HomeMy WebLinkAbout20250318 CC RM Packet
AGENDA
City Council Regular Meeting
Tuesday, March 18, 2025
7:00 PM
Council Chambers
1. CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
3. PRESENTATIONS, PROCLAMATIONS AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
a. Dakota County Presentation
b. Proclamation of Support – Monarch Butterfly Habitat Restoration
4. RESPONSE TO PUBLIC COMMENT
5. PUBLIC COMMENT
Individuals will be allowed to address the Council on subjects that are not a part of the meeting agenda.
Typically, replies to the concerns expressed will be made via letter or phone call within a week or at the
following council meeting.
6. CONSENT AGENDA
a. Bill Listings
b. Minutes of the March 4, 2025 Regular Meeting Minutes
c. Minutes of the March 4, 2025 Work Session Proceedings
d. Donation Acceptance for Officer Wellness Programming
e. Donation Acceptance from Minnesota Energy Resources
f. Donation Acceptance for K-9 program
g. Donation Acceptance from First State Bank of Rosemount
h. Declaration of Surplus Property - Fire Department
i. Liquor License Amendment - OMNI Orchard LLC
j. Temporary On-Sale Liquor License - VFW
k. Authorize Creation of Recreation Program Assistant
l. City of Rosemount and Dakota County CDA LAHA Agreement
m. Request by Danner, Inc. for renewal of its Small Scale Mineral Extraction Permit for
2025
n. Award Contract - Municipal Well No. 17 - Phase II
Page 1 of 142
7. PUBLIC HEARINGS
8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
9. NEW BUSINESS
a. Request by Riveter Real Estate LLC for a Major Amendment to the Omni Orchards
Farm Winery PUD Agreement.
b. Accept Bids, Award Contract, Declare Costs to be Assessed and Set the Assessment
Hearing for the 2025 Street Improvement Project
10. ANNOUNCEMENTS
a. City Staff Updates
b. Upcoming Community Calendar
11. ADJOURNMENT
Page 2 of 142
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
City Council Regular Meeting: March 18, 2025
AGENDA ITEM: Dakota County Presentation AGENDA SECTION:
PRESENTATIONS,
PROCLAMATIONS AND
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
PREPARED BY: Logan Martin, City Administrator AGENDA NO. 3.a.
ATTACHMENTS: APPROVED BY: LJM
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Presentation only.
BACKGROUND
Dakota County Commissioners Droste and Hamann-Roland will be present to provide an update on
current priorities and projects at the County.
RECOMMENDATION
Presentation only.
Page 3 of 142
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
City Council Regular Meeting: March 18, 2025
AGENDA ITEM: Proclamation of Support – Monarch Butterfly
Habitat Restoration
AGENDA SECTION:
PRESENTATIONS,
PROCLAMATIONS AND
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
PREPARED BY: Dan Schultz, Parks & Recreation Director AGENDA NO. 3.b.
ATTACHMENTS: Proclamation Monarch Bufferfly Habitat
Restoration
APPROVED BY: LJM
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to adopt a proclamation supporting the restoration of monarch
butterfly habitat and for Mayor Weisensel to submit the online Mayor’s Monarch Pledge.
BACKGROUND
Mayors and other heads of local and tribal government are taking action to help save the monarch
butterfly, an iconic species whose eastern populations have declined by 90% and western populations
by 99% in recent years. Through the National Wildlife Federation's Mayors' Monarch Pledge, U.S. cities,
municipalities, and other communities are committing to create habitat for the monarch butterfly and
pollinators, and to educate residents about how they can make a difference at home and in their
community.
The Mayors’ Monarch Pledge program launched in 2015 to engage cities and communities in monarch
and pollinator conservation. Between 2015 and 2020, the program welcomed over 600 mayors and
heads of local and tribal government who engaged 6 million people and restored more than 6,500
acres of monarch habitat.
Attached is a proclamation supporting the restoration of monarch butterfly habitat.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff is recommending the City Council adopt a proclamation supporting the restoration of monarch
butterfly habitat and for Mayor Weisensel to submit the online Mayor’s Monarch Pledge.
Page 4 of 142
PROCLAMATION
Whereas, the monarch butterfly is an iconic North American species whose
multigenerational migration and metamorphosis from caterpillar to butterfly has
captured the imagination of millions of Americans; and
Whereas, we are deeply concerned about the decline of the monarch butterfly population.
Both the western and eastern monarch populations have experienced significant
declines. Less than one percent of the western monarch population remains,
while the eastern population has fallen by as much as ninety percent. Monarch
scientists attribute the population decline to degradation and loss of summer
breeding habitat in the U.S., and loss of winter habitat in south-central Mexico
and coastal California; and
Whereas, cities, towns, counties, and communities have a critical role to play to help save
the monarch butterfly. Municipalities can provide habitat at public parks,
median strips, community gardens, schools, and municipal buildings like
recreation centers and libraries. Events such as community workshops, native
plant giveaways, and monarch festivals, can educate residents about the cultural
significance of monarchs and how to create habitat. Simple changes in
landscaping ordinances or other policies can make a big difference for the
monarch too; and
Whereas, we recognize the importance of creating monarch and pollinator habitat at parks,
gardens, and other green spaces, that every member of our community can
equally enjoy. Our work to help save the monarch butterfly intentionally
engages all parts of our communities, ensuring that historically marginalized
communities are not left out of the work or the many benefits this work will
create; and
Now, Therefore, I, Jeffery D. Weisensel, Mayor of Rosemount Minnesota, we hereby commit to
help restore habitat for the monarch and encourage our residents to do the same,
so that these magnificent butterflies will once again flourish across the
continent.
Dated this 18th day of March, 2025.
Mayor ________________________________________________
Page 5 of 142
Page 6 of 142
Page 7 of 142
Page 8 of 142
Page 9 of 142
Page 10 of 142
Page 11 of 142
Page 12 of 142
Page 13 of 142
Page 14 of 142
Page 15 of 142
Page 16 of 142
Page 17 of 142
Page 18 of 142
Page 19 of 142
Page 20 of 142
Page 21 of 142
Page 22 of 142
Page 23 of 142
Page 24 of 142
Page 25 of 142
Page 26 of 142
Page 27 of 142
ROSEMOUNT CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING PROCEEDINGS
MARCH 4, 2025
CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the Rosemount City Council was
held on Tuesday, March 4, 2025, at 7:00 PM. in Rosemount Council Chambers, 2875 145th
Street West.
Mayor Weisensel called the meeting to order with Councilmembers Freske, Essler, Theisen and
Klimpel.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Motion by Weisensel
Motion to approve the agenda.
Ayes: 5.
Nays: None. Motion carried.
PRESENTATIONS, PROCLAMATIONS AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
a. Minnesota Valley Transit Authority Presentation
City Administrator Martin introduced Minnesota Valley Transit Authority (MVTA) Chief Executive Officer
Luther Wynder. Mr. Wynder provided an update on MVTA's recent activities and discussed their current
priorities.
Councilmember Freske questioned whether direct service from Rosemount to Minneapolis and St. Paul
will occur in the future and MVTA discussed these routes are a priority for MVTA.
RESPONSE TO PUBLIC COMMENT
None.
PUBLIC COMMENT
None.
CONSENT AGENDA
Motion by Theisen Second by Essler
Motion to approve consent agenda
Ayes: 5.
Nays: None. Motion Carried.
a. Bill Listings
Page 28 of 142
b. Minutes of the February 18, 2025 Regular Meeting Minutes
c. Joint Powers Agreement with State of Minnesota
d. Authorize Creation of the Deputy PW Director
e. Ball Field Use Agreement - ISD #917
f. Items Related to Rosecott Place Apartments Development
g. Amber Fields 6 Subdivision Agreement
PUBLIC HEARINGS
None.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None.
NEW BUSINESS
a. Request by Magellan Land Development for approval of rezoning land from A-2 -
Agricultural to R-2 - Low to Medium Density Residential, and a Preliminary Plat to
develop 58 townhome units.
Planner, Julia Hogan, presented the requests by Magellan Land Development for rezoning and
preliminary plat approval to develop 58 townhome units on a 10-acre property east of Akron Avenue
and north of Bonaire Path that will be called Akron Ridge. The property is currently zoned A-2 –
Agricultural, and the applicant is requesting that the site be rezoned to R-2 – Low to Medium Density
Residential to accommodate the townhome development. The site is shown to have a total of 12
townhome buildings, with 5 of the buildings containing 6 units per building, and the remaining 7
buildings will contain 4 units per building.
The site will be accessed by a single public street that extends east and south off of Akron Avenue. The
first phase of development will consist of the public access road, main private road, both stormwater
ponding areas and 30 townhome units. The second phase will be the remaining 28 townhome units and
the three private drive areas. The Parks and Recreation Department also reviewed the plans for this
project and is recommending that an 8-foot-wide trail be benched in on the west side of the
development along Akron Avenue.
Staff and the Planning Commission are recommending approval of the rezoning and preliminary plat
requests, subject to the conditions listed in the resolution.
Councilmember Essler questioned the reasoning for the Planning Commission to defer the action at the
January 28th meeting to February 25th. Ms. Hogan confirmed the main concern was pedestrian access.
The applicant has since reached out to Dakota County and Flint Hills to address these concerns for
possible pedestrian access. Flint Hills would have to do further research noting that due to pipelines in
the area a pedestrian path may be challenging and Dakota County is working with City staff to address
trail access concerns on Akron Avenue.
Page 29 of 142
Councilmember Klimpel questioned the property owner to the south having concerns about
trespassers. The applicant intends to include HOA covenants as an acknowledgment that the property
to the south is private and trespassing is not allowed.
Jason Palmby
Magellan Land Development
Mr. Palmby, developer for Magellan Land Development, confirmed he had several discussions with Flint
Hills and Dakota County regarding safety pedestrian access. The timeline for the project will be to start
mid-June and finish in August for the first phase. The second phase will begin the following year.
Mayor Weisensel opened the floor for public comment at 7:40 p.m. and reiterated that the City Council
has read and heard all the comments received to date and if any additional comments have not been
expressed that they should come forward to state them at this time.
Motion by Essler Second by Freske
Motion to adopt an Ordinance amending Ordinance B City of Rosemount Zoning Ordinance
to change the zoning of the site from A-2 – Agricultural to R-2 – Low to Medium Density
Residential
Ayes: 5.
Nays: None. Motion Carried.
Motion by Theisen Second by Klimpel
Motion to adopt a resolution approving the Preliminary Plat for Akron Ridge, subject to
conditions.
Ayes: 5.
Nays: None. Motion Carried.
b. Adoption of City Council Goals and Strategic Directions
City Administrator Martin presented an overview of the outcome of City Council and staff's special work
session on January 30 to discuss the current 5-year Strategic Plan for the City and short-term goals /
initiatives for '25/'26. By adopting these goals, it allows us to communicate the city's vision. City
Administrator Martin highlighted each department's notables.
Motion by Essler Second by Klimpel
Motion to adopt the City Council's Goals and Strategic Directions, as presented.
Ayes: 5.
Nays: None. Motion Carried.
ANNOUNCEMENTS
a. City Staff Updates
City Administrator Martin highlighted currently recruiting for Firefighters, Rosemount Expo is on April
5th and Guns and Hoses Hockey game is also on April 5th.
b. Upcoming Community Calendar
Mayor Weisensel reviewed the calendar of events and upcoming meetings.
Page 30 of 142
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the City Council at the regular council meeting
and upon a motion by Weisensel and a second by Essler the meeting was adjourned at 8:03
p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Erin Fasbender
City Clerk
Page 31 of 142
ROSEMOUNT CITY COUNCIL
WORK SESSION PROCEEDINGS
MARCH 4, 2025
CALL TO ORDER
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a work session of the Rosemount City Council was held
on Tuesday, March 4, 2025, at 4:30 PM. in Rosemount Council Chambers, 2875 145th Street
West.
Mayor Weisensel called the meeting to order with Councilmembers Freske, Essler and Klimpel.
Councilmember Theisen arrived at 5:30 p.m.
a. FOLLOWING THE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING:
The Council may choose to reconvene the work session after the adjournment of the
regular meeting if the business of the work session is unable to be completed in the
allotted time.
DISCUSSION
a. Commissioner Interviews (4:30-6:00 p.m.)
City Councilmembers conducted interviews for residents who are interested in serving on a City
Commission. The remaining interviews will be held on March 18th.
UPDATES
a. Staff Reports
Parks and Recreation Department Update
Parks & Recreation Director Schultz provided the latest update on the ice needs study for Rosemount.
In addition, Mr. Schultz provided an update on a future Burnsville Ice Project which could include a
partnership to allow for ice time for Rosemount. City Councilmembers agreed additional information
needs to be provided before a decision can be made and staff should continue to do their due diligence
in determining Rosemount's needs.
Community Development Update
Community Development Director Kienberger presented a parcel that the owner would like to donate
to the City on Bonaire Path/Hwy 3. Councilmembers agreed that there is no municipal need for the
parcel unless staff determines the parcel would be needed for future needs for any updates to that
intersection.
Mr. Kienberger provided an update to the old Speedway building and noted staff is waiting to hear the
results of the appraisal. Once the appraisal is completed, staff will inform the City Council of the results
and determine the next steps.
Page 32 of 142
Council Updates
Councilmember Klimpel and Mayor Weisensel discussed their recent League of MN Cities training in
Plymouth. Mayor Weisensel mentioned staff and City Council should implement a code of conduct for
the City Council.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the City Council at the regular council meeting
and upon a motion by Weisensel the meeting was adjourned at 6:50 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Erin Fasbender
City Clerk
Page 33 of 142
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
City Council Regular Meeting: March 18, 2025
AGENDA ITEM: Donation Acceptance for Officer Wellness
Programming
AGENDA SECTION:
CONSENT AGENDA
PREPARED BY: Mikael Dahlstrom, Police Chief AGENDA NO. 6.d.
ATTACHMENTS: Resolution APPROVED BY: LJM
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to approve the acceptance and expenditure of $2000 from an
anonymous resident to be used for officer wellness programs or equipment.
BACKGROUND
A Rosemount resident, who wished to be anonymous, was recently the victim of a fraudulent scam
that initially cost him nearly twenty-five thousand dollars.
Detective Casey Murphy of the police department assisted him with the investigation. Following a
series of search warrants and seizure orders, Detective Murphy was able to freeze several fraudulent
accounts from out of the state and retrieve nearly thirteen thousand dollars back for the victim.
In a recent meeting with Chief Dahlstrom, the donor explained his appreciation for Detective Murphy
and his desire to assist Rosemount officers as a sign of gratitude. The donor wishes to assist with
officer wellness programming and equipment.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff is recommending that the City Council approve the acceptance and expenditure of the donation
to the police department.
Page 34 of 142
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A DONATION TO THE CITY
WHEREAS, the City of Rosemount is generally authorized to accept donations of real and personal
property pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 465.03 et seq. for the benefit of its citizens and is
specifically authorized to accept gifts;
WHEREAS, the following persons and entities have offered to contribute the cash amounts set
forth below to the city:
Name of Donor Amount
Anonymous $2,000
WHEREAS, the terms or conditions of the donations, if any, are as follows:
To help with the purchase of officer wellness programming and equipment.
WHEREAS, all such donations have been contributed to the city for the benefit of its citizens, as
allowed by law; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that it is appropriate to accept the donations offered.
THEREFORE, NOW BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rosemount as
follows:
1. The donations described above are accepted and shall be used to establish and/or operate
services either alone or in cooperation with others, as allowed by law.
2. The city clerk is hereby directed to issue receipts to each donor acknowledging the city’s
receipt of the donor’s donation.
ADOPTED this 18th day of March, by the City Council of the City of Rosemount.
______________________________
Jeffery D. Weisensel, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________________
Erin Fasbender, City Clerk
Page 35 of 142
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
City Council Regular Meeting: March 18, 2025
AGENDA ITEM: Donation Acceptance from Minnesota Energy
Resources
AGENDA SECTION:
CONSENT AGENDA
PREPARED BY: Michelle Rambo, Office Specialist AGENDA NO. 6.e.
ATTACHMENTS: Resolution APPROVED BY: LJM
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to approve the acceptance and expenditure of $500 from Minnesota
Energy Resources to be used for Safety Camp.
BACKGROUND
The Parks and Recreation department received a donation from Minnesota Energy Resources of
$500.The donation will be used for Safety Camp programming costs.
RECOMMENDATION
Motion to approve the acceptance and expenditure of $500 from Minnesota Energy Resources to be
used for Safety Camp.
Page 36 of 142
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2025- XX
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A DONATION TO THE CITY
WHEREAS, the City of Rosemount is generally authorized to accept donations of real and personal
property pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 465.03 et seq. for the benefit of its citizens and is
specifically authorized to accept gifts;
WHEREAS, the following persons and entities have offered to contribute the cash amounts set
forth below to the city:
Minnesota Energy Resources $500.00
WHEREAS, the terms or conditions of the donations, if any, are as follows:
Parks & Recreation: Safety Camp – speaker presentations, t-shirts, lunch and miscellaneous
programming costs.
WHEREAS, all such donations have been contributed to the city for the benefit of its citizens, as
allowed by law; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that it is appropriate to accept the donations offered.
THEREFORE, NOW BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rosemount as
follows:
1. The donations described above are accepted and shall be used to establish and/or operate
services either alone or in cooperation with others, as allowed by law.
2. The city clerk is hereby directed to issue receipts to each donor acknowledging the city’s
receipt of the donor’s donation.
ADOPTED this ___ day of ____, ____, by the City Council of the City of Rosemount.
______________________________
Jeffery D. Weisensel, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________________Erin Fasbender, City Clerk
Page 37 of 142
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
City Council Regular Meeting: March 18, 2025
AGENDA ITEM: Donation Acceptance for K-9 program AGENDA SECTION:
CONSENT AGENDA
PREPARED BY: Mikael Dahlstrom, Police Chief AGENDA NO. 6.f.
ATTACHMENTS: Resolution APPROVED BY: LJM
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to approve the acceptance and expenditure of $10,000 from an
anonymous Rosemount resident to be used for the K-9 program.
BACKGROUND
A donor, who wished to be anonymous, contacted the police department to donate $10,000 to the
police department to help with costs associated with the start of the K-9 program. The local resident
has been a strong supporter of our department in the past, and in a recent meeting with Chief
Dahlstrom, she explained she wanted the money to assist with the purchase of the K-9 and any
associated training costs.
Department staff are very excited to launch the first ever Rosemount K-9 program in the near future!
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the donation and expenditure to the police
department.
Page 38 of 142
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A DONATION TO THE CITY
WHEREAS, the City of Rosemount is generally authorized to accept donations of real and personal
property pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 465.03 et seq. for the benefit of its citizens and is
specifically authorized to accept gifts;
WHEREAS, the following persons and entities have offered to contribute the cash amounts set
forth below to the city:
Name of Donor Amount
Anonymous $10,000
WHEREAS, the terms or conditions of the donations, if any, are as follows:
To help with the purchase of a K9 and associated training costs.
WHEREAS, all such donations have been contributed to the city for the benefit of its citizens, as
allowed by law; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that it is appropriate to accept the donations offered.
THEREFORE, NOW BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rosemount as
follows:
1. The donations described above are accepted and shall be used to establish and/or operate
services either alone or in cooperation with others, as allowed by law.
2. The city clerk is hereby directed to issue receipts to each donor acknowledging the city’s
receipt of the donor’s donation.
ADOPTED this 18th day of March, by the City Council of the City of Rosemount.
______________________________
Jeffery D. Weisensel, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________________
Erin Fasbender, City Clerk
Page 39 of 142
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
City Council Regular Meeting: March 18, 2025
AGENDA ITEM: Donation Acceptance from First State Bank of
Rosemount
AGENDA SECTION:
CONSENT AGENDA
PREPARED BY: Michelle Rambo, Office Specialist AGENDA NO. 6.g.
ATTACHMENTS: Resolution APPROVED BY: LJM
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to approve the acceptance and expenditure of $1000 dollars from
First State Bank to be used for Safety Camp.
BACKGROUND
The Parks and Recreation Department received a donation from First State Bank of $1000. The
donation will be used for Safety Camp programming costs.
RECOMMENDATION
Motion to approve the acceptance and expenditure of $1000 dollars from First State Bank to be used
for Safety Camp programming costs.
Page 40 of 142
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2025 - XX
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A DONATION TO THE CITY
WHEREAS, the City of Rosemount is generally authorized to accept donations of real and personal
property pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 465.03 et seq. for the benefit of its citizens and is
specifically authorized to accept gifts;
WHEREAS, the following persons and entities have offered to contribute the cash amounts set
forth below to the city:
First State Bank of Rosemount $1000.00
WHEREAS, the terms or conditions of the donations, if any, are as follows:
Parks & Recreation: Safety Camp – speaker presentations, t-shirts, lunch and miscellaneous
programming costs.
WHEREAS, all such donations have been contributed to the city for the benefit of its citizens, as
allowed by law; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that it is appropriate to accept the donations offered.
THEREFORE, NOW BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rosemount as
follows:
1. The donations described above are accepted and shall be used to establish and/or operate
services either alone or in cooperation with others, as allowed by law.
2. The city clerk is hereby directed to issue receipts to each donor acknowledging the city’s
receipt of the donor’s donation.
ADOPTED this ___ day of ____, ____, by the City Council of the City of Rosemount.
______________________________
Jeffery D. Weisensel, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________________Erin Fasbender, City Clerk
Page 41 of 142
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
City Council Regular Meeting: March 18, 2025
AGENDA ITEM: Declaration of Surplus Property - Fire Department AGENDA SECTION:
CONSENT AGENDA
PREPARED BY: Kip Springer, Fire Chief AGENDA NO. 6.h.
ATTACHMENTS: Fixed asset list - Fire gear APPROVED BY: LJM
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to declare the items on the fixed asset list as surplus property and
for staff to appropriately dispose of the items
BACKGROUND
National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Standards require fire departments to develop criteria for
removing protective clothing from service. Chapter 10.1.1 states that the retirement criteria should be
based on factors such as overall condition, specific deterioration of materials or components, and age.
Chapter 10.1.2 adds, “structural firefighting ensembles shall be retired no more than ten years from
the date of manufacture.” The items listed are expired and have been removed from service. These
items are no longer used for structural firefighting and are declared to have no value to the
organization.
This declaration will authorize staff to donate listed items to the Minnesota Fire Exploring Association
(MN-FEA). MN-FEA, a 501(c)3 non-profit organization, was founded in 2008 and exists to bring
together Fire Exploring Posts from around the State of Minnesota and region to promote the fire
service among young men and women.The Learning for Life Program, which is affiliated with the Boy
Scouts of America, and local fire departments team up to enlist males and females between the ages of
14 and 21 to educate and train our future firefighters to give them an edge in the fire service
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends declaring the the attached list of equipment as surplus property for donation to the
Minnesota Fire Exploring Association
Page 42 of 142
RFD Expired Department Turnout Pants
Serial Number Manufactured Year Waist Inseam
1502095361 2015 42 36
1310001699 2014 38 42
1310001697 2014 42 32
1310001698 2014 44 32
1933252 2006 46R
5168112 2011 42R
5583692 2012 40R
5583712 2012 42L
5197552 2011 42L
1503006516 2015 42 34
1402000419 2014 42 32
2864472 2007 40L
5583682 2012 36R
6100792 2013 38R
6320242 2013 46L
5784052 2012 36R
1410001946 2014 50 34
5168122 2011 46R
3135652 2008 44XL
1402000416 2014 50 35
1402000415 2014 42 34
5002532 2011 40L
1550462 2006 36R
1305010251 2013 40 32
1402000417 2014 46 29
5960812 2012 44XL
Turnout Jacket
Serial Number Date Arms
2987891 2007 4632L
6087421 2013 4432R
6156601 2011 4832L
1402000411 2014 5232
5000841 2011 3632R
1402000413 2014 5235
5575801 2012 4432R
1402000410 2014 4833
5575781 2012 4232R
5575791 2012 4432R
6166581 2011 4632R
5575821 2012 4832R
5875811 2012 4632R
5510441 2012 4232R
6309971 2013 5232L
Page 43 of 142
5955931 2012 4632XL
1310001696 2014 4430
5157491 2011 4432R
5196641 2011 4632L
5196651 2011 5032L
5775681 2012 4432R
1402000414 2014 4630
7315251 1997 4429R
1410001945 2014 5034
1502095295 2015 5031
1305010250 2013 4431
1402000412 2014 4829
1310001695 2014 4831
Expired Bottles/Packs/Helmets/Masks
Expired Bottles Expired Packs Expired Helmets Suvive Air (Mask)
Bottle #City Asset #Pack #Helmet Date of ManufacturerMask Size Quantity
112 1605 418 Yellow 1995 Medium 29
128 1612 439 1996 Small 1
156 1591 12 1996
159 39 1997
160 1596 37 2005
163 1613 440 2008
164 1609 425 2008
165 1604 416 2009
167 1595 317 2010
168 1598 395 2010
170 2012
172 2014
173 2014
174 2015
180
182 Red 2002
184
185 White 1983
187
190
191
194
195
198
199
200
201
202
203
Page 44 of 142
204
206
207
208
209
210
213
227
228
243
408
409
434
Page 45 of 142
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
City Council Regular Meeting: March 18, 2025
AGENDA ITEM: Liquor License Amendment - OMNI Orchard LLC AGENDA SECTION:
CONSENT AGENDA
PREPARED BY: Erin Fasbender, City Clerk AGENDA NO. 6.i.
ATTACHMENTS: Resolution APPROVED BY: LJM
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to adopt a resolution approving an amendment to OMNI Orchard
LLC On Sale Liquor and Sunday License
BACKGROUND
The current owners of OMNI Orchard LLC are requesting an amendment to their current liquor license.
The request is soley to change the owners names listed on the liquor license. The new names listed on
the liquor application are Megan Ward and Allana Walsh. The new owners have finalized an agreement
on the ownership change and the previous owners listed on the liquor license, Justin Walsh and
Zachary Ward, have approved the transfer of ownership.
City Code requires council approval in the event of a change of ownership of a licensed liquor
establishment. The police department conducted the necessary background checks and found no
reason to deny the amendment to the license.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the above-stated motion.
Page 46 of 142
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2025-XX
A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AMENDMENT
TO THE ON-SALE LIQUOR LICENSE AND SPECIAL SUNDAY LIQUOR LICENSE
FOR OMNI ORCHARD LLC DBA OMNI WINERY & TAPROOM
WHEREAS, OMNI Orchard LLC has submitted a request to amend OMNI Orchard LLC On-
Sale Liquor License and Special Sunday Liquor License for the premise located 15701 Biscayne Ave;
WHEREAS, the request is to transfer the license ownership from Zachary Ward and Justin Walsh
to Megan Ward and Allana Walsh;
WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted all necessary documentation and payment for the Liquor
License Amendment;
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby approves this amendment to
said license.
ADOPTED this 18th day of March, 2025, by the City Council of the City of Rosemount.
Jeffery D. Weisensel, Mayor
ATTEST:
Erin Fasbender, City Clerk
Page 47 of 142
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
City Council Regular Meeting: March 18, 2025
AGENDA ITEM: Temporary On-Sale Liquor License - VFW AGENDA SECTION:
CONSENT AGENDA
PREPARED BY: Erin Fasbender, City Clerk AGENDA NO. 6.j.
ATTACHMENTS: APPROVED BY: LJM
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to approve a Temporary On-Sale Liquor License for VFW 9433 DBA
Rosemount VFW Post to hold a special event on May 3, 2025 at 2625 120th St West subject to
conditions within the staff report
BACKGROUND
The Rosemount VFW Post has submitted a request for a Temporary On-Sale Liquor License at 2625
120th St West. The purpose of the request is to hold an outdoor event in their parking lot for a
benefit.
Staff recommends approval of the temporary license as requested. The approvals are subject to the
following conditions:
• The parking lot area where liquor will be served and consumed fenced in a manner consistent
with prior years and approved by the Rosemount Chief of Police.
• Access points to the fenced area are staffed by the American Legion to control entry/exit.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Council approve the request for a temporary on-sale liquor license.
Page 48 of 142
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
City Council Regular Meeting: March 18, 2025
AGENDA ITEM: Authorize Creation of Recreation Program
Assistant Position
AGENDA SECTION:
CONSENT AGENDA
PREPARED BY: Dan Schultz, Parks & Recreation Director AGENDA NO. 6.k.
ATTACHMENTS: Recreation Program Assistant APPROVED BY: LJM
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to recommend the approval the job description and salary range for
the Recreation Program Assistant position.
BACKGROUND
As discussed during the 2025 Budget process, staff recommends the creation of a Recreation Program
Assistant position in the Parks and Recreation Department. With the continued expansion of senior
adult programs at the Steeple Center, the department requires additional assistance with onsite
programs and events and offsite tours and trips.
A position analysis of the part - time Recreation Program Assistant was completed utilizing the SAFE
Evaluation System to determine pointing, compensation, and grade placement. It is recommended that
the position be placed at Grade 3 ($21.001 – $26.278 per hour) and assigned 85 points based on the
nature, scope of the position, other position responsibilities within the City, and pay equity data. The
draft job description is attached. This position was included in the 2025 budget.
Once approved, staff intends to move forward with recruiting and filling this position this spring. This
position will work 5 – 20 hours per week depending on scheduled activities.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council approve the job description and salary range for the Recreation
Program Assistant position.
Page 49 of 142
City of Rosemount, Minnesota
Job Description
Baker Tilly’s SAFE® System November 2021 Page | 1
Title: Recreation Program Assistant FLSA Status: Non-Exempt
Department Park & Recreation Updated: 1/1/2025
Division: N/A
General Summary
The Recreation Program Assistant is responsible for assisting and implementing a variety of recreation
programs. This position will help with senior adult programs and other special events at the Steeple
Center, chaperone field trips and tours, lead recreation classes and assist in the planning of recreatio n
activities and programming for the City of Rosemount.
Essential Functions
• Assist in the coordination, planning, and day to day implementation of recreation programs.
• Establish a friendly, positive rapport with the program participants.
• Serve as on-site lead for recreation programs, field trips, tours and events.
• Communicate with supervisory staff to keep them informed of any concerns or issues related to staff,
participants, community individuals and facility matters.
• Assist in program specific tasks including, but not limited to supply acquisition, email correspondence,
reporting, and use evaluation.
• Have a good understanding of equipment needed for scheduled programs and assure supplies are
organized and ready as needed.
• Administer basic first aid or contact appropriate person(s) for situations requiring more support or aid.
• May provide work direction to other seasonal/temporary staff, volunteers, and participants on behalf
of supervisory staff.
• Recommend needs for program adjustments to increase or maintain levels of participation.
• Other duties as assigned.
Knowledge/Skills/Abilities
• Ability to work independently and in a team setting
• Ability to communicate effectively with participants.
Minimum Qualifications
• High School diploma or GED equivalent
• 18 year of age or older
• Valid Driver’s License
Desirable Qualifications
• CPR and/or other First Aid Training Certifications
Page 50 of 142
City of Rosemount, Minnesota
Job Description
Baker Tilly’s SAFE® System November 2021 Page | 2
• Experience working with or volunteering with seniors
• Experience in a recreation program setting
• Experience working with Microsoft systems.
Working Conditions
Physical Requirements and Activity
This work requires regular exertion of up to 10 pounds of force and frequent exertion of up to 30 pounds of
force; work regularly requires speaking or hearing and using hands to finger, handle or feel, frequently
requires sitting, standing and walking and occasionally requires stooping, kneeling, crouching or crawling,
reaching with hands and arms and repetitive motions.
Sensory Requirements
Work requires close vision, distance vision, ability to adjust focus, depth perception and color perception;
vocal communication is required for expressing or exchanging ideas by means of the spoken word and
conveying detailed or important instructions to o thers accurately, loudly or quickly; hearing is required to
perceive information at normal spoken word levels and to receive detailed information through oral
communications and/or to make fine distinctions in sound.
Sensory Utilization
Work requires preparing and analyzing written or computer data, operating motor vehicles or equipment
and observing general surroundings and activities.
Environmental Conditions
Work occasionally requires exposure to outdoor weather conditions; work is generally in a moderately noisy
location (e.g. business office, light traffic).
The statements in this class description are intended to describe the general nature and level of work being performed
by incumbent(s) assigned to this classification. They are not intended to be construed as an exhaustive list of all
responsibilities, duties, and skills required of personnel so classified . To perform this job successfully, an individual
must be able to perform each essential function satisfactorily. Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable an
individual with disabilities to perform the essential functions.
Page 51 of 142
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
City Council Regular Meeting: March 18, 2025
AGENDA ITEM: City of Rosemount and Dakota County Community
Development Agency (CDA) Local Affordable
Housing Aid (LAHA) Agreement
AGENDA SECTION:
CONSENT AGENDA
PREPARED BY: Adam Kienberger, Community Development
Director
AGENDA NO. 6.l.
ATTACHMENTS: Agreement, 2024 Expanded Home Improvement
Loan Program Overview, 2024 Radon Mitigation
Grant Program Overview
APPROVED BY: LJM
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to approve the attached Local Affordable Housing Aid Agreement
between the City of Rosemount and the Dakota County Community Development Agency.
BACKGROUND
In 2023, the Minnesota Legislature authorized aid payments to counties, cities and Tribal Nations. The
goal is to fund affordable housing projects and help organizations provide affordable and supportive
housing. Local Affordable Housing Aid (LAHA) is aid to metropolitan local governments. LAHA is funded
through a new dedicated sales tax in the seven-county metropolitan area.
As sales taxes will vary, the amount of LAHA distributed will also vary. All Minnesota counties, seven
Tribal Nations and 37 cities will receive this aid. Aid payments are made directly to local governments.
In the metro, aid is funded by the sales tax for housing. Statewide, aid is funded by state
appropriations. The Minnesota Department of Revenue has posted the 2024 LAHA amounts that cities
and counties will receive this year; the first half were distributed July 20 and the second half will be
distributed in December. Rosemount's 2024 distribution amount was $85,048.
The Port Authority received a presentation from the CDA at their meeting in July and provided
direction to support and proceed with this collaboration. The program dollars will be split between the
CDA's Home Improvement Loan Program, and Radon Mitigation Grant Program - both directly
benefiting Rosemount residents.
City Council approved a resolution on November 19, 2024 formally supporting this collaboration, and
provided direction to work with the CDA on formalizing an agreement. The City Attorney has reviewed
the agreement, and is comfortable with the language proposed.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the attached Local Affordable Housing Aid Agreement between the City of Rosemount and
the Dakota County Community Development Agency.
Page 52 of 142
LOCAL AFFORDABLE HOUSING AID AGREEMENT
between
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
and
DAKOTA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
THIS LOCAL AFFORDABLE HOUSING AID AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) is
entered into as of the __ day of , 2025 by and
between the City of Rosemount, Minnesota (the “City”), 2875 145th Street W., Rosemount,
MN 55068, a municipal corporation and political subdivision of the state of Minnesota,
and the Dakota County Community Development Agency (the “CDA”), 1228 Town Centre
Drive, Eagan, Minnesota 55123, a public body politic and corporate; also referred to as
“Party” or “Parties.”
WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota created Local Affordable Housing Aid (“LAHA”)
under Minnesota Statutes, Section 477A.35, as may be amended, which established
distributions to metropolitan area counties and tier I cities located in a metropolitan county
for qualifying projects as defined in Section 477A.35, subd. 4 (“Qualifying Projects”).
WHEREAS, the City desires to engage the CDA to receive the City’s LAHA funds
and administer Qualifying Projects on behalf of the City.
WHEREAS, the CDA desires to serve in this role with its experience in and staffing
of housing finance, preservation, and development.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises
contained in this Agreement, the sufficiency is hereby acknowledged, it is agreed by and
between the Parties as follows:
1. TERM. This Agreement shall commence as of the date written above and shall
continue until all duties are fulfilled, unless sooner terminated under the terms of
the Agreement.
2. DUTIES OF THE CDA.
2.1 Authorized to Act on Behalf of the City. The CDA shall act as the agent for
the City to administer LAHA funds according to state statutes, laws, and
rules. The CDA shall assume all duties and obligations that would otherwise
be imposed upon the City, specifically:
a. Spending the funds received under this Agreement on Qualifying
Projects, including disbursements to the CDA, eligible individuals
and subrecipients, as well as to contractors, affordable housing
developers, and vendors, all after determining that the use meets all
requirements of Qualifying Projects.
Page 53 of 142
2
b. Maintaining complete and accurate records of funds received and all
disbursements.
c. Ensuring timely expenditure of LAHA funds by December 31 in the
fourth year following the allocation of the funds by the Minnesota
Department of Revenue. If funds cannot be spent on Qualifying
Projects by the deadline due to factors outside of the control of the
CDA, the CDA will work with the City to transfer funds to a local
housing trust fund.
d. Preparing an annual report, as required starting December 1, 2025,
under Minnesota Statutes, Section 477A.35, subd. 6(b).
2.2 Compliance. The CDA shall comply with all applicable state and local LAHA
requirements.
2.3 Identification and Use of LAHA Funds.
a. All LAHA funds received and expended under this Agreement will be
spent solely on Qualifying Projects defined under Minnesota
Statutes, Section 477A.35, subd. 4.
b. CDA will be responsible for the administration of those Qualifying
Projects identified in Exhibit A, in a manner satisfactory to the City
and consistent with any required standards.
3. USE OF FUNDS.
3.1 Qualifying Projects. Per Minnesota Statutes, Section 477A.35, a broad list
of LAHA uses are defined as Qualifying Projects. The CDA has offered to
administer on behalf of the City the LAHA collaboration Qualifying Projects
identified in Exhibit A. Exhibit A will be amended if there are changes to the
list of Qualifying Projects in Minnesota Statutes or the CDA and the City
agree to changes in the Qualifying Projects.
3.2 Allocation of LAHA Funds to CDA. The City will annually take formal action
by resolution to allocate LAHA funds to the CDA for one, two, or all LAHA
collaboration Qualifying Projects. These changes will be reflected in Exhibit
B, which the CDA will update annually and deliver to the City. The CDA
reserves the right to update the adjustment of the LAHA collaboration
Qualifying Projects, as needed, including ongoing activities from previous
fiscal years.
4. TRANSFER OF FUNDS.
4.1 Transfer by the City. The City shall transfer the LAHA funds specified in
Exhibit B received from the State to the CDA. Upon receipt of the annual
authorizing City resolution, the CDA will submit a written request for the
Page 54 of 142
3
LAHA funds to the City. The Parties shall cooperate and mutually agree
upon the amount, timing, and transfer of LAHA funds to the CDA.
4.2 Retention of Funds. The CDA shall deposit and maintain the LAHA funds
received under this Agreement in a separate internal account. The CDA
shall maintain appropriate records of LAHA funds. The CDA shall administer
and disburse all LAHA funds in accordance with this Agreement.
4.3 Program Income. Program income is the gross income received by the CDA
that was generated from the use of the City’s LAHA funds. The primary
example is the payment of principal on loans made using LAHA funds.
Any program income generated from LAHA funds will be classified and
distributed based on rules and guidance issued from the State as it
becomes available.
Any program income on hand at the end of the expiration of this Agreement
or received after expiration of this Agreement shall be paid over to the City
unless the City and the CDA have entered into subsequent agreements.
4.4 Funding Contingency. The CDA’s obligations under this Agreement are
specifically contingent upon the disbursement of LAHA funds by the State
and the City’s transfer of LAHA funds to the CDA.
4.5 CDA Expenses. Unless allowable as a Qualifying Project, administrative
and salary expenses incurred by the CDA will be paid by the CDA’s special
benefit levy and/or program service fees. If/when administrative and salary
expenses are eligible, such costs will be assessed proportionally amongst
the City and other CDA LAHA collaboration parties.
5. RECORDS AND REPORTS.
5.1 Records. The CDA shall maintain complete and accurate records of LAHA
funds received and all disbursements.
5.2 Reports. The CDA shall prepare quarterly progress reports on the
Qualifying Projects regarding project pipeline, project start and completion
dates, amount spent on Qualifying Projects, and other information as
requested. Identifying data for individual clients will be aggregated. The
CDA shall prepare the annual report for the City to submit to the Minnesota
Housing Finance Agency.
5.3 Access to Records. The CDA agrees to provide the City, its designated
auditors, or any of its authorized representatives access to any financial
reports, documents, papers, and records of the CDA that are directly
pertinent to this Agreement for the purposes of making audits,
examinations, excerpts, and transcriptions.
Page 55 of 142
4
5.4 Record Retention. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 16C.05, subd.5,
Minnesota Statutes, Section 16B.98, subd. 8 and applicable requirements,
the CDA shall maintain records under this Agreement for a minimum of six
(6) years from the end of this Agreement.
6. INDEMNIFICATION.
6.1 The CDA agrees to hold harmless, indemnify, and defend the City, its
officials, agents, and employees against any and all third-party claims of
whatever nature, expenses (including attorneys’ fees), losses, damages or
lawsuits for damages that arise as a result of the willful misconduct,
negligent acts, errors, and/or omissions of the CDA in the performance of
this Agreement.
6.2 Nothing in this Agreement (including, but not limited to, indemnification or
insurance provisions) shall be deemed a waiver by either Party of the limits
of liability set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Section 466.04 or a waiver of any
available immunities or defenses. The CDA’s obligation to hold and save
harmless in this Agreement shall be limited by the limitations on liability set
forth in Minnesota Statutes, Section 466.04, as may be amended from time
to time.
6.3 The CDA shall notify the City within five (5) business days of actual receipt
of any of the potential claims against the CDA that may arise as a
consequence of any of the work or services performed or furnished by the
CDA under the terms of this Agreement.
7. TERMINATION. If the CDA materially fails to fulfill its obligations under this
Agreement, the City may suspend or terminate this Agreement upon written notice
to the CDA specifying the reason for termination. If the Agreement is terminated,
the CDA shall pay over any unexpended funds and program income to the City.
The CDA shall no longer be responsible for reporting on LAHA funds.
8. DATA PRIVACY. All data collected, created, received, maintained, disseminated,
or used for any purposes in the course of the CDA’s performance under this
Agreement is governed by the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act,
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13 or any other applicable state statutes and any
state rules adopted to implement LAHA, as well as state statutes and federal
regulations on data privacy. The CDA agrees to abide by these statutes, rules, and
regulations as they may be amended.
9. DISPUTE RESOLUTION. In the event that a dispute arises between the Parties
as to the interpretation or performance of this Agreement, then upon written
request of either Party, representatives with settlement authority for each Party
shall meet and confer in good faith to resolve the dispute. If the Parties are unable
to resolve the dispute, they shall make every effort to settle the dispute through
mediation or other alternative dispute resolution methods. If the Parties are unable
Page 56 of 142
5
to resolve the dispute through these methods, either Party may commence an
action in Dakota County District Court.
10. GENERAL PROVISIONS.
10.1 Compliance with Laws. The Parties shall abide by all applicable federal,
state, or local laws, statutes, ordinances, rules, and regulations now in effect
or hereunder adopted pertaining to activities governed by this Agreement.
The CDA shall be responsible for the performance of any contractors unless
otherwise agreed in writing.
10.2 Minnesota Law to Govern. This Agreement shall be governed by and
construed in accordance with the substantive and procedural laws of the
State of Minnesota, without giving effect to the principles of conflict of laws.
10.3 Independent Contractor. The CDA is an independent contractor and
nothing herein shall be construed to create the relationship of employer and
employee or joint venture between the City and the CDA. The CDA shall at
all times be free to exercise initiative, judgment, and discretion as to how
best to provide the services pursuant to this Agreement. The CDA
acknowledges and agrees that the CDA is not entitled to receive any of the
benefits received by City employees and is not eligible for workers or
reemployment compensation benefits.
10.4 Modifications. Any alternations, variations, modifications, or waivers of the
provisions of this Agreement shall only be valid when they have been
reduced to writing and signed by authorized representatives of the Parties.
10.5 Severability. The provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed severable.
If any part of this Agreement is rendered void, invalid, or unenforceable,
such rendering shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remainder
of this Agreement unless the part or parts which are void, invalid, or
otherwise unenforceable shall substantially impair the value of the entire
Agreement with respect to either Party.
10.6 Survival of Terms. The following components of this Agreement will survive
the termination or expiration of this Agreement: 4.4, 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 6, 7, and
8.
10.7 Assignment. Neither Party may assign any interest in this Agreement
without prior written consent of the other Party. Any non-approved transfer,
assignment or conveyance shall be void.
10.8 Certification and Signatures.
a. Each Party certifies and warrants that it has the legal authority to
enter into and perform under this Agreement and that its governing
Page 57 of 142
6
body has authorized the execution and acceptance of this
Agreement.
b. Each person executing this Agreement on behalf of a Party certifies
and warrants that such person is duly and validly authorized to legally
execute and bind the Party to the terms of this Agreement.
c. The Parties agree that electronic signatures to this Agreement shall
be as valid as original signatures of the Parties and shall be effective
to bind the Parties to this Agreement.
10.9 Rights and Remedies. All rights and remedies available to either the City
or the CDA under the terms of this Agreement or by law are cumulative and
may be exercised concurrently or separately, and the exercise of any one
remedy shall not be deemed an election of such remedy to the exclusion of
other remedies.
10.10 Notices. Notices required to be provided pursuant to this Agreement shall
be provided to the following named persons and address unless otherwise
stated in this Agreement or in an amendment to this Agreement.
10.11 Liaison. To assist the Parties in the day-to-day performance of this
Agreement, liaisons shall be designated by the City and the CDA. The
Parties shall keep each other continually informed. At the time of the
execution of this Agreement, the following persons are the designated
liaisons:
For the City:
Adam Kienberger
Community Development Director
2875 145th Street W.
Rosemount, MN 55068
Adam.Kienberger@rosemountmn.gov
(651) 322-2020
For the CDA:
Lisa Alfson
Director of Community & Economic Development
1228 Town Centre Drive
Eagan, MN 55123
lalfson@dakotacda.org
(651) 657-4467
Page 58 of 142
7
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused these presents to be
executed.
City of Rosemount, Minnesota
By: Dated:
Jeffery D. Weisensel
Its: Mayor
By: Dated:
Erin Fasbender
Its: City Clerk
Page 59 of 142
8
Dakota County Community Development Agency
By: Dated:
Joe Atkins
Its: Chair, Board of Commissioners
By: Dated:
Tony Schertler
Its: Executive Director
Page 60 of 142
9
EXHIBIT A TO SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENT
DAKOTA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY (CDA)
AND THE CITY OF ROSEMOUNT (City)
Local Affordable Housing Aid (LAHA) funds will be committed to the following Qualifying
Projects. CDA has offered to administer the following LAHA Collaboration Qualifying
Projects on behalf of the City.
1. Expanded Single-Family Home Improvement Loan Program. Increase the number
of loans made through the CDA’s Home Improvement Loan Program, which provides
zero percent, deferred loans up to $35,000 for home improvement projects that prioritize
health, safety, and structural integrity concerns.
LAHA funds will be administered in accordance with the Home Improvement Loan
Program policy and procedures handbook, as periodically amended. Households at or
below 80% of the Area Median Income (AMI) will be prioritized. If/when there are no
priority households on the waiting list to be served, the CDA will then consider serving
households above 80% AMI to the maximum LAHA income limit of 115% AMI.
2. Radon Testing and Mitigation Grant Program. This grant program will provide free
testing services to clients of the CDA’s Home Improvement Loan Program and will provide
free mitigation systems for those clients whose homes have radon levels exceeding
allowable levels, as determined by the US Environmental Protection Agency. The CDA
will discuss with City the expansion of the program to other eligible homeowners if there
is interest and CDA staff capacity.
As the Home Improvement Loan Program and the Radon Testing and Mitigation Grant
Program serve the same clients, the CDA reserves the right to combine the funding for
these two programs into one account to best serve the needs of clients.
3. Residential Preservation and New Construction Gap Financing Program. This
program will expand the existing CDA-administered gap financing resources for
affordable residential multi-family and single-family preservation and new construction.
The CDA will work with the City to identify potential projects that need gap financing.
Page 61 of 142
10
EXHIBIT B TO SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENT
DAKOTA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY (CDA)
AND THE CITY OF ROSEMOUNT (City)
Local Affordable Housing Aid (LAHA) funds will be committed to the following Qualifying
Projects. Exhibit B will be amended on an annual basis, or as needed, through the term
of this Agreement.
CURRENT YEAR ALLOCATION – 2024
All funds must be committed by December 31, 2027, and fully expended by December
31, 2028.
➢Qualifying Project 1: HOME IMPROVEMENT LOAN PROGRAM – Administered by
CDA
•Description: The Home Improvement Loan Program assists low and moderate-
income homeowners in improving and maintaining their homes in a decent, safe,
and sanitary condition. The program offers deferred loans up to $35,000 with
zero percent interest rates to homeowners earning 115 percent or below area
median income, and prioritizing homeowners with incomes at or below 80
percent area median income.
•Schedule: Ongoing
•Budget: $ 42,524.00 (50 percent of 2024 LAHA distribution to City, or as
determined by need)
➢Qualifying Project 2: RADON TESTING AND MITIGATION GRANT PROGRAM –
Administered by CDA
•Description: The Radon Testing and Mitigation Grant Program assists clients of
the Home Improvement Loan Program with free radon testing and installation of
a mitigation system, if needed. Clients will receive free radon tests to be
performed by professional radon testing providers. Clients whose homes have
radon levels greater than 4.0 pCi/L (picocuries of radon per liter of air) will
receive a mitigation system. Every effort will be made to ensure the radon levels
in the subject homes post-mitigation will not exceed 2.0 pCi/L.
•Schedule: Ongoing
•Budget: $ 42,524.00 (50 percent of LAHA distribution to City, or as determined by
need)
Page 62 of 142
Project
Proposal: Expanded Single-Family Home Improvement Loan Program
Project
Purpose:
Expand the existing CDA-administered Home Improvement Loan Program to
include Local Affordable Housing Aid (LAHA) funding.
The expanded Home Improvement Loan Program would be available to
residents earning no more than 80% of Area Median Income (AMI). Those
homeowners who earn between 81-115% AMI in cities that contribute to the
expanded Home Improvement Loan Program will be placed on a waitlist and
will be eligible for the program only if there are no homeowners below 80% AMI
on the waitlist.
Project
Objectives:
• Continue to improve the housing stock of Dakota County.
• Expand existing program with proven results to more income-eligible
residents of County.
• Provide cities with a way to use LAHA for an existing housing program.
• Diversify funding resources for an existing CDA program.
Project
Outcomes: • Increase number of homes improved from 60-70 per year to 115-120 per
year after Year 2 of infusion of cities’ LAHA funds.
Project
Details:
• Provide deferred 0% loans of up to $35,000 for home improvement projects.
• Home improvement projects prioritize health, safety, and structural integrity
issues.
o Common improvements include new roofs, siding, HVAC systems,
windows, building foundation or other structural updates, accessibility
improvements, kitchens and bathrooms(accessibility).
o Other improvements would be considered if they address health and
safety issues or otherwise improve the value of the home. Common
improvements are repairs or replacement of detached garages, kitchens
and bathrooms (non-accessibility), driveway replacement/repair
• Homeowners must be income eligible and meet other CDA program
requirements, e.g. own and reside in home, meet credit standards, be
current on property taxes, properties must be at least 15 years old, etc.
o CDBG funds require 80% AMI cap
o LAHA requires 115% AMI cap
• Eligible homeowners with incomes at or below 80% AMI could use either
countywide and city CDBG and cities’ LAHA funds.
• Eligible homeowners with incomes between 81-115% AMI would use only
available city LAHA funds and only if there are no homeowners with incomes
at or below 80% in that city.
• Program income generated from LAHA would be used for future home
improvement loans, similar to the CDBG program. The CDA would track
program income and deposit into individual city accounts.
Page 63 of 142
Project
Funding:
• Current CDBG entitlement funding totals $1,193,635 for FY 2023, which
includes cities and Dakota County CDBG allocated to the CDA’s existing
Home Improvement Loan Program.
• CDA spends approximately $1,900,000 to rehab 70 homes in a fiscal year,
on average. These loans are currently financed primarily with federal
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds, though there are some
CDA levy dollars included.
o Takes about 18 months to fully expend a year’s worth of CDBG and
program income.
o Funds are replenished annually, provided Congress funds the CDBG
program.
• Future LAHA – CDA estimates it could successfully deploy an additional
approximately $1,400,000 to rehabilitate an additional 55 loans per year after
first full year of additional funds.
• Individual cities contributing their LAHA funds to the expanded Home
Improvement Loan Program would have separate subaccounts that will be
tracked by CDA staff.
Project
Staff:
• Existing staff:
o 1 FT Rehab Coordinator
o 1 FT Rehab Advisor
o 1 FT PSA
o 2 Rehab Advisor contractors – each takes 5-7 files per year, total of 15
• One additional FT Rehab Advisor will be needed to deploy city LAHA funds.
The CDA Board of Commissioners has committed to funding this position
with CDA levy until the Local Affordable Housing Aid legislation is changed
to allow LAHA funds to be used for administrative costs. At that time, the
CDA will work with cities to use a portion of the LAHA funds for the Rehab
Advisor position.
Project
Reporting:
The CDA would provide annual reports to participating cities and Dakota
County. The annual report would include the following:
o Community’s contribution to program that fiscal year
o Number of loans using LAHA
o LAHA funds expended
o Program income generated
Page 64 of 142
Proposed
Project: Dakota County Homeowner Radon Testing and Mitigation Grant Program
Project
Purpose:
The average radon level in Minnesota is more than three times higher than the
U.S. radon level. This is due to our geology and how our homes operate.
Minnesota homes are closed up or heated most of the year, which can result in
higher levels of radon. In Minnesota, more than two in five homes have radon
levels that pose a significant health risk. Exposure to radon over a prolonged
period can lead to lung cancer. Minnesota Department of Health website
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has set the action level at 4 pCi/L
(picocuries of radon per liter of air). The Minnesota Department of Health
recommends installing a radon mitigation system when the radon level is at 4
pCi/L or higher. Between 2 and 4 pCi/L, a radon mitigation system should be
considered to lower the level as much as possible. The average indoor radon
level in Dakota County is 3.6 pCi/L as determined by radon test results from
AirChek, an at-home radon testing company. There is no safe level of radon in
a home.
The proposed Homeowner Radon Testing and Mitigation Grant program would
provide free testing services to clients of the Home Improvement Loan
Program and would provide free mitigation services for those residents whose
homes have radon levels greater than 2.6 pCi/L. A lower radon level was
chosen as the benchmark in order to reduce radon levels in existing homes as
much as possible.
The Radon Grant Program will be paired with the CDA’s Home Improvement
Loan Program. Homeowners in the Home Improvement Loan Program have
incomes at or below 80% of Area Median Income. By pairing a Radon grant
with a Home Improvement Loan, homeowners can stretch their loans to cover
more items that need improvement.
Project
Objectives:
• Continue to improve the housing stock of Dakota County.
• Reduce potential future risk of lung cancers in Dakota County residents.
• Provide cities with a way to use Local Affordable Housing Aid (LAHA).
Project
Outcomes:
• Test at least 50 homes in Dakota County for radon per year. The homes will
be those of clients in the Home Improvement Loan Program.
• Install radon mitigation systems in all homes assessed for radon with levels
greater than 2.6 pCi/L per year, subject to available funding.
• Reduce the number of homes with high radon levels. Mitigation systems
would be required to reduce radon to < 2.0 pCi/L.
Project
Details:
• Provide grants to clients of the Home Improvement Loan Program to test for
and mitigate radon when levels are 2.6 pCi/L or greater.
Page 65 of 142
• Homeowners must own and reside in home, be current on property taxes,
and be income eligible.
o CDBG funds require 80% AMI cap
o Sales tax funds require 115% AMI cap
• Homeowners would need to sign a grant agreement if they are recipients.
• Homeowners will solicit bids from two licensed mitigators; CDA will evaluate
bids for cost reasonableness.
• CDA will pay mitigators upon completion of project and satisfactory
clearance test numbers (< 2.0).
Project
Funding:
• Funding exclusively through LAHA funds.
• Estimate program would need $200,000 per year to assess for and install
radon mitigation systems in at least 50 homes per year.
• LAHA funds would be placed in individual city accounts at the CDA and will
be spent within the four-year spending deadline.
• The individual city accounts will be tracked by the CDA.
Project
Staff:
• The Radon Mitigation Grant program would use existing Home Improvement
Loan Program staff and the additional Home Improvement Loan Program
staff that will be hired to deploy LAHA funds.
Project
Reporting:
The CDA would provide annual reports to participating cities and Dakota
County. The annual report would include the following:
o Community’s contribution to program that fiscal year.
o Number of grants using LAHA funds.
o Amount spent per year.
Page 66 of 142
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
City Council Regular Meeting: March 18, 2025
AGENDA ITEM: Request by Danner, Inc. for renewal of its Small
Scale Mineral Extraction Permit for 2025
AGENDA SECTION:
CONSENT AGENDA
PREPARED BY: Julia Hogan, Planner AGENDA NO. 6.m.
ATTACHMENTS: 2025 Mineral Extraction Permit, Site Location,
Applicant's Narrative, Updated Site Plan , Aerial
Imagery , Panoramic Imagery, Site Photos, Haul-
Back Material Testing Results
APPROVED BY: LJM
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to approve the renewal of the Danner, Inc. Small Scale Mineral Extraction Permit for 2025,
subject to the terms and conditions in the attached 2025 Conditions for Mineral Extraction.
BACKGROUND
SUMMARY
Applicant & Property Owner(s): Marlon L. Danner of Danner, Inc.
Location: 4594 145th Street East – one half mile east of US
Highway 52 and one quarter mile south of CSAH 42
Area: 75 Acres
Comp. Guide Plan Designation: LDR Low Density Residential; MDR – Medium
Density Residential; HDR – High Density Residential
Current Zoning: A-2 - Agricultural
The City Council is being asked to consider an application from Danner, Inc. requesting renewal of their
annual small-scale mineral extraction permit for the 2025 calendar year. The small-scale mineral
extraction operation is located at 4594 145th Street East in the eastern portion of the city. Small Scale
Mineral Extraction is permitted in the city as an Interim Use within specified areas, and the permit for
this mineral extraction site expires after one year. The Danner site has been operating as a mine for
several years, and the request for renewal is consistent with similar renewals that have previously
been issued for the site.
Staff is not aware of any significant issues associated with site mining and haul-back since the last
review. Please note that the approved permit allows the applicant to perform grading work in the
northern portion of the site, outside the approved mining area. While this work is acceptable under the
terms of the permit, the applicant should ensure there is adequate fill and topsoil remaining for
reclamation of the mining site. After requesting a modification to the phasing of the grading work that
was ultimately approved by the city, the work commenced five years ago and has been part of the
Page 67 of 142
ongoing mining and reclamation operation being conducted on the site. All such grading is taking place
in the “Phase 1” grading area adjacent to County Road 42. It does not appear that much, if any,
additional material was placed in the Phase 1 fill area in 2023, and that area has been stabilized with
vegetation. The applicant did provide an updated status map with their submittal materials which
verified that mining is not occurring below the 840’elevation requirement of their permit.
The Planning Commission and staff recommend approval of the renewal request for 2025 based upon
a review of the information submitted by the applicant, the mineral extraction standards in Section 11-
6-4 M. of the City Code, and the attached permit.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
The Planning Commission held a public hearing during its regular meeting on February 25, 2025, to
review the request and receive public comment. No comments were received by the Commission, and
they voted unanimously to recommend Danner, Inc’s Small-Scale Mineral Extraction Permit be
renewed for 2025.
BACKGROUND
The Danner operation extracted approximately 40,000 tons of sand and gravel in 2014 and
approximately 65,000 tons of material each year from 2015 through 2017. For 2018 and 2019, the
applicant reported the extraction of 60,000 tons of material and this was the case for 2020 as well.
2021 saw about 30,000 tons removed, and 22,000 tons were removed in 2022. In 2023, 20,000 tons of
material was removed and in 2024 the applicant stated that approximately 25,000 tons of sand and
rock were removed from the site. For 2025, the applicant notes that they plan to be extracting 60,000
cubic yards of material from the site. In addition to the excavation activity, Danner continues to import
material to the site for future reclamation. Over the past year, the applicant reports that there were
10,000 cubic yards of “haul-back” material brought to the site from a combination of local government
road improvement projects and other redevelopment projects in the area.
Testing of this material was previously done in 2018 and at that time the annual review included a
report describing the testing performed by Braun Intertec on haul-back material in late 2016 and early
2017. Braun Intertec’s testing found that the soils “meet the requirements of the 2014 Conditions for
Small Scale Mineral Extraction Permit for Danner and the Borrow Pit Reclamation Protocol, along with
complying with the MPCA guidance for Best Management Practices for the Off-Site reuse of
Unregulated Fill.” The material brought to the site over the past few years originated in the same
stockpiles from Danner’s South St. Paul yard and Mendota Heights. Staff included a condition in the
2024 mineral extraction permit that haul-back material testing results would need to be submitted to
the city prior to the approval of a 2025 permit. Testing was done by Braun Intertec in January 2025 and
submitted to the City in February 2025. The testing results found that the sampled areas met the
requirements of the 2024 Small Scale Mineral Extraction Permit and are suitable for reuse as fill at the
site.
The active mining is shown to be continuing in the southern portions of Phases One, Two and Three.
Based upon the plan and site inspection, stockpiling is occurring in the northern portion of Phase one
and two. The attached 2024 pit status drawing illustrates the area outlined in blue is a combination of
stockpiling, circulation, and material handling activities. This work area is greater than just the mining
function.
Page 68 of 142
The application previously stated that little restoration is occurring on the site due to stockpiling of
material. Staff recommended that some restoration work be completed in 2020 and 2021. The project
narrative indicates that some filling has been occurring on the southern property line, and the updated
aerial imagery of the property does show that restoration continues to be completed in the southeast
corner of the mine. In general, the city expects reclamation to occur as mining reaches the approved
elevations, and staff is recommending that this restoration continue in 2025. The applicant has started
to run out of room for excavation in the first two phases and will need to continue restoration work in
these phases while moving forward into Phase 3. Filling and sloping from east to west has been
occurring.
During the previous reviews, staff noted that there was storage taking place on the property unrelated
to the mining activity. The permit was therefore updated in 2017 to limit the number of storage
trailers allowed on the property. Based on staff’s site visit in 2024 and evidence from recent air
photographs of the site, the applicant is following the requirement. Grading work is expected to
continue throughout 2025 and must adhere to the approved grading plan (as updated to reflect the
revised phasing plan). The intent of the grading is to create a level site with access from County Road
42 for future development. It is staff’s understanding that some of the material is from the mining site.
The property/owner will be expected to fulfill the reclamation plans using additional on-site material
or bring additional topsoil etc. from off site.
ISSUE ANALYSIS
The subject property is zoned A-2 – Agricultural and meets or exceeds the applicable performance
standards for small-scale mineral extraction. Small-scale mineral extraction is listed as an interim use
within the Agricultural district. The table below details the current land use, zoning, and future land
use information for the surrounding properties. These properties are all currently zoned Agricultural or
Agricultural Preserve and are located within the 2030 or 2040 Metropolitan Urban Service Area
(MUSA). The 2040 Future Land Use Map anticipates a mixture of residential, business park, and
industrial uses in this area.
Surrounding Land Use and Zoning Information
Direction Current Land Use Zoning Guided Land Use
North Agriculture A-2 - Agricultural BP – Business Park
and LI – Light
Industrial
South Agriculture A-1 - Agricultural
Preserve
LDR – Low Density
Residential
East Agriculture A-2 - Agricultural LDR – Low Density
Residential and MDR
– Medium Density
Residential
West Agriculture/Mining A-2 Agricultural LDR – Low Density
Residential, MDR –
Medium Density
Page 69 of 142
Residential and HDR
– High Density
Residential
Access to the Danner mine comes from County Road 42 via a gravel road along the eastern edge of the
property. This road is shared with the Bolander mine to the east. The applicant maintains a private
access agreement with the neighboring property to coordinate mining levels and allow continued
access to both the sites. The permit application notes that haul roads within the City will continue to be
County Road 42 to State Highway 52.
The annual renewal for mineral extraction permits includes a site inspection and consultation with the
Rosemount Police Department regarding any police activity. Police records noted no activity at (or calls
to) the subject property in 2024.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission and staff recommend renewal of this request based upon a review of the
information submitted by the applicant, the mineral extraction standards in Section 11-6-4 M. of the
City Code, and the attached permit with conditions of approval.
Page 70 of 142
1
Mineral Extraction Permit
2025 Conditions for Small Scale Mineral Extraction Permit
DANNER, INC.
A Danner Inc., hereinafter referred to as the “Property Owner”, shall sign a written consent to these
conditions binding itself and its successors or assigns to the conditions of said permit.
B The property Owner shall comply with all terms of this permit as well as the standards for mineral
extraction listed in Section 11-6-4 M. of the City Code.
C This permit is granted for the area designated as the eastern half of Phase Two and the entire Phase One
(approximately 19.5 acres) on Exhibit A, Mineral Extraction Permit Status Map, which is attached hereto as
an exhibit. Regrading and reclamation is granted for the area designated Phase I on Exhibit A. Mineral
Extraction Permit dated 10-24-2016. Reclamation in Phase I should occur over the 2024 calendar year.
D The term of the permit shall extend from the date approved by the City Council until December 31, 2025
unless revoked prior to that for failure to comply with the permit requirements. An Annual Mining Permit
fee shall be paid to the City of Rosemount.
E All required permits from the State of Minnesota, County of Dakota and City of Rosemount (hereinafter
"City") or any of their agencies shall be obtained and submitted to the City prior to the issuance of the
permit. Failure by the Property Owner to comply with the terms and conditions of any of the permits
required under this paragraph shall be grounds for the City to terminate said mining permit.
F The final grading for the permit area shall be completed in accordance with the Final Reclamation Plan,
attached as Exhibit B, or as approved by the City Engineer, and any other conditions that may be imposed
by the City from time to time.
G All gravel trucks and other mining related traffic shall enter and exit the mining area from County State Aid
Highway 42. It shall be the Property Owner's responsibility to obtain any access permits or easements
necessary for ingress and egress. The location of the accesses and/or easements for ingress and egress
shall be subject to approval by the City, as well as the County Highway Department if any changes occur
relative to the mining process.
H A plan for dust control shall be implemented and subject to approval by the City. The Property Owner
shall clean dirt and debris from extraction or hauling operations related to the Mineral Extraction Permit
from streets. After the Property Owner has received 24-hour verbal notice, the City may complete or
contract to complete the clean-up at the Property Owner’s expense. In the event of a traffic hazard as
determined by the Public Works Director or Rosemount Police Department, the City may proceed
immediately to complete or contract cleanup at Property Owner’s expense without prior notification.
I The surface water drainage of the mining area shall not be altered so as to interfere, contaminate, or
otherwise affect the natural drainage of adjacent property.
J No topsoil shall be removed from the site and the Property Owner shall take necessary measures to
prevent erosion of the stockpiled topsoil. The location of the stockpiled topsoil shall be as indicated on
Exhibit A.
Page 71 of 142
2
K Any costs incurred now or in the future in changing the location of existing public or private utilities
including but not limited to pipelines, transmission structures and sewer infrastructure located within the
permit area shall be the sole obligation and expense of the Property Owner.
L All costs of processing the permit, including but not limited to planning fees, engineering fees and legal
fees, shall be paid by the Property Owner prior to the issuance of the permit. The Property Owner shall
reimburse the City for the cost of periodic inspections by the City Engineer or any other City employee for
the purpose of insuring that conditions of the permit are being satisfied. The Property Owner agrees to
reimburse the City for any other costs incurred as a result of the granting or enforcing of the permit.
M The daily hours of operation for the mining area shall be limited to 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Monday through
Saturday, subject, however, to being changed by the City Council.
N The Property Owner shall deposit with the Planning Department a surety bond or cash escrow in the
amount of Seven Thousand Five Hundred Dollars per acre ($7,500.00/acre) of active phase in favor of the
City for the cost of restoration, regrading and/or revegetating land disturbed by mining activities and to
assure compliance with these conditions by the Property Owner. The required surety bonds must be:
(1) With good and sufficient surety by a surety company authorized to do business in the State of
Minnesota with the right of the surety company to cancel the same only upon at least thirty (30) days
written notice to the permit holder and the City.
(2) Satisfactory to the City Attorney in form and substance.
(3) Conditioned that the Property Owner will faithfully comply with all the terms, conditions and
requirements of the permit; all rules, regulations and requirements pursuant to the permit and as
required by the City and all reasonable requirements of the City Engineer, or any other City officials.
(4) Conditioned that the Property Owner will secure the City and its officers harmless against any and all
claims, or for which the City, the Council or any City officer may be made liable by reason of any
accident or injury to persons or property through the fault of the Property Owner.
(5) The surety bond or cash escrow shall remain in effect from January 1, 2025 to July 31, 2026.
Upon thirty (30) days’ notice to the permit holder and surety company, the City may reduce or increase
the amount of the bond or cash escrow during the term of this permit in order to insure that the City is
adequately protected.
O. The Property Owner shall furnish a certificate of comprehensive general liability insurance issued by
insurers duly licensed within the State of Minnesota in an amount of at least Five Hundred Thousand and
no/100 ($500,000.00) Dollars for injury or death of any one person in any one occurrence, bodily injury
liability in an amount of at least One Million Five Hundred Thousand and no/100 ($1,500,000.00) Dollars
and property damage liability in an amount of at least Two Hundred Fifty Thousand and no/100
($250,000.00) Dollars arising out of any one occurrence. The policy of insurance shall name the City as an
additional insured and shall remain in effect from January 1, 2025 to July 31, 2026.
P. The storage of equipment (unrelated to the sand and gravel mining and processing), manure, construction
debris, or hazardous materials of any kind shall not be permitted on site. The placement of construction
debris, manure, asphalt in any form or hazardous materials within the pit as fill shall be strictly prohibited.
Q. The Property Owner shall hold the City harmless from all claims or causes of action that may result from
the granting of the permit. The Property Owner shall indemnify the City for all costs, damages or
expenses, including but not limited to attorney's fees that the City may pay or incur in consequence of such
claims.
Page 72 of 142
3
R. The Property Owner shall comply with such other requirements of the City Council as it shall from time to
time deem proper and necessary for the protection of the citizens and general welfare of the community.
S. Complete mining and reclamation is required in all phases before any additional mining is authorized.
Modifications or expansion of the mining areas must be approved in writing to the City. Property Owner
shall submit to the City semiannually a written report indicating the amount of material extracted from the
site for the prior six-month period.
T. The Property Owner shall incorporate best management practices for controlling erosion and storm water
runoff as specified by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the United States Environmental
Protection Agency.
U. Reclamation shall include the replacement of the entire stockpile of topsoil on the mined area, reseeding
and mulching necessary to re-establish vegetative cover for permanent slope stabilization and erosion
control. The minimum depth of topsoil shall not be less than two inches after reclamation. No restored
slopes may exceed a gradient of 25% or four to 1 (4:1).
V. The Property Owner must show how materials stockpiled for recycling will be processed and inform the
City of all stockpiled materials.
W. All recycling must be completed with the completion of the current phase and materials removed from the
site. No recycling processes shall be allowed to continue into subsequent phases.
X. The Property Owner may not assign this permit without written approval of the City. The Property
Owner will be responsible for all requirements of this permit and all City ordinances on the licensed
premises for the permit period unless the Property Owner gives sixty (60) days prior written notice to the
City of termination and surrenders the permit to the City. The Property Owner shall identify all Operators
prior to their commencement of mineral extraction-related activities in the pit area. The City shall have the
authority to cause all mineral extraction activities to cease at any time there is an apparent breach of the
terms of this Permit.
Y. The Property Owner shall install and maintain a “stock” gate (or equivalent) at the entrance to the property
where the mining operation is located. The gate must be secured at 7:00 p.m. and at any time the pit is not
in use.
Z. The fill area regrading and reclamation shall follow the procedures described in the Danner Inc. Borrow Pit
Reclamation Protocol Rosemount, Minnesota including a report submitted to the City describing the
quantities of material brought in, where the material came from, and the test result of the material. The
reports submitted shall describe the quantities of material brought in, where the material came from, and
the test results, including supporting analytical results of the materials.
AA. No gravel mining is permitted in the Fill Area as shown on Exhibit A.
BB. Mining to the elevation of 840 feet above mean sea level provided that the site is reclaimed to the elevation
shown on Exhibit A with haul-back, clean-fill material in accordance with the Danner Inc. Borrow Pit
Reclamation Protocol Rosemount, Minnesota. In no instance shall mining occur in the groundwater
aquifer.
CC. Blasting or the use of explosives is prohibited in the mining of the Danner gravel pit.
DD. The City of Rosemount shall have the ability to collect independent soil and water samples.
Page 73 of 142
4
EE. The operator shall install and maintain “No Trespassing” signs consistent with the standards outlined in
Minnesota State Statute 609.605.
FF. The operator is permitted to have two trailers for storage of items directly related to the operation of the
mine and mining equipment. Storage of more than two trailers would be a violation of the conditions of
the mining permit and could be cause for revocation of the approval.
GG. Testing of all haul-back material brought to the site shall be completed, and the results submitted to the
City, by May 1, 2026.
That Danner, Inc., Property Owner, hereby consents and agrees to the foregoing conditions of said mining
permit.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Property Owner has hereunto set his hand this _____ day of
__________________, 20_____.
DANNER, INC.
By:__________________________________
Its: _________________________
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) §
COUNTY OF __________ )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ______day of _________________, 20___, by
__________________________________, on behalf of Danner, Inc., Property Owner.
______________________________________
Notary Public
Page 74 of 142
Page 75 of 142
Page 76 of 142
107221 PIT STATUS 2017
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
2422 Enterprise Drive,Mendota Heights, MN 55120
(651)681-1914 Fax:681-9488
CIVIL ENGINEERS LAND PLANNERS LAND SURVEYORS
Date
Designed
Drawn
OF
12-10-25
NAP
NAP 11DANNER, INC.
SOUTH ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55075
ROSEMOUNT PIT - CO. RD. 42
ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA
MINERAL EXTRACTION PERMIT
843 HARDMAN AVENUE SOUTH 2025 - STATUS
LOCATION MAP
LOWEST VERIFIED
ELEVATION: 840.01
12-10-24
Page 77 of 142
August
2023
October
2024
Page 78 of 142
April
2023
April
2024
Page 79 of 142
Page 80 of 142
Page 81 of 142
AA/EOE
Braun Intertec Corporation
11001 Hampshire Avenue S
Minneapolis, MN 55438
Phone: 952.995.2000
Fax: 952.995.2020
Web: braunintertec.com
February 19, 2025 Project B2500590
Mr. Bryan Chirhart
Danner Incorporated
843 Hardman Avenue South
South Saint Paul, MN 55075
Re: Stockpile Sampling Letter
Mineral Extraction Permit Dated 10-24-2016
Danner Rosemount Gravel Pit
4594 145th Street East
Rosemount, Minnesota
Dear Bryan Chirhart:
On behalf of Danner Incorporated (Danner), Braun Intertec Corporation recently conducted stockpile
sampling activities related to the proposed future use of the soils as fill material at the Danner
Rosemount Gravel Pit (Site), in accordance with the authorized scope of services described in our
proposal dated January 17, 2024. This letter summarizes the sampling activities and procedures and
provides a discussion of the soil analytical results.
Background
Two stockpiles of soil, each approximately 50,000 cubic yards in volume, are currently located at the Site.
The Site location map depicting the stockpiles (North Stockpile and South Stockpile) is included as Figure
1.It is our understanding these stockpiled soils were imported to the Site from two redevelopment
projects located in South Saint Paul and Mendota Heights, respectively, and are intended to be used as
fill at the Site in order to reclaim a portion of the mine. In order to meet the requirements of the 2024
Small Scale Mineral Extraction Permit, stockpile sampling is required prior to reuse to document that the
stockpile soils are not contaminated.
Stockpile Sampling Procedures
On January 29, 2025, Braun Intertec completed environmental soil screening and sampling of the
currently stockpiled soils at the Site. Danner provided the backhoe for excavation into the stockpiles to
assist in observing the soils and collecting the representative soil samples. A Braun Intertec
environmental professional visually observed the stockpiled soil for the presence of contamination such
as debris, unusual staining or odors, and/or and other apparent signs of contamination.
Page 82 of 142
Danner Incorporated
Project B2500590
February 19, 2025
Page 2
Each stockpile was divided into roughly four equal parts for sampling and evaluation purposes. Four
composite samples were collected from each stockpile. Each composite sample consisted of equal
volume sub-samples collected from two distinct sampling points. Each sampling point was visually
observed for indications of contamination and screened for headspace analysis of organic vapors
following the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) approved methodology and in accordance
with Braun Intertec Standards of Procedures (SOPs) using a photoionization device (PID) equipped with a
10.6 electron volt (eV) lamp.
The composite samples were submitted for laboratory analysis of the following parameters:
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Metals (RCRA Metals) by United States
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 6020B/7471B
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) by EPA Method 8270E SIM
Additionally, a grab sample was collected from one of the two sampling points from each composite
sample and analyzed for the following parameters:
Diesel range organics (DRO) by the Wisconsin Modified Method
Gasoline range organics (GRO) by the Wisconsin Modified Method
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260D
The resultant 8 composite and 8 grab samples were submitted to the Pace Analytical laboratory of
Minneapolis, Minnesota for laboratory analysis.
Results
Observed organic vapor concentrations ranged from 0.0 to 3.6 parts per million (ppm). PID readings less
than 10 ppm are considered to be general background readings. No indications of contamination (e.g.,
debris, unusual staining, or odors) were observed in or on the stockpiles or sampling points. Soil
screening PID results are included in Table 1.
A summary of the soil analytical results is provided in Table 2, which includes Soil Reference Values
(SRVs), Background Threshold Values (BTVs), and Soil Leaching Values (SLVs) for comparison. The SRVs
and SLVs are allowable risk-based contaminant concentrations derived by the MPCA using risk
assessment methodology, modeling, and risk management policy to guide investigation and cleanup
actions. SRVs relate to direct-contact exposure scenarios and SLVs relate to potential leaching of
Page 83 of 142
Danner Incorporated
Project B2500590
February 19, 2025
Page 3
contaminants to groundwater. BTVs were established by the MPCA based on an estimate of state-wide
natural background concentrations for inorganics and ambient background concentrations for organics.
BTVs are used in instances where the MPCA calculated a health-based SRV that is below estimated
background values (MPCA guidance document c-r1-05, April 2021). Concentrations of contaminants in
soil, SRVs, BTVs (where applicable), and SLVs are expressed in units of milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg).
Additionally, the soil analytical results for DRO and GRO analysis were compared against the MPCA
Unregulated Fill Criterion of 100 mg/kg.
The following provides a summary of the soil analytical results:
No VOCs were detected at concentrations above laboratory reporting limits in any grab samples.
Varying concentrations of PAHs were detected at or above laboratory reporting limits in each
composite soil sample analyzed. The concentrations of the detected PAHs were below all
regulatory standards.
Varying combinations of arsenic, barium, total chromium, and lead were detected in all
composite soil samples above laboratory reporting limits but below all regulatory standards. No
other metals were detected at concentrations above laboratory reporting limits in any samples.
GRO was not detected at concentrations above laboratory reporting limits in any grab samples.
DRO was detected at concentrations above laboratory reporting limits in two of the grab samples
collected. The concentrations of the detected DRO were below the MPCA Unregulated Fill
Criterion.
The complete laboratory report with chain-of-custody form is included in Attachment A.
Conclusions
Analytical results showed no analyzed constituent concentrations that were in exceedance of any
regulatory criteria. Based on the analytical results and field observations, the sampled North and South
Stockpiles meet the requirements of the 2024 Small Scale Mineral Extraction Permit and are suitable for
reuse as fill at the Site.
Page 84 of 142
Danner Incorporated
Project B2500590
February 19, 2025
Page 4
Closing Remarks
In performing its services, Braun Intertec used that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under
similar circumstances by reputable members of its profession currently practicing in the same locality.
No warranty, express or implied, is made.
Sincerely,
BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION
Amanda E. Lanning, PG
Project Scientist
Imants Pone
Group Manager, Senior Scientist
Attachments:
Figure 1 – Site and Stockpile Locations Map
Table 1 – Photoionization Detector (PID) Measurements
Table 2 - Analytical Results of Stockpile Soil Samples
Attachment A – Laboratory Analytical Report
Page 85 of 142
Figure
Page 86 of 142
APPROXIMATE
SITE BOUNDARY
NORTH
STOCKPILE
SOUTH
STOCKPILE
CR 42
Drawing Information
Project Information
Last Modified:
F:
\
2
0
2
5
\
B
2
5
0
0
5
9
0
\
G
I
S
\
B
2
5
0
0
5
9
0
.
a
p
r
x
Drawing No:
Checked By:
Date Drawn:
Drawn By:
2/19/2025
"/ Stockpile Grab Sample Locations
11001 Hampshire Avenue S
Minneapolis, MN 55438
952.995.2000
braunintertec.com
SCALE: 1" = 400'
0 410205 '
o
Fig1 Tabloid
Project No:
B2500590
AL
2/19/2025
SL
Rosemount, Minnesota
4594 145th Street East
Danner Rosemount
Gravel Pit
Site and Stockpile
Locations Map
Figure 1
"/
"/
"/
"/
"/
"/
"/
"/
"/
"/
"/
"/
"/
"/
"/
"/
NORTH
STOCKPILE
SOUTH
STOCKPILE
NSP 4-1
NSP 3-1
NSP 2-1
SSP 4-2
SSP 4-1
SSP 3-1
SSP 2-1
SSP 1-1
NSP 4-2
NSP
3-2
NSP
2-2
NSP 1-2
NSP 1-1
SSP 1-2
SSP 2-2
SSP 3-2
Page 87 of 142
Tables
Page 88 of 142
Table 1
Photoionization Detector (PID) Measurements
Danner Rosemount Gravel Pit
Rosemount, Minnesota
Project B2500590
NSP‐1‐1 0.1
NSP‐1‐2 0.2 X
NSP‐2‐1 1.5 X
NSP‐2‐2 0.1
NSP‐3‐1 2.1 X
NSP‐3‐2 0.5
NSP‐4‐1 0.5 X
NSP‐4‐2 0.0
SSP‐1‐1 2.1 X
SSP‐1‐2 1.8
SSP‐2‐1 1.9 X
SSP‐2‐2 0.9
SSP‐3‐1 3.4
SSP‐3‐2 3.6 X
SSP‐4‐1 1.5
SSP‐4‐2 1.9 X
Notes
ppm = parts per million
Sample Location ID PID Measurement
(ppm)
Grab Sample
Analyzed
South Stockpile
North Stockpile
Page 1 of 1
Page 89 of 142
Table 2
Analytical Results of Stockpile Soil Samples
Danner Rosemount Gravel Pit
Rosemount, Minnesota
Project B2500590
NSP‐1‐2NSP‐1NSP‐2‐1NSP‐2NSP‐3‐1NSP‐3NSP‐4‐1NSP‐4 SSP‐1‐1 SSP‐1 SSP‐2‐1 SSP‐2 SSP‐3‐2 SSP‐3 SSP‐4‐2 SSP‐4Trip Blank
Grab Composite Grab Composite Grab Composite Grab Composite Grab Composite Grab Composite Grab Composite Grab Composite ‐‐‐
1/29/2025 1/29/2025 1/29/2025 1/29/2025 1/29/2025 1/29/2025 1/29/2025 1/29/2025 1/29/2025 1/29/2025 1/29/2025 1/29/2025 1/29/2025 1/29/2025 1/29/2025 1/29/2025 1/29/2025
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) (mg/kg)
All reported VOCs ‐‐‐<RL ‐‐‐<RL ‐‐‐<RL ‐‐‐<RL ‐‐‐<RL ‐‐‐<RL ‐‐‐<RL ‐‐‐<RL ‐‐‐<RL ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) (mg/kg)
Acenaphthylene 208‐96‐8 ‐‐‐<0.0114 ‐‐‐<0.0120 ‐‐‐<0.0116 ‐‐‐<0.0110 ‐‐‐<0.0110 ‐‐‐<0.0118 ‐‐‐<0.0114 ‐‐‐0.0221 ‐‐‐NE NE NE
Anthracene 120‐12‐7 ‐‐‐<0.0114 ‐‐‐<0.0120 ‐‐‐<0.0116 ‐‐‐<0.0110 ‐‐‐0.0156 ‐‐‐0.0212 ‐‐‐<0.0114 ‐‐‐0.0347 ‐‐‐2,800 42,000 1,300
Benz(a)anthracene 56‐55‐3 ‐‐‐0.0156 ‐‐‐0.0166 ‐‐‐<0.0116 ‐‐‐0.0403 ‐‐‐0.0611 ‐‐‐0.0816 ‐‐‐0.0349 ‐‐‐0.135 ‐‐‐cPAH cPAH cPAH
Benzo(b)fluoranthene 205‐99‐2 ‐‐‐0.0308 ‐‐‐0.0346 ‐‐‐0.0215 ‐‐‐0.0682 ‐‐‐0.114 ‐‐‐0.128 ‐‐‐0.0605 ‐‐‐0.243 ‐‐‐cPAH cPAH cPAH
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 207‐08‐9 ‐‐‐<0.0114 ‐‐‐<0.0120 ‐‐‐<0.0116 ‐‐‐0.0228 ‐‐‐0.0404 ‐‐‐0.0492 ‐‐‐0.019 ‐‐‐0.0989 ‐‐‐cPAH cPAH cPAH
Benzo(a)pyrene (BaP) 50‐32‐8 ‐‐‐0.0198 ‐‐‐0.0197 ‐‐‐0.0144 ‐‐‐0.0495 ‐‐‐0.0814 ‐‐‐0.0929 ‐‐‐0.042 ‐‐‐0.183 ‐‐‐2BTV; cPAH 23; cPAH 1.4; cPAH
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 191‐24‐2 ‐‐‐0.0272 ‐‐‐0.0242 ‐‐‐0.0195 ‐‐‐0.045 ‐‐‐0.0666 ‐‐‐0.0763 ‐‐‐0.0403 ‐‐‐0.157 ‐‐‐NE NE NE
Chrysene 218‐01‐9 ‐‐‐0.0251 ‐‐‐0.0274 ‐‐‐0.0179 ‐‐‐0.0542 ‐‐‐0.0738 ‐‐‐0.0903 ‐‐‐0.0453 ‐‐‐0.182 ‐‐‐cPAH cPAH cPAH
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 53‐70‐3 ‐‐‐<0.0114 ‐‐‐<0.0120 ‐‐‐<0.0116 ‐‐‐<0.0110 ‐‐‐0.0145 ‐‐‐0.0159 ‐‐‐<0.0114 ‐‐‐0.031 ‐‐‐cPAH cPAH cPAH
Fluoranthene 206‐44‐0 ‐‐‐0.03 ‐‐‐0.0414 ‐‐‐0.0225 ‐‐‐0.079 ‐‐‐0.105 ‐‐‐0.178 ‐‐‐0.0636 ‐‐‐0.275 ‐‐‐210 2,700 670
Indeno(1,2,3‐cd)pyrene 193‐39‐5 ‐‐‐0.0155 ‐‐‐0.0168 ‐‐‐0.0117 ‐‐‐0.0322 ‐‐‐0.0539 ‐‐‐0.0625 ‐‐‐0.0305 ‐‐‐0.131 ‐‐‐cPAH cPAH cPAH
Phenanthrene 85‐01‐8 ‐‐‐0.0137 ‐‐‐0.0265 ‐‐‐<0.0116 ‐‐‐0.0295 ‐‐‐0.0388 ‐‐‐0.101 ‐‐‐0.0287 ‐‐‐0.101 ‐‐‐NE NE NE
Pyrene 129‐00‐0 ‐‐‐0.0307 ‐‐‐0.0385 ‐‐‐0.0239 ‐‐‐0.0719 ‐‐‐0.0839 ‐‐‐0.139 ‐‐‐0.0614 ‐‐‐0.239 ‐‐‐220 3,200 440
All other reported PAHs ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐<RL ‐‐‐<RL ‐‐‐<RL ‐‐‐<RL ‐‐‐<RL ‐‐‐<RL ‐‐‐<RL ‐‐‐<RL ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐
BaP Equivalent Concentration[c]‐‐‐ ‐‐‐0.0262 ‐‐‐0.0268 ‐‐‐0.0179 ‐‐‐0.0664 ‐‐‐0.1172 ‐‐‐0.1348 ‐‐‐0.0569 ‐‐‐0.2630 ‐‐‐2BTV 23 1.4
Metals (mg/kg)
Arsenic, Total 7440‐38‐2 ‐‐‐2.6 ‐‐‐2.4 ‐‐‐2.3 ‐‐‐2.6 ‐‐‐1.9 ‐‐‐2.0 ‐‐‐2.6 ‐‐‐2.0 ‐‐‐9BTV 9BTV 5.8
Barium, Total 7440‐39‐3 ‐‐‐43.3 ‐‐‐58.9 ‐‐‐48.8 ‐‐‐49.2 ‐‐‐37.0 ‐‐‐40.8 ‐‐‐56.6 ‐‐‐45.1 ‐‐‐260 41,000 1,700
Cadmium, Total 7440‐43‐9 ‐‐‐<0.16 ‐‐‐<0.17 ‐‐‐<0.16 ‐‐‐<0.16 ‐‐‐<0.16 ‐‐‐<0.17 ‐‐‐<0.16 ‐‐‐<0.16 ‐‐‐1.6 23 8.8
Chromium, Total[e]7440‐47‐3 ‐‐‐10.7 ‐‐‐10.8 ‐‐‐12.3 ‐‐‐16.5 ‐‐‐15.2 ‐‐‐14.5 ‐‐‐11.1 ‐‐‐13.6 ‐‐‐23,000/2.3[e]100,000/62[e]1,000,000,000/36[e]
Lead, Total 7439‐92‐1 ‐‐‐4.5 ‐‐‐5.7 ‐‐‐4.7 ‐‐‐6.8 ‐‐‐3.7 ‐‐‐5.6 ‐‐‐11.4 ‐‐‐5.6 ‐‐‐200 460 2,700
Mercury, Total 7439‐97‐6 ‐‐‐<0.021 ‐‐‐<0.021 ‐‐‐<0.021 ‐‐‐<0.022 ‐‐‐<0.020 ‐‐‐<0.021 ‐‐‐<0.021 ‐‐‐<0.022 ‐‐‐2.7 3.1 3.3
Selenium, Total 7782‐49‐2 ‐‐‐<1.1 ‐‐‐<1.2 ‐‐‐<1.1 ‐‐‐<1.1 ‐‐‐<1.1 ‐‐‐<1.1 ‐‐‐<1.0 ‐‐‐<1.1 ‐‐‐78 1,200 2.6
Silver, Total 7440‐22‐4 ‐‐‐<0.53 ‐‐‐<0.58 ‐‐‐<0.55 ‐‐‐<0.54 ‐‐‐<0.55 ‐‐‐<0.56 ‐‐‐<0.52 ‐‐‐<0.53 ‐‐‐78 1,200 7.9
Petroleum Parameters (mg/kg)
Gasoline Range Organics (GRO)‐‐‐<12.6 ‐‐‐<13.8 ‐‐‐<11.8 ‐‐‐<11.0 ‐‐‐<10.7 ‐‐‐<12.6 ‐‐‐<13.6 ‐‐‐<11.6 ‐‐‐<10.0
Diesel Range Organics (DRO) with Silica Gel Cleanup ‐‐‐<100 [1]‐‐‐<10.7 ‐‐‐10.3 [2]‐‐‐20.7 [2]‐‐‐<11.7 ‐‐‐<9.6 ‐‐‐<13.3 ‐‐‐<8.5 ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐
Notes
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Soil Reference Values (SRVs) updated in March 2024 (MPCA Guidance Document c‐r1‐06) and Soil Leaching Values (SLVs) updated in June 2013 (MPCA Guidance Document c‐r1‐03). The most conservative value for acute or chronic Residential/Recreational SRV is presented, if applicable.
mg/kg = Milligrams per kilogram.
< = Not detected at or above the laboratory reporting limit indicated.
‐‐‐ = Not analyzed or calculated for this parameter or not applicable.
Bold indicates the compound was detected at or above the laboratory reporting limit.
BTV = Background Threshold Value. BTVs are not calculated health based SRVs. The MPCA calculated SRVs were determined to be below background values (MPCA Guidance Document c‐r1‐05).
NE = Regulatory limit not established for this parameter.
RL = Reporting limits for other parameters that are not listed individually in this table because their concentrations were below reporting limits provided in the laboratory report.
[c] = Benzo(a)pyrene (BaP) equivalent concentration is calculated based on the concentration and weighted toxicity of cPAHs (MPCA Guidance Document c‐r1‐5). If no cPAHs were detected above reasonable laboratory reporting limits the BaP equivalent concentration is reported as 0 mg/kg per MPCA Remediation Division Policy (MPCA Guidance Document c‐rem3‐03).
[e] = Reported result is total chromium, regulatory limits for chromium III and chromium VI are provided.
[f] = DRO/GRO concentrations greater than 100 mg/kg are not suitable for reuse as unregulated fill per MPCA Guidance Document c‐rem1‐01 Best Management Practices for the Off‐Site Reuse of Unregulated Fill .
Exceeds Residential/Recreational SRV
Exceeds SLV
Exceeds 100 mg/kg for DRO/GRO
[1] [ED] Due to the extract's physical characteristics, the analysis was performed at dilution.
MPCA Unreg. Fill Criterion
100[f]
100[f]
[2] [T6] High boiling point hydrocarbons are present in the sample.
Compound/Parameter CAS No.
Sample Identifier, Sample Type, and Date Collected
Residential/
Recreational SRV
(mg/kg)
Commercial/
Industrial SRV
(mg/kg)
SLV
(mg/kg)
Page 1 of 1
Page 90 of 142
Attachment A
Page 91 of 142
#=CL#
February 11, 2025
LIMS USE: FR - AMANDA LANNING
LIMS OBJECT ID: 10722375
10722375
Project:
Pace Project No.:
RE:
Amanda Lanning
Braun Intertec Corporation
11001 Hampshire Ave South
Minneapolis, MN 55438
B2500590 Danner Rosemount Grav
Dear Amanda Lanning:
Enclosed are the analytical results for sample(s) received by the laboratory on January 29, 2025. The results relate only to
the samples included in this report. Results reported herein conform to the applicable TNI/NELAC Standards and the
laboratory's Quality Manual, where applicable, unless otherwise noted in the body of the report.
The test results provided in this final report were generated by each of the following laboratories within the Pace Network:
• Pace Analytical Services - Minneapolis
If you have any questions concerning this report, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Sydni Harrison
sydni.harrison@pacelabs.com
Project Manager
(612)607-1700
Enclosures
cc:Eric Crouser, Braun Intertec
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
1700 Elm Street
Minneapolis, MN 55414
(612)607-1700
Page 1 of 79
Page 92 of 142
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
City Council Regular Meeting: March 18, 2025
AGENDA ITEM: Award Contract - Municipal Well No. 17 - Phase II
(Wellhouse Construction)
AGENDA SECTION:
CONSENT AGENDA
PREPARED BY: Nick Egger, Public Works Director AGENDA NO. 6.n.
ATTACHMENTS: Recommendation of Award Letter - Short Elliot
Hendrickson, Well No. 17 Project Site Map
APPROVED BY: LJM
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt a Motion to Approve the Award of a Contract for Phase II of
Construction for Well No. 17
BACKGROUND
In 2024, the City awarded a contract to drill Well No. 17, the next addition to the City's water supply
system. In February 2025, the City solicited bids for the wellhouse construction, receiving three on
February 21. The lowest responsible bid of $2,219,500 from Rice Lake Construction Group of
Deerwood, MN, was about 3.8% over the estimate. However, City staff and consulting engineers, Short
Elliot Hendrickson, consider this a reasonable margin and recommend awarding the contract. Delaying
construction would hinder water supply expansion and likely increase future costs.
The total anticipated construction cost, including the well drilling ($587,198) and wellhouse
construction ($2,219,500), is $2,806,698. Adding an estimated $250,000 for design, project
management, testing, and oversight, the overall project cost is expected to fall between $3 million and
$3.1 million. The City's capital improvement plan originally estimated a total cost of $2.75 million.
Given the City's growing demand for water and the likelihood of rising construction costs, proceeding
with the wellhouse contract now is the most prudent course of action. Awarding the contract ensures
timely completion of the project and supports the City's long-term water supply needs.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Council move to approve the award of a contract to construct the wellhouse for
Well No. 17 to Rice Lake Construction Group in the amount of $2,219,500.
Page 93 of 142
Engineers | Architects | Planners | Scientists
Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 3535 Vadnais Center Drive, St. Paul, MN 55110-3507
651.490.2000 | 800.325.2055 | 888.908.8166 fax | sehinc.com
SEH is 100% employee-owned | Affirmative Action–Equal Opportunity Employer
March 4, 2025 RE: Rosemount, MN
Well No. 17 - Wellhouse (Contract B)
SEH No. ROSEM 172294
City of Rosemount
2875 145th Street
Rosemount, MN 55068
On 10:00 a.m., Friday, February 21, 2025, three bids were received for the above-referenced project. The
bids ranged from a high of $2,420,000 to a low of $2,219,500. The low bid received was submitted by
Rice Lake Construction Group, of Deerwood, MN, in the amount of $2,219,500.
Contractor Total Bid
Rice Lake Construction Group $2,219,500.00
Magney Construction, Inc. $2,389,978.00
Municipal Builders, Inc. $2,420,000.00
Engineer's Estimate ($2,137,648.50)
This contractor has worked in Rosemount on projects of various sizes. SEH engineers can conclude that
Rice Lake Construction Group has the experience and ability to complete a project of this size.
Accordingly, we recommend the project be awarded to Rice Lake Construction Group in the amount of
$2,219,500.
Sincerely,
Chad Katzenberger, PE
Project Manager
dmk
Attachment
x:\pt\r\rosem\172294\6-bid-const\bidding\contract b\recommendation of award letter.docx
Page 94 of 142
TABULATION OF BIDS
Well No. 17 - Wellhouse (Contract B)Engineer's Estimate Rice Lake Construction Group Magney Construction, Inc. Municipal Builders, Inc.
Rosemount, MN 22360 County Road 12 1401 Park Road 7900 Old Viking Blvd NW
SEH No.: ROSEM 172294 Deerwood, MN 56444 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Nowthen, MN 55303
Bid Date: 10:00 a.m., Friday, February 21, 2025
Item No. Item Unit
Est.
Quantity Unit Price Total Price Unit Price Total Price Unit Price Total Price Unit Price Total Price
2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 $33,000.00 $33,000.00 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $195,000.00 $195,000.00 $121,000.00 $121,000.00
2101.501 CLEARING & GRUBBING LS 1 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $6,290.00 $6,290.00 $7,850.00 $7,850.00 $5,841.24 $5,841.24
2104.502 REMOVE CASTING EACH 1 $500.00 $500.00 $735.00 $735.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $104.15 $104.15
2104.502 REMOVE HYDRANT EACH 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,469.00 $1,469.00 $4,800.00 $4,800.00 $1,105.96 $1,105.96
2104.503 REMOVE WATER MAIN LF 103 $30.00 $3,090.00 $67.00 $6,901.00 $35.00 $3,605.00 $56.51 $5,820.53
2104.503 REMOVE CURB & GUTTER LF 64 $20.00 $1,280.00 $22.00 $1,408.00 $20.00 $1,280.00 $8.98 $574.72
2104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY 71 $30.00 $2,130.00 $22.00 $1,562.00 $15.00 $1,065.00 $23.87 $1,694.77
2104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS WALK SY 69 $30.00 $2,070.00 $23.00 $1,587.00 $15.00 $1,035.00 $7.10 $489.90
2105.607 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV) CY 71 $50.00 $3,550.00 $44.00 $3,124.00 $35.00 $2,485.00 $34.48 $2,448.08
2106.507 EXCAVATION - COMMON (EV) CY 4 $35.00 $140.00 $155.00 $620.00 $40.00 $160.00 $1,242.09 $4,968.36
2106.507 COMMON EMBANKMENT (CV) CY 1297 $40.00 $51,880.00 $28.00 $36,316.00 $30.00 $38,910.00 $29.42 $38,157.74
2123.61 STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM) HR 20 $250.00 $5,000.00 $181.00 $3,620.00 $115.00 $2,300.00 $150.00 $3,000.00
2211.509 AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 TON 278 $50.00 $13,900.00 $36.00 $10,008.00 $35.00 $9,730.00 $11.00 $3,058.00
2301.503 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B618 LF 90 $80.00 $7,200.00 $39.00 $3,510.00 $53.00 $4,770.00 $37.20 $3,348.00
2301.503 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN RIBBON LF 102 $70.00 $7,140.00 $29.00 $2,958.00 $53.00 $5,406.00 $27.55 $2,810.10
2301.504 8" REINFORCED CONCRETE SF 400 $15.00 $6,000.00 $18.00 $7,200.00 $20.00 $8,000.00 $26.10 $10,440.00
2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3;C) TON 26 $175.00 $4,550.00 $150.00 $3,900.00 $150.00 $3,900.00 $143.00 $3,718.00
2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 NON-WEARING COURSE MIX (3;B) TON 16 $180.00 $2,880.00 $134.00 $2,144.00 $134.00 $2,144.00 $128.00 $2,048.00
2360.509 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (5;L) TON 128 $175.00 $22,400.00 $152.00 $19,456.00 $152.00 $19,456.00 $145.00 $18,560.00
2502.503 6" PVC PIPE DRAIN - SCH 40 LF 41 $35.00 $1,435.00 $50.00 $2,050.00 $25.00 $1,025.00 $25.91 $1,062.31
2502.602 4" PVC PIPE DRAIN CLEANOUT EACH 2 $75.00 $150.00 $494.00 $988.00 $500.00 $1,000.00 $244.84 $489.68
2503.603 4" PVC SANITARY SERVICE PIPE - SCH 40 LF 30 $100.00 $3,000.00 $90.00 $2,700.00 $25.00 $750.00 $35.97 $1,079.10
2504.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER MAIN EACH 2 $4,000.00 $8,000.00 $5,355.00 $10,710.00 $2,500.00 $5,000.00 $3,876.40 $7,752.80
2504.602 4" GATE VALVE AND BOX EACH 1 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $2,447.00 $2,447.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $2,126.55 $2,126.55
2504.602 6" GATE VALVE AND BOX EACH 2 $4,200.00 $8,400.00 $3,654.00 $7,308.00 $5,000.00 $10,000.00 $2,722.03 $5,444.06
2504.602 12" GATE VALVE AND BOX EACH 5 $8,000.00 $40,000.00 $7,456.00 $37,280.00 $7,000.00 $35,000.00 $6,940.06 $34,700.30
2504.602 HYDRANT EACH 2 $15,000.00 $30,000.00 $8,879.00 $17,758.00 $9,000.00 $18,000.00 $7,567.23 $15,134.46
2504.603 12" DIP WATER MAIN - CL52 LF 160 $150.00 $24,000.00 $165.00 $26,400.00 $115.00 $18,400.00 $184.16 $29,465.60
2504.603 6" DIP WATER MAIN - CL52 LF 51 $125.00 $6,375.00 $140.00 $7,140.00 $95.00 $4,845.00 $109.87 $5,603.37
2504.603 4" DIP WATER MAIN - CL52 LF 75 $115.00 $8,625.00 $98.00 $7,350.00 $95.00 $7,125.00 $133.21 $9,990.75
2504.608 DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS LB 1033 $6.00 $6,198.00 $12.00 $12,396.00 $13.00 $13,429.00 $17.02 $17,581.66
2506.502 INSTALL CASTING EACH 1 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $2,541.00 $2,541.00 $500.00 $500.00 $1,252.18 $1,252.18
2506.602 INSTALL 48" MANHOLE - WITH SEEPAGE PIT EACH 2 $15,000.00 $30,000.00 $10,598.00 $21,196.00 $4,000.00 $8,000.00 $7,559.50 $15,119.00
2521.518 6" CONCRETE WALK SF 261 $8.50 $2,218.50 $13.00 $3,393.00 $15.00 $3,915.00 $25.00 $6,525.00
2531.604 7" CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTER SY 27 $75.00 $2,025.00 $155.00 $4,185.00 $205.00 $5,535.00 $147.20 $3,974.40
$2,137,648.50 $2,219,500.00 $2,389,978.00 $2,420,000.00
Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc.Page 1 of 2
Page 95 of 142
TABULATION OF BIDS
Well No. 17 - Wellhouse (Contract B)Engineer's Estimate Rice Lake Construction Group Magney Construction, Inc. Municipal Builders, Inc.
Rosemount, MN 22360 County Road 12 1401 Park Road 7900 Old Viking Blvd NW
SEH No.: ROSEM 172294 Deerwood, MN 56444 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Nowthen, MN 55303
Bid Date: 10:00 a.m., Friday, February 21, 2025
Item No. Item Unit
Est.
Quantity Unit Price Total Price Unit Price Total Price Unit Price Total Price Unit Price Total Price
$2,137,648.50 $2,219,500.00 $2,389,978.00 $2,420,000.00
2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $2,324.00 $2,324.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00
2573.501 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT EACH 1 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $1,811.00 $1,811.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $1,608.91 $1,608.91
2573.502 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION EACH 2 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 $604.00 $1,208.00 $350.00 $700.00 $223.52 $447.04
2573.503 SILT FENCE; TYPE MS LF 362 $6.00 $2,172.00 $7.00 $2,534.00 $4.00 $1,448.00 $6.15 $2,226.30
2573.503 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE COMPOST LF 100 $4.00 $400.00 $7.00 $700.00 $3.00 $300.00 $7.68 $768.00
2574.507 COMMON TOPSOIL BORROW CY 180 $50.00 $9,000.00 $57.00 $10,260.00 $30.00 $5,400.00 $48.55 $8,739.00
2575.504 ROLLED EROSION PREVENTION CATEGORY 20 SY 2460 $3.50 $8,610.00 $2.25 $5,535.00 $1.00 $2,460.00 $4.00 $9,840.00
2575.508 SEEDING (MIXTURE 25-141) LB 33 $10.00 $330.00 $25.00 $825.00 $50.00 $1,650.00 $15.00 $495.00
WELL NO. 17 WELLHOUSE BUILDING, FOUNDATION, LS 1 $1,750,000.00 $1,750,000.00 $1,815,653.00 $1,815,653.00 $1,923,100.00 $1,923,100.00 $2,006,886.98 $2,006,886.98
TOTAL BID PRICE $2,137,648.50 $2,389,978.00 $2,420,000.00$2,219,500.00
Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc.Page 2 of 2
Page 96 of 142
Future Municipal Well No. 17 Site
Disclaimer: Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not guaranteed.
This is not a legal document and should not be substituted for a title search,appraisal, survey, or
for zoning verification.
Map Scale
1 inch = 200 feet
5/2/2024
Page 97 of 142
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
City Council Regular Meeting: March 18, 2025
Tenative City Council Meeting: March 18, 2025
AGENDA ITEM: Request by Riveter Real Estate LLC for a Major
Amendment to the Omni Orchards Farm Winery
PUD Agreement.
AGENDA SECTION:
NEW BUSINESS
PREPARED BY: Anthony Nemcek , Senior Planner AGENDA NO. 9.a.
ATTACHMENTS: Resolution, PUD Agreement, Planning Commission
Meeting Minutes Excerpt, Site Location, Site Plan,
Building Elevations, Building Floor Plan, Landscape
Plan, Engineer's Review Memo Dated February 14,
2025, Staff Report from the August 2021 Planning
Commission Meeting, Original PUD Agreement
APPROVED BY: LJM
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to adopt a resolution repealing the existing Omni Farm Winery
planned unit development agreement and replacing it with a similar agreement that encompasses
both 15675 Biscayne Avenue and 15701 Biscayne Avenue.
BACKGROUND
The Rosemount City Council is being asked to consider a request by Riveter Real Estate, LLC to amend
the Omni Orchards Farm Winery PUD. The PUD amendment request proposes expanding the Omni
Orchards Farm Winery PUD area to include the property immediately north of the existing Omni
Winery. Based on conversations with the City's attorney, the actual action by Council will be a repeal
and replacement of the existing PUD Agreement with a new one that includes both parcels as the
"subject property". The applicant is proposing a new building on that site containing wine production,
a tasting room, and event space. The Planning Commission reviewed and approved the site plan for
the expansion. Because Site Plan reviews are solely the purview of the Planning Commission, the
Council is only being asked to take action on the PUD agreement.
Applicant and
Property Owner
Riveter Real Estate, LLC
Site Location 15675 Biscayne Avenue
Site Area in Acres 5.0
Current Zoning B-2 Employment
Land Use
Designation
Business Park
Neighboring Uses East - Mineral Extraction
South - Omni Winery
North - Business Park/Agriculture
West - Business Park/Agriculture
Page 98 of 142
The subject property is located immediately north of the current Omni Winery and Taproom. Existing
structures on the site, which consist of a dwelling and a pole barn, will be removed to accommodate
Omni's expansion onto the property. The City Council approved the Omni Orchards Farm Winery
Planned Unit Development agreement in September 2021. The PUD agreement contains two
deviations from the City Code related to exterior materials and signage. Specifically, the PUD
agreement allows for the use of metal paneling as an exterior material and vinyl decals as signage. At
the time, justification was made for this deviation due to the agricultural nature of the winery
operation and the planting of vineyards and orchards. The vineyard and orchard components will be
expanded upon with the proposed project. The applicant is not proposing any additional deviations
from the City Code, they are only requesting to amend the PUD to also include the newly acquired
parcel north of the existing operation. The applicant would like to use the same exterior materials on
the new building being proposed. Vinyl decals used as wall signage would also be allowed. The
Planning Commission and staff are supportive of keeping the buildings and signage consistent across
the entire site.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
The Planning Commission held a public hearing to review the request and receive public comment
during its meeting on February 25, 2025. Following staff's presentation, the Commission asked about
the amount of parking on the site and if it is sufficient based on the seating within the new building, as
there is both a tasting room and an event space. Staff described how the current operation exceeds
the minimum parking requirement of the zoning ordinance, and the entire site should be considered
when assessing parking standards. The applicant was able to speak to the Commission's question and
said that there would be little overlap between the use of the tasting room and the event space. The
Commission also asked about traffic at County Road 42 and Biscayne Avenue. Staff provided a general
timeline for the construction of a signal light at that intersection. The Planning Commission voted
unanimously to approve the site plan and recommend the PUD area be expanded to the subject
property.
ISSUE ANALYSIS
Legal Authority. Planned Unit Developments are legislative in nature due to the proposed deviations
from the zoning ordinance. Therefore, the City Council has broad discretion in making
recommendations to approve or deny a request, although consideration should be given to prior PUD
approvals.
Land Use and Zoning
The site is zoned B-2 Employment, and farm wineries are a permitted use in that zoning district. The
Zoning Ordinance defines a farm winery as follows: A winery operated by the owner of a Minnesota
farm with a majority of the ingredients produced on the premises as regulated by Minnesota statutes,
as may be amended, and may or may not include associated event spaces, retail, and restaurants
without drive-through facilities. Therefore, expanding the existing farm winery operation to include an
event space is consistent with the Zoning Ordinance.
General Site Layout
The site will be accessed via the existing curb cut that currently serves the site. A new parking lot will
be located in the south central part of the site and an internal driveway will connect the subject parcel
Page 99 of 142
with Omni's existing operation. As part of this project the existing overflow parking on the north side
of the current operation will be paved. A benefit of the new parking lot and driveway connection will
be the ability to share parking at times when overflow parking is needed. The new structure will be
located toward the north central portion of the subject property. A stormwater pond will be located
east of the new parking lot and will provide some space as a buffer from Biscayne Avenue.
Building Materials and Massing
The Omni Orchards Farm Winery Planned Unit Development contains a deviation from the zoning code
related to building materials. Specifically, the PUD agreement allows for metal as an exterior material
and vinyl decals for wall signage. The applicant is proposing the PUD area be expanded to include this
site, so the proposed building can be consistent with the existing Omni Winery and Taproom building.
The elevations provided by the applicant show a single-story building with exterior materials similar to
the existing Omni building. The eastern elevation that faces Biscayne Avenue will feature brick
wainscoting and storefront windows extending to down to the grade. The south elevation shows a
covered patio area.
Landscaping
The applicant's landscape plan shows a row of trees being planted as a windbreak along the western
and northern property lines. Lilacs are also shown planted along the western property line to add to
the windbreak. Areas providing habitat for bumblebees will be planted in various locations throughout
the site. A row of trees and shrubs along the eastern border of the parking lot area will provide
screening from the public right of way. In addition to plantings used to augment the landscape,
orchard trees and grape vines will be planted on the site. Eight existing mature trees will be retained.
The zoning ordinance also requires 1 foundation planting per 10 linear feet of building exterior. The
plan contains 12 hydrangea bushes and 22 dogwoods. Staff finds that these plantings, in addition to
the vines and bumblebee habitat, meet the requirement of the zoning ordinance for foundation
plantings.
Engineering
The City's engineering staff has conducted a review of the plans and submitted a memorandum, which
is attached, containing comments related to the site plan. Some of the comments have already been
addressed, such as the paving of the northern parking area in the existing Omni site. The majority of
the comments within the memorandum are related to stormwater management. Stormwater will be
managed onsite in a pond located east of the parking area. The site is already served by sanitary sewer
and water utilities located within Biscayne Avenue, so no new public utilities will be required for this
project.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission and staff are recommending approval of an Omni Orchards Farm Winery
Planned Unit Development Agreement that includes both 15675 and 15701 Biscayne Avenue, and
would allow the proposed new buildings to be consistent with the existing Omni Winery and Taproom
structure.
Page 100 of 142
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2025 -
A RESOLUTION REPEALING THE EXISTING OMNI FARM WINERY PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND REPLACING IT WITH A SIMILAR AGREEMENT
THAT ENCOMPASSES BOTH 15675 BISCAYNE AVENUE AND 15701 BISCAYNE
AVENUE
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department of the City of Rosemount received a
request from Omni Wine Holdings, LLC, and Riveter Real Estate, LLC., concerning property legally
described as:
The East 466.69 feet of the North Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 32, Township 115, Range
19,
EXCEPT the North 466.69 feet thereof and EXCEPT the South 466.69 feet thereof, Dakota County,
Minnesota.
And
The North 466.69 feet of the East 466.69 feet of the North Half of the Southeast Quarter
of Section Thirty-Two (32), Township One Hundred Fifteen (115), Range Nineteen (19), Dakota
County, Minnesota. Said 466.69 feet being measured along or parallel with the North and East lines of
said North Half of the Southeast Quarter.
Subject to road easement for Biscayne Avenue.
Dakota County, Minnesota
WHEREAS, on February 25, 2025 the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount held a
public hearing and reviewed the request to expand the Omni Orchards Farm Winery PUD; and
WHEREAS, on February 25, 2025 the Planning Commission recommended approval of the
request; and
WHEREAS, on March 18, 2025 the City Council of the City of Rosemount reviewed the Planning
Commission’s recommendation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Council of the City of Rosemount hereby
repeals and replaces the existing Omni Orchards Farm Winery Planned Unit Development
Agreement, subject to:
1. Execution of a PUD agreement.
2. A deviation from Section 11-7-2 5. Allowing exterior wall surfaces to consist of metal
paneling.
3. A deviation from Section 11-8-7 D. 1. Allowing the use of vinyl decals for wall signage.
ADOPTED this 18th day of March, 2025, by the City Council of the City of Rosemount.
Page 101 of 142
2
__________________________________________
Jeffery D. Weisensel, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________________
Erin Fasbender, City Clerk
Page 102 of 142
1
DECLARATION OF COVENANTS
AND RESTRICTIONS
OMNI ORCHARDS FARM WINERY
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
THIS DECLARATION made this ______ day of _________________, 2025, by Omni
Wine Holdings and Riveter Real Estate, Limited Liability Companies (hereinafter referred to as the
“Declarants”);
WHEREAS, Declarants is are owners of the real property as described on Attachment One,
attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof (hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Subject
Property”); and
WHEREAS, the Subject Property is subject to certain zoning and land use restrictions
imposed by the City of Rosemount (hereinafter referred to as the “City”) in connection with the
approval of an application for a final site and building plan planned unit development for a farm
winery development on the Subject Property; and
WHEREAS, the City has approved such development on the basis of the determination by
the City Council of the City that such development is acceptable only by reason of the details of the
development proposed and the unique land use characteristics of the proposed use of the Subject
Property; and that but for the details of the development proposed and the unique land use
characteristics of such proposed use, the master development plan planned unit development would
not have been approved; and
Page 103 of 142
2
WHEREAS, as a condition of approval of the master development plan planned unit
development, the City has required the execution and filing of this Declaration of Covenants,
Conditions and Restrictions (hereinafter the “Declaration”); and
WHEREAS, to secure the benefits and advantages of approval of such planned unit
development, Declarant desires to subject the Subject Property to the terms hereof.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Declarant declares that the Subject Property is, and shall be, held,
transferred, sold, conveyed and occupied subject to the covenants, conditions, and restrictions,
hereinafter set forth.
1. The use and development of the Subject Property shall conform to the following
document:
a. City Resolution No. 2025-XX, Attachment Two
2.. Development and maintenance of structures and uses on the Subject Property shall
conform to the following standards and requirements:
a. Maintenance of the stormwater basins, infiltration basins and associated
stormwater infrastructure necessary for the long term operation and function will be
performed by the City. All other maintenance including but not limited to garbage
collection, or landscape replacement or the like shall be the responsibility of the of the
private property owners. All maintenance of the stormwater basin and infiltration basin
shall be the responsibility of the City after the basins have been established.
b. Maintenance and replacement of trees and landscaping other than that
associated with the stormwater basin and infiltration basin described in standard a. shall be
the responsibility of the Declarant.
Page 104 of 142
3
3. The Subject Property may only be developed and used in accordance with Paragraphs
1 and 2 of this Declaration unless the owner first secures approval by the City Council of an
amendment to the planned unit development plan or a rezoning to a zoning classification that permits
such other development and use.
4. In connection with the approval of development of the Subject Property, the following
deviations from City Zoning or Subdivision Code provisions were approved:
a.Section 11-7-2 5.: The exterior wall surfaces may consist of metal paneling in
lieu of brick, natural stone, specialty integral colored concrete block, tile, architectural
textured concrete panels case in place, or precast concrete panels.
b.Section 11-8-7 D. 1.: The use of vinyl decal wall signage shall be allowed.
In all other respects the use and development of the Subject Property shall conform to the
requirements of the Paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Declaration and the City Code of Ordinances.
5. The obligations and restrictions of this Declaration run with the land of the Subject
Property and shall be enforceable against the Declarant, its successors and assigns, by the City of
Rosemount acting through its City Council. This Declaration may be amended from time to time by
a written amendment executed by the City and the owner or owners of the lot or lots to be affected by
said amendment.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned as duly authorized agents, officers or representatives of
Declarant have hereunto set their hands and seals as of the day and year first above written.
DECLARANT
Omni Wine Holdings, LLC.
By
Its
Page 105 of 142
4
And
Riveter Real Estate, LLC.
By____________________________
Its____________________________
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF __________ )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of _________, 20___,
by _____________________, the _________________, for and on behalf of
_________________________, a ____________________, by and on behalf of said
_______________________.
_______________________________
Notary Public
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY:
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
2875 145TH STREET WEST
ROSEMOUNT, MN 55068
651-423-4411
Page 106 of 142
EXCERPT FROM THE FEBRUARY 25 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
b. Request by Riveter Real Estate LLC for a major amendment to the Omni Orchards Farm
Winery PUD Agreement and a final site and building plan.
Planner Nemcek presented on a request by Riveter Real Estate LLC for a major amendment to the
Omni Orchards farm winery PUD agreement and final site and building plan. Nemcek showed the
site location and explained that the current use is residential, but the existing home and pole barn
will be removed for this project. He showed a site plan and stated that the area that has been used
for overflow parking will be paved and create a connection to the new parking lot that serves the
new building.
Nemcek presented the received floor plan. He also discussed the capacity for parking and explained
that in the current parking lot there is an excess of 26 stalls which will meet the holistic site parking
requirements. He showed the external elevations. Nemcek also presented the landscape plan and
stated that it is a unique plan because of the orchard component of the site. The only issue that
would need to be addressed by the applicant is the requirement of 1 tree per 10 stalls and this has
been added as a condition of approval. No new public infrastructure is necessary for the site as
sewer and water are already located on Biscayne Avenue. The final stormwater pond design is being
completed and is a condition of approval. Staff recommended approval.
Chairperson Kenninger asked about parking requirements based on seating in the event space and if
the count included the tasting room or not. Nemcek responded that because of the extra parking in
the current parking lot the total number of spaces will meet the code requirement for both the event
space
and the tasting room. She also asked if the parking will be paved. Nemcek confirmed that it will be.
He also stated that there is additional overflow parking to the south that is not going to be paved
because it is designated for a future road. Commissioner Ellis asked if the previously identified
parking included the overflow parking to the south. Nemcek confirmed that it did not.
Chairperson Kenninger opened the public hearing.
Zack Ward 15701 Biscayne
The owners came up to the podium and stated that they are using the event space as a general event
space and the tasting room will be used more typically as a winery.
Chairperson Kennigner asked if they would be used at the same time. Ward responded that there
would be very little overlap. Chairperson Kennigner also asked about an opening date. Ward
responded that October first would be the desired opening date.
Motion by Kenninger Second by Reed to close public hearing
Page 107 of 142
Ayes: 6.
Nays: None. Motion Carried.
Commissioner Beadner asked about the intersection of County Road 42 and Biscayne Avenue.
Nemcek responded that the county will be realigning the intersection to make it a perpendicular
intersection and improve sight lines. The signals will be in prior to or concurrent with the opening
of the new middle school.
Motion by Kenninger Second by Reed to recommend the City Council approve a Major
Amendment to the Omni Farm Winery planned unit development agreement expanding the PUD
area to include the property located at 15675 Biscayne Avenue.
Ayes: 6.
Nays: None. Motion Carried.
Motion by Kenninger Second by Beadner to approve a final site and building plan for an event
space at the Omni farm winery located at 15675 Biscayne Avenue, subject to the following
conditions:
1. Submittal of a landscape surety equal to 110% of the value of trees planted on the
property.
2. The landscape plan shall be updated to relocate 13 trees to the landscaped areas of the
parking lot.
3. Compliance with the requirements of the City Engineer dated February 14th, 2025.
Ayes: 6.
Nays: None. Motion Carried.
Page 108 of 142
Page 109 of 142
ED
G
E
O
F
C
U
L
T
I
V
A
T
I
O
N
ED
G
E
O
F
C
U
L
T
I
V
A
T
I
O
N
EDGE OF CULTIVATION EDGE OF CULTIVATION
P
O
S
T
OM
N
I
W
I
N
E
R
Y
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
BISCAYNE AVENUE
PROPOSED BUILDING
FFE: 951.50
NO PARKING NO PARKING
ME
C
H
.
MECH.
NO PARKING
4
5A
6
20
'
40
'
24
'
40
'
24
'
20
'
24
'
24
'
24
'
24'
18
'
24
'
18
'
9'
TYP.
24'20'
9'
TYP.
15
'
15'
20'24'
6
7
VINEYARD AREA
LOADING DOCK
3
48'27'
1
20
'
33
.
6
7
'
24
'
20
'
20'24'20'
10
2
11
11
11
6'
8'
16'
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
9
9
3
3
3
3
33
3
3
3
3
12
12
12
2
2
2
2
2
10
66
65A5A
DescriptionRev.Date
OM
N
I
W
I
N
E
R
Y
A
N
D
TA
P
R
O
O
M
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
IM
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
RO
S
E
M
O
U
N
T
,
M
N
Sheet Title:
Project #:
Drawn By:
Checked By:
Issue Date:
12246066.000
JTM
NJN
XX.XX.24
35
2
4
L
a
b
o
r
e
R
o
a
d
Wh
i
t
e
B
e
a
r
L
a
k
e
,
M
N
5
5
1
1
0
65
1
.
4
8
1
.
9
1
2
0
ww
w
.
l
a
r
s
o
n
e
n
g
r
.
c
o
m
C
2
0
2
5
L
a
r
s
o
n
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
,
I
n
c
.
A
l
l
r
i
g
h
t
s
r
e
s
e
r
v
e
d
.
W:\2024\Civil\12246066 - OMNI Winery And Taproom Parking Improvements\2. Design\B. Drawing Files\12246066 - C200 - Site Plan.dwg
La
r
s
o
n
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
,
I
n
c
.
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
T
i
t
l
e
:
RI
V
E
T
E
R
R
E
A
L
ES
T
A
T
E
S
L
L
C
.
14
9
6
2
6
4
T
H
A
V
E
N
.
OS
S
E
O
,
M
N
5
5
3
1
1
Cl
i
e
n
t
:
Nathan Nohner, P.E.
Date: Lic. No.:
I hereby certify that this plan,
specifications or report was prepared
by me or under my direct supervision
and that I am a duly licensed
Professional Engineer under the laws
of the state of Minnesota.
20
2
5
.
0
2
.
1
4
-
P
U
D
S
U
B
M
I
T
T
A
L
-
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
0
NORTH
15 30 60
Sheet:
NEW BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT
DETAIL 1/C500
NEW CONCRETE PAVEMENT
DETAIL 2/C500
NEW STOOP
GENERAL SEED MIX WITH 4" NEW/SALVAGED
TOPSOIL (TYPICAL OF ALL DISTURBED AREAS
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
STORMWATER SEED MIX
WITH 6" PRE-MIXED PLANTING MEDIUM
DETAIL 6/C502
PAVEMENT MARKINGS (WHITE)
SITE PLAN
1
KEY NOTES
NEW BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT, DETAIL 1/C500
NEW CONCRETE PAVEMENT, DETAIL 2/C500
NEW B612 CONCRETE CURB, DETAIL 4/C500
NEW RETAINING WALL, DETAIL 6/C500
NEW SIGN, POST, AND BOLLARD DETAIL 5/C500
_A:ADA PARKING
NEW LIGHT POLE, SEE ELECTRICAL
NEW CURB CUT, DETAIL 7/C500
GENERAL SEED MIX WITH 4" NEW/SALVAGED TOPSOIL
(TYPICAL OF ALL DISTURBED AREAS UNLESS OTHERWISE
NOTED)
STORMWATER SEED MIX WITH 6" PRE-MIXED PLANTING
MEDIUM, DETAIL 6/C502
NEW TRASH ENCLOSURE
NEW PATHWAY/PATIO
TRANSITION CURB TO FLUSH
2
3
C200
SYMBOL LEGEND
NO PARKING3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Page 110 of 142
Page 111 of 142
Page 112 of 142
Page 113 of 142
7
0
1
X
E
N
I
A
A
V
E
N
U
E
S
|
S
U
I
T
E
3
0
0
|
M
I
N
N
E
A
P
O
L
I
S
,
M
N
|
5
5
4
1
6
|
7
6
3
.
5
4
1
.
4
8
0
0
|
W
S
B
E
N
G
.
C
O
M
Memorandum
To: Brian Erickson, City Engineer
Nick Egger, Director of Public Works
Anthony Nemcek, Senior Planner
Jane Byron, Storm Water Specialist
From: Amanda Sachi, PE
Henry Meeker
Kris Keller, PE
Date: February 14, 2025
Re: OMNI Phase II – Preliminary PUD/Site Plan Review
WSB Project No. 028071-000
We have reviewed the documents provided by Larson Engineering on January 31, 2025.
Documents reviewed include:
•OMNI Phase II Civil Set, dated 1/31/25
•OMNI Phase II Stormwater Report, dated 1/31/25
Applicant should provide responses to each comment. We offer the following comments below.
1. General
a. Submit for and provide copies to the City of all required permits from regulatory
agencies (MCES, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Minnesota Department of
Health, NPDES, etc.)
b. Address redline comments on attached plan sheets
2. Preliminary Plat & Site Plan
a. Pave all parking areas and the access road connection in the Phase I OMNI site
b. Provide emergency /fire access turning movements/routes
c. Extend building sidewalk to southern parking area
d. The access route on the north side is narrow
i. Show the turning movements of the vehicles that will be accessing that
area
ii. Show proposed loading areas, doors, etc. in the northwest area
e. We recommend protecting the perimeter pavement edge with curb and/or wheel
stops to prevent deterioration
f. Call out all curb transitions and terminations
g. Extend seeding to cover areas disturbed for utility installation
h. Clarify the use of the concrete ramp with retaining wall at the south end of the
southern parking area.
i. Provide garbage enclosure location and turning movements to access.
3. Grading and Retaining Wall Plan
Page 114 of 142
OMNI Phase II – Preliminary PUD/Site Plan Review
February 14, 2025
Page 2
a. Review the 947.4 EOF for the NURP/Basin
i. A large portion of the parking lot would be inundated with water and it
would be 3’+ deep in the northeast corner
ii. Grade a swale along the north edge of the southern parking area to drain
to the west, which will allow the EOF to drop to 945.19 at the NE corner
of lot, which reduces ponding and EOF distance
b. Provide 1.5' freeboard between EOF and LOE/FFE
c. We recommend draining the low point northwest of the building to the east with a
ditch instead of storm sewer
d. Currently water is shown being trapped in the northeast corner of the southern
parking area due to the proposed gutter line elevations.
e. Provide drainage and utility easement for all stormwater BMPs and the EOF
route.
f. The existing catch basin shown in the low area of the gravel parking lot in OMNI
Phase I looks like it would deposit a lot of sediment
i. Pave all existing gravel parking areas
g. Retaining walls exceeding 4’ in height shall require a plan prepared by a licensed
engineer submitted for review and approval by the Building Official prior to permit
issuance.
i. Currently the retaining wall is proposed at 3.5’
4. Utilities
a. Applicant to submit for Minnesota Department of Labor plumbing plan review and
provide approved plans to City prior to permit issuance.
b. Provide additional details regarding the utility connections
i. Verify existing gate valve shown on the as-built or provide gate valve at
connection
ii. Verify and maintain the existing sanitary sewer service slope to the
structure before changing.
c. Provide casting (Ford A1) for cleanouts in paved surfaces
d. Verify building is sprinklered to mitigate hydrant requirements
i. Otherwise, additional hydrant may be required
e. Recommend shifting cleanouts to just upstream of storm sewer bends
f. Recommend removing curb cut and drain the parking lot with catch basins and a
flared end.
i. This would reduce the amount of flow crossing and accumulating in the
driving routes
g. Label pipe sizes for structure SAN-1
5. Existing Conditions & Removal Plan
a. No comments
6. Details
a. No comments
Page 115 of 142
OMNI Phase II – Preliminary PUD/Site Plan Review
February 14, 2025
Page 3
Stormwater Management
Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Comments:
1. General
a. A NPDES permit will be required since over an acre of disturbance is proposed.
b. Provide onsite soil testing results once available.
c. Please provide HydroCAD modeling files with future submittals for ease of
review.
d. The City standard is to require a BMP with a constructed outlet control structure,
however based on the landlocked nature of the site and lack of neighboring
buildings with freeboard limitations, a designated EOF is an acceptable alterative
to a piped outlet.
2. Ponds and Wetlands
a. It is recommended to consolidate the site infiltration basin with the existing basin
to the south on the original OMNI site. This will reduce excavation volumes and
simplify future maintenance.
b. Site grading may be simplified by regrading the NURP cell to function with the
infiltration basin as an overflow bench set at 941.0, instead of building up a berm,
connecting pipe, and riprap overflow.
3. Emergency Overflow Routes:
a. The site EOF route should be shortened if possible, ponding within a large
portion of the parking lot before overflowing is not ideal. See recommended
changes marked up in the plans.
4. Retaining Walls:
a. The current retaining wall on the south end of the parking lot is under 4’ tall.
However in case grading changes result in the retaining wall exceeding 4’ in
height, a plan prepared by a licensed engineer must be submitted for review and
approval by the Building Official prior to permit issuance.
5. Erosion Control:
a. Restoration seeding is needed over all disturbed areas, current extents do not
cover disturbances for installation of proposed sanitary and water utilities.
b. Riprap at outfalls into the NURP basin must extend down to the bottom of the
dead storage.
6. Grading:
a. Show grading limits on grading plan sheet.
b. Call out the EOF for the low point north of the site driveway.
Stormwater Management Plan:
1. General Storm Sewer Design
a. It is recommended to drain the low point west of the proposed building to the east
via a ditch rather than an extended 8” storm sewer run.
Page 116 of 142
OMNI Phase II – Preliminary PUD/Site Plan Review
February 14, 2025
Page 4
b. Catchbasins on curblines and storm sewer are preferred over a curb cut to route
drainage from the parking lot. See suggested design marked up in plans.
•Additionally, the current grading plan would result in trapped water in the
NE corner of the parking lot.
c. Provide pipe capacity and velocity calculations for proposed storm sewer. There
must be capacity to convey the 10-year storm event. Flow velocities must not
exceed 6 ft/s for outfalls to BMPs. The maximum 10-year flow to a single inlet is
3 CFS.
d. Site storm sewer must be upsized to a minimum of 15” diameter pipe. RCP is
recommended under driving surfaces.
2. Water Quantity
a. HydroCAD runoff modeling must be set to “Calculate separate
Pervious/Impervious runoff (SBUH weighting)” rather than Weighted-CN.
b. Drainage area delineations must be expanded to capture offsite runoff from the
north.
c. As there does not appear to be any backflow from Pond 2P into 1P, Dyn-Stor
routing is recommended for the HydroCAD modeling.
d. Exfiltration is not allowed in modeling to determine site HWLs.
3. Rate/Volume Control
a. It is recommended that the site area flowing to the BMP is maximized, any
acreage within property limits such as Drainage Area F that is not routed to a
BMP is subject to City offsite ponding fees.
4. Freeboard
a. The EOF for the low point west of the proposed building is exactly 1.00’ below
the FFE, grading must be closely monitored here to ensure the EOF is not
constructed above the noted elevation.
5. Water Quality
a. Infiltration calculations must be provided based on City requirements of basin
area (not counting basin side slopes) sized to 1/12 ac-ft/ac/day for the entire site
area. The following formula can be used to determine this area:
𝑅𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑑 𝐴𝑟𝑒𝑎 (𝑎𝑐)=𝑆𝑖𝑡𝑒 𝐴𝑟𝑒𝑎 (𝑎𝑐)
𝐼𝑛𝑓𝑖𝑙𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑅𝑎𝑡𝑒 (𝑖𝑛ℎ𝑟)
∗0.0416 (𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟)
•The current infiltration surface of 6,730 square feet appears to be
properly sized for the inflow area, but these calculations are needed in
future submittals to continue to confirm compliance.
6. Easements
a. The proposed BMP must be contained in a drainage and utility easement.
General
Infrastructure design shall be completed in accordance with the City of Rosemount’s Engineering
Guidelines and Standards. Infrastructure construction shall be completed in accordance with the
latest edition of the City’s General Specifications and Standard Detail Plates for Street and Utility
Construction.
Page 117 of 142
E X E C U T I V E S U M M A R Y
Planning Commission Meeting Date: August 24, 2021
Tentative City Council Meeting Date: September 21, 2021
AGENDA ITEM: Case 21-42-CUP and 21-43-MS Request by
Omni Orchards Farm Winery for a Conditional
Use Permit and PUD Master Development Plan
to Allow Construction of an 8,000 Square Foot
Farm Winery Tasting Room and 4,000 Square
Foot Patio.
AGENDA SECTION:
Public Hearing
PREPARED BY: Eric Van Oss, Economic Development
Coordinator
AGENDA NO. 4.a.
ATTACHMENTS: Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Architectural
Plans, Grading Plan, Exterior Elevations,
Photometric Site Plan, Accent Wall Materials,
ALTA Survey, City Engineer Memorandum
APPROVED BY: AK
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:
1. Motion to recommend Council adopt a resolution approving a Conditional Use Permit
for a winery facility with tasting room in the BP-Business Park District at 15700 Biscayne
Avenue.
2. Motion to recommend Council approve the Planned Unit Development Master
Development Plan, Site Plan and building design review for Omni Brew Holdings, LLC to
allow the construction of a of an 8,000 SF winery facility with tasting room, a 4,000 SF
outdoor front patio, and parking lot at 15700 Biscayne Avenue, subject to the following
conditions:
1. A landscape surety for 110% of the site landscaping is required.
2. Execution of a PUD agreement.
3. Conformance with all conditions of the City Engineer as outlined in the memo dated
August 12, 2021 prior to issuance of a building permit, including compliance with
the stormwater standards and removal of the spillways.
4. Dedicate all easements listed in the City Engineer’s memo dated August 12, 2021.
5. Review and approval of the trash enclosure by City staff, including use of
complementary materials to the principal structure.
6. A deviation from City Code Section 11-4-15-1 G.3 to allow for the exterior wall
surface to be metal paneling in lieu of brick, natural stone, specialty integral colored
concrete block, tile, architectural textured concrete panels cast in place, or precast
concrete panels.
7. A deviation from City Code Section 11-4-15-1 G.9 to allow for the use of vinyl decal
signage.
Page 118 of 142
2
SUMMARY
The Planning Commission is being asked to consider an approval from Omni Brew Holdings, LLC to a
new community winery and tasting room within the City of Rosemount. The proposed facility, located at
15700 Biscayne Avenue, will be multi-phased with the initial phase consisting of an 8,000 SF winery facility
with tasting room, a 4,000 SF outdoor front patio, and parking lot. Future phases will include outdoor
amenities such as a rear patio, event space, orchard – vineyard, game areas, additional paved parking, and
an outbuilding. Food and drink will be available to the public as well as opportunities for special events
such as live music, competitive lawn games, weddings, and other celebratory milestones. The winery
building will contain a private event room, tasting room with bar, office, commercial kitchen, production
area, restrooms, and storage areas.
BACKGROUND
Applicant & Property Owner(s): Omni Brew Holdings, LLC
Location: 15701 Biscayne Avenue
Area in Acres: 4.23 Acres
Comp. Guide Plan Designation: BP – Business Park
Current Zoning: BP – Business Park
PUD Master Development Plan, Site Plan and Design Review
The purpose of a site plan review is to evaluate the project as it relates to the performance and site design
standards of the zoning ordinance. Site plan approval is required for all commercial, industrial,
institutional and multi-family development projects. In this case, the applicant is proposing to construct
an 8,000 square foot commercial building with a 4,000 square foot patio that is subject to the site plan
review process.
Legal Authority. Conditional Use Permit requests are considered quasi-judicial actions. In such cases, the
City is acting as a judge to determine if the regulations within the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance,
and Subdivision Ordinance are being followed. Generally, if the application meets these requirements it
must be approved. The Planned Unit Development Master Development Plan is a legislative decision
because of the Code deviations being requested. Legislative decisions give the Planning Commission more
latitude, but consideration should be given to the PUD standards of previously approved developments in
the City as well as the PUD standards of the nearby business park. The purpose of a Planned Unit
Development review is to evaluate each project as it relates to the performance and site design standards of
the zoning ordinance. Site plan approval is required for all commercial, industrial, institutional, and multi-
family development projects and is also considered a quasi-judicial action.
As a Planned Unit Development Master Development Plan, the winery and tasting room is subject to the
general PUD standards outlined in Section 11-10-6(E). These standards evaluate the City’s land use and
zoning performance standards and the potential impact of the proposed use on the surrounding
neighborhood; draft findings for each are provided below.
1. Compatibility of the proposed plan with this chapter and the goals and policies of the
comprehensive plan.
The proposed plan is consistent with 2040 Comprehensive Plan, which anticipated development on this
site. The amendment would help meet the Economic Development Element Goals and Policies from the
Rosemount 2040 Comprehensive Plan by providing a lot to “promote development of businesses with a
large number of employees that offer wages to support an entire family and that are further constructed of
high-quality buildings providing both beauty and tax base to the community.”
Page 119 of 142
3
2. Effect of the proposed plan on the neighborhood in which it is to be located.
The development is consistent with the type of development anticipated in the BP-Business Park. The
business will help grow Rosemount’s business community and will be a positive addition to the
community.
3. Internal organization and adequacy of various uses or densities, circulation and parking
facilities, public facilities, recreation areas, open spaces, screening and landscaping.
The parking and landscaping are consistent with both BP district standards.
4. Consistency with the standards of section 11-10-3 of this chapter pertaining to site and building
plan review.
The plan is consistent with the standards in Section 11-10-3 of the zoning ordinance.
5. Such other factors as the planning commission or city council deems relevant.
The applicant has stated they will work with the City to address any concerns about the project.
Land Use & Zoning. The subject property is guided for BP-Business Park uses in accordance with the
current 2040 Future Land Use Plan, which is intended to provide for the establishment of corporate
headquarters, businesses, healthcare offices and related professional and service uses that do not require
outdoor storage in an environment that provides a high level of amenities. The present zoning of the
property BP-Business Park is consistent with the land use designation, and the proposed farm winery use
is consistent with the land use plan and compatible with other professional services in the vicinity.
Lot and Building Standards. As proposed, the subject property is consistent with the BP – Business
Park lot and building standards. The subject property is an existing lot of record and exceeds the
minimum lot requirements. In addition, the proposed building exceeds all setback requirements. The lot
and building standards for the BP district are detailed in the table below.
Building Performance Standards for the BP – Business Park District
Standard Required Proposed
Minimum Lot Size 1 acre 4.23 acres
Front (South) 30 ft.180 ft.
Side (East)10 ft.166 ft.
Side (West)10 ft.177 ft.
Rear (North)10 ft.126 ft.
Maximum Lot Coverage 75%20.55%
Exterior Building Materials. The majority of the building is metal panel siding and includes burnished
concrete masonry block as a wainscot to be on the most public sides of the building – the east elevation
along Biscayne and the south elevation along the new public street. The specialty integral colored block
aligns with the City’s intent for exterior materials for the business parks. The architectural appearance has a
“360 degree” design achieved by utilizing a vocabulary of window bays, metal panel, garage doors,
perforated panels, steel members, plane changes, change in materials (metal/CMU block) and “cut-outs.”
The roof and walls are extended on the south edge of the building so that the corners on each side have a
distinctive “piano leg” feature. The southeast corner is wider and greets the public prominently with a
vertical Omni logo. The building footprint is 100’ x 80’ and is 44’ at the peak of the gable and 26’ at the
eaves. While the Biscayne elevation is less than one hundred feet long and not subject to the façade
articulation required by the City code the building mass is subdivided using panel color change, signage,
windows, and the accent block base. The south façade is an articulated one hundred feet wide elevation
using a combination of building plane change, window and garage door bays, material breaks (metal,
concrete block, perforated panel, and landscape feature), and sloping roof plane.
Page 120 of 142
4
While metal panel siding is not normally permitted in a business park zone, this Planned Use Development
application is requesting metal panel siding be allowed. Metal panel siding is not permitted to discourage
the use of outdoor storage sites, such as pole barns. However; in this instance metal panel façade is of a
quality considered “equal to or better” the permitted materials. Additionally, there is not any outdoor
storage associated with the metal panel building. The exterior metal building panel fits a farm-agricultural
aesthetic envisioned by this project and is incorporated into an attractive aesthetic with many other visual
upgrades. Metal buildings are present throughout the Rosemount community and Minnesota at-large and
the winery endeavors to respect its historic roots in the agricultural community and surrounding
architectural context.
Access & Parking. The public will access the site via Biscayne Avenue onto the newly proposed city
street (i.e., 157th Street) and turn north into the Omni Orchard paved parking lot, which will be striped for
38 parking stalls, including 3 accessible stalls. There is a new public street planned along the southern
property boundary utilizing a 60-foot easement, with 22% (i.e., 1.3 acres) of the total property dedicated
towards this city road easement. Utilities and sewer will follow the new street before continuing onto the
proposed facility. The driveway access into the parking lot is setback approximately 133’ from Biscayne to
center of the driveway. As previously discussed with the City, overflow parking would be allowed on grass
up to an additional 33 stalls (shown as proof of parking). Delivery trucks will pull up to the dock doors on
the north and east side of the building. The north dock is for straight trucks up to 40’ in length; those will
back down 4’ in elevation so that the bed is level with the dock floor. The east dock is for smaller box
trucks. Beyond the paved parking lot, trucks will be driving on class 5; the owner intends to pave the class
5 and grass overflow parking areas in the future. The applicant is also proposing temporary parking at the
“dead end” of what will become a new public street. Staff find this acceptable with the acknowledgement
the temporary parking spots will go away when construction of the public road (157th Street) moves
forward.
Landscaping. The City’s landscape ordinance (Section 11-6-3) requires that new developments include a
minimum amount of landscaping, which includes a minimum number of trees based on the size of the site
and exterior dimensions of the building. These requirements, and the amount provided on the landscape
plan, are as follows:
Trees Requirement: 1 tree per 3,000 square feet of land area
Trees Required/Provided 48/48 (30 Phase 1 and 18 for Phase 2)
Foundation Plantings Requirement: 1 per 10 feet of building perimeter
Foundation Plants Required/Provided: 36/66 (44 Phase 1 and 24 Phase 2)
All of the trees meet the City’s requirements for at least 75% deciduous trees on the site, with a mix of
Maple, Oak, Hackberry, and Honey Locust. Various other ornamental trees and shrubs will be used for
landscape islands, foundation plantings, and screening of the parking lot. From a staff perspective, it
appears that the applicant has prepared a landscape plan that provides a good mix of plants that will
provide screening of parking and storage areas and will break up any larger expanses of pavement, walls,
and similar elements from the public roadway. Due to the nature of the winery setting and stormwater
requirements, much of the property will be developed as open space; the building itself will be 8,000
square feet on a 184,000 square feet site. The building coverage plus impervious areas will be 21.8% of the
site leaving 78.2% as landscaped areas. Guests will be able to typically wander through the vineyards,
orchards and event areas A landscape surety for 110% of the site landscaping is required.
Page 121 of 142
5
Signage. Omni is asking for a deviation from 11-8-6 C.3.(2), “(2) All permanent wall signs shall be
individual channel letters mounted flush with the building or on a raceway. Channel letters shall have a
minimum depth of at least three inches (3"). Box or panel signs are prohibited.” The applicant is
proposing the use of vinyl decal signage that is not compliant with the 3” deep channel requirement. After
consulting with Omni, staff supports a deviation from the signage ordinance. The farm winery is not a
traditional Business Park office or industrial facility and the vinyl signage is more in line with the existing
agriculture use and feel. Additionally, the vinyl siding will not take up more than 20% of wall space.
Exterior Lighting. The attached site photometric plan indicates that the site lighting will comply with
code height (30’ max), business hour, and light level limits. While there are grandfathered-in single family
homes to the north and south of the subject property, there are no residence districts within 100’. The
adjacent districts are BP and AG (across Biscayne). Lights will be downturned to be sensitive to the
existing neighbors; light levels will drop to no more than 0.5 lumens at the property boundaries. The
design will include a combination of building wall packs and site light fixtures to accent/define patio edges.
Trash Enclosure. The trash enclosure will be located on the north side of the building, meeting minimum
setback requirements, and will be consistent with the exterior materials of the primary structure, see the
attached renderings.
Engineering. The applicant has provided stormwater information which has been reviewed by our
engineering group. The ALTA survey identifies a private easement to Mid-America Pipeline Company that
is undefined as to its location. This easement must be defined or vacated. The ALTA survey also identifies
a temporary easement located in the north east corner of the parcel. This easement needs to be vacated. A
10-foot drainage and utility easement should be dedicated along the perimeter of the parcel and along the
north side of the existing street easement. The proposed building is identified to be a foot lower than the
access elevation from the future street on the south side of the project. It is recommended to raise the
first-floor elevation.
Detailed grading, erosion control, and storm water management plans have been submitted with the
application, and these plans have been reviewed by the City’s Project Engineer. The Engineer’s comments
and recommendations are included in the attached memorandum. The applicant will have to revise some
of the stormwater infrastructure to comply with City requirements. These modifications should not
adversely impact the project and require significant changes to the site plan.
Lot Development Fees. The City has adopted a fee schedule that includes various access charges that
apply any development of the subject property. This property will not be platted. The applicant will be
required to pay these fees at the time the Conditional Use Permit and building permit are issued; these fees
include the following:
•Sanitary Sewer Trunk Charge: $1075/acre
•Watermain Trunk Charge: $6,500/acre
•Storm Sewer Trunk Charge: $6,865/ net developable acre
Page 122 of 142
6
Conditional Use Permit
Legal Authority. Conditional use permits (CUP) are considered quasi-judicial actions. In such cases, the
City is acting as a judge to determine if the regulations within the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance
and Subdivision Ordinance are being followed. Generally, if the application meets these requirements it
must be approved.
Purpose. The purpose of conditional use permits is to allow for those uses which are not generally
suitable by right within a given zoning district but may be suitable under some circumstances. The burden
of demonstrating the proposed use meets the criteria for granting a conditional use permit and meeting all
applicable standards lies with the applicant.
As a conditional use, the farm winery is subject to the general CUP standards outlined in Section 11-10-7
as well as the standards specific to this use in Section 11-4-7 (C), of which there are none. These standards
evaluate the City’s land use and zoning performance standards and the potential impact of the proposed
use on the surrounding neighborhood; draft findings for each are provided below.
1. Will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, or general welfare of the
neighborhood or the city.
Finding: The proposed winery and tasting room space will not be detrimental to the public health,
safety, or general welfare of the neighborhood or the City of Rosemount. The use will function
similar to other permitted Business Park uses. The addition of a new commercial and outdoor
community gathering space will enhance the general welfare of the City.
2. Will be harmonious with the objectives of the comprehensive plan and city code
provisions.
Finding: The subject property is guided Business Park Planned Unit Development, BP-PUD. City
code dictates farm winery space is a conditional use in this zoning district.
According to the comprehensive plan, the Business Park land use designation is intended to
promote development of businesses with a large number of employees that offer wages to support
an entire family and that are further constructed of high-quality buildings providing both beauty
and tax base to the community. Establishments within the business park district are intended to
have little or no outdoor storage, with the majority of the business activities occurring completely
indoors. The proposed winery and tasting room largely fits within the purpose of the land use
designation. All business activities will take place in the enclosed space and the new facility will
bring new employment with competitive wages to Rosemount.
3. Will be designed, constructed, operated, and maintained so as to be compatible or similar
in an architectural and landscape appearance with the existing or intended character of the
general vicinity and will not change the essential character of that area, nor substantially
diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood.
Finding: The building fits a farm-agricultural aesthetic that combines the historic use of the
property with surrounding Business Park uses. Metal buildings are present throughout the
Rosemount community and the winery endeavors to respect its historic roots in the agricultural
community and surrounding architectural context. The project incorporates an attractive aesthetic
with many other visual upgrades that fits within the existing character of the Business Park and
general vicinity.
Page 123 of 142
7
4. Will be served adequately by existing (or those proposed in the project) essential public
facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage, structures,
refuse disposal, water and sewer systems and schools.
Finding: The proposed winery is served adequately by existing essential public facilities and
services. At a future date a new public street is planned along the southern property boundary
utilizing a 60 feet easement; however, staff determined the construction of the new street can be
delayed until future surrounding parcels are developed.
5. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, material equipment and conditions of operation
that will be hazardous or detrimental to any persons, property, or the general welfare
because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors.
Finding: The proposed use will not generate any additional external impacts that would be
expected from the Business Park. The winery is compatible with the existing uses in the building
and the adjacent property. There are grandfathered-in single family homes to the north and south
of the property; however, there are no residence districts within 100 feet. All other surrounding
uses are either agricultural or Business Park.
6. Will have vehicular ingress and egress to the property which does not create traffic
congestion or interfere with traffic on surrounding public streets.
Finding: Vehicular circulation will be designed for ingress and egress to the property so that that
does not create traffic congestion or interfere with traffic on surrounding public streets. It will
comply with the City access spacing and design requirements.
7. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic, or historic feature of
major importance and will comply with all local, state, and federal environmental quality
standards.
Finding: The proposed use will not result in the destruction, loss, or damage of a natural, scenic,
or historic feature of major importance and will comply with all local, state, and federal
environmental quality standards.
8. These standards apply in addition to specific conditions as may be applied throughout this
code.
Finding: The zoning ordinance does not include specific standards for a farm winery.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the Planned Unit Development and Conditional Use Permit for Omni
Brew Holdings, LCC to allow the construction of an 8,000 square foot winery and tasting room at 15700
Biscayne Avenue near the Rosemount Business Park. This recommendation is based on the plan
submitted by the applicant, the findings made in this report and the conditions outlined in the
Recommended Actions section above.
Page 124 of 142
1
DECLARATION OF COVENANTS
AND RESTRICTIONS
OMNI ORCHARDS FARM WINERY
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
THIS DECLARATION made this ______ day of _________________, 2022, by Omni
Wine Holdings, LLC. (hereinafter referred to as the “Declarant”);
WHEREAS, Declarant is the owner of the real property as described on Attachment One,
attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof (hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Subject
Property”); and
WHEREAS, the Subject Property is subject to certain zoning and land use restrictions
imposed by the City of Rosemount (hereinafter referred to as the “City”) in connection with the
approval of an application for a final site and building plan planned unit development for a farm
winery development on the Subject Property; and
WHEREAS, the City has approved such development on the basis of the determination by
the City Council of the City that such development is acceptable only by reason of the details of the
development proposed and the unique land use characteristics of the proposed use of the Subject
Property; and that but for the details of the development proposed and the unique land use
characteristics of such proposed use, the master development plan planned unit development would
not have been approved; and
WHEREAS, as a condition of approval of the master development plan planned unit
development, the City has required the execution and filing of this Declaration of Covenants,
Conditions and Restrictions (hereinafter the “Declaration”); and
Page 125 of 142
2
WHEREAS, to secure the benefits and advantages of approval of such planned unit
development, Declarant desires to subject the Subject Property to the terms hereof.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Declarant declares that the Subject Property is, and shall be, held,
transferred, sold, conveyed and occupied subject to the covenants, conditions, and restrictions,
hereinafter set forth.
1. The use and development of the Subject Property shall conform to the following
documents, plans and drawings:
a. City Resolution No. 2021-80, Attachment 1
b. Overall Utility Plan (Sheet C1), Attachment 3
c. Site Plan-Overall (Sheet CS01), Attachment 4
d. Grading Plan-Overall (Sheet C1), Attachment 5
e. Landscape Plan (Sheet L1.01), Attachment 6
f. Architectural Plan and Renderings, Attachment 7
All of which attachments are copies of original documents on file with the City and are made a part
hereof.
2. Development and maintenance of structures and uses on the Subject Property shall
conform to the following standards and requirements:
a. Maintenance of the stormwater basins, infiltration basins and associated
stormwater infrastructure necessary for the long term operation and function will be
performed by the City. All other maintenance including but not limited to garbage
collection, or landscape replacement or the like shall be the responsibility of the of the
private property owners. All maintenance of the stormwater basin and infiltration basin
shall be the responsibility of the City after the basins have been established.
Page 126 of 142
3
b. Maintenance and replacement of trees and landscaping other than that
associated with the stormwater basin and infiltration basin described in standard a. shall be
the responsibility of the Declarant.
3. The Subject Property may only be developed and used in accordance with Paragraphs
1 and 2 of this Declaration unless the owner first secures approval by the City Council of an
amendment to the planned unit development plan or a rezoning to a zoning classification that permits
such other development and use.
4. In connection with the approval of development of the Subject Property, the following
deviations from City Zoning or Subdivision Code provisions were approved:
a. Section 11-4-15-1 G.3.: The exterior wall surface shall allow metal paneling
in lieu of brick, natural stone, specialty integral colored concrete block, tile, architectural
textured concrete panels case in place, or precast concrete panels.
b. Section 11-4-15-1 G.9: The tarping station shall allow for the use of vinyl
decal signage.
In all other respects the use and development of the Subject Property shall conform to the
requirements of the Paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Declaration and the City Code of Ordinances.
5. The obligations and restrictions of this Declaration run with the land of the Subject
Property and shall be enforceable against the Declarant, its successors and assigns, by the City of
Rosemount acting through its City Council. This Declaration may be amended from time to time by
a written amendment executed by the City and the owner or owners of the lot or lots to be affected by
said amendment.
Page 127 of 142
4
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned as duly authorized agents, officers or representatives of
Declarant have hereunto set their hands and seals as of the day and year first above written.
DECLARANT
Omni Wine Holdings, LLC.
By
Its
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF __________ )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of _________, 20___,
by _____________________, the _________________, for and on behalf of
_________________________, a ____________________, by and on behalf of said
_______________________.
_______________________________
Notary Public
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY:
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
2875 145TH STREET WEST
ROSEMOUNT, MN 55068
651-423-4411
Page 128 of 142
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
City Council Regular Meeting: March 18, 2025
AGENDA ITEM: Accept Bids, Award Contract, Declare Costs to be
Assessed and Set the Assessment Hearing for the
2025 Street Improvement Project
AGENDA SECTION:
NEW BUSINESS
PREPARED BY: Brian Erickson, City Engineer AGENDA NO. 9.b.
ATTACHMENTS: Resolution - Receive Bids; Award Contract,
Resolution - Declare Costs; Set Assessment Hearing,
Recommendation Letter, Bid Tabulation, Schedule,
Project Location Map
APPROVED BY: LJM
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Resolutions related to the 2025 Street Improvement Project, City
Project 2025-02:
1. Accepting the Bids and Awarding a contract
2. Declaring the Costs to be Assessed and Calling the Assessment Hearing
BACKGROUND
The 2025 Street Improvement Project, City Project 2025-02, was included as part of the 2023-2032
Capital Improvement Plan. The streets were identified for this improvement through the City’s
pavement management evaluation and are shown on the attached map. The project is proposed to
consist of full depth reclamation; spot replacement of curb and gutter; minor utility work and lining of
existing sanitary sewer mains; installing additional fire hydrants; and replacement of pedestrian ramps
and bump outs to meet current ADA standards and improve maintenance operations. The streets
planned for the improvement include:
• Chili Avenue between its northern right-of-way terminus and 145th Street W
• Cantata Avenue between its northern right-of-way terminus and 144th Street W
• Canada Avenue between 144th Street W and 145th Street W
• Cameo Avenue between 143rd Street W and 145th Street W
• 143rd Street W between Chili Avenue and Cantata Avenue
• 143rd Street W between Cameo Avenue and Minnesota Trunk Highway 3
• Upper 143rd Street W between Chili Avenue and Cantata Avenue
• 144th Street W between Chili Avenue and Cameo Avenue
Award Contract
As part of the 2025 SIP, a qualification requirement was added to the bidding process. Bidders were
required to provide information regarding experience and ability to complete the project as well as
references regarding past performance. Bidders were required to meet a minimum score to be
Page 129 of 142
considered for the award. Staff contacted the references and then scored the information for the low
and second low bids. Both bidders met the minimum requirements laid out in the specifications.
On February 18, 2025, bids were opened for the project and Minnesota Paving and Materials
submitted the lowest bid at $2,246,890.09, which includes both alternates. The low bid with
alternates is $290,170.91, or 11% below the Engineer’s Estimate. The following table shows the
bidders, bid amounts and engineer’s estimate. The two lowest bids were $310,316.56 or 12% apart.
The two bid alternates as part of the design were for:
• Alternate 1 provides for the sealing of sewer laterals from the main toward the home in the
area where sewer lining is occurring.
• Alternate 2 is the cost of modifying 145th Street intersections and bump outs at Canada and
Cameo to allow for easier winter maintenance.
The bid results are shown in the table below, and staff recommends that both alternate bid items be
included in the contract award.
Cost and Funding
The Feasibility Report prepared an initial estimate of the total project cost. During design, the
estimate was refined and the table below shows the estimated total project cost based on the
Feasibility Report, Engineer's Estimate and the Low Bid. The Street Improvement cost includes
Alternate 2, and the Sanitary Sewer Improvement cost includes Alternate 1. For the Feasibility Report
the construction contingency was set at 10%; however, for award the construction contingency has
been reduced to 5%. The Indirect Costs have been adjusted to more closely align with the consultant
fees and other indirect costs.
Page 130 of 142
The project would be funded via a combination of Street CIP, assessments and utility funds and is
detailed in the following table.
Call Assessment Hearing
The second action requested of the City Council is declaring the costs to be assessed and calling for the
Assessment Hearing, which is a necessary step under Minnesota Statute Chapter 429. The hearing will
take place during the Council meeting on April 15, 2025. Notice will be provided via public notice in
the local paper and individual notices will be mailed to each property owner along the project
corridor. Additional details will be provided at the Assessment hearing.
Schedule
Should the Council approve the attached resolutions and contract award, the project schedule is
attached. Completed items are shaded in gray.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends Council adoption of the attached resolutions accepting the bids, awarding the
contract, delaring the costs and setting the Assessment Hearing for the 2025 Street Improvement
Project, City Project 2025-02.
Page 131 of 142
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2025 – XX
A RESOLUTION RECEIVING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT
FOR 2025 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT,
CITY PROJECT 2025-02
BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Rosemount, Minnesota, as follows:
1. Pursuant to an advertisement for bids for Project 2025-02, the 2025 Street Improvement
Project, three bids were received and opened on February 18, 2025, and tabulated according to
law:
2. Based on the Total Bid, the bid of Minnesota Paving & Materials in the amount of
$2,246,890.09 for the construction of both the Base Bid and Alternate Bids 1 & 2
improvements is in accordance with the plans and specifications and advertisement for bids
and is the lowest qualified and responsible bid and shall be and hereby is accepted.
3. The Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with said
bidder for the construction of said improvements for and on behalf of the City of Rosemount.
4. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits
made with their bids, except that the deposit of the successful bidder and the next two lowest
bidders shall be retained until a contract has been executed.
ADOPTED this 18th day of March 2025.
Jeffery D. Weisensel, Mayor
ATTEST:
Erin Fasbender, City Clerk
Bidde r Base Bid A lter nate 1 A lte r nate 2 Total Bid
E ngineer's E stima te 2 ,261,8 3 3 .50$ 146,0 0 0 .00$ 2 5 9 ,072.0 0$ 2,6 6 6 ,905.5 0$
Minnesota Pav ing & Mate ria l s 1 ,984,3 4 0 .97$ 36,9 7 0 .12$ 225,5 7 9 .00$ 2,2 4 6 ,890.0 9$
McNama ra Contracting 2 ,252,7 5 8 .25$ 38,3 2 5 .00$ 2 6 6 ,123.4 0$ 2,5 5 7 ,206.6 5$
Bituminous Roadwa ys, Inc.2 ,484,5 0 6 .75$ 36,5 0 0 .00$ 2 2 7 ,817.2 5$ 2,7 4 8 ,824.0 0$
Bid Results
Page 132 of 142
1
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2025-XX
A RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING
PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT, AND CALLING
FOR HEARING ON THE PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
2025 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, CITY PROJECT 2025-02
WHEREAS, a contract has been let for the 2025 Street Improvement Project, City Project 2025-02, the
improvement of the following streets:
•Chili Avenue between its northern right of way terminus and 145th Street W
•Cantata Avenue between its northern right of way terminus and 144th Street W
•Canada Avenue between 144th Street W and 145th Street W
•Cameo Avenue between 143rd Street W and 145th Street W
•143rd Street W between Chili Avenue and Cantata Avenue
•143rd Street W between Cameo Avenue and Minnesota Trunk Highway 3
•Upper 143rd Street W between Chili Avenue and Cantata Avenue
•144th Street W between Chili Avenue and Cameo Avenue
WHEREAS, these streets will be improved by full depth reclamation; spot replacement of curb and
gutter; minor utility work and lining of existing sanitary sewer mains; installing additional fire hydrants;
and replacement of pedestrian ramps and bump outs to meet current ADA standards and improve
maintenance operations and the contract amount for such improvement is $2,246,890.09 and the
expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $361,545.00 so that
the total cost of the improvement will be $2,608,435.09.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Rosemount, Minnesota:
1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be
$1,241,433 and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared
to be $527,453.
2. Assessments plus applicable fees shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a
period of 10 years, the first of the installments to be payable with general taxes for the year 2025
and shall bear interest at the rate of 2% per annum above the interest rate paid by the City for its
bonds from date of the adoption of the assessment resolution.
3. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount
to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land
within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and she shall file a
copy of such proposed assessment in her office for public inspection; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of Rosemount, Minnesota:
Page 133 of 142
2
1. A hearing shall be held on the 15h day of April 2025 in the Council Chambers at 7:00 p.m., or as
soon thereafter as possible, to pass upon such proposed assessment, and at such time and place, all
persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard
with reference to such assessment.
2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be
published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing. The published
notice shall state that the Council is meeting to consider the proposed assessment and will state the
date, time, and place the of the hearing.
3. The City Clerk shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in
the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearings. The mailed notice shall include:
the date, time, and place of the hearing, the general nature of the improvement, the area proposed
to be assessed, the total amount of the proposed assessment, that the proposed assessment roll is
on file with the City Clerk and that written or oral objections by any property owner will be
considered. The notice shall also state that no appeal may be taken as to the amount of any
assessment unless a written objection signed by the property owner is filed with the City Clerk prior
to the assessment hearing or presented to the Mayor at the hearing. The notice shall state the
process and time lines for such appeals and will inform property owners of the existence of any
deferment procedures. The notice shall also state:
1) The amount to be specially assessed against the particular lot;
2) Adoption by the Council of the proposed assessment may be taken at the hearing;
3) The right of the property owner to prepay the entire assessment and the person to whom
prepayment must be made;
4) Whether partial prepayment of the assessment has been authorized by ordinance;
5) The time within which prepayment may be made without the assessment of interest; and
6) The rate of interest to be accrued if the assessment is not prepaid within the required time
period.
ADOPTED this 18th day of March 2025.
Jeffery D. Weisensel, Mayor
ATTEST:
Erin Fasbender, City Clerk
Page 134 of 142
March 10, 2025
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Rosemount, Minnesota
2875 145th Street West
Rosemount, MN 55068
Re: 2025 Street Improvements Project
City of Rosemount, Minnesota
City Project No. 2025-02
TKDA Project No. 21453.000
Dear Mayor and City Council:
On February 18, 2025, three bids for the referenced project were received. The lowest bid was submitted by
OMG Midwest dba Minnesota Paving and Material. Listed below is a summary of the base bids received,
and a complete Tabulation of Bids is enclosed for your information.
Contractor Base Bid Alternate #1 Alternate #2 Total Bid
OMG Midwest dba Minnesota
Paving and Materials
$1,984,340,97 $36,970.12 $225,579.00 $2,246,890.09
McNamara Contracting $2,252,758.25 $38,325.00 $266,123.40 $2,557,206.65
Bituminous Roadways $2,484,506.75 $36,500 $227,817.25 $2,748,824.00
Engineer’s Estimate $2,261,833.50 $146,000 $259,072.00 $2,666,905.50
Recommendation
Bidder qualifications requirements were added to the contract documents for this project. Bidders were required
to provide specific bidder information to ensure they are qualified and capable to complete the work. Items
requested included: example projects of similar size, references, equipment, current workload, and finance
assurances. Bidder qualifications were evaluated for the three bidders.
The lowest responsible bidder, OMG Midwest has met the bidder qualifications criteria and has successfully
completed past projects for the City. The pricing for alternates #1 and #2 were both reasonable. It is
recommended that OMG Midwest dba Minnesota Paving and Materials awarded the 2025 Street Improvements
project inclusive of both alternates.
Action Requested
1. Receive all bids submitted
2. Award the contract for the 2025 Street Improvements Project to the lowest responsible bidder, OMG
Midwest dba Minnesota Paving and Materials, Inc., for the Total Bid of $2,246,890.09.
Please do not hesitate to call me with any questions or comments you may have.
Sincerely,
Larry Poppler, PE
Project Manager
LPP
Page 135 of 142
2025 Street Improvements (#9489345)
Owner: City of Rosemount
Solicitor: TKDA
02/18/2025 10:00 AM CST
Line Item Item Description UofM Quantity Unit Price Extension Unit Price Extension Unit Price Extension Unit Price Extension
BASE BID
1 PUBLIC INFORMATION MANAGEMENT LUMP SUM 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $300.85 $300.85 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00
2 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 1 $80,000.00 $80,000.00 $85,000.00 $85,000.00 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $130,000.00 $130,000.00
3 SALVAGE SIGN EACH 5 $100.00 $500.00 $25.07 $125.35 $30.00 $150.00 $25.00 $125.00
4 REMOVE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EACH 13 $500.00 $6,500.00 $893.54 $11,616.02 $2,500.00 $32,500.00 $510.00 $6,630.00
5 REMOVE CASTING (STORM)EACH 9 $225.00 $2,025.00 $397.92 $3,581.28 $100.00 $900.00 $175.00 $1,575.00
6 REMOVE CASTING (SANITARY)EACH 6 $225.00 $1,350.00 $397.92 $2,387.52 $100.00 $600.00 $175.00 $1,050.00
7 REMOVE SIGN EACH 56 $60.00 $3,360.00 $25.07 $1,403.92 $30.00 $1,680.00 $4.00 $224.00
8 REMOVE GATE VALVE AND BOX EACH 24 $500.00 $12,000.00 $572.63 $13,743.12 $2,500.00 $60,000.00 $200.00 $4,800.00
9 REMOVE HYDRANT EACH 8 $500.00 $4,000.00 $631.79 $5,054.32 $2,500.00 $20,000.00 $400.00 $3,200.00
10 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)LIN FT 154 $3.00 $462.00 $2.82 $434.28 $1.00 $154.00 $2.50 $385.00
11 SAWING CONCRETE PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)LIN FT 376 $6.00 $2,256.00 $2.82 $1,060.32 $1.00 $376.00 $4.50 $1,692.00
12 REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER LIN FT 4140 $10.00 $41,400.00 $12.31 $50,963.40 $8.00 $33,120.00 $7.50 $31,050.00
13 REMOVE SEWER PIPE (SANITARY)LIN FT 50 $10.00 $500.00 $21.06 $1,053.00 $15.00 $750.00 $15.00 $750.00
14 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SQ YD 143 $10.00 $1,430.00 $17.03 $2,435.29 $5.00 $715.00 $11.50 $1,644.50
15 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SQ YD 52 $7.00 $364.00 $30.44 $1,582.88 $30.00 $1,560.00 $12.00 $624.00
16 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SQ YD 209 $13.50 $2,821.50 $20.73 $4,332.57 $30.00 $6,270.00 $22.00 $4,598.00
17 REMOVE CONCRETE WALK SQ YD 885 $10.00 $8,850.00 $26.15 $23,142.75 $10.00 $8,850.00 $22.00 $19,470.00
18 SALVAGE MAIL BOX SUPPORT EACH 20 $100.00 $2,000.00 $125.36 $2,507.20 $50.00 $1,000.00 $750.00 $15,000.00
19 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE 5 SQ YD 2767 $2.00 $5,534.00 $0.55 $1,521.85 $0.50 $1,383.50 $3.00 $8,301.00
20 DEWATERING LUMP SUM 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $2,507.12 $2,507.12 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00
21 CRUSHED ROCK (1" CLEAR)TON 259 $45.00 $11,655.00 $31.10 $8,054.90 $35.00 $9,065.00 $40.00 $10,360.00
22 CRUSHED ROCK (3" MINUS)TON 233 $45.00 $10,485.00 $37.14 $8,653.62 $35.00 $8,155.00 $27.00 $6,291.00
23 EXCAVATION - COMMON CU YD 3074 $20.00 $61,480.00 $22.77 $69,994.98 $20.00 $61,480.00 $35.00 $107,590.00
24 EXCAVATION - SUBGRADE CU YD 1845 $20.00 $36,900.00 $31.33 $57,803.85 $10.00 $18,450.00 $43.00 $79,335.00
25 TEST ROLLING ROAD STA 69 $150.00 $10,350.00 $10.03 $692.07 $10.00 $690.00 $160.00 $11,040.00
26 SUBGRADE PREPARATION ROAD STA 69 $500.00 $34,500.00 $411.74 $28,410.06 $1.00 $69.00 $440.00 $30,360.00
27 STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM)HOUR 110 $200.00 $22,000.00 $95.27 $10,479.70 $100.00 $11,000.00 $225.00 $24,750.00
28 1.5 CU YD BACKHOE HOUR 30 $250.00 $7,500.00 $270.15 $8,104.50 $100.00 $3,000.00 $310.00 $9,300.00
29 WATER M GALLON 90 $55.00 $4,950.00 $50.14 $4,512.60 $20.00 $1,800.00 $50.00 $4,500.00
30 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 TON 1149 $20.00 $22,980.00 $22.01 $25,289.49 $10.00 $11,490.00 $20.00 $22,980.00
31 FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION SQ YD 27664 $3.00 $82,992.00 $1.09 $30,153.76 $6.00 $165,984.00 $5.00 $138,320.00
32 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (2,C)TON 3423 $90.00 $308,070.00 $83.78 $286,778.94 $75.00 $256,725.00 $85.00 $290,955.00
33 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (2,C)TON 3423 $90.00 $308,070.00 $79.92 $273,566.16 $75.00 $256,725.00 $82.00 $280,686.00
34 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3,C) DRIVEWAYS TON 9 $140.00 $1,260.00 $273.35 $2,460.15 $200.00 $1,800.00 $150.00 $1,350.00
35 BITUMINOUS PATCHING MIXTURE TON 50 $150.00 $7,500.00 $1.00 $50.00 $75.00 $3,750.00 $270.00 $13,500.00
36 TEMPORARY CONVEYANCE (SANITARY)LUMP SUM 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,532.19 $2,532.19 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $32,500.00 $32,500.00
37 CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE EACH 1 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $2,431.91 $2,431.91 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00
38 CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EACH 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $1,579.48 $1,579.48 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,300.00 $1,300.00
39 REINSTATE SEWER SERVICE EACH 75 $60.00 $4,500.00 $50.64 $3,798.00 $55.00 $4,125.00 $50.00 $3,750.00
40 SANITARY SEWER REPAIR SPECIAL 1 EACH 1 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $1,068.03 $1,068.03 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00
41 SANITARY SEWER REPAIR SPECIAL 2 EACH 1 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $772.19 $772.19 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $5,700.00 $5,700.00
42 REINSTATE OUTSIDE DROP EACH 2 $500.00 $1,000.00 $50.64 $101.28 $55.00 $110.00 $12,200.00 $24,400.00
43 8" PVC PIPE SEWER LIN FT 50 $90.00 $4,500.00 $97.28 $4,864.00 $100.00 $5,000.00 $85.00 $4,250.00
44 CLEAN AND TELEVISE SANITARY SERVICE (PRE-REHABILITATION)LIN FT 3810 $5.00 $19,050.00 $8.28 $31,546.80 $9.00 $34,290.00 $8.50 $32,385.00
45 CIPP LINING (8" SANITARY SEWER)LIN FT 3810 $40.00 $152,400.00 $28.36 $108,051.60 $30.00 $114,300.00 $28.00 $106,680.00
46 HEAVY SEWER CLEANING HOUR 15 $400.00 $6,000.00 $303.86 $4,557.90 $325.00 $4,875.00 $300.00 $4,500.00
47 TRIM PROTUDING TAP EACH 5 $500.00 $2,500.00 $75.97 $379.85 $80.00 $400.00 $75.00 $375.00
48 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER MAIN EACH 35 $3,000.00 $105,000.00 $1,052.99 $36,854.65 $3,000.00 $105,000.00 $2,400.00 $84,000.00
49 HYDRANT EACH 10 $8,000.00 $80,000.00 $6,794.29 $67,942.90 $9,000.00 $90,000.00 $9,000.00 $90,000.00
50 1" CURB STOP AND BOX EACH 30 $600.00 $18,000.00 $1,689.80 $50,694.00 $2,000.00 $60,000.00 $1,400.00 $42,000.00
51 1" CORPORATION STOP EACH 3 $500.00 $1,500.00 $837.38 $2,512.14 $300.00 $900.00 $1,400.00 $4,200.00
OMG Midwest Inc. dba Minnesota Paving &
Materials McNamara Contracting Bituminous Roadways Inc.Engineer Estimate
Page 136 of 142
52 FURNISH AND INSTALL 6" GATE VALVE AND BOX EACH 17 $2,500.00 $42,500.00 $3,403.75 $57,863.75 $5,000.00 $85,000.00 $4,900.00 $83,300.00
53 FURNISH AND INSTALL 8" GATE VALVE AND BOX EACH 1 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,519.92 $4,519.92 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,300.00 $6,300.00
54 FURNISH AND INSTALL 12" GATE VALVE AND BOX EACH 2 $6,500.00 $13,000.00 $7,515.43 $15,030.86 $8,500.00 $17,000.00 $13,000.00 $26,000.00
55 FURNISH AND INSTALL VALVE BOX EACH 8 $1,000.00 $8,000.00 $2,195.32 $17,562.56 $2,000.00 $16,000.00 $2,100.00 $16,800.00
56 VERIFY WATER SERVICE PIPE MATERIAL EACH 50 $2,000.00 $100,000.00 $699.99 $34,999.50 $925.00 $46,250.00 $850.00 $42,500.00
57 1" TYPE K COPPER PIPE LIN FT 60 $65.00 $3,900.00 $66.19 $3,971.40 $120.00 $7,200.00 $55.00 $3,300.00
58 6" WATERMAIN DUCTILE IRON CL 53 LIN FT 250 $105.00 $26,250.00 $83.24 $20,810.00 $80.00 $20,000.00 $85.00 $21,250.00
59 8" WATERMAIN DUCTILE IRON CL 52 LIN FT 10 $115.00 $1,150.00 $158.45 $1,584.50 $150.00 $1,500.00 $120.00 $1,200.00
60 12" WATERMAIN DUCTILE IRON CL 52 LIN FT 35 $120.00 $4,200.00 $162.46 $5,686.10 $200.00 $7,000.00 $150.00 $5,250.00
61 DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS POUND 1500 $25.00 $37,500.00 $12.54 $18,810.00 $15.00 $22,500.00 $19.00 $28,500.00
62 FURNISH AND INSTALL NEW CASTING (STORM)EACH 9 $1,200.00 $10,800.00 $1,124.35 $10,119.15 $1,600.00 $14,400.00 $2,000.00 $18,000.00
63 FURNISH AND INSTALL NEW CASTING (SANITARY)EACH 6 $1,200.00 $7,200.00 $1,298.44 $7,790.64 $1,600.00 $9,600.00 $2,450.00 $14,700.00
64 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL CATCH BASIN CASTING W/ NEW HDPE RINGS EACH 16 $1,500.00 $24,000.00 $548.34 $8,773.44 $800.00 $12,800.00 $1,000.00 $16,000.00
65 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL STORM MANHOLE CASTING W/ NEW HDPE RINGSEACH 12 $1,500.00 $18,000.00 $1,063.09 $12,757.08 $800.00 $9,600.00 $1,000.00 $12,000.00
66 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL SAN. MANHOLE CASTING W/ NEW HDPE RINGSEACH 21 $1,500.00 $31,500.00 $1,237.18 $25,980.78 $800.00 $16,800.00 $1,000.00 $21,000.00
67 ADJUST GATE VALVE AND BOX EACH 9 $850.00 $7,650.00 $659.35 $5,934.15 $500.00 $4,500.00 $265.00 $2,385.00
68 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 2'X3'EACH 13 $1,200.00 $15,600.00 $3,653.97 $47,501.61 $5,000.00 $65,000.00 $4,700.00 $61,100.00
69 4" CONCRETE WALK SQ FT 5759 $8.00 $46,072.00 $5.78 $33,287.02 $10.00 $57,590.00 $5.75 $33,114.25
70 6" CONCRETE WALK SQ FT 2207 $16.00 $35,312.00 $14.92 $32,928.44 $15.00 $33,105.00 $15.00 $33,105.00
71 DRILL & GROUT DOWEL BAR (EPOXY COATED)EACH 52 $20.00 $1,040.00 $13.24 $688.48 $10.00 $520.00 $13.50 $702.00
72 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B618 LIN FT 4140 $30.00 $124,200.00 $25.32 $104,824.80 $30.00 $124,200.00 $25.00 $103,500.00
73 7" CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTER LIN FT 50 $30.00 $1,500.00 $116.73 $5,836.50 $50.00 $2,500.00 $115.00 $5,750.00
74 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SQ YD 209 $85.00 $17,765.00 $68.54 $14,324.86 $100.00 $20,900.00 $68.00 $14,212.00
75 7" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SQ YD 62 $90.00 $5,580.00 $78.20 $4,848.40 $120.00 $7,440.00 $80.00 $4,960.00
76 TRUNCATED DOMES SQ FT 208 $65.00 $13,520.00 $39.50 $8,216.00 $50.00 $10,400.00 $40.00 $8,320.00
77 INSTALL MAIL BOX SUPPORT EACH 20 $100.00 $2,000.00 $250.71 $5,014.20 $200.00 $4,000.00 $750.00 $15,000.00
78 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $10,780.61 $10,780.61 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00
79 INSTALL SIGN EACH 5 $200.00 $1,000.00 $100.28 $501.40 $105.00 $525.00 $100.00 $500.00
80 SIGN TYPE C SQ FT 340 $70.00 $23,800.00 $46.13 $15,684.20 $50.00 $17,000.00 $40.00 $13,600.00
81 TRIM TREES LUMP SUM 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $5,014.24 $5,014.24 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $12,000.00 $12,000.00
82 LANDSCAPING SQ FT 1000 $10.00 $10,000.00 $4.03 $4,030.00 $9.00 $9,000.00 $30.00 $30,000.00
83 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT LUMP SUM 1 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $1,504.27 $1,504.27 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $500.00 $500.00
84 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION EACH 44 $200.00 $8,800.00 $150.26 $6,611.44 $150.00 $6,600.00 $100.00 $4,400.00
85 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE COMPOST LIN FT 4140 $3.50 $14,490.00 $3.55 $14,697.00 $2.00 $8,280.00 $3.50 $14,490.00
86 COMMON TOPSOIL BORROW CU YD 500 $40.00 $20,000.00 $87.60 $43,800.00 $35.00 $17,500.00 $60.00 $30,000.00
87 FERTILIZER TYPE 3 POUND 100 $1.00 $100.00 $0.76 $76.00 $1.00 $100.00 $0.75 $75.00
88 RAPID STABILIZATION METHOD 3 ACRE 0.5 $750.00 $375.00 $911.59 $455.80 $7,500.00 $3,750.00 $900.00 $450.00
89 SEEDING ACRE 0.5 $3,500.00 $1,750.00 $759.66 $379.83 $4,500.00 $2,250.00 $750.00 $375.00
90 SEED MIXTURE RESIDENTIAL TURFGRASS POUND 100 $5.00 $500.00 $6.08 $608.00 $8.00 $800.00 $6.00 $600.00
91 STABILIZED FIBER MATRIX POUND 1500 $4.00 $6,000.00 $1.87 $2,805.00 $10.00 $15,000.00 $1.75 $2,625.00
92 4" SOLID LINE MULTI COMP (WR)LIN FT 1735 $1.00 $1,735.00 $1.20 $2,082.00 $1.25 $2,168.75 $1.00 $1,735.00
93 4" DBLE SOLID LINE MULTI COMP (WR)LIN FT 1850 $2.00 $3,700.00 $2.01 $3,718.50 $2.00 $3,700.00 $2.00 $3,700.00
94 24" SOLID LINE MULTI COMP (WR)LIN FT 25 $6.00 $150.00 $19.05 $476.25 $20.00 $500.00 $14.00 $350.00
95 PAVT MSSG MULTI COMP (WR)SQ FT 119 $20.00 $2,380.00 $11.53 $1,372.07 $12.00 $1,428.00 $9.00 $1,071.00
96 CROSSWALK MULTI COMP (WR)SQ FT 1116 $20.00 $22,320.00 $9.53 $10,635.48 $10.00 $11,160.00 $7.00 $7,812.00
TOTAL BASE BID $2,261,833.50 $1,984,340.97 $2,252,758.25 $2,484,506.75
ALTERNATE 1- LATERAL CONNECTION GROUT SEALING
97 LATERAL CONNECTION SEALING - 5 FEET EACH 73 $2,000.00 $146,000.00 $506.44 $36,970.12 $525.00 $38,325.00 $500.00 $36,500.00
TOTAL ALTERNATE #1 $146,000.00 $36,970.12 $38,325.00 $36,500.00
ALTERNATE 2- 145TH STREET INTERSECTIONS
98 REMOVE CASTING (STORM)EACH 4 $225.00 $900.00 $298.44 $1,193.76 $100.00 $400.00 $210.00 $840.00
99 REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER LIN FT 800 $10.00 $8,000.00 $12.17 $9,736.00 $8.00 $6,400.00 $10.00 $8,000.00
100 REMOVE CONCRETE PAVEMENT SQ YD 77 $10.00 $770.00 $23.33 $1,796.41 $30.00 $2,310.00 $30.00 $2,310.00
101 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SQ YD 2039 $10.00 $20,390.00 $5.20 $10,602.80 $25.00 $50,975.00 $6.50 $13,253.50
102 REMOVE CONCRETE WALK SQ YD 846 $10.00 $8,460.00 $27.11 $22,935.06 $10.00 $8,460.00 $22.00 $18,612.00
103 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (2,C)TON 218 $90.00 $19,620.00 $101.59 $22,146.62 $75.00 $16,350.00 $86.00 $18,748.00
104 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (2,C)TON 328 $90.00 $29,520.00 $88.19 $28,926.32 $75.00 $24,600.00 $85.00 $27,880.00
Page 137 of 142
105 ADJUST GATE VALVE AND BOX EACH 5 $850.00 $4,250.00 $659.35 $3,296.75 $500.00 $2,500.00 $265.00 $1,325.00
106 FURNISH AND INSTALL NEW CASTING (STORM)EACH 4 $1,200.00 $4,800.00 $1,124.35 $4,497.40 $1,400.00 $5,600.00 $3,200.00 $12,800.00
107 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL CATCH BASIN CASTING W/ NEW HDPE RINGS EACH 6 $1,500.00 $9,000.00 $448.86 $2,693.16 $800.00 $4,800.00 $1,000.00 $6,000.00
108 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL MANHOLE CASTING W/ NEW HDPE RINGS EACH 7 $1,500.00 $10,500.00 $1,137.70 $7,963.90 $800.00 $5,600.00 $1,000.00 $7,000.00
109 4" CONCRETE WALK SQ FT 5045 $8.00 $40,360.00 $5.78 $29,160.10 $10.00 $50,450.00 $5.75 $29,008.75
110 6" CONCRETE WALK SQ FT 2552 $16.00 $40,832.00 $14.92 $38,075.84 $15.00 $38,280.00 $15.00 $38,280.00
111 DRILL & GROUT DOWEL BAR (EPOXY COATED)EACH 100 $20.00 $2,000.00 $12.17 $1,217.00 $10.00 $1,000.00 $12.00 $1,200.00
112 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B618 LIN FT 800 $30.00 $24,000.00 $25.32 $20,256.00 $30.00 $24,000.00 $25.00 $20,000.00
113 TRUNCATED DOMES SQ FT 230 $65.00 $14,950.00 $39.50 $9,085.00 $50.00 $11,500.00 $40.00 $9,200.00
114 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL ELECTRONIC SIGN EACH 6 $1,000.00 $6,000.00 $802.28 $4,813.68 $900.00 $5,400.00 $1,000.00 $6,000.00
115 4" DBLE SOLID LINE MULTI COMP (WR)LIN FT 160 $2.00 $320.00 $2.01 $321.60 $2.00 $320.00 $10.00 $1,600.00
116 CROSSWALK MULTI COMP (WR)SQ FT 720 $20.00 $14,400.00 $9.53 $6,861.60 $9.97 $7,178.40 $8.00 $5,760.00
TOTAL ALTERNATE #2 $259,072.00 $225,579.00 $266,123.40 $227,817.25
TOTAL BASE BID $2,261,833.50 $1,984,340.97 $2,252,758.25 $2,484,506.75
TOTAL ALTERNATE #1 $146,000.00 $36,970.12 $38,325.00 $36,500.00
TOTAL ALTERNATE #2 $259,072.00 $225,579.00 $266,123.40 $227,817.25
TOTAL BID $2,666,905.50 $2,246,890.09 $2,557,206.65 $2,748,824.00
Bid Form X X X
Acknowledgement of Addendums X X X
Initial Contractor Verification X X X
Supplemental Verification X X X
Responsible Contractor Form X X X
Non-Collusion Affidavit X X X
Bid Bond 5%5%5%
Bidder Qualification Form X X X
Recommendation X
Page 138 of 142
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
2025 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (CP 2025-02)
SCHEDULE OF PROJECT MILESTONES
DATE ACTION
April 10, 2024 ➢ Issue Request for Proposals – Design Services
May 6, 2024 ➢ Proposals due to Engineering
May 21, 2024
City Council Meeting
➢ City Council accepts engineering services proposal
➢ City Council Considers a Resolution to:
o Authorize preparation of Feasibility Study
May 23, 2024 ➢ Project Kick off Meeting with City Staff
Late May to mid-July, 2024 ➢ Preliminary Design & Cost Estimates Developed (75% Plans)
Late July/Early August, 2024 ➢ DRAFT Feasibility Report
September 19, 2024 ➢ Neighborhood Meeting (One-on-One Sit-Down Style) – Steeple Center
Late September, 2024 ➢ Complete Feasibility Report
October 1, 2024
City Council Meeting
➢ City Council Considers a Resolution to:
o Accept Feasibility Report
o Call Public Hearing on Improvements on November 4 2024
o Authorizing preparation of Plans and Specifications
October 17, 2024 ➢ Notice of Public Hearing sent to Local Paper
October 28, 2024 ➢ Mail Notice of Public Hearing to Property Owners
November 1, 2024 ➢ 1st Publication of Notice of Public Hearing in Local Paper
November 8, 2024 ➢ 2nd Publication of Notice of Public Hearing in Local Paper
November 19, 2024
City Council Meeting
➢ City Council holds Public Hearing on Improvements
➢ City Council considers a Resolution to:
o Order the Improvement
o Authorizing preparation of final plans and specifications
o Authorizing Advertisement for Bids
November - December 2024 ➢ Finalize Project Design & Complete Plans and Specifications
January 17, 2025
➢ Advertisement for Bid sent to Local Paper
➢ Publish Advertisements for Bids on QuestCDN
➢ Bid Package Available for Purchase on QuestCDN
January 24, 2025 ➢ 1st Publication of Advertisement for Bid in Local Paper
January 31, 2025 ➢ 2nd Publication of Advertisement for Bid in Local Paper
February 18, 2025 ➢ Open Virtual Bids – 10:00 AM
February 18 – March 10, 2025 ➢ Evaluate Bids and Determine Financial Capacity for Project
➢ Bid Review and Contractor Qualifications/Reference Check
March 18, 2025
City Council Meeting
➢ City Council Considers a Resolution to:
o Award Contract
o Declare Costs to be Assessed
o Call Public Hearing on Assessments on April 15, 2025
March 19, 2025 ➢ Notice of Assessment Hearing sent to Local Paper
March 28, 2025 ➢ Publication of Notice of Assessment Hearing in Local Paper
March 28, 2025 ➢ Mail Notice of Assessment Hearing to Property Owners
March – April 2025 ➢ Contract Processing & Contractor Submittal Review
April 15, 2025
City Council Meeting
➢ City Council holds Public Hearing on Assessments
➢ City Council Considers a Resolution to:
o Adopt Proposed Assessments
Spring 2025 ➢ City Staff holds Preconstruction Meeting with Contractor & Construction Begins
September 2025 ➢ Substantial Completion Deadline/Turf Restoration Deadline
October 2025 ➢ Final Completion
Page 139 of 142
Page 140 of 142
Search Results from 03/19/2025 to 03/31/2025
◄ Return to Previous
Main Calendar
Youth Commission Meeting
March 19, 2025, 3:45 PM - 4:45 PM
More Details
Fire Department Recruitment Night
March 19, 2025, 6:00 PM - 8:00 PM
More Details
Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting
March 24, 2025, 7:00 PM - 8:00 PM
More Details
Utility Commission Meeting
March 31, 2025, 5:30 PM - 7:00 PM
More Details
@ Fire Station No. 1
Government Websites by CivicPlus®
Select Language
Translate
Page 141 of 142
Main Calendar
City Council Work Session Meeting
April 1, 2025, 5:00 PM - 7:00 PM
More Details
City Council Meeting
April 1, 2025, 7:00 PM - 8:00 PM
More Details
2025 Rosemount Expo
April 5, 2025, 9:30 AM - 2:30
PM
Connect with the Rosemount community at Rosemount
High School while shopping and networking with over
50 local businesses. This is a family-friendly event,
featuring activities, food, and entertainment. Interested
in becoming a vendor? Secure your booth today and
celebrate everything that makes Rosemount special!
Booth Registration is available through March 14.
More Details
City Council Meeting
April 15, 2025, 7:00 PM - 8:00 PM
More Details
Planning Commission Meeting
April 22, 2025, 6:30 PM - 7:30 PM
More Details
Youth Commission Meeting
April 23, 2025, 3:45 PM - 4:45 PM
More Details
Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting
April 28, 2025, 7:00 PM - 8:00 PM
Su M Tu W Th F Sa
30 31 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 1 2 3
April 2025
@ Rosemount High
School
Select Language
Translate
Page 142 of 142