A D D I T I O N PH A S E 2 FI N A L P L A T S U B M I T T A L 733 Marquette Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com Suite 700 EROSION CONTROL SCHEDULE: PERMANENT COVER: MANAGEMENT MEASURES: POLLUTION PREVENTION · SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES: EROSION CONTROL GENERAL NOTES: MAINTENANCE PROGRAM: EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEWATERING: FINAL STABILIZATION: CONCRETE WASHOUT DETAIL ER O S I O N A N D S E D I M E N T C O N T R O L N O T E S A N D D E T A I L S 10 Page 204 of 218 AST E R B O U L E V A R D AST E R B O U L E V A R D ASTER BOULEVARD ASTER BOULEVARD ANNESTOWN ROAD ANM E A D L E R O W AN N A G A I R E C U R V E ANNESTOWN ROAD ANMEADLE ROW A N N A G A I R E C U R V E 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ANNESTOWN ROAD ANM E A D L E R O W A N N A G A I R E C U R V E 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 BLOCK 1 ( P H 2 ) BLOCK 2(PH 2)BLOCK 3(PH 2) BL O C K 4 ( P H 2 ) BL O C K 5 ( P H 2 ) BLOCK 6(PH 2)BLOCK 7(PH 2) BLOCK 8 ( P H 2 ) BLOCK 9( P H 2 ) BLOCK 10(PH 2)BLOCK 11(PH 2) BL O C K 1 A R D A R A R I D G E R D 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 OU T L O T A OU T L O T B ASTER BOULEVARD OU T L O T E O F 1 4 T H A D D I T I O N 19TH ADDITION 13TH A D D I T I O N 14TH ADDITION AM B E R F I E L D S - 2 2 N D A D D I T I O N PH A S E 2 FI N A L P L A T S U B M I T T A L 733 Marquette Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com Suite 700 SA N I T A R Y S E W E R A N D W A T E R M A I N P L A N - O V E R A L L V I E W 11 LEGENDUTILITY NOTES: Page 205 of 218 ASTER BOULEVARD ASTER BOULEVARD ANNESTOWN ROAD ANM E A D L E R O W AN N A G A I R E C U R V E ANNESTOWN ROAD ANMEADLE ROW 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ANNESTOWN ROAD ANM E A D L E R O W 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 BLOCK 1 ( P H 2 ) BLOCK 2(PH 2)BLOCK 3(PH 2) BL O C K 4 ( P H 2 ) BL O C K 5 ( P H 2 ) BLOCK 6(PH 2)BLOCK 7(PH 2) BLOCK 8 ( P H 2 ) BLOCK 9( P H 2 ) BLOCK 10(PH 2)BLOCK 11(PH 2) BL O C K 1 OU T L O T A OU T L O T E O F 1 4 T H A D D I T I O N 14TH ADDITION Road A-S PROFILE AN M E A D L E RO W B4 L 3 ( P H 2 ) B4 L 2 ( P H 2 ) B4 L 1 ( P H 2 ) B5 L 6 ( P H 2 ) B5 L 5 ( P H 2 ) B5 L 4 ( P H 2 ) B5 L 3 ( P H 2 ) B5 L 2 ( P H 2 ) B5 L 1 ( P H 2 ) B6 L 1 ( P H 2 ) B6 L 2 ( P H 2 ) B6 L 3 ( P H 2 ) B6 L 4 ( P H 2 ) B6 L 5 ( P H 2 ) B6 L 6 ( P H 2 ) B6 L 7 ( P H 2 ) B6 L 8 ( P H 2 ) B7 L 1 ( P H 2 ) B7 L 2 ( P H 2 ) B7 L 3 ( P H 2 ) B7 L 4 ( P H 2 ) AM B E R F I E L D S - 2 2 N D A D D I T I O N PH A S E 2 FI N A L P L A T S U B M I T T A L 733 Marquette Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com Suite 700 SA N I T A R Y S E W E R A N D W A T E R M A I N P L A N A N D P R O F I L E S 12 ANNAGAIRE CURVE SANITARY SERVICE SHEDULE ANNESTOWN ROAD LEGEND NOTES: Page 206 of 218 ASTER BOULEVARD ASTER BOULEVARD ANM E A D L E R O W AN N A G A I R E C U R V E ANNESTOWN ROAD ANMEADLE ROW 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ANM E A D L E R O W 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 BLOCK 1 ( P H 2 ) BLOCK 2(PH 2)BLOCK 3(PH 2) BL O C K 4 ( P H 2 ) BL O C K 5 ( P H 2 ) BLOCK 6(PH 2)BLOCK 7(PH 2) BLOCK 8 ( P H 2 ) BLOCK 9( P H 2 ) BLOCK 10(PH 2)BLOCK 11(PH 2) BL O C K 1 A R D A R A R I D G E R D A R D A R A R I D G E R D 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 OU T L O T A OU T L O T B ASTER BOULEVARD OU T L O T E O F 1 4 T H A D D I T I O N 19TH ADDITION 13TH A D D I T I O N 14TH ADDITION AM B E R F I E L D S - 2 2 N D A D D I T I O N PH A S E 2 FI N A L P L A T S U B M I T T A L 733 Marquette Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com Suite 700 ST R E E T A N D S T O R M S E W E R P L A N - O V E R A L L V I E W 13 UTILITY NOTES:LEGEND: Page 207 of 218 ASTER BOULEVARD ASTER BOULEVARD ANNESTOWN ROAD ANM E A D L E R O W AN N A G A I R E C U R V E ANNESTOWN ROAD ANMEADLE ROW ANNAGAI R E C U R V E 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ANNESTOWN ROAD ANM E A D L E R O W ANNAGAI R E C U R V E 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 BLOCK 1 ( P H 2 ) BLOCK 2(PH 2)BLOCK 3(PH 2) BL O C K 4 ( P H 2 ) BL O C K 5 ( P H 2 ) BLOCK 6(PH 2)BLOCK 7(PH 2) BLOCK 8 ( P H 2 ) BLOCK 9( P H 2 ) BLOCK 10(PH 2)BLOCK 11(PH 2) OU T L O T A 14TH ADDITION Road A-S PROFILE AN M E A D L E RO W AS T E R BL V D AM B E R F I E L D S - 2 2 N D A D D I T I O N PH A S E 2 FI N A L P L A T S U B M I T T A L 733 Marquette Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com Suite 700 ST R E E T A N D S T O R M S E W E R P L A N A N D P R O F I L E S 14 GENERAL NOTES: CASTING SCHEDULE ANNESTOWN ROADANNAGAIRE CURVE Page 208 of 218 ASTER BOULEVARD ASTER BOULEVARD ANM E A D L E R O W AN N A G A I R E C U R V E ANMEADLE ROW ANM E A D L E R O W OU T L O T A OU T L O T E O F 1 4 T H A D D I T I O N 14TH ADDITION Road B-S PROFILE AN N A G A I R E CU R V E AM B E R F I E L D S - 2 2 N D A D D I T I O N PH A S E 2 FI N A L P L A T S U B M I T T A L 733 Marquette Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com Suite 700 ST R E E T A N D S T O R M S E W E R P L A N A N D P R O F I L E S 15 GENERAL NOTES: ANMEADLE ROW Page 209 of 218 ASTER BOULEVARD ASTER BOULEVARD 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 BLOCK 3(PH 2) BL O C K 4 ( P H 2 ) BL O C K 5 ( P H 2 ) BLOCK 6(PH 2) BLOCK 11(PH 2) 5 6 7 8 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 BLOCK 1 ( P H 2 ) BLOCK 2(PH 2) BLOCK 9( P H 2 ) BLOCK 10(PH 2) AM B E R F I E L D S - 2 2 N D A D D I T I O N PH A S E 2 FI N A L P L A T S U B M I T T A L 733 Marquette Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com Suite 700 ST R E E T I N T E R S E C T I O N D E T A I L S 16 ANMEADLE ROW - EAST PARKING AREAS ANNAGAIRE CURVE AND ANMEADLE ROW ANNAGAIRE CURVE BAY Page 210 of 218 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 BLOCK 6(PH 2)BLOCK 7(PH 2) 4 5 6 7 8 BLOCK 8 ( P H 2 ) AM B E R F I E L D S - 2 2 N D A D D I T I O N PH A S E 2 FI N A L P L A T S U B M I T T A L 733 Marquette Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com Suite 700 SH E E T N A M E 17 ANNESTOWN ROAD - SOUTHWEST PARKING AREA ANNESTOWN ROAD - SOUTHEAST PARKING AREA Page 211 of 218 AST E R B O U L E V A R D AST E R B O U L E V A R D ASTER BOULEVARD ASTER BOULEVARD A N N A G A I R E C U R V E ANNESTOWN ROAD ANM E A D L E R O W AN N A G A I R E C U R V E ANNESTOWN ROAD ANMEADLE ROW A N N A G A I R E C U R V E 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 A K R O N A V E . A N N A G A I R E C U R V E ANNESTOWN ROAD ANM E A D L E R O W A N N A G A I R E C U R V E 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 BLOCK 1 ( P H 2 ) BLOCK 2(PH 2)BLOCK 3(PH 2) BL O C K 4 ( P H 2 ) BL O C K 5 ( P H 2 ) BLOCK 6(PH 2)BLOCK 7(PH 2) BLOCK 8 ( P H 2 ) BLOCK 9( P H 2 ) BLOCK 10(PH 2)BLOCK 11(PH 2) 1 - R B 5 - K C 2 - P O 1 - N S 1 - R B 1 - N S 1 - R B 1 - R B 1 - N S 1 - R B 1 - N S 1 - R B 1 - N S 4 - R O 3 - A E 4 - P O 4 - C H 5 - A E 5 - A B 5 - A E 4 - N F 1 - R B 1 - R B 1 - R B 1 - R B 5 - H L 5 - A B 5 - C H BL O C K 1 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 OU T L O T A OU T L O T B ASTER BOULEVARD OU T L O T E O F 1 4 T H A D D I T I O N 19TH ADDITION 13TH A D D I T I O N 14TH ADDITION AM B E R F I E L D S - 2 2 N D A D D I T I O N PH A S E 2 FI N A L P L A T S U B M I T T A L 733 Marquette Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com Suite 700 TREE PLANTING DETAIL1 LANDSCAPE NOTES: MITIGATION & LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS: LA N D S C A P E P L A N - O V E R A L L V I E W 18 LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE: (PHASE TWO) Page 212 of 218 AMBER FIELDS TWENTY SECOND ADDITION CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA This plat was approved by the City Council of ROSEMOUNT, Minnesota, this _________ day of _____________________, 20 ____ and hereby certifies compliance with all requirements as set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2. By:___________________________________________________________________ Mayor Clerk COUNTY SURVEYOR, COUNTY OF DAKOTA, STATE OF MINNESOTA I hereby certify that in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 11, this plat has been reviewed and approved this _________ day of _____________________, 20 ____. _________________________________ Todd B. Tollefson Dakota County Surveyor KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Earl Street Partners II, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, owner of the following described property: Outlot E, AMBER FIELDS FOURTEENTH ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota. Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as AMBER FIELDS TWENTY SECOND ADDITION and does hereby dedicate to the public for public use the drainage and utility easements as created by this plat. In witness whereof said Earl Street Partners II, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this _________ day of _____________________, 20 ____. Signed: Earl Street Partners II, LLC by ___________________________________________ Mario J. Cocchiarella, Chief Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ____________________ This instrument was acknowledged before me on _________ day of _____________________, 20 ____, by Mario J. Cocchiarella, Chief Manager of Earl Street Partners II, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the limited liability company. ________________________________________ Signature ________________________________________ Printed Name Notary Public, ___________County, Minnesota My Commission Expires _________________ SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE I Daniel Ekrem do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been, or will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. Dated this ___________ day of _____________________ , 20 ____. _________________________________________ Daniel Ekrem, Licensed Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 57366 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF _____________________ This instrument was acknowledged before me on ___________ day of _____________________ , 20 ____, by Daniel Ekrem. ________________________________________ Signature ________________________________________ Printed Name Notary Public, ___________County, Minnesota My Commission Expires__________________ OFFICIAL PLAT DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION AND RECORDS, COUNTY OF DAKOTA, STATE OF MINNESOTA Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 9, taxes payable in the year 20___ on the land hereinbefore described have been paid. Also, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 272.12, there are no delinquent taxes and transfer entered this _________ day of _____________________, 20 ____. _________________________________________, Director Amy A. Koethe, Department of Property Taxation and Records COUNTY RECORDER, COUNTY OF DAKOTA, STATE OF MINNESOTA I hereby certify that this plat of AMBER FIELDS TWENTY SECOND ADDITION was filed in the office of the County Recorder for public record on this _________ day of _____________________, 20 ____, at ___ o'clock ___.M. and was duly filed in Book_________________ of Plats, Page______________________ , as Document Number _______________________ . _______________________________________ Amy A. Koethe, County Recorder Page 213 of 218 S40 ° 1 9 ' 4 9 " W 4 5 1 . 1 4 S 4 8 ° 1 2 ' 0 8 " E 3 2 1 . 3 0 N41 ° 4 7 ' 5 2 " E 25. 0 0 S 4 8 ° 1 2 ' 0 8 " E 2 1 9 . 5 8 R = 2 1 7 5.0 0 L = 3 2 9.7 6 Δ = 8°4 1'1 3" C .B rg = N 5 2°3 2'4 4" W C . = 3 2 9.4 5 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 9 S69°19'27"E 28.81 N51°00'49"E 14.05 N2 5 ° 2 2 ' 4 9 " E 72 . 0 0 N1 7 ° 1 5 ' 2 8 " E 47 . 4 9 N1 3 ° 1 4 ' 2 8 " E 72 . 0 0 OU T L O T A N2 1 ° 3 3 ' 2 1 " E 54 . 0 0 S 4 9 ° 4 0 ' 1 1 " E 4 5 5 . 6 2 R =830.00 L=393.16 Δ =27°08'24" C.Brg = S63°14'23"E C.=389.49 N7 9 ° 4 6 ' 1 6 " W 3 0 . 0 1 N09°22'35"E 40.68 N0 3 ° 0 3 ' 1 6 " E 72 . 0 0 N09°22'08"E 15.70 R=685.00 L=119.18Δ=9°58'08" C.Br g=S75°49'55"EC.=119.03 N2 4 ° 0 1 ' 1 7 " E 50 . 5 3 S41 ° 4 7 ' 5 2 " W 56. 2 8 3 0 . 0 0 1 4 1 . 9 7 3 6 . 0 5 2 4 7 . 6 0 20 . 4 3 30 . 1 0 49. 8 9 42 . 0 0 6.3 9 12 . 0 0 L= 3 0 . 2 1 =0° 4 7 ' 4 5 " L = 1 2 4.0 5 Δ = 3 °1 6'0 4 " R=998.00 L=110.44 Δ=6°20'25" C.Brg =S65°08'49"E C.=110.38 R = 9 8 0.0 0 L = 20 8.48 Δ = 12°11'20" C.Brg = S 5 5°4 5'51"E C.= 208.09 R = 950.00 L = 311.29 Δ =18°46'29" C.Brg = S 59°03'25"E C.=309.90 R = 2 4 .0 0 L = 3 7 .7 0 Δ = 9 0 ° 0 0'00" R = 685.00 L=253.19 Δ=21°10'40" C.Brg = S60°15'31"E C.=251.75 R = 715.0 0 L = 261.72 Δ =20°58'23" C.Brg = S 60°09'22"E C.=260.27 R=2.00 L=3.13 =89°47'09" R=2.00 L=3.14 =90°00'00" R = 2 4 . 0 0 L = 1 2 . 1 8 = 2 9 ° 0 5 ' 0 7 " C . B r g = S 5 4 ° 5 2 ' 2 3 " W C . = 1 2 . 0 5 R = 2 4 . 0 0 L = 1 2 . 1 8 = 2 9 ° 0 5 ' 0 7 " C . B r g = N 2 5 ° 4 7 ' 1 6 " E C . = 1 2 . 0 5 S40 ° 1 9 ' 4 9 " W 4 4 7 . 5 6 N40 ° 1 9 ' 4 9 " E 1 6 0 . 0 0 N40 ° 1 9 ' 4 9 " E 1 6 0 . 0 0 S 4 9 ° 4 0 ' 1 1 " E 7 2 . 0 0 S 4 9 ° 4 0 ' 1 1 " E 7 2 . 0 0 N 4 9 ° 4 0 ' 1 1 " W 7 4 . 0 0 N40 ° 1 9 ' 4 9 " E 2 1 0 . 0 0 N 4 9 ° 4 0 ' 1 1 " W 7 4 . 0 0 N40 ° 1 9 ' 4 9 " E 2 1 0 . 0 0 S 4 9 ° 4 0 ' 1 1 " E 7 2 . 0 0 S 4 9 ° 4 0 ' 1 1 " E 7 2 . 0 0 S 4 9 ° 4 0 ' 1 1 " E 7 2 . 0 0 S 4 9 ° 4 0 ' 1 1 " E 7 2 . 0 0 S 4 9 ° 4 0 ' 1 1 " E 7 2 . 0 0 N 4 9 ° 4 0 ' 1 1 " W 7 4 . 0 0 N 4 9 ° 4 0 ' 1 1 " W 7 4 . 0 0 N 4 9 ° 4 0 ' 1 1 " W 7 4 . 0 0 N 4 9 ° 4 0 ' 1 1 " W 7 4 . 0 0 N 4 9 ° 4 0 ' 1 1 " W 7 4 . 0 0 N 4 9 ° 4 0 ' 1 1 " W 7 4 . 0 0 N 4 9 ° 4 0 ' 1 1 " W 7 4 . 0 0 N40 ° 1 9 ' 4 9 " E 4 2 4 . 3 7 S40 ° 1 9 ' 4 9 " W 8 7 . 3 3 S40 ° 1 9 ' 4 9 " W 1 9 7 . 0 0 N40 ° 1 9 ' 4 9 " E 7 4 . 0 0 S40 ° 1 9 ' 4 9 " W 7 4 . 0 0 S 4 9 ° 4 0 ' 1 1 " E 2 1 0 . 0 0 S 4 9 ° 4 0 ' 1 1 " E 2 1 0 . 0 0 N40 ° 1 9 ' 4 9 " E 7 4 . 0 0 N40 ° 1 9 ' 4 9 " E 7 4 . 0 0 N40 ° 1 9 ' 4 9 " E 7 4 . 0 0 N40 ° 1 9 ' 4 9 " E 7 4 . 0 0 N40 ° 1 9 ' 4 9 " E 7 4 . 0 0 N40 ° 1 9 ' 4 9 " E 7 4 . 0 0 N40 ° 1 9 ' 4 9 " E 7 4 . 0 0 N40 ° 1 9 ' 4 9 " E 7 4 . 0 0 S40 ° 1 9 ' 4 9 " W 7 4 . 0 0 S40 ° 1 9 ' 4 9 " W 7 4 . 0 0 S40 ° 1 9 ' 4 9 " W 7 4 . 0 0 S40 ° 1 9 ' 4 9 " W 7 4 . 0 0 S40 ° 1 9 ' 4 9 " W 7 4 . 0 0 S40 ° 1 9 ' 4 9 " W 7 4 . 0 0 S40 ° 1 9 ' 4 9 " W 7 4 . 0 0 S40 ° 1 9 ' 4 9 " W 7 4 . 0 0 N 4 9 ° 4 0 ' 1 1 " W 2 1 0 . 0 0 N 4 9 ° 4 0 ' 1 1 " W 2 1 0 . 0 0 S 4 9 ° 4 0 ' 1 1 " E 3 3 3 . 5 4 S 4 9 ° 4 0 ' 1 2 " E 2 1 0 . 0 0 N40 ° 1 9 ' 4 8 " E 7 4 . 0 0 S 4 9 ° 4 0 ' 1 2 " E 2 1 0 . 0 0 N40 ° 1 9 ' 4 8 " E 7 4 . 0 0 N40 ° 1 9 ' 4 8 " E 7 4 . 0 0 N40 ° 1 9 ' 4 8 " E 7 4 . 0 0 N40 ° 1 9 ' 4 8 " E 7 4 . 0 0 N40 ° 1 9 ' 4 8 " E 7 4 . 0 0 N40 ° 1 9 ' 4 8 " E 7 4 . 0 0 N40 ° 1 9 ' 4 8 " E 7 4 . 0 0 N40 ° 1 9 ' 4 8 " E 7 4 . 0 0 S 5 1 ° 1 2 ' 4 1 " E 2 1 0 . 0 0 N38 ° 4 7 ' 1 9 " E 7 4 . 0 0 N38 ° 4 7 ' 1 9 " E 7 4 . 0 0 N38 ° 4 7 ' 1 9 " E 7 4 . 0 0 N38 ° 4 7 ' 1 9 " E 7 4 . 0 0 N38 ° 4 7 ' 1 9 " E 7 4 . 0 0 N38 ° 4 7 ' 1 9 " E 7 4 . 0 0 N38 ° 4 7 ' 1 9 " E 7 4 . 0 0 N38 ° 4 7 ' 1 9 " E 7 4 . 0 0 N38 ° 4 7 ' 1 9 " E 7 4 . 0 0 S 5 1 ° 1 2 ' 4 1 " E 2 1 0 . 0 0 N2 0 ° 5 2 ' 4 7 " E 7 4 . 0 0 S69 ° 0 7 ' 1 3 " E 2 1 0 . 0 0 S69 ° 0 7 ' 1 3 " E 2 1 0 . 0 0 N2 0 ° 5 2 ' 4 7 " E 7 4 . 0 0 N2 0 ° 5 2 ' 4 7 " E 7 4 . 0 0 N2 0 ° 5 2 ' 4 7 " E 7 4 . 0 0 N2 0 ° 5 2 ' 4 7 " E 7 4 . 0 0 N2 0 ° 5 2 ' 4 7 " E 7 4 . 0 0 N2 0 ° 5 2 ' 4 7 " E 7 4 . 0 0 N2 0 ° 5 2 ' 4 7 " E 7 4 . 0 0 N2 0 ° 5 2 ' 4 7 " E 7 4 . 0 0 N6 3 ° 3 2 ' 4 5 " W 1 6 0 . 0 0 N6 3 ° 3 2 ' 4 5 " W 1 6 0 . 0 0 N2 6 ° 2 7 ' 1 5 " E 7 2 . 0 0 N2 6 ° 2 7 ' 1 5 " E 7 2 . 0 0 N2 6 ° 2 7 ' 1 5 " E 7 2 . 0 0 N2 6 ° 2 7 ' 1 5 " E 7 2 . 0 0 N2 6 ° 2 7 ' 1 5 " E 7 2 . 0 0 N2 6 ° 2 7 ' 1 5 " E 7 2 . 0 0 N2 6 ° 2 7 ' 1 5 " E 7 2 . 0 0 N 4 9 ° 4 0 ' 1 1 " W 2 1 0 . 0 0 S40 ° 1 9 ' 4 9 " W 7 4 . 0 0 N 4 9 ° 4 0 ' 1 1 " W 2 1 0 . 0 0 S40 ° 1 9 ' 4 9 " W 7 4 . 0 0 S40 ° 1 9 ' 4 9 " W 7 4 . 0 0 S40 ° 1 9 ' 4 9 " W 7 4 . 0 0 S40 ° 1 9 ' 4 9 " W 7 4 . 0 0 S40 ° 1 9 ' 4 9 " W 7 4 . 0 0 S40 ° 1 9 ' 4 9 " W 7 4 . 0 0 S40 ° 1 9 ' 4 9 " W 7 4 . 0 0 S40 ° 1 9 ' 4 9 " W 7 4 . 0 0 N39 ° 1 7 ' 4 0 " E 7 4 . 0 0 S 5 0 ° 4 2 ' 2 0 " E 2 1 0 . 0 0 S 5 0 ° 4 2 ' 2 0 " E 2 1 0 . 0 0 N39 ° 1 7 ' 4 0 " E 7 4 . 0 0 N39 ° 1 7 ' 4 0 " E 7 4 . 0 0 N39 ° 1 7 ' 4 0 " E 7 4 . 0 0 N39 ° 1 7 ' 4 0 " E 7 4 . 0 0 N39 ° 1 7 ' 4 0 " E 7 4 . 0 0 N39 ° 1 7 ' 4 0 " E 7 4 . 0 0 N39 ° 1 7 ' 4 0 " E 7 4 . 0 0 N39 ° 1 7 ' 4 0 " E 7 4 . 0 0 N2 4 ° 1 8 ' 1 9 " E 7 4 . 0 0 S65 ° 4 1 ' 4 1 " E 2 1 0 . 0 0 S65 ° 4 1 ' 4 1 " E 2 1 0 . 0 0 N2 4 ° 1 8 ' 1 9 " E 7 4 . 0 0 N2 4 ° 1 8 ' 1 9 " E 7 4 . 0 0 N2 4 ° 1 8 ' 1 9 " E 7 4 . 0 0 N2 4 ° 1 8 ' 1 9 " E 7 4 . 0 0 N2 4 ° 1 8 ' 1 9 " E 7 4 . 0 0 N2 4 ° 1 8 ' 1 9 " E 7 4 . 0 0 N2 4 ° 1 8 ' 1 9 " E 7 4 . 0 0 N2 4 ° 1 8 ' 1 9 " E 7 4 . 0 0 S 4 9 ° 4 0 ' 1 1 " E 3 2 3 . 5 4 N 4 0 ° 1 9 ' 4 9 " E 1 6 . 0 0 S 4 0 ° 1 9 ' 4 9 " W 16. 0 0 N 4 9 ° 4 0 ' 1 1 " W 2 1 9 . 3 4 N2 7 ° 5 5 ' 3 8 " E 1 6 . 0 1 R = 2 . 0 0 L = 3 . 1 4 = 9 0 ° 0 0 ' 0 0 " 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 6 5 4 3 2 1 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 O U T L O T B OU T L O T C O U T L O T D O U T L O T D OU T L O T D N 4 9 ° 4 0 ' 1 1 " W 3 3 3 . 5 4 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 11 30. 0 0 25. 0 0 25. 0 0 25. 0 0 25. 0 0 25. 0 0 25. 0 0 30. 0 0 30. 0 0 25. 0 0 25. 0 0 25. 0 0 25. 0 0 30. 0 0 30. 0 0 25. 0 0 25. 0 0 25. 0 0 25. 0 0 30. 0 0 30. 0 0 25. 0 0 25. 0 0 25. 0 0 25. 0 0 25. 0 0 25. 0 0 30. 0 0 3 0 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 3 0 . 0 0 3 0 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 3 0 . 0 0 30.0 0 25.0 0 25.0 0 25.0 0 25.0 0 25.0 0 25.0 0 30.0 0 30.0 0 25.0 0 25.0 0 25.0 0 25.0 0 25.0 0 25.0 0 30.0 0 3 0 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 3 0 . 0 0 3 0 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 3 0 . 0 0 3 0 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 3 0 . 0 0 3 0 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 3 0 . 0 0 30. 0 0 25. 0 0 25. 0 0 25. 0 0 25. 0 0 30. 0 0 30. 0 0 25. 0 0 25. 0 0 25. 0 0 25. 0 0 30. 0 0 3 0 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 3 0 . 0 0 3 0 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 3 0 . 0 0 3 0 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 3 0 . 0 0 3 0 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 3 0 . 0 0 30. 0 0 25. 0 0 25. 0 0 25. 0 0 25. 0 0 25. 0 0 25. 0 0 30. 0 0 30. 0 0 25. 0 0 25. 0 0 25. 0 0 25. 0 0 25. 0 0 25. 0 0 30. 0 0 3 0 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 3 0 . 0 0 3 0 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 3 0 . 0 0 10 L= 3 0 . 0 2 =0° 4 7 ' 2 7 " L = 14 5.4 8 Δ = 3°4 9'5 7" R = 2 4 . 0 0 L = 3 7 . 7 0 = 9 0 ° 0 0 ' 0 0 " C . B r g = N 8 5 ° 1 9 ' 4 9 " E C . = 3 3 . 9 4 O U T L O T E OU T L O T F S89°30'31"E 74.23 N1 6 ° 2 6 ' 1 4 " E 39 . 5 1 N 4 9 ° 4 0 ' 1 1 " W 7 1 . 1 4 S 0 2 ° 4 9 ' 1 9 " E 2 1 . 9 3 N2 9 ° 0 1 ' 1 4 " E 10 . 2 0 S02 ° 4 9 ' 1 9 " E 2 1 . 9 3 R =1 4 .00 L =2 1.99 Δ =9 0 °0 0'0 0" R=14.00 L=21.99 =90°00'00" N 2 2 ° 5 9 ' 0 2 " E 1 6 . 7 6 N 5 7 ° 4 1 ' 0 4 " E 1 6 . 7 6 S 4 9 ° 4 0 ' 1 1 " E 1 0 . 0 0 S 5 0 ° 3 4 ' 0 9 " E 9. 7 9 S 4 8 ° 2 9 ' 4 3 " E 1 2 . 9 5 S6 1 ° 3 0 ' 1 2 " E 28. 5 3 S70°11'02"E 25.84S6 5 ° 0 4 ' 1 4 " E 1 3 . 7 7 N 4 9 ° 4 0 ' 1 1 " W 2 9 . 0 7 S 5 4 ° 3 9 ' 4 1 " E 2 5 . 9 2 OFFICIAL PLAT AMBER FIELDS TWENTY SECOND ADDITION SI T E Page 214 of 218 S 4 9 ° 4 0 ' 1 2 " E 3 0 . 0 0 S 4 9 ° 4 0 ' 1 2 " E 3 0 . 0 0 S 5 1 ° 1 2 ' 4 1 " E 3 0 . 0 0 S 5 1 ° 1 2 ' 4 1 " E 3 0 . 0 0 N40 ° 1 9 ' 4 8 " E 7 4 . 0 0 N38 ° 4 7 ' 1 9 " E 7 4 . 0 0 28 1 3 OU T L O T C S69° 0 7 ' 1 3 " E 30.0 0 N2 0 ° 5 2 ' 4 7 " E 7 4 . 0 0 8 1 OU T L O T C N 4 9 ° 4 0 ' 1 1 " W 3 0 . 0 0 N 4 9 ° 4 0 ' 1 1 " W 3 0 . 0 0 N 4 9 ° 4 0 ' 1 1 " W 3 0 . 0 0 N 4 9 ° 4 0 ' 1 1 " W 3 0 . 0 0 S40 ° 1 9 ' 4 9 " W 7 4 . 0 0 S40 ° 1 9 ' 4 9 " W 7 4 . 0 0 11 8 10OU T L O T B 1 N6 3 ° 3 2 ' 4 5 " W 30. 0 0 N2 6 ° 2 7 ' 1 5 " E 7 2 . 0 0 9 6 OU T L O T B S 5 0 ° 4 2 ' 2 0 " E 3 0 . 0 0 S65 ° 4 1 ' 4 1 " E 30. 0 0 N39 ° 1 7 ' 4 0 " E 7 4 . 0 0 N2 4 ° 1 8 ' 1 9 " E 7 4 . 0 0 7 8 8 1 OU T L O T B S65 ° 4 1 ' 4 1 " E 30. 0 0 S65 ° 4 1 ' 4 1 " E 30. 0 0 N2 4 ° 1 8 ' 1 9 " E 7 4 . 0 0 8 8 OU T L O T B OFFICIAL PLAT AMBER FIELDS TWENTY SECOND ADDITION DETAILS Page 215 of 218 M E M O R A N D U M To: Adam Kienberger, Community Development Director Anthony Nemcek, Senior Planner Julia Hogan, Planner From: Dan Schultz, Parks and Recreation Director Date: January 17, 2024 Subject: Amber Field 13th and 14th Additions The Parks and Recreation Department recently reviewed the plans for the Amber Fields 13th and 14th Additions. After reviewing the plans, the Parks and Recreation Department staff has the following comments: Parks Dedication The parks dedication for the 13th and 14th additions will be met through developer installed improvements as outlined in the subdivision agreement. Please let me know if you have any questions about this memo. Page 216 of 218 Page 217 of 218 Page 218 of 218